►
From YouTube: 2-25-2020: City Council Meeting
Description
Council Chambers, 500 Castro St., Mountain View, CA 94041
6:30 p.m. Tuesday, February 25, 2020
A
A
A
Thank
you.
We
city
clerk,
would
you
mind
announcing
the
attendance
all
council
members
are
present.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
item
three.
We
have
a
presentation
for
three
point:
one:
a
proclamation
and
recognition
of
african-american
history
month
a
month
of
February
I,
don't
know
if
we
have
a
I'm
gonna
come
down
to
the
podium.
A
A
B
C
D
Good
evening
my
name
is
Milan
Valentin
and
I'm.
The
executive
director
of
the
African
American
community
service
agency,
which
is
located
in
downtown
San
Jose,
but
we've
been
serving
Santa
Clara
County
since
1978,
if
you've
never
been
down
to
the
african-american
community
service
agency.
I
personally
invite
you
thank
you
to
the
mayor
and
the
amazing
council
members
that
are
behind
me
for
your
childÃs
work
and
making
sure
that
this
happens
to
recognize
the
contributions
of
African
Americans
in
this
country
today.
D
I
accept
this
Park
I
accept
this
Proclamation
on
behalf
of
Katherine
Johnson,
who
recently
passed
away
yesterday
at
101
years
old.
She,
yes,
she
was
the
American
mathematician.
They
got
the
Apollo
11
to
the
moon.
She
has
inspired
me
to
make
sure
my
niece
has
learned
about
who
she
is
and
who
she
was
in
the
world
and
today,
as
an
executive
director
of
a
non-profit
I
remind
them
by
her
quote,
girls
are
capable
of
doing
everything.
Men
can
sometimes
they
even
have
more
imagination
than
men.
D
I
agree
with
her
at
times
of
course,
but
I
share
that
because
she
inspired
me
to
let
them
know
about
hidden
figures
in
our
communities,
although
oftentimes
in
society.
We
think
that
everything
is
okay,
but
sometimes
we
need
to
partner
with
other
communities
of
color
to
support
racism
that
still
goes
on
in
our
society,
and
today,
Black
History
Month
is
to
teach
not
only
our
community
about
our
history
and
where
we
come
from,
but
how
the
United
States
of
America
was
even
formed
with
African
Americans
working
within
this
country.
D
A
Right
we
will
move
on
now
to
the
item
for
our
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion.
Only
one
motion,
unless
any
member
of
the
Council
or
audience
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
The
reading
of
the
full
text
of
ordinances
and
resolutions
will
be
waived
unless
a
council
member
requests.
Otherwise,
are
there
any
members
of
the
council
wishing
to
pull
an
item?
I
see
councillor
McAlister
I,
just.
A
E
Okay,
so
four
point:
seven
was
our
annual
council
work
goals
and
I
would
like
to
remind
our
council
that
we
do
this
because
we
are
try
to
regulate
the
flow
of
work
that
goes
to
our
staff
and
the
burden
event
lands
with
us.
So
when
I
see
and
don't
take
this
to
wrong
is
that
we
always
have
to
say
seems
to
have
a
cause
of
the
month
that
influences
the
direction.
That's
council
direct
staff
to
approach
some
item
now.
E
These
items
are
all
very
important,
but
a
lot
of
the
items
that
we
look
at
has
a
single
advocate
or
a
different
advocate
and
comes
up
in.
We.
We
have
a
tendency
to
jump
into
it.
We
as
a
council.
Sometimes
we
have
to
be
a
little
more
restraint
in
our
appreciation
for,
what's
being
done,
to
really
focus
on.
What's
really
what
we
need
to
do
for
our
city
in
the
way
of
budgeting,
our
very
limited
resources
and
I've
saw
a
couple
of
items
that
we've
come
across,
the
other.
E
They
can
be
labor,
they
could
be
guns,
they
could
be
whatever
and
they
have
a
tendency
to,
in
my
opinion,
sometimes
over
influence.
They're
true
work
that
we
need
to
do
for
the
rest
of
this,
for
the
residents
of
Mountain
View
and
have
to
improve
their
quality
of
life
and
sometimes
the
projects
they're.
The
cause
that
comes
up
is
very
pointed
and
well,
it's
very
important.
I
still
think
our
council
needs
to
start
looking
at
these
and
saying
thank
you,
but
we're
not
going
to
bring
it
up
at
this
time.
E
So
I
will
be
in
support
of
four
point.
Seven,
but
as
I
say,
there
was
a
couple
of
items
in
there
that
I
don't
support
because
there
are
existing
laws
in
place
that
addressed
a
couple
of
these
issues
and
if
we
had
an
easy
tweak
that
we
could
do
it,
but
sometimes
our
accounts.
Our
staff
wants
to
and
do
the
best
job
possible,
and
sometimes
they
go
a
little
further
than
I
think,
but
they
are
doing
their
job
to
make
sure
we
get
all
of
our
information.
A
Thank
you.
Any
other
comments
on
item
4.7
I
actually
would
respond
to
that,
but
I
look
at
it.
I
think
we
are
very
restrained
and
we
try
to
follow
our
work
plan,
but
it
is
a
two-year
work
plan
and
I
feel
that
we
need
to
also
be
nimble
and
flexible
at
times,
and
there
are
times
when
issues
come
up
and
it
calls
for
some
kind
of
response
for
the
from
the
city
and
and
sometimes
that
those
issues
bring
up
at
least
a
review.
A
It's
worth
reviewing
what
our
city
policies
are
around
that
issue,
and
so
as
much
as
I
know,
I
think
we
were
very
constrained,
and
this
was
probably
the
first
time
that
we
looked
at
how
to
lighten
the
load
in
a
sense,
but
I
also
do
think
that
it's
important
for
us
to
be
able
to
be
somewhat
flexible
and
responsive
in
a
timely
matter.
So
councilman
Ramirez
did
you
have
comments
on
this
as
well.
G
She's
gonna
move
the
balance.
I
move
the
balance
of
the
consent.
Calendar
including
item
4.3,
adopt
a
resolution
to
a
the
closure
of
certain
streets
in
the
downtown
area
on
Saturday
May,
2nd
2020
at
to
a
the
other
button.
Isn't
there
at
2:00
a.m.
until
Monday
May
4th
2020
at
2:00
a.m.
for
the
chamber
of
commerce,
a
la
carte
and
art
festival
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waved
4.4
adopt
a
resolution
amending
the
city
of
Mountain
View
Master
fees
scheduled
to
change
the
fees
for
electric
vehicle
Chargers
to
be
read
in
title.
G
Only
further
reading
waived
adopt
a
resolution
of
intention
to
vacate
public
easements
at
355,
365,
401
and
415
middlefield
Road,
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waived
and
set
a
date
for
a
public
hearing
to
consider
the
vacation
for
March
17,
2020
and
4.7
adopt
a
resolution
approving
the
new
classification
of
communications
manager
and
adopt
a
revised
salary
plan
listed
as
Exhibit
A
to
reflect
the
new
classification
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
for
the
reading
lift
thank.
A
A
F
I
want
to
say,
I
appreciate,
staff
working
continuing
to
work
on
safe
parking
and
I
appreciate
the
County
working
with
us
on
this,
since
they
have
an
exemption
that
allows
us
to
do
some
things.
We
were
concerned
about
doing
on
our
own,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
miss
the
opportunity
to
say
that,
because
it's
great,
we
can
work
with
the
County
on
this.
F
F
The
person
was
previously
a
resident
of
a
mountain
view
and
we
said
how
they
would
have
to
prove
that
we
also
said
elderly
or
disabled
and
when
I
got
the
email
which
had
more
detail
than
we
had
the
opportunity
in
a
conversation,
and
it
said
to
the
extent
possible,
we
will
verify
Mountain
View
connection
prior
residents.
We
will
direct
our
provider
to
do
so.
F
So
I
guess
I'm
wondering,
and
maybe
the
city
attorney
can
help
with
this
one.
When
we
originally
talked
about
this
before
we
had
the
opportunity
to
work
with
the
county,
I,
don't
remember
it
saying
to
the
extent
possible.
So
how
are
we
going
to
handle
that
if
somebody
couldn't
necessarily
prove
the
their
residence
was
Mountain
View
I
think
it
was
in
the
past
five
years?
And
how
are
we
going
to
handle
that
I.
H
Think
there
was
a
clear
intention
that
that
was
a
specific
preference
criteria
and
usually
when
the
city,
employees,
preference
criteria,
whether
it
be
for
BMR
units
or
some
other
there's
a
rigorous
check
and
documentation
and
other
other
factors
are
looked
at
pretty
closely
to
to
determine
that,
and
we
found
that
it
was
a
reasonable
way
to
verify
that
status.
So
I
think
that's
a
verifiable
status.
I
think.
F
F
H
F
H
Clearer
way
to
look
at
it
is
those
preferences
I
believe,
are
in
the
in
the
safe
parking
ordinance,
so
that
that
is
a
set
group
of
criteria,
and
it's
if
a
lease,
just
hypothetically
a
lease
with
the
county
were
to
say
we
will
compare.
The
lessee
shall
comply
with
those
preferences.
That's
just
an
absolute
requirement.
There's
not.
F
H
H
The
the
contract
is
being
negotiated
tonight,
we're
looking
for
authority
to
finalize
that,
because
of
that
time
crunch
we're
still
working
on
that,
but
that's
the
intent.
The
only
exception
that
was
agreed
upon
in
concept
was
the
hours
of
operation
to
go
to
24/7,
otherwise,
compliance
with
the
balance
of
the
city's
ordinance,
okay,.
F
That's
great,
thank
you.
The
other
item
I
wanted
to
bring
up
is
the
percent
of
passenger
vehicles.
I
understand
the
rationale
that
we
might
want
to
allow
some,
especially
if
someone
meets
the
criteria,
especially
I
would
say.
The
families
with
children
in
the
school
districts
25%
seemed
a
little
high
to
me,
especially
since
the
existing
safe
Lots
are
only
accepting
passenger
vehicles.
They're,
not
accepting
the
oversized
vehicles
and
we've
been
trying
to
find
a
place
for
the
oversized
vehicles,
and
so
I
I.
G
You
ver
so
I
the
way
I
was
thinking
about
it
is.
We
would
provide
sort
of
the
first
right
of
refusal
to
households
or
individuals
in
RVs
and
then
once
we've
exhausted
that
demand
I
guess,
then
any
leftover
would
be
for
passenger
vehicles.
I
mean
I.
I
was
not
really
enthusiastic
about
setting
a
specific
percentage.
It's
just
more.
Let's
get.
G
F
I'd
also
thought
about
that,
but
I
was
wondering
if
that
is
more
difficult
to
implement
like
how
quickly
would
you
get
enough
oversized
vehicles?
And
when
do
you
say,
oh,
we
can't
get
anymore,
so
we
can
open
it
to
passenger
vehicles.
I
just
thought
that
would
be
harder
to
implement,
but
if
the,
if
it
is
easy
to
implement
I'm
okay
with
that
quick.
G
Clarifying
question
for
staff,
so
my
understanding
of
the
the
order
of
operations
is,
we
would
fill
shore
line
first,
but
with
24/7
parking
we
could
operate
Evelynn
concurrently
and
that,
for
now
is
that's
that's
time
restricted!
That's
overnight
only
could
we
have
passenger
vehicles
go
to
Evelyn.
You
know.
If,
if,
if
we
have,
let's
say,
there's
extraordinary
demand,
we
can
provide
every
everybody
an
opportunity
to
park
at
Shoreline.
G
I
Currently,
as
the
as
councilmember
marachek
noted,
the
faith-based
programs
are
able
to
accommodate
only
passenger
vehicles
and
that's
a
total
of
eight
spots
and
those
are
full
with
the
with
a
waiting
list.
I
believe
councils
direction
for
both
the
shoreline
lot
and
the
Evelyn
lot
were
to
have
those
be
for
the
oversized
vehicle.
For
the
reasons
noted
that
the
that
the
faith-based
Lots
weren't
able
to
accommodate
those
and
what
we
weren't
trying
to
open
a
can
of
worms
and
I
apologize.
I
There
was
some
sense
that,
with
the
24/7
wraparound
services
that
would
be
available
at
shoreline
that
there
might
be
an
assessment
made
on
intake
by
CSA
by
by
home
by
the
county
that
there
were
people
within
our
preferences
still
complying
with
the
city's
safe
parking
ordinance,
who
would
be
well
suited
to
that
lot
and
but
not
be
an
oversized
vehicle.
So
that
was
the
reason
for
us
asking
if
there
might
be
some
flexibility
up
to
some
certain
amount
so
that
it
still
would
be
available.
I
For
you
know
the
majority
of
the
spaces
to
be
for
the
oversized
vehicles.
Since
those
are,
you
know
harder
to
find
locations
for,
but
the
council
can
choose
at
this
point
to
to
to
change
that
preference
for
or
the
the
size
requirement
for
shoreline
I
would
ask
the
attorney's
office
first.
I
would
want
to
verify.
Was
that
direction
by
the
council
regarding
the
Evelyn
lot?
Is
that
your
understanding,
and
whether
or
not
were
sufficiently
noticed
to
be
able
to
to
change
that?
It's
not
an
ordinance?
It's
not
in
our
ordinance
language.
It
was
just
direction.
I
I
G
I
think
my
the
way
my
takeaway
is.
We
can
provide
a
preference
for
RVs
in
the
shoreline
lot
if
there
aren't
29
RVs
that
want
to
occupy
that
space,
we
could
allow
passenger
vehicles
and
we
could
direct
passenger
vehicles
to
other
Lots.
You
know,
as
long
as
there
are
vacant
spaces,
Terra,
Bella
Evelynn,
the
faith
community
is
that
kind
of
thing,
but
if
we
want
to
set
aside
so
I
think
so
what
what
I
think?
G
What
I'm
understanding
is
staff
is
recommending
that
we
set
aside
some
number
of
spaces
for
passenger
vehicles
where
individuals
or
households
have
a
particular.
You
know
they're
extremely
vulnerable,
for
whatever
reason
and
the
24-hour
wraparound
services
would
provide
what
would
meet
the
needs
of
those
particular
households.
It's
not
just
any
passenger
vehicle.
It's
like
particularly
vulnerable
people
that.
F
I
guess
my
suggestion
was
to
reduce
that
percent.
I
understand
that
you
might
want
some
I
was
just
concerned
about
25%,
so
I
was
suggesting
we
do
10%
and
I
think
it
would
be
much
more
difficult
to
implement
and
I
guess.
If
the
folks
in
the
county
wanted
to
comment
on
this
to
say,
if
you
don't
have
enough
oversized
vehicles,
then
you
could
allow
passenger
vehicles.
I
was
thinking
that
would
be
harder
to
implement
but
very
open
to
your
input.
J
Michele
covert
housing
and
homeless
concerns
coordinator
at
office
of
supportive
housing
and
I.
Think,
as
has
been
noted,
it's
the
you
know
the
the
great
amount
of
flexibility
we're
given
would
be
helpful.
You
know,
as
you
mentioned,
25
percent
does
sound
a
bit
high,
but
you
know
that's,
you
know
four
or
five
six
vehicles
out
of
30,
so
I
think
our
concern
is,
you
know,
we'd
like
as
much
flexibility
as
possible.
If,
if
the
council
chooses
three
percent,
you
know
ten
percent,
that's
three
vehicles,
you
know
again,
the
can.
J
The
idea
as
council
Ramirez
was
saying,
is
if
we
find,
through
our
targeted
outreach
and
through
the
intent
of
finding
the
individuals
or
families
which
we
have
preference
and
they're
in
a
car,
we
want
to,
you
know,
be
able
to
meet
those
needs.
So,
for
example,
we
talk
about
a
vulnerable
population.
If
we
had
somebody
where
you'd
be
one
of
the
family
members
had
a
physical
disability
and
so
leaving
back
and
forth
or
driving
the
vehicle
was
more
of
a
challenge
for
them.
J
We'd
like
to
be
able
to
to
put
those
vulnerable
individuals
in
a
24/7
lot.
So
we
understand
the
intent
just
that
the
flexibility,
but
we
don't
exactly
and
the
intent
is
not
to
go
straight
to
oh.
We
always
want
to
have
six
cars.
It's
just
giving
us
that
flexibility
based
on
the
Preferences
that
Mountain
View
has
so.
F
It's
my
understanding
that
each
space
that
was
geared,
if
you
had
30
I'm
gonna
round
off
here,
actually
the
ground
up
to
28
because
it's
reduced
by
one.
If
we
had
the
shoreline
lot
for
later,
so
it's
really
29
but
for
ease
of
math
sure,
say
it's
28.
So
25
percent
is
7
RVs,
but
14
passenger
cars.
Isn't
that
correct
that
there's
two
passenger
cars
for
each
RV
space,
correct.
I
So
if
there
were
seven
spaces
that
were
allowed
to
be
used
by
passenger
vehicles,
passenger
vehicles
take
roughly
half
the
space
of
the
oversized
vehicles
that
it
could
accommodate
more
and
that
doesn't
sound.
Like
that's
your
understanding,
I
mean
that's
the
way
that
we
spaced
out
the
Terra
Bella
lock,
for
example,
which
is
a
combination
of
oversized
and
passenger
I'm.
I
The
smaller
vehicles
you
can
we've
we've
sized
a
lot
for
all
oversize
vehicles.
If
one
oversized
vehicle
space
was
not
used
by
an
oversized
vehicle.
It
is
our
estimate
that
it
could
be
used
by
two
passenger
vehicles,
so
six
spaces
would
be
twelve
vehicles.
Three
spaces
would
be
six
vehicles
for
the
end
for
the,
and
it
wouldn't
necessarily
be
that
it
would
be
above
twenty
nine
total.
It's.
F
J
I
J
E
E
Not
quicker,
there's
slow,
okay!
Well,
that's
too
bad
I
mean
that
okay,
so
we
had
some
other
groups
that
were
working
on
a
community
group,
so
we're
working
to
try
to
help.
What's
the
progress
on
that
I
guess,
that's
just
taking
time
to
get
that
gone.
Okay,
well,
I
do
support
my
council
member
of
matter,
checks,
idea
that
you
know.
If
we're
trying
to
get
our
v's
there,
they
they
only
have
one
option
where
the
cars
have
more
options.
A
K
You
vice
mayor
great,
thank
you
so
like
I
guess
to
talk
about
the
percentage
I
feel
like
I
agree
with
Kozma
Ramirez
I.
My
concern
about
percentages
and
calling
them
out
this
way
is
that
it's
kind
of
it
we're
trying
to
get
people
to
participate
in
this
a
parking
program,
and
so
you
know,
and
every
vehicle
type
and
so
I'd,
like
the
the
county
to
have
as
much
flexibility
as
possible
in
terms
of
both
providing
services
and
space.
K
However,
that
gets
calculated
to
happen
so
I
I'm
not
sure
that
it,
whether
it's
10%
passenger
vehicles,
25%
passenger
vehicles,
I,
guess
I,
look
to
the
county
in
terms
of
asking.
You
know
what
provides
you
with
the
greatest
flexibility.
I,
don't
feel
tied
to
any
type
of
percentage
and
would
just
like
people
to
be
able
to
participate
in
the
program.
I
would.
J
Say
kind
of
our
overall
intent
was
we
came
here
very
quickly.
We
know
that
this
is
the
amount
of
use
a
great
partner
of
ours,
and
we
came
very
quickly
with
this
idea
of
doing
24/7
lots
of
entering
into
County
leases.
So
we
didn't
expect
to
come
to
you
with
a
perfect
plan
yeah
and
we
didn't.
We
don't
even
expect
that
our
you,
if
decisions
made
to
give
you
know
the
delegation
of
authority
to
enter
into
lease
with
us,
we
don't
expect
it
to
be
a
perfect
lease.
J
So
you,
whatever
decision
you
guys,
you
know
that
the
group
intends
to
make
tonight
is
at
10
or
25%,
or
you
decide
to
not
give
one.
This
is
a
kind
of
a
short-term
idea
to
then
get
to
something
that
is
more
perfect,
so
it
just
allows
us
the
opportunity
to
to
explore
into
in
to
have
a
pilot
project
really
so
great.
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
I
agree.
We
need
to
be
kind
of
holistic
and
that
the
six-month
pilot
is
an
opportunity
to
maybe
get
some
of
that
information
and
better
inform
us
when
we
have,
hopefully
the
potential
to
to
do
a
longer
term
lease
than
just
the
pilot
of
the
six
months,
so
for
me,
I
think
I'm
leaning
towards
not
calling
out
any
type
of
percentage,
but
rather
you
follow
the
three
recommendations,
as
staff
has
laid
out
and
then
perhaps
past
the
county
as
we
are
having
people
participate
in
the
program.
K
B
G
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
the
staff
recommendation,
but
with
with
a
couple
of
modifications.
So
the
intention
here
I
think
we
all
share
a
desire
in
getting
vehicles
off
the
streets
and
in
particular
oversized
vehicles
which
are
much
more
challenging
to
place
so
that
we
we
really
provide
a
preference
for
oversized
vehicles
and
then,
if
there
isn't
sufficient
demand
or
if
you
have
households
or
individuals
in
passenger
vehicles
who
are
very
vulnerable.
G
G
Someone
who
is
extremely
vulnerable,
who
really
needs
access
to
those
services
and
that
we
don't
necessarily
sort
of
artificially
limit
that
number
other
than
we
really
intend
that
the
intention
really
is
for
RVs
and
other
other
oversized
vehicles,
but
to
not
limit
your
flexibility
to
provide
space
to
extremely
vulnerable
populations
that
are
in
passenger
vehicles.
That
is,
that
doable.
H
I
certainly
want
to
assist
in
facilitating
emotions,
but
you're
already
operating
in
a
system
of
preferences,
so
adding
a
new
preference,
however
well-intentioned
may
be
confusing
and
hard
to
administer
if
we
already
have
participant
preferences
that
are
set
the
for
the
one
that
we
mentioned
earlier
so
and
when
you
say
very,
very
vulnerable
that
that
would
be
potentially
challenging
to
administer
within
the
framework
of
the
Preferences.
We
already
have
this.
G
I'm,
sorry
I,
don't
want
it
because
I
know
you're
in
the
queue,
but
just
a
question
for
the
county.
Do
you
do
you?
Have
you
know
I,
don't
I,
don't
really
feel
the
need
to
dictate
terms
like
what
is
the
right
visa?
That
number,
but
do
you
have
when
you
were
thinking
about
conducting
outreach
to
people
living
in
vehicles
to
place
them
in
the
24/7
lot?
G
Do
you
have
some
sort
of
internal
sense
or
gauge
of
you
know
this
passenger
vehicle
qualifies
because
it's
housing,
a
very
vulnerable
person
or
household
that
would
sort
of
justify
placement
in
the
24/7
lot?
Is
there
sort
of
a
number
or
a
qualifier
that
comes
to
mind
that
you
could
administer
internally
and
not
really
have
dictated
by
us
now.
J
I
think
the
flexibility
you
know
is
ideal.
In
one
example,
I
can
give
is
anecdotally.
There
is
word
in
Mountain
View
that
some
RVs
are
rented
to
families
where
they
actually
don't
own.
The
RV
don't
have
the
keys.
The
RV
and
one
option
would
be
as
maybe,
that
household
has
a
car
and
they,
like
I,
said
they
don't
own.
J
Oh
they're,
renting
the
RV,
the
RV
needs
to
be
towed
or
it's
leaking,
and
you
don't
want
that
RV
to
be
used
anymore,
that
family
is
going
to
be
displaced
and
the
only
thing
they
have
is
a
car.
So
that
gives
us
that
that
loop
mean
that
flexibility,
for
example,
in
those
situations,
because
we've
heard
that's
the
one
anecdote
that
we've
heard
repeatedly.
J
We
don't
know
how
many
RVs
that
is
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
but
and
do
totally
you've
heard
anywhere
between
six
to
ten
Arby's
or
eating
one
time
rented
by
families,
but
they
don't
actually
own
it
and
those
could
be
susceptible
to
being.
You
know
towed
or
not
being
able
to
be
locked
out
of
them.
Just
some
unusual
experience,
Oh.
Potentially,
that
would
be
a
that's
who
I
I
was
thinking
of
what
we
thought
about
the
idea
being
flexible
for
four
households
and
also
again,
you
know
somebody
who
met
those
prioritization.
J
A
A
G
You
know
there
there
may
be
further
modifications
as
we
go
along,
but
so
I
what
I'm?
What
I'm
thinking
is
the
staff
recommendation
with
some
language
worked
out
between
the
the
city
and
the
county?
That
would
make
it
clear
that
the
preference
really
is
for
households
or
individuals
in
oversized
vehicles
that
meet
the
the
criteria
for
the
I
guess
the
the
preference,
the
participant
preferences
that
are
described
on
the
second
page
of
the
responses
to
council
questions
and
then
I
mean
I
agree
with
the
vice
mayor.
G
I'm,
not
sure
I'm
prepared
to
call
out
a
specific
cap
on
the
number
of
passenger
vehicles,
but
that
it
would
it
would
be
it
would
adhere
rigidly
to
these
participant
preferences
in
the
county
would
would
really
only
fill
spaces
with
passenger
vehicles.
If
it's,
you
know
if
it's
a
very
vulnerable
household,
to
like
a
family,
for
instance,
which
would
be
consistent
with
the
first
preference
here
in,
but
otherwise,
first
and
foremost
that
we're
using
this
available
spaces
to
to
to
how
is
our
occupy
RVs.
F
Yes,
so
I
think
the
reason
we're
doing
this
is
because
we
have
parking
regulations
going
into
effect
on
bike
lanes
and
potentially
narrow
streets
and
those
only
apply
to
the
oversize
vehicles.
They
don't
apply
to
the
passenger
vehicles
in
general,
so
we
are
trying
to
find
space
for
the
oversize
vehicles.
So
that's
why
I
feel
like
we're
doing
this,
as
opposed
to
trying
to
find
a
spot
for
everyone
who
is
living
in
a
vehicle.
F
So
I'll
make
a
substitute
motion
that
we
do
the
staff
recommendation
and
you
know
I'm
not
too
hung
up
on
the
ten
percent.
So
if
it
was
fifteen
percent
and
allow
the
county
to
come
back
to
us
if
things
are
not
working
as
planned,
even
within
the
time
frame
of
the
contract-
and
we
can
revisit
it
but
I'd
say
15
percent
and
then
let
the
county
come
back
to
us.
I'll.
M
Councilman
requires
just
extremely
quickly:
I
I,
understand
the
sentiment
but
I'm
uncomfortable
setting
a
threshold
under
which
there
may
possibly
be
an
empty
spot
there,
because
we've
hit
a
threshold,
and
there
should
never,
in
my
opinion,
be
an
empty
spot.
If
there's
need
by
someone
whether
it's
an
oversized
vehicle
or
a
or
a
passenger
vehicle,
so
I
would
I'm
just
not
comfortable
setting
a
threshold
lower
than
25
percent.
We
think
will
be
the
most.
What
so
counts.
N
My
most
important,
the
most
important
thing,
I,
think
that
I've
heard
now
is
the
need
for
flexibility,
because
I
feel,
like
it's
very
hard
to
I,
agree
with
almost
everything
that's
been
said,
but
it's
very
hard
to
second-guess.
What's
going
to
what's
how
this
will
play
out,
you
know
I
think
we
could
discuss
it
all
night
and
and
still
not
come
up
with
that.
So
the
ability
to
come
back
to
us
is
the
most
important
thing
to
me.
You
know
I
could
go
either
way
on
the
on
the
resolutions.
A
I'll
add
my
comments.
Yes,
I
I
think
the
key
here
is
flexibility
and
also
some
kind
of
mechanism
to
have
a
report
back
and
I.
Guess.
Six
months
is
probably
the
timeframe,
but
I
understand
I,
agree
that
the
intent
should
be
to
make
space
for
oversized
vehicles,
since
those
are
what
the
restrictions
will
be
I'm
plate
placed
upon,
but
I
actually
did
not
think
of
the
different
scenarios
that
came
up
and
so
in
that
sense,
I
do
think
we
should
be
flexible.
I
really
wasn't
wedded
to
a
number.
A
To
be
frank,
you
know
my
feeling
is:
let's
see
how
it
goes
and
let's
try
to
be
as
again
flexible
and
nimble
as
possible
tip
based
on
how
we,
how
things
unravel
and
so
at
this
point,
15
25
percent
I'm,
not
really
yeah
I.
Don't
really
have
a
preference
either
way.
So
why
don't?
We
go
ahead
and
vote
on
the
motions
for
the
15
percent
with
staff
recommendation
on
the
other
items,
but.
F
F
O
So
just
one
thought
from
a
perspective
on
staff
side,
the
staff
report
allows
for
up
to
20
or
22
25
%
week.
You
could
ask
that
we
come
back
to
you
at
a
certain
point
to
check
in
and
we
can
work
with
the
county
with
that
flexibility
as
an
option.
I
guess
or
you
know,
as
if
that
flexibility
is
built
in,
we
can
come
back
to
you
at
a
certain
point
and
give
you
progress,
updates
and
then,
as
staff
work
with
the
county,
to
determine
if
it's
viable
for
up
to
the
percentage
that's
intended.
A
O
G
Thank
you
so
much
so
I
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
the
the
recommendation
here.
So
would
it
be,
for
instance,
if
passenger
vehicles
become
15
or
20
percent,
or
some
number
that
makes
staff
a
little
uneasy
with
how
we're
filling
the
space,
then
you
would
come
back
to
us
and
we
can
discuss
it
further
or
I'm,
not
sure
I
understand
what
the
intention
is
for.
O
Your
discussions,
if
you
want
to
consider
that
add
a
thresholds,
we
could
come
back
to
you
if
we
hear
from
the
county
that
there's
15%
or
20%
at
a
certain
threshold,
we
can
make
you
aware
of
that,
but
it
still
affords
the
county
some
flexibility.
In
the
event,
there
are
circumstances
that
we
have
to
go
up
or
down.
F
I
think
that's
what
I
was
kind
of
saying.
Only
I
was
saying
the
staff
recommendation
and
have
it
15%,
but
if
the
county,
I
guess
when
I
said
come
back
to
us,
I
meant
the
city
in
general,
not
necessarily
the
council,
and
if
they
are
saying
you
know
we're
seeing
that
there's
not
a
lot
of
demand
from
the
oversized
vehicles.
We
could
probably
fill
it
with
passenger
vehicles,
but
instead
of
just
automatically
allowing
up
to
25%,
let's
do
a
check
in
and
say.
F
Instead,
it's
15%
and
let's
have
communication
during
implementation
of
this,
and
let
us
know
how
it's
going
so
in
some
ways,
I
feel
like
I'm,
saying
what
you're
saying
only
it's
changed
to
15%
instead
of
25
and
I,
think
I
feel
like
we
will
have
that
discussion
about.
Do
we
want
to
change
it?
You
know
I
I,
think
it
is
a
pilot
we
want
to
work
together.
We
do
want
this
to
be
successful,
so
I
think
we're
at
least
I'm
very
open
to
having
that
discussion.
I
just
wanted
to
start
at
a
lower
number.
N
G
A
K
So
if
we,
if
we
vote
on
this,
if
we
vote
on
council
member
mattad
checks
motion,
as
is,
does
that
mean
that
that
I
think
what
customer
ears
is
saying
it's
like?
Does
the
cat
live
to
fifteen,
or
does
it
stay
at
25
I
would
vote
for
council
members
matter
checks
motion
if
it's
data
at
25
and
that
15
was
the
check-in
point,
but
not
if
it
was
15
and
15
so
I
think
that's
what
customer
Ramirez
is
trying
to
clarify
and
I
and
I
am
as
well
so.
F
A
B
A
A
F
A
A
Moving
on
to
item
five
oral
communications,
this
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items,
any
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
on
a
non-agenda
item.
If
you
cannot
please
come
forward
and
if
you
can
fill
out
a
blue
card
before
or
afterwards
I
appreciate
it.
P
Steven
Goldstein
twelve
year
resident
Mountain
View
I
just
want
to
again
address
one
major
issue
that
seems
to
be
not
being
addressed
regarding
measure
D,
and
that
is
in
fact
measure
D
in
its
language,
takes
the
C
sfra
and
takes
complete
control
and
gives
it
to
the
City
Council.
In
my
bin
opinion,
that
is
poor
judgment
because
of
one
key
thing.
The
reason
why
we
have
such
a
housing
problem
in
the
city
of
mobula
well
in
the
whole
state
of
California
is
that
State
Council's
do
not
know
how
to
do
rudimentary
quantitative
business
analysis.
P
The
fact
is,
the
council
has
adopted
the
idea
that
it
could
set
aside
20
to
25
percent
of
any
new
project
to
be
for
a
below
market
rate,
housing
and
so
on.
Problem
is
most
of
these
housing
projects
are
luxury
units.
That
means,
in
effect,
if
you're,
looking
at
a
normal
bell
curve,
only
16%
of
any
new
project
should
be
luxury
units,
because
any
higher
than
that-
and
you
end
up
with
a
surplus
of
years
that
are
not
going
to
be
of
any
use
to
anybody.
P
And
if
you
noticed
in
the
eighth
bag
and
the
our
HOA
reports,
there
is
a
consistent
proof
of
that,
because
they
always
establish
that
there
is
a
surplus
of
luxury
units
in
every
section
of
the
state
of
California,
let
alone
Santa
Clara
County
and
the
City
of
Mountain
View
and
the
owners
are
turning
around
saying.
Well,
we
need
the
City
Council
and
so
on
to
give
us
subsidies.
So
we
can
fill
those
places
with
people
who
don't
have
the
earnings
to
be
able
to
pay
form.
I.
Think
that's
ridiculous.
That
was
inappropriate
allocation
of
land.
P
The
way
you
see
fit,
but
at
this
point
in
time,
given
the
fact
that
the
City
Council
adopted
such
a
ludicrously
dumb
idea
of
saying
that
we
will
only
provide
luxury
units,
it's
like
for
mocha
water
companies,
saying
that
there
will
always
sell
Mustangs,
no
that's
completely
insane,
and
so
the
bottom
line
is
I.
Think
giving
the
City
Council
that
kind
of
power
over
the
sea
sfra
would
be
nuts,
because
in
the
long
run,
that
port
judgment
is
going
to
be
conveyed
over
the
measure.
P
D
gives
complete
power
over
even
to
the
point
where
a
RHC
member
can
be
removed
for
any
reason,
based
on
the
idea
that,
if
it
can,
if
four
of
the
City
Council
members
will
vote
to
remove
them
for
all
causes,
there
is
no
definition
of
cause
in
this
situation.
So
this
is
nothing
about
intimidation
on
the
sea
sfra
by
the
City
Council
I.
You
say
this
is
proof
that
you
can't
trust
the
City
Council.
Thank
you.
Thank.
Q
You
change
a
lot
over
the
many
many
years
and
the
reason
why
I
moved
here
in
the
90s
is
because
I
really
love
this
community
right.
This
place
is
great.
It
has
a
small
town
feel
kind
of
to
it,
but
it
also
have
international
sized
companies
right.
We
have
both
in
the
same
place,
but
I
am
a
little
bit
concerned
about
the
direction
that
our
city
is
going
in.
Q
So
there
was
an
article
in
the
Los
Altos
town
crier
last
year
and
it
talked
about
depression
and
it
talked
about
the
groups
of
people
that
how
depression
is
a
much
bigger
issue
than
we
know
or
are
aware
of,
and
that
the
the
largest
group
of
people
who
are
depressed
are
Millennials
and
the
second
is
seniors,
so
I
look
at
the
direction
of
going
in
and
I
think.
So.
How
does
a
seven-story
office
building
help
with
any
of
the
issues
like
affordable
housing,
traffic?
Q
That's
being
that's
getting
worse
and
worse,
in
fact,
that
people
aren't
really
around
people
right
that
there's
in
downtown
Mountain
View.
We
have
restaurants
that
have
outdoor
seating.
If
you
just
walk
around,
it's
really
nice
to
be
there
right,
the
what
we
used
to
be
the
beer
house
right,
there's
a
community
tables
where
people
could
go
and
sit
and
be
together.
We
just
spent
quite
a
lot
of
time
talking
about
people
who
are
now
in
vehicles.
Q
You
think
about
people
who
are
there
having
a
place
like
the
beer
houses
for
the
price
of
a
beer
or
a
soft
drink.
They
can
go
and
sit
with
people
and
be
part
of
the
community.
I
can't
imagine
that
these
guys
can
can
afford
to
go
to
a
restaurant
anywhere
in
Mountain
View,
so
I
I,
think
about
you
know
where
we're
planning
is
really
now
starting
to
address.
Q
The
person
before
me
said:
luxury
apartments,
office,
buildings,
I
think
that
we
as
a
city
would
sit
down
and
say:
let's
make
a
priority
on
how
this
next
project
is
really
addressing
things
like
people
who
aren't
you
know
having
people
be
part
of
the
community,
be
able
to
feel
like
they're
part
of
it.
You
know
if
they
can't
really
afford
some
of
the
things
that
others
can
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Any
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
on
a
non-agenda
item,
if
not
I'll,
close
public
comment,
and
we
will
move
on
to
item
six
public
hearing
which
we
have
none.
So
we'll
move
on
to
item
seven
study
sessions.
First
17.1
is
on
the
ring
staff,
Park
Aquatic,
Center
replacement,
design
and
scoping
options
and.
R
Evening
mayor
vice
mayor
council
members,
my
name
is
David
Printy
I'm,
a
senior
project
manager
of
Public
Works
in
Mountain,
View
Christine
Crosby
to
my
right
is
a
recreation
manager.
Excuse
me
with
the
Department
of
Community
Services
and
we're
here
to
discuss
the
ring
star,
Park
Aquatic,
Center
replacement
project,
and
our
purpose
here
is
to
receive
council
direction
on
the
project
scope,
adoption
for
the
ring
store,
Park,
Aquatic,
Center
replacement
project.
As
a
matter
of
context,
the
project
is
located
in
ring
store,
Park.
R
R
So
for
further
context,
the
existing
facility
has
a
49
thousand
square
foot:
six
Lane
25
meter,
lap
pool
with
a
waterslide
and
a
1
meter,
diving
board.
It
also
has
a
Niner
square
foot,
wading
pool
and
48
parking
spaces,
it's
supported
by
5,200
square
feet
of
buildings
which
have
equipment
for
the
facility
and
lockers
and
showers
and
staff
areas.
R
A
little
more
in
the
project
background
in
2014
Council
passed
the
ring
store
of
park
master
plan
which
included
the
renovation
of
the
existing
building
and
replacement
of
the
pool
since
that
time,
Council
in
2017
approved
funding
that
included
the
complete
replacement
of
the
building
and
the
pool
together.
Thank
you.
R
It
is
also
surrounded
by
approximately
excuse
me
23
thousand
square
feet
of
green
space
for
leisure
areas
around
Poole
and
this
anticipated
to
cost
about
fifteen
point
three
million
dollars
option
two
has
a
larger,
more
versatile
pool,
main
lap
pool,
which
is
ten
25-yard
lanes
and
eight
twenty
five
meter
lanes
in
the
opposite
direction.
It
is
a
joined
by
a
over
3300
square
foot,
leisure
pool
with
a
waterslide
and
two
25-yard
cooldown
lanes,
which
are
relatively
shallow
and
could
be
used
for
other
recreational
purposes.
R
R
Square
foot
of
green
space
around
it,
but
it's
still
fairly
comfortable
and
is
anticipated
to
cost
18
point
1
million
dollars
to
construct
the
last
option.
Option
3
has
the
largest
pool
of
twelve
thousand
three
hundred
square
feet
and
it
is
an
eight-lane
50
meter,
lap
pool
and
with
20
25
yard
lanes
in
the
opposite
direction.
R
It's
a
joined
by
two
thousand
square
foot,
leisure
pool
with
slide
and
a
9,000
square
foot
building
and
58
parking
stalls.
The
buildings
get
larger
just
by
way
of
information
as
to
support
the
larger
water
bodies
and
treatment
of
the
water
and
filtration
and
heating.
This
one
and
again
another
option.
Another
feature
is
that
this
facility
has
about
10,000
square
feet
of
green
space
around
it
and
we
limited
it
so
as
to
not
encroach
further
into
the
park
and
this
option
3
is
expected
to
cost
around
20
10.6
million
to
build
after
we.
R
After
these
3
options
were
generated,
staff
commissioned
and
operational
study
to
evaluate
them
and
see
how
they
fared
against
the
local
market.
They
looked
at
the
regional
population
and
to
determine
which
of
the
three
aquatic
facilities
would
have
the
best
operational
performance
in
terms
of
cost
recovery
and
services
to
to
the
to
the
residents.
R
B
B
R
So,
as
the
staff
report
States,
we
come
to
Council
with
these
questions,
does
counsel
concur
with
staff
and
the
PRC's
recommendation
for
option
2
and
does
counsel
have
any
other
comments
or
direction
for
staff
for
the
conceptual
design
process
of
the
Ring
Store
Park
Aquatic
Center
replacement
project.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
You
so,
as
this
is
a
study
session,
we
will
take
public
comments
first.
So
are
there
any
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
on
this
item?
If
you
could
raise
your
hands?
Okay,
how
about?
Let's
do
two
and
a
half
minutes
and
if
you
can
come
on
up
and
line
up
and
fill
out
a
blue
cart
before
or
afterwards
you
don't
mind
lining
on
this
over
here
on
the
side,
so
we
can
have
you
up
come
up
quickly,
one
at
a
time,
I
appreciate
it.
First
person
welcome
to
start
us
off.
S
You
good
evening
my
name
is
Chris
Campbell
I
am
a
Sunnyvale
resident.
However,
I've
been
a
member
of
Mountain
View
Masters
for
thirty
years
since
1990,
a
coach
with
them
since
1998
I
am
currently
a
member
of
the
United
States
Masters
Swimming
Board
of
Directors
I
serve
as
the
executive.
Vice
president
of
Community,
Services
I
think
that
option
two
is
a
little
bit
short-sighted.
I'll
ask
the
question:
what
price
do
we
put
on
possibility?
We
dwell
in
the
realm
of
potential.
S
If
we
think
about
this,
we
want
to
sort
of
have
a
vision
for
the
future
we
can
fit
in
the
50-meter
facility.
Here
we
are
not
asking
for
an
elite
facility.
We
are
asking
oftentimes
the
PRC
at
their
meeting.
They
spoke
of
Santa
Clara
aquatics,
the
kwatak
Center,
the
Stanford
University
quad
Tara.
That's
not
what
we're
looking
for
better
equivalent
would
be
st.
Francis,
High,
School,
Fremont,
High
School
and
Sunnyvale
Sacred
Heart
up
in
Atherton
Lynbrook
High
School.
These
are
perfectly
adequate
facilities.
S
We're
not
looking
to
host
regional,
meets
we're
not
looking
to
host
elite
events
here.
What
we
are
looking
to
do
is
provide
opportunities
for
multiple
programs
for
growth.
One
of
the
nice
things
that
you
can
get
with
a
50-meter
pool
is
that
you
can
put
in
multiple
programs.
At
the
same
time
it
allows
for
growth.
It
allows
for
potential.
S
We
are
at
ground
zero
in
this
nation
for
developing
swimming
talent
at
the
elite
level,
and
the
best
thing
that
we
can
do
is
you
know.
While
we
celebrate
achievement,
we
need
to
enable
achievement
and
success
through
opportunity.
A
50-meter
facility
will
offer
that
the
25
meter
facility
described
an
option
to
actually
does
not
buy
us
anything
more
than
we
are
currently
have
an
Eagle
part
pool.
So
it's
I'll
challenge
you
to
think
bigger
and
to
think
of
the
future.
Thank
you.
B
My
name
is
Greg
Rogers
and
I'm,
a
swimmer
I'm,
also
a
senior
I'm
73
years
old,
so
seniors
up
on
your
on
your
board.
There
I've
been
swimming
at
the
Eagle
pool
for
about
seven
years
now.
Three
days
a
week
getting
in
shape
had
some
heart
issues
and
that
helped
what
I'm
telling
I?
What
I'm
asking
you
to
consider
is
what
the
the
previous
speaker
did
is
to
consider
the
possibility
of
a
50
meter,
Pele
pool
it's
not
an
elitist
thing.
Believe
me,
I
I,
never
swam
in
high
school
I'm,
not
a
competitive
swimmer.
B
I
am
an
exercise.
Swimmer
and
I
enjoy
the
fellowship
of
the
people
that
are
there.
It's
the
ego
pool
is
is
a
good
facility.
A
50
meter,
peeled
pool
would
be
better
because
it
would
give
us
more
opportunity
to
stretch
our
our
lungs
and
and
stuff
in
in
the
pool,
and
also
it
could
have
competitive
issues.
You
know
there
there's
been
a
Santa
Clara,
Swim
Club,
that's
been
around
for
ages
and
they
have
produced
some
really
fine
swimmers.
Mountain
view
could
could
participate
in
that
it's
not
at
least
as
elitist
thing.
B
T
T
I'm
72,
I
really
think
the
pool
has
been
instrumental
in
allowing
me
to
maintain
a
high
level
of
health,
even
though
you
know
we
all
have
our
health
issues
as
we
get
a
little
bit
older
and
I'm
definitely
no
no
no
exception,
but
the
pool
has
been
a
wonderful
addition
to
you
know,
used
to
ballroom
dance
and
and
tennis
and
cuesta
park
tennis
courts.
If
any
way
the
pool
has
definitely
remained
I,
think
my
primary
form
of
exercise
and
on
a
very
daily
basis.
Six
days
a
week
and
here
I
am
today
I'm.
T
I
think
for
attracting
the
types
of
families
that
really
would
like
to
see
their
kids
go
out
and
have
opportunity
to
to
either
competitive
swim
or
lab
swim
or
whatever,
whatever
they
do.
But
thank
you
very
much
I'm
just
here
to
advocate
for
a
50-meter
pool.
Thank.
U
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
so
I'm
Matt
grew
old
I'm,
a
resident
and
former
college
from
our
eighth
grade
summer,
master
somewhere
in
Mountain,
View
lifeguard,
so
just
had
a
lot
of
time
around
pools,
and
now
my
kids
are
participating
in
various
win
teams
in
a
round
down
view,
including
a
lamb
back
and
Covington.
Critters
want
to
offer
three
reasons
to
consider
the
option.
Three
one
I
think
just
echoing
that
the
value
of
having
an
Olympic
sized
pool
in
map
view
so
for
those
who
aren't
as
familiar
with
competitive
swimming.
U
This
season
is
split
up
into
two
seasons
short
course
and
long
course
or
short
course
is,
for
you
know
during
the
school
year
that
aligns
with
NCAA
Championships
high
school
championships,
those
sorts
of
meats
and
then
the
long
course
season
is
maps
too.
You
know
Olympic
Trials,
which
is
coming
up
Olympics
national
championships
right
now,
there's
no
opportunity
to
train
for
long
course
or
have
meats
you
know
in
Mountain
View.
U
So
that
would
just
be
a
clear
win
for
having
that
50
meter
pool
you
can't
get
that
with
a
25
meter
pool
number
two
I
think
the
ROI
is
there.
So
just
doing
some
quick
calculations
you're
talking
about
doubling
the
number
of
lanes
that
you'd
have
at
one
time
or
rinks
or
so
going
from
10
to
20
lanes
for
lab
swim,
49.7%,
higher
operating
cost
and
a
one-time
charge
of
19
percent
increased
costs.
U
So
you
know
to
be
able
to
get
that
benefit
of
having
twice
as
many
people
to
have
their
own
lane
or
more
people.
Fewer
people
sharing
lanes
for
both
lap
swimmers
and
competitive,
something
I
think
that's
pretty
compelling.
The
last
would
be
just
meeting
current
and
future
demands.
So
I
think
today
you
may
not
begin
getting
an
accurate
measure
of
demand
for
both
lap
swimmers
and
rec
swimmers.
I
know
that
when
my
children
were
smaller,
we
would
look
for
an
opportunity
to
swim.
U
Direct
swimming,
but
ego
part
was
only
opened
during
their
nap
time
like
1:00
to
4:00
p.m.
so
we
would
go
to
Burgess
kwatak
Center
and
we
eventually
joined
the
Elks
Club
in
Palo
Alto,
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
demand.
That's
unmet
today,
if
you're
looking
at
some
of
the
numbers
of
attendance
of
the
pools
just
because
of
the
shortened
schedule
and
lastly,
future
demand,
you
know:
Bay
Shore
gets
built
out.
U
You're
gonna
have
a
lot
more
people
who
are
interested
in
swimming
I,
don't
know
if
we
were
planning
on
building
another
pool
in
North
Bay
Shore.
So
where
can
those
people
go
to
swim?
You
might
want
to
ask
staff
for
quickly
like
a
metric
like
swim
lane
hours
per
capita
and
see
how
we
compare
to
other
jurisdictions.
Thank
you.
Thank.
V
V
Thank
4440
two
years
I
injured
my
back
around
2001
and
that's
the
one
thing
that
saved
me
was
the
pool
and
I
entry
injured.
My
back
again,
the
pool
is
the
only
thing
I
could
do
until
I
get
better.
So
that's
one
reason,
but
the
other
thing
is
currently.
There
is
not
enough
lanes
at
ego
pool,
so
we
are
talking
about
making
it
smaller
or
the
same
amount
of
lanes
and
the
city
is
growing.
V
So
I
am
going
to
request
the
the
council
to
consider
the
50
meter
pool
please
because
otherwise
we
it
is
not
helping
the
community.
There
are
so
many
people
that
take
advantage
of
the
pool
for
their
health
and,
as
we
heard
week
as
we
age,
we
cannot
do
all
the
things
that
we
could
do
when
we
were
younger
and
the
pool
really
is
a
way
to
keep
the
aging
population
healthy.
Don't
forget
the
kids
and
the
junior
youth
and
all
of
that
stuff.
So
I
really
really
hope
that
you
are
consider
the
50-meter
pool.
U
W
Thanks
for
considering
this,
we've
been
going
to
these
meetings
throughout
the
planning
process
and
I.
Think
that
considering
this
50-meter
is
a
really
valuable
option.
I
have
four
kids
who
swim
on
land
back,
they
their
whole
world
is
swimming
and
it's
it's
makes
a
huge
difference
to
be
able
to
train
in
that
size
pool
in
which
we
don't
have
currently
in
Mountain
View
I
think
it
would
be
a
real
valuable
asset
in
our
community.
W
I
was
actually
talking
to
a
fellow
swim
parent
this
afternoon
and
she
said
she
went
to
lap
swim
today
at
noon
and
there
are
five
people
in
every
lane.
So
you
know
to
speak
to
the
the
need
in
the
community.
It's
not
just
the
swim
team.
It's
masters,
it's
lap,
swimmers!
It's
you
know.
We've
had
like
underwater
rugby
we've
had
all
these
groups
come
to
advocate
for
a
larger
facility,
because
Mountain
U
is
only
growing.
We
have
a
very
healthy
population.
A
lot
of
people
are
looking
to
swim.
W
It's
I
think
short-sighted
to
build
something
that
barely
meets
the
needs
that
we
have
now
because,
as
you've
noted
it's
every
sixty
years,
we
the
opportunity
to
do
something
like
this.
It
would
be
really
nice
to
take
advantage
of
the
opportunity
and
I
had
one
other
thought.
Oh
well.
Okay,
just
I
would
really
appreciate
your
consideration.
I
think
this
would
be
a
sadly
missed
opportunity
to
to
go
small.
Thank
you.
Thank
You.
X
Hi
there,
my
name
is
Rajan
chef
and
I
have
lived
in
this
area
for
about
26
years
from
when
I
started
college.
Here
all
the
way
to
now
as
a
father
of
two,
and
what
has
attracted
me
here
is
the
community.
The
community
is
incredible
here
compared
to
almost
anywhere
else
that
I've
lived
and
I
really
want
to
commend
the
the
mountain
view,
leadership
for
building
out
the
community
center
for
building
out
the
pools.
It's
incredible
to
see
what
has
been
done
here
compared
to
even
other
cities
around
around
this
area.
X
Now
with
this
project,
this
is
a
very
long-term
decision.
If
you
as
you've
shown
it's
pretty
much
stayed
the
same
since
the
1950s
and
I
think
we
can
assume
that
what
we
do
here
is
gonna,
allow
it
for
decades,
and
so
I
also
would
argue
for,
given
that
it's
a
long-term
decision
to
put
in
the
50-meter
pool
and
my
argument
for
this
community
in
that
I've
seen
this
as
both
a
young
person.
X
That
was
a
swimmer
that
learned
how
to
swim
and
did
this
for
fitness
as
a
way
that
was
bringing
young
people
in
the
community
together
and
especially
having
a
bigger
pool.
You
bring
more
more
young
people
together,
I
hear
and
then
also
I've
seen
this
as
a
as
a
father
of
two
with
two
kids
in
the
in
the
swimming
program,
where,
as
a
result
of
this
we've
met,
many
more
people
into
the
in
the
community
and
and
the
swim
team
is
growing
very
very
rapidly.
X
As
a
result,
I
think
there
are
a
couple
of
key
reasons
for
this.
First
is
capacity,
is
as
people
we're
talking
about,
the
the
pool
is
already
quite
crowded
during
lab
swim
and
it's
gonna
continue
to
get
even
more
crowded
and
it's
actually
been
a
limiter
for
us
to
be
able
to
bring
more
people
in
to
swim
teams
or
get
more
people
to
swim
overall.
The
second
thing
is:
it
actually
brings
the
team
together.
X
So
right
now,
the
the
team
that
we
have
here
in
Mountain
View
has
to
swim
in
two
locations
because
of
the
split
schedule
that
that
was
mentioned
before,
because
there
is
no
larger
facility,
in
addition
to
all
of
that,
this
would
be
distinctive
compared
to
any
other
city
in
in
the
local
area,
in
terms
of
having
a
pool
of
that
size
and
the
revenue
would
pay
for
itself.
So
I
really
appreciate
you
considering
putting
in
a
pool
and
doing
this
renovation
and
would
really
really
encourage
you
to
consider
option
3.
Thank
you.
Thank.
Y
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
tonight.
It's
exciting
to
be
talking
about
a
project
like
this
and
and
we
are
in
a
very
fortunate
position
to
be
able
to
have
the
opportunity
to
not
only
fit
in
the
50-meter
pool,
but
the
space
is
our.
The
space
is
already
there.
That's
really
unique
most
times
when
cities
in
this
heavily
populated
areas
in
the
peninsula
and
all
throughout
California.
Y
There
isn't
space
for
something
like
this,
so
this
is
really
huge,
unique
and
great
position
to
be
in,
and
then
the
other
thing
I
wanted
to
say
is
that
the
that,
as
you
all
know,
this
is
a
50-year
opportunity.
These
don't
come
up
very
often
so
it's
time
to
jump,
jump
for
it
and
go
for
it.
So
thank
you
so
much.
Thank
you.
Thanks,
speaker.
A
Z
Thank
You
mayor
havoc,
okay,
council,
my
name
is
Greg
Cola
Donato
I'd
like
to
add
my
voice
to
the
chorus
of
people
in
favor
of
option,
considering
option
3
I've
been
swimming
more
and
more
last
year,
I
was
in
the
YMCA,
a
YMCA
Triathlon
Club
and
we'd
meet
at
6
a.m.
at
st.
Francis
pool.
That's
not
that
convenient
to
get
to
swim
at
6:00
in
the
morning.
Although
the
Masters
probably
do
that
every
day
it'd
be
great.
Z
If
there
were
more
capacity
in
our
mountain
view,
city
pools
that
would
enable
more
people
to
get
a
lot
of
swimming
exercise
in
a
normal
day
to
day
time
hours.
The
fact
that
the
pool
in
option
3
is
50
meters
long,
but
if
I
remember
Craiglist,
20
25
yards
wide,
so
you're,
just
if
you
run
it
that
way,
you
just
have
a
lot
more
capacity
and
I,
don't
see
why
you
wouldn't
spend
the
extra
two
or
three
million
dollars
to
get
so
much
extra
capacity.
Z
AA
Council
it,
my
name,
is
Bob
Stan's
I'm,
the
resident
of
Mountain
View
for
the
last
23
years
in
a
lifelong
swimmer
and
I.
Think
I'm
excited
to
be
here
and
be
talking
about
a
new
pool
I'm
here
in
support
of
option
3
I,
my
blood,
a
lot
of
you
would
know
all
of
you
I
think
know
about.
You
know
the
reasons
for
it
via
email.
B
AA
AA
A
50-meter
pool
is
a
pool,
that's
gonna
be
used,
year-round
January
through
December
and
I.
Think
you've
heard
the
others
speak
about
how
often
it's
gonna
be
used.
So
I'm
not
saying
a
50-meter
pool
is
gonna,
be
everything
to
everybody,
but
I
know
it'll
be
used
all
year
round
and
five
years
from
now,
we
have
a
50-meter
pool.
No
one's
gonna
second-guess
that
decision.
You
can
go
there
any
month
of
the
year
and
you
would
see
it
being
used
a
lot
so
I
wanted
to
leave
you
with
that
and
his
one
other
item.
AA
I
believe
this
is
a
study
session.
So
I
don't
know
if
the
decision
has
to
be
made
today
if
the
decision
is
made
today
in
support
of
a
50-meter
pool
I'm
all
for
it.
If
the
decision
today
is
not
as
supportive
a
50-meter
pool
I
ask
you
defer
it
put
an
agenda
for
a
decision,
so
so
we
have
another
shot
at
this.
Thank
you.
AA
A
E
Thank
you
so
I'm,
looking
at
all
these
diagrams
and
statistics
and
specs,
but
I,
don't
see
anything
about
people
in
any
of
these
things.
How
many
people
can
it
accommodate?
What
are
people
gonna
do
with
the
the
pool
deck?
What
are
people
are
gonna
do
on
the
lawn?
What
is
the
Park
and
recs
idea
of
this
area?
Is
that
something
that
somebody
canal
for
a
picnic
and
put
their
stuff
around
so
I'm
trying
to
get
a
better
sense
of
you
know
everybody's
looking
at
this
as
a
recreational
thing
and
but
they're
forgetting
the
people?
AB
Thing:
that's
not
a
problem
so
for
our
aquatic
programs
we'd
be
bringing
over
a
majority
of
our
program
so
via
the
recreation
swim
during
the
summer
season,
swim
lessons
during
spring
and
summer
we
would
have
lap
swim
year-round.
We
would
work
with
our
user
groups,
mountain
view
masters
and
the
Los
Altos
mountain
view,
aquatics
Club,
to
offer
their
swim
programs
and
also
offer
pool
rental
programs
and
the
opportunity
of
having
two
pools
in
one
facility,
as
well
as
a
community
room
inside
the
building
will
provide
us
with
some
opportunities
to
expand
our
facility
rental
program.
AB
AB
Currently,
people
swimming
for
a
lap
swim
is
three
to
four
people
circle
swimming
for
Perlane,
and
that
does
seem
to
get
a
little
credit.
Sometimes,
but
three
to
four
is
what's
most
comfortable
for
swim
lessons.
We
have
roughly
2500
youth
that
participate
in
some
lessons
in
the
spring
and
summer
sessions.
Lapsim
is
around
70
people
per
day
and
that's
a
combination
of
our
noon,
lap,
swim
and
our
evening
lap
some
program
as
well
as
our
weekends
and
then
recreation
swim
varies
but
I.
Believe.
Last
summer
we
had
around.
AB
E
My
concern
is
not
the
programs,
my
concerns
as
the
family
wants
to
come
down
on
a
hot
Saturday
and
use
them
pool
and
go
swimming.
You
have
it
programmed
so
I'm
looking
for
free
play,
free
swim
that
it's
you
know
a
couple
hours,
three
four
or
five
hours
instead
of
going
well,
we
can
squeeze
you
in
so
that.
AB
Would
be
the
recreation
swim
timeframe,
that
is
the
open
swim
program
currently
and
the
swim
hours
aren't
for
the
weekends
for
Eagle
pool
is
1:30
to
4:00
and
that
ranks
or
if
it's
1:30
to
6:00
p.m.
which
was
a
new
change.
With
summer
2019
we
expanded
those
hours
to
provide
more
open,
swim
time
I'm.
Also,
during
the
summer,
we
do
have
weekday
swim.
AB
That
is
catered
around
the
some
lessons
and
lap
swim
programs
with
the
opportunity
of
expanding
to
two
pools
on
one
site,
we'll
be
able
to
increase
concurrent
programming,
or
there
is
potential
opportunity
to
have
lap
swim
program
going
on
in
the
fast
water
pool
and
having
more
recreational
swim
going
on
in
the
leisure
pool,
especially
with
the
slide,
the
zero
depth
entry
and
the
potential
for
the
two
additional
lanes
that
would
be
associate
with
it.
So
there
are
options
to
look
at
you
in
concurrent
programming.
What's.
AB
It's
funny
that
you
say
that
so,
for
if
we
were
just
looking
at
ranks
or
pull
in
its
current
form,
and
one
of
the
programs
that
was
initiated
two
budget
cycles
ago
was
a
free
recreation
swim
when
there's
a
heat
advisory.
We
had
three
of
those
this
past
summer,
where
we
had
to
turn
people
away
because
of
the
increased
number
of
folks
wanting
to
utilize
the
pool
at
one
time
for
safety
purposes.
We
can
accommodate
between
150
to
200
people
during
the
Recreation
open
swim
as
well
as
generate
a
waitlist.
AB
So
as
people
leave
the
facility,
we
can
take
the
next
family
and
so
on
those
free
recreation.
Some
days
when
it
was
open
to
anybody,
we
had
roughly
450
people
come
through
during
the
recreation
swim
on
a
regular
recreation
swim
day.
Our
numbers
will
fluctuate
depending
whether
of
course,
and
between
I
would
say,
50
to
200
on
a
nice
warm
day
for
an
in
total
day.
So.
E
So
that's
parents,
okay
and
you're,
looking
at
the
current
capacity
right.
So
when
you
were
looking
at
these
capacities
and
and
the
various
programs
how
far
in
the
future,
were
you
looking
at
how
far
you
you're
looking
at
something
now
but
I
mean
we've
got
people
mentioned
years
down
and
then
we've
got
all
these
apartment
complexes
coming
up
we're
growing,
and
where
do
you
discuss
that
this
pool
will
handle
a
capacitor
I'm
still
trying
to
determine
your
capacity
in
5-10
years
that
all
of
a
sudden
you're
max
that
we
got
to
turn
people
away.
R
David
printed
with
Public,
Works,
I,
sorry
I,
think
to
your
question:
I
think
it
was
something
that
was
raised
at
the
PRC,
which
was
asking
staff
to
investigate
the
potential
for
opening
both
pools.
Concurrently,
we,
you
know
we
would
maintain
eagle,
pool
as
functional
just
not
open
year-round
and
so
to
your
question
of
you
know.
We
reached
the
capacity
point
that
secondary
pool
could
become
the
safety
valve
to
program
it
to
remain
open
longer.
You
know
at
certain
times
during
the
year,
if
that
was
determined,
to
be
advisable,
so.
E
What
is
the
capacity
I
mean?
If
you
have
you
looked
at
okay,
we
values
80,000.
Now
we
figure
in
10
years
it
could
be
90.
A
hundred
thousand.
Are
these
pools
gonna
be
able
to
handle
those
that
amount
of
people,
because,
if
you're
only
doing
200
or
300
at
the
time,
I'm
still
I'm
still
trying
to
grasp?
Where
were
what
we're
trying
to
achieve?
E
R
AB
E
AB
AB
Over
the
current
ring
circle
so
rings
are
pole.
Currently
has
six
lanes
option
two
would
be
moving
to
ten
lanes,
plus
the
two
additional
cooldown
lanes,
a
total
of
twelve
25-yard
lanes,
and
so
you
have
an
increase
of
six
lanes
that
would
be
available
compared
to
Eagle
pool.
Currently
there
are
eight
regulated
regulation,
25-yard
lanes
and
Soviet
net
increase
of
four
with
option
two.
So.
E
From
what
I
see
that
this
pool
is
really
designed
for
swimmers
and
not
necessarily
for
the
community
of
free
swim,
because
you
keeps
talking
about,
we
got
these
lanes,
we
can
handle
that
so
I'm
still
trying
to
and
I'm
getting
the
sense
that
it's
more
designed
to
accommodate
swimmers
and
clubs
and
so
forth,
versus
the
community
as
a
whole
and
that's
a
comment.
So
I
won't
go
there.
But,
okay,
if
we
went
with
option
three,
would
that
give
you
more
flexibility?
E
AB
Water
and
could
accommodate
more
people
entering
the
facility
during
recreation,
open,
swim
program
times,
just
like
with
option
two.
There
is
still
the
option
to
hog
concurrent
programming,
it's
just
in
a
different,
slightly
different
fashion,
and
there
are
ways
that
we've
seen
other
facilities
operate
and,
where
they've
and
say
dictated
that
lanes,
one
through
five
we're
going
to
be
for
one
user
group
or
for
one
programmer
lane.
Six
through
ten
could
be
utilized
for
another
program.
AB
R
Note
excuse
me
that
with
option
three,
however,
you
have
a
reduced
buffer
zone
around
the
pool.
You
could
increase
it,
but
you
would
be
encroaching
further
into
the
park
and
so
that's
a
choice
to
be
made.
There
would
be
some
pressure
to
increase
the
buffer
zone.
The
green
zone
around
say:
option
three
beyond
the
current
diagram
are
showing.
If
that
was
a
desire
and.
E
Has
you
know,
I
had
some
friends
that
wanted
to
sign
up
for
swim
lessons
and
it
was
they
fill
up
pretty
quick?
Yes,
so
that's
one
thing,
but
is
there,
do
you
see
a
demand
for
free
swim
or
is
it
that
this
facility?
That's
one
question
that
ties
into
the
other
one?
The
facility
wasn't,
the
most
pleasing
facility,
some
might
say,
are
welcoming
the
location
so
forth.
Do
you
think
with
this
new
facility
will
have
more
community
people
wanting
to
come?
E
AB
I
would
think
that
the
the
new
facility
will
attract
more
folks
to
this
this
park
and
to
the
cEPAL.
One
example
is
the
most
recent
renovation
of
the
Mountain
View
community
center,
and
it
was
very
similar
fashion
prior
to
the
renovation
and
since
then,
we've
seen
a
significant
increase
in
the
number
of
user
groups
of
enrollment
for
winter
programs
has
skyrocketed
over
previous
seasons
and
we've
also
seen
more
folks
that
are,
you
know,
having
their
special
moments,
their
their
weddings,
their
baby
showers
or
engagement
parties.
AB
We
anticipate
a
very
similar
effort
taking
place
over
every
surf
pool.
We
feel
that
enrollment
will
increase
first,
one
lessons
held
at
that
facility
that
we
will
have
a
larger
number
for
recreation
opens
Swim,
especially
with
the
features
that
could
be
planned
for
the
second
leisure
pool,
as
well
as
an
opportunity
in
options,
two
and
three
to
increase
lap,
swim
and
so
many
opportunities
in
general.
My.
E
Projections
of
some
of
the
costs
we
already
know
the
mountains,
use
16:05
and
that's
the
very
low
end.
How
would
we
interpret
these
design?
Numbers
are
constant.
Was
it
the
operational
dollars?
And
so
we
know
that's
down
the
road
you
were
given
cost
of
operating
so
was
that,
based
on
the
16
dollars
for.
AB
The
hourly
wages-
yes
at
the
time
that
we
commissioned
the
report
staff
was
not
aware
that
there
was
going
to
be
an
increase
as
a
January
1
to
the
16:05,
and
we
anticipate
that
when
we
do
come
back
for
operating
costs
for
this
facility,
based
off
of
whichever
design
is
selected,
that
we
will
do
a
further
dive
into
the
operational
model
and
that
would
be
presented
through
the
fiscal
year.
22
23
budget
process.
AB
F
Following
up
on
some
of
councilmember
McCallister's
questions
when
you're
talking
about
area
4,
as
you
were
saying
the
community
to
do
swimming
recreational
leisure
I
was
comparing
the
the
900
square
feet.
That's
there
now
to
its
2,000
square
feet
under
option
1
and
3,
but
30
360
square
feet
in
option
2.
So
that's
a
huge
increase
in
the
amount
of
area
so
am.
AB
I
reading
that
correctly,
so
four
ranks
are
pull
than
nine
hundred
square
feet
is
a
toddler
size,
wading
pool
currently,
and
so
during
recreation.
Swim
at
that
facility,
both
the
the
wading
pool,
as
well
as
the
large
pool,
is
utilized
to
accommodate
both
programs.
Okay,
but
yes,
option
two
is
an
increased
leisure
water
pool.
Okay,
how.
F
AB
AC
I,
may
we
are
aware
that
there
are
some
Foothill
DeAnza
is
available
for
rental,
some
of
our
existing
groups.
Do
you
take
advantage
of
that
50
meter
pool
at
a
time
when
we
were
looking
for
some
wondering
what
we
could
do
as
far
as
if
one
of
our
pools
does
go
down,
looking
for
some
additional
capacity,
we
did
reach
out
to
st.
Francis
at
the
time
they
were
saying
they
did
not
have
any
additional
times
available.
AC
F
So
we
heard
from
mr.
Pollard
annatto
that
he
swam
there,
but
that
was
part
of
an
organized
group
right,
okay,
okay
and
then
my
other
question
is
I
know
this
just
was
a
first
cut
conceptual
kind
of
thing,
but
do
we
have
any
estimates
on
the
amount
of
encroachment
into
the
park
for
the
different
options?
Even
a
relative
amount
like
option,
two
is
25
percent
more
than
current
and
option.
Three
is
forty
percent
more.
Do
we
have
any
guests.
R
Ipods,
I
don't
have
numbers
for
you,
I
mean
the
intent
I'll,
give
you
the
intent
behind
why
those
options
are
arranged
as
such
as
they
are.
The
intent
was
to
try
to
minimize
and
and
they're
all
fairly
close
in
the
diagrams.
You
can
see
a
background
image
showing
the
outline
of
the
existing
park
just
for
relative
purposes.
R
What
I
would
say
is,
for
example,
you
go
back
to
option
one.
It
probably
has
the
most
flexibility
to
say
avoid,
say
a
heritage
tree
or
so
we
could.
You
know,
like
the
currently
does,
as
a
fairly
doesn't
have
a
rectilinear
shape,
and
so
it
could
be
shaped
more
freely
when
you
get
to
the
larger
pools,
such
as
option
three,
those
opportunities
or
less,
and
you
have
more
constriction,
it
really
comes
down
to
the
direction
we
receive
in
terms
of
how
much
buffer
space
around
the
pools
is
desired.
If
say,
option
three
were
gone
with.
R
Would
they
like
it
to
look
more
like
option
two
and
have
a
greater
amount
of
green
space
than
is
shown?
Currently,
those
are
all
questions
that
we
would
have
to
evaluate
during
the
conceptual
design
phase.
So
I
guess
I
want
to
preface
and
say
something
I
failed
to
mention
earlier
in
the
presentation
which
is
we're
not
designing
the
facility
here,
we're
just
selecting
which
direction
to
go.
We
will
be
coming
back
to
both
the
PRC
and
Council
in
the
coming
months,
with
more
fleshed
out
designs
and
options
within
that
scope.
R
N
So
before
I
ask
my
questions:
I
wanted
to
compliment
staff.
I
thought
the
the
report
was
very
clear
and
and
complete
and
also
Els
has
a
one
to
compliment.
Whoever
chose
them
as
an
architectural
firm
because
they
I've
been
they
work
out
of
Berkeley,
where
I
went
to
school
and
I've
been
following
them.
A
bit
and
I
really
respect
their
work,
so
I'm
sure
they'll
they'll
turn
out
a
good
product.
N
N
It's
only
conceptual
is
that
true,
true,
okay,
good
and
then
I
noticed
that
the
third
that
there's
that
it's
very
different
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
if
we're
gonna,
do
recreational
swimming
in
terms
of
the
amount
like
when
I've
done,
recreational
swimming
with
my
kids
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
and
out
of
the
pool
and
sitting
around
the
sidelines
and
that
option
three
to
me
did
not
left
hardly
any
room
for
that
and
it
also
it
was.
The
borders
were
so
close
to
the
large
edge
of
the
larger
pool.
That
I
didn't
understand.
N
I
know
it's
only
conceptual,
but
it
looked
like
it
might
be,
not
completely
safe
or
not
completely
easy.
I
know
you
don't
run
around
the
pole,
but
for
a
lot
of
people
to
walk
around
the
pool,
and
so
that
that
it
looked
to
me
like
that
option
had
was
the
most
likely
to
expand
even
further
than
in
the
picture
into
the
into
the
rest
of
the
park
and
I'm
wondering
unless
we
wanted
to
keep
those
margins.
Very
slim
am
I.
Seeing
that
right
is
that
the
potential
correct.
AC
So
in
each
of
the
diagrams
there
is
the
the
outline
of
the
existing
fence
line
that
you
can
use
as
a
reference
point
for
the
existing
pool.
So
in
this
in
option
3,
what
we're
showing
is
a
pretty
small
boundary
on
what
would
be
the
south
side
of
the
pool,
and
that
is
to
try
to
limit
the
encroachment
into
the
park
area.
And
so,
if
option
3
is
chosen
through
the
next
design
phase,
we
would
be
bringing
back
different
options
for
you
to
look
at.
AC
Some
may
actually
be
encroaching
further
into
the
park
so
that
we
can
increase
the
amount
of
space
around
the
pool.
But
currently
we
were
showing
the
minimum
amount
required
just
to
have
a
safe
location
for
our
lifeguards
and
possibly
some
circulation
around.
It
would
be
very
tight
and
given
the
design,
as
shown
and
in
the
report,
yeah.
N
I
mean,
in
my
opinion,
it
doesn't
really
provide
for
good
recreation,
the
fun
water,
but
that's
getting
to
comments.
I,
guess,
I
think
it
would
have
to
extend
more
into
the
park.
So
my
my
last
question
is
the
potential
for
the.
N
Potential
for
expansion
at
some
point
at
Eagle
pool
because
I
have
to
say
that
Park
is
very
different,
I
find
it,
except
for
during
soccer
I
live
near
there,
I
passed
by
it
all
the
time.
It's
fairly
underused.
Nobody
wants,
unlike
renter
Park,
where
people
want
to
walk
people,
it's
full
of
people
walking.
Nobody
wants
to
walk
around
the
middle
of
vehicle
park
and
if
I
were
to
put
in
a
50
meter
pool
on
that's
where
I
would
put
it
and
is
there
any
possibility
of
that?
Or
what
are
your
comments
on
that.
AC
Any
remodel
or
renovation
of
Eagle
Park
pool
has
not
been
discussed.
The
facility
itself
is
in
good
operational
condition.
It
has
not
been
listed
as
a
even
unfunded
project
within
the
city's
capital
improvement
project.
So
right
now
we
have
not
looked
at
that
as
an
option
down
the
road.
There
could
be
an
option
to
look
at
that
with
associated
parking
and
circulation.
It
may
be
viable,
but
we
have
not
done
any
research
into
how
well
that
would
work.
Okay,.
G
Thank
you
a
lot
of
really
good
and
helpful
questions.
I
only
have
one
and
my
apologies
if
this
is
answered
somewhere
else,
but
the
staff
answers
to
the
council.
Questions
indicated
that
there
are
there's
a
roughly
4.5
million
dollars
as
uncommitted
balance
in
the
park.
Man,
dedication
fund
and
it
wasn't
really
cleared
so
we
have
enough
money
to
pay
for
any
of
these
options,
but
it
wasn't
clear
to
me
whether
if
we
did,
you
know,
option
two
or
option
three
of
whether
that
would
eat
into
the
uncommitted
balance.
G
AC
G
A
You
I
had
a
couple
of
questions,
see
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
heard
correctly
in
terms
of
so
eagle.
Pull
would
become
the
seasonal
pole,
but
at
some
point
in
time,
if
we
did
reach
capacity,
we
could
look
at
making
both
around
pools.
Is
that
correct?
That
is.
AB
AB
And
so
from
our
I'm
usage
of
the
pools,
the
primary
and
non-resident
cities
would
come
from
Los
Altos,
Santa,
Clara,
Palo,
Alto,
Cupertino
and
and
a
little
small
amount
from
San
Jose
but
majority
in
Sunnyvale,
yes,
I'm,
saying
yeah.
The
majority
would
be
coming,
though,
from
our
most
surrounding
neighbors,
but.
AB
A
AB
A
A
And
we,
you
know,
we've
just
assisted
with
Los
Altos,
School,
District
and
purchasing
their
school,
and
you
know
their
ship
was
supposed
to
be
shared
use
of
their
facilities
and
like
have
we
thought
about
talking
with
them
about
building
a
larger
pool
there
yeah
have
we
explored
other
options
for
other
locations
if
we
need
a
50-meter
pool
so.
AC
In
relation
to
a
50-meter
pool,
I
think
the
the
shared
use
with
the
school
would
not
help
what
the
residents
that
you
heard
from
tonight
would
be
helping
due
to
the
the
school
time
availability
day.
Time
are
our
laps
swim
when
we
have
a
large
number
of
users
is
during
that
lunch
time
and
an
afternoon,
so
the
availability
of
that
50
meter
pool
at
a
school
site
would
be
limited.
Hopefully
we
would.
If
we
could
come
to
some
agreement,
there
would
be
some
summer
time
opportunities,
I,
don't
know
what
their
current
use
is.
AC
I
know
that
there's
there
are
some
other
user
groups
that
do
use
the
pools,
but
I
just
don't
know
what
they're
there
availabilities
is
at
the
moment
in
relation
to
negotiations
with
the
Los
Altos
School
District.
As
of
now
it's
my
understanding
that
it
was
direction
to
be
comparable
to
the
existing
middle
school
location,
so
a
shared
track
field
and
then
gymnasium,
but
a
pool
itself
has
not
been
discussed
as
far
as
I
know,.
A
AB
Yeah,
the
70
outreaches
throughout
the
day.
So
that's
a
combination
of
the
noon,
time,
which
is
really
a
10:30
a.m.
to
1:00
p.m.
swim
time
slot
and
then
the
evening
hours
which
is
1630
p.m.
and
pending
the
swim
Eric.
They
could
be
swimming
for
thirty
minutes
to
an
hour
depending
on
their
style
of
workout,
and
so
it's
not
70
people
all
at
once,
but
it's
throughout
the
time.
King
mm-hmm
all.
E
One
question
for
John:
so,
with
the
cost
of
the
police,
talk
about
cost
recovery.
Are
we
trying
to
talk
about
the
in
relations
of
fees
that
we
charge
people?
Would
that
be
based
on
the
construction
of
the
new
pool
or
just
in
our
standard
scheme
of
things
that
we're
gonna
say
well,
this
is
what
we're
gonna
get
it.
AC
A
Great,
so
I
think
we
are
done
with
questions.
It
looks
like
so
my
thought
was
to
ask
the
question
number
one
question
with
this
show
of
hands
and
then
to
is
a
little
bit
more
open-ended,
but
I
could
I
could
and
entertain
overall
general
comments.
First,
if
you
want
to
dive
into
that.
N
You
know
people
without
green
space
in
their
in
their
housing,
and
many
of
them
live
in
apartments
without
without
pools
or
recreational
facilities
as
well
and
I
so
and
I've
seen
them
at
at
all
times
the
day
that
I've
been
there
so
I
I
feel
that
we
need
to
be
sensitive
to
that.
I
also
feel
that
if
we
are
trying
to
do
the
fun
water
that
the
way
it's
it's
drawn,
currently
an
option.
N
Three:
it's
not
really
very
pleasant
so
that
I
feel
that
if
I
were
designing
it
to
be
pleasant,
I
would
want
to
push
it
out
into
the
park
much
more
and
I'm
hesitant
to
do
that.
So
I
just
feel
like
it's,
not
the
right
place
for
a
50-meter
pool.
If
we're
really
going
to
be
serving
that
community
and
I
think
that
rinks
turf
Park
should
be
a
community
serving
you
know
really
serving
the
local
residents
I.
N
L
N
F
So
I
also
am
leaning
toward
option
2
for
the
same
reasons
that
councilmember
Hicks,
articulated
I
did
have
a
couple
of
other
comments,
though
I
do
like
that
all
the
options
have
two
pools
and
I.
Definitely
like
the
increase
in
the
amount
of
leisure
water
in
option.
Two
I
would
suggest
that
we
take
a
look
at
on
the
days
when
we
open
the
pools
for
free
for
use
when
it's
hot
days
that
perhaps
that's
limited
to
residents
only
so
that
we're
not
turning
away
residents
I'd
rather
be
turning
away
non-residents.
F
If
we're
gonna
turn.
Anyone
away.
I
also
think
that,
as
was
mentioned
in
the
ballard
king
report,
that
we
should
potentially
take
a
look
at
the
fees
and
see
whether
or
not
we
want
to
tweak
those,
especially
for
non-residents,
and
so
that
we
had
greater
cost
recovery
and
probably
my
biggest
concern
with
any
of
the
options
is
encroaching
on
the
park
park.
F
Space
is
so
scarce
in
a
way
we're
still
trying
to
get
to
the
metric
of
three
acres
per
thousand
people
and
we're
not
there
everywhere
and
we
are
we
have
taken
and
we
have
plans
to
take
even
more
space
from
Reinsdorf
with
the
magical
bridge
playground.
We
took
some
I
think
for
the
community
center,
the
pickleball
courts,
and
it's
like
the.
When
do
you
say
we
can't
continue
to
do
that,
because
that
park
is
heavily
used
in
the
green
area
for
walking
playing
ball
all
kinds
of
activities.
F
You
know
if
there
was
a
way
to
do
the
50-meter
and
not
take
away
park.
Space
I
I'd
be
much
more
open
to
that.
My
concern
is,
though,
that
at
least
how
its
drawn
here
and
I
get
that
these
are
just
conceptual.
You
know
there
isn't
a
lot
of
space
around
that
and
I
think
there
should
be,
and
there
definitely
needs
to
be
spaced
around
the
leisure
pool
for
folks
to
just
hang
out
if
their
children
are
in
the
pool
or
they're
taking
a
break
or
they're
just
enjoying
some
time
there.
F
B
E
I
am
also
very
concerned
about
the
park
encroachments
if
Donna
lecher
was
here,
he'd
be
all
over
us
on
this
one,
so
shout
out
to
dawn
ledger
for
keeping
us
honest,
yeah,
but
the
reason
I'm
looking
at
three
is
we
haven't
tied.
You
know,
I,
keep
talking
about
the
people,
freeze,
free,
swim
and
so
forth,
and
I
think
that
if
we're
gonna
do
this,
we're
gonna
do
I
have
to
see
us.
Do
it
big
and
allow
a
lot
of
people
to
come
enjoy
it.
E
I
do
have
concerns
about
the
grass
area,
it's
a
little
small
and
it
needs
to
be
bigger,
but
for
three
million
dollars
we
should
be
looking
down
the
road.
It's
not
that
much
of
a
bigger
investment
and
I'm,
not
thinking
of
the
swimmers
or
all
the
programs
I'm
thinking
about
the
ever
gay
residents.
That
will
have
the
opportunity
to
go.
There
I
think
we'll
open
up
more
swim.
Lessons
and
people
get
out
there
enjoy
it.
There
was
a
talk
about
well.
E
If
one
pool
closes
well
we're
in
a
bad
situation,
so
at
least
if
we
go
with
a
bigger
pool
and
so
Eagle
Park
decides
to
do
some
kind
of
remodeling
or
something
goes
down,
we
still
have
capacity
to
to
handle
the
crowds
and
I
think
in
the
long
run
we
I
think
we
need
the
space
I.
Think
it's
more
gives
us
more
flexiblity,
more
options.
E
Maybe-
and
the
fee
is
important
too,
but
I
wasn't
I'm,
not
looking
at
the
fee
I'm
trying
to
get
people
to
come
out
and
enjoy
it
and
I,
don't
know,
I
think
a
crowd
can
come
out
on
a
hot
day.
There's
a
synergy.
People
feel
comfortable,
but
again
you
have
to
do
the
the
grass
around
it
and
so
forth
and
yeah.
It
does
go
into
the
park
a
little
bit
but
again,
I
think
it
gives
us
more
flexibility.
E
A
K
Mayor
great,
thank
you,
so
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
thank
staff.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
your
report.
I
want
to
thank
the
public.
We
got
so
many
emails
on
this
topic
and
your
public
comment
today
is
really
helpful
and
so
I
don't
want
to
kind
of
reiterate
points
that
I've
already
heard.
So
what
I'll
do
is
instead
say
some
of
the
ideas
and
the
concerns
brought
up
by
councilmember
Hicks
I
matichek
are
ones
that
I
have
as
well
and
so
from
for
Mia
I
feel
torn
I.
K
Think
we
do
need
to
be
forward-looking
as
option.
Three
is
a
kind
of
where
we
now
as
a
city
and
so
I
want
to
maybe
have
a
little
bit
more
information
with
when
this
item
comes
back
about
demand
and
capacity,
so
would,
for
example,
opening
Eagle
to
year-round
help
with
the
demand
that
we
have
and
in
terms
of
access
to
the
pool
versus
going
towards
the
50
meter
pool
I'd,
just
like
a
little
bit
more
information
on
that.
K
If
that
could
be
an
option,
you
know
I
think
the
of
kind
of
place
making
and
how
Eagle
might
be
one
that
can
facilitate
the
50-meter
as
councilmember
Hicks
was
saying
versus
kind
of
the
the
personality
and
character
of
Reinsdorf
is
one
that
I
also
thought
of,
but
given
that
we
just
kind
of
have
done
all
these
renovations
I
know
that
that
might
be
something
that
we
would
plan
for
in
the
future.
Is
that
a
possibility?
M
Coming
into
tonight,
yeah
I
I
generally
felt
that
just
with
the
community
focused
orientation
of
ring,
Stewart
Park
and
the
existing
facilities
that
that
option
probably
made
the
most
sense,
I
and
part
of
my
thought
there
was.
You
know
if
we
didn't
want
to
do
a
facility
that
was
more
more
of
a
sort
of
regional
draw,
draw
beyond
mountain
view
that
you,
that
would
be
the
sort
of
facility
that
we
might
look
at
putting
in
as
a
new.
M
Some
day
whether
it
be
in
north
north
bayshore
or
where
there's
a
lot
of
development
going
on
or
or
East
Wisman.
Frankly,
if
a
large
community
serving
Park
were
to
were
to
materialize
there,
we
could
program
it
and
maybe
have
an
additional
aquatics
facility.
There
I
think
I
am
open
to
studying
option
3
we're
doing
a
conceptual
plan
there,
but
I
think
the
only
way
that
I
would
support.
M
That
would
be
if
we,
if
the
concept
allowed
us
to
sort
of
look
at
sort
of
what
you've
laid
out
here,
but
some
different
options
for
the
the
buffer
zones,
so
that
we
can
make
it
a
determination
about
ok,
even
with
the
least
even
with
the
least
amount
of
buffer.
That's
too
much
encroachment
and
sort
of
reverting
back
to
something
more
like
option,
2
that
draws
the
process
out
and
it
creates
more
work,
but
also
in
my
mind,
you
know
this
isn't
like
the
thing
that
has
to
start
this
year.
M
Then
then
I
could
see
supporting
doing
a
conceptual
plan
for
option
3
but
I
think
that's
the
only
that's,
probably
the
only
approach
that
I'd
be
comfortable.
Doing
that
otherwise
I
think
option.
2
probably
makes
the
most
sense
unless
we
want
to
go
down
the
path
of
doing
a
concept
for
option
3
and
then
being
prepared
to
sort
of
revert.
If
we,
if
we're
just
uncomfortable
at
the
general
level
of
encroachment,
that
also
creates
more
work
and
more
time
so
I'm
I'm.
G
You
I'm
struggling
with
this
one
I,
was
impressed
with
the
the
community
support
released,
the
number
of
emails
and
incumbents
that
we've
received
in
support
of
option,
3
and
I.
Think
that's
that,
as
several
members
of
the
council
had
expressed
I,
think
that's
something
we
should
explore.
If
there
was
opportunities
with
redevelopment
or
you
know
at
Eagle,
Park
I'm
comfortable
with
exploring
you
know,
other
other
ideas
and
I.
G
What
option
three
appears
to
provide?
But
you
know
I
I
would
challenge
you.
Councilmember
Clark
I
probably
use
the
Aquatic
Center
less
than
you
so
I'm.
Also
not
you
know
really
in
the
best
position
to
say
you
know:
I'll
largely
be
deferential
to
staff
I.
Think
on
where
we're
we're
identifying
that
the
need
it's
just
about
figuring
out.
How
can
we
address
the
need
within
our
community
best?
So
not
a
post
option.
G
Three
at
all,
I
think
I
think
you
know
finding
a
location
for
a
50-meter
pool
at
some
point,
whether
it's
rang
store
for
Eagle
or
or
you
know,
when
one
of
the
the
areas
that
you
know
the
change
areas
in
the
city
I
think
I'd
like
to
get
there.
But
you
know,
based
on
the
recommendations
provided
by
staff
and
the
analysis
that
we've
been
provided
so
far,
option
to
make
sense,
at
least
for
now.
A
Would
you
mind
if
I
chimed
in?
Thank
you,
so
thank
you
to
staff
for
the
report
and
thank
you
for
to
members
of
the
public
for
coming
to
speak
as
well
as
all
the
emails
who've
received,
I
I.
A
A
But
you
know
you
get
by,
and
so
when
I
was
looking
at
this
being
ranked
store
pool,
the
location
is
very
key
to
me
and
I
agree
with
my
colleagues
who
say
who
mentioned
that
you
know
it's
a
community
park.
I
also
feel
that
we've
really
programmed
a
lot
at
that
Park,
which
is
great
it's
being
fully
used,
but
my
concerns
with
a
larger
pool
at
this
time
as
the
encroachment
into
the
park
facilities
as
well
as
like.
If
we
did
that
I
was
thinking,
do
we
need
to
look
at
parking
or
parking
spaces?
A
You
know
and
there's
something
at
the
community
center
it's
hard
to
find
parking
as
it
is
with
a
larger
Poole,
and
this
is
what
I
guess.
I
was
thinking.
You
know
it's
a
community
pool,
maybe
the
smaller
sizes
and
like
maybe
we
look
at
more
or
an
open
opening,
Eagle
pool,
but
it's
much
to
me
a
much
more
community
oriented
pool
rather
than
a
competitive
pool,
I've
been
to
50-meter
pool
facilities
and
when
I
have
two
little
kids,
it's
intimidating
to
go
in
there.
So
maybe
you
can
fit
more
people,
but
I
guess.
A
Who
said
maybe
Eagle
Park
is
a
better
location
or
frankly,
as
our
community
grows,
you
know,
I
say
I
have
been
thinking.
We
do
need
to
look
at
more
facilities.
You
know,
I
had
looked
at
San
Antonio
being
being
satisfied,
hopefully
with
the
loss
of
school
district
you
know,
lands
there,
I,
don't
know
where.
Maybe
it's
worth
us
going
back
and
talking
to
them
about
a
pool
or
but
you
know
the
Whisman
area
is
in
need
of
facilities.
A
So
those
are
areas
that
I'm
thinking
of
down
the
road
where
we
would
need
to
add
more
facilities,
and
at
that
point
in
time
perhaps
we
can
look
at
a
larger
size
pool
I
also
was
thinking
shoreline
park.
You
know
so
I
think
there
are
other
options
and
you
know
and
I
know
folks.
Think
or
might
it
be
thinking
this
since
1959
so
was
sixty
years?
I,
probably
I
think
we're
probably
gonna
be
discussing
this
and
we
won't
be
I'm
sixty
years
from
now,
and
my
concern
is
actually
the
other
way
around.
B
A
Might
miss
our
opportunity
in
light
of
where
we
are
economically
so
yes,
three
million
dollars
may
not
seem
that
much
more
but
I
guess.
My
question
is
you
know,
given
the
financial
outlook
I'm,
not
even
sure,
if
we'll
have
that
so
I'd
like
to
just
get
going
on
this
project
and
get
it
done
and
then
we
can
look
at
the
next.
You
know
the
next
step,
so
I'm
yeah,
so
I
would
prefer
option
two.
For
those
reasons.
I
do
agree
with
some
of
the
comments
councillor
matichek
mentioned.
A
You
know
this
is
always
it's
been
a
pet
peeve
of
mine
over
the
years.
I
know
that
you
know
I
think
it's
important
that
our
facilities
are
open
to
everybody,
but
considering
that
some
of
our
neighboring
cities
don't
even
have
certain
facilities,
especially
with
these
joint
sports
programs.
We've
carried
the
load
with
you
know,
Little,
League
and
softball,
and
it
was
slim
teen.
A
A
A
F
I
just
wanted
to
add
you
know:
we've
talked
a
little
bit
about,
maybe
there's
another
place
in
the
city
to
put
a
50-meter
pool.
I,
don't
know
if
any
of
you
have
had
discussions.
I'm
assuming
you
have
with
some
of
the
major
property
owners
in
different
areas
like
North,
Bay,
Shore,
nice
Whitman,
but
I've
certainly
had
the
conversation
with
at
least
well.
That's
the
three
major
property
owners
in
the
East
women
area
and
one
of
them
specifically
mentioned
that
they
thought
it
would
be
nice
to
have
a
pool
in
that
area.
F
So
I
think
we
could
potentially
talk
to
them
about
making
it
a
50
meter,
pole
and
in
North
Bay
sure
their
that
property
owner
in
the
gateway
has
talked
quite
a
bit
about
having
a
Sports
Club
and
the
one
that
I
toured
in
San.
Jose
had
a
lot
of
pools,
I'm,
not
sure
if
any
of
them
were
50
meters,
but
they
had
lots
of
pools.
Maybe
we
could
talk
to
them
about
a
50
meter
pool
there.
I.
A
All
right,
very
good
good,
thank
you,
which
accounts
like
to
take
a
ten-minute
break.
Yes,
we
have
one
who's
already
doing
it
so
we'll
take
it
fake.
Thank
you.
AD
The
primary
transit
shuttle
services
that
we
examined
included
the
Mountain
View
community
shuttle,
the
in
Vigo
shuttle
routes
operated
by
the
transportation
management
association
and
the
Valley
Transportation
Authority
our
VTA
bus
routes,
and
how
they
interconnect
and
serve
the
entirety
of
the
city
of
Mount
View.
In
relation
to
also
the
light
rail
system
and
Cal
train
system
in
this
map
kind
of
gives
you
a
sense
of
the
coverage
of
the
existing
transit
and
shuttle
services.
AD
AD
You
have
the
greatest
need
for
transit
and
the
greatest
likelihood
for
transit,
ridership
and
developed
a
transit
propensity
map
also
included
an
analysis
of
the
current
shuttle
and
transit
services
conducted
a
wide
reaching
community
survey
and
stakeholder
interviews
after
producing
a
report,
and
that
was
shared
off
agenda
with
the
council
in
the
community
in
November.
With
the
results
of
this
initial
research
phase,
the
project
moved
on
to
looking
at
potential
service
improvements
and
strategies
which
have
been
documented
in
your
council
report,
along
with
a
consultant
report
that
is
attached
to
your
council
report
tonight.
AD
In
addition,
we
started
looking
at
the
future
operations
for
the
community
shuttle,
taking
into
account
googles
request
and
our
plans
to
transition
the
operating
of
the
community
shuttle
from
Google
as
City
responsibility
based
on
the
result.
The
results
of
the
Shuttle
study,
which
are
documented
in
your
report
staff,
is
recommending
the
following
related
to
the
community
shuttle
develop
a
two-year
agreement
with
the
transportation
management
Association
for
management
and
operations
of
the
community
shuttle.
AD
Effective
July
1st
2020
do
not
make
any
changes
in
the
shuttle
route
and
hours
during
this
transition
period
to
allow
the
new
management
operations
to
settle
in
and
make
sure
that
we're
not
adversely
affecting
our
existing
riders.
As
we
do,
this
transition
consider
expanding
service
hours
in
2021.
We
feel
that
this
might
be.
This
would
be
the
most
cost
effective
biggest
bang
for
the
buck.
Change
that
we
can
make
to
the
community
shuttle
in
the
near
term.
AD
Look
at
possibly
single
brandings
so
that
we're
not
confusing
our
community
with
two
different
free
fare
open
to
the
public
shuttle
systems
and
what
we
can
do
to
through
this
integration,
to
increase
overall
utilization
and
availability
of
our
shuttle
services
so
based
on
those
recommendations.
These
are
the
questions
can't
ask
to
have,
has
for
Council
tonight.
First,
as
council
support
staffs
recommendation
for
the
community
shuttle,
as
laid
out
on
the
previous
slide.
AD
Many
of
these
all
these
items
come
with
costs
and
before
staff
spent
a
lot
of
time
delving
in
doing
a
lot
of
research
into
them.
We
needed
a
sense
from
the
council
which
ones
interested
you
that
you
thought
was
worthwhile
first
to
have
to
put
time
into
it,
so
we've
laid
them
out
the
three
options
that
were
put
in
the
report
here
and
we'd
appreciate
hearing
from
you
tonight,
which
of
these
you
would
like
staff
to
take
a
deeper
dive,
investigate
and
potentially
come
back
to
you
with
recommendations.
AD
The
same
is
true
for
pricing
and
marketing
strategies.
Are
there
any
of
these
that
you
would
like
staff
to
take
a
deeper
dive
and
potentially
come
back
to
you
with
recommendations,
and
our
final
question
tonight
is:
is
there
anything
else
regarding
the
community
shuttle
service
and
our
operational
options,
you
would
like
staff
to
take
into
consideration
as
we
move
forward
with
the
future
of
the
community
shuttle.
So
that
concludes
staffs
rec
presentation
and
we're
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
You
have
great.
A
AE
Thank
you
very
much
cliff
chambers,
the
resident
of
Mountain
View,
also
with
the
Mountain
View
Coalition
for
sustainable
planning
and
Michael
apron
s'en
submitted
a
letter
on
our
behalf
and
on
I.
Won't
repeat
all
the
points
there
I
just
like
to
make
a
couple
of
of
key
points.
First
off
thanks
Don
for
an
excellent
presentation.
I
think
the
staff
report
really
sets
out
a
good
array
of
options.
AE
AE
I've
used
it
occasionally,
and
it's
very,
very
well
utilized
the
fact
that
it
gets
27
passengers
hour
is
incredible
for
such
a
service
and
certainly
I,
think
the
highest
priority
is
the
financial
sustainability
of
that
service
and
I
think
we
have
a
great
deal
of
gratitude
to
Google
for
funding
this
over
this
long
period
of
time
and
extending
it
so
I
really
want
to
thank
them
in
terms
of
the
comments.
The
terms
of
the
staff
recommendations,
I
think
I
generally
support
them.
AE
I
just
have
a
couple
of
questions:
there
there's
probably
a
lot
of
value
to
doing
a
contract
with
the
TMA,
but
I'm
always
there.
There
are
a
lot
of
different
vendors
out
there
that
provide
transit
management
services
that
could
provide
even
more
value,
so
I
always
like
to
see
some
sort
of
competitive
bid
for
those
types
of
of
services.
The
other
thing
is
is
when
we
did
approve
measure
P,
and
there
was
a
great
deal
of
support
for
it.
AE
I
think
there
was
an
expectation
of
just
like
at
the
pool
thinking
a
little
bit
bigger
in
terms
of
the
types
of
improvements,
not
just
increasing
the
hours,
but
when
the
environmental
sustainability
task
force
was
going
about
its
business,
we
wanted
more
frequency.
We
want
more
opportunities
for
the
public.
The
the
schedule
right
now
between
10
and
8:10
a.m.
and
6
p.m.
AE
is
limited
I'd
really
like
to
see,
for
example,
on
a
Friday
Saturday
having
longer
hours
up
till
like
9
o'clock
with
frequencies,
even
though
it's
a
pilot
project
getting
some
grant
funding
to
test
what
kind
of
ridership
could
you
get
with
15-minute
frequencies
during
those
really
peak
times
and
I?
Think
that
would
open
it
up
to
a
much
broader
market
in
Mountain
View.
Besides
that
people
who
really
depend
on
transit
and
really
use
it
heavily,
it
would
broaden
the
market
to
more
residents
within
Mountain
View.
AE
L
C
A
M
M
Think
I
support
all
of
staff's
recommendations.
I
initially
thought.
No,
maybe
it
made
more
sense
to
do
some
additional
expansion
now
versus
later,
but
I
think
once
you
start
looking
at
how
all
the
different
timelines
line
up
in
terms
of
the
success
that
M
Vigo
has
had
and
with
with
their
employer
shuttles
and
the
opportunity
to
sort
of
integrate
them
as
a
service
provider
into
this.
M
So
I
think
for
me
the
most
important
thing
that
it
makes
sense
to
change
the
go
ahead
and
expand
the
hours
now.
I
think
we
can
also
do
an
analysis
after
that
to
see
what
the
ridership
changes
are,
because
that
may
attract
some
additional
students
or
additional
first
and
last
mile
users
that
we
don't
currently
serve
today
and
then
my
understanding
is
that
there
may
be
an
opportunity
through
if
we
were
successful
with
M
V
go
to
look
at.
M
So
it's
a
long
way
of
saying
I
think
all
the
staff
recommendations
make
sense
right
now,
the
only
first
and
last
mile
strategies
that
I
think
I
want
staff
to
maybe
spend
time
on
in
the
near
term
and
maybe
not
even
the
the
immediate
need
term
the
the
one
strategy
that
piqued
my
interest
was:
perhaps
the
the
VTA
pique
tripperz
and
sort
of
supplementing
some
of
some
of
those
frequencies
and
routes,
but
I,
don't
feel
super
strongly
about
that.
But
that's
really
the
only
I
think
the
I'm
not
sure
deonda.
M
M
You
know
whether
it's
a
shuttle
or
a
scooter
service
or
a
bike
service
or
whatever
it
happens
to
be,
or
maybe
it's
maybe
you
could
apply
it
to
a
clipper
card
if
you're
using
a
VTA
line.
I
think
that's
the
one
thing
that
seems
the
most
promising
to
me.
So
so,
just
in
sum,
I
support
the
staff
recommendations,
I
think
on
the
VTA
peak,
tripperz
or
probably
VTA
peak
tripperz
are
probably
worth
at
least
a
little
bit
of
Investigation
and
then
I.
Think
longer-term.
E
Thanks
dawn,
so
I
support
staff
report
was
what
I
expected,
but
we,
when
we
sat
down
I,
we
had
this
discussion.
I
was
gritting
the
whole
time
so
boy.
This
doesn't
sound
like
the
comprehensive
modal
study
that
we're
gonna
do
and
it's
gonna
feed
into
it.
So,
with
this
delay
timeline
with
a
comprehensive
modal
starting
over
here
and
your
timeline
over
here,
we
have
time
to
blend
that
into
the
study.
Is
there
Shuttle
study?
Then?
Won't
we?
E
AD
So
the
you
know,
one
of
the
reasons
where
you
see
these
very
specific
staff
recommendations
were
for
us.
This
was
the
more
time
critical
decision-making
that
that
the
city
needs
to
do,
which
is
really
focus
on
transitioning
the
operations
of
the
community
shuttle
with
the
target
date
of
this
July.
First
and
and
again,
you
know,
in
our
initial
analysis,
on
how
you
know
the
the
first
step
in
expanding
or
improving
the
community
shuttle,
the
expanding
the
service
hours
in
2021,
but
as
councilmember
McAllister
is
referencing.
A
E
F
I
do
support
staffs
recommendations
for
the
community
shuttle.
The
one
thing
I
would
potentially
add
to
that
and
I
got
to
thinking
after
we
had
I
think
was
council
matter.
Our
vice
mayor,
Khmer
and
I
met
with
you
to
talk
about
this
topic
and
I
can't
remember
now
what
the
vice
mayor
said,
but
it
got
me
thinking
that
we
were
talking
about
the
cost
of
the
shuttles,
because
they're,
electric
and
I
think
you
said
they
were
25
percent
more
expensive
than
gas-powered
vehicles.
AD
So
I
know
that
that
is
one
of
the
key
questions
that
we
are
going
to
face.
As
this
discussion
of.
Do
we
work
on
integrating
these
two
shuttle
systems
must
have
become
an
all-electric
system
versus.
Are
we
open
to
maybe
a
combined
electric
and
gas-powered
system
and
giving
both
ourselves
and
the
team
a
some
flexibility,
as
we
study
these
options
over
the
next
two
years
of
how
do
we
get
the
biggest
bang
for
the
buck
again
in
terms
the
amount
of
service?
AD
If
we
can
put
on
the
road
generating
that
ridership
reducing
that
carbon
footprint
from
increased
ridership
versus
as
you're
saying,
focusing
exclusively
on
electric
vehicles
and
the
other
trend
to
watch
for
is
we
fully
expect
the
cost
of
electric
vehicles
and
running
electric
service
to
go
down
over
time?
It
just
is
going
to
take
longer
for
the
technology
still
developing,
so
I.
F
We've
had
issues
with
them
in
the
past
and
I.
Don't
see
that
changing
and
I
think
we
can
provide
that
potentially
with
the
on-demand
services
of
the
ones
in
number,
three
I
was
looking
mostly
at
the
marketing
and
the
customer
information,
because
when
you
look
at
the
survey
results
in
the
survey
that
we
got
late
last
year,
one
of
the
barriers
for
students
to
use
transit
was
the
lack
they
felt
like.
It
was
the
lack
of
information,
and
if
that's
one
of
the
target
populations
helping
them
have
better
information.
F
G
You,
mayor
and
just
I
can
mean
councilmember
Clark
I'm
grateful
for
staffs
work
on
this.
The
report
in
the
analysis
was,
was
very
helpful
and
I'm
gonna
support
the
staff
recommendation
and
I'm
also
grateful
to
to
Google
for
sort
of
making
possible
this
opportunity
and
funding
at
you
know
providing
us
with
enough
time
to
sort
of
figure
out
how
we
want
to
maintain
the
operation
of
the
of
the
shuttle
I
remember
being
skeptical
when
the
idea
was
first
floated
but
I'm
happy
to
say
that
I
was
proven
very
wrong.
G
AD
That
particular
question
we're
gonna,
need
more
time
to
research
and
I
think
it
keeps
coming
down
to
the
same
thing,
which
is
if,
if
the
city
has
a
shuttle
system,
does
that
necessarily
make
us
a
public
transit
operator
in
and
we
will
have
to
look
into
the
definitions
and
also
the
other
issue.
Question
is:
does
that
really
only
apply
if
you
receive
federal
money?
G
Thank
you
and
then
mr.
chambers
have
brought
up
a
question
or
suggestion
that
we
do
an
RFP
for
operators
and
not
just
necessary
necessarily
look
at
the
the
TMA.
If
the
staff
have
an
opinion
about
that,
is
there
a
reason
why
we
wouldn't
look
at
other
operators
and
just
move
straight
to
the
TMA
or
what.
AD
Well,
there
there
were
two
considerations:
a
staff
looked
at
this
first
off
was
the
question:
is
Mountain
View
want
to
become
a
transit
operator,
and
do
we
want
to
set
up
our
own
staff
of
transit
planners
and
operations
and
and
become
running
the
shuttle
ourselves,
which
staff
recommends
that
we
not
do
that
and
the
other
aspect
that
we're
looking
at
is
the
fact
that
we
do
have
this
nonprofit
organization.
That's
already
well
knowledgeable
and
skilled
and
running
a
shuttle
system.
AD
Free
fare
for
open
for
the
public,
that's
our
timet
TMA,
and
if
our
overall
goal
potentially
is
to
integrate
these
two
shuttle
systems
and
a
single
branding,
then
that
leads
itself
automatically
to
thinking
about
working
with
the
TMA.
I
will
say
a
couple
things.
One
is
if
we
enter
into
this
partnership
with
the
TMA,
you
know
we
we
do
have
performance
expectations
with
them
and
that
they
will
operate
the
the
system
as
economically
as
possible,
while
at
the
same
time,
meeting
our
expectations.
The
TMA
also
uses
good
good
purchasing
best
practices
in
about
two
years.
AD
They
will
be
re
looking
at
their
shuttle
operations
and
their
practice
is
to
do
an
RFP
to
look
at
all
the
competitive
pricing,
as
well
as
the
most
qualified
providers,
and
you
know,
I
envisioned
that
if
we
are
a
partner
with
the
TM,
a
related,
the
community
shuttle
we're
looking
at
integrating
these
shuttle
services,
and
we
are
a
member
of
the
TM
a
we
do
have
a
seat
on
the
board
that
we
will
be.
You
know.
I
G
Only
longer-term
concern
I
have
and
councilmember
matichek
comment
sort
of
resonated
with
me.
I
don't
want
to
subsidize
VTA
either,
but
a
roundabout
concern
could
be.
You
know,
as
we
invest
more
in
the
shuttle,
as
the
TMA
shuttle
operations
become
more
robust.
That
could
be
that
could
lead
to
VTA
withdrawing
further
investment
from
Mountain
View.
You
know
we
already
have
a
robust
shuttle
operation.
We
don't
need
to
provide
service
to
Mountain
View
anymore
and
then
in
particular
the
impact
that
may
have
on
paratransit
operations.
So
I
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
have
any
helpful.
G
G
But
beyond
that
I'm
comfortable
with
all
of
the
staff
recommendations
there
really
weren't
any
additional
strategies.
I
was
interested
in
investigating
I.
Think
a
lot
of
these.
Probably
we
can
work
with
the
TM
a
to
pursue
if
there's
interest,
unless
there's
something
that
you
think
reaffirms
staffs
perspective
would
have
a
meaningful
impact
on
providing
transit
service
to
residents.
There
wasn't
anything
that
really
stood
out,
I
guess
so
appreciating
staff
capacity
and
resources
there's
something
that
I'm
really
that
enthusiastic
about
pursuing
right
now
and
I
I.
Don't
have
any
other
input
beyond
that.
Thank
you.
Thank.
N
N
N
I
think
we
need
to
especially
look
through
the
the
steps
we're
taking
here
to
make
sure
that
we're
addressing
the
things
that
we
said
we
would
let's
see.
Oh
I
did
have
one
question,
which
is
the
mobility
wallet.
I
thought
it
was
a
great
idea:
I
wondered
how
it
would
how
lower-income
people
who
main
and/or
end
seniors,
who
may
not
own
cellphones
how
they
would.
If
you
had
ideas
for
them
accessing
it,
I
mean
I
could
I'll.
Let
you
speak
to
that
because
I
thought
I
I
see
various
ways,
but
maybe
you
thought
it
there.
AF
There
are
a
number
of
cities
and
transit
agencies
around
the
country
that
have
done
this
and
typically
they
they
often
do
use
a
smartphone
app,
but
they
will
also
have
some
kind
of
a
car
or
whatever.
So
residents
can
come
in
and
get
a
card
and
use
that
also
so
there's
different
ways
of
reaching
different
residents
that
might
not
have
access
to
an
app
okay.
N
Great,
so
there
are
other
options
and
then
yeah
I
think
that
I
actually
was
somewhat
interested
in
the
VTA
at
least
exploring
the
VTA,
pique
tripperz
and
possibly
just
because
I
know
a
lot
of
people
who
take
those
routes
and
thought
it
might
be
useful,
but
rolling
that
into
you
know
visiting
that
when
we
visit
the
comprehensive
notable
strategy,
maybe
it
will
you
know
you
explore
that
and
look
at
that
all
as
one
package
maybe
I'll
end
up
deciding.
That's
not
a
good
idea.
K
Thank
you,
Thank
You
staff
also
want
to
echo
the
thanks
to
to
Google
for
this
long
partnership
and,
in
particular,
the
communication
I
think
that
Google
sent
a
great
job
of
updating,
counsel
and
giving
us
updates
on
on
the
shuttle,
as
its
progressed
and
I
appreciate
that
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
came
up
at
a
council
goal-setting
meeting
in
February
when
the
TMA
came
during
public
comment,
is
I'd
love
an
opportunity
for
the
TMA
to
be
able
to
be
integrated
in
this
shuttle
discussion.
So
whether
and
I've
expressed
this
to
staff.
K
So
we
can
have
this
be
the
venue
for
those
conversations.
I
think
that
would
be
really
great
one
to
maybe
have
more
than
three
minutes,
if
necessary,
so
that
the
tme
can
can
share
with
us
and
especially
given
the
stock
wreck
staff
recommendation
and
we're
in
the
direction
we're
heading
in
and
could
be
really
helpful
and
I.
Think
as
we're
talking
about
in
the
future.
The
comprehensive
modal
plan
it
just.
K
Think
one
of
the
things
that
I
reflected
upon
from
the
shell
study
in
October
was
a
lot
of
the
usage
comes
from
the
zip
code
that
I
live
in,
which
is
nine
four,
oh
four,
three,
particularly
with
their
seniors
and
our
youth,
and
as
we
are
talking
about
transportation,
making
sure
we're
able
to
include
access
and
equity
into
the
transportation
discussion
and
so
I.
Don't
know
if
this
necessarily
falls
under
three
or
number.
Four,
but
that's
one
of
the
things
I've
been
been
thinking
about
and.
K
For
item
three
I,
like
the
possibility
of
a
mobility
wallet
visit
but
as
someone
who's
taking
public
transit
transit
exclusively
to
commute
to
work,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
is
my
frustration
can
be
the
communication
from
the
transit
entity
on
what
the
hours
are.
If
there's
disruptions
to
service
or
holiday.
K
An
under
item
number
for
kind
of
other
comments,
I
think
one
of
the
most
immediate
things
that
the
city
can
do
is
do
a
frequency
of
service.
You
know
being
able
to
get
those
rides.
Every
15
minutes,
I,
think,
is
really
critical
and
I
think
the
expanded
timelines
I
think
the
comments
about
maybe
nights
and
weekends.
K
One
of
the
things
that
I
was
reflecting
upon
with
the
study
was
kind
of
VTA
change
in
service
and
kind
of
their
continual
changes
that
are
happening
there
and
and
how
the
city
might
be
able
to
create
some
stopgaps
and
be
more
reliable
than
what's
what's
what's
happening
there
in
terms
of
their
service
plan.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
so
I'll
add
my
comments
and
then
we'll
try
to
do
a
little
summary
tally.
I
appreciate
staff's
work
on
this
issue.
I'm
very
excited
that
we're
here.
This
has
been
a
long
time
in
coming
starting
from
my
first
year
on
council
back
in
oh
seven
was
the
discussion.
I
appreciate,
Google's
support
and
coming
on
board
and
my
the
year
after
I
left
the
first
time
around
and
five
years
later
we
are
here.
It's
been
great
to
see.
The
increase
in
ridership
I
had
always
thought
that,
well
with
the
shuttle
program,
it's
flexible.
A
If
it's
frequent
enough-
and
you
know
our
city
is
only
12
square
miles-
it
should
be
able
to
cover
most
of
the
city
and
if
we
get
a
robust
system
that
is
frequent
and
gets
folks
to
where
they
need
to
go
and
a
reasonable
amount
of
time,
it
should
help
with
ridership
and
and
trying
to
get
cars
off
the
road.
So
I
think
the
data
is
showing
that
and
so
I'm
excited
that
we're
really
looking
now
at
how
we
can
expand
that
program.
I
support,
staffs
recommendations,
I
think,
that's
a
great
start.
A
A
The
shuttle
program
is
the
right
way
to
go.
My
and
I've
been
interested
in
how
we
can
integrate
all
the
different
shuttle
programs
we
have
in
the
city,
and
you
know
to
as
few
as
possible.
That's
more
again
integrated
and
if
I
could
you
know,
create
efficiencies
and
then
expand
the
service
that
that
was
my
interest
and
when
we
have
you
know,
first
talked
about
TMA's
and
origins
of
TMA's.
You
know
it
was
the
model
that
used
was
in
Emeryville
and
they
were.
A
They
ran
in
this
community
shuttle,
and
so
that
was
always
my
I
guess.
My
you
know,
understanding
is
where
we
would
go,
and
so
the
TMA
taking
on
our
shuttle
community
shuttle
makes
sense
if
we
can
integrate
it
into
NV.
Go
that's
great.
You
know,
I've
heard
from
other
comfort
organizations.
Companies
who
are
not
interested
in
running
their
own
transportation
service
system
either
enjoy
I
can,
for
instance,
Lucile
Packard
runs.
One
and
they've
said
you
know
they
don't
want
to
be
a
transportation
agency.
A
How
can
they
they've
been
interested,
I,
think
and
seeing
if
we
can
combine
efforts,
so
perhaps
what?
If?
What
the
TM
a
that
would
be
the
option
as
if
we
could
get
more.
You
know
companies
and
so
forth
to
join
the
TM
a
they
can.
They
can
satisfy
their
needs
through
that
through
our
the
TM
a
and
then
help
us
expand
our
service
I
would
say
to
before
we
look
at
you
know
next
steps
and
one
is
being
the
altering
the
routes.
I
was
hoping.
A
We
could
maybe
talk
with
El
Camino
Hospital
further
I
know
it's
mentioned
in
the
staff
report
that
that
section
is
maybe
redundant,
but
I
don't
know.
If
it's
because
folks
don't
know
about
the
shuttle
service
they
provide
or
I'm,
not
sure.
If
that's
temporary
but
I,
think
we
should
definitely
discuss
with
them.
How
we
could
again,
maybe
partner
up
if
we
can
and
then
the
other
interest
for
me
has
been
the
on-demand
services.
A
So
I
think
I
mentioned
I
spent
a
day
going
to
Sacramento
with
councilmember
rod,
sinks
from
Cupertino,
and
he
told
me
all
about
their
via
on
demand
shuttle
program
and
that
the
that
program
or
those
shuttles
go
to
the
Sunnyvale
Transit
Center.
So
why
not
them
rockin
via
Transit
Center
and
he's
been
sending
me?
Their
data
have
their
ridership
and
it
seems
to
be
doing
quite
well.
A
So
you
know,
as
we
look
at
I,
definitely
want
to
focus
on
Mountain
View
first,
but
I
think
we
should
start
looking
more
regionally
and
I
know
I
wasn't
a
part
of
the
manzanita
talks.
I,
don't
really
know
exactly
what
was
said
there,
but
you
know
if
we
were
really
starting
to
look
at
regional.
Maybe
we
start
with
some
smaller
partners,
there's
a
few
partners
and
see
if
we
can
slowly
build
up
a
regional
system,
so
their
program
is
18
months.
I
believe
that
pilot
program.
A
A
I
am
NOT
interested
in
VTA
peak
tripperz
I
was
trying
to
find
I
think
my
colleagues
had
some
questions
about
what
the
ridership
on
the
51
and
52
bus
are
and
I
went
online
to
try
to
find
something
and
this
data
is
outdated,
but
it
was
from
like
2015-2016
transit
plan
and
their
weekday
service.
I
didn't
I
brought
the
wrong
a
hub,
laptop
iPad,
but
51
was
something
like
1100
and
then
52
was
about
440
riders
and
then
in
comparison,
their
best
route
is
a
22
at
over
11,000.
A
So
my
concern
is
that
these
are
two
routes
that
are
not
very
well
used
at
this
time
and
I
just
wondered
like
the
the
viability
of
the
right
right.
These
routes
for
VTA
as
in
general
and
to
be
frank,
like
I,
feel
like
VT
I,
should
be
helping
to
fund
our
transportation
efforts.
Not
the
other
way
around
right
and
and
these
these
routes
do
cross
over,
like
one
I,
think
dance
on
college,
the
other
two
foothills
so
I
would
expect
the
other
communities
then
to
join
up.
A
Then,
if
we
really
want
to
look
at
supporting
these
routes,
so
I
don't
think
it
should
just
be
on
Mountain
View
and
then
the
TNC
is
in
light
of
the
fact
that
they
don't
share
the
data
and
we
wait.
You
know
didn't,
have
a
partnership.
We
were
hoping
to
have
with
them,
I'm,
not
really
interested
in
pursuing
that
the
via
actually
the
Cupertino
shuttle.
They
do
share
data.
So
you
know,
perhaps
we
can
look
at
other
other
agencies
I,
like
the
mobility
wallet
idea.
A
Definitely
that's
something
you
know
if
we
can
get
to
seamless
payment,
I
think
that
would
be
very
helpful.
Customer
information
I
was
asking
you
know
how
do
you
see
like
which,
if
you
need
to
get
on
the
bus
and
then
get
to
VTA
or
get
on
Cal
train?
Looking
at
the
timing-
and
you
know,
but
the
best
routes
to
get
wherever
I
guess-
that's,
maybe
Google
Maps.
A
Allow
already
has
that
I
don't
know
if
there's
ways
we
need
to
improve
that
or
just
get
the
word
out
about
how
to
plan
your
routes,
but
definitely
that
would
be
helpful
and
then
the
other
things
just
a
few
thoughts
I
had
down
the
road.
My
I
would
like
to
look
at
shorter,
head
ways.
So
frequency
I,
you
know
I've
always
learned
and
my
transportation
tutorials,
that
shorter
head
ways
are
the
way
to
get
more
ridership.
A
I
know
forty
percent
is
distributed
by
VTA,
but
there
I
believe
sixty
percent
is
actually
distributed
by
med
and
they
did
help
fund
the
Cupertino
via
program,
and
my
thought
is
I'm
wondering
if
maybe,
if
it's
the
purchasing
of
electric
buses
and
whatever
the
charge
of
the
stations
and
if
it's
a
one-time
cost
I
wonder
if
we
could
actually
apply
for
funds.
There.
There's
also
like
the
light
duty
and
the
heavy
duty
vehicle
grants,
funds
and
there's
a
lot
of
funds.
A
Programs
I've
learned
that
Bach
Bach
med
and
you
know,
I'll,
go
and
ask
staff
if
there
might
be
some
opportunities
there
so
to
try
to
offset
some
of
these
costs
and
then
the
other
thought
I
had
to
is
a
Silicon
Valley,
clean
energy.
Since
we've
done
all
the
buildings,
our
next
big
areas,
transportation,
so
maybe
this
is
something
that
we
should
look
at
to
interpret
in
terms
of
starting
a
program.
So
just
a
lot
of
thoughts
on
this.
E
A
L
A
O
AB
B
L
A
I've
heard
a
few
folks
for
marketing
and
customer
information.
I
wouldn't
one
two
three
just
three
before
okay
and
then
are
there
other
community
shuttle
service
or
operational
options.
I
did
hear
frequency
of
service
down
the
road,
eventually
one
two
three
four
five
six
and
then
what
else
did
I
hear?
Oh,
yes,
that
would
be
the
frequency
of
services.
Is
the
increased
ten
days
hours
expansion
of
hours?
Yes,
anyone
interested
in
I
think
beyond
the
seven
to
seven.
A
E
AD
I'm
not
certain
how
we
would
analyze
VMT
in
relation
to
looking
at
routes
and
service.
We
mostly
focus
on
what
could
generate
the
best
ridership
best
serve
folks.
If
you
did
any
kind
of
EMT
analysis,
it
would
be.
You
know,
kind
of
some
kind
of
survey,
but
we
found
out
how
many
people
had
a
choice
to
use
a
car.
AD
L
AD
I
would
like
to
make
a
request
to
staff.
Yes,
I
appreciate
hearing
very
clearly
that
there
were.
You
know
at
least
four
members
interested
in
looking
further
at
mobility
will
wallet
and
marketing
customer
information.
We
did
hear
three
on
the
end
on
demand
services
and
even
though
they
didn't
meet
the
magic
four
because
of
the
fact
that
Cupertino
is
running,
this
pilot
I
guessed
that
it
is
worthwhile
that
we
do
talk
to
Cupertino.
AD
We
keep
an
eye
on
how
their
pilot
goes
and
if,
if
it's
looking
successful
that
we
do
explore
it
for
Mountain
View
to
see
if
we
you
know,
we
could
also
see
such
a
similar
option,
because
it
is
one
way
to
reach
into
a
lot
of
our
single-family
neighborhoods
that
do
not
have
the
densities
to
support
a
fixed
route
service,
but
could
benefit
from
improved
first
model
connections
to
Caltrain.
Yes,.
A
K
A
K
K
K
A
K
A
Any
other
reports
from
I
think
we
have
to
do
this,
but
we
several
of
us
attended
this
joint
venture
state
of
the
Valley
Conference.
A
Yes,
this
city
sponsored
us
yes,
I
thought
dan
Rather
was
quite
interesting,
and
that
was
a
trait
to
listen
to
him
very
insightful
and
then
I
just
want
to
thank
our
interim
city
manager
max
Bozell.
This
is
probably
his
last
meeting
as
I
see
them,
but
thank
you
so
much
for
stepping
in
during
this
time
and
for
your
enthusiasm
and
willingness
to
to
step
in.
We
will
be
welcoming
our
new
city
manager
next
week,
Kimbra
McCarthy
and
there
will
be
a
public
welcome
reception
on
March
10th
from
10:00
a.m.