►
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View City Council Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, May 19 2021.
Live Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26.
A
B
Okay
and
mr
anderson,
do
you
have
any
insight
on
where
we
are
with
the
google
master
plan.
C
Well,
you
know
the
the
zoning
administrator
planning
manager
may
know
a
little
more
than
me,
but
as
far
as
I
know,
the
google
master
plan
is
a
master
plan,
and
so
there
that's
kind
of
a
preliminary
stage
earlier
than
this,
this
entitlement
stage
that
this
project
is
actually
seeking
right
now,
so
once
google
gets
the
master
plan,
they
would
still
need
to
come
back
in
and
get
approvals
for
individual
buildings
in
the
project.
So
I
would
imagine
if
you
know
buildings
take
the
same
amount
of
time.
D
Yeah,
I
can
add
a
little
bit
of
information
to
that
so
yeah.
The
master
plan
is
the
first
step
and
then
I
think
google
has
three
phases
planned
to
pull
the
actual
permits
for
the
buildings
within
those
phases
and
so
and
then
that
would
be
done
in
a
20-year
time
horizon,
which
is
the
same
as
would
be
their
requested
development
or
sorry,
yeah,
d.a
timeline.
B
Yeah
yeah
that
that
was,
you
know,
just
a
concern
that
you
know
we
have
these
wonderful
apartments
available.
You
know
within
five
years
or
so
when
google's
20
20
years
out.
So
you
know
you
just
have
a
concern
that
you're
gonna
have
people
living
out.
You
know
kind
of
beyond
a
service
in
amenities
areas
and
that
you
know
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
that
would
make
it
less
appealing
from
from
people
who
would
like
to
you
know
live
there.
So
that's
that's
just
a
concern
that
I
had
thanks.
E
Dempsey
your
hand
stopped.
Did
you
have
another
question?
Okay,
other
questions,
questions
from
other
commissioners,
commissioner,
hamline.
F
F
G
Gary's
around
gary
are
you
able
to
opine
on
that.
I
Okay,
I
see
myself.
Thank
you
very
much.
I'm
not
aware
of
data
that
indicates
how
many
people
that
live
near
a
light
rail
station
would
use
the
light
rail,
typical
transit.
I
I
I
We
counted
the
number
of
cars
that
are
parked
there
during
peak
times
and
then
we
related
that
to
the
number
of
units
and-
and
we
came
up
with
with
ratios,
based
on
that-
to
set
it
to
convince
ourselves
that
the
number
of
parking
spaces
provided
here
would
be
adequate.
I
So
that's
part
of
the
picture,
but
exactly
to
answer
your
question
of
how
many
might
ride
light
rail.
We,
as
I
said
we
don't
have
any
surveys
of
that.
J
J
I
would
imagine
that
there's
street
parking
available
for
some
of
the
residents
in
the
interim,
while
everything
else
is
being
built
out
potentially
and
that
could
ease
any
potential
need
for
extra
parking
and
is
there
then
a
program
in
place
as
things
get
built
out
that
street
parking
will
change
over
time,
and
you
know
things
just
get
moderated
over
time.
As
things
get
pulled
out,.
C
Yeah,
so
the
precise
plan
does
have,
and
I'm
just
looking
this
up
right
now,
have
it
in
just
a
second.
I
believe
the
price
precise
plan
has
two
different
kind
of
future
visions
for
mod
and
log
avenues.
C
One
of
them
more
near
term
does
include
street
parking.
The
other
one
longer
term
does
or
include
street
parking
on
both
sides
of
the
street.
The
other
one
longer
term
would
only
have
street
parking
on
one
side
of
the
street.
The
goal
here
is
to
really
kind
of
you
help
use
the
the
parking
strength
constraint
to
really
limit
the
viability
of
vehicle
use
over
the
long
term
and
to
provide
that
additional
street
space
for
a
higher
diversity
of
modes,
bicycles
and
larger
pedestrian
areas
and
things
as
the
precise
plan
built
out.
K
Yes,
I
saw
in
this
report
that
there
was
one
neighborhood
meeting
and
only
one
person
showed
up
and
was
generally
supportive.
Has
the
applicant
received
any
more
communication
from
neighbors
outside
of
that
meeting
via
email
or
or
aware
of
anything
anything
else.
A
You
know:
we've
had
several
community
interest
group
meetings,
they're
listed
on
our
presentation.
A
K
E
L
Well,
we
as
as
mentioned
we
there
was
a
community
meeting
on
on
april
1st,
but
in
addition
to
that,
we
reached
out
to
the
wagon
wheel,
neighborhood
association,
which
is
the
closest
neighborhood
group,
and
I
I
I
think
that
the
chair
of
that
group
may
be
on
tonight
and
they
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
them,
but
we
had
a
very
nice
meeting
with
them
and
good
discussion
and
good
good
interchange.
K
Yeah,
I'm
more
just
I
think,
looking
at
the
info
or
the
letter
we
got
from
wagon
wheel,
it
looks
like
there
is
some
interest
right
there,
they're
excited
about
the
walkability
of
the
area
and
and
how
open
it
is
to
the
public
and
including
more
perk
like
amenities.
So
I
just
yeah
just
want
to
see
if
you've
had
any
more
ideas
on
ways
to
address
feedback.
You've
gotten
from
the
community
include
more
of
those
perk
like
features
mentioned
anything
like
that.
A
K
A
I
could
I
can
tell
you
and
brian
and
armond:
could
you
know
we
have
a
pretty
pretty
tight
site,
it's
very
limited
and
we
basically
have
a
perimeter,
an
open
perimeter
around
a
publicly
accessible
perimeter
around
it
for
the
public,
for
each
part
of
it
is
eva.
It's
actually
much
larger
than
should
have
been
on
the
north
side.
It's
also
fairly
generous
because
of
that
pet
bike
path
and
uva
access
so
really
to
accommodate
this
kind
of
density.
A
On
a
two
and
a
half
acre
site,
we've
done
the
best
we
can
as
far
as
open
space
and
we've
have
some
terraces
in
addition
to
the
central
courtyard.
M
I
just
want
to
add
metrics
to
that
to
what
period
brian
mentioned,
so
we
really
try
to
just
maximize
the
open
space
on
the
site
and
also
program.
Just
you
know,
with
the
increase
the
programmed
areas
as
much
as
possible,
with
adding
microplazas
at
the
northeast
corner,
eva
path
with
all
these
programs,
as
mentioned,
and
the
paseo
in
the
south,
and
also
setbacking
on
the
log
side
to
just
widen
up
the
sidewalk
and
just
adding
as
much
as
planters
and
green
spaces
with
sittings.
K
Great
yeah,
I
really
appreciate
all
the
effort
that
went
into
making
it
as
green
as
possible.
My
other
question-
and
this
is
staff
and
developer.
Potentially
I
have
mentioned
before
on
this
on
a
pc,
I'm
a
bike
commuter
and
I'm
always
thinking
about
how
accessible
areas
are
by
different
bikes,
and
I
know
the
wagon
wheel
letter
and
just
my
general
kind
of
as
I
visited
the
area
of
the
site.
K
I
think
it's
great
how
accessible
the
property
is
by
bike
and
all
the
the
work
you
guys
are
putting
in
to
make
encouraging
biking.
But
there
are
a
couple
areas
where
it's,
maybe
not
so,
bike
friendly
around
the
area
and
was
wondering
maybe
if
staff
could
comment
on
kind
of
what
the
timeline
is
in
terms
of
any
plans
for
bike
paths
in
east
westman
or
or
what
that
might
look
like
and
if
developers
have
any
thoughts
on
that
as
well.
C
Person
on
this
project,
renee
gunn,
is
in
the
audience
she
might
be
able
to
respond
to
projects
that
may
be
in
the
pipeline
in
terms
of
public
improvements
in
the
area.
Certainly,
the
project
is
proposing
to
provide
funds.
I
believe
is
public
benefit.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
perry,
a
million.
N
Good
evening,
commissioners,
my
name
is
renee
gunn,
I'm
a
senior
civil
engineer
in
public
works.
We
do
have
plans
for
bike
paths
and
bike
lanes
on
all
of
the
streets
surrounding
this.
N
N
I
will
say
one
thing
we
do
promote
is
we
do
whole
streets
at
a
time
so,
like
this
project
in
particular,
will
not
be
painting
the
bike
lane
just
in
front
of
their
project.
We
would
like
to
do
logo
all
as
one
when
we
come
to
that.
K
Project,
that
is
all
my
questions.
J
J
I
don't
know
if
it's
inconsistency
but
on
the
site
plan,
there's
a
three
foot,
eight
ada
path
on
a
long
load
and
then
in
other
drawings
it
says
it's
a
seven
foot
sidewalk.
I
was
just
curious,
which
one
is
the
one
you're
going
to
go
with
at
the
end
or
if
there's
a
difference,
and
if
that
means
something
else,
then
what
I
think
sure.
M
Ada
path
is
the
building
code
requirement,
which
is
44
inches
for
the
ada
to
be
able
to
just
use
the
the
sidewalk,
but
the
width
of
the
sidewalk
is
actually
7
feet.
So
it's
the
building
code
requirement
should
show
that
there
is
still
enough
width
along
the
sides
of
the
project
for
the
wheelchairs
to
be
able
to
access
the
to
the
building.
Okay,.
J
Got
it
okay?
Oh
sorry,
and
one
last
question
about
the
the
land
to
the
north.
You
guys
had
mentioned
that
you
guys
are
done.
Half
of
the
land
for
the
bike
and
pedestrian
over
car
overpassing
will
be
from
you
and
the
other
will
be
from
google.
I
know
it
isn't
designed
yet,
but
is
that?
Is
that
considered
part
of
the
open
space
or
is
that
just
land?
That's
just
gonna!
Go
straight
to
the
city,
however,.
G
M
G
J
G
We
did
some
preliminary
sketches
just
to
make
sure
that
there
was
enough
space
to
do
to
do
a
ramp
in
overpass,
but
it's
really
really
early
days
on
that.
E
A
couple
questions
I
guess,
first
for
mr
black
and
then
in
the
parking
study,
you
included,
looks
like
it's
a
total
of
eight
properties
that
you
have
evaluated
and
two
of
those
the
two
that
have
the
lowest
parking
demand
per
unit,
the
madera
property
in
mountain
view
and
the
avalon
at
cahill
park
in
san
jose
are
not
just
next
to
vta
sites,
but
they
are
at
sites
that
that
address
both
vta
and
caltrain.
E
If
the
way
other
things
are
laid
out,
so
they,
the
parking
demand
per
unit,
was
particularly
low
relative
to
those
two
versus
the
others,
and
they
were
some
of
the
ones
lower
on
the
parking
demand
for
bedroom,
which
concerns
me
because
the
vta
station
doesn't
fall
into
that
category.
I
Yes,
we
wanted
to
get
you
know
to
provide
the
data
for
for
everyone
to
look
at
and
to
interpret
as
you
have
chair
cranston.
We
actually
have
parking
counts
at
24
apartment
complexes
and
we
put
only
six
of
them
in
here,
the
the
the
one
in
san
jose
near
the
cahill
station.
That's
that's!
Not
our
study.
That's
from
the
green
trips
database,
which
is
a
bay
area-wide.
I
I
However,
even
if
we
were
to
drop
those
out
and
just
create
the
average
without
those,
the
average
would
still
be
well
within
the
number
of
parking
spaces
that
are
being
proposed
for
this
particular
project.
We
also
looked
at
the
the
ite
parking
generation
manual,
which
you
may
be
familiar
with.
I
That
includes
all
all
types
of
apartments,
whether
they're
near
transit
or
not,
and
the
ratio
that
that
is
published
in
that
reference
is
almost
identical
to
the
ratio
that
we
got
in
our
in
our
surveys.
From
the
from
those
six
properties
that
you're
looking
at
so
we've
kind
of
come
at
this
from
a
lot
of
different
angles
to
satisfy
ourselves
that
the
parking
would
be
adequate.
E
And
I
know
this
is
the
question
for
you
for
staff.
I'd
ask
the
question
as
to
why
parking
demand
for
bedroom
was
chosen
over
parking
and
demand
per
unit.
That's
not
it's!
These
particular
the
project
is
being
proposed
as
a
high
percentage
of
a
much
higher
percentage
of
one
and
studio
relative
to
most.
E
So
it's
just
parking
demand
per
bedroom
and
freaking
mentoring.
It
seems
like
it'd,
be
almost
the
same
thing.
So
can
you
comment
on
why
one,
if
you
believe
one.
I
Well,
I
I
don't
know
if
staff
wants
to
jump
in
on
that
one,
but
all
from
my
perspective,
if
you
look
at
parking
demand
per
unit,
there's
always
the
question
of
what
types
of
units
are
being
surveyed
for
that
data,
whether
that
includes
a
lot
of
studios
and
what
bedrooms
or
whether
there's
two
and
three
bedrooms
in
the
mix,
and
so
that
always
comes
up
as
a
question.
I
But
if
you
actually
express
your
ratio
per
bedroom
rather
than
per
unit,
and
you
take
out
that
you
take
that
uncertainty
out
of
the
equation
and
so
everything's
on
the
level
field,
because
it's
per
bedroom
and
that's
kind
of
becoming
the
industry
standard.
I
know
that
typically
parking
or
a
lot
of
parking
ratios
and
cities
are
based
on
per
unit.
But
by
half
the
cities
that
we
look
at.
The
parking
ratio
is
based
on
the
number
of
bedrooms,
not
on
the
number
of
units
and
the
the
ite
parking
generation
manual.
D
Yeah
and
I
can
go
ahead
and
build
on
that
part
of
the
response
to
the
to
the
written
questions
was
give
the
example
of
you
know.
What
is
the
estimated
parking
demand
for
a
three
bedroom
unit
versus
a
one
bedroom
unit?
They
could
be
the
same
size
unit,
but
it
typically
is
a
better
estimation
of
the
number
of
cars
per
unit
based
on
the
number
of
bedrooms,
because
those
units
could
be
the
same
size
but
generally
there's
more
people
and
therefore
cars
per
bedroom.
E
Above
so
I
guess
my
I
I
one
of
the
kind
one
of
the
questions
that
commissioner
capos
asked
was
proximity
to
services.
Was
that
taken
into
account
in
this
because
it's
there
are
no
services
near
this
property.
There's
no
grocery
stores,
there's
no
coffee
shops,
there's
no
dry
cleaners,
salons
anything
nearby,
and
I
just
I'm
I'm.
I
guess
I'm
trying
to
understand
how
the
the
fact
that
something
that's
in
the
middle
of
this
area
is
going
to
behave.
E
C
C
You
know,
services
are
changing,
certainly
that
you
know
we're
seeing
the
the
rise
of
uber
and
lyft
and
a
lot
of
these
other
companies
that
are
providing
that
type
of
transportation
without
car
ownership
and
then,
in
addition,
you
know
we,
you
know.
Part
of
the
precise
plan
goal
is
to
not
encourage.
C
You
know
this
huge
investment
in
parking
infrastructure
when,
in
the
long
term,
the
the
community
is
going
to
be
much
more
fine-grained
have
much
more
better
access
to
those
services
that
you're
talking
about
and
the
jobs
and
the
fact
that
this
place
this
is
it's
so
close
to
light
rail
light.
Rail
itself
is
an
ecosystem
of
a
diversity
of
uses,
so
you
may
not
be
able
to
find
a
dry
cleaner
at
this
light
rail
stop,
but
you
can
probably
find
a
dry
cleaner
at
a
nearby
light.
Rail
stop.
E
And
then
my
other
questions
are
more
from
the
developer.
I
went
out
and
looked
at
that
little
moving
car
thing
that
you're
proposing
for
the
ground
floor.
It's
pretty
cool.
Is
there
space
to
do
any
more
of
those
or
is
it
limited
to
the
to
the?
I
think
you've
got
it
on
the
bottom
floor.
E
E
G
Go
ahead,
brian,
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
the
current
plan
is
to
is
to
have
traditional
parking,
not
a
not
a
mechanized
parking
system.
G
G
Those
I
mean
working
count
didn't
change,
though,
so
now
that
we
feel
more
comfortable
with
the
delivery
of
of
a
traditional
parking
model
within
this
building
with
the
same
number
of
stalls.
Oh.
E
E
All
right,
thank
you.
Vice
chair
love,
you
another
question.
P
Thank
you,
chair
yeah.
I
have
a
couple
of
additional
questions
for
mainly
the
applicant,
but
maybe
for
the
staffs
too,
has
to
do
with
some
of
the
landscape
features
that
are
proposed
on
in
the
project.
P
I
was
wondering
I
in
the
question
I
submitted
to
staff.
I
did
ask
about
recycled
water.
I
understand,
there's
no
recycled
water
right
now,
but
in
the
future
there
may
be-
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
so
I
wanted
to
ask
whether
the
when
you
select
the
plants
and
especially
trees,
because
they're
going
to
be
there
for
a
long
time,
hopefully
that
you're
selecting
those
species
that
can
tolerate
recycled
water
because
they
usually
have
higher
sodium
level.
A
G
Has
changes
on
he
looks
like
he's
logging
in
or
he's
I
think,
you're
still
muted,
james.
Q
Q
Yeah,
absolutely
as
perry
noted
you,
you
hardly
can
propose
a
plant
palette
that
doesn't
satisfy
those
perimeters
and
especially
in
mountain
view,
as
most
areas
are
receiving
the
the
sort
of
future
recycled
water
service.
So
we
we
have
selected.
You
know,
there's
no
redwoods,
for
instance,
that
would
be
susceptible
to
that
sort
of
high
salinity
water.
So
yeah
we've
taken
that
into
consideration.
P
Great
a
follow-up
question:
is
you
know
how
much
consideration
have
you
taken
when
you
select
the
plants
again
to
include
native
species?
P
As
you
may
know,
the
council's
strategic
priorities
include
improving
ecosystem
and
biodiversity,
so
we'd
love
to
see
more
native
species
that
are
included
on
the
palette.
G
And
james,
why
don't
you
take
that?
Why
don't
you
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
difference
between
native
and
adaptive
native,
so
I
think
it
would
be
helpful
just
to
give
an
overview
of
that.
Q
Sure
that's
a
great
question.
I
think,
like
your
neighbors
in
palo
alto
requires
a
certain
number
of
percentage
of
native
plates
on
the
project,
so
we're
used
to
that
building,
grant
pallets
that
accommodate
california,
natives.
We
know
it's
great
for
habitat
and
we
do
understand.
There
are
limitations
in
the
look
of
california
dips.
So
it's
good
to
have
a
blend
of
sort
of
regionally
adapted
plants
to
to
our
water
levels
and
interspersed
so
you
don't
have
sort
of
barren
landscape
when
the
time
of
the
year,
the
california
natives
are
sort
of
dormant.
Q
So
there's
a
considerable
there's
25
made
up
trees
on
the
project
so
far
and
we'll
strive
to
get
as
many
little
natives
in
the
landscape
under
story
as
well.
Q
I
don't
have
it,
we
haven't
built
the
understory
planting,
probably
yet
okay,
but
I
I
could
imagine
it
it
is
in
in
somewhere
in
the
25
range
as
well.
You
know
as
the
trees.
P
Okay,
one
more
question
has
to
do
with
the
trees
that
you're
proposing
in
the
central
courtyard
as
well
as
roof
decks.
I'm
assuming
there
are
some
small
trees
that
will
be
planted
in
containers.
Is
that
correct.
P
Okay,
so
when
you
calculate
the
tree
canopy,
you
know
projected
into
future
years.
I
would
assume
if
the
trees
are
in
containers
or
planters
you're,
not
projecting
them
to
grow
into
full
tree
canopy
potential.
Q
E
This
looks
sicker
in
with
questions
next
section.
We
move
to
public
comment
so
open
up
where
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
If
so,
please
click
on
the
raise
hand,
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
6
on
your
phone
phone
users
can
mute
and
unmute
themselves
with
star
6..
The
pc
clerk
will
start
the
timer
and
let
you
know
when
your
time
is
up.
H
Yeah
sure
cranston.
Currently
there
are
two
attendees
with
their
hands
raised.
One
of
the
individuals
with
a
4015
area
code
number
had
their
hand
raised
first
and
has
had
their
hands
raised
for
a
while.
So
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
allow
them
to
talk.
If
that's
okay
with
you,
yes,
that'd,
be
great
okay
and
then
you
are
now
allowed
to
talk.
If
you
just
give
me
one
moment,
so
I
can
configure
the
timer
and
share
my.
H
R
I
think
I
can't
thank
you,
commissioners,
my
name's
matt
regan,
I'm
calling
on
behalf
of
the
bay
area
council,
an
employer
sponsored
public
policy
or
organization
representing
about
350
of
the
region's
largest
employers,
and
we
are
calling
in
strong
support
of
the
project.
We
are
looking
at
408
new
apartments
62..
R
Can
you
hear
me
yeah,
yep,
sorry,
62
below
market
rate
and
28
million
dollars
in
community
benefits
bike
parking
electric
vehicle
charging,
this
project
kicks
all
the
boxes
in
terms
of
economic,
environmental
and
equity,
and
we
strongly
support
it
and
urge
that
you
move
it
forward.
Thank
you.
So
much.
H
Yes,
I
believe
catwortham
is
next
and
I'm
going
to
allow
them
to
talk
as
well.
S
Can
you
hear
me
all
right
so
good
evening,
chair
and
honorable
commissioners?
My
name
is
kat
wortham
and
I'm
the
director
of
housing
and
health
policy
at
the
silicon
valley
leadership
group,
I'm
here
tonight
to
speak
in
support
of
400
logue.
The
leadership
group
was
actively
engaged
in
the
creation
of
the
east
wisdom,
precise
plan
that
was
adopted
a
couple
of
years
ago,
so
we
actively
advocated
for
the
inclusion
of
housing
in
the
plan.
As
this
is
this
neighborhood
is
very
jobs
rich.
S
S
We
are
pleased
to
see
on-site,
affordable
housing,
as
we
heard
tonight
from
both
perry,
the
developer,
because
I
think
we
we're
all
well
aware
of
that.
It's
very
difficult
to
make
affordable
housing
pencil
these
days
and
then,
finally,
we're
excited
to
see
a
number
of
tdm
measures
proposed,
including
the
fact
that
you're
just
a
thousand
feet
from
vta
light
rail
and
there's
ample
bike
storage
and
a
bike
repair
station
on
site.
S
T
T
Yes,
okay,
just
making
sure
the
timer
didn't
go
on,
but
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
mountain
view,
gmb
in
support
of
this
project.
It's
408
proposed
new
units
taking
over
office
space
in
an
area
that's
close
to
jobs
and
transit.
That's
pretty
good
all
right!
Thank
you!
So
much
for
your
time.
Please
support
this
project.
H
O
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
yes,
okay,
thank
you,
chair,
cranston
and
commissioners.
I
have
it
very
thoughtful
and
informative
discussion
I'm
going
to
rather
than
make
a
comment,
I'm
going
to
ask
a
question,
but
I
think
you'll
get
the
point,
and
I
know
you
can't
answer
it
now,
but
I'll
follow
up
with
the
commissioners
later.
O
I
was
curious
about
one
of
the
slides
that
had
rough
stated
roughly,
there
was
25
million
dollars
attributed
to
park
space
and
parking
and
other
public
benefits,
and
I
sort
of
wanted
to
get
a
clarification
of
what
that
means
and
specifically
how
park
space
is
being
sort
of
factored
into
this
development
project.
So
thank
you
very
much.
E
Miss
ramos
you're,
I
think,
you've
you're
done.
Mr
greinberg
has
already
spoken.
K
Thank
you
I
yeah.
I
will
be
supporting
this
project.
I
in
general,
thought
the
plans
were
very
well
done.
I
really
like
the
green
spaces,
the
walkability,
the
bike
ability,
the
inclusion
of
those
15
bmr
units,
and
I
particularly
was
excited
to
see
some
of
those
moderate
income
units
proposed,
given
the
struggle
that
we
have
with
moderate
income
housing
in
this
city.
K
Yeah,
there's
there's
a
lot
of
aspects
I
like
to
this
project,
and
I
remember
one
of
the
first
projects
that
I
sat
on
on
the
epc
was
another
residential
unit
within
east
whistman.
So
I
am
hopeful
that,
as
there
becomes
a
critical
mass
of
people
living
in
that
area,
it
will
attract
those
amenities
like
a
grocery
store,
like
just
different
shops,
and
all
of
that
I
remember
the
developer.
There
was
saying
I
think
that
5
000
people
need
to
live
in
an
area
before
a
grocery
store
is
attracted,
or
something
like
that.
K
So
I
am
hopeful
that
as
more
housing
comes
into
this
area,
those
amenities
will
follow.
Based
on
my
questions,
the
one
the
one
thought
I
had
would
be
to
look.
I
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
getting
this
right,
but
the
five-year
cip
with
those
bike
paths.
K
I
just
might
encourage
council
to
look
at
what
the
timing
is
in
terms
of
when
this
development
project
is
looking
at
being
completed
and
where
those
bike
paths
surrounding
this
project
are
falling
within
that
five-year
plan
and
see
if
they
can't
coincide
so
that
people
who
do
desire
to
bike
in
this
area
have
the
that
option
to
do
so
safely.
Within
and
outside
of
the
complex.
U
B
Thank
you
chair.
I
I
think
this
is
a
good
example
of
trying
to
make
the
best
out
of
a
small
piece
of
property,
but
it's
close
to
transit
and
I'm
also
definitely
in
support
of
it.
I
think
it's
a
good
balance
and
I
too
am
happy
that
they
address
the
the
middle
middle
income
area.
We
desperately
need
to
continue
to
work
toward
reaching
goals
in
that
area.
B
So
I
think
this
is
an
excellent
start
and
definitely
see
them
following
the
east
wisman
precise
plan
and
appreciate
that
and
a
well-be
in
support
of
this
project.
So,
thank
you
very
much
for
staff
and
all
the
all
the
work
from
miramar,
because
I
think
this
is
certainly
a
good
model
of
setting
us
in
the
right
direction.
Thank
you.
E
Thank
you,
commissioner.
Heyman.
F
Thank
you
and
my
commissioner
capriles
and
commissioner
musing.
I
want
to
applaud
the
the
developers
efforts.
I
think
this
is
a
nice
near-term
effort
to
realize
the
east
western
precise
plan
and
start
us
down
that
path
toward
an
integrated
community
and
particularly
appreciate
the
onsite
bmr
and
the
proximity
to
transit
without
displacement.
F
I
don't
know
that
any
one
developer
or
project
can
can
help
boost
vta
ridership,
but
I
really
think
that
that's
going
to
be
so
critical
to
the
success
of
this
area
and
so
appreciate
the
thoughtfulness
that
went
into
the
the
amenities
to
support
bike
and
pedestrian
access
and
try
and
go
as
car
light
as
we
can.
While,
while
this
vision
is
realized.
P
Thank
you
chair.
I
too
will
be
supporting
this
project
and
I
echo
what
others
have
said
so
far.
I
definitely
appreciate
all
the
hard
work
that
has
gone
into
it.
I
think,
since
this
will
be
one
of
the
first
projects
you
know
being
implemented
at
the
east
westmin
precise
plan,
by
the
way,
I
I
think
the
the
precise
plan
is
excellent
and
I
I
hope,
having
that
plan
in
place
has
made
the
you
know
the
process
for
this
project
a
little
easier.
P
If
we
didn't
have,
then,
if
we
didn't
have
the
plan,
I
didn't
want
to
see
if
the
applicant
or
staff
would
like
to
respond
to.
Mr
lambert's
question
about
parks
and
green.
P
E
Mr
anderson
or
ms
williams,
we
can
respond
outside
of
the
meeting.
I
think
he
was
open
to
that.
D
So
I
think,
I
think
in
general,
the
question,
if
I'm
remembering
correctly,
was
kind
of
what
is
the
project's
contribution
to
two
parts
through
payment
of
the
fee
yeah
so
with
residential
projects.
There's
the
option
to
dedicate
land
specifically
for
a
park
on
site
or
the
option
to
pay
part
in
new
fees,
and
those
fees
would
go
towards
the
acquisition
and
development
of
other
parks
within
the
same
park.
Planning
area
and
this
project
will
be
paying
parking
new
fees
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
the
to
go
towards
parks
within
this
park.
E
Thank
you,
commissioner.
V
Thank
you.
So
I
don't
want
to
be
repetitive
with
what
my
colleagues
have
already
said,
because
I
agree
with
it.
This
is
an
easy
project
to
like
it
checks
all
the
boxes
for
me
and
I'm
really
glad
that
there
won't
be
any
displacement.
It's
nice
to
see
us,
you
know
putting
some
new
units
up
on
the
scoreboard,
so
I'll
be
supporting
it
today
and
bravo
to
the
to
the
developers
for
the
good
job
they
did
on
this
and
for
staff.
J
Yes,
I
I
don't
want
to
go
into
everything.
Everybody
else
has
said.
There
are
a
lot
of
exciting
things
about
this
project.
I
agree
with
vice
chair
lowe
that
I
think,
having
the
precise
plan
in
place
really
helped
make
this
site
very
walkable
and
likable
having
that
holistic
view,
and
I
think
the
design
of
the
building
is
subdued,
but
especially
the
ground
floor
plane.
I
like
what
they
did
with
the
massing
and
sort
of
the
breakthroughs.
J
Hopefully,
vta
truly
is
going
to
maintain
and
maybe
increase
its
ridership.
As
commissioner
haymarron
mentioned,
it
is
key
to
the
success
of
this
particular
project
and
others
that
will
be
built
in
the
area.
J
I'm
wondering
also,
if
maybe,
if
we
find
that
parking
more
parking
is
needed,
that
we
can
reach
out
or
the
developer
can
reach
out
to
neighboring
office
buildings
and
maybe
work
out
something
with
them
to
use
their
empty
parking
lots
at
night
to
park
for
residents
in
the
evening.
So
that
might
be
an
idea.
J
It
is
a
little
bit
of
shame
when
I
walked
around
there.
There's
a
very
nice
park
feel
to
the
area,
and
I
know
a
lot
of
these
major
mature
trees
have
to
get
shut
down
parking
garages
just
can't
sustain
very
large
trees,
underground
parking
and
I'm
hoping
that
the
street
trees
and
all
the
plantings
around
that
there
will
be
trees
that
not
only
grow
fast,
but
there
are
some
that
will
also
grow
to
be
very
large
and
that
there's
enough
room
for
those
to
grow.
J
E
E
From
the
first
time
we
saw
it
was
moving
this
space
moving
the
property
away
from
the
vta
light
rail
and
moving
it
south
of
the
property
learnings
that-
and
I
do
like
about
the
precise
plan-
is
it
does
anticipate
these
kind
of
these
connections,
as
things
are
built
out,
so
really
encouraging
potential
applicants
to
come
in
ahead
of
time
and
say:
hey,
look,
you
know,
don't
don't
make
us
go
through
this
twice.
You
need
to
take
into
account
these
pathways
and
I
think
the
developers
listen
to
your
feedback.
E
E
Regarding
the
parking,
I
guess
I'm
my
feeling
is
that
the
the
parking
estimate
between
now
and
kind
of
the
end
state
of
the
precise
plan,
the
end
state,
the
parking
level
is
probably
okay.
What
I'm
worried
about
is
until
there
is
there
are
amenities
nearby.
E
There
are
things
to
go
to
that,
in
fact
that
the
estimate
of
the
parking
during
the
transition
time
when
people
will
have
to
drive
to
grocery
stores
will
not
be
sufficient.
So
I
don't,
I
don't
know
that's
in
my
mind,
that's
not
sufficient
for
me
to
say
no
to
this,
but
I
do
think
staff
needs
to
kind
of
think
about
whether
it's
on
street
parking,
like
commission,
is
talking
about
I'd
hate
to
take
away
the
the
bite
spaces
that
the
commissioner
schmeezing
would
like
to
have.
E
But
I
do
it
does
feel
to
me
like
between
when
the
project
goes,
live
and
and
when
other
stuff
is
built
out
around
it
that
there
probably
will
be
a
parking
deficit.
That's
not
anticipated
simply
because
there's
not
enough,
there's
not
other
things
around
it
to
connect
to
it.
Yet
and
again,
it's
not
a
reason
for
me
to
I
like
the
project.
Otherwise,
the
changes
in
design
are
better
in
general.
E
I'm
just
worried
about
that
period
until
until
there's
more
around
it
that
we've
kind
of
we've
not
we're
not
allowing
for
the
the
time
in
between.
I
don't
know
that.
That's
not
a
it's,
not
a
issue
that
the
developer
can
necessarily
address,
but
it's
a
it's
a
question
for
staff
as
to
are
there
things
that
could
be
done
in
the
meantime?
So
so
I
will
be
supporting
the
project
and
I
think
it's
overall,
it's
a
good
project
and
I
think
I'd
like
to
see
it
to
move
ahead.
E
So
unless
there's
any
other
feat,
unless
there's
any
other
discussion
quick
up
at
halvey,
can
you
call
the
vote?
Please.
E
All
right,
I'm
sorry,
I
need
a
motion
natto.
Can
you
pull
the
the
the
items
up
and
then
we'll
I'll
ask
for
a
motion
from
somebody
from
the
floor.
It
looks
like
commissioner
cavalis
is
open
to
that.
B
Thank
you
chair.
I
would
like
to
recommend
from
the
epc
that
the
city
council
approved
the
initial
study
of
environmental
significance
for
the
400
log
avenue
residential
project
pursuant
to
section
1516
of
the
california
environmental
quality
act
sequa
and
find
the
project
within
the
scope
of
the
east
wisman
precise
plan.
E
And
commissioner.
H
E
K
I
did
already
reach
out
to
chair
karen's
didn't
work
about
this,
but
I,
unfortunately,
unless
another
meeting
gets
scheduled
between
now
and
the
summer
recess.
This
will
be
my
last
epc
meeting,
I'm
getting
married,
this
fall
and
we
are
I'm
not
sure
if
we'll
be
able
to
rent
in
mountain
view
or
not.
K
Basically
is
the
situation
just
depending
on
where
we
can
get
the
best
price,
and
I
didn't
want
to
leave
the
epc
one,
commissioner
short,
like
kind
of
a
last
minute
notice,
so
I
figured
I
would
bow
out
before
the
summer,
so
the
council
has
time
ample
time
to
find
someone
to
fill
in.
K
But
if
we
do
end
up
in
mountain
view,
I
may
try
and
reapply
it's
been
just
a
really
wonderful
experience
from
having
to
ask
what
zoning
was
in
my
interview
to
just
getting
to
serve
alongside
all
of
you
and
learn
so
much
about
our
city
and
development
and
all
the
different
considerations
that
go
into
that
and
how
hard
everyone
works
to
make
our
city
what
it
is,
and
it's
just
given
me
a
new
appreciation
for
where
I
grew
up.
K
So
I'm
just
really
grateful
for
all
of
you
and
for
the
time
on
the
epc
and
it's
sad
to
go
early.
But
I
you
know
if
I
do
end
up
in
mountain
view,
I
hope
to
stay
involved
in
our
city
and
community.
J
K
F
Absolutely
congratulations,
we're
very
happy
for
you
and
I
really
appreciated
having
you
as
a
colleague
and
asking
such
great
questions.
I
mean
particularly
tonight
you're
always
getting
us
to
think
you're
picking
up
former
commissioners,
barbaros
and
mansell
and
really
getting
us
to
think
about
mobility
on
on
bicycles
and
how
things
fit
together.
So
we
hope
you
continue
to
participate
in
other
ways.
E
You
started
off
your
camera
with,
unfortunately,
congratulations
you're
getting
married,
I
mean
that's,
that's
good
news,
you
know
it's.
That's
not
unfortunate,
that's
good!
So,
really
from
that,
your
future
has
been
all
the
very
best
and,
like
I
said
in
my
email
I'd
I
think
we'd.
All
we
all
want
to
make
mountain
view
place
where
people
like
you
or
you
feel
comfortable
that
you
can.
E
You
can
move
to
the
phases
of
your
life
and
and
mountain
view
can
still
be
your
home
and
you
know
we
may
not
be
there
yet,
but
we're
going
to
try
and
if
you
do
decide
to
be
able
to
stay
we'd
love
to
have
you
stay
involved,
because
I
think
you've
been
a
great
addition
to
the
upc.
U
C
Yeah
and
I'll
I'll
just
add
again
deep,
deep,
deep,
heartfelt
thanks
for
your
contributions
and
for
all
the
work
that
you've
put
into
this.
C
I
know
it's
often
a
thankless
job
and
we,
I
just
hope
that
me
and
among
the
rest
of
your
peers
here,
can
can
add
our
thanks
for
all
the
attention
and
focus
and
time
that
this
takes,
and
it
really
is
a
rare
breed
of
people
at
your
stage
in
life.
You
know
young
people
getting
involved
and
being
committed
to
to
improving
your
community,
and
it's
that's
why
it's
it's
first
off,
it's
a
it's
a
huge!
C
It
shows
that
you're,
you
know
the
quality
of
you
as
a
person
right
that
you
are
getting
involved
at
this
stage
in
your
life
when
other
people
are
thinking
about
other
things
and
starting
their
careers
and
all
these
things,
but
also
the
this.
Having
this
viewpoint
on
the
commission
is
so
vitally
important,
and
so
we
are
really
really
grateful
for
the
time
that
you've
had
here
and
really
do
hope
that
you
can
find
your
way
back.
So
thanks
again,.
E
Thank
you
so
eric
any
announcements
on
our
next
meetings
are.
We
is
this.
Is
this
the
last
meeting
before
the
summer?
Are
there
other
items.
C
Certainly
looking
like
yeah
we've
got,
we've
definitely
canceled
june
2nd.
We
so
far
have
nothing
that
we
are
planning
for
the
june
16th
meeting.
So
I
think
we
can,
with
with
99
confidence
at
this
point,
say
have
a
very
happy
summer
at
the
end
of
this
meeting
and-
and
you
know,
enjoy
yourselves
and
and
rest
and
relax-
and
you
know
hopefully,
the
world
that
we
come
back
to
is
a
little
more
open
in
the
fall.
C
I
do
want
to
highlight
some
of
the
upcoming
fall
items.
We
are
going
to
have
a
study
session
regarding
the
housing
element
which
we're
kicking
off.
Now
we're
probably
going
to
have
a
study
session
regarding
the
north
bay
shore
master
plan,
google
master
plan
we're
probably
going
to
have
a
public
hearing
for
north
bay
shore
bonus
far
and
the
gateway
master
plan,
as
well
as
the
tdr.
C
C
I
also
want
to
highlight
that
the
council,
strategic
roadmap
is
going
to
be
up
for
review
and
adoption
in
june
june,
8th
and
22nd
at
council.
So
that's
really,
you
know
great
to
watch
to
see
kind
of
the
direction
the
council
wants
to
go
over
the
next
three
to
five
years,
so
we
are
going
to
be
getting
our
marching
orders
from
that
and
we'll
have
a
conversation
about
our
work
plan
in
the
fall
as
well
based
on
the
council
strategic
roadmap.
E
I
I
guess
I
don't
know
whether
this
is
this
is
kind
of
a
a
request.
I
don't
and
given
that
council
is
already
kind
of
setting
their
plans,
I
am
troubled
by
the
summerhill
cancellation
of
their
project
or
the
suspending
their
project,
the
feedback
from
google
on
the
financial
viability
of
the
20
inclusionary
and
even
the
feedback.
Today,
on
the
bmr
rate,
I
know
a
lot
of
work
was
done
on
the
the
latest
phase
of
bmr
ordinance
and
there
was
economic
analysis
done
the
assist
with
that,
but
it
seemed.
E
I
would
I'm
concerned
that
if
we,
if
we
stop
seeing
projects-
and
then
everybody
wants
to
the
error
on
the
side
of
not
inclusionary,
that
kind
of
defeats
what
we
are
hoping
to
get
in
that,
so
it's
a,
I
guess
it's
a
question
for
staff.
I
don't
know
whether
other
commissioners
have
the
same
question,
but
it
just
seems
like
the
the
inclusionary
number
is
causing
more
consternation
than
I
think
I
certainly
expected
to
hear
after
we
went
through
that
process,
and
so
I
don't
know
if
things
have
changed
or
not.
E
With
that,
I
think
we
will
then
move
to
will
then
adjourn
the
may
19th
environmental
planning
commission
meeting
at
8
38
pm
and
see
everyone
in
the
fall.
Thank
you
all
and
thank
you
all.
The
best
part.