►
From YouTube: May 24, 2022 Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council and Shoreline Regional Park Community
Description
Live teleconference of the Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council (Regular) And Shoreline Regional Park Community (Special) scheduled for Tuesday, May 24, 2022.
A
B
C
You
mayor
ramirez,
there
are
two
items
on
the
closest
close
session
agenda
for
this
evening.
Item
2.1
is
a
conference
with
labor
negotiators
pursuant
to
california
government
code,
section
54957.6,
the
agency
designated
representatives
are
the
city
of
mountain
view,
assistant
city
manager,
chief
operating
officer,
audrey,
seymour,
ramberg,
the
human
resources
director
sue
rush
and
charles
sakai
of
sloan
sakai
young
and
wong
llp.
C
The
employee
organizations
are
service
employees,
international
union,
seiu,
local
521,
the
eagles
association,
the
police
officers,
association,
international
association
of
firefighters,
local
1965,
unrepresented
fire
managers
unrepresented
police
managers,
unrepresented
department,
heads
council,
appointees,
unrepresented
confidential
employees
and
unrepresented
hourly
employees
item
2.2
is
a
conference
with
real
property
negotiators
pursuant
to
government
code
section
six
point:
the
property
at
issue
is
909
san
rafael
avenue.
The
agency
negotiators
are
angela,
lamonica
real
property
program,
administrator
and
don
cameron.
Public
works
director,
the
negotiating
party
is
newmark
and
under
negotiation,
is
priced
in
terms
of
purchase.
B
Very
exciting
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
the
closed
session
items
listed
on
tonight's
agenda.
If
so,
please
click
the
raised
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen,
see
no
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak.
B
D
A
Good
evening,
everyone
welcome
to
the
joint
meeting
of
the
city
council
in
the
shoreline
regional
park
community
of
may
24
2022
before
we
get
started.
I
would
like
to
note
that
the
items
tentatively
scheduled
and
noticed
for
tonight's
meeting
regarding
590
caster
street
365
to
405
san
antonio
road
and
25.85
to
25.95
california
street,
have
been
continued
to
a
date
uncertain
and
will
not
be
heard
at
tonight's
meeting.
A
A
A
All
members
of
the
city
council
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting
live,
may
do
so
at
mountainview.legistar.com,
youtube.com
youtube.comforwardslashmountainviewgov
and
on
comcastchannel26
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda.
Members
of
the
public
may
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
by
visiting
mountainview.gov
meeting
to
enter
the
zoom
webinar
or
by
phone
by
dialing
669-900-9128
and
entering
webinar
id
843-5126-7142.
A
D
A
A
First
is
3.1
mental
health
awareness
month
proclamation,
and
we
will
now
invite
the
proclamation
recipient
to
join
korea,
randy
symbol,
decker
somebody
can
help
find
her
there.
She
is
thank
you
for
joining
us.
We
are
happy
to
be
joined
this
evening
by
local
middle
school
student
and
mental
health
activist
arya
randy
sindelbecker.
A
And
whereas
the
city
of
mountain
view
has
prioritized
mental
health
by
completing
and
continuing
to
support,
both
short
and
long-term
action
items.
As
part
of
the
2020
city
city
council
goal
to
assess
gaps
in
youth,
mental
health
services
and
whereas
the
city
council's
fiscal
year's
2021-23
work
plan
includes
a
priority
project
to
explore.
Alternative
mental
health
crisis
response
methods
and
whereas
the
city
of
mountain
view
has
provided
programming
to
strengthen
resiliency
efforts
in
mental
health
for
teens,
such
as
a
teen
wellness,
retreat.
A
A
G
Thank
you
so
much
for
having
me,
I'm
so
excited
to
accept
this
proclamation.
It
really
means
a
lot.
The
council
has
focused
on
mental
health
as
the
youth
mental
health
crisis
has
been
boosted
by
the
pandemic,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
my
mom
dad
dr
stephen
hinshaw,
miss
gay
krause,
mr
alex
briscoe,
miss
galassie
mr
sayre,
mr
lao
and
miss
nashara
for
supporting
me
along
my
journey.
G
I'm
two
years
into
my
mental
health
advocacy
and
it's
really
changed
me.
I've
become
an
advocate
for
more
peer-to-peer
communication
and
support
and
mental
health
education
in
schools.
I
made
a
documentary
about
mental
health
parity
and
I
just
want
to
say
I
believe
we
need
to
eliminate
the
stigma
around
mental
health
in
order
to
create
parity
between
mental
and
physical
health
challenges
in
order
for
everyone,
teens
tweens
adults,
to
get
the
mental
health
care
they
need,
and
I
believe
that
my
generation
will
be
the
one
to
make
those
changes.
A
H
A
A
So
thank
you
for
joining
us
and
we
will
now
move
on
to
3.2
recognition
of
outgoing
youth
advisory
committee
members
and
I
believe,
emily
chan
who
has
joined
us
will
be
receiving
the
proclamation
or
not.
There
is
no
proclamation.
We
are
happy
to
be
joined
this
evening
by
youth
advisory
committee,
chair
emily
chan.
Six
of
the
advisory
committee
members
are
graduating
this
june.
Being
a
part
of
this
committee
requires
time
effort
and
leadership.
A
We
would
like
to
thank,
annie,
eliza,
emily
hannah
lauren
and
richard
for
their
hard
work,
dedication
and
positive
contributions
to
our
community.
These
members,
some
of
which
have
been
involved
with
the
committee
since
middle
school,
have
represented
an
important
team
voice
and
worked
hard
to
accomplish
work
plan
items
year
after
year,
though
a
virtual
committee
over
the
past
year,
each
of
these
members
helped
plan
and
lead
several
successful.
In-Person
events,
including
the
teen
wellness,
retreat
being
open
mic
night
and
find
your
fit
team
career
day.
A
These
six
members
also
contributed
to
the
view
teen
center
by
attending
drop-in
activities
and
offering
ideas
to
improve
the
center.
Lastly,
they
use
their
voice
to
relaunch
teen
week
teen
week
and
the
teen
friendly
business
award,
which
highlighted
how
valuable
teams
are
to
our
community.
Thank
you
again
for
your
service
to
the
mountain
view,
community.
Through
your
time
on
the
youth
advisory
committee.
We
wish
you
every
success
in
your
next
endeavors
emily.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
few
words.
J
J
I've
met
some
really
amazing
people
that
I
don't
think
I
would
have,
and
it's
just
a
great
opportunity
to
be
involved
in
the
community,
and
so
I
think
I
speak
on
behalf
of
all
the
other
seniors.
Let
me
just
say
this
has
been
an
amazing
opportunity
and
we
are
so
grateful
and
we
will
definitely
miss
it,
but
yeah.
Thank
you.
So.
A
F
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
offer
my
congratulations
to
our
departing
yak
members.
Certainly
if
you've
been
you're
a
unique
group
having
to
had
to
go
through
the
pandemic-
and
I
just
want
to
you
know-
acknowledge
all
of
your
hard
work
and
your
enthusiasm
despite
the
various
challenges
that
the
last
couple
of
years
have
offered,
and
I'm
just
really
pleased
at
how
the
yak
has
grown
over
the
years
and
you
play
a
really
instrumental
part
of
our
community.
F
So
thank
you
for
all
of
your
hard
work
and
dedication,
and
I
wish
you
all
well,
as
you
move
on
to
your
college
career
and
yes,
please
come
back
and
and
if
you
do
and
we
would
love
to
have
you
get
involved
and
participate
in
in
our
city's
activities
again,
but
congratulations
and
best
wishes
to
all
of
you.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
the
other
member
of
the
council
machine
to
speak,
not
thank
you
very
much
emily
for
joining
us
and
for
your
dedication
and
service
on
the
yak
into
our
community
very
grateful.
We
will
now
take
public
comment
for
the
presentation
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
the
presentation
items
listed
on
the
agenda?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button,
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
A
A
If
not,
then
maybe
you
can
try
again
later
in
the
non-agenda
public
comment
period.
I'm
sorry
we
weren't
able
to
get
that
to
work.
So
now
we
will
proceed
to
the
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
council
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
Would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
pull
an
item?
H
A
Well,
let's
do
that
after
the
public
comment,
if
that's
okay,
great
any
other
members
of
the
council
wishing
to
pull
an
item,
I'm
gonna
pull
4.3
shoreline
boulevard
interim
bus
lane,
and
if
there
are
no
other
items,
then
we
will
earn
to
the
public.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
any
item
on
the
consent
calendar?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button,
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
A
L
Eva
tang,
here
I
wanted
to
pull
4.1,
which
is
the
resolution
to
continue
remote
public
meetings
during
a
state
of
emergency,
just
to
bring
attention
to
the
fact
that
covid
is
you
know,
raging
across
the
county.
There
are,
I
mean
the
the
case
rate
has
risen
a
lot.
I'm
sorry,
my
cat
has
a
lot
of
opinions
and
the
access
to
meetings
has
been
really
really
important
to
the
public.
So
I
I
believe
that
4.1
is
particularly
important.
A
O
N
P
Just
want
to
agree
with
eva
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
have
been
able
to
participate
during
this
epidemic
in
ways
that
they
couldn't
otherwise,
and
I
would
like
to
ensure
that
they
continue
to
be
able
to
participate
in
these
meetings,
so
allowing
for
hybrid
or
remote
meetings
is
very
important
to
a
lot
of
members
of
the
community.
Thanks.
Q
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I've
seen.
No
other
public
comment
will
return
to
the
council
for
the
liberation
and
I'll
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar
should
also
include
the
reading
of
the
title
of
the
resolution
attached
to
4.1
and
4.2.
I
understand
that
members
of
the
council
wanted
to
highlight
or
speak
to
some
of
the
items
before
we
take
a
motion.
So
let's
go
ahead.
H
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
two
of
the
consent.
Calendar
items
that
I
know
a
lot
of
members
of
the
public
have
been
interested
in.
One
is
4.4
the
active
transportation
plan,
so
we've
gotten
an
email,
particularly
from
one
of
our
big
pedestrian
activists,
joel
dean,
saying
that
they
he
hopes.
We
take
a
close
look,
look
in
particular
at
walkability
and
use
walkability
experts
rather
than
our
usual
consultants,
to
do
the
to
look
at
this
important
transportation
mode
and
do
it
justice.
H
H
H
If
you
look
in
the
packet,
you
can
see
a
kind
of
a
rough
draft
of
how
it
might
be
laid
out
and
we
are
inviting
community
engagement
around
park
planning
and
and
also
there's
the
possibility
of
having
some
of
the
league
sports
there
and
maybe
relieving
some
of
our
other
parks
of
that
particular
activity.
So
I
know
the
community
has
been
very
interested
in
that
and
wanted
to
highlight
that
as
well.
Thank
you.
E
Yes,
I
just
have
a
brief
comment
on
item
4.5,
which
is
again
the
los
altos
school
district
update
and-
and
I
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
the
update.
As
vice
mayor
hicks
said,
there
is
a
lot
of
interest
in
our
community
about
this
and
it's
a
very
exciting
opportunity.
So
it's
really
nice
to
see.
E
A
F
Thank
you
mayor
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
balance
of
the
consent.
Calendar,
including
item
4.1,
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
authorizing
and
continuing
virtual
meetings
of
city
council
committees,
boards
and
commissions
pursuant
to
ab361
and
making
required
findings
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
4.2
adopter
resolution
of
the
city
council
city
of
mountain
view,
authorizing
a
local
enforcement
agency
pursuant
to
assembly
bill
1276
to
be
read
entitled
only
to
be
further
reading
waved.
Thank
you.
M
A
Fantastic,
thank
you
very
much.
I'm
now
going
to
promote
don
and
head
to
panelist
for
4.3,
so
hopefully
they
will
join
momentarily.
4.3
is
the
shoreline
boulevard
interim
bus
lane
and
utility
improvements
there.
They
are
thank
you
for
joining
us.
I
just
I
don't
want
to
belabor
the
point,
I'm
going
to
support
the
staff
recommendation,
but
it's
it's
a
big
deal
for
a
project
on
the
verge
of
construction
to
to
be
canceled
and
for
the
contract
to
be
to
be
terminated.
A
So
I
I
wanted
to
better
understand
how
we
got
here.
So
I
I
understood
I
appreciated
the
staff
report
and
the
I
guess
the
utilities
that
had
previously
been
unidentified
in
the
corridor
itself.
I
want
to
better
understand:
is
it
the
fault
of
the
contractor?
You
know:
did
the
city
not
do
sufficient
due
diligence?
S
S
If
it's
there
and
it's
very
important
when
you
do
that
during
the
design
phase
to
identify
whether
there
are
unforeseen
utilities,
they
might
be
so
old
that
they
they're
they're
not
showing
up
on
our
plans
and
that's
one
of
the
challenges
we
face
with
the
shoreline
corridor.
It's
one
of
the
oldest
corridors
in
the
city
and
has
turned
out
to
have
a
lot
more
un
unknown
utilities
than
anticipated.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
That's
helpful
and
very
quickly
for
members
of
the
public,
we'll
go
to
the
public
comment
right
after
questions
and
then
after
public
comment,
we'll
we'll
take
a
motion
and
then
the
other
set
of
questions
I
had
has
to
do
with.
There
were
sort
of
two
big
reasons
why
the
contract
has
to
be
terminated,
that's
one
of
them
and
then
the
other
is
the
decision
to
eliminate.
The
second
left
turn
lane
from
middle
field
to
shoreline
between
the
two,
which
is
the
more
significant
change
if
it
had.
A
S
We've
asked
herself
that
I
followed
up
with
staff,
and
it's
really
difficult
for
us
to
predict
that
the
utility
changes
were
significant,
but
when
we
sat
down
to
talk
to
the
contractor,
it
was
both
the
combined
utility
changes,
as
well
as
removing
the
left,
turn
lanes
and
reconfiguring
the
intersection
from
the
scope
of
work.
And
so
what
basically
led
to
the
decision
was
the
cumulative
effect
of
both
these
scope
changes.
At
this
time.
A
A
T
Yes,
as
some
of
you
may
know,
I've
long
opposed
the
shrine
bus
lane,
because
even
in
pre-covert
conditions,
I
just
could
not
see
why
it
was
needed,
because
google
buses
all
of
its
employees
in
off
of
the
freeway,
they
don't
use
the
transit
center,
and
so
who
else
is
there
to
use
it?
But
anyways
whatever
was
the
justification?
Was
they
certainly
assumed
that
traffic
was
what
it
was
at
that
time
and
not
what
it
is
today
next
slide?
These
are
the
pictures
I
took
today.
This
is
101,
which
is
pretty
much
back
to
pre-cover
conditions.
T
Look
like
maybe
aggravated
by
the
express
lanes
next
slide,
please,
but
you
look
at
shoreline
looking
at
both
directions
off
the
overpass,
it's
really
empty.
Still,
this
is
on
tuesday,
which
you
know
under
google's.
Hybrid
work
system
is
probably
one
of
the
more
busier
days.
I
think
a
lot
more
people
take
mondays
and
fridays
off
next
slide.
Please
and
you
look
at
the
caltrain
parking
lot.
It's
still
pretty
empty.
You
know
there's
maybe
20
or
30
cars
there
and
you
know
granted
that
you
know.
T
Google
people
are
not
parking
there
and
going
in,
but
I
think
it
just
shows
that
caltrain
is
still
weight.
Ridership
is
still
way
down,
and
so
there's
not
many
people
going
from
the
transit
center
to
north
bay
shore
and
going
forward.
We
have
no
idea,
you
know
what
it
will
be
like
going
for.
You
know
in
the
next
couple
years,
but
the
cobit
doesn't
seem
to
be
going
away
and
it
may
be
just
a
thing
we
have
to
live
with
from
now
on,
in
which
case,
I
think
that's
except
the
last
slide.
T
Okay
yeah,
I
you
know
personally,
I
think
this
is
a
good
chance.
Just
pause
this
project
wait
and
see
you
know.
Is
this
bus
lane
really
going
to
be
needed?
You
know:
do
we
see
traffic
returning
to
shoreline
or
is
google's
hybrid
system
going
forward
going
to
work
like
this?
You
know
from
now
on
and
yes,
north
bay
shore
is
coming
up
and
maybe
hopefully
it
will
get
built
out.
T
I
do
agree
that
you
know
we
need
to
provide
utilities
for
north
bay
shore
and
I
certainly
like
the
idea
of
a
better
bicycling
on
shoreline,
but
in
terms
of
the
reversal
of
a
bus
lane.
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
chance
to
pause
it.
I
know.
You'll,
probably
you
know,
go
ahead
and
you
know
approve
it,
but
that's
just
my
opinion.
Thank
you
very
much.
O
A
U
U
I
would
I
would
like
to
see
us
at
least
have
have
the
opportunity
to
have
council
transportation
look
at
something.
That's
such
a
major
impact
in
in
terms
of
traffic
flow
and
getting
people
to
use
public
transit
and
and
a
a
monetary
hit
to
us
as
as
well,
and
I
I'd
be
willing
to
make
a
motion
in
that
direction.
U
Through
the
mayor,
if
I
may,
I
I'd
like
to
see
some
consideration
of
the
the
bus
left
turn
lane,
because
I
feel
like
when
this
came
to
us
the
last
time.
There
was
a
a
very
quick
about
face
on
on
that
issue
and,
and
I
think
it
given
the
the
expenditure,
it
would
be
in
the
public
interest
to
bring
it
back
and
at
least
have
an
opportunity
to
look
at
it.
F
Mayor,
so
I,
if
emotion
like
that
comes
about,
I
will
not
be
supporting
it.
I
don't
think
it
was
a
quick
about
face.
We
actually
had
our,
I
believe
our
parks
and
rec's
commission
like
weigh
in
on
that
issue,
so
I
would
think
that
we
studied
it
quite
extensively
and
I
stand
with
the
vote.
You
know
this.
F
I
caution
that
when
we
may
take
it
to
make
a
decision,
if
we're
going
to
keep
revisiting
it,
it's
just
going
to
continue
to
delay
these
projects
and
initiatives,
and
I
hope
that
that's
not
something
that
this
council
we'll
be
doing.
You
know
we
win
and
lose
votes
and
if
we
lose,
we
have
to
continue
with
the
consensus.
F
A
U
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
saying
that
I
think
in
a
sense
I'm
glad
that
we're
going
forward
with
it
or
well
I'm
going
to
be
supporting
this,
because
I
think
we
should
move
forward
with
it.
It's
true
that
our
traffic
patterns
have
not
gotten
back
to
quite
pre-pandemic
levels,
and
we
don't
really
know
when
that's
going
to
happen,
but
in
a
sense
having
a
street
to
work
on
that
doesn't
have
as
horrible
traffic
as
it
used
usually
does
is
an
asset.
A
M
A
Thank
you.
So
that
concludes
the
consent
calendar.
Let's
do
oral
communications
from
the
public
and
then
6.1
east
wisman,
precise
plan
and
then
we'll
take
a
break.
Is
everyone
comfortable
with
that?
Okay,
so
item
five
is
oral
communications?
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
A
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
Timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen
and
we
did
have
a
request
before
the
meeting,
for,
I
think,
a
speaker
to
speak
on
behalf
of
several
others,
a
city
clerk.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
assisting
me
with
that,
I
think
they
will
go
first.
V
V
W
Great
good
evening,
my
name
is
michelle:
oh
yeah,
I'm
presenting
with
aaron
miller
and
tim
mather
we're
residents
at
the
crossings
and
all
of
us
have
lived
in
mountain
view
for
over
20
years.
The
reason
we're
speaking
tonight
is
because
we've
seen
a
massive
surge
of
residential
construction
along
san
antonio
road
without
any
significant
changes
made
to
the
existing
infrastructure
next
slide.
W
A
major
area
of
infrastructure
failure
is
san
antonio
road.
I
took
this
photo
when
I
was
driving
northbound
on
san
antonio
at
10
39
a.m.
On
a
tuesday.
This
is
what
we
experience
daily
next
slide.
Please,
on
this
map,
we've
labeled
the
1.6
mile
section
of
san
antonio
road
that
extends
from
el
camino
to
east
charleston.
We're
going
to
take
a
closer
look
at
this
section,
because
it's
used
by
residents
of
mountain
view,
palo,
alto
and
los
altos
to
get
to
101,
north
and
south,
and
it's
where
major
development
has
occurred
recently
next
slide.
W
W
The
consequence
is
park,
crossings
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood
are
no
longer
family
friendly,
while
it's
a
painful
memory
for
us
all,
the
very
real
tragic
consequence
of
having
too
much
traffic
around
children
is
that
a
13
year
old
child
was
killed
on
grant
and
el
camino,
while
riding
his
scooter
to
school.
We
cannot
allow
for
tragedies
like
this
to
occur
next
slide.
Please.
W
W
W
W
X
Yes,
thank
you
michelle
to
summarize
what
michelle
just
reviewed.
This
is
a
netpad
of
over
2
000
residences
in
less
than
10
years,
and
this
is
not
replacement
housing.
This
is
brand
new
housing
all
within
a
small
section,
less
than
two
miles
long
of
san
antonio
road,
not
an
expressway,
not
an
avenue,
not
a
boulevard
san
antonio
road.
All
of
this
data
that
we're
looking
at
comes
directly
from
the
city's
own
reports.
X
Yet
clearly
something
has
been
lacking
from
the
analysis
of
it.
We've
heard
repeatedly
the
importance
of
parking,
but
that
is
an
easily
mandated
problem
seldom
mentioned,
is
the
vastly
more
challenging
problem
of
coordinating
three
cities
and
the
required
infrastructure
changes,
roads,
electrical
grid,
networking
and
telecom
services
to
sustain
a
modern
lifestyle
that
the
residents
of
silicon
valley
demand
and
deserve
next
slide.
X
Please
it's
been
the
fervent
hope
and
overuse
refrain
of
the
real
estate
developers
that
caltrain
can
easily
offset
this
increase
in
traffic,
but
bear
in
mind
san
antonio
is
a
limited
service
station
and
is
already
overloaded
baby
bullets
regularly
blow
by
it,
because
the
next
stop
mountain
view
downtown
is
a
major
stop
and
the
bridge
to
light
rail.
It
makes
little
sense
for
couch
train
to
add
another
stop
to
their
busy
bullet
schedule.
X
X
Moving
on
to
pg
e,
as
we
all
know,
pg
e
is
a
major
bottleneck
for
a
modernized
and
safe
electrical
grid,
not
just
for
our
small
area
but
for
all
of
northern
california,
as
this
table
shows.
The
area
of
san
antonio
is
already
clearly
overloaded
and
little
has
been
done
to
alleviate
the
added
demands
of
an
increasingly
electrified
society.
X
X
This
is
a
major
concern
for
me
and
I'm
sure
many
other
residents
of
mountain
view,
and,
frankly,
it's
disgraceful
to
admit
that,
within
a
thousand
feet
of
the
lab
that
invented
the
integrated
circuit
that
powers,
everything
we
do
and
as
the
namesake
for
silicon
valley,
we
all
suffer
from
such
frequent
electrical
outages
next
slide.
Please.
X
This
summarizes
the
impact
on
telecom
and
I
don't
need
to
express
that
this
is
not
a
direct
city
responsibility,
but
it
is
a
responsibility
of
the
city
to
work
closely
with
the
mobile
network
operators
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
just
a
reality
of
modern
life-
that
we
are
all
in
densely
populated
areas.
We
all
use
wi-fi.
The
city
should
be
doing
a
better
job
at
educating
the
population
of
how
to
work
and
live
in
more
densely
populated
areas.
X
V
My
name
is
tim
mather,
I'm
also
a
resident
here
in
the
crossings.
Council,
members,
city
staff,
we're
frustrated.
We
hear
from
the
city
staff
that
each
plan
is
reviewed
individually
and
to
us
that's
exactly
the
problem.
It
appears
to
us
that
the
city
is
looking
at
these
development
projects
through
soda
straws.
V
V
V
V
Our
quality
of
life
is
deteriorating
and
we
believe
that
the
city
of
mountain
view
is
failing
to
properly
serve
its
residents
next
slide,
please
what
we
would
like
the
city
council
to
do
frankly
is
to
reject
the
milk
pail
development.
Okay,
I
don't
even
know
why
we
don't
even
know
why
the
city
council
is
even
considering
the
exemptions
requested
by
the
developer
something's,
not
right
here.
We
urge
you
to
request
department
to
reject
that
development.
We
urge
you
to
request
the
valero
development
when
it's
proposed
to
that.
V
We
understand
this
in
the
planning
phase
and
not
yet
under
consideration.
We
urge
you
to
reject
both
of
these
projects.
The
current
infrastructure
and
the
projected
in
perma
improvements
simply
cannot
handle
those
developments.
Council,
members
staff.
We
appreciate
your
time
if
rules
protocol
prohibit
our
primary
permits.
We
welcome
your
questions.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
consideration.
A
A
Q
Greetings
all
tim
mckenzie.
He
him
pronounce
a
resident
of
the
montaloma
neighborhood.
I
just
I
I'm
sure
most
of
most
of
you
on
council
know
me
and
I've
been
around
for
a
little
bit.
I
just
I
want
to
raise
attention
to
something.
I
got
an
email
within
the
past,
10
to
14
days
the
past
week
and
a
half
or
two
weeks
from
a
city
staff,
member
of
the
city
of
redwood
city,
and
they
were
reaching
out
to
me
to.
Q
The
city
of
redwood
city
is
now
providing
period
products
in
the
municipal
bathrooms,
the
ones
that
the
city
itself
is
able
to
provide
product
for,
and
a
a
staff
member
reached
out
to
me-
and
let
me
know
hey,
I
you
reached
out
a
year
ago,
and
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
this
was
happening
and
the
that
was
fantastic
to
hear
as
as
an
advocate,
and
the
only
reason
it
was
able
to
happen
is
because
the
city
of
mountain
view
had
made
that
decision.
So
I
really
wanted
to
thank
you.
Q
Everyone
on
council,
thank
you
for
the
work
that
you
did
to
make
this
a
reality
in
mountain
non-view
and
for
the
encouragement
that
some
council
members
gave
me
personally
to
go,
spread
and
ask
for
other
local
cities
to
do
likewise.
I
appreciate
your
your
encouragement.
I
probably
wouldn't
have
done
it
without
you
asking
me
to
do
so,
and
I
appreciate
that-
and
I
want
to
highlight
of
what
happened
that
when
we
as
mountain
view,
made
a
model
for
other
cities
to
follow,
and
they
did
so.
A
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
I'm
sorry
tim
you've
exhausted
your
time
and
I
have
to
be
fair
to
everybody.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
want
to
speak
on
an
item
not
on
the
agenda
seeing
none?
We
will
proceed
now
to
item
6.1,
eastwood
and
precise
land
development
impact
fee,
nexus,
study
and
east
wisdom,
development
impact
c
vice
mayor
hicks.
Do
you
have
an
announcement
to
make.
A
K
Y
Y
Nexus
studies
and
development
impact
fees
are
programs
that
ensure
that
new
development
pay
for
the
capital
cost
incurred
by
a
city
associated
with
growth.
The
nexus
study
calculates
the
cost
of
capital
improvement
projects
required
to
support
the
growth
in
the
east
whispering
precise
plan.
The
cost
is
divided
by
the
growth.
The
result
is
the
fee
for
land
use.
Y
Y
Y
K
Thank
you
very
much
renee.
The
total
estimated
cost
of
improvements
is
about
151
million
dollars.
Of
this,
only
about
54
million
dollars
can
possibly
be
paid
through
the
proposed
fee.
The
remainder
is
the
share
of
the
responsibility
due
to
existing
buildings
and
pipeline
projects
that
are
exempt
under
state
law.
Note
that
more
projects
could
be
exempt
under
state
law
before
the
fee
goes
into
effect.
K
K
Affordable
units
should
also
be
exempt,
which
would
which
would
result
in
potentially
a
lost
income
of
about
five
million
dollars.
Neighborhood
commercial
uses
should
also
be
exempt,
which
would
result
in
lost
income
of
about
two
million
dollars
and
government
and
non-profit
uses
should
also
be
exempt,
but
this
would
have
minimal
or
uncertain
lost
income.
K
K
K
This
slide
shows
a
total
fee
comparison
for
three
hypothetical
projects
across
several
similar
jurisdictions,
including
the
north
bay
shore,
precise
plan
they're,
expressed
in
terms
of
percent
of
market
value.
Attachment
5
to
the
council
report
had
an
error
in
milpitas
data,
and
this
slide
reflects
the
actual
amounts
showing
higher
fee
burdens
across
milpitas's
residential
building
types.
K
The
eastwood
precise
plan
already
has
the
second
highest
total
fees
for
the
apartment
project
after
milpitas,
but
is
competitive
with
sunnyvale
for
the
condo
project
and
milpitas
and
competitive
with
several
other
jurisdictions
for
the
office
project.
The
proposed
fees
nonetheless
would
only
increase
the
total
fees
on
these
projects
by
less
than
one
percent
of
market
value.
K
I'd
also
like
to
note
that
staff
is
recommending
a
modification
to
the
ordinance.
This
is
in
section
four
previously
approved
development
projects.
This
is
the
pipeline
provision
within
the
ordinance
and
staff
is
recommending
that
the
language
shown
here
be
be
added
to
the
ordinance
to
ensure
that
projects
with
development
agreements
will
pay
the
fee
pursuant
to
their
da.
K
E
K
So
the
the
the
amount
of
this
fee
is
small
relative
to
other
fees
and
and
costs
that
are
on
residential
development.
There's
also
potentially
a
large
variation
over
time
in
how
residential
development
will
be
feasible
as
time
goes
on.
In
addition,
part
of
the
east
wism
and
precise
plan
strategy
to
address
that
feasibility
issue
was
to
adopt
the
jobs,
housing
linkage
strategy,
which
is
intended
to
shift
costs
from
residential
to
office.
K
Nonetheless,
as
part
of
the
housing
element,
we
are
looking
at
potentially
reducing
costs
for
residential
citywide
in
various
ways.
There
will
be
more
information
about
that
at
an
upcoming
study
session,
and
so
in
summary,
I
think
those
are
different
ways
that
you
can
consider
adopting
this
fee.
Despite
recent
feasibility
analyses
that
show
the
challenge
of
building
residential
right
now,.
E
E
Okay-
well,
I
one
thing
I
just
really
liked
it
I'd
like
to
congratulate
that.
I
know
this
is
complex.
I'd
like
to
congratulate
you
on
working
through
it
and
also
I.
I
really
appreciate
the
exclu,
the
recommendation
to
exclude
affordable
housing.
I
think
that
that
that
that
that
is
key
and
later
I
want
to
talk
about-
maybe
some
other
exclusions,
but
but
I
think
that
that's
it
for
right
now.
Thank
you.
U
K
U
K
R
Thank
you.
So,
in
the
material
on
this
topic
it
talked
about
the
ability
to
update
the
fee
from
time
to
time.
If
there
was
new
information,
or
things
like
that-
and
I
was
wondering
if
the
build
out
in
terms
of
the
number
of
units
or
the
amount
of
square
footage
is
much
lower
than
what
is
allowed
in
the
precise
plan.
Would
that
also
be
a
reason
for
taking
a
look
at
the
fees
because
we'd
be
generating
less
in
fees
than
we
were
expecting.
K
M
Z
If,
at
some
point
in
the
future
the
master
plan
square
footage
is
reduced,
then
you
would
have
to
look
at
what
improvements
are
actually
required
to
support
the
reduced
square
footage
and
then
build
the
next
study
on
that,
and
then
the
last
piece
again
is
the
question
about.
If
the
build
out
is
lower
than
the
precise
plan,
can
we
change
it?
R
Okay,
so
the
amount
of
square
footage
or
the
number
of
residential
units
is
more,
the
infrastructure
is
more
sensitive.
Tell
me
if
this
is
correct
thinking
here.
The
infrastructure
capacity
so
to
speak
is
more
sensitive
than
I
might
have
thought
to
the
number
of
units
or
the
amount
of
square
footage,
so
you
could
potentially
have
a
smaller
water
pipe,
because
there's
fewer
units
or
less
square
footage
is
that
what
you're
saying.
Z
What
I'm
saying
is
that,
even
if
the
build-out
is
lower
on
a
side-by-side
basis,
we
would
have
to
look
at
the
overall
build
out
that
is
still
in
the
precise
plan,
look
at
the
infrastructure
requirements
and
then
base
any
reductions
or
reassignment
on
on
that
new
number
and
the
new
infrastructure
requirements,
you
may
find
that
the
pipes
are
still
needed.
You
may
find
that
you
know
the
street.
Z
F
K
K
Maybe
big
box,
retail
or
some
other
regional
retail
may
have
an
interest
in
locating
in
this
area
the,
but
the
the
intent
of
the
exemption
is
really
to
tie
the
the
exemption,
this
incentive
of
the
exemption
to
a
legal
agreement
that
would
preserve
the
space
as
retail,
which
is
already
a
requirement
to
have
it
be
exempt
from
far
so
would
be.
It
would
be
part
of
that
legal
agreement,
but
it's
it's
an
additional
incentive
to
ensure
that
spaces
are
kept
neighborhood
serving
retail
and
not
converted
to
office
over
time.
F
Great,
thank
you.
I
guess
I'm
can
I'm
interested
in
just
any
kind
of
retail,
given
that
retail
has
always
been,
at
least
in
my
time,
a
challenge
to
attract
and
to
maintain.
So
what
was
the
thought
and,
and
that-
and
I
guess
I'm
always
surprised
that
the
retail
fee
is
like
one
of
the
higher
fees
it
and
for
me.
I
think
that
you
know
it's
also
mentioned
in
the.
AA
F
K
Yeah,
so
we
we
thought
a
lot
about
this
because
in
in
north
bay
shore
there's
a
similar
fee,
but
retail
is
not
charged
or
charged
a
lower
amount.
I
don't
recall,
but
and
really
the
rationale
there
is
north
bay.
Shore,
as
everybody
knows,
is
the
cul-de-sac
right,
there's
very
little
travel
to
north
bay
shore,
foreign
neighborhood,
serving
you
know,
goods
and
services,
and
so
you
really
can
make
the
rationale
that
those
goods
and
services
are
locally
serving
east
wisman
is
is
not
a
cul-de-sac.
K
You
know.
Middle
field
runs
right
through
the
middle
of
it
serves
neighborhoods
on
you
know
in
sunnyvale
serves
neighborhoods
in
in
the
north,
wismen
wagon
wheel
area
and
even
potentially
further
afield,
and
so
there
is
the
potential
that
new
retail
will
generate
trips
in
the
area
and
and
because
the
improvements
that
we've
identified
are
local
improvements,
they're,
not
regional
improvements,
any
reduction
in
regional
travel.
K
You
know,
maybe
people
deciding
to
go
to
a
closer
grocery
store.
You
know,
instead
of
driving
a
little
further
to
bailey
park
or
driving
a
little
further
to
another
grocery
store.
That's
not
actually
reflected
in
the
improvements
in
the
in
the
nexus
study,
because
these
are
improved
improvements
serving
this
local
area,
and
so
the
additional
trips
that
are
generated
in
this
area
by
those
that
retail
would
would
need
a
proportional
cost
to
that
use.
K
That's
that's
pretty
far
to
go
to
a
grocery
store,
but
the
the
the
sorry,
the
question
you
asked
was:
would
that
would
the
reduction
in
vehicle
trips
from
mode
shift
have
a
kind
of
reduce
the
effect
of
of
retail
on
the
emt
pursuant
to
the
fee?
Right
I
mean,
I
think
it
really
comes
down
to
we.
We
studied
this
in
the
eir,
and
these
were
you
know
in
the
the
the
eir
that
we.
F
K
F
Because
we
want
more
right,
we
want
more
retail,
we
want
more
hotel.
My
concern
is
this
and
that
we've
talked
about
this
in
other
parts
of
the
city
and
that's
why
we
have
reduced
the
fees
on
retail
and
maybe
even
again,
I
can't
remember
what
we've
done
with
hotel
elsewhere,
but
I
guess
I
you
know.
I
feel
the
same.
Obviously
in
this
area
of
town
too,
where
there
is
no
grocery
store
right
and
right
there
and
like
how
do
we
get
one?
F
I
I
feel,
like
you
know,
if
someone's
interested
in
bringing
in
retail,
we
should
be
welcoming
that
and
not
adding
not
putting
on
the
highest
fees
on
on
that
or
even
hotels.
Frankly,
so
sorry
that
was
commentary,
but
going
back
to
the
question
of
how
that's
calculated
in
terms
of
the
revenue
potential
revenue
benefits
would
be
helpful
to
understand.
Z
Council
member
robbie
kuga,
I
I
wanted
to
respond
to
the
question
about
whether
these
were
inputs
and
they
weren't,
because
the
nexus
study
was
based
purely
on
the
demand
of
each
land
use
per
square
foot
and
and
the
cost
of
the
improvements
the
council
may
as
a
policy
reduce
that
amount
for
various
land
uses.
We
obviously
can't
increase
it
because
it's
a
nexus
fee,
but
it
could
be
reduced.
F
Thank
you
that
I
I
understood
that,
and
I
I
guess
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
get
at,
because
I
think
you
know
there
there
is
that
potential
for
revenue
with
hotels
or
retail
that
we
wouldn't
get
from
houses
or
offices,
and
so
that's
is
a
factor
there
that
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
included
or
not
in
the
calculations.
So
thank
you
for
clarifying
that.
E
Yeah,
I
I
have
another
question
that
came
up
listening
to
the
discussion
here
and
that's
about
sort
of
the
timing
of
setting
these
fees
and
sort
of
now
and
in
the
future.
So
tonight
the
job
before
us
is
to
basically
set
the.
As
I
understand
it
is
to
set
the
the
fees,
the
impact
fees
for
the
east,
whistling
precise
plan
and,
and
then
every
year
we
and
as
part
of
the
budget
process
set
the
fees
based
on
whether
they're
well
set
the
fees
exactly
for
that
year.
E
Right-
and
I
guess
my
question
is,
you
know,
say
as
a
policy
decision
we
wanted
to
say
we
don't
want
to
as
margaret
was
talking
about.
We
don't
want
to
have
impact
fees
on
commercial
because
we
want
to
encourage
that.
Can
we,
when
we
pass
the
budget,
say
for
the
next
five
years,
we're
not
going
to
have
these
impact
fees
on
commercial
as
a
policy,
and
yet
we
still
have
the
fees
on
the
books.
So
if
that
policy
need,
I
mean
this,
this
precise
plan
is
rather
long-lived.
E
I
mean
we're
plan,
it's
it's
to
take
what
20
25
years
to
to
build
up.
So
you
know
things
could
change
20
years
from
now
so
say
for
the
first
five
years.
Our
policy
decision
was
to
exclude
certain
things
because
we
want
to
encourage
them.
Would
that
mean
we
could
never
get
fees
back
on
these
other
things
or
how
would
we
go
about
doing
that?
Is
that
clear.
K
K
Certainly,
the
council
could
decide
to
lower
or
put
moratorium
fees
without
doing
a
new
nexus
study
without
adopting
new
nexus
findings.
Obviously,
as
we
said
before,
that
would
be
lost
income
and
there
would
not
be
an
opportunity
to
get
that
money
back
at
any
time.
You
wouldn't
be
able
to
put
that
on.
The
future.
E
What
I'm
really
unders?
Well,
I
think
all
of
a
lot
of
us
are
interested
in
is
the
dif.
The
difference
between
you
know
the
the
nexus
study
where
we're
being
asked
to
approve
this
nexus
study
and
and
setting
fees
for
the
plan
and
and
really
what
I'm
interested
in,
is
what's
the
term
of
that
plan.
Does
that
mean
if
we
set
a
moratorium
for
five
years
or
ten
years
to
encourage,
say
housing
to
be
developed
quickly
that
we
couldn't?
E
Z
Z
If
the
council
still
wants
to
see
the
improvements
being
done,
and
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
if
the
council
needs
to
make
an
informed
decision,
we
would
have
to
bring
back
some
kind
of
a
plan
that
would
allow
us
to
look
at
this.
You
know
at
page
10
of
the
staff
report
and
maybe
eric
you
can
confirm
this
notes
that
the
the
retail
would
would
bring
in
about
1.8
million
or
so
so.
Z
S
Yeah,
I
do
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
add
on
to
what
assistant
city
manager
so
fast
saying
was
that
as
this
growth
occurs,
there
is
an
expectation,
we're
going
to
deliver
this
infrastructure
and
we're
going
to
need
a
funding
strategy
to
do
so,
and,
as
noted
based
upon
what's
recommended
here,
including
going
ahead
and
exempting
affordable
housing
exempting
neighborhood
commercial,
the
amount
of
fees
that's
projected
to
be
collected
will
will
come
to
about
a
third.
I
re,
as
I
recall,
of
these
total
capital
costs.
K
A
Thank
you.
I
have
one
question
just
to
clarify:
the
fees
have
not
been
adopted
yet
so
they
were
not
an
input
into
the
housing
element,
constraints
analysis,
but
staff
intends
presuming
the
council
adopts
the
fees
to
include
the
new
impact
fees
in
the
constraints.
Analysis
for
our
housing
element.
Is
that
right?
Yes,
fantastic!
Thank
you
for
the
clarification.
Any
final
questions
from
the
council
before
we
move
on
to
public
comment,
see
none.
A
AB
AB
AB
So
when
staff
says
we're
solving
this
problem
because
we
have
the
this
linkage
fee
or
this
linkage,
that's
basically
admitting
there's
no
way
we're
going
to
resolve
our
jobs,
housing
and
balance,
because
we're
banking
on
more
jobs
in
order
to
build
build
more
homes.
So
you
know
it's
true.
This
is
not
that
much
worse.
I
mean
in
comparison
to
our
parkland
fee.
This
is
a
relatively
small
tax
bill
to
put
on
housing,
but
when
we've
already
made
housing
and
feasible
to
build
on
its
own,
why
are
we
continuing
to
go
down
this
direction?
AB
AB
A
maximum
allowable
impact
fee
does
not
mean
you
have
to
approve
that
amount.
You
can
improve
anything
you
want
underneath
that
amount.
So
I
would,
I
would
recommend
just
to
prove
what
other
cities
do
so
that
we
don't
add
another
constraint
to
this
project
and
something
to
note
our
housing
element
draft
as
it's
written
really
depends
on
middle
field,
getting
past
the
finish
line,
and
and
so
we
can
get
land
for
this
affordable
housing.
AB
You
can
ask
staff
this
like
the
way
we've
drafted
our
housing
element,
we're
really
hoping
that
the
pipeline
can
get
us
more
like
the
majority
of
our
low
income
units,
and
if
that
doesn't
happen,
we
have
to
redo
a
lot
of
our
analysis.
So
we
can't
make
this
housing
infeasible.
We
need
the
middle
field
project
to
succeed,
and
so
I
really,
I
think
we
should
think
twice
about
imposing
an
impact
fee
much
higher
than
comparable
cities
do.
Thank
you.
AC
Evening,
council,
my
name
is
kevin
ma
and
I
like
to
echo
most
of
the
points
that
salim
has
brought
up.
We've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
from
590
about
the
impact
of
new
office
development
on
the
jobs,
housing
balance
and,
as
the
consultants
have
found
for
east
wismen
is
basically
we're
kind
of
assuming
a
hot
out
of
office
and
not
much
housing
to
actually
match
the
demand
for
the
office
so
and
we're
not
making
housing
any
cheaper
to
build
we're,
making
it
more
expensive.
AC
There's
no
products
being
proposed,
no
off
no
housing
proposed,
so
which
is
not
really
a
great
solution
when
the
housing
crisis
is
ever
growing
more
painful
by
the
year,
because
if
you
don't
build
anything
and
people
still
come
here,
it
just
causes
everything
to
be
expensive,
and
I
understand
we
are
coming
back
with
a
re-look
at
the
parkland
dedication
ordinance
and
the
impact
thesis
tulsi
with
that.
But
still
every
time
we
just
add
another
feed,
it's
just
reducing
our
ability
to
address
the
housing
shortage.
AC
AD
Hello,
I
pretty
short
comment.
I
just
want
to
say
almost
exactly
echoing
what
each
of
the
previous
commenters
has
said,
but
you
know
just
because
the
we've
figured
out
what
the
maximum
legal
limit
of
how
much
we
can
charge
is,
doesn't
mean
that
that's
the
right
number
to
charge
and
as
staff
notes,
it's
probably
a
good
idea
not
to
charge
the
maximum.
For
you
know
multiple
different
reasons,
especially
affordable
housing.
You
know
high
higher
higher
fees.
AD
U
U
Second,
that
we
introduced
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
adding
chapter
47
to
the
mountain
view,
city
code
regarding
precise
plan,
development
impact
fees
and
the
east
wisman
precise
plan
development
impact
feed
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waved
and
set
a
second
reading
for
june
14
2022.
D
E
I
I
wanted
to
bring
up
the
idea
of.
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
that
that
the
staff
recommendation,
including
included
excluding
affordable
housing
and
the
affordable
housing
and
retail
development,
and
what
was
the
other
one,
the
the
government
nonprofit.
I
thought
that
was
good,
but
I
would
really
also
like
to
entertain
the
idea
that
we
exclude
regular
residential
or
that
we
reduce
the
amount
that
is
is
charged
for
resident
the
residential
fee.
And
I
wondered
if
the
maker
of
the
motion
would
consider
that.
A
U
What
is
critical
right
now.
I
would
be
leery
of
putting
ourselves
in
a
in
a
financially
risky
position
to
underwrite
you
know
more
expensive
housing,
more
market
rate,
which
we
know
is,
is
so
out
of
reach
of
the
the
individuals
that
we
most
need
to
serve
in
the
community
who
do
not
have
the
housing.
U
U
E
All
right:
well,
I
I
I'm
also
really
interested
in
in
what
mr
anderson
said
about
the
evaluation
of
our
entire
fee
structure
that
we're
going
to
look
at
in
the
housing
element.
It
wasn't
incompletely
clear
to
me
that
actually
we
were
really
looking
at
the
entire
fee
structure
or
just
impact
fees
when,
for
instance,
park
fees
would
be
folded
into
all
that
maybe
staff
could
respond,
but
when,
when
will
the
park
fee
all
of
the
fees,
including
park
fees,
invest?
K
Well,
I
I
don't
want
to
get
too
far
ahead
of
ourselves
in
the
in
the
housing
element.
That's
that's
going
to
be
in
an
upcoming
item
and
there
will
be
some
opportunity
to
discuss
how
the
city
will
carry
out
ongoing
programs
to
look
at
fees
and-
and
you
know,
address
them
as
well
as
development
standards.
K
E
A
R
D
R
I
think
I
was
a
little
bit
surprised
at
the
amount
of
infrastructure
we
do
need
to
add
in
the
east-westman
area,
given
that
it's
surrounded
by
more
developed
areas
and
in
comparison
to
say,
north
bayshore
and
this
fee,
even
if
there
was
full
build
out,
represents
35
percent
of
the
total
cost.
So
there's
still
quite
a
bit
of
cost
that
we
need
to
either
fund
from
city
resources
or
get
grants,
or
you
know
anything
else
we
can
do
to
help
with.
R
You
know
I
appreciated
the
discussion
about
retail
because
we
certainly
do
need
more
retail
in
the
lisbon
area,
but
I
I
will
say
that
places
like
dollar
tree
and
the
restaurants
in
that
same
shopping
center.
They
are
definitely
regional
serving
and
not
just
neighborhood
serving,
and
I
guess
I
can
those
are
places.
I
frequent-
and
you
know
you
hear
people
talking
and
they
aren't
from
this
neighborhood.
But
those
are
such
great
restaurants
and
great
places
to
shop
that
they're
driving
from
other
cities
to
go
to
those
locations.
R
So
I
appreciate
the
exemption
for
neighborhood
serving
especially
say
a
grocery
store,
but
we
do
have
you
know
regional
retail
in
this
area.
So
I'm
okay
with
what
staff
proposed
and
I
do
appreciate
you
know
the
other
exemptions.
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So
I'm
happy
well.
I
seconded
the
motion
I'm
going
to
support
it
thanks.
F
Thank
you,
mayor,
councilman,
matacek,
said
a
lot
of
what
I
was
thinking
as
well.
I
I
appreciate
that
we
do
need
to
make
these
infrastructure
improvements.
You
know
I've
said
time
and
time
again
we
can't
just
build
houses.
We
have
to
build
neighborhoods
and
infrastructure
and
services
to
support
those
houses.
Otherwise
we
just
have
houses
and
not
a
community.
F
So
it's
important
and
you
know
my
question-
is:
if
we
don't
have
these
impact
fees
and
where
else
are
we
going
to
get
the
funding-
and
I
know
there's
some
opportunities,
but
that
they're,
you
know
they're
always
potential
and
not
guaranteed,
and
so
in
light
of
the
fact
that
this
is
just
a
third
of
the
the
cost
estimates,
I
think
we
do
need
to
move
forward
with
impact
fees.
I
was
interested
in
seeing
if
we
can
just
you
know,
eliminate
retail
completely,
because
again,
I'm
looking
for
revenue
generation.
F
Z
F
Z
I
I
would
just
add
that,
yes,
the
council
can
choose
to
to
do
that,
but
we
might
have
to
go
back
through
the
mitigation
fiat
process
to
increase
the
fees.
In
that
case,
we
can't
just
reinstate
those
the
easier
way
to
do
that
would
be
to
adopt
the
fees
and
then
choose
a
period
to
suspend
it
or
reduce
it
after
which
it
starts
taking
effect.
F
F
F
It
was
like
the
low
or
one
of
the
lowest,
if
not
the
lowest
fee,
and
I
think
that,
given
that
we've
heard
office
is
really
the
you
know
lucrative
type
of
development,
they
probably
can
take
some
offset
or
or
take
some
of
the
the
costs
from
the
residential
side.
So
I
think
it'll
balance
out
so
I'm
comfortable
with
moving
forward
with
this,
and
let's
see
how
it
goes
thanks.
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
bring
up
one
more
thing,
I
think,
just
as
a
matter
of
principle,
so
that
it
wasn't
unanimous.
I'm
probably
gonna
vote
against
this,
but
but
I
wanted
to
bring
up
that.
This
is
really
a
great
time
for
us
to
be
getting
funding
for
infrastructure
projects
from
other
sources.
I
mean
the
the
federal
government.
E
This
fall
passed,
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law,
which
is
a
1.2
trillion
dollar
law,
now
infrastructure
infusion
now
granted
that's
got
to
be
shared
hundreds
of
different
ways,
but
still
it
is
a
major
source
of
of
grants
that
we
haven't
always
had
and
we
may
have.
We
may
not
have
it's
it's
the
those
funds
will
be
expended
for
the
next
five
years
and
then
another
thing
that
puts
us
in
a
really
good
position
again
at
the
moment
is
the
surplus
that
the
state
has.
E
I
think
it's
92
million
dollars,
92
billion
dollars
this
year,
so
a
great
some
of
that
money
is
going
to
be
spent
on
housing,
supportive
things
and
infrastructure.
So
right
now
we
do
have
better
opportunities
to
go
for
grants
and
in
the
next
few
years
than
we
we
have
in
the
past
and-
and
we
probably
will
10
years
from
now-
and
I
just
wanted
to
let
people
know
that
that
this
is.
E
A
If
not,
we've
got
a
motion
from
council
member
lieber
seconded
by
council
member
member
matac
for
the
staff
recommendation,
as
amended
by
staff.
I
think
the
only
thing
I'll
add
is
one
of
my
favorite
history.
Lessons
is
from
the
north
san
jose
area,
development
policy,
which
was
approved
almost
20
years
ago
and
council
member
robbie,
kogan
and
don.
You
might
actually
know
more
about
this
than
I
do.
They
approved
a
tremendous
amount
of
development
in
north
san
jose
and
then
to
incentivize
it.
A
The
city
dramatically
reduced
the
impact
fees
which
were
supported
by
a
nexus
study
very
similar
to
this.
On
on
the
the
industrial
development
specifically,
and
understandably,
that
created
a
deficit,
they
could
not
fund
the
transportation
needs
and
so
what
they
did
was
they
plugged
in
all
of
the
projects
that
would
have
been
funded
by
those
fees
into
2016
bta
measure
b.
So
they
took
san
jose's
problem
and
made
it
yours
and
mine.
A
M
A
A
Welcome
back
everyone,
it
is
now
8
40..
We
will
proceed
to
item
7.1,
adoption
of
resolutions
to
prohibit
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
and
streets,
adjacent
to
class,
2,
bikeways
and
introduction
of
an
ordinance
and
adoption
of
resolutions
to
prohibit
parking
of
all
vehicles
from
2
am
to
6
am
at
designated
locations.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
This
item
has
been
segmented
to
allow
participation
by
council
members
who
have
conflicts
of
interest
and
will
be
recusing
as
a
result.
The
process
for
this
item
will
be
as
follows.
The
first
part
will
be
the
staff
presentation
and
we'll
proceed
to
public
comment
and
then
recommendations.
One
and
two
will
be
considered
together
with
council
member
libra
recused
recommendation.
Three
will
be
considered
with
council
member
of
mata
check,
request.
A
Recommendation
four
will
be
considered
with
council
member
abe
toga
and
vice
mayor
hicks
for
cues
recommendations.
5,
6
and
8
will
be
considered
by
the
full
council
recommendation.
9
will
be
considered
with
myself,
recused
and
finally,
recommendation
10
will
be
considered
by
the
full
council.
Public
works
director.
Don
cameron
will
present
the
item
whenever
you're
ready.
Oh,
we
need
to
oh
no
she's
here,
hello,
hi.
S
Thank
you
very
much
good
evening
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members.
I'm
don
cameron
public
works
director
joining
me
to
help
answer.
Questions
is
lorenzo
lopez,
city
traffic
engineer
in
2019,
the
city
council
adopted
ordinances
to
prohibit
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
streets
with
bike
lanes
and
on
narrow
streets
for
enforcement.
The
street
segments
subject
to
the
ordinances
must
be
designated
by
council
resolution
and
signs
installed.
S
S
S
The
resolution
designating
narrow
streets
adopted
in
2020
included,
444
street
segments
based
on
a
review
of
the
city's
140
mile
street
network
and
measuring
475
street
segments
due
to
the
large
quantity
of
streets
requiring
measurement
and
verification
staff
anticipated
that
there
may
be
additional
street
segments
that
qualify
as
narrow
that
were
missed
in
2020
and
therefore,
staff
started.
Compiling
a
list
of
street
segments
to
measure
53
segments
were
reviewed
during
the
last
couple
of
months,
which
resulted
in
the
following
findings.
S
The
streets
measured
that
were
previously
designated
as
narrow
in
the
2020
resolution
were
all
confirmed
to
qualify
as
narrow
35
street
segments
that
were
inadvertently
not
measured
in
2020
have
been
identified
as
narrow
and
two
street
segments
not
previously
identified
as
narrow
were
re-measured
and
determined
to
qualify
as
narrow
staff
recommends.
Council
adopter
resolution
adding
these
37
street
segments
identified
in
green
on
the
attached
map
to
the
list
of
narrow
streets.
S
S
S
As
part
of
the
evaluation
process,
notices
were
mailed
to
all
property
owners
and
tenants
along
the
streets
with
existing
overnight
parking
prohibition
sites.
The
notices
indicated
that
the
city
is
evaluating
the
no
parking
signs
on
the
street
fronting
their
property,
the
possibility
the
signs
may
be
identified
for
removal
and
invited
their
comments
of
the
57
responses
received.
48
requested
the
signs
remain
and
expressed
a
variety
of
concerns
primarily
related
to
long-term
oversized
vehicle
parking
being
allowed
on
these
streets.
S
In
addition,
the
type
of
parking
restrictions
should
be
appropriate
to
the
parking
issue
being
addressed.
For
instance,
two
hour
parking
limits
are
used
when
there
is
a
high
parking
demand
location
in
a
retail
area.
Where
is
desirable
for
parking
to
turn
over
frequently
in
reviewing
the
two
to
six
am
parking
prohibition
staff
determined
that
they
do
not
address
traffic
safety?
S
Based
on
staff's
assessment,
it
is
recommended
that
the
signs
be
retained
on
eight
street
segments
which
are
located
in
residential
or
habitat
areas.
The
red
lines
on
the
map
indicate
which
street
segments
are
recommended
to
retain
the
signs
and
the
blue
lines
are
the
streets
where
signs
would
be
removed.
If
council
adopts
the
recommended
resolutions.
S
S
In
summary,
staff
recommends
council
adopt
the
resolutions
for
designating
streets
subject
to
the
bike
lane
and
narrow
streets
ordinances,
introduce
an
ordinance
amending
the
city
code
related
to
prohibiting
parking
2
to
6
a.m
and
adopt
resolutions
designating
streets
to
have
parking
prohibited
from
2
to
6
am.
This
concludes
staff's,
recommend
presentation.
A
A
AE
Hi
there
thanks
for
taking
my
my
call
in
I'm
a
landlord,
and
I
wanted
to
avoid
my
opposition
to
allowing
rvs
and
campers
and
other
vehicles
to
camp
out
overnight
and
sleep
in
their
vehicles
on
wyandotte
street.
I
operated
my
business
there
for
25
years
between
1980
and
2005,
and
I
went
through
the
hell
when
they
had
vehicles
parking
out
there
and
it
was
a
mess
it
was
unsafe
and
additionally,
our
employees
and
our
customers
had
no
place
to
park.
AE
AE
There
are
routine
full-size,
semi
trucks
that
make
deliveries
during
business
hours
with
the
semis
trying
to
maneuver
and
rig
loads
unloading
on
wyandotte
street
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
So
if
you
had
parking
overnight,
people
stay
there
and
it's
impossible,
there's
also
a
school
on
the
street,
and
there
are,
I
just
see
I'm
running
out
of
time.
So
anyhow
I'll
just
thank
you
and
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
not
pass
that
on
wyandotte
street
it'll
be
a
disaster.
AF
Hello,
I
remember
many
years
ago,
when
I
used
to
see
rvs
on
leghorn
the
then
one
day
the
rvs
were
gone,
replaced
by
the
no
parking
2
am
to
6
am
signs
much
of
leg,
horn
and
independence
dominated
by
large
storage
sites
has
little
foot
traffic.
Few
driveways
and
rvs
parking
on
the
street
would
have
little
impact.
AF
Of
course,
large
vehicle
parking
will
only
be
possible
if
bike
lanes
are
not
added.
If
bike
lanes
exist
or
are
added
to
every
street,
that
is
not
narrow.
The
council
will
have
ended
rv
street
parking
in
mountain
view.
What
would
happen
if
rvs
are
legally
banned
from
mountain
view?
Will
the
residents
leave?
Will
they
move
to
smaller
vehicles?
AF
AF
AF
AC
AC
I
do
worry
that,
given
the
justice
juxtaposition
with
the
rest
of
the
outer
streets
to
the
rv
bands,
basically,
is
that
there
are
plans
for
the
streets
in
the
current
overnight
parking
list
that
will
later
probably
be
added
to
the
narrow
streets
or
bike
lane
ordinances,
because
there
are
either
bike
lanes
there
or
maybe
there's
another
measuring.
So
I
do
caution
to
think
that
this
would
alleviate
those
that
do
live
in
oversized
vehicles.
AC
AA
AG
AG
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
if,
if
we
keep
these
as
well
as
expand
parking
bans
in
various
areas,
it's
just
gonna
make
the
situation
worse
overall,
not
better,
because
people
are
still
relying
on
their
vehicle
to
survive
in
and
they're
still,
a
part
of
this
community
will
just
push
them
out
to
different
areas
and
I'd
like
to
see
the
city
find
other
solutions
to
help.
People
have
a
safe
place
to
park,
rather
than
just
push
them
out
of
the
city.
AG
I
find
that
extremely
unjust
and
as
far
as
expanding
the
oversized
vehicle
parking
ban,
I
wonder
how
the
street
measurements
are
being
done
and
how
the
ordinance
actually
defines
them.
If
there's
an
exact
point
on
the
curb
or
whatnot.
That
needs
to
be
measured
and
find
a
little
ridiculous
that
the
measurement
changes
by
like
such
small
amounts
and
it
is
or
is
not
either.
You
know,
considered
a
narrow
street,
and
maybe
council
has
some
leeway
to
define
that
in
a
way
that
isn't
up
to
whoever
is
measuring
it
at
that
moment.
AG
L
Thanks
yeah,
I'm
another
caller,
I'm
calling
in
to
support
removing
parking
or
prohibited
parking
between
the
hours
of
two
and
six,
and
I
don't
agree
with
these
resolutions-
designating
more
streets
to
prohibit
oversized
vehicle
parking.
I
hate
the
oversized
vehicle
parking
ban
in
the
first
place,
I'll
put
that
out.
L
We've
seen
this
economic
crisis
really
hit
low-income
people
the
most
and
these
people
already
don't
really
have
anywhere
to
go
it.
It
doesn't
make
sense
in
a
month
that
we've
declared
mental
health
month
to
enact
more
policies
that
would
be
detrimental
to
people's
mental
health,
like
removing
a
possible
place
that
they
can
park
safely.
L
I
understand
that
this
is
a
tough
decision,
because
there
are
people
that
are
dissatisfied
with
oversized
vehicles
being
on
their
streets,
but
I
don't
think
these
people
want
to
be
on
the
street
like
that
either,
but
I
don't
think
that
there
are
solutions
right
now
that
would
allow
us
to
keep
these
people
from
parking
on
the
street
using
that
as
a
way
of
housing.
I
I
just
think
it's
incredibly
inhumane
and
some
of
these
people
have
kids
that
need
to
go
to
school
as
well.
L
AA
Thank
you,
mayor,
bruce
england,
speaking
for
mountain
view
coalition
for
sustainable
planning.
In
short,
we
stand
behind
the
staff
recommendations
and
ask
you
to
approve
those.
The
bigger
picture
is,
as
you
all
know,
housing
and
everything
related
to.
That
is
a
huge
issue.
It
isn't
just
this
part
of
it:
the
parking
allowances
but
safe
parking
and
supportive
housing,
affordable
housing,
and
all
of
that
goes
along
that
it's
a
huge
challenge
and
the
fact
that
staff
can
do
the
work
they
do
around
all
the
moving
parts
is
impressive.
N
Hi,
I
recommend
that
remove
the
design
of
no
parking,
because
a
lot
of
people
like
a
lot
of
family.
They
have
two
or
three
more
than
two
cars,
three
cars
and
they
need
to
park,
and
since
there
is
a
sign
or
parking,
a
lot
of
people
couldn't
park
and
that's
not
right
and
the
same
time
that
the
housing
costs
in
monu
are
so
expensive.
It's
an
outrage
and
we
push
the
middle
income,
people
or
the
low
income
people
out
of
the
mom
you.
N
But,
however,
we
still
need
them
to
work
for
in
restaurant,
industry
and
everywhere,
and
they
don't
have
a
place
to
stay
and
mom.
You
didn't
have
housing
to
offer
for
them,
so
they
only
stay
in
the
car.
We
have
to
give
them
the
chance
to
have
a
place
to
park,
so
we
need
to
open
more
instead
only
a
few
designated
place.
Thank
you.
AH
All
right,
thank
you.
I
think
you
know
this
is
a
very
kind
of
difficult
thing
to
contend
with.
I
I
think
it's
the
case
where
the
stated
rationale
for
the
the
policies
that
we're
looking
at
here
is
different
than
the
actual
intention
and
the
actual
intention
of
these,
like
overnight
parking
bans
in
mountain
view,
is
to
push
out
poor
people,
and
I
think
that
you
know
that
needs
to
be
contended
with
more
more
directly,
so
you
know
take
taking
down
some
of
the.
AH
The
signs
is
good,
some
of
this
other
stuff,
where
it's
like
we
want
to
have.
You
know,
restrictions
on
near
bike
lanes
and
things
like
that.
You
know
I
I
ride
the
bike
cleans
a
lot.
Usually
the
problem
is
not
these
oversized
vehicles.
So
that's
my
comment
and
I'll
give
you
the
rest
of
my
time.
I
guess.
P
Hey
friends,
I
agree
with
the
previous
speakers
largely
excluding
the
commercial
landlord.
I
think
that
staff
is
doing
a
good
job,
trying
to
find
regulations
that
are
serve
a
good
purpose
in
a
you
know,
parsimonious
way,
so
good
job
on
that.
I
think
it's
something
we
need
to
continue
doing,
because
laws
and
regulations
like
this
should
serve
the
people
of
the
city
and
do
as
much
as
they
can
to
protect
people
and
help
the
people
here.
But
I'm
speaking
mostly
just
on
behalf
of
my
local
community.
P
A
lot
of
their
those
parking
spots
are
slated
for
removal
with
updates
the
precise
plan
and
some
of
the
development
at
microsoft,
and
so
the
sobrato
project,
so
yeah,
giving
them
more
time
where
they
can
park
overnight
and
hopefully,
eventually
figuring
out
a
solution
where
they
can
find
a
way
to
keep
their
cars
that
don't
fit
in
their
driveways
would
be
really
nice.
So
thank
you.
A
U
A
C
A
C
A
A
F
F
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.3
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council,
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution,
number
18533
designating
one
street
yosemite
avenue
or
portions
thereof
were
oversized.
Vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
is
prohibited.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
wave.
M
A
A
A
F
Thank
you
mayor.
I
will
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution
number
one:
eight,
five,
three
three
designating
one
street
walk
or
drive,
or
portions
thereof,
where
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
is
prohibited.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived.
H
H
H
What
I
see
happening
here
is
that
the
the
the
oversized
vehicles
are
going
to
be
able
to
move
into
some
of
our
more
commercial
and
office
spaces
and
the
feedback
I've
been
getting
and
I'm
sure
other
council
members
have
as
well
from
the
developers
and
owners
of
those
spaces.
Is
that
they're
not
particularly
happy,
but
I
have
met
with
several
of
them
and
they
are
because
this
is
more
visible
to
them.
The
the
I
mean.
Frankly,
the
problems
of
homelessness
are
more
visible
to
them.
H
I've
been
meeting
with
several
of
them
and
they
are
expressing
a
willingness
to
partner
with
the
city
to
come
up
with
solutions,
so
I'm
hoping
that
and
and
quite
frankly,
it's
the
huge
growth
of
of
jobs
and
the
difficulty
finding
housing
the
expensiveness
of
housing.
That
is
one
of
the
big
factors
causing
this
problem.
So
I'm
I'm.
You
know
I'm
happy
to
see
that
people
are
now
that
the
this
problem
may
be
more
visible
to
some
people
that
they
may
want
to
partner
and
help
us
help
us
solve
the
problem.
H
A
Thank
you.
We
might
want
to
keep
the
comments
fairly,
narrowly
scoped
to
just
each
of
the
streets
or
street
segments
that
we're
commenting
on
or
that
we're
deliberating.
I
think,
fair
point,
but
now
that's
something
that
the
whole
council
may
want
to
consider
any
questions
or
comments
specifically
about
walker
dry.
M
A
F
H
A
U
Thank
you
mayor,
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution
number
one,
eight
five,
three
three
designating
one
street
blossom
lane
or
portions
thereof,
where
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
is
prohibited.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived.
A
M
A
Hopefully
they
will
do
so
momentarily.
The
full
council
will
now
consider
the
balance
of
the
streets
to
be
designated
as
narrow
streets
or
adjacent
to
class.
2
bikeways,
as
well
as
the
introduction
of
the
ordinance
to
amend,
prohibited
parking
between
the
hours
of
2
am
and
6
am
attachments,
5,
6
and
8
to
the
council
report.
E
E
E
We
we,
you
know,
we've
tried
for
a
long
time
to
get
that
off
the
ground
and
it
it
really
didn't
work
until
covid
when
the
with
the
county
came
through
and
and
helped
with
one
of
the
legal
issues
so
that
we
could.
We
could
have
a
safe
parking
lot
without
going
into
the
long-term
rv
parking
business,
which
you
know,
which
nobody
really
wanted
to
do
so
anyway.
E
E
They
sign
up
with
case
managers
and
get
assistance
in
moving
into
better,
more
stable
housing.
So
I
think
that
you
know
with
this
this.
This
exercise
we're
going
through
now
is
largely
kind
of
a
a
large
whackable
project.
You
know
we
we're
saying
you
have
to
move
from
this
area
to
another
area,
but
it
doesn't
necessarily
solve
the
problem,
and
I
think
we
need
to
make
a
a
new
effort
to
solve
that
problem
again
and
get
some
more
safe
parking
lots.
So
I
hope
that
that's
will
be.
E
R
R
R
R
C
C
When
we
get
to
the
2
a.m,
to
6
a.m,
we
do
have
one
more
recusal
and
we've
put
them
in
order
so
that
these
discussions
do
not
impact
those
who
are
recusing.
So
if
we
can,
you
know,
keep
your
comments
to
the
narrow
streets
and
bike
lanes
resolutions
right
now
and
then,
as
we
get
to
the
2
a.m,
to
6
a.m.
It
will
be
more
appropriate
to
have
a
full
discussion
about
that.
Just
so
we're
careful.
U
What
I
wanted
to
bring
up
is
that
I
hope
that
the
individuals
who
spoke
and
talked
about
what
was
the
methodology
and
and
was
it
fair
and
and
can
we
fudge
on
it
and
et
cetera,
really
urge
you
to
read
the
staff
report
and
read
the
repeated
effort
that
went
into
making
a
fair
and
objective
and
repeated
measurements
and
etc.
And
I.
U
U
F
F
Recently
I've
been
doing
some
precinct
walking
for
other
folks
in
other
cities,
and
what
I've
noticed
is
that
many
of
the
cities
around
us,
including
san
jose,
have
parking
restrictions
on
most
of
at
least
the
streets
that
I've
walked
in
neighborhoods,
and
you
know
as
much
as
I
mean
I'm
very
proud
of
what
we
have
done
in
mountain
view.
But
I
you
know
would
remind
folks
that
this
is
a
regional
issue
and
we
really
need
the
partnership
of
all
communities,
all
cities
to
come
forward
to
with
solutions
to
that
regard.
F
I
think
it's
like
midtown
palo
alto
so
because
of
their
proximity
to
each
other.
Apparently,
that's
encouraged
churches
to
participate
or
whatever,
and
I
think
maybe
their
collaborate
and
partner
to
make
this
program
work.
So
you
know
that
actually
gave
me
hope
that
maybe
more
private
property
owners
churches
will
step
up.
Also,
just
that
you
know,
another
city
is
now
participating.
F
That
should
help
that
helps
because,
frankly,
palo
alto
has
had
parking
restrictions
on
their
streets
for
much
of
a
very
long
time.
I've
noticed,
and
so
you
know,
I
think,
it's
important
that
all
the
communities
participate.
So
you
know
we
do
our
part.
I
think
we've
done
frankly
more
than
our
share.
I
know
that
we
like
to
do
that,
but
there
are
limitations
in
terms
of
land
and
frankly
costs.
This
is
not
you
know
it's.
It
is
a
cost
to
us.
F
We
pay
the
county
to
provide
those
services
which
I
still
don't
understand
because
county
the
county
is
supposed
to
get
the
funding
for
homeless
services
and
whatnot,
but
we
pay
them
to
do
it.
So
you
know,
I
think
we
have
to
be
again
be
mindful
of
that
and
the
that
we
need
to
you
know,
be
fiscally
prudent
and
frankly,
scar,
our
neighbors
to
neighboring
communities
to
help
out
in
this
regional
issue.
Thanks.
R
R
C
No,
she
is
correct.
I'm
sorry,
I
heard
you
say
the
balance
of
the
items
and
I
didn't
realize
that
we,
that
included
the
ordinance.
I
didn't
realize
that
we
had
moved
into
that.
So
I
apologize
council
member
member
comments
with
regard
to
the
2
a.m.
To
6
a.m.
Ordinance
was
appropriate
and
if
other
council
members
would
like
to
discuss
that
ordinance,
that
would
be
appropriate
at
this
time.
I'm
sorry,
I
just
missed
it
when
you
said
the
balance
of
the
items
that
we
were
on
the
ordinance
thanks.
S
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
would
like
to
clarify
again.
The
ordinance
is
simply
amending
the
current
city
code,
about
2am
to
6am
parking
to
say
it's
only
on
streets
designated
by
city
council
by
resolution,
so
the
ordinance
is
not
addressing
the
locations
or
nor
the
criteria
or
the
decision
points
related
to
the
locations
themselves.
S
I
H
Say
that
one
of
the
things
that
I
found
positive
when
I
talk
to
some
of
the
business
owners
who,
if
we
go
through
with
everything
on
the
staff
recommendation
would
be
affected,
is
that
they
were.
They
were
landlords
office
landlords
for
large
corporations
with
with
locations
in
multiple
cities.
So
we
did
have
a
short
conversation
about
how
this
has
to
be
a
more
regional
solution,
and
if
we
partner
with
them
that
it
would
have
to
be
not
just
in
mountain
view,
it
would
have
to
be
elsewhere
as
well.
H
So
I
will
make
a
motion
to
I
hope,
I'm
in
the
right
place,
because
I
was
recused
for
a
while.
I
hope
I'm
at
the
right
point
in
the
meeting
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution
number
18,
409,
designating
three
streets
or
portions
thereof,
where
oversized
vehicle
parking
adjacent
to
class
2
bikeways
is
prohibited.
H
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
ready
title
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
to
introduce
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
chapter
19,
article
8
division,
3,
section
19.71
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
relating
to
prohibited
parking
between
the
hours
of
2
am
and
6
am
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
wave
and
set
a
second
reading
for
june
14
2022,
the
effective
date
of
the
ordinance
is
august.
30Th
of
2022.
A
M
A
Thank
you
very
much
now
it's
my
turn.
I
have
to
recuse
myself
from
the
next
item.
I
have
a
real
property
interest.
I
guess
a
leasehold
interest
and
close
proximity
to
san
antonio
circle,
a
street
designated
in
the
overnight
parking
resolution
identified
as
attachment
9
in
the
council
report.
So
I
will
recuse
myself
from
consideration
of
this
resolution.
H
Good
luck!
Okay,
so
I
will
be
the
chair.
While
the
mayor
is
recused,
the
council
will
next
consider
adoption
of
a
resolution
designating
san
antonio
circle
as
a
location
to
prohibit
parking
between
the
hours
of
2
am
and
6
am
attachment
9
to
the
council
report.
Does
any
member
of
the
council
have
questions
on
this
item?.
H
So
seeing
no,
oh,
I
do
see
a
question
council
member,
okay,
you're
moving
on
so
seeing
no
questions.
The
council
may
now
deliberate
and
take
action
on
this
item.
I'll
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
resolution
attachment
9
to
the
council
report.
E
Yes,
I
was
going
to
make
a
motion
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
designating
one
street
or
portions
thereof,
where
parking
is
prohibited
between
the
hours
of
2
a.m
and
6
a.m.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.71
to
be
read
in
title
only
further
reading
waived.
The
effective
date
of
the
resolution
is
august.
30Th,
2022.
H
To
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
designating
seven
streets
or
portions
thereof,
where
parking
is
prohibited
between
the
hours
of
2
a.m
and
6
a.m.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.71
to
be
read
entitled
only
further
reading
waived.
The
effective
date
of
the
resolution
is
august.
30Th,
2022.
R
R
R
Let's
say
it
that
way:
it's
up
to
all
of
us
to
conserve
water,
because
we
might
come
to
the
point
where
we
need
to
help
a
neighbor,
and
so
everyone
needs
to
do
their
fair
share.
And
I
know
we
keep
on
saying
this,
but
we
really
do
need
to
conserve
water
and
certainly
when
it
comes
to
outside
watering.
R
That
is
in
the
creek
beds,
and
I
always
sign
up
for
stevens
creek
in
mountain
view,
and
I
I
was
surprised,
pleasantly
surprised
that
there
was
less
stuff
and
I'll
say
stuff,
because
it's
a
wide
variety
of
things
that
were
in
the
creek
bed
this
year
in
comparison
to
all
the
other
years.
I've
done
this
didn't
come
across
any
microwave
ovens
or
tables
or
chairs
or
refrigerators,
but
we
still
had
quite
a
few
shopping
carts.
R
F
Thank
much
mayor
and
thank
you,
councilman
mata
check
for
covering
the
clean
energy
board
meeting.
For
me.
I
also
attended
the
cal
cities
city
summit
in
sacramento
and
wanted
to
make
a
couple
announcements
well
part
of
that.
During
that
time
I
was
also
I
attended
the
cities
association
board
meeting
where
we
passed
our
upcoming
budget
for
the
upcoming
year,
and
I
wanted
to
just
make
an
announcement
and
encourage
my
colleagues.
F
If
you
haven't
signed
up
already,
we
will
be
having
our
general
meeting
on
june
9th
at
the
winchester
house
in
san
jose
with
the
speaker,
russ
hancock,
from
joint
venture
silicon
valley.
So,
if
you're
able
to
attend,
I
would
encourage
you
to
join
us.
It
should
be
interesting
and
it's
just
a
it's
a
good
opportunity.
We
are
in
person.
F
I
know
that
it's
a
little
bit
challenging
still,
but
if
you're
able
to
uncomfortable
feel
comfortable
coming,
it's
just
a
great
opportunity
to
meet
up
with
our
colleagues
throughout
the
the
county
on
other
city
councils,
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
this
thursday
marks
the
one-year
anniversary
of
the
unfortunate
tragedy
at
the
vta
yard,
and
there
will
be
a
public
event
at
9.
00
am
at
on
the
526
resiliency
center,
located
at
353
west
julian
street,
in
san
jose,
and
so
for.