►
From YouTube: March 22, 2022 Mountain View City Council Meeting
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, March 22, 2022.
Live Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26.
A
A
B
Thank
you,
mr
mayor.
There
are
two
items
on
the
closed
session.
This
evening
item
2.1
is
conference
with
legal
counsel
for
existing
litigation
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54956.9
d1.
The
name
of
the
case
is
celerino
navarro,
janet
stevens,
armando
covarrubias,
evelyn,
estrada
gabrielle,
ranjal,
jaime
alma,
aldaco
and
other
similarly
situated
versus
the
city
of
mountain
view
in
united
states
district
court
for
the
northern
district
of
california.
B
The
employee
organizations
are
service
employees,
international
union
known
as
seiu
local
521,
the
eagles
association,
the
police
officers,
association
or
poa,
and
the
international
association
of
firefighters,
iaff,
local
1965,
the
unrepresented
fire
managers,
the
unrepresented
police
managers,
the
unrepresented
department
heads
and
the
unrepresented
confidential
employees,
and
that
concludes
the
closed
session
announcement.
This
evening.
A
C
A
I
would
like
to
start
the
meeting
by
acknowledging
that
last
thursday
morning,
13
year
old
george
andre
oseida
was
tragically
killed
in
a
traffic
collision
with
a
truck
on
el
camino
real,
while
riding
his
bike
to
grand
middle
school,
while
the
police
investigation
continues.
My
council
colleagues
and
I
joined
the
community
in
grieving
the
loss
of
this
young
life.
D
Who've
also
been
impacted
by
this,
so
I
want
to
let
everyone
know
what
the
city
is
working
on
and
I'd
like
to
focus
on
three
key
areas
that
we
have
received
a
lot
of
questions
about
and
also
comments
about,
certain
projects
that
we
have
in
the
pipeline
and
then
wondering
what
happens
what's
happening
now
and
what
happens
next,
so
I'll
talk
about
three
three
focus
areas
that
our
public
works
staff
is
working
on
right
now.
The
first
is
collaborating
with
with
caltrans.
D
D
D
D
D
So
this
repaving
project
from
caltrans
extends
into
los
altos
and
into
palo
alto,
so
the
plans
to
add
class
2
bike
lanes
and
remove
all
street
parking
from
ringsdorf
to
the
palo
alto
boundary
and
those
will
tie
into
the
improvements
in
mountain
view.
That's
on
the
los
alto
city
council
agenda
this
evening
and
then
just
in
terms
of
the
timing
of
when
this
will
all
happen.
D
Caltrans
plans
to
complete
the
95
design
plans
within
the
next
three
months
from
now.
So
then
they
can
seek
approval
to
advertise
the
construction
project.
Then
they'll
need
to
get
approval
from
the
california
transportation
commission
that
that's
anticipated
to
be
in
september,
and
then
construction
should
begin
in
spring
of
23..
D
So,
prior
to
this
tragic
incident,
the
city
was
already
working
on
efforts
to
improve
road
safety,
and
that
includes
the
vision,
zero
action
plan
and
our
local
road
safety
plan.
So
these
really
are
meant
to
be
a
framework
for
really
looking
at
and
analyzing
and
prioritizing
certain
improvement
safety
improvements
on
all
city
roads,
and
these
plans
are
based
on
collision
analysis
and
various
measures
that
are
proven
to
reduce
the
risk
of
collisions.
D
So
I
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
is
aware
that
this
week
is
when
the
community
meeting
has
been
scheduled
to
happen.
So
that
will
be
this
thursday
may
24th
on
from
five.
Sorry
excuse
me
march
24th
from
5
to
six
thirty,
and
you
can
go
on
the
project
website
to
look
at
the
slide
deck
in
advance
of
the
meeting
staffs
going
to
be
posting
that
this
this
thursday
and
that
website
is
mountainview.gov,
slash,
vision,
zero.
D
So,
at
this
meeting
we've
we've
been
asked:
what's
what's
actually
going
to
happen
at
the
meeting,
so
staff's
going
to
provide
an
overview
of
the
most
common
types
of
crashes
that
involve
pedestrians,
bicyclists
and
motorists
in
mountain
view
and
they're
going
to
look
at
six
years
of
collision?
History
they'll
also
present
the
list
of
these
proven
safety
measures
that
best
address
each
type
of
crash.
D
So
then,
after
this
meeting
on
march
30th
next
week,
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advisory
committee
is
going
to
review
and
provide
feedback
on
this
phase
of
work
for
the
vision,
zero
plan.
Then
in
early
may,
the
council
transportation
committee
is
also
going
to
consider
this
phase
of
the
work.
So
we
anticipate
bringing
a
final
vision,
zero
action
plan
and
the
local
road
safety
plan
back
to
city
council.
This
fall
2022.
D
So
then,
the
last
category
of
an
update
that
I'd
like
to
give
is
just
the
state
routes
to
school
program,
and
we
did
recently
relaunch
this
program
and
what
this
program
is
is
a
program
that
promotes
walking
and
bicycling
to
school
safely.
For
mountain
view,
students
and
their
families
and
the
program
also
provides
various
road
safety
tips
and
addresses
various
transportation
concerns
that
either
the
families
or
the
school
or
even
the
city
staff
may
have.
So.
We
are
working
in
close
collaboration
with
the
school
district
and
we
have
formed
a
staff
routes
to
school.
D
They
provide
traffic
safety
training
during
pe
classes
as
well.
So
I
also
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
we
have
received
a
number
of
ideas
and
suggestions
related
to
a
very
the
suggested
route
from
graham
middle
school
to
the
sapara
mobile
home
park,
and
we
have
reviewed
various
routes
that
avoid
using
el
camino.
Real
and
staff
will
be
adding
a
suggested
route
that
uses
stevens
creek
trail
and
connects
then
into
the
suggested
route
along
martin's
avenue.
D
So
this
will
be
somewhat
of
a
longer
distance
than
using
el
camino
real,
but
it
will
still
allow
students
to
get
to
school
in
around
15
to
20
minutes,
so
those
maps
have
been
created
for
the
public
schools.
They
show
all
these
preferred
routes
and
we'll
be
updating
that
route
and
you
can
visit
those
at
mountainview.gov,
safe
routes.
D
A
The
meeting
this
evening
will
also
be
adjourned
in
memory
of
former
mayor
council,
member
and
mountain
view,
police
captain
nick
galiota
that
will
occur
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
I
will
now
read
the
usual
meeting
the
usual
announcement
as
required.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
california
government
code,
section
54953,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
A
A
F
A
A
So
if
someone
hasn't
already
done
so
looks
like
we've
brought
mike
into
the
panel.
A
My
pleasure,
the
proclamation
reads,
whereas
march
is
american
red
cross
month,
a
special
time
to
honor
the
kindness
of
our
neighbors
who
aid
families
in
need
every
day
in
mountain
view,
across
the
united
states
and
around
the
world.
The
american
red
cross's
dedication
touches
millions
of
lives
each
year
as
they
carry
out
the
organization's
140-year
mission
of
preventing
and
alleviating
suffering,
and
whereas,
during
the
trying
times
of
the
coronavirus
pandemic,
people
have
stepped
up
to
help.
A
When
our
country
faced
a
severe
blood
shortage
and
whereas
here
in
mountain
view,
families
have
relied
on
50,
local
volunteers
for
comfort
and
hope,
while
coping
with
10
area
disasters,
including
wildfires
floods
and
house
fires,
and
whereas
last
year
in
mountain
view,
the
red
cross
collected
125
units
of
blood
from
local
residents,
which
goes
far
in
supporting
area
hospitals
and
in
educating
the
need
to
donate
blood,
since
one
pint
alone
can
save
up
to
three
lives.
And
whereas
this
life-saving
work
is
vital
to
strengthening
our
communities
resilience
nearly
200
years.
A
Since
the
birth
of
american
red
cross
founder,
clara
barton,
we
dedicate
this
month
of
march
to
all
those
who
continue
to
advance
her
noble
legacy,
and
we
ask
others
to
join
in
their
commitment
to
care
for
people
in
need.
Now,
therefore,
I
lucas
ramirez
mayor
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
along
with
my
colleagues
on
the
city
council,
do
hereby
proclaim
the
month
of
march
as
american
red
cross
month
in
the
city
of
mountain
view.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
everybody,
mr
casper
zach.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
few
words.
G
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
and
it's
great
to
see
all
the
members
of
the
council
you
know
march
is
red
cross
month.
It
has
been
forever
and
it
is
an
opportunity
for
communities
across
the
country
to
recognize
all
of
the
volunteers
that
work
on
disasters
that
teach
first,
aid
that
are
blood
and
platelet
donors,
and
that
are
financial
donors
that
make
the
red
cross
what
it
is
today.
G
The
mission
of
the
red
cross
is
to
prevent
and
alleviate
human
suffering
in
the
face
of
emergencies
by
mobilizing
the
power
of
volunteers
and
the
generosity
of
their
donors.
You've
listed
some
of
the
things
that
have
been
done
here
in
mountain
view,
just
some
of
the
things
that
have
been
happening
in
the
county.
Over
the
last
year,
over
222
families
were
assisted
in
116
emergencies,
responding
to
two
to
three
fires
a
week
throughout
the
county.
G
We
also
provide
service
to
our
military
families
and
veterans,
and
we
did
over
900
cases
this
year
with
military
members.
In
our
county,
we
collected
over
17
400
units
of
blood
in
500
blood
drives
throughout
the
county,
and
it's
important
to
know
that
one
pint
of
blood
can
serve
up
to
three
people
and
we
trained
over
9
000
people
in
various
eight
forms
of
first
aid
and
cpr.
G
So,
just
a
little
bit
of
the
work
we've
been
doing
here
in
the
county
and
in
mountain
view,
we're
grateful
to
the
city
for
working
with
us
to
start
doing
blood
drives,
and
we
are
always
here
for
the
people
of
mountain
view,
through
our
sound
the
alarm
program,
to
make
sure
that
they
get
active
smoke,
detectors
change
their
batteries
every
year
at
least
twice
a
year,
and
that's
about
all
I
have
to
say.
G
I
will
just
say
I
think
I'm
also
being
joined,
although
not
here
by
some
of
our
other
community
volunteers,
neil
mata
and
nisha
boxy,
and
with
that,
that's
it.
Unless
anybody
has
any
questions
which
I
doubt.
A
A
Take
mike
out
of
the
panel,
we
are
happy
to
be
joined
this
evening
by
president
of
the
los
altos
mountain
view
league
with
league
of
women
voters,
karen
bricker,
to
accept
this
proclamation,
and
I
see
karen
is
joining
us
now.
In
the
panel.
A
The
proclamation
reads,
whereas
american
women
of
every
race,
class
and
ethnic
background
have
made
historic
contributions
to
the
growth
and
strength
of
mountain
view,
in
countless
recorded
and
unrecorded
ways
and
american
women
have
played
and
continue
to
play,
critical
economic,
cultural
and
social
social
roles
in
every
year
of
life
of
the
nation
and
constitute
a
significant
portion
of
the
labor
force
working
inside
and
outside
of
the
home.
And
whereas
american
women
have
played
a
unique
role
throughout
the
history
of
the
nation.
A
H
I
would
love
to,
but
very
few
thank
you
mayor
ramirez
vice
mayor
hicks
and
members
of
the
city
council
for
commemorating
women's
history
month
with
this
proclamation.
I
accept
it
on
behalf
of
the
league
of
women
voters
of
los
alcos
mountain
view.
101
years
ago,
women's
suffrage
became
part
of
our
constitution
with
the
19th
amendment.
H
In
that
same
year
the
national
league
was
founded
because
the
work
of
voting
and
other
crucial
rights
was
not
done
and
is
not
done.
There
is
much
to
do.
41
years
later,
our
local
league
was
formed.
The
women
and
men
of
the
league
educate
the
community
about
the
importance
of
voting
about
candidates
and
issues.
We
are
non-partisan
and
we
never
support
candidates.
H
Instead,
we
provide
reliable,
trustworthy
information,
so
voters
can
make
informed
choices
for
themselves.
We
do
advocate
for
ballot
measures
and
local
issues,
especially
those
we
prioritize
this
year.
They
are
making
democracy,
work,
housing
and
homelessness
and
ameliorating
climate
change.
We
are
dedicated
to
continuing
this
work
and
appreciate
this
recognition.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
Thank
you
very
much
karen
for
joining
us
to
accept
the
proclamation.
Would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
say
a
few
words
I
will
was
that
there
was
a
hand
there
vice
mayor,
hicks,.
I
Well,
I
I
was
just
going
to
say
thank
you,
ms
bricker,
for
for
accepting
the
award
and
or
the
the
recognition,
and
also
I
I
have
to
say
that
I
think
of
my
grandmother,
who
was
a
member
of
the
league
when
women
voting
was
still
a
new
and
special
thing,
certainly
not
something
that
was
taken
for
granted.
So
as
as
we're
recognizing
this
month.
I
I'm
thinking
of
my
grandmother.
Thank
you.
I
A
You
any
other
comments.
The
only
thing
I
would
add-
and
I
think
this
was
mentioned
at
the
last
council
meeting
as
well.
Six
of
our
seven
member
council
are
women.
All
three
of
our
council
appointees
are
women.
It
only
took
I
think,
120
years
to
get
here
really
historic,
I'm
honored
to
serve
with
all
of
you.
A
K
Great,
thank
you
so
much
mayor,
ramirez
and
council
colleagues.
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
introduce
high
school
junior
ava
porter,
who
worked
with
me
on
tonight's
proclamation,
ava
attends
my
alma
mater
presentation,
high
school,
and
I
was
thrilled
to
work
with
her
on
tonight's
celebration.
Ava.
What
are
you.
L
Thank
you,
council
member
committee
hi.
My
name
is
eva
porter
and
I'm
a
junior
at
presentation,
high
school
in
san
jose
this
semester.
I've
been
attending
a
civics
class
and
as
our
semester
project,
we
have
been
assigned
to
do
any
kind
of
work
in
our
government
in
order
to
fully
grasp
the
impact
one
person
can
make
I
reached
out
to
council
member
kame,
and
she
was
kind
enough
to
allow
me
to
work
with
her
on
this
incredible
award.
It
is
my
honor
and
privilege
to
recognize
a
few
people
from
our
community
tonight.
L
L
The
mountain
view
is
a
multi-racial
and
cross-class
mutual
aid
fund
led
by
working-class
latina
immigrants
in
mountain
view,
to
primarily
support
undocumented
latino
families.
In
mountain
view,
their
work
is
led
primarily
by
latina
parents
in
mountain
view,
who
have
been
informally
organizing
supporting
families
in
our
community
and
fighting
for
equality
in
education,
affordable
housing
and
economic
opportunity
for
20-plus
years.
L
Mountain
view.
Solidarity
fund
is
the
latest
community-led
effort
in
this
decades-long
arc
of
community
organizing
in
january
2021
with
fiscal
sponsorship
via
los
altos
mountain
view,
community
foundation,
these
seven
latina
community
leaders,
leverage
trusted
relationships
and
networks
in
schools,
churches,
community
groups,
etc
to
quietly
identify
and
get
critical
financial
support
to
families
who
have
been
among
the
hardest
hit
during
coven
in
2021
they
redis
redistributed
more
than
1.2
million
dollars
in
flexible
financial
assistance
to
500
plus
low-income
families
in
our
community.
L
In
our
early
stages
of
2021,
they
raised
100
more
than
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
private
donations
and
redistributed
critical,
flexible
assistance
to
a
hundred
plus
undocumented
latino
families
through
a
simple
accessible
process
through
trusted.
Community
members,
the
city
of
mountain
view
allocated
one
million
dollars
in
coveted
relief
support
to
be
redistributed
by
mountain
view.
Solidarity
funds
latina
immigrant
community
leaders
in
just
two
months.
L
They
distributed
the
funds
through
a
simple,
accessible
process
to
almost
400
of
the
hardest
to
reach
families
in
our
community,
including
80
percent
plus
undocumented
households,
and
more
than
50
percent
of
households
who
had
not
received
any
kind
of
financial
assistance
during
copen.
We
are
thrilled
to
honor
them
tonight.
Back
to
you,
council,
member.
K
Great
thanks
so
much
ava.
I
really
appreciate
all
your
efforts
as
we
worked
with
the
city
clerk's
office,
to
make
tonight
a
reality
and,
as
some
of
you
know
this
year,
I'm
president
of
the
league
of
california,
women's
caucus,
the
women's
caucus,
we're
nonpartisan
and
multicultural
organization
of
local
public
officials
who
are
dedicated
to
advancing
and
empowering
women
as
leaders
and
advocating
for
issues
that
improve
the
well-being
of
women
and
constituents
throughout
the
state.
Each
year,
the
league
of
california
cities,
women's
caucus,
honors
women
of
persistence.
K
K
K
And
so
I
just
said:
congratulations
this
year
when
I
was
asked
to
nominate
a
woman
of
persistence,
I
knew
it
could
not
just
be
one
person.
It
had
to
be
the
mountain
view,
solidarity
fund
over
the
years,
but
especially
this
year
I
was
able
to
get
to
know
all
of
you
closely
whether
it
was
working
on
vaccine
appointment
opportunities,
distribution
of
coca-19
tests
or
organizing
community
events.
You
are
all
well-connected,
latino
parents
who
have
worked
as
community
organizers
for
years.
K
You
have
all
been
committed
to
the
community
without
asking
for
anything
in
return
and
often
putting
the
well-being
of
others
before
yourselves.
You
are
committed
to
the
greater
good
of
others
from
the
bottom
of
my
heart.
Thank
you.
You
are
all
women
of
persistence.
So
if
you
don't
mind,
if
a
round
of
applause
for
our
awardees.
N
N
To
suffer
on
the
depth
of
my
heart,
I
want
to
say
thank
you
very
much
to
all
of
you.
Thank
you
for
this
recognition,
and
every
day
of
our
lives
is
our
commitment
is
to
serve
our
community
of
mountain
view,
because
we
love
mountain
view.
Thank
you
very
much.
K
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Councilmember
tomay,
for
your
leadership
and
for
recognizing
a
community
group
in
mountain
view.
Would.
I
Well,
I'll
just
say
very
few
words.
I
just
want
to
extend
a
deep
thanks
to
you
for
for
all
that,
you've
done.
O
A
Thank
you,
paulo
did
you
did
you
want
to
share
a
quick
thought.
P
P
J
J
Today,
I
give
a
special
thanks
to
the
los
altos
mountain
view,
community
foundation
for
all
the
support
they
gave
us
to
create
the
mountain
view,
solidarity
foundation.
With
that
the
support
of
this
great
organization,
this
would
not
have
been
possible.
Thank
you
mountain
view,
city
council,
for
giving
us
a
great
opportunity
to
demonstrate
our
ability
to
administer
and
manage
local
resources
through
this
program.
J
I
want
to
emphasize
that
this
action
of
trust
and
credibility
towards
the
members
of
our
solidarity
foundation
demonstrates
once
again
that
mountain
view
is
a
city
that
I
believe
believes
in
basic
principles
of
equity
and
inclusiveness.
I,
my
colleagues,
our
fellow
anthony
chang,
feel
extremely
honored
to
be
to
be
recognized
and
receive
this
today.
It
is
very
gratifying
to
know
that
our
work
is
recognized
by
such
a
distinguished
organization,
women's
caucus.
Thank
you
for
a
respectable
helen
kame
member
of
the
city
council
and
president
of
the
women's
caucuses
in
the
league
of
california
cities.
J
I
have
for
honoring
arenas
with
this
solidarity
foundation
of
the
year.
Women's
persistences
for
me
has
been
an
honor
to
work
with
the
women's
caucuses.
It
has
always
been
an
honor
for
me
to
work
with
my
fellow
women
and
men
leaders
in
this
community
in
different
and
diverse
over
the
past
years,
and
I
do
it
because
I
love
my
community
and
because,
as
a
leader,
I
have
a
moral
obligation
to
fight
for
just
causes
and
a
conviction
to
bring
about
change
and
equipment
to
our
community.
J
However,
those
changes
improvements
will
not
be
possible
without
your
support.
The
community
requires
participation
from
the
city
council,
our
community
leaders
and
all
of
us
as
a
community
community
leaders.
I
reaffirmed
my
commitment
to
continue
to
work
as
a
team
in
common
good
and
which,
although
for
the
well-being
of
the
community,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
and
attention.
A
Thank
you
very
much
olga
very
quickly.
We're
gonna
have
to
move
on
to
the
next
presentation.
Did
you
want
to
add
a
quick
thought.
J
Good
evening
respectable
council
members,
it
is
such
an
honor
to
be
recognized
tonight.
Special.
Thank
you
to
ellen.
She
is
wonderful
for
giving
this
nomination
and
for
supporting
the
solidarity
foundation
of
mountain
view.
It
is
especially
great
to
be
honored
since
women's
work
is
not
always
recognized,
and
I
commit
myself
with
passion
to
this
program
and
thank
you
from
everyone
from
the
solidarity
foundation.
A
A
A
And
then,
if
rabbi
prosnic
could
also
be
added,
go
ahead
and
read
the
proclamation,
whereas
anti-semitism
is
the
centuries
old
bigotry
and
form
of
hate
faced
by
jewish
people
simply
because
they
are
simply
because
they
are
jews,
often
involving
the
use
of
stereotypes
and
myths.
And
whereas
nearly
one
in
four
jewish
americans
said
they
experienced
anti-semitism
in
the
past
year.
A
In
the
anti-vaccine
movement
january,
13,
2022
and
february
20
2022
in
santa
rosa,
then
vandalism
of
a
holocaust
memorial
statue
january
7
2022
and
in
los
angeles,
two
jewish
diners,
were
assaulted
outside
a
restaurant.
A
After
the
assailants
asked,
who
was
jewish
may
18th
2021
and
whereas
jewish
neighbors
in
our
own
community
are
fearful
of
the
current
uptick
in
anti-semitic
incidents
and
hateful
rhetoric,
and
whereas
the
city
of
mountain
view
has
a
duty
to
speak
out
against
all
forms
of
discrimination
and
hate
and
draws
its
strength
from
its
diverse
population,
of
which
many
self-identify
as
jewish.
Now,
therefore,
be.
It
proclaimed
that
I
lucas
ramirez,
mayor
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
on
behalf
of
the
city
council
and
the
city,
hereby
condemn
anti-semitism
and
stand
with
the
jewish
people.
R
Yes,
please
so
mayor
members
of
the
city
council,
I'm
honored
to
be
here
this
evening,
along
with
my
colleague
from
congregation
betham,
to
accept
this
proclamation.
Thank
you.
We
really
appreciate
your
leadership
and
speaking
out
against
anti-semitism,
and
I
especially
want
to
thank
mayor
ramirez
and
council
member
comey
for
their
past
partnership
with
jcrc.
R
R
First,
it's
important
as
you
have
to
treat
anti-semitism
like
other
forms
of
hate
and
our
community
must
be
involved
in
in
describing
and
defining
it.
Second,
our
community
is
very
diverse
and
different
jews
experience
anti-semitism
differently,
given
their
different
identities
and
different
experiences
in
life.
R
Third,
jewish
identity
is
increasingly
being
conflated
with
the
politics
of
the
israeli-palestinian
conflict
and
relatedly.
When
politics
is
involved,
concerns
are
sometimes
brushed
aside,
because
it's
it's
challenging
and
it's
political
speech
and
it's
brushed
aside,
sometimes
as
controversial.
Fourth.
Anti-Semitism
is
found
across
the
political
spectrum,
but
it's
in
its
most
toxic
forms
that
both
political
extremes
and
finally,
beside
behind
much
of
the
anti-semitism
we
see
today,
is
that
people
just
don't
really
know
or
understand
jews.
R
You
know
we
don't
fit
neatly
into
an
identity
box,
we're
both
a
diverse
people
and
of
faith
to
address
this.
We
launched
a
campaign
this
year
using
video
story
italian,
it's
called
here.
I
am,
and
you
can
see
it
at
hereimstories.com
and
I
encourage
you
to
visit
this
website
watch
video
stories
from
elected
officials,
rabbis
and
community
members
who
talk
about
who
they
are
as
jews
and
their
experiences
with
anti-semitism.
S
I
so
admire
the
city
of
mountain
view
I'm
signed
on
to
my
wife's
computer,
so
I'm
rabbi,
john
president
of
congregation
in
bethlehem.
S
I
also
admire
the
citizen
mountain
view's,
continued
quest
to
support
those
who
are
most
vulnerable
in
our
community
at
all
costs
and
to
recognize
that
we
does
take
a
village.
It
takes
a
village
to
raise
our
kids.
It
takes
a
village
to
fight
any
form
of
discrimination,
and
this
proclamation
is
a
great
symbol,
not
just
for
the
city
of
mountain
view,
for
all
those
throughout
our
community.
So
as
they
say
in
hebrew,
kol
hakavod
job
well
done.
Thank
you
to
mayor
ramirez
and
the
entire
city
council.
A
Thank
you
and
I
would
also
like
to
recognize
councilman
robbie
koga,
who
had
recommended
that
we
bring
this
res
the
proclamation
before
the
council
sooner.
Would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
say
a
few
words
council
member
robbie
koga.
T
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
want
to
thank
ms
stiller
and
rabbi
president
for
being
here
and
accepting
our
proclamation.
T
It's
been
it's
unfortunate
that
we
have
to
do
a
proclamation
like
this
and
unfortunate
that
many
of
our
segments
of
our
community
have
been
experiencing
hate
through
in
a
heightened
level.
I
would
I
would
say
in
the
last
few
years,
but
this
is
why
it's
important
for
us
to
one
speak
out
and
also
to
be
united
in
our
fight
against
hate
of
any
kind.
I
am
actually
tuned
into
your
webinar,
the
adl
webinar
fighting
hate
from
home.
T
It
was
very
really
quite
striking.
Actually-
and
just
you
know
reminded
me
how
much
I'm
vigilant.
We
have
to
continue
to
be
to
to
fight
hate,
and
I
just
want
to
be
thank
the
community
too.
T
When
you
know
our
asian
community
experienced
hate,
the
jewish
community
were
one
of
the
first
communities
to
come
forward
to
unite
with
us,
and
it
might
me
personally
when
I
was
mayor
back
in
2009,
I
had
experienced
some
hate
messages
and
had
shared
that
with
the
community,
and
it
was
actually,
I
can't
remember
his
name,
but
rabbi
back
then,
and
many
other
members
of
the
jewish
community
who
came
forward
first
and
and
offered
their
support.
T
So
I
personally
want
to
thank
you
and
thank
the
community
and
we'll
continue
to
to
keep
working
together
to
to
to
fight
the
hate
and
hopefully
be
more
unified
as
a
community.
Thank
you.
U
Thank
you
mayor,
well,
I'd
just
like
to
thank
the
jcrc
and
bethlehem
for
all
their
good
works
throughout
the
year,
in
particular,
jcrc
for
their
steadfast
support
of
supporting
survivors
of
human
trafficking
and
supporting
refugees
everywhere,
regardless
of
what
country
they
come
from
and
for
betham
for
everything
that
you
do
throughout
the
year.
Rabbi
prosthetic
is
always
available
literally,
and
whether
the
issue
is
child
care
or
people
in
need.
U
S
A
A
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
the
presentation
items
listed
on
the
agenda.
So
this
is
the
preceding
four
presentations.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen,
we'll
allocate
two
minutes.
V
J
Yes,
good
evening,
city,
council,
members
and
everyone
who's
joining
us
tonight,
my
name
is
dora.
Isabel
salazar.
I
have
lived
in
the
city
of
mountain
view
for
21
years.
I
am
a
volunteer
to
solidarity
foundation.
I
am
extremely
thankful
for
this
award
for
the
contribution
to
our
community
to
to
cover
19
impact.
I
would
like
to
let
you
know
that
this
experience
has
been
extremely
rewarding.
We
have
been
able
to
see
up
close
the
need
of
our
community
and,
in
these
aspects,
economic,
physical,
emotional
and
social.
J
This
change
was
a
great
impact
for
all
of
us.
The
one
million
award
brought
great
relief
to
many
families,
although
not
the
solution
to
the
problems
and
brought
on
by
this
pandemic.
Once
again,
thank
you
for
trusting
us
and
giving
us
the
opportunity.
We
would
be
greatly
honored
to
do
it
all
over
again
join
us
in
working
together
to
make
our
community
better.
Thank
you.
A
Jack,
are
you
able
to
mute
yourself
to
speak.
A
Proceed
to
the
consent
calendar
jack,
if
you
would
like
to
speak,
feel
free
to
do
so
during
non-agenda
public
comment.
That's
item
5.
A
The
consent
calendar
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
council
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
The
reading
of
the
full
text
of
resolutions
and
ordinances
will
be
waived
unless
a
council
member
requests
otherwise.
As
a
reminder,
the
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
council
to
efficiently
and
quickly
consider
a
high
volume
of
routine
or
administrative
business
items
with
one
motion,
although
council
members
may
remove
items,
it
is
generally
not
intended
for
the
council
to
have
a
lengthy,
substantive
discussion
on
consent.
O
I
don't
want
to
pull
an
item,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment
in
particular
the
item.
Well,
many
of
these
items
are
a
tremendous
amount
of
work.
So
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
doing
that,
but
in
particular
item
4.3,
the
general
plan
annual
progress
report-
that
not
only
is
the
report
itself
a
great
deal
of
work,
it
represents.
O
You
know
all
the
development
that
has
taken
place
in
the
last
year
here
and
it's
really
quite
impressive,
and
I
I
just
wanted
to
to
mention
that
that
that
we
appreciate
all
the
work
that
the
the
planning
and
the
building
and
public
works
have
had
to
do
to
make
that
come
to
fruition,
and
we
we're
just
we're
very
thankful
for
their
contribution.
A
A
A
There
should
be
a
prompt,
unfortunately,
we're
not
able
to
hear
you
we'll
we'll
give
you
one
more
chance
in
item
five.
The
non-agenda
public
comment.
I'm
sorry
if
this
isn't
working
being
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
on
the
consent,
calendar
we'll
proceed
with
a
motion,
so
this
is
for
the
balance
of
the
consent
calendar,
excluding
4.5,
councilmember,
robbie,
toga,.
T
Thank
you
mayor
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
balance
of
the
consent
calendar
other
than
4.5,
and
that
includes
4.1,
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
of
city
council,
the
city
of
mountain
view
authorizing
and
continuing
virtual
meetings
of
city
council
committees,
boards
and
commissions
pursuant
to
ab361
and
making
required
findings
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
4.2
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
to
oppose
the
taxpayer
protection
and
government
accountability
act
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
the
reading
waived.
E
F
A
I
feel
badly
about
fully
4.5,
but
I
seen
the
response
to
the
council
questions
submitted
in
advance.
I
I
wanted
to
ask
a
few
questions
about
how
we
it
it
feels
like
the
rules
are
inconsistent
across
the
annual
performance
reports.
So,
for
instance,
I
went
back
several
years
in
2019,
for
instance,
so
I
appreciated
the
response
to
the
intent
in
the.
I
think.
It's
page
two.
It
shows
the
gross
number
of
units,
not
the
net
new
and
so
570.
A
South
brainstorm
was
reflected
to
the
85
as
opposed
to
15.,
but
it
feels
like
that's
not
always
applied
in
2019
when
the
council
approved.
I
think
it
was
a
2310
rock
street
in
1950
monticido.
I
can't
recall
if
there
were
net
reductions
or
or
minor
increases,
but
the
pro
the
projects
are
absent
from
from
previous
annual
progress
reports
and
the
777
west
middle
field
doesn't
appear
to
show
the
gross
number
of
units,
and
so
I
wanted
to
get
clarity
from
staff.
W
I
can
tell
you
mayor
that
this
year
we
did
review
the
guidance
provided
by
apr.
I
know
that
that
gets
more
and
more
specific.
Every
year
I
probably
eric
anderson
who
helped
prepare.
The
report
is
also
here
and
can
probably
give
you
some
more
technical
information,
we're
happy
to
go
back
in
time
and
review
some
of
the
questions
you
asked
in
case.
We
can't
do
it
today.
X
Hi
mayor,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Thank
you
rt.
The
truth
is
that
this
is
a
very
complicated
report
and
there
are
a
lot
of
complicated
rules.
We
have
endeavored.
X
We
have
been
very
consistent
in
how
we
apply
what
actually
gets
counted
to
our
arena,
so
the
the
numbers
in
the
kind
of
middle
columns
of
table
a2
that
reflect
the
building
permits
we've
done
that
exactly
the
same
every
time
and
if
we
found
errors
in
the
past,
we've
gone
back
and
corrected
them
with
hcd
and
everything
the
other
columns
or
the
other
table
table
a2.
I
think
I
will
admit
that
we
didn't
realize
until
this
year
that
they
were
asking
for
gross.
X
Looking
for
whether
the
city
is
requiring
reductions
in
housing
units,
so
a
gross
number
rather
than
a
net
number
now,
because
that
data
isn't
tracked
from
year
to
year,
it's
not
in
our
arena
progress,
we
didn't
feel
it
was
important
to
go
back
and
correct
the
older
reports,
but
that's
the
detailed
story
for
how
we
may
have
looked
at
table
a2
differently
in
the
past.
A
Okay,
thank
you
that
that's
helpful
and
then
the
next
question
is
I
I
don't
feel
like
there's
a
lot
of
value
and
going
back
in
time
and
amending
previously
approved
reports
unless
you
feel
it
isn't
important
to
go
back.
So
I
I
guess
the
question
for
staff
would
be.
Is
it
really
worth
the
effort
to
go
and
correct
errors
going
back
a
few
years.
X
I
I
think
it's
only
appropriate
to
go
back
and
correct
errors
if
it
affects
our
arena
progress.
So
if
it's
based
on
the
building
permits.
A
A
Thank
you
any
questions
or
concerns,
if
not
we'll
go
to
the
city
clerk
for
the
roll
call
vote.
F
A
Thank
you
and
thank
you
staff
for
answering
those
questions.
We
will
now
move
to
item
five
oral
communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic,
we'll
see
how
much
time
is
available
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Spanish
translation
services
are
available
for
this
item.
We
will
now
hear
from
our
interpreters.
A
F
Z
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
mayor
council,
members.
Over
the
past
two
years,
the
city
has
been
very
proactive
in
helping
tenants
who
have
lost
their
their
income
due
to
covet
pandemic
to
help
pay
their
rent.
Furthermore,
the
state
has
come
in
and
provided
rental
assistance
over,
but
all
of
this
ends
on
the
first
of
april
and
specifically
what's
ending
is
the
eviction
moratorium
that
prevents
the
landlords
from
from
evicting
tenants
who
haven't
paid
the
past
rent.
AA
Yes,
my
apologies,
mr
mayor,
for
the
earlier
inconvenience
I'd
like
to
congratulate
you
guys
for
your
proclamations
and
declarations.
AA
I
did
want
to
comment
on
the
navarro
case,
because
my
wife
and
I
are
among
the
homeless
here
in
mountain
view,
and
it
seems
like
there's
a
discriminatory
practice
of
enforcing
the
safe
streets
act
or
the
narrow
streets
act
that,
in
my
view,
there's
there's
there.
It's
not
being
enforced
against
anyone
else
other
than
rv
owners,
and
you
know
none
of
these
parking
laws
are
really
being
enforced
very
well,
but
it
seems
like
the
rvers
are
targets
of
law
enforcement.
AA
At
least
we
were
on
at
least
three
occasions
in
the
last
month,
so
I
wanted
to
bring
that
to
the
council's
attention.
I
know
there's
not
a
lot
of
time.
I
did
have
some
other
suggestions
concerning
the
negotiations
on
a
settlement
agreement.
AA
A
Thank
you
jack.
I'm
sorry,
you've
exhausted
your
time,
but
please
do
follow
up
with
an
email
with
any
additional
thoughts
or
ideas.
The
next
speaker
is
deborah
lundgren.
Y
Yes,
we
can
okay,
I
am.
I
am
wanting
to
speak
on
the
project
at
1057
through
1061
el
monte,
it's
a
senior
housing
project
that
we
are
all
glad
that
is
coming
to
our
city,
because
we
all
agree
that
it's
an
important
asset
that
is
needed.
Y
Our
concern
is
that
the
project
has
been
approved
which
are
much
with
a
much
higher
density
that
goes
beyond
the
state
density
bonus
and
nobody
has
been
able
to
explain
clearly
how
it's
come
about
to
be
as
density
as
it
is,
and
so
we
are
requesting
that
this
be.
This
item
be
placed
on
a
city
council
agenda
meeting
in
the
future
so
that
it
can
be
discussed.
Y
Our
concerns
on
this
can
be
discussed
and
and
addressed
specifically,
so
we
can
understand
how
the
project
was
approved
to
be
so
high
and
so
massive.
AB
Greetings,
council
mackenzie
resident
of
the
montaloma
neighborhood
just
want
to
make
note
of
an
article
from
the
boston
globe
today.
Eviction
rates
higher
in
communities
of
color
during
pandemic
report
report
fines,
55
percent
of
evictions
in
massachusetts.
AB
I
worry
about
seeing
the
same
thing
happening
here
in
mountain
view.
The
were
hopefully
hopefully
through
the
public
health
aspect
of
the
pandemic,
but
the
recovery
is
going
to
take
a
lot
longer
and
seeing
that
the
state
moratorium
on
eviction
is
ending.
Knowing
that
there's
money
it
just
hasn't
gone
out.
Yet
I
would
love
to
see
something
enacted
by
the
city.
AB
Also
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
to
have
heard
from
a
previous
speaker
of
being
harassed
in
an
rv
by
the
police
several
times
in
the
past
month,
when
it
was
my
impression
that
no
enforcement
of
narrow
streets
ordinance
was
happening
until
april,
1st
or
5th,
or
something
like
that.
So
that
was
really
troubling
to
hear
and
something
that
I,
as
a
resident
of
the
city
am
very
disappointed
in,
but
also
thanks
for
having
comment
after
the
presentations
in
item
3.
That
was
a
great
change.
AC
Evening,
council,
I'm
here
to
speak
on
two
items.
One
is
inherently
the
eviction
moratorium,
as
previous
makers
have
mentioned,
as
coming
to
an
end
from
the
state,
but
even
at
the
state
that,
but
even
the
landlords
have
asked
for
an
extension
of
the
mortar,
which
kind
of
tells
you
how
dire
the
situation
still
is.
AC
The
other
item
I'd
like
to
speak
out.
As
regards
the
bike
fatality
that
happened
last
week.
I
do
recognize
that
staff
is
working
their
hardest
on
this
issue,
but
I
feel
like
we've
done
a
lot
of
waiting
in
the
past
decade.
We've
had
fatalities
before
and
it
doesn't
seem
like.
There's
much
has
changed
so
we
do
wish
the
city
put
more
resources
into.
AC
You
know
things
that
protect
bikers
and
pedestrians.
You
know
we
spend
a
million
dollars
on
signs
to
kick
out.
Rvs
like
I
feel
like.
We
could
have
used
the
money
better
to
make
sure
that
you
know
students
can
go
from
their
mobile
home
park
to
their
schools
without
dying,
because
someone
just
didn't
look
at
it
for
a
moment's
notice,
so
I
hope
we
do
put
a
great
emphasis
on
life.
Thank
you.
AD
Hail
like
with
the
previous
speakers,
I
would
appreciate
an
eviction
moratorium.
I
think
that
one
of
the
the
great
things
about
having
a
city
about
having
government
in
general
is
the
ability
to
protect
people,
and
this
is
a
good
time
to
do
that,
and
keeping
people
off
the
streets
and
in
their
homes
is
huge.
AD
Additionally,
the
bike
lane
and
trying
to
protect
kids,
it's
about
it's.
I
can't
think
of
anything
that
is
more
important
than
the
safety
of
the
next
generation
of
just
people,
and
anything
you
can
do
to
help
is
this
is
a
tragedy,
and
it's
sad
that
that
it
often
takes
a
tragedy
to
galvanize
action,
but
I
am
very
heartened
to
see
that
there
is
work
being
done
and
that
everyone
here
has
the
goal
of
doing
what
we
can
to
help
people
thanks.
AD
AE
Good
evening
council,
this
is
christine
keller
from
555
west
middle
field.
I
thank
you
so
much
for
taking
the
time
on
public
comment.
I
really
appreciate
it.
I
have
been
in
touch
with
trying
to
be
in
touch
with
avalon
and
my
neighbors
about
our
concerns
at
5.5,
a
few
things
that
are
current
right
now
that
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
and
ask
for
your
support
with
are.
AE
I
know
that
they're
working
on
trying
to
save
some
of
the
redwoods
in
block
a
I
do
hope
that
we
can
save
all
12
redwoods
in
blockade,
but
for
the
few
that
they've
mentioned
that
they're
specifically
trying
to
save
179,
180
and
181,
it
doesn't
sound
like
they're
leaving
10
foot
space
around
it,
which
would
be
important
for
the
survival.
AE
For
example,
178
should
be
one
saved
as
well,
because
otherwise,
179
and
180
won't
have
much
of
a
chance
of
survival.
I
don't
think
is
my
understanding,
because
they're
very
close,
together
and
redwoods
are
kind
of
community
grove
type
trees,
so
they
really
rely
on
each
other.
So
I
really
hope
that
there
can
be
more
encouragement
to
have
an
arborist
and
help
them
to
not
just
save
the
trees
but
make
sure
that
they
can
last
and
also
I
want
to
give
my
support
again
for
block
c
to
save
the
tree
canopy.
Thank
you.
V
J
Yes,
hello,
my
name
is
isabel
salazar.
I
have
lived
in
this
beautiful
city
of
mountain
view
for
about
21
years.
I
want
to
tell
you
that
I
am
concerned
about
the
community.
Now
the
eviction
moratorium
is
going
to
end
because
of
I
know,
there's
many
cases
of
low-income
community
members
who
are
still
in
need
of
assistance
to
pay
their
rent.
For
example,
people
who
haven't
been
employed
by
restaurants
who
cannot
go
to
work
because
these
restaurants
have
clothes.
J
A
lot
of
the
community
members
have
opted
on
having
two
shifts
just
to
be
able
to
afford
their
living
expenses
and
also
other
trades
that
have
been
affected
because
they
have
reduced
their
work
hours
and
the
impact
of
this
pandemic
has
affected
their
economy.
It
is
necessary
to
request
a
new
addiction
moratorium,
because
this
instability
is
not
over
yet,
although
there
are
fewer
fewer
covet
cases,
our
community
is
still
impacted
and
is
sad
and
it's
affected
the
most
vulnerable,
not
only
economically
but
emotionally
and
in
their
health
problems.
We
need
more
solutions
and
less
displacement.
J
Good
evening
city
council,
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
you
for
all
the
amazing
work
you've
been
doing
and
also
for
the
eviction
help
center
staff,
who
has
been
providing
support
to
so
many
community
members
in
applying
for
rent
assistance.
We
are
worried
this
eviction.
Moratorium
is
about
to
end
we're
worried
about
the
children.
Will
they
be
able
to
have
a
home?
Will
they
be
ready
to
go
back
to
school
if
the
families
don't
have
a
protection
for
their
home?
C
J
Good
evening
city,
council
members,
my
name
is
maria
marroquin.
It
was
my
intentions
to
find
the
right
words
to
say
tonight,
but
I
have
said
here
and
watch
you
all
city,
council
members,
community
members
speak,
and
I
am
feeling
like
everyone
will
do
the
right
thing
and
find
a
way
in
a
solution
to
extend
this
moratorium
to
make
sure
that
the
community
members
are
not
displaced
from
their
home.
Thank
you.
AG
Hi
yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
express
support
for
extending
the
moratorium
and
also
for
additional
bike
safety
in
the
city.
I
would
say
more
about
it,
but
james
kuzmal
already
said
it
perfectly
in
his
op-ed
in
mountain
view,
voice,
and
I
hope
you
get
a
chance
to
read
it.
Thank
you.
C
A
C
AH
AH
AH
AH
J
J
The
code
pandemic
has
not
just
affected
us
financially,
it
is
also
something
that
is
extremely
mentally
draining.
I
have
a
family,
I
have
two
small
children
and
I
have
been
harassed
by
my
landlord
for
payment,
and
I
am
sure
that
I
am
not
alone.
I
asked
you
to
touch
your
heart
and
do
the
right
thing
and
please
help
everyone
who
is
in
need
of
this
financial
assistance
and
also
for
their
own
mental
health.
Thank
you.
AI
Hi
good
evening,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
speak
with
us,
and
I
just
want
to
second
everything
that
my
my
friends
are
saying
I
think,
like
isabelle
maria
maria
maroquin
paola
in
cindy.
The
moratorium
is
very
important
because
it
affects
a
lot
of
families
and
I'm
sorry.
AI
I
get
emotional
because
I
have
older,
kids
and
and
with
older
families
that
have
older
kids
and
they
see
the
parents
struggling
because
of
the
monetary
ending
and
not
knowing,
if
they're
going
to
live
in
their
homes,
it's
very
frustrating
and
and
it's
very
worrisome
for
them
and
and
they're
not
stable
emotionally.
AI
So
I
beg
you,
we
beg
you
to.
You
know
take
time
to
consider
this,
because
I
just
you
know
it's
it's
a
big
big
problem
that
their
families
are
going
through
and
yeah.
Just
you
know,
one
is
second
everything
that
my
my
my
friends
are
saying.
Thank
you.
A
One
last
hand:
mary
lou,
you're
you're,
the
last
speaker,
so
mary
lou
quinta
flores.
I'm
sorry.
N
J
Good
evening
city,
council
members,
my
name
is
marilu
questa.
I
feel
it
is
extremely
important
for
city
council
to
help
us
with
the
living
stability
that
the
community
is
facing.
I
believe
there
has
been
many
families
who
have
applied
for
the
rent
relief
and
have
yet
to
receive
this
assistance,
and
it
is
extremely
important
that
these
families
receive
this
help.
Please
take
action.
Thank
you.
A
AJ
Thank
you
good
evening,
I'm
here
before
you
today
for
a
brief
verbal
presentation.
In
accordance
with
council
policy,
d-13
mountain
view,
employee
home
buyer
and
relocation
assistance,
the
city
clerk
is
actively
pursuing
the
purchase
of
a
primary
residence
within
a
5
or
10
mile
radius
of
mountain
view.
The
staff's
recommendation
for
council's
consideration
tonight
is
for
the
appropriation
of
funds
in
accordance
with
the
policy
and
in
the
event
that
the
city
clerk
secures
a
property
within
a
five
mile.
AJ
A
The
nun
will
move
to
the
public
comment
portion.
I
will
let's
see
here,
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raised
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
A
K
Thanks
mir,
so
I
I
realized
that
I
needed
to
read
the
whole
resolution.
So
I'll
move
the
adoption,
the
resolution
of
city
council,
the
city
of
mountain
view,
approving
housing
assistance
for
the
city
clerk
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
shall
I
read
the
attachment
one
or
is
that
necessary.
AK
K
Let's
see,
in
addition,
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54953c,
this
is
an
oral
report
of
the
summary
of
the
recommendation
of
the
action
to
be
taken
by
the
council.
K
This
evening
approve
a
loan
for
a
home
within
a
five
mile
radius
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
for
the
city
clerk
that
is
subordinate
to
a
first
loan
through
a
financial
institution
that
is
acceptable
to
the
city
up
to
a
maximum
loan
of
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
or
in
the
alternate
alone,
within
a
ten
mile
radius
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
for
the
city
clerk
that
is
subordinate
to
a
first
loan
through
a
financial
institution
that
is
acceptable
to
the
city
up
to
the
maximum
loan
amount
of
250
000.
Thanks.
O
Yes,
I'm
happy
to
second
this.
I
I
think
it's
a
good
thing
for
us
to
be
doing
to
support
our
employees
so
that
they
can
live
in
or
close
to
our
community,
both
to
be
part
of
the
community
and
also
to
limit
their
their
need
to
commute
and
the
greenhouse
gases
that
that
and
and
just
the
time,
commitment
that
that
takes.
O
So
I'm
very
happy
to
you
know
to
second
that,
but
I
also
want
to
bring
up
that
this
program
that
we've
had
for
quite
a
while
has
never
been
used
by
an
employee
by
the
policy.
As
it's
stated,
it's
always
had
to
be
changed
to
be
used,
because
I
mean
one
problem:
is
this
subordinate
issue?
The
loans
need
to
be
subordinate,
so
it's
something
that
I
feel
like
in
the
future.
O
The
council
needs
to
consider
whether
this
policy
is
appropriate
and
come
up
with
I
mean
if
it's
not
being
used
and
it's
never
been
used,
it
seems
to
me
there's
something
wrong
with
it
and
we
need
to
look
into
what
that
is.
So
it's
it's
a
it's
a
goal
of
mine.
I
think
that
it
would
be
a
good
retention
and
recruitment
policy
for
our
you
know
our
employees,
so
I
just
would
like
to
bring
this
up
as
something
that
in
the
future.
O
I
would
like
to
see
us
work
on,
but
I'm
very
happy
to
to
second,
this
particular
motion
thanks.
A
Thank
you
and
staff.
I
recall
seeing
and
the
responses
to
the
council
questions.
I
think
modification
of
this
policy
is
going
before
the
cppc
is
that
right.
D
Yes
mayor
so
once
staff
realized
some
of
the
practical
implications
of
the
policy
staff
will
be
taking
a
look
at
it
further
and
seeing
what
other
updates
may
need
to
be
made
and
then
we'll
bring
it
back
to
the
council
policies
and
procedures.
Committee.
T
Thank
you
here.
I
guess
that
is
going
to
ask
us
that
cppc
take
a
look
at.
It
sounds
like
it's
going
to
happen.
We
have
looked
at
this
policy
over
the
years
since
we
implemented,
I
think
it's
in
around
2009
and
we're
trying
to
improve
it
and
the
whole
purpose
of
it
is
to
have
it
be
used.
I
I
know
that
we
have
had
our
appointees
in
the
past.
T
Use
it,
but
it
there
was
the
the
addition
of
the
program
being
expanded
to
our
our
frontline
employees
as
well.
So
the
hope
is
that
we
can
continue
to
modify
that
part
which
I
know
there
are
some
hurdles
too,
but
to
try
to
to
modify
it
so
it
can
actually
be
used.
The
challenge
is,
of
course,
that
you
know
the
cost
of
living
here
makes
it
a
little
bit
challenging,
but
I
do
appreciate
cc
cppc,
taking
a
look
at
it
once
again.
Thank
you.
F
U
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
just
had
a
point
of
parliamentary
inquiry.
U
It's
it's
my
understanding
that
the
the
state
law
and
the
custom
and
practice
of
the
council
is
that
the
the
council
cannot
take
action
on
any
of
the
items
that
were
raised
under
public
comment
and
if
I'm
understanding
that
correctly,
I
just
wanted
to
make
the
public
that
did
comment
on
item
5,
where
that
that
that
we
kept
moving,
because
we
are
not
able
to
interact
on
those
items,
but
our
time
to
bring
up
items
is
under
item
eight.
Am
I
correct
in
that
understanding.
A
That
is
correct,
so
at
the
conclusion
near
the
conclusion,
we
will
have
council
comments,
questions
and
reports.
A
F
AM
AK
AM
AM
Alternative
one
highlights
full
expansion
of
the
north
bay
shore
area.
The
purple
lines
indicate
the
existing
infrastructure,
while
the
orange
lines
indicate
their
future
pipelines.
AM
This
option
serves
133
total
customers
with
a
total
average
day
demand
of
1.45
million
gallons
a
day.
However,
a
handful
of
days
in
the
year,
the
maximum
daily
demand
is
3.7
mgd,
which
is
0.7
mgd
more
than
our
3
million
gallon
a
day
allotment
with
palo
alto,
hence
additional
recycled
water
supply
is
needed.
AM
Alternatives:
two
three
and
four
highlight
full:
build
out
of
north
bay
shore
and
various
expansion
options
to
east
whistman,
with
a
storage
tank
and
a
potential
future
neighborhood
park.
AM
AM
AM
Alternative
four
shows
an
expansion
to
e-swissman
via
central
expressway.
This
option
includes
additional
coordination
with
santa
clara
county
and
high.
It
has
the
highest
traffic
impacts.
This
option
requires
an
additional
recycled
water
supply
of
3.5
mgd
and
accumulated
a
4.2
million
gallon
storage
requirement.
AM
As
noted
earlier,
additional
supply
is
needed
to
supplement
the
3mgd
from
palo
alto
in
order
to
meet
the
maximum
daily
demand.
In
addition
to
storage,
other
strategies
include
supplement
with
potable
water
restrict
recycled
water.
Irrigation
use,
continue
coordination
with
palo
alto,
google
and
sunnyvale
on
other
options.
Meeting
maximum
day
demand.
AM
A
summary
of
the
four
main
alternatives
considering
capital
costs
are
shown
in
this
table
for
the
build
out
of
north
bay
shore.
It's
projected
to
be
27.4
million
dollars
with
extensions
to
the
east
whistman
area,
ranging
from
41
to
52
million
dollars.
AM
The
primary
challenge
regarding
the
use
of
recycled
water
has
been
the
high
level
salinity.
The
city
of
palo,
alto
and
valley
water
entered
into
an
agreement
towards
an
advanced
treatment
system
to
reduce
salinity
to
an
acceptable
level.
The
awps
is
currently
in
60
design,
with
a
projected
cost
of
to
treat
1.125
million
mgd
at
51.4
million
dollars.
AM
AM
AM
A
storage
reservoir
siding
study
in
the
north
bay
shore
proceed
with
alternative
one
to
build
out
the
recycled
water
system
in
north
bay
shore
conduct
a
supply;
supplemental
evaluation
to
implement
alternative
three
to
expand
the
east
western
via
shoreline
and
middle
field,
and
finally
reevaluate
opportunities
to
serve
other
areas
throughout
the
city
in
the
future
when
we
are
ready
to
expand
in
those
areas.
AM
In
conclusion,
these
are
recommended
council
actions
for
your
consideration
tonight.
This
concludes
staff
presentation.
Thank
you.
We're
available
for
questions
and
answers.
I
So,
thank
you
very
much.
I
I
actually
I
wanted
to
check
in
since
the
last
time
we
vision
visited
this
subject.
Your
the
presentation
showed
maximum
daily
demands
and
storage,
but
my
my
understanding
is
that,
at
this
point,
mountain
view
has
more
water
than
we
need
so,
and
I
just
want
to
check
that.
I
I'm
right,
you
know,
there's
been
a
sort
of
a
mega
drought
since
then,
so
maybe
I'm
no
longer
right,
but
I'm
wondering
whether
it's
still
true
that
we
have
excess
water,
so
the
recycled
water
at
this
point
is
planning
for
the
future
is
my
understanding,
but
that
it's
not
needed
yet,
and
I
want
to
check
that.
That's
true
and
then
my
second
question
is:
when
might
is
there
an
estimate?
I
know
things
constantly
change,
but
is
there
an
estimate
of
of
when
we
might
need
that
water?
I
AM
Sure
I
think
maybe
I
can
answer
the
the
first
part
currently
for
the
existing
situation
or
existing
where
we
are,
and
currently
there
is
enough
supply
to
handle
kind
of
what
we
have.
Currently,
there
are
still
some
operational
storage
that
we
need
to
to
get
in
terms
of
the
current
base
case,
where
we're
at
right
now,
but
for
any
future
expansion
options,
whether
it's
expanding
north
bay
shore
or
or
expanding
out
to
east
westmin,
we
will
need
additional
supply.
AN
I
So
excuse
me
if
I've
misunderstood,
but
I
thought
that
the
recycled
water
was
a
portion
of
our
total
water,
and
so
I'm
asking-
and
I
know
that
this
is
in
some
ways-
I'm
asking
you
to
predict
the
future
and
how
climate
change
will
impact
rainfall
in
in
mountain
view,
which
I
I
think
is
probably
more
than
I
can
expect
that
you'll
answer.
But
anyway
I
wanted
to
take
a
stab
at
it.
I
wanted
to.
I
I
want
to
know,
I
want
to
confirm
that
we
still
have
more
water
than
we
need
and
that
this
is
preparing
for
the
future,
and
I
I
want
to
know.
I
assume
you
know
more
than
I
do
about
what
time
during
build
out.
We
might
win
to
shortages
and
what
you
know
what
weather
or
rainfall
predictions
you
know
with
the
the
more
serious
drought
than
we
had
the
last
time
we
spoke,
whether
you
have
any
additional
information
on
that.
AN
So
before
I'm
going
to
also
invite
lisa
al
assistant
public
works
director
to
add
on
to
my
response,
but
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
start
out
by
saying
is
last
june,
the
city
council
adopted
the
five,
the
urban
growth
urban
water
management
plan
and
it
is
available
on
our
website,
and
the
purpose
of
that
is
to
do
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
is
to
look
into
the
future
in
terms
of
our
various
sources
of
water
supply
compared
to
our
land
use
growth
patterns.
AN
To
evaluate
do
we
have
an
adequate
water
supply
and
plans
for
it
to
keep
up
with
our
land
use
planning
and
one
of
the
key
things
that
we
had
pointed
out
in
that
urban
water
management
plan
is
the
resiliency
that
the
city
has
in
terms
of
our
water
supply,
because
we
have
four
different
water
supply
sources
that
we
look
to.
Of
course,
our
primary
one
is
the
water
from
sfpuc,
also
known
as
hetch
hetchy,
but
we
also
received
some
water
from
valley
water.
AN
We
received
some
groundwater
and
recycled
water,
while
provides
approximately
four
percent
of
our
total
water
supply
is
looked
to
in
the
future.
As
an
opportunity
to
continue
to
grow
our
sustainability
and
resiliency,
because,
although
right
now
we
have,
you
know
plenty
of
guaranteed
water
supply
from
sfpuc
that
could
always
change
in
the
future
in
the
nature
of
drought,
reduce
allocations
that
could
come
to
play
into
this.
AN
AO
Don
you
did
a
good
job
in
responding
just
wanted
to
point
out
also
from
the
urban
water
management
plan.
If
you
have
a
chance
to
take
a
look
back
at
it,
we
actually
kept
our
recycled
water
estimates
in
that
study,
constant
as
to
current
use.
So
that
was,
I
think
it
like
you
know
the
0.5
or
half
half
a
million
gallons
per
day
was
the
recycled
water
estimate
we
used
in
the
urban
water
management
plan.
AO
So,
as
you
can
tell
from
this
recycled
water
study,
our
recycled
water
supply
is
a
much
greater
number
than
that,
so
that
again
provides
us
more
supply
of
water
than
than
we
need,
and
so
that's
just
to
say
that
we
we
actually
are
pretty
resilient
with
the
recycled
water
supply
and
our
our
water's
potable
water
wholesalers,
providing
us
from
sfp,
uc
and
valley,
water.
AN
What
we
do
know
is
that,
if,
if
we
want
to
continue
to
depend
upon
recycled
water
as
one
of
our
options
and
even
grow,
its
use
beyond,
as
lisa
says,
what
we're
currently
using
it,
that
that
takes
a
long-term
strategy
and
it
takes
quite
a
while
to
put
in
place,
and
so
we
this
plan-
and
this
study
is
all
about.
You
know
laying
the
groundwork
to
prepare
for
the
future.
U
U
Would
we
also
bear
you
know
some
percentage
of
a
loan
that
we
would
pay
back,
because
I
was
very
interested
in
what
kind
of
non-loan
options
are
there
for
paying
for
this,
and
I
saw
the
mention
of
of
grants
and
I
would
love
to
see
participation
of
the
very
large
companies
that
exist
in
north
bay
shore
and
also
have
a
presence
at
nasa
ames.
AO
So,
council,
member
libra,
I'm
lisa
al
assistant
public
works
director
when
this
advanced
water
purification
project
started
designing
the
city
of
palau
to
pursue
the
state
revolving
fund
loan
as
the
main
means
of
funding
the
project
and
as
you've
seen
in
the
report,
the
cost
has
increased.
AO
They
are
planning
to
ask
for
additional
state
revolving
fund
loan.
At
the
same
time,
you
know
currently
with
the
infrastructure
bill,
the
u.s
bureau
reclamation
has
obtained
some
of
that
funding
and
the
city
of
palo
alto
has
applied
for
some
grant
funding
from
the
infrastructure
bill
to
help
pay
for
the
advanced
treatment
plan.
AO
That's
in
order
of
they
are
only
supplying
25
percent,
so
75
still
needs
to
be
provided
by
the
agencies,
which
are
palo,
alto
and
mountain
view
and
mountain
view
uses
75
of
the
recycled
water,
so
we're
actually
responsible
for
75
percent
of
all
the
recycled
water
project
costs
at
the
city
of
palo
alto.
AO
AK
U
And
how
would
the
the
salinity
work
into
councils
put
a
high
priority
on
native
plants
and
north
bay
shore
and
etc,
and
and
how
would
the
higher
salinity
work
into
that.
AO
A
If
not,
we
will
turn
to
the
to
the
public.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
The
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
A
AP
Thank
you.
So
I
am
glad
this
topic
came
to
us.
AP
I
do
want
to
make
sure
that
the
two
areas
of
the
city
that
we
expect
the
most
growth
north
bay
shore
and
east
wisman
to
have
great
access
to
recycled
water,
and
I
really
want
to
note
that
I
appreciate
the
analysis
that
went
into
the
staff's
recommendation
as
I
was
reading
through
it.
I
thought,
oh,
if
only
I
knew,
and
then
there
it
was.
So
thank
you
for
anticipating
what
my
questions
were
going
to
be
and
doing
the
analysis
and
having
it
in
the
staff
report.
I
really
appreciate
it.
AP
O
Well,
I'm
happy
to
move
the
staff
recommendation
as
well,
but
I
I
I
would
like
to
do
a
little
more
talking
that
aren't
quite
questions.
One
is
that
I,
I
think
it's
really
important
for
us
to
can
continue
to
investigate
these
opportunities
and
clearly
the
first
group.
O
The
first
project
that
we
really
need
to
complete
is
the
the
sighting
of
the
storage
facility
in
the
north
bay
shore
and
the
you
know,
and
the
completion
of
that
you
know
the
building
of
that.
But
I
think
another
thing
I
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we
talk
about
in
public
is,
is
the
need-
and
I
think
public
works
is
doing
this,
but
I
still
think
it's
really
important
for
us
to
talk
about.
O
It
is
the
need
for
this
expansion
of
recycled
water
network
to
be
kept
in
mind
as
all
the
other
development
in
the
in
the
community
goes
forward.
For
instance,
if
there
is
a
trench
being
opened
up
that
could
be
used
for
a
recycled
water
line,
you
know,
could
be
used
for
a
number
of
lines
or
there's
right
away
for
a
in
a
trench
that
we
could
reserve
for
future.
You
know
for
future
recycled
water
pipes.
O
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
we
we
signal
to
our
public
works
department
that
that
this
is
a
that
this
is
a
very
important
priority
for
them
to
keep
on
top
of,
because
you
know
these,
these
expansion
facilities
are,
you
know,
are
very
complicated
and
they
cover
a
lot
of
ground
and
some
of
that
ground
is
going
to
be
dug
up
between
now
and
then
and
some
of
it
isn't.
O
So
you
know
keeping
tabs
on
on
on
what
the
chronology
is
of
various
development
projects
in
our
community.
That
could
you
know
that,
where
there's
synergism
between
this
project
and
other
projects-
I
just
you
know-
I
really
just
want
to
you
know-
I
I
discussed
this
some
with
the
with
public
works.
O
When
I
had
my
briefing-
and
I
just
want
to
bring
it
up
and
and
say
what
an
important
idea
it
is,
and
as
part
of
that,
I
think
you
know
we-
we
really
want
the
storage
facility
for
the
east
westman
site
to
also
be
cited
as
soon
as
possible,
because
that's
a
big
facility
and
there
aren't
that
many
possibilities
for
where
it
can
go.
O
So
you
know
we
we
want
getting
that
tied
down
so
that
there
is
the
adequate
pressure
in
the
system.
Is,
is
really
important
and-
and
I
just
would
urge
public
works
to
and
and
planning
to
work
on
that
as
appropriate,
and
I
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
before
we
vote
on
the
mission
on
the
motion.
I
don't
know
if
it's
something
that
we
need
to
add
to
it.
O
O
This
these
future
distribution
systems-
and
I
think,
alternative
three-
certainly
looks
the
most
promising
so
that
we
can
take
advantage
of
development
activities
that
are
being
done
before
we
get
there
to
to
reserve
right-of-ways
and
to
plan
for
needed
storage
facilities.
AP
You
know,
can
I
ask
a
question
because
I
sent
in
a
question
about
this,
and
I
was
under
the
impression
that
while
we
have
good
plans
for
north
bay
shore
that
prior
to
finalizing
the
plans
for
east
wisman,
another
analysis
was
going
to
be
done
in
order
to
sort
out
some
of
the
details.
O
No,
I
don't
think
you
did
get
that
wrong.
I
think
that
the
big
the
big
exception
for
that
is
the
storage
facility.
You
know
they
that
that
I
mean
staff.
Should
it
should
answer
that
yeah.
Let's
stay
off
answer
that.
AO
Council
members,
I
wanted
to
note
that,
in
our
summary
of
recommendations
in
the
report,
we
do
discuss
asking
council
to
support,
locating
a
second
reservoir
in
the
future
neighborhood
park
in
east
whistman.
So
does
that
cover
what
you
were
considering?
Councilmember
showalter?
Yes,
okay,
but
in
addition,
you're
asking
for
additional
consideration
for
trenches
or
right
away
as
development
occurs
throughout
the
city
to
reserve
room
for
recycled
water
pipeline.
I
think
you
wanted
to
amend
to
add
that
to
our
recommendations,
so
councilman
mata
check
back
to
your
question.
AO
Yes,
we
are
planning
to
do
a
further
analysis
after
we.
Our
first
priority
is
to
complete
the
projects
in
north
bay
shore
and
be,
and
after
getting
close
to
the
end
of
that,
we
will
proceed
to
read:
we're
going
to
continue
evaluating
the
options
to
go
to
east
wissman,
with
the
alternative
three
via
shoreline
and
middle
field,
being
the
preferred
alternative,
but
we
will
be
doing
some
more
analysis
and
refining.
AO
You
know.
Looking
at
the
demand
assessment
demand
projections
again
pipe
sizes.
It
is
projected
right
now
to
the
general
plan
build
out,
but
by
the
time
we
start
east
westmin.
We
may
have,
you
know,
reached
the
2030
general
plan
time
time
zone,
and
then
we
would
need
to
look
at
the
future
growth
if
any
of
the
pipelines
need
to
be
adjusted.
AP
So
if
it's
needed,
I'm
okay,
adding
that,
but
I
also
kind
of
assumed
staff
would
do
that
anyway,
given
all
of
the
steps
that
are
laid
out
here.
But
if
we
need
to
add
it,
I'm
fine
with
it.
A
F
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
item.
7.1
is
text,
amendments
to
chapter
28,
subdivisions
and
chapter
36,
zoning
of
the
city
code
to
implement
california,
state
sorry,
senate
bill,
9
and
other
minor
text
amendments.
This
item
will
either
be
long
or
short
or
somewhere
in
the
middle.
So
I'm
hoping
we
can
take
a
10
minute
break.
Is
that
okay
with
everybody?
A
AK
AQ
The
item
in
front
of
you
consists
of
proposed
text
amendments
to
chapters
36,
zoning
and
28
subdivisions
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
to
implement
california
senate
bill
9
and
other
minor
code
amendments
senate
bill
9,
which
took
effect
on
january.
1St
2022
requires
ministerial
approval
of
the
following
two
unit:
housing
developments,
meaning
two
homes
on
an
eligible
r1
law,
which
staff
proposes
to
call
a
dual
urban
opportunity
or
duo.
Development.
AQ
A
A
AQ
AQ
The
r1
standards
currently
allow
for
a
two
lot
subdivision
through
a
discretionary
process
with
a
public
hearing
pursuant
to
sb9
eligible
r1.
Zoned
lots
may
be
subdivided
into
two
lots
through
a
ministerial
process
or
a
process
which
does
not
require
discretionary
review
or
a
public
hearing
under
sb9.
An
eligible
r1
zone
property
can
only
be
subdivided
into
two
roughly
proportional
lots
to
ensure
rough
proportionality.
AQ
AQ
In
addition
to
the
urban
lot
split
provisions,
sb9
requires
local
agencies
to
allow
the
development
of
two
dwelling
units
on
eligible
r1
zoned
lots.
In
order
to
allow
this
development
type
staff
proposes
to
create
a
new
land
use,
type
dual
urban
opportunity
or
duo
development.
As
a
permitted
use
in
the
r1
district,
this
slide
shows
the
mandatory
standards
that
all
local
jurisdictions
must
implement
for
two
unit
developments
or
duo
developments.
AQ
AQ
Staff
proposes
to
largely
maintain
the
existing
r1
development
standards
for
duo
developments
and
only
adjust
those
standards
where
sb9
establishes
either
more
restrictive
standards,
for
example,
occupancy
acknowledgments
or
less
restrictive
standards,
for
example,
setbacks,
because
the
side
and
rear
setbacks
for
duo
developments
will
be
reduced.
Staff
proposes
to
prohibit
the
construction
of
second
story
decks
in
association
with
newly
constructed
units
of
a
duo
development
proposal
in
order
to
reduce
potential
privacy
concerns,
since
sb9
will
allow
for
smaller
lots
than
what
the
existing
city
code
allows.
AQ
This
slide
compares
the
existing
regulations
in
the
top
row,
with
the
new
regulations
in
the
middle
middle
and
bottom
rows
to
show
the
maximum
of
up
to
four
units.
Could
be
achieved
through
different
combinations
of
primary
units
adus
and
jadus
on
each
original
r1
lot,
either
with
or
without
a
lot
split
staff
is
also
proposing
a
minor
amendment
to
the
administration
section
of
the
zoning
code.
The
city
has
a
standard
practice
of
closing
out
inactive
planning
permit
applications
after
three
months
to
ensure
the
timely
processing
of
projects
staff
is
proposing
to
formalize
this
policy.
AQ
Staff
has
prepared
an
alternative
based
on
the
epc's
recommendation,
while
staff
is
not
proposing
this
option,
it
has
been
provided
for
council
consideration
under
this
alternative.
Second
story:
decks
would
be
allowed
only
along
the
front
and
street
side
facades
of
duo
development
units
up
to
an
aggregate
of
150
square
feet
and
subject
to
the
setback
requirements
of
the
units.
AQ
In
conclusion,
the
epc
is
recommending
the
adoption
of
the
ordinance
per
the
recommendations
listed
on
this
slide.
This
item
is
scheduled
to
return
to
the
city
council
for
a
second
reading
on
april
12
2022
and,
if
approved
by
the
city
council,
the
proposed
text
amendments
would
become
effective
on
may
12th
of
2022.
I
I
actually
asked
this
in
my
written
questions,
my
written
counsel
questions,
but
it
continually
confuses
me
when
I
hear
this
when
it
when
you
say:
there's
a
the
there's,
a
minimum
size
of
800
square
feet,
you
can
actually
one
can
build
a
house,
that's
smaller
than
that.
That's
just
we
have
to
allow
that
size.
As
my
understanding,
I
just
want
to
confirm
that
that
a
person
could
build
a
smaller
house
if
they
wanted
to.
W
Vice
mayor,
hicks,
you're
right
when
we
say
the
the
a
minimum
of
800
square
feet
has
to
be
allowed.
We
mean
that,
regardless
of
whether
a
development
meets
development
standards
such
as
far
the
city
has
to
allow
at
least
an
800
foot
square
foot
two
primary
units
on
each
lot,
so
they
can
always
propose
smaller
ones.
They
are
subject,
however,
to
building
code
requirements,
but
that's
a
separate
code.
A
I
have
a
quick
one
and
I
think
we
talked
about
it
in
the
briefing
provided
to
each
council
member
in
advance,
but
just
again
to
to
clarify.
Is
there
a
reason
why
staff
opted
to
create
a
new
land
use
the
duo
development
rather
than
modify
the
existing
duplex
views.
O
Yes,
in
our
briefing,
I
asked
this
question
and
you
provided
me
the
answer
with
email,
but
I
don't
think
it
got
into
the
the
council
question.
So
I
wanted
to
bring
it
up
again
and
that's
the
number
of
of
r1
units
that
we
have
or
lots
that
we
have
in
the
in
the
in
the
city
and
also
kind
of
how
our
adu
development
has
gone
over
the
last
few
years.
O
I
think
43
was
the
highest
number
that
was
last
year
and
previous
to
that
it
had.
It
had
been
slightly
lower,
but
anyway,
just
just
kind
of.
How
is
that?
What
are
we
really
producing
with
things
like
this.
W
W
I
believe
about
four
or
five
years
ago
we
had
about
10
and
we've
gone
up
to
about
43
last
year.
So
since
the
state
law
there's
been
a
lot
more
awareness
and
a
lot
more
options
for
people
to
add
adus,
so
it
has
helped,
but
not
to
the
extent
that
one
might
think
a
lot
of
this
has
to
do
with
people
wanting
to
build.
I
don't
believe
the
city's
denied
any
permits.
We
understand
it's
a
very
ministerial
decision.
W
O
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
that
was
that
was
right
and
then
the
other
question
we
we,
the
turner
report
from
uc
berkeley,
said
that
over
time
we
might
get
as
much
as
700
developments
from
that,
but
this
is
over
a
long
period
of
time.
We're
not
expecting
that
to
happen
anytime
soon.
That
could
be
at
a
pace
of
you
know
five
or
six
a
year.
Is
that
that's?
My
understanding?
Is
that
correct.
W
I
I
believe
so
if
they
they
looked
at
a
long
time
period,
I
can't
confirm
the
five
or
six
a
year,
but
I
can
say
we
currently
have
two
applications.
O
Okay,
and
and
as
we
discussed
before,
it's
like
each
each
of
these
applications
is
going
to
be
a
different
family
story.
You
know
what
they
wanted.
What
what
people
want
to
do
to
develop
is
it
is
it
to
provide
housing
for
their
children
or.
O
Is
it
to
provide
housing,
for
you
know
another
way
to
to
collect
rental
income.
I
mean
there's
just
kind
of
an
infinite
number
of
possibilities
that
that
could
you
know
that
could
lead
to
this,
but
none
of
them
are
required
and
we
will
just
have
to
see
how
how
it
how
it
opens
up.
You
know
how
it
goes
forward.
Okay,
thank
you,
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
what
we
really
expect
from
that,
because
you
know
we
we
we
need
to
build.
O
You
know
we
have
a
terrible
housing
crisis.
This
is
not
the
answer.
I
guess
that's
my
question.
We
don't
expect
this
to
be
the
answer
to
our
housing
crisis.
It's
it's
just
not
it's
not
going
to
do
that.
Much
and
that's
what
was
the
gist
of
what
you
said
in
your
staff
report,
and
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
that.
That's
that's
your
view.
This
is
this
is
going
to
move
the
needle.
W
Right
that
is
right.
We
used
to
turn
the
center
numbers
again
and
you
know
phil
feel
that
the
motivations
for
single-family
homeowners
a
little
bit
different
than
than
than
developers
they
want
to
build
for
different
reasons.
So
it's
hard
to
predict
what
exactly
is
going
to
happen
on
r1
lots,
but
we
don't
believe
there'll
be
wholesale
change.
A
AC
Good
evening,
city
council,
for
my
comments
for
this
one
are
regarding
the
letter
that
the
league
of
women
voters
have
sent
out
the
council.
I
support
many
of
their
recommendations,
including
removing
the
ban
on
selling
half
a
duplex.
I
realize
there's
not
quite
a
process
to
create
a
two
unit
condo.
At
this
point,
I
feel
like
it's
premature
to
just
ban
it
completely
with
other
cities,
not
even
los
altos,
abandoned
and
fundamentally
sb9
is
an
ex
spiritual
extension
to
adu
law.
Adus
are
right
now
for
rentals.
AC
I
realize
that
it's
probably
not
going
to
get
that
many
units,
necessarily
that
maybe
because
obviously
it's
a
new
feature,
so
it
takes
time
for
contractors
to
create
processes
to
streamline
it,
but
fundamentally
we're
in
a
housing
crisis,
which
means
we
kind
of
have
to
do
all
hands
on
deck.
We
have
to
try
anything,
that's
feasibly
that
could
get
any
units
rather
than
sticking
to
what
is
the
status
quo,
which
is
clearly
not
really
giving
us
enough
housing
for
anyone
to
be
good
at.
AC
Regarding
the
second
story,
decks,
I
will
mention
that
it
doesn't
feel
that
much
of
a
privacy
saver
in
that,
if
you
did
build
up
to
the
setback,
you'll
still
have
a
you
can
still
have
a
window
right.
You
can
still
have
people
looking
outside
of
their
window,
not
necessarily
outside,
but
if
you
have
a
noise,
if
you
have
a
nosy
enough
neighbor,
that
is
a
thing
that
can
do
so.
AC
I
don't
feel
like
it's
really
saving
much,
so
I
do
reckon
I
do
agree
with
ebc's
recommendation
to
remove
it
or
just
remove
any
kind
of
like
prohibition
that
does
not
clearly
apply
to
single-family
homes.
Currently
we're
in
a
situation
where
every
every
bit
of
housing
helps,
especially
if
it's
cheaper
than
anything
that's
currently
on
the
market.
Thank
you.
AR
Hi
good
evening,
city
council,
my
name
is
kelsey
baines.
I
am
a
mountain
view
resident.
I
live
in
rex
manor
and
I
agree
with
kevin
ma's
comments.
I
support
sb9
and
want
to
just
remind
the
council
that
we
do
have
a
great
need
for
for
more
homes,
in
mountain
view,
particularly
more
ownership
opportunities
for
people
who
can't
afford
the
very
high
cost
of
a
single
family
home.
AR
I
also
really
encourage
you
to
expand
home
ownership
opportunities
by
allowing
for
half
of
a
duplex
to
be
sold.
AR
My
my
mom
was
able
to
buy
half
a
duplex
as
a
single
mom,
so
I
grew
up
in
in
an
attached
duplex
and
I'm
very
glad
that
that
ownership
opportunity
was
available
to
my
mom
so
that
I
could
have
a
stable
place
to
live
as
a
kid,
and
I
think
that's
all,
oh,
and
I
also
support
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
to
allow
second-story
decks
or
outdoor
spaces,
especially
during
covid
having
some
outdoor
space
has
proved
to
be
really
important
as
a
resident.
Thank
you.
AS
Hey
hi,
my
name
is
cindy
and
I'm
a
yeah,
a
monumental
residence
as
well
yeah.
I
was
wondering
yeah,
the
other,
because
palo
alto
and
the
sunnyvale
they
all
allowed
like,
like
r2
zoning,
to
be
qualified
for
the
sb9.
So
I
I
highly
recommend
the
console
to
consider
consider
to
allow
the
r2
to
be
able
to,
because
the
r2
original
already
have
two
units
and
also
has
larger,
normally
has
a
larger.
AS
Like
a
large
and
the
I
I
mean
more
desirable,
like
like
the
like
the
more
desirable
like
a
lot
to
to
subdivide
more
than
the
more
than
the,
and
also
it
wouldn't
increase
the
density
or
something
it's
still
like.
It
makes
the
I
mean
it
still
makes
the
area
nice,
but
I
mean
it's
not
it's
like
not.
AS
It
doesn't
affect
too
much
things,
so
I
I
really
think,
like
I
mean
rather
like
definitely,
we
support
the
sb9
on
the
r1,
but
I
I
also
hope
the
city
to
allow
the
r2
to
be
to
be
included
just
like
the
other
cities.
Thank
you.
AG
Hi
yeah,
I'm
saleem.
I
support
everything
in
the
league
of
women
voters
letter.
I
almost
wrote
a
letter
myself,
but
then
I
saw
theirs
and
I
thought.
AG
Okay
yeah,
so
the
only
thing
I
wanted
to
add
was
to
the
second
story:
deck
discussion.
So
I
appreciate
the
modification
made
by
staff.
I
think
that's
in
the
right
direction,
but
I
don't
understand
this
band
at
all.
For
a
few
reasons,
a
it
only
applies
to
duo
developments,
but
you
can
build
a
single
family
home
as
an
sp9
project
and
you
can
still
access
the
same
setbacks.
AG
The
this
is
actually
happening
in
los
altos.
So
if
someone's
using
sb9
to
expedite
a
single-family
home
they've
been
trying
to
build
for
forever
and
all
the
privacy
impacts
that
you
could
have
from
a
second,
a
second-story
deck
on
a
single-family
home
also
apply
for
the
dua
development.
AG
So
it
seems
quite
odd
that
this
is
just
specifically
applied
to
duo
developments.
The
second
concern
I
have
with
this
is
that
it
doesn't
solve
the
stated
goal.
So
the
stated
goal
is
to
preserve
privacy,
but
it
doesn't
stop
you
from.
AG
I
mean
we're
basically
saying
it
violates
someone's
privacy
if
you
look
into
their
backyard
from
a
deck,
but
it
doesn't
violate
their
privacy.
If
you
look
into
their
backyard
from
behind
a
curtain,
I
mean,
if
anything,
I
would.
Rather
someone
be
looking
into
my
backyard
while
on
a
deck,
because
then
I
could
see
them
too
right.
AG
If
there's
really
this,
you
know
huge
problem
or
an
epidemic
of
of
you
know:
nosy
neighbors
I
would
rather
them
at
least
be
outside
and
additionally
they're,
probably
outside
less
than
they
are
inside
right
I
mean
more
people
are
in
their
bedrooms
more
often
than
they
are
on
their
decks,
so
this
actually
seems
to
make
the
privacy
impact
worse.
So
I
don't
understand
how
you
know
banning
second
story.
Decks
on
the
on
the
back
side
of
a
house
will
somehow
deal
with
privacy.
AG
AI
Hey
hello,
hi,
my
name
is
betty,
I'm
also
a
montreal
resident.
So
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
previous
speakers,
so
the
intent
of
isbn
is
to
create
more
affordable
housing,
and
currently
I
really
sit
in
mountain
view.
The
guidelines
restrict
a
development
only
for
the
r1
family
zone,
but
I
think
the
mountain
view
has
particularly
a
lot
more
r2r
three
zone
compared
to
other
cities.
AI
They
did
not
put
the
strictly
restriction
on.
It
has
to
be
a
run.
Zoom
like
the
street,
like
the
state
law
required.
AI
Second,
that
also
on
the
like
suny
requirement:
a
lot
of
identity
regulation.
A
lot
of
requirements
need
to
be
made
in
order
to
do
the
isp,
9
development
and
another
example,
is
a
100
year.
Flood
zone
that's
not
allowed,
which
100
year
flat,
one
is
already
very,
very
considered,
very
rare,
a
very
low
hazard
zone
and
I
don't
know
why
that
has
to
be
exclude
from
the
sp9
opportunity.
AT
I'm
mute,
can
you
hear
me
yes,.
F
AT
Okay,
I
have
a
comment
on
two
items.
First,
it's
kind
of
related
to
that
privacy
concern
and
I
will
also
push
back
on
that
and
say
that
if
you
know
three
or
four
units
are
developed
on
a
standard
lot,
then
there
will
be
very
little
space
left
for
for
people
to
hang
out
outside
near
their
house.
AT
So
I
I
suggest
that
we
also
allow
rooftop
decks
where
people
can
relax
outside
and
enjoy
the
outside,
and
it's
not
something
outlandish,
particularly
the
city
of
seattle
has
been
doing
it
all
day
for
decades
now
and
people
you
know
it,
it's
accepted,
there's
nothing
wrong
with
it.
AT
The
other
point
that
I
have
is
that
800
square
foot
minimum
is
results
in
a
really
really
cramped,
two-bedroom
apartment
or
unit,
and
it
would
just
be
a
lot
more
livable
and
enjoyable
if
it
was
900,
950
square
feet
and
we
as
a
city,
have
you
know
we
we
can
do
that
we
can.
We
can
erase
our
limit,
because
we
want
our
families,
our
working
folks,
to
come
back
home
and
enjoy
their
space
as
opposed
to
come
back
home
and
be
frustrated
with
their
space.
AD
I'll
keep
it
quick
I'd
like
to
echo
the
previous
speaker's
comments,
the
about
simplifying
this,
removing
unnecessary
restrictions
for
things
like
seconds
or
decks,
but
also
to
try
to
be
as
inclusive
as
possible.
AD
I
think
that
if
we're
going
to
open
up
the
options
for
new
housing
to
help
both
current
and
prospective
residents
of
mountain
view,
that
we
should
not
limit
it
if
possible
and
if
we
so
if
we
can
extend
it
to
r2
and
other
zoning
areas
or
you
know,
just
get
rid
of
the
the
basic
zoning
and
allow
for
more
housing,
because
a
lot
of
people
who
would
love
to
live
closer
to
work
and
their
friends,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
you
need
housing.
AD
A
Seeing
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak,
we
will
return
to
the
council
for
deliberation
and
I
will
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
ordinances
and
resolution
attached
to
the
report
and
those
are
listed
in
the
agenda
flow
and
he
questions
or
comments
from
the
council
or
a
motion.
I
did
have
a
quick
question
for
steph.
A
A
Okay
but
but
the
r3
concern
would
come
back
with
the
r3
update
next.
W
Year,
yes,.
A
Okay,
so
then
r2
remains
the
the
missing
link
in
this
okay
vicente.
I
So
I'm
I'm
generally
supportive
of
the
staff
recommendation.
A
couple
of
additional
things
of
thoughts
I
have
one
is
that
I
I'm
also
supportive
of
allowing
half
of
a
duplex
to
be
sold,
which
I
think
some
people
mentioned.
I
An
additional
thing
that
hasn't
been
brought
up
yet
is
the
the
flag
yet
pictured
in
the
staff
report
need
to
have
a
minimum
of
a
16
foot.
I
I
can't
remember
what
the
staff
report
calls
it.
Maybe
an
access
strip,
basically
a
driveway
to
the
back
unit
and
what
I'm
thinking
when
I
look
at
some
of
the
older
housing
in
old
mountain
view
and
the
swan
neighborhoods,
and
I
guess
any
other
neighborhood
that
was
developed.
I
I
This
is
like
friends
and
family
who
live
in
alameda.
County
are
building
a
good
number
of
cottages
in
the
backyard,
but
but
they
keep
the
houses
in
the
front,
and
so
I
you
know
in
these
older
neighborhoods,
I
wouldn't
want
to
kind
of
force
people
to
tear
down
heritage
homes
and
build
something
quick
and
cheap
just
so
that
they
could
access
sb9.
I
So
so
I
think
we'd
get
better
housing
and
less
expensive
housing.
If
we
allow
flag
lots
to
have
say
a
minimum
11
foot
access
strip
to
the
back
lot.
So
that
would
be
that
and
allowing
a
half
a
duplex
to
be
solved
would
be
the
two
changes
that
I
would
make.
Thank
you
and
I'm
well.
I
could
make
a
motion
but
I'll
hear
what
other
people
have
to
say.
AP
Thanks
so
I
guess
I
I'm
curious
as
to
staff's
response
to
vice
mayor
hicks
comment
about
the
16
foot
strip
or
access
point.
W
Council
member
matacek
we
had
provided
this
in
our
response
to
a
question
by
council
member
hicks.
The
16
foot
comes
from
an
existing
requirement
for
what
we
call
the
flagpole
to
create
a
flag
lot.
It.
It
accounts
for
a
minimum
of
nine
feet
for
the
actual
driveway
and
a
little
bit
of
a
buffer
on
either
side
to
allow
the
planting
of
trees
and
the
construction
fences,
it
can
be
reduced
to
11
feet,
but
that
would
then
likely
not
really
support
any
trees
at
the
edges.
W
So
we
had
recommended
16
feet
as
the
original.
If
I
may,
I
do
want
to
comment
on
the
supporting
the
half
duplex
being
sold.
W
That
would
be
a
larger
undertaking
and
would
require
us
to
come
back
and
amend
the
ordinance
to
allow
planned
unit
developments.
It's
probably
something
we
would
recommend
as
a
future
council
work
item,
because
it
it
would,
it
would
end
up
creating
a
new
process
for
r1,
and
maybe
we
could.
We
could
wrap
that
up
with
some
other
things
and
then
the
council
could
make
that
part
of
their
future
strategic
work
plan.
AP
Thanks
yeah,
sometimes
I
feel
like
it's
helpful
for
us
to
ask
questions
that
were
sent
in
by
the
council
so
that
everyone
can
hear,
including
the
public,
your
responses
in
case
they
didn't
have
a
chance
to
also
read
the
questions
and
answers.
So
thank
you
for
indulging
me
on
that
one.
AP
AP
28
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
to
reorganize
and
renumber
the
chapter
and
to
include
procedures
and
standards
related
to
urban
lot,
splits
in
compliance
with
senate
bill
9
to
be
read,
entitled
only
further
reading
waived
and
set
a
second
reading
for
april
12
2022
and
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view.
Amending
the
city
of
mountain
view,
master
fee
schedule
to
establish
a
permit
fee
for
preliminary
parcel
maps
for
urban
lot,
splits
to
be
read
in
title
only
further
reading
waived
and
then
to
include
the
alternate.
AP
I
don't
have
the
wording
that
to
allow
the
second
story
decks
under
certain
circumstances
that
staff
showed
earlier
think
do.
I
have
to
read
that
if
so,
I
can
pull
it
up.
The
presentation.
W
Council
member,
we
actually
have
a
an
alternative
recommendation
that
brittany,
you
could
see
it
in
bold.
O
AP
So
sorry,
so
I'll
amend
number
two
to
include
the
section
in
bold,
which
is
with
a
modification
to
allow
second
story
decks
along
the
street
facing
front
and
side
facades
of
dual
urban
opportunity
development
units
up
to
an
aggregate
of
150
square
feet
per
unit.
AP
A
Thank
you.
So
there
are
some
hands
raised
and
I
have
some
comments
too,
but
just
to
make
sure
we
have
a
proper
motion.
Is
there
a
member
of
the
council
who
would
like
to
second
the.
A
Motion,
okay,
council
member
abby
koga,
I
saw
your
hand
first,
so
we
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
madichak
seconded
by
councilman,
robbie
koga,
or
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
second
story:
deck
alternative
council
member
lieber.
U
U
My
understanding
that
right
and
if
it
seems
like
to
me,
we
have
enough
atmospherics
and
conflicts
around
decks
that
are
in
a
standard
house,
with
the
setbacks
that
a
standard
house
has
so
now
we're
talking
about.
It
seems
to
me
like
putting
people
four
feet
from
the
property
line
of,
say
a
woman
who
lives
next
door
who's
trying
to
enjoy
her
backyard.
Am
I
understanding
this
right.
W
Our
recommendation
was
to
have
it
on
the
front
and
the
street
side,
so
one
of
the
sides
of
the
deck
might
get
a
little
bit
closer,
but
the
primary
the
primary
location
of
the
decks
that
staff
had
recommended
was
to
be
either
on
the
on
on
the
front
of
the
house
facing
the
street
or
facing
a
side
street
in
order
to
minimize
those
privacy
impacts.
U
So
if,
if
I'm
understanding
it
right
like
if
it's
on
the
front
of
the
the
adu
or
the
small
smaller
building,
it
could
have
10
feet
of
exposure
to
a
neighbor's
yard.
W
It
would,
I
think,
we're
gonna
have
to
if
you
could
just
give
us
a
minute.
I
I
want
to
confer
with
staff
to
figure
out
you're
asking
the
majority
of
the
deck
would
have
to
face
the
street
right
right,
but
but
there
is
a
chance
that
the
side
of
the
deck
could
come
close
enough
to
the
edge,
but
the
focus
would
be
to
to
face
the
the
balcony
on
the
street
side.
U
But
that
would
look
that
would
leave
a
10
foot
exposure
four
feet
away
from
the
person
who
lives
next
door,
and
that
seems
like
a
a
real
recipe
for
having
a
lot
of
reaction.
U
W
You
will
you
will
note
that
staff
had
not
recommended
this
alternative,
but
it
would,
it
would
meet
the
they
would
meet
all
the
building
setbacks.
So,
yes,
on
the
side,
it
would
be
four
feet
away
from
the
property
line,
but
the
focus
of
it
would
be
on
the
front.
U
Okay,
this
is
this
is
why
I
have
a
concern
about
the
motion,
because,
if
I'm
in
the
backyard
of
my
one
story
home-
and
I
have
a
man
who's
on
the
second
floor
of
a
building-
and
he
has
10
feet
to
walk
around
and
look
down
on
me
in
my
yard,
that
would
restrict
my
my
quiet
enjoyment
of
of
my
property
and-
and
I
think
it's,
what
we're
trying
to
get
at
with
trying
to
promote.
Adus
is
for
more
housing,
not
more
conflict.
U
And
I
I
just
think
that
this
is
a
recipe
for
staff
having
to
deal
with
a
lot
of
atmospherics.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember.
I'm
going
to
take
a
quick
turn
here.
I
did
have
a
question
about
the
flag
lot:
access
that
vice
mayor
vicente
hicks
had
discussed
earlier.
A
A
W
A
Okay,
no
worries
vice
mayor
kicks.
I
Well,
obviously,
I
was
going
to
try
to
persuade
the
maker
of
the
motion
and
the
seconder
to
to
reduce
the
16
foot
access
point
and
the
re.
The
reason
is
that
every
single
house
on
my
street,
besides
mine,
which
is
a
corner
and
and
almost
in
in
many
of
our
older
neighborhoods
you
would,
unless
this
waiver
goes,
is
something
that
we
can
confirm.
I
You
would
have
to
tear
down
the
houses
in
order
to
build
a
flag
lot
and
the
other
alternative
would
be
to
build
two
very
narrow,
skinny
houses,
which
is
probably
equally
you
know
ungainly.
I
So,
in
order
for
anybody
in
these
neighborhoods
to
access
it
and
keep
the
neighborhood,
you
know
well
relatively
livable
and
pleasant,
you
would
have
to
reduce
that
16
foot
and
the
the
driveway
is
the
access
point
now
in
our
neighborhoods
already
has
bushes
on
both
sides.
In
most
cases,
so
you
would
be.
You
would
be
tearing
down
the
house
and
getting
rid
of
the
landscaping.
I
That's
already
there
surrounding
the
driveway,
so
I'm
hoping
to
persuade
people
to
reduce
that
so
that
our
existing
neighborhoods
can
be
saved
as
existing,
and
I
I
will
not
be
supporting
the
motion.
I
assume
the
motion:
will
the
staff
re
as
more
or
less
as
staff
as
proposed
will
pass
tonight,
but
I
will
not
be
supporting
it
if
it's
going
to
encourage
you
know
tearing
down
those
homes
and
making
more
expensive
housing.
O
I'm
following
up
on
many
of
the
comments
we
heard,
I'm
also
interested
in,
including
in
the
motion
direction,
to
staff
to
work
on
an
ordinance
that
allows
one
half
of
a
duplex
to
be
sold.
Apparently
that
will
take
additional
work,
which
is
fine,
but
I
do
think
that
that
we've
heard
loud
and
clear
that
that
that's
a
desired
something
many
people
think
is
a
good
idea,
and
I
I
think
it's
a
good
idea.
I
mean
it
seems
like
if
our
idea
is
to
produce
more
affordable
housing.
O
Having
being
able
to
buy
half
of
a
duplex
is
very
logical.
So
would
the
maker
of
the
motion
be
willing
to
include
that
direction
in
it.
AP
So
my
concern
with
doing
that
is
it's
a
project
that
takes
staff
time
and
I
don't
know
what
it
would
potentially
push
out
in
terms
of
other
work,
that's
on
their
work
plan,
and
so
I
would
prefer
we
not
include
it
tonight
and
that
when
we
talk
about
the
next
work
plan,
we
talk
about
whether
or
not
it's
on
that,
because
we
also
had
quite
a
few
things
just
at
the
last
meeting
that
we
talked
about
adding
to
their
work
plan
having
to
do
with
the
housing
element.
AP
O
Logical,
but
I
do
feel
like
you
know,
this
is
a
good
idea.
We
shouldn't
let
it
you
know
completely
drop
off
of
the
the
screen
here.
AP
And
regarding
the
vice
mayor's
concern,
are
they
lots
in
the
downtown
area?
Are
most
of
them
even
big
enough
to
do
this?.
I
AP
So
I
think
staff
was
looking
up
some
information.
W
Sorry
we
were,
we
were
looking
at
the
question
that
the
mayor
had
asked
so
currently
mayor
the
way
it's
written
up
duo.
W
The
only
standard
that
is
waived
for
them
is
far
if
they
exceed
the
far
they
are
allowed
at
least
a
minimum
of
800
square
feet.
If
it's
a
duo,
development
and
that
that
is
for
state
law,
we
don't
currently
have
an
exception
for
the
actual
subdivision
to
create
lots,
they
would
have
to
apply
for
a
variance
any
any.
Anyone
can
apply
for
a
variance
if
they
deviate
from
the
standards,
but
there
are
some
very
strict
findings.
W
The
lot
itself
has
to
be
in
such
as
in
in
such
a
situation
that
there
is
a
special
circumstance
that
applies
to
that
lot.
That
doesn't
apply
to
similar
lots,
but
similarly
situated
lots
in
the
same
district,
so
the
barriers
to
getting
a
variance
are
much
higher
and
and
that's
what
they
would
have
to
apply
for
if
they
wanted
to
deviate
from
the
standards.
F
C
A
A
Going
to
be
applied,
so
I
I'll
I'll.
Look
for
that
and
and
come
back
but
council
member
mata
check
and
you
still
have
the
floor,
give
your
hand.
AP
Up
yeah,
so
sorry,
I'm
not
sure
without
having
more
information.
I
want
to
change
that,
but
I
am
open
to
you
know
if
people
don't
feel
strongly
about
the
balconies,
I'm
okay,
with
not
doing
that.
I
could
go
either
way
on
that.
So
you
know.
AP
A
Council,
member
ravi
koga:
do
you
concur
with
the
modification
as
a
secondary
okay?
So
then
I
guess
you've
amended
your
own
motion
to
be
simply
the
staff
recommendation
anything
else:
council,
member
mata,
chad,.
A
Thank
you.
I
wish
I
could,
but
maybe
hopefully,
maybe
staffs
if
you
could
help
me,
find
the
the
language
and
the
draft
ordinance
related
to
waving
standards.
That
would
be
much
appreciated.
A
So,
okay
or
it
it
might
very
well
be
that
the
so
that
the
standards
wave
only
are
in
the
zoning
ordinance
and
not
in
the
subdivision
ordinance,
and
maybe
that's
why
I
am,
I
might
be
a
little
confused
in
which
case
I'll,
take
a
quick
turn
because
we're
going
into
actually
remember
kame,
I
don't
think
you've
spoken.
Did
you
have
any
I'll
I'll
take
a
quick
turn
after
everyone
has
already
spoken,
but
did
you
want
to
chime
in
first.
K
Sure
so
you
know
I'm
I'm
comfortable
with
the
staff
recommendation.
K
In
my
staff
briefing,
we
did
discuss
quite
a
few
items
and
they
shared
that
that
the
appropriate
time
would
be
when
we're
talking
about
the
council
work
plan,
and
so
I
I
do
agree
that,
with
what
councilman
mata
check
said,
I
think
there's
quite
a
few
things
that
I'd
like
to
talk
about
kind
of
in
aggregate,
and
it
sounds
like
the
appropriate
time
to
do
that
and
share
that
with
staff
will
be
when
we
talk
about
the
work
plan,
and
so
I've
been
holding
off
my
my
comments
because
I
was,
I
was
comfortable
with
that
discussion
that
I
had
with
with
staff
and
sounds
like
that's
the
appropriate
venue
with
which
to
discuss.
A
No
problem,
thank
you.
So
I'll
I'll
have
a
quick
comment
here.
I
I'm
interested
in
modifying
the
some
of
the
standards
that
vice
mayor
had
suggested
to
to
facilitate
the
creation
of
sb9
or
duo
developments.
I
think
not
only
could
it
potentially
allow
for
improved
design
and
reduce
the
need
to
demolish
existing
housing,
but
it
facilitates
the
creation
of
housing
in
areas
where
right
now,
it's
difficult
to
add
units,
but
the
the
concern
I
have
is
the
language
in
sections.
A
A
If
we
don't,
if
we
don't
remove
that
language
and
at
some
point
direct
staff
to
modify
whatever
processes
we
need
to
modify,
the
council
has
been
talking
about
increasing
ownership
housing
for
a
very
long
time.
This
would
be
much
more
entry
level
than
the
type
of
housing
that
we
currently
see
in
our
one
zoned
lot
and
we
have,
in
our
work
plan
a
middle-income
ownership,
housing
project
that
has
been
there.
I
think,
since
june
2019,
and
that
the
council
has
not
talked
about
once,
and
I
feel
like
this
is.
A
It
sits
quite
neatly
within
that
existing
work
plan
item
or
could
if
the
council
ever
has
an
opportunity
to
talk
about
it.
But
I
I
feel
like
it
is
important
to
not
deny
ourselves
the
opportunity
to
increase
the
production
of
desperately
needed
of
ownership
housing.
A
That
would
be
more
entry
level,
and
that
would,
I
think,
provide
opportunities
for
for
moderate
income
people
to
to
own
in
an
established
neighborhood.
So,
even
if
we
don't
necessarily
provide
the
direction
today
to
change
whatever
processes,
we
would
need
to
change
to
allow
it.
I
do
think
eliminating
that
language
to
allow
for
the
possibility
of
ownership
down
the
road
and
then
maybe
when
we
have
a
study
session
on
the
middle
income
ownership
housing
item
in
our
work
plan.
A
That
might
be
the
opportunity
for
us
to
to
revisit
whatever
other
modifications
will
be
necessary
to
allow
for
ownership
production,
so
that
would
be
my
request
of
the
maker
of
the
motion.
If
that's,
if
that's
okay,
but
if
you
would
like
to
respond
now,
that's
that's.
Okay,
too,.
AP
I
I
guess
I
as
staff,
if
that
language
was
removed,
does
it
cause
confusion,
and
I
guess
I
was
thinking
if
we
prioritize
that
project.
When
we
talk
about
the
work
plan,
then
as
part
of
that
you
would
remove
that
language
when
you
come
up
with.
AP
However,
you
like
the
condo
portion
of
this
ordinance,
but
I
guess
I'd
look
to
staff
or
our
city
attorney.
AS
W
So
this
creates
a
new
process
and
I
understand
there's
a
if
the
council
wishes
to
do
that.
We
could
develop
that
for
r1
properties
and
r2.
If
that's,
what
council
wants
to
see,
but
we're
suggesting
that
tonight,
council
adopt
at
least
the
sb9
recommendations
that
staff
had
with
any
adjustments.
So
we
we
can
then
establish
the
process
and
then
take
up
either
through
middle
income
strategies
or
through
the
work
plan,
all
the
additional
items,
because
that's
that's
where
we
could
take
it
up
as
a
separate
project.
W
A
W
We
expect
it
to
come.
This
fall
mayor
in
2022.
W
I
could
talk
to
the
city
manager.
I
believe
that
we
could
at
least
come
back
with
a
work
plan
that
that
that
talks
about
what
it
would
take
and
then
council
can
always
revise.
It
would
probably
be
done
either
through
the
middle
income
strategy
and
we'll
have
to
prioritize
what
items
we
do
under
that.
W
D
Thank
you
mayor.
May
I
so
I
think
you
know
the
options
that
we
have
here.
As
mishravastava
said,
the
middle-income
housing
item
is
scheduled
now
to
come
back
in
the
fall
of
this
calendar
year,
which
is
next
fiscal
year.
So
you
all
will
start
the
discussion
about
your
next
work
plan
in
february
next
february.
D
So
there
isn't
that
much
time
in
between
the
middle
income
housing
item
coming
to
council,
and
then
you
all
talking
about
your
work
plan,
so
we
could
potentially
bring
back
with
the
middle
income
housing
strategy
what
the
process
could
be
for
this
this
item.
But
I
we
wouldn't
have
this
item,
I
think
fully
baked
with
the
middle
income
housing
strategy,
but
we
could
bring
back
what
the
approach,
what
the
next
steps
would
be,
and
we
would
likely
just
have
to
include
it
on
the
next
work
plan
which,
like
I
said,
starts
in
february
23..
A
Right
and
the
work
time
would
be
approved
in
june
23,
correct,
okay,
councilmember
lieber.
U
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
have
a
question
for
staff.
Maybe
this
would
be
best
handled
by
the
city
attorney,
not
sure
in
reference
to
the
mayor's
questions.
The
way
that
the
wording
is
now
and
the
concern
about
creating
a
lot
split
through
a
sale
is
the.
Would
the
current
wording
preclude
a
tenancy
and
common
agreement.
B
B
Sorry
thought
I
was
on
mute
apologize
for
that,
so
the
whole
premise
is
that
you
create
multiple
housing
units
on
a
single
parcel
and
that
it's
owned
by
one
owner
and
they
can
rent
one
unit.
There's
some
certain
requirements
under
the
subdivision
when
they
split
the
parcels
and
so
modifying
the
ordinance
to
allow
multiple
property
owners
to
own
the
parcels
on
the
same
unit
without
giving
staff
the
opportunity
to
as
miss
as
the
community
development
director
says,
to
to
really
be
able
to
study
the
impacts
that
and
whether
that
creates
a
subdivision.
B
And
then
that
would
be
the
subdivision,
then
you're
changing
the
lot
dimensions.
And
so
I
think
it's
it's
a
process
that
staff
needs
further
time
to
review
and
understand
the
impacts
of
what
the
council's
asking
for.
U
So,
under
the
current
wording,
say
that
there's
an
individual
who
comes
forward
and
has
has
an
empty
lot
to
deal
with,
and
it's
it's-
you
know
not
involving
past
tenants
or
anything
like
that,
and
they
want
to
build
a
house
with
a
jadu
or
they
want
to
build
a
duplex
or
whatever
and
and
they
want
to
have,
they
want
to
be
tenants
in
common
with
someone.
Is
that
considered
one
owner?
The
the
the
tenant
and
common
agreement
is
the
owner.
AE
B
W
W
U
Okay,
and
I'm
just
wondering
if,
if
given
all
the
complications
could
tenancy
in
common
come
back
to
us
sooner
than
than
lot
splitting
and
and
all
the
various
complications
that
that
that
would
entail.
B
U
Okay,
I
I
think
that
would
be
very
helpful,
because
if
we,
if
we
can
ensure
that
we're
creating
a
pathway,
you
know
maybe
not
tonight,
but
when
we
get
that
that
information
back
then
that
would
be
something
that
would
be
there
for
us.
A
And
community
development
director
srivastava,
you
have
your
hand
up.
Did
you
want
to
speak.
W
Yes,
you
had
asked
about
the
section
where
exceptions
were
allowed.
That's
an
attachment,
one
page
26,
where
we
section
36.13.45.
W
A
Okay,
so
the
the
standards
that
could
be
waived
apply
only
for
the
construction
of
duo
developments,
yes
and
not
creation
of
the
lot.
So
in
other
words,
if
I
have
to
demolish
my
home
in
order
to
do
the
lot
split,
then
I
the
the
subdivision,
ordinance,
wouldn't
provide
me
any
relief.
The
only
way
I
can
get
my
lot
split
would
be
to
demolish
my
home.
F
A
O
Yeah,
I
think
that
when
we
work
on
things
like
this,
it's
always
important
to
to
work
through
as
many
consequences
as
we
can
see.
So
we
can
reduce
the
number
of
unintended
consequences
that
you
know
there
always
are
unintended
consequences
and
to
me
what
vice
mayor
hicks
has
brought
up
is
a
consequence.
That
is,
you
know
that
is
germane
to
our
community.
We
have
a
section
of
town
that
was
built
before
the
setback
requirements
that
are
in
you
know
in
the
in
the
newer
section.
O
I
guess
in
the
past
six
past
1960
section
that
that
won't
work
with
this.
That
would
no,
I
think
nobody
really
thinks
the
idea
of
tearing
down
a
house,
so
you
could
build.
You
know.
Two
of
them
is
a
good
idea.
It's
obviously
better
to
you
know
I
mean
it's,
it's
obviously
just
thriftier
to
keep
the
one
house
and
not
tear
it
down
and
be
able
to
build
one
behind
it.
So
I
I
would
really
like
the
maker
of
the
motion
to
accept
the
reduction
in
the
the
driveway
to
the
12
feet.
O
Suggestion
that
that
council
member
I
mean
that
vice
mayor
hicks
who's.
So
familiar
with
old
mountain
view,
thinks
is
appropriate.
Is
that
acceptable
to
you
maker
of
the
motion?
AP
I'm
really
torn
on
that
one,
because
I
feel
like
steph,
you
know,
has
researched
this
and
looked
at
the
issue
and
came
up
with
a
proposal,
and
you
know
I
feel
like
what
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
is
single-family
homes
in
the
downtown
area
being
torn
down
and
a
much
larger
single-family
home
being
built
in
its
place.
O
Well,
I
think
the
whole
point
is
that
we
don't
know
you
know
and
we
want
to
you
know
the
the
idea
behind
this
is
to
get
more
housing
and
we
we
you
know
we
want
to
do
it
as
efficiently
as
possible
and
with
as
less
disruption
to
our
community
as
possible.
O
So
that's
why
I
think
that
it
would
be
prudent
to
just
change
that.
You
know
it's
one
of
the
things
you
can
get.
I
can't
think
of
a
vehicle.
You
couldn't
get
down
a
12-foot,
you
know
easement,
if
you
needed
to
right,
I
mean
cars
are
six
to
eight
feet
wide.
Isn't
that
right,
so
a
12
foot
easement
is,
should
work.
AP
I
guess
I'd
like
to
hear
what
my
colleagues
think
about
this.
AI
I
A
That's
entirely
your
prerogative,
if
you
do
that
staff
will
will
the
vice
mayor
have
to
re-read
the
language
with
the
modifications,
and
I
guess
that
would
be
a
different
ordinance
with
the
modification
so
I'll
I'll
leave
that
up
to
you
vice
mayor,
we
could
either
vote
on
the
current
ordinance
and
if
that
does
not
pass,
then
we
can
consider
a
different
one
or
if
you
want
an
alternate
mode
or
a
substitute
motion.
That's
your
prerogative.
I
AP
So
sorry,
I
didn't
realize
you
were
waiting
for
me
because
I
said
I
wanted
to
hear
from
my
colleagues
and
I
I
kind
of
knew
where
you
stood
on
this
one.
I
was
hoping
to
hear
from
others,
but
I
also
you
know
would
like
to
get
staff's
input
on
this
as
well.
You
know
they
gave
us
their
perspective
on
this,
and
I'm
wondering
you
know
what
they
think
of.
If
we
changed
it.
W
We,
the
council
member,
we
I
did
confer
with
staff.
We
believe
that
an
11
or
12
foot
driveway
would
be
sufficient
to
cover
the
fence,
a
short
shoulder,
a
a
narrow
shoulder
and
the
nine
feet
it
just
wouldn't
allow
the
trees.
But
again
I
guess
it's
balancing
development
versus
landscaping
buffers
so.
AP
So,
okay,
so
modify
it
to
12
feet.
T
I
was
just
gonna,
throw
out
a
compromise
and
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
magic
number
to
12
or
14
or
yeah,
but
I
agree
I
think,
just
as
we
talked
about
balconies,
you
know
there
is
a
privacy
issue.
I
think
having
some
vegetation
along
the
fence
line
is
helpful,
so
I
you
know
doing
the
bare
minimum
at
12
to
me
seems
a
little
too
tight.
So
if
I
don't
know
14
letters
or
it
has
to
be
16,
but
I'd
rather
go
for
something
a
little
bit
more
than
the
bare
minimum.
T
It's
also
just
frankly,
you
know
to
be
realistic,
and
I
I
you
know
quite
depending
on.
I
guess
how
cars
go
down
turn
about.
You
know
turn
it
around
getting
out
it
just
it
makes
it
a
lot
trickier.
So
I
don't
want
to
narrow
it
down
so
much
that
it
just
becomes.
You
know
hard
to
to
move
around
on
the
property.
A
Kind
of
like
not
not
quite
an
agreement
with
12.
councilman
romano.
AP
Well,
so
I'm
I'm
happy
to
go
up
a
little.
I
guess
you
know
this
is
real
hard
to
do
on
the
fly
from
my
perspective,
because
I
I
don't
know
for
most
lots
in
the
downtown
area.
What
would
be
the
optimal
number
that
balances
all
the
things
we've
talked
about
here,
the
desire
for
landscaping,
but
not
incentivizing,
somebody
to
tear
down
their
house.
Is
it
13?
Is
it
14?
AP
W
Well,
we
think
it
could
go
down
as
much
as
12.
We
would
allow
a
little
bit.
W
You
know
a
very
narrow
landscaping,
buffer,
nothing
like
trees,
but
no
no
lower
is
what
we
would
say
and
anything
in
between
it's
hard
to
say
it's
hard
to
say
what
exactly
a
situation
is
going
to
be
because
homes
are
built
in
different
sections
of
the
lot,
sometimes
right
in
the
middle.
So
it's
hard
for
us
to
predict
beyond
that.
AP
Yeah
and
it's
hard
for
me
to
predict
so
what
if
it
was
yeah,
I
I
do
appreciate
the
comment
about.
We
do
want
some
landscaping
there,
because
we
do
want
some
sort
of
buffer
between
parcels
and
some
privacy
so
gosh.
I
hate
to
do
this,
but
14.
A
And
council
member
robbie
toga
are
you
okay?
So
we've
got
the
seconder
on
board
a
quick
question
for
staff?
Can
we
require
that
trees
be
planted
or
that
landscaping
being
you
know
incorporated
into
the
development?
Because
of
a
concern
I
see
with
16?
I
mean
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if
you
could
physically
do
this,
but
you
know
I
could
pave
that,
and
maybe
I
could
put
two
cars
side
by
side
and
not
have
any
trees
at
all.
So
what
what
do
the
standards
actually
require?
W
AU
Good
evening
council
stephanie
williams,
a
zoning
administrator.
We
actually
only
require
a
minimum
of
nine
feet
paved
within
that
area.
Most
people
tend
to
actually
create
a
wider
driveway.
For
the
reasons
that
I
think
we're
brought
up
in
terms
of
maneuverability
and
nine
feet
is
actually
quite
a
narrow
driveway.
AU
So
I
think
most
driveways
end
up
being
more
around
I'd,
say
the
the
11
foot
width
range,
but
we
don't
re,
require
the
landscaping,
but
most
people
do
tend
to
do
about
11
feet
paved
and
then
some
landscaping
in
our
trees
on
on
either
side.
A
U
Mayor,
so
is
there
a
setback
on
either
side
of
this?
On
the
the
neighbor
side
of
the
the
driveway,
however
wide
we
allow
folks
to
have
it
or
we
or
we
mandate
as
a
minimum.
U
So
I
I
think
that
you
know
to
my
mind,
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
have
the
potential
that
the
neighborhoods
look
roughly
the
same
and
that
we
have
less
circumstances
where
including
additional
housing
upsets
the
apple
cart,
and
so
I
think,
a
reduced
width.
I
think
12
feet.
You
know
there
aren't
a
lot
of
cars
that
are
12
feet
wide,
and
then
you
have
the
the
the
four
foot
setback
and
I
would
not
want
to
go
into
the
thing
of
you
have
to
have
screening
plants.
U
U
You
know
for
for
cars
to
be,
and
and
in
old
mountain
view,
we
do
have
quite
a
few
homes
that
are
not
considered
historic,
but
it's
a
visual.
It's
a
visual
landscape
that
that
people
are
used
to,
and
that's
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
maintain.
U
While
we
do
the
additional
housing-
and
I
think
if
you
know
we
just
require
more
more
and
more
paving
in
every
direction,
I
would
have
a
hard
time
with
that
going
in
next
door
to
me
and-
and
I
think
that
if
we
can
just
be
kind
of
conservative
and-
and
you
know
not
try
to
have
things-
be
a
big
change,
that's
you
know
frightening
and
concerning
then
that's
that's
the
better
part
of
things.
I
So
I
I
thank
you
for
reducing
it
a
little,
and
I
totally
appreciate
council
member
mata
comment
that
she
that
it's
hard
to
make
changes
on
the
fly
without
you
know,
being
able
to
go
out
and
look
at
everything
that
we're
talking
about.
But
the
reason
I
said,
11
or
12
is
that
every
house
I
looked
at
there.
Many
of
these
were
built
with
you
know,
as
sears
kit
houses
there.
Many
many
of
them
are
all
the
ones
I
visited
were
the
same.
They
were
all
between
the
house
and
the
fence.
I
There
was
12
feet,
so
14
feet
is
just
like
16
feet.
It's
gonna!
It's
going
to
mean
tearing
down
tearing
down
the
front
house
in
every
single
case,
so
I
said
11
feet
originally
because
I
didn't
want
somebody
to
come
in
and
be
told
they
were
off
by
an
inch
or
two
and
had
to
tear
their
house
down
for
an
inch.
I
And
I
want
people,
you
know,
I
want
people,
it's
a
lot
of
neighborhoods,
swan
and
old
mountain
view.
It's
a
lot
of
lots.
I
want
people
to
be
able
to
access
the
benefits
of
sb9
and
without
you
know,
without
having
to
demolish
homes
and
without
you
know,
all
that
extra
expense
and
tearing
up
the
fabric
of
the
neighborhood
and
they
do
have
bushes.
Currently
they
have
bushes
and
landscaping,
not
a
lot,
but
a
little
bit
on
both
sides.
AP
Check
so
can
I
ask
a
question
about
setbacks,
so
if
it's
four
feet
on
the
side,
obviously
that
applies
to
the
building.
Does
that
also
apply
to
the
driveway?
No,
I
didn't
think
so.
W
AP
A
Recommends
yeah,
thank
you
and
then
council,
member
koga.
Are
you
comfortable
with
thank
you
so
then
the
motion
on
the
floor
is
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
modification
of
the
flag.
Lot
access
strip
would
would
be
12
feet.
Minimum
interim
city
attorney
quinn.
B
W
Yeah,
I
believe,
there's
a
section
that
talks
about
the
driveway
with
and
maybe
brittany
you
can
point
us
to
it.
I
remember
access
requirements
for
flag
lots
that
are,
it
was
on
page
18
and
it
talks
about.
W
AS
W
W
I
think
I
think,
if,
if
the
council
wishes
to
look
at
this,
we
might
want
to,
we
might
want
to
go
back
and
look
at
where
what
changes
we
need
to
make.
Because
what
you
see
here
is.
AP
So
do
I
need
to
include
something
else
in
the
motion
about
and
the
associated
changes
to,
the
zoning
ordinance
to
accommodate
what
we
just
talked
about.
W
AP
Okay,
so
I'll
include
in
the
motion
should
direct
staff
to
come
back
to
us
based
on
the
direction
we
provided
tonight
to
change
to
the
14
foot
minimum
with
the
driveway
and
to
the
five
glass
that
was
12
right,
I'm
sorry,
12.
god.
AP
Yes,
I
circled
14.,
but
yes,
12.,
yes
and
make
the
associated
come
back
to
us
with
the
associated
changes
to
the
zoning
ordinance
to
accommodate.
That
is
that
good.
W
B
And
then
rt
does
that
need
to
go
to
epc
or
that,
since
it's
a
zoning
code
amendment
or
that
bypasses
since
it's
council
direction,
that
can
come
straight
back
to
the
council.
A
A
Thank
you,
so
staff
recommendation
reducing
the
flag,
lot
access
strip
width
to
12
feet
and
then
making
associated
modifications
to
the
draft
ordinances
as
appropriate
that
anything
else
that
we
ought
to
know
or
provide
direction
on.
A
A
I'm
not
seeing
any
I'll
just
say.
Thank
you
very
much.
This
was
a
long
conversation,
but
I
think
we
ended
up
in
a
in
a
good
place
of
a
thoughtful
compromise
and
the
only
I
guess
addition
I
would
have
is
when
we
discuss
the
middle-income
ownership
strategies.
I
hope
we
use
that
opportunity
to
allow
for
ownership
with
sb
9
developments
in
the
future.
A
A
F
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
staff
for
working
on
this
issue.
I'm
going
to
move
to
continue
the
meeting
past
10
pm.
We
have
one
final
item
and
then
the
adjournment
is
there
a
second.
F
E
A
Thank
you
very
much,
I'm
going
to
head
off
conversation.
This
relates
to
the
public
comment
we
received
earlier
and
a
number
of
emails
that
we've
gotten
about
the
expiration
of
the
state
protections
for
households
that
have
active
or
pending
rent
release
applications.
A
In
the
event,
there
is
a
resolution
at
the
state
level.
We
would
not
need
to
have
the
meeting
so
that
city
attorney
and
city
manager.
If
I
missed
anything,
please
let
me
know
the
only
other
thing
I
would
add,
is
the
city
of
san
jose
council,
earlier
this
afternoon,
directed
staff
to
explore
a
local
eviction
moratorium.
So
we're
not
alone.
This
doesn't
preclude.
A
This
doesn't
necessarily
guarantee
that
will
be
you
know.
A
local
moratorium
is
simply
to
provide
staff
latitude
and
direction
to
explore
what
types
of
local
responses
might
be
defensible
and
appropriate,
but
I'll
I'll
ask
the
city,
manager
or
city
attorney
to
weigh
in
if
I,
if
I've
missed
anything
based
on
that
conversation,.
D
A
Okay,
thank
you
and
do
we
need
a
second
that
form
was
the
formal
motion
necessary
or
a
struggle?
You
wanted
formal
motion.
Okay,
so
that
would
be
the
motion
council
member
lever.
Second,
any
questions:
if
not
city
clerk,
did
you
conduct
a
roll
call.
F
A
Thank
you
very
much.
The
only
other
thing
is
in
accordance
with
city
council
policy
a2.
I
would
like
to
report
that
I
attended
both
the
national
league
of
cities
and
the
mayor's
innovation
project
in
washington
dc
last
week,
and
with
my
colleagues,
council,
members,
matac
and
showalter
attended
a
number
of
very
interesting
seminars
and
workshops,
and
we've
had
several
meetings
with
various
federal
departments
just
top
the
top
of
my
head.
A
I
think
hud
d.o.t
federal
highway
administration,
environmental
protection,
age
agency,
and
then
there
was
a
meeting
with
some
arpa
representatives
or
I
think,
was
it
an
attorney
firm
that
that
handled
arpa
and
worked
with
nlc
and
then
also
I
had
a
meeting
with
congresswoman
anna
eshoo
regarding
great
separations
and
the
desalination
facility
that
the
city
of
mountain
view
is
working
on.
Among
other
things,
that
is
the
end
of
my
report.
Council
member
medicaid.
AP
Thanks,
I
just
want
to
add,
as
you
said,
we
attended
the
nlc
meeting
in
all
the
ones
I've
been
to.
I
would
say
this
was
right
there
at
the
top,
the
speakers,
the
quality
of
the
speakers
was
outstanding.
AP
AP
The
speakers
were
phenomenal
and
the
information
was
incredible.
So
I
I
I'm
really
glad
I
went
to
it.
I
was
debating
about
it
given
covet,
but
I'm
glad
I
went
it
was
outstanding
and
then
I
participated
in
a
the
board
meeting
for
the
bay
area,
water,
spline
conservation
agency,
bosca
and,
as
usual,
you
know.
AP
We
talked
about
the
water
situation
as
a
puc,
as
we
talked
about
earlier
is
our
major
supplier
and
they
are
still
requesting
everyone
do
the
voluntary
10
reduction-
and
you
know
it's
always
hard
to
say
what
you
measure
that
in
comparison
to
so
it's
like
might
be
five
percent
versus
one
year
30
versus
another
year.
AP
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
I'm
glad
you
went
to
that
workshop.
I
was
thinking
about
going
to
the
litigation
affecting
cities
and
pick
something
else,
but
I'm
I'm
sorry.
I
missed
it
now.
Councilmember
showalter.
O
Yeah,
I
just
was
going
to
add
a
little
bit
more
about
nlc.
I
did
get
to
attend
the
energy
environment
and
natural
resources
policy
committee
meeting.
I'm
on
that,
and
I
would
just
really
urge
all
of
us
to
think
about
stepping
up
to
be
on
the
various
policy
committees.
It's
a
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
get
to
weigh
in
on
a
national
level,
about
policy
issues
and
at
least
for
ee
and
r.
You
just
basically
have
to
say
you
want
to
do
it
and
they
let
you
on.
O
I
mean
it's
not.
I
don't
think
it's
it's
it's
terribly
selective,
but
but
the
people
who
do
step
up
really
seem
to
know
a
tremendous
amount
about
a
variety
of
issues,
and
so
I
I
you
know,
I
I
really
enjoyed
it.
O
I
wanted
to
say,
though,
that
that
kind
of
the
take-home
message
if
there
was
and
from
the
this
conference
and
and
council
member
matacek
was
right.
I
I
was
just
really
blown
away
by
the
quality
of
the
speakers
I
mean
literally,
we
were.
We
were
addressed
by
joe
biden
by
beat
pete
budac
by
nancy
pelosi
and
at
the
democratic
municipal
officers
breakfast
by
the
second
gentleman
doug
almost
so
that
was
just
I
mean
an
incred
incredible
array
of
individuals
to
hear
from
and
boy
they
know
their
stuff.
O
It
was
they
they
were.
You
know
they
were
each
inspiring
in
different
ways,
but
but
there
was
a
take-home
message
from
all
of
this
and
one
and
and
basically
it's
that
there's
going
to
be
a
tremendous
amount
of
money
and
that's
going
to
translate
hopefully
into
opportunity
for
with
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law,
and
they
call
that
the
bill
bil.
I
hadn't
heard
that
acronym
before,
but
that's
what
it
is
it's
the
bill,
and
so
there's
a
there's.
O
I
mean
there
are
billions
of
dollars
coming
down
through
mostly
through
state
grant
programs,
but
not
all
through
straight
grand
pub
rooms.
There's
there's
many
ways
it's
coming
down.
O
We
really,
we
really
need
to
be
paying
attention
to
that
and
I've
talked
to
the
city
manager,
and
I
know
that
about
that
a
little
bit,
and
I
I
know
that
our
you
know
our
consultants,
our
political
consultants,
are
looking
into
things
and
our
public
works
department
is
looking
into
into
to
grants,
but
I
just
think
we
should
all
have
our
ears
out.
You
know.
If
we
hear
of
things
we
should
we
should
bring
them
home
and
the
other.
O
Then
then,
when
I
got
home
from
from
nlc,
I
went
to
the
next
day
to
bcdc
meeting
and
the
message
there
take
home
message.
There
was
also
that
there's
going
to
be
a
tremendous
amount
of
opportunities
available
to
us,
but
on
top
of
that
we
had
several
speakers
who
came
forward
warner
chabot,
who
heads
up
sfei
and
david
lewis,
who
is
the
ed
of
save
the
bay
and
basically
they
were
sort
of
giving
us
a
lecture
on.
O
How
not
only
do
we
need
to
have
a
heads
up
about
all
this
funding
opportunities,
but
we
need
to
do
some
real
strategic
thinking
about
what
should
be
on
our
lists
of
ass
and
also
how
we
want
to
collaborate,
because
if
we
collaborate
as
a
region
or
if
we
collaborate
with
our
neighboring
communities,
then
our
you
know
our
message
is:
is
more
meaningful
and
stronger
and
we're
likely
to
do
better.
O
I
heard
when
we
talked
to
all
of
the
offices
was
the
value
of
talking
to
our
congressional
representatives,
and
I
I
think
that
we
have
a
really
close
or
I
have
I
feel
like
you
know.
I
have
a
quite
a
close
relationship
with
an
issue.
I
don't
not
that
I
necessarily
talk
to
her
all
the
time,
but
she
knows
who
I
am
and
when
I
do
send
an
email.
O
I
hear
back
immediately
and
you
know
she's
she's,
really
a
very
active
part
of
our
community,
but
I
I
don't
necessarily
have
those
relationships
with
the
staff
or
or
our
senators.
So
maybe-
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
does-
but
I
I
think
that
I
would
hope
over
time
that
perhaps
we
could
you
know
we
could
work
on
on
some
of
those
relationships.
So
those
were
the
the
looking
out
for
the
money
and
collaborating
together
and
getting
to
know
our
the
staffs
of
our
representatives
were
two
take-home
messages.
O
That
kind
of
I
I
wanted
to
make
sure
I
shared,
and
it
was
great,
not
only
was
it
it
was
just
it
was.
It
was
inspiring
I
felt
like,
and
it
was
lots
of
fun.
So
I
hope
that
you
know
in
the
coming
years.
People
will
consider
seriously
coming
along
to
these
it's
good
time.
A
Appreciate
it
council,
member
abi.
T
Thank
you.
Listening
to
council
member
show
letter,
I
thought
I'd
just
piggyback
on
her
comments.
Tomorrow
we
will
be
having
our
mtc
metropolitan
transportation
commission
meeting
and
one
of
the
items
is
in
fact
our
consolidation
of
priority
projects
for
the
bil
funding,
so
staff
has
compiled
a
list
of
priorities.
I'm
very
pleased
to
see
that
caltrain
electrification
is
on
there,
including
some
grade
separations.
T
I'm
not
quite
sure
this.
This
is
like
11th
hour,
we're
still
waiting
to
see
what
staff
proposes
if
they'll
actually
get
to
a
list
of
prioritizing
grade
separation
locations
for
tomorrow
or,
if
it'll
be
later.
But
you
know
my
my
plan
is,
if
there's
opportunity
to
advocate
for
our
two
great
separation
projects,
since
they
are-
and
you
know,
emphasizing
that
they
are
ready
to
go.
They've
been
cleared
as
well
as
we've
identified.
Local
funding
match
matching
funds
for
that.
T
So
we're
doing
exactly
what
we
thought
we've
been
told
to
do
and,
in
addition,
like
bart
the
bard
extensions
on
there.
T
A
You
and
mountain
view
is
very
fortunate
to
have
a
representative
on
the
mtc,
so
thank
you
for
at
your
advocacy
at
that
level,
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
or
reports
from
the
council.
F
A
Thoughts
are
with
his
family
and
loved
ones.
At
this
time,
council
member
robby
cook,
I
think
you
have
the
opportunity
to
serve
with
him
or
if
any
member
of
the
council
would
like
to
speak
about
former
former
mayor
dalioto.
O
Yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
say
I
I
served
with
him
on
the
environmental
planning
commission
for
several
years
and
I
I
was
just
really
impressed
by
how,
through
I
mean
he
was
just
a
very
nice
man
and
very
thoughtful,
but
I
I
was,
I
also
was
kind
of
impressed
by
his
intellect
and
how
he
you
know
throughout
his
life
continued
to
improve
himself.
I
mean
he
went
to
college
and
then
he
worked
for
many
years
and
then
he
went
to
law
school
and
you
know
it
was
just.
O
He
was
just
really
a
very
admirable
person.
So
I'm
glad
I
I'm
glad
I
get
to
spend
time
with
him.
It
was.
It
was
really.
You
know
it
was
really
an
honor
to
to
have
have
time
with
him,
and
so
sorry,
you
know
like
so
sorry
to
hear
about
his
death
and
send
my
condolences
to
his
family.
T
Thank
you.
Yes,
I've
been
really
saddened
by
by
the
passing
of
former
mayor
galioto,
and
I
send
my
condolences
to
his
family.
I
had
the
opportunity
to
well
first
meet
him
when
we
ran
in
2004
and
he
won
and
I
lost,
and
he
then
took
me
under
his
wing
to
support
me
for
my
second
bid
and
having
been
able
to
serve
with
him
after
that
he's.
I
know
the
award's
been
used.
I've
seen
it
on
and
I
think
I
posted
too
he's
the
consummate
gentleman.
T
Just
a
real
class
act
very
thoughtful
super,
smart
and
kind,
and
just
really
caring
about
this
community,
and
not
only
did
he
serve
on
council
and
serve
as
a
police
captain.
He
was
part
of
a
leader
in
the
historical
association
as
well
as
the
kiwanis
club,
and
just
you
know,
someone
who
really
was
dedicated
to
service
in
the
community,
so
I
miss
him
deeply
and
again
send
my
deepest
sympathy
to
his
family.
Thank
you.
AP
Thanks,
unfortunately,
I
didn't
have
the
opportunity
to
serve
with
him,
but
I
certainly
had
many
conversations
with
the
former
mayor
and
the
way
he's
been
described.
AP
U
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I
just
wanted
to
comment
that
I
think
what
was
really
stood
out
about
mayor
galioto
to
me
was
his
collegiality
and
just
being
a
thoroughly
kind
person
and
so
helpful
to
everyone
in
town
and
he
really
spanned
two
distinct
eras
of
mountain
view
with
his
his
career
in
the
police
department
and
the
work
that
he
did
there
to
modernize
the
department
from
being
a
a
small
rural
town
department
to
a
much
more
professionalized
force.
U
And
then
all
the
work
that
he
did
on
council
and
in
a
very
collegial
way
that
didn't
draw
attention
to
himself
but
but
really
empowered
the
community.
And
so
I'm
very
thankful
that
we
had
him.
I
Well,
although
I
didn't
get
to
serve
with
mayor
galioto,
I
have
to
say
that
I
first
met
him
when
he
was
campaigning.
He
knocked
on
my
door
and
I
had
a
sign
for
his
opponent,
bruce
carney
and
my
friend,
which,
because
of
bruce's
concern
about
fighting
climate
change,
and
I
have
to
say
nick
all
remembered
that
when
he
talked
to
me,
but
despite
that,
he
was
always
as
as
people
have
mentioned,
polite
and
kind
and
ended
up
being
the
first
former
mayor
to
support
my
candidacy.
I
When,
when
I
ran
for
office,
so
apparently
he
didn't
hold
a
grudge,
and
I
also
want
to
offer
my
condolences
to
his
family.