►
From YouTube: April 12, 2022 Mountain View City Council Meeting
Description
Live teleconference of the Mountain View City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 12, 2022.
A
Everyone
welcome
to
our
study
session
of
april
12
2022.
I
am
going
to
read
the
usual
announcement
as
required.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
california
government
code,
section
54953e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
city
council
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting
live,
may
do
so
at
mountainview.legistar.com.
A
C
A
Thank
you.
We
will
now
move
on
to
item
3.1
fiscal
year,
2022-23
capital
improvement
program.
The
purpose
of
this
study
session
is
to
provide
the
city
council
an
overview
of
the
capital
improvement
program
and
obtain
city
council
input
to
guide
staff
in
the
preparation
of
the
recommended
fiscal
year.
20
22
to
23
capital
improvement
program
assistant,
public
works,
director
and
city
engineer.
Ed
oringo
will
present
the
well
presented
the
memo.
D
D
All
right,
you
should
be
seeing
the
presentation
great
great,
okay,
I'll
start
us
off.
So
thank
you,
mayor
and
council
members.
As
mentioned,
I'm
ed
orango
assistant
public
works,
director
and
city
engineer,
and
I'm
also
joined
tonight
by
don
cameron.
Public
works
director
and
robert
gonzalez
principal
civil
engineer,
as
the
mayor
mentioned,
we're
here,
to
provide
the
city
council
an
overview
of
the
capital
improvement
program
regularly
termed
the
cip,
and
obtain
council's
input
to
guide
staff
in
the
preparation
of
the
recommended
fiscal
year.
22
and
23
cip.
D
For
background,
the
cip
is
a
bi-annual
planning
cycle
where
every
other
year
is
a
re-look
at
the
entire
cip,
and
the
off-years
are
primarily
focused
on
the
second-year
scheduled
projects
identified
in
the
previous
year's
five-year
cip
or
what
we
term
roll
forward
projects
for
the
next
fiscal
year.
This
is
a
roll
forward
year
and
we
are
evaluating
just
what's
planned
for
the
next
fiscal
year
during
this
row
forward
year,
staff
does
identify
modifications
to
existing
real
forward
projects,
look
at
a
limited
number
of
new
projects
and
amendments
to
existing
projects.
D
D
Looking
at
the
two
five-year
periods
over
the
last
10
years,
the
average
number
of
new
projects
each
year
has
grown,
comparing
the
two
five-year
periods,
the
average
number
of
new
projects
has
increased
15
percent
in
the
second
five-year
period
and
the
total
value
of
projects
is
more
than
doubled.
During
that
same
time,
recently,
we've
refocused
and
made
a
concerted
effort
to
reduce
the
number
of
new
projects
to
deliver
the
existing
projects
more
quickly
and
better
align
with
staff's
capacity.
D
Staff
has
recognized
there
is
a
particular
interest
by
council
in
the
community
for
bicycle
and
pedestrian
improvement
projects,
as
shown
in
attachment
to
the
limo.
There
are
26
active
projects
currently
under
development
with
bicycle
and
pedestrian
improvements
here,
we're
providing
a
general
status
summary
of
those
projects
and
how
these
projects
relate
to
vision,
zero
and
local
road
safety
plan.
Currently
under
development
of
the
26
projects,
one
is
complete.
Five
will
be
or
have
started
construction
this
calendar
year,
18
are
in
design
with
an
additional
11
starting
construction
in
2023.
D
There
are
three
traffic
signal
replacement
projects
that
will
provide
proven
safety
measure,
improvements
for
reducing
conflicts
between
pedestrian
and
vehicles,
the
miramonte
repaving
improvements
project,
integrating
class,
2
bike
lanes
and
filling
a
sidewall
gap.
Where
for
this
mir
monty
project,
council
will
be
seeing
at
the
next
council
meeting
additional
scope
recommendations
to
provide
further
enhanced
bicycle
improvements
along
ramani
for
use
by
graham
middle
school
students
and
finally,
the
california
complete
street
pilot
project
to
include
a
lane
reduction.
Temporary
bowl
downs
and
mid
block
crossings.
D
In
looking
how
these
projects
and
looking
at
how
these
projects
relate
to
vision,
zero
and
local
road
safety
plan,
we
note
that
13
projects
are
located
on
the
high
injury
network.
15
projects
are
at
locations
with
known
collision.
History
between
2014
and
2019,
20
are
applying
known,
proven.
Safety
measures
for
collision
type
and
15
of
the
projects
are
along
school
routes.
D
As
we
look
at
the
roll
forward
projects
for
the
2223
fiscal
year,
we
review
funding
availability.
The
cip
uses
five
funding
categories
outlined
here,
each
with
specific
parameters
how
they
may
be
used.
While
we
did
see
a
decline
in
funding
sources
over
the
last
two
years.
Some
have
recovered,
including
the
construction
of
humane
stocks
and
the
development
fees
and
charges
fund
available.
Funding
from
these
categories
will
be
used
to
fund
the
roll
forward
projects,
new
projects
and
amendments
to
existing
projects.
D
For
non-discretionary
projects
again
these
are
for
annual
and
periodic
maintenance
and
repairs.
There
are
25
planned
projects
with
two
modifications
recommended
the
annual
street
maintenance
project
and
the
forestry
maintenance
program
and
street
tree
replanting
project.
Both
are
recommended
for
a
one-time
funding
increase
for
the
annual
street
project.
This
will
add
new
streets
for
payment
treatment
and
for
the
forestry
maintenance
project.
This
will
provide
added
work
on
stevens,
creek
trail
and
environmental
education
programs.
D
On
the
discretionary
project
side,
there
are
three
main
components:
the
role
forwards,
new
projects
and
amendments
to
existing
projects
for
row
forwards.
17
projects
were
identified
in
the
fiscal
year,
2122
five-year
cip.
This
is
last
year's
staff
evaluated.
The
projects
identified
and
identified
six
could
be
deleted
on
five
of
these
six
projects.
This
work
is
not
going
away,
but
in
an
effort
is
an
effort
to
add
construction
phase
of
the
plan
project
to
an
existing
design
phase
via
an
amendment
rather
than
creating
a
new
project
for
the
construction
phase.
D
The
sixth
project
is
for
storm
during
system
improvements
and
is
recommended
to
be
deleted.
As
these
improvements
can
be
funded
through
the
non-discretionary
related
project,
four
projects
were
identified
to
be
deferred
to
a
future
year
due
to
existing
high
workloads
and
lack
of
staffing
capacity.
This
results
in
seven
roll
forward
projects.
D
For
new
projects,
while
we
do
try
to
limit
the
number
of
new
projects
in
a
row
forward
year,
these
were
determined
by
staff
to
address
immediate
needs
and
could
not
wait
for
the
next
five-year
planning
cycle
and
we
were
able
to
identify
staffing
resources
to
deliver
them.
They
include
a
few
critical
facility
projects,
grant
funded
projects,
utility
improvements
and
council-directed
projects,
such
as
the
biodiversity
strategy,
which
was
a
council
strategic
priority.
This
results
in
12
new
projects.
D
D
D
The
council
question
for
tonight
is:
does
the
city
council
support
the
fiscal
year
2223
cip
project
recommendations,
including
roll
forwards,
modified
non-discretionary
and
discretionary
projects,
new
projects
and
amendments
to
existing
projects?
That
concludes
my
presentation.
A
Thank
you
ed.
Any
additional
comments
from
staff,
if
not
we'll
burn
to
the
public
for
a
public
comment
and
then
come
back
to
the
council
for
council
questions
and
then
deliberation
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
A
A
A
Jesse
start
your
comment:
when
you're
ready.
E
Okay,
so
thanks
for
having
me
I
can
talk,
so
I
just
have
a
question
about
the
california
complete
streets
projects
2140
as
the
kfi
policy
is
written
right
now
it
doesn't
trigger
the
two
percent
funding
for
this
particular
project.
The
council
does
have
the
discussion
to
add
an
art
aspect
to
this.
If
they
want.
So
that's
what's
around
how
you
could
enhance
this
project
with
public
art,
whether
it's
you
know,
painting
a
video
or
something
on
the
side
of
the.
E
E
Because
it's
actually
providing
something
to
them
too:
that's
giving
them
public
art,
so
they're,
just
taking
away
anything
that
claims.
So
thank
you
very
much.
F
Thank
you,
mayor,
bruce
englund,
I'm
a
member
of
mountain
view
coalition
for
sustainable
planning
and
the
group
submitted
a
letter
and
I
believe
others
will
be
speaking
to
it,
but
I
just
want
to
say
as
an
individual,
I
support
the
letter.
I
agree.
The
entire
california
street,
complete
streets
project
should
be
prioritized
and
completed
at
the
earliest
opportunity.
F
That's
that's
the
entire
project,
not
just
the
stretch,
that's
being
considered
right
now,
I'd
like
to
see
what's
prior
what
is
prioritized
taking
into
account,
taking
into
account
what
has
been
defined
in
access
mountain
view
and
envision
zero
goals
for
the
annual
street
maintenance
program.
I'd
like
to
see
bikeway
conditions
looked
at
as
a
separate
consideration,
separate
from
the
actual
vehicle
roadway
part,
given
that
further
changes
might
occur
around
parking
I'd
like
to
see
the
lot
5
parking
structure,
work
be
deferred
until
later
time
and
the
hope
street.
F
The
hope
and
villa
street
traffic
seal
installation
is
new
to
me,
or
I
had
noticed
it
before
and
I'd
like
to
know
more
about
that,
and
maybe
I
can
find
out
more
offline.
But
if
you're
wondering
too,
I
hope
you'll
ask
and
then,
lastly,
how
can
the
public
see
what
the
balances
are
at
any
point
in
time
for
each
of
the
funding
sources
defined
in
the
memo
and
what
has
been
or
might
be
earmarked
from
them?
Thanks.
G
Hello,
I'm
rick
spelaine.
G
I
live
in
steele
in
the
states,
I'm
I
wanted
to
comment
on
item
number
3.1,
basically
within
steel
in
the
states,
we're
planning
to
add
up
to
3,
000,
more
people
in
the
planning
area
and
actually,
in
tonight's
council
session,
we're
going
to
be
discussing
or
there
they'll
be
studying
hearing
staff
reports
on
a
planned
housing
on
a
potential
housing
project
as
well.
All
these
people
kind
of
feel
in
the
states.
It's
tragic
that
steel
states
has
no
access
to
stevens
creek
trail.
G
You
have
to
go
basically
completely
out
of
our
neighborhood
all
the
way
down
middle
field,
all
the
way
back
up,
moffitt,
there's
no
real,
safe
sidewalks
to
get
you
there.
You
have
to
basically
run
along
the
shoulder
of
busy
highways
under
bridges
until
you
get
there.
I
would
like
to
ask
council
to
consider
making
an
access
from
steelers
states
at
terribella
avenue
to
stevens
creek
trail.
I
think
it
can
be
done
with
a
tunnel
under
85
and
then
a
walking
path
under
the
flyovers
after
that.
So
I
think
it's
feasible
and
possible.
G
H
I
was
very
happy
to
see
that
two
potential
alternatives
were
provided
in
the
response
to
questions
from
the
council
and
I
I
would
really
like
to
see
both
the
segments
from
showers
to
mariposa,
with
the
center
turn
lane
and
from
mariposa
to
shoreline
segment
where
those
meeting
and
traffic
lanes
could
be
reduced
from
four
lanes
to
two
lanes.
H
Both
segments
would
really
have
significant
safety
improvements
in
active
transportation
instructor
and
would
be
a
really
good,
adequate
response
to
the
2015,
complete
street
study
and
in
june
it'll
be
10
years
since
william
ware
was
killed
on
on
california
street.
I
also
sent
in
a
letter
on
and
you
receive
many
letters
on
the
need
for
additional
pickleball
courts.
H
There
is
definitely
a
need
for
eight
to
twelve
new
permanent
courts
and
I
was
happy
to
see
that
we're
gonna
be
it's
gonna,
go
to
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
for
new
painting
new
lines,
but
we
really
do
need
to
explore
alternatives
and,
I
hope
staff
directs.
I
mean
council
direct
staff
to
add
at
least
six
to
eight
new
pickleball
courts
in
the
very
near
future.
Thank
you
very
much.
H
I
Hi
there
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
this
is
exactly
the
place
to
say
this,
but
like
rick,
I
have
a
a
want
that
I'd
like
to
have
voice
to
the
council.
I
live
in
the
stereo
united
states
also
and,
as
you
know,
the
former
village
lake
site
is
currently
being
built.
It's
going
to
add
at
least
a
thousand
people
almost
across
the
street
from
san
veron
park,
and
that's
just
the
first
of
many
large
projects
very
close
to
this
park.
I
So,
even
though
pg
e
is
building
a
gas
regulator
substation
there,
I
still
think
the
park
would
greatly
benefit
from
a
makeover
or
redesigned
to
make
the
space
more
efficiently
used
and
able
to
serve
a
huge
number
of
people
coming
into
this
immediate
area.
So
I
would
just
like
to
plant
that
seed.
Maybe
you
know,
maybe
that's
the
thing
to
suggest
at
next
year's
cip
meeting,
but
I
just
like
to
put
that
out
there.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
Hi
yeah,
I'm
john
john
keane,
long-time
resident
of
mountain
view
and
an
active
participant
in
the
mountain
view
coalition
for
sustainable
planning
and
also
I
rely
on
my
bicycle
for
getting
around
doing
a
lot
of
commuting
and
just
getting
around
town.
So
I
would
like
to
express
my
support
for
the
letter
that
came
from
mountain
view
coalition
for
sustainable
planning
and
authored
by
cliff
chambers
regarding
the
california
street
improvements
of
recycling.
So
I
think,
going
beyond
just
a
one
block.
J
Pilot
segment
would
be
a
really
good
thing,
making
it
a
full-length
corridor
and
there
were
some
specific
suggestions
there,
because
I
often
ride
along
california
street,
going
to,
for
example,
like
the
san
antonio
plaza,
there's
a
bunch
of
good
shops
there.
You
know
there's
target
and
trader
joe's
whole
foods,
but
I'm
often
taking
some
risks
there
riding
with
the
traffic,
and
it
could
be
much
better
from
a
cycling
point
of
view.
I
guess
there's
other
alternatives.
J
There's
like
el
camino,
real
and
central
expressway,
but
they're,
not
very
good,
so
california
street
would
definitely
be
better,
but
right
now
it
it
needs
some
improvements
and
we've
seen
some
good
examples
of
that.
You
know
if
you
go
to
palo
alto,
bryant
bicycle
boulevard
is
a
really
good
way
for
getting
back
and
forth
along
that
segment
of
palo
alto.
So
I'd
really
like
to
see
something
like
that
here.
In
mountain
view,
california
street
just
seems
like
a
good
place
to
do
it.
J
So
count
me
in
for
supporting
the
the
memo
that
you
received
from
mdcsp.
Thank
you.
K
Hi,
I'm
april
webster
I've
lived
in
mountain
view
for
over
10
years.
I
wanted
to
also
voice
my
support
for
the
mvcsp
letter
regarding
the
california
street
pilot
project.
I
am
super
excited
about
this
project
to
see
it
moving
forward.
Just
a
few
asks
actually,
four
one
that
cliff
brought
up
and
john
also
mentioned
about
extending
the
pilot
beyond
just
a
block.
I
really
feel
to
truly
and
adequately
study
and
demonstrate
the
benefits
of
the
complete
street
proposal.
K
One
block
just
really
isn't
going
to
cut
it,
particularly
if
a
traffic
study
needs
to
be
done
to
evaluate
the
85th
percentile
speed
limit.
I
just
one
block
just
won't
be
enough.
I
feel
the
second
is
to
consider
quick,
build
options.
These
have
been
used
in
a
number
of
communities
to
condense,
timeline,
cut
down,
planning
and
engineering
costs,
etc.
K
This
was
done
on
castro
street
near
graham
middle
school,
which
is
wonderful.
The
third
is
when
doing
to
consider
reducing
car
lanes
to
about
10
to
11
feet
during
the
pilot
pilot
drivers
have
been
shown
to
slow
down
when
lanes
are
narrowed.
K
This
would
be
more
indicative
of
what
to
expect
if
a
road
diet
was
truly
done,
especially
for
the
speed
limit
study
and
then,
finally,
I
know
I'm
running
out
of
time.
Consider
green
infrastructure
for
the
queen
quick,
build
buffers
on
the
protected
bike
lanes.
This
would
also
have
the
effect
of
improving
urban
design
and
place,
making
that
jesse.
A
Thank
you
april.
The
next
speaker
is
james
kuzmal.
L
Hi,
like
some
of
the
previous
speakers,
I
also
want
to
encourage
council
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
make
more
effective
and
urgent
use
of
the
the
funding
and
resources
we
have
to
quickly
implement
street
safety
improvements.
I
really
like
the
suggestion
from
cliff
in
april
with
regards
to
california
street,
I
think
there's
a
good
number
of
other
locations,
as
I
outlined
in
the
letter
essential
about.
L
Is
there
general
things
we
could
be
trying
to
do
to
rapidly
make
improvements?
We
currently
don't
really
do
quick
build
anywhere.
We
have
a
few
things
where
we've
sort
of
done
the
physical
infrastructure
associate
that
you
might
call
quick
build,
but
where
we
went
through
a
large
amount
of
design
process
to
do
that,
rather
than
just
doing
it
and
in
terms
of
just
the
resources
required
to
do
these
sorts
of
things.
L
If
we
can
afford
to
spend
a
million
dollars
on
that,
I
think
we
can
find
some
money
and
some
staff
time
to
at
least
explore
the
possibility
that
not
all
of
our
street
safety
improvements
need
to
take
multiple
years
to
implement.
Thank
you.
M
M
I
should
say
good
evening,
mayor
ramirez
and
the
council
members,
I'm
concerned
about
the
lack
of
pickleball
courts
in
mountain
view,
and
the
city
has
known
about
the
growing
needs
of
pickleball
courts
for
seven
years
ever
since
my
husband
and
I
introduced
it
to
the
senior
center
in
2015.,
I'm
president
of
the
palo
alto
pickleball
club.
M
N
Hi
I
was
just
calling,
or
speaking
also
in
support
of
expanding
the
california
street
project.
I
literally
just
drove
home
on
it
and
from
showers
to
ortega.
I
can't
even
call
it
a
pilot-
it's
like
maybe
a
teaser,
so
it
would
be
really
nice
to
expand
it,
especially
considering
it
already
goes
down
to
one
lane
effectively
at
piketty.
It
would
make
more
sense
than
since
that's
already
going
down
to
one
lane
to
continue
that
and
then
I
would
love
for
it
to
go
further
east.
N
One
thing
I
haven't
heard
people
mention
is
that
almost
all
of
the
summer
camps
for
mountain
view
are
in
rankstarve
park,
the
senior
center
or
the
teen
center,
and
there's
not
really
any
way
to
access
that
from
the
east
and
also
there's
not
a
great
way
for
people
in
ranksturf
area
to
access
downtown.
So
it's
definitely
a
channel.
We
need
to
open
up
and
since
latham
seems
to
be
stagnated,
even
though
everyone
would
prefer
that
california
seems
our
best
option.
So
I
hope
you
will
expand
that
project.
Thank
you.
O
Oh
great,
I'm
helen
carroll,
president
of
the
mountain
view,
pickleball
club,
which
began
in
2019
when
you
built
the
two
new
courts
in
the
temporary
court
and
started
with
around
eight
to
12
people.
Now
we
have
every
single
day
20
to
40
people
trying
to
play
on
the
three
courts
that
are
available
from
10
to
2
p.m,
and
even
at
night
we
have
a
really
enthusiastic
group
that
put
up
lights
and
try
to
trace
play
through
the
night.
So,
like
monica
said,
there
is
a
a
real
big
need
for
more
courts.
O
I
think,
after
seeing
the
neighboring
cities
of
750
people
in
that
club,
we
really
want
to
look
at
that
club.
So
I'm
hoping
for
this
year
in
the
projects,
we
could
look
at
blended
lines
on
the
tennis
courts
next
to
the
ringstor
of
courts,
which
is
very
inexpensive,
and
then
we
can
look
at
a
facility,
perhaps
next
year,
in
the
in
when
we're
looking
at
capital
projects
at
that
time.
It's
a
part.
O
It's
a
sport
that
supports
the
seniors
of
the
community,
myself
included
and
as
an
athletic
director
in
nebraska
north
carolina,
tennessee
and
out
here.
I've
built
tennis,
courts
and
and
many
other
facilities-
and
I
know
I
know
the
work
that
goes
through
that,
so
I'm
really
hoping
that
that
we
can
do
this,
get
this
set
up
and
have
it
go
forward
for
mountain
view.
I
think
it
will
be
really
great
for
the
seniors
and
everyone
else.
Thanks.
A
Very
much
seeing
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak.
We
will
return
to
the
council
for
questions
and
then
once
we've
asked
questions,
we
will
continue
with
deliberation,
but
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
ask
any
questions.
P
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation
miss
during
orango.
What's
up
always
amazing
how
many
projects
we
have
going
on,
I
did
have
a
question
that
came
up
actually
as
from
a
member
of
the
public
and
it's
in
relation
to
the
study
session.
We
have
later
this
evening,
but
cip
project
22-30
the
terrible
bella
bike
lane
study.
Q
Thank
you,
ed
don
cameron,
public
works
director.
We
have
not
been
able
to
start
that
study,
yet
it
is
an
example
of
having
way
too
many
active
projects
and
not
enough
staff,
so
it
is
on
our
list
to
start,
I
think,
when
I
checked
in
with
our
project
team,
we
feel
we
may
be
able
to
have
a.
We
expect
to
have
a
project
manager
available
later
this
year
or
early
2023.
To
begin
that
study.
P
Thank
you
and
the
other
question
I
had.
There
was
a
comment.
Public
comment
about,
I
think
speed
studies
and
I
would
I
was
couldn't
find
it
on
the
list,
but
I
had
been.
I
have
been
hearing
more
through
my
work
at
mtc
about
vision,
zero,
including
slowing
down
speeds,
and
I
think
there
might
be
state
law,
that's
changed
or
changing
that
would
allow
us
to
you
know,
be
able
to
enforce
those
speeds
better.
P
Q
Thank
you
councilmember.
So
when
it
comes
to
speed
management-
and
it
is
something
that's
definitely
on
the
list
of
measures
being
studied
as
part
of
vision,
zero
and
the
local
road
safety
plan
there,
there
are
two
aspects
to
it.
Q
One
is
looking
at
engineering
solutions
that
do
help
naturally
reduce
speeds,
and
that
is
something
that,
as
we
do
paving
projects
and
restriping
put
in
bike
lanes,
as
was
mentioned
by
one
member
of
the
public,
when
you
narrow
from
12
feet
to
11
feet
in
lane
with
lanes,
it
does
show
that
people
naturally
will
drive
slower,
especially
when
more
is
happening
around
them.
So
you
know
these
are
part
of
what
part
of
our
strategies
as
we
look
at
as
we
make
improvements
to
manage
speed.
Q
Q
Q
However,
I
think
you
all
know
just
by
putting
up
a
lower
speed
limit
sign,
does
not
by
itself
slow
down
traffic.
We
see
that
time
and
again
so
as
part
of
any
effort.
Besides
putting
in
any
design
solutions
that
we
can,
we
also
have
to
work
with
our
police
department
in
terms
of
their
ability
to
help
enforce.
Q
I
would
suggest
that,
as
we
work
to
complete
the
vision,
zero
and
local
road
safety
act
plan
which
is
going
to
be
happening
by
this
fall,
this
will
be
one
of
the
efforts
I
think
coming
out
of.
That
is
go
ahead
now
and
step
back
and
look
at
that
new
piece
of
legislation
work
with
our
traffic
engineering
team
to
evaluate
where
we
may
as
a
city
want
to
take
advantage
of
it.
A
Thank
you.
The
next,
I'm
in
public
comment
mode,
councilmember,
medic,.
S
T
Councilmember
mata
check,
so
the
second
tranche
of
arpa
funds
is
expected.
Some
point
we're
thinking.
If
it's
not
later
this
spring
we're
thinking
summer
early
fall.
Last
year
we
were
a
little
delayed
in
getting
the
first
tranche.
We
didn't
get
it
until
the
fall,
so
we
hope
that
the
kinks
have
been
worked
out
with
just
the
system
and
the
the
flow
of
the
funding.
T
So
we
should
be
getting
that
the
intention
is
to
bring
some
recommendations
to
council
as
part
of
the
recommended
budget,
but
you
will
actually
have
time
to
make
your
decisions,
so
the
funding
does
not
have
to
be
committed
until
the
end
of
2024
and
then
spent
until
the
end
of
2026..
T
So
yes,
cip
projects
could
be
a
part
of
that,
but
they
do
need
to
have
some
sort
of
nexus
to
covid
related
impacts,
and
I
am
working
with
with
staff
on
that,
but
we
will
be
bringing
this
initially
for
council
consideration
as
part
of
the
recommended
budget
and
then,
of
course,
get
get
feedback
from
council
members
in
the
community.
T
S
Thank
you,
and
I
you
know,
I
don't
know
if
this
is
something
you
can
speak
to
tonight,
but
I
know
we're
stretched
for
capacity
in
public
works
as
well
as
in
other
departments,
and
I
am
wondering
about
you
know
when,
if
how
are
we
doing
in
terms
of
increasing
capacity,
if
we
want
to
do
more,
especially
if
we
wanted
to
allocate
some
of
the
arpa
funds.
T
Great
thank
you
for
that
question.
Councilmember
matacek,
so
we
are
going
through
the
budget
development
process
right
now
and
I'm
working
with
our
finance
team
and
our
department
heads
on
the
budget
request
to
bring
a
recommended
budget
forward
to
council
in
june.
So
part
of
that
recommendation
is
doing
a
lot
of
analysis
and
a
deep
dive
into
what
some
of
the
needs
are
in
our
departments,
including
public
works.
T
You
all
may
have
heard
me
mention
before,
what's
really
happening
with
the
development
review
process
also
and
the
positions
that
were
recommended
in
both
public
works
and
community
development
and
I.t
as
part
of
that
review,
so
I
will
be
bringing
recommendations
forward
to
council
at
that
time.
I
do
not
believe
that
we
will
need
to
use
arpa
funding
for
those
positions
so
again
we're
we're
just
formulating
that
and
that
that
will
come
to
council
soon,
but
we
do
have
other
funding
sources
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
utilize.
S
Okay-
and
I
noticed
on
the
agenda
flow,
it
actually
has
another
question
for
us
that
hasn't
been
mentioned
until
the
agenda
flow.
Are
we
supposed
to
talk
to
that
tonight
about
2
million
in
reserve.
Q
S
Great.
Thank
you.
U
Thank
you
yes
for
for
a
great
report,
miss
cameron
and
mr
arando.
I
have
several
questions
here.
Let's
see,
let's
start
with
the
one
of
the
new
projects
is
the
lot
five
parking
structure
and
I'm
wondering
what
deferring
it
might
do
in
in
terms
of
I
feel
as
if
we
are.
U
Still
discussing
how
to
handle
parking
in
the
downtown
and
that
there
are
multiple
options.
U
On
the
other
hand,
I
don't
want
to
defer
this
project
if
it
were
to
if
it
were
to
slow
up
the
affordable
housing
project
on
lot
12,
but
I
would
be
interested
in
deferring
it
if
starting
it
now
kind
of
restricts
our
options.
I'll
give
you
one
example,
I
saw
a
google
park
parking
structure
that
had
micro
units
clad
on
the
outside.
U
I
also
think
that
there
are
other
ways
that
we
could
handle
parking
downtown
in,
including,
I
know
the
old
mountain
view.
Parking
committee
is
suggesting
time
limited
parking
on
the
streets,
which,
I
think
could
add
a
lot
of
parking.
So
I
think
there
are
multiple
ways
of
handling
parking
in
the
downtown
and
I
don't
want
to
get
too
deeply
into
this
project
before
we've
explored
some
of
the
available
options,
so
I'm
wondering
what
deferring
it
would
do
in
particular
to
the
lot
12
project.
Q
Q
Deferring
it
could
mean
that
we're
you
know
downtown
could
be
parking
challenged
for
a
lot
longer
period.
This
is
not
a
fast
project
to
deliver.
It
will
take
a
year
to
develop
concepts
and
alternatives,
and
once
you
know
there
is
direction
and
approval
what
the
alternative
might
be.
Then
design
is
a
two
to
two
and
a
half
year
process
and
then
construction.
U
D
D
The
the
whitman
sports
center
actually
there's
two
gym
facility
projects
that
we're
identifying
here
that
the
hvac
system
is
at
the
end
of
its
useful
life,
for
both
systems
and
among
other
facility
improvements
that
are
needed,
such
as
the
roof
and
other
elements
at
both
facilities,
and
the
intent
is
to
replace
the
hvac
system
with
an
all-electric
hvac
system.
Q
Okay,
I'd
like
to
add
on
and
note,
though,
that
we
have
a
funding
partner
in
this.
The
school
district
is
responsible
for
half
the
cost
at
the
wisman
sports
center,
and
we
know
converting
to
all
electric
will
cost
more,
so
we're
having
discussions
with
them
now
about
this
is
one
of
the
city's
goals
is
to
convert
to
all
electric
and
asking
them
to
continue
to
provide
for
half
of
that
cost.
So
we're
working
towards
that.
U
Okay,
great!
Well,
that's
that's
the
answer
I
wanted
to
hear.
Then.
The
hope
and
villa
street
traffic
signal
is
a
roll
forward
project.
Is
that
changed
at
all
the
need
for
that
because
of
the
closed
three
blocks
of
the
downtown
or
not
I'm
having
trouble
figuring?
How
that
that
fits
into
the
whole
the
changes
since
the
the
pandemic
yeah.
D
The
hope
and
villa
signal
project
really
stems
from
the
lots,
four
and
eight
development
project.
This
is
the
robert
green
company,
donald,
where
they're
taking
away
the
parking
for
lots,
four
and
eight,
so
that
development
project
triggered
the
need
with
we're
doing
a
shared
approach
for
that
intersection,
where
the
the
development
does
need
to
put
in
a
traffic
signal
for
that,
and
it
is
anticipated
that
that
will
happen
this
next
fiscal
year
and
that
funding
is
in
place
for
that
purpose.
U
Okay,
so
you
don't
feel
that
the
closure
of
the
first
three
blocks
change.
That
is
what
I'm
hearing
correct:
okay,
good
and
then
I'm
interested
in
the
the
a
whole
bundle
of
issues
around
california
street
there
are
people
have
asked
council
people
asked
several
questions
about
how
to
expand
that,
and
there
were
several
options
that
staff
gave.
And
then
members
of
the
public
has
have
also
talked
about
quick,
build
options.
U
I'm
and
I'm
wondering
whether
whether
you
have
a
preferred
option
and
whether
a
quick
build
option
would
you
know,
starting
with
the
one
block,
but
quick,
build
for
the
rest
of
them,
whether
that
would
be
an
option
that
would
be
workable
as
well.
Q
So,
thank
you.
So
I
think
first,
we
there
are
a
variety
of
different
understandings
of
what
quick
build
is
and
the
the
way
we're
working
towards
quick
build
is
when
we're
doing
a
temporary
installation,
a
pilot
installation.
We
will
use
those
kinds
of
treatments
that
can
be
delivered
when
you
construct
them.
They
can
be
instructed
pretty
quickly.
Q
It
is
paint
on
the
ground,
it's
bollards
that
can
be
installed.
It's
not
the
more
permanent
improvements,
and
there
are
advantages
with
with
that
kind
of
quick,
build
approach
because
has
been
said.
It
allows
you
to
test
out.
You
know
your
layout,
how
is
it
working
how's
it
been
received
and
eventually,
if
you
want
to
keep
it
over
the
longer
term,
you
go
in
with
more
permanent
installations
that
can
also
further
improve
safety.
Q
Q
Q
If
you
do
not
do
so,
you
can
unintentionally
create
conflicts
at
driveways
and
intersections
that
can
create
other
hazards
and,
and
you
know
and
lead
to
collisions
so,
for
instance,
the
the
castro
street
in
front
of
grand
middle
school
was
kind
of
referenced
as
a
quick
build,
and
it
does
use
very
a
lot
of
quick,
build
type
treatments,
but
it
was
fully
designed
and
vetted
because
we
want
to
ensure
the
safety
of
everybody
on
that
street,
including
the
students
for
what's
built,
so
that
is
that
is
what's
planned.
Q
For
the
pilot
project
is
a
quick,
build
type
treatments.
However,
we
first
go
through
design.
The
other
piece,
as
we
pointed
out
in
our
q
a
is
this-
is
a
public
works
project
subject
to
public
contracts,
code,
our
own
city
codes-
and
we
know
the
construction
cost
is
going
to
cost
over
a
hundred
thousand.
Therefore,
we
still
have
to
go
through
the
formal
bidding
process.
Where
council
approves
the
plans
and
specs,
we
bid
it,
we
advertise
it
and
then
we
award
a
construction
contract.
U
So
I
guess
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
the
proposal
for
california
street
uses
what
you
would
say
are
quick
build
materials
and
can
be
improved
on,
hopefully
in
the
future,
with
some
of
the
things
that
members
of
the
public
have
mentioned,
some
of
the
things
like
more
green
infrastructure
or
integration
with
artwork,
but
that
for
now
it
is
quick,
build
to
kind
of
see
how
it
works
out.
That.
Q
V
Now
I
just
want
to
follow
up
on
the
questions
that
a
number
of
people
ask
about
pickleball.
I
know
it
was
answered
in
the
council
questions,
but
just
so
it
can
be
shared
with
the
public
here.
Could
could
could
staff
respond
to
the
question
about
where
we
are
in
the
process
of
bringing
more
pickleball
courts
into
mountain
view,
both
as
shared
facilities
with
tennis
courts
and
perhaps
finding
some
dedicated
courts
in
the
not
too
distant
future.
D
I
think
for
this
one
we
would
ask
direct
community
development
community
services
director
john
marchant,
to
help
provide
the
response.
Is
there
a
way
that
the
moderator
can
promote
him.
V
W
Good
evening
councilmember
joe
walter,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Regarding
pickleball,
the
recreation
division
has
been
going
through
a
process
to
gather
information
through
a
community
survey
to
learn
more
from
both
the
pickleball
community
and
the
tennis
community
about
adding
blended
lines
to
existing
tennis
court
facilities.
W
We
plan
on
bringing
some
recommendations
to
both
the
tennis
advisory
board
and
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
over
the
next
two
months
and
then
based
on
their
recommendations,
be
able
to
look
at
expanding
pickleball
within
mountain
view,
utilizing
blended
lines
at
certain
locations
in
certain
certain
tennis
courts.
W
So
we
are
prepared
to
bring
forward
some
recommendations
to
both
of
those
advisory
bodies,
get
some
input
additional
public
input
through
that
process
and
then,
shortly
after
the
the
recommendations
are
heard,
city
staff
can
work
pretty
quickly
to
add
blended
lines
as
we
determine
what
is
best
for
the
community
at
this
point
and
that
can
be
done
at
a
pretty
low
cost.
Therefore,
we
haven't
asked
for
capital
dollars
for
the
capital
improvement
project
to
date.
W
We
do
understand
that
there
is
a
desire
for
more
stand-alone
pickleball
courts
within
mountain
view.
In
order
to
accomplish
that,
we
do
need
to
to
look
at
that
more
holistically,
as
we
just
responded
to
in
in
the
council
question
is
we
think
that
there
would
be
it
would
be
appropriate
to
bring
on
a
consultant
to
look
at
a
feasibility
study
to
determine
best
locations?
Make
sure
that
it
is
what
locations
are
most
appropriate
for
those
types
of
facilities
that
are
existing
park
locations
and
working
with
dawn
and
and
my
staff.
W
We
believe
that
the
capacity
to
add
this
additional
project
for
the
next
fiscal
year
would
really
strain
our
our
resources.
Don
doesn't
have
the
appropriate
staff
to
support
the
the
project
at
this
time,
so
we
are
recommending
to
look
at
bringing
this
as
part
of
the
five-year
cip
next
year
and
being
able
to
look
at
that
feasibility
study
and
look
at
additional
courts
for
standalone
courts.
W
However,
in
the
meantime,
we
are
looking
to
create
some
opportunities
to
expand
pickleball
courts
through
the
blended
line
program
at
certain
locations
that
we
will
bring
again
forward
to
the
tennis
advisory
board
and
the
parks
and
recreation
commission
over
the
next
two
months.
V
And
I
that's
great
and
I'm
sure
that
you
have
a
list
of
people
you
reach
out
to
for
these
various
meetings.
I
would
imagine
that
people
who
testified
are
on
the
list,
but
if
they're
not
how
do
people
get
on
your
list
for
for
being
notified
about
the
parks
and
rec
media
and
the
tennis
advisory
board
meetings.
W
They
can
go
ahead
and
just
send
an
email
to
the
recreation
division
and
that's
recreation
mountainview.gov,
and
they
can
request
to
be
added
to
to
the
pickleball
list
to
be
to
reach
additional
communication
from
us
as
available.
A
Thank
you
any
other
questions
from
the
council.
A
I've
got
a
couple
first
for
you,
john.
Thank
you
for
joining
us.
We
received
a
couple
of
comments
about
the
residential
development
in
the
tarabella
area
and
the
eventual
need
for
land
acquisition
for
parks,
and
I
know
there's
not
a
lot
of
money
for
that
planning
area
right
now,
but
we're
anticipating
a
pretty
substantial
sum
of
money.
A
I
think
from
saras
regis
relatively
soon
and
I'm
curious
to
better
understand
if
there's
anything
that
council
can
or
should
do
to
key
up
the
potential
acquisition
of
land
for
a
park
in
that
in
that
area.
W
Thank
you
for
the
question
mayor
ramirez
and
I'm
going
to
ask
don
cameron
to
jump
into
this
question
as
well.
She
and
I
have
had
discussions
related
to
opportunities
in
that
area
and
I
think,
as
of
now,
there's
no
requested
action
on
the
part
of
council,
however,
give
us
some
time
to
continue
identifying
possible
locations,
and
I
think
don
can
speak
to
another
study
that
is
being
looked
at
in
that
area.
Q
Q
Other
opportunities
are
that
we
want
to
continue
to
work
with
community
development
and
look
at
the
overall.
You
know
eventually,
if
council
and
city
is
taking
on
a
precise
plan
for
terra
bella,
that
would
be
the
best
opportunity
to
identify
where
a
park
could
be
most
advantageously
located
to
serve
the
current
and
future
community,
as
well
as
to
create
the
opportunity
for
assembling
land
and
and
and
providing
incentives
to
get
that
park
plan
in
place.
Q
A
I
I
don't
disagree
with
you,
but
if
the
council
chooses
not
to
prioritize
a
terribella,
precise
plan,
for
you
know
an
additional
couple
of
cycles,
because
there
are
many
other
things
that
we're
doing,
I
I
feel
like
we
risk
losing
out
on
some
nearer
term
opportunities,
since
we
know
that
there
are
property
owners
in
the
area
who
had
been
interested
in
housing
development.
That's
not
going
to
happen.
A
Maybe
they
would
consider
selling
to
the
city,
so
is,
is
staff
even
now
in
anticipation
of
the
funding
from
cirrus
regis
looking
at
potential
strategic
acquisitions
since
park,
development
can
take
quite
some
time.
Q
Q
A
That's
great,
thank
you
and
then
I
think
this
was
also
a
part
of
the
discussion
from
the
saris
regis
project,
but
I
can't
remember
the
conclusion:
is
there
any
direction
we
could
provide
to
explore
the
feasibility
of
a
connection
from
tarabella
to
stephens
creek
trail.
Q
Q
It's
a
very
significant
project
and
we
would
suggest
that
and
it
would
have
to
start
with
a
feasibility
study
and
we
would
have
to
look
at
it
in
terms
of
all
the
other
priorities
related
to
bi-compete
improvements
and
connectivity.
Q
A
Okay,
great,
that
would
be
tremendous
council
member
abby
koga,
says
for
a
second
round
of
questions.
P
Actually,
I
just
wanted
to
add
to
you
your
line
of
questioning.
Sorry,
my
internet
might
not
be
stable,
but
I
was
actually
walking
the
neighborhood
today
and
there
was
there
is
a
house
for
sale
there.
So
I
was
gonna,
send
the
my
address
to
staff,
but
you
know
that's
one
thing
is
we.
P
I
know
there's
this
issue
of
housing
and
open
space,
but
we
have
done
that.
So,
if
there's
property
that
is
for
sale,
then-
and
there
are-
I
think
there
are
a
few
I'd
like
to
ask
staff
to
to
look
at
look
at
those
thanks.
A
Thank
you
any
other
questions
from
the
council
before
we
proceed
with
the
question
staff
has
asked:
if
not
what
I'm
going
to
suggest
is
what
we've
been
doing
with
other
study
sessions.
If
you
have
so
we'll
start
with
the
base
line,
which
is
the
staff
recommended
set
of
items,
if
there
are
amendments
or
anything,
you
want
to
postpone,
remove
or
add
I'll
collect
the
list
and
then
once
everyone
has
shared
their
recommendations,
we'll
go
through
and
take
straw,
straw,
motions
or
straw
polls
for
for
each
of
them.
U
Well,
I
generally
support
the
staff
recommendations.
I
guess
my
my
additions
will
be
will
be
to
expand
the
calif
look
at
ways
to
expand
the
california
street
quick,
build
beyond
one
block
to.
U
I
also
support
the
the
options
for
parkland
and
connections
to
the
stephens
creek
trail
in
tarabella,
although
it
seems
like
that's
not
for
this
session,
so
I'm
not
going
to
raise
that
for
this
session,
but
for
the
next
five
years,
unless
another
council
person
wants
to
say
they've
found
a
way
to
put
it
on
for
this
session,
I
would
defer
the
lot
5
parking
structure
to
see
if
we
can
figure
out
parking
in
some
other
way,
and
I
would
also
you
know
my
understanding
is
that
the
blended
pickleball
solution
would
would
be
something
that
we
can
do
without
putting
it
on
the
list
here.
U
A
A
X
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I
am
very
much
in
support
of
increasing
the
the
california
street
bicycle
infrastructure
and
then
I'm
hearing
staffs
input
that
and
the
parking
structure
process
is
a
very
lengthy
one
and
the
dependencies
coming
from
that.
So
so
I'm
okay
with
entering
that
that
process
I
I
do
have
a
request
that
when
we
look
at
the
equity
statements
that
are
coming
forward
as
a
part
of
this,
if
we
include
access
for
our
community
members
with
disabilities
and
when
we're
talking
about
recreational
infrastructure
and.
X
P
Thank
you
mayor.
I
do
support
staff's
recommendation
and
in
regards
to
the
california
street
project,
which
I
appreciate
that
it's
actually
back
on
the
list.
I
think
mayor
and
I
talked
about
that
because
it
had
been
taken
off
for
a
while.
I
would
support
the
expansion
of
and
doing
both
one
and
two
in
the
it's.
I
think
it's
pay
item
five
question:
five,
a
response
so
showers
to
mariposa
both
ways
and
then.
P
S
Thank
you.
So
in
general,
I
do
support
status
recommendations.
I
really
appreciated
the
breakout
of
the
bike
ped
project,
so
we
could
see
those
all
together
and
I
appreciated
the
additional
funds
for
street
maintenance.
I
think
that
benefits
more
than
just
vehicles
riding
a
bike
on
a
really
bumpy
road
is
not
fun,
and
I
also
appreciate
the
work
on
the
stevens
creek
trail.
S
That
sounds
really
good
and
while
I
feel
like
it's
always
tempting
to
tinker
with
the
list,
I
do
have
reservations
about
doing
that
because
I
am
you
know
very
aware
of
the
challenges
we
have
with
capacity
and
I
am
concerned
that
tinkering
with
the
list
might
have
some
unintended
consequences
of
pushing
something
out
that
is
really
important
to
us.
S
So
while
I
am
supportive
of
expanding,
I
would
consider
it
the
pilot
for
california
street.
I
am
not
interested
in
taking
any
shortcuts
in
terms
of
the
engineering,
the
design
and
especially
the
public
outreach.
I
think
that's
really
important,
and
so,
if
there's
a
way
to
expand
the
pilot
without
cutting
corners,
I'm
fine
with
that.
As
long
as
we
have
staff
capacity
to
do
that,
I
guess
yeah.
S
S
I
am
supportive
of
again
if
it
doesn't
throw
a
wrench
in
things,
a
project
manager
to
look
at
the
pickleball
and
I'm
very
supportive
of
figuring
out
additional
park
space,
not
just
in
the
sterling
estates
area
but
throughout
the
city,
but
I
was
going
to
comment
on
parks
when
we
get
to
the
other
topic
on
our
agenda
tonight.
So
I'll
hold
my
comments
on
that
one.
Q
Thank
you.
I
would
just
like
to
clarify
on
the
pickleball
first
off
what
the
director
michonne
was
mentioning
is
that
the
blended
lines
is
something
that
he
and
his
team
can
pursue.
You
know,
after
they
work
through
the
process
of
ensuring
support
for
it,
so
that
could
give
near-term
options
for
additional
pickleball
courts.
Q
Q
Q
So
I
I
just
want
to
provide
clarity,
so
if
council
does
direct,
they
want
to
see
that
feasibility
study
started.
Then
the
next
fiscal
year
is.
It
is
something
we
would
look
at
adding
acip
before
you
approve
it
in
june,
and-
and
we
would
look
for
this-
you
know
move
things
around
as
needed
to
provide
the
project
manager
capacity.
V
Thank
you.
First,
I
want
to
just
make
a
shout
out
generally
to
public
works
and
all
the
incredible
amount
of
effort
well
and
also
community
services,
all
an
incredible
amount
of
effort
that
these
lists
involve.
V
I
mean
this
is
just
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
and
behind
this,
and
we
know
this
is
only
kind
of
the
carry
forward.
It's
there's
there's
a
lot
going
on.
That's
not
on
these
lists,
so
I
just
want
to
to
mention
that
we
we
really
do
appreciate
all
this
effort
and
it
makes
such
an
incredible
difference
in
the
quality
of
our
city,
and
we
all
you
know
we
all
benefit
from
it.
So
thank
you.
First
of
all,
then
getting
to
the
questions
I
yeah.
V
If
you
can
fit
in
the
pickleball
getting
the
pickleball
started
in
the
next
year.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea,
but
I'm
I
was
really
pleased
to
hear
that
we're
making
great
progress
on
figuring
out
where
we
can
reline
some
of
our
existing
tennis
courts
so
that
they
can
be
used
for
both,
and
I
know
that
there
are
always
some
governance
issues
associated
with
this
kind
of
shared
use.
V
But
that's
why
it's
going
to
be
discussed
by
the
tennis
advisory
board
and
the
parks
and
rec
board
and
I'm
sure
they'll
come
up
with.
You
know,
rules
that
that
make
it
work
for
everybody.
I
too
think
increasing
the
california
street
bike.
Pilot
project
is
a
great
idea.
I
like
the
suggestions
that
are
in
the
council
question
for
both
showers
to
mariposa
and
mariposa
to
shoreline,
but
at
the
same
time
you
know.
I
really.
I
think
that
council
member
malachi
said
it
quite
clearly.
V
We
don't
want
there
to
be
any
shortcuts
for
safety,
so
this
is
something
that
I,
I
really
trust
staff
to
in
a
sense
make
the
best
decision
about.
You
know
how
to
go
forward
with
this
and
if
it's
possible
to
do
those
other
sex
segments
after
you've
looked
at
it
again
and
and
staff
resources.
V
Let's
do
it.
If,
if
it
doesn't
look
reasonable,
then
you
know
I.
I
certainly
trust
you
to
make
that
decision
that
it's
not
reasonable
at
this
time,
then
I
think
the
idea
of
our
equity
lens,
including
access
for
people
with
disabilities,
is
you
know,
a
good
addition.
I
I
also
wanted
to
bring
up
the
idea
of
including
public
art
and
the
complete
streets
as
a
concept.
V
I
think
it
really
fits
quite
well
and
then,
in
terms
of
deferring
lot
five
it
seems
like
it
sounds
like
this
is
going
to
be
a
very
long
process
anyway,
and
so
the
discussion
related
to
the
downtown
parking
will
all
already
be
available
by
the
time
the
design
is
finished,
so
it
can
be
incorporated.
You
know
that
way,
so
I
don't
think
that
needs
to
be
deferred.
I
think
keeping
going
with
it
is
a
good
idea,
so
is
that
everything.
Y
Great
thank
you,
so
I
think,
and
I'll
just
wait
until
the
straw
motions,
I
think
to
you,
know,
take
all
those
items
one
by
one,
but
I
just
I
think
kind
of
my.
My
comments
are
really
appreciate.
The
way
this
cip
update
was
put
together
by
staff.
It
was
really
clear
we
can
cross-reference,
it
was
it
was
you
know
I.
I
really
appreciated
the
refresher,
because
some
things
we've
approved
a
long
time
ago
and
council
needs
to
chock
their
memory,
and
I
I
do
want
to
commend
the
the
equity
lens.
Y
I
think
this
is
the
first
staff
report
where
I'm
seeing
the
equity
lens
highlighted,
and
I
know
that
this
passed
unanimously
just
last
year
and
the
city
and
council
has
been
doing
the
budgeting
101
workshops
now
we're
adopting
the
equity
lens
as
part
of
the
rei
action
plan
and
I
think,
there's
ways
to
make
it
even
more
inclusive,
as
some
of
my
colleagues
brought
up-
and
I
think
that
that's
really
great-
and
I
would
say
you
know-
I
want
to
make
these
comments,
because
I
think
this
is
a
really
great
model
for
how
we're
how
council
is
presented
this
in
the
future,
so
other
staff
reports
that
would
include
an
equity
lens.
Y
I
think
staff
has
really
laid
a
really
great
framework
with
which
to
build
upon,
and
so
just
really
wanted
to
to
highlight
that
and
and
thank
staff,
and
it
was
also,
I
think,
helpful,
where
staff
called
out
a
few
certain
projects
that
actually
would
even
benefit,
and
so
I
think
that
it
was
not
just
you
know,
there's
no
negative
impact,
but
they
these
are
the
you
know,
xyz
projects
that
would
benefit
the
community,
particularly
our
most
disadvantaged
residents,
and
I
thought
that
was
the
whole
point
of
why
we
talked
about
putting
forward
the
equity
lens.
Y
So
thank
you
very
much.
I
do
agree
with
some
colleagues
who
have
talked
about
wanting
to
see
projects
through
all
the
way,
and
so
some
of
the
projects
we're
talking
about
beginning.
You
know
when
we
first
started
on
council,
some
of
us
started
on
councilman
2019
and
I
do
feel
hesitant
to
add
tweak
augment
anything
one
because
of
staff
capacity.
Two
to
see
things
through
right.
I
think
it's
difficult
to
give
feedback
on
something
while
they're
still
in
progress.
Y
Y
So
that's
why
I
didn't
kind
of
put
anything
forward
and
stuff,
as
usual,
is
really
forward-thinking.
It
sounds
like
a
lot
of
the
emails
we've
gotten
about
some
of
the
concerns
related
to
the
cip
staff
is
already
addressing
so
just
want
to
say
thanks
all
right
turn
it
to
you
mayor.
So
we
can
hear
the
different
straw
polls.
A
Thank
you,
I'm
going
to
take
a
quick
turn
and
then
we'll
go
to
to
you
vice
mayor.
So,
echoing
with
council
member
command
council
membership,
walter
and
others
have
said
tremendous
work.
This
is
a
remarkable
schedule,
a
lot
of
really
important
and
I
think
responsive
projects.
We've
heard
a
lot
over
the
past
couple
of
weeks,
especially
related
to
bicycle
pedestrian
safety.
I
think
we're
doing
a
great
work
and
as
much
as
I
support
expediting
that
work,
you
know.
A
But
having
said
that,
I
will
be
also
supporting
the
expansion
of
the
california
street
project,
as
described
in
the
responses
provided
by
staff
to
the
council
in
advance
in
the
meeting
and
for
a
couple
of
reasons.
First,
I
I've
always
been
a
little
nervous
about
the
pilot
as
proposed,
I
feel
like
we
risk
getting
kind
of
the
worst
of
all
worlds
where,
if
you
just
have
one
block,
it's
not
going
to
be
sufficiently
safe
for
people,
I
think
to
ride
their
bikes
because
they're
not
usually
just
traversing
that
block
they're
going
down.
A
I
do
right.
I
go
down
almost
the
entire
corridor
every
time
I
I
go
down
california
street,
so
I
feel
like
it's
not
sufficiently
protective
to
get
people.
You
know
on
their
bikes
and
you
know,
it'll
serve
as
sort
of
a
pinch
point
because
it's
between
you
know
segments
with
more
lanes,
and
so
I
worry
that
we'll
hear
from
motorists
who
are
trying
to
get
through
and
express
concern
about
that
pinch
point
and
we
won't
have
the
full
benefit
of
the
full
complete
street
project.
A
So
I
appreciate
staff
offering
those
options
and
I'm
happy
to
support
them
and
then
I'll.
I
will
also
be
supporting
the
pickleball
item
as
well.
Vice
mayor
vicente
hicks,
do
you
want
to
add
anything
before
we
start
the
straw
polls.
U
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
one
of
the
comments
that
I
made
when
I
was
talking
about
deferring
the
lot
5
parking
garage.
U
My
thoughts
are
just
that
because
expanding
the
california
street
bike
lane
and
because
the
pickleball
carts
seem
to
have
been
recently
rising
priorities.
I
I
would
let
that
I
would
let
staff
if
it
frees
up
staff
capacity.
I
would
allow
the
lot
five
to
kind
of
float
down
the
list
and
allow
the
pickleball
and
the
california
street
to
float
up
the
list.
I
don't
know
whether
that
really
adds
staff
capacity.
U
A
Just
for
my
benefit
vice
mayor
did
you
still
want
to
retain
that
as
an
item
for
council
to
provide
input
on,
or
is
that.
U
S
It's
just
real
quick.
So
for
me
the
audio
when
mr
cup
was
speaking
was
really
poor,
and
so
I
did
hear
adding
public
art
to
something.
But
I
didn't
hear
what-
and
I
just
want
to
clarify-
was
that,
as
you
just
said
mayor
the
oh,
no,
no,
actually,
sorry,
it
was
council
member
show
walter.
Was
it
the
complete
streets?
S
It
wasn't
a
specific
project,
it
was
the
like
the
program
of
complete
streets.
A
A
I
think
a
few
weeks
back,
I
wasn't
able
to
go
so
he'd
filled
me
in
and
he
told
me
he
felt
that
a
public
art
component
might
help
increase
public
support
for
the
pilot
program,
so
I
think
he
would
probably
not
oppose
applying
k5
to
all
complete
streets
project,
but
his
comment,
at
least
as
related
to
me,
was
nearly
scoped
to
california
street.
A
No
problem
any
final
thoughts,
recommendations,
vicente
hicks.
U
Okay,
now
that
does
leave
me
with
an
additional
question
I
mean
I
do
support
adding
public
art
to
to
bike
and
pedestrian
and
other
public
space
projects,
but
I
don't
know
beyond
general
support,
I
don't
know
and
possibly
may
or
you
know
from
talking
to
this
particular
member
of
the
public.
Possibly
you
know,
is
there
a
way
on
this
cip
or
is
the
list
of
projects,
or
is
this
just
something
in
general
now,
council
has
brought
it
up.
Some
members
of
council
seem
supportive
and
we
can
continue
to
talk
about
it.
A
So
my
understanding
and
staff-
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
council
policy
case
five
allows
counsel
the
discretion
to
apply
a
public
art
component
to
projects
there's
a
list,
that's
sort
of
you
know
explicitly
included
and
then
other
projects
as
council
fees
fit.
California.
Three
complete
streets
is
not
included
in
that
white
list,
so
the
council
would
have
to
affirmatively
direct
staff
to
include
a
public
art
component.
That
was
my
understanding,
but
if
please
staff,
let
me
know
if
I'm
wrong.
Q
Thank
you
mayor.
That
is
correct
in
terms
of
the
revisions
that
to
policy
k-5
that
were
recently
approved
by
council
is
a
council
did
retain
the
discretion
to
direct
staff
to
include
public
art
component
in
projects
that
would
not
otherwise
qualify.
I
do
want
to
just
caution
again
here.
Is
you
know
what
we've
been
hearing
is:
deliver
this
project
as
quickly
as
possible?
Make
it
a
quick
build.
The
public
art
strategy
process
takes
time.
Q
So
you
know
you
may
want
to
consider
that
in
terms
of
the
pilot
project
and
now
when
it's
time
to
come
forward
with
more
of
the
permanent
improvements
which
is
going
to
be,
you
know
a
longer-term
project,
you
know
that's
where
you
may
want
to
consider
public
art,
but
adding
it
to
this
would
slow
down
the
project.
U
V
Yeah,
I
was
just
gonna
say
I
I
thought
in
my
head:
it
was
related
to
the
permanent
complete
streets
and
that's
when
it
seems
appropriate.
So
I
I
definitely
concur
with
that.
X
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
my
staff.
If
my
understanding
of
things
is
right,
so
the
entire
pickleball
issue,
the
shared
use
side
of
it,
will
go
to
the
tennis
advisory
board.
W
Z
X
Okay,
great,
so
I
I
think
I'm
I'm
interested
in
having
a
a
consultant
on
the
the
issue
of
having
more
more
supply
and
where
it
is
throughout
the
city,
because
I
think
our
our
demographics
are
shifting
and
the
popularity
of
pickleball
is
really
shifting.
X
But
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
really
honor
the
efforts
of
the
people
who
have
committed
to
being
on
the
tennis
advisory
board
over
time,
as
well
as
as
parks
and
rec.
And
then
I
want
to
make
sure
that
as
we're
considering
installing
additional
courts
or
any
paving
of
of
open
space
that
we,
we
have
the
adequate
amount
of
time
to
really
consider
where
to
place.
That.
X
I
know
that
a
few
years
back,
there
was
some
additional
recreational
opportunities
that
were
suggested
for
rainstorm
park,
and
it
was
very
difficult,
a
nuanced
conversation
about
putting
those
additional
opportunities
in
in
there.
So
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
adequate
time
and
that
that
we
respect
everybody's
efforts
and
that
obviously,
we've
gotten
a
lot
of
pickleball
related
email
messages.
X
And
I
I
want
to
see
if
we
can
make
sure
that
the
clubs
in
mountain
view,
as
well
as
palo
alto-
and
you
know
the
the
surrounding
area,
that
they're
informed
about
the
the
opportunities
for
them
to
speak
out,
so
that
they
don't
just
concentrate
on
counsel
and
miss
the
advisory
bodies
as
well.
Because
I
I
think
it's
it's
good
for
them
to
also
voice
that
they're,
because
the
advisory
bodies,
I
know,
are
taken
very
seriously
by
council.
A
A
They're
going
to
be
three
separate
votes
related
to
california
street
the
two
segments
that
staff
have
proposed
for
the
expansion
and
then
the
consideration
of
applying
council
policy,
k-5
public
art
to
the
permanent
project,
and
then
we'll
do
pickleball
and
the
equity
lens.
So
first,
let's
raise
hands.
If
you
support
the
staff
recommendation.
A
Two
three:
four:
five,
that's
unanimous!
Thank
you
and
then
first
recommendation
is
ex
expanding
the
california
street
quick
filled
project.
To
so
remember,
two
separate
segments
showers
to
mariposa
as
described
by
staff
and
the
recommendations,
is
their
support
for
that
one,
two,
three,
four
five,
so
that's
unanimous
as
well
and
then
mariposa
to
shoreline.
A
The
pickleball
project
manager
or
consultant
for
a
feasibility
study
is
described
by
staff.
If
your
support
for
that
two
three,
four
five
six
that's
also
unanimous
and
then
the
last
is
expanding.
The
equity
lens
to
include
access
for
individuals
with
disabilities,
so
that
would
be
part
of
the
formal
evaluation
used
by
staff
or
public
works
projects,
and
then
also
recreational
for
for
folks
with
disabilities.
Too,
is
your
support
for
that
one?
Two,
three,
four,
five,
six,
that's
also
unanimous.
Did
I
miss
anything
death?
A
Is
that
clear,
okay,
fantastic!
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
work
on
this.
Let's
go
through
the
regular
session
until
public
comment
and
then
we'll
take
a
quick
break
and
then
we'll
proceed
with
the
remaining
items.
Is
that
everyone
comfortable
with
that
fantastic?
A
Thank
you.
So
now
we
will
move
to
the
regular
session
and
I'll
make
the
usual
announcement
good
evening.
Everyone
welcome
to
the
meeting
of
the
city
council
of
april
12
2022..
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
california
government
code,
section
54953e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
A
A
C
A
A
A
We
are
happy
to
be
joined
this
evening
by
community
volunteer
paola
perez
who
will
accept
this
proclamation.
Pala
perez
has
been
an
active
member
of
the
spanish
speaking
community
for
over
a
decade
actively
volunteering
in
local
schools.
She
has
been
an
invaluable
part
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
ambassadors
program
for
the
last
five
years.
During
the
coveted
pandemic.
She
was
one
of
the
pillars
that
helped
the
spanish
speaking
community
navigate
very
difficult
situations,
bringing
them
timely
information
and
accompaniment.
A
The
mountain
view
center
for
the
performing
arts,
senior
center
and
team
center,
as
well
as
programs
such
as
junior
leaders,
trail
ambassadors,
special
events
and
the
community
emergency
response
team
over
the
past
year.
And
whereas
national
volunteer
week
is
a
48-year
national
tradition
designated
throughout
our
nation.
AA
AB
Good
evening
respectable
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
paola
perez.
It
is
an
honor
for
me
to
receive
the
national
volunteer
appreciation
week.
Proclamation
mountain
view
is
a
wonderfully
diverse
city,
with
a
wide
network
of
committed
and
supportive
volunteers
in
various
areas.
All
of
them
contribute
their
skills
and
strengths
for
the
common
well-being.
AB
U
Well,
I
just
wanted
to
give
paula
a
personal
congratulations
for
all
the
awards.
She's
winning
lately,
I've
known
paula
since
her
children
and
mine
went
to
castro
school
together.
So
again,
congratulations.
A
If
not,
I
will
go
ahead
and
second,
that
you
are
a
tremendous
community
leader
and
partner
and
we're
very
grateful
for
all
the
work
that
you
do
for
the
city.
A
A
I'm
not
seeing
any
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak,
so
we
will
return
to
the
council.
Thank
you,
padlock,
for
joining
us
and
for
accepting
the
proclamation
we're
very
grateful.
A
Now
I
would
like
to
make
an
announcement
about
agenda
item
8.2
commercial
development
at
590,
caster
street.
This
agenda
item
will
not
be
heard
or
discussed
this
evening
and
will
be
continued
to
the
city
council
meeting
of
may
24th.
2022
public
comment
will
not
be
taken
on
this
item
tonight.
So
for
members
of
the
public
who
are
here
for
the
office
project
proposed
by
sobrato
on
castro
street,
there
will
not
be
an
opportunity
for
public
comment.
We
will
not
be
hearing
that
presentation
tonight.
It
has
been
postponed
until
may.
A
U
I
would
like
to
pull
4.5,
which
is
regarding
historic
preservation
and
4.7
regarding
fire
department,
fleet
replacement.
U
S
A
Public
comment
so
since
items
4.5
historic
preservation
and
4.7
regarding
the
replacement
of
the
fire
fleet
have
been
pulled,
will
take
public
comment
for
those
items
separately.
So
would
any
member
of
the
public
like
to
speak
on
any
consent,
calendar
item
that
is
not
4.5
historic
preservation
or
4.7.
A
See
no
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
on
bruce
england.
Let's
do
two
minutes.
F
I
won't
even
need
that
mayor.
Thank
you.
Yes,
I
just
want
to
comment
on
4.9.
This
is
the
except
public
improvements
for
a
particular
project.
I've
actually
commented
on
this
before
I.
I
don't
think
that
you
get
enough
information
about
these
projects.
They're
basically
tables
that
list
what
the
improvements
are,
but
no
details
that
enable
you
to
really
accept
those
and
also
for
members
of
the
public.
We
can't
see
what
those
improvements
actually
are.
I
would
encourage
you
to
ask
for
more
details
in
those
reports.
F
A
Thank
you
very
much,
luis
katz.
A
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
so
4.5
has
been
pulled,
so
we're
going
to
hear
it
separately
and
there
will
be
an.
A
A
No
worries
see
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
on
the
balance
of
the
consent.
Calendar
will
return
to
the
council
for
a
motion
and
the
resolution.
Titles
are
in
the
agenda
flow.
V
Just
a
second
when
we
pull
up
all
the
things
to
read,
but
I
I
move
the
the
remainder
of
the
consent
calendar
and
that
includes
4.2,
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
authorizing
and
continuing
virtual
meetings
of
city
council
committees,
boards
and
commissions,
pursuant
to
a
b
361
and
making
required
findings
to
be
read
in
title.
V
Only
further
reading
waived,
4.3
adopt
an
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
chapter
36,
zoning
of
the
city
code
to
establish
procedures
and
standards
related
to
dual
urban
opportunity,
duo
developments
and
urban
lot,
splits
in
compliance
with
senate
bill
9
and
to
make
other
minor
amendments
relative
to
inactive,
permit
applications
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waived
and
adopt
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
repealing
mountain
view,
city
code,
chapter
28
subdivisions
in
its
entirety
and
replacing
it
with
a
new
chapter.
V
28
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
to
reorganize
and
renumber
the
chapter
and
to
include
procedures
and
standards
related
to
urban
lot.
Splits
in
compliance
with
senate
bill
9
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
for
the
reading
waived
and
then
4.10
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
the
master
fee
schedule
to
change
fees
for
electric
vehicle
chargers
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived.
A
C
A
Fantastic,
thank
you.
So
now
we
will
move
on
to
item
4.5
regarding
historic
preservation.
Let's
do
it
this
way.
Let's
take
questions
from
the
council.
First
then
we'll
go
to
the
public
for
comment
and
then
we'll
return
for
deliberation.
A
AD
AD
I
know
that
because
I
was,
in
our
livable
mountain
view,
group
that
hired
the
attorney
and
submitted
the
evidence
for
the
qualification
in
sacramento,
and
I
was
at
the
current
hearing-
I'm
not
here
to
quibble
about
whether
it
should
be
eight
buildings
or
ten
buildings,
or
even
all
the
buildings
in
district
h,
which
are
on
the
register,
our
local
register.
But
I
want
to
just
state
that
this
small
number
of
key
historic
buildings
in
district
8
should
be
qualified
for
the
state
registry
as
you
as
soon
as
possible.
AD
It's
not
a
huge
amount
of
work,
nor
needed
involve
a
lot
of
staff
time
if
a
consultant
with
the
right
expertise
and
tracker
is
selected
like
the
one
we
used,
I'm
perfectly
all
right
with
the
laying
staff's
proposed
ordinance
and
registry
ups
date,
as
welcome
as
it
is
until
the
qualification
of
these
historic
buildings
is
completed.
Please
act
on
this
while
we
have
time
our
district
h.
Buildings
deserve
the
protection
of
state
registry
qualification.
They
are
the
heart
and
soul
of
our
downtown
and
I'll.
Let
louise
talk
about
why
this
has
to
be
done
urgently.
AD
AD
AE
I
want
to
second
what
robert
has
said
and
I'm
a
member
of
livable
mountain
view,
and
I
also
submitted
or
signed
the
letter
that
we
submitted,
but
I
wanted
to
share
one
piece
of
information
when
livable
mountain
view
went
through
the
process
of
working
on
the
historic
preservation
for
what
we
know
as
tidehouse
or
the
airbase
laundry
and
weilheimer
house
or
shea
tj.
AE
That
process
took
a
year,
maybe
a
year
and
a
half
because
of
the
way
that
the
state
operates
in
terms
of
getting
historic
status.
So
I
really
want
to
encourage
you
to
take
the
interim
step
of
putting
eight
or
ten
buildings
that
are
not
yet
on
the
historic
register
into
process
now
without
having
to
make
the
entire
list
and
the
entire
overhaul
of
the
ordinance,
because
that
is
such
a
long
lead
time.
AE
In
the
meantime,
we
can
also
concurrently
do
the
other
historic
work.
It's
necessary.
It's
important.
I
really
appreciate
that
you're
taking
it
up,
but
getting
a
consultant
to
just
do
the
10
buildings
or
eight
buildings
that
we
are
considering
first
or
that
we
think
ought
to
be
considered.
AE
First,
would
be
a
short-term
kind
of
a
and
a
smaller
scope
of
work
that
would
get
them
into
that
year
and
a
half
process,
and
I
don't
want
to
lose
the
opportunity
to
do
that
by
waiting
for
the
the
larger
scope,
because
at
any
time
the
state
could
pass
a
law
and
historic
buildings
would
be.
AE
A
Thank
you,
mary,
and
I
know
louise
katz,
you
had
your
hand
up.
It's
not
up
anymore,
so
just
wanted
to
invite
you
to
speak.
If
you
would
like
to
the
next
speaker
is
april,
webster.
K
Hi,
I
wasn't
actually
planning
to
speak
on
this
topic,
but
I
heard
a
pop-up
and
I
wanted
to
echo
my
support
for
this.
Getting
on
a
state
registry
provides
a
lot
of
provides
additional
protection
for
historic
buildings.
It
also
opens
up
the
option
for
applying
for
different
types
of
funding
for
improvements.
K
Identifying
it
as
a
historic
site
that
was
overturned
by
the
current
council,
however,
if
it
had
been
earlier
protected
as
in
one
of
these,
you
know
the
provincial
or
federal
registries
we
wouldn't
have
necessarily
had
to
go
through
the
fight
that
we
did
to
save
the
building.
So
I
just
wanted
to
echo
how
important
it
is
to
get
it
on
these
registries.
Thanks.
A
Z
Thank
you,
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
know
I
had
the
raised
hand,
but
it
didn't
seem
to
work.
So.
Thank
you,
council
and
mayor.
I
wanted
to
address
this
historical
question.
Sb50
was
intended
to
restrict
any
sort
of
historic
preservation
only
to
buildings,
which
were
already
on
state
and
federal
registers,
basically
to
try
to
solve
one
problem.
They
were
creating
another
because
then,
basically,
we
would
have
no
history
going
forward.
Z
Anything
would
be
cut
off
from
preservation
if
it
wasn't
already
there
on
the
day
that
this
law
passed,
the
law
didn't
pass,
but
we
should
not
assume
or
believe
or
have
any
doubt
that
it
will
not.
So
it
will
not
reappear
in
some
iteration.
That
is
again
why
it's
necessary
to
move
forward
as
quickly
as
possible
for
to
preserve
our
downtown
buildings.
Z
Z
A
U
Basically,
what
I'm
hearing
from
members
of
livable
mountain
view
and
various
members
of
the
public
is
that
the
downtown
buildings
that
I
believe
it
would
be
the
11
buildings
that
eric
anderson
named
minus
the
two
that
are
already
designated
as
historic
state,
historic
buildings.
So
I
guess
that's:
nine
are
a
priority
over
buildings,
scattered
all
throughout
the
city,
and
you
know
I
I
agree
with
that.
U
I
think
the
downtown
is
kind
of
the
heart
and
soul
is
what
of
the
city
it
kind
of
gives
it's
kind
of
like
our
front
facade
and
gives
our
city
kind
of
an
image
to
to
visitors
and
residents
alike.
It
also
helps
visibly
tell
we've
been
talking
about
public
art,
it
is
architecture,
is
public
art
and
it
kind
of
visibly
tells
the
story
of
the
immigrants
that
have
come
and
built
this
city.
U
We've
been
a
diverse
city,
for
you
know
over
150
years,
and
these
are
the
physical
remnants
of
you-
know,
kind
of
telling
the
story
of
how
this
city
was
built.
So
I
do
support-
and
I
could
tell
a
bunch
of
stories
now,
but
I
won't
so
I
do
support
prioritizing
those
buildings.
U
Above
buildings,
scattered
throughout
the
whole
city
to
to
do
those
downtown
buildings
first
and
to
hire
a
consultant
to
do
that.
Thank
you.
A
S
S
Thanks
very
much,
I
have
similar
thoughts
as
councilmember
hicks
and
I
believe
it's
actually
eight
buildings.
There
were
ten.
Originally,
I
went
back
and
listened
to
mr
anderson
and
I
think
he
listed
ten
and
two
of
them
have
already
been
taken
care
of
thanks
to
livable
mountain
view,
and
so
there's
eight
left
and
I
do
feel
a
great
sense
of
urgency
around
this.
S
Given
what
happens
at
the
state
level-
and
I
would
hate
to
have
the
state
do
something
that
would
have
a
negative
impact
on
our
historic
buildings
and
since
we
know
that
these
eight
are
important,
I
I
think
it's
a
great
suggestion
that
we
heard
from
the
public
about
switching
the
order
and
doing
the
eight
buildings
first
and
then
update
the
ordinance.
So
I
would
absolutely
support
council
member
hicks's
suggestion.
Thank
you.
X
Thank
you
mayor.
I
am
also
very
interested
in
preserving
the
importance
of
the
downtown
buildings
that
are
such
a
critical
part
of
the
the
fabric
of
our
history,
and
and
it's
not
that
I
want
the
historical
resources
that
are
in
other
parts
of
the
city
to
take
a
backseat.
X
A
You
a
quick
question
for
staff.
I
think
it's
pretty
clear.
The
council
is
interested
in
exploring
livable
mountain
views
request.
If,
if
we
were
to
do
that,
what
would
be
the
best
way
to
provide
that
direction.
R
R
And
then
you
know
there
might
be
some
work
that
could
be
done
alongside
if
there
is,
if
there's
time
it
will
add
about
nine
months
to
the
process,
and
it
will
add,
I'm
I'm
estimating,
because
I
don't
have
all
the
information
I
need,
but
it
costs
up
to
about
14,
000
per
property,
to
prepare
the
paperwork,
and
then
there
will
be
additional
potentially
costs
for
the
consultant
to
attend
any
meetings
as
well
as
meetings
at
the
the
the
state
commission.
That
accepts
these
nominations
and
makes
the
does
the
review.
R
So
I'm
ballparking
about
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
more.
But
it's
it's
not
clear.
You
know
we
haven't
confirmed
the
number,
but
the
council
could
maybe
authorize
up
to
an
additional
hundred
thousand.
R
That
gives
us
some
leeway
to
move
forward,
and
then
we
would
come
back
if
there's
a
change,
but
not
if
there
isn't
a
change
to
that
contract
amount
so
again
to
confirm
adding
those
eight
properties,
state
and
national
register
listing
prioritizing
them
and
authorizing
up
to
an
additional
hundred
thousand
for
the
project,
as
well
as
the
city
manager,
to
sign
the
contract.
Y
Great
thanks
mayor
that
was
going
to
be
my
question,
so
I'm
really
glad
you
asked
it
and
I
you
know
just
I'll
just
state
I'm
comfortable
with,
I
guess
the
kind
of
shifting
that
would
need
to
happen
to
make
sure
that
that
these
are
added.
So
I
know
that
vice
mayor,
hicks
and
councilmember
matacek
are
the
ones
that
pulled
it
so
I'll.
Let
them
make
the
you
know,
motion
if
they'd
like,
but
I
do
support
the
direction
this
is
going
in
and
I'm
comfortable
with.
Y
I
guess
the
the
components
that
mr
vostov
has
said
are
necessary
to
do
this
thanks.
V
Just
basically
ditto
what
former
mayor
commae
said
and
and
everyone
else,
I
think
that
we
all
do
really
treasure
our
downtown
and
want
it
to
be
preserved
and
getting
things
on
the
register
is
a
you
know,
an
unpleasant
task,
but
it's
probably
best
done
by
our
consultants,
and
so
this
seems
like
an
appropriate
time
to
make
that
change.
U
Gosh,
so
I
was
going
to
make
a
motion
to
prioritize
the
eight
buildings
for
state
and
national
designation
above
the
other
parts
of
the
project
authorized
up
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
the
project.
Although
I
I
have
to
say
in
speaking
with
people
from
livable
mountain
view,
who
did
it
before
they
said
it
took
five
thousand
per
building
several
years
ago.
U
So
I'm
hoping,
although
we
authorize
that
that
we
will
not
be
spending
that
and
but
authorize
up
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
also
authorize
the
city
manager
to
sign
off
tinker
with
those
words
if
you'd
like.
A
AF
I
I
just
thought
that,
let's
see
okay,
I
thought
that
perhaps
srivastava
could
clarify
what
where
the
hundred
thousand
dollars
would
go.
There's
three
recommendations
in
the
staff
report
and
the
third
one
has
to
do
with
the
amount
of
the
contract,
and
I
was
wondering
just
for
clarification
sake
if
the
hundred
thousand
dollars
should
be
added
to
that
amount
or
somewhere
else
in
the
recommendation.
R
Yeah,
so
it
would
be
added
to
recommendation
one
which
would
be
approving
the
major
capital
improvement
project
and
transferring
and
appropriating
530
000
instead
of
the
430.
It
would
be
adding
to
the
scope
of
work.
R
The
the
num
preparing
the
paperwork
to
nominate
eight
buildings
in
the
downtown
to
the
state,
slash
national
registers
and
then
adding
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
execute
the
service
contract
in
an
amount
not
to
exceed
455
385..
U
Did
you
want
me
interim
city
attorney
quinn
to
change
the
wording
or
is
the
wording
I
used
for
the
motion?
Fine.
AF
C
A
F
A
A
Can
we
remove
the
timer
please
if
that's
okay?
Thank
you
very
much.
Would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
speak
vice
mayor.
U
Well,
I
would
love
for
them
to
all
be
electric,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
we
can
go
for
that
at
this
right
at
this
moment,
but
I'm
just
hoping
to
add
what
I
understand
from
reading
the
staff
report
is
that
we
would
be
authorizing
looking
into
the
next
fleet
and
then
purchasing
it.
U
I
would
also
like
a
consideration
of
any
more
sustainable
measures
from
what
I've
seen
some
cities
are
buying
one
or
two
tests:
hybrid,
electric
plug-in
high
plug-in
hybrid
electric
fire
vehicles
or
smaller
emergency
vehicles
that
allow
smaller
roads
and
that
are
safer
for
bikes
and
pedestrians.
V
Now,
along
those
lines
we
are,
you
know
trying
to
reduce
our
greenhouse
gas
emissions
dramatically
and
we're.
I
mean
we're
working
very
hard
on
that
we're
and
we're
we're
making
progress,
and
one
of
the
things
that
has
a
a
big
carbon
footprint
is:
is
large
trucks
like
fire
trucks,
so
I
think,
as
part
of
you
know,
walking
the
walk
of
things.
We
are
asking
other
people
to
do.
V
We
we
need
to
also
look
into
the
you
know
the
what's
the
best
we
can
do
at
the
moment
with
existing
technology,
and
so
that's
really
what
we're
you
know
we're
asking
to
be
considered
and
and
also
if
there
is
technology
that
is
sort
of
on
the
cusp
of
being
available
like
five
years
down
the
road.
Is
there
some
way
to
defer
some,
or
would
it
be
wise
to
defer
some
of
this
expenditure
so
that
that
could
be
taken
into
account?
And
I
personally
think
this.
V
I
know
this
is
a
very
complicated
subject
and
I
think
it's
the
kind
of
thing
that
we
can
delegate
to
our
city
manager
and
chief
sustainability
officer
and
submit
sustainability
staff
and
fire
staff
to
all
work
on
together.
For
the
you
know,
the
best
outcome
for
for
for
the
city.
P
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I
appreciate
the
comments
about
sustainability.
Obviously
I'm
supportive
of
that,
but
the
challenge
right
now
is
the
technology
is
not
there
yet
and
from
what
I
read.
If
we
were
to
go
electric,
we
would
have
to
have
backup
generators
which
are
diesel
run,
so
it
doesn't
really
solve
the
problem.
P
So
I
understand-
and
I
think
you
know,
there's
definitely
interest
and
talk
about
trying
to
to
push
the
industry
to
come
up
with
police,
even
police
cars
and
fire
engines
that
can
last
you
know
the
duration
that
is
needed
for
the
them
to
provide
the
service
that
our
city
requires.
So
I
would
like
to
you
know,
move
forward
with
this
fleet
replacement
project,
cip
project.
P
I
was
around
when
we
brought
in
the
current
fleet
fleet
back
in
2009,
and
I
remember
it
it
just.
It
takes
a
very
long
time
for
the
department,
firefighters
and
and
staff
to
come
up
with
all
of
the
specs
for
and
then
the
build
of
an
entire
fleet
takes
quite
a
bit
of
time,
and
so
I
you
know
feel
very
strongly
that
we
should
replace
start
the
replacement
on
our
regular
15-year
schedule,
but
you
know
certainly
on
the
side
we
should
be
looking
at
what
new
technologies
come
forward.
P
I
would
point
to
also
the
bachmed,
the
bay
area,
air
quality
management
district
that
I
serve
on.
We
actually
have
a
grant
program
for
agencies
to
apply
to
for
funding
to
replace
fleet
and
part
of
that
I've
heard
some
east
bay
cities
actually
have,
I
think,
purchase
police
cars.
I
haven't
heard
of
anyone
doing
fire
engines
yet,
but
there
is
this
program
that
we
could
look
at
accessing
if
we
need
funding
for
it,
but
you
know
I
would
do
that
on
a
separate
track
and
move
forward
with
this
fleet
replacement.
P
S
Thank
you
yes,
so
I'll.
Second,
that
motion,
but
I
feel,
like
the
police
department,
has
already
done
what
has
been
suggested
tonight,
looking
at
the
options
and
concluded
that,
what's
in
the
recommendation,
is
the
best
option
for
now,
and
so
I
am
prepared
to
move
forward
with
it.
Thanks.
X
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I
am
very
supportive
of
the
environmental
goals
that
have
been
mentioned
by
council.
X
I
I
do
have
a
concern
that,
in
an
increasing
number
of
instances,
we
are
sending
our
vehicles
and
staff
out
large
distances
to
fight
urban
or
you
know
suburban
wildlife,
wildfire
areas
that
are
very
separate
from
our
community,
and
we
also
know
that
a
major
earthquake
is
likely
in
the
future
for
the
san
francisco
bay
area,
and
I
just
in
this
very
specialized
instance,
I
want
to
have
the
most
robust,
flexible
equipment
that
we
can
possibly
have
for
the
the
community,
and
so
I
want
to
kind
of
defer
to
our
our
fire
chief
and
our
fire
staff
for
what?
X
What
is
the
strongest
option
that
we
can
possibly
have
for
this
very
highly
specialized
need
and
knowing
that
at
certain
times,
where
required,
an
increasing
way
to
go
hundreds
of
miles
away
from
our
community
to
provide
mutual
aid
to
other
departments.
Y
Great
thank
you,
so
I
will
be
supporting
the
motion
by
councilmember,
abby,
coca
and
councilmember
matacek.
I
I
feel
like
mountain
view
it
we
are
always
looking
at
being
the
most.
You
know
making
the
right
decisions
trying
to
be
as
sustainable
as
possible,
and
I
know
that
if
it
was
possible
we
would,
I
would
say
that
we've
seen
a
lot
more
opportunities
too.
I
would
call
green
our
fleet
with
our
vehicles
that
we
have
like
our
maintenance
vehicles.
Y
I
just
saw
some
today
that
are
hybrid
and
I
know
we
have
some
electric
vehicles
and
I
think
that's
where
maybe
we
could
focus
our
efforts
and
and
move
the
needle
there
that,
like
as
customer
ravi
koga
mentioned,
the
technologies
is
more
kind
of
in
the
smaller
vehicles,
and
I
would
say
you
know,
appreciate
the
the
thoughts
and
the
idea
here,
but
I
would
say
kind
of
working
to
green.
Our
fleet
is
something
that
I've
seen
in
santa
clara
county
and
other
municipalities.
Y
I
used
to
work
for,
and
I
think
that's
where
we
should
focus
our
effort.
I
also
wanted
you
know
to
take
the
opportunity
to
thank
our
fire
department,
who
has
been
going
above
and
beyond
during
the
cobin
19
pandemic,
to
provide
you
know,
in-home
vaccinations,
working,
24
7.,
and
I
believe
that
this
is
you
know.
The
request
is
something
that
council
should
fully
and
wholeheartedly
support
thanks.
U
So
with
with
that,
I
I
brought
this
up
in
part
to
highlight
the
increasing
sustainability
of
of
the
fleet,
and
perhaps
I
should
have
started.
I
wish
I
had
started
by
in
council
questions,
because
I
see
chief
diaz
here
asking
what
you
know
what
had
been
under
consideration
already.
U
I
will
be
supporting
the
the
motion
on
the
table
now,
but
I
did
want
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
dialogue
and
I
want
to
continue
to
have
a
dialogue
on
you
know
on
making
this
move
as
as
soon
as
possible,
and
I
am
starting
to
read
about
other
cities,
la
rancho,
cucamonga,
baltimore
and
san
francisco,
and
I'm
sure
there
are
others
starting
to
get
a
hybrid,
hybrid
fire
trucks
and
smaller
emergency
vehicles.
So
I
wanted
to
start
that
conversation
and
I
will.
A
Thank
you.
Any
council
member
shell,
walter.
V
I
just
wanted
to
say
too
that
this
doesn't
come
before
us
very
often
we
don't
get
to
talk
about
it,
and
so
I
think
the
the
point
that
that
all
of
us
are
trying
to
make
is
that
when
the
technology
is
ready
for
us
to
do
this
job
well
with
more
sustainable
equipment,
we're
interested
in
that
and
if
it's
not
now
well,
then
let's
keep
on
the
keep
on
the
lookout
for
it
and
when
it
is
available,
take
advantage
of
it,
but
it
doesn't
work
if,
if,
if
you
know
if
the
technology
isn't
available
and
as
council
member
abby
koga
brought
up
it's
you
know,
there's
there's
multiple
parts
to
it.
V
Well,
that's
you
know,
that's
pretty
much
canceling
out
the
value
of
the
electric
field
vehicle
at
this
point,
but
perhaps
you
know
sometime
down
the
road
that
might
not
be
the
case.
So
so
I
I
think
that
you
know
what
we
really
want
to
have
here.
What
we're
really
having
here
is
a
policy
discussion
about
the
council's
approval
of
of
sustainability,
which
you
know
we
talk
about
a
lot,
but
we
don't
talk
about
fire
trucks
a
lot.
V
A
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
see
our
chief
has
joined
us
this
evening.
Thank
you
for
being
here
and
any
remarks
that
you
wanted
to
share.
AG
AG
Honourable
members
of
the
city
council,
can
you
hear
me
okay?
Yes,
we
can.
Thank
you
so
correct.
Our
fleet
is
due
for
replacement.
We
explore
every
option.
I
personally
looked
at
one
of
the
hybrid
fire
trucks
and
the
technology
has
has
been
reported.
It's
just
not
there.
They
have
a
limitation
because
of
their
batteries
to
only
about
30
minutes
of
pumping
in
about
two
hours
of
driving.
AG
Most
of
these
fire
trucks
that
have
been
purchased
by
the
cities
that
have
been
mentioned
are
really
in
the
prototype
stages,
the
piers
manufacturer,
who
is
the
one
that
we're
buying
our
fleet
from
they're,
not
ready?
They
have
a
prototype
that
they're
they're
working
with,
but
they're,
not
even
ready
to
sell
that
vehicle.
AG
The
cost
is
also
quite
high.
The
particular
one
that
was
purchased
in
southern
california
is
nearly
two
million
dollars,
and
so
we
are
exporting
all
the
options
we
do
have
a
smaller
vehicle
council
approved
in
last
year's
budget
for
us
to
have
a
quick
response,
smaller
vehicle,
which
we
are
in
the
process
of
acquiring,
but
we're
we're
constantly
in
the
fire
department
as
being
a
very
modern,
progressive
class.
AG
One
fire
department
exploring
all
the
options
that
we
can
to
to
improve
our
services
and
having
a
hybrid
or
a
completely
electrical
vehicle
will
be
a
benefit
not
only
to
the
environment
but
also
to
the
firefighters,
because
diesel
is
not
the
most
healthy
thing
to
be
around,
so
I'm
continuing
to
explore
it,
but
it
it
seems
to
me
we're
about
two
to
five
years
away
and
there'll
be
other
opportunities.
We
will
have
another.
We
have
the
hazmat
unit.
AG
A
B
C
A
Thank
you
very
much
in
case
anybody
came,
so
thank
you
very
much.
Chief,
we
and
brian
for
being
here
the
in
case
any
member
of
the
public
came
late.
I
want
to
again
make
the
announcement
about
agenda
item
8.2
commercial
development
at
590,
caster
street.
This
agenda
item
will
not
be
heard
or
discussed
this
evening
and
will
be
continued
to
the
city
council
meeting
of
may
24.
2022
public
comment
will
not
be
taken
on
this
item
tonight.
A
So
if
you're
waiting
for
the
sobrato
office
project
on
castro,
it
will
not
be
heard
tonight
we'll
proceed
to
item
five
oral
communications
from
the
public,
we'll
take
a
break
and
then
we'll
return
with
the
tarabella
avenue
study
session
so
item
five
oral
communications
from
the
public.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
A
AC
AC
About
a
year
ago,
my
balcony
was
prepared
under
the
instruc,
the
approval
of
john
carr
and,
in
fact
later
on
john
carr
testified
in
a
legal
proceeding
called
a
rent
reduction
hearing,
saying
that,
in
fact,
the
structural
components
of
my
balcony
work
perfectly
within
normal
conditions.
AC
Apart
and
in
fact,
the
support
beam
that
supports
the
outer
edge
of
the
balcony
is
actually
splitting
in
the
middle
of
it,
and
so
I'm
very
concerned,
because
john
carr
actually
testified
on
behalf
of
a
private
landlord
while
acting
as
an
employee
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
and
in
effect
stated
information
that
clearly,
I
can
show
by
evidence
today
was
not
necessarily
easily
provable.
AC
If
not,
it
was
very
easily
observed
that
the
parts
were
not
in
place
and,
unfortunately,
the
repair
never
did
anything
to
deal
with
it,
and
that's
why
my
balcony
is
starting
to
fall
apart
again
and
it's
only
been
a
year.
I
thank
you
for
your
time
and
I
hope
that
we
can
get
something
to
get
done
about
that.
Thank
you.
A
Seeing
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
will
return
to
the
council
and,
let's
take
a
it's,
a
15-minute
break
that
sounds
good
to
everybody.
15
minutes
all
right,
so
we
will
return.
I
guess
that
makes
it
at
8,
10
p.m,
see
everybody
then.
A
A
S
Thank
you,
so
I
will
disclose
that
I
met
with
the
applicant
I've
been
by
the
site
on
my
own,
and
I've
met
with
the
sterling
estates.
Neighbors.
V
Yes,
I
met
with
the
applicant
several
times
and
I
visited
the
site.
A
Thank
you.
I
will
also
disclose
that
I
met
with
the
applicant
and
we
can
come
back
to
council
members,
abikoga
and
kame.
If
they
have
disclosures
councilmember
kame,
do
you
have
any
disclosures.
A
Oh
fantastic,
thank
you
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
council
member
abigail.
When
she
available
senior
planner
edgar
maravilla
will
present
the
memo.
AH
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
good
evening,
mayor
council,
members
and
members
of
the
public.
My
name
is
edgar
maravilla
senior
planner
with
the
city
of
mountain
view.
I
am
here
with
community
development
director,
slash
assistant
city
manager,
artist
for
bostova
and
planning
manager,
stephanie
williams.
Today's
presentation
is
a
study
session
for
1020
1040,
terabella
avenue,
a
personal
storage
development
and
an
affordable
housing
development.
They're
two
separate
projects
but
are
connected
by
way
of
an
august
2020
city
council
authorized
gatekeeper
application,
specifically
edgar.
A
No
worries:
while
we
wait
council
member
coca,
did
you
have
any
disclosures
regarding
the
terra
bella
development.
P
Oh,
thank
you
sorry
about
that.
Yes,
I
met
with
the
applicant
and
I
met
with
the
neighbors
some
of
the
neighbors.
Thank
you.
AH
Okay,
that
should
be
sharing
the
screen
now.
Yes,
we
can
see
it
okay,
great
well,
let's
start
from
the
beginning
good
evening,
mayor
council,
members
and
members
of
the
public.
My
name
is
edgar
maravilla
senior
planner
with
the
city
of
mountain
view,
and
today
I'm
here
with
community
development,
director
assistant
and
assistant
city
manager,
our
teacher
vasava
and
planning
manager,
stephanie
williams.
AH
Today's
presentation
is
a
study
session
for
1020
1040,
terabella
avenue,
a
personal
storage
development
and
an
affordable
housing
development.
There
are
two
separate
projects
but
are
connected
by
way
of
an
august.
2020
city
council
authorized
gatekeeper
application.
Specifically,
the
sites
are
proposing
a
land
transfer
and
the
public
storage
site
will
donate
over
half
an
acre
to
the
affordable
housing
site
as
a
community
benefit
for
an
increase.
In
far
the
project
parcels
are
in
the
tarabella
area
and
front
san
rafael,
avenue,
terra
bella
avenue
and
linda
vista
avenue.
AH
AH
The
land
transfer
would
increase
the
size
of
the
affordable
housing
site
from
twenty
six
thousand
six
hundred
and
eighteen
square
feet
to
forty
five
thousand
one
hundred
and
eighty
square
feet
for
a
net
gain
of
twenty
four
thousand
five
hundred
and
sixty
two
square
feet
allowing
for
more
units
to
be
constructed
on
site.
Additionally,
you
will
note
the
affordable
housing
site
would
front
on
terrapella
and
the
public
storage
facility
would
be
tucked
behind
adjacent
to
highway
101..
AH
His
only
map
amendment
from
general
industrial
district
to
plan
p
district,
a
state
density
bonus
and
a
parking
reduction
for
10
40
terabilla.
The
authorized
requested
a
two-phase
approach,
a
general
planned
text
amendment
to
allow
an
increase
in
far
as
only
map
amendment
from
general
industrial
to
plan
p
district
and
a
parking
reduction.
AH
The
applicant
public
storage
has
revised
their
project
since
the
original
gatekeeper,
adding
an
additional
story
to
one
building
and
decreasing
the
height
by
one
sword
for
the
other
building,
as
shown
on
the
chart
in
the
right.
In
the
right
hand,
side
staff
therefore
brought
this
provision
to
council
for
feedback.
AH
This
is
the
site
layout
for
1020
teravela,
the
100,
affordable
housing
project
by
alta.
The
parcel
is
1.04
acres
in
size,
including
the
land
transferred
by
public
storage.
Project
site
would
allow
80
units
per
acre
and
the
applicant
will
use
a
33
state
density.
Bonus
to
propose
108
units
project
will
have
individual
entrances
to
all
the
units
fronting
on
terra
bella
avenue
and
units
above
would
be
accessed
by
the
entry
plaza
vehicular
access
into
accurate
and
above
grade
parking
is
provided
by
way
of
cerebella
and
san
rafael
avenue.
AH
Here
you
get
to
see
a
better
view
of
the
private
open
space
and
the
overall
design
of
the
building,
which
is
a
simple
modern
building
formed
with
flat
roofs
and
prominent
window
trims.
The
builds
the
building
is
broken
up
along
terra
bella
avenue
by
a
third
floor
courtyard,
providing
open
space
to
the
proposed
tenor.
Other
building
materials
include
board
form,
concrete,
cementis,
lap,
siding
ap,
standing
seams,
metal,
siding
and
aluminum
windows
and
accents.
AH
Planning
commission
had
the
following
to
say
about
1020
terabella
staff
should
work
with
the
application
with
the
applicant
to
create
a
warmer
front
facade,
but
only
by
way
of
low
cost
modifications,
staff
should
keep
in
mind.
100,
affordable
projects
have
limited
budgets.
Design
modifications
should
ideally
be
cost
neutral
and
staff
was
encouraged
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
meet
state
deadlines
to
help
secure
state
local
funding
for
the
affordable
housing
project.
AH
Here's
the
site
layout
for
1040
terrible
the
parcel
site
would
be
3.7
acres
in
size
after
the
land
donation
to
the
affordable
housing
site.
The
project
site
currently
has
18
existing
single-story
storage
buildings.
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
demolish
all
18
storage
units
to
construct
a
six-storey
285
000
square
feet,
building
in
a
four-story
124
thousand
square
feet.
Building.
This
is
proposed
by
way
of
a
two-based
approach.
Further
discussed
on
today's
approach
on
the
upcoming
slides,
vehicular
access
to
the
site
would
be
derived
by
way
of
linda
vista
and
san
rafael
avenue.
AH
Here,
you
see
a
view
of
the
san
rafael
and
linda
vista
frontages,
and
the
overall
design
of
the
building,
which
is
a
modern
building,
with
a
flat
roof
proposing
strong,
vertical
and
horizontal
orange
trim.
Bands
around
the
building
other
building
materials
include
clear
and
spandrel
glass,
a
mixture
of
concrete
cementite
material,
stucco
and
metal
panels.
AH
As
noted
in
the
earlier
slides
staff
brought
this
project
to
a
study
session
to
receive
feedback
on
the
proposed
high
increase
for
one
of
the
storage
buildings
that
feels
a
high
increase
can
be
supported,
as
it
would
be
similar
to
the
existing
and
slash
future
scale
nearby
development
for
five
to
seven
story:
buildings
ranging
in
height
from
70
to
88
feet.
However,
additional
design
work
may
be
needed
to
support
this
increased
height
and
more
prominent
building
views
to
ensure
the
proposed
buildings
will
fit
into
the
evolving
mixed-use
neighborhood.
AH
They
supported
the
height
change,
asked
staff
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
include
more
on-site
trees
highlighted
the
new
buildings
would
be
a
substantial
improvement
over
existing
structures
did
not
feel
substantial
design.
Modifications
beyond
staff's
preliminary
recommendations
aren't
needed
in
addition
to
building
height
chains
for
1040
terabella
avenue,
the
applicant
is
requesting
a
commercial
housing
impact
fee
waiver.
Pursuant
to
city
code.
The
commercial
housing
impact
fee
can
be
waived
by
council
for
projects
with
no
employees
or
fewer
than
one
employee
per
2000
square
feet.
AH
The
building
must
be
designed
and
built
such
that
it
cannot
be
converted
to
a
use
capable
of
helping
larger
number
of
employees,
except
by
major
reconstruction
staff,
recommends
consideration
of
the
fee
waiver,
as
this
project
is
proposing.
No
more
than
four
employees
for
the
409
000
square
feet.
Square
foot
gross
building
as
designed
the
building
is
solely
intended
for
personal
storage,
and
any
deviation
would
require
substantial
improvements
and
modifications
of
the
building
which
would
require
city
review.
AH
Following
the
council
study
session,
the
project
will
continue
through
the
development
review
and
sql
process
and
will
go
to
environmental
planning
commission
for
a
recommendation
into
the
city
council
for
a
final
decision.
In
conclusion,
staff
is
requesting
council's
feedback
on
three
questions.
This
concludes
staff's
presentation.
More
than
glad
to
take
questions
please
be
advised.
The
applicant
also
has
a
combined
presentation
for
council.
A
AI
There
we
go,
I
am
no
longer
on
mute.
I
was
unmuted
my
phone,
but
not
my
computer.
I
was
double
protected
just
in
case
good
evening,
mayor
and
city
council
members
appreciate
the
time
this
evening.
My
name
is
brian
miranda,
as
mentioned
by
mayor
ramirez,
I'm
regional.
Vice
president
for
public
storage.
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
a
thorough
presentation,
I'll
try
to
cut
mine
a
little
bit
short
since
it's
probably
been
a
long
evening
for
evening,
for
you
all
already.
AI
As
you
know,
this
is
a
one
one-of-a-kind
collaboration
between
alta
housing
and
public
storage,
very
unique
to
see
a
private
developer,
slash
private
property
owner
work
with
a
affordable
housing
developer
to
create
something
that
is
very
much
needed
in
almost
every
community
throughout
our
state
and
the
country,
as
mentioned
before.
It's
about
a
little
over
half
an
acre
contribution
of
land
to
all
to
housing
through
the
form
of
a
lot
line.
Adjustments
that's
going
to
allow
them
to
more
than
double
the
bedroom
count
and
roughly
double
the
number
of
units.
AI
Their
site
will
end
up
fronting
carabella.
So
that's
going
to
be
great
for
pedestrian
family
friendly
environments
and
our
our
site
will
be
pushed
more
towards
the
85
overpass
and
the
sound
wall
and
closer
to
the
101.
overall.
What
was
being
requested
is
a
general
plan
amendment
to
allow
residential
development
general
plan
text
amendment
to
allow
greater
far
for
industrial
use
zone
change,
to
allow
residential
and
secret
approval
of
a
mitigated,
negative
deck.
Of
course,
those
aren't
her
tonight
just
giving
an
overview
of
what's
going
to
happen
throughout
the
process.
AI
As
I
think
you've
all
seen
here
is
the
current
parcel
configuration
on
the
blue
is
the
alta
housing
property
and
then
the
red
is
the
public
storage
property.
With
the
half
an
acre
development,
you
can
see
the
reconfiguration
of
the
parcels.
AI
So
that's
that's.
I
think,
a
big
initial
sacrifice
into
showing
how
committed
we
are
to
this
property.
The
community
benefits
that
are,
I
think,
clear.
In
this
situation
and
from
a
design
standpoint,
it
improves
the
efficiency
layout
quality
of
the
affordable
housing
project,
as
mentioned
before
it
provides
the
terabilla
frontage,
creates
a
better
community
and
walkable
environment
on
tarabella.
AI
It
achieves
not
just
the
city's
goals,
the
state's
goals
for
affordable
housing,
as
mentioned
before
it
increases
their
housing
counts,
and
it
reduces
the
cost
of
all
the
affordable
units.
AI
AI
That
was
one
change.
Second,
change
is
we're
decreasing
the
total
building
area
from
just
under
442
000
square
feet
to
just
under
409
we're
going
from
two
five-story
buildings
to
a
six-story
and
a
four-story
building
which
changes
the
max
height
and
the
far
drops
from
2.62
to
2.49.
AI
The
plan
is
to
execute
this
in
two
phases:
removing
16
buildings
and
eventually
constructing
two
buildings
that
will
all
be
interior
access
to
climate-controlled,
secure
storage.
We
build
very
energy-efficient
buildings.
We
incorporate
solar
in
most
of
our
new
developments.
California,
anticipate
that
here
the
loading
will
be
on
the
north
side
of
the
building
adjacent
to
the
sound
wall
in
the
85
overpass.
AI
So
from
from
a
noise
and
visibility,
standpoint
will
be
very
self-contained
and,
as
mentioned
before,
all
the
units
will
be
climate
controlled
and
secure
at
gatekeeper.
It
was
the
design
we
presented,
a
gatekeeper
in
2020,
that's
very
prototypical
orange
tower
orange
stripe
at
the
top
orange
doors
behind
glazing
and
two
shades
of
tan.
AI
As
you
can
see
on
the
right
in
collaboration
with
staff,
the
design
has
changed
materially,
you
can
see
both
vertical
and
horizontal
articulation,
incorporation
of
a
significant
amount
of
glazing
changes
in
materials,
and
I
think
it
looks
it
reads
much
more
like
a
tech
building
and
I
think
it
belongs
in
the
city
of
mountain
view.
I
think
it's
an
attractive
building.
AI
This
is
important
for
many
reasons,
one
first
and
foremost
the
use
behind
it.
If
it
was
vision
glass,
you
would
actually
see
the
back
side
of
storage
units
so
we're
given
the
appearance
of
a
office
or
tech
building,
while
at
the
same
time
allowing
it
to
operate
as
a
storage
facility
to
help
make
this
transaction
work.
AI
We
have
both,
as
mentioned
before,
horizontal
and
vertical
articulation,
pedestrian
scale
at
the
ground
level,
with
some
grounding
elements
and
additional
colors
and
materials
from
what
we
had
before.
Here's
the
same
effective
designs
in
the
second
phase,
I.e
the
four-story.
It
was
a
five
story
on
the
left.
AI
Here's
a
view,
a
bird's
eye
view
from
the
85
overpass.
Looking
at
the
building.
You
can
see
both
phase
one
and
phase.
Two
as
you
as
you
head
down
here,
a
lot
of
visual
interest
as
you
progress
down
the
the
the
freeway
and
you
can
see
all
of
the
changes,
materials
and
glazing
all.
C
AI
As
mentioned
by
edgar,
we're
seeking
a
housing
impact
fee
waiver,
it's
as
if
the
the
fee
waiver
language
was
written
for
us,
it's
for
very
low
employee
usage.
That's
us
and
we
build
a
very
single
purpose.
Specialized
building.
Our
structural
systems
are
typically
on
for
this
type
of
building
on
a
10
by
10
grid,
which
is
not
conducive
to
effectively
any
other
use.
Frankly,
in
addition,
we
have
a
land
donation
is
pretty
significant
with
the
community
benefit.
AI
We
only
mention
it,
as
I
mentioned
two
to
four
employees,
and
we
provide
a
manager's
unit
for
one
to
two
of
our
employees,
so
we're
we're
taking
care
of
our
own,
affordable
housing
needs
in
in
our
facility
or
in
the
combined
development.
AI
Last,
as
as
mentioned
by
edgar
as
well,
there's
a
seven
year
development
agreement
being
requested.
This
allows
us
to
phase
the
development
phase.
One
alone
is
260
000
square
feet.
That's
a
lot
to
build
at
one
time,
so
we
need
the
time
to
absorb
that
first
phase.
Before
we
start
in
the
second
one.
As
part
of
that,
we
pay
a
public
benefit
fee,
that's
incorporated
in
the
agreement
as
well
and
I'll
hand
it
over
to
edgar.
I
mean
excuse
me
to
carlos,
with
alta
housing,
to
take
it
from
here.
Carlos.
AJ
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
brian
I'm,
carlos
castellanos,
vice
president
real
estate
development
at
alta
housing
and
just
to
go
over
from
the
gatekeeper
to
now.
We've
we've
heard,
based
on
community
and
staff
feedback.
We've
made
changes
since
that
gatekeeper
application.
We've
we've
actually
done
inc.
We've
increased
the
efficiency
of
the
development,
as
you
may
have
seen
in
edgar
slide
that
we've
we've
not
only
removed
one
story
of
the
building
and
reduced
it
by
a
13,
13
feet.
AJ
Height
we've
also
been
able
to
be
more
efficient
on
our
massing,
so
we've
actually
increased
the
the
building
massing,
the
building
square
footage
and
we've
been
able
to
increase
the
number
of
units
from
105
to
108.
AJ
We've
also
shifted
the
massing
to
the
rear,
and
we've
added
additionally
was
able
to
bring
down
the
affordability
of
the
units
from
50
of
the
area
median
to
currently
at
45
of
the
area
median,
and
we
have
two
parking
entrances
which
we'll
show
in
a
few
minutes.
AJ
The
next
slide
here
is
is
showing
the
the
current
shifting
of
the
mass
back,
and
that
is
really
showing
how
the
the
development
is
now
more
efficient
and
allows
for
a
larger
front
loaded
podium
con
courtyard
space,
and
it
actually
makes
it
for
a
much
more
usable
space
that
we
can
partition
into
different
zones
so
that
we
can
have
different
activities
happening
and
it's
it's
almost
a
quarter
acre
space
next
slide.
AJ
So
here
it
it's,
showing
the
the
rendering
how
you
can
see
we
on
on
the
ground
floor,
we
have
a
very
publicly
engaging
ground
floor
frontage,
both
with
the
corner
entrance
to
the
building
and
right
off
the
corner.
AJ
We
have
a
bike
entrance
to
our
bike
storage
facility
and,
and
then
we
have
a
somewhat
linear
park,
feel
going
down
terra
bella
away
from
san
rafael
and
then
on
top
of
that
two
stories
above
that
is
our
large
deck,
our
podium
level,
which
you
can
see
in
in
the
slide
below
and
and
we
actually
the
next
slide
goes
more
into
detail
there,
and
so
actually,
this
slide
first
is
is
again
showing
the
ground
floor,
how
it
is
laid
out
where
we
have
an
opportunity
here
for
play,
to
relax
and
to
learn
next
slide.
AJ
Please-
and
these
are
renderings
of
that
ground
floor
here,
we
are.
We.
AJ
Of
how
we
want
to
engage
residents
and
community
right
at
the
at
the
entrance
on
the
corner
of
san
rafael
and
tarabella,
and
then
the
other
slide
on
on
the
top
right
shows
how
how
we
have
created
a
bike
room
with
a
potential
bike
shop
and
our
workshop
area
for
fixing,
bikes
and
and
possibly
have
programmatic
uses
there.
It
creates
that
indoor
outdoor
activity
space
there
and
then
we
also
have.
We
have
also
sculptural
stones.
AJ
That
can
be
seating
areas
that
can
also
be
used
more
actively
by
children
and
we
have
interpreted
signage,
which
is
what
you
see
on
the
on
the
bottom
left
along
the
the
whole
frontage
of
tarabella,
where
it
talks
about
the
different
kinds
of
landscaping
that
we
have
planted
in
in
on
long
terrabella.
AJ
Next
slide,
please
and
now
again
going
up
to
our
our
podium.
We
have
the
the,
as
I
mentioned
before,
the
zoned
areas
here,
where
we
have
active
and
more
passive
areas
for
the
residents
to
to
enjoy
and-
and
the
feature
here
is,
is
the
the
bottom
right
slide
is
actually
a
slide,
a
a
view
from
inside
the
community
room,
which
you
see
on
the
right
hand,
side
looking
out,
we
actually
are
going
to
have
an
open
open
opening
to
that.
AJ
AI
AI
This
is
what
we
have
completed
and
is
in
process
gatekeeper
in
2020,
as
I've
mentioned
before
at
previous
meetings.
We
started
this
back.
In
2016.,
we
submitted
an
informal
application,
which
was
as
robust
as
a
formal
application,
went
through
a
review
on
that
a
formal
application,
a
design
review
with
staff,
multiple
design,
review
meetings
with
staff,
no
fab
application.
AI
We
participate
in
the
epc
study
session.
Here
we
are
at
city
council
study
session
and,
as
you
can
see,
there's
still
a
good
amount
of
work
to
do
to
get
to
what
is
the
goal
of
of
allowing
alt
housing
to
achieve
funding
in
early
2023.
So
the
hope
is
that
we
can
get
all
of
these
items
completed
by
year
end
so
that
they
can
make
their
funding
deadline.
AI
It's
not
nearly
as
urgent
for
public
storage,
because
we
don't
have
a
deadline
like
that,
but
we
certainly
want
to
make
sure
that
alta
housing
doesn't
have
to
wait
another
year
for
funding.
We
have
to
initiate
a
sequel
m
d.
We
have
to
work
with
drc
and
attend
drc.
No
fa
application
has
to
be
accepted.
I'm
assuming
there's
many
community
meetings
in
community
outreach.
AI
AI
So
in
conclusion,
we're
requesting
support
for
the
following
the
height
changes
for
both
buildings
support
the
proposed
design
as
it
stands,
with
the
exception
of
potentially
working
with
staff
and
drcn
minor
design,
revisions
that
are
revenue,
neutral
revenue
and
cost
neutral
support
for
commercial
housing,
fee
waiver
and
support
for
development
agreement
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
Thank
you,
brian
and
carlos
for
your
presentations.
We're
going
to
go
to
public
comment
first
and
then
return
to
counsel
for
questions
and
deliberations.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
L
Yeah
good
evening,
council
just
wanted
to
say
this
looks
like
a
lovely
project
and
I
look
forward
to
a
lot
more
affordable
housing
coming
to
mountain
view
as
as
soon
as
feasible.
L
The
only
minor
notes
I'd
want
to
make
are
first
off
to
request
that
council
and
the
city
not
impose
any
additional
parking
requirements
on
the
affordable
housing
beyond
what
ulta
themselves
wants
to
build.
I
believe
council
already
indicated
in
a
housing
element
study
session
that
they
are
willing
to
remove
old
parking
minimums
for
affordable
housing
developments
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
occur
in
these
projects.
L
As
a
reminder,
underground
parking
especially,
is
incredibly
expensive
and
we
don't
want
our
affordable
housing
fees
going
to
any
more
parking.
That
is
absolutely
critical.
I
would
apply
to
say
no
to
the
public
storage
thing.
After
all,
I
live
in
a
small
apartment
without
a
car,
and
I
can
I've
definitely
had
use
for
store
private
storage
rentals
before
without
needing
a
car
to
get
my
stuff
to
and
from
it.
L
Unless
I
just
wanted
to
ask
that
in
general,
council
look
to
try
to
reduce
the
amount
of
process
and
number
of
council
meetings
and
everything
that
these
sorts
of
projects
have
to
go
for
it.
It
seems
a
bit
silly
that
effectively
we
are
having
yet
another
study
session
on
a
project
because
we're
haggling
over
a
few
feet
of
height
on
when
we're.
When
we're
talking
about
building
lots
of
affordable
housing.
Our
questions
should
be.
L
G
Hello,
my
name
is
rick
spelaine
I've
been
a
resident
of
san
pablo,
which
is
the
street
closest
to
terra
bella
for
eight
years.
I
support
the
idea
of
having
more
affordable
housing
in
mountain
view,
but
the
region
in
terra
bella
is
an
aging
light
industrial
region
and
is
highly
non-walkable.
G
There's
very.
There
are
no
amenities,
there's
one
overloaded
park
sanderon
nearby,
but
otherwise
it
is
not
a
hospitable
area
in
which
to
live.
G
Having
public
storage
behind
the
building
will
definitely
help
with
the
highway,
but
the
area
is
generally
cut
off
from
access
to
any
air,
any
like
parks
or
shops
or
grocery
stores
that
you
would
walk
to
and
since
the
parking
situation
is
not
going
to
be
very
good
there
that
that
that
is
going
to
be
very
problematic
for
any
potential
residents
that
live
there.
With
that
said,
I
recognize
and
understand
the
need
for
more
housing
in
in
mountain
view.
G
I
think
that
adding
more
housing,
this
area
means
that
we
should
add
a
commensurate
amount
of
park
space.
The
only
park
in
the
area
that's
remotely
reachable
sand
road
park,
which
is
going
to
be
accessed
by
the
apartments
going
up
by
village
lake
and
over
by
the
temple,
and
that
park
will
be
extremely
overloaded.
G
Adding
more
housing
in
tarabella
is
going
to
continue
to
put
load
and
pressure
on
that
park
and
steel
in
the
states.
That
area
in
general
hasn't
gotten
very
much
park
development
over
the
last
10
years,
and
it's
not
looking
promising
as
of
this
point
going
forward
either.
So
any
new
housing
should
have
a
commensurate
amount
of
park
space
to
go
with
it.
That's
my
strong
desire
and
wish
thank
you.
I
Good
evening,
council
members
and
mayor
ramirez,
thank
you
yeah,
like
rick,
I
am
a
member
of
I'm
a
resident
of
sterling
estates.
I've
been
here
for
over
30
years,
I'm
actually
very
supportive
of
this
project.
I
really
like
the
collaboration
between
public
storage
and
also
housing.
I've
talked
a
lot
with
both
both
parties
and
I'm
very
impressed
with
them.
As
rick
said,
what
we're
mostly
worried
about
is
the
environment
that
this
is
going
into
next
slide.
Please.
I
As
you
can
see,
it's
pretty
isolated
it's
in
the
middle
of
this.
You
know
industrial
area
and
as
such,
there
is
a
question
about
whether
people
will
really
need
cars
here.
Next
slide,
please
whoops
wrong
way,
and
the
problem
is,
you
know,
unfortunately,
over
the
last
year,
the
environment
here
has
changed
quite
a
bit
for
the
worst
because
of
the
narrow
streets
ordinance,
a
lot
of
oversized
vehicles
are
now
parking
on
carabella
and
so
that
nice
frontage,
that
will
be
in
front
of
alta
could
be
all
for
naught
if
that
is
installed.
I
So
I
was
happy
to
hear
that
bike
lanes
are
sort
of
on
the
table
for
the
city,
because
that
would
solve
this
problem
and
also
make
the
street
much
more
walkable,
rideable
and
even
drivable,
because
it's
very
dangerous
now
because
of
limited
visibility
next
slide
please-
and
it
is
yes,
it's
three
quarters
of
a
mile
to
the
safeway.
So
again,
I'm
not
sure
somebody
would
want
to
walk
that
every
day.
Next
slide.
Please
and
I
live
right
next
to
sandrone
apartments
which
are
100
affordable
and
we
do
have
an
overflow
parking
problem.
I
Next
slide,
please
yeah!
This
highlights
again
the
shortage
of
parks,
basements
area.
This
is
city-owned
parks
in
this
area
and,
as
you
can
see,
there
are
only
five
less
than
six
acres
here
for
what
will
soon
be.
You
know
something
like
13
000
residents
next
slide,
please,
and
so
what
we'd
like
is
yeah
better
for
the
city
to
step
up
and
use
this
as
a
chance
to
improve
this
area
and
make
it
a
really
livable
area
and,
unfortunately,
I'm
out
of
time.
I
sent
these
slides
to
you.
I
AL
AL
I
was
concerned
when
I
saw
the
slide
that
showed
the
path
forward
and
included
a
drc
meeting
going
back
to
city
council
getting
another
application
approved
from
the
city
and
then
funding
for
getting
an
application
for
state
funding.
There
is
so
so
much
process
just
to
get
this
done
by
or
just
to
get
funding
by
2023.
AL
AL
AL
A
Alex
we're
not
able
to
hear
you
or
unmute
yourself
if
you
haven't
already.
A
All
right
well,
we'll
come
back
to
alex
and
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
speaker,
zur
nahushton.
AM
AM
AN
Okay,
can
you
hear
me
now?
Yes,
we
can
awesome
all
right:
hey
alex
brown
president
of
santiago
villa
north
station,
we're
just
on
the
other
side
of
the
101
from
this
project.
I'd
like
to
speak
and
strong
support,
as
several
speakers
have
said,
there's
not
a
lot
going
on
in
the
terrible
neighborhood
right
now,
but
I
think
that
the
best
way
to
start
is
by
having
affordable
housing
and
a
good
commercial
uses.
AN
AO
Good
evening,
city
council,
my
name
is
kevin
ma
much
like
other
speakers,
I'm
in
support
of
this
project
and
would
like
to
see
these
kinds
of
projects
done
quicker.
Much
as
we
talked
about
quick
builds
earlier,
because
every
day
there's
a
delay
in
these
kind
of
projects,
the
more
harm
we
are
consistent
that
we
are
providing
to
those
who
are
in
most
need
of
the
housing.
Thank
you.
AP
AP
AQ
Great,
thank
you
hi.
My
name
is
katie
just
for
the
record
note
against
the
project,
but
I
say
I
I
live
in
sterling
estates,
neighborhood
and
I'm
very
close
to
tarabella
and
I
drive
on
that
street
daily,
since
this
project
will
add
more
residents
and
families.
I
would
like
to
request
a
few
things
that
can
benefit
the
future
residents
and
current
neighbors
safety
is
priority
at
the
moment.
AQ
Street
parking
is
very
limited
at
the
moment.
So,
if
possible,
I
would
recommend
exploring
a
solution
for
that.
Lastly,
I
want
to
make
it
very
clear
as
a
current
residence
nearby.
I
welcome
any
project
that
will
make
this
area
better.
My
request
is
to
consider
adding
amenities
and,
of
course,
insurance
safety.
As
a
whole
to
this
area
and
not
just
focus
on
the
improvement
of
specific
corner
or
curb
appeal
where
the
projects
are
being
proposed,
thank
you
so
much.
A
P
Mayor
I
understand
this
is
a
study
session
and
we
have
specific
questions
to
respond
to.
But
it's
come
up
a
number
of
times
my
public
comment.
I
had
some.
I
was
kind
of
curious
too.
Like
do
we
have
streetscape
improvements
planned.
I
know
we
talked
earlier
about
the
terra
bella
bike
lane
project
on
our
cip,
but
what
about
the
sidewalks
and
widening
them,
or
just
making
them
more
walkable.
R
Council,
member
ave
koga
I'm
going
to
have
to
go
back
to
public
works
and
maybe
answer
that
question
after
this
meeting,
but
I
don't
believe
there
are
any
big
streetscape
plans
other
than
the
bike
lanes.
We
had
asked
this
question.
R
I
believe
when
the
gatekeeper
came
in
at
one
point,
there
was
some
talk
about
converting
this
to
a
mixed-use
district,
but
that
particular
conversation
didn't
move
forward
and
we
are
not
doing
a
precise
plan
for
terra
bella.
But
if
we
were
in
the
future
we
would
probably
look
at
some
changes
to
the
district
as
it
stands.
It
stands.
R
It
is
still
industrial,
and
so
we,
I
don't
believe,
there's
a
plan
to
you
know
make
make
create
wider
sidewalks,
but
we
do
look
at
existing
how
at
existing
proposals
such
as
this
one
and
the
one
that
serious
regis
proposed
to
kind
of
get
ready
for
the
future
and
to
make
sure
that
the
sidewalks
and
the
frontages
are
consistent
with
how
we
have
you
know
developed
other
residential
projects.
So
this
is
something
that
staff
tries
to
do
with
any
of
the
newer
gatekeepers
to
get
in
place
for
the
future.
P
I
guess
I
was
thinking
specifically
about
when
I
think
it's
one
thousand
one
shoreline
the
sarasota's
project
and
I
couldn't
remember
what
that
front.
Scape
was
going
to
look
like,
but
I
think
it
was.
You
know
an
improvement,
so
my
thought
was
like.
Can
we
just
finish
off
that
parabella
the
whole
stretch-
and
you
know
you-
make
it
uniform
and
improve.
R
Yeah,
we
are
actually
working
with
alta
who's,
doing
the
front
part
of
their
of
their
project
and
so
that
entire
block
going
all
the
way
to
linda
vista
will
have
that
frontage
and
then
the
altar
portion.
R
V
Yeah,
I
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
the
funding
cycle.
I
I
understand
that
the
funding
cycle
has
changed
so
that
it's
an
annual
cycle.
Now
it's
not
a
a
twice
a
year
thing,
and
so
that's
why
we
have
the
you
know
the
very
real
deadline
of
the
end
of
the
calendar
year
to
get
so
many
things
done
so
alda
can
apply
for
the
apply
for
the
financing.
V
So
I
was
hoping
that
the
applicant
would
explain
that
change
a
little
to
us
and
the
the
funding
cycle
and
why
it's
so
important.
AJ
Certainly
the
what
we're
doing
is
is
stacking
and
getting
the
all
the
funding
that
we
need
together
to
be
able
to
get
this
to
construction.
And
one
of
the
key
pieces
is
going
to
be
a
a
state
funding
source
which
used
to
be
had
rounds
throughout
the
year.
But
the
state
has
has
consolidated
all
of
their
financing
sources
into
one
round
once
a
year,
and
that
round
is
is
early
in
the
beginning
of
the
year.
AJ
V
R
Public
storage
is
is
proposing
to
underground
the
utilities
along
along
the
the
street
frontages
as
part
of
their
project.
It's
not
required.
U
I
I
wanted
to
confirm
two
questions.
I
asked
in
my
my
meetings
with
public
storage
and
and
alt
housing.
The
first
is,
I
guess,
for
alta
that
so
for
carlos,
as
one
of
the
members
of
the
public
said
it
would
be
nice
to
have
like
more
coffee
shops
and
so
forth,
mine.
I
do
like
larger
projects
like
this
to
have
some
interface
with
the
public
on
the
street,
but
my
understanding
is
that's
pretty
hard
with
tax
credit
projects
that
you're
actually
not
really
allowed.
U
To
do
that,
you
know
I
would
love
it
if
your
community
space
could
be
rendered
out
to
the
larger
community,
but
we
did
talk
a
little
bit
about
maybe
the
bike
repair
since
it's
not
in
all
some
of
it
is
outside
making
that
plaza
and
the
bike
repair
may
be
open
to
the
larger
public,
which
might
pair
well
with
with
bike
lanes
on
the
street
and
more
safe
routes
to
school.
AJ
Yeah
we're
we're
investigating,
through
our
design
team
and
with
our
management
and
operations,
internal
staff,
how
we
can
because
you're
right,
the
we
cannot
with
the
tax
credit
financing
it
has
the
the
indoor
has
to
be
for
the
benefit
of
the
residents
who
live
there
and
cannot
include
the
the
the
the
public
outside.
But
we
want
to
do
that.
AJ
That's
why
we
have
that
really
it's
an
18
foot
at
least
and
18-foot
setback,
so
that
we're
having
these
these
very
open
areas
for
exchange
where
we
can
have
and
that's
why
we
tried
to
create
an
open
area
right
around
the
the
bike
facility,
the
bike
storage.
So
we're
we're
investigating
that
with
our
team
right
now
and
what
we
can
do
and
what
can
be
properly
maintained
through
through
the
life
we
will,
we
will
be
the
ones
maintaining
whatever's
there.
AJ
That's
why
we
put
in
some
interpretive
signing
we
put
in
some
some
kind
of
climbing
features
out
there
too,
but
we're
also.
We
also
want
to
look
at
what
we
can
do
with
the
with
the
bicycle
facility.
There.
U
Okay,
great,
thank
you
because,
yes,
that's
the
main
reason
I
can't
ride
my
bike.
I
can
never
keep
it
repaired
and
then
for
mr
miranda
from
public
storage.
We
also
talked
a
little
about
how
different
ways
to
make
the
your
storage
buildings
more
attractive,
both
from
the
the
freeway
and
from
the
the
housing
and
neighborhood,
and
recently
I've
been
seeing.
U
You
know
larger
buildings
like
yours,
for
example,
when
I
was
recently
in
san
francisco
with
murals
in
instead
of
kind
of
an
office
look-
and
I
know
that
our
our
visual
arts
committee
is
doing
its
strategic
plan,
so
I'm
kind
of
thinking
about
muraling
and
all,
and
when
I,
when
I
talked
to
you,
I
think
you
said
that
that
was
one
possibility
and
that
it
would
actually
be
less
expensive
than
some
of
the
things
that
are
being
recommended.
U
AI
Yeah,
it
depends
on
where
we'd
execute
it
for
sure
we're
open
to
looking
into
it.
There's
a
lot
of
angular
walls
along
the
freeway
overpass
that
I
think,
would
be
visible
to
a
lot
of
folks,
the
other.
The
other
facades
may
not
lend
themselves
quite
as
well
to
it,
just
because
you've
got
limited
eyeballs,
seeing
it,
but
yeah
we'd
certainly
explore
it.
Okay,.
Y
Great
thanks,
so
I
had
a
quick
question
for
staff
about
the
commercial
housing
impact
fee
waiver.
So
if
staff
can
just
remind
us
what
is
typically
what
the
city
typically
uses,
those
fees
for.
Y
So
if
we
do
the
1.1
million
waiver,
then
that
would
be
funding.
That's
not
going
into
our
affordable
housing
fund.
Is
that
correct.
Y
R
That's
right,
so
the
city
has
a
fee
waiver
policy
written
up
in
the
ordinance
and
it
basically
applies
and
extends
the
waiver
to
projects
that
would
have
a
very
low
employee
count,
thereby
requiring
very
little
affordable
housing
to
offset
the
square
footage
they
build.
R
And
then
the
other
criterion
is
to
make
sure
that
the
project
itself
is
a
specialized
building
that
can't
later
be
converted
to
a
different
use,
and-
and
you
know
so,
it
could
have
more
employees,
and
so
because
this
project
meets
both
those
criteria.
Under
our
ordinance
we
are
recommending
the
waiver.
A
I
have
a
quick
question
for
staff
as
part
of
the
housing
element
constraints.
Analysis.
Are
we
looking
at
the
development
review
process,
including
design
review.
R
We
are
looking
at
the
at
the
process,
improvements
in
general
and
we
can
certainly
look
at
a
number
of
items,
including
design
review.
I
think,
with
with
most
housing
development,
we
have
become
a
lot
more
efficient
with
design
review
and
we
we
focus
on
very
few
drc
meetings,
trying
to
be
fairly
objective
about
our
standards
and
especially
so,
with
housing
developments,
most
of
them
most
of
the
affordable
housing
developments
are
qualify
under
sb
35
and
have
very
tight
turnarounds
and
we
meet
those
in
this
case.
R
It's
slightly
different
because
it's
a
legislative
action,
but
we
still
want
it
to
be
efficient,
and
I
think
staff
has
been
quite
efficient
with
both
projects.
Public
storage
took
a
little
bit
longer.
I
think
you
could
saw
the
befores
and
afters,
but
we
were.
We
had
a
light
touch
with
the
alter
project
and
we're
very
mindful
that
you
know
we
don't
want
to
increase
costs
there.
R
Mayor
you're
on
mute,
sorry.
A
Wow
rookie
mistake.
Thank
you
for
your
response
from
steph's
perspective.
Are
we
on
track
for
the
2023
state
nova.
R
R
We
expect
that
the
nofa
funding
will
come
in
the
fall
to
council
developers
actually
like
to
have
that
certainty
earlier,
and
so
they
will
get
that
and
then
the
project
itself
we
just
scoped
the
timelines
is
expected
to
come
to
council
in
january
and
then
the
funding,
I
believe,
is
end
of
march.
So
we
should
be
on
track
for
the
project
to
get
funding.
A
That's
encouraging,
thank
you
and
then
last
question.
Is
it
typical
that
we
include,
I
guess
most
of
our
affordable
housing?
Well,
I
don't
even
want
to
see
most
like
montecito
also
requires
a.
A
And
rezoning
do
we
typically
do
nepa
clearance
for
affordable
housing.
R
Not
unless
they
have
federal
funding
sources
that
require
nepa,
I
believe
I
I
recall
one
or
two
projects.
I've
done
in
mountain
view
previously
that
we
knew
needed
fund
federal
funding.
I
don't
specifically
know
what
that
source
is,
but
I
understand
it
might
be
a
county
source
and
ulta
might
know
more
about
it.
C
C
AJ
A
Okay,
I
did
okay,
that's
that's
an
important
clarification.
Thank
you.
Any
other
questions
from
the
council
not
seen
any
so,
let's
proceed
to
deliberation
and
I'm
not
sure
we
will
need
this,
but
just
the
sake
of
continuity.
A
If
there
are
recommendations
beyond
the
staff
recommendation
that
you
would
like
straw
polls
for
I'll
go
ahead
and
catalog
those
and
if
there's
anything
that
we
want
to
recommend
beyond
what
staff
is
recommending,
then
I'll
keep
track
of
that
and
then
we'll
go
back
and
take
a
straw
motion
for
each
one.
A
But
if
anyone
would
like
to
feel
free
to
take
any
and
all
of
the
questions,
I
think
I
think
all
three
of
them
are
scoped
narrowly
enough
where
we
can
probably
take
comments
for
for
all
three
simultaneously.
V
Sure
I'll
give
it
a
try,
question
number
one:
does
the
council
support
the
design
comments
and
direction
by
the
epc
or
have
additional
feedback
for
20
1020
terabella
avenue
yeah?
I
do
support
their
comments
and
in
particular
I
think,
as
we've
all
said,
this,
this
deadline
of
of
the
nofa
funding
is
is
real,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
we
need
that
and
then
does
the
council
support
the
design
comments
and
direction
given
by
ep
set
c
for
1040
tara
bella.
V
Is
that
the
is
that
the
public
storage,
one
yeah,
okay,
yeah,
I
I
am.
I
really
am
pleased
with
the
changes
that
were
made
and
you
know
when
I
first
saw
this.
I
thought
why
you
know
this
is
just
kind
of
a
shifting
of
things.
It's
not
really
different
in
terms
of
or
significantly
different
in
terms
of
the
impact
on
the
community.
V
So
I
kind
of
wondered
why
it
was
coming
to
us
as
a
you
know,
a
study
session
item,
but
then,
when
we
get
into
the
details
of
it,
it's
because
we
have
to
formally
give
them
the
okay
for
the
fee
waiver.
So,
while
we're
doing
that,
we,
you
know
it's
good
to
discuss
the
whole
thing
and
for
them
to
get
support
for
the
entire
project
so
anyway,
yes,
yes,
I
think
that
I
really
appreciate
that
public
storage
and
how
the
housing
are
working
together.
V
There
are
a
lot
of
things
that
government
can
do,
but
amalgamating
parcels
like
this,
isn't
one
of
them
and-
and
I
think
that
this
is
creating
a
much
better
project
for
our
community.
So
I
I
really
you
know,
I'm
really.
I
really
appreciate
public
storage,
ulta
and
the
city
staff,
for
you
know
for
all
working
on
it
together
and
making
it
work,
and
so
I
also
want
to
say
yes
for
for
question
three.
I
do
support
the
consideration
of
the
waiver.
V
I
think
that
you
know
when
you
we
think
about
the
nexus
for
a
housing
development
fee.
It's
the
idea
of
that
nexus
is
that
is,
you
know,
is
the
project
going
to
induce
a
need
for
housing?
Well,
it
induces
a
need
for
housing
if
it
has
a
lot
of
employees.
Well,
if
it
doesn't
have
employees,
it
doesn't
induce
the
need
for
housing,
which
is
why
it's
part
of
the
regulation
that
it
should
get
a
waiver,
and
I
think
that
this
as
staff
has
shown
this.
V
This
fits
in
beautifully
with
the
language
of
our
our
ordinance.
So
so
that's
that's.
I.
I
think
this
is
a
good
project
and
I'm
I'm
looking
forward
to
seeing
it
through
this
stage
and
in
the
next
few.
X
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I'm
I'm
a
yes
on
all
three
questions
and
I'm
a
big
yes
on
all
the
work
that
public
storage
and
ulta
housing
and
our
city
staff
have
done
together.
I
think
that
this
is
really
a
shining
example
of
the
way
that
things
should
be,
and
I
I
really
appreciate
everyone's
flexibility,
in
particular
public
storage.
X
I
I
I
don't
know
where
I've
ever
seen
something
work
as
seamlessly
as
this
has,
and
I'm
I'm
really
happy
with
the
end
result
design
wise
it's
to
be
a
great
place
for
homes,
for
people
in
mountain
view.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
So
much.
P
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
remember
when
I
do
support
in
general
apc's
comments.
I
will
just
you
know,
be
honest
and
say:
first
look:
the
building
looks
a
little
heavy
and
a
little
boxy,
but
I
trust
with
drc's
input,
maybe
end
with
maybe
some
changes
in
the
materials
and
we'll
see
a
little
bit
more
form
and
you
know
more
features
or
details
that
will
add
to
the
design
of
the
the
building
and
then,
in
terms
of
two
I
support
apc
as
well.
P
I
actually
thought
the
public
storage
building
was
a
noticeable
improvement
from
the
original,
and
I
I
know
that
they
had
to
go
outside
of
their.
You
know
usual
look
in
the
colors
and
whatnot
to
do
this,
and
so
I
really
appreciate
the
extra
effort
that
was
made
to
to
do
that
and
I
think
it
looks
really
great,
as
is
so.
Maybe
maybe
there
are
some
minor
changes
that
could
be
made
that
are
low
cost,
but
overall
I
think
it's
moved
remarkably
to
the
improvement
improved
zone.
P
So
I'm
happy
with
the
building
there
and
then
three.
As
already
mentioned,
I
support
the
waiver
of
the
impact
fee.
In
light
of
the
very
few
employees
that
will
be
there-
and
I
I
read
in
the
question-
answers
about
how-
and
I
think
the
applicant
mentioned
that
they'll
be
providing
housing
for
their
few
couple
of
their
handful
of
employees
that
they're
having.
So
I
appreciate
that
and
overall
I
just
want
to
thank,
of
course,
staff,
but
really
public
storage
and
ulta
housing
for
their
partnership.
P
Someone
had
asked
me
well
what
was
the
origin
of
this
and
I
remember
it
being
a
gatekeeper
and
when
they
had
originally
come
with
their
proposal,
I
think
it
was
about
70
units
of
affordable
housing
that
was
being
proposed,
and
you
know,
for
me,
gatekeepers
are
very
special.
I
don't
like
I
don't.
You
know,
seek
to
let
them
all
through
easily,
and
so
I
had
asked
the
applicant
to
look
at
providing
significant,
affordable
housing
units.
P
You
know
100
or
more
and
didn't
really
know
if
they
would
do
it,
but
here
they
are,
and
so
I'm
just
really
really
thrilled
at
how
this
has
come
together,
and
I
do
really
want
to
thank
especially
pure
storage
for
being
flexible
and
and
making
this
happen
so
that
we
have
a
significant,
affordable
housing
project
here.
Thank
you.
Y
Great,
thank
you.
So
I'm
yes
to
all
three
questions.
I
think
that
the
I
know
it's
been
a
long
journey
and
I
talked
to
the
the
applicants
about
this,
but
I
feel
like
what
we're
seeing
is
a
really
incredible
partnership
and
an
amazing
final
end
product
that
I
think
integrates
into
the
community
a
lot
better,
and
so
you
know
I
I
just
want
to
thank
them
for
sticking
in
and
trying
and
working
and
being
innovative
in
the
design,
especially
and
the
placement
and
the
size
of
the
parcel.
Y
So
you
know
the
the
one
thing
I
do
want
to
do
and
it's
difficult
to
go
from
a
work
day
to
to
read
all
the
council
questions.
But
in
terms
of-
and
this
is
I
think,
separate
of
of
the
applicants-
is
the
discussion
about
fees
and
waivers
right.
We
constantly,
as
a
city
and
a
city
council,
hear
about
how
difficult
it
is
to
leverage
funding
for
affordable
housing
projects,
and
so
you
know,
while
I
support
what's
you
know,
question
three
and
its
waiver.
Y
I
think
that
I
just
want
us
to
all
be
cognizant
of
the
trade-offs
that
we're
that
we're
making.
I
think
it's
really
important
for
the
community
as
well.
Sometimes
they
ask
counsel
different
questions
and
you
know,
I
think,
we're
it's
a
delicate
balance
and
tonight
we're
discussing
one
of
those-
and
I
think
one
of
the
great
things
about
this
project,
too
is
ulta,
is
going
to
be
using
rapid
re-housing
some
units
for
rapid
rehousing,
as
well
as
those
with
developmental
disabilities.
Y
Alta's
always
great
about
carlos
you
and
your
team
are
always
great
about
finding
that
funding
being
innovative
in
terms
of
the
the
units
that
are
created,
but
I
just
know
that
it's
such
a
struggle
to
do
the
funding.
I
mean
that's,
why
we're
talking
about
it
tonight,
right
I'm
being
able
to
make
those
deadlines,
so
just
wanted
to
to
talk
about
that
and
I'm
sure
that'll
come
up
as
we're
talking
about
our
strategic
goal,
setting
and
work
plan
items
in
the
future.
Thanks.
S
Thank
you
so
kudos
to
the
team
who
came
up
with
the
idea
to
rearrange
these
parcels
and
do
the
land
dedication
and
actually
I'm
going
to
start
with
question
three,
because
from
my
perspective,
while
it
might
be
in
the
ordinance
about
waving
the
affordable
housing
fee
because
of
the
few
employees
and
the
inability
to
reuse
the
building.
S
For
me,
the
land
dedication
is
huge
and
for
affordable
housing
and
so
I'd
much
rather
have
that
than
the
money
to
put
toward
additional,
affordable
housing,
because
this
got
us
much
more
than
the
fee
would
so
on
question.
One
specific
comments
about
the
alter
housing
project.
S
I
I
do
agree
with
staff's
input
on
the
project
and
in
particular
I
really
want
to
emphasize
a
couple
points
that
resonated
with
me
and
that
was
the
to
address
the
landscaping
in
front
and
sorry.
That
was
the
one
staff
comment
that
I
wanted
to
say.
I
also
agree
with.
I
had
a
few
comments
on
my
own
and
I
did
talk
about
these
with
the
applicants
when
we
met.
I
was
a
little
bit
concerned
about
the
colors
I
feel
like
I.
S
I
want
affordable
housing
projects
to
look
like
market
rate
housing,
and
I
I
think
sometimes
the
colors
indicate
that,
and
so
we
specifically
talked
about
lightening
up
the
dark,
colors
and
making
sure
that
the
they're
not
loud
colors
like
there's
some
orange
throughout
the
city,
that
not
sure
I'd
use
that.
So
I
want
to
make
sure
the
the
brownish
color
isn't
actually
orangish
and
so
sorry
to
be
so
particular
here.
S
But
I
do
want
to
make
sure
it's
just
a
really
attractive
building
similar
to
a
lot
of
the
other,
affordable
housing
projects
we
have
in
the
city.
I
also
want
to
make
sure
on
the
wall
the
back
wall
that
there's,
maybe
it's
broken
up
a
little
bit.
So
it's
not
a
solid
wall
and
we
talked
about
that
as
well.
S
I
do
appreciate
that
a
parking
study
is
going
to
be
done,
but
I
must
quickly
admit
that
I
think
I've
been
very
disappointed
in
pretty
much
every
single
parking
study
that
I've
seen
and
I
think
the
thing
that
causes
that,
for
me,
is
a
lot
of
times.
It's
more
convenient
for
people
to
park
on
the
street
than
it
is
in
the
parking
structure,
the
underground
parking.
S
And
so
I
would
request
that
when
a
parking
study
is
done
for
this
one
and
that
if
you're
going
to
look
at
other
projects,
you
also
include
what's
happening
on
the
street
surrounding
those
projects
and
not
just
what's
happening
in
the
official
parking
lot.
And
we
saw
pictures
from
one
affordable
housing
project
near
san
veron
park.
And
there's
one
near
me
where
yeah
the
streets
are
really
really
crowded.
S
I
also
want
to
echo
the
point
about
this
being
in
kind
of
an
industrial
area,
and
while
I
am
supportive
of
the
project,
I
I
do
want
to
make
sure
at
some
point.
We
do
talk
about
as
a
council
taking
a
look
at
the
entire
area
and
making
sure
we
add
the
the
park
space.
S
The
maybe
it's
bike
lanes
make
sure
it's
walkable.
It
has
trees
all
the
things
that
makes
for
a
really
nice
complete
neighborhood.
S
This
is
a
start,
but
there's
so
much
more
that
I
think
needs
to
be
done
and
when
it
comes
to
parks-
and
I
mentioned
earlier-
I
was
going
to
talk
about
this
and
that's
because
I
think
it's
going
to
be
really
challenging
to
find
park
space
in
this
area,
and
so
if
there
are
existing
opportunities
as
council
member
abee
kova
mentioned,
I
absolutely
think
we
should
pursue
those
now
and
not
wait
for
maybe
a
precise
plan
or
something
way
down
the
road.
S
We
can
use
more
park
space
in
that
area
now,
and
so
I
don't
want
to
miss
an
opportunity
that
might
not
come
along
later.
So
definitely
want
to
look
at
that
now
question
two
in
terms
of
the
public
storage
building.
S
I
am
not
an
architect
or
a
city
planner
the
building
looked
fine
to
me,
but
I
know
staff
said
some
comments
on
it
and
I
you
know
appreciate
that
folks
who
have
more
experience
at
this
than
I
do
are
thinking
about
things,
and
so
I'm
good
with
every
whatever
staff
is
recommending
on
that
one.
S
The
one
comment
I
do
want
to
emphasize
that
staff
made
is
about
the
landscaping
and
I
do
think
it
needs
more
variety,
and
I
also
would
like
to
see
additional
trees
and
taller
trees
along
the
freeway
and
so
that
there's
more
of
a
buffer,
crepe
myrtles
don't
get
very
tall
and
they're
not
going
to
really.
You
know
cover
the
freeway,
and
you
know
my
experience
with
tulip
trees,
although
they're
tall,
they
definitely
drop
a
lot
of
sap
unless
you
constantly
treat
them.
S
So
I
just
be
mindful
of
that,
and
I
already
talked
about
question
three
thanks
very
much.
U
So
my
answer
is
also
yes
to
all
three
questions.
I
appreciated
council
member
command
bringing
up
maybe
taking
careful
consideration
in
the
future
of
when
we
waive
fees
and
I'm
open
to
that.
U
But
for
this
one
I
I
would
vote
yes
in
term
of
I
some
of
the
things
that
resonated
for
me
I'm
doing
comments
on
design
of
for
the
for
both
pure
storage
and
alt,
the
alta
housing
project
more
trees,
particularly
buffering
the
freeway,
reducing
the
prominence
of
the
parking
garage.
U
These
are
things
that
the
epc,
I
guess
had
mentioned
as
well,
and
I
those
are
things
that,
like
I
said,
resonated
with
me,
possibly
using
warmer
colors
for
the
building
making
it
what
the
alta
housing
building,
making
it
more
welcoming,
and
then
I
would
add,
possibly
using
murals
on
the
pure
storage
building,
to
also
make
it
more
welcoming
on
on
both
sides.
You
know
the
freeway
side
and
the
side
facing
the
neighborhood
and
residents
and
possibly
reducing
the
cost
of
the
building
as
well.
U
In
addition
to
that,
I
I
just
agree
with
a
lot
of
the
things
that
the
neighbors
said.
I
think
that
increasing
widening
the
sidewalk,
making
it
more
walkable
making
the
bike
routes
to
school,
safer,
possibly
greening
the
streets
and
adding
parkland,
is
really
important
and
not
to
be
put
off,
and
that's
it.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
take
a
quick
turn
here
and
then
we'll
see
if
there
are
any
additional
questions
or
comments,
starting
with
question
three
also,
I
support
the
fee
waiver
and
I
agree
with
council
member
mata
check
that
the
land
dedication
has
significant
value
far
beyond
the
million
dollars
we
would
get
from
from
the
fee.
But
I
also
appreciate
council
member
commee's
observation
that
it's
extremely
valuable
to
have
local,
affordable
housing
funding
that
we
can
leverage.
It's
the
only
way
we're
going
to
get
access
to.
A
A
So
so
we
do
need
to
be
mindful
about
where
local
sources
of
funding
are
going
to
come
from
down
the
road
for
questions
one
and
two,
just
as
peter
katz
spoiled
my
punchline
at
the
annual
city
update
council
member
mata
check
you've
spoiled
my
punchline
for
what
I
was
going
to
say
here
and
that's
essentially,
you
know
putting
my
hand
very
deep
into
the
wayback
machine
and
taking
out
my
council
member
tom
means
hat,
I'm
not
an
architect,
I'm
not
a
designer.
We
hire
professional
staff
to
do
this
evaluation.
A
The
developers
have
architects
and
design
designers
too,
and
at
least
you
know
tom
had
his
own
technical,
like
expertise
as
an
economist,
I'm
a
music
major.
So
I
have
nothing
to
offer
other
than
opinions
about
musical
aesthetics.
So
if
we're
talking
about
constructing
a
rudimentary
fugue
or
if
you
want
a
harmonic
analysis
of
a
bot
corral,
I
can
help
you
with
that,
but
I'm
completely
worthless
to
you.
If
we're
talking
about
architecture
and
design.
So
I
support
the
planning,
commission
and
staff's
recommendations
for
questions
one
and
two
any
other
thoughts.
A
A
Not
seeing
anything
so
thank
you
very
much,
carlos
and
brian
and
edgar
and
rt
everyone
who
provided
information
during
this
study
session.
We'll
conclude
the
item
and
then
we'll
proceed
to
item
7.1,
introduction
of
an
ordinance
to
enact
campaign
contribution
limits,
amend
campaign,
finance
reporting
and
disclosure
requirements
and
repeal
political
sign
regulations,
senior
assistant
city
attorney,
nicole
wright,
will
present
the
item.
AR
I'll
I'll
go
ahead
and
get
started,
and
maybe
my
video
will
decide
to
work.
The
light
is
on
as
if
it's
capturing
me,
but
it's
not
sorry
about
that
so
good
evening,
mayor
council,
members,
I'm
nicole
wright,
senior
assistant
city
attorney
and
I'll
be
presenting
this
evening
on
the
proposed
ordinance
to
enact
campaign
contribution
limits,
amend
campaign,
finance
reporting
and
disclosure
requirements
and
repeal
political
sign
regulations.
AR
AR
AR
As
directed
by
council
this
evening,
staff
is
returning
with
a
proposed
ordinance
that
addresses
council's
direction
and
includes
the
following.
It
includes
the
council
directed
campaign
contribution
limits.
It
also
includes
staff,
recommended
disclosure
and
advertisement
ordinance
amendments
and,
in
addition,
it
eliminates
in
the
advertisement
in
the
starting.
The
disclosure
and
advertisement
ordinance
eliminates
the
two-year
time
period
to
bring
criminal
charges
in
the
enforcement
provision.
AR
AR
The
proposed
approach
addresses
the
council's
concerns
about
the
need
for
enhanced
disclosures
for
transparency
in
campaign
communications
and
strikes
the
balance
of
the
practical
needs
of
staff,
resources
for
enforcement
and
allowance
of
campaign
communications
below
the
threshold
amount
without
reporting
or
disclosure.
So
the
streamlined
approach
requires
reporting
and
disclosure
for
independent
expenditures
of
500
or
more
as
proposed.
It
would
not
require
committee
formation
and
it
would
also
apply
within
the
90-day
window
preceding
an
election.
The
90-day
window
is
when
most
campaign
communications
occur.
AR
It
would
also
be
applicable
to
a
person
or
group
of
persons
who
are
only
active
in
the
local
election
or
primarily
support
or
oppose
a
local
candidate
or
measure.
What
would
be
required
is
submittal
to
the
city.
Clerk
of
an
fppc
form.
Currently,
496
is
the
entitle
of
the
the
title
of
that
form
and
that
would
have
to
be
submitted
within
24
hours
of
expenditure.
AR
Staff
is
recommending
use
of
an
fppc
form,
since
it
already
exists.
This
particular
form
is
to
report
independent
expenditures.
It's
an
existing
form
that
includes
instructions
on
how
to
complete
it
for
ease
of
use
of
anyone
subject
to
the
reporting
requirement
and
also
ease
of
receipt
by
the
city
clerk's
office.
Since
it's
a
forum,
staff
is
already
familiar
with.
AR
AR
It's
subject
to
these
provisions
and
finally,
the
enforcement
provisions
include
penalties
consistent
with
the
city's
disclosure
and
advertisements
ordinance
as
mon
as
modified
like
staff's
enforcement
of
the
disclosure
and
advertisement
ordinance
staff
would
strive
to
obtain
voluntary
compliance
where
possible
and
enforcement
would
be
on
a
complaint
basis.
AR
The
proposed
ordinance
also
includes
a
requirement
that
the
city
clerk
will
develop
administrative
guidelines
for
receipt
and
review
of
alleged
violations
under
the
political
reform
act
and
coordinate
reporting
of
suspected
violations
to
the
fppc.
Where
appropriate,
consistent
with
the
city
clerk's
office.
Current
practice,
they
would
continue
to
seek
voluntary
compliance
where
possible.
AR
A
Is
it
okay
if
we
remove
the
powerpoint
okay?
Thank
you,
I'm
not
seeing
any
hands
up.
I
do
have
a
question,
though,
a
follow-up
from
a
response
to
a
question
submitted
in
advance
in
the
meeting
so.
A
If
is
it
true
that
if
a
campaign
committee
making
a
an
independent
expenditure
in
a
local
campaign
in
mountain
view,
it
receives
a
contribution
in
excess
of
fifty
thousand
dollars?
It's
subject
only
to
the
state
disclose
act,
regulations
and
not
the
city,
disclose
disclosure
regulations.
AR
I
I
believe,
that's
correct,
because
50
000
or
more
well
taking
a
step
back.
So
our
disclosure
and
advertisement
ordinance
addresses
additional
disclosures
beyond
state
law,
with
respect
to
top
contributors
at
thresholds
below
the
state
threshold
right,
and
so,
if
their
receipt
of
contributions
from
contributors
at
the
50,
000
or
more
amount.
AR
AR
It's
actually
pretty
consistent
with
our
local
ordinance
in
terms
of
disclosure.
Well,
our
ordinance
requires
the
top
five
contributors
be
disclosed.
State
law
requires
top
three,
but
in
terms
of
the
nature
of
the
disclosures
and
some
of
the
technical
requirements
for
the
formatting
of
it,
it's
consistent.
There
are
some
differences.
I'd
have
to
review,
to
kind
of
call
those
out,
but
the
real
difference
between
the
state
law
and
the
city's
ordinance
or
the
primary
one
is
the
threshold.
A
AR
I
see
what
you're
saying
and
that's
a
good
question.
AR
I
think
I
think
that
would
yeah
sorry.
I
realize
you
can't
see
me.
I
think
that
would
be.
I
think
that
would
be
correct
that
I
think
I
think
our
ordinance
would
not
apply,
because
there
are
top
contributors
subject
to
the
state
requirement,
and
so
the
state
law
would
apply.
We
don't
we
don't
have
a
provision
in
our
ordinance
that
that,
really,
to
be
honest,
anticipated
some
sort
of
hybrid
between
between
the
two.
A
Okay
and
but
state
law
doesn't
preempt
our
ability
to
regulate
that
gap
right
so
we
could
say
in
excess
of
50
000
state
law
applies
between
the
local
threshold
and
the
upper
limit.
You
know
step
by
state
law,
the
local
ordinance
would
apply.
Could
we
do
that.
AR
A
A
Okay,
seeing
none,
I
will
go
to
the
public.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
AK
Thank
you
good
evening,
mr
mayor
and
city
council
members.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
of
this
proposed
ordinance,
and
I
do
hope
that
you
will
support
the
proposed
amendments.
I'm
requiring
disclosures
for
the
independent
expenditures
for
ads,
as
well
as
the
campaign
contribution
limits.
There's
one
section
related
to
the
campaign
contribution
violations.
That
would
benefit
from
some
discussion,
and
this
was
not
discussed
in
the
presentation
to
council.
AK
If
you
look
at
section
2.173
of
the
proposed
ordinance
on
my
copy
as
page
five
of
the
proposed
ordinance
sort
of
talks
about
the
remedies
or
the
consequences,
if
you
don't
don't
comply
and
and
first
of
all,
I
do
appreciate
that
candidates
would
be
given
the
opportunity
to
remedy
excessive
contributions,
but
there
really
should
be
some
type
of
consequences.
AK
So,
for
example,
if
a
candidate
has
accepted
a
voluntary
contribution
limit
under
the
storms,
they
could
accept
a
thousand
dollars
in
contributions,
but
let's
say
they
receive
1500
and
decide
not
to
return
the
extra
500..
I
I
would
suggest
that
you
should
consider
having
a
penalty
of
a
thousand
dollars,
so
that's
500
for
the
excessive
contribution
plus
a
penalty
of
the
additional
500
that
way
they
don't
benefit
from
not
complying
with
with
the
ordinance.
AK
As
I
said,
there
may
be
many
other
ideas,
but
the
bottom
line
is
there
should
be
some
consequence
if
someone
does
not
comply
with
the
the
contribution
limits.
Thank
you.
A
X
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
believe
that
ms
zoglin's
comments
were
very
well
taken
and,
and
I'd
like
to
know
from
staff.
If
we
wanted
to
move
in
that
direction,
would
that
be
an
item
that
we
would
bring
back,
or
is
that
something
that
we
could
add
to
the
proposal
tonight.
AR
X
With
you,
okay,
I
I
would
very
much
support
that,
because
I
I
feel
that
we
need
to
present
a
disincentive
to
unfair
play.
X
V
Yeah
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
we're
doing
this.
We,
you
know
we.
We
need
to
have
count
campaign,
finance
rules
so
that
we,
you
know,
we
have
good
campaigns,
we
get
a
good
council
and
things
are
fair
and
and
above
board.
I
think
that
our
voluntary
campaign
limit
is
exceedingly
effective
in
making
it
so
that
a
wide
range
in
our
community
is
eligible
to
run
for
office.
V
We
are
literally,
our
voluntary
limit
is
literally
about
a
quarter
of
what
people
are
spending
in
neighboring
communities
and
that
allows
a
lot
of
people
to
step
forward
and
run
for
council
and
that's
good
for
us,
that's
good
for
the
city,
so
I
I
really
applaud
that,
and
I
I'm
I
think
it's
worked
really
well
for
us.
I
think
it's
been
in
place,
maybe
20
or
30
years-
it's
not
new,
but
it
you
know
it
ratchets
up
and
I
think
that's
that's
really
the
kind
of
the
the
backbone
of
our
campaign
reform.
V
I
think
that
I'm
not
so
sure
that
this
this
campaign
limit.
You
know
this
contribution
limit
is
really
very
important,
because
I
think
that
the
spending
limit
of
I
think
it's
about
twenty
seven
thousand.
Maybe
it's
twenty
eight
thousand.
Now
it
gets
wrapped
in
it
up.
That's
what
really
you
know.
That's
what
really
makes
the
difference,
and
so
I
I
I
just.
I
want
to
bring
that
up
again,
because
there
are
very
few
of
us
who
have
I
have
had.
V
I
I've
had
one
contribution
in
excess
of
a
thousand
dollars
and
in
my
my
campaigns-
and
I
think
that
you
know
in
general-
people
are
incredibly
generous,
but
but
the
normal
contribution
we
get
is
a
hundred
dollars,
and
you
know
then
the
most
generous,
really
that
I
see
is
a
thousand.
V
So
I
I
just
feel
like
I'm
wondering,
if
we're
putting
more
burden
on
staff,
then
then
we're
going
to
get
banks
literally
paying
for
our
buck
here,
because
we
because
the
system
that
we
do
have
with
the
voluntary
spending
limit
it
has
been
so
successful.
V
So
I
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
again
and
then
say
that
I
I
think
that
all
the
other
changes
you
know
about
the
the
the
signage
and
are
are
perfectly
necessary,
because
we
we
want
to
be
legal.
We
need
to
do
it
in,
in
conformance
with
california
law
and
then
the
other
thing
I
think
that's
important
is
that
we
do
have.
We
do
have
good
disclosure
of
high
donations,
particularly
in
the
last.
Is
it
the
last
four
weeks
of
the
campaign
that
you
have
to
donate?
V
V
It's
a
90-day
period,
okay,
so
that's
already
there
and
a
large
percentage
of
the
contributions
that
people
get
are
in
the
last
90
days
of
of
the
campaign.
V
So
I
I
just
you
know
I
just
wonder
how
how
much
difference
this
is
going
to
make
in
the
future
and
if
it's
worth
the
extra
staff
time
that's
going
to
be
required
to
carry
it
out.
S
Thanks
so
I
agree
with
councilmember
show
walter
when
we
talked
about
this
last
time.
I
was
not
supportive
of
having
limits
on
campaign
contributions
and
that's
primarily
because
it
I
don't
think
it
has
been
an
issue,
and
so
I
do
feel
like
we're,
adding
extra
burden
to
staff
to
monitor
and
address
campaign
contributions
that
I
I
don't
think,
they're
an
issue.
So
I
agree
that
the
spending
limits
have
been
very
effective
and
I
do
support
those,
and
I
do
support
all
the
other
changes
that
are
part
of
this.
Y
Great
thanks:
well
I
appreciate
council
member
showalter
and
councilmember
matatech
bringing
this
up,
because
I
think
we
were
on
the
the
three
side
of
this
vote
when
this
came
forward,
and
I
think
they
very
eloquently
talked
about
why
I
don't
think
it's
necessary
to
go
forward
with
the
contribution
limits
I
do
feel
like
we
would
be.
Y
Should
we
not
go
forward
with
what's
in
the
staff
report,
there
is
a
state
contribution
limit
with
which
you
would
adhere
to
so
we
would
de
facto
be
going
with
what
the
state
already
has,
and
so
you
know
I
feel
like
with
our
voluntary
spending
limit,
which
I
believe
every
candidate
has
adhered
to,
plus
this
new
state
limit,
which
I
believe
is
about
4
000
dollars,
maybe
there's
a
little
change,
4,
000
and
change.
Y
I
feel
like
there's
already
tools
in
place
to
monitor
the
contribution
limits,
I'm
much
more
interested
in
the
disclosures
and
the
other
changes
that
are
made
interested
in
pursuing
what
misoglen
brought
up,
and
I
would
I
guess
if
it
was
a
trade-off.
I'd
rather
have
staff
be
focusing
on
those
items
and
bringing
greater
transparency
than
be
focused
on
just
contribution
limits,
and
I
do
agree
with
with
what
councilmember
showalter
said
in
having
that
voluntary
expenditure
limit
means
that
people
who
you
know
some
of
us
do
work.
You
know
full
time.
Y
Those
who
are
can
still
be
able
to
to
have
that
that
people
of
all
backgrounds
can
can
run
for
council,
and
I
think
that
that's
what's
made
mountain
view
so
special
and
yeah.
I
don't
know
if
there's
an
opportunity
for
for
that
discussion
to
happen
again,
but
appreciate
the
two
of
them
for
bringing
that
back
up.
Thank
you.
P
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I
did
support
this
originally
and
you
know
my
main
main
interest
was
in
disclosures
and
then
I
had
heard
about
the
changes
in
the
political
sign
area,
so
I
wanted
to
make
sure
we
were
in
line
with
the
new
laws,
but
in
regards
to
the
contribution
limits,
I
I
do
agree.
I
think
our
voluntary
spending
cap
has
made
it.
P
P
I
think
it's
for
actually
4
800,
I
believe,
is
the
state
limit,
and
you
know
that
seems
reasonable
for
higher
office
assembly
state
senate,
when
you
know
those
campaigns
cost
frankly
a
half
a
million
dollars
or
more
so
I
was
just
looking
at
it
relative
to
that
when
our
elections,
our
campaigns,
are,
I
think,
it'll,
be
about
29
000
this
year.
It
seems
reasonable
to
me
that
we
set
the
limit
at
about
a
thousand
dollars,
and
even
at
that
you
know
it's
29
people
and
a
thousand
dollars.
P
A
Thank
you
very
much
before
we
get
into
a
second
round
any
member
of
the
council.
Local
has
not
spoken
yet.
A
I
did
have
a
couple
of
comments,
so
first,
I
would
request
whoever
makes
the
motion
to
include
a
fix
for,
or
at
least
staff
consideration
of,
a
fix
for
that
gap
between
2500
and
49
999,
because,
as
it
exists,
the
local
disclosure
or
the
disclosure,
I
guess,
is
more
substantial
for
lower
funded,
independent
expenditures,
then
for
higher
funded
ones.
So
it's
a
peculiarity
and
I
don't
think
that's
the
intention.
A
You
know
just
because
a
campaign
receives
significantly
larger
contributions
doesn't
mean
that
they
should
disclose
fewer
contributors.
I
don't
think
that's
the
intent
of
the
ordinance.
Even
if
you
get
a
fifty
thousand
dollar
contribution,
you
should
still
disclose
any
fifteen
thousand
ten
thousand
dollar
contributions
that
you
receive,
making
independent
expenditures,
because
that's
really
the
spirit
of
the
local
disclosure
origin.
A
So
I
would
request
that
we
include
that
in
the
in
the
motion
on
the
campaign
limits
for
candidates,
the
way
I
think
about
this
is
it's
not
a
problem
until
it
becomes
one.
I
remember
in
2008
when
then
candidate
for
president
barack
obama
became
the
first
major
candidate
for
president
to
not
accept
public
financing
and
the
reason
he
didn't
do.
That
is
because
he
could
raise
enormous
amounts
of
money
very
easily
and
since
then,
no
major
candidate
has
accepted
public
financing
we've.
A
So
he
he
set
a
precedent
and
now
that
we
know
you
could
raise
substantially
more
money
privately
than
you
can
through
public
funds.
What's
the
point
of
adhering
to
that
regulation-
and
I
worry
about
the
day
when
people
running
for
city,
council
and
mountain
view
realize
that
you
can
raise
a
lot
of
money
very
easily
and
spend
astronomical
sums,
and
the
voluntary
expenditure
limit
ceases
to
be
something
that
people
voluntarily
comply
with,
because
we
can't
enforce
it.
It's
it's
not.
A
There's
no
we're,
I
think,
legally
prohibited
from
requiring
expenditure
limits,
and
I
like
the
idea
of
a
contribution
limit
as
a
safeguard,
for
I
think
when
that
happens.
Other
cities
have
voluntary
expenditure
limits
that
are
regularly
not
adhered
to,
and-
and
I
I
don't
want
that
to
happen
here,
but
it
could
very
easily
happen
and
I
think
that's
why
it's
proven
to
adopt
reasonable
campaign
contribution
limits
at
this
time.
X
AR
AR
X
So
part
of
my
thinking
here
I
I
know
that
the
league
of
women
voters
is
working
with
palo
alto
city,
council
and
they're,
putting
forward
a
250
limit.
I
I
believe
that
los
angeles
has
either
250
or
500.
X
The
county
is
substantially
lower
than
than
where
the
state
is,
and
I
do
feel
like
the
the
state
limits
are
unreasonably
high
for
a
local
race
that
should
involve
reaching
out
to
grassroots
people
in
the
community
and
our
own
voters
in
the
community
and
and
not
be
skewed
as
strongly
towards
particular
interests
as
it
can
be
when
the
limit
is,
is
much
higher.
X
So
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
that
we
introduced
an
ordinance.
The
mountain
view,
city
council,
amending
chapter
2,
article
12
of
mountain
view,
city
code
relating
to
campaign
finance
and
repealing
article
3
of
chapter
3
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
relating
to
political
signs
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waived
and
set
a
second
reading
for
april
26,
2022
and,
second,
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view.
X
Rescinding
resolution
number
17876
designating
public
properties
under
which
political
signs
may
be
posted
to
be
read,
entitled
only
further
reading
waived
and
I
think
I'll
hold
off
on
ms
zoglin's.
A
very
good
suggestion
for
right
now
and
just
take
that.
As
my
motion.
A
A
AK
A
Okay,
fantastic
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
council
vicenercast.
U
X
Yes
and
the
the
staff
recommendation
is
what
we
came
up
with
at
the
last
meeting,
which
included
the
limits.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
Any
other
questions
or
comments.
I
have
a
motion
made
by
councilmember
lieber
seconded
by
councilman
robbie
coca
for
the
staff
recommendations.
If
there
are
no
questions
or
comments,
I'll
ask
the
city
clerk
to
commence
the
roll
call.
C
X
A
Thank
you,
council,
member
shellwalter.
Second,
thank
you
very
much.
Any
staff
or
interim
city
attorney
quinn.
AF
AR
A
Thank
you,
so
city
clerk
glazer,
you
have
your
hand
up.
B
I
just
also
want
to
clarify
so,
as
the
ordinance
is
structured
right
now,
we
give
someone
30
days
to
rectify.
So
are
we
also
we're
saying
that
that
doesn't
matter
whether
they
return
it
or
not?
They're
gonna
have
to
pay
a
penalty.
X
Well
does
miss
quinn.
I
noticed
that
the
interim
city
attorney
has
her
hand
up
not
sure.
Oh,
that
was
a
legacy
hand.
X
Yeah,
I
would
say
that
the
the
discouragement
could
happen
as
immediately
as
it's
discovered
and
and
the
the
penalty
could
be
within
the
90
days.
AF
A
Okay.
So
then,
to
restate
the
motion
made
by
council
member
lieber
executed
by
councilmember
shel
walter,
it's
first
to
direct
staff
to
come
back
or
evaluate
you
know
and
make
sure
it's,
it's
feasible:
a
fix
for
disclosure
between
twenty
five
hundred
and
four
thousand
forty.
Nine
thousand
nine
hundred.
Ninety
nine
then
secondarily
come
back
with
a
a
penalty
for
acceptance
of
contributions
above
the
limit,
but
with
a
30-day
grace
period
or
basically
a
period
to
cure
right.
A
S
So
I'm
I
very
much
support
the
additional
disclosure
requirements
to
fill
the
gap
there,
but
since
I
am
not
supportive
of
limits
on
campaign
contributions,
it
makes
it
hard
for
me
to
support
penalties.
So
unfortunately
I
have
to
vote
no
on
something
that
half
of
it.
I
agree
with
thanks.
V
Oh,
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
I'm
the
seconder
and
I
agree
with
having
the
having
a
period
of
penalty.
I
do
think
that
people
mis
make
mistakes
and
they
ought
to
have
an
opportunity
to
correct
their
mistake.
And
if
they
don't
do
that
in
a
reasonable
amount
of
time,
then
they
should
definitely
be
penalized.
C
C
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I'm
going
to
move
to
continue
the
meeting
past
10
o'clock.
We
have
one
item
remaining
and
I
hope
it's
a
pretty
quick
one.
Is
there
a
second
a
council
member
to
me.
A
Thank
you
very
much
city
clerk.
Can
you
get
a
vocal.
C
A
A
City
manager,
are
you
contacting
wayne.
AS
Good
evening,
how
are
you
all
thanks
for
the
the
moment
to
get
me
set
up
here
and
I'll
take
one
more
second
to
share
the
screen.
AS
Okay,
hopefully
you
can
all
see
the
screen
and
I
will
go
ahead
and
begin.
Thank
you.
This
is
a
public
hearing,
the
first
reading
for
extending
the
tenant
relocation,
assistance
ordinance
to
mobile
home
tenants,
and
this
item
will
go
over
the
proposed
amendments
before
I
go
on.
I
do
want
to
note
that
anki
von
dersen,
who
is
the
project
manager
for
the
red
stabilization
team,.
AS
I
apologize
I'm
hearing
the
words
being
replayed
back
to
me
as
as
I'm
talking
so
let
me
see
if
I
can
fix
the
situation
here.
AS
Okay,
let
me
let
me
try
again.
I
apologize
for
that
disruption.
Also,
karen
tiedemann,
who
is
outside
legal
counsel
for
the
rent
stabilization
team,
is
also
attending
the
meeting.
Should
any
questions
come
up,
they
can
assist
in
answering
any
questions.
AS
AS
At
that
september,
approval
meeting
council
also
included
wanting
to
extend
mobile
home
tenants,
two
additional
pieces,
relocation,
protection
to
mobile
home
tenants
who
are
evicted
without
fault
and
also
a
right
of
return
to
a
unit
where
a
unit
was
taken
off
the
rental
market,
but
has
been
returned
back
to
the
rental
market.
So
I
wanted
to
extend
that
right
to
mobile
home
tenants
as
well
just
a
brief
summary
in
terms
of
the
applicability
of
this
modification
and
a
bit
of
terminology.
AS
We
wanted
to
clarify
that
the
recommendation
would
cover
the
tenants
of
a
mobile
home
that
is
rented
from
two
situations.
Tenants
could
be
renting
from
a
mobile
home
owner
who
actually
rents
out
a
space
in
a
park
but
is
renting
out
the
unit
to
a
tenant.
AS
It
could
also
cover
a
situation
where
the
park
owner
also
rents
out
the
space
and
the
unit
to
a
tenant.
So
in
both
cases
the
tenants
would
be
covered.
The
trail
is
not
proposed
to
apply
to
mobile
home
space
rentals
by
a
mobile
home
owner,
maybe
meaning
an
owner
who
owns
the
unit
but
rents
a
space
from
the
park
owner.
In
that
particular
situation,
state
law
provides
protections
for
those
for
those
folks.
AS
AS
It
is
based
on
eight
city
income
limits
that
are
published
each
year
and
it's
based
off
of
the
median
moderate
income
limit,
the
120
ami
limit,
plus
an
additional
five
percent,
five
thousand
dollars
on
top
of
those
limits
so
you'll
see.
The
second
row
is
the
five
thousand
in
addition
to
the
income
limits
in
the
first
row.
AS
The
relocation
assistance
as
part
of
the
trail
that
would
be
extended
to
mobile
home
tenants
would
include
a
security
deposit
refund
subscription
to
a
rental
agency
three
months
of
equivalent
rent
to
a
comparable
unit
and
also
a
special
circumstance
household
would
receive
additional
payment.
It
started
as
a
thousand
as
adjusted
for
inflation,
so
for
this
year
the
additional
special
household
amount
would
be
eight
thousand
five
hundred
and
three
dollars
and
special
circumstances.
AS
Households
includes
at
least
one
person
in
the
household
who
is
62
years
of
age
or
older,
someone
who
has
a
disability
or
handicap
in
the
household
or
one
or
more
minor
children
who
is
19
years
of
age
or
under
and
who
are
considered
to
be
legal
dependents.
AS
The
second
piece
of
the
provisions
is
the
first
right
of
return
and
between
the
mobile
home,
rent,
stabilization
ordinance
and
a
tenant
relocation
assistance
ordinance.
It
covers
a
variety
of
right
to
return
situations,
so
the
mobile
home
ordinance
itself
covers
situations
where
units
were
were
removed
from
the
market
because
of
substantial
repairs,
a
owner
moving
into
a
unit.
AS
If
the
property
was
permanently
withdrawn
from
the
rental
market
or
it
would
if
it
was
intended
to
be
demolished
and
it
was
removed
from
the
market
and
then
the
trio
would
amendments
would
regulate
the
first
right
of
return,
the
process
for
implementing
these
right-of-return
procedures
and
extending
those
procedures
to
mobile
home
tenants.
AS
It
does
apply
to
a
couple
of
different
situations.
Again,
it
can
cover
a
situation
where
a
park
owner
also
rents
out
units
in
the
park,
and
they
would
have
to
withdraw
and
return
back
all
those
units
or
it
could
be
a
an
owner
who
owns
maybe
one
unit
or
more
than
one
unit
but
rents
the
space
out
from
a
more
a
park
owner
in
that
situation.
A
mobile
home
owner
would
also
be
subject
to
the
trio
provisions.
AS
The
process
today
included
a
meeting
with
the
rental
housing
committee
because
they
are
the
body
implementing
the
mobile
run
stabilization
ordinance
and
they
supported
the
proposed
amendments.
This
item
also
did
go
to
the
epc
in
march,
who
unanimously
recommended
the
amendments
we
are
here
at
the
first
reading.
If
council
approves,
this
will
come
back
to
council
for
a
second
reading
next
month
in
may,
and
then
it
would
take
effect
30
days
after
on
june
9..
AS
A
Seeing
none
we
will
turn
to
the
public
for
comments.
If
you
have
any
comments,
please
raise
your
hand
at
the
zoo
or
press
star
9.
Are
there
any
members
of
the
public
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item?.
A
Being
done,
we
will
return
alex
brown
as
quick
as
you
can.
AN
All
right,
you
know
I
had
to
alex
brown
mountain
viewmo
home
alliance.
This
is
very
important
to
a
lot
of
members
of
our
community.
They've
had
a
lot
of
anxiety
about
park
closures
and
being
put
out
of
their
homes.
We
also
have
a
lot
of
members
who
are
disabled
elderly
who
have
who
are
taking
care
of
their
families,
and
I
think
that
it's
it's
a
great
move
for
the
city
to
try
to
take
care
of
them,
help
reduce
anxiety
and
protect
them
from
being
displaced.
So,
thank
you.
Thank
you
for
joining
us.
A
No
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
will
return
to
the
council
for
deliberation
and
emotion,
councilmember
lieber.
X
X
Thank
you
like
to
move
that
we
introduced
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
amending
article
13
of
chapter
36
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
related
to
tenant,
relocation,
assistance
to
provide
tenant
relocations,
relocation
assistance
benefits
and
a
first
right
of
return
to
mobile
home
tenants
who
rent
a
mobile
home
in
a
mountain
view,
mobile
home
park
and
finding
the
ordinance
to
be
exempt
from
the
california
environmental
quality
act
under
secret
guidelines.
15061B3.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
council
member
to
may
do
you
have
a.
A
Okay,
I'm
sure
we'll
we'll
go
to
the
city
attorney.
First.
AF
I
just
had
a
a
clarification
question
that
I
wondering
why
it's
not
set
for
a
second
reading
at
the
second
meeting
in
april,
because
it
just
it
needs
five
days
between
a
first
reading
and
a
second
reading
and
that
could
allow
it
to
go
into
effect
earlier.
So
I
didn't
know
if
mr
chen
had
a
idea.
If
that's
if
there
was
a
particular
reason
or
if
the
council
would
have
the
desire
to
move
it
forward,
a.
AS
I
meeting
the
date
was
just
determined
in
discussion
with
processing
the
timeline.
I
think
if
the
council
wanted
to
move
it
forward
faster,
we
could
turn
the
report
around
and
and
place
it
on.
The
next
council
meeting.
Y
A
A
Seeing
none
we'll
turn
to
the
city
clerk.
B
C
A
S
P
Mayor,
I
know
that
my
colleagues
have
received
notice
about
this,
but
I
wanted
to
mention
it
in
public.
At
our
last
mtc
meeting,
we,
the
commission
passed
a
project's
priority
list
to
respond
to
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law,
funding
that
will
be
coming
down
and
on
that
list
of
priorities,
we're
very
pleased
to
have
caltrain
electric
electrification
on
the
list,
as
well
as
six
three.
P
There
are
six
grade
separation
projects,
caltrain
grade
separation
projects
that
were
also
on
the
list
and
two
of
those
both
are
castro
street
and
rankstar
separations
made
the
list
of
six.
The
other
one
was
from
the
santa
clara
county
was
the
one
in
sunnyvale
and
there
were
some
in
san
mateo
county,
but
so
we
are
very
well
poised
if
the
funding
does
come
through
to
hopefully
actually
get
that
funding.
P
So
it
was
very
exciting,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
our
staff,
who
worked
really
hard
to
prepare
us
in,
and
we
really
were
focused
on
project
ready-ness
and
shovel-ready
projects,
and
you
know
all
the
hard
work
that
we've
been
doing
the
last
10
years
or
so
to
prepare
get
these
projects
ready.
I
think
paid
off
and
I
also
want
to
acknowledge
our
vta
staff,
who
really
worked
around
the
clock
until
the
very
couple
of
hours
before
the
meeting
advocating
for
our
santa
clara
county
projects,
and
so
we
did
quite
well
bart.
P
The
bart
extension
is
also
included
in
that
on
that
list
too.
So
I
wanted
to
share
that
with
everyone
and
then
other
activities.
I
attended
the
state
of
the
city
and
heard
mayor
ramirez's
punchline
about
ross
perot.
I
can't
believe
he
actually.
I
think
you
were
too
young
for
that,
but
that
was
a
great
punchline
or
was
it
raspberry?
Oh
ross
perez
running
mate.
P
I
forget
his
name,
but
who
am
I?
Why
am
I
here
and
then
I
attended
the
fire
academy
at
graduation.
We
have
five
new
recruits
and
it's
always
great
to
see,
meet
them
and
meet
their
families
and
to
be
a
part
of
that
badge.
Pinning
ceremony
and
then
attended
the
santa
clara
county
public
health
discussion
on
gun,
violence
they
and
councilmember
sally
labor
was
also
there
taking
input
from
cities
on
you
know
what
what
are
our
biggest
concerns
around
gun
violence.
P
A
X
Well,
I
I'd
like
to
add
on
to
council
member
abby
koga's
good
comments
about
the
the
county
by
the
county
meeting
on
gun
violence,
and
it's
it's
quite
interesting
that
public
health
department
is
is
really
taking
the
lead
on
this
and
regarding
gun,
violence's
public
health
issue.
X
That
does
have
an
identifiable
cost
to
society
and
so
mountain
view's
efforts
were
very
ably
represented
there
and,
as
were
some
of
our
other
cities,
and
one
of
the
issues
that
I
was
very
interested
in
was
the
possibility
of
the
county
as
a
convener
to
look
at
the
gaps
in
our
local
ordinances
and
how
we
could
have
a
more
cohesive
landscape
of
policy
across
the
cities,
and
they
seem
quite
interested
in
that.
X
So
that's
something
that
will
be
coming
and
I
think
that
we
can
share
the
the
lessons
learned
that
we've
had
and
hopefully
receive
policy
from
other
cities
as
well.
And
it's
it's
really
good
to
see
the
the
strong
interest
there.
X
So
that
was
definitely
a
bright
light
on
things
and
and
then
I
wanted
to
raise
an
issue
with
council
and
see
if
we
can
get
support
for
a
piece
of
legislation
authored
by
senator
josh
becker,
who
has
been
very
helpful
for
the
city
in
so
many
ways,
and
he
is
authoring
sb
1000,
which
is
the
public
right
to
police,
radio
communications
act,
and
this
is
a
piece
of
legislation
that
would
clarify
the
the
california
department
of
justice
actions
of
a
couple
of
years
ago
that
led
to
most
police
ban
radio
communications
becoming
encrypted,
and
so
this
legislation
would
require
that
personally
identifiable
information
be
encrypted,
but
that
other
transmissions
be
on
an
open
frequency.
X
So
the
california
highway
patrol
has
already
adopted
this
hybrid
approach
and
other
jurisdictions
in
the
the
state
are
doing
so.
So
this
bill
would
simply
clarify
that
and
help
to
clear
up
some
of
the
misunderstandings
coming
from
the
dog
j
memo,
and
so
mayor
of
I
don't
know
if
the
best
way
to
approach
this
is
a
straw
poll
of
those
who
would
like
to
support
senator
becker's,
sb
1000
or
to
bring
it
back
to
council.
To
consider
a
position
of
support.
A
Let's
first
turn
to
staff.
I
see
police
chief
shang
has
joined
us.
Did
you
want
to
speak
to
this
chief.
T
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
Thank
you
chief
sean.
I
think,
if
you
maybe
could
give
council
an
update
on
the
process
and
and
mountain
view,
and
just
where
we're
at
and
what
svra
did
just
to
give
a
little
bit
of
context
to
what
councilmember
lieber
is
talking
about
and
the
feedback
about
from
svria
and
maybe
what's
what's
happened
in
palo
alto
and
other
cities.
AT
Sure,
as
as
council
may
recall,
back
in
march
of
2021,
our
department
joined
the
majority
of
other
santa
clara
county
agencies
and
law
enforcement
on
moving
over
for
encryption,
and
that
was
as
a
result
of
the
department
of
justice,
putting
out
a
memo
that
basically
mandated
all
police
departments
and
sheriff's
departments
in
the
state
to
protect
personal,
identifying
information,
and
this
comes
about
as
in
our
day-to-day
course
of
duties.
When
we
interact
with
people,
we
pull
them
over
we'll
check
their
license
driver's
license.
AT
So
if
you
have
a
scanner
and
it's
unencrypted,
you
would
hear
this
information
over
the
air
and
I
believe
the
spirit
of
that
behind
the
doj's
mandate
is
to
protect
from
id
theft.
So
svraa
is
the
governing
authority
in
the
county
that
helps
with
interoperability
of
all
of
our
radios
and
one
by
one
over
the
course
of
last
year.
Each
of
the
agencies
in
our
county
moved
over
to
the
encrypted
site.
Oops
apologies
for
the
technical
error.
AT
It
wouldn't
be
a
zoom
meeting
without
something
like
this
happening
right
as
I
try
to
speak
and
and
fix
that
and
chew
gum
at
the
same
time.
Hopefully
that
will
fix
it.
AT
Does
that
look?
Okay,
all
right
so
with
that
everyone
has
since
moved
over
now
I
am
vaguely
familiar
with
what
the
chp
does.
I
don't
know
operationally.
I
haven't
seen
exactly
how
that
works,
for
us
is
a
little
bit
problematic
in
having
extra
channels
per
se,
because
for
us
that
operationally,
that
represents
the
need
to
actually
have
a
dispatcher
man
that
extra
channel
and
listen
for
it.
So
right
now,
if
you
were
to
walk
into
our
dispatch
center,
you
would
see
three
to
four
dispatchers.
AT
One
monitoring
all
911
calls
coming
in
one
monitoring,
all
police
channel
and
one
monitoring
the
fire
department
and
then
one
for
mid
peninsula
open
space,
which
is
our
contracted
city.
We
don't
have
the
staffing
currently
to
create
a
new
channel
for
them
to
listen
and
just
run
license
plates
and
personal,
identifying
information.
So
there's
some
operational
difficulties
and
my
understanding
is
palo
alto.
Our
neighbor
considered
this
and
looked
at
this
as
well.
AT
I
may
stand
to
be
correct,
but
I
believe
that
their
council
voted
to
maintain
it
as
an
encrypted
channel.
So
I
don't
know
if,
if
council
has
any
other
questions
in
regards
to
that.
A
AT
I
haven't
done
any
like
official
analysis
if
you
will
so
I
don't
know
that
I
would
be
prepared
to
go
line
by
line
and
go
into
that
bill.
I
know
operationally
for
the
county.
It
does
present
a
number
of
challenges,
if
enacted
as
it
is,
because
it's
with
the
technology
as
it
is
the
whole
purpose
for
the
svra
was
interoperability
for
a
major
event.
AT
So,
let's
take
the
gilroy
garden
shooting,
for
instance,
everyone
was
able
to
go
and
be
on
one
channel
when
you
add
to
the
mix
encryption
versus
non-encryption,
any
mixing
of
the
two
will
automatically
default
it
to
an
non-encrypted
channel
status,
which
means
in
the
in
the
midst
of
a
critical
incident.
AT
You
don't
want
a
situation
where
it's
pure
chaos,
basically
and
officers
shouldn't
have
to
say:
is
this
channel
encrypted
or
not?
They
just
need
to
go
about
and
dealing
with
that
critical
incident.
So
there's
technological
challenges
that
come
with
something
as
simple
as
one
any
one
city
in
this
santa
clara
county
that
goes
unencrypted.
AT
Now
it
presents
a
hurdle
where
interoperability
now
becomes
at
risk.
If
you
will
so
there's
a
lot,
I
think
that
we
would
need
to
look
at
in
order
to
kind
of
do
carry
this
through.
S
I
did
so
yeah,
I
served
on
svria
for
several
years
and
I
was
wondering
about
the
challenges
it
would
pose
if
you
had
both
encrypted
and
unencrypted,
but
beyond
the
dispatchers
here
in
mountain
view.
S
I
don't
know
if
you've
thought
about
this,
but
what
would
be
the
impact
on
everyone
else
using
the
radios
just
to
you
know,
address
situations
in
mountain
view.
AT
So
one
kind
of
aspect:
if
you
were
to
go
on
a
ride-along
and
you
would
hear
all
the
radio
chatter
it
might
sound
foreign,
but
to
us
it's
actually
a
great
amount
of
situal
situational
awareness.
So
we
understand
what
all
the
officers
are
doing,
if
an
officer
kind
of
switches
channels
and
goes
to
a
different
channel
to
check
personal,
identifying
information,
we
kind
of
lose
a
little
bit
of
that
right.
That
person
could
be
on
a
different
channel
when
something's
happening.
AT
You
know
the
dispatcher
obviously
would
hear
that
call
for
help,
but
you're
talking
about
seconds
of
delay
of
not
knowing,
whereas
right
now
in
any
given
time,
a
street
supervisor
would
know
pretty
innately
where
each
of
his
or
her
officers
are
in
the
city
and
what
they're
doing
right.
So
you
lose
a
little
bit
of
that
and
we're
not
unique
in
this
in
terms
of
how
we
are
operating.
This
is
consistent
throughout
santa
clara
county.
All
of
law
enforcement
operates
in
this
manner
and
we're
all
kind
of
on
the
same
on
board.
With
the
encryption.
AT
The
talk
groups
are
working
right
now,
for
instance,
if
there's
a
pursuit
that
leaves
our
jurisdiction
and
goes
into
any
santa
clara
county
agency,
it's
seamless,
we
all
go
to
one
channel
or
the
dispatchers
can
just
patch
us
all
together.
You
lose
that
if
one
agency
kind
of
breaks
from
the
fold
and
is
unencrypted
at
that
point,.
AA
C
A
Agenda
memo
with
staff's
evaluation
of
the
bill,
it
sounds
like
it's.
X
X
And
so,
if
the
highway
patrol
is
is
adopting
a
hybrid
approach,
then
there
must
be
a
way
to
surmount
the
the
technical
difficulties.
I
know
that
we're
you
know
very,
very
close
to
101
and
and
85,
and
that
there
are
incidents
that
take
place
that
involve
those
roadways
or
even
el
camino
could
involve
chp.
X
So
I
I
know
that
there
are
technological
ways,
and
I
guess
some
of
the
the
things
that
are
important
to
me
about
this
is
that
we
do
have
a
position
statement
that
we've
adopted
around
transparency
for
law
enforcement
in
the
community,
and-
and
this
is
one
of
the
the
largest
compromises
to
transparency
that
has
has
happened
in
a
in
a
very
very
long
time,
and
I
definitely
understand
the
the
possibility
of
losing
some
of
the
information
around
situational
awareness.
But
I
I
think
that
in
the
future.
X
All
of
our
departments
in
our
area
and
in
our
state
will
will
have
resolve
the
the
technological
issues
and
this
bill
would
take
effect
in
2023.
X
And
I
I
would
really
appreciate
the
the
offer
of
the
the
off
agenda
analysis
of
the
bill,
because
I
think,
having
been
up
in
the
state
legislature,
one
of
the
most
frequent
things
that
that
people
kind
of
call
out
to
each
other
is
read
the
bill.
X
And
I,
I
would
really
be
interested
in
staff's
staff's
analysis
and
what
what
you
see
in
it
and
I'd
like
to
put
particular
emphasis
on
our
our
home
delegations
legislation.
I
think
that
everyone
in
our
delegation
has
been
very
open
to
mountain
view
and
incredibly
responsive,
and
so
I
would
like
to
make
a
good
faith
effort
to
to
really
analyze
their
priorities
as
well,
because
everything
is
a
is
a
reciprocal
relationship
in
in
this
kind
of
a
sphere.
X
So
I
would
very
much
value
that
mayor
and
I'd
like
to
continue
to
come
back
to
this
because
of
the
the
great
importance
of
it,
and
this
legislation
is
sponsored
by
our
news
outlets
and
I
think,
we've
seen
on
the
the
international
scene
and
the
the
national
scene
and
frankly,
state
and
local
and
every
level
of
government
that,
when
the
the
sunshine
of
a
free
flow
of
information
is
not,
there
is
when
things
happen,
that
do
compromise
the
public
interest,
and
so
that's
what
I'm
very
motivated
to
to
maintain
and
and
what
we
lost.
X
Frankly
with
a
doj
memo
that
was
was
not
well
stated
and
was
not
clear.
So
I
would
appreciate
this
coming
back.
T
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
I
was
gonna
say
if
council
wants
to
take
a
straw
poll
on
whether
they're
interested
in
an
off
agenda
memo
on
this
item.
We
can
certainly
analyze
the
bill
further
and
also
provide
information
that
we
have
received
from
svria
about
this.
So
if
council
would
provide
that
direction,
that
would
be
helpful.
A
Thank
you
so
we'll
just
raise
our
hands.
If
there's
support
for
an
off
agenda
memo
about
the
senate
bill,
one
two,
three,
four:
five:
okay,
so
majority
support-
and
it
sounds
like
it's
good
for
us
to
understand,
since
it
may
have
an
impact
on
public
safety
in
mountain
view.
Thank
you,
councilmember
lever.
Is
there
anything
else?
V
Well,
this
is
just
on
a
much
lighter
note,
but
on
march
26
I
think
it
was
most
of
us
attended
the
mountain
view,
multicultural
festival,
and
I
I
I
really
enjoyed
it.
V
I
thought
it
was
just
a
wonderful
demonstration
of
the
range
of
cultures
that
come
together
and
live
in
peace
in
our
in
our
community,
and
so
I
I
just
wanted
to
end
on
that
and
thank
the
recreation
department
for
all
the
effort
that
they
went
to
to
organize
it,
and
you
know
all
the
people
who
took
part
and
particularly
with
the
things
that
are
going
on.
You
know
we
hear
going
on
in
the
world
these
getting
cultures
getting
together
in
a
peaceful
manner.
V
A
AF
A
Thank
you
for
your
service
to
our
city
and
for
being
willing
to
step
in
as
the
term
city
attorney
it's
difficult
work
and
we
really
appreciate
you
for
stepping
in
only
we
could
have
done
a
proclamation
for
you.