►
From YouTube: May 24, 2022 Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council and Shoreline Regional Park Community
Description
Live teleconference of the Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council (Regular) And Shoreline Regional Park Community (Special) scheduled for Tuesday, May 24, 2022.
A
B
C
You
mayor
ramirez,
there
are
two
items
on
the
closest
close
session
agenda
for
this
evening.
Item
2.1
is
a
conference
with
labor
negotiators
pursuant
to
california
government
code,
section
54957.6,
the
agency
designated
representatives
are
the
city
of
mountain
view,
assistant
city
manager,
chief
operating
officer,
audrey,
seymour,
ramberg,
the
human
resources
director
sue
rush
and
charles
sakai
of
sloan
sakai
young
and
wong
llp.
C
The
employee
organizations
are
service
employees,
international
union,
seiu,
local
521,
the
eagles
association,
the
police
officers,
association,
international
association
of
firefighters,
local
1965,
unrepresented
fire
managers
unrepresented
police
managers,
unrepresented
department,
heads
council,
appointees,
unrepresented
confidential
employees
and
unrepresented
hourly
employees
item
2.2
is
a
conference
with
real
property
negotiators
pursuant
to
government
code
section
six
point:
the
property
at
issue
is
909
san
rafael
avenue.
The
agency
negotiators
are
angela,
lamonica
real
property
program,
administrator
and
don
cameron.
Public
works
director,
the
negotiating
party
is
newmark
and
under
negotiation,
is
priced
in
terms
of
purchase.
B
Very
exciting
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
the
closed
session
items
listed
on
tonight's
agenda.
If
so,
please
click
the
raised
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen,
see
no
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak.
B
D
A
Good
evening,
everyone
welcome
to
the
joint
meeting
of
the
city
council
in
the
shoreline
regional
park
community
of
may
24
2022
before
we
get
started.
I
would
like
to
note
that
the
items
tentatively
scheduled
and
noticed
for
tonight's
meeting
regarding
590
caster
street
365
to
405
san
antonio
road
and
25.85
to
25.95
california
street,
have
been
continued
to
a
date
uncertain
and
will
not
be
heard
at
tonight's
meeting.
A
A
A
All
members
of
the
city
council
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting
live,
may
do
so
at
mountainview.legistar.com,
youtube.com
youtube.comforwardslashmountainviewgov
and
on
comcastchannel26
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda.
Members
of
the
public
may
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
by
visiting
mountainview.gov
meeting
to
enter
the
zoom
webinar
or
by
phone
by
dialing
669-900-9128
and
entering
webinar
id
843-5126-7142.
A
D
A
A
First
is
3.1
mental
health
awareness
month
proclamation,
and
we
will
now
invite
the
proclamation
recipient
to
join
korea,
randy
symbol,
decker
somebody
can
help
find
her
there.
She
is
thank
you
for
joining
us.
We
are
happy
to
be
joined
this
evening
by
local
middle
school
student
and
mental
health
activist
arya
randy
sindelbecker.
A
And
whereas
the
city
of
mountain
view
has
prioritized
mental
health
by
completing
and
continuing
to
support,
both
short
and
long-term
action
items.
As
part
of
the
2020
city
city
council
goal
to
assess
gaps
in
youth,
mental
health
services
and
whereas
the
city
council's
fiscal
year's
2021-23
work
plan
includes
a
priority
project
to
explore.
Alternative
mental
health
crisis
response
methods
and
whereas
the
city
of
mountain
view
has
provided
programming
to
strengthen
resiliency
efforts
in
mental
health
for
teens,
such
as
a
teen
wellness,
retreat.
A
A
G
Thank
you
so
much
for
having
me,
I'm
so
excited
to
accept
this
proclamation.
It
really
means
a
lot.
The
council
has
focused
on
mental
health
as
the
youth
mental
health
crisis
has
been
boosted
by
the
pandemic,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
my
mom
dad
dr
stephen
hinshaw,
miss
gay
krause,
mr
alex
briscoe,
miss
galassie
mr
sayre,
mr
lao
and
miss
nashara
for
supporting
me
along
my
journey.
G
I'm
two
years
into
my
mental
health
advocacy
and
it's
really
changed
me.
I've
become
an
advocate
for
more
peer-to-peer
communication
and
support
and
mental
health
education
in
schools.
I
made
a
documentary
about
mental
health
parity
and
I
just
want
to
say
I
believe
we
need
to
eliminate
the
stigma
around
mental
health
in
order
to
create
parity
between
mental
and
physical
health
challenges
in
order
for
everyone,
teens
tweens
adults,
to
get
the
mental
health
care
they
need,
and
I
believe
that
my
generation
will
be
the
one
to
make
those
changes.
A
H
To
see
ronnie,
can
you
tell
us,
is
there
any
opportunity
for
people,
members
of
the
public
who
may
be
interested
any
opportunity
to
see
it?
Is
it
streaming
somewhere.
G
A
Thank
you
very
much
if
there
are
no
other
comments
from
the
council.
Well,
thank
you
very
much
for
joining
us
and
accepting
the
proclamation
and
again
very
much
appreciate
your
advocacy
on
behalf
of
those
in
our
community
who
really
could
benefit
from
the
services
that
you're
promoting.
A
So
thank
you
for
joining
us
and
we
will
now
move
on
to
3.2
recognition
of
outgoing
youth
advisory
committee
members
and
I
believe,
emily
chan
who
has
joined
us
will
be
receiving
the
proclamation
or
not.
There
is
no
proclamation.
We
are
happy
to
be
joined
this
evening
by
youth
advisory
committee,
chair
emily
chan.
Six
of
the
advisory
committee
members
are
graduating
this
june.
Being
a
part
of
this
committee
requires
time
effort
and
leadership.
A
We
would
like
to
thank,
annie,
eliza,
emily
hannah
lauren
and
richard
for
their
hard
work,
dedication
and
positive
contributions
to
our
community.
These
members,
some
of
which
have
been
involved
with
the
committee
since
middle
school,
have
represented
an
important
team
voice
and
worked
hard
to
accomplish
work
plan
items
year
after
year,
though
a
virtual
committee
over
the
past
year,
each
of
these
members
helped
plan
and
lead
several
successful.
In-Person
events,
including
the
teen
wellness,
retreat
being
open
mic
night
and
find
your
fit
team
career
day.
A
These
six
members
also
contributed
to
the
view
teen
center
by
attending
drop-in
activities
and
offering
ideas
to
improve
the
center.
Lastly,
they
use
their
voice
to
relaunch
teen
week
teen
week
and
the
teen
friendly
business
award,
which
highlighted
how
valuable
teams
are
to
our
community.
Thank
you
again
for
your
service
to
the
mountain
view,
community.
Through
your
time
on
the
youth
advisory
committee.
We
wish
you
every
success
in
your
next
endeavors
emily.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
few
words.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
so
much
for
having
me
and
for
recognizing
us.
I
think
it's
super
special.
I
joined
yak
on
my
sophomore
year,
and
so
that
was
pre
pandemic
and
I
got
to
see
how
things
were
run
and
moving
into
virtual.
J
Obviously,
there
were
some
difficult
transitions,
but
I
think
it
was
really
cool
to
see
how
me
and
the
other
seniors
as
well,
really
stepped
up
to
kind
of
help
our
yak
through
that
time
and
just
remind
everyone
about
what
we
are
here
to
do
and
keep
us
motivated
to
have
our
events,
and
I
think
it's
really
fulfilling
to
see
that
how
much
we
still
accomplished
over
the
pandemic
and
I've
just
really
had
a
great
time
on
yak.
J
I've
met
some
really
amazing
people
that
I
don't
think
I
would
have,
and
it's
just
a
great
opportunity
to
be
involved
in
the
community,
and
so
I
think
I
speak
on
behalf
of
all
the
other
seniors.
Let
me
just
say
this
has
been
an
amazing
opportunity
and
we
are
so
grateful
and
we
will
definitely
miss
it,
but
yeah.
Thank
you.
So.
A
F
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
offer
my
congratulations
to
our
departing
yak
members.
Certainly
if
you've
been
you're
a
unique
group
having
to
had
to
go
through
the
pandemic-
and
I
just
want
to
you
know-
acknowledge
all
of
your
hard
work
and
your
enthusiasm
despite
the
various
challenges
that
the
last
couple
of
years
have
offered,
and
I'm
just
really
pleased
at
how
the
yak
has
grown
over
the
years
and
you
play
a
really
instrumental
part
of
our
community.
F
So
thank
you
for
all
of
your
hard
work
and
dedication,
and
I
wish
you
all
well,
as
you
move
on
to
your
college
career
and
yes,
please
come
back
and
and
if
you
do
and
we
would
love
to
have
you
get
involved
and
participate
in
in
our
city's
activities
again,
but
congratulations
and
best
wishes
to
all
of
you.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
the
other
member
of
the
council
machine
to
speak,
not
thank
you
very
much
emily
for
joining
us
and
for
your
dedication
and
service
on
the
yak
into
our
community
very
grateful.
We
will
now
take
public
comment
for
the
presentation
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
the
presentation
items
listed
on
the
agenda?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button,
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
A
So
I
see
ruth.
Has
you
have
your
hand
up?
This
is
for
the
two
presentation
items
that
we've
just
heard:
let's
go
ahead
and
set
three
minutes
ruth.
You
are
the
first
speaker.
A
If
not,
then
maybe
you
can
try
again
later
in
the
non-agenda
public
comment
period.
I'm
sorry
we
weren't
able
to
get
that
to
work.
So
now
we
will
proceed
to
the
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
council
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
Would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
pull
an
item?
H
A
Well,
let's
do
that
after
the
public
comment,
if
that's
okay,
great
any
other
members
of
the
council
wishing
to
pull
an
item,
I'm
gonna
pull
4.3
shoreline
boulevard
interim
bus
lane,
and
if
there
are
no
other
items,
then
we
will
earn
to
the
public.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
any
item
on
the
consent
calendar?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button,
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
A
L
Eva
tang,
here
I
wanted
to
pull
4.1,
which
is
the
resolution
to
continue
remote
public
meetings
during
a
state
of
emergency,
just
to
bring
attention
to
the
fact
that
covid
is
you
know,
raging
across
the
county.
There
are,
I
mean
the
the
case
rate
has
risen
a
lot.
I'm
sorry,
my
cat
has
a
lot
of
opinions
and
the
access
to
meetings
has
been
really
really
important
to
the
public.
So
I
I
believe
that
4.1
is
particularly
important.
A
N
Hi
is
it:
I
got
a
a
mail
say
that,
regarding
overnight
parking
restriction
between
2
a.m,.
O
N
A
You
no
problem.
The
next
speaker
is
alex
brown.
P
Just
want
to
agree
with
eva
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
have
been
able
to
participate
during
this
epidemic
in
ways
that
they
couldn't
otherwise,
and
I
would
like
to
ensure
that
they
continue
to
be
able
to
participate
in
these
meetings,
so
allowing
for
hybrid
or
remote
meetings
is
very
important
to
a
lot
of
members
of
the
community.
Thanks.
Q
Hi
tim
mckenzie
he
him
pronouns,
just
would
like
to
echo
how
important
hybrid
is
for
a
way
for
the
community
to
be
engaged.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I've
seen.
No
other
public
comment
will
return
to
the
council
for
the
liberation
and
I'll
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar
should
also
include
the
reading
of
the
title
of
the
resolution
attached
to
4.1
and
4.2.
I
understand
that
members
of
the
council
wanted
to
highlight
or
speak
to
some
of
the
items
before
we
take
a
motion.
So
let's
go
ahead.
H
Yes,
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
two
of
the
consent.
Calendar
items
that
I
know
a
lot
of
members
of
the
public
have
been
interested
in.
One
is
4.4
the
active
transportation
plan,
so
we've
gotten
an
email,
particularly
from
one
of
our
big
pedestrian
activists,
joel
dean,
saying
that
they
he
hopes.
We
take
a
close
look,
look
in
particular
at
walkability
and
use
walkability
experts
rather
than
our
usual
consultants,
to
do
the
to
look
at
this
important
transportation
mode
and
do
it
justice.
H
H
H
So
I
just
wanted
to
reassure
members
of
the
public
who
are,
I
think,
validly
concerned
that
sometimes
we
give
pedestrianism
a
short
shrift
that
they
that
they
were
hired
and
you
can
look
in
the
staff
report
and
you
can
look
at
their
website
and
see
if
you
agree
with
me
that
they
were
a
good
choice
and
I
just
wanted
to
add
also
on
pedestrianism
that,
although
we've
gotten
away
from
just
looking
at
safety
safety
is
important,
of
course,
for
pedestrians.
H
H
You
need
places
to
go
and
that's
something
that
members
of
the
public
have
been
emailing
us
about
the
potential
loss
of
neighborhood
serving
retail,
such
as
grocery
stores
and
so
forth,
and
I
hope
that
will
be
a
focus
of
our
walkability
as
well,
because
you
can't
walk
places
if
there's
nowhere
to
walk
to
and
the
second
one
I
wanted
to
comment
on
is
4.5,
which
is
the
status
update
on
los
altos
district
school
and
city
park
master
plan.
H
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
it
for
the
public
in
case
people
skipped
over
the
consent
calendar
that
we
found
a
location
and
rough
plans
for
the
san
antonio
city
park,
an
adjacent
school
with
some
shared
recreation
space,
and
that
you
can
look
at
that.
H
If
you
look
in
the
packet,
you
can
see
a
kind
of
a
rough
draft
of
how
it
might
be
laid
out
and
we
are
inviting
community
engagement
around
park
planning
and
and
also
there's
the
possibility
of
having
some
of
the
league
sports
there
and
maybe
relieving
some
of
our
other
parks
of
that
particular
activity.
So
I
know
the
community
has
been
very
interested
in
that
and
wanted
to
highlight
that
as
well.
Thank
you.
E
Yes,
I
just
have
a
brief
comment
on
item
4.5,
which
is
again
the
los
altos
school
district
update
and-
and
I
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
the
update.
As
vice
mayor
hicks
said,
there
is
a
lot
of
interest
in
our
community
about
this
and
it's
a
very
exciting
opportunity.
So
it's
really
nice
to
see.
E
You
know
what
progress
has
been
made
and
kind
of
what
the
plan
is
for
the
next
year
or
so,
and
I
just
wanted
to
also
state
that
I'm
particularly
interested
and
make-
and
I
think
many
people
in
our
community
are
and
making
sure
that
our
residents
have
access
as
much
of
the
time
as
possible
to
the
joint
use
open
space
section,
which
is
which
has
come
up
so
much
with
our
other.
E
You
know
school
district
sites,
so
it's
really
important
to
us
that
you
know
we're
giving
this
as
park
we're
giving
this
with
park
money,
and
so
it
is
so
important
that
that
people
get
to
use
it
as
much
as
possible,
and
it's
really
wonderful
to
see
this
progress.
So
thank
you.
A
F
Thank
you
mayor
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
balance
of
the
consent.
Calendar,
including
item
4.1,
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
authorizing
and
continuing
virtual
meetings
of
city
council
committees,
boards
and
commissions
pursuant
to
ab361
and
making
required
findings
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
4.2
adopter
resolution
of
the
city
council
city
of
mountain
view,
authorizing
a
local
enforcement
agency
pursuant
to
assembly
bill
1276
to
be
read
entitled
only
to
be
further
reading
waved.
Thank
you.
M
A
Fantastic,
thank
you
very
much.
I'm
now
going
to
promote
don
and
head
to
panelist
for
4.3,
so
hopefully
they
will
join
momentarily.
4.3
is
the
shoreline
boulevard
interim
bus
lane
and
utility
improvements
there.
They
are
thank
you
for
joining
us.
I
just
I
don't
want
to
belabor
the
point,
I'm
going
to
support
the
staff
recommendation,
but
it's
it's
a
big
deal
for
a
project
on
the
verge
of
construction
to
to
be
canceled
and
for
the
contract
to
be
to
be
terminated.
A
So
I
I
wanted
to
better
understand
how
we
got
here.
So
I
I
understood
I
appreciated
the
staff
report
and
the
I
guess
the
utilities
that
had
previously
been
unidentified
in
the
corridor
itself.
I
want
to
better
understand:
is
it
the
fault
of
the
contractor?
You
know:
did
the
city
not
do
sufficient
due
diligence?
A
S
S
If
it's
there
and
it's
very
important
when
you
do
that
during
the
design
phase
to
identify
whether
there
are
unforeseen
utilities,
they
might
be
so
old
that
they
they're
they're
not
showing
up
on
our
plans
and
that's
one
of
the
challenges
we
face
with
the
shoreline
corridor.
It's
one
of
the
oldest
corridors
in
the
city
and
has
turned
out
to
have
a
lot
more
un
unknown
utilities
than
anticipated.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
That's
helpful
and
very
quickly
for
members
of
the
public,
we'll
go
to
the
public
comment
right
after
questions
and
then
after
public
comment,
we'll
we'll
take
a
motion
and
then
the
other
set
of
questions
I
had
has
to
do
with.
There
were
sort
of
two
big
reasons
why
the
contract
has
to
be
terminated,
that's
one
of
them
and
then
the
other
is
the
decision
to
eliminate.
The
second
left
turn
lane
from
middle
field
to
shoreline
between
the
two,
which
is
the
more
significant
change
if
it
had.
A
S
We've
asked
herself
that
I
followed
up
with
staff,
and
it's
really
difficult
for
us
to
predict
that
the
utility
changes
were
significant,
but
when
we
sat
down
to
talk
to
the
contractor,
it
was
both
the
combined
utility
changes,
as
well
as
removing
the
left,
turn
lanes
and
reconfiguring
the
intersection
from
the
scope
of
work.
And
so
what
basically
led
to
the
decision
was
the
cumulative
effect
of
both
these
scope
changes.
At
this
time.
A
A
If
not,
if
any
member
of
the
public
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item,
4.3
shoreline
interim
bus
lane,
please
raise
your
hand
or
press
star
9.
nine.
Let's
go
ahead
and
allocate
three
minutes.
Okay,
the
first
speaker
is
albert
keynes.
T
Yes,
as
some
of
you
may
know,
I've
long
opposed
the
shrine
bus
lane,
because
even
in
pre-covert
conditions,
I
just
could
not
see
why
it
was
needed,
because
google
buses
all
of
its
employees
in
off
of
the
freeway,
they
don't
use
the
transit
center,
and
so
who
else
is
there
to
use
it?
But
anyways
whatever
was
the
justification?
Was
they
certainly
assumed
that
traffic
was
what
it
was
at
that
time
and
not
what
it
is
today
next
slide?
These
are
the
pictures
I
took
today.
This
is
101,
which
is
pretty
much
back
to
pre-cover
conditions.
T
Look
like
maybe
aggravated
by
the
express
lanes
next
slide,
please,
but
you
look
at
shoreline
looking
at
both
directions
off
the
overpass,
it's
really
empty.
Still,
this
is
on
tuesday,
which
you
know
under
google's.
Hybrid
work
system
is
probably
one
of
the
more
busier
days.
I
think
a
lot
more
people
take
mondays
and
fridays
off
next
slide.
Please
and
you
look
at
the
caltrain
parking
lot.
It's
still
pretty
empty.
You
know
there's
maybe
20
or
30
cars
there
and
you
know
granted
that
you
know.
T
Google
people
are
not
parking
there
and
going
in,
but
I
think
it
just
shows
that
caltrain
is
still
weight.
Ridership
is
still
way
down,
and
so
there's
not
many
people
going
from
the
transit
center
to
north
bay
shore
and
going
forward.
We
have
no
idea,
you
know
what
it
will
be
like
going
for.
You
know
in
the
next
couple
years,
but
the
cobit
doesn't
seem
to
be
going
away
and
it
may
be
just
a
thing
we
have
to
live
with
from
now
on,
in
which
case,
I
think
that's
except
the
last
slide.
T
Okay
yeah,
I
you
know
personally,
I
think
this
is
a
good
chance.
Just
pause
this
project
wait
and
see
you
know.
Is
this
bus
lane
really
going
to
be
needed?
You
know:
do
we
see
traffic
returning
to
shoreline
or
is
google's
hybrid
system
going
forward
going
to
work
like
this?
You
know
from
now
on
and
yes,
north
bay
shore
is
coming
up
and
maybe
hopefully
it
will
get
built
out.
T
I
do
agree
that
you
know
we
need
to
provide
utilities
for
north
bay
shore
and
I
certainly
like
the
idea
of
a
better
bicycling
on
shoreline,
but
in
terms
of
the
reversal
of
a
bus
lane.
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
chance
to
pause
it.
I
know.
You'll,
probably
you
know,
go
ahead
and
you
know
approve
it,
but
that's
just
my
opinion.
Thank
you
very
much.
O
Accidentally-
and
I
would
have
comments
but
don't
have
enough
to-
they
would
be
a
wasted
background-
put
them
together
in
the
next
180
seconds.
So
I
apologize
for
that.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
think
that
concludes
tim's
comment.
Seeing
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
will
return
to
council
for
deliberation
and
emotion,
council,
member
lieber.
U
Thank
you
mayor
well,
this
is
one
that.
U
Originally
came
to
us,
and
there
was
a
a
very
quick
about
face
on
the
the
subject.
U
Unfortunately,
I
didn't
think
about
that
until
about
five
minutes
later,
and
I
I
really
strongly
feel
that
this
is
something
that
we
will
end
up
doing
in
in
the
near
future,
when
it's
more
expensive
and
and
more
of
an
impact
on
community
members,
and
I'm
guessing
from
what's
been
presented
to
us
that
that
there's
no
way
to
have
state
council,
transportation
or
any
committees
take
a
look
at
that
and
see
now
with
the
knowledge
of
what
we
have
and
now
we're
pretty
pretty
far
downstream.
U
Yeah,
I
guess
question
to
staff-
would
be:
do
we
have
any
possibility
of
unringing
that
bell
or
is
that
something
that
we're
just
kind
of
stuck
with
now?
At
this
juncture,.
U
I
would
I
would
like
to
see
us
at
least
have
have
the
opportunity
to
have
council
transportation
look
at
something.
That's
such
a
major
impact
in
in
terms
of
traffic
flow
and
getting
people
to
use
public
transit
and
and
a
a
monetary
hit
to
us
as
as
well,
and
I
I'd
be
willing
to
make
a
motion
in
that
direction.
U
Mayor
or
if
there
are
other
council
members
who
would
like
to
comment.
U
Through
the
mayor,
if
I
may,
I
I'd
like
to
see
some
consideration
of
the
the
bus
left
turn
lane,
because
I
feel
like
when
this
came
to
us
the
last
time.
There
was
a
a
very
quick
about
face
on
on
that
issue
and,
and
I
think
it
given
the
the
expenditure,
it
would
be
in
the
public
interest
to
bring
it
back
and
at
least
have
an
opportunity
to
look
at
it.
F
Mayor,
so
I,
if
emotion
like
that
comes
about,
I
will
not
be
supporting
it.
I
don't
think
it
was
a
quick
about
face.
We
actually
had
our,
I
believe
our
parks
and
rec's
commission
like
weigh
in
on
that
issue,
so
I
would
think
that
we
studied
it
quite
extensively
and
I
stand
with
the
vote.
You
know
this.
F
I
caution
that
when
we
may
take
it
to
make
a
decision,
if
we're
going
to
keep
revisiting
it,
it's
just
going
to
continue
to
delay
these
projects
and
initiatives,
and
I
hope
that
that's
not
something
that
this
council
we'll
be
doing.
You
know
we
win
and
lose
votes
and
if
we
lose,
we
have
to
continue
with
the
consensus.
F
A
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
the
clarification,
any
other
questions
or
comments.
If
not
a
motion.
U
Thank
you
go
ahead
and
attempt
a
motion
and
staff
could
weigh
in
on
it
and
let
let
me
know
if
it's
sufficient
in
the
direction
that
I'm
trying
to
go
like
to
move
the
staff
recommendation
and
refer
the
issue
of
the
second
left.
Turn
lane
on
middle
field
to
council
transportation
committee.
A
I'm
not
hearing
one,
so
I,
unfortunately,
the
motion
will
not
proceed.
Councilman
bravikova.
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
saying
that
I
think
in
a
sense
I'm
glad
that
we're
going
forward
with
it
or
well
I'm
going
to
be
supporting
this,
because
I
think
we
should
move
forward
with
it.
It's
true
that
our
traffic
patterns
have
not
gotten
back
to
quite
pre-pandemic
levels,
and
we
don't
really
know
when
that's
going
to
happen,
but
in
a
sense
having
a
street
to
work
on
that
doesn't
have
as
horrible
traffic
as
it
used
usually
does
is
an
asset.
E
So
I
see
this
as
an
opportunity
we
should
take
advantage
of.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
Any
final
questions
comments
thoughts.
If
not,
I
will
ask
the
city
clerk
to
proceed
with
their
roll
call,
though.
M
A
Thank
you.
So
that
concludes
the
consent
calendar.
Let's
do
oral
communications
from
the
public
and
then
6.1
east
wisman,
precise
plan
and
then
we'll
take
a
break.
Is
everyone
comfortable
with
that?
Okay,
so
item
five
is
oral
communications?
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
A
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
Timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen
and
we
did
have
a
request
before
the
meeting,
for,
I
think,
a
speaker
to
speak
on
behalf
of
several
others,
a
city
clerk.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
assisting
me
with
that,
I
think
they
will
go
first.
V
Thank
you
mayor.
Yes,
my
name
is
tim
mather
and
I'd
requested,
please
that
three
of
us
be
allowed
to
speak.
Thank
you
for
bringing
it
up.
I'd
like
to
start
with
my
neighbor
michelle,
please,
who
will
be
followed
by
aaron,
who
will
be
followed
by
myself.
V
We
request
a
total
of
nine
minutes,
a
maximum
of
three
minutes
per
speaker,
but
one
continuous
block
if
we
may
to
go
through
our
presentation
in
a
coherent
manner.
So
if
I
may,
please
counsel,
if
I
may
turn
it
over
to
michelle,
please
to
begin
our
presentation.
W
Great
good
evening,
my
name
is
michelle:
oh
yeah,
I'm
presenting
with
aaron
miller
and
tim
mather
we're
residents
at
the
crossings
and
all
of
us
have
lived
in
mountain
view
for
over
20
years.
The
reason
we're
speaking
tonight
is
because
we've
seen
a
massive
surge
of
residential
construction
along
san
antonio
road
without
any
significant
changes
made
to
the
existing
infrastructure
next
slide.
W
A
major
area
of
infrastructure
failure
is
san
antonio
road.
I
took
this
photo
when
I
was
driving
northbound
on
san
antonio
at
10
39
a.m.
On
a
tuesday.
This
is
what
we
experience
daily
next
slide.
Please,
on
this
map,
we've
labeled
the
1.6
mile
section
of
san
antonio
road
that
extends
from
el
camino
to
east
charleston.
We're
going
to
take
a
closer
look
at
this
section,
because
it's
used
by
residents
of
mountain
view,
palo,
alto
and
los
altos
to
get
to
101,
north
and
south,
and
it's
where
major
development
has
occurred
recently
next
slide.
W
W
The
consequence
is
park,
crossings
and
the
surrounding
neighborhood
are
no
longer
family
friendly,
while
it's
a
painful
memory
for
us
all,
the
very
real
tragic
consequence
of
having
too
much
traffic
around
children
is
that
a
13
year
old
child
was
killed
on
grant
and
el
camino,
while
riding
his
scooter
to
school.
We
cannot
allow
for
tragedies
like
this
to
occur
next
slide.
Please.
W
W
W
W
X
Yes,
thank
you
michelle
to
summarize
what
michelle
just
reviewed.
This
is
a
netpad
of
over
2
000
residences
in
less
than
10
years,
and
this
is
not
replacement
housing.
This
is
brand
new
housing
all
within
a
small
section,
less
than
two
miles
long
of
san
antonio
road,
not
an
expressway,
not
an
avenue,
not
a
boulevard
san
antonio
road.
All
of
this
data
that
we're
looking
at
comes
directly
from
the
city's
own
reports.
X
Yet
clearly
something
has
been
lacking
from
the
analysis
of
it.
We've
heard
repeatedly
the
importance
of
parking,
but
that
is
an
easily
mandated
problem
seldom
mentioned,
is
the
vastly
more
challenging
problem
of
coordinating
three
cities
and
the
required
infrastructure
changes,
roads,
electrical
grid,
networking
and
telecom
services
to
sustain
a
modern
lifestyle
that
the
residents
of
silicon
valley
demand
and
deserve
next
slide.
X
Please
it's
been
the
fervent
hope
and
overuse
refrain
of
the
real
estate
developers
that
caltrain
can
easily
offset
this
increase
in
traffic,
but
bear
in
mind
san
antonio
is
a
limited
service
station
and
is
already
overloaded
baby
bullets
regularly
blow
by
it,
because
the
next
stop
mountain
view
downtown
is
a
major
stop
and
the
bridge
to
light
rail.
It
makes
little
sense
for
couch
train
to
add
another
stop
to
their
busy
bullet
schedule.
X
X
Moving
on
to
pg
e,
as
we
all
know,
pg
e
is
a
major
bottleneck
for
a
modernized
and
safe
electrical
grid,
not
just
for
our
small
area
but
for
all
of
northern
california,
as
this
table
shows.
The
area
of
san
antonio
is
already
clearly
overloaded
and
little
has
been
done
to
alleviate
the
added
demands
of
an
increasingly
electrified
society.
X
X
This
is
a
major
concern
for
me
and
I'm
sure
many
other
residents
of
mountain
view,
and,
frankly,
it's
disgraceful
to
admit
that,
within
a
thousand
feet
of
the
lab
that
invented
the
integrated
circuit
that
powers,
everything
we
do
and
as
the
namesake
for
silicon
valley,
we
all
suffer
from
such
frequent
electrical
outages
next
slide.
Please.
X
This
summarizes
the
impact
on
telecom
and
I
don't
need
to
express
that
this
is
not
a
direct
city
responsibility,
but
it
is
a
responsibility
of
the
city
to
work
closely
with
the
mobile
network
operators
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
is
just
a
reality
of
modern
life-
that
we
are
all
in
densely
populated
areas.
We
all
use
wi-fi.
The
city
should
be
doing
a
better
job
at
educating
the
population
of
how
to
work
and
live
in
more
densely
populated
areas.
X
V
My
name
is
tim
mather,
I'm
also
a
resident
here
in
the
crossings.
Council,
members,
city
staff,
we're
frustrated.
We
hear
from
the
city
staff
that
each
plan
is
reviewed
individually
and
to
us
that's
exactly
the
problem.
It
appears
to
us
that
the
city
is
looking
at
these
development
projects
through
soda
straws.
V
Okay,
next
slide,
please
we
want
the
city
council
to
change
its
methodology,
to
look
at
the
cumulative
impact
that
all
of
these
projects
are
having
on
san
antonio
road,
the
the
the
area
here:
okay,
r4,
r4,
r4,
it's
frankly,
just
too
much
the
infrastructure
can
handle
it
next
slide.
Please!
V
V
V
Our
quality
of
life
is
deteriorating
and
we
believe
that
the
city
of
mountain
view
is
failing
to
properly
serve
its
residents
next
slide,
please
what
we
would
like
the
city
council
to
do
frankly
is
to
reject
the
milk
pail
development.
Okay,
I
don't
even
know
why
we
don't
even
know
why
the
city
council
is
even
considering
the
exemptions
requested
by
the
developer
something's,
not
right
here.
We
urge
you
to
request
department
to
reject
that
development.
We
urge
you
to
request
the
valero
development
when
it's
proposed
to
that.
V
We
understand
this
in
the
planning
phase
and
not
yet
under
consideration.
We
urge
you
to
reject
both
of
these
projects.
The
current
infrastructure
and
the
projected
in
perma
improvements
simply
cannot
handle
those
developments.
Council,
members
staff.
We
appreciate
your
time
if
rules
protocol
prohibit
our
primary
permits.
We
welcome
your
questions.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
consideration.
A
Thank
you
for
your
presentation.
Unfortunately,
we
are
not
able
to
respond
to
comments
during
item
five
oral
communications
from
the
public
on
non-agenda
items,
but
we
appreciate
your
presentation.
A
Your
time
is
up
and
we
we
do
have
to
be
fair
to
everybody
so,
but
but
please,
you
know,
always
feel
free
to
send
us
an
email.
The
next
speaker
is
tim
mckenzie.
Q
Greetings
all
tim
mckenzie.
He
him
pronounce
a
resident
of
the
montaloma
neighborhood.
I
just
I
I'm
sure
most
of
most
of
you
on
council
know
me
and
I've
been
around
for
a
little
bit.
I
just
I
want
to
raise
attention
to
something.
I
got
an
email
within
the
past,
10
to
14
days
the
past
week
and
a
half
or
two
weeks
from
a
city
staff,
member
of
the
city
of
redwood
city,
and
they
were
reaching
out
to
me
to.
Q
The
city
of
redwood
city
is
now
providing
period
products
in
the
municipal
bathrooms,
the
ones
that
the
city
itself
is
able
to
provide
product
for,
and
a
a
staff
member
reached
out
to
me-
and
let
me
know
hey,
I
you
reached
out
a
year
ago,
and
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
that
this
was
happening
and
the
that
was
fantastic
to
hear
as
as
an
advocate,
and
the
only
reason
it
was
able
to
happen
is
because
the
city
of
mountain
view
had
made
that
decision.
So
I
really
wanted
to
thank
you.
Q
Everyone
on
council,
thank
you
for
the
work
that
you
did
to
make
this
a
reality
in
mountain
non-view
and
for
the
encouragement
that
some
council
members
gave
me
personally
to
go,
spread
and
ask
for
other
local
cities
to
do
likewise.
I
appreciate
your
your
encouragement.
I
probably
wouldn't
have
done
it
without
you
asking
me
to
do
so,
and
I
appreciate
that-
and
I
want
to
highlight
of
what
happened
that
when
we
as
mountain
view,
made
a
model
for
other
cities
to
follow,
and
they
did
so.
Q
It
was
it's
great
to
see
it's
amazing
to
see
what
we
were
able
to
do
take
place
in
other
places
in
in
the
south
bay,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
use
this
as
inspiration
so
that
we
can
think
of
things
that
we
as
the
city
of
mountain
view,
as
a
municipal
group
can
make
a
decision
about
such
as
municipal
power,
so
that
pg
e
is
not
getting
public
or
getting
private
benefits
from
making
not
taking
up.
A
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
I'm
sorry
tim
you've
exhausted
your
time
and
I
have
to
be
fair
to
everybody.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
who
want
to
speak
on
an
item
not
on
the
agenda
seeing
none?
We
will
proceed
now
to
item
6.1,
eastwood
and
precise
land
development
impact
fee,
nexus,
study
and
east
wisdom,
development
impact
c
vice
mayor
hicks.
Do
you
have
an
announcement
to
make.
A
K
Y
Good
evening
mayor
mayor
ramirez
vice
mayor
hicks,
council
members,
I
am
renee
gunn
senior
civil
engineer
here
with
eric
anderson,
advance
planning
manager.
Tonight
eric
and
I
will
be
be
presenting
the
east,
whispering
precise
plan
development
impact
fee
and
the
nexus
study.
Y
Nexus
studies
and
development
impact
fees
are
programs
that
ensure
that
new
development
pay
for
the
capital
cost
incurred
by
a
city
associated
with
growth.
The
nexus
study
calculates
the
cost
of
capital
improvement
projects
required
to
support
the
growth
in
the
east
whispering
precise
plan.
The
cost
is
divided
by
the
growth.
The
result
is
the
fee
for
land
use.
Y
Y
Y
K
Thank
you
very
much
renee.
The
total
estimated
cost
of
improvements
is
about
151
million
dollars.
Of
this,
only
about
54
million
dollars
can
possibly
be
paid
through
the
proposed
fee.
The
remainder
is
the
share
of
the
responsibility
due
to
existing
buildings
and
pipeline
projects
that
are
exempt
under
state
law.
Note
that
more
projects
could
be
exempt
under
state
law
before
the
fee
goes
into
effect.
K
K
Affordable
units
should
also
be
exempt,
which
would
which
would
result
in
potentially
a
lost
income
of
about
five
million
dollars.
Neighborhood
commercial
uses
should
also
be
exempt,
which
would
result
in
lost
income
of
about
two
million
dollars
and
government
and
non-profit
uses
should
also
be
exempt,
but
this
would
have
minimal
or
uncertain
lost
income.
K
K
K
This
slide
shows
a
total
fee
comparison
for
three
hypothetical
projects
across
several
similar
jurisdictions,
including
the
north
bay
shore,
precise
plan
they're,
expressed
in
terms
of
percent
of
market
value.
Attachment
5
to
the
council
report
had
an
error
in
milpitas
data,
and
this
slide
reflects
the
actual
amounts
showing
higher
fee
burdens
across
milpitas's
residential
building
types.
K
The
eastwood
precise
plan
already
has
the
second
highest
total
fees
for
the
apartment
project
after
milpitas,
but
is
competitive
with
sunnyvale
for
the
condo
project
and
milpitas
and
competitive
with
several
other
jurisdictions
for
the
office
project.
The
proposed
fees
nonetheless
would
only
increase
the
total
fees
on
these
projects
by
less
than
one
percent
of
market
value.
K
I'd
also
like
to
note
that
staff
is
recommending
a
modification
to
the
ordinance.
This
is
in
section
four
previously
approved
development
projects.
This
is
the
pipeline
provision
within
the
ordinance
and
staff
is
recommending
that
the
language
shown
here
be
be
added
to
the
ordinance
to
ensure
that
projects
with
development
agreements
will
pay
the
fee
pursuant
to
their
da.
K
This
concludes
our
presentation.
We
also
have
consultants
available
from
wildan
our
consulting
team,
james
edison
and
carlos
villarreal,
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
might
have.
E
Yes,
I
remember
that
we,
there
was
a
feasibility,
a
financial
feasibility
report
done
as
part
of
the
east
westman
precise
plan
process,
and
basically
it
showed
that
housing
wasn't
financially
feasible
with
our
existing
fees.
So
how
does
that
mesh
with
what
we
are
being
presented
with
here.
K
So
the
the
the
amount
of
this
fee
is
small
relative
to
other
fees
and
and
costs
that
are
on
residential
development.
There's
also
potentially
a
large
variation
over
time
in
how
residential
development
will
be
feasible
as
time
goes
on.
In
addition,
part
of
the
east
wism
and
precise
plan
strategy
to
address
that
feasibility
issue
was
to
adopt
the
jobs,
housing
linkage
strategy,
which
is
intended
to
shift
costs
from
residential
to
office.
K
Nonetheless,
as
part
of
the
housing
element,
we
are
looking
at
potentially
reducing
costs
for
residential
citywide
in
various
ways.
There
will
be
more
information
about
that
at
an
upcoming
study
session,
and
so
in
summary,
I
think
those
are
different
ways
that
you
can
consider
adopting
this
fee.
Despite
recent
feasibility
analyses
that
show
the
challenge
of
building
residential
right
now,.
E
So
eric,
if
we
were
to
adopt
it
tonight
and
then
after
we
do
the
housing
element
and
the
analysis,
we
would
decide
that
that
housing
fees
should
be
reduced.
We
would
just
come
back
and
reduce
these.
Let
me
have
that
work.
E
Okay-
well,
I
one
thing
I
just
really
liked
it
I'd
like
to
congratulate
that.
I
know
this
is
complex.
I'd
like
to
congratulate
you
on
working
through
it
and
also
I.
I
really
appreciate
the
exclu,
the
recommendation
to
exclude
affordable
housing.
I
think
that
that
that
that
that
is
key
and
later
I
want
to
talk
about-
maybe
some
other
exclusions,
but
but
I
think
that
that's
it
for
right
now.
Thank
you.
U
Thank
you
mayor.
I
want
to
ask
a
question
which
I
believe
I
already
know
the
answer
to,
but
just
for
clarity's
sake,
so
under
the
state
law
the
city
can
only
charge
their
costs.
K
So
the
the
city
can
charge
for
the
cost
for
public
improvements
and
can
only
charge
for
a
portion
of
those
costs
and
they
have
to
be
capital
costs.
They
can't
be
maintenance,
costs
or
operational
costs.
They
have
to
be
capital
costs
and
can
only
charge
for
a
portion
proportional
to
new
growth.
U
K
Well,
potentially,
it
could
also
come
from
grants
or
you
know
other
sources
that
wouldn't
that
may
not
necessarily
come
from
the
mountain
view.
Tax
pin.
R
Thank
you.
So,
in
the
material
on
this
topic
it
talked
about
the
ability
to
update
the
fee
from
time
to
time.
If
there
was
new
information,
or
things
like
that-
and
I
was
wondering
if
the
build
out
in
terms
of
the
number
of
units
or
the
amount
of
square
footage
is
much
lower
than
what
is
allowed
in
the
precise
plan.
Would
that
also
be
a
reason
for
taking
a
look
at
the
fees
because
we'd
be
generating
less
in
fees
than
we
were
expecting.
K
So
there's
a
chicken
and
egg
issue
with
that
question
and
that's
that
we
wouldn't
know
that
the
build-out
is
lower
at
the
time
that
projects
are
built
right.
So
so
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
retroactively
increase
fees
on
projects
that
had
already
been
built.
Does
that
answer
your
question.
R
M
K
Yeah,
absolutely
I
you
know
first
I'll
say
that
that's
not
what
we're
finding
with
applications
that
we're
reviewing
right
now,
but
secondly,
yes
in
the
in
the
periodic
review
of
the
fee,
you
can't
you
can
go
in
and
you
can
update
any
assumptions.
Z
Mayor,
if
I
may
my
address
the
the
council,
artichoke
assistant
city
manager
and
community
development
director
councilmember
matacek,
there
are
a
number
of
issues
related
to
the
question
you're
asking,
and
the
key
question
is:
is
that
amount
of
square
footage
still
available
in
the
in
the
precise
plan
to
build?
Z
If,
at
some
point
in
the
future
the
master
plan
square
footage
is
reduced,
then
you
would
have
to
look
at
what
improvements
are
actually
required
to
support
the
reduced
square
footage
and
then
build
the
next
study
on
that,
and
then
the
last
piece
again
is
the
question
about.
If
the
build
out
is
lower
than
the
precise
plan,
can
we
change
it?
R
Okay,
so
the
amount
of
square
footage
or
the
number
of
residential
units
is
more,
the
infrastructure
is
more
sensitive.
Tell
me
if
this
is
correct
thinking
here.
The
infrastructure
capacity
so
to
speak
is
more
sensitive
than
I
might
have
thought
to
the
number
of
units
or
the
amount
of
square
footage,
so
you
could
potentially
have
a
smaller
water
pipe,
because
there's
fewer
units
or
less
square
footage
is
that
what
you're
saying.
Z
No,
I'm
not
necessarily
saying
that
and
don
can
maybe
answer
that
all
of
these
all
of
these
improvements
are
based
on
an
eir
that
was
conducted
to
study
the
amount
of
development
in
the
precise
plan.
Z
What
I'm
saying
is
that,
even
if
the
build-out
is
lower
on
a
side-by-side
basis,
we
would
have
to
look
at
the
overall
build
out
that
is
still
in
the
precise
plan,
look
at
the
infrastructure
requirements
and
then
base
any
reductions
or
reassignment
on
on
that
new
number
and
the
new
infrastructure
requirements,
you
may
find
that
the
pipes
are
still
needed.
You
may
find
that
you
know
the
street.
Z
R
Thank
you,
that's
my
only
question.
F
Thank
you
mayor.
I
had
some
questions
regarding
the
retail
fee
and
number
one:
could
you
explain
what
else
other
than
neighborhood
serving
retail?
What
other
types
of
retail
we
have
in
this
neighborhood.
K
K
Maybe
big
box,
retail
or
some
other
regional
retail
may
have
an
interest
in
locating
in
this
area
the,
but
the
the
intent
of
the
exemption
is
really
to
tie
the
the
exemption,
this
incentive
of
the
exemption
to
a
legal
agreement
that
would
preserve
the
space
as
retail,
which
is
already
a
requirement
to
have
it
be
exempt
from
far
so
would
be.
It
would
be
part
of
that
legal
agreement,
but
it's
it's
an
additional
incentive
to
ensure
that
spaces
are
kept
neighborhood
serving
retail
and
not
converted
to
office
over
time.
F
Great,
thank
you.
I
guess
I'm
can
I'm
interested
in
just
any
kind
of
retail,
given
that
retail
has
always
been,
at
least
in
my
time,
a
challenge
to
attract
and
to
maintain.
So
what
was
the
thought
and,
and
that-
and
I
guess
I'm
always
surprised
that
the
retail
fee
is
like
one
of
the
higher
fees
it
and
for
me.
I
think
that
you
know
it's
also
mentioned
in
the.
AA
F
Letter
but
with
retail-
and
I
know
neighborhood
serving
retail
in
particular,
but
doesn't
that
actually
reduce
the
or
potentially
reduce
the
vehicle
miles
traveled?
So
why
would
we
charge
a
higher
fee.
K
Yeah,
so
we
we
thought
a
lot
about
this
because
in
in
north
bay
shore
there's
a
similar
fee,
but
retail
is
not
charged
or
charged
a
lower
amount.
I
don't
recall,
but
and
really
the
rationale
there
is
north
bay.
Shore,
as
everybody
knows,
is
the
cul-de-sac
right,
there's
very
little
travel
to
north
bay
shore,
foreign
neighborhood,
serving
you
know,
goods
and
services,
and
so
you
really
can
make
the
rationale
that
those
goods
and
services
are
locally
serving
east
wisman
is
is
not
a
cul-de-sac.
K
You
know.
Middle
field
runs
right
through
the
middle
of
it
serves
neighborhoods
on
you
know
in
sunnyvale
serves
neighborhoods
in
in
the
north,
wismen
wagon
wheel
area
and
even
potentially
further
afield,
and
so
there
is
the
potential
that
new
retail
will
generate
trips
in
the
area
and
and
because
the
improvements
that
we've
identified
are
local
improvements,
they're,
not
regional
improvements,
any
reduction
in
regional
travel.
K
You
know,
maybe
people
deciding
to
go
to
a
closer
grocery
store.
You
know,
instead
of
driving
a
little
further
to
bailey
park
or
driving
a
little
further
to
another
grocery
store.
That's
not
actually
reflected
in
the
improvements
in
the
in
the
nexus
study,
because
these
are
improved
improvements
serving
this
local
area,
and
so
the
additional
trips
that
are
generated
in
this
area
by
those
that
retail
would
would
need
a
proportional
cost
to
that
use.
F
And
theoretically
or
idealist,
ideally,
if
we've
had
the
neighborhood
grocery
store,
wouldn't
that
reduce
the
trips
to
the
bailey
park,
safeway
for
instance,
so
it
wouldn't
it
help
yes,
reduce
and
and
thus
have
less
impact
than,
let's
say.
K
Well,
so
so
there's
a
broad
range
of
different
types
of
retail
and
different
types
of
retail
trips,
and
so
we
can't
anticipate
that,
for
example,
somebody
who
lives
on
you
know
tyrella
or
something
like
that,
would
necessarily
be
able
to
walk
to
a
grocery
store
in
the
middle
of
east
wisman.
K
That's
that's
pretty
far
to
go
to
a
grocery
store,
but
the
the
the
sorry,
the
question
you
asked
was:
would
that
would
the
reduction
in
vehicle
trips
from
mode
shift
have
a
kind
of
reduce
the
effect
of
of
retail
on
the
emt
pursuant
to
the
fee?
Right
I
mean,
I
think
it
really
comes
down
to
we.
We
studied
this
in
the
eir,
and
these
were
you
know
in
the
the
the
eir
that
we.
K
F
So
then,
with
the
hotel,
this,
the
the
potential
t.o.t
tax
revenue,
get
counted,
or
is
that
a
part
of
the
formula
that
was
used
to
come
up
with
the
fee.
F
Okay,
I
guess,
because
I-
and
it
actually
is
similar
with
retail-
is
looking
at.
You
know
how
does
the
sales
tax
revenue
from
more
retail
and
hotel
t.o.t
tax
benefit
the
city
you
know
enough
like?
Is
it
enough
to
be
able
to
offset
some
of
these
fees?
That's
the
question
I.
K
Guess
I
see
I
see
I'll
give
that
over
to
the
assistant
city
manager,
community
development
director.
F
Because
we
want
more
right,
we
want
more
retail,
we
want
more
hotel.
My
concern
is
this
and
that
we've
talked
about
this
in
other
parts
of
the
city
and
that's
why
we
have
reduced
the
fees
on
retail
and
maybe
even
again,
I
can't
remember
what
we've
done
with
hotel
elsewhere,
but
I
guess
I
you
know.
I
feel
the
same.
Obviously
in
this
area
of
town
too,
where
there
is
no
grocery
store
right
and
right
there
and
like
how
do
we
get
one?
F
I
I
I
see
that
might
be
neighborhood,
so
maybe
that's
you
know
extraneous,
but
just
retail
in
general,
especially
as
it's
becoming
more
and
more
challenging
to
sustain.
F
I
I
feel,
like
you
know,
if
someone's
interested
in
bringing
in
retail,
we
should
be
welcoming
that
and
not
adding
not
putting
on
the
highest
fees
on
on
that
or
even
hotels.
Frankly,
so
sorry
that
was
commentary,
but
going
back
to
the
question
of
how
that's
calculated
in
terms
of
the
revenue
potential
revenue
benefits
would
be
helpful
to
understand.
Z
Council
member
robbie
kuga,
I
I
wanted
to
respond
to
the
question
about
whether
these
were
inputs
and
they
weren't,
because
the
nexus
study
was
based
purely
on
the
demand
of
each
land
use
per
square
foot
and
and
the
cost
of
the
improvements
the
council
may
as
a
policy
reduce
that
amount
for
various
land
uses.
We
obviously
can't
increase
it
because
it's
a
nexus
fee,
but
it
could
be
reduced.
Z
You
know
capacity
demand
and
the
cost
of
the
improvements.
F
Thank
you
that
I
I
understood
that,
and
I
I
guess
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
get
at,
because
I
think
you
know
there
there
is
that
potential
for
revenue
with
hotels
or
retail
that
we
wouldn't
get
from
houses
or
offices,
and
so
that's
is
a
factor
there
that
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
included
or
not
in
the
calculations.
So
thank
you
for
clarifying
that.
E
Yeah,
I
I
have
another
question
that
came
up
listening
to
the
discussion
here
and
that's
about
sort
of
the
timing
of
setting
these
fees
and
sort
of
now
and
in
the
future.
So
tonight
the
job
before
us
is
to
basically
set
the.
As
I
understand
it
is
to
set
the
the
fees,
the
impact
fees
for
the
east,
whistling
precise
plan
and,
and
then
every
year
we
and
as
part
of
the
budget
process
set
the
fees
based
on
whether
they're
well
set
the
fees
exactly
for
that
year.
E
Right-
and
I
guess
my
question
is,
you
know,
say
as
a
policy
decision
we
wanted
to
say
we
don't
want
to
as
margaret
was
talking
about.
We
don't
want
to
have
impact
fees
on
commercial
because
we
want
to
encourage
that.
Can
we,
when
we
pass
the
budget,
say
for
the
next
five
years,
we're
not
going
to
have
these
impact
fees
on
commercial
as
a
policy,
and
yet
we
still
have
the
fees
on
the
books.
So
if
that
policy
need,
I
mean
this,
this
precise
plan
is
rather
long-lived.
E
I
mean
we're
plan,
it's
it's
to
take
what
20
25
years
to
to
build
up.
So
you
know
things
could
change
20
years
from
now
so
say
for
the
first
five
years.
Our
policy
decision
was
to
exclude
certain
things
because
we
want
to
encourage
them.
Would
that
mean
we
could
never
get
fees
back
on
these
other
things
or
how
would
we
go
about
doing
that?
Is
that
clear.
K
K
Certainly,
the
council
could
decide
to
lower
or
put
moratorium
fees
without
doing
a
new
nexus
study
without
adopting
new
nexus
findings.
Obviously,
as
we
said
before,
that
would
be
lost
income
and
there
would
not
be
an
opportunity
to
get
that
money
back
at
any
time.
You
wouldn't
be
able
to
put
that
on.
The
future.
K
I'll
I'll
see
if
anybody
else
knows
anything
about
the
budget
process,
to
answer
the
question
about
how
much
flexibility
we
have
during
the
budget
process
to
modify
fees.
E
What
I'm
really
unders?
Well,
I
think
all
of
a
lot
of
us
are
interested
in
is
the
dif.
The
difference
between
you
know
the
the
nexus
study
where
we're
being
asked
to
approve
this
nexus
study
and
and
setting
fees
for
the
plan
and
and
really
what
I'm
interested
in,
is
what's
the
term
of
that
plan.
Does
that
mean
if
we
set
a
moratorium
for
five
years
or
ten
years
to
encourage,
say
housing
to
be
developed
quickly
that
we
couldn't?
E
You
know
15
years
from
now,
come
back
and
say
now,
you
know
we
don't
have
as
big
a
housing
crisis
anymore.
So
we're
going
to
you
know
we're
gonna,
we're
not
gonna
have
a
moratorium
anymore.
That's
the
kind
of
thing
I'm
interested
in
so.
Z
Council
member,
I
think
I
think
it
would
have
to
come
in
concert
with
the
funding
strategy
for
cip.
Z
If
the
council
still
wants
to
see
the
improvements
being
done,
and
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
if
the
council
needs
to
make
an
informed
decision,
we
would
have
to
bring
back
some
kind
of
a
plan
that
would
allow
us
to
look
at
this.
You
know
at
page
10
of
the
staff
report
and
maybe
eric
you
can
confirm
this
notes
that
the
the
retail
would
would
bring
in
about
1.8
million
or
so
so.
Z
S
Yeah,
I
do
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
add
on
to
what
assistant
city
manager
so
fast
saying
was
that
as
this
growth
occurs,
there
is
an
expectation,
we're
going
to
deliver
this
infrastructure
and
we're
going
to
need
a
funding
strategy
to
do
so,
and,
as
noted
based
upon
what's
recommended
here,
including
going
ahead
and
exempting
affordable
housing
exempting
neighborhood
commercial,
the
amount
of
fees
that's
projected
to
be
collected
will
will
come
to
about
a
third.
I
re,
as
I
recall,
of
these
total
capital
costs.
U
Thank
you
mayor.
A
question
for
staff
is
affordable
housing
currently
protected
from
some
fees.
U
And
what's
the
the
ratio
of
size
between
the
fees
that
are
proposed
here
in
the
parkland
is
parkland,
more
expensive
or
less
expensive?.
K
U
And
then
the
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
ask,
I
I
have
not
heard
about
the
state
potentially
picking
up
the
tab
for
local
communities
that
don't
want
to
fund
their
baseline
infrastructure.
U
So
if
we
couldn't
get,
if
we
did
decide
to
declare
a
tax
holiday
for
whatever
sector,
then
and
and
we
don't
have
the
state
or
the
federal
government
coming
in
to
pick
it
up
and
and
hard
to
get
grant
funds
for
something
like
that,
would
that
just
come
out
of
our
our
general
fund
that
we
we
use
for
our
sustainability
and
mental
health
and
affordable
housing
and
everything
else.
A
Thank
you.
I
have
one
question
just
to
clarify:
the
fees
have
not
been
adopted
yet
so
they
were
not
an
input
into
the
housing
element,
constraints
analysis,
but
staff
intends
presuming
the
council
adopts
the
fees
to
include
the
new
impact
fees
in
the
constraints.
Analysis
for
our
housing
element.
Is
that
right?
Yes,
fantastic!
Thank
you
for
the
clarification.
Any
final
questions
from
the
council
before
we
move
on
to
public
comment,
see
none.
A
AB
Hi,
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
I
come
to
these
city
council
meetings
because
most
of
my
friends
have
been
priced
out
of
the
area
because
of
the
housing
crisis.
I
just
want
to
start
with
the
basic
fact
that
is
incontrovertible.
Housing
is
infeasible
in
east
whistman.
AB
AB
So
when
staff
says
we're
solving
this
problem
because
we
have
the
this
linkage
fee
or
this
linkage,
that's
basically
admitting
there's
no
way
we're
going
to
resolve
our
jobs,
housing
and
balance,
because
we're
banking
on
more
jobs
in
order
to
build
build
more
homes.
So
you
know
it's
true.
This
is
not
that
much
worse.
I
mean
in
comparison
to
our
parkland
fee.
This
is
a
relatively
small
tax
bill
to
put
on
housing,
but
when
we've
already
made
housing
and
feasible
to
build
on
its
own,
why
are
we
continuing
to
go
down
this
direction?
AB
AB
A
maximum
allowable
impact
fee
does
not
mean
you
have
to
approve
that
amount.
You
can
improve
anything
you
want
underneath
that
amount.
So
I
would,
I
would
recommend
just
to
prove
what
other
cities
do
so
that
we
don't
add
another
constraint
to
this
project
and
something
to
note
our
housing
element
draft
as
it's
written
really
depends
on
middle
field,
getting
past
the
finish
line,
and
and
so
we
can
get
land
for
this
affordable
housing.
AB
You
can
ask
staff
this
like
the
way
we've
drafted
our
housing
element,
we're
really
hoping
that
the
pipeline
can
get
us
more
like
the
majority
of
our
low
income
units,
and
if
that
doesn't
happen,
we
have
to
redo
a
lot
of
our
analysis.
So
we
can't
make
this
housing
infeasible.
We
need
the
middle
field
project
to
succeed,
and
so
I
really,
I
think
we
should
think
twice
about
imposing
an
impact
fee
much
higher
than
comparable
cities
do.
Thank
you.
AC
Evening,
council,
my
name
is
kevin
ma
and
I
like
to
echo
most
of
the
points
that
salim
has
brought
up.
We've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
from
590
about
the
impact
of
new
office
development
on
the
jobs,
housing
balance
and,
as
the
consultants
have
found
for
east
wismen
is
basically
we're
kind
of
assuming
a
hot
out
of
office
and
not
much
housing
to
actually
match
the
demand
for
the
office
so
and
we're
not
making
housing
any
cheaper
to
build
we're,
making
it
more
expensive.
AC
There's
no
products
being
proposed,
no
off
no
housing
proposed,
so
which
is
not
really
a
great
solution
when
the
housing
crisis
is
ever
growing
more
painful
by
the
year,
because
if
you
don't
build
anything
and
people
still
come
here,
it
just
causes
everything
to
be
expensive,
and
I
understand
we
are
coming
back
with
a
re-look
at
the
parkland
dedication
ordinance
and
the
impact
thesis
tulsi
with
that.
But
still
every
time
we
just
add
another
feed,
it's
just
reducing
our
ability
to
address
the
housing
shortage.
AC
AD
Hello,
I
pretty
short
comment.
I
just
want
to
say
almost
exactly
echoing
what
each
of
the
previous
commenters
has
said,
but
you
know
just
because
the
we've
figured
out
what
the
maximum
legal
limit
of
how
much
we
can
charge
is,
doesn't
mean
that
that's
the
right
number
to
charge
and
as
staff
notes,
it's
probably
a
good
idea
not
to
charge
the
maximum.
For
you
know
multiple
different
reasons,
especially
affordable
housing.
You
know
high
higher
higher
fees.
AD
A
Thank
you
very
much
see
no
other
speakers
in
the
queue
we
will
return
to
the
council
for
deliberation
in
action,
and
I
will
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
resolutions
and
ordinance
attached
to
the
report.
U
U
Second,
that
we
introduced
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
adding
chapter
47
to
the
mountain
view,
city
code
regarding
precise
plan,
development
impact
fees
and
the
east
wisman
precise
plan
development
impact
feed
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waved
and
set
a
second
reading
for
june
14
2022.
A
Thank
you,
city
clerk.
Did
you
want
to
speak
quickly.
D
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that
included
the
amended
text
that
was
referenced
by
staff
earlier
for
the
ordinance.
D
E
I
I
wanted
to
bring
up
the
idea
of.
I
was
really
pleased
to
see
that
that
the
staff
recommendation,
including
included
excluding
affordable
housing
and
the
affordable
housing
and
retail
development,
and
what
was
the
other
one,
the
the
government
nonprofit.
I
thought
that
was
good,
but
I
would
really
also
like
to
entertain
the
idea
that
we
exclude
regular
residential
or
that
we
reduce
the
amount
that
is
is
charged
for
resident
the
residential
fee.
And
I
wondered
if
the
maker
of
the
motion
would
consider
that.
A
U
My
my
concern
about
that
is
that
I
think
we
might
be
getting
into
financially
unstable
territory
with
that,
not
not
knowing
exactly
how
we
would
pay
for
that
without
borrowing
from
other
capital
improvements
project
and
then,
ultimately,
the
the
general
fund
that
we
use
for
many
things,
including
affordable
housing,
would
be
the
last
stop
and-
and
I
think
and
staff
could
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
this-
that
we've
fulfilled
something
like
300
percent
of
our
our
most
expensive
housing
and-
and
so
I
think
the
the
affordable
housing
is.
U
What
is
critical
right
now.
I
would
be
leery
of
putting
ourselves
in
a
in
a
financially
risky
position
to
underwrite
you
know
more
expensive
housing,
more
market
rate,
which
we
know
is,
is
so
out
of
reach
of
the
the
individuals
that
we
most
need
to
serve
in
the
community
who
do
not
have
the
housing.
U
I
think
the
figures
that
I
saw
was
you
know
we
fulfilled
300
and
something
percent
of
the
highest
cost
housing.
So
I
I
would
be
concerned
about
just
putting
it
out
there
and
I
I
know
that
I
read
in
the
staff
report
that
it
would
be
a
loss
of
19
million
dollars,
and
so
I
I'd
be
leery
of
that.
U
Maybe
perhaps,
if
we
came
back
and
said,
okay
we're
going
to
cut
out
the
sustainability
we're
going
to
cut
out
the
the
mental
health
unless
we
can
find
other
capital
projects
like
the
sidewalks
that
are
falling
apart,
that
we
need
to
take
care
of
and
to
give
a
holiday
to
developers
who
are
building
ex
expensive
and
and
sometimes
speculative
real
estate.
U
I
I'd
be
very
nervous
about
the
budgeting
impact.
To
that
I
I
don't
think
we
can.
We
can
find
it
going
into
the
next
two
years,
but
affordable
housing,
I'm
fully
on
board
with
okay.
E
All
right:
well,
I
I
I'm
also
really
interested
in
in
what
mr
anderson
said
about
the
evaluation
of
our
entire
fee
structure
that
we're
going
to
look
at
in
the
housing
element.
It
wasn't
incompletely
clear
to
me
that
actually
we
were
really
looking
at
the
entire
fee
structure
or
just
impact
fees
when,
for
instance,
park
fees
would
be
folded
into
all
that
maybe
staff
could
respond,
but
when,
when
will
the
park
fee
all
of
the
fees,
including
park
fees,
invest?
K
Well,
I
I
don't
want
to
get
too
far
ahead
of
ourselves
in
the
in
the
housing
element.
That's
that's
going
to
be
in
an
upcoming
item
and
there
will
be
some
opportunity
to
discuss
how
the
city
will
carry
out
ongoing
programs
to
look
at
fees
and-
and
you
know,
address
them
as
well
as
development
standards.
K
Suffice
to
say
that
there
is
a
draft
program
in
the
housing
element.
That
is
a
kind
of
general
review
of
development
standards
and
fees,
and
so
we
it
is,
it
does
not
have
a.
K
E
So
there
are
a
lot
of
these
things
going
on
sort
of
in
parallel
that
will
be
considered
either
in
the
housing
element
or
shortly
thereafter.
That's
what
you're
saying!
Okay!
Thank
you
all
right!
Well,
yeah,
I'm
really!
I'm
really
interested
in
including
housing
or
or
reducing
the
housing
amount.
A
R
Thank
you
so
actually
before
I
start
at
least
on
my
screen,
our
city
clerk
froze,
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
we
really
answered
the
question
about
the
motion,
did
we
get?
Did
we
do
everything
we
needed
to
do.
D
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
the
motion
included
that
amendment
so
okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
R
I
think
I
was
a
little
bit
surprised
at
the
amount
of
infrastructure
we
do
need
to
add
in
the
east-westman
area,
given
that
it's
surrounded
by
more
developed
areas
and
in
comparison
to
say,
north
bayshore
and
this
fee,
even
if
there
was
full
build
out,
represents
35
percent
of
the
total
cost.
So
there's
still
quite
a
bit
of
cost
that
we
need
to
either
fund
from
city
resources
or
get
grants,
or
you
know
anything
else
we
can
do
to
help
with.
R
You
know
almost
two-thirds,
which
is
a
sizable
number
and
it's
money
that
you
know
isn't
being
spent
on
other
city
services,
and
I
think
we
need
to
keep
that
in
mind.
R
You
know
I
appreciated
the
discussion
about
retail
because
we
certainly
do
need
more
retail
in
the
lisbon
area,
but
I
I
will
say
that
places
like
dollar
tree
and
the
restaurants
in
that
same
shopping
center.
They
are
definitely
regional
serving
and
not
just
neighborhood
serving,
and
I
guess
I
can
those
are
places.
I
frequent-
and
you
know
you
hear
people
talking
and
they
aren't
from
this
neighborhood.
But
those
are
such
great
restaurants
and
great
places
to
shop
that
they're
driving
from
other
cities
to
go
to
those
locations.
R
So
I
appreciate
the
exemption
for
neighborhood
serving
especially
say
a
grocery
store,
but
we
do
have
you
know
regional
retail
in
this
area.
So
I'm
okay
with
what
staff
proposed
and
I
do
appreciate
you
know
the
other
exemptions.
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
So
I'm
happy
well.
I
seconded
the
motion
I'm
going
to
support
it
thanks.
F
Thank
you,
mayor,
councilman,
matacek,
said
a
lot
of
what
I
was
thinking
as
well.
I
I
appreciate
that
we
do
need
to
make
these
infrastructure
improvements.
You
know
I've
said
time
and
time
again
we
can't
just
build
houses.
We
have
to
build
neighborhoods
and
infrastructure
and
services
to
support
those
houses.
Otherwise
we
just
have
houses
and
not
a
community.
F
So
it's
important
and
you
know
my
question-
is:
if
we
don't
have
these
impact
fees
and
where
else
are
we
going
to
get
the
funding-
and
I
know
there's
some
opportunities,
but
that
they're,
you
know
they're
always
potential
and
not
guaranteed,
and
so
in
light
of
the
fact
that
this
is
just
a
third
of
the
the
cost
estimates,
I
think
we
do
need
to
move
forward
with
impact
fees.
I
was
interested
in
seeing
if
we
can
just
you
know,
eliminate
retail
completely,
because
again,
I'm
looking
for
revenue
generation.
F
Frankly,
as
councilmember
lieber
mentioned,
you
know
we
do
have
to
think
about
our
financial
situation
and
you
know
we're
continuing
to
convert
commercial
and
industrial
into
housing
because
we
need
more
housing,
but
we
do
need
to
sustain
the
city
and
our
services,
and
so
we
also
need
to
be
mindful
of
how
to
pay
for
all
that,
and
so
we
need
to
be
looking
for
revenue
generation,
so
I
would
be
interested
in
all
of
which
are
eliminating
all
retail
and
maybe
even
reducing
hotel,
but
I
guess
what
I
was
thinking
of
is
maybe
I
I
think
do
we.
F
F
If
you
know,
we
see
that
it
is
becoming
a
deterrent
for
retail
or
or
hotels,
if
I'm
fine
with
that
approach,
if
folks
just
want
to
move
ahead
with
these
fees
tonight,
but
I
do
think
that
we
should
review
the
impacts
of
these
fees
in
terms
of
what
kind
of
development
is
actually
happening.
Z
S
I
I
think,
what's
being
asked,
is
if
the
fees
are
adopted
as
recommended
tonight,
can
we
in
a
couple
years
or
three
years,
just
look
at
how
they
are,
how
they
may
have
impacted
development
decisions
and
then
deciding
if
they
want
to
reduce
the
fee
in
the
future,
and
I
was
just
wondering
since,
as
we've
said,
it
comes
back
as
part
of
the
budget
every
year
it
you
know
the
the
the
inflation
costs
that
you
can
do
is
a
discretionary
decision
being
made
by
the
council
every
year
about
the
fees
of
whether
you
want
to
increase
them
by
inflation
and
perhaps
in
a
and
you
know
if
we're
asked
you
know
in
two
or
three
years,
we
could
do
a
quick
analysis
that
talks
to
whether
or
not
we
think
how
it
might
be
affecting
development
decisions.
F
Z
I
I
would
just
add
that,
yes,
the
council
can
choose
to
to
do
that,
but
we
might
have
to
go
back
through
the
mitigation
fiat
process
to
increase
the
fees.
In
that
case,
we
can't
just
reinstate
those
the
easier
way
to
do
that
would
be
to
adopt
the
fees
and
then
choose
a
period
to
suspend
it
or
reduce
it
after
which
it
starts
taking
effect.
F
Okay,
in
light
of
that,
then
I
well,
I
think
I
I
think
I'll
just
support
the
the
motion,
as
is
one
commentary
on
the
housing
piece.
You
know
I
I
agree
with
councilmember
lieber,
affordable
housing
is
really
the
focus.
F
I
believe
that
that
we
need
we
need
to
focus
on,
and
one
thing
about,
affordable
that
I've
learned
and
mentioned
before
is
that
if
with
100
affordable
projects,
we
don't
get
the
property
tax
on
that,
so
we're
already
losing
funding
from
that,
and
so
you
know
I
know
we
will
exempt
affordable
here,
but
we
have
to
offset
the
cost
somewhere,
and
I
agree
that
the
market
rate
is
you
know
it's
it's,
it's
not
the
fees,
yes,
impact
the
cost,
but
there
is
some
flexibility
and
variability
in
the
cost
of
housing,
because,
frankly,
it
is
the
developers
who
set
the
prices,
and
you
know
they're
they
do.
F
I
think
they
do
have
room
for
you
know
they.
They
set
certain
goals
for
for
a
profit,
but
there
is
some
variability
there.
So
I
think
that,
with
the
fact
that
you
know
the
office
will
offset
the
costs-
and
I
think
that
was
my
big
surprise-
was
the
office
square
footage
cost
was
so
much.
F
It
was
like
the
low
or
one
of
the
lowest,
if
not
the
lowest
fee,
and
I
think
that,
given
that
we've
heard
office
is
really
the
you
know
lucrative
type
of
development,
they
probably
can
take
some
offset
or
or
take
some
of
the
the
costs
from
the
residential
side.
So
I
think
it'll
balance
out
so
I'm
comfortable
with
moving
forward
with
this,
and
let's
see
how
it
goes
thanks.
E
Yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
bring
up
one
more
thing,
I
think,
just
as
a
matter
of
principle,
so
that
it
wasn't
unanimous.
I'm
probably
gonna
vote
against
this,
but
but
I
wanted
to
bring
up
that.
This
is
really
a
great
time
for
us
to
be
getting
funding
for
infrastructure
projects
from
other
sources.
I
mean
the
the
federal
government.
E
This
fall
passed,
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law,
which
is
a
1.2
trillion
dollar
law,
now
infrastructure
infusion
now
granted
that's
got
to
be
shared
hundreds
of
different
ways,
but
still
it
is
a
major
source
of
of
grants
that
we
haven't
always
had
and
we
may
have.
We
may
not
have
it's
it's
the
those
funds
will
be
expended
for
the
next
five
years
and
then
another
thing
that
puts
us
in
a
really
good
position
again
at
the
moment
is
the
surplus
that
the
state
has.
E
I
think
it's
92
million
dollars,
92
billion
dollars
this
year,
so
a
great
some
of
that
money
is
going
to
be
spent
on
housing,
supportive
things
and
infrastructure.
So
right
now
we
do
have
better
opportunities
to
go
for
grants
and
in
the
next
few
years
than
we
we
have
in
the
past
and-
and
we
probably
will
10
years
from
now-
and
I
just
wanted
to
let
people
know
that
that
this
is.
E
This
is
a
moment
in
time
where
we
in
a
sense,
are
more
grant
rich
than
than
normal
and
and
that's
a
good
thing.
Thank.
A
If
not,
we've
got
a
motion
from
council
member
lieber
seconded
by
council
member
member
matac
for
the
staff
recommendation,
as
amended
by
staff.
I
think
the
only
thing
I'll
add
is
one
of
my
favorite
history.
Lessons
is
from
the
north
san
jose
area,
development
policy,
which
was
approved
almost
20
years
ago
and
council
member
robbie,
kogan
and
don.
You
might
actually
know
more
about
this
than
I
do.
They
approved
a
tremendous
amount
of
development
in
north
san
jose
and
then
to
incentivize
it.
A
The
city
dramatically
reduced
the
impact
fees
which
were
supported
by
a
nexus
study
very
similar
to
this.
On
on
the
the
industrial
development
specifically,
and
understandably,
that
created
a
deficit,
they
could
not
fund
the
transportation
needs
and
so
what
they
did
was
they
plugged
in
all
of
the
projects
that
would
have
been
funded
by
those
fees
into
2016
bta
measure
b.
So
they
took
san
jose's
problem
and
made
it
yours
and
mine.
A
So
something
to
to
think
about.
I'm
gonna
support
the
staff
recommendation
city
clerk.
Would
you
mind
initiating
the
roll
call.
M
A
Thank
you
very
much.
It
is
8
30.
colleagues.
That
means
I
am
042,
as
you
will
recall,
from
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
Let's
take
a
10
minute
break
and
then
so
we'll
reconvene
at
8
40
and
then
we'll
begin.
The
final
item.
A
Welcome
back
everyone,
it
is
now
8
40..
We
will
proceed
to
item
7.1,
adoption
of
resolutions
to
prohibit
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
and
streets,
adjacent
to
class,
2,
bikeways
and
introduction
of
an
ordinance
and
adoption
of
resolutions
to
prohibit
parking
of
all
vehicles
from
2
am
to
6
am
at
designated
locations.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
This
item
has
been
segmented
to
allow
participation
by
council
members
who
have
conflicts
of
interest
and
will
be
recusing
as
a
result.
The
process
for
this
item
will
be
as
follows.
The
first
part
will
be
the
staff
presentation
and
we'll
proceed
to
public
comment
and
then
recommendations.
One
and
two
will
be
considered
together
with
council
member
libra
recused
recommendation.
Three
will
be
considered
with
council
member
of
mata
check,
request.
A
Recommendation
four
will
be
considered
with
council
member
abe
toga
and
vice
mayor
hicks
for
cues
recommendations.
5,
6
and
8
will
be
considered
by
the
full
council
recommendation.
9
will
be
considered
with
myself,
recused
and
finally,
recommendation
10
will
be
considered
by
the
full
council.
Public
works
director.
Don
cameron
will
present
the
item
whenever
you're
ready.
Oh,
we
need
to
oh
no
she's
here,
hello,
hi.
S
Thank
you
very
much
good
evening
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members.
I'm
don
cameron
public
works
director
joining
me
to
help
answer.
Questions
is
lorenzo
lopez,
city
traffic
engineer
in
2019,
the
city
council
adopted
ordinances
to
prohibit
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
streets
with
bike
lanes
and
on
narrow
streets
for
enforcement.
The
street
segments
subject
to
the
ordinances
must
be
designated
by
council
resolution
and
signs
installed.
S
S
S
The
resolution
designating
narrow
streets
adopted
in
2020
included,
444
street
segments
based
on
a
review
of
the
city's
140
mile
street
network
and
measuring
475
street
segments
due
to
the
large
quantity
of
streets
requiring
measurement
and
verification
staff
anticipated
that
there
may
be
additional
street
segments
that
qualify
as
narrow
that
were
missed
in
2020
and
therefore,
staff
started.
Compiling
a
list
of
street
segments
to
measure
53
segments
were
reviewed
during
the
last
couple
of
months,
which
resulted
in
the
following
findings.
S
The
streets
measured
that
were
previously
designated
as
narrow
in
the
2020
resolution
were
all
confirmed
to
qualify
as
narrow
35
street
segments
that
were
inadvertently
not
measured
in
2020
have
been
identified
as
narrow
and
two
street
segments
not
previously
identified
as
narrow
were
re-measured
and
determined
to
qualify
as
narrow
staff
recommends.
Council
adopter
resolution
adding
these
37
street
segments
identified
in
green
on
the
attached
map
to
the
list
of
narrow
streets.
S
S
S
As
part
of
the
evaluation
process,
notices
were
mailed
to
all
property
owners
and
tenants
along
the
streets
with
existing
overnight
parking
prohibition
sites.
The
notices
indicated
that
the
city
is
evaluating
the
no
parking
signs
on
the
street
fronting
their
property,
the
possibility
the
signs
may
be
identified
for
removal
and
invited
their
comments
of
the
57
responses
received.
48
requested
the
signs
remain
and
expressed
a
variety
of
concerns
primarily
related
to
long-term
oversized
vehicle
parking
being
allowed
on
these
streets.
S
In
addition,
the
type
of
parking
restrictions
should
be
appropriate
to
the
parking
issue
being
addressed.
For
instance,
two
hour
parking
limits
are
used
when
there
is
a
high
parking
demand
location
in
a
retail
area.
Where
is
desirable
for
parking
to
turn
over
frequently
in
reviewing
the
two
to
six
am
parking
prohibition
staff
determined
that
they
do
not
address
traffic
safety?
S
Based
on
staff's
assessment,
it
is
recommended
that
the
signs
be
retained
on
eight
street
segments
which
are
located
in
residential
or
habitat
areas.
The
red
lines
on
the
map
indicate
which
street
segments
are
recommended
to
retain
the
signs
and
the
blue
lines
are
the
streets
where
signs
would
be
removed.
If
council
adopts
the
recommended
resolutions.
S
S
In
summary,
staff
recommends
council
adopt
the
resolutions
for
designating
streets
subject
to
the
bike
lane
and
narrow
streets
ordinances,
introduce
an
ordinance
amending
the
city
code
related
to
prohibiting
parking
2
to
6
a.m
and
adopt
resolutions
designating
streets
to
have
parking
prohibited
from
2
to
6
am.
This
concludes
staff's,
recommend
presentation.
A
A
AE
Hi
there
thanks
for
taking
my
my
call
in
I'm
a
landlord,
and
I
wanted
to
avoid
my
opposition
to
allowing
rvs
and
campers
and
other
vehicles
to
camp
out
overnight
and
sleep
in
their
vehicles
on
wyandotte
street.
I
operated
my
business
there
for
25
years
between
1980
and
2005,
and
I
went
through
the
hell
when
they
had
vehicles
parking
out
there
and
it
was
a
mess
it
was
unsafe
and
additionally,
our
employees
and
our
customers
had
no
place
to
park.
AE
I
I
sent
in
my
opposition
when
was
first
asked
in
april,
and
I
never
received
a
reply
or
any
comments
from
that,
and
I
did
ask
for
comments,
but
nothing
came
back
until
literally
on
this
sunday.
They
sent
me
a
a
copy
of
this
agenda
and
I
was
outraged.
AE
I
did
reach
out
to
my
tenants
who
operate
two
five,
five:
seven,
why
not
now
and
that's
cobalt
power
systems,
and
I
wanted
to
read
their
comments.
AE
There
are
routine
full-size,
semi
trucks
that
make
deliveries
during
business
hours
with
the
semis
trying
to
maneuver
and
rig
loads
unloading
on
wyandotte
street
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
So
if
you
had
parking
overnight,
people
stay
there
and
it's
impossible,
there's
also
a
school
on
the
street,
and
there
are,
I
just
see
I'm
running
out
of
time.
So
anyhow
I'll
just
thank
you
and
I
strongly
encourage
you
to
not
pass
that
on
wyandotte
street
it'll
be
a
disaster.
AF
Hello,
I
remember
many
years
ago,
when
I
used
to
see
rvs
on
leghorn
the
then
one
day
the
rvs
were
gone,
replaced
by
the
no
parking
2
am
to
6
am
signs
much
of
leg,
horn
and
independence
dominated
by
large
storage
sites
has
little
foot
traffic.
Few
driveways
and
rvs
parking
on
the
street
would
have
little
impact.
AF
Of
course,
large
vehicle
parking
will
only
be
possible
if
bike
lanes
are
not
added.
If
bike
lanes
exist
or
are
added
to
every
street,
that
is
not
narrow.
The
council
will
have
ended
rv
street
parking
in
mountain
view.
What
would
happen
if
rvs
are
legally
banned
from
mountain
view?
Will
the
residents
leave?
Will
they
move
to
smaller
vehicles?
AF
AF
AF
AC
AC
I
do
worry
that,
given
the
justice
juxtaposition
with
the
rest
of
the
outer
streets
to
the
rv
bands,
basically,
is
that
there
are
plans
for
the
streets
in
the
current
overnight
parking
list
that
will
later
probably
be
added
to
the
narrow
streets
or
bike
lane
ordinances,
because
there
are
either
bike
lanes
there
or
maybe
there's
another
measuring.
So
I
do
caution
to
think
that
this
would
alleviate
those
that
do
live
in
oversized
vehicles.
AC
AA
AG
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
okay,
great
well
yeah.
I
would
I
just
wanted
to
call
in
to
speak
similar
to
the
previous
two
speakers
of
I.
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
remove
these
overnight
parking
ban
signs
from
the
selected
streets
in
this
agenda
item.
AG
I
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
if,
if
we
keep
these
as
well
as
expand
parking
bans
in
various
areas,
it's
just
gonna
make
the
situation
worse
overall,
not
better,
because
people
are
still
relying
on
their
vehicle
to
survive
in
and
they're
still,
a
part
of
this
community
will
just
push
them
out
to
different
areas
and
I'd
like
to
see
the
city
find
other
solutions
to
help.
People
have
a
safe
place
to
park,
rather
than
just
push
them
out
of
the
city.
AG
I
find
that
extremely
unjust
and
as
far
as
expanding
the
oversized
vehicle
parking
ban,
I
wonder
how
the
street
measurements
are
being
done
and
how
the
ordinance
actually
defines
them.
If
there's
an
exact
point
on
the
curb
or
whatnot.
That
needs
to
be
measured
and
find
a
little
ridiculous
that
the
measurement
changes
by
like
such
small
amounts
and
it
is
or
is
not
either.
You
know,
considered
a
narrow
street,
and
maybe
council
has
some
leeway
to
define
that
in
a
way
that
isn't
up
to
whoever
is
measuring
it
at
that
moment.
AG
L
Hey
council,
just
testing
to
see
that
you
hear
me.
L
Thanks
yeah,
I'm
another
caller,
I'm
calling
in
to
support
removing
parking
or
prohibited
parking
between
the
hours
of
two
and
six,
and
I
don't
agree
with
these
resolutions-
designating
more
streets
to
prohibit
oversized
vehicle
parking.
I
hate
the
oversized
vehicle
parking
ban
in
the
first
place,
I'll
put
that
out.
L
We've
seen
this
economic
crisis
really
hit
low-income
people
the
most
and
these
people
already
don't
really
have
anywhere
to
go
it.
It
doesn't
make
sense
in
a
month
that
we've
declared
mental
health
month
to
enact
more
policies
that
would
be
detrimental
to
people's
mental
health,
like
removing
a
possible
place
that
they
can
park
safely.
L
I
understand
that
this
is
a
tough
decision,
because
there
are
people
that
are
dissatisfied
with
oversized
vehicles
being
on
their
streets,
but
I
don't
think
these
people
want
to
be
on
the
street
like
that
either,
but
I
don't
think
that
there
are
solutions
right
now
that
would
allow
us
to
keep
these
people
from
parking
on
the
street
using
that
as
a
way
of
housing.
I
I
just
think
it's
incredibly
inhumane
and
some
of
these
people
have
kids
that
need
to
go
to
school
as
well.
L
AA
Thank
you,
mayor,
bruce
england,
speaking
for
mountain
view
coalition
for
sustainable
planning.
In
short,
we
stand
behind
the
staff
recommendations
and
ask
you
to
approve
those.
The
bigger
picture
is,
as
you
all
know,
housing
and
everything
related
to.
That
is
a
huge
issue.
It
isn't
just
this
part
of
it:
the
parking
allowances
but
safe
parking
and
supportive
housing,
affordable
housing,
and
all
of
that
goes
along
that
it's
a
huge
challenge
and
the
fact
that
staff
can
do
the
work
they
do
around
all
the
moving
parts
is
impressive.
N
Hi,
I
recommend
that
remove
the
design
of
no
parking,
because
a
lot
of
people
like
a
lot
of
family.
They
have
two
or
three
more
than
two
cars,
three
cars
and
they
need
to
park,
and
since
there
is
a
sign
or
parking,
a
lot
of
people
couldn't
park
and
that's
not
right
and
the
same
time
that
the
housing
costs
in
monu
are
so
expensive.
It's
an
outrage
and
we
push
the
middle
income,
people
or
the
low
income
people
out
of
the
mom
you.
N
But,
however,
we
still
need
them
to
work
for
in
restaurant,
industry
and
everywhere,
and
they
don't
have
a
place
to
stay
and
mom.
You
didn't
have
housing
to
offer
for
them,
so
they
only
stay
in
the
car.
We
have
to
give
them
the
chance
to
have
a
place
to
park,
so
we
need
to
open
more
instead
only
a
few
designated
place.
Thank
you.
AH
All
right,
thank
you.
I
think
you
know
this
is
a
very
kind
of
difficult
thing
to
contend
with.
I
I
think
it's
the
case
where
the
stated
rationale
for
the
the
policies
that
we're
looking
at
here
is
different
than
the
actual
intention
and
the
actual
intention
of
these,
like
overnight
parking
bans
in
mountain
view,
is
to
push
out
poor
people,
and
I
think
that
you
know
that
needs
to
be
contended
with
more
more
directly,
so
you
know
take
taking
down
some
of
the.
AH
The
signs
is
good,
some
of
this
other
stuff,
where
it's
like
we
want
to
have.
You
know,
restrictions
on
near
bike
lanes
and
things
like
that.
You
know
I
I
ride
the
bike
cleans
a
lot.
Usually
the
problem
is
not
these
oversized
vehicles.
So
that's
my
comment
and
I'll
give
you
the
rest
of
my
time.
I
guess.
P
Hey
friends,
I
agree
with
the
previous
speakers
largely
excluding
the
commercial
landlord.
I
think
that
staff
is
doing
a
good
job,
trying
to
find
regulations
that
are
serve
a
good
purpose
in
a
you
know,
parsimonious
way,
so
good
job
on
that.
I
think
it's
something
we
need
to
continue
doing,
because
laws
and
regulations
like
this
should
serve
the
people
of
the
city
and
do
as
much
as
they
can
to
protect
people
and
help
the
people
here.
But
I'm
speaking
mostly
just
on
behalf
of
my
local
community.
P
P
A
lot
of
their
those
parking
spots
are
slated
for
removal
with
updates
the
precise
plan
and
some
of
the
development
at
microsoft,
and
so
the
sobrato
project,
so
yeah,
giving
them
more
time
where
they
can
park
overnight
and
hopefully,
eventually
figuring
out
a
solution
where
they
can
find
a
way
to
keep
their
cars
that
don't
fit
in
their
driveways
would
be
really
nice.
So
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
are
any
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
being
none.
We
will
return
to
the
council
for
deliberation
and
serious
emotions,
but
first
we
have
to
go
through
the
segmented
recommendations.
Councilmember
lieber.
Do
you
have
an
announcement
to
make.
U
A
C
A
C
A
A
F
F
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.3
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council,
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution,
number
18533
designating
one
street
yosemite
avenue
or
portions
thereof
were
oversized.
Vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
is
prohibited.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
wave.
M
A
Very
much
we'll
now
proceed
to
the
next
item.
Councilmember
lieber
is
invited
to
return
councilmember
mata
check.
Do
you
have
an
announcement
to
make.
A
A
There
are
no
council
questions.
The
council
may
now
deliberate
and
take
action
on
this
item.
A
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
resolution
council
member
abikova.
F
Thank
you
mayor.
I
will
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution
number
one:
eight,
five,
three
three
designating
one
street
walk
or
drive,
or
portions
thereof,
where
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
is
prohibited.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived.
H
H
H
What
I
see
happening
here
is
that
the
the
the
oversized
vehicles
are
going
to
be
able
to
move
into
some
of
our
more
commercial
and
office
spaces
and
the
feedback
I've
been
getting
and
I'm
sure
other
council
members
have
as
well
from
the
developers
and
owners
of
those
spaces.
Is
that
they're
not
particularly
happy,
but
I
have
met
with
several
of
them
and
they
are
because
this
is
more
visible
to
them.
The
the
I
mean.
Frankly,
the
problems
of
homelessness
are
more
visible
to
them.
H
I've
been
meeting
with
several
of
them
and
they
are
expressing
a
willingness
to
partner
with
the
city
to
come
up
with
solutions,
so
I'm
hoping
that
and
and
quite
frankly,
it's
the
huge
growth
of
of
jobs
and
the
difficulty
finding
housing
the
expensiveness
of
housing.
That
is
one
of
the
big
factors
causing
this
problem.
So
I'm
I'm.
You
know
I'm
happy
to
see
that
people
are
now
that
the
this
problem
may
be
more
visible
to
some
people
that
they
may
want
to
partner
and
help
us
help
us
solve
the
problem.
H
A
Thank
you.
We
might
want
to
keep
the
comments
fairly,
narrowly
scoped
to
just
each
of
the
streets
or
street
segments
that
we're
commenting
on
or
that
we're
deliberating.
I
think,
fair
point,
but
now
that's
something
that
the
whole
council
may
want
to
consider
any
questions
or
comments
specifically
about
walker
dry.
M
A
Thank
you
and
we'll
invite
council
member
matajak
to
return
and
we'll
move
on
to
the
next
set
of
recommendations:
council,
member
abbey,
toga
and
vice
mayor
hicks.
Do
you
have
announcements
to
make
and
let's
go
in
that
order.
F
H
A
A
U
Thank
you
mayor,
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution
number
one,
eight
five,
three
three
designating
one
street
blossom
lane
or
portions
thereof,
where
oversized
vehicle
parking
on
narrow
streets
is
prohibited.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived.
A
Fantastic
you're
cutting
out
a
little
bit
for
me.
Councilmember
mata
check
just
ahead.
That
might
just
be
me:
I'm
not
really
sure.
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions?
M
A
Hopefully
they
will
do
so
momentarily.
The
full
council
will
now
consider
the
balance
of
the
streets
to
be
designated
as
narrow
streets
or
adjacent
to
class.
2
bikeways,
as
well
as
the
introduction
of
the
ordinance
to
amend,
prohibited
parking
between
the
hours
of
2
am
and
6
am
attachments,
5,
6
and
8
to
the
council
report.
E
Yes,
I
I
wanted
to
make
a
comment.
I'm
following
up
is
that
is
this
an
appropriate
time
for
a
comment,
or
will
we
do
that.
E
Okay,
yeah.
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
what
vice
mayor
hicks
was
talking
about
and
what
we
heard
several
of
the
the
residents
who
came
and
spoke
to
us
discussed,
and
that
is
that
that
there
needs
to
be
a
a
place
for
people
in
rvs
to
go.
E
That
is
acceptable,
and
you
know
that
that
works
for
everybody,
and
it
seems
like
in
the
last
couple
years,
we've
we've
demonstrated
that
we
we
can
do
that
with
our
safe
parking
program.
E
We
we,
you
know,
we've
tried
for
a
long
time
to
get
that
off
the
ground
and
it
it
really
didn't
work
until
covid
when
the
with
the
county
came
through
and
and
helped
with
one
of
the
legal
issues
so
that
we
could.
We
could
have
a
safe
parking
lot
without
going
into
the
long-term
rv
parking
business,
which
you
know,
which
nobody
really
wanted
to
do
so
anyway.
E
We've
demonstrated
that
safe
parking
really
does
work
it
not
not
only
does
it
get
the
rvs
off
of
the
street,
it
provides
them
with
a
safe
park
place
to
park.
It
provides
kind
of
a
community
for
those
residents.
It
provides
them
with
services.
E
They
sign
up
with
case
managers
and
get
assistance
in
moving
into
better,
more
stable
housing.
So
I
think
that
you
know
with
this
this.
This
exercise
we're
going
through
now
is
largely
kind
of
a
a
large
whackable
project.
You
know
we
we're
saying
you
have
to
move
from
this
area
to
another
area,
but
it
doesn't
necessarily
solve
the
problem,
and
I
think
we
need
to
make
a
a
new
effort
to
solve
that
problem
again
and
get
some
more
safe
parking
lots.
So
I
hope
that
that's
will
be.
E
One
of
the
outcomes
of
this
of
this
whole
problem
is
that
we
will.
You
know
we
will
find
some
more
spaces
to
have
safe
parking,
lots
and
and
assist
people
in
getting
out
of
their
rvs
and
into
more
stable
housing.
R
R
R
Sometimes
they're
employees
as
well,
and
also
a
lot
of
our
small
businesses
are
in
low
one-story
buildings
and
they
do
need
to
be
seen
by.
R
Driving
by
walking
by
biking
by
and
they
do
need
to
be
seen,
and
so
it
really
concerns
me
that
we
would
impact
their
business.
So
I
hope,
through
all
of
this,
we
can
find
a
way
to
help
them,
because
it
is
important
to
keep
our
small
businesses,
especially
in
business
and
serving
our
community.
R
C
Thank
you,
mayor
ramirez.
I
don't
want
to
interrupt,
but
I
think
we
need
to
be
really
careful
not
to
talk
about
the
2
a.m,
to
6
a.m.
Ordinances,
we've!
In
light
of
the
you
know,
numerous
recusals
that
have
to
go
through
for
each
one
of
these
ordinances
and
resolutions.
C
When
we
get
to
the
2
a.m,
to
6
a.m,
we
do
have
one
more
recusal
and
we've
put
them
in
order
so
that
these
discussions
do
not
impact
those
who
are
recusing.
So
if
we
can,
you
know,
keep
your
comments
to
the
narrow
streets
and
bike
lanes
resolutions
right
now
and
then,
as
we
get
to
the
2
a.m,
to
6
a.m.
It
will
be
more
appropriate
to
have
a
full
discussion
about
that.
Just
so
we're
careful.
U
What
I
wanted
to
bring
up
is
that
I
hope
that
the
individuals
who
spoke
and
talked
about
what
was
the
methodology
and
and
was
it
fair
and
and
can
we
fudge
on
it
and
et
cetera,
really
urge
you
to
read
the
staff
report
and
read
the
repeated
effort
that
went
into
making
a
fair
and
objective
and
repeated
measurements
and
etc.
And
I.
U
U
You
know
I
guess
for
months,
I've
heard
that
from
a
number
of
folks
that
a
truck
trailer
will
just
be
be
left
on
the
street,
with
no
truck
to
pull
it
away
for
months
at
a
time
and
I've
not
given
up
hope
of
a
commercial
provider
being
able
to
provide
rv
spaces.
U
I've
looked
at
the
the
map
recently
and
there
are
some
of
those
still
around
they're
like
in
the
range
of
a
thousand
dollars
a
month.
U
So
it's
you
know
more
expensive
than
living
in
a
shared
apartment
for
sure,
but
I
I
hope
that
we
can
look
at
that,
and
I
hope
that
we
can
continue
to
look
at
the
issue
of
the
vehicle
rentals
on
the
street,
where
there's
a
a
landlord
or
a
vehicle,
lord
or
whatever,
they're
called
that
owns
many
minivans
or
suvs,
or
what
have
you
and
they
just
rent
them
out
and
and
you
get
to
rent
it
for
like
upwards
of
900
a
month
and
there's
a
low
jack
on
the
steering
wheel.
U
F
Thank
you
mayor.
I
kept
going
up,
lowering
and
putting
my
hand
up,
because
I
wasn't
sure
when
I
can
and
cannot
save
it.
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
respond.
A
bit
to
councilmember
show
walter's
comments.
I
it's
been
interesting.
F
Recently
I've
been
doing
some
precinct
walking
for
other
folks
in
other
cities,
and
what
I've
noticed
is
that
many
of
the
cities
around
us,
including
san
jose,
have
parking
restrictions
on
most
of
at
least
the
streets
that
I've
walked
in
neighborhoods,
and
you
know
as
much
as
I
mean
I'm
very
proud
of
what
we
have
done
in
mountain
view.
But
I
you
know
would
remind
folks
that
this
is
a
regional
issue
and
we
really
need
the
partnership
of
all
communities,
all
cities
to
come
forward
to
with
solutions
to
that
regard.
F
I
recently
I
listened
to
a
presentation
by
move
mountain
view
and
they
had
updated
that
palo
alto,
the
city
of
palo
alto,
has
a
few
safe
parking
lots
that
are
opening
up,
and
what
I
found
interesting
was
that
the
city,
I
think,
is
providing
one
space
but
or
one
parcel,
but
a
lot
of
the
churches
have
actually
come
forward
and
offered
their
parking
lots,
and
you
know
we
haven't
had
that
success
here
in
mountain
view,
and
you
know
I
had
asked
the
presenter
what
the
thoughts
were
around
that
I
guess
and
when
I
think
about
it,
when
I
was
visualizing
it
there
a
lot,
I
guess
there's
a
congregation,
not
no
pun
intended,
but
a
congregation
of
churches
in
a
certain
area.
F
I
think
it's
like
midtown
palo
alto
so
because
of
their
proximity
to
each
other.
Apparently,
that's
encouraged
churches
to
participate
or
whatever,
and
I
think
maybe
their
collaborate
and
partner
to
make
this
program
work.
So
you
know
that
actually
gave
me
hope
that
maybe
more
private
property
owners
churches
will
step
up.
Also,
just
that
you
know,
another
city
is
now
participating.
F
That
should
help
that
helps
because,
frankly,
palo
alto
has
had
parking
restrictions
on
their
streets
for
much
of
a
very
long
time.
I've
noticed,
and
so
you
know,
I
think,
it's
important
that
all
the
communities
participate.
So
you
know
we
do
our
part.
I
think
we've
done
frankly
more
than
our
share.
I
know
that
we
like
to
do
that,
but
there
are
limitations
in
terms
of
land
and
frankly
costs.
This
is
not
you
know
it's.
It
is
a
cost
to
us.
F
We
pay
the
county
to
provide
those
services
which
I
still
don't
understand
because
county
the
county
is
supposed
to
get
the
funding
for
homeless
services
and
whatnot,
but
we
pay
them
to
do
it.
So
you
know,
I
think
we
have
to
be
again
be
mindful
of
that
and
the
that
we
need
to
you
know,
be
fiscally
prudent
and
frankly,
scar,
our
neighbors
to
neighboring
communities
to
help
out
in
this
regional
issue.
Thanks.
R
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
clarify.
We've
got
so
many
sections
here
lots
of
recusals
happening.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
heard
correctly
that
we
were
covering
five
six,
seven
and
eight
next.
A
Two
resolutions
and
introduction
of
an
ordinance.
R
Right
so
that
does
cover
some
of
the
2
a.m,
to
6
a.m,
and
that's
why
I
made
that
comment.
That's
I
ate.
C
No,
she
is
correct.
I'm
sorry,
I
heard
you
say
the
balance
of
the
items
and
I
didn't
realize
that
we,
that
included
the
ordinance.
I
didn't
realize
that
we
had
moved
into
that.
So
I
apologize
council
member
member
comments
with
regard
to
the
2
a.m.
To
6
a.m.
Ordinance
was
appropriate
and
if
other
council
members
would
like
to
discuss
that
ordinance,
that
would
be
appropriate
at
this
time.
I'm
sorry,
I
just
missed
it
when
you
said
the
balance
of
the
items
that
we
were
on
the
ordinance
thanks.
S
Yes,
thank
you
mayor.
I
would
like
to
clarify
again.
The
ordinance
is
simply
amending
the
current
city
code,
about
2am
to
6am
parking
to
say
it's
only
on
streets
designated
by
city
council
by
resolution,
so
the
ordinance
is
not
addressing
the
locations
or
nor
the
criteria
or
the
decision
points
related
to
the
locations
themselves.
S
It's
I
so,
I
think
that's
part
of
what
the
city
attorney
was
trying
to
get
to
is
talking
about.
The
ordinance
itself
is,
do
you
want
to
adopt
these
by
resolution
going
forward,
but
talking
about
specific
locations
need
to
wait
until
the
resolutions
are
discussed.
H
I
H
Say
that
one
of
the
things
that
I
found
positive
when
I
talk
to
some
of
the
business
owners
who,
if
we
go
through
with
everything
on
the
staff
recommendation
would
be
affected,
is
that
they
were.
They
were
landlords
office
landlords
for
large
corporations
with
with
locations
in
multiple
cities.
So
we
did
have
a
short
conversation
about
how
this
has
to
be
a
more
regional
solution,
and
if
we
partner
with
them
that
it
would
have
to
be
not
just
in
mountain
view,
it
would
have
to
be
elsewhere
as
well.
H
So
I
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
if
there
are
no
other
questions
or
comments,
the
emotion
is
in
order
for
the
three
items
that
are
part
of
this
segment.
H
So
I
will
make
a
motion
to
I
hope,
I'm
in
the
right
place,
because
I
was
recused
for
a
while.
I
hope
I'm
at
the
right
point
in
the
meeting
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
resolution
number
18,
409,
designating
three
streets
or
portions
thereof,
where
oversized
vehicle
parking
adjacent
to
class
2
bikeways
is
prohibited.
H
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.79.4
to
be
ready
title
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
to
introduce
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
amending
chapter
19,
article
8
division,
3,
section
19.71
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
relating
to
prohibited
parking
between
the
hours
of
2
am
and
6
am
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
wave
and
set
a
second
reading
for
june
14
2022,
the
effective
date
of
the
ordinance
is
august.
30Th
of
2022.
A
M
A
Thank
you
very
much
now
it's
my
turn.
I
have
to
recuse
myself
from
the
next
item.
I
have
a
real
property
interest.
I
guess
a
leasehold
interest
and
close
proximity
to
san
antonio
circle,
a
street
designated
in
the
overnight
parking
resolution
identified
as
attachment
9
in
the
council
report.
So
I
will
recuse
myself
from
consideration
of
this
resolution.
H
Good
luck!
Okay,
so
I
will
be
the
chair.
While
the
mayor
is
recused,
the
council
will
next
consider
adoption
of
a
resolution
designating
san
antonio
circle
as
a
location
to
prohibit
parking
between
the
hours
of
2
am
and
6
am
attachment
9
to
the
council
report.
Does
any
member
of
the
council
have
questions
on
this
item?.
H
So
seeing
no,
oh,
I
do
see
a
question
council
member,
okay,
you're
moving
on
so
seeing
no
questions.
The
council
may
now
deliberate
and
take
action
on
this
item.
I'll
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
resolution
attachment
9
to
the
council
report.
E
Yes,
I
was
going
to
make
a
motion
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
designating
one
street
or
portions
thereof,
where
parking
is
prohibited
between
the
hours
of
2
a.m
and
6
a.m.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.71
to
be
read
in
title
only
further
reading
waived.
The
effective
date
of
the
resolution
is
august.
30Th,
2022.
H
And
do
we
have
a
second
for
that
motion
council
member
abbey
koga,
a
second
it?
H
So
if
there's
no
further
deliberation,
can
we
take
a
vote?
Councilmember.
B
H
To
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
designating
seven
streets
or
portions
thereof,
where
parking
is
prohibited
between
the
hours
of
2
a.m
and
6
a.m.
Pursuant
to
mountain
view,
city
code,
section
19.71
to
be
read
entitled
only
further
reading
waived.
The
effective
date
of
the
resolution
is
august.
30Th,
2022.
R
Thanks
very
much,
I
have
a
few
things.
I
attended
the
league
of
california
city's
city
leaders
summit,
which
was
in
sacramento
for
two
and
a
half
days,
and
there
were
lots
of
good
sessions
and
opportunities
to
meet
with
our
elected
representatives
in
sacramento.
R
I
also
participated
in
the
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
board
meeting
as
the
alternate
for
council
member
abbey
koga
and
one
of
the
most
important
topics
that
was
discussed.
There
was
the
upcoming
reach
codes
for
2022,
as
the
state
updates,
their
building
and
energy
codes.
R
So
look
forward
to
that
later
this
year
and
I
also
participated
in
the
bosca
bay
area,
water
supply
and
conservation
agency
board
meeting,
and
I
want
to
reiterate,
as
I'm
sure
everyone
knows,
we
are
still
in
a
statewide
drought
and
while
different
systems,
water
systems
are
in
different
states
of
well,
they
have
different
amounts
of
water.
R
Let's
say
it
that
way:
it's
up
to
all
of
us
to
conserve
water,
because
we
might
come
to
the
point
where
we
need
to
help
a
neighbor,
and
so
everyone
needs
to
do
their
fair
share.
And
I
know
we
keep
on
saying
this,
but
we
really
do
need
to
conserve
water
and
certainly
when
it
comes
to
outside
watering.
R
That's
probably
the
most
important
area
where
you
can
conserve
bosca,
as
well
as
other
agencies,
have
a
lot
of
advertising
going
on
to
remind
folks
that
we're
in
a
drought
and
to
conserve-
and
I'm
sure
we'll
be
seeing
that
for
a
while-
and
it
really
is
a
you
know-
serious
situation
throughout
the
state,
and
I
participated
in
one
of
my
favorite
events,
which
is
national
river
cleanup
day
where,
throughout
santa
clara
county
and
the
rest
of
the
us,
you
sign
up
for
a
location
where
you
go
pick
up
stuff.
R
That
is
in
the
creek
beds,
and
I
always
sign
up
for
stevens
creek
in
mountain
view,
and
I
I
was
surprised,
pleasantly
surprised
that
there
was
less
stuff
and
I'll
say
stuff,
because
it's
a
wide
variety
of
things
that
were
in
the
creek
bed
this
year
in
comparison
to
all
the
other
years.
I've
done
this
didn't
come
across
any
microwave
ovens
or
tables
or
chairs
or
refrigerators,
but
we
still
had
quite
a
few
shopping
carts.
R
R
If
they'd
come
out
the
day
before
and
done
an
initial
round
of
cleanup
and
they
promised
me
they
hadn't,
but
it's
a
you
know,
there's
a
large
group
of
people
that
does
this
and
it
feels
really
good
to
do
something
to
help
the
environment,
because
stuff
that
goes
into
the
creek
bed
goes
into
the
creeks
and
finds
its
way
to
the
bay.
F
Thank
much
mayor
and
thank
you,
councilman
mata
check
for
covering
the
clean
energy
board
meeting.
For
me.
I
also
attended
the
cal
cities
city
summit
in
sacramento
and
wanted
to
make
a
couple
announcements
well
part
of
that.
During
that
time
I
was
also
I
attended
the
cities
association
board
meeting
where
we
passed
our
upcoming
budget
for
the
upcoming
year,
and
I
wanted
to
just
make
an
announcement
and
encourage
my
colleagues.
F
If
you
haven't
signed
up
already,
we
will
be
having
our
general
meeting
on
june
9th
at
the
winchester
house
in
san
jose
with
the
speaker,
russ
hancock,
from
joint
venture
silicon
valley.
So,
if
you're
able
to
attend,
I
would
encourage
you
to
join
us.
It
should
be
interesting
and
it's
just
a
it's
a
good
opportunity.
We
are
in
person.
F
I
know
that
it's
a
little
bit
challenging
still,
but
if
you're
able
to
uncomfortable
feel
comfortable
coming,
it's
just
a
great
opportunity
to
meet
up
with
our
colleagues
throughout
the
the
county
on
other
city
councils,
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
this
thursday
marks
the
one-year
anniversary
of
the
unfortunate
tragedy
at
the
vta
yard,
and
there
will
be
a
public
event
at
9.
00
am
at
on
the
526
resiliency
center,
located
at
353
west
julian
street,
in
san
jose,
and
so
for.
F
Anyone
who
would
like
to
participate,
please
feel
free
to
join
in.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
and
council
member
abigail.
If
you
wouldn't
mind
sending
me
a
reminder,
email
or
something
or
something
any
other
questions
or
comments
or
reports
that
will
proceed
to
the
closed
session
report
city
attorney
load.
Do
we
have
a
closed
session
required.
B
Thank
you.
We
will
now
adjourn
the
meeting.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
joining
us.
Our
next
city
council
meeting
will
be
held
on
june
14th
2022
until
then
stay
healthy.