►
From YouTube: 01-25-2022 - Mountain View City Council Meeting
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 25, 2022.
Live Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26.
A
Thank
you
for
joining
us
for
our
closed
session.
I
am
going
to
read
the
usual
announcement
as
required.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
california
government
code,
section
54953e
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
B
Good
evening
and
my
remarks
consist
entirely
of
the
closed
session
announcement
item.
2.1
is
conference
with
legal
counsel,
existing
litigation
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
549,
56.9
d,
one.
The
name
of
the
case
is
celerina
navarro,
janet
stevens,
armando
covarrubias,
evelyn,
estrada
gabrielle
rangel,
jaime
alma
aldaco
and
all
other
similarly
situated
versus
the
city
of
mountain
view
in
u.s
district
court,
northern
district
of
california,
the
san
jose
division
case
number
521-cd-05381.
B
Nc
and
then
item
2.1
2.2
is
conference
with
your
labor
negotiators
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
549
57.6,
the
agency
designated
representative
is
sue
rush.
The
human
resources
director,
the
unrepresented
employee
is
a
city
is
the
city
attorney
for
public
employee
appointment
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
549,
57
and
the
title
is
city
attorney
and
that
concludes
the
closed
session
announcement.
A
A
A
A
A
Thank
you.
The
city
clerk
will
take
attendance
by
roll
call.
C
Councilman
richard
walter
oops
vice
mayor
hicks,
here
mayor
ramirez,.
A
D
Thank
you
mayor
a
brief
point
of
order.
D
I
know
that
our
slide
said
that
the
updated
time
for
starting
was
7
p.m,
and
I
know
that
there's
a
an
item
on
consent
that
concerns
council
member,
show
walter
that
she's
a
a
very
strong
supporter
of
is
as
a
member
of
bcdc,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
it's
possible
for
a
very
slow
reading
of
the
items
or
something
like
that.
A
A
Any
other
items
I
any
would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
pull
any
other
item
being.
None
will
turn
to
public
comment.
A
A
D
Thank
you
mayor,
I'd
like
to
move
the
consent
calendar,
with
the
exception
of
item
4.2
and
on
4.3
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
declaring
city-owned
real
property
commonly
referred
to
as
lot
c.
That
comprises
part
of
the
site
located
at
one
amp
theater
parkway
as
surplus
land,
and
not
necessary
for
the
city's
use
and
taking
related
actions
under
the
surplus
land
act
to
be
read
in
title.
D
Only
further
reading
waived
and
under
4.4
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view.
Acknowledging
receipt
of
a
report
made
by
the
mountain
view,
fire
chief
regarding
the
annual
inspection
of
certain
occupancies
pursuant
to
sections
131,
46.2
and
131
46.3
of
the
california
health
and
safety
code
to
be
read,
entitled
only
further
reading
waived.
A
A
Thank
you,
any
discussion,
being
none
we'll
have
the
city
clerk
commence,
the
role
calling.
E
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We
will
now
return
to
item
4.2
and
since
it
was
pulled
from
consent,
I'll
do
a
quick
check
to
see.
If
there's
any
public
comment,
would
any
member
of
the
public
like
to
speak
on
item
4.2?
D
Thank
you
mayor,
and
I
know
that
councilmember
shel
walter
will
probably
want
to
make
comments
on
this
as
well.
But
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view
to
support
the
bay
adapt
regional
strategy
for
a
rising
bay
joint
platform
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
for
the
reading
waived.
G
Yes,
yes,
I
would
like
to
second
this.
This
is
an
important
platform
that
has
been
put
together
through
a
consortium
of
regional
agencies,
and
it
will
it
describes
how
we
should
plan
as
a
region
for
sea
level
rise.
So
it's
very
important
for
us
to
take
part
in
this.
A
C
E
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
will
now
move
on
to
item
five
oral
communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
I'll
note
that
if
there
are
a
great
number
of
speakers,
I
will
reduce
the
allotted
time
accordingly.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
What
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
A
H
Thank
you
mayor.
This
is
item
five
right.
I
want
to
make
sure
I've
got
it
right,
that's
correct!
Yeah!
I
just
wanted
to
tell
you.
This
is
informational,
but
a
group
of
us
in
mountain
view,
community
members
and
also
in
sunnyvale,
are
discussing
opportunities
for
an
open
streets
event
similar
to
vivaca
san
jose.
H
That
would
go
through
parts
of
mountain
view
and
sunnyvale.
Part
of
the
conversation
includes
brandon
white
and
riolo
in
public
works,
and
they
actually
had
a
similar
idea
before
we
even
brought
it
up.
So
there
are
parallel
tracks
going
on
for
this
and
we're
just
starting
early
stages
on
this.
But
I
want
you
to
be
aware
about
council
members
and
also
the
city
manager
and
others
on
staff,
and
then
we
will
be
reaching
out
to
you
for
support
and
assistance
with
making
this
happen.
But
now,
at
least
you
know,
thank
you.
I
Yeah
hi:
this
is
not
a
very
exciting
comment,
but
I
just
wanted
to
ask
if
it's
possible
to
change
the
view
on
zoom
to
gallery
mode,
so
we
can
see
all
of
the
council
members
right
now.
It
kind
of
pops
face
to
face,
and
it's
a
little
strange,
but
if
not,
it
is
not
a
big
deal.
Thank
you.
J
Chambers
resident
of
mountain
view-
and
I
play
pickleball
four
times
a
week-
I
had
the
pleasure
of
actually
playing
with
council
member
mata
check
when
the
courts
first
opened
at
ranksdorf
rankstorf
park.
We
really
appreciate
the
two
dedicated
courts
there
and
one
temporary
court
that
you
can
put
a
net
up
and
play,
and
the
recreation
department
during
rainy
season
really
made
efforts
to
have
play
made
available
at
the
pavilion
on
saturdays,
where
I
normally
play
supply
is
limited
and
the
demand
is
growing
exponentially.
J
There's
a
real
need
for
increased
a
number
of
dedicated
courts.
I'm
happy
to
report
that
I've
had
really
good
conversations
with
christine
crosby
the
recreation
manager
who's,
considering
a
process
of
creating
some
standalone
courts
at
rankstart
park,
but
also
I
mean
was
involved
with
that
and
then
is
also
interested
in
exploring
some
options
for
some
shared
court
facilities.
J
J
K
Hey,
I
still
don't
believe
the
pickleball
is
a
real
thing,
I'm
pretty
sure
it's
just
an
elaborate
prank.
I
would
like
to
echo
miriam's
request.
I
also
prefer
to
see
gallery
mode
I
like
to
watch
all
of
your
beautiful
faces
as
you
deliberate
and
listen
to
public
comment.
So
please
make
zoom
gallery
thanks.
L
Hi,
I
really
would
like
to
echo
prior
to
commenters
on
getting
gallery
mode.
It's
somewhat
disconcerting
to
be
talking
to
a
city
council
and
not
seeing
who's
actually
there
from
a
transparency
standpoint.
I
would
hope
we
would
remedy
that.
Thank
you
for
the
time.
M
A
The
purpose
of
this
study
session
is
to
receive
council
input
on
the
proposed
legislative
program,
priority
issues
to
guide
the
council's
regional
and
state
legislative
advocacy
during
the
2022
legislative
session.
After
the
staff
presentation,
the
council
will
answer
the
following
question
in
turn:
are
there
any
policy
issues,
priorities
or
policy
statements?
A
That
council
would
like
to
discuss,
seek
further
clarification
on
add
or
remove
from
the
proposed
2022
state
legislative
platform
assistant
to
the
city
manager,
christina
gilmore,
dane
hutchings,
managing
director
reni
public
policy
group
and
sharon
gonzalez
director
of
government
affairs
renee
public
policy
group
will
present
the
item,
but
I
believe
our
convention
ordinarily
is
to
take
public
comment
first.
So
we'll
take
public
comment,
we'll
sorry,
we'll
we'll
do
the
theft
presentation,
we'll
take
public
comments
and
then
proceed
to
council
questions
and
deliberations
so
staff
when
you're
ready
feel
free
to
begin
the
presentation.
N
Thank
you
mayor
good
evening,
mayor
and
council,
christina
gilmore
assistant
to
the
city
manager.
As
the
mayor
stated
earlier,
the
purpose
of
the
study
session
is
to
receive
city
council
input
on
the
proposed
legislative
program.
Priority
issues
to
guide
the
city's
regional
and
state
legislative
advocacy
during
the
2022
legislative
session.
N
Joining
me
this
evening
are
dane
hutchings
managing
director
and
sharon.
Gonzalez
director
of
government
of
government
affairs
from
renny
public
policy
group,
the
city's
legislative
advocacy,
firm
dean
and
sharon
will
present
the
proposed
legislative
platform
to
the
city
council
for
discussion
and
input,
after
which
staff
and
rppg
will
be
available
to
answer
questions
about
the
proposed
platform.
N
O
Good
evening,
mayor
and
council,
I
am
going
to
share
my
screen
and
you
tell
me
if
you're
able
to
see
it,
let's
see
here,
I
believe
I
can
do.
O
Everyone
see
this
okay,
just
anyone
give
me
a
thumbs
up
and
all
know
we're
in
good
shape
here.
Perfect.
Thank
you.
As
christina
said,
my
name
is
dane
hutchings,
I'm
the
managing
director
with
iranian
public
policy
group.
I
am
joined
by
my
colleague,
sharon
gonzalez,
I'm
going
to
run
through
our
initial
presentation
and
then
share-
and
I
are
both
here
to
answer
any
questions
or
provide
any
guidance
as
needed
for
the
study
session.
O
So
just
a
quick
introduction.
I
know
we've
met
most
of
you
all
but
again
dane
hutchings,
chair
gonzalez
and
then
jake
whitaker,
who
is
not
here
today,
but
is
part
of
your
core
team,
as
the
city
is
also
working
with
we're.
Also
working
with
the
city
on
grant
writing
services
as
well,
and
so
we're
not
only
going
to
be
looking
out
for
funding
opportunities
within
the
state
budget,
but
also
really
going
to
be
working
with
your
departments
trying
to
seek
both
state
and
federal
funding
for
grant
programs.
O
Just
a
real,
quick
snapshot
of
what's
happening
right
now
in
the
legislature,
and
so
there
is
a
ton
of
legislative
turnover
happening
in
the
state.
Folks
are
either
running
for
congress
or
with
redistricting
happening
folks
are,
are
deciding
neither
not
to
run
or
have
been
drawn
out
of
their
districts,
and
so
that
is
having
a
quite
quite
a
bit
of
an
impact
on
some
of
the
legislation
that's
been
introduced
so
far
we
are
also
seeing
you
know.
O
The
governor
has
proposed
with
his
initial
budget
proposal
in
january
about
a
about
a
really
a
45
billion
dollar
surplus,
although
most
of
you
know
about
20
billion
of
that
has
already
been
earmarked
for
prop
98
and
other
other
obligations,
so
about
25
billion
in
discretionary
discretionary
funds
that
you
know
is
really
up
for
grabs
for
for
a
host
of
things.
One
thing
of
note
that
actually
broke
this
evening.
I
sent
the
I
sent
a
brief
summary
to
christina
already.
O
There
will
be
an
early
budget
action
item
this
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks
on
covet
response
with
response
with
extended
paid,
sick
leave
and
some
other
issues
around
paying
for
testing,
and
things
like
that.
So
I
provided
a
quick
detail
on
that,
but
that
should
be
moving.
The
next
couple
of
weeks
also
going
to
be
seeing
some
budget
items
with
respect
to
homelessness,
housing
and
retail
crime.
O
O
So
moving
on
to
the
main
main
course
here,
our
state
legislative
platform,
and
so
we
are
creating
a
robust
set
of
policies
for
engagement,
and
so
really
the
the
point
of
establishing
a
state
legislative
platform
is
to
allow
staff,
your
legislative
team
here
to
really
quickly
triage
and
assess.
O
When
we
see
all
of
these
measures
getting
introduced
really
allows
us
to
say:
okay,
where's
the
city
provided
us
guidance
on
issues
of
importance,
and
we
take
all
of
those
measures
and
we
really
try
to
distill
them
down
to
something
that
is,
is
much
more
easy
for
the
city
to
be
able
to
engage
and
respond
to
also
provides
a
focus
for
a
proactive
council
member
engagement.
O
Once
the
council
agrees
to
a
set
of
policies,
then
it's
you
know
it's
much
easier
to
move
in
a
unified
voice,
and
so
it
helps
it
helps
your
team
help.
You
become
better
advocates
for
your
city.
It
also
allows
us
to
quickly
triage
and
review.
O
You
know
thousands
and
thousands
of
bills
that
introduced
each
and
every
year,
and
so
you
know
given
the
platform
structure
and
how
many
thousands
of
bills
we
see
each
and
every
year
you
know
we,
we
traditionally
try
to
make
these
statements
slightly
on
the
broad
side,
just
to
encapsulate
so
many
different
policy
areas.
O
You
know
platform
statements
are
divided
by
issue
area,
but
there
may
be
some
crossover.
For
example,
there
could
be
a
a
potential
policy
that
touches
in
the
transportation
policy
area,
but
also
has
implications
in
climate
adaptation
and
resiliency,
and
so
you
know
being
able
to
look
at.
You
know
different
variations
of
of
your
of
your
platform.
Statements
to
make
an
informed
decision
is
helpful
because
not
all
policy
is
very
clear-cut,
and
so
you
know
it
really
helps
us
find
that
balance.
O
We
also
like
to
advise
our
clients
that
we
look
at
the
platform
as
a
living
document
each
and
every
year.
It
is
advised
that
the
platform
is
is
evaluated.
Do
we
need
to
make
room
for
improvements?
Some
things?
O
In
fact,
what
spurs
some
changes
in
in
each
year
in
the
platform
is
that
if,
if
the
platform
does
not
touch
on
a
on
a
specific
policy
and
a
council
member
or
the
city
wants
to
engage
on
it
on
a
bill
that
the
policy
doesn't
touch
on,
there's
more
of
a
deliberative
process
where
you
would
have
to
potentially
create
a
staff
report
analyze
the
bill,
take
it
to
council
for
approval
and
that
you
know,
may
cause
some
delays
and
so
saying,
okay!
O
Well,
we'll
do
it
this
time,
but
then
next
year,
let's
add
a
policy
statement
that
encapsulates
some
of
that
policy.
So
if
something
comes
up
again
next
year,
we
can
be
a
little
bit
more
nimble
and
engaged
quicker,
and
so
we
do
what
we
do
plan
on.
Looking
at
this
each
and
every
year
to
refresh
it
in
advance
of
each
of
the
legislative
session
and
so
through
when
we
adopted
or
when
we
created
the
platform.
O
We
really
worked
really
hard
to
work
with
each
one
of
your
of
your
department,
heads
and
so
over.
Between
november
and
january,
we
had
about
16
individual
meetings
where
we
walked
through
not
only
met
with
with
most
of
the
folks
in
the
council,
but
also
met
with
really
every
department
head
and
actually
had
some
follow-up
meetings.
O
Two
additional
standalone
meetings
with
housing
and
community
development,
understanding
that
that
is
certainly
a
huge
issue
for
the
city,
as
well
as
with
the
city,
manager's
office
and
so
rppg,
along
with
cmo
staff
met
with
really
all
department
heads
to
assess
a
variety
of
different
factors
that
we'll
jump
into
for
about
an
hour
a
piece.
O
And
so
we
really
took
quite
a
bit
of
time
meeting
with
folks,
then
reviewing
reviewing
the
platform
and
refining
those
statements,
and
so
when
we,
when
we
met
with
folks
really
the
the
the
genesis
of
the
meetings,
are
really
the
the
theme
which
I
know
all
of
you
who
we
we
met
with
you
sort
of
heard
this
a
little
bit,
but
you
know
wanted
to
get
a
sense
from
each
council.
O
Remember
what
state
policies
have
an
impact
on
on
departmental
operations,
assessing
major
issues
or
projects
or
initiatives
within
the
city
that
we
wanted
to
get
a
better
understanding
about.
O
You
know
a
lot
of
times
you
know,
cities
can
be
doing
really
fantastic
things
in
their
community
and
there
can
be
a
bill
that
could
actually
complement
those
efforts.
We
just
want
to
try
to
align
those
things
together.
So
having
an
understanding
of
what's
happening
in
the
city
certainly
makes
us
better
advocates
for
you
major
policy
import
areas
of
importance
that
we
should
be
monitoring
more
closely
analyzing
more
closely.
O
What
are
the
critical
funding
priorities
that
the
city
is
really
looking
to
try
and
advance
and
how
perhaps
do
those
align
with
some
of
the
state
budget
goals?
So
we
can
find
some
alignment
there
and
we're
working
hard
for
you
on
that
already
and,
and
then
I
think,
most
importantly,
how
can
we,
your
advocates,
support
the
city
in
its
advocacy
efforts
and
so
trying
to
get
each
of
your
perspectives
to
see
how
we
can
be
the
best
advocates
for
the
city
of
mountain
view,
and
so
the
key
takeaways?
O
You
know
really
what
we
saw
from
that
over
lined
both
with
what
we
were
hearing
from
departmental
staff,
as
well
as
members
of
the
council,
housing,
land,
use
and
homelessness.
Of
course,
a
huge
issue
for
the
city
and
really
the
theme
that
we
heard
was
that
the
city
is
doing
really
great
things
in
these
areas.
We
want
to
continue
to
try
to
be
recognized
as
a
state
leader
in
addressing
these
housing
needs.
O
The
things
you're
doing
in
homelessness
as
well
is
fantastic
and
advocating
for
more
ongoing
resources
to
help
support
those
great
efforts
that
you
were
doing.
Climate
resiliency
and
adaptation
continue
to
lead
the
region
and
innovative
and
solutions
based
approaches
to
ghg
production
and
carbon
neutrality.
I'll
tell
you
that
is
a
goal
that
I
know
your
state.
Senator
senator
becker
certainly
feels
very
strongly
about
and
has
has
already
established
quite
a
reputation
in
that
space,
and
so
it's
great
to
have
that
alignment
with
your
state
representative
transportation.
O
Public
works
continue
to
seek
opportunities
to
modernize
transportation,
connectivity
and
advocate
for
funding
to
support
the
city's
needs.
One
thing
that
we
were
really
impressed
about
was
the
community
shuttle
program
that
you
that
you
all
are
operating
the
fact
that
it's
zero
emission
battery-powered.
It's
just
really
really.
You
know
forward
thinking,
and
we
were
certainly
impressed
by
that
and
we're
looking
to
see
if
we
can't
help
continuing
to
keep
that
program
going
in
perpetuity.
N
N
The
next
steps
after
this
evening
study
session
will
be
following
feedback
from
the
council
staff,
will
finalize
the
proposed
legislative
platform
and
bring
the
item
back
to
the
council
for
adoption
on
the
consent
agenda
on
february
8th?
This
concludes
staff's
presentation,
staff
and
rp
rppg
are
available
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
christina
and
dame
so
that
we
will
first
go
to
the
public
and
I
will
invite
senator
josh
becker
to
join
us
as
a
panelist
and
provide
a
presentation
and
then
I
believe
also
we
have
a
presentation
from
congresswoman
anna
issues
office,
but
we'll
begin
with
you
senator
becker.
Thank
you
for.
P
Joining
me:
well,
it's
great
to
hear
those
priorities
and
good
to
see
the
alignment
and
I
promised
council
member
libra.
I
would
only
have
37
powerpoint
slides
tonight
to
share
with
you,
but
yeah,
we'll
just
you
know,
keep
it
brief,
just
to
say
that
you
know
we
are
aligned,
as
was
noted,
you
know.
In
generally,
I
see
my
legislative
agenda
from
myself.
P
My
team
really
focusing
on
two
things:
one
is
quality
of
life
issues
on
the
peninsula
and
then
two
broad
issues
like
climate,
where
I
think
our
region
has
to
leave
the
state
which
has
to
leave
the
country
which
has
the
world
in
many
ways.
So
just
to
talk
briefly
about
those
you
mentioned
housing
homelessness.
P
I
was
really
proud
to
work
with
mountain
view,
securing
money
for
the
lot
12
development
last
year
and
look
forward
to
further
partnerships
and
appreciate
the
council's
leadership
there
on
whole
and,
of
course,
on
homelessness,
as
well
with
the
the
the
the
life
news
project
in
the
district,
which
is
great
in
mountain
view
where
the
governor
came,
and
that
was
really
pioneering.
We're
now
looking
to
replicate
those
across
the
state.
P
So
we've
allocated
14
billion
dollars
for
homelessness
last
year
and
this
year
that's
a
tremendous
amount
of
money
and
what
we're
working
on
now
is
the
oversight
of
that
and
make
sure
that
is
deployed
effectively
and
look
forward
to
working
with
you
on
that
and
getting
your
feedback
transportation
of
a
fair
integration
bill.
P
As
you
know,
if
you
follow
seamless
bay
area,
if
you
get
more
ridership,
we
have
many
different
transit
agencies
and
promoting
fair
integration,
schedule,
integration
or
two
of
those
priorities:
I'll
have
a
fair
integration
bill
this
year,
many
other
bills
on
education
and
other
things
that
I
think
you
will
be
really
interested
in
and
then
on
the
other
side
on
climate
side
working
on
a
really
comprehensive
climate
package.
P
This
is
just
a
critical
year
for
leadership
to
come
out
of
our
state
and
working
across
the
board
in
transportation
and
buildings
in
the
grid
and
other
areas
like
ag
and
industrial
like
our
favorite
topic
of
cement,
cement
and
concrete,
so
really
appreciate
your
leadership.
It
helps
me,
go
back
to
sacramento
and
say:
hey,
look!
Here's
what's
happening
on
the
ground,
so
they're
happening
in
my
cities.
Q
Representative
eshoo
is
humbled
and
grateful
for
the
trust
you
have
placed
in
her
to
represent
you.
He
also
appreciates
that
mountain
view
will
be
participating
in
a
briefing
tomorrow
with
the
national
telecommunications
and
information
administration
on
how
best
to
distribute
the
broadband
funding
from
the
new
infrastructure
law.
Q
Q
Next,
I
want
to
talk
about
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law.
The
bipartisan
infrastructure
law
is
the
largest
investment
in
public
transit,
water
infrastructure
and
broadband
in
our
nation's
history.
The
bay
area
will
receive
4.5
billion
dollars
in
guaranteed
funding
through
formula
grants
and
can
compete
for
140
billion
dollars
in
competitive
grants.
Q
Q
Q
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
we
will,
if
senator
becker
and
new
nicholas,
are
able
to
stay
you're.
Welcome
to
we'll
take
public
comment,
we'll
return
to
council
for
questions
and
then
once
we've
concluded
the
questions,
we'll
begin
the
deliberation.
But
first
I
will
now
invite
members
of
the
public
to
provide
comment.
A
We
will
allocate
three
minutes
and
we
will
begin
with
bruce
england.
H
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah,
just
a
few
quick
comments.
I
had
a
question
to
start
with,
I'm
wondering
about
the
ongoing
input
process
and
what
that
will
look
like
people
in
the
public
and
new
council
members
might
have
some
thoughts
about
what
to
promote
and
advocate
for
and
lobby
for
right
now,
but
then
bills
get
introduced
later
on
and
we
might
learn
about
them
and
want
to
provide
input
and
I'm
not
sure
how
best
to
do
that.
Should
it
just
be
letters
public
comments,
ask
mountain
view.
H
I'd
like
to
ask
for
supporting
legislation
that
would
help
mountain
view
meet
our
tree.
Canopy
goals
and
those
are
called
out
for
us.
They're
called
out
in
the
community
tree
master
plan
and
as
far
as
we
can
tell
we're,
not
meeting
those
goals
yet
and
that
plan
is
going
to
be
updated
soon
and
maybe
those
numbers
will
be
even
higher
and
we
can
use
help
to
meet
that
and
then
under
transportation
and
public
works.
H
J
Thanks
mayor
mayor
ramirez
and
members
of
the
city
council,
I
I
really
commend
staff
and
the
consultants
for
developing
a
very
comprehensive
11-page
list
of
state
legislative
priorities.
I
would
like
to
suggest
an
additional
state
legislative
priority.
J
That
would
be
something
along
the
lines
of
support
legislation
and
funding
that
facilitates
the
implementation
of
slow,
green
and
shared
use
street
network.
In
mountain
view,
the
pandemic
has
really
been
a
catalyst
for
more
opportunities
for
walking
and
bicycling
in
our
neighborhoods,
and
recent
legislation,
such
as
ab43,
has
enabled
the
reduction
of
the
speed
limit
by
five
miles
an
hour
such
that
20
miles
an
hour
can
now
be
the
speed
limit
on
designated
neighborhood
streets.
J
Ab-773
authorized
local
authorities
to
implement
slow
street
program
to
close
or
limit
access
to
the
vehicular
traffic
on
certain
neighborhood
local
streets.
Future
legislation
and
funding
opportunities
should
continue
to
be
explored
for
additional
tree
canopy,
as
mr
england
just
stated
on
really
a
network
of
slow
green
streets
that
facilitates
increased
active
transportation
in
mountain
view.
I'd
also
like
to
take
a
minute
just
to
support
the
amendment.
That's
in
the
list
that
you
have
of
the
pedestrian
mall
act
of
1960.
J
A
Thank
you
cliff,
and
you
will
be
happy
to
know
that
a
member
of
the
council
submitted
the
recommendation
regarding
the
slow,
green
and
shared
youth
street
network
recommendation
in
advance
of
the
meeting
and
staff
included
the
policy
statement
in
the
legislative
platform.
Thank
you
for
the
suggestion
tim.
R
Mckenzie
all
thank
you
for
a
moment
to
speak
with
the
new
infrastructure
bill
that
was
passed
and
the
mountain
view
consistently
being
a
leader
and
wanting
to
remain
a
leader,
I'd
love
to
make
a
plug
for
municipal
broadband
as
a
service
that
this
is
something
we
had
the
electrification
of
america
with
a
new
deal
almost
a
century
ago.
R
Municipal
broadband
is
a
necessity
in
the
modern
world,
as
we've
seen
with
the
pandemic
and
work
from
home,
which
will
probably
continue
along
and
mountain
view,
is
the
heart
of
silicon
valley.
We
could
be
a
leader
on
this,
so
would
that
be
a
great
thing
and
ab
1400
calcare
healthcare
for
all
is
coming
up
soon.
That's
something
that
I
think
the
city
should
support
and
would
love
to
see
my
representatives
that
also
love
to
see
my
federal
representatives
bring
forward
medicare
for
all.
R
I
know
that
our
representative
is
the
chair
of
the
health
sub
committee,
so
that
would
be
great
to
see
too
because
it
would
really
help
all
the
residents
of
mountain
view.
Thank
you.
S
Evening,
city
council,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
council
for
providing
many
of
the
informative
ideas
in
this
platform,
which
are
fundamentally
good,
such
as
defending
the
csfra
or
encouraging
more
legislation
to
assist
finding
alternative
housing
sources.
S
Though
I
will
say
that
the
current
awarding
of
the
arena
portion
seems
more
like
a
dodge
against
trying
to
build
the
housing,
because
it's
about
flexibility
and
what
counts
marina.
But
I
also
would
like
the
council
to
perhaps
in
the
future,
open
up
a
broader
discussion
about
the
council
policy
a16
on
local
control
inherently
and
we're
facing.
Obviously
with
many
items
you
see
constantly
on
the
consent
calendar
that
sometimes
we
do
not
have
enough
staffers
to
handle
the
work
you
know.
S
R3
has
been
delayed
for
a
long
time
because
it's
not
about
snapping
we've
had
these
projects
like
bike
lanes
delayed
because
we
don't
have
enough
staffing
to
do
that.
So
maybe
at
some
point
we
could
revisit
that
and
just
determine
whether
that
might
be
better
handled
as
a
separate
level
government
with
more
money
or,
in
the
meantime,
obviously
getting
more
money
for
us
to
provide
local
inputs
to
make
the
output
something
that
everyone
can
semi
agree
on.
At
least.
S
I
also
would
like
to
thank
the
council
for
emphasizing
for
the
community
shuttle
program
that
the
money
should
be
going
to
operations
inherently
while
buying
a
bus
is
all
you
know,
ribbon
cutting
and
ice,
but
you
know
we
need
to
pay
the
drivers
to
drive
the
bus
and
given
the
nature
of
the
shortage
of
transit
workers
is
needed
more
than
ever.
So.
A
T
Well,
I'll
ask
the
question
that
some
of
the
members
of
the
public
asked
how
they
can
participate.
I
assume
that
the
answer
might
be
some
of
the
the
suggestions
that
they
raised
like
ask
mountain
view
or
email,
a
council
person
as
a
champion
for
that
particular
item,
but
if
I'm
wrong
or
if
I
there
are
additional
ways
for
the
public
to
make
suggestions,
I'd
like
to
hear
about
that.
Thank
you.
N
F
Thanks
just
one
quick
question
on
page
four
of
attachment
one,
the
third
point:
support
efforts
to
maintain
fiscal
solvency,
and
then
it
goes
on
is
that
the
city's
fiscal
solvency
or
calpers
fiscal
solvency.
O
Good
evening,
customer
amanda
check
the
intent
behind
this
statement
was
to
support
efforts
for
the
city's
fiscal
solvency
with
respect
to
unfunded
pension
liabilities.
A
Seeing
none
we'll
begin
the
discussion
so
just
the
benefit
of
the
council.
What
I
intend
to
do
is
collect
or
create
a
catalog
of
all
of
the
recommendations
that
members
of
the
council
bring
up
individually
and
once
we've
finished
our
deliberation
I'll
go
back
and
we'll
take
a
straw
hole
for
each
of
those
items
and
then
I'll
summarize
everything
at
the
end
and
we'll
we'll
do
a
final
star
motion
to
make
sure
we.
We
have
council
consensus
on
all
of
the
items
senator
becker
and
nicholas.
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
participating
tonight.
You're
welcome
to
continue
to
observe
the
meeting
if
you
have
to
go,
no
worries,
but
thank
you
very
much
for
for
joining
us
council
member
show
walter.
G
Thank
you
well,
first
off
I'd
like
to
thank
the
the
the
city
staff
and
the
new
consultants
that
we've
hired
for
this
report.
I
really
think
that
you've
done
a
great
job
and
I'm
I'm
I'm
very
pleased
with
it.
There
was,
however,
one
policy
that
I
could
not
find
in
here
that
we
need
that.
I
think
we
need
to
add-
and
I
hope
I
think
everyone
else
may
agree
with
me
because
of
what
we
just
passed
on
the
consent
calendar
and
that
is
on
page
eight
under
environment,
climate
change
and
sustainability.
G
I
think
we
need
a
specific
policy
that
says:
support,
funding
and
planning
for
sea
level
rise
protections.
G
I
was
not
able
to
find
that
in
here,
so
let
me
know
if
it's
somewhere
else,
but
otherwise
I
think
we
really
need
to
to
add
sea
level
rise
protections
very
explicitly,
and
so
that's
that's
my
main
comment
and
and
thank
you
I
I
also
would
like
to
say-
I
really
enjoyed
our
discussion.
G
D
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
start
with
several
labor-related
issues,
and
I'm
I'm
looking
at
page
three
of
the
proposed
platform
and
the
the
first
bullet
point
I'd
like
to
make
an
amendment
to
say
that
we
will
monitor
slash,
watch
measures
providing
for
flexibility
for
local
government
and
contracting.
D
My
next
one
is
at
the
top
of
page
four.
The
first
bullet
point,
instead
of
a
pose,
monitor,
slash,
watch
measures
that
reduce
local
control
over
employee
relations
issues
or
mandate
new
or
enhanced
local
government
employee
benefits.
D
It
was
on
page
six
I'd
like
to
add
a
new
bullet
point
that
would
say:
support
funding
for
public
health
measures
and
expansion
of
health
care
services.
D
On
page
10,
under
transportation
and
public
works
under
the
first
bullet
point,
I'd
like
to
when
it
says,
enhancing
bicycle
pedestrian
and
disability
safety.
A
So
that
that
last
one
was
enhancing
bicycle
and
pedestrian
safety,
and
then
I
might
I
apologize
he
said
and
and
what
was
the
addition.
A
T
So
I
I'm
not
as
thorough
with
all
the
page
numbers
and
so
forth,
but
under
in
the
title
of
environmental
environment,
climate
change
and
sustainability.
I
spoke
with
some
people
from
carbon
free
mountain
view.
Our
community
group
in
particular
bruce
carney,
and
he
had
some
suggestions
that
I
thought
were
good
and
I'm
going
to
add
them
in
by
the
way
these
are
from
a
from
a
webinar
that
actera
did
on
how
we
could
accelerate
the
fighting
climate
change,
which
is
available
on
youtube,
and
I
encourage
everyone
to
watch.
T
So.
The
two
items
that
I
would
like
to
add
are
the
first
is
any
action
most
likely
funding
related
to
caltrain
electrification,
because
there's
trouble
with
the
funding
at
this
point
and
the
second
one
is
legislation
or
funding
relating
to
acceleration
of
heat
pump
installation
in
california.
T
That
may
include
training
workers
to
install
heat
pump,
hvac
and
water
heaters
and
actions
to
speed
up
and
simplify,
permitting
and
building
inspection,
and
that's
just
tremendously
important
for
cities
that
are
trying
to
accelerate
their
their.
You
know
fight
to
get
down
to
net
zero
or
as
close
as
as
possible
to
that,
and
it
could
also
mean
a
tremendous
number
of
of
new
jobs,
so
any
funding
for
jobs
for
training
that
whole
realm
of
things.
T
I
also
strongly
support
what
people
have
said
about
slow,
green
and
slow
green
complete
streets,
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
add
the
one
that
several
members
of
the
public
have
mentioned
on
any.
I
assume
it
would
be
any
funding,
I'm
I'm
not
thinking
of
legislation,
but
if
there's
legislation
I'd
go
for
that
too,
but
any
funding
related
to
a
tree,
canopy
expanding
tree
canopy
for
carbon
sequestration
or
other
purposes.
V
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
to
our
staff
and
our
new
part
of
our
staff
for
this
platform,
and
this
is
really
very
extensive,
and
I
I'm
very
appreciative
of
this.
This
is
something
that's
been
a
long
time
in
coming
and
I'm
really
glad
to
see
it
with
that.
I
just
had
a
couple
of
additions
that
I
wanted
to
suggest
one
I
didn't
see
it.
It
would
probably
fall
under
public
safety,
but
it
would
be
to
support
legislation
that
strengthens
gun
safety
measures.
V
I
guess
I
was
thinking
a
little
broader,
broader
regarding
heat
water
pumps,
but
actually
broadening
it
to
supporting
legislation
or
funding
or
expanded
funding
and
funding
mechanisms
for
the
electrification
of
existing
buildings,
and
then
the
final
one,
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
to
word
this
and
it
might
be
in
here
in
different
parts.
But
what
I'm
seeing
at
the
regional
level,
in
particular
with
what
my
work
at
mtc
a
bag,
is
an
attempt
to
tie
more
string.
I
call
them
strings
of
transportation
funding
to
well.
V
Frankly,
it's
to
housing
policies,
and
my
I
understand
the
reasoning
for
that,
but
you
know
I
think
the
the
the
danger
of
that
is
that
number
one,
our
our
region
as
I've
brought
up
before,
is
not
getting
its
full
share
and
adequate
funding,
and
so
I
would
I
would
you
know
shy
away
from
anything
that
ties
our
hands
even
more,
so
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
to
say
it,
but
I
guess
it
would
be
just
to
continue
to
you
know:
support
increased
funding
for
transportation
and
particularly
transit,
without
attaching
additional
requirements
to
those
funds.
A
Requirements-
my
apologies,
I'm
writing
seriously.
Councilmember
matajak.
F
Thank
you.
I'm
also
writing
furiously.
So
I
want
to
start
by
saying
I
really
like
that.
We
now
have
a
legislative
platform
and
I'm
really
hopeful
that
it
leads
to
more
influence
on
state
legislation.
F
It's
been
something
that
we've
needed
for
quite
some
time,
so
I'm
really
happy
to
see
it
come
to
fruition,
but
I
must
admit
I
did
not
expect
such
a
long
platform
and
it's
I'm
not
going
to
suggest
adding
anything
or
taking
anything
off
because
there's
a
lot
of
important
topics
here,
and
I
appreciate
the
additions
and
tweaks
that
folks
have
made.
F
I
would
also
like
to
make
a
few
tweaks
and
that's
to
make
the
statements
here
consistent
with
our
council
policy
and
in
some
instances
I
feel,
like
the
wording,
isn't
necessarily
in
alignment
with
our
council
policy,
and
specifically,
I
do
want
to
make
sure
we
protect
the
city's
financial
position
and
our
ability
to
have
a
to
help
have
a
great
quality
of
life
for
residents
here,
and
so
anything
that
would
take
away
our
ability
to
collect
fees
for
things
like
parks
or
transportation
impact
and
those
kinds
of
things.
F
And
I
want
to
make
sure
that
doesn't
happen
and
along
the
same
lines,
I
do
want
to
maintain
local
control
of
lots
of
things.
I
think
mountain
view
has
done
a
good
job
of
planning
and
while
other
cities
might
not
have,
you
know,
that's
their
problem,
but
I
think
we've
done
a
good
job
and
I
don't
want
to
see
that
undone
or
overridden
by
state
laws.
F
F
It's
so
for
a
lot
of
the
things
I'm
going
to
suggest
it's,
not
necessarily
that
I
think
the
the
concept
is
not
correct.
In
many
cases
it
I
think
it
is
it's
just
the
initial
wording
of
like
support
and
to
me
it
would
be
more
monitor
for
many
things,
because
we
don't
really
know.
At
least
I
don't
what
is
being
proposed,
and
I
would
want
to
know
the
details
to
see
whether
or
not
it
you
know
maintains
our
city's
finances
or
it
maintains
local
control
consistent
with
our
council
policy.
F
So
this
is
kind
of
a
long
list,
mayor
ramirez
of
28
items
where
I
would
change
support
to
monitor.
A
I
think
you
and
I
share
the
same
concern
and
that's
fundamentally
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
council
is
able
to
provide
input
on
a
lot
of
these
matters
rather
than
give
that
discretion
to
the
mayor
and
city
manager.
So
we
can
do
it
your
way
that
that
works.
For
me,
I
had
a
suggestion
for
an
approach.
If
the
council
supports
it,
that
would
achieve
a
substantially
similar
objective.
So
would
you
like
to
go
through
the
list
or
see,
if
maybe
there's,
there's
another
way
to
achieve
the
same
goal?.
A
Okay
and
my
apologies
again
for
the
interruption,
were
there.
A
Okay,
anything
else
that
you
wanted
to
recommend
outside
of
that.
That
list.
F
I
think
it's
the
only
not
when
it
comes
to
the
list,
but
I
have
a
related
suggestion
and
I
can
do
that
afterwards.
If
you
want
me
to.
A
Sure,
yeah
I'll
I'll
go
ahead
and
share
the
suggestion.
If
the
council
supports
it
great,
if
not
totally
okay,
then
we
can
go
through
the
list
of
28
and
and
see
where
there's
support
from
the
council.
A
I
think
the
the
concern
I
have
which
I've
shared
with
staff-
and
I
I
appreciate
the
question
submitted
in
advance
in
the
meeting-
is
there
are
certain
things
where
there's
a
level
of
discretion
or
interpretation
and
a
different
mayor
or
a
different
city
manager
may
come
to
different
conclusions,
and
it
may
not
necessarily
reflect
the
will
of
the
council.
We
we
want
to
prevent
a
scenario
where
you
know
I.
I
have
strong
views
about
certain
issues.
Other
members
of
the
council
have
different
views.
A
We
want
to
prevent
a
scenario
where,
just
because
the
mayor
is
different,
you
know
we
we
end
up
sending
letters
or
not
in
in
support
of
or
in
opposition
to
items
that
the
full
council
really
hasn't
had
a
chance
to
weigh
in
on
so
the
the
suggestion
is
that
we
grant
that
expedited
review
for
two
kinds
of
things.
One
is
so
that
would
be
the
mayor
and
city
manager
work
together
and
submit
a
letter
without
council
approval
for
legislation
or
regulatory
measures
that
provide
funding
to
the
city.
A
I
think,
there's
probably
no
instance
where
the
council
would
object
to
us
advocating
for
more
funding
or
where
the
city
is
advocating
for
a
power
or
authority
that
it
doesn't
currently
have
so.
For
instance,
we
needed
regulatory
relief
to
provide
24
7
safe
parking,
so
we
advocated,
and
the
state
granted
that
authority
to
to
the
city.
Everything
else
would
go
before
the
council,
either
as
a
package
or
individually
on
the
consent
calendar.
A
So
if
the
council
or
the
public
had
concerns
about
something,
then
there
would
be
an
opportunity
for
for
members
of
the
council
or
public
to
speak
to
it,
and
we
can
take
things
off
if
there.
If
there
isn't
consensus.
F
So
I
was
concerned
about
us
weighing
in
on
every
single
topic,
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
our
voice
is
not
diluted
by
sort
of
over
over
contributing,
so
to
speak
and
sending
a
letter
about
everything
or
talking
to
our
representatives
about
everything
I
feel
like.
We
really
need
to
focus
and
to
have
a
good
impact
on
the
things
that
are
truly
the
most
important
to
us.
So
I
guess
I
don't
disagree
with
what
you
said.
F
Certainly
funding
is
important
and
having
authority
to
do
things
that
we
don't
currently
have
authority
to
do
in
principle.
That
sounds
okay.
I'd
have
to
think
about
that
one,
a
little
bit
see
if
I
could
come
up
with
an
example
where
I
wouldn't
be.
Okay
with
that.
F
I
guess
I
wouldn't
be
okay
with
that,
if,
along
with
it
came
an
unfunded
obligation,
but
that's
in
our
council
policy
that
says
we
don't
support
things
that
where
it's
an
unfunded
obligation,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
to
have
the
platform
reflect
what
we
really
mean,
and
so
I
still
would
like
to
change
the
areas
that
say
support
to
monitor.
F
In
almost
I
guess
I
could
say
in
all
those
instances
except
for
funding,
because
I
didn't
cross
those
out
as
I
was
going
through
this
or
if
it
gives
us
the
power
or
authority
to
do
something
we
don't
currently
have.
But
I
want
the
platform
to
reflect
what
we
really
mean,
and
perhaps
that's
because
sometimes
I
feel
like
we're
not
really
careful
about
our
words
and
it
creates
confusion
and
miscommunication
and
misperceptions,
especially
among
our
residents,
who
were
not
part
of
this
discussion.
F
So
I'm
not
sure
do
you
want
me
to
I
mean
I
could
say
in
general
and
when
this
comes
back
to
us,
if
there's
any
that
haven't
been
tweaked,
then
we
can
address
it
then
or
because
in
general
it
is
the
ones
that
say.
Support
should
say
monitor
unless
it's
funding
or
authority.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
So
maybe
what
we'll
do
is.
A
The
council
is
invited
to
provide
additional
comments
if
you
would
like,
we
can
go
through
the
other
items
that
were
brought
up
before
do
quick
straw
votes
and
we
can
re.
We
can
revisit
this
topic
in
sort
of
a
broader
way,
the
process
by
which
we
actually
formally
take
a
position
one
way
or
the
other,
because
there
might
be
other
ideas
that
neither
of
us
have
have
articulated
here
any
additional
comments
before
I
go
through
the
list
that
I've
compiled
councilmember
lieber.
D
Thank
you
mayor
just
on
the
general
topic
of
the
value
of
having
some
affirmative
support
positions
is
that
at
times
the
legislative
process
can
move
quickly
and
if
you're
waiting
for
two
weeks
for
a
council
meeting.
D
You've
therefore
missed
the
window
of
opportunity
to
comment
on
something,
and
I
I
think
that
if
every
every
bill
has
to
come
to
council
even
on
consent,
it
it
slows
the
process
down
greatly,
and
I
mean
there
are
things
that
we've
identified,
that
we
are
for
through
our
goal
setting
process,
and
I
think
that
this
list
is
very
much
keyed
off
of
our
strategic
priorities
and
the
the
one
thing
about
the
the
legislative
process
is.
D
It
starts
on
a
particular
date
and
it
does
not
stop
moving
until
the
end
of
session
and
bills
can
fail
in
committee.
They
can
fail
and
approach,
they
can
fail
on
the
floor
and
a
letter
coming
in
the
week
after
does
not
help
to
make
that
a
not
dead
bill.
It's
dead
and
many
of
the
the
items
that
we've
identified
as
our
strategic
priorities
are
affirmative
in
nature.
D
They
are
out
in
front,
particularly
in
terms
of
the
environment
of
where
other
cities
are
at
and-
and
I
think
that's
the
investment
in
effort
that
that
we've
made.
So
I
I
definitely
appreciate
council
member
manichaek's
comments
and
I
in
every
meeting
I
learned
something
different
from
council
member
manichaek.
X
Thank
you
mayor.
I
would
also
ask
that
council
consider
as
part
of
the
discussion
the
fact
that
sometimes
staff
does
use
the
legislative
platform
to
also
communicate
and
advocate
with
the
county.
So,
for
example,
we've
had
several
things
during
covid,
where
we
have
turned
around
very
quickly
and
sent
in
letters
of
support
or
somehow
been
able
to
talk
about
mountain
view's
position.
X
For
example,
distribution
of
free
covet
tests
advocating
for
north
county
health
center
mental
health
efforts
that
the
county
is
trying
to
do
for
pilot
projects,
so
they
may
not
necessarily
fit
in
those
neat
categories.
So
I
would
just
ask
that
you
all
consider
the
fact
that
sometimes
we
need
that
flexibility
to
turn
around
really
quickly
to
send
letters
to
regional
bodies
as
well,
and
that
would
include
the
county.
F
Yeah,
I
certainly
don't
want
to
imply
that
we
miss
opportunities
by
slowing
things
down
and
having
it
come
to
council.
When
I
said
having
it
come
back
to
council,
I
meant
the
platform
because
that's
coming
back
to
us
on
consent,
calendar
and
I
would
just
give
the
general
direction
to
staff
to
tweak
it,
and
there
will
absolutely
be
from
my
perspective
items
on
here.
F
That
say,
support,
and
it's
just
there's
quite
a
few-
that
I
am
worried
that
we
don't
know
enough
about
what
might
be
proposed
to
outright
support
it,
and
so
there's
a
couple
things
we
could
do
like
if
we
added
to
it
to
say
as
long
as
it
you
know,
is
funded
and
doesn't
impact
local
control.
F
That's
fine
with
me!
If
that's
an
easier
way
and
just
provide
that
general
direction,
I'm
good
with
that,
and
then
we
wouldn't
have
to
go
through
the
28.
F
F
Sure
so,
for
the
items
where
it
says,
support,
take
a
look
at
those
and,
if
needed,
add
that
we
support
it
as
long
as
there.
It's
not
unfunded
and
it
doesn't
erode
local
control.
G
I
was
just
going
to
say
that
that,
on
I
think
the
system
we
have
works
pretty
well,
there's
there's
enough
checks,
I
think
there's
pretty
good
set
of
checks
and
balances.
We
have
the
city
manager,
we
have
the
legislative,
we
have
christine,
christina
who's
been
working
with
us
on
developing
these.
We
have
the
consultants
and
they
get
into
the
nuts
and
bolts
of
the
legislation.
G
Most
of
us
aren't
going
to
be
able
to
do
that
with
very
few
exceptions.
And
then
the
mayor
is,
is
the
final
check
and
I
just
like
to
say:
I
think
I
think
the
system
works
and
I
think
the
timeliness
of
these
things
is
is
very
important,
and
I
also
think
that
sometimes
in
the
letters
there
are
two
piles,
you
know
there's
a
support
and
a
pose
and
then
there's
a
there's,
often
groups
that
will
support
based
on
one
or
two
things
and
that
that
gets
into
piles.
G
But
I
I
still
think
that
to
really
be
effective,
we
need
to
be
fast
and
we
have
a
system
that
works.
So
I
I
don't
think
we
need
to
break.
We
need
to
change
it
very
much.
A
Thank
you
I'll
share
a
couple
of
quick
thoughts
and
actually
a
question
for
for
staff.
There
was
a
question
submitted
in
advance
of
the
meeting
regarding
the
value
of
developing
a
federal
platform,
and
I
know
ready
public
policy
group
handles
state
matters,
but
I
would
be
interested
in
staff's
thoughts
about
the
value
of
creating
a
similar
type
of
platform
that
would
apply
to
federal
matters
as
well.
Is
that
something
that
would
be
helpful
to
provide
direction
on
tonight?.
A
One
of
two
of
the
biggest
takeaways
from
the
u.s
conference
of
mayors
last
week
were
one
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
opportunity,
and
I
think
others
have
spoken
about
this
already,
including
the
presentation
we
got
from
nicholas
from
congresswoman
ashu's
office,
a
tremendous
amount
of
opportunity
at
the
federal
level,
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law
and
and
the
funding
opportunities
that
come
out
of
that,
as
well
as
technical
assistance
provided
by
a
friendly
administration
of
the
white
house,
and
I
I
do
think
it's
staff
may
already
be
doing
this.
A
But
to
the
extent
it's
it's
value,
valuable
for
the
council
to
say
this
is
a
priority
for
us
as
well
to
make
sure
that
we're
dedicating
some
amount
of
resources
to
evaluating
those
opportunities,
doing
the
deep
dive
there
and
then
working
with
with
the
the
white
house
and
and
our
congress
members
and
senators
to
to
take
advantage
of
that-
is
that
something
that
could
be
incorporated
into
a
federal
platform.
Is
there
any
value
in
providing
direction
tonight?
N
So
mayor,
let
me
see
if
I
can,
if
I
understood
your
question
so
in
addition
to
providing
input
on
a
federal
platform
you're
asking
if
we
can
also
incorporate
that
that
we
will
monitor
federal
issues.
Is
that
was
that
what
was
your
question.
A
More
specifically,
dedicating
resources
to
seeing
what
funding
opportunities
can
benefit
mountain
view,
for
instance,
in
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law,
and
then
also
dedicating
resources
to
reaching
out
to
various
departments
in
any
federal
agency
or
entity
that
could
provide
technical
assistance.
A
If
there's,
you
know
any
question
about
whether
we're
eligible
for
some
funding
or
if
a
particular
project
you
know,
may
be
eligible
for
for
some
some
federal
opportunity.
Yes,.
N
The
city
manager-
oh,
I
was
go.
I
think,
if
I
just
could
add
mayor
that
is
part
of
our
contract
with
reni
public
policy
group
that,
as
part
of
the
grant
portion
of
their
contract,
they
will
assist
us
with
identifying
both
federal
and
state
funding
that
would
align
with
the
city's
priorities.
X
Yes,
thank
you
maren
thank
you
assistant
to
the
city
manager,
christina
gilmour.
I
really
appreciate
that
answer.
That's
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
say.
Yes,
part
of
what
rppg
is
going
to
help
us
with
the
seeking
grant
opportunities,
so
some
of
those
might
be
federal
opportunities.
Others
might
be
state,
but
more
specifically,
to
your
question.
X
Staff
is
very
aware
of
all
of
the
opportunities
now
that
have
just
come
out
of
the
infrastructure
bill.
Certainly
arpa
all
of
the
different
funding
streams
that
not
only
we
are
getting
information
from
our
ppg
about,
but
also
the
league
of
california
cities,
our
financial
officers,
statewide
group.
Even
the
statewide
city
managers
group
there
there
are
emails
and
information
sessions
coming
fast
and
furious
about
the
different
opportunities,
so
staff
will
be
taking
a
deep
dive
into
this
and
certainly
working
with
our
ppg
on
it.
X
So
I
don't
think
it
would
hurt
if
you
all
want
to
just
add
some
sort
of
statement
saying
that
we
will
work
with
rppg
on
any
federal
opportunities
available
as
part
of
the
federal
infrastructure
bill
or
any
other
funding.
That's
available
and
a
lot
of
those
monies
come
flowing
through
the
state
anyways.
X
So
it's
not
that
we
would
be
going
right
to
a
federal
agency,
so
I
think
we
can
certainly
add
something
related
to
that
and
then
go
from
there.
A
Great,
thank
you.
That's
very
encouraging.
So
we'll
take
some
final
comments.
I'll
go
through
the
the
items
that
that
we've
come
up
with
and
then,
if
there
are
any
final
remarks,
I'll
I'll
return
to
the
council
council
member
abby
coca.
V
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
like
go
back
and
I
guess
my
understanding
or
or
my
perception
of
this
platform
was,
although
it
does
say
state
and
that's
our
focus-
that
as
city
manager
mentioned,
there
are
things
that
will
come
up
at
the
in
a
local
level,
county
level,
the
regional
level
and
federal
level,
and
my
thought
was
that
we
use
this
platform
as
our
guideline
and
you
know
deciding
how
what
kind
of
positions
we
take
at
any
level
of
government.
V
So
I
know
that
there's
a
question
about
the
federal
federal
platform
and
I'm
all
for
creating
one,
I'm
not
sure
how
much
more
different
it
would
be
than
what
we
have
now.
But
to
me
this
was
like
the
baseline
of
what
we
would
reference
when
we
are
taking
positions
or
seeking
funding
at
any
level
of
government.
Thanks.
X
Mayor
councilmember,
abbey
koga,
I
still
had
my
hand
left
up
getting
back
into
the
zoom
environment.
I
think
we
can
certainly
incorporate
that
just
the
federal
the
the
federal
priority,
as
I
mentioned,
will
include
those
pieces
of
legislation
that
we
know
about,
and
yes,
we
would
use
our
platform
as
a
launching
point
for
all
the
other
advocacy
efforts
as
well.
D
Thank
you
mayor.
I
think
that
sounds
great.
What
the
city
manager
has
mentioned,
and
we
used
to
have
a
federal
list
of
priorities
that
related
to
moffett
field,
to
the
bay
to
our
toxic
situation,
definitely
to
sea
level
rise
and-
and
perhaps
we
could
bring
that
back,
so
we
don't
have
to
really
noodle
around
in
it
as
much
tonight.
F
So
I
was
going
to
bring
this
up
later,
but
we're
kind
of
talking
about
it
now,
and
that
is
you
know,
since
we
have
a
platform
you
know
all
of
us
are
on
regional
boards,
and
I
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
put
this
in
the
council
policies
and
procedures
or
what.
But
I
think
when
we
are
on
those
regional
boards
and
that
board
is
taking
a
position
that
our
position
or
our
vote
on
it
should
be
in
alignment
with
whatever
this
policy
is.
F
And
so
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
put
that
in
words
in
our
policies
and
procedures.
But
we
could
refer
that
to
the
cppc
to
just
write
down
thanks.
A
Thank
you
and
then
just
a
question
for
staff.
Is
that
something
we
can
take
on
the
context
of
this
item,
or
would
you
prefer
for
that
to
return
as
part
of
item
nine.
X
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I
would
suggest
that
this
item,
if
it's
a
change
to
council
policy,
that
we
would
update
the
council
policy
and
then
it
would
go
to
the
cppc
should
council
want
to
so
you
can
also
make
that
as
one
of
your
straw
poll
votes
and
then,
if
council
wants
to
do
that,
then
we
can
make
sure
that
it's
moved
forward
in
that
way.
X
But
I
certainly
think
it
could
also
be
incorporated
as
part
of
what
you
will
do
in
terms
of
the
regional
boards
that
you
serve
on
and
making
sure
that
your
votes
that
you
take
are
aligned
with
our
platform.
So
both
you
can
do
it
in
the
platform
and
also,
if
you
want
to
actually
put
it
in
the
policy
itself,
it
would
have
to
go
to
the
cppc.
A
Great
thank
you
so
then
I
will
include
it
in
in
this
list
of
items
for
straw
motions
any
final
thoughts.
Okay,
so
I'll
try
and
be
as
clear
as
I
can.
The
first
recommended
change
was
to
add
support
for
funding
and,
I
think,
advocating
for
regional
planning
for
sea
level
rise
protections.
A
Is
there
support
for
that,
raise
our
hands,
and
that
is
unanimous.
Then
the
next
one
is
change.
The
I
think
it's
a
support
position
for
the
first
item:
the
administration,
finance
and
human
resources
and
risk
management
item
support
maximum
flexibility
for
local
government
and
contracting.
The
recommendation
is
to
change
that
to
monitor
and
watch.
Is
there
support
for
that.
A
That's
unanimous,
similarly
change
from
support
to
monitor
and
watch
for
legislation
that
promotes
efforts.
I'm
sorry!
This
is
measures
that
reduce
local
control
on
employee
relations
and
that's
the
first
item
in
on
page
four,
and
my
apologies-
that's
currently
opposed.
It
would
be
changed
to
monitor
and
watch
support
for
that
also
unanimous.
A
A
That's
also
unanimous.
Thank
you,
monitor
and
watch.
This
is
related
to
cost
of
municipal
elections.
A
A
A
I
might
need
your
assistance
with
this
one
council
member
libra,
so
there
was
a
recommendation
to
add
support
funding
for
public
services
or
expansion
of
public
health
services.
Is
that
an
accurate.
A
Unanimous,
thank
you
and
then
page
10.
A
F
Halfway
done
on
that
one
just
real
quickly,
I
feel,
like
maybe
there's
a
little
bit
better
wording
on
that
one
and
I'm
not
sure
what
it
is.
But
disability
safety
sounds
just
kind
of
odd
to
me.
Maybe
it's.
A
Okay,
no
problem,
and
I
think
the
broad
direction
to
staff
would
be
to
modify
the
wording
as
they
deem
appropriate.
A
A
There's
support
for
that
recommendation.
Unanimous
support,
so
another
recommendation
to
add
support
for
so
I
think
councilmember
obitoka
had
a
more
comprehensive
version
of
this
so
support
for.
I
think
this
would
be
funding
if
there's
anything
else.
Let
us
know
for
the
electrification
of
existing
buildings.
A
Oh,
that's,
okay,
funding
and
funding
mechanisms,
for
so
vice
mayor,
so
I'll
go
to
you
in
a
second,
but
to
support
that
recommendation,
funding
and
funding
mechanisms
for
the
electrification
of
existing
buildings.
That
is
unanimous.
Thank
you.
Vice
mayor
hicks,.
T
And
then
anything
to
add
to
this
a
lot
of
it
may
include
workforce
training,
so
anything
related
to
also
funding
or
mechanisms
for
workforce
training
related
to
electrification.
A
We,
I
think
staff
had
already
indicated
that
they
were
comfortable,
adding
the
slow,
green,
complete
streets
item
that
mr
chambers
had
recommended.
Echo
recommended,
but
just
to
confirm
is
their
council
support
for
that
recommendation
as
well,
and
once
again,
I
think
that's
unanimous
councilmember
robbie
coca.
Do
you
support
that
as
well?
There
you
go,
I
thought
so
and
support
funding
or
funding
mechanisms
for
tree
canopy
expansion
for
carbon
sequestration
support
for
that.
A
That's
unanimous,
strengthen
a
support
for
measures
that
strengthen
sorry
support
legislation
that
would
strengthen
gun
safety
measures.
Report
for
that
recommendation.
That
is
unanimous.
A
So
this
one
staff
might
need
to
to
think
about
some
specific
wording
for,
but
to
support
funding
for
transit
without
attaching
additional
requirements.
Councilmember.
Does
that
to
your
recommendation.
V
I
think
so
I
think
that's
actually
very
broadened
broad
that
it'll
satisfy
a
lot
of
concerns.
A
That
is
not
unanimous,
but
it's
five
to
one
then
so.
Support
for
this
is
my
recommendation
about
adding
a
a
federal
platform,
but
I
think
council,
member
avi
koga,
had
suggested
that
we
use
this
platform
as
the
basis
to
include
federal
matters.
I'm
okay
with
that
is
there
support
for
just
to
be
clear
that
we're
on
the
same
page
as
their
support
to
use
the
state
platform
also
to
cover
federal
matters,
is
unanimous
support
for
that
council.
A
X
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
appreciate
it
so
in
thinking
further
about
just
the
process,
it
may
be
easier
if
council
wishes,
when
we
bring
back
the
platform
next
month
on
consent,
we
could
actually
bring
back
the
legislative
policy
itself
and
just
include
those
one
or
two
sentences
that
make
sure
that
you
are
in
alignment.
You
know
when
you're
on
your
regional
bodies
voting
that
way.
We
can
just
include
that
with
the
platform
and
it's
much
easier,
I
think,
for
for
council
and
for
staff.
So
if
that
works
for
you,
that
would
be
my
suggestion.
A
Report
for
that
recommendation
raise
your
hands
one
two,
three
four
five,
that
appears
to
be
unanimous.
Thank
you,
council,
member
show
walter.
You
want
to
speak.
G
Out
it
seems
like
on
you
know:
we
we
have
slightly
different
roles
when
we
serve
on
regional
boards.
Sometimes
we
represent.
We
serve
on
regional
boards.
As
a
mountain
view,
city,
council,
member
and
sometimes
we
serve
on
regional
boards
from
another
appointed
process,
sometimes
we're
sorted
appointed
by
abag.
I
I'm
I'm
appointed
by
the
senate
rules
committee
to
bcdc,
so
you
know
I
can't
imagine
a
time
when
there's
been
something
that's
come
before
bcdc.
That
was
at
odds
with
the
mountain
view.
G
G
You
know
that
there
would
be
very
few
instances
where
she
well,
I
don't
know
I
should
I
shouldn't
put
words
in
your
mouth,
but
but
but
I
I
just
you
know
I
I
I
wonder
if,
if
again,
this
isn't
something
that
is
appropriate
for
us
to
use
our
best
judgment
on
as
the
situation
arises,
I
mean.
Certainly,
this
would
be
a
valuable
guidance
to
all
of
us,
but
do
we
really
think
it's
necessary
to
put
this
in
the
council
policies
or
not?
I
I
just
I
question
that.
V
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you.
Council
member,
show
walter
for
bringing
up
that
point.
I
guess
my
initial
my
thought
was,
it
kind
of
depends
on
where
the
vote
is
going
to
be
taken.
So
you
know,
for
example,
I
serve
I'm
at
the
appointee
to
mtc
from
the
cities
association,
but
usually
the
cities
association
will
take
positions
on
you
know
certain
like
pieces
of
legislation,
and
so
when
that
vote
is
being
taken,
I
guess
I
would
use
you
know
mountain.
V
I
would
represent
mountain
view
and
use
our
platform,
but
if
the
city's
association
vote
ends
up
being
different
from
you
know
my
initial
vote
as
a
mountain
view
rep
then
I
do
feel
compelled
to
represent
the
cities
association
of
fmtc,
so
I
yeah,
so
I
I
would
like
think.
I
think
we
do
need
to
clarify
that,
like
I
don't
feel
like,
I
can
continue
to
represe.
You
know.
Take
the
mountain
view
position
if
it
if
the
city's
association
position
is
different.
A
I
think
just
as
a
matter
of
process,
if
the
council
is
comfortable
with
revisiting
the
policy,
we
don't
have
to
make
that
determination
tonight,
but
simply
to
refer
it.
It
sounds
like
bypass
cpp
return
to
the
council
with
that
update
and
if
the
council
wants
to
make
adjustments
to
the
language
at
that
time,
we're
able
to
do
so.
Is
everyone
comfortable
with
that
the
process?
A
So
that
way,
we
don't
have
to
make
the
determination
tonight
so
so
then
the
direction
would
be
to
return
to
council
with
an
update
to
the
council
policy
and
then,
if
the
council
is
dissatisfied
with
the
language
we
can,
we
could
figure
it
out.
Then
city
manager.
X
Thank
you
mayor,
so
just
to
clarify
what
I
was
suggesting
to
make
it
easier.
Before
I
heard
the
straw
poll
vote
was
to
bring
the
update
to
that
policy
back
with
this
platform
when
it
comes
back
to
you
all
next
month,
so
we
would
include
councils
already
adopted
legislative
policy
and
we
would
include
a
sentence
or
two
about
you
know
your
voting
in
alignment
with
the
city
platform
on
your
regional
bodies.
X
F
So
I'll
clarify
it
was
my
intention
to
say
when
you're
representing
mountain
view,
you
are
in
alignment
with
the
platform,
not
when
you're
representing
a
different
group,
and
so
that
would
be
what
I
was
would
be
looking
to
have
in
the
council
policies.
A
Okay,
but
but
everyone
to
with
the
the
addition
from
the
city
manager,
is
everyone
comfortable
with
with
the
proposed
approach
or
do
you
feel
there's
a
need
for
additional
discussion
and
it
would
be
more
appropriate
to
refer
to
the
cppc
so
currently,
we've
directed
staff
to
come
back
with
the
legislative
platform
adoption
in
february?
A
Okay?
So
then
we're
not
changing
that
direction,
we're
not
going
to
refer
to
cpbc
the
manager.
Do
you
want
to
add
anything
else,
your
hand
is
still
up
okay
and
then
the
last
item
is
change
where
it
says,
support
in
the
platform
add
a
clarifying
language
that
it
would
be
support
as
long
as
it
is
not
an
unfunded
mandate
and
it
does
not
erode
local
control.
F
So
I
I
just
want
to
add
it's
not
every
single
instance
where
it
says
support,
because
I
agree
there
are
some
things
on
here,
like
I
just
happen
to
be
open
to
page
11
at
the
moment,
support
legislation
that
preserves
net
neutrality
that
doesn't
need
any
qualification.
F
M
D
Caution,
council
and
staff
and
the
consultants
about
making
a
major
part
of
our
message:
local
control,
I
think,
there's
a
common
sense
side
to
local
control,
but
it's
become
such
a
mantra
within
the
process
that
I
think
it
does
cause.
D
Individuals
to
then
close
their
ears
to
the
rest
of
the
message,
and
so
I
I
want
to
make
sure
that
our
priorities
are
really
the
thing
that
that
shines
through
and
and
I
I
think
that
if
there
is
a
major
issue
as
far
as
local
control,
maybe
we
could
bring
that
back
to
council,
but
not
make
local
control
the
overarching
message
in
in
sacramento
and
washington,
because
I
think
you
get
you
end
up
with
less
for
your
community
by
bringing
up
that
catchphrase.
A
Thank
you,
so
I
think
that
the
direction
would
be
allow
staff
the
discretion
to
interpret
that
sentiment,
and
I
think
it's
it's
understood
that
we're
we're
intending
this,
I
think,
to
apply
where
there
might
be
some
substantial
impact
to
the
city
that
we're
we
want
to
avoid.
A
But
if,
if
the
council
is
comfortable
with
giving
staff
that
discretion,
then
when
the
final
product
returns
in
february,
we
can
make
modifications,
as
as
we
see
fit
so
is.
Is
that
recommendation
supported
by
the
council.
M
A
A
Okay,
seeing
none?
Thank
you
very
much
staff
and
dane
and
sharon.
I
appreciate
your
patience,
but
I
think
what
we,
what
we
all
agree
is.
We
have
a
strong
foundational
document
and
I
think
it's
just
important
to
make
sure
that
we
find
council
consensus
on
these
items
before
we.
We
give
the
discretion
to
the
mayor
and
city
manager
to
to
proceed
with
the
advocacy
okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
We
will
end
item
point
one
and
then
move
to
item
8.1
school
resource
officer,
program,
update
assistant
city
manager
and
chief
operating
officer,
audrey
ramberg
will
present
the
item.
Police
chief,
chris
chung
and
police
police
captain
michael
canfield,
will
be
available
for
questions,
so
we
will
start
with
the
staff
presentation,
we'll
take
council
questions,
we'll
go
to
public
comment
and
then
we'll
return
for
deliberation,
so
audrey
chris
begin
when
you're
ready.
Thank
you.
Y
Y
It's
important
to
recognize
right
up
front
that
there
are
different
personal
experiences
and
deeply
held
feelings
on
this
topic,
and
those
perspectives
may
vary
depending
on
whether
or
not
a
student
or
family
was
directly
assisted
by
the
sro
program
by
other
experiences
with
policing
or
any
number
of
other
factors.
Y
Y
Y
Sros
use
an
approach
that
emphasizes
mentoring
and
building
relationships
with
youth,
providing
enrichment
opportunities,
collaborating
with
families
and
teachers
and
counselors
at
the
schools,
nonprofit
and
community
resources,
in
order
to
better
meet
needs
and
to
address
and
prevent
and
address
criminal
behaviors
as
they
emerge
before
they
emerge
and
in
ways
that
avoid
involvement
in
the
criminal
justice
system.
Y
The
psalm
appointed
a
three-person
subcommittee
that
worked
with
the
two
staff
liaisons
from
june
to
november
of
2021.
They
met
with
staff
from
schools.
In
addition,
I
met
with
the
superintendents
of
both
of
the
school
districts
they
met
with
parents
and
that
included,
for
example,
parents
from
cafecito
and
castrol
and
miss
castro
and
mistral
schools.
Y
They
met
with
community
groups,
which
included
the
mountain
view
coalition
for
police
reform
and
accountability
and
justice
vanguard.
They
wrote
a
survey
that
was
translated
into
english.
Spanish
sorry
was
written
in
english,
translated
into
spanish,
mandarin
and
russian
and
then
distributed
by
the
school
districts
to
high
school
and
middle
school
students,
as
well
as
their
parents
and
teachers.
A
Audrey,
I
I'm
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
so
I
I
didn't
realize
that
we
had
spanish
interpretation
for
this
item
and
I
should
have
invited
the
spanish
interpreter
to
share
that
with
the
public.
Is
it
okay?
If
I
allow
the
interpreter
an
opportunity
to
speak
my
apology,
so
we
will
now
hear
for
from
our
interpreter.
Z
Y
You
thank
you,
mayor
no
worries.
Thank
you.
I
think
that
might
have
been
elena,
so
I
was
just
about
to
talk
about
the
participation
in
the
survey.
Y
It
was
completed
by
137
students,
most
of
whom
were
from
high
school
and
of
the
103
high
school
students
who
the
largest
percentage
were
identified
themselves
as
white,
and
that
was
34
students
or
37
percent
that
was
followed
by
asian
or
asian
american
students,
which
was
30
or
29
percent
30
students
29,
followed
by
20
hispanic
or
latino
students,
which
is
19,
and
then
six
students
who
identified
as
black
or
african
american,
and
that
was
six
percent.
Y
As
then,
there
were
ten
students
who
did
not
answer
the
question
regarding
race
and
ethnicity,
for
middle
school,
of
the
34
students.
The
largest
number
that
answered
the
question
regarding
race
and
ethnicity
were
hispanic
or
latino,
and
that
was
11
students
or
32
percent,
followed
by
asian
or
asian
american
students,
which
was
nine
students
at
26
percent,
the
same
amount
for
white
students
and
then
one
black
or
african-american
student
from
middle
school.
Y
When
asked
about
their
feelings
of
having
sros
on
campus
for
the
middle
school
students,
the
largest
percent
provided
a
response
that
they
were
neutral
about
it
that
was
43,
and
then
there
were
30
percent
who
were
positive
or
very
positive
and
27
percent
who
were
negative
or
very
negative
for
middle
school
students.
The
largest
percentage
relates
to
those
who
gave
a
positive
or
very
positive
rating
that
was
54
with
37,
neutral
and
9
negative,
or
very
negative.
Y
As
you
can
see
here,
the
vast
majority
of
parents
support
who
participated
in
the
survey
support
the
sros
at
schools.
Y
Y
Important
feedback
was
also
shared
by
about
some
students,
discomfort
with
armed
officers
being
on
campus,
and
I
think
that's
especially
the
case
if
they,
the
purpose
of
them
being.
There
is
not
clear
concern
that
students
of
color
have
been
treated
with
bias
and
discrimination,
and
also
a
sense
that
there
are
negative
repercussions
for
students
who
are
interviewed
or
searched
in
view
of
their
peers.
Y
The
psab
subcommittee
at
first
developed
seven
recommendations
in
response
to
that
input
which
were
presented
to
the
psab
at
its
november
18th
meeting.
There
was
considerable
public
comment
and
deliberation
by
the
psap
members
and
ultimately,
the
group
adopted
11
recommendations
that
are
listed
on
this
slide
with
shortened
titles
and
are
these
are
more
fully
stated
in
table.
Y
One
of
the
staff
report
on
page
eight
in
follow-up
to
that
november,
18th
meeting
staff
assessed
each
of
these
recommendations
to
understand
the
administrative,
operational
and
fiscal
feasibility
and
also
talked
with
the
two
school
superintendents
and
heard
their
general
support
for
these
recommendations.
Y
The
breakdown
of
the
psab
recommendations
into
those
categories
of
mou
and
and
staff
level
is
shown
in
table
two
of
the
staff
report,
which
is
on
pages
14
and
15.,
and
then
these
next
two
slides.
I
will
briefly
go
over
that
that
kind
of
summarize
those
different
policy
mou
level
actions
that
carry
forward
the
p
step
recommendations
in
the
next
slide,
we'll
we'll
all
look
at
the
recommendations
that
would
be
carried
forward
in
an
administrative
manner.
Y
So,
in
addition
to
the
mou,
staff
is
recommending
that
we
create
a
procedure
manual
for
the
services
unit
and
that
this
would
addre
address
nearly
all
of
the
p
sub
recommendations
and
further
defining
them,
including
those
that
were
also
addressed
at
a
policy
level
in
the
mou,
and
this
relates
to
the
things
on
this
screen
that
you
can
see
regarding
communication
methods,
annual
reporting,
metrics
coordination,
collection
and
coordination
of
suggestions
and
concerns.
Quarterly
reporting
of
complaints,
development
of
specific
programs
and
other
items
that
you
see
here
on
this
screen.
Y
So
the
staff
recommendation
is
that
you
receive
this
update,
which
you
you
did
through
the
staff
report
and
my
summary
presentation
and
any
follow-up
discussion
you
wish
to
have
about
it
and
also
that
you
direct
direct
the
city
manager
to
execute
mouse
with
the
high
school
and
the
mountain
view.
Lisbon
school
districts,
based
on
the
key
terms
that
are
in
table
three
of
the
staff
report,
which
is
on
pages
16
and
17..
Y
This
slide
lists
the
the
general
categories
of
terms
that
have
been
proposed
by
staff
as
the
starting
point
for
the
mous,
and
these
are
in,
as
I
mentioned
on,
table
three
and
they
reflect
the
input
from
the
pseg
process,
as
well
as
terms
from
the
former
mou
that
had
been
in
place
between
the
city
and
the
mountain
view,
los
altos
union
high
school
district,
and
while
I
do
have
slides
that
list,
the
specific
proposed
key
terms
in
each
of
these
category
areas,
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
those
in
the
interest
of
time,
but
they're
available.
Y
During
your
deliberation.
Should
you
wish
to
visit
any
of
those
broad
categories
or
any
of
the
specific
terms
to
to
discuss?
Ask
questions
or
suggest
make
suggestions
so
with
that.
That
concludes
staff's
presentation
and
I
am
happy
to
answer
questions
and
also
refer
questions
to
our
two
police
chief
police
representatives.
A
D
D
D
So
I
don't
know
exactly
if
we're
still
on
a
hunt
for
what
the
objectives
of
this
program
are,
and
I'm
a
little
bit
concerned
that
we
would
try
to
figure
ourselves
out
during
the
mou
process
without
further
direction.
So
how
should?
How
should
council
be
interpreting
this?
Y
I'm
happy
to
provide
a
first
response
to
that,
and
then
chief
jung
can
can
speak
more
specifically
to
kind
of
the
the
program
as
it
operates
on
the
ground.
But
from
a
purpose
standpoint.
Y
The
purposes
of
the
program
are
are
both:
they
are
to
provide
enrichment
opportunities
and
mentoring
for
kids,
who
are
at
risk
of
gang
involvement
or
other
types
of
behaviors.
That
are,
you
know,
not
a
path
towards
their
best
outcomes
and
that
their
parents
are
concerned
about,
or
that
have
resulted
in.
You
know,
potentially
all
the
way
up
to
criminal
behavior,
but
the
the
effort
is
to
to
to
get
to
that
point
sooner
and,
and
so
there
are
there's
definite
engagement
of
of
kids
in
those
kinds
of
activities
and
and
opportunities.
Y
In
addition,
the
establishing
officers
who
are
specifically
selected
and
trained
for
their
ability
to
connect
with
youth
and
having
them
engaged
with
youth
in
a
structured
setting
where
there
aren't
criminal
behavior
issues
allows
for
the
kinds
of
dialogue
and
relationship
building
that
can
positively
influence
police
and
youth
relationships,
which
have,
I
think,
outcomes
that
are
perhaps
a
little
bit
less
immediate
and
tangible,
but
but
still
beneficial
for
the
youth
and
for
the
school
community
and
I'm
gonna.
Y
I
I
don't
know
that
we're
still
kind
of
searching
for
those
we
do
have
a
a
a
list,
and
this
is
gleaned
from
the
the
the
way
that
the
program
currently
and
has
been
operating
as
well
as
the
mou
that
was
previously
in
place
with
the
high
school
district
and
those
goals
and
purpose
are
to
create
a
safe
and
secure
school
environment
to
prevent
or
reduce
juvenile
delinquency,
to
reduce
referrals
to
criminal
justice
system
and
to
have
positive
engagement
and
relationships
between
the
police
and
students.
W
Thank
you
audrey
good
evening,
council
members,
chris
shang
police
chief.
I
guess
the
best
way
to
fill
in
the
blanks
there
would
be
to
look
at
the
past
and
how
we've
operated
in
the
schools,
and
this
goes
back
decades
and
it's
the
majority
is
a
relational
purpose
in
much
the
same
way
as
maybe
a
detective.
Their
main
duty
is
to
do
follow
up
on
cases,
but
as
their
their.
They
are
a
police
officer.
W
W
It
is
not
so
much
of
a
security
guard
role
as
we
we
don't
patrol
the
hallways
per
se
and
and
do
any
sort
of
you
know
mandatory
checks
on
and
that
you
may
hear
about
in
other
parts
of
the
country
where
there's
metal
detectors.
This
is
very
much
based
on
relational,
both
to
kind
of
identify,
potentially
at-risk
youth,
to
just
provide
a
mentoring
relationship
and
a
lot
of
it.
W
These
all
have
a
large
degree
of
behind
the
scenes
organization.
So
it's
it's
a
huge
span
of
different
things,
but
I
would
say
the
vast
majority
of
it
is
to
build
relationships.
D
Okay
and
a
follow-up
question:
are
there
written
protocols
about
when
and
how
and
for
what
reasons
students
can
be
searched
or
detained?
I
know
that
the
pcab
said
that
they
had
spoken
to
students
who
felt
like
there
was.
D
D
I
don't
think
I've
ever
seen
a
manual
or
any
kind
of
written
documentation
about
about
this,
and
I
know
it's
a
very
substantive
part
of
what
mountain
view
does
and
I
think
he
did
a
great
job
of
enumerating
the
programs
throughout
the
year
and
the
things
that
are
ongoing,
but
I
I
don't
feel
like.
I
have
a
particularly
good
understanding
when
kids
say
that
they've
been
searched
under
what
conditions
would
that
be
warranted?
D
When
would
they
be
detained?
Why
are
they
detained
in
public
view
or
or
even
in
in
a
private
situation
where
there
might
not
be
a
parent?
I
don't
know
what
the
protocols
are
about,
calling
parents
and
having
a
parent
there
when
a
youth
is
questioned.
W
There
is
not
a
specific
written
protocol
as
it
relates
to
schools
and
our
sros
and
that's
something
that
we
in
the
police
department
have
already
begun
discussing
and
are
working
towards.
There
are,
however,
general
policies
that
apply
to
all
of
our
officers
in
regards
to
searching
not
just
juveniles,
but
adults
as
well.
This
would,
in
general
terms,
be
you
know,
making
sure
that
it's
a
same-sex
person
searching
someone.
W
D
Okay,
that's
good
to
know,
I'm
I'm
very
concerned
because
it's
it's
compulsory
for
youth
to
attend
school,
they're
truant,
if,
if
they
don't-
and
so
I
I
feel
like
we
have
as
council
an
extra
duty
of
care
to
understand
how
a
situation
could
come
about
where,
where
they
would
be
searched
or
detained
or
where
they
would
be.
D
M
Thank
you
vice
mayor
hicks,.
T
Okay,
for
a
totally
different
line
of
questioning
the
staff
report
talked
about
some
additional
possible
programs.
It
was
an
mvpdy
for
students
in
addition
to
the
mvpdx
program
that
now
exists
to
familiarize
residents
in
general,
with
with
the
police.
This
would
be
for
students
and
then
also
life
skills
class.
T
I
won't
go
into
details
with
the
the
details
that
were
spelled
out
in
the
staff
report,
but
they're
I'm
wondering
since
we're
talking
about
mousse
and
not
so
much
talking
about
funding
how
this
was
how
it
was
envisioned
to
add
these
additional
programs
was.
Is
the
idea
that
there
will
be
funding
added
over
time
or
is
it
at
the
same
funding
level?
Will
other
activities
be
reduced?
T
How
are
these
additional
activities
going
to
be?
How
are
they
going
to
be
involved
with
this
program?.
W
Thank
you
vice
mayor
hicks,
so
this
these
programs
that
you
named
would
be
the
police
department's
capable
to
do
it
just
with
existing
staffing
and
funding
much
in
the
same
way
that
mvpdx
was
done
through
just
officers
and
staff,
stepping
up
to
just
kind
of
facilitate
and
and
plan
for
these
programs,
so
the
the
one
in
the
school,
the
life
skills,
one
that
was
a,
I
believe
it's
called
the
community
service
club
in
concept.
W
It's
just
more
of
a
an
opportunity
for
the
the
student
body
to
kind
of
get
to
know
not
just
police
officers,
but
firefighters
and
other
service
industries,
and
again
these
would
not
require
any
additional
funding
per
se
they're
they're,
not
that
heavy
of
a
lift
for
our
school
resource
officers.
The
mvpdy
program
also
is
a
short-term
program
that
would
be
capable
to
be
don't
be
done
with
existing
resources
and
staff.
T
So
I
mean
something
must
be.
If
I
add
something
to
my
to-do
list,
I
have
to
take
something
off
or
spend
extra
time.
So
it's
I
I
don't
know
what
would
be
subtracted
patrolling
the
school.
Maybe
don't
refer
to
it
as
patrolling
what
would
be
if
there's
no
additional
budget,
what
would
be
subtracted.
W
The
the
school
resource
officers
are
pretty
good
at
managing
there's,
there's
items
that
are
like
seasonal,
for
instance.
If
there's
a
cops
that
care
event
comes
up,
you
know
that
will
kind
of
ramp
up
and
they'll
plan
for
that,
and
then
that
happens
and
then
they'll
prep
for
the
next
thing.
So
there's
an
ebb
and
flow
to
the
number
of
community
events
and
and
things
that
we
can
you
know
commit
to
the
mvpdy
program
is
a
short
term.
A
Thank
you
any
additional
questions
before
we
move
to
public
comment,
seeing
none,
we
will
now
take
public
comment.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
The
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen
and
given
the
number
of
public
comments,
let's
allocate
two
minutes
per
speaker.
E
AA
All
right,
hi
everyone,
my
name-
is
dana
peady
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
mountain
view
coalition
for
police
reform
and
accountability,
we'd
like
to
thank
the
psab
and
staff
for
all
their
hard
work
on
this
topic
and
as
mvc
pro,
we
see
three
major
next
steps
that
we'd,
like
the
council
to
approve
tonight.
First
of
all,
the
manual
for
the
youth
services
unit
should
be
developed
with
significant
community
involvement.
AA
It
should
also
be
presented
to
the
psab
at
a
public
meeting
in
its
draft
stages
to
give
opportunity
for
feedback
from
psab
and
members
of
the
public.
This
presentation
should
happen
during
the
development
stage,
as
I
mentioned,
when
there's
still
time
to
gather
and
incorporate
community
feedback,
rather
than
waiting
until
the
end
to
present
a
final
product.
AA
AA
If
you
do
not
create
an
mou
with
the
private
schools
due
to
the
limited
scope
of
services,
provided
there
still
needs
to
be
transparency
to
the
public
regarding
what
those
agreements
are.
For
example,
under
what
circumstances
are
the
sros
participating
in
events
or
providing
services
at
the
private
schools?
Is
that
work
being
funded
by
the
youth
services
unit
budget,
the
mvpd
budget,
more
broadly
or
the
schools
themselves?
AA
AB
AB
AB
AC
Yes,
hello,
hello,
council,
city
staff
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
nellie
meyer
and
I'm
the
superintendent
of
mountain
villa
saltos
high
school
district.
I
would
like
to
start
by
thanking
the
public
safety
advisory
board
for
their
thoughtful
work.
The
meetings
they
held
over
the
last
year
and
the
robust
conversations
that
occurred
during
these
discussions
on
behalf
of
the
mountain
view
los
altos
school
district.
I
would
like
to
support
the
recommendations
made
by
city
staff
committee
and
express
the
full
support
of
our
board
of
education
and
our
site
leaders
at
mountain
view.
High
school.
AC
AC
Lastly,
I
want
to
share
that
the
relationships
between
students
in
our
sros,
the
staff
and
our
sros,
as
well
as
our
community
members
and
sros,
are
the
most
valued
part
of
this
role,
our
relationships
and
the
sro's
understanding
of
how
our
school
system
works
has
been
invaluable,
as
we
use
a
multi-pronged
approach
to
supporting
our
students.
Thank
you.
A
R
Hi
all
to
mackenzie
lived
in
the
montelum
neighborhood
for
nearly
seven
years,
maybe
eight
years
now.
At
this
point,
I
just
want
to
note
that
by
construction,
this
entire
process
was
made
to
justify
school
resource
officers
and
expand
the
program
there
was
there
by
construction.
Again
there
was
no
approach
to
consider
alternatives.
R
I
have
been
I'm
a
regular
commenter
on
that
council.
Maybe
I
speak
too
frequently
and
dilute
my
power,
but
one
thing
that
has
really
shown
up
over
the
past
year
and
a
half,
and
especially
the
past
several
months
with
regards
to
this
issue
is
the
number
of
people
who
show
up
it.
Really
it's
pretty
it's
powerful
and
there
have
been
repeated,
calls
to
eliminate
the
school
resource
officer
program
that
have
been
ignored.
I
think
it's
I'm
I'm
engaged
on
this
issue.
R
I
want
to
try
to
build
the
type
of
city
that
I
could
see
myself
racing
family
in
and
but
I
think
we
should
listen
to
the
people
who
have
most
direct
experience
and
if
we
view
the
survey
as
a
longitudinal
cross
section,
we
see
that
there's
actually
a
tripling
of
negative
views
as
students
move
from
middle
school
to
high
school,
which
is
troubling
just
with
regards
to
the
recommendations
having
mou's
so
that
we
can
finally
actually
have
metrics
for
the
program
seems
really
important.
R
I
think
a
five-year
term
is
too
long,
as
some
others
have
said,
there
should
be
yearly
reviews
where
we
go
over
and
the
staff
report.
I
know
said
that
we
shouldn't
be
doing
assessment
as
we
create
the
mous.
But
if
this
is
a
program,
that's
worth
investing
over
a
million
dollars
a
year
in
then
we
should
also
be
seeing
if
we're
living
up
to
the
goals.
So
that
might
thank
you
for
your
time.
H
Thank
you
mayor,
I'm
just
getting
to
my
comments
here,
so
it
seems
that
the
ysu
programs
have
changed
in
mission
over
time
with
largely
informal
guidance
in
place.
That's
what
I'm
reading
in
the
staff
report.
For
that
reason
alone,
the
recommended
changes
are
certainly
called
for,
and
I
support
all
the
points
raised
by
envy.
Cbr
I'd
like
to
emphasize
that
all
sro
materials,
including
the
operations
guide,
need
to
be
reviewed
in
a
public
context
and
that
these
materials,
including
the
mous,
need
to
apply
to
all
participating
schools,
including
the
private
schools.
Thanks.
M
AD
Hi
everyone
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
speak.
My
name
is
tony
moss
and
I
am
an
mvla
parent
and
have
four
kids
go
through
the
school
district.
First,
I'd
like
to
just
address
one
thing
that
superintendent
meyer
mentioned,
which
was
the
incidents
on
campus
that
took
place.
I
believe
it
was
a
shelter
in
place,
as
well
as
a
gas
leak
and
a
bomb
threat.
I
just
wanted
to
just
remind
everyone
that
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
sro
program.
The
police
came
to
respond
as
they
would
continue
to
do.
AD
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
I've
been
keeping
track
of
what
has
been
going
on
with
the
psab,
and
I
thank
them
for
their
time
and
attention
to
this
manner
matter.
I
know
that
it
has
not
been
easy.
I
want
to
clearly
state
that
I
understand
the
efforts
were
made
to
gauge
student
staff
and
public
feedback
about
the
sro
program,
but
I
also
want
to
remind
you
that
you
are
likely
only
getting
information
from
those
least
impacted
by
the
presence
of
sros
on
campus.
AD
AD
AD
AE
I
I'm
calling
to
really
request
you
guys
to
make
extremely
strong
language
in
the
mou
and
manual
deliberately
detailing
all
the
reasons
why
the
sros
would
be
on
campus,
what
their
duties
will
be
on
campus
and
also
just
how
to
conduct
themselves
on
campus
their
attire,
whether
or
not
they
are
allowed
to
corner
kids
or
talk
to
them
in
any
facet,
and
there
needs
to
be
strong
language
talking
about
how
police
can
no
longer
be
lingering
on
our
campuses.
AE
AE
For
some
reason,
we
are
willing
to
fund
these
programs
that
have
caused
a
lot
of
public
division
and
scrutiny
towards
this,
these
programs.
So
if
you're
going
to
continue
to
fund
these
kind
of
programs,
I
also
hope
you
fund
other
programs
sunchat
such
as
mental
health
resources,
not
only
in
our
school
systems
but
in
the
broader
community
as
well.
Thank
you.
U
Hi,
I'm
catherine
vonnegut.
I
am
the
president
of
the
board
of
trustees
of
mbla
and
I
have
just
a
couple
sentences.
One
is
that
mvla
continues
to
see
value
in
the
sro
program
and
I
should
say
specifically
after
the
public
safety
committee
and
public
input
have
recommended
positive
changes
to
the
program
that
should
detail
more
specifically,
the
interactions
with
students
and
the
sros
and
manuals
to
help
guide
the
interactions
and
thank
you
for
the
public
safety
committee's
input
and
thank
you
to
our
city
council.
AF
AF
I
didn't
really
want
a
calling,
so
I
feel,
like
often
my
words
fall
on
deaf
ears
as
from
the
beginning,
when
this
was
done,
a
great
great
amount
of
time
and
effort
was
put
into
this,
but
from
the
beginning
there
was
no
chance
that
the
azeroth
program
was
going
to
end.
It
was
just
how
could
we
change
it
and
do
things
like
that?
AF
A
lot
of
students,
former
previous
to
the
2018
that
was
looked
at
in
the
the
surveys
which
all
were
which
were
excluded,
are
many
of
the
students
who
are
like
I'm
23
years
old,
and
I
can't
even
talk
about
for
having
to
count
my
issues
that
I
had
with
the
sros
on
campus.
So
not
only
did
a
lot
of
the
students
who
now
are
feeling
confident
enough
myself
included
to
speak
up
about.
It
are
not
even
included
in
the
survey
and
the
actual
statistics
of
it.
AF
AF
L
Hello,
can
you
hear
me
hello?
Yes,
we
can
yeah
okay
good
evening,
I'm
a
commissioner
in
los
altos,
but
I'm
speaking
as
a
member
of
the
public
as
a
33-year
resident
and
as
a
parent
alumna
of
the
high
school
district.
Before
I
begin
my
prepared
comment
and
with
all
due
respect
to
superintendent
meyer,
los
altos
high,
has
no
sro
and
yet
proper
involvement
from
pd
the
police
department
and
good
collaboration
therein
occurred
with
no
loss
of
response
integrity
during
both
emergency
response
to
the
shelter
in
place
and
during
any
investigation
of
crime.
L
Legislators,
in
my
experience,
go
so
far
as
to
add
weight
to
the
negative
reactions
more
than
the
supportive
reactions
when
it
comes
to
issues
like
playground,
structures,
house,
designs,
dog
parks
and
city
services
in
general,
but
tragically,
whenever
it
seems,
feedback
highlights
negative
impacts
felt
by
marginalized
members
of
our
communities.
Legislators
suddenly
lose
their
hearing.
L
A
AG
Hello
good
evening,
my
name
is
kalinda
price
and
I'm
a
teacher
at
los
altos
high
school,
having
personally
witnessed
officers
communicating
officers
from
mountain
view,
communicating
and
attempting
to
charge
one
of
my
students
and
failing
to
notify
parents,
students
behavior
being
escalated
during
mental
health
breakdowns
when
officers
are
called
having
a
personal,
negative
experience
and
being
threatened
by
an
officer
in
charge.
After
I
did
identifying
who
I
was
also
observing
several
different
occasions
where
black
and
brown
parents
or
families
were
disrespected
accosted.
AG
Having
numerous
reports
of
my
from
my
students
or
students
that
I
mentored
about
their
experiences,
whether
it
was
in
the
community
on
campus
heading
to
school,
I
I
just
don't
understand
why
we
have
to
continue
having
this
conversation,
just
like
other
members
or
other
people
on
this
panel.
They
have
communicated
that
about
the
lack
of
transparency
about
incidents.
That's
happened
on
campus
and
there
they've
had
response
without
the
sro.
The
sro
is
never
on
campus.
AG
When
things
are,
you
know,
I'm
not
saying
never
but
they're,
usually
not
on
campus
when
things
are
happening,
but
things
are
still
being
taken
care
of,
and
I
don't
understand
why
we
have
to
jump
through
so
many
hoops
and
repeat
ourselves
over
and
over
again
to
have
some
resolve
in
reference
to
this
issue.
AG
It
just
seems
like
there's
a
lot
of
time
and
effort
being
put
on
things
that
doesn't
support
the
people
who
look
like
me
or
the
students
that
I
serve
and
it's
it's
really
it's
outright
disrespectful,
especially
for
our
schools
to
to
fly,
to
fly
a
black
lives
matter
flag
or
anything
and
say
that
they
support.
But
yet
you
continue
to
put
people
on
campus.
A
I'm
sorry
you're
out
of
time,
and
I
have
to
be
fair
with
with
all
the
speakers.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
comments.
The
next
speaker
is
saleem
de
murgi.
AH
AH
Teachers
should
teach
police
should
police
we're
not
putting
students
first,
if
we
ask
police
officers
to
be
teachers
or
psychologists
or
anything
else,
they're
not
trained
for
it's
the
question
of
years
of
experience
versus
the
training
that
officers
get
which
can
be
measured
in
hours,
so
it's
not
putting
students
first,
it
also
makes
us
less
safe.
AH
Police
officers
cannot
be
walking
the
street
or
doing
walking
their
beat
if
they
are
busy
teaching
a
program.
A
boxing
program
at
mount
vee
high
school.
So
I
wish
the
the
recommendation
from
the
public
safety
advisory
board
was
to
end
this
program,
but
short
of
that,
I
hope
that
the
mou
is
as
strong
as
possible.
I
do
think
that
if
there
is
a
serious
you
know
incident
at
campus,
that
requires
a
police
officer.
We
should
try
to
make
sure
that
someone
like
officer
lloyd,
is
the
one
dispatched.
AH
He
seems
like
a
great
guy,
but
I
hope
you
know.
In
general,
we
try
to
limit
the
amount
of
involvement
that
police
play
on
campuses
outside
of
serious
crimes.
Students
deserve
care,
not
cops.
AH
Additionally,
I
think
the
recommendations
about
tracking
metrics
kind
of
evidences
how
poorly
designed
the
sro
program
is.
There
aren't
any
key
performance
indicators.
People
even
disagree
on
what
the
performance
indicator
should
be
because
they
have
different
understandings
of
what
the
point
is.
The
teachers
disagree
with
what
the
police
department
will
say
about
the
purpose
of
this
program.
AH
The
fact
that
we've
never
measured
whether
the
program
works
or
achieves
any
of
those
purposes
is
evidence
of
the
fact
that
it's
not
a
well-designed
program.
So
I
think
it
was
a
mistake
for
the
community
or
for
the
public
safety
advisory
board
to
recommend
modifications
this
program,
but
I
hope
we
try
to
make
it
as
reasonable
as
possible
moving
forward.
Thank
you.
AI
Hi
see
I'm
los
salto's
high
school
alumni
and
I.
E
AI
Want
to
call
in
speak
on
the
sro
removal
as
well.
I
think
a
lot
of
people
have
brought
up
some
great
comments
about
it.
AI
I
think
that,
like
many
of
others
said
was
if
one
student
feels
uncomfortable
with
sro,
then
that's
one
too
many,
but
I
also
wanted
to
mention
like
I
strongly
believe
we
need
more
resources
for
mental
health
and
mental
health
professionals.
AI
On
campus,
like
I
have
a
family
member
who
would
have
struggled
a
long
time
with
his
own
mental
disorder
and
he's
had
some
nightmarish
stories
where
the
staff
and
sro
officers
had
don't
know
didn't
know
what
to
do
or
how
to
handle
the
situation,
and
it
would
just
make
it
worse
and
make
it
harder
for
him
to
go
to
school
focus
so
having
resources
on
campus
or
a
safe
space
for
him
would
have
been
very
beneficial
but
yeah.
That's
it
for
me.
Thank
you.
A
A
I
I
want
to
strongly
discourage
this
members
of
the
public.
Please
raise
your
hands
during
the
public
comment
period.
There
is
one
additional
speaker,
kevin
ma
I'll,
give
you
this
opportunity,
but
moving
forward,
I'm
going
to
cut
off
public
comment
period
after
I
don't
see
any
more
ads,
but
this
is
I'll.
Allow
this
one
last
opportunity.
S
Sorry
mayor,
I
was
expecting
more
speakers,
but
as
you've
heard
with
the
com,
with
all
the
testimonies
here
tonight,
inherently
we're
dealing
with
a
program
where
we're
still
facing
a
lot
of
questions
about
like
what
is
the
actual
root
issue,
we're
trying
to
solve
with
sros
on
campus
that
inherently
it's
kind
of
this
like
feeling
game
where
we
still
have
yet
to
fix
actual
metrics,
which
we
can
you
know,
look
back
and
say
well
we're
successful
at
all
about
this.
S
So
I
do
wish
to
see
that
we
actually
come
back
this
at
an
annual
basis
to
make
sure
that
it
is
doing
what
we're
supposed
to
be
doing.
If
los
altos
could
get
rid
of
them
and
nothing
seems
to
be
catching
on
fire.
I
don't
see
why
we
can't
go
to
you
know
why,
for
us
it
has
to
basically
become
mandatory
inherently,
it
does
lead
to
perhaps
a
situation
of
you
know
a
discussion
like
where
do
police
have
to
be
stationed
at
that?
S
I
don't
really
think
we
need
to
discuss
right
now,
given
the
general,
you
know,
lack
of
city
resources
right
now
due
to
budgeting,
but
I
guess
that's
a
conversation
psab
which
unfortunately
not
send
a
rep
for
some
reason
here
tonight,
we'll
deal
with
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
now
we
will
conclude
public
comment
and
return
to
the
council
for
discussion.
A
X
Mayor,
if
I
may
thank
you
so
the
1.3
million
in
funding
does
cover
five
employees
staff
positions
in
the
police
department,
so
the
decision
would
have
to
be
then.
If
the
the
program
itself
ends,
that
funding
would
still
remain
in
the
police
department
and
those
positions
would
be
repurposed
for
other
duties
and
other
assignments
within
the
department.
So
there
are
a
number
of
things
that
those
positions
do
work
on
now
as
needed.
A
D
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I
I
came
into
tonight's
discussion
very
prepared
to
support
the
the
program
going
forward
with
enhanced
oversight
from
the
psab,
but
I
I
have
to
say
that
I
am
concerned
by
the
things
that
I've
I've
heard
tonight.
D
D
Data
data
driven
measurement
or
functions,
and
I
understand
that
with
some
socialization
kinds
of
programs,
you
maybe
can't
really
get
that
data,
but
the
data
that
is
here
that
says
that
a
third
of
the
students
are
uncomfortable
or
want
the
officers
removed
and
a
thing
that
has
really
stood
out
for
me
is
that
we're
living
in
a
more
complicated
world.
Now,
when
I
went
to
school,
the
only
time
that
we
saw
a
police
officer
in
school
was
on
career
day
and
we
did
have
bomb
threats,
we
didn't
have
school
shootings,
etc.
D
D
I
and
I'm
also
very
concerned
that
new
programs
are
being
instituted
without
any
council
involvement.
Seemingly
it's
just
popped
up
that
oh
there's
going
to
be
a
new
thing
and
given
what's
been
going
on
and
what
the
response
from
the
community
has
been.
I'm
I'm
very
concerned.
D
So
I
I
think
that
there's
there's
a
lack
of
clarity
here.
It
feels
like
we're
we're
kind
of
throwing
spaghetti
at
the
wall
and
and
then
we
see
what
sticks
and
what
has
a
positive
impact,
and
we
are
sophisticated
enough
of
a
city
that
we
are
data
driven
in
our
other
city
functions.
D
We
we
do
have
manuals
and
protocols
that
that
council
can
see
and
understand,
and
it's
not
within
a
black
box.
That
says
trust
me
there's
something
great
going
on.
D
I
want
to
have
mental
health
response
to
youth
by
individuals
who
are
qualified
qualified
connect,
clinicians,
providing
mental
health
response,
and
this
just
isn't
it
so
I
I
cannot
be
on
this
train.
This
is
not
the
best
that
we
can
do
this
is
this
is
a
a
program
that's
grown
over
time
very
clearly.
D
I
have
no
doubt
that
it
works
for
some
students,
but
I
don't
feel
like
I
can
be
responsible
in
supporting
this
continuing
when
there
is
such
a
lack
of
information
and
so
much
coming
from
the
students
that
is
negative
towards
it.
I
I
just
don't
think
that
I
could
support
continuing
to
put
1.3
million
per
year
in.
V
You
mirror
and
thank
you
staff
for
the
presentation,
and
I
also
want
to
thank
the
members
of
our
public
safety
advisory
board
for
their
incredible
hard
work
on
this
issue.
I
was
just
extremely
impressed
by
how
how
seriously
they
took
the
task
at
hand.
I
I
personally
spoken
with
some
of
the
advisory
board
members
and
learned
about
you
know
how
they
really
went.
I
think,
above
and
beyond,
to
understand
the
issue
research.
V
The
issue
you
know
put
together
a
survey,
and
I
mean
I
was
actually
impressed
by
the
the
response
rate
we
got.
You
know
in
the
hundreds,
it's
actually
really
good.
So
I
I
just
want
to
thank
the
psa
board
members
for
for
their
their
work,
and
you
know
I
watched
their
meetings,
and
these
are.
These
are
definitely
difficult
issues.
V
You
know
I
saw
that
in
the
in
the
conversations
and
the
deliberations
that
went
on
I
mean
I
personally
have
you
know
experienced
it
too
and
as
being
a
part
of
those
discussions
and
conversations.
So
you
know,
I
want
to
note
that
that
this
has
been
challenging,
but
especially
with
the
psab
board.
Members
they've
really
risen
to
the
occasion.
So
thank
you
for
that.
V
I
have
a
completely
different
perspective
and
as
the
one
person
here
that
has
still
has
a
daughter
at
mountain
view,
high
school
and
has
has
had
two
go
through
the
entire
public
school
district
system
in
mountain
view,
as
well
as
being
a
part
of
the
city
council
since
2007
and
being
actually
the
one
who
first
raised
the
issue
of
adding
budget
budget
to
the
pal
program
back
in
2007
time
frame
and
the
reason
being
that
at
that
time
we
were
experiencing
a
rise
in
gang
activity,
and
you
know
the
concern
for
me
and
at
that
time
my
children
were
like
one
was
in
elementary
school
and
I
saw
firsthand
the
the
challenges,
the
threats
that
children
faced
with
with
gang
activity
on
the
rise,
and
I
had
asked
our
police
chief
back,
then
you
know
what
can
we
do
to
to
prevent
gang
activity
prevent
children?
V
You
know
get
young
people
from
being
recruited
and
him
having
had
experience
and
before
in
a
different
city
department,
establishing
a
very
strong
pal
program.
You
know
I.
I
was
convinced
that
that
was
a
a
good
approach
and
supported
that,
and
so
I've
had
a
really.
I
would
say
you
know
firsthand
view
of
the
program
I've
tried
to
as
much
as
possible.
V
You
know
participate
where
I
can
with
the
community
events.
I've.
You
know
been
on
campus
with
my
kids.
You
know
frequently
as
a
student
as
a
volunteer
weekly
back
in
elementary
school
and
even
now
at
the
high
school.
I
go
I'm
on
campus,
quite
a
bit
and
frankly,
you
know
I
saw
the
most
recent
incidents
when
it
comes
to
public
safety.
V
I
was
actually
on
campus
a
few
weeks
ago,
when
there
was
a
lockdown,
I
was
going
to
do
a
tedx
talks
there
and
when
I
arrived,
I
was
told
I
couldn't
get
on
campus
because
they
had
a
lockdown
because
of
a
threat
and
finally
it
was
within
30
minutes
that
they
lifted
that
and
when
I
got
on
campus
and
then
was
walking
out,
I
saw
our
sro
and
had
a
chance
to
talk
to
to
him.
So
my
my
approach
to
this
has
been
that
you
know
I
I
I
don't.
V
V
There
was
an
incident
at
los
altos
high
school,
a
while
back
too,
and
I
had
been
hearing
about
it,
getting
reports
on
it
as
a
parent
and
then
my
daughter
too
told
me
that
she
had
been.
You
know
they
they're
on
social
media,
so
they
were
getting
play
by
play
on
what
happened
and
frankly,
the
way
that
was
handled
was
it
took
a
lot
longer
and
it
was
a
lot
less
organized
than
what
we
have
I've
seen
at
mountain
view,
high
school.
So
you
know
I
I
put
that
out
there
too.
V
But
my
feeling
is
is
that
this
is
a
positive
program
and
you
know
I
I
don't.
I
think
we
shouldn't
be
putting
people
in
silos
just
because
you're,
a
police
officer
or
a
firefighter
doesn't
mean
that
you
can't
be
a
role
model.
You
know
and
frankly,
and
the
reason
why
this
program,
I
think
part
of
the
reason
why
this
program
was
established,
is
that
you
know
when
kids
are
little.
V
They
actually
look
up
to
police
officers,
and
you
know
firefighters,
everybody
loves,
firefighters,
right
and,
and
then,
if
you
do,
you
know,
we've
done
community
surveys
and
when
we
asked
the
residents
of
mount
view,
you
know
what
is
the
most
valuable
service
that
city
provides.
It's
always
public
safety
and
fire
and
police
come
up
number
one
in
the
90
percentile
range.
So
that's.
Why
that
that
part
of
being
a
role
model
is
incorporated
into
this
program
and,
frankly,
you
know.
V
Nowadays
I
actually
feel
that
the
idea
of
like
career
paths
is
important
because
we're
having
a
really
hard
time
recruiting
police
officers
and
firefighters.
You
know
to
work
for
our
city,
and
you
know
my
pet
peeve.
Frankly
as
much
as
I
love
our
you
know,
this
community
and
silicon
valley
is
that
you
know
having
a
daughter
who
wasn't
a
tech
person
when
you're
not
involved
in
tech.
V
You
don't
there's
not
a
lot
of
options
out
there
and
what
I
would
like
to
see
is
to
be
able
to
provide
you
know
young
people
with
options
to
alternatives.
You
know
if
you're,
not
an
engineer
type,
it's
okay,
maybe
you
look
at
police,
you
know
police
or
firefighting
or
my
daughter,
wanna,
be
an
artist
and
that's
what
I
really
you
know.
V
Think
of
when
I
think
of
the
educational
system,
and
you
know
that
we
as
people
like
I'm,
not
a
professional,
I
don't
know
what
am
I
is
there
such
thing
as
a
professional
city
council?
Member,
probably
you
know
I
mean
I
think
I've
been
doing
this
for
a
while,
but
does
that
prevent
me
from
you
know
doing
something
else?
I'm
a
mom
too.
I've
worked
in
tech
and
I've
worked
in
the
non-profit
world.
So
why
do
we
need
to
put
put
ourselves
in
silos?
V
V
I
feel
that
the
only
way
we
can
deal
with
these
issues
of
discrimination,
racism,
you
know
everything
that's
happening
right
now-
is
that
we
need
to
interact
with
each
other
more
and
learn
from
each
other
more
and
understand
each
other
more.
But
when
we
talk
about,
let's
get
rid
of
this
because
you
know-
and
I
I
you
know-
I
absolutely.
V
V
V
You
know
that
idea
of
yeah
providing
that
role,
model
role,
model
role,
and
so
I
think
it's
a
good
program,
but
I
definitely-
and
I
appreciate
this
whole
conversation-
we've
have
had
over
the
last
year
or
so
I
think
we
can
definitely
improve
on
it
and
that's
where
I
really
appreciate
staff
and
peace
have
coming
together
with
these
recommendations.
V
I
think
these
points
are
definitely
going
to
help
improve
a
program
that
you
know
is
the
intentions
are
good
and
we
can
make
it
better,
and
so,
let's
give
it
a
chance
first,
rather
than
just
you
know,
dismantle
it.
I
I
I
understand.
You
know
it's
hard
to
please
everyone
it's
hard
to
satisfy
everyone.
You
know.
I
certainly
agree
that
there
are
other
issues
and
areas.
You
know
that
we
can
focus
on
you
know.
V
V
So
and
frankly,
if
you
ask
me
it
was
totally
different
conversation,
but
if
you
you
know,
I
would
like
to
actually
talk
about
how
the
city
addresses
mental
health
and
youth
mental
health,
because
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
improvement.
We
could
be
making
there
too,
but
you
know
I'm
looking
to
enhance
I'm
not
looking
to
dismantle.
T
So
I
thought
that
the
black
lives
matter,
protests
last
year
were
kind
of
a
breath
of
fresh
air,
offering
us
the
space
to
rethink
priorities
and
rethink
the
way
we
do
things,
and
I
I
feel
like
the
and
also
a
lot
of
the
local
input
from
from
residents.
You
know
in
our
our
public
commentary
period
and
I
feel
like
kind
of
the
the
procedure
and
recommendations
have
not
really
allowed
us
to
rethink
things
or
re-prioritize.
T
I
know
rethinking
things
and
re-prioritizing
is
not
always
always
quick,
but
I
feel
that
council
should
have
a
place
to
do
that.
A
little
more
than
the
the
what's
agenda
is
tonight.
It
seems
to
be
tweaking
mousse
and
I
hope
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
do
a
little
bit
more
than
that.
You
know
I
one
of
the
things
that
this
whole
procedure
has
made
me
think
about
is
what
do
people
really
want
our
police
department
to
do,
and
what
do
we
really
want
at
our
schools?
T
And
what
do
the
schools
really
want
funded?
And
you
know
some
of
the
things
that
people
in
my
neighborhood
have
brought
up
are
things
like
they?
They
have
heard
of
intensive
programs
for
reducing
bike
theft,
because
one
of
the
reasons
that
people
that
that
people
choose
not
to
bike
is
they
keep
losing
bikes
or
there
are
also
innovative
programs
to
reduce
catalytic
converter
theft
or
to
reduce
scamming
of
elders,
teaching
elders
to
not
be
scammed.
T
So
when
I
think
of
priorities,
I'm
not
sure
that
a
sro
program
of
this
size
is
really
you
know.
If
you
were
to
talk
to,
people
in
the
community
would
be
the
top
priority
for
our
our
spending,
and
I
think
that
we
could.
You
know,
I
think
we
could
shift
things
around
and,
like
the
city
manager
said,
if
we
changed
anything
about
this
programmer,
the
police
officers
would
go
back,
you
know
and
and
work
with
other
police
officers.
T
I
think
that
there
would
be
you
know,
there'd
be
things
that
might
be
a
bigger
priority
for
the
community.
That
officers
could
do
so,
and
not
only
that
when
I
the
reading,
I
do
tells
me
that
only
10
of
grade
schools
in
california
and
25
of
middle
schools
in
california
have
school
resource
officers.
T
So
you
know
it's
not
something,
that's
absolutely
necessary.
I
I
also
have
two
children
who
recently
went
through
the
school
program
and
and
friends
of
theirs
as
well.
You
know,
and
they
have,
I
think,
mixed
feelings
about
the
sro
program.
I
I
know
some
of
them
frankly,
some
of
them
had
good
interactions
with
the
program
and
and
others
would
have
preferred
that
they
had
some
alternative
ways
to
address
mental
health.
T
For
example,
the
high
school
drama
program
was
cut
and
many
of
the
children
involved
in
that
thought
that
that
was
that
was
kind
of
their
anchor
in
terms
of
mental
health.
I
think
earlier
tonight
well
I'll,
say
I'm
also
all
for
alternatives
to
tech
careers,
but
I
hope
that
we're
offering
something
more
than
you
know
it's
fine
to
offer
police
joining
the
police
force
as
an
alternative,
but
I
hope
we're
offering
much
more
than
that.
I
I
would
not
want
to
focus
solely
on
that
as
the
alternative
to
tech.
T
T
I
I
kind
of
gravitate
towards
something
that
council
member
lieber
said
earlier
tonight
that
she
would
like
to
see
the
line
items
separated
out
from
the
security
and
the
socialization
aspects,
so
that
we
could
look
at
those.
When
we
look
at
the
budget,
we
could
look
at
them
separately
and
we
wouldn't
have
to
make
a
decision
on
both,
and
I
also
do
think
that
any
mou
and
procedural
manual
should
any
changes
in
that
or
for
any
definition
of
it
should
be
done
in
a
public
process.
G
Well,
I
knew
this
was
going
to
be
a
very
poignant
discussion,
and
it
certainly
is
keeping
our
community
safe
is,
you
know,
is,
is
very
vital
to
all
of
us.
It's
just
a
fundamental
thing:
we
can't
have
a
civil
society.
G
Without
you
know,
laws
and
and
people
behaving
well,
and
so
it's
you
know
it
is
fundamental
and
that's
the
reason,
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
spend
so
much
money
on
it
and
why
we
think
it's
so
important
that
we
have
a
good
police
force
and
we
work
very
hard
to
have
a
good
police
force,
and
my
understanding
is
that
we
actually
do
a
very
good
police
force.
But
of
course
that
doesn't
mean
they're
they're
perfect.
G
During
the
last
summer.
You
know
we
were
all
awakened
by
just
horrible
incidents
that
took
place
that
created
or
brought
to
light
this
national
narrative
of
of
real
bad
behavior
on
the
point
of
police
officers,
and
I
think
that
it
became
incumbent
on
everybody
to
look
at
their
own
community
and
say
what's
happening
here
and
to
me
that's
what
we
were
doing
with
the
psab.
G
G
We
and
the
first
major
task
that
we
gave
them
was
to
look
at
this
sro
issue,
which
had
certainly
come
up
and
they've
looked
at
it,
and
I
I've
talked
to
several
of
them
about
it
and
and
they
were
actually
a
bit
surprised
by
what
they
found
and
how
and
particularly
supportive
the
adults
were
who
were
surveyed.
G
I
mean
we
have
heard,
of
course,
that
the
kids
said
there
were
about.
You
know
a
third
of
them
said
they
were
neutral.
A
third
of
them
said
they
should
we
should
get
rid
of
them.
A
third
of
them
said
we
should.
We
should
keep
the
program
or
it
was
very
good,
and
but
with
parents
it
was
really
different
with
parents.
It
was
over
something
like
82
percent
or
84
were
positive
or
very
positive
about
the
program.
G
That's
not
you
know.
That's
not
equivocable
at
all.
That's
a
very
strong
support
so
so
that
that's
important
to
me,
because
I
think
that
parents
look
at
how
their
children
respond
to
things
and
and
over
a
long
period
of
time
and
say
this
either
helped
my
child
or
this
didn't
now
that
doesn't
mean
that
there
weren't
specific
encounters
for
specific
children
at
one
time
or
another
that
weren't
as
good
as
they
could
have
been.
G
But
it
does
mean
that
there's
a
strong
perception
that
this
program
was
very
helpful
for
a
group
of
kids
over
a
long
time
over
a
long
term,
and-
and
that's
that's
important
to
me-
and
also
I
think,
what's
important
is
my
discussions
with
the
psab
members.
They
were.
They
were
kind
of
surprised
that
they
found
that
the
parents
of
kids,
who
had
been
interacted
with
many
of
these
with
the
sros
over
time
that
they'd
had
a
really
positive
influence
and
they'd
appreciated
the
impact
that
it
had
on
their
children's
development.
G
That
said,
we
heard
loud
and
clear
from
the
survey
and
from
psab
that
there's
a
tremendous
amount
of
confusion
about
what
this
program
really
is.
Well,
that's
not
good.
We
need
to
have
that
clarified
and
I
know
in
reading
these
reports,
I
found
that
I
thought
some
of
the
reasons
for
having
the
you
know
for
having
this
program
were
a
little
buried.
They
shouldn't
be
buried,
they
should
be
front
and
centered.
G
That's
what
I've
sort
of
taken
out
of
the
staff
report
and
stuff
that
I've
read.
That's
the
purpose.
I
think
we
need
to
have
some
people,
not
an
engineer.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
need
to
have
some
people
wordsmith
this
and
get
it
out
into
a
very
clear
statement
of
what's
the
purpose
and
that
needs
to
be.
You
know.
What's
the
mission
for
this
project
that
needs
to
be
the
lead-in
for
the
mou
and
everything
needs
to
build
off
of
that
and
that's
not
at
odds
at
all
with
what
has
been
recommended.
G
So
I
my
my
feeling
is
that
we
should
continue
to
support
this
program,
but
we
should
follow
the
recommendation
of
the
peace
ad,
which
and
and
and
the
officers
involved
and
the
school
which
is
to
develop
a
you
know
a
much
clearer
mou
and
I
don't
think
I
think
the
idea
of
maybe
setting
out
the
differences
between
the
the
the
mentoring
type
parts
of
the
program
and
the
and
the
security
part
that
that
could
be
a
good.
As
as
council
member
lieber
mentioned.
G
I
think
that
could
be
valuable,
but
still
I
I
do
think
that
we,
you
know,
we've
had
a
group,
do
an
investigation
and
we've
gotten
their
answer,
and,
and
I
and
it
and
to
me
it
has
largely
answered
the
question
of
how
is
our
program
different
from
what
we're
hearing
in
the
national
narrative
and
that's
what
we
that's
the
that's
the
basis
of
what
we
we
wanted
to
find
out
and
we
found
out
that
it's
largely
positive,
but
it
has
problems
with
clarity
and
also,
I
think
that
well
particularly
problems
with
clarity
and
communication,
and
so
I
I
I
just
again
want
to
thank
the
psat
for
their
work,
and
I
think
that
that
moving
forward
with
the
recommendations
is,
is
a
reasonable,
a
reasonable
way
to
go.
F
F
I
have
watched
all
of
the
psab
meetings
and
it
really
is
great
to
see
the
level
of
engagement
by
all
of
the
members
of
the
psab
and
they
willingness
and
the
openness
and
the
collaboration
and
the
just
the
spirit
of
the
discussions
that
are
had
among
psap
members,
as
well
as
with
members
of
the
nvpd.
F
F
I
felt
it
left
a
little
bit
too
much
open
to
people's
interpretation
of
what
they
thought.
The
role
of
the
sro
was.
F
I
thought
it
would
be
better
to
just
define
it
and
then
say,
and
do
you
think,
they're
meeting
those
that
role,
but
nevertheless
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
valuable
information
from
the
survey
and,
like
others,
I
I
think
I
was
surprised
at
the
conclusion
that
the
psab
came
to,
but
I
I
personally
think
they
came
to
the
right
conclusion
and
I
think
the
sros
do
play
a
good
role
with
our
students.
F
For
all
the
reasons
that
my
colleagues
have
mentioned,
I
kind
of
summed
it
up
when
I
was
talking
with
someone
about
the
sros
that
I
feel
like
it's
another
adult
who
cares
about
a
student
and
is
there
to
help
them
and
support
them
and
just
be
another
caring
adult
in
their
life,
and
I
shared
that
I
feel
like.
I
was
fortunate
to
have.
F
You
know
people
in
my
life
that
were
additional
caring
adults
beyond
my
parents
and
it's
nice
to
have
a
variety
and
they
have
different
experiences
and
can
share
different
information,
and
I
think
that's
really
important
and
was
mentioned.
You
know,
I
think
police
officers
are
a
role
model
as
well
as
lots
of
other
people,
and
it's
just
one
more
person
that
enriches
a
student's
life.
I
I
was
just
made
to
hear
about
the
incidences
that
people
have
brought
up
and
clearly
we
can.
F
You
know
I
haven't
heard
those
necessarily
about
our
police
department,
but
certainly
we
can
work
to
improve
the
program
and
I
think
we're
on
a
good
path
to
do
that.
And
you
know
like
lots
of
issues,
it's
always
hard
to
find
the
right
solution
and
strike
the
right
balance.
F
But
I
think
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
mou
and
the
contents
of
that,
as
well
as
the
manuals
so
that
it's
more
clear
about
the
role
of
the
sro
program
are
go
a
long
way
to
addressing
concerns
and
I'm
very
happy
to
support
the
staff
recommendation
and
actually
I'm
prepared
to
make
a
motion
mayor.
Unless
you
want
to
say
some
share
your
thoughts
and
then
I'm
happy
to
make
the
motion
thanks.
A
Thank
you,
emotion
is
in
order.
I
should
have
said
that
from
the
outset
I
did
have
a
couple
of
comments
and
then
we'll
we'll
presume
comments
from
the
other
members
of
the
council.
A
As
a
as
a
catholic,
I
have
a
proclivity
for
arcane
and
obscure
metaphor
and
on
this
issue
I
am
my
approach-
is
much
more
akin
to
that
of
erasmus
than
to
martin
luther.
That
will
mean
very
little
to
anybody
here,
but
I
I
support
the
reform
from
within
concept.
A
So
I
I
do
want
to
thank
the
psab
for
their
efforts
and
and
also,
I
think,
staff
for
providing
a
framework
for
this
discussion.
I've
been
a
little
apprehensive
about
this
item
for
quite
some
time
because
it
is
very
challenging
to
talk
about.
There
are
many
different
elements
and
there's
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity.
I
think
to
to
pull
the
conversation
one
way
or
another.
I
think
the
framework
that
staff
has
provided
is
is
a
very
good
one.
A
My
sense
is
that
we
we
do
weigh
the
stakeholder
input
very
carefully,
it's
very
difficult
to
do
that.
In
this
case
we
have
a
diverse
set
of
opinions
represented
within
the
student
body.
You
know,
although
the
survey
wasn't,
you
know,
isn't
sort
of
scientifically
rigorous
in
its
approach.
I
think
it
does
demonstrate
pretty
clearly
that
not
everybody
has
had
a
good
experience.
A
It's
important
to
know
that
some
people
have
thrived
with
the
program,
but
it's
equally
important
for
us
to
know
and
understand
that
some
people,
students
have
been
negatively
impacted
and
I
think
that's
very
concerning-
and
I
think
that's
what
I
want
to
focus
on
as
we
continue
the
public
process
to
improve
the
program.
A
So
that's
that
will
be
part
of
the
the
recommendation
I'll
support.
I
I
don't
think
that
we
have
a
final
product.
I
I
do
think
it's
important
for
the
public
to
have
the
opportunity
to
review
the
final
draft
of
the
mou.
A
There
was
an
individual
who
shared
an
anecdote
that
she
had
heard
from
the
student
body.
You
know
who
had
engaged
the
sros
that
some
concerning
activities
had
occurred.
I
think
that
this
was
related
to
the
inspection
of
of
backpacks
in
front
of
other
students.
That's
a
you
know
it's
a
it's
a
it
can
be
a
traumatic
experience
to
go
through
and
then
hearing
from
the
sros
themselves.
No,
that's
not
part
of
our
practice.
A
So
it's
it's
problematic
when
there's
a
perception
that
something
is
occurring
and
the
you
know
the
officers
themselves
dispute
that
saying
that's
not
part
of
their
current
set
of
procedures
so
making
that
document
public,
I
think,
is
a
critical
first
step
for
us
to
get
on
the
same
page
about
what's
actually
occurring
day
to
day.
It's
not
that
they
don't
trust
one
side
or
the
other.
A
But
if
we
have
a
public
procedure
manual,
then
if
there
is
a
violation
of
a
procedure,
the
accountability
mechanism
becomes
much
stronger
and
I
agree
very
strongly
with
members
of
the
public
who
said
that
it's
important
for
there
to
be
an
opportunity
to
provide
some
input
on
the
metrics
that
are
used
to
evaluate
the
relative
success
or
failure
of
the
program.
A
We
don't
have
that
and
until
we
do,
I
think
we're
not
going
to
find
consensus
on
whether
the
program
is
working
or
not,
and
I
think
that's
why
it's
critical
to
to
establish
establish
those
metrics
again
in
the
public
process.
A
The
last
thing
I'll
say
is
eliminating
the
sro
program,
may
free
up
some
resources
for
other
police
operations
and
that's
important
to
know,
and
that
might
be
something
that
down
the
road
we
can
choose
to
explore
if
we're
finding
that
the
program
isn't
meeting
expectations
or
if
there
are
other
priorities
that
we
want
to
fund.
But
what
eliminating
the
sro
program
does
not
do
is
free
up
1.3
million
for
discretionary
spending
on
things
like
mental
health
services
or
or
other
unrelated
programs
outside
of
mvpd.
A
The
only
way
you
would
free
up
that
money
is
by
terminating
city
employees
and
that's
not
something
I'm
comfortable
doing
right
now.
So
my
suggestion
would
be
that
so
we'll
we'll
go
well.
Emotion
is
in
order
so
I'll
allow
members
of
the
council
to
suggest
a
particular
approach.
But
I
do
think
that
if
we
proceed
with
the
staff
recommendations
which
I'm
inclined
to
do,
that,
we
provide
a
additional
direction
for
the
final
draft
of
the
mou
to
be
first
reviewed
by
the
council
youth
services
committee
and
for
the
ysu
procedure
manual.
A
If
we're
going
in
the
right
direction
on
what
metrics
we
use
for
for
the
evaluation
of
the
program
by
the
psab,
which
I
think
is,
is
an
important
part
of
the
mou,
so
I
do
support
retaining
the
the.
I
think
it's
an
annual
evaluation.
A
D
Thank
you
mayor
for
clarity's
sake
as
well.
I
I'd
like
to
see
the
manual
also
go
to
the
psab,
because,
for
my
part,
what
I
took
into
consideration
when
appointing
the
members
of
the
psab
was,
in
certain
cases,
their
actual
experience
in
law
enforcement
and
their
their
study
of
the
subject
matter.
Overall,
which
is,
is
something
that
I
think
in
the
youth
services
committee
we're
all
very
interested.
D
I
come
from
a
law
enforcement
family,
so
I'm
very
interested,
but
I
think
that
we're
trying
to
develop
the
expertise
within
the
psab
and-
and
so
I
would
like
to
have
them
see
that
manual,
see
the
review
and
and
see
the
the
performance
metrics
as
well.
That's
kind
of
what
we
established
the
psab
for,
and
so
I'd
like
to
suggest
that
to
the
maker
of
the
motion
when
when
she
does
make
the
motion,
I
I
think
that
that's
appropriate.
D
For
the
sake
of
transparency,
the
public
has
come
to
understand
that
the
p
sab
is
the
body
that
will
oversee
technical
aspects
of
public
safety
issues,
and
I
think
in
particular,
when
we're
dealing
with
an
issue
that,
where
there's
been
a
real
lack
of
clarity
and
a
lack
of
understanding
among
the
public
and
and
others
about
what
is
actually
going
on
with
youth.
In
this
regard,
I
think
that
would
be
an
important
transparency
measure.
A
Thank
you,
and
I
appreciate
you
mentioning
that
council
member
lever,
one
one
thing
I
neglected
to
say
in
my
comments
is
the
the
reason
I
prefer
the
council
youth
services
committee
over
the
psab
is.
The
psab
still
has
a
very
ambitious
work
plan
that
I'm
hoping
that
they
will
complete
before
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year
and
that
will
include,
for
instance,
I
think,
a
presentation
on
the
public
safety
budget.
It
was
something
that
was
personally
important
to
me.
So
not
that
I
oppose
that
concept.
A
I
don't
I
mean
the
intention
is
to
make
the
youth
services
unit
procedure
manual
public,
so
providing
you
know
the
psab
and
opportunity
to
see
that
document,
I
think,
is
perfectly
consistent
with
their
mission.
I
am
a
little
concerned
about
keeping
making
this
a
big
focus
of
their
work
plan
for
the
balance
of
the
fiscal
year,
because
there's
a
lot
of
other
stuff
that
I'm
hoping
that
they
will
complete.
So
just
to
conclude
that
thought,
council
member
mata
check.
F
Thanks
so
I
was
going
to
ask
you
why
you
were
thinking
it
would
go
to
the
youth
services
rather
than
the
psat.
So
thank
you
for
responding
to
that.
I
will
move
the
staff
recommendation,
I'm
a
little
bit
torn
about,
though
well.
I
totally
agree
with
the
mou
and
the
manual
being
public
everything.
The
city
does
it's
public,
so
it's
not
like
we're
hiding
it
that
I
kind
of
feel
like
that.
F
Psab
has
now
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
this
topic
and
is
more
up
to
speed
than
the
youth
services
committee.
So
I
guess
I
I
would.
I
think
I'd
prefer
to
have
it
go
to
the
psab,
but
I
guess
if
staff
or
other
council
members
felt
strongly
that
it
should
go
to
use
services,
I'd
be
open
to
that
too.
A
Thank
you
so
just
to
clarify
is
that
the
staff
recommendations
with
the
addition
that
the
the
documents
cited
go
to
and
this
could
change,
but
currently
the
psav
for
review
and
then
back
to
council
for
final
approval
is
that
is
that
part
of
the
motion?
Or
is
that
not
part
of
the
motion.
F
So
only
the
mou
would
come
well
actually
yeah.
I
don't
think
they
would
come
to
the
council
right
we're
directing
staff
what
should
be
included
in
it,
and
then
staff
would
just
implement
that
right.
The
mlu
wouldn't
come
back
to
council.
Would
it.
X
F
Okay,
so
I
agree
with
the
staff
recommendation
on
that.
I
think
we've
seen
what
would
be
in
the
mou
and
I
don't
feel
like
that-
has
to
come
back
to
council
in
terms
of
the
procedure
manual,
I'm
open
to
that
being
discussed
at
the
psab
or
the
youth
services.
I
don't
think
that
has
to
come
back
to
council.
That's
not
a
policy
document,
and
so
I
I
would
trust
staff
to
work
with
others
to
put
that
together.
A
You
for
the
clarification
anything
else
council,
remember:
council,
member
abe,
hoka.
V
Thank
you.
I
would
second
the
motion
and
I
do
agree.
I
think
the
mou
it's
like
every
other
mou
that
we
handle.
We
usually
direct
the
city
manager
to
execute
an
mou,
so
that
would
be
just
being
consistent
with
our
procedures.
You
know
reminding
ourselves
that
we
are
policy
makers.
We
are
not
the
day-to-day
operation
managers
here
and
in
the
same
regard
with
the
handbook
yeah,
I
would
leave
that
up
to
our
professionals
to
be
able
to
take
care
of
that.
V
I
think,
we've
all
heard
loud
and
clear
the
concerns
that
have
been
raised
and
I
trust
our
staff
has
as
well
and
will
take
that
into
consideration
and
incorporate
as
much
as
possible,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
there's
you
know
professional
expertise
that
I
rely
on
for
that
for
them
on,
and
so
I
I
would
leave
it
up
to
them
as
far
as
where
you
want
to
direct
the
either
to
youth
services
or
psab,
I
I
don't
really
have
a
preference.
V
I
understand
both
concerns.
You
know
I
would
just
say
that
I
mean-
and
I
I'm
on
the
youth
services
committee,
but
I
think
I'm
pretty
familiar
with
this
topic
now,
as
my
colleagues
on
the
committee
probably
are
too
so
I
wouldn't
think
that
you
know
that's.
That
would
be
a
concern.
G
Yeah
I'm
going
to
be
supporting
this
and
I
I
like
the
idea
of
it
of
the
mou
and
the
well,
particularly
the
mou
being
and
the
and
the
procedures
manual
being
shared
with
the
psab.
I
really
think
that
the
the
the
staffs
should
develop
it
and
it
should
go
to
psab
for
kind
of
final
recommend.
G
You
know
if
they
want
to
make
final
recommendations,
but
I
don't
think
psat
should
necessarily
be
spending
a
lot
of
time
on
the
review
then,
based
on
on
the
comments
that
they
get,
I
think
it's
fine
for
the
city
manager
to
approve
it.
G
I
feel
like
they've
given
in
this
report,
a
lot
of
direction
about
what
should
be
in
the
mou,
which
is
great,
and
so
I
think
staff
can
go
forward
with
that.
T
So
I'm
becoming
unclear
on
whether
council,
member
showalter,
whether
that
was
a
friendly
amendment
to
have
the
manual
go
to
the
psab
or
whether
that's,
whether
that's
the
understanding
that
the
manual
will
go
to
the
the
psab.
I'm
with
that
comment,
I'm
I'm
unclear
on
where
we
play.
F
Thank
you,
so
I
feel
like
both
the
psab
and
the
council
have
given
direction
on
the
mou,
so
staff
can
just
take
that
it
doesn't
need
to
go
back
to
either
the
council
or
the
psab
or
any
other
body.
When
it
comes
to
the
manual,
I
feel
like
I'll
leave
it
up
to
staff
to
figure
out
what's
best
if
they
want
to
run
it
by
the
psab,
I'm
fine
with
that
they
want
to
run
by
the
youth
services
committee.
F
I'm
fine
with
that,
but
I
would
trust
staff
to
take
the
lead
on
that
and
let
them
make
the
decision.
G
Then
I
just
want
a
question
about
we
would
we
want
to
you
know:
we've
all
talked
about
how
it's
important
to
be
transparent,
so
we
would
want
to
make
it.
You
know
it
public.
So,
typically,
the
way
we
make
an
mou
public
is
it's
on
the
consent,
calendar
or
or
how
do
we
typically
make
an
emoji
public?
Maybe
that's
that's
a
question
to
our
attorney.
AJ
All
of
our
public
records
and
they're
available.
So
if
there's
additional
direction
from
the
council
to
do
something
different
than
that,
we
welcome
that.
W
If
I
may
may-
or
I
could
add
some
clarity
to
that,
the
police
department
does
have
kind
of
a
transparency
page
where
we
post
our
entire
policy
manual.
So
there's
locations
on
our
police
department
website
where
we
could
house
that.
M
Thank
you
very
much.
Vice
mayor
go
ahead.
T
So
I
wanted
just
an
assurance
in
order
to
support
it.
I
would
want
a
little
more
assurance
that
the
psab
would
be
able
to
review
the
manual.
Not
just
you
know,
staff
can
decide,
but
but
some
kind
of
review
that's
a
little
more
open.
Y
I
was
actually
going
to
add
on
to
chris's
response
on
the
you
know,
public
nature
of
the
mou
and
the
procedure
manual
once
they're
created
that
you
know,
as
he
noted,
that
there
are
places
that
that
information
lives
for
the
purposes
of
transparency
and
accountability
already
on
the
website,
and
these
would
be
added
to
that.
But
it's
also
in
the
mou
that
there
is
the
expectation
of
ongoing
communication
and
clarity
around
the
program
that
we
could
develop
ways
to
share
that
information
with
the
school
community
above
and
beyond.
Y
What
would
just
be
more
kind
of
available
as
a
repository
on
the
website
and
then
the
question
from
council
member
hit
vice
mayor
hicks.
Would
you
restate
that
please.
T
So
my
understanding
from
the
council
member
matacek,
the
maker
of
the
motion,
was
it
was
staff's
discretion
whether
it
was
brought
to
the
whether
the
manual
was
brought
to
the
psab,
and
I
just
want
some
more
opportunity
for
not
just
you
know,
making
sure
that
once
it's
done,
it's
posted
somewhere,
where
you
know
transparency
in
terms
of
people
being
able
to
read
it
over.
But
some
kind
of
review
and
input
is
what
I
had
wanted.
A
Anything
else
audrey.
A
D
D
I
think
if
we
don't
have
transparency
about
those
steps,
then
it
really
raises
the
question
of.
Why
is
the
transparency
not
there
and
the
pcb
has
a
significant
investment
in
this
process?
D
400
people
from
the
community,
that's
more
than
the
number
of
people
who
have
commented
on
the
downtown,
but
400
people
from
the
community
have
taken
time
to
participate
and
if
we
wait
for
them
to
discover
that
it's
on
a
web
page
somewhere,
rather
than
giving
an
actual
posted
notice
of
a
time
to
give
comment,
then
I
I
I
feel
like
we
really
aren't
keeping
faith
with
the
public
and-
and
I
don't
think
we
should
fear
the
input
from
the
public
and
hide
from
it
and
try
to
not
have
it
on
a
public
agenda.
D
F
Sorry,
I'm
having
trouble
unmuting
tonight.
I
don't
think
we're
trying
to
hide
anything
or
not
have
this
discussed.
I
feel
like
a
lot
of
the
things
that
I
think
are
going
to
be
in
the
manual
have
been
discussed
by
the
psab
and
nvpd
has
participated
in
those
discussions
and
have
heard
what
their
thoughts
are.
So
I
I
don't
have
any
problem.
Having
the
psab
take
a
look
at
this,
I
don't
think
we're
trying
to
hide
it.
F
I
was
responding
to
the
comment
the
mayor
made
about
there's
so
much
on
their
agenda.
Do
we
really
want
to
add
more
to
it,
but
I'm
fine
either
way,
and
I'm
happy
to
include
that
in
the
motion
that
the
manual
will
be
discussed
at
a
psap
meeting.
A
And
then
we'll
check
with
the
secondary
council
member
abi
toga.
Are
you
comfortable
with
that
edition.
A
Thank
you
any
other
comments,
so
then,
to
restate
the
motion:
it's
a
motion
made
by
council
member
matajak
seconded
by
councilmember
robbie
toga,
to
approve
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
addition
that
and
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong,
it
would
be
the
ysu
procedure
manual,
which
would
return
to
the
psab
in
a
future
agenda
for
discussion.
A
C
E
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
staff
for
the
presentation
and
work
on
this
issue.
That
concludes
item
8.1.
I
think,
technically,
a
motion
to
continue
the
meeting.
Past
10
o'clock
might
be
necessary,
even
though
only
item
nine
remains
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
make
that
motion.
Is
there
a
second
council
member
showalter
a.
A
E
A
I
have
a
very
brief
one
in
accordance
with
city
council
policy
a2,
I
would
like
to
report
that
I
attended
the
u.s
conference
of
mayors
meeting
in
washington
dc
from
january
18th
through
the
21st
2022,
and
I,
if,
if
it
weren't
so
late,
I
would
provide
a
brief
report
on
on
what
I
did
there.
In
short,
I
participated
in
a
number
of
programs
related
primarily
to
the
arpa
funds,
the
bipartisan
infrastructure
law,
small
business
relief
and
workforce
development
council,
member
robbie
hogan.
V
Thank
you
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
report
out
on
a
couple
things.
I
know
several
of
us
were
at
the
joint
venture.
Silicon
valley
hosted
bike
super
highway
forum,
which
was
very
interesting
also
with
silicon
valley,
clean
energy.
I
just
ended
my
chair
ship
and
the
new
chair
is
council,
member
liz
gibbons
from
campbell,
and
the
vice
chair
is
council.
Member
george
tyson.
Actually,
I
think,
he's
mayor
now,
george
tyson
from
los
altos
hills.
We
also
met
with
the
svce
staff.
V
We
did
the
reach
codes,
as
you
remember,
back
in
2019
every
three
years.
The
building
codes
has
a
revision
time
frame
so
we're
in
that
next
cycle.
V
So,
as
we
are
looking
at
reach,
codes
2.0
and
what
that
could
be
so
svce
staff
is
reaching
out
to
all
the
cities
and
we'll
be
providing
some
options
and
recommendations.
I
believe
in
the
near
future
also,
I
am
a
part
of,
as
mentioned
the
bay
area,
housing
finance
authority.
V
This
is
a
part
of
mtc
a
bag
and
looking
for
ways
to
fund
affordable
housing,
we,
the
bafa,
we
call
it
received
a
20
million
dollar
grant
from
the
state
to
kind
of
kick
start
things.
I
brought
this
up
before.
V
The
continued
focus
is
on
some
kind
of
bond
measure
down
the
road,
a
regional
bond
measure
to
be
able
to
provide
financing
for
affordable
housing
projects,
as
I
think
I
mentioned
they
polled
it
didn't
do
the
poll
didn't
do
well,
so
they
chose
not
to
move
forward
with
a
ballot
measure
this
year.
Apparently
there
was
an
attempt
to
do
a
statewide
ballot
measure,
but
that
too
did
not
pull
well,
so
that's
been
pulled
back,
so
it
looks
like
2024.
V
Maybe
this
earliest
a
ballot
measure
would
happen
if
it
happens,
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
announce,
I
think
she's
fine
with
it,
but
happy
news.
Our
former
mayor,
councilmember,
ellen
commay
had
a
healthy
baby
boy
on
sunday
and
she
and
her
the
family
are
doing
well
she's
and
still
in
the
hospital
recovering,
but
he's
beautiful
and
healthy,
and
so
congratulations
to
her.
Thank
you.
M
F
So
I
just
want
to
report
that
I
participated
in
a
board
mediating
of
the
bay
area,
water
supply
and
conservation
agency
bosco
for
short,
and
each
time
we
have
a
meeting,
we
get
an
update
on
the
water
situation
and
remember
that
mountain
view
gets
the
vast
majority
of
their
water
from
the
sfpuc's
regional
water
system,
and
it's
great
that
we
had
such
incredible
rains,
which
is
a
precipitation
in
december,
because
that
certainly
helped
the
situation
with
water
storage
and,
while
we're
still
not
out
of
the
woods
when
it
comes
to
the
drought
and
it
certainly
improved
things.
F
The
system
that
we
rely
on
is
now
at
74.7
percent
of
the
total
system-
storage,
which
is
below
the
normal
for
this
time
of
year,
which
is
81.6
percent.
But
they
are
forecasting
that
we
should
get
a
little
bit
more
rain
in
february,
which
will
help
we.
There
was
a
chart
that
showed
for
each
of
the
reservoirs
throughout
the
state
of
california,
where
they
were
versus
average,
and
it
was
really
interesting
to
see
the
differences
across
the
state
and
how
much
some
had
improved
with
the
rains
we
had
in
december.
F
So
I
feel,
like
I
say
this
every
time.
I
always
want
to
remind
folks,
though,
that,
even
though
we
had
those
wonderful
rains,
we
still
need
to
conserve
water
and
sfpuc
has
adopted
the
10
percent
system-wide
voluntary
water
reduction
target,
and
we
appreciate
every
appreciate
everyone's
efforts
to
conserve
water.
It
helps
and
we
need
to
keep
on
doing
it.
Thanks.
G
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
bcdc.
I
attended
the
environmental
justice
meeting
on
committee
meeting
on
january
18th
and
we
are
working
on
with
our
environmental
justice
advisors
on
getting
a
directory
of
community-based
organizations
around
the
whole
bay
area
region,
who
might
be
good
groups
to
work
with
when
environmental
justice
issues
came
up
from
place
to
place
and
then,
on
the
board
meeting
on
january
20th,
we
had
a
very
significant
discussion
of
bay
adapt.
Thank
you,
everybody
for
supporting
bay,
adapt
on
the
consent
calendar.
G
Today
we
are
part
of
about,
I
think
30
plus
organizations
that
have
passed
the
resolution
to
date
and
the
idea
for
the
next
steps
is
is
basically
that
bcdc
will
function
as
a
backbone
agency
for
moving
forward
with
sea
level
rise
planning,
and
we
we
went
back
and
forth
about
what
a
backbone
agency
is,
and
as
that
gets
clarified,
I
will
explain
it
to
you
better,
but
but
but
basically
it
really
means
that
we
conceptually
lead
the
efforts,
but
in
collaboration
with
lots
of
other
regional
agencies,
as
has
been
going
on,
it's
it's
bay
area,
regional
collaborative
is
part
of
it.
G
Mtc
is
part
of
it.
Abag
is
part
of
it.
The
coastal
conservative
city
is
part
of
it,
and
so
is
the
the
california
water
boards,
and
so
is
the
san
francisco
estuary
partnership,
and
I
wouldn't
be
at
all
surprised
if
more
groups
join
over
time.
So,
oh
then
I
wanted
to
share
that
today.
G
The
national
league
of
cities,
energy
environment
and
natural
resources
committee
met
for
the
first
time
this
year
and
we
basically
just
introduced
ourselves
to
each
other
and
talked
about
what
are
the
jobs
of
serving
on
one
of
these
policy
committees.
It's
basically
to
develop
the
policy
recommendations
for
nlc
to
help
nlc
advocate
for
these
policies
and
then
to
share
best
practices
and
supposedly
we'll
have
three
mean
three
annual
meetings
in
person
this
year.
D
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I
appreciate
hearing
from
my
my
bae
sister
about
everything
that
bcdc
is
doing
and
I
am
serving
on
the
the
board
of
the
san
francisco
bay
restoration
authority,
and
we
also
have
a
very
good
emphasis
on
working
with
the
environmental
justice
groups,
and
so
I
think
I
can
share
some
sources
there
with
you
and
with
bcdc,
and
I
wanted
to
recognize
that
this
week
we
recognized
ed
roberts
day
in
california
and
ed
roberts
was
considered.
D
Ed
roberts
also
taught
a
class
in
conjunction
with
foothill
college
during
the
60s
and
was
one
of
the
first
students
to
attend
uc
berkeley
as
a
student
with
disabilities,
and
there
are
now
many
who
are
inheritors
of
the
genius
of
ed
roberts,
and
so
I
wanted
to
raise
his
name
here
and
say
that
he
is
still
remembered
in
our
area
and
that
we
can
have
policy
development
that
is
very
successful
around
empowering
people
with
disabilities
and
providing
for
good
and
meaningful
lives
that
help
them
reach
their
dreams.
So
viva,
ed
roberts,.