►
From YouTube: (2022) 06-21 - Planning Commission Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
B
C
B
Some
move
we're
going
to
move
the
number
two
request
for
a
rezone
to
number
one
and
deal
with
that.
So
we
have
a
motion.
Is
there?
Second?
Second,
all
in
favor
say
aye
aye
oppose,
so
we
will.
We
will
deal
with
that.
First,
the
minutes
from
the
previous
meeting,
which
was
may
the
17th
2022
and
everybody
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
minutes.
B
A
The
only
thing
I
have
for
the
appointment
commission
this
evening,
you
have
your
fresh
printed
copies
of
the
newly
adopted
comp
plan
by
the
city.
This
was
adopted
last
tuesday
night
by
the
city
council.
This
is
our
comm
plan
for
the
next
five
years
until
the
next
update.
A
But
those
are
your
personal
copies
to
keep
and
one
bit
of
housekeeping
from
the
agenda
approval.
Just
then,
I
think
when
we
get
to
the
new
business
items,
you'll
need
to
vote
to
table
that
item
until
next
month.
Oh
we
will,
I
think,
yeah.
I
think
you'll
have
to.
B
B
B
B
A
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
request
before
planning
commission
is
a
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
at
1080
north
broad
street.
They
are
proposing
to
construct
a
dental
office
at
that
location
and
just
to
look
at
the
site
plan
behind
you.
There
they're
proposing
to
access
north
broad
street
from
one
driveway
that
would
enter
the
site.
They
have
a
building
that
will
be
located
in
the
center
of
the
site
with
parking
on
each
side
of
the
building
itself.
B
C
Us
your
name
and
wilson,
sullins
engineering,
winder,
georgia,
4
500
square
foot,
dental
office
to
relocate
an
existing
office.
Where
is
your
existence?
Okay,
yeah,
replace.
C
They've
outgrown
that
one,
it's
gonna
be
about
74
and
a
half
feet
from
the
right
of
way:
20
000
square
feet
of
pavement,
27
spaces,
and
I
have
architectural
renderings.
If
you'd
like
to
look
at.
B
Any
any
questions:
are
you
you're,
familiar
with
the
three
conditions
that
yes
you're
referring
to?
Is
that
suitable,
okay.
A
B
B
A
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
site
plan
behind
you
shows
three
potential
or
three
proposed
locations
for
requested
signage
for
this
product
that
has
been
developed
for
some
time.
You've
seen
the
aerial
photograph.
Actually,
the
foot
prints
of
the
existing
buildings
that
have
been
constructed,
the
property
is
zoned
in
one.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
construct
three
different
signs,
a
ground
sign,
a
wall
sign
and
a
silo
sign.
A
The
first
sign
is
a
ground
sign
that
would
face
mayfield
drive.
This
is
a
ground
sign
that
complies
with
the
requirements
of
the
corridor
and
the
sign
ordinance
itself.
The
representative
signs
shown
on
the
screen
they're
with
you.
It's
a
brick
monument
sign
with
a
company
logo
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
sun.
A
A
A
78
staff
has
reviewed
all
three
signs,
though,
and
has
made
a
recommendation
that
the
first
two
signs,
the
ground
sign
on
mayfield
and
the
wall
sign
facing
mayfield,
be
approved
as
submitted
and
then
there's
conditions
that
would
be
applicable
to
their
construction
and
then
the
third
sign
we
are
not
supporting,
because
this
does
not
meet
the
requirements
of
the
cdo
corridor.
A
E
Thank
y'all,
I
wyatt
howard
here
on
behalf
of
mayfield.
We
we
did
submit
the
three
signs.
Thank
you
for
the
one
and
two
just
advertise
our
self
storage
units
there
for
sign
three.
The
intention
was
to
install
a
silo
six
foot
by
six
foot
concrete
pad
attached
to
our
existing
curb
along
highway
78
and
then
approximately
a
12
to
15
foot
tall
silo
with
our
sign
with
our
logo
they're
painted
on
the
side.
The
only
intention
for
that
was
to
be
was
to
match
the
quasi-rural.
E
B
I
would
have
to
ask
if
there
was
anybody
present
to
speak
in
opposition
to
this,
seeing
none
we'll
entertain
a
motion.
B
A
Thank
you,
mr
chairman.
The
subject
property
is
located
north
of
the
new
entrance
to
the
monroe
pavilion
shopping
center.
You
can
see
that
kind
of
outline
on
the
site
plan
that
entrance
here
just
to
give
you
some
reference
to
where
the
location,
this
property
is
there's
currently
an
existing
building
in
the
front
of
the
property.
That's
got
some
tire,
tire,
sales
and
whatnot
and
some
other
various.
I
think,
leasing
officers
for
u-hauls
and
things
like
that
are
also
at
that
location,
they're,
proposing
to
access
the
property
through
this.
A
This
is
their
fee,
simple
access
to
north
broad
street,
into
the
site
itself
and
they're,
proposing
to
develop
that
site
with
an
office
warehouse
building
in
the
front
and
a
mini
storage
warehouse
facility
in
the
back.
This
would
essentially
be
the
first
phase
of
the
project
and
then
the
second
phase
would
be
this
office
warehouse
facility.
A
The
applicant
submitted
architectural
renderings
of
the
product
itself
that
meets
the
requirements
of
the
corridor.
As
far
as
facade
material
materials
are
concerned,
they've
added
a
few
other
elements
on
there,
like
some
metal
paneling
and
all
that
and
areas
that
may
or
may
not
be
visible
from
north
broad
street,
and
I've
got
a
condition
that
would
address
that
specifically.
A
I
can
read
those
for
you
if
you'd
like,
but
specifically
those
are
dealing
with
the
the
proposed
attached
drawings
and
the
biggest
thing
would
just
be
the
metal
paneling,
which
is
a
you
know,
a
prohibition
inside
the
corridor
itself
to
prohibit
metal
buildings.
So
we've
had
a
condition
here
that
any
metal
that
would
be
visible
from
the
public
roadway,
not
that
it
be
constructed
with
brooker
stucco.
D
Week,
owner
of
809
north
broad,
we
propose
building
in
two
phases:
phase
one's
forty,
eight
thousand
square,
foot,
self
storage,
phase,
two
well
in
phase
one,
we
clear
all
the
land
and
then
plant
plant
grass
in
the
phase
two
area
and
phase
two
would
be
an
office
warehouse,
and
I
understand.
A
Well-
and
it
says
any
public
street
so
this
this-
this
would
pop
the
pavilion
parkway
up,
and
I
I
noted
that,
specifically
in
the
report
that,
due
to
that
power
easement
through
theirs,
the
if
there's
extreme
visibility
of
those
buildings
that
they
should
also
not
be
metal-
and
I
think
we
asked
that
we
there
would
be
a
supplemental
tree
planting
along
there,
because
you're
proposing
landscaping
there.
We
asked
that
there
be
supplemental
trees
planted
along
the
sides
of
those
buildings.
D
A
It's
acceptable
to
the
easement
itself.
I
don't
yeah.
I
don't
expect
a
full-sized
shade
tree
to
be
planted
there,
but
something
that
would
block
you
know
a
modest
I'm,
not
necessarily
a
decorative
tree,
but
a
modest
tree
itself.
That's
acceptable
to
them,
because
I
think
they
do
allow
certain
trees
to
be
planted
near
the
easement,
because
I
don't
think
the
back
up.
I
think
the
easements
is
directly
in
this
part
right
here.
I
think
on
your
plan
that
dash
line
kind
of
goes
right
through
here.
A
If
it
affects
it,
it
affects
it
right
here
I
don't
have
the
landscape
plan
on
the
slides
itself
here
to
verify.
I
think
you
had
hedges
along
that
side
of
that
building
itself.
A
In
sure
I
was
going
to
say
there
is
a
there
is
a
narrow
dimension
of
it
looks
like
there
is
not
a
power
line
easement
against
the
buildings
themselves,
but
we
would
need
to
confirm
that
at
your
site
plan
review,
I
think,
obviously,
if
the
commission's
okay
with
this,
if
you
put
the
appropriate
materials
on
those
buildings
too,
I
think
that
would
also
address
the
the
concerns
of
the
visibility.
C
Brad,
just
for
the
record,
you
want
to
restate
that
I'm
in
amended
condition
for
the
the
vegetative
screening.
A
D
A
B
C
Amend
first,
you
can
do
a
motion
to
approve,
with
the
recommended,
amended
conditions,
conditions,
yeah,
okay,
okay,
motion
to
approve
the
two
conditions
with
the
amendment.