►
From YouTube: June 27, 2023 Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council, Shoreline Regional Park Community, MVCFIA
Description
Live teleconference of the Joint Meeting of Mountain View City Council (Regular), Shoreline Regional Park Community (Special), and City of Mountain View Capital Improvements Financing Authority (Special) scheduled for Tuesday, June 27, 2023.
B
A
Thank
you
we'll
now
move
to
item
3.1
on
our
agenda:
the
community
Workforce
agreement
for
city
capital
projects.
The
purpose
of
this
study
session
is
to
provide
the
city
council
with
an
overview
of
community
Workforce
agreements,
including
major
considerations
associated
with
their
adoption
staff,
seeks
Council
Direction
on
policy
guidance
related
to
a
recommended
schedule
and
a
process
for
adoption
of
a
CWA
and
guiding
principles
for
an
agreement.
D
D
The
council
strategic
work
plan
includes
a
priority:
a
project
to
negotiate
a
community
Workforce
agreement
or
CWA.
At
this
study
session
staff
will
provide
an
overview
of
cwa's,
including
potential
agreement
provisions.
Staff
will
also
present
a
recommended
adoption
process
and
guiding
principles
for
Council
consideration
and
direction.
D
D
D
Typically,
a
CWA
binds
both
contractors
and
subcontractors
working
on
the
city's
construction
project.
It
sets
standards
for
wages
and
benefits,
prohibits,
strikes
or
slow
downs
that
could
delay.
Construction
requires
hiring
from
union
hiring
halls,
with
a
small
number
of
contractor
core
workers
possibly
allowed
and
requires
non-union
workers
to
pay
dues
or
fees
to
the
union
while
employed
on
the
project.
D
Mountain
View
has
not
previously
entered
into
project
labor
agreements
for
any
of
our
projects.
Therefore,
we
do
not
have
direct
experience
in
determining
CWA
Provisions
that
will
work
well
for
our
community
to
learn
more
about
the
opportunities
challenges
and
Provisions
of
cwas
Staff
reviewed
cwas
and
various
staff
reports
from
14
agencies
in
California.
D
A
key
negotiated
provision
of
a
CDA
CWA
is
establishing
a
construction
cost
threshold
contractors
and
subcontractors
working
on
a
city
project
with
a
total
construction
costs
that
exceeds
the
threshold
would
be
subject
to
the
CWA.
As
can
be
seen
here.
The
project
thresholds
used
by
the
three
agencies
in
Santa
Clara
County,
are
2
million
and
3
million
dollars.
D
D
The
study
session
memo
provides
11
examples
of
negotiated
exclusions
from
peer
agency.
Cwas
examples
include:
limiting
the
CWA
to
City
Construction
contracts
and
not
applying
to
projects
receiving
city
funding
that
are
being
constructed
by
others
and
exempting
certain
types
of
projects
such
as
Street
sewer,
water
maintenance,
building
maintenance
are
have
been
negotiated
by
San
Jose.
As
you
can
see
here,.
D
Based
on
the
experience
of
other
agencies,
some
of
the
potential
challenges
with
the
CWA
include
administrative
costs
and
workload
impacts,
project
delays
due
to
lack
of
bids
or
high
bids
and
contractors
choosing
not
to
bid
because
they
have
a
standing
Workforce.
They
cannot
use
having
to
pay
for
double
benefits,
increasing
their
costs
and
making
their
bids
less
competitive
or
for
smaller
contractors.
Finding
the
requirements
difficult
or
too
burdensome.
D
The
staff
memo
also
highlights
that
the
2023
bid,
experience
to
date
has
been
troubling,
with
only
one
bid
on
most
projects
higher
bids
and
a
higher
use
of
subcontractors.
Now
this
is
very
raw
data.
We
do
not
know
exactly
what
this
would
mean
when
trying
to
apply
a
CWA
to
these
projects,
and
this
is,
we
will
find
as
partis
test
recommendations
and
need
to
do
a
deeper
Dive
by
talking
to
contractors
to
understand
this
further.
D
Some
of
the
challenges
that
the
city
could
experience
may
be
able
to
be
addressed
in
negotiations,
including
setting
a
higher
cost
threshold
to
help
manage
workload.
Administrative
costs
impacts,
while
taking
advantage
of
the
capacity
of
larger
projects
for
higher
apprenticeship
pre-apprenticeship
targets.
D
It
may
also
be
desirable
to
negotiate
exemptions
for
certain
types
of
projects
and
provide
flexibility
to
rebid
without
the
CWA.
There
may
also
be
a
discussion
about
carve
outs
for
small
or
disadvantaged
contractors.
However,
we
should
note
that
other
agencies
in
our
area
have
had
limited
to
no
success
in
negotiating
some
of
these
types
of
provisions.
D
While
the
review
of
other
agencies
experiences
have
been
informative,
each
agency
is
different
in
their
goals
and
needs.
For
this
reason,
staff
recommends
we
first
conduct
Outreach
to
stakeholders
such
as
the
labor
organization's
contractors
and
other
interested
parties
before
Council
provides
Direction
on
the
provisions
of
a
CWA
for
Mountain
View.
D
A
E
Yes,
good
afternoon,
mayor
Hicks
and
member
members
of
the
city
council,
I
would
like
to
first
thank
the
city
of
Mountain
View
staff
for
the
thorough
presentation
I
look
forward
to
working
together
on
creating
and
administering
a
pla
that
works,
sort
of
CWA
that
works
for
Mountain
View,
as
staff
at
other
public
entities
have
discovered.
The
agreement
once
negotiated
will
create
a
more
professional
construction
environment
and
may
lead
to
less
of
an
administrative
burden
rather
than
more.
E
There
are
a
number
of
benefits
associated
with
a
with
cwas,
but
I'd
like
to
focus
on
those
that
will
have
the
most
significant
impact
for
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
its
businesses
and
its
residents.
First,
the
CWA
is
a
signal
to
low
road
contractors
to
the
city
is
requiring
a
higher
standard
of
Contracting.
It's
also
a
signal
to
High
Road
contractors
that
the
high
standards
that
they
bring
are
welcome
in
Mountain
View.
E
E
Second,
as
you
can
see
from
the
staff
report,
Table
Six
bids
in
Mountain
View
are
regularly
going
far
over
the
engineer's
estimate,
with
change
orders
and
delays
caused
by
hiring
unethical
firms.
These
costs
increase
even
more
potentially
popping
the
city's
Capital
Improvement
budget,
with
the
more
ethical
bidding
pool
provided
by
a
CWA.
The
city
will
experience
more
construction,
that
is
on
time
and
on
budget
third.
Small
construction,
businesses
in
and
around
Mountain
View
will
have
a
greater
opportunity
to
secure
work,
as
described
in
material
previously
submitted
to
this
Council.
E
A
CWA
allows
small
non-union
contractors
to
save
up
to
30
percent
of
their
payroll
taxes
by
accessing
multi-employer
health
care
and
pension
programs.
It
also
allows
them
access
to
highly
skilled
and
trained
union
labor,
which
otherwise
can
only
be
accessed
through
a
master
collective
bargaining
agreement.
E
E
I
will
conclude
by
saying
that
there
are
a
handful
of
people
who
will
be
happy
to
tell
you
why
they
think
a
CWA
is
bad
and
would
be
a
catastrophe,
and
all
you
need
to
do
is
look
to
other
local
agencies
such
as
the
county,
the
city
of
San,
Jose,
Foothill,
De,
Anza,
Community,
College,
District
and
others
who
have
entered
cwas,
not
just
once
but
multiple
times.
The
leaders
of
these
agencies
are
people
we
know
and
admire,
and
it's
not
a
great
risk
to
follow
in
their
footsteps.
E
A
F
Good
evening,
mayor
Hicks
and
council
members,
my
name
is
Clint
Steele
I'm,
a
business
representative
for
operating
engineers,
local
3
Union,
and
we
have.
We
cover
four
different
states.
We
are
close
to
about
40
000
members,
strong
in
all
four
states,
encompassing
four
states
I'm
here
to
talk
about
a
community
Workforce
agreement,
we'll
provide
a
Target
hiring
program
for
Mountain
View
residents
through
the
targeting
orientation
program.
F
The
Santa,
Clara,
County,
Trade,
trades
orientation
program.
Aka
top
is
a
comprehensive
apprenticeship,
Readiness
program
that
provides
a
pathway
into
construction
apprenticeship
programs
like
which
oe3
has
a
great
apprenticeship
program
for
this
disadvantage
and
under
representative
represented
community
members.
F
The
CWA
will
connect
the
top
program
graduates
with
contractors
working
on
a
city
project
and
with
the
apprenticeship
program
as
well.
The
targeted
higher
pathway
and
the
top
program
provide
family
support
lifetime
careers
to
the
people
of
our
community,
and
it
does
this
at
no
cost
to
the
city
or
the
student.
Please
make
these
benefits
a
priority
for
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
Thank
you.
G
Up
all
right,
thank
you.
Yes,
this
is
Beth
Fisher
from
the
Santa
Clara
and
San
Bernardino
County
Building
Trades
Council
good
evening,
mayor
and
city
council.
I
wanted
to
talk
about
the
benefits
of
small
businesses
working
on
community
Workforce
agreement
projects
cwas
actually
provide
a
financial
advantage
to
small
non-union
businesses.
G
The
CWA
sets
the
basic
terms
and
conditions
for
all
contractors
and
the
non-union
contractors
actually
gain
unprecedented
access
to
multi-employer
benefit
plans
which
would
normally
only
be
offered
to
the
union
signatory
contractors.
This
access
to
the
multi-employer
plans
allows
them
to
pay
20
to
35
percent
prevailing
wage
as
actual
benefits
to
workers,
and
this
reduces
the
payroll
tax
burden
by
20
to
35
percent.
G
The
cost
savings
can
be
reflected,
then,
in
a
lower
bid,
increasing
competitiveness
on
projects
and
giving
the
contractors
a
better
chance
to
secure
the
job
After
experiencing
the
advantages
of
a
partnership
with
a
union
through
a
community
Workforce
agreement.
Many
contractors
actually
choose
to
extend
the
partnership
to
non-cwa
jobs
and
become
signatory
to
the
union.
Companies
that
experience
the
cost
savings,
flexible
access
to
Skilled
and
trained
labor
and
the
reduction
of
In-House
labor
Administration
are
more
likely
to
be
unions
as
a
good
business
decision
and
I.
Thank
you
for
the
time.
G
H
So
you
heard
a
few
of
the
other
speakers
mention
our
program,
which
is
the
trades
orientation
program
since
2015
we've
supported
and
trained
over
550
disadvantaged
community
members
in
Santa
Clara
County
to
enter
construction
careers
through
Partnerships,
with
the
Building
Trades
apprenticeships,
with
the
contractors
and
with
public
agencies
like
cities
and
counties,
water
districts
and
so
forth.
Who
support
and
promote
targeted,
hiring
in
community
Workforce
agreements?
Targeted
hiring
gives
those
community
members
once
they're
they're
ready
and
have
overcome
their
barriers
and
are
ready
for
apprenticeship.
H
It
gives
them
that
critical
First
Step
as
an
entry-level
Apprentice
on
those
construction
projects.
By
providing
that
first
step,
a
community
Workforce
agreement
can
help
expand
the
pipeline
by
creating
more
opportunities.
More
hiring.
To
get
on
that
pathway
to
apprenticeship
and
to
a
lifelong
career
for
apprenticeship
is
on-the-job,
training
for
on-the-job
training
to
work
there
need
to
be
jobs
and
by
including
Apprentice
ratios
and
targeted
hiring
Provisions
committee.
H
Working
Partnerships
is
also
in
the
process
of
receiving
a
generous
Grant
from
the
city
of
Mountain
View
to
help
us
Provide
support
for
Mountain
View
residents
to
overcome
barriers
and
get
into
apprenticeships.
This
is
the
other
half
of
that.
This
community
Workforce
agreement
would
help
ensure
that
there
are
jobs
and
opportunities
for
those
residents
once
we
help
prepare
them
so
that
they
can
enter
and
succeed
into
the
careers.
So
I
urge
you
to
consider
strongly
passing
this
community
Workforce
agreement,
making
it
as
broad
as
possible.
H
I
also
understand
that
your
work
working
on
160
million
dollar
public
safety
building.
That
could
be
a
tremendous
opportunity
for
community
members
to
get
their
start
in
apprenticeship
and
have
a
stable
job
where
they
can
learn
and
be
on
the
job
for
several
years.
Building
that
project
so
I
strongly
hope
that
this
process
can
be
completed
in
time
to
apply
to
that
project
as
well
as
others.
Thank
you.
J
Hello,
mayor
and
Council,
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
hear
us
out
today.
My
name
is
Keith
Silva
I'm,
a
Sheet
Metal,
Workers,
Local
104
and,
like
some
of
these
other
speakers,
I
represent
a
bunch
of
members
not
just
in
Santa
Clara
County,
but
throughout
the
state
cwa's
efficiently
implement
the
purpose
of
the
prevailing
wage
law.
Prevailing
wage
is
meant
to
ensure
industry
standards
such
as
Career
Training,
health
care
and
retirement
security.
J
Unfortunately,
even
though
prevailing
wage
policy
mandates
that
employers
provide
the
money
for
these
essential
benefits,
it
does
not
mandate
that
the
employers
actually
provide
these
benefits.
Instead,
many
employers
provide
them
as
taxable
wage
which
cheats
the
worker
out
of
the
essential
services
and
increases
their
loss
to
payroll
taxes.
K
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Eric
Christian
I'm,
the
executive
director
of
the
Coalition
for
Fair
Employment
and
construction
Coalition
was
formed
25
years
ago
by
Union
and
non-union
construction
firms
solely
to
oppose
discriminatory
and
wasteful
project
labor
agreements.
Thank
you
for
this
time
tonight.
I
wanted
to
share
with
you
a
couple
of
points
and
then
pose
some
questions.
Number
one.
In
the
era
of
macro
inflation,
record
macro
inflation
and
micro,
inflation,
meaning
in
the
industry
itself,
where
you
have
too
few
bidders
already
for
the
projects
that
are
out
there.
K
Why
would
you
consider
anything
that
would
reduce
that
bid
force?
Your
Staff
Zone
report
showed
what
you're
getting
for
bidders
right
now
and
that
it
is
a
problem
and
attempting
to
do
something
like
this,
which
would
make
it
even
more
difficult.
Just
does
not
make
any
sense.
It
seems
to
be
a
solution
in
search
of
a
problem.
The
reality
is
according
to
the
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics
in
the
country
and
in
California
88
of
the
construction
Workforce
chooses
to
wake
up
and
work
in
a
union-free
environment.
K
Now
those
workers
could
take
their
valued
skill
sets
and
work
anywhere.
They
wish
many
work
in
the
unions,
but
a
vast
majority
work
on
the
non-union
side.
They
could
choose
to
work
Union
tomorrow.
If
that's
what
they
want
to
do,
because
there
are
not
enough
blue-collar
workers
out
there
in
the
trades
as
it
is,
but
they
choose
to
work
where
they
are
and
they
shouldn't
be
compelled
to
work
under
a
pla
that
all,
but
implicitly
enforces
them
to
have
to
be
Union
as
a
condition
of
employment.
K
So
just
consider
that
please
there's
four
Provisions
within
a
pla.
That's
really
what
they're
all
about
everything
else
is
a
smoke
screen.
If
you
will
first
provision
forces
a
non-union
contractor
to
use
only
a
couple
of
their
own
workers,
the
rest
have
to
come
from
a
union
hiring
Hall,
so
the
contractor
has
to
work
with
people.
He
has
no
relationship
with.
Secondly,
the
anonymity
worker
has
to
pay
dues
to
a
union.
He
doesn't
wish
to
belong
to
now
quote
unquote.
He
isn't
a
member
of
the
Union,
but
he
still
has
to
pay
dues.
K
K
Finally,
I'd
ask
that
you
do
with
the
San
Jose
Unified
School
District
did
and
the
East
Bay
Municipal
Utility
District
did
when
they
rejected
plas
by
going
out
to
your
contractors
that
you've
done
who
have
done
work
for
you
and
surveying
them
to
find
out
what
their
thoughts
are
on
a
project
labor
agreement
when
those
two
entities
did
that
they
found
they
would
lose
50
percent
of
their
bidders
and
they
rejected
project
labor
agreements.
Thank
you
for
your
time
tonight.
L
L
L
So
yeah
I
just
want
to
talk
about
the
the
cwa's
they
can
be
found
throughout
the
you
know
the
Bay
Area
and
have
become
established
policy.
They
bring
numerous
benefits.
Some,
including
they'll,
Leverage
The,
the
resources
of
the
construction
industry
to
to
bring
Superior
construction
to
the
city
of
Mountain
View
projects.
L
Cwa
is
also
ensure
projects
are
completed
on
time.
They
prevent
serious
delays
by
providing
alternatives
to
work,
stoppages
and
attract
the
most
professional
of
contractors
who
know
how
to
properly
plan
and,
more
importantly,
execute
a
project,
and
it
and
cwa's
also
will
save
money
not
only
in
the
short
term,
but
also
in
the
long
term,
as
the
high
quality
construction
will
extend
usable
life
of
the
project
and
reduce
repairs.
M
M
California
Carpenters
Local,
405
and
I'm
here
to
talk
about
that.
Neither
the
cwas
that
improve
actually
improve
and
actually
help
our
our
working
force
by
implementing
Healthcare
apprenticeship
programs
are
actually
by
the
state
of
California
that
have
proven
that
from
four
years
most
of
the
construction
workers
get
a
get
actual
the
journey
out
and
they
were
able
to
accomplish
a
project
to
the
highest
standards.
M
Local
hire,
basically
keeping
our
employees
local,
ensuring
that
they're
actually
able
to
work
in
their
communities
and
not
pushing
their
members
that
are
out
of
work
out
of
our
communities
as
it's
happening
now
and
the
best.
The
only
thing
is
that
it
prevents
a
lot
of
wage
theft,
wage
step
and
taxed
fraud,
which
happens
more
than
often
and
I.
M
A
N
B
D
O
Thank
you,
first
of
all,
as
to
the
size
of
the
projects
that
it
would
apply
to
I.
Think
actually,
Don
can
probably
speak
to
that
she's.
There's
a
list
in
your
in
your
documents.
It
sounds
like
it's
roughly
somewhere
between
1
million
and
20
million.
Depending
on
again
what
threshold
you
were
to
negotiate.
D
N
D
So
I'll
set
the
stage
and
allow
you
to
finish,
and
just
again,
as
you
were
mentioning
historically,
the
city's
capital
projects
have
have
been
some.
Some
are
under
a
million.
Many
are
in
the
one
to
five
million
seven
million
stage
and
occasionally
in
the
past,
we've
had
something
at
20
or
25
million.
As
you
may
recall,
from
The
Five-Year
cips
that
you
you've
been
reviewing
and
are
set
to
approve
tonight.
D
We
do
have
a
lot
of
high
cost
capital
projects
that
we
would
like
to
do
on
the
books
and
we're
going
to
be
seeing
more
and
more
projects
that
are
in
the
25
to
40
million
dollar
range
over
the
next
several
years.
As
was
mentioned,
the
public
safety
building,
of
course,
is
definitely
an
outlier
for
us.
It
will
be
a
well
over
100
million
dollar
construction,
so
we
are
seeing
the
cost
the
the
size
of
the
projects
we're
taking
on
Trend
up
and
then
there's
the
inflationary
costs.
D
O
Sure
so
most
of
the
Union
Master
agreements,
specify
and
and
state
law
to
some
extent
specifies
what
the
ratio
permissible
ratio
of
apprentices
to
journey
level
employees
are
in
in
different
situations,
there's
a
little
bit
of
variation
between
the
trades
and
actually
Mr.
Beanie
probably
could
speak
to
that
more
specifically,
the
one
of
the
challenges
of,
in
my
view,
of
a
pla
like
this
is
that
when
you
have
sporadic
work,
it's
a
little
harder
for
the
trades,
I
think
and
I'd
like
to
you
know.
O
Mr
Beanie
may
have
a
thought
about
this
to
plan
for
how
much
how
many
apprentices
they
could
hire
more
than
they
would
otherwise
have
hired.
So
the
real
question
is
so
an
apprenticeship
is
at
many
levels,
so
it
takes
multiple
years.
So
there
are
two
different
questions.
One
is
how
many
apprentices
will
you
employ
on
the
project
and
then
the
other
is-
and
this
is
the
one
that
that
most
of
my
clients
really
want
to
know.
The
most
I
think
is
how
you
know
how
many
new
apprentices
will
this?
O
Will
our
work
employ
or
or
bring
or
allow
you
to
bring
into
the
trades?
And
you
know
the
answer:
I
think
you
know
and
I'm
not
really
I
guess
I'd
like
to
hear
from
Mr
Beanie
is
I.
Think
it's
very
challenging
when
you
have
sporadic
work
like
this,
it's
much
easier
when
you
have
when
you
have
a
larger
project
like
a
20
million
or
more
project,
and
so
I
I
I.
You
know
and
again
you
have
multiple
trades
as
well.
O
P
And
vice
mayor
I'll,
just
add,
contractually
speaking
in
a
lot
of
the
peer
review
that
we
did,
they
will
add
kind
of
a
increment
of
dollar
value
that
will
then
warrant
x
amount
of
apprentices.
So,
for
instance,
it
looks
like
the
first
threshold
is
for
the
first
million
dollars
that
warrants
one
Apprentice.
P
They
have
also
tried
to
craft
it
where
to
Mr
holtzman's
comment.
It
would
be
one
new
apprentice
and
usually
some
type
of
local
orientation
for
that
apprentice,
and
then
in
some
of
the
agreements,
we
then
see
the
next
break
point
around
five
million,
so
5
million
would
then
be
get
another
apprentice
and
I
have
seen
agreements
where
it
is
by
trade
Council.
So,
for
instance,
if
it
is
a
larger
project
with
multiple
trade
councils
working
on
it
and
then
a
large
dollar
volume,
you
could
end
up
with
a
pretty
good
amount
of
apprentices.
A
S
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
to
staff
for
bringing
this
to
us.
I
am
pretty
easy,
went
into
I
support.
Both
items.
I
I,
want
to
say
just
wanted
to
say
a
few
things
as
I
am
I.
I
was
a
signer
to
the
pla
for
the
VTA
Bart
phase,
one
project
back
when
I
was
chair
of
the
VTA
board,
so
I
I
have
some
experience
in
a
lot
of
our
transportation
projects.
S
Frankly,
do
are
covered
by
plas
with
the
BART
project,
so
the
actually
folks
were
amazed,
but
and
but
that
project
came
under
budget
by
a
hundred
million
dollars,
and
so
that
was
when
a
a
big
source
of
Pride
for
for
our
organization
and
I
think
the
pla
was
a
big
part
of
creating
creating
that
savings.
So
I,
you
know
fully
support
support.
S
Moving
forward
with
this
I
wanted
to
mention
Mr
Steele
Steele
we
mentioned
the
tops
program
and
I
was
very
happy
that
we
were
able
to
actually
fund
that
program
with
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
that's
why
I'm
excited
about
the
possibility
of
this
and
kind
of
creating
a
Continuum
as
we
support
the
these
apprenticeship
programs.
The
hope
is
that
we
will
actually
have
folks
from
that
program
be
able
to
come
and
work
on
our
projects
down
the
road.
The
one
area
and
I
know
that
we
received
some
emails
about
dbes
disadvantaged
business
enterprises.
S
T
Thank
you
mayor
so
for
question.
One
I
am
I.
Concur
with
the
recommended
time
frame
and
adoption
process
like
council
member
Abba
Koga
there
there
is
the
Hope
for
robust,
Outreach
and
I
know
that
staff
will
do
its
due
diligence
on
that.
Regarding
question
number
two:
one
of
the
things
I'm
thinking
about
in
terms
of
guiding
principles
and
and
The
Guiding
principles.
We
have
are
great
one
thing,
I
kind
of
noticed.
T
A
R
R
I
certainly
heard
the
comments
about
the
pros
and
cons
of
these
and
I
think
the
next
time
we
discuss
this
I
would
kind
of
like
to
have
like
one
level
deeper
on
those.
So
I
have
a
better
understanding,
but
I
do
support
well,
I,
yes
to
question
one
and
two.
To
put
it
briefly,
but
I
would
add
that
you
know
you
mentioned
a
potentially
short-term
agreement.
R
It
also
might
just
be
a
pilot,
so
we
pick
a
few
projects
that
would
really
highlight
both
the
pros
and
cons
of
these
and
I.
Don't
know
what
those
would
be,
but
I
would
leave
that
up
to
staff
to
decide
that
might
be
an
alternative
to
a
short-term
agreement.
We
just
say
for
these
three
projects
or
something
so
I'm
very
open
to
that.
If
that
would
make
sense,
but
yes
and
yes
for
me,
thank
you.
N
I
I
really
am
interested
in
the
apprenticeship
and
the
process
and
and
helping
people
get
educated
to
be
the
skilled
workers
of
you
know
of
tomorrow.
So
to
me,
that's
you
know,
I
like
to
maximize
the
most
that
as
much
as
practicable
and
that
you
know
I
know
that
varies
depending
on
kind
of
Union
and
various
other
things,
but
that
to
me
is
very
socially
important.
N
I
I'm
also
concerned
about
specialized
contractors.
You
know
having
worked
on
projects
with
doing
restoration
work
where
you
have,
you
know,
biologists,
and
that
that
grow
plants
and
things
like
that
that
are
very
specialized
they're,
not
necessarily,
you
know
very
sophisticated
from
a
business
point
of
view.
So
I
am
concerned
with
how
that's
that
kind
of
thing
is
taken.
N
Care
of
I
can
imagine,
for
instance,
on
a
big
project
even
like
our
our
public,
our
public
safety
building,
which
seems
like
a
you
know,
good
example
that
the
Landscaping
could
be
quite
specialized
and
we
might
not
want
I
mean
it
might
be
too
complicated
for
somebody
to
have
a
ple
or
a
CWA
with
that.
I
really
don't
know,
but
it's
something
I'm
concerned
about
and
I
thought
that
Emily's
comment
about.
We
do
want
to
take
care
of
workers.
I
mean
that's.
We
do
want
to
do
that.
N
We
know
that
that's
in
everybody's
best
interest
and
but
at
the
same
time
I
also
I,
like
I,
like
the
there's,
always
a
balance
to
everything,
and
this
ensure
that
the
city's
capital
projects
will
continue
to
be
delivered
in
a
timely
and
cost-effective
manner.
I
think
that's
really.
You
know
that
is
also
quite
important.
So
and
oh
then,
the
last
thing
I
wanted
to
bring
up
is
our
day
workers
Center,
you
know
the
day.
Workers
are
a
very
important.
N
A
staff
organization
in
our
community
I
think
they've
been
around
for
25,
maybe
30
years,
and
they
really
you
know
they
really
feel
an
important
social
Niche
and
and
help
people
to
get
employment
and
skills.
So
I
would
like
to
understand
how
is
there
a
way
to
help
them
connect
with
the
apprenticeships
programs
and
that
sort
of
thing?
So
those
are
my
comments.
Thank
you
very
much
appreciated
the
report.
It
really
was
well
written.
U
Thank
you
so
for
question.
One
yes
and
I
wanted
to
include
some
comments
about
the
Outreach
process.
Since
it
looks
like
from
the
recommended
timeline,
you
know
that
will
be
over
the
summer,
so
the
time
to
comment
is
now
and
so
for
the
Outreach
process.
I
think
it
would
be
really
great
to
keep
counsel.
U
You
know
up
to
date
on
what
the
what's
happening.
I
thought.
A
really
great
example,
was
the
displacement
response
strategy
you've
shared
with
Council
the
different
stakeholder
meetings
that
were
occurring
so
that
council
members
could
share
it
with
community
members
or
neighborhood
associations.
I
think
that
kind
of
communication
is
really
critical
so
that
we
can,
as
you
as
it
states,
have
a
robust
Outreach
process.
U
This
is
different
times
different
venues,
different
kind
of
modes
of
participation,
so
you
know
for
those
who
are
working
or
have
child
care
issues,
translation
services
that
to
make
sure
we're
capturing
everyone
and
then
for
question
two.
Yes,
I
think
for
the
guiding
principles,
as
some
of
my
colleagues
have
talked
about,
I
think
that
I'd
really
like
to
as
we're
rolling
out
our
Workforce
Development
with
the
apprenticeship
program
it'd,
be
really
great
to
hear
how
maybe
that's
like
can
tie
in
to
our
work
with
the
CWA.
U
So
I
know
that
that's
using
you
know,
one-time
art
funding,
but
I'd
really
like
to
kind
of
hear
the
interface
there
I
think
it's
a
really
great
partnership.
I
know
in
particular
Foothill
De
Anza
was
mentioned.
I
know
they
have
their
apprenticeship
program.
So
are
there
continued
partnership
opportunities
aside
just
with
working
Partnerships,
I'd.
V
C
Thank
you,
mayor,
I,
agree
with
my
colleagues
and
won't
have
much
to
add
that's
new
I.
So,
yes
to
both
questions,
I
agree
with
council
member
camay's
suggestions
to
enhance
our
Outreach
efforts
and
I
I
appreciate,
especially
the
recommendation
to
make
sure
the
council
understands
the
input
that
we're
receiving
from
different
stakeholder
groups.
C
That
would
be
ideal.
The
second
guiding
principle
that
staff
has
recommended
I
think
is
important
too
and
I
think
that's
where
the
stakeholder
research
can
help
us.
You
know
make
decisions
about,
for
instance,
what
impact
there
might
be
on
the
number
of
bids
that
we
receive
so
I'd
be
interested
in
learning
from
from
all
stakeholders,
but
I
think
the
only
other
input
I'd
provide.
Maybe
it's
too
early
to
say
this,
but
I
would
rather
give
staff
broad
latitude
in
the
negotiations.
C
A
A
This
is
the
point
where
we
often
I
would
often
go
through
the
comments
that
people
have
made
and
take
straw
votes
to
make
to
see
whether
everyone
agreed
in
this
case,
I,
think
I'm.
Assuming
that
everything
everyone
has
said
that
I
don't
have
to
go
through
that
exercise,
I'm
going
to
name
off
a
few
that
people
have
said
just
to
make
sure
we
get
them
all
down
and
because
I
personally
agreed
with
I
think
everything
that
was
said.
A
That
a
guiding
principle
we
could
add
is
that
our
workers
be
cared
for
that.
We
consider
starting
off
as
a
pilot
project
that
we'd
like
to
have
more
deep
information
on
pros
and
cons,
and
then
the
one
that
I'm
particularly
interested
in
is
Max
finding
ways
to
maximize
the
apprenticeship
program
and
work
with
our
existing
organizations,
such
as
the
day
Worker
Center,
so
to
be
sure
to
include
them
in
the
summer.
A
Outreach
also
updating
Council
regularly
on
our
summer
on
the
summer,
Outreach,
that's
being
done
and
doing
robust
Outreach
to
union
members
living
in
Mountain
View
and
seeing
how
we
can
tie
our
current
ARP
based
apprenticeship
program
in
in
with
this.
So
those
were
were
the
main
things
that
that
I
heard
and
Now's
the
Time
to
raise
your
hand
if
you
strongly
disagree
with
any
one
of
those
so
seeing
none
I,
think
that
closes
our
study
session.
Any
final
comments.
A
A
C
A
You
we're
now
on
item
number
three,
which
is
presentations.
Please
note
these
are
presentations.
Only
the
city
council
will
not
take
any
action.
A
public
comment
will
occur
after
the
presentation
items
and
if
you
would
like
to
speak
on
these
items
in
person,
please
submit
a
blue
speaker
card
to
the
city
clerk.
Now,
Spanish
translation
services
are
available
in
person
for
item
3.2.
A
Well,
I
guess
maybe
we
won't
now
hear
from
our
interpreter,
so
I
want
to
say
in
this
last
council
meeting
before
summer
break
we
have
three
proclamations,
honoring
different
communities
and
peoples
within
Mountain
View.
Those
are
a
Jewish
American
Heritage
Proclamation
and
immigrant
Heritage
Month
Proclamation
and
a
Juneteenth
Proclamation.
Our
proclamations
decry
the
Discrimination.
These
three
communities
have
faced,
but,
moreover,
celebrate
their
contributions
and
the
joy
that
diverse
communities
bring
all
of
us
in
particular
tonight
we'll
highlight
art,
historic
architecture
and
food
as
things
that
bring
us
all
together.
A
X
A
A
A
His
house
was
so
fine
that
it
was
eventually
bought
by
a
an
Arthur
freed,
who
became
our
first
City
attorney
and
our
only
congressman
and
lobbied
to
have
the
air
base.
The
Moffitt
Air
Base
in
Mountain
View.
So
altogether,
the
welheimer
family
contributed
a
great
deal
both
in
terms
of
founding
our
city
and
in
some
of
the
the
historic
buildings
that
you
see
when
you
walk
in
Downtown,
Mountain
View.
A
X
X
It's
quite
an
honor
to
be
here
representing
the
Jewish
community
of
Mountain,
View
I've
thought
of
a
couple
things
I
wanted
to
say
and
I
thought
it
would
be
amusing
if
I
put
it
to
rhyme,
so
bear
with
me
for
about
two
minutes
or
less
while
I
read
this
poem,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
gather
around
this
day
and
come
together
in
a
joyous
way
for
our
city
has
issued
a
tremendous
decree
to
honor
our
Jewish
Heritage
so
wonderfully
from
ancient
times.
To
present
days,
Jewish
Traditions
have
graced
our
ways:
culture,
art
and
wisdom.
X
They
bestow
enriching
our
community
and
helping
us
grow.
We
Embrace
diversity
with
Open
Hearts
and
recognize
the
important
of
each
unique
part
in
this
Proclamation
We
Stand
side
by
side
together
in
harmony
with
love.
As
our
guide.
Let
us
honor
the
contributions
they
bring
from
literature
and
medicine
to
the
Joy.
They
sing
their
values
of
justice
and
compassion
ring.
True
teaching
us
to
strive
for
a
world
Anew.
Today
we
affirm
our
commitment
and
embrace
the
Jewish
Heritage
with
its
beauty
and
Grace
may
it
serve
as
a
beacon
shining,
so
clear,
promoting
understanding
and
conquering
fear.
A
A
X
A
A
We've
started
out
with
architectural
history
and
we're
moving
on
to
Cuisine
and
I
wanted
to
highlight
the
program
that
reached
Silicon,
Valley
and
the
city
are
partnering
on
the
mompreneurs
program,
where
people
involved
in
the
program
get
to
achieve
their
dream
of
opening
a
restaurant
in
a
very
small
way.
So
with
that,
you
can
have
this
Proclamation
for
immigrant
heritage
month,
and
you
can.
You
can
say
a
few
words.
Z
Z
I
get
to
hear
about
their
stories
as
I
become
one
of
also
an
immigrant
at
a
three-year-old
that
came
to
this
country,
not
knowing
what
I
was
gonna
get
myself
into,
and
here
I
am
and
not
knowing
my
country,
but
thanks
to
them,
I
get
to
learn
about
my
culture,
different
traditions
and
different
things
that
happen
in
different
countries.
So
I'm
really
excited
about
that
and
I'm
just
blessed
to
work
with
them
all
the
time.
So
thank
you
for
this
opportunity.
Q
AA
Q
AA
V
AA
AB
AB
AA
A
A
A
His
name
is
Joe
Sam
and
his
artwork
is
the
running
and
joyous
boy
and
girl
that
you
see
between
the
front
doors
of
this
building
and
the
library.
So
you
can,
when
this
meeting
tonight
gets
to
a
boring
point,
you
can
all
Google
Joe
Sam
and
look
over
his
work
with
that.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
few
words
and
I'll
go
back
to
my
seat?
Okay,.
AC
I
just
want
to
thank
the
city
of
Mountain
View
for
this
recognition
and
I
am
really
proud
to
accept
this
on
behalf
of
all
the
African-Americans
and
everything
that
went
on
up
to
leading
up
to
June
10th.
So
thank
you
very
much.
If
you
want
to
know
more
about
Juneteenth
I
didn't
know
how
to
prepare
anything
I,
guess
it's
no
longer
Wikipedia,
so
consult
GPT,
I
guess
so.
Thank
you
very
much
much.
Thank
you.
A
AD
At
that
point,
however,
liberal
Mountain
views
work
on
this
preservation
campaign
wasn't
quite
done.
We
petitioned
California,
State,
Historical,
Resources
Commission,
then
traveled
to
Sacramento
for
the
commission's
hearing
on
the
buildings.
The
commission
voted
overwhelmingly
at
the
hearing
that
both
buildings
deserve
designations
historically
significant,
thus
qualifying
them
for
the
California
register
of
historical
resources,
as
well
as
eligibility
for
the
national
register
of
historic
places.
AD
I
A
AE
Evening,
everyone,
my
name,
is
Alejandro
padron
I'm,
the
external
relations
associate
at
jcrc,
the
Jewish
community
relations
Council
good
evening,
mayor
Hicks
and
other
council
members
of
the
city
council
of
Mountain
View.
It's
honor,
it's
an
honor
for
us
to
be
here
today
because
of
the
Proclamation
of
the
Jewish
American
heritage
month,
but
also
for
the
proclamation
of
immigrant
heritage
month
or
history.
AE
So
both
of
these
issues
are
really
core
to
me
and
to
us
at
the
Jewish
community
relations
Council,
we're
so
honored
for
this
proclamation
to
be
enacted
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
because
it's
the
time
and
the
opportunity
to
uplift
more
than
three
and
350
years
of
Jewish
history
in
the
country
from
Levi
Strauss
to
Ruth,
Bader
Ginsburg,
the
Jewish
Community
have
had
an
impact,
a
profound
impact
in
the
Jewish
and
the
history
of
the
Jewish
in
the
history
of
America
I'm.
Sorry.
AE
But
we
also
have
to
be
aware
and
acknowledge
the
rising
hate
against
our
community.
Today,
the
Attorney
General
published
the
hate
crime
report
and
we
saw
a
significant
24
increase
in
anti-semitic
incidents.
So,
as
we
reflect
on
this
beautiful
history,
we
also
have
to
Ascend
against
anti-Semitism
and
keep
initiatives
like
this.
So
rest
assured
that
we
are
jcrc.
AE
We
are
committed
to
keep
fighting
anti-Semitism
and
we
will
be
able
to
work
together
with
the
city
of
montevue
and
the
other
communities
in
the
Bay
Area
to
promote
initiative
to
keep
the
Jewish
Community
safe,
and
this
is
the
starting
of
that.
So
thank
you.
Everyone
and
thank
you
for
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
to
announce
and
knocked
in
this,
and
you
know
promoting
and
advertising
this
beautiful
history
for
everyone.
Thank
you.
A
Which
is
bear
with
me,
it's
item
number
four,
which
is
our
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
improved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
council
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
If
you'd
like
to
speak
on
this
item
or
the
next
item
number
five,
which
is
oral
Communications
on
non-agenda
items
in
person,
please
submit
a
blue
speaker
card
to
the
city
clerk
now
and
now
council
member
may
do
you
have
an
announcement
to
make.
U
I
I
do
thank
you.
Mayor
I
am
recusing
myself
from
participation
in
record
recommendation
number
one
under
consent
item
4.3
adoption
of
a
resolution
to
include
the
underground
utilities
at
1020
Terra
Bella
project
in
the
fiscal
year
2023-24
through
2027-28
Capital
Improvement
program
due
to
my
employment
as
an
external
Affairs
manager
with
at
T
an
international
Telecom
Communications
company.
A
C
AF
C
N
N
Okay,
well
for
those
of
you
in
the
audience
who
didn't
read
every
page
of
the
16
pages
of
our
agenda,
you
might
not
know
that
we
have
21
items
on
the
consent
calendar.
There
is
always
just
an
incredible
plethora
of
them.
The
the
meeting
before
the
summer
break-
and
this
is
no
exception
and
they
recommend
they.
They
represent
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
on
the
part
of
staff,
and
so
I
I
like
to
sort
of
share
with
people
a
little
bit
about
these
items.
N
So
people
recognize
kind
of
what's
going
on
behind
the
more
controversial
things
that
that
is
really
you
know,
sort
of
the
80
percent
of
the
city's
work
is
I.
Think
most
things
that
most
of
us
really
aren't
aren't
aware.
That's
happening
and
I
I
I've
asked
a
couple
of
Staff
members
about
this
and
what
it,
what
were?
N
But
this
is
a
this
is
a
water
and
a
sewer
main
that
are
over
60
years
old,
and
so
they
have
reached
the
end
of
their
useful
life
going
out
into
the
North
Bay
Shore
and
in
addition
to
that,
we're
doing
a
tremendous
amount
of
development
out
there,
and
so
it's
important
that
we
have
bigger.
You
know
we
have.
We
have
bigger
lines
with
better
service,
so
this
project
is
being
done
to
do
that
and
it's
taken
quite
a
few
years,
because
there
were
multiple
agencies
involved.
N
It
goes
under
101
which
of
course,
is
Cal
Trans
and
there
were
I
think
something
like
nine
Property
Owners.
So
it
was,
you
know,
was
getting
this
all
figured
out
was
a
big
deal.
So
congratulations
to
coming
to
this
point,
then
another
one
is
4.7:
that's
the
education
enhancement
Reserve
joint
Powers
agreement.
N
This
is
an
agreement
to
extend
the
existing
jpa
agreement
so
that
we
can
now
negotiate
a
longer
term,
one
related
to
funds
from
the
Shoreline
Community,
and
we
needed
to
wait
until
the
North
Bayshore
master
plan
was
passed
because
it's
going
to
it
provides
important
information
about
what
we
really
expect
to
be
built
and
consequently,
what
will
be
the
tax
base
out
there.
So
the
Mountain
View
Westman
school
board
and
the
Mountain
View
Los
Altos
school
district
have
passed
this.
N
You
know
this
agreement
to
to
extend
it
for
a
year
and
we're
we're
about
to
to
pass
it
too.
So
that's
something
to
celebrate
that
we're
all
going
to
be
working
together
to
work
on
a
long-term
agreement.
Then
another
one
is
the
item
4.8
except
the
final
2020
and
preliminary
2021
Community
greenhouse
gas
emissions
in
Mountain
View.
N
We
have
been
working
diligently
for
many
years
to
work
to
mitigate
our
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
one
of
the
ways
that
we
kind
of
keep
track
is
that
we
do
an
inventory
of
how
it's
going,
and
this
was
presented
to
the
council
sustainability
Council
in
great
detail.
So
if
you
would
like
to
read
the
staff
report,
that's
that's
a
good
way,
a
great
place
to
go,
see
it.
But
it's
it's!
It's
really.
N
N
Okay.
So
then,
that's
that's
some
greenhouse
gas
mitigation.
That's
climate
change
mitigation.
This
next
one
is
about
climate
change
adaptation.
So
that's
about
negotiation
of
an
advanced
water
purification
or
recycled
water
cost-sharing
agreement
with
Palo
Alto,
and
it's
very
exciting
that
this
is
moving
forward.
This
will
provide
us
with
a
drought,
proof,
supply
and
really
good
quality
recycled
water
to
use
in
the
North
Bay
Shore
we've
had
recycled
water
in
the
North
Bay
Shore,
since
the
mid
80s,
but
over
the
years
we've
had
a
lot
of
problems
with
salt
content.
N
It's
just
been
too
salty
for
some
of
the
plants
and
so
this
purification
plant,
which
uses
essentially
desalination
methodologies
to
desalinate
our
waste,
our
treated
Wastewater.
It's
going
to
create
this
Ultra
Pure
Water
that
we're
going
to
mix
with
our
existing
Wastewater
and
have
a
great
product
so
moving
forward,
that's
just
a
very,
very,
very
important
adaptation
activity
for
our
water
supply.
N
Then
4.15,
oh,
were
we
did
that
get
cold?
Okay.
This
is
an
authorization
to
extend
the
operation
of
our
safe
parking
lots
and
execute
various
agreements
to
provide
annual
and
one-time
funding
for
homeless
service
programs.
I
think
here
in
Mountain
View
we're
very
proud
of
the
work
that
we
do
to
support
our
homeless
population
and
and
we
we
have
a
lot
of
support
for
safe
parking.
N
It's
something
that's
evolved
over
the
years
and
with
the
help
of
one
thing
that
helped
us
a
great
deal
was
the
county
providing
a
waiver,
so
we
could
have
24
7
parking,
but
this
has
been
a
tremendous
amount
of
work
and
we're
really
proud
of
it.
That
said,
we
still
have
too
many
people
who
are
who
need
to
park
their
RVs
or
on
our
city,
streets
and
and
I.
Think
many
of
us
are
hoping
that
we
can
increase
that
safe
parking
program.
N
And
then
the
last
one
I
wanted
to
mention
was
the
mou
for
the
preliminary
engineering
and
environmental
clearance
for
the
ringsdorf
grade.
Separation,
that
is
where
we
are
going
to
have
the
train
tracks
separated
from
the
road
elevation,
so
that
you'll
just
be
able
to
seamlessly
go
continue
on
in
the
road
under
the
tracks,
and
that
will
be
a
much
safer
situation.
So
it's
very
good
to
see
this
project
this
process,
so
anyway,
I
just
wanted
to
I
wanted
to
Daylight
these.
N
A
AF
I
A
AF
U
Regional
Park
Community
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
adopting
the
recommended
fiscal
year
2023-24
through
fiscal
year,
2027-28
Capital
Improvement
program
for
the
shoreline
Regional
Park
Community,
including
amendments
to
existing
projects
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
for
the
reading
waived
item
4.15
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View
authorizing
the
city
manager,
org
designee
to
one
amend
the
lease
agreement
with
Terra
Bella
two
LLC
for
safe
parking
to
extend
the
term
through
June
30th
2024
to
amend
the
lease
agreements
with
the
county
of
Santa
Clara.
U
2023-24
agreement
with
CSA
for
a
capital
funding
contribution
in
an
amount
not
to
exceed
one
million
dollars
to
be
read,
entitled
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Mountain,
View
authorizing
the
city
manager
or
designee
to
enter
into
a
fiscal
year.
2023-24
Revenue,
sharing
agreement
with
the
county
of
Santa
Clara
for
a
two-year
operational
funding.
U
Commitment
for
the
life
moves,
Mountain,
View
interim
housing
community
in
a
total
amount
not
to
exceed
2.4
million
dollars
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
the
reading
waived
item
4.17
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
approving
requests
to
the
Metro
Transportation
Commission
for
the
allocation
of
fiscal
year.
20
23-24
Transportation
development
act,
article
3,
pedestrian,
bicycle
Project,
funding
to
be
read
entitled
only
further
reading
waived.
I
A
AG
C
Thank
you
mayor,
thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
Sarah
for
being
available.
I
don't
want
to
take
too
much
time.
I'll
share
when
I
read
well.
First
I'm
excited
for
both
projects,
they're
both
important
I'm
grateful
to
staff
for
their
work,
to
apply
for
the
grant.
I'm
glad
that
we
have
been
awarded
the
funds
and
I'm
only
disappointed
that
costs
keep
increasing
to
the
point
where
we
can't
deliver.
C
So
what
I
would
like
to
recommend
to
my
colleagues
is
that
we
approve
the
staff
recommendation,
but
that
we
also
provide
direction
to
staff
to
negotiate
with
or
work
with,
life
moves
to
use
the
balance,
to
the
extent
that
the
parking
project
as
proposed
is
not
constructed
that
we
negotiate
with
life,
moves
to
use
the
balance
of
the
property
for
safe
parking
or
some
other
use
that
staff
deems
appropriate,
but
not
to
just
leave
it
vacant
and
underutilized.
So
unless
there's
an
objection,
that's
the
motion.
I
intend
to
make.
T
AG
Hi
so
I'm
also
joined
by
my
colleague,
Amy
gardeno
who's
here,
who
does
many
of
our
renovation
projects
and
and
can
get
into
some
of
the
technicalities
as
well,
so
she's
here
also
available
for
questions.
I
do
just
want
to
remind
Council
that
this
is
the
funding
is
coming
from
a
cdbg
grant
that
was
specifically
made
available
to
recipients
of
the
first
round
of
home
key
funds
to
complement
already
existing
home
key
projects.
AG
So
this
lot,
so
it's
two
projects,
it's
the
solar,
which
is
extremely
important,
because
our
operating
costs,
just
like
everything
else,
have
increased
over
time
and
we've
put
in
some
recent
Investments,
including
improving
our
internet
at
the
the
interim
housing
site,
which
means
our
energy
costs
are
actually
expected
to
go
up.
So
the
solar
and
storage
for
the
solar
for
solar
battery
is
is
really
a
high
priority
for
this.
AG
For
these
funds,
the
lot
has
to
be
intrinsically
tied
to
the
home
key
site
because
of
the
way
the
applic,
our
joint
application
was,
was
written
and
because
of
the
nature
of
these
funds.
So
I
would
defer
to
the
City
attorney
actually
on
if
it's
possible,
to
use
the
site
for
something
that's
sort
of
beyond
the
scope
of
the
home
key
project.
AF
AG
And
I
would
just
add
that
life
moves
purchased.
This
lot
for
just
over
three
million
dollars
over
a
year
ago,
with
the
understanding
again
that
this
was
a
joint
application
that
we
would
be
reimbursed
for
these
funds,
and
we
have
been
accruing
interest
in
the
meantime,
so
being
repaid
is
a
concern
of
ours.
The
other
thing
is
that,
given
the
increasing
costs,
this
is
a
grant
for
five
million
dollars.
Hcd
has
told
us,
in
calls
between
life,
moves
City
staff
and
hcd.
AG
That's
the
state
that
we
would
need
to
move
towards
developing
this
lot
with
at
least
three
spots.
As
indicated
in
the
staff
report.
I
don't
believe.
Unless
the
city
has
funds,
we
would
not
have
funds
to
to
improve
the
site
Beyond
those
three
spots,
so
the
five
million
dollars
that's
in
the
cdbg
grant,
is
accounted
for
through
solar
and
the
development
of
the
lot,
as
indicated
in
the
staff
report.
AG
AH
Good
evening
Wayne
Chen
assistant
community
development,
director
I,
did
have
an
opportunity
to
reach
out
to
hcd
to
inquire
on
this.
It
would
require
some
additional
analysis
and
I
noted
the
hcd
that
we
would
be
able
to
come
back
and
provide
a
follow-up
to
hcd
based
on
any
Council
direction
or
input.
AH
There
may
be
funding
implications
if
the
remaining
portion
of
the
site
were
converted
and
to
be
used
for
safe
parking,
so
that
would
have
to
be
taken
into
account
and
and
then
but
removing
maybe
funding
that
is
part
of
the
site.
Acquisition
could
free
up
the
use
of
the
funds,
but
we
would
have
to
have
a
further
conversation
with
hcd
in
terms
of
what
would
be
allowed.
It
wasn't
a
hard
fast,
yes
or
no,
but
further
analysis
would
be
needed.
AG
But
again
we
would
like
to
be
paid
back
for
purchasing
that
lot,
which
we
purchased
over
a
year
ago.
That
was
indicated
in
that
joint
application.
So
that's,
like
I,
said
it's
a
five
million
cdbg
Grant.
It's
the
budget
has
been
detailed
to
staff,
it's
it's
what
was
submitted
and
there
really
isn't
money.
That's
not
already
accounted
for.
I
S
I
AG
Okay,
so
I'll
remind
you
that
the
the
home
key
site,
which
is
the
life
moves,
interim
housing
site,
is
owned
by
life,
moves
the
organization,
and
so
it
was
agreed
to
in
the
application
that
we
life
moves
would
acquire
the
second
lot.
So
there's
consistency
across
ownership
between
the
two
lots
again,
the
cdbg
money
was
only
available
to
those
initial
home
key
grantees
and
it
is
dependent-
and
it's
meant
to
be
complementary
of
that
initial
project.
So
the
uses
of
this
land
have
to
be
complementary
to
that
interim.
AG
AI
AG
S
AJ
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
mayor
council
members.
I
would
just
like
to
clarify
that
the
city
has
been
a
very
collaborative
partner
to
life,
moves
on
this
project
and
there
were
legal
implications
with
the
hcd
submission
for
this
project
and
what
the
funding
was
supposed
to
be
used
for.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
it
has
taken
quite
some
time
to
get
through
the
changes
and
the
different
implications
to
what
is
now
needed
for
this
project.
S
So
I
guess
I'm
going
through
this
I
I'm
fine
to
support
the
motion,
but
my
ultimately
I'm
concerned
about
what
could
happen
at
the
end
of
the
day.
Should
these
projects
not
move
forward
because
of
funding
issues
and
my
interest
is
that
the
city
try
to
negotiate
right,
some
other
acquisition
of
the
land,
if
it's
possible,
so
I
would
ask
if
we
could
add
that
as
a
friendly
amendment
to
your
emotion.
Thank
you.
AH
What
would
happen
if
the
projects
could
not
be
completed
to
meet
all
of
those
state
and
federal
requirements
and
meet
the
city
requirements,
but
certainly
regarding
the
state
is
that
most
likely,
the
city
would
be
seeking
to
pay
hcd
back
and
then
seek
reimbursement
from
from
life
moves
and
in
the
situation
with
a
with
a
parking
depending
on
where
life
moves
might
be.
Whether
there's
funding
to
reimburse
the
city,
then
there
might
need
to
be
a
discussion
about
whether
the
site
becomes
part
of.
S
AH
Whether
it's
a
maybe
taking
title
or
or
you
know,
selling
for
proceeds,
but
those
will
have
to
be
discussions
at
the
the
city
and
like
agreement,
has
not
been
executed
yet
either,
because
we
have
been
taking
some
time
to
work
with
hcd
to
understand
what
are
the
requirements.
What
are
the
options
and
the
possibilities
and
to
get
information
from
live
moves
about
the
best
way
forward,
so
the
city
agreement
with
live
moves
is
also
still
in
process
not
executed.
Yet.
S
AG
And
if
I
might
I'll
just
add
that
as
of
right
now,
all
of
the
parking
needs
at
the
life
moves.
Interim
housing
site
are
being
met
on
site.
However,
in
three
months
in
six
months,
when
there's
a
different
set
of
clients
on
site,
we
there
could
be
a
different
need
for
parking.
We
simply
don't
know,
but
this
is
an
incredibly
opportune
location.
S
AG
R
AH
R
U
Great,
thank
you.
My
questions
are
for
staff.
Okay,
so
I
I
just
want
to
clarify.
So
what
changed?
When
this
application
went
forward,
this
joint
application
went
forward.
The
two
items
were
included
for
the
solar,
as
well
as
providing
the
parking
we
knew
it
was
5
million.
Is
there
can?
Can
you
walk
staff
through
that?
The
staff
report
doesn't
technically
say
what
actually
changed
so
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
for
all
of
us
to
hear
yeah.
AH
Thank
you
for
the
question,
so
in
the
application
it
noted
that
the
parking
site
would
be
acquired
and
then
improved
to
benefit
up
to
45
households
at
the
interim
housing
site
and
then
with
remaining
funding,
determine
the
the
scale
and
scope
of
the
solar.
So
that
was
what
was
worked
on
in
the
application
jointly
with
live
moves
in
City
staff
and
submitted
and
approved
as
such
by
by
hcd
towards
the
end
of
last
year
and
into
this
year
life
move
staff.
Let
us
know
that
costs
have
have
been
increasing.
AH
They
are
committed
to
completing
both
projects.
It
would
like
to
complete
the
the
solar
piece
first,
but
are
still
committed
to
working
on
both
projects,
but
definitely
the
the
cost
of
both
the
solar
and
other
costs
have
led
to
that.
I
think
determination
by
life
moves
and
and
staff,
so
we've
been
working
with
staff
at
life,
moves
and
hcd
to
figure
out
how
that
could
move
forward.
So
that's
some
of
the
background
information
and
happy
to
provide
more
detail.
AH
U
You
have
an
estimate
on
how
much
so
the
cdbg
grant
was
5
million
correct.
The
acquisition
of
the
parking
lot
was
3.25.
Is
that
right,
yep,
so
we're
talking
about
8.25
already
allocated
so
in
addition
to
the
8.25
that
was
already
allocated?
How
many
much
are
we
talking
about
will
be
the
increase
for
both
the
solar
and
the
parking.
AI
U
V
U
AG
U
About
numbers:
right,
yes,
can
I,
yes,
yeah,
okay,
thanks
yeah
I'm
gonna
finish
my
question.
Please
so
I
think
from
what
it
also
sounds
it
you
know
and
I
Look
to
City
stuff.
It
sounds
like
life
move
is
prioritizing
the
solar
versus
the
parking,
and
it
sounds
like
that
is
the
prioritization
from
a
life
moves
interest
and
I'm,
not
I.
You
know,
I
I,
understand
that
that
could
benefit
the
residents,
but
perhaps
you
could
share
with
Council
how
that
determination
was
made.
U
The
solar
versus
the
parking
and
though
the
parking
that
we
did
help
provide
the
shuttle
service
may
have
been
inconvenient.
It
was
something
that
we've
received
feedback
that
residents
need
and
that
people
in
that
residence
in
that
area
will
appreciate
them.
Having
so
can
you
please
share
the
thought
process
on
why
the
solar
versus
the
parking
and
that
there
was
no
estimate
done
on
what
the
parking
would
cost.
Just
so
Council
can
understand.
AG
So
when
we
looked
at
our
increased
operating
costs
over
time,
this
was
a
way
to
both
be
sustainable
in
terms
of
fiscal
responsibility
as
well
as
sustainable
in
terms
of
thinking
about
it,
our
energy
and
our
impact.
So
that-
and
we
saw
in
this
in
the
cdpg
money
that
that
was
a
reimbursable
expense,
and
so
that
was
really
what
what
had
brought
us
to
the
table
around
this
potential
funding
and
the.
AG
AG
Obviously,
this
the
site
was
was
created
and
crafted
in
partnership
with
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
which
we
are
grateful
for
and
in
the
spirit
of
that
partnership
we
moved
very
quickly
based
on
a
high
level
of
need,
and
so
solar
was
not
in
the
initial
scoping
of
this
project,
and
so
you
know,
I
think
we'd
always
hoped
that
it
would
be,
and
so
you
know
putting
it
in
now.
With
this
available,
funding
was
a
priority
and.
AI
AG
W
W
W
That
was
always
a
part
of
it
pre-dating
and
pre-dating
myself,
but
for
those
of
you
that
have
been
on
the
council
for
a
while,
if
you
remember
when
we
originally
had
set
out
to
build
a
home
key
site,
the
original
estimates
was
nine
million
dollars
because
ended
up
being
around
a
little
over
17
million
dollars,
of
which
life
moves
front
into
different
or
paid.
The
difference
in
that
you
know
in
that
project
to
complete
that
project
from
the
overall
home
key
award,
which
I
believe
netted
out.
W
It
was
two
different
awards
that
netted
out
at
12
million
dollars,
so
life
moves
did
put
in
the
the
additional
funds
and
does
on
the
site
as
as
Sarah
my
colleague
mentioned
there.
When
we
applied
for
this
award,
this
award
was
really
meant
to
be.
It's
not
meant
to
cover
the
entire
cost.
It
was
meant
to
basically
be
used
for
eligible
expenses,
regardless
of
what
the
overall
costs
were.
When
we
endeavored
to
do
it,
we
thought
that
cost
would
would
fit
into
the
5
million
the
land
acquisition.
W
What
the
what
it
would
be
to
turn
it
into
a
parking
lot,
as
well
as
the
solar
cost.
As
you
all
have
heard,
and
we
went
out
to
competitive
bidding,
we
had
an
original
estimate
at
the
time
that
was
done
in
2021
and,
as
you
all
know,
costs
have
gone
up
significantly.
Since
then,
we've
done
competitive
building
on
the
on
the
solar
project
twice
and,
as
you
heard,
the
cost
will
be
for
solar,
depending
on
the
size
of
solar
and
battery
backup.
W
You
know
somewhere
around
that
million
and
a
half
to
two
million
dollars,
depending
on
where
we
ultimately
spoke.
The
project
out
at
this
point
in
time
that
and
with
the
three
required
spots
of
striping
that
we
need
to
do
life
moves
is
prepared
to
to
complete
that
project.
So
there
is
no.
There
is
no
doubt,
and
there
is
no
lack
of
commitment
from
life
moves
to
in
to
to
add
solar
to
the
site,
as
well
as
complete.
W
It
is
accurate
to
say
that
the
award
is
awarded
to
the
city,
but
always
with
the
intent
that
the
city
would
then
reimburse
life
moves
for
All
eligible,
expensive
expenses
consistent
with
the
award,
and
we
went
ahead
and
made
the
purchase
of
the
property
to
do
that.
I
will
Echo
Sarah's
comment
and
saying
that
the
state
has
for
as
much
time
as
the
site
has
been
open.
Our
current
clients
needs
are
being
met
by
the
parking.
That's
at
the
site
and
parking
that
is
close
by.
W
There
is
a
lot
of
other
cars
on
the
on
the
on
the
streets
there
that
are
RV
that
are
RVs,
but
the
RVs.
There
are
not
clients
of
this
site,
the
restrictions
of
the
award,
and
there
is
a
use
restriction
on
the
deed
of
this
property.
The
use
restriction
for
these
cdbg
funds
is
to
be
used
for
the
same
home.
Key
project
or
these
funds
can
be
used
in
support
of
the
same
homekeeping
project.
Using
the
using
the
acquired
property
for
a
safe
parking
site
would
not
be
considered
the
same
project.
W
It
would
not
be
our
eligible
use
of
this
property
at
this
at
this
time,
but
but
I
do
want
to
make
it
clear
that
life
moves
as
always
plan
and
is
prepared
to
put
solar
on
the
site
and
do
what's
necessary
to
meet
the
minimum
requirements
for
the
ACD
award.
But
the
H
well
I'm,
sorry
for
the
cdbg
award,
but
the
cdbg
award
was
never
meant
to
be
an
award
that
covers
all
of
your
costs.
It
was
award
up
to
amount
for
eligible
expenses,
so
I'll
stop
there
and
see.
R
Appreciate
the
questions
that
council
member
May
was
asking,
and
one
of
the
questions
that
was
sent
in
by
someone
was
if
the
solar
panel
project
is
constructed,
how
much
in
electricity
costs
will
life
move
save
annually
appreciated
the
question?
The
answer
that
it
says
was
provided
by
life
moves
is
a
significant
cost
savings
and
environmental
benefits,
and
since
we
have
the
CFO
here,
I
was
thinking.
Perhaps
you
could
quantify
that
for
us.
W
R
W
A
W
Month,
okay,
yeah
yeah
and
that's
been
growing.
That's
the
last
12
months,
energy
costs
to
continue
to
go
up
and,
as
my
colleague
mentioned
earlier,
as
we've
been
able
to
also
increase
our
IIT
infrastructure
and
bandwidth
on
site,
our
clients
are
actually
using
and
have
access
to
more
devices
and
therefore,
since
there's
no
gas
on
the
site
at
all,
everything
on
the
site
runs
on
electricity.
That
will
only
continue
to
you
know,
rise.
A
C
So,
in
the
event,
as
part
of
the
funding
agreement,
that
we
include
a
provision
that
would
require
life,
moves
to
transfer
title
of
the
site
to
the
city
in
the
event,
I
suppose
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
secure
the
grant
something
along
those
lines.
So
please
help
me
with
that
and
then
two
to
provide
staff.
Direction
to
explore
or
negotiate
with
life
moves
in
the
event
the
parking
project
is
not
completed.
A
A
S
S
D
AK
AK
AK
Again
David
printing
with
public
works,
so
Community
donations
have
been
continued
to
trickle
in
and
will
continue
to
and
magical
Bridge
has
ongoing,
fundraising
efforts,
including
issuing
through
their
website
and
issuing
of
postcards
with
with
the
project
and
links,
so
they
are
continuing
to
fundraise,
and
so
the
staff
is
not
implying
that
they
are
not
continuing
to
attempt
to
raise
the
money.
It's
it's
just
very
likely
that,
as
we
get
closer
to
construction,
they
will
certainly
be
more
interest
and
and
activity
on
that
front.
D
So
if
I
may
add
on
to
more
directly
respond
to
your
question,
also
as
I
understand
it
in
staff
discussions
with
magical
bridge
in
terms
of
their
continuing
to
do,
Outreach
continue
to
raise
funds,
the
expenses
they're
incurring
related
to
that
they
did
request
of
the
city
that
we
go
ahead
and
release
the
fifty
thousand
dollar
progress
payment.
While
they
continue,
as
recommended
in
the
staff
report,
we
am
in
the
agreement
that
they
will
continue
to
to
really
pursue
various
fundraising
options
through
construction
of
the
project
until
up
to
I.
D
S
AL
AM
Good
evening
John
Marchant
Community
Services
director
in
discussions
with
magical
Bridge
number
one.
They
would
like.
They
requested
the
city
to
take
into
consideration
the
large
amount
of
effort
that
they
worked
with
various
organizations
and
they
felt
that
they
contributed
significantly
toward
The
Landings
project
and
the
public
benefits
that
came
thereof,
which.
AM
D
So
yeah
to
clarify
they,
while
they
did
help
conversations
with
Google
and
help
promote
support
for
Google,
offering
Community
benefit
funds
for
Landings
towards
up
towards
the
project
it
was
received
as
Community
benefits
by
the
city.
They
did
not
get
eight
percent
of
that
900
000
because
it
came
directly
to
the
city.
The
original
agreement,
the
city
entered
into,
was
basically
a
two-fold
agreement
for
how
they
would
be
compensated
and
address
their.
D
D
S
I
I,
you
know
I
just
don't
feel
comfortable,
providing
the
four
five
fifty
thousand
dollars
when
the
project,
the
job
frankly
to
in
my
mind,
has
not
been
completed
and
that
we,
the
city,
are
having
to
use
Park
line
funds
to
cover
that
cost.
I
understand
timing,
wise
I'm,
fine
doing
this,
but
I,
don't
think
that
we
should
just
forgive
the
amount
and
I'd
like
to
see
at
least
to
completion
the
yeah,
the
fundraise
funds
raised
to
completion
to
be
to
to
be
willing
to
pay
the
entire
amount.
S
R
So
I
agree:
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars
of
Park
funds
is
kind
of
tough
to
allocate
to
this
project.
Although
I
do
support
the
project,
I
am
disappointed
in
the
amount
of
fundraising
that
they've
been
able
to
accomplish
and
I
guess.
I
had
a
question
about
the
motion,
I
believe
in
the
original
staff
recommendation.
It
said
that
they
would
continue
to
fundraise
until
one
year
after
project
completion
and
they
would
get
the
balance
of
that
time.
R
S
D
Thank
you,
I
think
staff
would
appreciate
a
little
clarification.
I
was
even
asked
by
city
clerk
to
also
talk
a
little
bit
about
being
certain
what
it
is
it's
being
recommended
here.
So
recommendation
number
seven
under
this
item
was
worded
to
authorized.
City
manage
designee,
to
amend
the
agreement,
magical
bridge
and
you'll
note
that
sub
section
A
was
to
reduce
the
community
donations
initial
Target,
and
that
was
done
to
trigger
the
payout
of
the
fifty
thousand.
D
So
if
I'm
I'm
understanding
correctly,
what
you're
suggesting
maybe
could
have
a
for
a
change
that,
to
you
know
we're
going
to
amend
the
contract.
The
agreement
that,
rather
than
reducing
their
target,
we
don't
reduce
their
target
it'd,
be
that
they
we
foreign
to
support,
giving
them
a
proportional
payment.
Now
for
the
money
that
they've
raised
out
of
the
fifty
thousand,
and
we
continue
with
B,
which
is
continue
their
fundraising
up
until
at
least
a
year
after
project
completion,
and
we
will
pay
them.
D
Additional
proportion
amounts
based
upon
the
additional
fundraising
that
they
do
succeed
and
if
they
hit
the
original
Target
of
1.9
million
and
the
full
list,
they
would
get
the
full.
Fifty
thousand,
but
they
never
quite
reached
that
full
Target
they
would
just
get
in
proportion
to
the
fifty
thousand,
and
this
needs
an
end
point.
So
we
would
a
staff
still
suggest
that
this
would
end
one
year
after
project
completion,
because
it's
unlikely
that
they
would
be
able
to
raise
any
more
funds.
After
that.
S
D
Thank
you
for
the
clarification
so
pay
proportional
now,
based
upon
how
much
they've
done
out
of
the
50
000
and
come
back
to
council
one
year
after
project
completion
to
report
out
on
how
much
more
they've
raised
and
at
that
time
Council
can
make
a
determination
of
a
proportional
payment
or
pay
the
rest
of
the
fifty
thousand.
Yes,
okay.
Thank
you.
D
A
A
Item
five
on
our
agenda,
which
is
oral
Communications
from
the
public.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
Council
on
any
matter,
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
If
you'd
like
to
speak
on
this
item
in
person
or
the
next
item,
please
submit
a
blue
speaker
card
to
the
city
clerk
now.
A
AN
Thank
you
for
your
time,
I've
been
having
some
very
interesting
situations.
Regarding
my
current
living
situation,
my
billing
was
sold
on
May
10th
to
a
group
which
assigned
management,
property
responsibilities
to
a
company
called
Center,
LLC
11
LLC,
and
in
35
days
we
were
just
informed
that
that
management
and
operational
division
was
just
hand
it
over
to
a
new
group
called
Zell
Associates.
AN
So
if
the
devices
fail-
and
they
start
flooding,
there's
a
way
that
the
water
can
be
discharged
out
of
the
room
and
so
far
I've
not
heard
or
seen
any
sign
of
that
being
installed,
but
I've
also
discovered
that
the
current
washer
and
dryer
that
in
hot
water
tank,
that's
in
our
building,
is
in
a
room
that
does
seem
to
have
a
grain
Grid
in
the
floor.
But
it
turns
out
it's
not
a
drain.
It's
actually
plugged
up.
AN
There
is
no
drain
in
that
building
at
all
for
that
environment,
and
not
only
that,
but
there
are
cracks
permeating
throughout
the
entire
area
of
that
environment
and
I've
been
saying
over
and
over
again
that
someone
needs
to
do
something
regarding
inspecting
the
Integrity
of
this
building
and
I
keep
getting
nothing,
but
the
runaround
I've
been
asking
it
politely
for
the
past
three
years
and
I.
Think
what's
really
going
on
here
is
again
I
discovered
the
fact
that
the
building
is
not
conforming
with
the
land.
AN
That's
on
it's
an
R4
class
building
in
an
r31
Zone,
and
that
would
mean
that,
if
anything,
it
would
make
it
technically
illegal
for
it
to
operate
as
an
apartment
complex
and
from
I'm.
Seeing
and
I've
asked
again
the
city
multiple
times,
whereas
the
at
least
the
contingency
approval
for
operations-
and
there
doesn't
seem
to
be
one
and
so
I'm.
AN
Just
saying
at
this
point
in
time
we're
having
musical
chairs
regarding
the
operations
of
this
building
and
every
time
I
write
a
letter
to
the
the
management
I
think
what
I'm
going
to
discover
is
that
they're
going
to
keep
on
dropping
one
operation
in
in
bringing
in
another
to
just
keep
me
from
Ever
Getting,
Any,
repair,
work
done
on
my
structure
and
my
unit.
Thank
you.
A
A
AK
Thank
you
mayor
good
evening,
mayor
vice
mayor
city
council.
My
name
is
David
printe
I'm
principal
project
manager
with
public
works,
I
have
with
me
assistant,
Public
Works
director
at
arango,
as
well
as
Naveen
Govan
senior
project
manager
for
public
works,
as
well
as
Public
Safety,
Chiefs,
Michael,
Canfield
and
Juan
Diaz
in
the
audience
for
any
questions
and.
S
AK
B
AK
Here
we
have
the
existing
site
at
1000,
Villa,
4.3
acres
and
it
currently
houses
the
police
and
fire
administration.
Building
it
is
north
in
this
site
is
to
your
right.
We
have
Shoreline
at
the
top
of
the
screen,
West
Devlin
to
the
right,
Franklin,
Villa
and
Oak
Street
surrounding
the
rest
of
the
site.
AK
In
accordance
with
the
council
approved
layout
to
include
the
new
building
parking
elements
to
meet
the
public
safety
operational
requirements,
the
generalized,
the
general
organizing
principle
of
the
site
is
to
have
the
public
areas
off
of
villa
and
Franklin
in
Oak
Street,
which
is
comprised
of
a
public
Plaza
entry
to
the
building,
a
Auditorium
and,
of
course,
public
parking.
The
balance
of
the
site
is
reserved
for
the
secure
areas
for
staff
and
operations.
AK
AK
AK
Quickly
go
through
the
the
floor
plan.
This
is
the
design
of
the
new
building,
which
has
the
public
elements.
This
in
this
plan,
North,
is
to
the
top
of
the
screen
and
Villa
is
to
this
to
the
bottom
and
Franklin
to
the
right.
The
entry
Lobby
is
at
the
lower
part
of
the
screen.
I
should
probably
use
my
mouse,
see
that
and
the
Public
Auditorium
is
at
the
top.
The
balance
of
the
building
is
comprised
of
various
areas
for
field
operations,
evidence,
storage
and
intake.
AK
As
we
go
up
to
the
upper
level,
the
central
Atrium
and
circulation
continues.
The
floors
are
organized
around
the
central
circulation
spine
and
Atrium,
which
provides
ample
natural
lighting
at
each
floor
and
includes
breakout
areas
so
that
they
become
hubs
of
the
building
rather
than
just
circulation.
AK
AK
Another
goal
of
the
design
was
also
to
visually,
reduce
the
overall
massing
of
the
building
at
the
street
level
by
increasing
the
level
of
transparency
at
each
level.
So
when
they
transition
from
the
first
to
second
to
third,
they
decrease
the
structural
elements
to
to
achieve
that
and
on
the
right
hand,
side
you
have
the
module
they
generated
as
they
went
to
the
design
review
board.
AK
And
as
they
further
enhance
the
design
with
a
selection
of
materials
and
colors,
they
arrived
at
this
design,
which
we're
showing
here
to
give
a
sense
of
scale.
As
you
can
see,
these
columns
are
fairly
substantial
and
they,
you
know,
provide
a
provide.
The
facade,
some
very
strong
linear
design
elements.
AK
Excuse
me:
the
landscape.
Let's
see
the
modules
and
elements
were
further
refined
to
include
major
texture
columns,
a
smoother,
lighter,
T,
minor
T
elements
at
the
ground
level.
The
landscape
planting
shown
here
and
side
elements
were
added
to
soften
the
public.
Interface
provide
needed
water
infiltration
systems,
as
well
as
improve
the
security
for
the
ground
floor.
AK
There's
a
view
looking
from
around
the
corner
of
villa
and
Oak
Street,
where
you
can
see
the
accent
elements
at
the
stairwell
as
well
as
the
roof
Eaves
go
around
towards.
This
is
a
view
of
the
entry
Plaza
and
the
two-story
lobby
at
the
corner
of
villa
and
Franklin.
This
is
turning
the
corner.
You
can
start
to
see,
of
course,
the
lobby
again
and
on
the
right
hand,
side.
You
have
the
auditorium
and
above
that
you
have
the
open
air
area
outside
of
the
EOC.
AK
AC
AK
I
A
I
R
AK
Certainly
David
printing
with
Public
Works.
So
along
the
way
we
have
our
Consultants
directly,
providing
we'll
call
progress,
designs
with
staff,
and
we
share
those
internally
until
we
reach
a
point
that
we
feel
that
it's
ready
to
be
reviewed
by
police
and
fire
and
we
review
the
operational
elements
and
make
sure
that
they
are
met.
And
then,
at
a
certain
level
we
develop.
We
bring
those
when
we
feel
we
reached
a
sufficient
level
of
completeness.
We
bring
it
to.
AK
We
share
it
with
planning
and
take
their
input
and
then
eventually
we
bring
that
set.
We
schedule
a
public
meeting
with
the
design
development
Review
Committee,
which
we
did
back
in
May
and
we
follow,
take
several
options
to
them
and
take
their
input.
They
were
very
supportive
of
the
staff
recommendation,
which
is
which
was
at
that
time,
a
version
of
what
you're,
seeing
here
after
that
we
took
the
plans
to
a
public
meeting
and
again
introduced
it
to
the
public,
was
an
open
house
and
receive
comments
and
questions.
AK
AK
AK
R
H
AK
Then
this
other
gated
entry
is
a
secure
delivery
point
both
access
for
there's
another
entry
and
exit
there
from
the
parking
structure.
There's
actually
a
third.
If
you
can
see
in
the
back
of
the
lot
near
Evelyn,
there's
a
third
point
there
to
exit
at
the
ground
level.
You
can
see
where
my
cursor
is.
AK
So
not
not
in
this
design
at
this
time,
Evelyn
of
course,
as
you
may
know,
is,
is
scheduled
to
have.
This
is
going
to
be
an
on-ramp,
so
that
will
be
an
elevated
on-ramp
and
don't
know
precisely
where
it.
You
know
the
the
abutment
ends
and
you
could
actually
go
under
it,
but
there's
no
public
way
out
under
under
Shoreline.
AK
AK
AC
AK
That
could
be
looked
at,
I
mean
it
would
impact
the
as
you
as
you
we've
stated
in
Prior
Council
meetings.
The
it
was
a
request
to
leave
this
site
at
the
corner,
they're
available
for
redevelopment,
so
I
believe.
What's
going
on
at
the
Evelyn
on-ramp
at
this
point
you
would
have
to
come
all
the
way
down
to
Franklin
to
be
to
exit
out
of
the
site
parking
lot
there.
AC
R
AK
Right
right
here,
so
this
is
yeah.
This
is
a
walkway,
so
there's
what's
shown
diagrammatically,
it
could
be
a
you
know:
a
covered,
trellis
or
structured
walkway,
so
staff
would
exit
the
you
know:
Park
they
would
park
either
surface
or
go
from
the
building
to
the
to
the
secure
parking
to
get
into
their
patrol
vehicles.
AK
AK
Whole,
so,
if
I
go
back,
let's
see
if
I
go
back
a
slide
there.
So
yes,
it's
it's
part
of
the
secure
area,
so
that's
all
fenced
in
so
the
public
acts.
There's
no
Public,
Access
Beyond
I
mean
technically
not
supposed
to
walk
on
the
Landscaping,
so
there'll
be
it
would
be
a
secure
area
where
the
staff
entry
is.
AK
Could
be
fencing,
I
mean
it's
certainly
something
we're
developing
it's
most
likely.
Some
sort
of
fencing
element
wouldn't
necessarily
be
a
solid
wall,
but
we
haven't
determined
the
exact
nature
of
that
process.
Part
of
it
is
the
building,
of
course,
and
then
the
structure
of
the
you
know
the
parking
structure
itself.
AP
Okay,
if
I
may
at
a
Rango
assistant,
Public
Works
director,
so
as
part
of
the
development
of
the
design,
we
would
take
advantage
of
the
Landscaping
feature.
So
it
would
be
a
secure
fence,
but
we
would
want
to
soften
the
the
edges
with
that.
So
that
way
as
inferences
to
the
public
surface
slot
they
would
it
would
they
would
see
Landscaping,
they
went
to
see
fence.
So
we
would
want
to
make
sure
that,
but
that
we
developed
that
as
part
of
the
Landscape
Design
Incorporated
with
its
site,
design.
R
Okay
and
then
I
didn't
see
this
in
the
documents,
but
I
did
send
in
a
question
about
this.
Just
in
this
example,
but
is
there
a
list
that
shows
the
current
square
footage
for
each
of
the
different
units
and
then
the
proposed
square
footage
for
each
because
I
sent
in
the
question
about
the
auditorium-
and
it
looks
like
the
auditorium-
is
actually
slightly
smaller.
R
AK
We
we
could
certainly
provide
that
we
have
the
program
which
lists
the
the
requested
square
footage
or
the
the
target
square
footage
for
this
project,
which
was
I,
think
around
66
000
square
feet
and
the
building
as
currently
designed
is
about
68
000
square
feet.
So
in
terms
of
overall
requirements
of
each
of
the
uses
for
the
building
that
were
just
that
were
established
at
the
beginning
of
the
project
have
been
met,
the
as
you
you
mentioned
the
auditorium.
AK
That's
the
current
configuration
is
about
1600
square
feet,
but
that
is
a
larger
room
and
a
much
smaller
400
square
foot
room
that
is
not
as
efficient
as
the
one
we
are
providing
in
this
design.
So
we
feel
that
the
design-
that's
we're
providing,
is
a
more
efficient
layout
and
will
be
more
easily
divided
into
two
equal
rooms
that
can
be
used
simultaneously.
So.
S
AK
AK
S
S
S
AQ
AP
S
S
AK
A
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
the
question
mayor,
so
you
may
recall
that
one
of
the
plans
we
have
from
the
North
Bay
Shore
area
is
to
set
up
a
police
operation
station
that
can
hold
as
many
as
10
officers.
So
this
is
part
of
supporting
some
of
the
growth
that
would
be
happening
in
North
Bayshore,
providing
a
separate
station
for
some
of
the
growth.
D
D
AR
AR
That
feels
like
that.
It
really
has
a
lot
of
connection
with
the
this
discussion
about
the
this
public
safety
building.
That's
being
built,
I
I
just
had
a
real
trouble
understanding
or
justifying
the
juxtaposition
between
the
recent
report
from
Mountain
View
Police
Department
that
they
gave
the
annual
report
to
psab,
which
had
some
excellent
information
like
mercifully.
AR
I
A
R
R
You
know
I,
don't
want
to
have
a
building
that
short,
while
from
now
will
be
saying,
darn
I
wish
we
would
have
done
something
differently.
This
is
a
significant
investment
and
I
think
it
warrants
very
careful
planning
and
consideration
and,
having
heard
the
question
about
basically,
what
year
are
we
planning
for?
It
needs
to
be
more
than
2030.
R
It
does
need
to
you
know
who
knows
when
we
will
have
the
opportunity
to
redo
this
building,
certainly
not
in
my
lifetime,
but
you
know,
let's
make
sure
we're
really
planning
for
the
future
here
and
not
be
Pennywise
and
found
foolish
I
I,
don't
know
where
the
request
came
to
save
the
remnant.
I
heard
some
council
members
saying
you
know
different
things
about
the
use
of
it.
Of
that
property.
R
More
capacity
for
city
employees
and
while
I
supported
the
site
layout
I,
will
say
with
additional
information
I'm
having
second
thoughts
about
it
and
specifically
I
think
we
could
use
the
remnant
area
for
areas
that
I
wasn't
aware
of
were
going
to
be
incorporated
into
the
main
building.
So
I
wasn't
aware
that
we
were
going
to
have
sleeping
quarters
in
the
main
building
and
then,
when
I
looked
at,
that
I
thought.
You
know.
R
R
This
would
not
be
my
preference
for
what
the
building
would
look
like.
I
would
prefer
it
looked
more
like
city
hall
or
the
library
and
to
me
it
looks
like
an
office
building
and
I
want
people,
especially
people
who
might
be
having
an
emergency
situation,
to
immediately
recognize
that
this
is
the
police
department
and
they
can
run
in
and
be
safe.
R
You
know
I
would
say
you
know
my
gut
feeling
is
I'd
go
out
to
Franklin
that
is
probably
an
easier
route
than
going
to
Evelyn,
given
the
changes
that
we're
planning
to
that
straight
I
think
it's
important
that
we
have
a
second
exit.
You
just
never
know,
what's
going
to
happen
and
I
don't
want
a
a
bottleneck
getting
out
of
the
building.
R
B
N
Okay,
I'd
like
to
build
on
that
I
do
think
that
we
want
to
plan
for
the
long
term.
Maybe
we
want
this
to
have
another
floor
so
that
there
would
be
more
expansion
space
while
we're
while
we're
doing
it,
I
mean
we're
gonna.
This
is
this
is
a
huge
undertaking
we're
going
to
have
to
go
out
for
a
tax
measure.
N
That
said,
I
I
can't
say
that
I
gave
it
as
much
thought,
as
my
colleague
councilmember
Matt
check
and
I'm
glad
that
you
did
give
it
all
that
thought,
because
I
think
you're
right
about
additional
exits
from
the
parking
structure.
I
can
imagine
emergency
situations
where
that
might
matter,
and
this
is
an
emergency
building.
That's
a
really
big
deal
and
I.
Think
from
my
point
of
view.
That's
why
we're
doing
this
is
because
it
doesn't
meet
seismic
standards.
That
said,
I
just
kind
of
had
to
laugh.
N
N
You
know
that
one
problem
on
the
test
and
I
remember
there
were
these
pictures
of
buildings
that
looked
like
they
would
fall
down
in
an
earthquake,
and
this
was
like
that's
what
these
look
like
to
me.
I
mean
it
looks
to
me
like
this
structure,
could
just
go.
You
know
topple
and
I'm
sure.
That's
not
true,
I'm
sure
that
you,
but
but
anyway,
I
didn't
like
that.
That
was
my
first
feeling
that
it
wasn't
stable
so
and
then
I
thought
about
well.
N
I
do
feel,
like
you
know,
if
you,
if
I'm
sitting,
if
I
think
of
myself
as
a
worker
in
that
office,
where
there's
literally
a
wall
of
glass
I,
would
find
that
kind
of
uncomfortable
and
I
don't
want
to
create
a
work
situation.
That
is
uncomfortable.
So
you
know
we,
you
know.
On
the
one
hand,
we
want
the
building
to
there
to
be
a
lot
of
natural
light,
because
that's
we
know
that
that
creates.
N
You
know
that
was
a
reasonably
well
thought
of
and
a
good
use
of
the
land,
and
it
did
seem
to
meet
the
criteria
that
we
had
asked
for
previously
to
have
a
to
have
the
safety
building
there,
which
and
and
meet
the
needs
of
the
safety
building
and
also
to
have
configured
so
that
there's
another
part
of
the
land
that
we
could
put
to.
Another
use
and
I
think
you've
done
a
good,
really
good
job
with
that.
S
S
So
it's
great
to
actually
see
some
renderings,
but
I
am
concerned,
as
my
colleagues
have
mentioned,
about
the
size
and
planning
for
a
future
of
40
to
50
years,
not
I,
I
totally
understand
like
again
15
years
ago
or
when
we
did
the
general
Plan
update
back.
Then
we
were
looking
at
2030,
but
that
Horizon
was
almost
20
years
now
we're
seven
years
away
from
2030,
so
I
just
feel
like
the
obviously.
S
The
time
is
short
and
we
need
to
look
beyond
that,
especially
as
we
have
a
move,
the
North
Bay
Shore
precise
plan,
and
we
have
a
sense
of
our
growth
there.
Even
though
it's
concentrated
there
I
imagine
that
their
operations,
some
of
that
will
growth,
will
need
to
happen
within
headquarters
as
well.
So
I
that
that
is
my
concern.
S
I
also
know
and
remember
that
well
no,
that
costs,
as
we've
talked
about
earlier
today,
costs
increase
and
so
I
would
much.
Rather
you
know,
plan
and
build
now
something
that
can
grow
over
time.
I
recall
when
we
did
fire
station
number
five.
The
original
plan
was
to
have
that
police,
substation
and
dormitories
in
there
and
the
it
was
a
10
million
dollar
cost
and
then
I
can't
remember.
S
I
understand
how
maybe
the
attempt
was
to
match
it
with
what
else
is
in
the
neighborhood,
but
I
was
actually
thinking
more.
Similarly,
looking
at
City
Hall,
the
library
you
know,
I
know
Aesthetics
is
subjective,
but
I
actually
really
like
the
New.
Well,
it's
not
that
new
anymore,
but
the
police
station
in
my
hometown
of
San
Mateo,
it's
a
very
Majestic
building
and
so
I
was
hoping
for
something
more
like
that.
Look
and
I
think
it
would
match
City
Hall
better.
S
So
that
would
be
my
preference
is
to
look
at
a
different
design,
but
my
main
concern
is
the
ability
to
expand
as
we
need,
and
so
you
know,
adding
a
story
is,
is
you
know,
is
one
way
to
do
it?
I
was
just
thinking
though
like.
If
we
are,
we
are
limited
and
in
costs
right
now
or
funds.
The
way
to
expand
would
be
to
maintain
that
Remnant
peace
for
future
use.
B
AD
C
C
And
then
I
I
don't
want
to
put
you
on
the
spot,
but
for
for
both
the
fire
chief
and
police
chief.
Can
you
share
with
us
any
compromises
that
you
might
have
had
or
that
you've
made
in
order
to
provide
us
a
design
that
I'm
again
presuming
is
intended
to
be
financially
feasible
right?
So
if
there
are
things
that
you
could
you
know,
your
input
is
valuable
to
us.
If
there
are
things
that
you
know,
you
would
have
liked
to
have
seen
or
changes
that
you
would
like
to
make
for
the
design
or
layout.
AS
AS
As
you
may
know,
the
fire
Environmental
Protection
division,
which
is
on
this
floor
of
this
building,
we'll
be
moving
into
our
building,
and
my
staff
has
worked
very
closely
with
Mr
printy
and
his
team
in
terms
of
what
we
need
for
the
future
of
the
fire
department
so
and
I
get
it
that
it
was
only
up
to
the
year
to
2030,
but
I
honestly
have
to
say
that
everything
that
the
fire
department
asked
for
we
received.
Thank
you
thank.
AT
Thank
you,
Mike
Canfield,
new
police
chief.
We
have
similarly
worked
collaboratively
with
City
staff
on
the
project
and
on
the
design.
There
are
areas
of
balance,
certainly
with
the
public
safety
building.
You
know
a
secure
building,
but
also
a
welcoming
feel
so
we
have,
you
know,
worked
hand
in
hand
to
try
to
meet
that
balance.
AT
An
area
of
compromise,
an
area,
something
that
we
might
be
interested
in
revisiting
would
be
a
shooting
range
for
our
officers
to
qualify
and
maintain
their
proficiency
likely
on
top
of
the
parking
garage
was
one
area,
one
Avenue
that
we
had
examined,
there's
just
logistic
issues
related
to
not
having
a
range
and
the
difficulties
that
we
may
face.
Should
one
of
the
agencies
that
allow
us
to
use
their
range
decide
to
roll
back.
A
And
what
an
item
to
get
on
your
second
day
so
so
I
just
have
a
follow-up
question,
because
I
hadn't
thought
about
that:
a
shooting
range.
Where,
where
do
you
do
that
now
and
where
would
you
envision
I,
don't
even
know
whether
you
do
that
on
on
this
same
site?
Now,
if
you
do
you're
keeping
it
pretty
quiet
because
I
live
in
the
downtown,
and
so
where
do
you
do
it
now
and
if
you
don't
do
it
now
on
this
block?
How
would
you
envision
putting
it
in
a
place
like
this?
That's.
AT
A
very
good
question
and
without
context
it's
a
an
interesting
question:
where
would
you
do
a
shooting
range
on
a
police
station?
We
currently
shoot
and
do
our
Firearms
qualification
for
our
our
sworn
staff,
our
police
officers
in
two
locations,
the
City
of
Santa
Clara
and
the
Santa
Clara
County
Sheriff's
range.
There
have
been
times
when
those
contracts
have
either
lapsed
or
the
the
agencies
have
not
been
interested
in
renewing
them.
Thankfully,
those
have
not
overlapped
at
the
same
time,
so
we've
been
able
to
qualify
consistently
at
one
or
the
other.
AT
However,
that's
not
a
guarantee
and
one
format
for
a
shooting
range
in
a
facility
like
this
would
be
to
put
it
in
a
essentially
a
portable
container.
If
you
will
that's
noise
and
climate
controlled
and
one
area
that
we
had
looked
at
and
we
had
worked
and
considering
that
the
kind
of
The
Balancing
Act
was
on
top
of
the
parking
garage.
C
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
your
input
and
I'm
I'm
very
heartened
to
hear
that
there's
been
a
collaborative
spirit.
You
know
and
I
I,
not
that
I
wouldn't
doubt
that,
but
but
in
this
case
it's
it's
really
encouraging
to
hear
that.
For
the
most
part,
everything
that
has
been
requested
is
incorporated
into
the
design
and
for
that
reason,
I'm
I'm
generally
supportive
of
the
staff
recommendation.
I,
don't
really
have
anything
valuable
to
contribute
around.
You
know,
architecture.
C
That's
really
not
my
area
of
expertise,
so
I'm
interested
in
the
input
from
my
colleagues
but
I
have
I
have
and
I
would
be
interested
if
we
have
to
expand
it
in
adding
a
fourth
floor.
That
would
be
my
preference,
but
I
would
also
be
supportive
of
whatever
we
end
up
using
the
The
Remnant
parcel,
for
perhaps
we
could
do
something
creative
like
require
if
it's
a
revenue
generating
use,
for
instance,
or
even
affordable
housing
that
you
know
once
we
identify
future
needs,
we
could
incorporate
that
into
whatever
is
developed
there.
C
So
I
think
there's
opportunity
to
expand
and
but
I
I'm
a
little
concerned
or
reluctant
to
provide
direction
to
substantially
modify
the
design
in
part,
because
I
think
we
do
have
a
Time
sensitivity.
The
two
items
that
we
pulled
pulled
for
from
consent
are
good
examples
of
over-promising
and
under
delivering,
and
what
I
would
hate
to
see?
C
Is
you
know
if
there's
a
substantial
delay,
because
there's
a
redesign
or
if
we
incorporate
elements
that
end
up
being
a
very
costly,
then
we
might
develop
a
revenue
generating
measure
that
commits
to
far
more
than
it's
able
to
actually
pay
for,
and
so
we
might
end
up
seeing
a
scenario
where
we
over
promise
and
under
deliver
so
I'm
I'm,
trusting
the
staff,
I
I
think
this.
This
is
consistent
with
the
the
direction
I
think
I
had
supported
when
this
came
to
us
last
time.
C
If,
if
what
we're
hearing
from
Public
Safety
is,
this
is
not
merely
acceptable,
but
but
actually
it
provides
everything
for
the
most
part,
I
mean
there
may
be
opportunities
to
incorporate
additional
elements,
but
for
now
this
is
this
is
what
we've
been
asking
for,
and
Public
Works
has
been
working
in
good
faith
with
them,
I'm
I'm
reluctant
to
second
guess
the
work,
and
instead
you
know,
as
we
identify
additional
needs,
we
we
can
use
the
The
Remnant
parcel.
I
would
still
prefer
to
keep
that
for
some
use.
C
That
has
some
additional
value
like
Revenue
generation
or
or
affordable
housing,
but
that
we,
you
know,
keep
open
the
option
of
incorporating
whatever
that
expansion
may
be
into
that
future
use
and
I'm.
Also
so
that
you
know
I
I,
don't
think
it
hurts
to
be
too
concerned
about.
You
know,
emergencies
and
and
safety.
But
if
this,
if
the
staff
didn't
feel
there
was
a
need
for
a
second
exit
from
the
the
garage,
for
instance,
I'm
I'm
I
would
trust
the
staffs
recommendation.
C
Maybe
again,
that's
something
that,
if
it's
evaluated
when,
whenever
we
decide
what
to
do
with
the
remnant
parcel
at
that
time,
we
could
decide.
You
know
we
really
do
need
that
that
additional
right-of-way
but
I'm
I'm
reluctant
to
commit
to
something
right
now
that
might
end
up
delaying
the
the
work
and
increasing
costs
or
that
might
compromise
the
the
utility
of
the
remnant
parcel
when
it
may
end
up
being
something
that
wasn't
really
necessary
in
the
first
place.
C
So
it's
a
long-winded
way
of
saying
right
now,
based
on
what
I've
heard
and
what
I've
read:
I'm
comfortable
with
the
staff
recommendations,
I'm
open
to
changes
for
for
architecture
and
that
kind
of
thing,
but
I
don't
want
to
provide
direction
to
substantial
modifications
that
end
up,
not
that
end
up
being
counterproductive.
Thank
you.
U
U
I
will
say
one
of
the
things
I
I
haven't
heard,
brought
up,
which
I
think
is
really
critical.
Is
the
community
uses
that
I
really
value
in
the
public
safety
building
right
now
that
I
I'm
not
sure
that
I
see
coming
to
life
and
what
the
site
plan
looks
like
and
so
hope
hope
staff
will
take
this
into
consideration?
You
know
the
auditorium
it
sounded
like
it
was.
There
was
outdoor
space,
but
there's
also
it's
an
indoor
space
right,
so
our
challenge
team
can
still
meet
there.
U
We
can
still
have
other
I
mean
okay,
great,
because
I
I
really
want
to
make
sure
as
we're
doing
mvpdx.
We
have
all
these
other
community
facing
events
that
the
space
right
now
tends
to
be
at
capacity
or
that
room
tends
to
be
at
capacity
now
so
making
sure
we
have
enough
room
for
those
Community.
What
I
call
Community
uses
for,
for
me,
I
think
is,
is
really
important
and
I
I
think.
U
U
I
know
that
we
have
Council
has
funded
both
fire
and
PD
programs.
Looking
into
how
we're
training
our
our
dogs
to
have
also
emotional
support
for
our
Workforce
I
think
it's
really
important
and
so
making
sure
that
that
site
is
adequate.
It's
I
I
like
to
see
it
in
the
site
plan
I,
think
in
terms
of
the
remnant
parcel
I.
U
Think
it's
really
critical
for
us
to
hold
on
to
that,
and
also,
as
was
mentioned,
I
know
that
we
are
busting
at
the
seams
in
our
existing
City
Hall,
and
so
do
we
need
to
include
that
space
on
the
remnant
parcel.
So
you
know
I
think
it's
you
know
per
the
staff
report
too
soon
to
kind
of
talk
about
what
that
would
be
yet,
but
I
do
want
us
to
be
future
planning
on
how
we
grow
and
develop
as
we're
looking
at
long-term
projects
before
the
city.
U
T
AC
T
Exit
from
the
secure
parking
now
I
get
that
there's
like
a
an
understanding
that,
like
yeah,
you
want
the
parking
to
be
secured,
so
you
only
have
like
a
limited
number
of
entrants,
but
the
idea
of
exits
is
slightly
concerning
to
me.
So
I
figured
that
this
might
be
something
that
that
either
of
you
can
address,
because
it
it
it's.
You
gonna
be
trapped.
D
All
right
I'll
go
ahead
and
start
Don,
Cameron,
Public,
Works,
director
and
just
Consulting
with
my
colleagues
here
you
know
I
what
I'm
hearing
from
them
is.
It
would
be
valuable
to
have
a
second
exit
out
of
the
area
that
doesn't
lead
directly
onto
Oak
Street,
whether
that
could
be
something
that's
designed
to
lead
them
in
onto
Evelyn
under
the
ramp,
which
then
sends
them
under
Shoreline
and
into
basically
a
parking
lot.
That's
currently
being
used
to
drive
through
to
connect,
possibly
using
a
portion.
D
The
Remnant
parcel
to
provide
another
exit
point
out
that
kind
of
parallels,
Evelyn
and
exits
out
onto
Franklin,
which
does
give
a
second
point
of
exit
if
Oak
Street
is
blocked
for
any
reason
whatsoever,
and
that
is
something
that
if
council
is
open
to
us
exploring,
we
do
think
it's
worthwhile
to
do.
We
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
it
will
reduce
the
size
of
the
remnant
parcel,
but
there
could
be
advantages
to
that
and
did
you
want
to
add
anything
I.
AS
Wendy
is
a
fire
chief
currently,
while
there
are
gates
in
that
building
we're
able
to
exit
through
a
gate
that
is
for
humans.
So
if
you're
talking
about
vehicle
exiting
or
are
we
talking
about
exiting
for
the
Personnel
in
the
building,
because
the
fire
code
will
come
into
the
equation
and
you
do
have
to
provide
for
me
for
people
to
push
a
panic
Hardware
through
the
gate
to
be
able
to
exit
a
building.
AS
AT
Mike
Canfield
Police,
Chief,
I
I
would
just
Echo
the
sentiment
it.
There
is
a
lot
of
value
for
us
and
and
Public
Safety
to
be
able
to
have
an
alternative
exit,
how
that's
constructed
exactly
a
link
to
staff
and
certainly
to
you
to
decide
what
to
do
with
the
remnant
parcel,
but
the
ability
to
have
an
alternative
exit.
Should
there
be
an
emergency,
whether
intentional
or
mechanical
I,
don't
want
to
have
our
Public
Safety
Services
hindered
because
they're
all
locked
into
one
place
and
can't
escape.
That
could
be
certainly
problematic.
I
T
Right
so
based
on
that,
that
is
something
that
I'm
I'm
hoping
to
support.
If
there
was
any
changes,
I'm
I'm
happy
to
leave
that
up
to
staff,
to
figure
that
out,
I
had
the
opportunity
to
randomly
see
another
Police
Department
building
recently
through
a
bunch
of
hijinks
I.
Guess
where
I
remember
we
arrived
at
the
police
department
and
we're
like
this
is
kind
of
like
a
underwhelming
building.
So
I
guess
it's
not
something
that
we
are
too
worried
about.
T
I
was
trying
to
see
like
what
are
nice
Police
Department
buildings.
Look
like
and
I:
don't
have
that
kind
of
visual
aesthetic,
so
I
guess
even
when
I
was
looking
at
them,
I
don't
know
how
to
even
convert
that
to
making
ours,
but
I
do
love
how
our
city
hall
looks
so
I,
guess
and
I
didn't
see
that
in
the
conceptual
design
here
so
I
guess
a
little
bit
more
effort.
There
I
agree
with
council
member
Ramirez
if
we
are
expanding
the
fourth
having
adding
adding
another
floor.
T
A
Thank
you.
So,
as
for
my
comments,
I'm,
you
know
I'm
more
aligned
with
some
things
that
Council
council
members
have
said
unless,
with
others,
I'm
mostly
prepared
to
move
forward
and
would
rather
not
change
the
project
substantially.
At
this
point,
I
agree
with
I
agree
with
things
I've
heard
about
that.
The
setbacks
are
important
for
outdoor
activities.
AI
A
You
know
the
Out
of
Doors
is
for
Community
engagement
and
I
liked
her
comments
on
other
spaces,
making
sure
we
have
ample
space
for
Community
uses
and
that,
if
possible,
those
be
kind
of
interfaced
with
the
street
so
that,
as
you
walk
by,
you
know
that
it's
a
community
space
or
use
the
the
when
this
is
something.
Although
I
like
many
things
about
our
city
hall,
I,
would
say
it
does
not
engage
with
the
sidewalk
very
well
and
that
maybe
we
could
do
a
better
job.
A
Maybe
we
could
engage
with
the
public
a
little
better
and
and
take
care
with
what
we
put
against
the
sidewalk
as
far
as
if
we
need
to
expand
I
agree
that
I
would
prefer
a
fourth
floor
expansion
but
generally
I
support
the
staff
recommendation.
I
am
maybe
I
would
support,
exploring
a
second
exit
and
I'm,
maybe
not
as
critical
as
the
of
the
architectures.
Some
other
council
members
I
have
some
worries
about
trying
to
make
this
building
too
similar
to
the
City
Hall.
A
Post-Modern
building
you
know
very
pink
and
with
architectural
elements
that
I'm
not
even
going
to
be
able
to
to
describe
but
I,
don't
think
we
I
I,
don't
think
we
could
imitate
that
at
this
point.
You
know:
that's
like
we're
going
back
almost
I,
don't
know
what
is
that
40
years
I,
don't
think
we
can
quite
do
what
what
they
did
at
the
time
and
I
don't
want
to
push
it
in
that
direction.
A
Yeah
and
I
would
take
care
with
the
additional
parcel
I
agree
with
using
it
for
Revenue,
Generation
and
I
would
hate
to
have
it
just
lay
there
for
too
long
I
mean
if
it
were
going
to
lay
there
for
a
long
time.
I
would
prefer
that
it
be
facing
the
sidewalk,
because
that
there's
been
a
lot
of
open
space
facing
the
sidewalk
for
quite
some
time.
AJ
You
mayor
so
I
wanted
to
just
point
out
a
couple
things
that
might
provide
some
more
clarity
or
context
so
part
of
the
window
concept.
So
right
now
you
all
have
been
in
the
the
current
building
and
it
is
very
dark
and
there
are
no
windows.
So
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
that
staff
were
excited
about
was
to
have
Windows
and
natural
light,
so
that's
kind
of
where
I
think
the
feeling
of
that
came
from,
but
hearing
feedback
from
Council
I
think
there
are
certainly
some
areas
that
we
can
look
at.
AJ
If
that's
something
that
is
the
direction
of
council,
but
just
wanted
to
at
least
provide
I.
Think
some
of
the
rationalists
to
why,
just
because
the
the
current
building
is
very,
very
dark
and
somewhat
windowless,
especially
where
the
staff
are
and
then
also
wanted
to
provide
a
little
more
information
about
the
numbers
of
staff,
so
the
152
current
staff
that
number
that
was
provided.
That's
the
folks
that
are
there
now.
That
is
not
including
the
fire
and
Environmental
Protection
group
that
would
be
moving
there.
AJ
So
that
group
is
going
to
be
relocating
now
to
the
Villa
Street
office,
that
Council
approved
rental
of
over
the
next
few
years,
so
that
adds
another
roughly
and
these
are
all
estimated
numbers,
roughly
14
staff,
so
that
would
be
around
166
staff
there.
What
this
building
proposes
is
around
198
ish
staff,
so
I
realized
that
the
plan
was
through
2030.
AJ
Excuse
me,
so
if
you
take
198
minus
166,
that
leaves
growth
for
around
32
positions
and
if
you
look
at
the
rate
of
growth
in
the
police
department,
it's
pretty
unlikely
that
we
would
get
to
32
new
positions
by
2030
and
remember
this
building
is
for
fire
Administration.
So
if
we
were
to
add
fire
fighters-
or
you
know,
captains
or
those
positions,
they
would
be
at
the
fire
stations.
So
really
it's
just
fire
Administration
in
this
building,
which
I
wouldn't
anticipate
growing
very
much
over
the
next.
AJ
You
know
10
to
20
years,
certainly
with
population
growth.
We'd
have
to
look
at
it,
but
not
in
the
next
seven
years.
So
I
think
there
is
some
room
there.
We
have
some
room
for
growth
and
then
the
anticipated
10
officers.
That
would
be
out
in
North.
Bay
Shore
also
gives
us
some
room
for
growth
and
I
realize
that
is
a
30-year
Horizon,
so
it's
much
longer
than
what
we
have,
but
I
just
wanted
to
provide
a
little
more
context
for
just
the
the
notion
of
32
bodies.
AJ
Basically
that
that
could
fill
this
I,
don't
anticipate
at
all
that
we
would
come
anywhere
close
to
that
in
the
next
seven,
probably
even
20
years,
I
think
we've
added
one
position
to
police
in
the
last
five
or
six
years
just
for
context,
and
that
was
the
community
services
or
the
NES
position
that
we
converted
from
limited
period
to
regular
in
this
current
budget
tonight.
So
there
is
a
little
bit
of
room
for
growth,
but
I
think
with
the
public
works
director
working
with
her
team
depending
on
what
the
direction
is
tonight.
AJ
We
could
certainly
go
back
and
and
look
at
look
at
these
things
and
look
at
the
other
exit.
Look
at
the
options
for
some
of
the
windows
looking
at.
If
there
are
some
architectural
changes
that
we
could
make
and
just
really
taking
this
feedback
depending
on
council's
Direction,
because
I
think
I've
heard
some
really
important
things
being
raised,
but
I
at
least
wanted
you
all
to
understand
the
numbers
that
I
think
we
do
have
some
room
for
growth
realistically.
A
So
you
know
the
the
statements
you've
just
made
bring
to
mind
things
that
I
talked
to
Dan
Rich
about
when
I
was
first
elected.
Our
previous
city
manager
and
I
asked
him
about
the
the
need
for
growth
in
a
number
of
different
staff
capacities,
but
particularly
police
and
fire,
and
he
what
he
told
me
is
as
we
grow.
A
He
expects
that
the
administration
that
there
is
economy
of
scale
and
that
we
shouldn't
plan
for
as
if
every
time
we
add
you
know
a
certain
percentage
of
residents,
we
add
a
certain
percentage
of
Administrators
that
that's
not
an
efficient
way
to
grow.
So
it
seems
like
you're,
saying
kind
of
the
same
thing,
but
I
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
fully
understand
that,
because
one
of
the
things
I
don't
want
to
do,
I
don't
want
to
spend
too
much
on
this.
AJ
AJ
Certainly,
there
would
be
I
would
imagine
some
Administration
positions
over
time,
but
not
at
the
rate
of
getting
to
the
number
of
around
32
positions,
but
yes,
I
would
anticipate.
There
would
be
some
some
growth,
but
not
within
seven
years
that
sort
of
growth,
but
the
other
part
of
it
is
again
this
North
Bay
Shore
area.
That's
also
in
play.
A
AJ
N
N
R
R
It
is
not
my
intention
to
slow
things
down.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
planning
for
the
right
Horizon
so
that
we
don't
end
up
in
a
situation
where
we
regret
not
doing
something.
You
know
30
40
50
years
from
now,
and
so
what
I
would
like
to
propose
is
that
we
asked
staff
to
take
a
look
at
the
expected
population
that
would
occupy
this
building
40
50
years
from
now
and
take
a
look
at
if
that
means
another
floor.
R
I
definitely
heard
the
comment
about
taking
a
look
at
the
corner
of
Evelyn
and
Franklin
and
making
sure
that
that
still
is
welcoming
and
could
be
used
for
community
activities
like
we've
had
in
the
past
at
the
front
of
the
public
safety
building.
While
I
appreciate
the
planters
that
are
there
and
I
can
imagine
what
they're
there,
for
maybe
we
need
to
look
at
does.
Is
that
conducive
to
some
of
the
activities
we've
often
had
in
that
Center
area
I
would
say,
take
a
look
at.
R
I
I
just
feel
like
this
doesn't
convey
the
sense
of
like
permanence
and
kind
of
like
presence
like
some
gravitas
to
it,
that
I'm
looking
for
and
it
doesn't
I'm
not
saying
it
has
to
be
an
exactly
replica.
I
want
to
make
sure
folks
hear
that,
but
something
that's
more
along
the
lines
of
what
we
have
I
appreciate,
though,
that
we
want
to
be
sensitive
to
light
and
so
I
guess
the
direction
is
just.
R
Let's
take
a
look
at
some
other
alternatives
for
the
architecture
that
does
provide
light
and
is
welcoming
is
more
along
the
lines
of
what
we
already
have
versus
an
office
building
and,
let's
see,
if
there
is,
is
trying
to
take
a
lot
of
notes,
Here
and
look
at
the
second
exit
from
the
garage
and
I.
Don't
know
how
long
this
would
take
I'm
not
trying
to
make
this
a
really
long
process.
AP
R
AP
AP
A
R
AP
So,
as
far
as
I
think,
the
the
site
layout
isn't
I,
didn't
hear,
site
layout
changes,
significant
site,
layout
changes,
certainly
architectural
and
then
incorporating
what's
needed.
So
we
do.
We
would
like
to
return
in
the
fall
to
council.
I,
don't
know
exactly
when
that
would
be
based
on
it.
We
have
to
Circle
back
with
staff,
talk
to
the
consultant,
discuss
what
this
would
mean.
We'd
work
over
the
summer
to
do
this,
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
council
again.
AP
R
And
I
guess
you
know
if
it's
less
finalized
when
it
comes
back
to
council
I'm?
Okay
with
that,
so
that
if
we
have
additional
input-
or
we
say-
oh
no-
don't
do
that!
The
cost
is
too
much
or
something
we
do
that
before
it
goes
through
like
the
DRC
and
all
the
other
steps,
I'm
fine
with
that,
if
others
are.
S
S
U
U
No
worries
I
saw
the
red
like
on
I
was
like
oh
wait.
You
know
I
appreciate
that
its
main
use
is
going
to
be
for
Public
Safety
purposes,
but
the
only
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
the
only
thing
that
we
hadn't
talked
about
was
kind
of
the
other
uses
that
we
have
for,
which
are
you
know,
interfacing
with
the
community.
We
have
so
many
great
programs
right
Partnerships
with
our
nonprofits
or
school
districts,
Etc.
AK
Sorry,
if
I
could
just
put
some
context
into
as
I'm
hearing
what
you're
saying
one
thing
that
probably
we
should
re-explain
is
why
the
building
is
where
it
is.
The
building
is
in
its.
The
design
is
putting
it
where
it
is
primarily
because
we're
designing
so
they
can
be
constructed,
while
the
existing
building
remains
in
operation.
AR
AC
R
R
S
So,
just
to
continue
that
that
was
really
my
interest
was
that
when
I
hear
councilman
Ramirez
your
comment
about
jet
Revenue
generation
but
I
think
I
read
in
the
the
questions
that,
because
of
the
Surplus
Land
Act,
we're
kind
of
limited
in
in
that
and
then
number
two
I
know
we
want
affordable
housing
and
housing.
But
at
this
for
me
this
is
really
the
public
safety.
S
And
I'm
not
concerned
I'm,
not
so
certain
that
having
housing
next
to
a
police
station
is
the
best
location,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
you
know
we
have
room
to
expand
and
use
the
site
for
its
primary
purpose
of
Public
Safety.
So
my
thought
too
was
like
having
the
land
sit
there.
You
know
we
could
landscape
it
and
temporarily
make
it
into
a
little
mini
Park
until
we
decide
you
know
if
we.
AI
C
You
mayor
I'm,
appreciating
in
this
moment
that
the
value
of
Master
planning
it
would
be
nice
to
have
some
sense
of
what
we
want
to
achieve
with
the
remnant
parcel,
because
then
that
would
help
us
I
think
determine
what
design
elements
would
be
most
ideal.
I'm
generally
supportive
of
the
motion.
I
think
I
appreciate
the
framing
as
exploring
a
lot
of
these
Concepts.
C
If
I
could
suggest
to
maybe
some
guard
rails
or
additional
parameters,
one
would
be
to
give
staff
some
pretty
broad
discretion
in
determining
whether
a
given
element
ends
up
being
so
costly
or
or
so
significant
significant,
a
change
that
it
ends
up
substantially.
Delaying
the
project
so,
for
instance,
I'm
not
opposed
to
exploring
a
shooting
range.
R
C
Thank
you
and
it
I
I
trust
staff
too.
I
think
they
will
do
a
a
good
job
and
also
justify
their
their
their
determination
and
then
the
other
parameter
or
consideration
would
be
I'm
not
opposed
at
all
to
exploring
the
the
second
exit
from
the
secure
parking
structure,
but
that
that
it
be
designed
in
such
a
way
that
it
doesn't
have
the
effect
of
substantially
impacting
The
Remnant
parcel
or
diminishing
its
future
utility
or
Integrity,
because
I
I'm
I,
don't
I,
don't
want
to
profess
any
technical
expertise.
C
But
if
that's
that's,
probably
going
to
have
to
be
secured
in
and
of
itself
as
well,
you
don't
want
people
jumping
a
fence
to
get
into
a
secured
area.
So
I
don't
know
what
it
will
look
like
like,
but
it
might
end
up
pretty
substantially
impacting
that
Remnant
parcel
so
that
staff
just
have
another
guard
rail
or
parameter
that
as
they
designed
that
if
they
conclude
it's
necessary
or
appropriate
that
they
also
think
about
minimizing
its
impact
to
the
future.
Use
of
the
remnant
parcel.
R
S
S
C
A
So
I'll
just
add,
I
do
think
I
will
be
supporting
the
motion.
I
guess.
My
two
kind
of
caveats
is
I,
hope
that
the
architecture
doesn't
go
and
I'm
not
expecting
a
modification
to
the
to
the.
This
is
not
a
friendly
Amendment,
but
I
hope
it
doesn't
go
too
far
in
the
direction
of
kind
of
faux
historic
is
my
okay,
good
and
and
then
the
second
thing
is
that
I
do
I,
do
really
value
the
concept
of
economies
of
scale
and
I.
A
AC
AP
R
Yeah,
so
I
didn't
make
that
clear.
So
when
I
talked
about
that,
I
was
talking
about
the
current
corner,
but
if
it's
not
possible
to
make
that
a
nice
area
taking
into
considerations
all
the
things
we
want
it
to
be
then
look
at.
Is
there
something
we
could
do
on
the
remnant,
whether
it
be
temporary
or
permanent.
A
I
actually
have
a
question
related
to
that
one
of
the
things
I
wondered
looking
at
and
I
didn't
look
at
it
closely
enough,
but
sometimes
buildings
have
very
large
lobbies
like
larger
than
they
need
to
be
so
it
seems,
like
that's
a
possible
way
to
enlarge
the
out
of
doors
and
make
the
lobby
smaller.
I
have
no
idea.
I
haven't
looked
at
it
enough
to
see
whether
that's
appropriate
in
this
case,
but
it's
one
one
possible
way
of
handling
that
without
you
know,
eating
into
other
parts
of
the
of
site.
AP
A
D
A
A
Okay,
so
moving
along
to
item
7.1
public
hearing
on
recommended
trash
recycling,
Organics
rate
increase.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
a
public
hearing
under
proposition.
218
utility
rate
increases
are
subject
to
a
written
protest
that
may
be
filed
by
affected
customers.
Notices
went
out
to
all
customers,
as
required
by
law,
including
instructions
for
submitting
written
protests,
and
this
hearing
complies
with
proposition
218
requirements,
written
protests
to
the
recommended
rate
increases
received
by
mail
at
the
city,
clerk's
office
or
in
person
at
the
public
hearing.
A
If
anyone
in
the
audience
has
a
written
protest
to
the
proposed
rate
increases,
please
give
it
to
the
city
clerk
at
this
time,
so
it
may
be
counted
and
recorded.
We
will
now
hear
a
presentation
by
assistant,
finance
and
administrative
Services,
director
Grace
sang
regarding
the
requirements
of
prop
218.
I
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
Sorry
go
back
yeah,
yeah
in
front
of
you
surface
guy
picture
here
for
property
management
and
residents.
We
College
site
assessment
is
also
available
to
provide
the
composting
service
level
recommendation
and
we
also
have
some
tools
and
resources
provided
to
multi-family
homes,
which
include
program,
introduction,
letters,
composting,
how
to
guide
and
free
food
scrap
kitchen
pile
and
composting
programs,
science,
signatures
and
staff
trainings.
AU
AU
So
for
2023
2324,
a
7
increase
for
the
solid
waste
rate
is
recommended.
This
is
based
on
the
ecology
agreement
that
provided
8.13
increase
that
we
have
with
Recology
that,
based
on
the
projected
expenditure
income
and
when
and
the
revenue
requirements
and
cities,
residential
and
Commercial
trash
and
also
residential
recyclables,
are
all
processed
at
the
Smart
Station.
AU
So
the
next
slide
shows
you
the
comparison
for
the
solid
waste
rate
at
our
neighboring
cities
for
comparison
purpose,
Palo
Alto
is
not
using
smart
stations,
so
it's
only
Sunnyvale
and
Mountain
View
using
that
and
the
chart
above
shows
that
our
most
common
residential
bin
is
a
32
gallons
card,
which
is
seven
percent
increase.
Is
a
cost
increase
about
2.75
cents
per
month
over
about
54
of
our
residential
customer?
Has
this
have
this
size
spin?
AU
Follows
the
proposition
to
18
process
based
on
the
California
Supreme
Court
decisions?
This
process
requires
a
public
hearing
be
held
prior
to
any
increase
being
adopted
for
the
utility.
Raise
notice
are
required
to
be
sent
45
days
prior
to
the
hearing
dates
and
on
the
screen.
Here
is
a
copy
of
the
pop
218
notice
that
we
send
out
about
16
700
notice
will
mail
on
or
before
May
12th
and
no
tests
must
be
included,
recommended
rate
adjustment,
calculation
of
methodologies
and
the
process
for
residents
in
business
to
submit
a
protest
wall
at
this
hearing.
AU
If
a
majority
protest
rule
which
is
50
plus
one
on
protest
OBC,
which
is
equivalent
to
about
8360
protests
rate
increase
subject
to
the
public
hearing,
cannot
be
adopted
tonight
without
repeating
the
notice
and
hearing
process.
As
of
5
pm
today,
we
have
received
one
protest
so
far,
so
in
summary,
staff
is
requesting
Council
to
consist
of
recommended
seven
percent
trash
and
recycler
rate
increase.
Adoption
of
this
rate,
increased
for
2324
is
included
with
the
budget
public
hearing
item
amending
the
master
fee
schedule,
which
will
be
happening
later
on
tonight's
Council
agenda.
AU
A
AV
Lucas
Ramirez,
the
Y
is
not
in
Spanish.
I
was
not
aware,
but
I'm
glad
that
I
speak
English.
So
I
think
this
should
be
one
thing
that
we,
the
city,
has
to
talk
about
it
because
we
need
to
know
we
need
to
know,
and
we
not
get
surprises
and
we're
not
get
shocked
because,
as
you
know,
we
live
in
day
by
day
check
by
check
to
cover
our
rent
and
also
I.
Think
in
Palo
Alto,
maybe
Sunnyvale
they
have.
AV
You
has
kind
of
like
little
hires
on
on
increasing
is
because
maybe
they're
already
informed
so,
and
we
just
always
get
surprised
in
what
would
never
telling
us
anything
in
Spanish
and
I.
Please
one
more
time
yes
consider
this,
and
because
also
you
increase
like
five
percent
and
seven
percent
and
totally
if
we
adding
is
like
a
hundred
dollar
more
added
on
our
monthly
basic
rate.
Thank
you.
So
very
much
have
a
good
night.
AW
Good
evening,
mayor
and
City
Council
Members
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
just
like
some
of
the
spots
on
behalf
of
the
cafecito
in
Residence
of
Mountain,
View
and
I,
and
this
is
the
second
year
that
I
come
and
place.
My
concern
that
this
notice
one
is
not
being
sent
to
every
single
resident
and
it's
not
being
done
in
different
languages,
it's
only
in
English.
AW
So
the
fact
that
you
are
not
getting
any
pro
protest
is
because
they're
not
aware
all
that
they
know
is
that
their
utilities
are
going
up
and
they
don't
know
the
U.S
city
council
have
a
discretion.
You
can
say
no
to
these
scene
Chris's,
especially
because
inflation
is
so
high
and
I
can
tell
you.
It's
like
I
I
I
feel
like
I
am
always
running
against
time,
because
I
have
reduced
my
my
expenditures,
unnecessary
expenditures,
I,
don't
I.
I
have
cut
them
out
because
my
rent,
my
sewage
everything
is
going
up.
AW
Food
is
going
up.
I
cannot
afford
it
and
I'm
very
sad.
The
city
council
is
also
pushing
people
out.
Pushing
people
who
are
the
most
in
need
us.
The
the
people
who
are
paycheck
to
paycheck
so
I
urge
I
implore
that
this
city
council
says
no
to
these
increases
one,
because
we
are
not
aware
we
are
not
being
notified
and
is
so
unfair
that
we
feel
powerless
because
nobody
has
been
telling
us
that
this
is
happening.
AW
AX
Good
evening,
everyone
I
really
want
to
Echo
what
Guadalupe
said
as
well.
I
feel
like
I'm,
pretty
tapped
into
what's
going
on
with
the
Mountain
View
government.
I
had
no
idea
about
this
at
all
until
actually
tonight,
when
I
was
pinged
about
it
and
I
would
definitely
have
Pro
protested
as
well
as
many
other
neighbors
within
the
mobile
home
Community.
AX
Something
to
really
think
about.
There's
still
people
who
have
been
really
affected
by
the
pandemic
by
the
inflation
going
on
the
mobile
home
Community
is
particularly
vulnerable,
especially
since
we
were
passed
over
from
the
csfra
back
in
2015..
So
so
many
of
us
have
been
getting
really
steep
rent
increases
since
then,
so
adding
this
on
top
of
that
would
be
completely
devastating
for
many
people.
I
really
really
hope
the
city
council
really
thinks
about
that
tonight
and
when
making
the
decision
takes
all
that
to
encounter.
Thank
you
so
much.
A
AD
AA
AD
M
AD
AT
AO
A
Thank
you.
I'll
now
bring
the
item
back
for
Council
deliberation
and
action
and
note
that
emotion
should
include
a
finding
that
no
majority
protest
has
been
received
and
that
the
recommended
trash,
Recycling
and
organic
rates
for
fiscal
year
2324
shall
be
included
with
the
adoption
of
the
budget
in
our
next
agenda
item,
which
is
item
7.2,
so
Council
deliberation,
council,
member
Ramos.
T
T
There
there's
a
lot
of
fear
right
now
and
and
that
that
was
what
some
of
those
comments
that
we
heard
during
public
comment
were
about,
and
it
is
fear
of
it
passing
through.
So
as
you
send
that
kind
of
information,
maybe
some
information
about
the
rent
stabilization
program
to
see
what
actually
is
allowed
to
be
passed
through
versus
not
and
that
I
think
that
that
could
help
quell
some
issues
and
fears
and
I.
B
N
Kind
of
along
those
lines,
I
asked
the
question
specifically
of
what
happens
if
someone
can't
pay
their
water
or
their
trash
fees,
because,
obviously
we
we
don't
want
anybody
to
get
evicted
because
they
can't
pay
their
water
bill
or
their
trash
bill.
But
for
the
those
of
us
for
many
of
us
who
can't
afford
to
pay
it,
you
know
we
it's
reasonable
to
have
these
raises.
N
So
I
got
an
answer
back.
You
know.
I
asked
that
question
I
got
an
answer
back,
that
the
City
offers
the
option
of
payment
plans
to
customers
who
need
more
time
to
play
their
utility
bills
and
in
addition,
there
are
two
utility
assistance
services
available
to
Mountain
View
customers
that
are
administered
by
the
Sacred
Heart
Community
Services.
Is
that
true?
Or
is
that
a
CSA
here?
It's
it's
Sacred
Heart
here,
oh
okay
and
one
is
called
the
low
income
household
water
assistance
program.
N
It's
a
federally
funded
program
that
provides
financial
assistance
to
low-income
Californians
to
help
them
manage
their
Residential,
Water
and
Wastewater
bills
and
I.
Remember
looking
at
the
amount
that
of
arpa
funds,
because
that
was
one
of
the
things
that
Arbor
funds
were
supposed
to
cover
and
it
was,
it
was
not
a
trivial
amount
of
money.
It
was
like
four
hundred
and
eighty
thousand.
What
was
it.
N
AU
AF
A
Yeah
and
an
accompanying
question
to
that
is,
is
it
very
formulaic
in
terms
of
you
know
the
way
that
I
assume
it's
a
postcard
is
send
out
or
or
can
it
be?
Can
the
city
easily
I
know
the
city
can
translate
anything,
but
are
we
given
a
very
formulaic
card?
That's
all
in
English.
Would
it
be
easy
to
do
it
in
two
languages?
What
do
you
know
the
answer
to
that
the.
A
A
AU
A
N
N
So
it's
it's
a
little
packet
that
you
get
and
obviously
most
of
us
ignore
it.
I
was
wondering
if
maybe
it
might
be
better
to
include
notification
in
the
Outreach.
We
do
like
the
city
connection.
You
know
have
a
paragraph
in
it
that
you
should
expect
this
in
your
mail
and
because
I
think
that
that's
a
little
bit
or
something
along
those
lines,
I
would
just
urge
I
mean
I,
don't
think
we.
N
This
is
a
pretty
substantial
little
package
you
get
from
the
utility
and
so
I
I.
Don't
think
more
of
the
same.
You
know
if
it's
not
working
doing
more
of
it
is
not
necessarily
going
to
meet
our
goals.
I
I
would
suggest
that.
Maybe
we
ask
staff
to
think
a
little
bit
about.
You
know
what
would
be
a
better
way
to
get
this
out
and
and
move
along
on
that
lines.
So.
AJ
Yes,
thank
you
vice
mayor,
so
I
believe
that,
as
a
City
attorney
said,
we
will
need
to
look
at
the
legal
implications
of
mailing
it
to
folks
who
aren't
ratepayers,
because
only
rate
pairs
can
protest
in
that
legal
instance.
But
what
we
can
do
is
make
sure
that
our
community
groups
are
aware.
Certainly
the
community
groups
we've
heard
from
we
can
make
sure
that
we
are
posting
it
more
widely
than
is
done
now
through
City
Hall
connection.
We
could
do
it
also
on
social
media.
AJ
C
Also,
if
memory
serves,
we
have
funding
in
the
budget
for
a
language,
access
policy
and
I,
don't
know
if
staff
has
some
idea
for
when
that's
likely
to
be
implemented,
but
I'm
I've
been
told
that
that
will
also
inform
how
we
provide
notice
for
the
rate
increases.
Is
that
the
case?
So
we
we
do,
have
a
policy
in
the
works
that
I
think
it
doesn't
have
to
be.
You
said
seven
pages.
It
won't
have
to
be
seven
pages
in
every
language.
C
Maybe
there's
a
smarter
way
of
providing
that
notice,
but
it
sounds
like
it's
already
in
the
works
to
to
make
the
noticing
available
in
other
languages
and
I
I'm,
looking
forward
to
that
Improvement,
so
staff
I
think
there
were
some
good
ideas
in
shared.
Do
you
want
that
in
the
motion
as
well,
or
is
that
something
you
can
do
administratively.
AJ
T
Yeah,
it's
just
clarification
on
I'm,
looking
at
what
happens
when
this
and
this
and
this
so
we
we
send
this
out
to
the
rate
payers
and
those
rate
payers
are
the
ones
who
are
able
to
protest.
So
what
happens
if
the
rate
payers
pass
this
on
to
tenants
now,
in
some
cases
there
are
the
rent
stabilization
protections.
What
does
that
mean
for
those
tenants
and
then
what
does
that
mean
for
tenants
who
are
not
having
those
kinds
of
protections?
Where
is
their
ability
to
protest?
These
increases.
AU
AJ
Thank
you
mayor,
so
councilmember
Emma.
So
this
is
something
that
staff
will
look
into
and
with
the
education
part
of
the
expansion
on
on
that
next
year.
I
think
we
can
certainly
look
into
how
we
can
get
the
word
out
to
folks
that
are
renting.
That
may
not
get
a
notice,
so
I
would
expect
that.
That's
all
part
of
what.
N
And
another
thing
that
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
include
in
this
is
why
these
rates
need
to
be
raised,
because
I
think
if
people
understand
why
they
need
to
be
raised,
it's
it's
much
more
palatable
than
if
they
don't
and
that
seven
page
packet
that
we
did
get
did
explain
it,
and
so
I
hope
that
you
know
when
we,
when
we
we
talk
about
in
in
the
you
know,
whatever
Outreach
we
do,
that.
You
know
that
we
sort
of
tell
both
sides
of
the
story.
Why
it's
it?
N
A
So
before
we
vote,
I
guess
I
have
one
additional
question
which
is:
is
there?
Is
there
any
reason
as
we
explore
the
issues
that
Council
has
raised,
that
maybe
the
rental
housing
committee
might
want
to
put
this
on
their
agenda
or
could
that
is
that
part
of
the
exploration
figuring
out
whether
they
need
to
talk
about
this
in
any
way.
AJ
AH
Yes,
thanks
for
the
question
we
will
check
and
I
think
we
will
also
want
to
check
with
the
rental
housing
committee
legal
folks.
There
are
Provisions
in
the
cities
of
RA,
where
the
annual
allowable
rent
increase
includes
utility
costs,
so
I
think
that's
where
we'll
have
to
go
back
study
a
little
bit
more
and
get
some
legal
input
and
we
can
come
back
with
some
responses
after
we
do
some
research.
I
A
AO
A
AQ
Services,
director
and
tonight
we've
got
item
number
7.2,
which
is
the
public
but
public
hearing
for
the
budget.
Adoption
I'm
happy
to
present
that
there
we
go
so
just
a
quick
recap
of
the
timeline
of
the
budget
process.
As
a
reminder,
the
last
meeting
that
we
had
was
on
June
13th
was
for
the
first
public
hearing
for
the
budget.
This
was
to
receive
comments
from
the
public
and
receive
direction
from
the
council.
Now
we're
at
the
final
step
in
the
process
adopting
the
CIP
budget
operating
budget
and
including
our
Master
Fee
schedule.
AQ
On
this
slide,
there's
a
few
changes
that
have
happened
since
the
June
13th
meeting.
The
the
first
item,
as
your
call
was
added
as
part
of
council
action
recommendation
on
the
13th
to
add
the
seven
thousand
dollars
in
the
CNC
neighborhood
grant
program,
increasing
funding
from
33
000
to
40
000
total
there's
also
a
few
other
items
that
were
made
after
the
recommended
public
or
mark
them
into
budget
public
hearing,
and
these
were
really
due
to
just
timing
issues.
A
few
of
these
items
were
added
because
of
price
increases.
AQ
That
would
be
happening
over
the
summer
that
we
would
like
to
avoid
so
having
those
in
this
recommended
budget
would
would
help
avoid
some
price
increases,
especially
for
the
the
top
item
there
on
the
the
list.
There's
also
was
some
concern
about
some
outdated
equipment
that
we
needed
to
get
on
the
list
in
regards
to
the
police
logging
recorder
number
two
on
there,
and
then
there
was
some
just
cleanup
items
that
we
that
were
either
erroneously
left
out
or
needed
to
do
due
to
timing
needed
to
be
added
at
between
the
budget
hearing
and
today.
AQ
So
that's
on
this
list.
Here
so
these
are
the
changes
from
last
time
till
this
meeting,
and
this
here
is
just
a
recap
of
of
the
general
operating
fund.
As
you'll
recall.
In
the
last
meeting,
we
had
a
ending
balance,
operating
balance
of
6
million,
and
so
with
all
the
changes,
any
changes
that
were
made
since
then.
We'll
now
have
a
5.1
million
dollar
operating
balance.
AQ
Quite
a
few
recommended
actions
with
this
item
tonight:
I'm
not
going
to
read
them
all
but
they're
on
the
next
few
slides.
But
in
summary,
these
are
what
we
are
recommending
and
including
adopting
the
budget,
the
operating
budget
and
CIP
budget.
Also,
the
Gan
Appropriations
limit
is
included
in
here,
as
well
as
the
Master
Fee
schedules.
A
Thank
you
before
questions.
This
item
includes
a
recommendation
that
Council
adopt
a
resolution
appropriating
funds
for
Capital
Improvement
project
24-38,
which
is
underground
utilities
at
1020,
Terra
Bella.
This
action
requires
a
council
member
to
recuse
from
participation
in
this
project
due
to
conflicts
of
interest.
So
we'll
consider
this
resolution
first
council
member
kamay,
do
you
have
an
announcement
to
make?
Yes.
U
Thank
you.
I
am
recusing
myself
from
participating
in
recommendation
number
one
under
item
7.2
adoption
of
a
resolution
appropriating
funds
for
Capital
Improvement
project,
24-38,
underground
utilities,
at
1020,
tarabella,
due
to
my
employment
as
an
external
Affairs
manager
with
atnt,
an
international
telecommunications
company.
I
R
So
I
move
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
adopting
Appropriations
for
the
adopted
Capital
Improvement
project
24-38
underground
utilities
at
1020,
Terra
Bella
identified
in
the
recommended
fiscal
year
2023-24
through
fiscal
year,
2027-28
Capital
Improvement
program
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waived.
A
A
The
council
will
now
convene
a
public
hearing
except
public
comment
and
consider
the
remaining
recommended
actions
to
adopt
the
fiscal
year.
2324
budgets,
Appropriations,
limit
fee
modifications
and
funding
for
the
adopted
fiscal
year,
2324
Capital
Improvement
projects
do
any
members
of
the
council
have
questions.
A
R
R
We
definitely
need
to
figure
out
how
to
I'm.
Sorry
I
feel
like
a
broken
record
on
this
one,
but
we
definitely
need
to
figure
out
how
to
allocate
more
funds
to
road
maintenance,
while
PCI
of
70
is
at
the
very
low
end
of
good
I
do
think
our
residents
expect
more
than
that,
and
so
we
do
need
a
plan
for
not
only
just
maintaining
70
but
getting
to
the
75
that
I
think
residents
would
be
more
happy
with.
So
thanks
very
much
for
providing
that
information,
it
was
really
helpful.
N
2023-24
Capital
Improvement
projects
for
the
shoreline
Regional
Park
Community,
including
amendments
to
existing
projects
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
their
reading
waived
and
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
Capital
Improvements
financing
authority
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
adopting
the
fiscal
year
2023-24
budget
for
Debt
Service
payments
to
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waived.
AL
The
life
of
a
planning
project
is
typically
two
years
and
the
life
of
our
subdivision
map
or
a
parcel
map
in
our
ordinance
is
about
12
months,
and
so
the
applicant
actually
requested
an
extension
and
received
it
prior
to
the
expiration
of
the
map
and
on
July
13th
of
2022.
The
subdivision
committee
approved
a
one-year
extension
within
this
time
frame.
AL
AL
C
A
Okay,
any
additional
questions
seeing
none
from
Council
would
any
member
of
the
public
joining
us
virtually
or
in
person
like
to
provide
comments.
If
you
are
virtual
and
want
to
provide
comments,
please
raise
your
hand
in
zoom
and
if
you're
in
person,
please
submit
a
blue
speaker
card
to
the
city
clerk
we'll
take
in-person
speakers.
First.
A
I
guess
we
don't
have
any
and
virtual
speakers,
please
raise
your
hand
I,
don't
see
any
of
those
either.
So
I'll
now
bring
the
item
back
for
Council
deliberation
and
action
and
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
resolution
attached
to
the
report.
U
C
Thank
you,
mayor,
I
have
nothing
to
report,
but
I
did
want
to
ask
staff
I've
already
spoken
briefly,
I
think
with
the
city
manager
about
this.
But
many
months
ago
the
council
directed
staff
to
return
with
resolutions
or
modifications
to
the
whatever
establishing
documents
exist
for
advisory
bodies
to
allow
alternates
and
I
was
curious
to
know
from
staff.
AO
The
city
manager's
office
and
city
clerk's
office
have
been
coordinating
on
that
effort,
oh
good
evening,
Audrey
Seymour,
randburg
assistant
city
manager.
Thank
you
for
the
question
and
we
have
two
tracks
one
to
bring
back
resolutions
that
serve
to
customize,
or
rather
standardize
across
all
the
advisory
bodies
on
their
what's
the
term
that
I'm
looking
for
that.
S
Thank
you
mayor.
Just
a
couple
of
good
news
items:
I
received
a
notice
from
our
California
Transportation,
commissioner
Carl,
Gardino
and
I
think
we're
already
aware
of
this,
but
the
there's
a
recommendation
on
the
CT,
the
California
Transportation
Commission
meeting
agenda
tomorrow
for
recommending
25
million
dollars
for
our
Castro
Street
grade
separation
project.
So
fingers
crossed
on
that
one
and
then
Senator
Becker
left
me
a
message
saying
that
he
was
able
to
secure
1.5
million
dollars
for
CSA
and
I'm
thinking
it
might
be
for
their
Capital
project.
So
good
news
thanks.
N
Yeah
I
attended
the
June
14th
Silicon
Valley
clean
energy
study
session.
This
is
one
where
they
wanted
alternates
and
members
to
attend,
and
basically
this
was
about
how
it's
getting
more
difficult
to
buy
all
clean
power.
In
a
sense
due
to
the
success
of
the
the
the
clean
energy,
the
community
aggregation
movement,
I
mean
there
are
so
many
Community
aggregation
organizations
now
buying
clean
energy
that
that
it's
getting
much
more
competitive.
N
So
there
was
a
discussion
of
of
how
they
are
going
to
move
forward
with
that
and
lots
of
discussion
about
whether
it
would
be
the
the
we
would
have
to
decide
in
the
next
year
years
about
whether
we
want
to
have
our
what
we
mean
by
Clean
Energy.
Do
we
mean
it
every
hour
of
every
day,
or
do
we
mean
it
on
a
you
know,
on
a
sort
of
on
a
different
on
a
a
basis,
or
do
we
want
to
do
it
a
95
or
you
know?
N
N
One
more
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
I
attended
the
the
Mountain
View
Westman
school
board
meeting,
where
they
voted
to
support
the
education
enhancement
jpa,
and
that
was.
It
was
good
to
see
that
and
the
comments
that
the
the
various
board
members
made
were
quite
positive,
so
I
I
was
you
know.
I
was
heartened
by
that.
AJ
Yes,
thank
you.
Mayor
I,
just
have
a
couple
short
updates
for
Council.
So
very
recently,
we've
gotten
some
requests
and
public
comments
about
adding
ancillary
or
commuter
parking
to
our
safe
parking
lot
at
Shoreline
and
I
just
wanted
to
let
Council
know
that
information
has
changed
since
we
started
that
program
a
couple
years
ago
and
once
where
we
thought
that
it
wasn't
going
to
be
possible
and
for
various
reasons,
I
won't
necessarily
get
into
tonight.
AJ
T
AJ
Don't
know
how
many
what
that
may
mean,
but
we
will
re
start
those
conversations
so
wanted
to
give
Council
an
update
about
that.
The
second
update
is
also
we
have
received
questions
about
the
number
of
public
restrooms
and
what
the
city
is
doing
with
restrooms
and
specifically
for
and
house
residents,
so
I
just
wanted
to.
Let
Council
know
that
we
do
have
31
existing
public
restrooms
in
Mountain
View.
AJ
That's
a
combinations
of
restrooms
at
our
city
parks,
various
porta
potties
that
are
placed
at
different
locations
around
town
there's
five
of
those
also
restrooms
at
our
safe
parking
locations.
We
also
have
dignity
on
Wheels,
which
provides
restroom
and
hygiene
services,
and
also
we
will
be
looking
at
what
possibilities
we
may
have
to
look
at
different
criteria
in
our
Parks
and
Rec
strategic
plan
as
we
develop
new
parks,
so
various
criteria
for
adding
public
restrooms
there
at
our
new
parks.
AJ
We're
also
going
to
be,
as
you
all,
are
aware,
bringing
Council
the
homelessness
response
strategy
next
year.
So
next
calendar
year
in
2024.,
part
of
that
strategy
does
entail
looking
at
what
might
be
needed
for
various
hygiene
or
restroom
services.
I.
Don't
know
at
this
point
exactly
what
that
might
mean,
but
we
did
just
secure
the
consultant.
That's
going
to
help
us
with
that.
AJ
So
that's
the
other
part
of
it
and
then,
lastly,
our
city
staff
will
be
meeting
with
several
of
the
community
Advocates
who
are
really
behind
and
passionate
about
this
effort
just
to
let
them
know
what
we
will
be
working
on,
what
the
possibilities
are
and
one
of
those
possibilities
is
potentially
exploring
some
sort
of
mobile
restroom
near
the
Wyandotte
area
likely
at
the
park.
So
that
is
something
that
we
will
be
looking
at.
So
that
way
that
folks,
that
live
in
the
area
who
go
to
the
park
might
be
able
to
use
it.
AJ
A
So
I
have
a
a
report.
I
attended,
what's
planned
to
be
a
quarterly
meeting
for
City
Mayors,
it
was
this
would
be
Sunnyvale,
so
it
would
be
mayor,
Larry,
Klein,
Santa,
Clara,
So,
Lisa,
Gilmore
and
cupertino's
mayor
hung
Wei.
This
was
I,
think
sort
of
the
brainchild
of
Mayor
hungway.
She
wanted
to
meet
with
City
Mayors
who,
where
she
thought
the
cities
had
a
lot
in
common
in
terms
of
what
they
were
experiencing.
A
We
all
presented
some
of
the
major
projects
in
our
city
and
we
all
have
long-term
kind
of
like
the
Google
master
plan,
eco
urbanist
car
light
developments
that
will
be
happening
over
the
next
number
of
decades
in
in
Sunnyvale.
It's
includes
20
000
units
of
housing
in
Santa
Clara.
It
includes,
and
arts
and
entertainment
portion
of
the
development
and
cupertino's
is
the
Valco
project
so
with
a
large,
Park
and
so
forth.
A
So
that
said,
there
were.
There
are
three
particular
things
that
the
Mayors
wanted
to
focus
on
sharing
information
for
so
one
is
revenue
measures
for
infrastructure
for
some
of
our
upcoming
projects
and
development.
Another
is
Homeless,
Solutions
and
possibly
affordable.
Housing
Solutions
there's
some
interest
in
our
safe
parking
and
possible
other
solutions
that
the
other
cities
can
learn
from
and
the
last
one
is
possible
networking
of
our
shuttles
so
that
we
could
have
a
maybe
a
more
Regional
mass
transit.
U
Great,
thank
you.
Sorry,
I
just
recalled
so
on
the
21st
I
attended
our
finance
committee
meeting
for
track.
Community,
Health,
Awareness,
Council
I
think
that
colleagues
are
aware
that
Chuck
had
to
to
stop
Clinic
services
this
month
and
are
going
through
quite
quite
a
bit
to
restructure
the
organization,
and
so
we
have
our
board
meeting
tomorrow.
So
I
won't
be
able
to
update
Council,
but
this
was
just
going
into
the
summer.
U
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
touched
upon
it
and
the
Santa
Clara
County
Board
of
Supervisors
did
vote
to
allocate
one
million
dollars
towards
check
what
that
actually
means.
We
do
not
know
yet,
and
there
has
been
discussion.
Does
that
mean
that
the
county
would
also
join
the
jpa,
so
there's
more
to
come,
and
so,
when
we
reconvene
in
September
I
think
there'll
be
quite
a
large
update
on
on
what's
Happening
and
there
was
also
Federal
funding.
That
Chuck
has
pursued
that
we
hope
to
hear
back
within
the
next
couple
weeks.
U
A
A
We
will
move
on
to
item
number
10.
The
council
will
have
a
special
closed
session,
which
is
adjournment.
The
council
will
have
a
special
closed
session
meeting
on
June
29th
before
we
head
into
a
summer
recess,
so
our
next
regular
city
council
meeting
will
be
held
on
September
12th
of
2023,
and
this
meeting
is
adjourned
at
10
42.