►
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Environmental Planning Commission Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 17, 2021.
Live Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26.
A
C
D
C
A
Yes,
so
to
the
westerlo
is
absent.
In
general,
council
has
determined
that
that
is
an
excused
absence.
I'd
also
like
to
welcome
to
his
first
meeting
on
this
side
of
the
of
the
of
the
of
the
bench
commissioner.
Nunez
who's
was
recently
appointed
appointed.
I
think,
actually
just
yesterday,
to
take
over
the
position
that
commissioner
smusing
vacated
this
summer
so
welcome.
Commissioner
nunes.
A
A
Open
up
for
public
comment
would
any
member
of
the
public
like
to
comment?
That's
who's
on
the
line
like
to
comment
on
the
meeting
minutes.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
10
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
phone
users
can
mute
and
unmute
themselves
with
star
6.
epc
clerk
will
start
the
timer
and
let
you
know
when
your
time
is
up.
A
F
A
B
H
I
C
A
A
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
commission
from
acting
on
any
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
a
non-agendized
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
star
9
on
your
phone
phone
users
can
mute
and
unmute
themselves
with
star
six.
The
pc
clerk
will
start
the
timer
and
let
you
know
when
your
time
is
up
quick
penal
year.
Anyone
wishing
to
speak
on
the
scenes
section.
C
A
K
K
We
we
provide
skilled
labor
that
takes
five
years
of
training
and
I'm
speaking
to
you
tonight
to
make
sure
young
people
from
mountain
view
will
be
able
to
have
the
same
opportunity
and
learn
a
trade
as
I
do
so
they
can
afford
to
live
here.
Some
of
you
might
remember
that,
a
few
years
back,
my
fellow
construction
workers
participated
in
a
public
hearings
on
north
bay,
sure
they
shore
precise
plan.
K
A
C
K
I
think
this
presents
a
great
opportunity
for
the
next
generation
coming
up,
especially
for
the
local
environment.
You
know
these
people
that
are
coming
in
the
trades
and
these
young
kids
they're
going
to
be
skilled
laborers
and
they
do.
We
do
precision,
work
and
I
have
been
for
20
years
and
we
are
very
familiar
with
the
area
and
there
there
are
really
no
complaints
with
any
of
the
contracts
that
local
104
provides.
A
So
just
for
clarification
to
the
attendees
we
are,
we
have
not
yet
moved
into
into
input
on
the
google
master
plan
where
we're
in
the
section
talking
about
items
that
are
not
related
to
the
google
master
plan.
If
you
have
something
that
is
not
related
to
the
google
master
plan,
please
raise
your
hand
if
it's
related
to
the
google
master
plan.
Please
we'll
wait
until
we
get
to
that
section
and
there'll
be
plenty
of
opportunity
for
you
to
speak
at
that
time.
B
A
For
them,
so
michelle
and
alex
b,
we
are
not
at
this
point,
taking
feedback
on
the
google
master
plan
yep.
We
will
in
a
few
minutes,
so
please
hold
on
and
you'll,
be
more
than
you'll
be
able
to
to
bring
up
your
comments
and
questions
at
that
time.
You'll
have
plenty
of
opportunity.
Okay,
so
we'll
move
back
to
item
number
five
and
diana
you're
on.
G
G
The
item
that
epc
is
reviewing
tonight
at
the
study
session
is
on
google,
north
bay
for
master
plan
and
staff
presentation
tonight
is
going
to
be
focused
to
provide
introduction
to
the
master
plan
and
also
receive
input
on
key
aspects
to
guide
the
future
review
of
the
master
plan.
Further
starting
with
the
location,
the
master
plan
area
is
located
around
shoreline
boulevard
north
of
highway
101
in
north
bay
shore,
precise
plan
area,
the
master
plan
spans
across
127
acres
shown
in
yellow
boundary
in
the
on
your
screen
right
here.
G
The
project
area
also
includes
a
portion
of
a
gateway
master
plan.
The
current
project
site
is
surrounded
by
existing
suburban
office
development,
commercial
development
and
another
specific
thing
is
a
existing
mobile
home
park
to
the
south
of
the
shoreline
neighborhood,
as
proposed
in
the
master
plan.
G
Before
I
dive
into
the
details,
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
the
regulatory
context
of
the
master
plan.
The
so
the
north
bay
show
precise
plan
sets
the
tone
for
the
development
framework
in
the
entire
area
of
the
precise
plan
in
terms
of
development
standards
and
the
processes
and
the
master
plan
will
come
under
and
it
fits
within
the
precise
plan
that
allows
the
developers
to
take
all
the
precise
plan
requirements
and
lay
it
out
to
meet
their
needs
while
complying
with
the
precise
plan.
G
Use
circulation,
parking,
etc.
So
if
a
master
plan
is
approved,
you
know
there
will
be
subsequent
permits
for
individual
building
developments
that
will
be
needed
as
part
of
the
master
plan,
implementation
and
now
I'll
dive
deep
into
you
know
what
have
you
done
so
far
so
in
terms
of
prior
meetings?
Earlier
this
year,
city
council,
at
a
public
hearing,
approved
requalification
of
one
1.3
million
square
foot
of
non-residential
floor
area
ratio
to
google.
G
With
you
know,
it
was
subject
to
around
42
million
in
community
benefits
at
the
same
meeting
in
a
study
session.
Council
also
provided
input
on
google's
preliminary
master
plan
proposal
in
general
city
council
was
supportive
of
the
of
the
proposal
with
some
comments
about
land
use,
distribution,
layout
location,
dedication
of
open
space
for
school
and
also
balancing
out
some
of
the
land
use
distribution
within
the
character
areas
and
also
sharing
district
parking
facilities
with
other
non-google
property
owners.
G
The
mastermind
master
plan
proposal
is
generally
consistent
with
the
city's
journal
plan
and
the
three
character
areas
of
the
north
bay
show
precise
plan
area
as
well.
This
includes
integrated
land,
uses
district
facilities,
improvement
to
the
public,
open
space
and
maintaining
sensitive
habitat
in
the
area
as
well.
G
G
Through
inclusionary
housing
units,
the
current
bmr
proposal
requires
further
refinement
and
details
as
well,
such
as
the
unit
size,
unit
mix,
etc,
and
staff
will
continue
to
work
with
the
applicant
on
refining
this
proposal,
as
well
as
well
as
conduct
a
feasibility
study
on
this,
as
well
in
terms
of
public
open
space
and
open
space
in
general.
The
proposal
is
a
network
of
public
parks
and
open
spaces.
G
This
is
distributed
throughout
the
master
plan
and
includes
12,
distinct,
open
spaces,
which
accounts
for
19
acres
of
public
park,
space
and
12
acres
of
privately
owned,
publicly
accessible
areas.
The
estimated
required
parkland
for
the
development
in
the
master
plan
is
33.6
acres
and
around
300
or
351
million
in.
L
G
New
fees
overall,
google's
intent
with
this
parks
and
open
space
strategy,
is
to
meet
the
parkland
obligation
through
a
combination
of
land
dedication,
parkland
credit
for
the
popas,
which
are
privately
owned,
publicly
accessible
areas
and
payment
of
the
inlu
fees
as
well.
City
staff
is
generally
supportive
of
the
identified
parklands
and
open
space
areas
and
refinements
to
the
location
size,
and
you
know
public
courses.
Popa
areas
will
continue
to
be
done
through
the
review
process.
G
G
So
at
the
previous
city
council
meeting
at
in
march
earlier
this
year,
city
council
suggested
the
applicant
to
refine
their
proposal
to
dedicate
a
four
acre
parcel,
which
was
previously
proposed
to
be
dedicated
to
the
school
mountain
usman
school
district,
that
it
should
be
dedicated
to
the
city
and
that's
what
is
included
in
the
shorebird
yards
in
the
open,
open
space
and
park
strategy.
Here.
G
A
little
bit
about
street
parking
proposal
in
compliance
with
the
north
bay
show
precise
plan.
The
proposal
includes
shared
parking
facilities
for
office,
residential
uses
and
district
parking
approach
to
help
manage
parking
demand
in
the
precise
plan.
This
has
been
an
important
aspect
of
the
of
the
north
asia.
Precise
plan
throughout
the
proposal
includes
a
district
serving
residential
parking
garage
in
each
of
the
neighborhoods
to
support
residential
parking
of
the
total
office.
Parking
10
will
be
provided
on
site
and
90
of
the
office.
G
The
proposed
phasing
pattern
allows
google
to
rebuild
the
existing
office
square
footage
to
be
demolished
and
make
space
for
new
residential
development
in
the
area
currently,
as
proposed,
40
42
of
the
residential
units
will
be
provided
in
the
first
two
phases
of
the
development
and
the
remaining
58
will
be
provided
in
the
last
four
phases
of
the
development
about
80
percent
of
the
dedication
of
parkland
is
also
proposed
to
be
provided
by
first
two
phases,
as
proposed
in
this
construction.
Phasing.
G
G
Google's
master
brand
proposal
complies
with
the
conceptual
street
network,
as
proposed
in
the
master
plan
as
well.
But
in
order
to
implement
this
this
transformation
and
implement
the
precise
plan
guidance,
you
know
it
will
require
us
to
remove
existing
trees
and
replanting
of
new
street
trees
and
landscaping
that
promote
the
biodiversity
goals
of
the
precise
plan.
The
goal
of
increasing
biodiversity
is
is
an
important
goal
in
the
council's
failure,
2021
and
2023
strategic
priorities.
G
So
in
order
to
implement
this
staff
notes
that
you
know
it
will
necessitate
design
of
street
infrastructure,
including
sidewalks
landscaping
and
other
modes
of
transportation,
potential
vacation
of
existing
easements
and
dedication
of
new
easements,
and
also
removal
of
existing
trees
and
replacement.
With
new
street
trees
to
meet
with
the
biodiversity
goals
of
the
precise
plan,
this
brings
me
to
the
next
topic
on
community
benefits.
G
In
accordance
with
the
precise
plan
bonus
far
standards
applicant
is
required
to
provide
community
benefits
above
and
for
the
additional
bonus
far
that
they
are
proposing
at
the
marsh
study
session.
Earlier
this
year,
city
council
did
approve
requalification
of
non-residential
office
far
to
google
subject
to
a
minimum
42
million
in
community.
G
And
in
accordance
to
that,
google
is
proposing
to
provide
community
benefits
such
as
you
know:
affordable
housing,
15
through
land
dedication,
green
building
and
site
design
measures.
In
addition
to
that,
google
is
also
proposing
to
provide
monetary
contribution
of
35
million
towards
charleston
transit
corridor
phase,
2
and
3
construction,
which
is
a
priority
transportation
improvement
identified
in
the
precise
plan
and
around
7
million
contribution
towards
the
delivery
of
ecogem
open
space,
as
proposed
in
the
master
plans
open
space
strategy.
G
So,
while
google's
proposal
for
community
benefits
is
in
alignment
with
what
was
reviewed
by
city
council
at
the
study
session,
earlier,
staff
will
be
working
with
the
consultant
in
order
to
prepare
an
economic
analysis
to
evaluate
the
community
benefit
proposal
which
is
being
presented
right
now.
So
this
brings
me
to
the
first
question
for
epc
tonight.
If
epc
have
any
additional
input
regarding
land
use,
affordable
housing
parks
and
open
space,
district
parking,
construction,
phasing
and
implementation
of
the
complete
street
network.
G
Another
you
know,
trees
are
an
important
part
of
the
precise
plan.
The
master
plan
has
approximately
377
72
trees,
with
about
26
of
the
trees
in
the
existing
street
right
away
and
bill
to
area
over
40
percent
of
the
existing
trees
are
in
poor
health
and
a
significant
percentage
of
these
trees
are
not
native
to
the
area
and
not
suitable
for
the
local
climate,
as
well.
G
So,
in
order
to
review
this
proposal,
staff
has
prepared
a
framework
on
you
know.
How
are
we
going
to
review
this
and
the
framework
is
going
to
emphasize
on
retaining
and
integrating
existing
healthy
trees
in
the
plant
explore
opportunities
to
transplant
healthy
trees
which
are
suitable
to
the
local
climate,
when
we
are
reviewing
the
site
design
for
individual
sites
and
also
emphasize
on
the
tree
replacements,
which
will
contribute
towards
the
tree
canopy
and
overall
biodiversity
goals?
G
G
The
precise
plan
prescribes
the
city
council
shall
determine
at
the
time
of
master
plan
approval
the
subsequent
development
review
process
for
planned
community
permits.
As
associated
with
the
approved
master
plan,
google
is
proposing
a
streamlined
review
process
for
future
permits
wherein
based
on
the
scale
and
size
of
the
project,
the
project
will
be
reviewed
by
staff
and
drc,
and
a
final
decision
will
be
made
by
the
zoning
administrator
at
a
public
hearing.
G
Staff
does
believe
that
this
shorter
and
streamlined
approach
for
review
is
suitable
for
the
master
plan,
because
majority
of
the
components
of
development
have
been
or
would
be
worked
out
under
the
master
plan
itself,
and
this
would
have
involved
input
from
all
our
decision
makers.
Our
community
as
well,
and
the
future
permits
could
be
streamlined
to
focus
on
verifying
their
compliance
with
the
with
the
master
plan
itself.
G
Lastly,
for
epc's
information
only
applicant
is
requesting
a
development
agreement
for
a
30-year
term
in
tandem
with
the
master
plan
itself.
Essentially,
the
development
agreement
will
lock
in
certain
development
rights.
The
city
does
expect
some
public
benefits
to
be
provided.
The
development
agreement,
which
are
going
to
be
above
and
beyond
the
community
benefits
to
be
provided.
G
G
N
A
M
Hopefully
I
won't
duplicate
very
much
of
that,
but
anyway
good
evening,
chair
grandstanding,
commissioners,
I
want
to
start
off
by
thanking
you
for
having
us
here
tonight.
We're
really
excited
to
provide
an
overview
of
our
project
in
north
bayshore
and
why
we've
been
working
with
the
city
on
this
project
for
many
years
now.
This
is
the
first
time
we're
formally
presenting
to
the
epc.
M
So
on
that
note,
I'd
also
like
to
thank
staff
for
their
great
efforts
over
the
last
few
years.
Working
with
us,
it's
been,
it's
been
a
real
pleasure
honestly
as
the
lead
urban
planner
for
google.
I'm
really
proud
to
be
able
to
present
tonight
on
how
we
plan
to
deliver
on
the
vision
of
the
north
bay
shore,
precise
plan
in
my
10
years
of
working
with
and
for
google.
Now
I've
been
able
to
watch
google
evolve
and
grow
as
a
company
and
a
landowner.
M
As
the
commission
knows,
back
in
2017,
the
city
council,
supported
by
the
community,
made
the
really
astute
decision
to
amend
the
north
bay
short
precise
plan
to
facilitate
three
complete
neighborhoods
as
a
major
landowner
within
these
complete
neighborhoods.
We
now
have
this
opportunity
and
ability
to
deliver
on
many
of
the
precise
plan
priorities.
M
Most
importantly,
the
precise
plan
seeks
to
deliver
nearly
10
000
new
homes
in
a
region
with
undisputed
pent-up
demand
for
housing,
google's
committed
to
delivering
up
to
about
7
000
of
those
new
homes,
including
20
as
affordable
units.
This
is
equivalent
to
doubling
the
amount
of
affordable
housing
in
mountain
view.
Today,
as
diana
said,
the
plan
also
provides
over
31
acres
of
publicly
accessible
open
spaces,
including
expanded
habitat
for
the
existing
eager
rookery.
M
We
will
also
continue
to
invest
and
lead
the
way
in
mobility
solutions
prioritizing
people
over
cars
with
every
opportunity.
So
this
includes
delivering
almost
four
miles
of
new
pedestrian
and
bike
paths,
completing
the
green
loop
between
stevens,
creek
and
permanente
creek,
implementing
a
really
comprehensive
transportation
demand
management
plan.
M
Our
project
will
be
accompanied
by
the
comprehensive
community
benefits
package
that
diana
outlined
35
million
dollars
towards
the
charleston
transit
corridor
phase-
one
just
opened
earlier
this
year,
so
this
money
will
go
towards
phases
two
and
three
now:
seven
million
dollars
towards
habitat
restoration
up
at
the
ecogem,
five
percent
inclusionary,
affordable
housing,
a
public
art
program
and
small
business
diversification
program
as
well.
In
total.
This
is
no
small
feat
and
it
will
definitely
take
time
to
implement.
M
Sustainability
is
really
key
to
google.
It's
really
built
into
everything
that
we
do
it's
in
our
dna
and
we
strive
to
lead
by
example:
we've
committed
to
using
up
100
carbon
free
energy
in
the
operations
of
all
of
our
campuses
by
2030,
and
we
are
already
designing
all
electric
office
buildings
here
in
the
bay
area.
M
Earlier
this
year
we
announced
our
enhanced
water
stewardship
commitment,
which
means
that
google
will
replenish
120
of
the
water
we
consume
on
average
across
our
offices
and
data
centers
in
a
time
of
drought.
This
is
really
critical
for
the
area
and
then,
as
we
look
to
the
future,
we're
also
exploring
innovative
district
systems
that
will
help
reduce
energy
and
water
consumption
in
both
the
residential
and
commercial
buildings
that
we
want
to
build,
but
that
vision
of
tomorrow
starts
with
the
north
bay
shore
today
being
predominantly
single-story
office.
M
M
Our
proposed
open
space
network
will
create
a
spectrum
of
experiences
along
shoreline,
we're
able
to
create
more
urban
conditions
for
walkability
social
experiences
and
vibrancy
in
the
public
area.
The
scale
of
the
open
spaces
allows
expansive
neighborhood,
open
spaces
with
active
and
passive
recreational
opportunities
really
designed
for
all
ages
and
then
because
of
that
scale,
we're
also
able
to
build
on
the
ecology
that
already
exists
at
the
retention
basin
and
out
at
stevens
creek,
with
the
addition
of
the
shorebird
wilds
and
the
ecogem.
M
M
M
As
we
plan
ahead
over
the
next
20
years,
many
of
the
redwoods
within
the
master
plan
area
will
be
replaced
with
a
more
diverse,
more
water,
sensitive
and
healthier
ecosystem.
That's
better
suited
for
the
new
streetscape
with
wider
sidewalks,
cafe,
seating,
storefronts
and
residential
stoops
that
come
closer
to
the
street.
M
This
new
ecosystem
will
also
include
the
critical
and
critically
important
understory
that
is
largely
unable
to
grow
in
today's
redwood
forest.
This
will
attract
butterflies,
allow
pollinators
to
thrive
and
help
manage
our
stormwater
more.
Naturally,
the
design
and
implementation
of
this
evolving
urban
forest
has
already
begun
with
the
retention
basin
and
charleston
east
projects.
M
Additionally,
we
are
growing
thousands
of
trees
on
a
farm
so
that
the
replacement
trees
and
their
canopies
will
be
more
mature
at
the
time
of
planting.
And
finally,
during
this
master
plan
process,
we
are
also
identifying
those
healthy
existing
trees
that
can
remain
as
part
of
the
complete
neighborhoods.
These
tend
to
be
at
key
corners
along
the
green
loop
and
in
parks
and
open
spaces.
M
M
M
So
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
tonight.
I
think
diana
provided
a
lot
of
really
great
information.
Hopefully
I
added
to
that
a
little
bit,
but
when
you,
if
you
have
more
questions,
I'm
joined
by
a
number
of
my
team
members
here
who
are
all
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
you
may
have.
So
thank
you
for
your
time.
A
So
in
this
section
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
phone
users
can
mute
and
unmute
themselves
with
star
6.
epc
clerk
will
start
the
timer
to
let
you
know
when
your
time
is
up.
B
O
Hi
this
is
erica.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
tonight
I
represent
local
393.
We
have
two
over
2
000
members
in
this
area.
We
have
over
100
members
that
actually
live
in
mountain
view.
I
am
calling
in
support
of
this
project
and
I'm
appreciative
for
google
for
all
of
the
work
that
they
have
done
in
the
bay
area.
P
P
Google
has
committed
the
commercial
portion
of
this
project
will
employ
local
construction
workers
and
pay
family
supporting
wages,
and
that
is
great
news.
We
need
to
invest
in
construction
workforce.
We
need
to
train
the
next
generation
of
skilled
workers-
it's
not
clear
yet,
where
the
workforce
will
come
from
to
build
these
thousands
of
homes.
I
hope
google
and
mentally
step
up
to
the
plate
on
these
jobs
and
we're
just
coming
out
of
this
pandemic
and
local
workers
are
going
to
need
these
jobs.
P
C
N
N
I
first
want
to
say:
lindley's
has
been
a
great
neighbor
to
have
within
the
community
of
mountain
view,
they've
done
great
public
outreach.
I've
been
discovering
these
meetings
they're
very
responsive
to
concerns,
and
I
think
that's
shown
in
the
project
they're
putting
forward
everything
about
this
plan
will
be
a
benefit
to
the
community,
seven
thousand
new
homes.
That's
a
community
benefit
the
fact
that
these
will
be
low,
vmt
neighborhoods
that
prioritize
people
over
cars
also
community
benefit
the
affordable
housing,
the
preservation
of
trees,
the
31
acres
of
new
land
for
recreation.
N
N
We
have
very
few
neighborhoods
that
are
as
vibrant
and
as
green
as
what's
being
proposed
here,
and
I
think
we
should
try
to
approve
this
as
soon
as
we
can
it's
been
years
in
the
pipeline,
which,
which
I
think
is
a
little
disappointing,
given
how
great
this
project
will
be.
I
you
know
it's
kind
of
sad
to
see
someone
propose
something
so
good
and
then
bend
over
backwards
to
just
get
through
government
bureaucracy.
N
So
I
hope
we
approve
this
as
quickly
as
possible
and
I
hope
you
support
the
streamlined
development
review
process.
I
also
think
it's
worth
noting
we're
now
kind
of
operating
with
a
bit
more
uncertainty
related
to
the
school
fees.
It's
the
more
you
try
to.
I.
I
think
we
should
just
acknowledge
that
that
makes
this
project
harder,
there's
more
uncertainty
to
deal
with,
and
I
hope
the
epc
is
sensitive
to
that
before
making
more
requests
from
the
developer.
N
C
C
Q
Thank
you.
My
name
is
kat
wortham.
I
am
representing
the
housing
action
coalition
tonight.
I'd
first
like
to
start
off
by
saying
that
the
housing
action
action
coalition
excuse
me
has
not
yet
reviewed
the
google
master
plan,
but
we
did
do
work
in
previous
years
around
the
precise
plan
process.
I'm
here
tonight
just
to
echo
the
support
that
we
had
a
few
years
ago.
Q
We
know
that
building
housing
is
the
best
way
that
we
can
get
out
of
our
housing
shortage.
That
isn't,
unfortunately,
doesn't
just
touch
mountain
view,
but
touches
the
entire
bay
area.
Also
just
want
to
say
that
this
plan,
like
salim
just
said,
is
a
long
time
in
the
making
really
want
to
see
it
move
forward
as
quickly
as
possible,
really
excited
to
really
excited
by
the
opportunity
to
rethink
this
area
and
include
housing
as
well
as
a
ton
of
feature
amenities.
C
R
R
R
It
is
an
ecological
jewel
and
what
google
is
proposing
will
only
embellish
that
the
proposal
to
have
what
they
have
called
the
eco
gem,
which
is
an
ecological
area
where
they
are
removing
some
buildings
in
order
to
create
wetlands
and
variety.
Three
different
ecosystems
is
going
to
be
transformational
for
the
area.
I
do
agree.
R
We
do
support
that
as
well
as
recognizing
that
it
will
provide
very
valuable
open
space,
and
I
hope
that
all
the
epc
members
will
be
very
supportive
of
that.
One.
Other
item
that
I
would
like
to
bring
up
is
something
that
the
pres
we
have
all
worked
on
this
precise
plan
very
hard,
and
I
some
epc
members
were
there
too.
R
R
I
would
hope
that
in
google's
master
plan
that
they
would
consider
green
storm
water
infrastructure
as
standard,
and
I
hope
that
the
city
standards
will
allow
that
to
be
changed
from
the
precise
plan
so
that
we
can
have
bios
whales
with
natural
drainage,
use
the
water
more
effectively
to
water,
the
trees
and
similarly,
also
pay
attention
to
the
lighting
in
this
area,
which
is
oops.
I'm
so
sorry,
excuse
me.
R
I
apologize
can't
control
that
the
lighting
in
standards
that
we
have
set
maybe
should
be
modified
to
acknowledge
the
fact
that
there's
new
understandings
of
the
importance
of
not
having
very
bright
lighting,
even
if
there
are
parking
lots.
Thank
you.
I
hope
the
council
and
epc
and
staff
will
take
that
into
consideration.
C
S
S
S
I
was
at
the
focus
groups
which
they
they
have
been
very
careful
to
involve
all
of
the
neighborhood
groups
and
the
the
stakeholders,
such
as
sierra
club
and
all
the
others,
they've
been
very
responsive,
they're,
a
really
good
neighbor.
I've
also
worked
at
google
as
well,
but
that's
beside
the
point.
S
Basically,
I
just
wanted
to
support
this.
This
redevelopment,
I'm
not
looking
forward
to
the
actual
construction
part
of
it.
I've
been
here
for
for
25
years,
I
think-
and
so
it's
not
not
pleasant,
but
the
the
results
of
what
google
is
doing
even
over
at
moffett
and
at
the
in
the
the
landings
area.
It's
all
just
just
superlative
architecture
and
just
extremely
well
considered
and
has
involved
all
of
us
neighbors.
S
T
Hello,
can
you
hear
me
hi
good
evening?
My
name
is
michelle
galang
and
I'm
a
second
year
apprentice,
a
commercial
electrician
with
ibew
local
332,
and
I
have
lived
in
mountain
view
for
over
nine
years.
I'm
a
single
mother
of
two
daughters
and
I
just
got
into
the
insider
commercial
program
of
ibew
332
and
it's
a
good
way
for
me
to
get
paid
a
middle-class
wage.
So
I
can
help
support
my
daughter's
education
receive
a
better
health
care
insurance
and
retirement
package
and
save
up
to
buy
and
own
a
house.
T
T
T
So-
and
I
know
that
this
is
definitely
a
rewarding
and
fulfilling
career
and
but
being
in
the
union
matters.
I
believe
that
being
a
union
construction
worker,
especially
as
women,
are
given
more
security,
safety
and
equality
in
the
workforce
or
in
the
workplace
and
regarding
tonight's
agenda.
I
strongly
support
this
project.
We
need
more
affordable
housing
in
the
area
and
this
master
plan
promises
seven
thousand
new
units,
including
much
needed,
affordable
housing.
T
T
We
need
to
train
and
protect
the
next
generation
of
skilled
workers.
So
please
I
want
google
and
landlist
to
commit
to
training
and
employing
local
construction
workers.
If
developers
commit
to
building
union.
There
will
be
more
opportunities
like
for
people
like
me
and
to
become
skilled
trades
people,
and
I
don't.
I
understand
that
the
building
trades
plan
to
make
with
google
and
landlines
to
discuss
the
master
plan
further.
T
U
U
V
Hello,
thank
you.
For
your
time.
My
name
is
brian
and
I
am
in
strong
support
of
this
project
proposed
by
google.
I
feel
there
is
no
doubt
that
google
has
offered
several
community
benefits
with
this
project
vision.
I
am
a
construction
worker
and
a
plumbing
instructor
for
ua
local
393,
and
I
urge
google
to
once
again
consider
using
the
local
workforce
with
this
build
and
to
support
the
local
community
with
a
few
thousand
jobs
that
support
apprenticeship,
programs
and
training
the
next
generation
of
highly
skilled
workers.
V
I
truly
appreciate
all
the
work
that
google
brings
to
this
area
and
I
would
be
honored
to
work
on
this
project.
Just
like
I've
been
honored
for
every
google
project
that
I've
been
a
part
of
in
the
past.
I
truly
believe
that
our
shared
standards
of
excellence
make
for
some
of
the
most
amazing
projects
that
I've
been
a
part
of,
and
I
expect
this
one
to
be
no
different.
Thank
you
in
advance,
google,
for
continuing
to
build
great
things
and
supporting
local
laborers
and
laborers
and
families
in
your
community.
Thank
you
very
much.
V
C
W
Evening,
epc,
commissioners,
my
name
is
kevin
ma
a
resident
in
the
san
antonio
neighborhood
and
I'm
in
support
of
this
project.
This
project
is
a
well
done
project.
Despite
the
tree
removals.
I
believe
that
google
will
provide
a
tree
replacement
strategy
that
is
suitable
for
the
city,
given
that
they're
well
accommodating
to
the
environment,
as
it
is
now
with
the
egrets
and
herons
that
are
in
that
area.
W
W
I
believe
that
the
project
does
provide
good
enough
benefits
such
as
the
sea
level,
riders
mitigation
that
inherently
a
city
like
us,
does
need
in
funding
and
as
well
as
the
affordable
housing
requirement.
That
is
part,
though,
obviously
we
would
always
like
more
affordable
housing,
but
any
housing
is
great
in
this
kind
of
market.
So,
just
to
recap,
just
like
I'm
strong
support
this
project
moving
fast.
Thank
you.
B
X
All
right,
my
name
is
corey
and
I'm
a
plumber
with
local
393
and
I'm
currently
working
on
the
google
bay
view
project.
I'm
supported
this
plan.
If
it
one
establishes
a
local
higher
up,
not
only
our
trade
but
of
all
the
local
construction
trades
and
two.
It
establishes
apprentice
programs
as
goals
for
this
project.
C
B
D
Hale
alex
brown
mobile,
homeowner
resident
of
north
bay
shore,
member
of
the
steering
committee,
the
santiago
neighborhood
association,
you've
already
heard
from
our
queen
bee,
I'm
also
a
member
of
the
outfit
workers
union.
It's
great
to
see
all
the
turnout
organization,
yay
google's
been
an
excellent
neighbor
and
partner
over
the
last
several
years.
Working
on
this
development
they've
met
with
our
community
several
times
and
responsive
to
our
community's
feedback.
D
D
D
D
A
C
A
C
Y
Y
Y
F
F
G
Sure
I
would
just
like
to
show
the
phasing
plan.
I
know
it's
a
little
bit
difficult
for
people
to
see
when
we
are
looking
at
the
just
the
phasing
plan.
But
if,
if
someone
is
trying
to
understand
this,
they
might
have
to
look
at
the
phasing
plan,
along
with
the
the
housing
plan
as
well.
So
as
part
of
phase
one
itself
which
you
can
see
on
the
screen
right
here
in
dark
blue
outline.
G
Phase
one
and
phase
two
both
combine:
google
is
proposing
to
provide
40
plus
percentage
of
housing
as
part
of
phase
one
two
sites
will
be
dedicated,
which
I'm
indicating
on
my
screen
right
now.
One
is
along
shoreline
bullard
right
here
and
the
other
one
is
indicated
over
here.
This
is
along
the
pear
avenue
site.
These
are
two
sites
which
will
be
dedicated
for
affordable
housing.
G
Dedication
for
affordable
housing,
so
first
two
phases,
40
plus
percentage
of
housing
units,
will
be
developed,
phase
three
and
phase
four.
No
new
housing
will
be
developed
that
will
be
concentrated
on
the
office.
Development
and
rest
of
the
housing
units
will
be
developed
in
the
joaquin
area
and
the
gateway
area
that
will
be
towards
the
later
phases.
You
know
it
moves
actually
inside
from
shoreline
towards
half,
and
then
the
gateway
portion
of
a
residential
site
on
the
gateway
portion
is
at
the
very
end.
F
G
F
Okay
and
then
can
you
just
also
talk
about
the
community
benefit
piece
related
to
the
charleston
corridor?
Sure
so
when,
when
is
the
phasing
of
the
community
benefits
it's
at
the
time,
because
this
is
a
long
time
horizon
right.
So
if
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
like
with
the
charleston
transit
corridor?
If
the
design
study
is
being
is
conducted
right
now
and
then
it's
going
after
construction?
G
That
is
correct,
so
I
think
a
lot
of
the
details
are
still
being
figured
out
and
we
are
currently
negotiating
that
with
the
applicant,
but
our
intent
is
that
the
community
benefits,
as
you
know,
any
other
typical
project
should
be
provided
fairly
soon
after
the
project
approval,
and
that
will
definitely
help
us
with.
You
know:
constructing
one
of
the
most
priority
transpiration
improvement
project
that
we
have
in
the
area.
F
I
So
a
couple
of
different
questions.
Let
me
just
just
start
with
two:
the
first
following
on
with
commissioner:
hey
myers
question
for
the
land
that's
dedicated
to
the
city.
What
is
the
condition
of
the
land
when
it's
dedicated
over?
Is
it
the
who
does
the
demo?
I
guess
that's
the
question:
is
it
given
over
as
like
dirt,
or
is
it
given
over
as
a
space
that
we,
the
city,
have
to
pay
for
the
demo.
L
I
think
some
of
those
finer
green
details
are
things
that
we'd
have
to
work
out
with
the
applicant.
Typically,
sites
are
delivered
without
without
structures
on
them,
unless
that's
something
that
we
find
beneficial
in
the
short
term
in
order
to
be
able
to
lease.
But
those
specific
details
are
things
that
we'd
have
to
work
through
for
each
site
as
part
of
the
development
review
and
the
in
the
development
agreement.
I
Okay,
all
right,
so
that
gets
worked
out
later.
So
the
the
other
large
question
I
have
and
it's
something
that
I
know
very
little
about,
but
I'm
I
you
know-
we've
got
a
lot
of
folks
from
the
trades
here
tonight
watching
this
and
I'm
interested
in
knowing
more
about
the
issue
that
they
raised.
So
this
is
kind
of
a
two-part
question,
one
part
for
the
city
and
then
one
part
for
google.
I
H
Well,
I
can,
commissioner,
I
could
tell
you
that
that
there
is
a
policy
that
the
several
speakers
referred
to
in
the
north
bay
shore
precise
plan-
it's
not
mandatory,
it
just
requires
it
encourages
the
use
of
local
workforce
and
local
business
sourcing
for
development
in
the
planning
area.
So
it's
not
mandatory,
but
it's
encouraged.
I
Considered
a
goal:
okay
and
then
for
google.
What
is
this?
What's
the
state
of
what
what
level
of
commitment
has
been
made
in
terms
of
local
hire
for
any
of
those
phases,
I
mean,
I
know
it's
like
30
years
worth
of
phases.
So
that's
a
lot
of
time,
but
I'm
curious
to
know
what
is
the
level
of
that?
What
what
commencement
just
so
that
I
know.
M
Z
Z
I
AA
M
M
You
know-
and
I
will
say
probably
the
completion
of
phase
two
would
be
late,
2030
31
somewhere
in
that
area,
maybe
32,
if
you
know,
but
there's
a
lot
of
pcp
permits
to
to
happen
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
city
permitting
to
happen,
and
then
you
know
a
lot
of
construction
that
will
go
on
to
make
that
happen,
and
I
think
you
know
I
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
len
lee.
So
I'll.
M
Let
andrew
jump
in
here,
but
I
know
absorption
rates
of
the
housing
are
something
that
they
consider
as
a
residential
developer
predominantly
so
they
have
to
be
able.
They
don't
want
too
many
empty
units
sitting
there
ever
which
I
doubt
if
that
would
be
the
case.
But
andrew
do
you
have
anything
to
you
want
to
jump
in
on.
M
AB
You
hear
me
yep,
yes,
yeah
look,
I
mean,
I
think
this
is
you
know
just
for
everyone
in
the
in
the
simplest
way.
I
can
explain
this.
You
know
we
are
motivated
to
get
as
many
people
living
in
this
place
as
fast
as
we
possibly
can,
and
you
know
commercially
we're
driven
by
our
ability
to
attract
people
and
compel
people
to
want
to
live
here.
So
we're
going
to
do
that
as
fast
as
we
possibly
can.
I
think
we
always
are
confronted
by
realities
of
the
economic
cycle,
and
so
that's
the
only
thing.
AB
That's
going
to
stop
us
from
really
getting
through
this
as
fast
as
we
possibly
can
so
we're
all
incentivized
to
make
sure
that
this
place
is
brought
to
life
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
that
includes
you
know
attracting
people
to
want
to
live
there.
So
you
know
there
is
nothing
more
simple
than
that.
We
are
really
driven
by
our
ability
to
to
work
with
the
market
and
the
economic
cycles
that
we're
confronted
with.
AA
Thank
you,
yeah.
I
was
just
curious
about
the
overall
timing
of
just
because
the
last
time
I
think
north
bay
shore
came
before
us.
The
timing
was
15
to
20
years
and
I
noticed
that
there
was
a
big
jump
and
I
know
with
a
lot
of
economic
uncertainty,
there's
always
some
buffer.
It's
just
seemed
like
a
big
buffer,
and
I
wanted
to
find
out
if
something
happened
in
the
meantime
to
cause
that
jump,
and
the
second
part
of
that
question
is:
if
phase
two
is
slated
optimistically
to
be
ten
years
from
now.
AA
M
You're
exactly
correct
and
that's
the
reason
for
the
30-year
ask
on
the
d.a
is
because
there
are
so
many
unknowns
when
you
start
to
get
that
far
out
as
andrew
was
saying
with
the
economic
cycles,
but
I
you
know,
I
still
believe
that
if
things
go
really
well
and
the
support
is
there
from
you
know
all
parties,
you
know
they're
a
part
of
this.
I
think
I
think
we
could
do
it
in
in
just
over
20
years
and
and
really.
M
I
think
that
d.a
asked
that
diana
mentioned
is
is
just
a
buffer
as
a
just
in
case,
but
construction
takes
a
long
time
and,
as
others
have
pointed
out,
you
know
we
started
this
process
back
in
2014,
and
here
we
are
seven
years
later
you
know
with
really
no
housing
to
show
nothing.
You
know
very
minimal
built
already,
so
that's
would
be
a
third
of
the
way
through
that
20-year
da
to
begin
with.
So
there
are
unforeseen
things
at
play
here.
AA
AA
AA
Okay,
okay,
that
was
one
question,
I'm
going
to
jump
a
little
and
then
I'm
going
to
hop
on
to
commissioner
dempsey's
question
with
the
the
local
unions.
I
appreciate
mr
timeoff's
continuous
efforts
to
reach
out
and
work
with
them
and
you've
already
shown
that
you've
had
relationships
and
have
supported
local
workers.
So
is
there
anything
you
can
say
to
sort
of
allay
those
fears,
just
the
fact
that
so
many
have
come
out
tonight
to
try
to
ensure
that
this
happens.
AA
Z
Sure,
thank
you
for
the
question.
Commissioner
yen.
You
know
I
what
I
heard
was
a
great
deal
of
support
right
and
for
the
projects
right
and
the
goals
of
the
the
city
to
deliver
housing
and
affordable
housing
and-
and
we
support
those
goals,
and
we
also,
you
know,
want
to
get
to
building
this
and
and
make
sure
that
that
vision
is
realized.
Z
Z
We
are
having
conversations
internally
about
job
training
programs
and
supporting
the
apprenticeships,
so
those
conversations
are
in
process.
I
think
what
you're
hearing
tonight
is
just
encouragement,
hopefully
rather
than
fear,
because
from
our
perspectives,
those
conversations
continue
to
be
productive.
AA
Great,
thank
you
and
then
this
is
for
the
city.
Perhaps,
and
I
know
numbers
need
to
be
fine-tuned
just
very
quickly
with
the
five
percent
inclusionary
housing
and
the
15
landing
dedication.
Do
you
guys
have
in
mind
a
general
number
of
where
what
level
of
affordability
is
in
the
inclusionary
and
what
level
affordability
and
the
land
dedication.
A
E
Just
a
quick
question:
the
master
plan
that
you've
given
to
us
diana
is
that
one
that
is
from
the
city.
I
think.
Historically,
we
had
a
couple
of
land
owners
out
here
and
we
were
concerned
about
what
master
plan
would
be
presented
forward,
and
it
was
my
understanding
that
the
city
was
going
to
be
really
running
with
this
master
plan.
E
G
So
stephanie
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
and
I
would
like
google
to
probably
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
ownership
of
the
property,
but
to
answer
your
question,
commissioner,
this
is
the
master
plan
I
presented
tonight
is
google's
master
plan
proposal
to
the
city
for
our
review.
This
is
a
little
bit
different
than
the
gateway
master
plan
where
city
has
you
know,
encountered
two
separate
property
owners
and
not
much
agreement
on
how
the
development
is
going
to
happen,
and
city
council
directed
staff
to
work
on
and
prepare
this
gateway
master
plan.
G
That
is
separate,
but
it
is
part
of
this
master
plan.
I
I
know
this
can
be
a
little
bit
confusing,
but
the
gateway
master
plan
is
part
of
the
google
north
base
or
master
plan,
but
it's
just
a
small
portion
and
it
only
includes
the
the
google
controlled
parcels
within
the
gateway
master
plan
that
is
included
in
this
north
bay
or
master
plan
here,
stephanie
jeff
michael.
Anyone
would
like
to
add
anything
else
to
that.
M
E
And-
and
I
guess
this
is
my
concern,
because
everybody
is
anxious
for
this
master
brand
to
proceed
and
we
want
housing
and
we
want
to
meet
our
housing
element
requirements
and
all
of
that
within
a
certain
limited
time,
and
so
you
know
the
plan
looks
looks
great,
but
we
need
to
make
sure
that
everybody
is
in
agreement
with
this.
In
order
for
us
to
really
jump
start
started,
it
was
my
understanding
that
it
was
delayed
because
of
the
the
difference
of
opinion.
L
So
I
think
you're,
referring
more
to
the
gateway
master
plan
and
just
coming
back
to
kind
of
the
fundamentals
of
the
purpose
of
the
master
plan,
is
really
to
plan
multi-owner
and
multi-property
land
areas
so
that
there
is
a
a
you
know:
cohesive
design
across
those
multiple
properties
with
the
multiple
property
owners.
But
the
unique
thing
about
the
google
north
face
or
master
plan
is
that
they
actually
own
all
of
those
properties
which
is
pretty
unique
in
such
a
large
master
plan
area.
L
So
there's
not
the
same
dynamic
of
agreement
that
needs
to
take
place
with
the
north
base,
your
master
plan
that
was
occurring
with
the
gateway
master
plan.
So
the
reason
the
city
took
over
the
gateway
master
plan
was
because
the
the
two
property
owners
were
having
difficulty
coming
to
agreement
on.
You
know
kind
of
what
would
be
the
ultimate.
L
E
Z
J
Thank
you
yeah.
So
in
terms
of
my
thinking
around
this,
I
think,
as
several
of
the
speakers
and
I
believe
the
applicant
noted,
the
lack
of
housing
or
the
need
for
housing
is
definitely
a
substantial
concern
to
the
community
in
particular.
Affordable
housing.
Affordability
is
definitely
something
that
I
believe
ought
to
be
prioritized
and
the
reason
why
I
say
this
is
because
of
the
proposed
development
agreement
of
30
years.
J
I
understand
that
there's
a
phased-in
approach,
so
there
will
be
some
kind
of
almost
waterfall
cascading
approach
that
you
know,
completion
of
one
triggers
another
and
triggers
another
to
move
forward
in
terms
of
development,
but
I
I
am
a
little
bit,
hesitant
or
concerned
or
apprehensive
around
not
knowing
exactly
or
having
some
sort
of
stated
like
milestone
trajectory
for
how
we
can
expect
these.
The
time
that
we
can
see
these
phases
to
actually
be
completed
in.
J
That's
something
that
I
I
would
very
much
be
very
supportive
of
one
of
the
things
that
I
was
wondering.
Maybe
this
is
a
city
question
or
a
question
for
the
applicant
in
terms
of
the
delivery
of
the
affordable
units
compared
to
you
know,
like
the
market
rate
units.
I
think
commissioner
yen
yin
noted
that
the
phase
one
and
two
development,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
would
deliver
the
bulk
of
the
housing
at
that
offset
and
that
could
be
deployed
at
about
15
years.
J
G
J
G
We
don't
have
that
level
of
details,
yet
we
do
have
some
approximate
numbers
on
the
units
that
will
be
dedicated
that
will
be
received
through
land
dedication,
but
we
do
not
have
the
numbers
on
the
inclusionary
housing
units
in
the
market
rate
development.
Yet
so
I
think
those
numbers
will
be
will
be
coming
through
for
the
refinement
of
the
plan.
J
The
full
allotment
of
affordable
units
would
have
been
delivered
with
you
know
the
other
10
years
or
even
like
15
by
you
know,
15
years,
75
of
the
affordable
units
have
been
delivered
by
20.
You
know
100
percent,
you
know,
are
there
any
like
what
are
the
in?
What
ways?
Might
that
be
something
that
is
fitted
into
the
recommendation?.
L
Oh
sorry,
go
ahead!
Oh
sorry,
I
was
just
gonna
say
so
I
think
we
are
anticipating
that
there
are
going
to
be
kind
of
benchmarks
incorporated
into
the
development
agreement
for
delivery
of
of
things,
exactly
that
you
are
speaking
of
so.
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
that
this
study
session
is
really
intended
to
hear
feedback
and
further
things
that
the
epc
recommends
that
be
studied
or
incorporated
into
the
into
the
project.
L
J
Okay,
yeah,
that
that
is
helpful,
and
then
I
guess
I'll
have
an
another
general
comment.
One
thing
that
I
did
find
very
helpful
out
of
the
community
outreach
which
I
appreciate
you
know
everyone
the
applicant
doing
as
well
is
that
desire
that
stated
desire
for
local
amenities
like
a
grocery
store
like
a
bike
shop,
a
gym.
J
You
know
if
the
goal
is
to
reduce
some
of
these
trips,
you
know
it
would
be
a
shame
if
people
had
to
drive
from
north
bay
shore
down
to
the
safeway
here
or
elsewhere,
to
do
something
they
could
do
on
a
bicycle.
I
really
appreciate
that
point
of
community
feedback,
and
then
I
do
have
one
more
question
about
the
park
and
open
space
that
green
belt
is.
I
noticed
that
the
green
belt
cut
through
some
of
the
parkland
that
was
dedicated
to
the
city.
J
W
M
M
We
always
have
to
remember
how
big
north
bay
shore
really
is
and
that
size
of
the
park
is
has
usable
space
on
both
sides
of
that
for
sure,
while
we
haven't
gotten
into
any
park
design
and
that
will
be
done
with
the
city,
you
know
we
look
forward
to
that
opportunity
as
we
move
forward,
but
it'd
be
a
shame
to
not
take
advantage
of
the
existing
ecology.
That's
already
there
and
doing
really
well.
J
J
M
Yeah
well,
I
I
think
this
will
probably
be
something
that
gets
worked
out
further
in
the
day,
but
so
the
ownership
is
only
two
colors.
It's
the
lighter
green,
which
is
the
popo
which
remains
google
owned
and
publicly
accessible,
and
then
the
joaquin
commons
and
the
eco
gem
and
the
and
the
shorebird
yards
where
the
school
might
be.
Those
are
dedicated
to
the
city.
The
the
darker
green
green
loop
is
just
there
as
a
graphical
representation
of
where
the
green
loop
is.
M
You
know,
I
think
that
there
is
a
there's,
a
public
easement,
a
public
access
easement
around
the
entirety
of
the
green
loop,
and
so
the
intention,
that's
its
intention,
the
ownership,
I
guess
in
theory.
I
think
this
is
something
we
need
to
talk
to
the
city
about,
might
change
as
it
goes
through
that
joaquin
commons
park,
but
I'm
not
sure
that
makes
the
most
sense
from
a
maintenance
point
of
view
or
anything
else.
So
I
think
that's
something
to
talk
about
as
we
work
through
the
master
plan.
J
Yeah,
absolutely
because
I
just
you
know,
I
don't
really
know
what
the
implications
are,
or
I
don't
know,
maybe
other
people
are
it
just
to
your
point
has
to
be
worked
out,
but
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
just
have
clarity
around
what
the
implications
are
of
you
know
who
owns
that
loop
when
and
where,
and
just
having
clarity
around
that.
That
would
be
very
good.
I
would
have
a
ton
of
other
questions,
but
I'll
just
hand
it
off
to
anyone
else
who
wants
to
have
questions.
A
All
right,
I've
have
a
few.
The
district
parking
is
wasn't
kind
of
clear,
clear
in
the
in
the
phasing
document
that,
as
part
of
the
google
summary
the
so
the
building
of
the
of
a
lot
over
the
parking
garage
over
on
the
shoreline
property.
The
district
parking
overweight
by
by
san
antonio.
How
will
that
fit
into
the
phasing?
Is
that
the
assumption
is
that
would
be
built
early
on
to
be
able
to
get
those
those
cars
consolidated
into
single
areas
or
out,
or
is
that
something
you
haven't
even
looked
at.
M
Yeah,
so
lot
c
would
be
the
amphitheater
site
would
be
where
we
would
prefer
to
have
the
first
district
parking
structure.
Those
negotiations
haven't
started
with
the
city,
yet
since
that
is
city-owned
land,
so
that's
something
that
we
need
to
continue
into.
The
future
marine
way
would
be
built
on
google
property
out
by
san
antonio,
as
you
said,
but
that
is
a
far
off
in
the
future.
That's
one
of
the
very
future
phases
or
longer
future
phases.
I
guess-
and
you
know,
with
every
intent
of
prioritizing
people
over
cars.
M
A
Okay,
let
me
really
ask
the
question:
a
different
way
is
building
the
structure
on
a
shoreline
amphitheater,
a
something
that
will
be
required
for
phase
one
or
phase
two
or
phase
three
to
be
able
to
be
successfully
move
ahead.
That's
what
I'm
trying
to
understand
is:
is
that
is
there
a
linkage
between
the
construction
of
that
parking
garage
and
the
rest
of
the
phases.
A
G
You
know
type
of
trees,
species
which
are
more
suitable
for
the
north
bay,
show
precise
plan
area,
and
we
did
that
effort
in
consultation
with
a
lot
of
other
groups
like
sierra
club,
audubon
society.
A
lot
of
people
were
involved
in
that
that
said,
that
is
going
to
be
the
basis
where
we
start
the
replanting
plan
review,
and
you
know
that's
a
good
guide.
In
addition
to
that,
we
do
have
some
in-house
expertise,
but
at
the
same
time
we
will
be.
A
Google's
not
built
housing
before
and
so,
as
michael's
indicated,
you've
done
a
lot
of
work
with
them
on
the
commercial
space.
So
two
parts-
I
guess
it's
my
understanding
that
any
any
housing
built
up
by
the
city
on
the
dedicated
land
we're
required
today
to
use
union
labor.
Is
that
correct,
so
any
of
the
dedicated
land?
Anything
that
would
be
up
there
would
be
required
to
be
from
the
unions.
Is
that
correct?
H
M
AB
Yeah
thanks,
look
len
lease
has
been
active
in
the
local
market
for
about
20
years
or
so
now,
in
a
construction
capacity,
and
we've
got
a
long
history
of
working
collaboratively
collaboratively
with
with
the
unions,
and
we
intend
to
do
so
here
also
in
in
in
north
bay
shore
and
we've
started
those
discussions
with
our
our
union
partners
and
and
they're
going
to
continue
and
fully
expect
that
you
know
we
are
going
to
be
employing
a
lot
of
local
local
hires
in
this.
In
this
development.
A
Okay
and
then
I
guess
this
last
question
for
staff-
it's
my
understanding
that
the
gateway
master
plan
only
encompasses
what's
in
this
plan,
which
would
be
called
phase
eight
and
the
gateway
master
plan
is
still
currently
scheduled
to
be
presented
to
council
for
approval
in
december.
Is
that
correct?
A
A
AA
AA
AA
AA
G
G
If
anything,
you
know
whenever
we
will
be
reviewing
new
proposal
new
alternatives,
we
will
always
go
back
to
the
original
principles
and
see.
Does
this
match
to
the
overall
goals
and
principles
of
the
precise
plan,
which
I
think
you
know
all
these
new
options
and
alternatives
do
go
towards
more
sustainability
and
sustainable
options
and
stuff,
and
so
they
should
be.
AA
Okay,
great
thank
you,
and
I
trust
that
google
is
always
looking
at
the
most
innovative,
but
at
some
point
you
just
have
to
draw
the
line
and
say
this
is
what
we're
doing,
even
if
something
new
is
being
invented
with
just
such
a
long
process.
Who
knows
what
might
be
invented
in
the
next
10
years?
So
I
just
wanted
to
hear
from
google
that
that
that,
yes,
you
are
open
to
being
flexible
to
what
would
be
most
innovative
in
the
highest
technology
within
reason.
M
100
yeah
innovation
is
just
something
that
we
do
every
day
or
we
try
to
do
every
day
for
sure.
So
I
think
that's
that
we're
always
looking
to
the
better
solution
and
looking
out
into
the
future.
So
that
is
something
that
we
are
going
to
dig
into
more
in
the
next
year.
I
would
say,
and
and
really
come
down
to
at
least
the
the
lighting
design
as
a
baseline,
and
then
we
can
always
improve
it
with
future
pcps.
M
M
I
I
AA
Oh,
yes,
I'm
sorry,
since
commissioner
dempsey
had
just
brought
that
up.
I
forgot
to
mention
that
I
had
already
heard
this
presentation
from
jeff
and
google.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
first,
and
I
also
did
comment
on
that
and
I
believe
he
had
mentioned
that
pg
e
owned
some
of
the
land
there
and
it's
a
little
bit
difficult
to
get
more
than
the
one
connection.
AA
However,
I
also
wanted
to
chime
in
and
press
for
more
porosity
in
any
shape
or
fashion
in
terms
of
walkability
like
ability,
and
I
believe
jeff
was
striving
for
that
too,
and
I
didn't
know
whether
or
not
you
guys
had
thought
of
going
along
the
the
santiago
villa
portion.
I
didn't
know
if
pg
e
also
owned
that
connection.
M
M
So
we
need
to
work
with
them
in
order
to
get
more
porosity,
but
that
is
always
something
that
we're
doing
I,
I
know
our
transportation
team
is
working
with
the
city's
transportation
team
as
well
to
try
to
figure
out
where
those
best
connections
are
and
how
to
really
how
to
optimize
stephen's
creek,
as
as
you
both
are
saying
here,
it
is
a.
It
is
a
very
primary
connection
into
into
north
bay
shore
for
sure.
M
AA
H
AA
A
I
guess
I
mean
I'll,
take
a
crack
at
this
on
these
questions,
so
overall
I'm
I'm
supportive
of
the
the
general
land
use
plan.
What
I've
seen
here,
the
affordable
housing
seems
to
be
by
by
doing
land
dedication.
Hopefully
we
get
that
faster
and
potentially,
if
it's
done
with
with
you
know
local
partners
like
all
the
housing
and
even
housing
and
so
forth,
that
can
happen
more
quickly
than
it
might
otherwise.
A
I
like
the
green
loop
and
then
the
open
space.
I
I'm
I
like
the
idea
district
parking,
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
it
being
way
in
the
back
of
the
whole
property,
but
I
not
having
parking
lots
everywhere
is
a
good
thing.
Like
commissioner
nunez
I'm
a
little,
I
would
like
to
see
something
in
the
overall
plan
that
that
places
some.
A
A
If
you
just
divide
up
30
years
into
by
eight
and
that's
a
long
time,
and
so
anything
we,
I
guess,
would
I
would
love
to
see
anything
that
could
it
would
pull
the
housing
that
currently
starts
to
reappear
out
in
phase
five
somehow
into
phase
three
and
and
four.
That
would
be
great.
The
other
thing
that
I
guess,
and
I
don't
staff-
I
don't
know
how
you
incorporate
this,
but
right
now.
C
A
So
the
phasing
is
probably
my
biggest
my
biggest
question
and
making
sure
that
happens
in
a
timely
fashion
and
if
we,
if
there's
any
opportunity
to
accelerate
that
that
there's
nothing
in
the
in
the
master
plan
or
in
the
development
agreement
that
would
prevent
that
from
happening
sooner.
Okay,
commissioner
kapolis.
E
And
so
I
don't
have
really
any
additional
input,
because
at
this
at
this
level
of
planning,
it's
just
a
general
overall.
This
is
what
we
want
to
do
and
I
think,
as
as
the
plan
proceeds
and
gets
into
a
little
bit
more
detail,
it'll
be
a
little
bit
easier
to
kind
of
get
get
that
vision
of
exactly
how
how
this
is
going
to
really
evolve
as
we
go.
So
I
personally
don't
have
any
additional
comments
at
this
time,
but
certainly
like
to
see
where
we're
going
with
with
this.
F
F
So
I
would
share
the
comment
about
stevens,
creek
and
and
being
able
to
make
sure
that
we're
building
up
that
infrastructure
as
well
to
support
the
number
of
and
cyclists
and
pedestrians
who
will
want
to
come
to
this
great
neighborhood
and
and
just
ongoing
conversations.
But,
as
commissioner
said
early
on
in
this
process,
I'm
really
really
excited
about
where
this
is
heading.
AA
Yes,
in
general
answering
the
question
I
think
I'm
I'm
very
supportive
of
the
overall
concepts
and
where
everything's
going,
I'm
very
appreciative
of
google
outreach
to
all
the
stakeholders,
and
it
sounds
like
every
group
has
been
giving
positive
feedback
about
that.
So
that
is
great.
Thank
you
for
being
a
good
neighbor,
and
I
know
it's
been
a
long
time
in
the
making,
but
I
have
to
say
that
every
iteration
I
see
improves
it.
AA
So
it's
been
worthwhile
so
as
far
as
additional
input
at
this
higher
level
there's
nothing
necessarily
that
I
want
to
add.
I
just
do
hope
for
the
complete
streets
from
what
I
saw
that
there
was
a
breakdown
of
the
blocking
and
that
buildings
will
not
be
enormous
giant
super
blocked
buildings
and
that
it
won't
be
just
like
a
cut
away
through
the
ground
floor
to
pass
through
and
you
have
over
building,
not
that
kind
of
you
know
access
through.
J
Yeah
so
definitely
overall,
very
supportive
of
getting
new
housing
very
supportive
of
getting
this
project
moving
forward.
I
do
have
a
question
and
then
I'll
try
to
streamline
it
into
what
everyone
else
is
is
getting
into
as
well,
probably
for
the
applicant
or
for
the
city.
Whoever
is
best
suited
to
answer.
J
How
much
has
climate
resiliency
at
this
point
in
time
factored
into
the
overall
planning,
and
by
that
I
mean
resiliency
from
the
building
perspective,
with
measures
like
green
roofs,
albedo,
reflectivity
or
district-wide
like
flood
control
measures?
How
much
of
that
has
gone
into
this
planning
so
far?.
M
We're
learning
a
lot
from
our
office
buildings
that
we're
on
that
are
under
construction
and
that
we're
building
so
we're
we're
actually
measuring
a
lot
from
those
already
today,
charleston,
east
and
bayview
and
and
some
others
over
in
sunnyvale,
so
we're
we're
always
taking
into
account
the
newest.
You
know
technologies
that
can
help
us
in
that
regard.
I
think
we've
got
a
lot
of
opportunity
here
to
explore
new
areas
like,
like
you
said,
with
the
green
roofs
and
actually
occupiable,
green
roofs
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
M
You
know,
I
think
I
could.
I
could
keep
going
on
our
the
rest
of
our
resilience.
You
know
raising
the
the
building
floors.
Above
you
know
the
pima
flood
levels
as
we're
required
to
so
on
and
so
forth
and
district
systems
are
always
a
big
part
of
it.
So
you
know
that
is
a
big
piece
of
our
plan.
Is
you
know?
The
district
systems
can
then
take
pressure
off
of
the
the
rest
of
the
city
system.
We
can
do
water
blending
so
that
we
can
better
utilize
the
recycled
water.
M
That's
coming
out
of
palo
alto.
You
know
the
ecogem
is
going
to
act
as
a
is
a
large
stormwater
element.
You
know
just
because
of
it
as
we
take
away
the
asphalt
from
that
area.
It's
now
just
much
more
porous,
and
so
that
that's
how
you
know
we're
really
examining
this
today.
North
bay
shore
is
about
58
asphalt
in
the
area
that
we're
redeveloping,
and
so
we're
going
to.
You
know
really
open
that
up
with
30
acres
of
new
open
space,
and
so
that
transformation
is,
is
what
we're
all
hoping
to
see.
J
Well
and
to
what
extent
would
google
and
then
lease?
And
if
the
answer
right
now
is
like
don't
know,
then
you
know
that's
fine
too,
but
to
what
extent
would
google
and
when
we
feel
comfortable
committing
to
you,
know
looking
at
on
a
more
conscious
level
having
it
very
documented
that
you
know,
as
construction
is
phased
in
that
you
know,
those
techniques
will
be
consciously
sought
out
to
make
sure
that
you
know
the
essentially.
J
What
I'm
concerned
about
is
the
human
condition
right
and
having
making
sure
that
the
people
inside
are
betressed
from
you
know,
high
temperatures
flooding
and
making
sure
that
that
would
be
equitably
basically
distributed
to
make
sure
that
the
like
dedicated,
affordable
units,
for
example,
don't
receive
less
tree
canopy,
less
green
roof
less
technology.
What
would
be
the
extent
of
comfort
that
google,
and
at
least,
would
have
kind
of
documenting
that
in
the
plans
moving
forward.
M
M
You
know
designing
for
health,
designing
for
the
you
know
the
human
and
and
the
performance
that
goes
along
with
that.
So
I
would
venture
to
say
that
our
our
own
goals
are
potentially
you
know,
I
don't
know
they're
they're
pretty
forward
thinking.
I
guess
just
just
to
be
blunt.
So,
hopefully,
hopefully
we
can
continue
to
study
that
in
the
future
yeah
michael.
Z
And
then,
I
would
just
say
the
city's
own
reach
code
and
title
24
are
probably
the
most
far-reaching
pardon.
The
puns
in
terms
of
you
know,
leading
at
the
you
know:
sustainability
and
building
systems
from
energy
performance
standpoint
and
then,
as
jeff
mentioned,
all
the
elements
of
the
master
plan,
the
housing,
the
affordable
housing,
that's
integrated
within
the
complete
neighborhood,
so
everything
that
we're
doing
from
a
parks
and
open
space
standpoint
in
the
tree
canopy
will
be
equitably
shared
amongst
all
residents.
J
Sounds
good,
then
I'll
just
kind
of
bring
it
home
in
terms
of
this
round
of
comment
for
myself
in
terms
of
the
low
lighting
limiting
light
pollution,
I'm
very
supportive
of
that.
I'm
also
very
supportive
of
commissioner
dempsey
and
commissioner
hamer's
recommendation
for
a
very
robust
connection
for
bicycling
between
the
stevens
quick
trails
and
making
sure
that
that
green
loop
is
very
accessible
from
that.
I
very
much
am
also
supportive
of
chair
cranston's.
J
You
know
desire
to
see
some
of
that
phasing
the
earlier
phasing
being
able
to
deliver
more
of
the
housing
and
then
one
thought
or
proposal
for
anyone
else
to
consider
is
you
know,
I
would
like
to
make
sure
that
it
is
stated
somewhere
that
the
technologies
for
having
very
climate
resilient
building
are
just
documented
somewhere
and
yeah
want
to
make
sure
that
people
can
can
actually
live
there
for
the
climate
that
we
have
in
the
future.
So
those
are
my
comments.
I
So
in
my
earlier
comments,
I
I
neglected
to
say
one
thing:
yeah
as
we're
giving
feedback
and
and
the
truth
is
it's
the
most
important
piece
of
feedback,
which
is.
I
am
really
excited
about
this
plan.
There's
so
much
in
this
plan
that
I
like
when
I
I
sat
down
with
with
google
earlier
to
to
hear
about
the
project.
I
You
know
I
couldn't
talk
to
him
for
two
hours
because
as
they
went
through
and
they
they
walked
me
through
all
the
pieces.
I
kept
seeing
all
these
little
thoughtful
flourishes
that
I
was
like.
Oh
that
never
even
occurred
to
me
right
and
it,
and
it
really
brought
home
to
me
how
how
thoughtful
and
considerate
I
think
this
process
was.
I
I
know,
god
knows
it
was
a
long
process,
but
I
it's
very
easy
in
these
contexts
to
to
find
things
to
quibble
with
and
there's
always
something
that
we
could
change,
but
the
the
most
important
message.
I
think
that
at
least
I
individually
have
is
that
I'm
really
excited
about
this,
and
I
I
just
wish
it
wasn't
going
to
take
so
long,
because
the
truth
is.
I
want
to
go
and
hang
out
there
so
anyway.
I
A
C
F
Happy
to
kick
us
off
again,
I
mean,
I
think
our
redevelopment
of
the
scale
unfortunately
does
have
real
implications
for
the
existing
canopy,
and
we
know
from
earlier
projects
that
the
state
of
the
canopy
is
not
great.
I,
I
think
the
the
prioritization
of
preserving
where
we
can
transplanting
and
then
and
really.
D
E
E
So
they
have
thought
about
that,
and
I
think
that
that's
you
know
just
really
acknowledges
what
commissioner
dempsey
says.
They
have
taken
the
time
to
understand
that
we
don't
want
to
take
to
take
down
these
larger
trees.
If,
if
they're
in
ill
health,
then
that's
one
thing
but
to
replace
them
with
more
mature
trees
and
and
really
incorporate
that
into
the
overall
plan
is
another
another
indication
of
the
types
of
detail
that
google
has
gone
into
so
jump
in
jeff.
M
Thank
you
for
the
comment
that
you're
exactly
correct,
so
yeah,
so
we're
growing
trees
down
south
already.
Some
of
those
are
already
being
re-boxed,
because
they're
they're
growing
out
of
their
first
boxes.
So
that's
really
encouraging.
So
when
the
trees
go
in,
not
only
will
the
trunks
be
bigger,
they'll
be
taller,
the
actual
canopy
will
be
bigger
as
well,
and
these
are
the
the
sustainable
and
native
trees
that
that
we
are
looking
and
we've
been
talking
to
the
city
for
years
about
that
plant
palette.
So
this
will
be.
M
You
know
those
trees
that
we'll
get
to
see
here.
I
think
the
other
really
important
piece
of
the
tree
story
is
that
with
the
phasing
of
the
development
means
that
the
trees
come
out
in
phases
as
well,
so
they
come
out
in
small
little
increments
and
then
they
get
replaced
in
those
same
increments
as
opposed
to
you
know,
there's
no
we're
not
clear
cutting
north.
They
sure
on
day
one
there's
no
need
for
that.
So
trees
will
come
down.
I
Just
a
quick
question
for
jeff
I
I
had
asked
about
you
know
the
there's
a
number
of
trees
that
are
not
doing
well
and
I
had
asked
sort
of
about
their
prognosis
and
and
jeff,
I'm
probably
going
to
butcher
this,
but
you
had
said
given
the
effort
that
the
area
is
going
to
make
to
use
recycled,
recycled
water
gray
water,
which
is,
you
know,
far
more
environmentally
conscious.
It
does
not
bode
well
for
the
health
of
a
bunch
of
those
non-native
trees.
I
If
you
could
maybe
spend
60
seconds
talking
about
that,
I
thought
that
was
actually
important
and
compelling
because
you
know
it
breaks
my
heart
to
cut
down.
You
know
to
see
redwoods
cut
down,
but
if
they're
not
going
to
make
it
where
they
are
because
redwoods
don't
grow
on
the
shore
that
that's
you
know
it's
unfortunate
but
necessary.
M
Yeah
again,
thank
you.
Another
good
comment,
you're
exactly
correct,
so
the
the
recycled
water
that
comes
from
the
palo
alto
plant
is
unfortunately
compromised
and
getting
leached
by
the
sea
water.
So
it
comes
into
northeast
or
too
salty
for
the
redwoods
to
survive.
So
there's
too
much
salt
content
in
it.
M
The
redwoods
are
just
they're,
not
native,
and
they
and
they
really
can't
remain
with
the
street
transformation
that
happens
as
well.
So
when
we
start
adding
bike
lanes
wider
sidewalks
and-
and
you
want
the
you
know-
pedestrian
experience
to
be
correct-
the
redwoods
don't
match
that,
but
they
can.
They
can
hopefully
remain
in
part
of
the
parks.
AA
Yes,
the
first
time
I
saw
the
presentation
and
when
you
just
see
that
final
number
of
how
many
trees
are
getting
cut,
it's
it's
a
little
shocking
but,
as
everyone
had
said
that
it
was
broken
down
and
explained
to
me
in
a
way
that
made
me
feel
a
little
less.
I
guess
heartbroken
is
what
everybody
else
is
saying,
but
and
it's
understandable
that
if
you're
going
to
put
down
a
ton
of
new
buildings
and
a
ton
of
new
streets
that
some
old
trees
are
going
to
have
to
have
to
go.
AA
AA
I
know
we
have
a
large
amount
of
open
space,
I'm
going
to
put
my
plug
in
for
true
urban
forest
and
if
there
are
trees
that
are
appropriate
to
this
type
of
geographic
area-
and
you
know
marshy
climate-
that
we
we
aim,
for.
You
know
variation
in
our
open
spaces,
and
perhaps
we
have
a
true
forest
somewhere
to
try
to
make
up
for
a
lot
of
the
larger
trees
that
are
getting
cut
down,
because
street
trees
just
aren't
going
to
be
as
large
as
trees.
M
Yeah
again
you're
correct,
you
know,
I'm
not
going
to
be
the
expert
on
on
how
to
go
about
creating
an
urban
forest
by
any
means.
I
think
we
rely
on
on
some
really
smart
consultants,
h.t
harvey,
for
example,
and
some
others
that
are
sfei
and
some
others
that
are
doing
this
for
a
living
and
have
studied
this
this
in
particular,
so
we
rely
on
them
to
guide
us
in
the
street.
In
this
regard,
I
think
it
is
you
know
replant
or
transplanting
trees
can
be
an
expensive
endeavor.
M
AA
J
A
C
A
I'll
just
say
I
I'm
supportive
of
the
process
of
the
streamline
process.
It
would
make
sense
to
me,
given
you
know,
since
we'll
have
a
an
overall
development
agreement
in
place
in
the
master
plan,
I'm
supportive
of
the
of
using
the
streamline
process
in
order
to
try
to
keep
everything
moving
as
quickly
as
we
can
so.
F
Hamer,
yes,
I
get
that.
I
think
the
one
piece
that
didn't
quite
convince
me
is
that
the
there's
a
same
level
of
input,
design,
review,
and
I
just
don't
know
that
to
be
true.
So
I
applaud
google
for
and
a
robust
community
engagement
strategy,
and
I
just
like
to
see
that
continue
as
opposed
to
believing
that
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
are
going
to
shop
on
a
tuesday
afternoon
or
whatever
it
is,
and
to
give
specific
feedback,
as
these
are
going
through
this
staff.
E
I
you
know
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
an
opportunity
to
continue
that
dialogue,
because
this
is
such
an
important
project
and
one
that
is
going
to
be
a
really
a
model,
an
example
of
what
we
want
to
see
done.
You
know
throughout
the
city,
and
I
think
it
is
an
opportunity
to
make
sure
that
people
have
had
that
opportunity.
So
I
I
support
that,
but
making
sure
that,
along
the
way
when
we
get
to
that
point,
we
have
had.
E
A
AA
I
really
want
to
be
supportive
of
the
streamline
development
review
process.
I
think,
as
google
has
moved
in
this
process,
you're
gaining
our
trust
that
you,
you
do
the
outreach
that
your
goals
are
in
line
with.
What's
in
the
precise
plan,
and-
and
I
feel
that
you
know
I'm
so
close-
I
just
I
did
want
to
hear
what
everyone
else
had
to
say.
My
concern
lies
in
this
long
process.
C
I
Yeah,
I
I
think
I'm
much
of
the
same
mind
as
commissioner
yen.
This
is
actually
a
hard
one
for
me,
because
I
generally
think
that
streamlining-
and
you
know
compressing
the
period
of
time
where
people
have
to
chase
paperwork.
To
do
something
should
be
short.
I
think
that
that's
generally
a
really
good
thing,
but
30.
I
A
long
time
right,
like
you,
know,
30
years
back,
it's
1991
and
you
know
mountain
view
was
very
different.
The
needs
we
had
were
very
different.
The
tech
industry
was
very
different.
You
know
if
it
had
been,
you
know
if
we
were
talking
about
10
years.
I
don't
know
that
I
would
have
even
blinked
an
eye
and
maybe
even
20
years.
I
feel
yeah.
I
can
see
it,
but
I
guess
I.
F
G
The
process
that
is
being
proposed
in
the
streamline
review
has
drc
review
and
a
public
hearing
at
the
za
level,
depending
upon
the
scale
and
the
size
of
development.
Community
outreach
is
done
for
individual
projects,
which
is
you
know,
individual
community
meetings
on
specific
development
proposal
itself,
and
that
will
still
be
part
of
the
process.
G
It's
just
that
you
know
the
final
approval
will
be
at
the
za
public
hearing
process,
so
there
will
be
like
at
least
a
couple
of
public
hearings
for
community
input,
in
addition
to
community
outreach
meetings
as
well,
and
then
coming
back
to
commissioner
dempsey's
question
on
precedence,
we
don't
have
any
precedence,
but
I
just
want
to
bring
in
a
comparison,
epc
reviewed
the
proposal
on
google's
middle
field
park.
You
know
earlier
this
year
that
project
is
requesting
a
20
is
considering
20-year
da
for
that
development.
J
I
I
just
would
like
to
see
a
lot
more
clarity
in
terms
of
you
know,
deliverable
dates.
I
don't
think
that
anyone
wants
to
just
kind
of
sit
on
the
land
and
not
do
anything
until
year.
29,
that's
not
what
I
think,
but
I
do
think
that,
having
more
clarity
around
the
expectations
for
when
these
community
services
or
facilities,
you
know,
parks
whatever
it
is
when
these
things
will
be
made
available
to
the
public.
I
I
would
love
to
you
know,
streamline
that
thing.
J
That
was
then
clear,
but
I
also
go
back
to
you
know.
I
I
feel
very
strongly
that,
right
now
the
housing
is
going
to
be
what's
important,
so
I
would
love
to
stream.
I
would
love
to
support
this.
I
I
really
want
to
see
the
housing
be
prioritized,
or
you
know
in
the
first
four
to
five
phases.
But
again
I
am
supportive
of
streamlined
development.
In
principle
so
yeah
I'm
trying
to
think
through
that.
C
A
B
B
Second
epc
interviews
were
held
recently
and
the
council
has
indicated
that
they
will
reappoint
commissioner
yin
so
congrats
and
congrats
to
alex
muniz.
He
was
also
appointed
and
they
will
also
appoint
chris
clark
and
he's
going
to
start
sometime
in
january
and,
lastly,
yeah
eric
said
to
also
wish
everyone
a
happy
thanksgiving
holiday.