►
From YouTube: 3-5-2020: Human Relations Commission Meeting
Description
Council Chambers, 500 Castro St., Mountain View, CA 94041
6:30 p.m. Thursday, March 5, 2020
A
A
If
you
would
like
one
so
thank
you
for
being
here
and
being
involved
in
your
community,
but
before
we
start
I
want
to
thank
my
fellow
commissioners
for
a
great
meeting
last
month
with
interesting
insights
and
high
integrity,
and
tonight
we
have
some
of
our
most
important
large
actions
of
the
year.
I
think
thank
the
staff,
the
grant
applicants
and
the
public
who
are
here
to
speak
on
these
items.
A
A
Julie
Solomon
here
vice-chair
Linda
batten
and
share
Ida
row.
Sylvester
I
am
here
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
minutes
approval
from
last
month.
The
minutes
for
the
February
6
2020
meeting
have
been
delivered
to
the
commission.
Members
and
copies
are
available
on
the
city
hall
bulletin
board
do
I,
have
any
amendments
or
Corrections
to
these
minutes.
A
C
C
A
D
E
A
Thank
you.
Next
we're
going
to
move
on
to
oral
communications
from
the
public.
We
will
open
the
floor
to
comments.
So
if
you
come
up
to
speak,
please
speak
at
the
podium
into
the
mic.
We
have
blue
comment
cards
that
you
can
hand
to
Kristina.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
speak
to
the
Commission
on
any
matter.
That
is
not
already
on
the
agenda.
You
will
be
limited
to
three
minutes.
State
law
prohibits
us
from
broke,
acting
on
any
non
agendized
items.
F
Thank
you
very
much.
Hi
I'm,
Michael
Kahn
I
am
a
Mountain
View
resident
and
I
also
teach
in
the
urban
studies
program
at
Stanford
and
I
just
wanted
to
speak
very
briefly
to
suggest
an
event
that
the
HRC
might
consider
as
part
of
its
civility
roundtable
series
on
bias
for
your
next
budget
year.
I
understand
that
you
know
you're
already
booked
up
for
this
year,
but
something
that
you
might
consider
for
the
fall
of
2020
or
maybe
early
2021.
F
One
of
the
subjects
that
I
teach
about
in
urban
studies
and
one
of
the
most
I
think
insidious
manifestations
of
bias
in
our
community
and
in
American
cities.
More
generally
is
segregation
in
housing
and
discrimination
in
housing,
and
we
are
very
fortunate
in
the
Bay
Area
to
have
one
of
the
leading
Scholars
on
housing,
discrimination,
Richard,
Rothstein,
I,
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
with
this
book,
the
color
of
law
was
published
a
couple
of
years
ago,
quite
a
bit
of
a
comb.
You
know
he
was
on
Terry
Gross
and
got
reviewed
in
all
sorts
of.
F
You
know
major
publications,
and
this
brought
a
lot
of
attention
to
this
subject
of
discrimination.
In
housing
and
segregation,
and
particularly
the
ways
that
it
was
not
only
permitted
but
encouraged
by
the
government
for
for
many
years
and
also
the
ways
that
it
still
goes
on
and
the
ways
that
our
communities
can
address
it
and
work
to
diminish
it
in
the
future.
And.
F
F
The
event
drew
from
what
I
understand
about
300
people
to
come
out
and
hear
him
speak
at
one
of
the
churches
in
town
and
then
in
Menlo
Park.
They
did
a
follow
up
event
called
the
color
of
law,
Menlo
Park
edition
that
got
together
the
housing,
Leadership
Council,
all
menlo,
together
tech
equity,
the
community
equity
collaborative
they'll,
sponsored
an
event
to
discuss
the
implications
of
his
work
in
the
community
of
Menlo
Park.
So
my
suggestion
would
be.
We
could
sort
of
combine
these
two
kinds
of
events.
F
We
could
invite
professor
Rothstein
to
speak
in
Mountain
View
about
the
history
that
he
writes
about
in
this
book,
and
then
we
could
follow
it
with
a
community
discussion
about
how
this
history
has
impacted.
Mountain
View
I
think
this
could
be
quite
impactful,
especially
as
we
think
about
the
ways
that
Mountain
View
is
growing
and
building
new
housing
and
how
we
can
do
that
in
a
way
that
combats
this
kind
of
of
history.
A
G
G
We
had
a
good
opportunity
to
investigate
potential
Lots
for
safe
parking,
collect
contact
information
and
also
inform
business
owners
and
property
owners
about
the
informational
sessions
that
supervisors
submitting
this
hosting
I
think
next
week
to
educate
potential
or
property
owners
who
may
be
potentially
interested
in
hosting
a
safe
parking
site.
It's
not
glamorous
work,
but
it
can
be
fun.
G
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Councilmember
Ramirez.
We
really
appreciate
your
support
with
the
safe
parking
subcommittee
and
I
would
say
it's
very
glamorous
work.
Okay,
maybe
I'm
the
only
one.
It
feels
that
way,
but
it's
very,
very
important
work
and
it's
a
very
positive
outcome.
I
think
for
all
of
us,
no
other
questions
from
I.
Second,
that
all
thank
you.
A
It's
what
the
community
comes
together
to
solve
problems.
Great
things
happen.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
in
public
comments?
If
not
I
will
close
this
section
of
the
meeting.
Moving
on
to
item
5,
which
is
unfinished
business,
we
have
none
so
moving
on
to
new
business
item
six
6.1,
we
are
starting
with
funding
recommendations
for
fiscal
year
2020
and
2021.
A
Tonight
we
are
joined
by
housing,
a
neighborhoods
says
manager,
Tim,
Wong
and
senior
planning.
Planner
Orlando
Reyes
wrote
us.
Thank
you
very
much
for
being
here.
We
look
forward
to
hearing
the
discussion
and
helping
you
provide,
provide
direction
on
the
public
hearing
protocols
and
requirements.
So
thank
you
so.
H
Good
evening
again,
yes,
thank
you
for
that
welcome.
My
name
is
Tim
Wong
I'm,
the
housing
and
neighborhood
services
manager,
and
tonight
we
will
be
presenting
CDBG
funding
recommendations.
You
have
to
say
CDBG
a
number
of
times
before
it
rolls
off
the
tongue,
but
we'll
be
presenting
funding
recommendations
this
evening
for
your
consideration,
which
we
will
be
taking
the
HRC
recommendations,
then
on
to
the
City
Council
in
April,
but
Orlando
will
be
giving
the
presentation
so
I'll
be
handing
it
off
to
him.
E
I
So
starting
off
on
the
CDBG
or
Community
Development,
Block
Grant,
the
funding
application
process
I'll
be
providing
an
overview
and
then
jumping
into
the
review
of
the
applicants.
Just
to
give
you
a
little
background,
so
the
funding
application
process,
the
city
does
hold
two
public
hearings
prior
to
the
approval
and
use
of
the
funds.
The
applications
are
considered
annually
for
capital
projects
and
with
public
service
programs
which
are
funded
every
on
a
two-year
cycle.
They
won't
be
considered
on
at
this
time,
but
they
would
be
considered
in
the
subsequent
year.
I
What
is
CDBG
again,
it's
a
California,
sorry
Community,
Development
Block
Grant,
it's
an
entitlement
program
of
which
the
city
receives
approximately
five
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
annually.
The
purpose
of
the
funds
are
to
help
address.
Community
development
needs
to
support
neighborhood
and
revitalization
economic
development,
improve
and
improve
housing
opportunities
and
community
services.
I
I
The
the
values
in
green
represent
the
sum
of
the
592,
the
three
categories
being
public
service
activities,
planning
and
administration
and
capital
projects,
the
limits
in
terms
of
the
15
percent,
the
20
percent
and
65
percent,
respectively,
with
the
capital
projects
are
driven
by
the
CDBG
guidelines.
So
the
values
in
green
again
represent
the
sum
of
the
592
right
below.
It
are
two
additional
categories:
program,
income
and
reprogrammed
funds;
the
program
income
there,
those
are
funds
of
which
the
city
is
receiving
for
either
for
repayment
of
existing
CDBG
funds
through
annual
service.
I
The
reprogrammed
funds
of
435,000
represent
funds
that
were
either
not
utilized
from
prior
awards
and
therefore
reprogrammed
for
use
at
this
point
in
time,
and
I'll
explain
a
little
bit
more
about
that
in
a
moment
to
the
far
right
that
column.
That
says,
capital
project
allocations,
the
value
of
1
million
132
367.
That
represents
the
total
allocation
for
CB
from
CDBG
dollars
that
can
be
used
for
capital
projects
and
that's
the
385,
which
again
is
only
65
percent
of
the
current
allocation
plus
prior
year.
Reprogrammed
funds
plus
existing
program
income.
I
The
activities
in
which
the
cdbg
must
meet
in
order
to
qualify
for
use
of
these
dollars
are
these
three
objectives.
First,
is
to
benefit
low,
mod
incomes,
low
to
moderate
incomes
that,
according
to
HDD,
is
80%
or
less
of
ami
or
the
average
medium
income.
The
second
is
the
prevention
or
elimination
of
slums
or
blight,
and
the
third
is
to
meet
a
particular
urgency.
For
example,
if
there
was
a
an
earthquake
and
a
building
gets
damaged,
then
there's
an
emergency
there's,
an
urgent
need
to
address
a
building.
I
Those
dollars
can
be
used,
so
all
applicants
must
meet
one
of
these
three
criteria.
Generally,
the
city's
has
typically
most
of
the
activities
have
met
the
first
objective,
which
is
a
low
mod
low
to
moderate,
which
in
in
the
HUD
guidelines,
it
represents
that
at
least
51%
of
the
area
must
have
low
to
moderate
income
levels.
I
Some
examples
of
CDBG
eligible
activities
are
presented
above
the
ones
highlighted
in
orange,
tend
to
represent
the
most
common
activities
in
the
City
of
Mountain
View,
that
being
acquisition,
rehab
of
residential
and
non-residential
structures
and
public
services.
Again,
public
services
won't
be
considered
at
this
point,
but
it
would
be
considered
in
the
next
fiscal
cycle
in
terms
of
acquisition,
just
to
elaborate
on
that.
That
also
means
providing
an
applicant
funds
so
that
they
may
acquire
a
property
for
the
purposes
of
creating
affordable
housing.
I
The
next
program
is
called
the
home
investment
partnership
program
which
we
administer.
The
city
receives
approximately
two
hundred
and
thirty
six
thousand
annually.
The
purpose
is,
or
the
use
of
home
is
slightly
different
in
that
it's
related
essentially
to
address
the
housing
needs
for
low,
very
low
households,
as
opposed
to
CDBG,
which
is
flexible
for
services.
I
The
values
in
green,
similar
to
the
prior
slide
represent
that
the
sum
of
those
equals
two
hundred
and
seventy
three
thousand
one
sixty
so
of
the
two
hundred
and
seventy
three
thousand
and
change
10%
of
it
or
twenty
seven
thousand
can
be
used
for
planning
and
administration,
15
percent
or
forty
thousand
nine.
Seventy
four
would
need
to
be
set
aside
for
community
housing,
development
organizations
or
Chodos,
and
the
balance
seventy
five
percent
or
two
hundred
and
four
thousand
eight.
Seventy
could
be
used
for
capital
projects
below
that
similar
to
the
prior
slide.
I
When
we
spoke
about
CDBG,
there
is
again
program
income
income,
that's
being
received
for
a
repayment
of
prior
home
dollars
that
were
dispersed
its
repayment
of
those
and
then
and
the
reprogrammed
funds
of
two
hundred
and
one
thousand
reprogrammed
funds
again
represent
funds
that
were
not
utilized
by
prior
awards
by
prior
recipients.
I'll
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
on
the
201
450
notice
that
it
says
net
reprogrammed
funds
to
highlight
the
net
reprogrammed
funds.
The
gross
amount
is
right
below
which
represents
two
hundred
and
thirty
seven
thousand.
I
That
237,000
was
awarded
previously
in
2019
to
Palo
Alto
Housing
Development
Corporation
of
that
2:37,
though
we
need
to
set
aside
15
percent
or
thirty,
five
thousand
five
hundred
and
fifty
for
a
community
development
housing
development
organization.
So
the
balance
that's
left
over
is
that
tool
one.
There.
I
I
I
I
The
next
is
a
request
for
750
750
thousand
dollars
by
the
city
of
Mountain,
View
Public,
Works
Department,
for
the
development
of
Maura
Ortega
neighborhood
park.
Currently
there
is
raw
land
there,
so
there's
it's
just
vacant
a
vacant
piece
of
parcel
or
a
vacant
parcel,
and
then
the
third
is
a
request
for
$12,000
$12,000
requested
for
the
repairs
of
the
graduate
house.
It's
an
existing
single-family
home,
that's
being
used
as
a
shelter
for
the
homeless.
The
property
is
owned
and
operated
by
life.
Moose
a
nonprofit
organization.
I
I
I
I
As
you
see
here,
I've
identified
where
the
three
applicants
would
fall.
So
the
graduate
house
responds
to
the
lack
of
housing
for
homeless,
bridge
housings
acquisition
of
sixty
six
sixty
mariposa
or
the
preservation
is
to
increase,
affordable
housing.
That
property
is
currently
market
rate
and
then
the
third
is
to
improve
community
and
public
facilities.
That
would
be
moral
park
or
more.
Our
ticket
park.
I
The
slide
in
front
of
you
reflects
the
staff
report
and
original
recommendations
I'm
bringing
this
slide
forward,
so
that
you
can
see
the
third
that
this
slide
has
been
revised
and
I'll.
Explain
again,
why?
So?
These
are
the
numbers
that
you
have
in
your
current
staff
report.
The
items
in
green
are
the
numbers
that
will
be
changing.
You
know
and
I'll
again
explain
why.
I
Here's
the
revised
recommendations,
the
staff
total
recommendation-
is
still
the
same
to
meet
the
needs
of,
what's
being
requested,
the
984
660
Mariposa,
the
754
Memorial
Ortega
and
the
twelve
thousand
for
the
graduate
house,
so
that
amount
doesn't
change.
The
values
in
green
are
what
changed
and
the
reason
for
that,
as
shown
in
this
slide
here,
is
because
of
the
prior
slide,
where
we
discussed
the
additional
monies
that
were
necessary
from
the
additional
monies
that
were
necessary
for
the
chotto
or
the
Community
Development
Block.
Sorry,
community
development,
community,
housing
development
organization.
I
I
Those
are
set
assessment,
factors
or
items
that
the
Commissioner
should
take
into
consent
into
consideration
when
reviewing
the
applications,
such
as
the
need
for
the
project,
the
number
of
percent
number
and
percentage
of
low-income
Mountain
View
residents
that
would
be
served
by
these
applications
or
these
projects
or
activities,
the
leveraging
of
funds,
the
project
schedule
and
any
green
components.
Again.
That
was
an
assessment
factor
found
in
your
staff
report.
I
I
This
final
slide
is
just
to
show
you
the
trajectory
of
what
happens
next,
so
we
are
February,
sorry,
March
5th,
where
we're
hearing
the
capital
funding
and
also
the
consolidated
plan.
Your
recommendations
would
carry
over
to
Council
to
City
Council,
to
hear
on
April
28th
I
will
highlight
that
on
April
2nd,
we
will
bring
again
to
the
HRC
the
assessment
of
fair
housing.
It's
another
document,
that's
within
the
consolidated
plan.
We
broke
it
up,
given
the
size
and
volume
of
documents
like
over
200
pages
or
so
so
we
have.
So.
I
These
are
some
key
milestones:
April,
2nd
April,
28th
and
then
on
May
15th.
Both
the
consolidated
plan,
the
annual
action
plan,
which
would
be
the
synopsis
or
summary
of
active,
recommended
actions
to
move
forward
on
these
activities,
whatever
HRC
recommends
to
Council
and
what
council
finally
determines
that
would
be
folded
into
that
annual
action
plan,
thereby
supporting
the
goals
that
are
identified
in
the
consolidated
plan
roughly
in
July
or
so
is
when
we.
I
C
H
That
is
correct.
They
will
carry
over
HUD
allows
that
some
allows
jurisdictions
to
carry
over
funds
as
long
as
it
doesn't
exceed
one
and
a
half
times
their
allocation.
And
so
we
are
in
this
very
unique
circumstance
where
we
have
more
money
than
applications,
but
we're
very
happy
to
be
able
to
push
these
funds
out
the
door
while
being
able
to
and
also
meet
a
being
able
to
meet
the
one
and
a
half
times
threshold.
A
H
A
J
Can
you
yeah
so
stuff
consulted
before
the
meeting
and
sunder?
I
understanding
that
the
commissioner
Romero
lives
at
that
apartment
complex?
Yes,
so
our
recommendation
is
for
the
Commission
to
hear
each
of
the
projects
to
vote
on
them
separately.
So
when
it
comes
to
the
vote,
then
commissioner
Romero
camera
Cuse
himself
for
the
vote
for
that.
Okay,.
E
A
L
L
Our
mission
is
to
provide
housing
from
very
low
income,
we're
building
a
permanent,
supportive
housing
down
in
Berkeley
to
moderate
income
and
workforce
housing,
and
we've
developed
over
17,000
homes
throughout
California
in
the
Pacific
Northwest,
and
we
we
haven't
had
that
much
for
presence
in
Mountain
View,
but
we
did
one
project
I,
think
in
the
90s
called
the
fountains
124
unit
senior
project
with
mid-penn
and
yeah.
We
kind
of
utilize
all
creative
financing
structures
and
we
have
a
cool
S&P
rating.
L
So
a
little
bit
of
background
on
Mariposa
we
were,
you
know
we
were
noticing
that
there
were
a
lot
of
displacement
projects
happening
out
here.
A
lot
of
a
little
higher
density,
say:
Class,
B,
C
apartments
were
getting
torn
down
and
in
return
for
high-end
townhomes,
so
this
site
in
particular
660
Mariposa.
It
was
taken
out
to
market
for
townhomes
and
we
I
was
de
quiring
it
and
trying
to
figure
out
some
preservation
plan.
L
L
There
are
a
couple
things
here:
it
didn't
have
10-year
ownership
and
high
land
values
out
and
mountain
view
kind
of
limit
what
we
can
throw
into
tax
credit
illegible
basis.
So
we
came
up
with
a
little
alternative
formula,
leveraging
property
tax
exemption
and
we're
raising
some
social
impact
capital
to
help
fund
this
preservation.
L
The
affordable
program,
is
pretty
simple
in
place.
Tenants
get
no
greater
than
four
percent
fixed
increases
annually
and
new
households
must
have
incomes,
no
greater
than
80%
of
ami
approach,
CD
standards
to
qualify
and
there's
just
a
little
chart
on
the
four
percent
fixed
increases
and
how
its
relate
to
affordable
housing
because
most
are
affordable.
Housing
rents
are
benched
benchmark
to
Tcat
rents
and
that's
a
little
chart
on
how
it's
you
know.
L
Santa
Clara
County
has
seen
such
strong
growth
in
the
past
five
years,
so
it's
the
four
percent
fixed
increased
sense
of
reconciling
to
how
those
rents
have
grown
so
a
little
bit
about
the
requirements.
All
residents
by
the
nature
of
housing
or
will
be
found
view
residents
and
right
now,
there's
I
believe
three,
three
households
that
are
over
income
for
the
income
requirements,
but
we've
committed
to
keeping
them
in
place.
L
So
right
now,
it's
not
all,
but
you
know
it's
assigment
majority
of
the
initial
residents
we've
done
community
meet
community
meetings
with
the
residents
and
we've
got
verified
household
income
data
so
and
then,
eventually,
all
tenants
will
be
fit
that
category
so
yeah
we're
hoping
to
use
these
funds
for
the
acquisition.
Only
by
using
these
funds,
we
will
have
to
turn
less
to
traditional
financing
sources,
which
will
give
us
greater
flexibility
in
the
long
run
of
managing
the
property
and
any
issues
that
arise.
A
D
D
L
L
D
L
D
D
B
D
C
L
C
M
L
A
A
A
A
D
L
D
A
J
B
D
That
I
have
is
at
some
point:
it's
going
to
be.
The
rents
are
going
to
be
increased,
as
people
tend
to
move
out,
and
so
it
will
become
less
of
a
low-income
project,
as
people
move
out
and
new
people
move
in
paying
the
higher
rent.
That's
the
only
concern
that
I
had,
but
they
will
still
be
at
below-market.
Is
that
correct?
Yes,
when
they're
paying
the
higher
rent.
L
A
Can't
be
it
not
that
I
don't
like
a
great
discussion
but
I'm
sensing
that
we
are
coming
to
a
point
very
quickly.
Would
anybody
like
to
make
a
motion?
The
motion
would
need
to
be
framed
as
approving
the
request,
the
dollars
you
would
like
to
see
it
approved
at
and
and
for
whom-
and
in
this
case
of
course
it's
just
Bridge
housing.
What
any
would
like
to
make
a
motion
I.
D
A
A
J
A
B
A
O
J
O
O
So
this
project
proposes
a
future
park
along
Ortega
and
Mora,
as
shown
in
the
highlighted
blue
square
on
the
map
there.
The
0.45
acre
land
was
dedicated
to
the
city
by
the
developers
of
the
nearby
town
home
development
for
the
intent
of
constructing
a
new
neighborhood
park.
The
site
is
located
in
a
low
to
moderate
income
census
group,
and
it
is
anticipated
that
50
3.27
percent
of
the
total
number
of
Mountain
View
residents
served,
will
be
from
the
low
to
moderate
income
population.
O
By
building
this
Park,
the
city
will
make
progress
towards
meeting
some
of
our
objectives.
One
goal
from
the
parks
and
open
space
plan,
which
is
to
provide
three
acres
of
open
space
per
thousand
residents.
Moore
Park,
is
located
in
the
San
Antonio
planning
area,
which
currently
has
a
standard
of
1.3
four
acres
per
1,000
residents,
and
so
once
the
park
gets
constructed,
this
standard
will
increase
to
1.3
seven
acres
of
open
space
available
available
per
thousand
residents.
O
So
the
concept
for
the
future
Park
is
shown
here,
and
it
was
prepared,
based
on
a
community
input
that
city
staff
obtained
by
holding
community
meetings.
The
concept
was
presented
to
the
Parks
and
Recreation
Commission
for
a
recommendation
and
then
later
presented
to
City
Council
for
approval,
and
so,
as
shown,
is
what
what
the
City
Council
approved.
O
The
concept
proposes
a
lawn
area
made
of
natural
turf,
a
play
area
with
play,
equipment
and
structures,
a
small
fitness
area
and
a
shaded
courtyard
that
has
picnic
benches,
and
all
of
this
is
surrounded
by
a
meandering
loop
trail
and
in
the
meet
in
the
community
meeting.
The
residents
also
showed
interest
in
giving
the
park
a
and
Orchard
theme,
and
so
that
explains
the
plenty
of
trees
kind
of
meandering
through
the
walk
walkway,
to
give
it
sort
of
a
nice
shade,
but
also
Orchard
theme
like
and
the
park
will
also
be
fenced.
O
There'll
actually
be
a
short
perimeter
fence
facing
Ortega,
Avenue
and
Mora,
and
the
park
will
of
course
provide
standard
park.
Amenities
such
as
benches
bike,
racks
and
a
drinking
fountain,
and
these
images
just
show
examples
of
the
play
equipment
being
proposed
for
the
park,
and
these
are
also
like
these.
The
circular
mounds
are
kind
of
just
colorful
turf
areas
for
the
kids
to
kind
of
roll
on
give
them
the
feeling
of
rolling
on
hills
almost.
O
The
current
project
budget
is
approximately
one
point:
six,
six:
five
million
dollars.
We
are
requesting
$750,000
of
the
CBD
G
funds
available;
CDBG,
sorry,
with
the
prices
for
contractors
and
materials
constantly
rising,
the
designers
have
increased
the
estimated
project
cost.
We
also
anticipate
an
increase
in
cost
as
we
refine
the
design
to
address
staff
recommended
changes
and
constructability
concerns.
D
H
D
In
this
case,
the
city
can't
pay
pay.
The
whole
thing
is
that
the
whole
cost
of
it
is
1.6
million
dollars
to
do
it,
and
we're
asked
to
fund
a
portion
of
that
$750,000
and
that's
something
that
the
city
is
not
going
to
well.
I
guess
we
will
through
our
through
through
HUD,
but
why
are
we
being
asked
to
fund
part
of
it.
O
O
So
the
yes,
the
one
point,
six
six
five
doesn't
only
mean
that
the
construction
will
be
one
point:
six,
six,
five
million
dollars,
so
additional
funding
will
just
help
towards
kind
of
just
hope,
pick
towards
adding
any
park,
amenities
that
may
have
been
increasing,
cost
construction,
wise
or
even
adding
a
couple
more
elements
that
we
would
want
to
provide
the
neighborhood.
But
we
with
the
construction
rising
costs
it's
a
little
hard
to
provide
one
example,
being
four
traffic
improvements.
We
would
like
to
work
on
some
sort
of
crossing,
but
I.
P
Is
a
capital
improvement,
Park
project
and
it's
funded
through
different
funding
sources.
This
one
in
particular,
is
funded
through
our
parkland
fund.
The
project
budget
is
1.6,
but
we
are
anticipating.
We
are
only
at
95
percent
right
now
and
design,
and
we
are
still
refining
the
cause
of
the
the
whole
project
and
we
are
anticipating
a
shortfall
at
this
time,
and
so
the
requested
funds
will
be
used
towards
that.
It.
A
P
We
are
still
refining
that
right
now,
like
I
mentioned,
we
were
only
at
95%.
We
progressed
into
the
design,
we'll
find
out
more
and
there's
currently
a
a
construction,
a
park
under
construction,
and
it's
having
some
issues
that
we're
hoping
we
can
address
during
design
for
this
one,
so
the
numbers
are
still
being
refined
at
this
moment.
Okay,.
K
I
might
I
don't
know
that,
obviously,
the
the
city
develops
and
parks
all
the
time.
Actually,
that's,
maybe
not
obvious
cuz
Mountain
View
I
think
is
very
fortunate.
The
degree
to
which
we
are
able
to
add
parks
and
open
space
in
the
community
with
a
very
proactive
strategy
around
that
and
for
each
project,
the,
but
the
potential
funding
sources
are
assessed
and
many
if
not
most
of
them,
would
not
qualify
for
use
of
CDBG
funds.
K
But
this
park
in
this
location,
given
the
population
that
it
will
serve,
does
qualify,
and
so
each
project
on
a
project-by-project
basis
does
look
at
what
are
the
available
funding
sources
to
try
to
maximize
being
able
to
deliver
and
bring
these
parks
to
the
communities
so
not
having
to
use
more
parkland
fee
funds
means
that
those
funds
will
be
available
for
other
parks
that
wouldn't
be
able
to
qualify
for
use
of
these
CDBG
funds.
Thank.
M
I
have
a
question
about
so
you
said
you're
about
nine,
wasn't
95
90
percent,
something
like
that
very
close.
So
what
exactly
is
the
let's
say
at
this
point
you
don't
reach,
say
100%
or
go
over
a
hundred
percent.
What
will
be
the
outcome
of
the
park?
Do
you
just
develop
part
of
it
or
do
you
like
what
exactly
gets
actually
developed
and
constructed.
B
M
If
you
don't
get
just
let's
say
like
forever
on
from
here
on
out
as
a
hypothetical,
you
only
ever
get
like
95
or
98
percent
of
what
is
required.
So
if
you
can
never
I,
don't
want
to
be
pessimistic
here,
but
if
you
can
never
receive
all
the
funds
that
are
required
since
it's
on
an
unknown
right
now,
what
what
is
the
proposed
outcome
like?
Are
there
cuts
to
this
design,
or
do
you
anticipate
I,
don't
know
like
less
fewer
trees
or
that's
what
I'm
asking.
Let
me
have
the
project
manager,
okay,
yeah.
O
Yeah
something
along
those
lines,
usually
when
we
put
out
the
project
to
bid.
If
we
anticipate
that
the
available
funds
aren't
sufficient,
we
may
put
items
as
a
bid
alternate
meaning
we'll
have
the
contractors
give
us
a
price,
but
it
gives
us
the
chance
to
say
if
we
can't,
if
we
can't
you
know,
we
can't
either
ask
Council
for
the
additional
funding
to
fund
those
items
of
construction
items.
Then
we
don't
have
to
have
the
contractor
to
perform
that
sort
of
work.
Okay,
do.
O
I
think
we
would
have
to
analyze
the
items
of
bid,
work
and
kind
of
evaluate
which
ones
are
top
priority,
which
ones
may
be
able
to
be
cut
off
on
some
of
it
may
be.
You
know
like
not
making
the
pathways
concrete
instead
of
a
cheaper
material
like
decomposed,
granite
or
something.
Okay,
that's
yeah,.
M
Cuz
I
I
see
the
function
of
this
park
as,
like
a
couple
of
things.
There's
the
environmental
component,
the
children's
play
component,
thee,
I,
don't
I,
don't
know,
I,
don't
know
that
how
much
about
parks
are
designed,
but
it
seems
like
it's
serving
a
lot
of
different
types
of
residents
and
folks
in
Mountain
View.
So
is
there
sort
of
a
like
a
hierarchy
almost
or
like
a
prioritization
of
which
of
those
like
subpopulations
you'd
you'd
hold
over
another
uhm.
O
I,
don't
believe
we
would
remove
any
of
the
furnishing
furnishing
set.
Did
I
say
service
one
group
over
the
other
I
think
we
our
priority
would
be
to
have
those
installed.
It
would
just
be
more
of
like
the
landscaping
that
might
be
affected
or
like
choice
of
material.
For
other,
say
it
yeah.
Okay!
Sorry!
No!
Thank
you.
Yeah!
That's
helpful.
Just.
M
D
Follow
up
on
that
that
question
to
be
sure,
I
understand
you
need
another
nine
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars
right
to
complete
the
project
if,
if
we
funded
seven
hundred
and
fifty
the
difference
between
the
entire
cost
of
the
entire
project
and
what
we
would
fund
would
be
about
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars,
have
you
a
commitment
from
the
city
or
from
other
funders
to
cover
that
and
I
think
that's
to
follow
up
what
was
asked.
Sorry.
K
A
E
K
A
Following
along
to
something
Fernando
mentioned,
while
the
area
is
in
a
census
block-
that's
80
percent
ami
or
less
than
80
percent
ami,
the
area
immediately
around
this
park
seems
to
be
potentially
higher.
Income
like
this
particular
Park
is
built
because
some
older
house
and
got
torn
out
and
it's
being
replaced
with
some
pretty
look,
upscale
looking
housing.
So
the
immediate
area
around
this
park
looks
like
it
has
a
lot
of
brand
new
upscale
development
or
market
rate
development.
I
So
the
analysis
that
was
done
on
this
on
this
park
consisted
of
four
block
groups
of
those
four
block
groups.
Three
of
them
are,
would
primarily
use
it.
The
analysis
behind
that
is,
the
property
is
bordered
by
Central
Expressway
to
the
north,
which
includes
three
lanes
plus
the
Cal
trains
which
divides
so
then
it's
anticipated
that
the
residents
would
be
the
ones
immediately
immediately
surrounding
that
block
group-
one,
oh
sorry,
Baku
to
where
the
park
was,
that
resides
block
group
three
and
four.
They
do
consist
of
some
larger
communities.
I
However,
in
terms
of
open
space,
there
isn't
anything
around
their
block
group
four
consist
of
primarily
commercial
businesses.
There
are
I,
think
I
counted
a
total
of
five
residential
apartment
buildings
that
would
benefit
from
use
of
this
property
as
size
from
the
newer
adjacent
community
that
was
recently
built.
So
again,
that's
just
to
reflect
that
from
the
analysis
done.
N
Right,
my
name
is
Ray
Rodriguez
I'm
senior
project
manager
in
Public,
Works
I
work
with
Mary
Chris
at
the
community
meetings
that
we
held.
We
had
a
lot
of
attendees
from
outside
of
that
development,
so
there
was
a
lot
of
interest
to
with
from
the
residents
in
the
area
that
came
to
our
meetings
to
help
plan
the
park.
So
just
in
another
metrics,
for
you
great.
A
D
C
I'm
very
much
in
favor
of
being
able
to
use
less
traditional
sources
of
funding
for
parks
so
that
other
funding
can
be
used
for
other
sources
in
it,
in
particular
that
there's
surprisingly
this
year,
there's
not
a
competition
for
the
funds.
In
other
words,
we
don't
have
more
requests
for
funds.
Then
we
have
funds
available
so
I'm
very
much
in
favor
of
this.
E
A
Thank
you
just
for
myself,
I,
like
I,
really
like
the
design
of
this
park.
I
like
the
combination
abuses,
including
the
playground,
the
fitness
and
the
orchards
are
a
really
cool
touch,
so
it's
very,
very
thoughtful
design
and
I
like
to
see
a
new
development
with
such
an
area
with
new
development
have
such
a
large
park
being
established
as
you
can't
build
them
later.
So.
Thank
you
very
much
furthering
other
comments
from
the
Commission
and
further
discussion.
I
just.
D
O
A
A
A
Q
That
is
correct.
Sorry,
I,
don't
have
a
fancy
presentation
for
you,
but
your
questions,
a
person
from
us
good
evening,
commissioners
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
present
this
evening
and
thank
you
for
staff
for
your
due
diligence
in
reviewing
our
application.
My
name
is
Joanne
price
I'm
vice
president
of
real
estate
with
life
moves
I'm
here
with
my
colleague,
Samantha
Harris
who's,
a
project
manager
for
this
particular
project.
I'm
gonna
give
you
a
quick
overview
of
life.
Q
Moves
if
you're
not
familiar
with
us,
how
we
serve
Mountain
View
residents,
not
only
in
the
project
that
we're
asking
for
the
$12,000,
but
also
in
some
of
our
other
facilities
and
then
I'll
give
you
a
quick
overview
on
the
project
itself.
So
life
moves
we've
an
organization,
that's
been
going
40
years,
we're
the
largest
service
provider
of
homeless,
shelter
and
services
in
Silicon
Valley.
We
on
one
night
we
have
950
beds,
one-third
of
those
beds
are
taken
by
children
and
at
by
one-fifth,
our
veterans.
Q
Q
Q
They
we
have
it
so
total
of
six
rooms
and
four
rooms
are
specifically
reserved
for
Mountain
View
residents,
but
typically
all
units
are
taken
by
the
residents
and
we
would
serve
in
one
year
about
ten
Mountain
View
residents.
The
average
length
of
stay
is
about
99
to
129
days
that
length
erstes
extending
because
we
haven't
got
the
affordable
housing
to
help
house
these
people,
the
transitional
housing.
Q
The
people
who
have
been
at
graduate
house
would
otherwise
be
sleeping
in
the
streets
in
vehicles
or
in
other
uninhabitable
places
like
garages
or
on
like
couchsurfing
and
in
terms
of
the
numbers
I'm
in
graduate
house
alone.
That
number
of
10
residents
equates
to
about
two
hundred
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
per
year,
but
not
only
that
we
serve
a
number
of
Mountain
View
residents
at
our
other
facilities
and
that
averages
about
twenty-eight
clients
in
the
past
two
years,
and
that
comes
to
a
total
of
four
thousand
two
hundred
and
seventy-three
nights
of
stay.
Q
We
have
the
data
to
support
this.
We
track
all
our
clients
coming
into
the
facility
that
equates
to
about
300
thousand
dollars
and
we
do
not
request
funding
through
Mountain
View
in
terms
of
services.
So
it's
great
that
we
get
this
capital
request
to
help
bolster
to
graduate
at
house.
So
quick
summary
of
the
application
about
two
years
ago,
we
applied
for
by
fifty
eight
thousand
to
update
the
kitchen
and
when
you
think
of
the
average
age
for
single
clients,
now
it
shelters
just
exceeded
50
and
with
that
comes
the
challenges
of
mobility
and
accessibility.
Q
So
it's
a
really
valuable
use
of
the
money
when
we
went
through
the
process
and
back
in
2018
under
the
California
Labor
Code
1720,
homeless,
shelters
are
exempt
pom
prevailing
wage,
but
it
was
since
determined
when
the
contract
was
signed.
It
does
apply
to
hurt
projects.
So
we
kindly
request
this
12,000
cover
the
uptick
in
the
labor
costs,
so
we
can
complete
the
project.
We're
ready
to
go.
The
contractor
is
ready
to
go
so
once
we
get
the
contract
signed,
we'll
get
this
job
done
within
a
couple
of
months.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Life
moves.
You
do
incredibly
valuable
work
in
our
community,
so
thank
you
for
sharing
a
little
bit
more
about
the
impact
you
make.
That
was
very
nice
to
hear,
although
well
nice,
it's
a
lot
of
numbers
per
night.
So
thank
you
for
doing
the
hard
work
to
the
commissioners
have
questions
up
to
for
this
applicant
I.
D
Q
At
first,
it
was
hard
to
find
the
small
contractor
able
to
undertake
this
work
and,
at
the
same
time,
we
were
seeking
clarification
about
the
prevailing
wage,
because
we
had
this
contradictory
information
from
the
California
Labor
Code,
which
were
very
familiar
with.
We
were
needed
like
their
guidance
from
the
city,
and
once
that
was
verified,
it
is
pushed
us
back,
and
so
then,
once
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
were
on
the
correct
side
of
the
requirements
before
we
sign
the
contract.
So
everything
is
ready.
Q
M
B
J
E
Often
thank
you
for
the
work
that
you
guys
are
doing
for
our
community.
So
my
question
is:
if
you
guys
don't
get
the
12,000
hour,
I
don't
want
to
be
pessimistic.
Well,
but
oh,
how
only
you
guys
do
it?
I
guess
I
have
other
sources
of
funding,
or
we
must
rely
on
these
12,000
to
get
the
work
moving.
We.
Q
Really
would
like
to
go
ahead
with
this
work.
Typically
I'd
like
where
our
funding
comes
through.
Sixty
percent
public
40
percent
donors
and
typically
the
donor
funds
want
to
go
to
direct
services,
is
paying
for,
like
the
case
managers
and
very
brightly
in
light
interacting
with
the
clients,
so
the
capital
projects
kind
of
get
pushed
down
the
line,
which
is
great
when
we
got
the
opportunity
for
funding
there,
it
was
like.
Yes,
we
can
do
this
work
because,
typically,
it
kind
of
the
support
services
take
priority
than
capital
projects
which
was
much
needed.
E
A
Q
Interviewed
no
graduate
houses,
the
only
shelter
we
operate,
although
we
do
like
when
I
was
talking
about
our
other
facilities
from
Daly
City
to
San
Jose,
we
do
have
clients
from
Mountain
View
and
that
Montgomery
Street
Julian
Street
Villa
and
we
do
have
capital
projects
that
those
locations
but
they're
in
a
different
jurisdiction.
Okay,.
A
C
Appreciate
the
challenges
of
getting
funding
for
capital
projects
when
donors
want
to
want
their
money
to
go
directly
for
services,
so
I
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
to
be
able
to
provide
that
additional
capital
funding
for
an
organization.
That's
really
playing
a
crucial
role
for
homeless
individuals
in
this
city.
A
A
A
Review
and
provide
input
on
recommended
draft
2020
2025
consolidated
plan
goals.
The
HRC
will
hold
a
public
hearing
now
to
review,
discuss
and
provide
input
on
the
recommended
draft
goals
for
the
2020
25
consolidated
plan
for
City
Council
consideration,
community
development,
neighborhoods
and
housing,
Division
housing,
a
Neighborhood
Services
Manager,
Tim,
Wong
and
Senior
Planner,
Orlando
Reyes
wrote
us
will
lead
the
discussion
and
provide
direction
on
the
public
hearing
protocols
and
requirements.
H
I
I
B
I
I
The
consultant,
Plan
Update
process
consists
of
both
qualitative
and
quantitative
data
gathering
that
was
found
in
the
report.
One
of
them
is
called
the
Chazz
or
the
comprehensive
housing
affordability
strategy.
That's
where
some
of
the
data
comes
from.
The
other
is
the
ACS
or
american
community
survey,
which
is
a
survey
the
last
or
the
most
current
survey.
I
There
is
a
2020
census
that
will
be
happening,
but
for
now
the
data
points
use
are
the
last
census.
We
also
use
a
placed
in
time
data
point
for
2019,
so
that's
the
quantitative
and
qualitative
data
that
builds
the
consolidated
plan.
The
other
aspect
of
it
is
the
community
outreach
from
the
community
outreach.
I
There
was
there's,
essentially
three
components
that
took
place:
one
was
partnering
with
the
County
of
Santa,
Clara
and
other
local
jurisdictions
in
an
outreach
that
consisted
of
three
regional
forums
that
were
conducted
through
throughout
the
county
and
two
community
forums
that
happen
locally
here
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
In
addition,
there
was
a
online
survey
that
was
made
of
made
available,
of
which
184
City
respondents
on
which
184
City
residents.
I
I
I
The
consolidated
plan
identified
some
needs
here
are
just
a
few
examples
on
the
screen,
which
include
the
city,
has
the
fourth
largest
homeless
population
in
the
county.
Many
households
per
housing
cost
burdened,
especially
those
in
the
low
to
moderate
income,
households,
80%
of
ami
or
less
over
half
of
the
elderly.
Households
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View
are
LMI
or
low
to
moderate
income.
I
Black
and
African
American
Asian
American
households
experience
a
higher
disproportionate
of
housing
problems
and
then
the
other
was
the
that
certain
Hispanic
and
Asian
American
households
experience
severe
housing
problems
again.
These
are
just
a
few
examples
that
are
in
the
con
plan.
I
think
there,
maybe
is
a
dozen
or
so
more
in
the
identified
needs.
I
The
first
question
for
the
HRC
to
consider
is
whether
those
identified
needs,
as
detailed
in
the
needs
assessment
portion
of
the
consolidated
plan,
whether
you
agree
with
them.
The
other
is,
if
there
are
any
additional
needs,
that
the
HRC
would
like
to
identify
that
are
not
found
in
the
plan
as
shared
by
the
community
and
through
the
outreach
means.
I
That
includes
establishing
homeless
prevention,
service
programs,
responding
to
lack
of
housing
for
homeless,
creating
sustainable
jobs
and
increasing
earnings
capacity
and
addressing
and
promoting
fair
housing.
In
the
earlier
presentation,
you
would
have
seen
these
same
goals
and
how
the
activities
or
applications
presented,
how
they
aligned
with
these
current
goals,
found
in
the
22
2025
consolidated
plan,
doesn't
require
us
to
prioritize
these
goals.
So
these
bullet
points
are
in
no
order
of
priority
or
ranking
a
question.
I
The
affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing
or
afh
is
the
next
step
which
will
be
brought
to
the
HRC
for
review.
We
did
separate
that
from
the
consolidated
plan,
just
because
of
the
volume
for
you
to
review
the
aged
sorry,
the
afh
is
designed
to
identify
fair
housing
issues
and
determine
factors
that
significant
significantly
contribute
to
those
issues.
I
Some
of
the
key
dates
March
13th
through
April
14th,
is
when
the
30-day
public
commenting
period
begins
for
the
consolidated
plan.
The
plan
that
you
have
had
a
chance
to
review
the
afh
will
again
be
shared
following
this
meeting
for
us
to
reconvene
on
April,
2nd
and
discuss
on
April
28th
is
when
the
city
councils
to
consider
both
the
approval
of
the
con
plan
and
the
capital
project
fundings
activities
that
you
review
today
with
the
culmination
in
that
on
May
15th.
A
D
One
of
the
questions
I
have
inclined
it
here
had
to
do
with
the
various
data
points
where
you're
getting
information
and
one
of
them
under
methodology.
The
second
paragraph
talks
about
the
am
I
meaning
area
median
family
income.
What
is
the
area
that
they're
are
referring
to?
How
does
that
drill
down?
H
C
Have
a
clarification
question
about
just
about
our
task
here
and
I:
don't
need
to
jump
the
I
don't
like
to
use
a
violent
metaphor,
jump
jump
the
barrier
on
that,
but
I
want
to
understand.
If
you
posed
some
questions
to
us,
they
were
in
the
slide
set
and-
and
we
were
aware
of
those
I'm
wondering
if
beyond
that,
are
you
looking
for
other
feedback
on
the
report?
If
there
were
parts
of
that
didn't
weren't,
clear
or
other
comments,
or
are
we
restricted
to
addressing
the
questions
that
you've
posed
to
us.
H
Absolutely
all
comments
we,
we
are
most
interested
in
the
hrs
that
sees
feedback
in
regards
to
the
needs
and
goals
of
the
Kahn
plan,
because
that
is
really
the
meat
of
the
document.
However,
if
you
do
see,
some
discrepancies,
or
something
that
is
missing,
for
example,
will
be
certainly
happy
to
take
a
note
of
that
and
as
one
of
the
one
of
the
parts
of
the
Kahn
plan,
HUD
requires
that
we
look
at
all
comments
that
are
received
and
how
we
address
them
so
certainly
available
to
receive
any
overall
comments.
D
A
Q
Hi
Joanne
with
lightmaps
again
on
some
of
the
numbers
that
you
reported.
It
was
stated
that
Mountain
View
is
actually
the
fourth
the
city
with
the
fourth
largest
homeless
population,
but
when
you
actually
read
the
point-in-time
count,
Mountain
View
is
actually
second
when
it
comes
to
unsheltered
populations
in
Mountain
View.
When
it
comes
to
sheltered.
Yes,
they
are
fourth,
but
the
numbers
are
substantially
higher
when
you
look
at
the
unsheltered
numbers,
so
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out.
Q
A
A
So
staff
just
checking
in
with
you
my
understanding
is,
we
should
under
question
one
under
the
goals.
Go
one
by
one
and
have
the
commissioners
comment
in
question:
make
any
comments
on
each
one
and
agree
or
disagree
and
then,
at
the
end
of
going
through
the
established
bullet
points,
see
if
anybody
would
like
to
add
any.
A
Okay,
I,
don't
think
this
will
be
too
tedious,
but
the
way
I
said
it
made
it
sound
terrible.
So
we
will
amend
as
needed
if
it
gets
terrible.
So
can
we
put
the
slide
up
with
I?
Guess
it's
I,
don't
know
what
site
it
is
this
one?
Yes,
so
for
question
one
we
must
identify.
Do
we
agree
with
it
or
do
we
must
agree?
Do
we
identify
with
the
needs,
as
detailed
in
the
needs
assessment
and
from
community
input,
and
that's
the
list
up
on
the
screen
and
are
there
any
additional
needs?
A
H
Question
number
two:
so
we're
gonna
serve
start
with
the
needs
which
are
these
are
identified.
These
are
some
of
the
summary
of
needs
that
have
been
identified
in
the
needs
assessment.
However,
in
the
con
clan
there
are
a
number
of
needs
that
have
been
identified.
This
we
didn't
want
to
list
them
all
yeah.
A
A
D
H
No,
that
was
just
drawing
from
the
point
in
time.
It's
very
nuanced,
where,
yes,
we!
This
was
just
more
highlighting
the
fact
that
we
are
in
terms
of
overall
population,
shelter
and
unsheltered
in
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
but
we
can
clarify
as
part
of
the
consolidated
plan,
we
have
the
second
largest
unsheltered
or.
B
A
Think
we
are
agreeing
with
enthusiasm
unless
anyone
has
any
of
any
other
comments.
On
the
first
item
I'm
moving
on
to
the
next
and
I
guess,
we
could
always
check
back
if
someone
comes
up
with
thing.
The
second
point:
many
households
are
how
housing
cost
burdened,
especially
the
low
moderate
LMI
households.
H
Burn
there
are
two
definitions:
cost
burden
is
those
who
spend
more
than
30%
of
their
household
income
on
housing,
which
is
generally
the
federal
government
standard,
and
when
just
to
explain
when
we
say
severe,
cost
burden
that
is
50%,
they
spend
more
than
half
their
household
income
on
housing.
That.
A
A
I
would
like
to
comment
a
bit
on
this
one
based
on
the
public
feedback.
So
from
the
surveys
and
from
the
forum
I
went
to
in
the
summary
of
that
forum.
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
concern
about
the
elderly
in
general,
not
just
that
many
households
are
LMI
and
that's
I,
think
I
think
it's
actually
well
over
half
right,
65
percent.
A
There's
a
lot
of
concerns
about
other
needs
and
services
for
seniors
that
the
senior
population
has
become
somewhat
invisible
and
it's
growing
so
I
don't
know
if
we
can
expand
that
bullet
to
include
that
the
elderly
populations
service
needs
as
a
whole
need
to
be
looked
at,
not
not
just
affordable
housing,
legal
services,
health
care,
home
care,
accessibility
and
other
issues.
Transportation
I
know,
there's
a
whole
host
of
issues
as
the
baby
boomers
age
up.
H
A
Thank
you.
It's
just
a
population
that
I'm
I'm
very
concerned
about
after
what
I've
read
a
lot
of
the
work
that
you've
shared
with
us
is
very
informative.
Other
comment
comments
from
commissioners
next
point:
black
african-american
and
Asian
American
households
experience
a
higher
disproportion
of
housing
problems,
I.
D
H
I'd
have
to
look
into
you.
Can
these
these
estimates
because
I
will
say
just
backing
up
these
identified
needs
again
are
more
summary.
There
are
there's
more
a
quantitative
analysis
in
the
needs
assessment
and
in
regards
to
those
those
are
based
on
the
census.
The
census
itself
is
I
believe
very
when
it
talks
about
Asians.
H
It
does
have
that
ethnic
breakdown
breakdown,
but
when
it
comes
to
ECS
data
and
Chas
data,
which
this,
which
the
khan
plan
with
the
which
the
needs
assessment
we're
built
in,
does
not
drill
down
as
specific
or
granular
as
what
as
the
2010
census,
what
these
numbers
are
based
on.
Does
that
make
sense?
Does
that
answer
your
question.
D
C
I
have
a
question
I'm.
Actually,
if
I
may
step
back
a
little
bit,
I'm
somewhat
confused,
because
the
consolidated
plan
document
itself
has
a
list
of
things
called
priority
needs
and
that
list
doesn't
match
this
list
and
I
just
want
to
be
sure.
I
understand,
I
thought
we
were
going
to
be
talking
about.
The
priority
needs
as
listed
starting
on
page
117
and
so
starting
on
page
117.
H
Absolutely
yeah
so,
just
to
point
out
these
identified
needs
were
staff
just
picking
out.
Just
to
summarize,
these
are
some
of
the
identified
needs
that
were
a
produced
in
the
executive
summary,
so
we
would
just
highlight
some
of
those,
but
absolutely
these
identified
needs
or
these
priority
needs.
If,
if
if
the
HRC
would
like
to
comment
on
would
like
to
go
through
these
priority
needs
and
see,
if
you
agree
with
their
assessments,
for
example,
increase
affordable
housing
as
a
priority
need
right
now
we
have
it
categorized
as
a
very
high
priority
or
or
or
housing.
H
N
H
C
A
I
recommend
that
we
continue
on
the
process.
We
only
have
we're
done
with
this
boat.
We
only
have
one
more
after
this
and
then
after
that,
I
will
open
up
for
comment.
If
anyone
has
anything
that
they
would
like
to
add,
which
could
in
fact
come
from
the
table
starting
on
page
117,
more
of
their
own
reading
or
thoughts
and
I,
think
there
will
be
some
really
good
discussion
in
that
section.
So
thank
you.
Thank
You,
Gerry,
Solomon
old
habits
die
hard.
A
Did
anyone
else
have
any
questions
or
comments
on
black
african-american
and
Asian
American
households
any
more
on
this
specific
point,
if
not
moving
along
to
the
last
formal
point
on
this
list,
certain
Hispanic
and
Asian
American
households,
experience
severe
housing
problems,
thoughts
or
comments.
Commissioner,.
M
H
That
goes
back
to
black.
If
you
go
into
the
executive
summary
to
kind
of
teases
it
out
more,
but
black
or
african-american
households
in
Asian,
American,
households,
I
believe
in
different
ami
levels,
I
believe
them
in
number
four
it.
It
refers
to
low-income,
african-american
and
Asian
American
households
experience
a
higher
disproportion
of
housing
problems
which
is
low
income
at
those
low
income,
households
spend
more
than
30
percent
certain
Hispanic
in
Asian
American
households.
H
A
A
A
Quick
process
step
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
completed
certain
Hispanic
anyone
else
when
it
comment
on
certain
Hispanic
and
Asian
American
population
and
then
suggest
a
process
for
how
we
could
go
through
identity.
Unique
identified
needs
that
we
all
see
so
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
take
turns
if
we
have
any
identifying
needs
that
we
think
should
be
on
this
list
and
one
by
one
so
safer
and
actually,
let's
say
Linda,
has
an
item,
shares
an
item
about
mental
health
and
explains
whatever
she
wants
to.
C
Back
to
the
process,
sorry
I,
but
I'm
still
confused.
If
the
item
is
on
the
priority
needs
list
already
do
we
need
to
discuss
it,
I
mean
if
we
all
agree
that
it
should
be
there
I
guess,
I'm
wondering
which
list
is
gonna
end
up
kind
of
going
up
and
on
to
City,
Council
etc?
Is
it
the
bullets
we're
seeing
here
or
is
it
the
plan
which
has
the
priority
needs
absolutely.
B
A
A
A
Are
we
all
in
agreement?
Okay,
okay,
priority
number
one
increase,
affordable
housing,
priority
level,
high
I
think
it
speaks
for
itself.
The
description
is
create
housing
that
include
programs
that
increase
homeownership,
preserve
diversity
and
inclusion,
support,
creative
rental
opportunities,
increase
portable
rented
rental
units,
support,
integrated
housing
solutions
and
plans,
development
of
housing
for
special
needs
population.
It
keeps
going
rehabilitation,
programs
that
reduce
vacancies
and
deteriorating
housing
stock
and
reducing
development
and
construction
costs.
A
H
A
K
A
A
A
A
So
too,
I
want
to
make
sure
that
it
works
with
the
process
so
for
priority.
One
increase,
affordable,
housing,
priority
level
high
show
of
hands.
If
you
agree
with
this
priority
and
it's
priority
level
that
looks
unanimous
priority,
two
housing
opportunities
near
transit,
priority
level
medium
as
you
can
see,
create
and
provide
housing
near
and
adjacent
to
major
transit
routes,
making
transportation
to
education,
healthcare,
jobs
and
shopping,
more
convenient
and
efficient
for
families.
A
M
K
K
A
D
Category
one
and
two
in
oh,
never
mind.
I'm,
sorry,
are
you
sure
yeah?
Well,
they
all
have
to
I'm.
Just
surprised
that
this
raised
to
the
level
of
medium
I
didn't
realize
that
so
this
has
to
do
with
housing
that
there's
a
priority,
need
medium
need
for
housing
near
not
just
housing,
but
housing
near
transit,
right
and
and
these
populations
are
the
ones
most
in
need
of
that.
A
Yeah,
that
was
my
understanding
as
well.
That
specifically
near
transit
is
less
of
a
priority
than
just
more
affordable
housing.
Although
yeah,
okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
vote,
do
we
all
agree
that
on
the
city's
priority
housing
opportunities
near
transit
and
that
we
should
have
that
priority
and
it
should
be
priority
level
medium?
If
you
disagree
on
half
of
it,
I
guess:
holler
I,
gots,.
A
C
Noticed
that
so
nothing
has
a
low
priority
of
these
nine
items.
They're
all
either
medium
or
high
I
just
want
to
comment
on
that
that
I
kind
of
looked
at
it
to
see
what
was
the
range
to
get
a
sense
of?
What
might
you
know
how
many
categories
are
there
and
there
seem
to
be
only
two?
Yes,
so
just
wanted
to
put
that
out.
There.
A
D
A
A
Priority
need
number
three:
sustainable
jobs
and
income
equality
priority
hi,
so
these
would
be
jobs
for
extremely
low
income
or
I'm
jobs
and
jobs,
training
and
programs
for
extremely
low
income,
low
income,
people
with
disability,
abilities,
elderly
homeless,
chronically
homeless
veterans,
families
with
kids
non
housing,
public
facilities,
an
economic
development.
That's
the
population
served.
A
D
A
B
A
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
comment
about
the
my
own
thoughts
on
the
priority
level.
I
understand
the
need
for
jobs,
but
for
me
for
the
report,
I've
found
it
a
little
bit
difficult
to
understand
what
kind
of
jobs
programs
would
be
developed
and
how
they
would
directly
contribute
to
the
populations
mentioned
here
and
I
also
I,
while
I
feel
it
is
extremely
important
and
Noble
I
was
concerned
that
issues
around
housing
mattered
more
than
this
one
that
was
a
personal
take
on
me.
I'd
be
very
curious.
H
The
reason
for
it
being
high
is
actually
these
are
based
on
community
feedback
and
through
the
survey,
those
those
type
of
things
that,
when,
when
polled,
you
saw
the
survey
in
the
back
that
these
were
important
or
high.
Priority
needs
for
them
in
regards
to
why
jobs
are
being
mentioned,
for
example,
because
CDBG
does
offer
its
economic
development
for
low
income,
households
or
low
income.
Persons
is
a
eligible
activity.
Yes,.
A
H
However,
just
to
let
you
know
just
because
the
community
said
it,
it
does
have
some
outside
influences
also,
and
so,
if
that
is
something
that
the
HRC
feels
doesn't
rate
as
high
for
this
community,
that's
certainly
versus
all
these
other
worthy
needs.
Then
that's
something
that
you
can
also
determine
further.
A
C
Have
a
question:
what
are
the
implications
of
rating
something
as
higher
medium?
Like
you
know,
let's
say
if
the
City
Council
agrees
that
something
is
you
know
these
are
in
the
high
category.
These
are
in
the
medium
category.
What
are
the
implications,
therefore,
for
funding
and
resources?
Would
it
mean
that,
for
example,
if
we
rated
this
category
sorry
just
trying
to
scroll
back
to
it
of
sustainable
jobs
and
income
equality,
if
we
put
it
down
to
medium
instead
of
high,
would
a
smaller
percentage
of
CDBG
funds
be
allocated
toward
it?
A
H
Would
be
more
for
the
allocation
of
funds
because,
as
you
know,
for
example,
public
services
are
always
oversubscribed
by
like
a
four
to
one
ratio
or
something
like
that
so
again,
they're
all
worthy
causes,
but
if
you're
matching
up
a
public
service
for
this
versus
that
and
if
one
it
could
come
down
to
if
in
the
con
plan,
it's
a
high
priority
for
this
and
a
median
priority
for
that,
then
that
could
be
the
deciding
factor.
It
really
does
just
depend.
H
A
My
preference
would
be
to
make
an
immediate
priority,
not
to
say
it's
not
a
high
priority.
Otherwise,
but
there
are
many
issues
around
housing
and
help
them
homelessness
prevention.
And
if
you
don't
have
housing,
you
really
can't
keep
a
job,
let
alone
get
educated
on
a
new
field
or
worry
about
income
equality.
So
I
think
my
preference
would
be
to
make
it
a
medium.
B
E
A
C
A
M
Now
that
one's
a
pretty
complex
one
I
think
that
you
know
such
a
simple
statement-
I'm,
not
sure,
but
if
it's
well
is,
can
I
ask
I
mean
this
is
based
on
the
I,
like
the
data
that
was
collected
from
the
community.
So
my
thing,
okay,
now
I'm
leaning
back
towards
where
so
this
does
reflect
the
what
the
community
says.
Then
it
sounds
like
it's.
D
A
C
Think
to
the
challenge
and
I
say
this:
based
on
you
know,
working
on
a
couple
of
needs
and
assets
assessment
projects
through
the
HRC
as
well
as
outside
the
HRC
is
you
know
when
we
have
relatively
small
numbers,
I
mean
it
was
great
to
get
I.
Think
was
a
hundred
and
eighty
something
surveys
which
is
wonderful
to
get,
but
thinking
about
that
is
a
very
very
small
percentage
of
you
know
of
the
entire
city
and
and-
and
there
were
a
couple
of
community
forums
as
well,
but
just
being
hard
to
know.
C
If
that
high
priority
is
generalizable
to
and
in
the
city
as
well,
not
to
say
that
it's
not
important
and
I
think
we
all
recognize
it's
important
and
it
should
be
on
this
list
as
a
priority
need,
but
just
wondering
if
the
community
input
deed
and
our
thinking
about
the
other
items
on
this
list
and
how
they
relate
to
each
other.
If
that,
if
we
feel
that
would
justify
elevating
this
item
to
the
high
versus
the
medium
priority
level,.
B
C
A
Question
4
for
staff:
how
important
is
it
for
you
to
hear
what
we
feel
about
your
priority
levels
on
each
item,
for
example,
let's
say
we're
just
ittle,
unbreakable
tie
or
a
really
lengthy
discussion
on?
Is
it
medium
or
high?
Can
we
leave
you
with
an
approval
of
a
priority
and
just
say
no
consensus
on
that's
fine.
H
A
With
that
said,
I
would
really
really
like
us
to
spend
time
providing
you
insights
on
things
that
we
think
need
higher
prioritization
or
are
missing
entirely
otherwise
we're
just
fighting
over.
You
know
high
low,
it's
not
going
to
take
you
anywhere.
So
if
everyone
agrees,
may
we
skip
a
priority
level
for
number
four
but
agree
that
housing
for
special
I'm
sorry
I
keep
flipping
the
paper
that
we
agree
that
priority
three
sustainable
jobs
and
income
equality
quality
is
a
goal
that
we
support,
but
without
putting
a
priority
level
on
it.
A
At
this
time,
raise
your
hand
if
you
agree
great.
Thank
you
for
that
discussion.
I
think
that
helped
us
get
through
some
process.
Hiccups
now
I
can
talk
about
prayer.
Each
number
for
housing
for
special
needs
populations.
Priority
level
high.
There
is
a
wide
wide
range
of
populations
listed,
so
I'm
not
going
to
read
them
all
out.
This
is
item
four
page
118.
A
A
A
H
B
H
A
H
A
H
A
Good
I
agree
with
you
well
with
that
said.
I'd
I
do
remember
that
there
were
a
lot
of
I.
Think
public
comments
from
the
online
survey,
in
particular,
where
people
assumed
that
this
was
a
problem
in
the
city
and
that's
how
I
got
voted
so
much
that
there
was
some
sort
of
bureaucratic
process
that
got
in
the
way,
but
that's
how
it
felt
when
I
read
some
of
the
comments
but
I'm
not
sure
anyway,
does
anyone
else
have
any
comments
or
questions
on
this
one.
C
C
H
Don't
believe
so
I
understand
the
importance
of
creating
more
efficient,
a
do
Adu
process
to
increase
that
overall
housing
stock,
but
in
general
CDBG
is
for
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing,
focusing
on
CDBG
and
home,
it's
mostly
deed,
restricted,
eighty
percent
or
below
eighty.
You
may
help
and
be
naturally
affordable,
but
this
is
more
targeted,
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing.
A
A
Maybe
just
a
comment
to
staff
for
me
that
the
populations
that
you
know
most
at
risk
are
the
most
important
which
I
guess
chronic
homelessness,
and
there
are
a
whole
lot
of
families
that
could
easily
fall
into
the
into
the
pipeline
of
homelessness.
So
I
think
just
emphasizing
at-risk
populations
in
this
or
is
really
important
to
me
to
clarify
that.
D
K
H
D
A
C
Was
too
I
think
is
the
way
the
description
is
worded
is
provide
enhanced
care
for
mentally
disabled
individuals
and
the
families
are
agencies
providing
care,
I.
Think
there's,
certainly
a
need
abroad
need
for
a
variety
of
types
of
mental
health
services,
including
for
people
who
would
not
be
considered
mentally
disabled,
but
my
question
is
I
recognize
that
this
is
specific
to
CBD.
C
H
Would
say
you
do
have
the
latitude
just
going
back
to
CDBG
and
home
home
does
not
can't
be
used,
but
CDBG
Public
Services
transitional
such
as
graduate
house
funded
Quetzal,
which
was
for
transitioning,
you
or
or
transitioning
out
of
foster
care.
So
it's
it's
up
to
the
HRC
to.
If
you
would
like
to
strike
disabled
then
add
a
few
more
groups.
D
I
was
just
gonna
say:
that's
such
a
good
point,
because
I
have
seen
mental
illness
and
disability
connected
throughout.
So
it's
not
so
I
agree
with
I
think
that's
a
very
good
point.
Not
all
mentally
ill
people
are
disabled,
it
could
be
children
in
high
school
that
are
attending
school.
It
could
be
a
lot
of
different
things.
So
if
we
could
somehow
break
that
linkage
or.
D
C
D
A
D
H
Is
correct,
yes,
you're,
correct,
CDBG
and
home.
Primarily,
you
know
it's
it's
for
low
and
very
low
income
households,
that's
regardless
of
situation,
but
were,
but
these
are
maybe
just
some
of
those
groups
that
were
called
out
as
part
of
the
survey
community
survey.
But
youth
is
certainly
one
of
those
populations.
I.
A
Would
like
to
add
seniors
as
well,
especially
given
what
we've
learned
about
the
impact
in
their
housing
mm-hmm
good
see.
Do
we
have
a
show
of
hands
for
people
who
agree
with
priority
7
increase
mental
health
services
and
priority
medium?
We
actually
didn't
talk
about
the
priority,
but
does
anyone
agree
with
it?
I.
C
H
A
We're
almost
to
the
homestretch
before
we
start
adding
our
own
ideas,
speeding
it
up
priority
number:
eight,
fair
housing,
representation,
priority
medium
I,
have
a
question
for
staff
right
off
the
bat.
Are
we
going
to
be
discussing
this
particular
topic
next
month?
No
we're
talking
about
fair
housing
next
month.
H
D
C
D
E
I
would
like
to
come,
and
you
know
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
law
or
how
many
low-income
people
that
probably
don't
have
internet
access
at
home
and
I,
know
I.
Think
the
city
of
South
said
there
are
they
have
a
partnership
with
they
call
this
a
approach
to
closing
the
teacher
divide,
so
I
think
they
threw
a
fund
that
they
get
indeed
property
and
free
internet
to
households
and
I.
E
E
D
E
D
A
D
Because
it's
not
just
having
it
so
that
everybody
can
have
the
latest
broadband,
but
if
in
a
household,
if
they
cannot
afford
it,
then
the
children
doesn't
do
any
good
to
the
people
in
the
home.
If
they
don't
have
the
money
to
pay
for
it.
So
there
must
be
maybe
a
way
to
to
have
it
on
a
sliding
scale
or
something
like
that
for
people
or
through
the
schools
or
library.
H
Again,
just
yes,
we
can
certainly
put
that
in,
and
so,
if,
if
there
are
I,
don't
want
to
think
competing,
there
are
two
applications
side
by
side,
one
to
provide
free
internet
or
reduced
price
versus,
affordable
housing
or
or
that's
where
this
will
come
in
place.
But
we
can
absolutely
put
in
access
to
free
internet
as
part
of
this
priority
need
okay
or
affordable
Internet
access.
Okay,.
I
A
Now
I
would
like
it
to
open
up
I
think
we
should
go
Commissioner
by
Commissioner.
If
you
have
any
needs,
you
feel
should
be
eyed
defied
that
or
not
or
called
out
more
specifically
inside
of
this
I
think
we
should
just
do
that
and
just
actually
let's
go.
How
should
we
best
do
this?
Well,
first
of
all,
does
anyone
have
anything
that
they
would
like
to
ask
to
be
added
to
the
list
of
identify
needs.
C
They
were
two
issues
that
were
referenced
in
the
report,
but
one
I
found
hard
to
follow
through
and
the
other
one
was
only
mentioned
in
one
sentence
and
I
was
really
surprised,
so
bring
it
okay,
why
don't
I
start
with
that?
One,
because
I
foreshadowed
it
by
mentioning
earlier,
and
that
is
about
earthquake
retrofitting
right
and
I-
have
a
couple
comments
on
that.
So
there
was
a
reference
to
that.
The
only
one
I
could
find
in
both
the
plan
and
the
public
input
document.
The
summary
of
public
input
was
in
the
plan.
C
There
was
one
sentence
about
it
on
page
86,
a
reference
to
soft
story,
buildings
being
susceptible
to
earthquake
damage,
no
one
from
the
public
gave
input,
but
I
have
a
couple
comments.
One
is
that
the
data
that
were
referenced
about
the
percentage
of
housing
units
in
Mountain
View
that
are
soft
construction,
that
is
from
I,
believe
the
housing
element
report.
2015
223,
it
says
seven
percent,
based
on
the
San
Jose
State
University
study
from
2003.
C
However,
the
city
put
out
another
report
and
that
came
out
in
May
2018,
that's
bhana,
Witt,
says
report,
and
that
has
a
very
different
number
and
this
was
talked
about
in
a
Mountain
View
voice,
article
or
actually
several
articles
that
later
report
says.
16
percent
of
the
housing
stock
in
Mountain
View
is
soft
construction,
so
I
just
wanted
to
call
out
that.
What's
in
the
report,
is
the
older
data
source
based
on
the
San,
Jose,
State
and
I?
Think
it's
important
reference?
There's
another
data
source.
C
I
I
couldn't
readily
find
information
on
Mountain
View's
latest
plan
to
address
soft
structures-
and
you
know
there's
this
whole
question
of.
Is
it
required
that
landlords
make
the
retrofit
and
it
or
is
it
recommended
and
who
pays
for
it?
So
I
felt
like
people
in
the
lower
income
category
end
up
at
the
greatest
risk
if
they
are
the
ones
living
in
these
structures
and
they're,
the
ones
least
able
to
pay
for
the
retrofitting.
C
H
Can
give
it
a
shot
and
then
I'm
sorry
that
was
so
long.
Sorry
as
part
of
the
report,
the
city
is
still
going
to
a
soft
story.
Retrofit
evaluation
right
now,
I
think
the
the
first
step
is
a
survey
of
all
the
various
structures
in
the
city
and
then
based
on
that
survey,
the
city
will
move
forward.
I,
don't
know
if
it's
required
or
not
how
they
plan
enforcing
this
off
story,
but
that
effort
is
already
underway
in
regards
to
using
soft
story
with
CDBG.
H
If,
if
a
CDBG
applicant
such
as
bridge
housing,
came
in
and
applied
for
rehabilitation
funds,
that's
certainly
one
of
the
things
that
we
would
want
them
to
address
on
that
voluntary
basis.
But
I
believe
with
the
soft
story,
is
I
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
a
voluntary
program
or
not
I
in
in
regards
to
the
next
steps.
After
the
survey
yeah.
K
So
in
terms
of
it
being
a
burden
for
low-income
people,
it's
it's
a
you
know
it's
the
responsibility
of
the
multifamily
property
owners
for
rental
properties,
so
for
properties
that
are
owner
occupied
then
I
would
imagine
if
they
are
serving
low-income
people,
they
could
be
eligible
for
CDBG,
but
I.
Don't
know
that
that
would
likely
be
the
case
for
the
owner
occupied
buildings
and.
C
A
H
C
Thank
you
for
indulging
me
on
that
item.
I
had
a
question
about
unaccompanied
minors
who
will
become
homeless
because
when
I
was
looking
at
the
numbers,
I
think
the
numbers
were
different
in
terms
of
how
many
units
or
or
beds
I
should
say,
are
available
because
they
weren't
all
measuring
the
same
thing.
C
So
I
think
it
was
Quetzal
house,
although
it
was
not
named
as
such,
has
40
serves
40
youth,
but
there
seemed
to
be
a
table
and
some
bullets
that
repeated
that
said
that
in
the
entire
county
there
are
only
23
emergency
shelter
beds
for
unaccompanied
youth.
I
saw
that
in
two
places
in
the
report,
in
a
table
and
in
some
bullets,
let's
see
that's
on
page
90
and
also
on
page
91
and
I.
C
There
were
some
tables
where
I
wasn't
sure
if
it
was
talking
about
the
county
or
the
city,
but
I
was
thinking
especially
seeing
the
other
numbers
page
61.
That
talked
countywide
about
the
needs
for
youth
and
young
adults
for
beds.
I
just
thought:
oh,
my
gosh.
How
can
we
be
in
a
county
that
has
only
23
beds
for
unaccompanied
minors
and
I
wondered
in
Mountain
View?
H
C
H
C
C
D
C
All
house
is
for
youth
right
and
they
seem
to
have
more
beds
so,
but
some
of
them
are
for
youth
transitioning
and
a
foster
care
home
wouldn't
count,
maybe
is
unaccompanied
minors.
So
that's
why
I
was
having
trouble
understanding
the
numbers,
but
it
was
just
trying
to
get
a
sense
of
a
in
the
county.
I
think
we're
short.
If
you
go
to
downtown
San
Jose,
it's
obvious
that
we're
short
on
beds
for
minors,
but
here
in
Mountain,
View
I
was
wondering:
do
we
have
unaccompanied
minors
who
are
homeless?
C
A
D
Sorry,
just
just
to
or
to
go
back
to
mental
health,
I
think
there's
a
real
need
for
services,
not
just
for
low
income,
but
middle
income
people.
They
don't
qualify
for
any
of
the
aid
out
there.
That
may
be
happening
and
yet
oftentimes
they're,
mortgaging
their
house
or
anything
to
get
someone
care
who
needs
mental
health
services
and
there's
a
tremendous
lack
of
beds.
D
So
I
mean
that's
just
my
real
concern
that
I
have
because
I've
seen
it
happen
and
in
my
life
you
know,
there's
there's
just
no
services
for
young
people
at
all
or
for
anyone
who
has
a
severe
mental
health
issue
and
needs
to
be
hospitalized.
There
aren't
any
beds
for
them
and
there's
very
little
services.
So
I
just
raised
that
as
a
concern.
A
Other
ideas
from
commissioners,
seeing
none
I
would
like
to
add
a
few
food
insecurity
is
something
that
came
up
in
the
community
surveys
in
the
community
forums
and
was
reference
quite
a
few
times
in
the
report
itself,
but
it
never
made
it
to
the
top
of
the
list
of
identified
needs
and
I
I've
heard
I've
been
hearing
more
and
more
about
food
insecurity,
because
rents
are
going
up,
so
people
aren't
eating.
I
would
like
to
see
that
brought
forward
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
long-term
health
impacts,
especially
on
children.
A
Another
idea,
I
thought
for
a
need
that
could
be
identified,
is
income
stabilization.
So
if
people
are
having
a
lot
of
paying
sixty
or
more
percent
of
their
income
on
rent,
what
other
programs
can
be
identified
to
give
people
help
on
their
costs,
such
as
food,
childcare,
transportation
and
other
things
that
reduce
their
overall
income
burden
to
make
their
housing
situation
more
secure?
A
I
do
know
that
sustainability
and
transportation
came
up
a
lot
up
in
community
comments.
This
is
more
of
a
question.
I
didn't
know
how
that
would
necessarily
relate
to
this
particular
plan,
but
there
was
a
lot
of
conversation
in
the
report
about
walkability
traffic
safety
traffic
in
general.
I
know
people
just
talk
about
those
things,
no
matter
what
but
I
didn't
know
if
there
would
be
if
that
really
fit
within
the
consolidated
plan
or
not,
and
sustainability
too,
there
is
definitely
an
affordable
housing
component
there,
but.
H
In
terms
of
safety,
some
of
those
things
can
be
included.
For
example,
CDBG
is
used
for
a
DA
accessibility
items,
and
it
still
goes
back
to
whether
that
area
is
still
a
low-income
group
or
what
have
you
we?
We
still
have
to
do
that
due
diligence
as
you
will,
but
there
can
be,
although
yeah
like
many
of
these
other
needs,
they're
all
just
worthy
needs
and
in
regards
to
sustainability.
A
J
A
A
A
A
Okay,
we
are
on
to
question
number
two:
does
the
HRC
agree
with
the
proposed
consolidated
plan
goals
and
are
there
any
additional
goals
that
the
HRC
would
like
to
add
just
to
focus
us
this
time,
I'm
going
to
recommend
that
we
look
at
the
lovely
chart
on
page
135
and
use
those
as
our
discussion
point
just
so
we
have
one
point
of
starting
this.
Everyone
have
oh
I,
see
that
PDF
is
getting
pulled
out.
Its
I
think
it's
putt,
page
135
I.
A
Have
a
funny
feeling
we're
gonna
repeat
ourselves
a
little
bit
but
probably
add
a
lot
more
specific
information.
So
if
staff
is
ready,
I
will
start
goal
number
one
establish
humless,
Prevention's
and
programs
provide
needed
and
essential
homeless
prevention,
services
and
programs.
Such
programs
and
activities
will
assist
homeless
or
at
risk
homeless,
individuals
and
families
in
the
following
ways:
crisis
intervention,
service
for
at-risk
families,
shelter,
shelter,
intake
services
and
job
training
and
search
assistance
and
other
vital
social
services.
C
C
C
B
A
Any
other
comments-
I
guess
you
just
are
looking
for
our
up
vote
on
this
great
show
of
hands
who
approves
of
gold
number
one
establish
this.
Whatever
we
agree,
the
title
should
be
number
one
great:
moving
along
gold
name,
gold
name,
good.
One
goal
to
respond
to
housing,
to
respond
to
lack
of
housing
for
homeless,
assist
the
homeless
population
by
creating
additional
homeless,
shelter,
spaces,
emergency
and
permanent,
addressing
RV
conditions,
identifying
designated
safe
parking,
addressing
shelter,
maintenance,
utility
and
Internet
access.
D
H
H
A
A
A
A
A
Seeing
none
I
guess
show
of
hands.
Do
we
approve
goal
number
to
respond
to
lack
of
housing
for
homeless,
homeless
yeah?
Is
that
unanimous
great
goal
number
three
increase
affordable
housing?
This
is
long
I
think
it
speaks
for
itself.
Does
anyone
have
any
comments
or
questions
on
the
item
as
written
I.
A
Don't
know
if
this
would
be
the
right
place
for
it
I
to
Linda's
point
earlier.
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
it's
a
little
bit
addressed
here,
but
I'm
addressing
the
missing
middle.
The
moderate-income
families
I
think
they're
in
in
the
different
reports
that
you
gave
us.
So
many
comments
were
made
about
how
to
help
the
missing
middle
with
low
in
assistance,
payment
assistance,
building
more
housing
in
a
category
they
can
afford.
So
I
would
really
really
like
to
call
that
out,
affordable
I,
guess
it's
affordable,
housing
for
all
and.
H
H
A
Other
comments,
then
too,
we
all
approve
goal.
Number
three
increase:
affordable
housing;
Fernando,
you
don't
have
to.
Let
me
just
just
make
sure
goal
number
four
provide
programs
for
youth
and
families;
continued
support
for
youth
programs,
clinic
sports
mental
health,
parenting
classes
that
focus
on
family,
civility,
training,
basics
of
basics,
of
etiquette,
diversity,
awareness,
cultural
sensitivity
and
good
si
stewardship,
also
access
to
child
care,
school
safety
and
better
collaboration
with
schools.
D
B
C
I
I
recall
from
the
to
your
point,
I
recall
the
residents
conveying
the
message
of
from
no
littering.
You
know
teaching
the
youth
about
littering
teaching
the
youth
about
things
you
mentioned
bullying
so
trying
to
connect
and
help
the
youth
become
more
familiar
with,
in
this
case
kind
of
the
norms,
every
case
of
society
and
being
able
to
that's
what
this
sentence
is
trying
to
convey.
But
civic.
M
B
H
H
A
I
would
also
like
to
see
the
description
of
family
includes
seniors.
We
have
many
multi-generational
households
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View
and
those
are
often
the
ones
that
most
risk.
It's
you
know
noted
that
things
like
child
care
would
be
included.
I
think
it
would
also
be
nice
to
see
support
for
elder
care
and
elderly
elder
programs.
Okay,.
A
Any
other
comments
so
do
we
agree
with
goal
for
provide
programs
for
youth
and
families
unanimous
moving
along
goal.
Five
support
opportunities
for
special
needs
populations,
provide
programs,
funding
and
services
for
special
needs
populations,
including,
but
not
limited,
to
abused
and
abandoned
children,
mental
and
preventative
health
services,
victims
of
domestic
violence,
senior
seniors
and
physically
disabled
comments
from
the
Commission.
C
A
H
J
M
Comment
any
other
I
know
you're
gonna
remove
it
can
I'm,
not
sure.
So
if
we
limit
the
dis,
the
disabled
description
from
just
only
physical
to
also
include
like
developmentally
or
mentally
as
well
or
just
strike
the
physical
so
that
it
just
seems
disabled
like
broadly
because
I,
don't
think
I
should
just
say
limited
to
that.
That's.
A
I'm,
just
looking
do
you
have
it?
Does
anyone
else
have
anything
else
to
add?
Okay,
great
we're
getting
faster?
Do
we
support
goal,
5
support
opportunities
for
special
needs
populations,
unanimous
goal
number
six,
creating
sustainable
jobs,
increasing
earning
capacity?
We
talked
a
lot
about
this
earlier,
supporting
economic
development
activities
that
improve
education
and
skills,
training,
and
primarily,
the
professional
scientific
and
technical
services,
information
services
and
magnify
industries,
activities
that
create
vital
partnerships
that
create
opportunities
for
employment,
workforce
development
and
readiness
programs,
comments,
questions.
A
H
H
A
More
questions
or
comments
do
we
agree
with
goal
number
six,
creating
sustainable
jobs
and
increasing
earning
capacity?
Great
we're
an
easy
Bunch
goal:
number
seven:
improving
community
and
public
facilities
supporting
a
higher
quality
of
life
through
enhanced
community
and
public
facilities
and
infrastructure,
including
recreational
spaces,
community
and
social
service
facility
upgrades
existing
public
infrastructure
such
as
streets,
sidewalks,
curbing
and
other
public
facilities,
internet
access,
safe
routes
to
school,
addressing
public
safety
concerns?
Does
anybody
have
any
comments
or
questions
obvious
short
sounding,
but
far-reaching
category.
D
H
M
You
know
like
little
things
like
that
they
put
bumps
and
places
just
to
sort
of
to
to
sort
of
discourage
folks
from
sleeping
on
the
sidewalks
things
like
that
is
there
any
way
to
just
for
me,
I
think
that
that's
a
very
like
it's
something
that
could
be
construed
as
a
public
facility
or
something
and
I
think
there's
you
know.
History
of
that
is.
Is
there
a
way
to
limit
this
goal
in
some
way?
That
would
prevent
that
to
be
included
in
this.
H
Well,
excuse
me,
with
the
vetting
of
these
public
funds
going
through
the
NOFA
process,
if,
if
that
is
something
that
is
proposed,
certainly
if
there
are
members
of
the
committee
or
if
the
community
opposes
that,
they
can
certainly
speak
up
against
that
type
of
proposal
such
as
here.
If
I'm
not
saying
the
park,
would
propose
anything
like
that,
but
if
they
did
during
this
public
comment
period,
that's
where
the
community
could
potentially
could
oppose
those
type
of
measures.
If
anybody
did
submit
an
application
for
that,
that
type
of
thing.
K
If
I
might
it
seems
hard
for
me
to
picture
an
application
that
would
come
in
with
its
purpose
of
preventing
homeless
people
from
enjoying
the
public
infrastructure
would
be
meeting
the
needs,
or
rather
meeting
the
goals
of
the
consolidated
plan,
where
the
the
purpose
is
to
improve
community
and
public
facilities,
and
so
for
an
application
to
come
in
with
a
stated
goal
to
have
infrastructure
that
prevents
used
by
homeless
folks,
I
it's
hard
to
see
that
that
would
be
something
that
would
fit
the
requirements
of
use
of
CDBG
funds.
If.
M
It
were
to
appear
I
would
assume
that
it
would
be
pretextual
likes
instead
of
explicit
but
I'm
just
saying
just
the
term.
Public
safety
concern
like
that
I
I
know
historically,
like
that's
been
used
in
the
past
and
I
just
I
mean,
of
course
not
by
about
Singh,
Mountain,
View
but
other
suppose
I'm,
just
maybe
if
that
can
be
massaged
in
a
way
that
wouldn't
I
can't
come
up
with
anything
off
the
top
of
my
head
right
now,
but
just
like
putting
out
there
is
a
concern.
M
B
M
C
C
P
B
A
Don't
think
anything
would
ever
happen
like
that,
but
it
is
the
phrase
often
used
with
with
other
context
in
mind.
So
do
we
approve
call
seven
improve
community
and
public
facilities?
Woohoo
I
think
that
was
unanimous.
How
goal
number
eight
address
and
promote
fair
housing
continue
to
collaborate
with
social
service
entities
and
the
county
to
provide
assistance
for
families
and
individuals
seeking
counseling,
and/or
legal
solutions
to
fair
housing
and
discrimination,
discrimination
problems,
any
comments
or
questions.
A
A
A
Letting
the
thoughts
bubble
going
once
twice
and
I
think
sold
I
didn't
mean
to
rush
that
no
one,
no
one
leaned
forward
at
all
so
great
I
guess
a
motion
is
in
order.
Is
that
correct,
Christina,
just
a
motion
to
approve
goals,
one
through
eight
I
guess
be
to
be
specific
HR
so
that
we
I
motion
I'll,
make
the
motion
I
motion
that
we
approve
goals,
one
through
eight
with
the
HRC
comments
made
therein.
Would
anyone
like
to
second
my
motion?
I'll.
C
A
A
C
A
Well-Deserved
definitely
earned
moving
on
to
our
final
item,
everyone's
getting
ready
to
go,
wait,
there's
more
item
7
Commission
and
staff
comments,
questions
and
Commission
reports.
As
you
know,
we're
not
doing
official
Commission
report
outs
tonight,
because
the
agenda,
as
is
if
any
commission
would
subcommittee
I
should
say,
would
like
to
report
out
you
may,
as
always,
no
action
will
be
taken
on
any
questions
raised
by
the
Commission
or
yeah
by
the
Commission
at
this
time.
A
C
I'll
share
a
few
things:
I
attended
the
challenge
team
meeting
at
the
police
department
on
February
13th.
That
was
the
first
time
I
ever
went
to
that
meeting
and
it
was
very
well
attended.
It
was
a
packed
room
with
a
great
breakfast.
They
gave
us
little
Valentine's
candies
was
very
nice.
There
was
a
presentation
on
the
2020
California
children's
report
card,
so
that
was
really
interesting
with
data
and
California
got
lots
of
bad
grades.
C
I'll
sum
it
up
that
way,
but
it
was
good
to
have
that
presentation
and
understand
more
about
the
data
for
California
and
for
Santa
Clara
County,
and
there
was
also
a
presentation
on
prep
pre-exposure
prophylaxis
to
prevent
HIV
infection
among
young
people
and
how
young
people
can
locally
can
access
prep
so
also
that
day,
I
attended
the
census
party
at
the
community
center,
and
that
was
really
fun
and
well
done,
and
it
was.
It
was
nice
to
see
the
different
language
groups.
C
So
you
know
speakers
of
English,
Spanish,
Russian
and
Mandarin
Chinese
all
together
and
having
different
activities
and
having
all
the
interpreters
there.
So
that
was
some
quite
fun
and
also
our
immigrant
needs.
An
asset
subcommittee
is
meeting
next
Wednesday
to
go
over
the
survey
data
so
which
will
be
really
fun
and
I
will
make
sure
I
get
that
out
to
folks.
So
the
quantitative
analyses
are
done
and
my
RA
and
I
are
still
we're.
C
Gonna
do
as
many
of
the
call
analyses
as
we
can,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
you
guys
get
the
the
draft
of
this
weekend.
So
you
have
some
time
to
look
at
it
and
also
I'm
helping
just
a
little
bit
helping
the
spanish-language
Civic
Academy
that
the
multilingual
community
outreach
program
to
plan
retrospective,
meaning
look
back
and
also
prospective
evaluation.
So
just
providing
some
input
through
a
few
phone
calls
and
we're
gonna
have
a
logic
modeling
session
to
articulate
the
theory
of
change
and
that's
to
help
so
Nancy.
C
Do
Coast's
from
the
program
is:
is
spearheading
this
whole
evaluation
process
and
it's
very
knowledgeable
about
evaluation.
So
it
was
a
pleasure
to
speak
with
her
about
that
and
it'll
be
fun
to
see
the
results
of
that
assessment
and
how
that
can
inform
future
academies
in
Spanish
and/or.
In
other
languages,
and
those
are
my
announcements.
A
A
K
A
Direct
I
thought
so
thank
you,
but
we
do
have
beautiful
Flyers
for
the
event
on
30th.
Anyone
wants
to
learn
about
what
our
marketing
for
the
event
wound
up
being
and
what
it
looks
like
happy
to
share
we're
very
proud
of
this.
If
anyone
wants
to
take
a
flyer
and
take
a
look
we'll
update
you
later
with
that
said,
we
I
adjourn
this
meeting
at
9:57
p.m.
and
so
we
meet
at
our
next
scheduled
meeting,
which
is
scheduled
for
April,
2nd
2020
at
6:30
p.m.