►
Description
Live Teleconference of the Meeting of the City of Mountain View's Rental Housing Committee
B
And
welcome
to
the
September
19
2022
rental
housing
committee
meeting.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code
5495
3E,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
rental
housing
committee.
Please
contact
MV,
rent
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
B
B
B
B
The
committee
will
reconvene
on
this
public
Zoom
meeting
once
the
closed
session
has
ended.
Legal
counsel
will
report
any
updates
from
the
closed
session
during
the
agenda
item
11.
now
before
we
go.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
the
closed
session
agenda
item?
If
so,
please
click
raise
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
B
C
B
B
A
B
Thank
you,
Jessica.
Okay.
We
will
now
move
to
agenda
item
five,
the
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
committee
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
The
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
committee
to
officially
and
quickly
continue
consider
routine
or
administrative
business
items
with
one
motion.
Although
committee
members
May
remove
items,
it
is
generally
not
intended
for
the
committee
to
have
a
lengthy
substantive
discussion
on
consent.
Calendar
item.
B
D
B
D
B
Okay,
we
will
now
start
with
agenda
item
5.2,
which
was
pulled
by
Committee
Member
part
of
design.
This
is
the
adoptive
resolution
to
continue
virtual
meetings
pursuant
to
the
brown
act
Provisions
as
amended
by
ab361.,
okay,
so
I
actually
start
with
the
member
of
the
committee
who
pulled
the
item
so
Committee
Member
partisella.
B
E
D
E
B
B
I
seconded
excellent,
okay:
let's
take
a
vote
on
everything
except
for
5.2.
This
would
be
a
this
would
be
the
motion
to
approve
a
done
to
item
5.1.
The
minutes
from
August
22nd
2022.
I
do
have
a
friendly
Amendment
on
that
there
is
an
item
on
the
minutes.
That
needs
a
small
administrative
correction.
B
Can
my
motion
maker
in
second
confirm
they're?
Okay,
with
that
I'm
down
me
too
excellent,
and
then
we'll
also
have
5.3
to
acknowledge
the
year-end
results
for
the
community
stabilization
and
fair
rent
act
fund
for
fiscal
year,
ending
June,
30,
2022
and
5.4
to
acknowledge
the
year-end
results
for
the
mobile
home,
rent
stabilization
ordinance
fund
for
the
fiscal
year,
ending
June,
30
2022,
and
let's
do
a
roll
call
vote
and
Jessica
if
you'll
help
with
my
roll
call
vote.
B
D
We
are
an
independent
body
from
city
council
and
the
City,
and
so,
regardless
of
what
steps
to
the
city
or
city
council
is
taking
or
has
taken
prior
to
the
president's
announcement
on
Sunday
night,
we
still
as
an
independent
body
can
follow
our
own
lead
on
this
issue.
It's
been
two
and
a
half
years.
D
It
allows
every
opportunity,
a
social
distance
and
so
I
would
propose
some
sort
of
hybrid
model
where
we
can
continue
with
the
virtual
meetings
for
people
who
find
it
difficult
or
challenging,
for
whatever
reason
or
for
health
reasons
to
attend
the
meetings
in
person,
but
still
allow
people
to
attend
in
person,
because
I
think
there
are.
There
is
a
class
of
people
that
are
not
particularly
technologically
savvy
and
who
do
benefit
from
in-person
meetings.
So
that
is
my
suggestion.
B
On
that
topic,
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
actually
am
very
favorable
on
the
idea
of
going
to
hybrid
model.
I
think
it
would
be
a
really
really
nice
to
get
back
into
the
actual
room
and
sit
with
y'all
I.
Think
there's
a
lot
of
benefit
there
and
I
think
a
hybrid
Model
A
does
allow
accommodations
for
all
parties.
You
have
your
folks
who
may
not
be
as
technologically
savvy
or
who,
just
for
whatever
reason,
can't
get
into
a
phone
or
video
conference.
You
have
accommodations
for
them.
B
You
have
accommodations
for
folks
who
may
not
be
able
to
attend
in
person.
I
do
worry
that
if
we
try
and
go
hybrid
before
the
city
is
supportive,
which
I
know
the
city
has
said
where
they
are
staying
in
the
fully
remote
through
October
13th
I
do
have
concerns
that
if
we
try
and
go
hybrid
before
the
city
does
there's
a
lot
of
costs
that
could
be
associated
with
doing
that
and
I
don't
know
about
the
viability.
That
would
be
my
concern
with
not
staying
in
lockstep
with
the
city
Vice,
chair,
Reynolds,.
F
So
I
actually
don't
mind
going
back
in
a
hybrid
because
I
miss
the
the
dice
and
everything
what
I
am
concerned
about
is
to
appear.
How
do
I
say
this,
not
Cooperative
with
the
city,
so
I
am
open
to
having
a
collaborative
process
with
the
city.
We
are
a
separate
entity
and
we
can
make
our
own
decisions,
and
that
is
something
that
every
once
in
a
while
gets
acknowledged
when
we
don't
want
it
to
be
acknowledged
and
then
not
acknowledge
when
we
do
want
to
be
acknowledged.
It's
it's.
G
See
how
they
are
reacting
to
that
information
I'm,
not
sure
when
they
put
their
information
out,
that
they
expect
their
advisory
bodies
to
adhere
that
that
was
also
included.
The
fundamental
housing
committee-
I,
don't
even
know
if
they
wanted
to
include
us
in
that,
but
I
can
definitely
let
them
know
and
see
how
they
react
to
that
information.
E
B
Well,
let
me
go
to
public
comment,
since
I
did
miss
that
before
the
last
motion
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen
and
I
do
see
a
hand.
H
H
You
know
you
might
be
in
person
as
long
as
you
always
enable
essentially
a
virtual
session
or
virtual
way
of
joining
and
contributing
from
the
community,
but
it
seems
like
this
is
something
that
should
be
properly
put
on
the
agenda
and
discussed
and
that
sort
of
put
a
motion
on
now
during
the
consent
calendar.
Thank
you.
F
So
I
moved
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
rental
housing
committee,
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
making
the
findings
we're
authorizing
continued
remote
teleconference
meetings
of
the
rental
housing
committee
pursuant
to
Brown
act
Provisions
as
amended
by
assembly,
bill
number
361
to
be
read
in
title
only
further.
We
further
reading
waived
and
I
also
include
empowering
staff
to
reach
out
to
City
staff
about
our
desire
to
to
go
virtual.
We
could
even
offer
being
the
guinea
pigs
I'm
totally
down
with
that.
D
J
B
Some
new
good
stuff
to
come
on
now
we
will
open
the
meeting
for
oral
public
comment
from
the
public.
The
portion
this
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
committee
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
committee
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
a
non-agenda
item?
B
K
Good
evening
committee
members
and
thank
you
chair,
Haynes
livesay
this
evening.
We
have
a
brief
presentation
on
the
monthly
status
report
for
the
months
of
July
and
August.
We're
only
going
to
report
the
August
report
because
it
includes
the
July
numbers
as
well
and
again.
This
is
the
brief
overview.
We'll
have
a
more
in-depth
one
at
the
end
of
the
quarter,
which
we'll
be
reporting
in
October.
K
So
far
through
the
end
of
August,
we've
had
365
public
inquiries
made,
30
percent
of
which
have
been
with
Spanish
as
the
primary
language,
and
the
biggest
topic
for
the
current
fiscal
year
has
still
revolved
around
eviction.
Protections
we've
held
six
workshops
had
nine
office
hours
provided
support
to
89
households
and
community
members,
and
then
you'll
see
here
something
that
I
wanted
to
highlight.
We've
held
13
or
participated
in
13
eviction,
help
center
clinics
and
pop-up
events.
K
This
is
pop-up
events
for
the
rent,
stabilization
program
and
the
housing
and
eviction
help
center
and
we've
reached
542
people
through
these.
So
far
through
the
end
of
August,
we've
really
connected
with
the
school
districts
and
been
able
to
do
some
very
impactful
Outreach
there,
and
because
of
that,
we
did
see
a
an
increase
in
people
attending
the
housing
and
eviction
help
center
and
coming
to
our
offices
as
well.
K
We've
had
two
Mass
mailings:
we've
sent
out
138
targeted
letters
and
we
have
927
email
subscribers,
so
that
number
has
jumped
up
we've
held
26,
mediations
and
conciliations,
12
of
which
have
been
resolved,
and
we
have
a
few
pending
from
last
year
in
this
number
as
well,
we've
sent
we've
received
76,
banked,
rent,
increased
notices
and
88
termination
notices
through
the
end,
the
end
of
the
August
time
period,
we've
had
145
failure
to
pay
rent
notices
again.
This
is
trending.
K
We
have
three
petitions
in
the
hearing
process
and
we
still
have
some
petitions
that
are
outstanding
and
in
review
from
the
prior
fiscal
year,
so
you'll
see
there's
also
four.
Over
there
we
have
received
more
inquiries
with
a
relationship
to
hardship,
petitions
and
unlawful
rent
petitions,
so
those
are
both
happening.
We
also
have
received
an
increase
just
in
people
inquirying
about
petitions
in
general,
and
we
believe
that
has
something
to
do
with
not
only
the
trust
that
we've
built
in
the
community,
but
also
with
the
extensive
Outreach
that
we've
been
doing
for
market
conditions.
K
K
Now,
when
you
look
at
the
newly
built
units,
I
just
want
to
remind
everyone
that
every
time
a
new
building
comes
back
on
online,
the
vacancy
rate,
spikes
for
newly
covered
units
and
that's
what
you're
seeing
in
these
numbers
here
so
that
will
drop
as
the
those
units
are
filled
and
we'll
probably
see
another
another
Spike
at
the
beginning
of
the
calendar
year.
I
think
that
there's
another
large
complex
coming
online,
so
that
will
change
in
the
future
as
well.
K
It's
just
a
reminder:
it's
a
very
unstable
number
and
that
makes
our
all
units
number
a
little
bit
higher
than
it
actually
is
now
for
average
Market
rent.
The
market
has
fully
rebounded
to
above
the
2020
dive
that
took
place
because
of
covid.
So
we
are
above
what
it
was.
And
now
the
average
market
rate
for
a
fully
covered
unit
is
2756
dollars
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
We
are
going
to
change
the
monthly
status
report
a
little
bit.
K
Some
of
the
information
will
be
expanded,
we're
going
to
break
this
down
into
a
unit
size,
so
you
can
see
some
differentiations
in
the
market
as
we
expand
the
report
for
property
sales
for
fully
covered
units.
We
have
had
one
so
far
this
fiscal
year
for
a
total
of
12
units
and
you
have
five
properties
that
are
currently
up
for
sale
for
a
total
of
63
units.
So
again,
this
is
just
properties
that
are
transacting
and
typically
they
transact
there's
no
Redevelopment
on
the
property.
K
B
K
B
B
B
L
L
You
know
these
include
that
non-compliance
May
prevent
or
might
serve
as
an
affirmative
defense.
In
an
eviction
case,
we
talked
about
the
inability
to
impose
a
rent,
increase
or
file
a
petition
for
Upward
adjustment
as
well.
As
you
know,
legal
remedies
that
are
provided
to
both
the
tenants
and
the
rental
housing
committee,
as
well
as
the
city.
L
So
while
there
are
these
built-in
mechanisms
for
enforcement
of
the
mhrso
and
the
csfra,
there
are
some
barriers
to
the
utilization
of
these
mechanisms.
The
first
being
informational,
tenants,
lack
the
information
necessary
to
you
know,
know
when
to
file
a
petition
or
when
to
oppose
a
rent
increase.
L
Additionally,
in
addition
to
the
informational
barrier,
there's
the
rhc
also
lacks
affirmative
tools,
short
of
a
lawsuit
to
proactively
enforce
the
requirements
of
the
csfri
and
mhr.
So
a
lot
of
the
mechanisms
that
are
in
the
csfra
and
mhrso
are
complaint
based,
and
so
the
rhc
has
to
wait
for
someone
to
complain
about
an
issue
before
they
can
do
anything
to
enforce
the
requirements.
L
L
So
with
code
inspections,
we
did
want
to
want
to
provide
some
additional
information
as
far
as
the
health
and
safety
substantial
requirement.
So
the
goal
of
the
city
is
to
complete
inspections
of
multi-family
properties
every
five
years
and
potentially
that
could
get
bumped
up
to
every
eight
years,
depending
on
you
know,
if
there
were
no
prior
violations,
so
you'll
see
in
the
next
section
which
talks
about
the
database,
we
decided
based
on
that
information.
It
didn't
make
sense
to
include
that
information
in
the
database.
L
L
L
The
database
will
show
the
following
information,
so
the
property
address,
as
well
as
the
Assessor's
parcel
numbers,
so
that
people
are
able
to
easily
Identify
the
property
that
they
are
looking
for
as
well
as
the
year.
The
property
was
built,
the
number
of
units
on
the
property,
whether
the
property
is
fully
or
partially
covered
by
the
csfra
or
the
mhrso,
the
status
of
the
payment
of
the
annual
fees
and
the
annual
registration
status.
L
And
to
expand
a
little
bit
on
the
different
statuses,
so
the
way
that
the
current
database
works,
the
what's
indicated
is
because
I
know
there
were
some
concerns
and
questions
about.
You
know
what,
if
the
landlord
doesn't
fill
out
the
information
for
one
unit,
are
they
going
to
be
considered
out
of
compliance,
and
this
is
the
way
that
the
database
is
currently
set
up,
is
sort
of
an
All
or
Nothing
type
of
system.
So
the
database
knows
how
many
units
are
on
each
property.
L
So,
let's
say:
if
there's
12,
the
landlord
will
not
be
able
to
submit
the
registration
unless
they
have
filled
out
information
for
all
12.
They
will
physically
not
be
able
to
press
the
submit
button.
It
won't
light
up
the
way
that
it
needs
to
to
submit,
and
so,
if
they
missed
one
unit,
if
they
didn't
put
in
information
for
one
unit,
that
submit
button
will
not
even
light
up
to
let
them,
and
in
that
case
their
registration
status
will
show
up
as
registration
not
submitted,
and
they
would
be
in
non-compliance
or
they
would.
L
L
L
L
Similarly,
for
the
annual
registration
status,
there's
four
different
statuses
that
could
potentially
show
on
a
certain
property.
The
first
is
registration
open
again,
that
is
the
period
of
time
when
registration
is
open
each
year
for
landlords
to
register
their
properties.
I
usually
start
sometime
in
December
and
runs
through
February
1st.
So
if
the
status
remains
registration
open
after
February
2nd,
that
means
that
the
property
has
failed
to
timely,
complete
their
annual
registration,
and
that
would
indicate
non-compliance.
L
The
second
status
is
registration
submitted.
That
means
that
the
landlord
has
completed
their
annual
registration
and
staff
is
reviewing
it
for
completeness.
They
would
not
be
considered
out
of
compliance
in
this
interim
period
because
they
have
done
their
Duty
and
submitted
the
information
staff
is
just
checking
it
over
to
make
sure
that
it's
accurate.
L
L
L
L
So
for
the
annual
housing
and
space
fees,
a
four
percent
per
month
fee
would
be
charged
on
any
any
unpaid
balances,
if
not
with
paid
within
30
days
of
the
due
date
and
then
for
annual
registration
of
the
property.
A
25
per
unit
per
month
fee
would
be
charged
after
February
1st
of
each
year
and
the
regulations
do
provide.
L
The
four
percent
would
begin
accruing
as
soon
as
the
on
that
on
that
existing
balance
as
soon
as
the
regulations
go
into
effect,
if
adopted
next
slide.
So
this
is
to
talk
about
the
effective
date
would
be
December
1st.
This
is
intended
to
coincide
with
the
annual
rental,
housing
and
space
fees,
payment
requirement
and
the
annual
registration
period,
and
so
essentially
it
would
you
know
this
cycle
would
be
the
first
when
these
regulations
would
be
used.
L
So
while
staff's
recommendation
is
to
review
and
adopt
the
draft
amendments,
there
are
some
alternative
actions
that
the
committee
could
choose
to
take
tonight.
The
first
would
be
to
review
and
adopt
the
draft
regulations
with
amendments.
If
there
are
certain
portions
that
you
agree
upon
as
a
committee
that
you
don't
like
and
you
want
changed,
you
can
make
amendments.
The
second
would
be
to
direct
staff
to
revise
regulations
for
consideration
at
a
future
meeting.
M
L
Just
going
back
so
just
to
talk
about
how
these
regulations
might
impact
the
rhc
budget,
the
adoption
of
the
regulations
may
increase
Revenue
through
increased
payment
of
annual
fees
and
or
late
fees.
However,
administration
of
the
draft
regulations
will
increase
expenditures
through
one
the
development
of
a
public-facing
database,
section
that
has
some
costs
associated
with
it,
as
well
as
increased
staff
time
for
the
implementation
and
administration
of
these
enforcement
mechanisms.
L
Etc
will
increase
staff
time
so
yeah.
That
is
just
something
for
your
consideration
and
I
think
that
might
actually
be
the
last
slide.
Oh
no,
okay,
so
just
to
reiterate
staff's
recommendation
is
to
review
and
adopt
the
Amendments
to
csfra
regulations
and
mhrso
regulations
to
add
chapter
12,
compliance
and
general
remedies
and
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions.
F
F
Okay,
then
the
second
one
is:
should
this
pass?
Could
we
get
a
a
suggested
letter
of
non-compliance
in
a
future
agenda
packet?
It
doesn't
have
to
be
the
next
one,
but
like
something
that
we
can
see
how
it'll
look
and
if
there's
any
feedback
related
to
it,
I
believe.
Also,
there
was
a
letter
by
the
legal
Women
Voters
asking
for
that
to
be
in
in
accessible
languages
as
well.
F
Awesome
and
then
the
third
one
this
also
had
to
do
with
correspondence.
There
was
a
suggestion
by
someone
asking
for
like
a
compliance
focus
group.
Essentially
I,
don't
know
I
I.
What
I
don't
want
to
do
is
add
more
to
staff's
plate,
but
I'm,
trying
to
think
of
ways
to
fulfill
something
like
that
without
adding
to
staff
plate
and
I
was
wondering.
Other
committees
like,
for
example,
the
HRC
which
constantly
because
of
the
initials,
are
the
same
but
different
order.
F
Committee,
so
they
they
they're
subcommunically
three
people.
In
our
case
it
would
be
two
people,
but
is
it
possible
for,
like
I,
don't
know,
I
think
the
chair
technically
appoints
you
we're
on
subcommittees
or
or
generally
people
say
I
want
to
do
that
and
no
one
else
wants
to
do
it,
and
so
those
are
the
people
ending
up
doing
whatever
it
is,
but
like
could
they
as
subcommittees
host?
F
These
focus
groups
on
ways
to
improve
the
system
in
general
and
what
I
want
to
do
is
just
ensure
that
there's
that
there's
dialogue
and
an
Open
Door,
which
I
understand
staff,
has
been
very
good
at
doing
their
best
trying
to
get
that
open
door,
but
sometimes
sometimes
you
need
a
different
person
opening
the
door,
and
that
makes
other
people
feel
better.
It
happens.
F
So
what
kind
of
options
would
be
available
for
something
like
that?
I,
it's
sort
of
tangentially
related
to
this
because
it
was
sent
there.
Was
this
a
suggestion
like
this
was
in
response
to
something
like
this,
but
like
our
actions
tonight,
don't
aren't
contingent
on
something
like
that.
I
just
want
to
see
what
kind
of
options
are
open
for
that.
G
F
F
G
F
F
O
L
N
N
We
we
would
know
whether
they've
sent
the
check
in
Failure
to
register
the
property.
Let's
say
someone
the
landlord
comes
in
to
register
the
property.
They
have
filled
out
their
their
information
and
then
the
unit.
If
it
says,
if
they
say
this
building
has
50
units
then
would
50
they
would
not
be
fully
registered
or
would
not
have
submitted
their
registration
until
all
50
units.
All
the
fields
for
those
50
units
had
been
submitted.
So
it
looks
like
there's
like
nine
Fields
per
per
unit.
Is
that
correct.
N
Got
it
the
fields
and-
and
that's
actually
at
least
my
next
question,
so
the
nine
fields
that
I'm
seeing
are
like
it's
occupied
by
the
tenant
and
not
the
landlord
themselves?
That's
one
of
just
a
they're,
not
looking
for
tenant
name
but
you're.
Just
looking
for
whether
it's
the
tenant
or
the
landlord
who's
in
the
unit
is
that
right.
N
Right
right
and
then
move-in
date,
rent
base,
rent
and
base
rank
going
back
or
base
rent
data
data
blast,
rent
increase.
Lastly,
last
monthly
rent
increase
amount,
rent
increase
percent
and
then
the
submitters
information
is
that
which
has
first
name
last
name:
phone
and
email,
that's
required
for
each
of
the
50
units,
correct,
okay
and
so
for
the
next
bullet
point
on
this
slide:
failure
to
comply
with
rollback
provisions.
N
Got
it
and
and
that
that
was
getting
to
my
question
so
the
or
a
tenant
files,
a
petition
saying
that
that's
not
been
rolled
back
correct?
Yes,
so
it
would
be
petition
based.
So
if
a
landlord
went
into
those
fields
that
are
going
to
be
part
of
each
unit's
information
and
they
entered
it,
and
it
was
clear
that
you
know
currently
the
person's
being
charged
40
percent
higher
than
the
base
rent,
which
we
have
not
had
that
many
a
lot
agas
would
not
add
up
to
that
right
now
right
so
it
would.
N
L
She
will
flag
that,
so
it
is
possible
that
you
know
that
that
week,
that
staff
would
become
aware
of
it
through
the
database
and
then
would
send
that's
a
non-compliance
letter
and
then
the
landlord
you
know
will
have
the
30
days
to
come
in
and
say:
oh
I
actually
just
made
a
mistake
and
typed
it
in
correctly-
and
this
is
the
real
you
know
number
or
they
can
say.
No,
that
is
I
did
charge
a
15
rent
increase,
in
which
case
they
would
be
out
of
compliance.
It
would
need
to
roll
back
the
rent.
N
Right
and
I
I
think
that's
what
I'm
trying
to
bring
light
too,
is
that
we
are.
We
have
been
described
to
this
point
as
a
complete
based
system
and
that,
if
we
are
preventing
landlords
from
registering,
because
we're
manually
reviewing
the
registration
and
saying
we
actually
found
an
infraction,
so
you
were
actually
out
of
non-compliance.
We
are
no
longer
a
complaint-based
system
or.
N
E
G
L
N
P
E
N
But
to
this
point
we
have
described
ourselves
as
a
complaint-based
system
and
that
we
are
educating
tenants
with
they
can
call
into
a
number
and
get
all
the
information
they
need
about,
whether
their
rent
increases
is
legit
and
but
that
we
are
not
overseeing
and
and
I.
Think
I
mean
if
we're
moving
to
that,
because
it
seems
like
the
entry
of
information
will
lead
to
your
being
out
of
compliance
because
you're
sending
that
second
letter
and
then
you're
out
of
compliance.
No
sorry
people
are
saying
that
so
yeah.
L
L
The
submit
button
your
status
on
the
database
is
going
to
show
up
as
registration
submitted
and
therefore
any
tenant
who
looks
on
there
will
not
be
able
to
know
that
you're
out
of
compliance
with
an
AGA,
because
all
that's
indicating
is
that
you're
out
of
compliance
with
the
registration
requirement.
So
so
your
registration
status
on
the
database
is
registration.
Submitted
staff
then
takes
the
time
to
review
and
go
through
the
information
that
you've
submitted.
L
If
they
see
something
that,
for
instance,
that
you
gave
a
15
rent
increase
over
last
year,
what
they're
going
to
send
you
a
non-compliance
letter
for
is
not
your
failure
to
register
you've
registered
you've
provided
the
information
but
they're
going
to
send
you
a
non-compliance
letter
for
is
a
failure
to
abide
by
the
AGA
increases
right.
So
then,
you
have
30
days
to
either
come
to
staff
and
say
hey
the
information
I
submitted.
It
was
actually
a
typo.
You
know,
I
didn't
mean
to
do
that.
L
That's
not
the
rent
increase
I
gave,
in
which
case
it'll
be
corrected.
No
second
non-compliance
letter
will
be
sent
to
anybody.
If
you
come
in
and
say,
yeah
I
gave
that
15
rent
increase
and
I'm
not
willing
to
roll
it
back.
Then,
a
second
non-compliance
letter
is
going
to
be
sent
to
you
and
to
the
tenant.
If
you
come
in
and
say,
oh
I
didn't
realize
that
I
wasn't
allowed
to
give
a
15
rent
increase,
I'll
roll
it
back
right
now,
and
you
do
that
within
the
30
days.
That's
provided
to
you
again.
E
Well
and
I
just
want
to
add
to
that
I
mean
I,
understand
the
point
you're,
making
that
this
is
primarily
a
complaint-based
system.
It
is
still
a
complaint-based
system.
There
is
no
step
after
that
letter
to
the
tenant
or
the
property
owner
that
will
be
taken
unless
you,
the
rhc
and
the
city
council,
because
we
cannot
bring
affirmative
litigation
without
the
city
council's
consent
agree
to
it.
E
N
L
E
L
You're
not
like
I,
said
they're
they're
not
receiving
a
non-compliance
letter
for
failure
to
register,
in
which
case
they
would
incur
a
fee
that
25
per
unit
that
they
didn't
do
properly
they've
registered.
They
are
out
of
compliance
with
the
allowable
rent
adjustment
and
there's
no
neck,
like
Karen
said,
there's
no
next
step
after
the
second
component.
G
N
N
N
And
then,
when
we
get
to
next
year,
let's
say
no
tenant
ends
up
filing
a
petition.
Maybe
it's
a
four
unit
complex
and
no
one
cares
the
next
time
the
the
registration
comes
through
the
following
year.
If
that
that
will
no
longer
and
and
they
didn't
have
an
AGA
that
was
given-
that
was
above
the
above
the
allowable
increase,
would
they
then
go
into
with
the
compliance
still
hold
indefinitely
from
that
prior
information
that
was
given,
or
does
it
reset
on
the
annual.
L
Yeah,
so
if
you
charge
rent
above
what
the
permitted
base
rent
is
plus
valid
agas,
then
you
are
not
in
compliance
with
the
csfra
or
the
mhr.
So
so,
yes,
if
they
charged
a
15
rent
increase
one
year
and
then
the
next
year
they
decided
to
comply
with
the
AGA
or
the
next
five
years
they
decided
to
comply
with
the
AGA.
Eventually,
if
a
tenant
decides
to
file
a
petition,
those
would
likely
all
be
considered
invalid
rent
increases
because
they
were
charged
after
an
invalid
rent
increase
was
given
based
on
the
wrong
number,
but.
E
It's
only
going
to
be
based
on
a
tenant
petition
that
the
substantial
non-compliance
for
charging
and
improper
rent
is
going
to
be
addressed
at
this
point
in
time
there
will
not
be
any
further
action
from
the
rhc
about
that,
so
they're
in
substantial
non-compliance,
whether
we
send
them
a
letter
or
not,
the
tenant
can
file
a
petition,
whether
we
send
them
a
letter
or
not.
So
all
we
are
doing
is
adding
a
letter
that
may
go
out
if
we
notice
something
in
the
registration
that
indicates
that
they
may
have
taken
a
rent
increase.
N
Thank
you
and
last
question:
I'll
give
it
and
there
are
other
folks
waiting.
So
is
there
penalty
for
lying,
essentially
like
because
again,
if
you're
trying
to
put
your
shoes
with
somebody
who's
filling
this
out
and
they
did
give
a
10
increase
and
they,
you
know,
let's
say
two
years
ago,
they're
filling
out
that
information
and
and
put
in
the
wrong
rate
or
miscalculate
it,
because
maybe
the
initial
time
was
a
miscalculation.
N
G
Yeah,
it
still
requires
them
so
dead.
Will
then,
then,
if,
as
a
consequence
of
that,
the
tenant
files,
a
petition
and
the
hearing
officer
sees
the
real
numbers
in
the
petition
which
are
different
from
what
he
may
have
wrongly
entered
into
the
database,
he
will
make
his
decision
based
on
the
actual
date,
been
received.
L
E
N
Okay,
thank
you.
Yes,
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
get
at
is
is
I
want
to
be
clear
on
I,
just
want
to
be
clear
on
what
registration
meant
and
yeah.
If
there's
Fields
there
that
somebody
put
in
fields
is
compliance
but
then,
as
always,
anyone
can
can
file
a
petition.
Any
tenant
can
file
petition
at
any
time
to
have
that
information
reviewed
by
a
hearing
officer
all
right.
Thank
you.
C
C
What
I'm
concerned
is
I,
don't
want
staff
to
be
overburdened.
I
want
them
to
be
able
to
look
at
the
application
and
say:
oh
okay.
This
is
this,
doesn't
look
right,
but
then
they
have
a
whole
bunch
of
applications
they
came
in
that
month.
You
want
to
make
sure
that
they
are
looking
at
this
thoroughly
and
without
being
rushed
so
that
we
don't
create
mistakes
and
then
the
other
thing
is
so
that
the
landlord
will
understand
and
know
that
they're
getting
ample
time
for
them
to
respond.
These
applications
correctly.
G
G
Well,
we
have
to
check
I
mean
half
of
it
is
done
by
the
database.
It
just
gives
us
an
overview
at
the
end
of
February
January,
who
has
registered
and
who
has
not
registered,
and
we
can
equally
run
a
whole
Excel
sheet
to
see
whether
the
fees
were
paid
in
time
or
not.
So
that
is
all
doable
I
think
where
it
becomes
a
little
bit
more
staff
intense,
is
when
there's
non-compliance
and
we
have
to
keep
following
up,
but
that
is
something
that
we
are
already
preparing
for.
G
B
Okay,
I
had
a
few
questions
to
start
off
with
I
just
want
to
confirm
when
we
are
defining
compliance
and
non-compliance.
We
are
using
the
traditional
definition,
meaning
and
I'm,
going
to
use
an
analogy
here,
because
I
think
it'll
become
more
clear
to
folks
when
I
am
speeding
and
doing
95
down
the
101.
I
am
out
of
compliance
with
the
law.
B
B
Okay,
okay,
so
with
that
being
said,
a
couple
of
more
minutia
questions
here,
so
with
the
non-compliance
letters
would,
we
I
think
maybe
we're
a
Committee.
Member
also
is
going
with
this
and
another
way
I'm
thinking
of
it,
too,
is
perhaps
we
need
to
give
more
time
between
the
first
letter,
which
goes
just
to
the
landlord
and
the
second
that
goes
to
the
landlord
and
the
Tenant.
L
I
think
you
know
the
language
is
Broad
enough,
that
the
the
30
days
is
really
meant
as
the
compliance
period
for
the
landlord
and
not
so
much
as
the
period
when
staff
has
like
these
hard
deadlines
that
they
have
to
send
things
out
by
it's
saying
landlord.
If
you
do
this
in
30
days
great,
if
you
don't
do
it
in
30
days,
then
at
some
point
after
that
has
expired.
G
B
Sure
thank
you
and
final
question
on
the
regs
for
the
mhsro
that
one
says
the
effective
date
is
January
1,
whereas
the
rigs
for
the
csfra
say
December,
30,
December
1
are
those
different
because
we
were
trying
to
make
them
different.
Is
one
not
supposed
like?
Are
they
supposed
to
say
the
same
date?
Do
you
see
what
I
mean.
L
B
N
N
E
J
Just
briefly,
there
was
some
mention
of
of
having
the
staff
having
discretion
over
when
they
would
send
out
notices,
I
I,
think
for
everybody's
involved.
We
should
decide
on
the
amount
of
time,
and
then
you
know
stick
to
that,
because
I'd
hate
to
have
some
housing
provider
say:
oh,
my
God
gave
them
45
days
and-
and
you
only
gave
me
30
and
it
could
really
mess
us
up
quite
a
bit
so
I'm
hoping
we
can
come
up
with
consistent
regulations.
B
D
So
my
question
is
I'm.
Looking
at
section,
1709
of
the
csfra
and
I
see
that
there's
a
provision
there
that
permits
the
rhc
to
subpoena
witnesses
as
well
as
documents,
and
my
question
is,
would
or
could
we
use
that
as
a
mechanism
along
with
the
compliance
letter,
in
whatever
form
to
essentially
send
a
compliance
letter
to
a
landlord
at
the
same
time
serving
them
with
a
subpoena
which
instructs
them
to
appear
before
staff?
And
it
could
be
by
Zoom
to
explain
why
they
have
not
responded
to
our
Outreach
efforts
or
otherwise
been
in
compliance.
D
Real-Time
dialogue
between
the
landlords
that
are
not
compliant
in
our
staff
and
again
it
could
be
by
Zoom,
where
there
could
be
dialogue
about
why
they're
not
in
compliant
and
what
can
be
done
to
bring
them
into
compliance.
So
that's
my
question:
is
that
a
mechanism
that
we
could
use
or
are
there
what
challenges
would
be
associated
with
doing
that.
E
E
Yes,
that
is
a
possibility.
We
have
looked
into
how
far
you
can
go
with
your
subpoena
power.
I
mean
you
could
issue
a
subpoena,
but
if
the
person
subpoenaed
didn't
comply,
we
would
have
to
go
into
court
to
enforce
it.
So
we
have
looked
into
this
on
behalf
of
hearing
officers
who
have
requested
information
and
have
found
that
it
might
not
be
at
the
most
useful
tool
Because
unless
we're
willing
to
go
into
court
to
seek
compliance,
it's
very
easy
for
anyone
that
we
might
subpoena
to
just
avoid
us.
K
We
can
do
push
notifications,
we
can
do
different
types
of
Outreach,
not
just
these
compliance,
letters
and
I'm
sure
that
we
would
do
that
type
of
Outreach
before
the
compliance
letter
went
out
now,
we
currently,
you
know,
have
call
the
property
owners
when
they're,
not
in
compliance
for
the
the
rental
housing
fee.
Andrea
is
actually
quite
gifted
at
that,
and
it
will
continue
to
to
do
so.
K
E
B
Because
a
follow-up
to
that
question
would
we
also
potentially
have
the
ability
to
put
out
an
online
scheduler
where
maybe
it's
not
a?
We
compel
you
as
via
Pina,
but
we
offer
times
that
we
have
availability
that
they
can
easily
schedule.
You
know
maybe
with
a
QR
code,
because
I
really
like
those
in
the.
G
Letters
we
definitely
already
do
that.
We
have
office
hours
for
landlords.
We
communicate
that
repeatedly
throughout
each
month,
as
you
may
have
noticed
in
the
monthly
data,
there
were
quite
a
few
landlords
that
called
us
with
registration
questions
so
that
for
those
who
want
to
contact
us
I
think
they
do
get
a
lot
of
information
on
how
to
reach
us
emails.
Letters
phone
calls,
you
name
it
so
I
think
that's
not.
That
is
not
the
problem
that
they
don't
have
any
information
where
they
reach
us.
N
Do
I
I
do
I'll
try
to
keep
this
short
or
short
as
I.
Can
our
system
also
records
when
an
individual
record
on
a
unit
was
modified
right
so
that
it
would
know,
let's
say
a
landlord
is
not
aware
that
they
need
to
be
updating
any
move
in
or
move
out
every
within
30
days,
so
the
movement
move
out,
and
so
they
submit
the
registration
saying
that
in
June
of
last
year
they
had
they.
They
had
not
recorded
that
there
was
a.
M
N
And
so
for
my
second
part
of
the
question
it's
like
if
let's
say
someone
then
notices
that
it
hasn't
been
updated
for
any
of
those
units,
they
had
gotten
a
rental
increase
in
August
of
last,
let's
say
last
year,
let's
say
January
now,
and
this
is
last
year,
so
they
went
four
months.
They
had
a
rent
increase
and
they're
saying
my
building
was
not
was
not
compliant
because
he
did
the
the
he
or
she
the
landlord
did
not
update
within
the
30-day
window.
N
B
Clarify
on
that,
but
for
our
purposes
for
the
letters
and
the
database
as
proposed,
it's
a
high
water
mark
right.
So
if
you
register
you
count
as
in
compliance
and
we're
not
then
actually
looking
to
see
if,
throughout
the
year
you
go
in
and
out,
we
just
say
you
were
in
compliance
as
of
January
27th,
so
you're
in
compliance
for
2023
right.
G
G
B
N
We
are
not
saying
that
right
now
right
and
that
is
not
an
expectation,
but
we
absolutely
someone
could
very
simply
a
motivated
tenant
could
go
back
file
of
and
sorry.
This
is
a
question
and
by
understanding
they
could
file
an
information
request
for
everything
that's
been
submitted
for
their
building
for
the
past
six
seven
eight
years,
however
long
we,
you
know,
we
get
this
data,
we
have
data
for
and
they
could
look
at
dates
modified
and
say
my
building
was
out
of
compliance
during
this
period
of
time.
N
B
Just
other
questions
before
I
go
to
public
comment:
okay,
seeing
none
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
So
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star.
Nine
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen:
okay
and
we're
going
to
start
off
with
Tim
Larson.
O
H
O
Would
ask
the
question
if,
if
someone
is
non-compliant
with
registration,
I'm,
not
sure
how
that
would
impact
somebody's
ability
to
request
a
an
adjustment
for
aga
non-compliance,
so
I'm
not
really
sure
how
those
two
things
are
directly
compared,
but
maybe
y'all
could
address
that
or
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
you
all.
Thank
you.
P
Thank
you
good
good
evening,
everybody
yeah,
so
just
a
couple
things.
First
I
would
like
to
request
a
study
session
with
stakeholders
regarding
the
portal
for
Tech
updates
that
Anki
mentioned.
Thank
you
so
much
Anki
for
working
on
that,
and
also
for
the
public
portal
proposal
and
then
also
I
did
have
a
question
about
why
units
that
are
not
covered
by
the
rent
control
Provisions
under
syspra
are
required
to
provide
rent
information.
P
I,
don't
know
what
the
legal
basis
for
that
is,
and
then,
if
it
is
what,
if
the
CIS
for
a
portal
for
registration
or
payment
of
fees,
causes
the
delay
so,
for
example,
if
the
registration
opens
on
December
25th-
and
you
know
it
just
feels
like
there
has
to
be-
you
know,
extensions
for
delays
caused
by
I
mean
software
goes
down.
You
know
things
happen,
so
I
think
that
that
definitely
needs
to
be
addressed
so
that
you
know
the
registration.
The
portal
should
be
open
on
December
1st
for
registration.
Q
Q
I,
substantially
support
them
in
section
c,
three,
where
a
second
notice
to
the
landlord
includes
a
cc
to
tenants.
There
is
one
more
CC
that
is
needed.
It
should
also
be
like
a
generic
letter
to
the
tenant,
hiding
tenant
information,
of
course,
but
including
which
landlord
should
be
included
in
the
next
rhc
package,
because
you
don't
want
to
have
too
much
of
this
obligation
fall
to
the
tenants.
You
also
want
to
let
the
public
and
the
Press
know
what
is
going
on
if
a
landlord
has
made
it
to
that
level
of
non-compliance.
Q
Q
So
you
know
their
postcards,
reminding
renters
that
they
have
red
stabilization
available
to
them
and
and
protecting
them
and
I
would
really
include
some
of
that
communication
out
annually
to
be
to
encourage
tenants
how
they
can
look
and
confirm
that
the
ad
information
provided
by
their
landlord
is
accurate,
not
that
there
needs
to
be
a
big
penalty
if
something
is
not
accurate,
but
just
lots
of
daylight.
There
is
too
much
question
about
why
landlords
aren't
registering.
We
need
a
lot
more
Daylight.
Q
M
Good
evening
Madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
Joshua
Howard,
with
the
California
Apartment
Association
I,
want
to
thank
you
for
your
continued
interest
in
this
issue,
and
I
want
to
just
raise
a
couple
of
points
in
no
particular
order.
That
I
think
the
committee
should
be
mindful
of
as
you
contemplate
this
resolution
and
regulation
tonight
number
one
and
encourage
flexibility.
Flexibility,
especially
for
independent
rental
owners.
M
M
In
addition,
If
a
landlord
registers
or
pays
late,
but
does
pay
the
late
fee,
they
should
immediately
be
considered
in
compliance.
They've
paid
the
penalty
they've
come
into
compliance
and
they
should
then
therefore
be
deemed
in
compliance.
And,
finally,
this
should
not
be
an
all
or
nothing
meaning.
If
going
back
to
the
12
unit
example,
if
one
unit
can't
be
registered,
the
owner
should
not
have
the
be
penalized
for
doing
the
right
thing
in
the
other
11..
So
just
encourage
you
to
look
at
that
very
carefully
with
that.
I
Yeah
I'll
try
to
actually
keep
it
brief,
so
a
right
without
a
remedy
is
no
right
at
all
and
in
a
complaint-based
system,
just
because
someone
has
the
right
to
file
a
complaint
if
they
don't
know
that
they
actually
have
a
complaint
to
file
who's
going
to
help
them
like
this
is
a
step.
This
is
a
tool.
This
is
helping
people
to
know
like
what
they
can
do.
This
is
information.
This
is
transparency.
This
is
how
government
should
work.
This
is
how
the
world
should
work.
I
So
no,
this
isn't
a
matter
of
changing
the
paradigm.
Someone
still
needs
to
file
a
petition
for
downward
adjustment
or
petition
for
a
rollback
and
under
this
the
system.
You
are
just
equipping
yourselves
with
tools
that
allow
you
to
help
people
better
that
allow
you
to
work
more
efficiently
to
allow
you
to
provide
more
information
to
people
to
landlords
to
the
city
like
this
is
a
good.
This
is
a
net
good.
This
is
a
I
mean
I.
I
B
B
F
F
So
so
that
would
be
one
Amendment
I'm
trying
to
think
of
any
other
amendments
that
were
I,
don't
think
there
actually
was
any
actual
other
amendments.
Although
I
would
like
to
see
some
exploration
on
that
a
focused
stakeholder
group,
something
that
does
not
put
a
lot
of
stress
on
staff
I
know.
That's
like
I
want
you
to
find
a
unicorn
for
me
and
not
be
stressed
about
it
and
I'm.
Really
sorry
about
that.
F
G
B
F
A
F
B
N
It
will
move
away
from
that
right
it
we
will
be
collecting
all
this
information.
I,
don't
feel
like
we're,
making
a
message
to
the
landlord
that
this
is
going
to
be
collected
and
saved
in
perpetuity.
This
is
all
public
information,
it
will
be
publicly
visible
and
even
the
community
I
think
most
people
are
probably
okay
with
their
their
unit
number.
N
We
want
to
get
to
100
complaint
100
registration
for
all
buildings
in
Mountain
View
and
get
everybody
paid
to
be
fair
to
the
whole
system,
but
it
is.
It
is
quickly
going
into
something
very
different,
which
is
now
we're
collecting
all
this
information,
and
it
will
be
visible
publicly
and
officially.
N
Oh
sorry,
I'll
I'll
end
here
and
to
say
that,
like
we
are
saying
that
non-compliance
is
30
day,
if
you,
if
you
don't
update
a
move
in
or
move
out
within
30
days,
you
are
non-compliant
and
that
is
retroactive
and
could
potentially
a
hearing
officer
could
say,
give
back
all
of
your
rent
increases,
even
if
they
were
legitimately
according
to
the
AGA,
because
you
didn't
enter
the
move
and
move
out
of
certain
units
within
30
days.
They
could
make
that
determination
and
we're
not
saying
anything
here
about
what
substantial
is
we're.
N
Just
saying,
substantial
and
trusting
that
that
a
hearing
officer
or
future
rental
housing
committees
will
do
the
right
thing
and
and
Define
substantial
non-compliance
as
substantial,
so
I
think
that's.
That
is
my
concern
in
that
both
we
message
to
the
community
and
to
landlords
that
all
this
information
is
publicly
available
now
and
will
be
in
the
future
and
we
really
Define
what
substantial
non-compliance
is.
That's
that's
my
ask
of
the
committee.
Thank
you.
C
C
Is
because
I
think
I
don't
think
the
other
way
was
working.
This
is
what
we're
trying
to
fix.
Trying
to
fix
I
mean
it's
been
like
what
six
years
of
the
csfra
and
I
know
that
us
asking
for
home
providers
to
be
compliant.
It's
been
two
years,
but
it's
been
six
years
of
the
csfra.
This
is
not
new.
You
know
it's
been.
It's
been
here
for
a
while.
B
B
What
could
it
be
used
for?
How
is
how
long
are
the
records
being
retained?
Is
there
risk
of
you
know
something
becoming
more
than
just
hey?
We
have
this
data,
but
really
trying
to
use
it
to
act
upon.
So
with
that
in
mind,
I
do
wonder
if
that
means
that
maybe
one
of
the
options
here
for
us
tonight
is
not
ripe
for
implementation,
meaning
the
database
one
and
maybe
the
other
two
are
more
right
for
implementation.
B
K
L
I
also
wanted
to
clarify
that
landlords
that
are
currently
in
compliance
with
the
registration
requirements.
This
data
is
in
the
system,
we
have
it
for
them
and
a
tenant.
Could
you
know,
submit
a
public
record
request
right
now
for
that
information?
So
it's
really
the
landlords
who
are
not
in
compliance
who
we
don't
have
that
information
for
the
the
landlords
who
are
in
compliance.
You
know
our
policy
is
not
changing
as
far
as
the
data
that's
being
collected
or
the
data
that
needs
to
be
retained
pursuant
to
state
law.
N
I
would
I
would
agree
with
those
comments
that
it
is
I
think
it's
just
not
known
that
it's
public
data
and
it's
there
in
the
database
and
someone
just
has
to
ask
for
it
right
and
that
will
be
become
that
will
become
more
with
the
level
of
visibility
from
these
regs
and
from
the
registration
asks.
I
feel
like
that
will
become
more
visible
foreign.
F
K
That
is
an
option
and
I
I
also
wanted
to
clarify
quickly
that
the
the
system
that
we
have
works
very
well
for
registration
and
fees
in
terms
of
us
knowing
what's
happening
and
where
people
are
at
so
I
did
want
to
clarify
that
piece.
A
bit
too.
The
the
challenge
that
people
are
having
has
to
do
with
the
some
of
the
the
other
technical
aspects
like
the
bulk,
uploads
and
everything
that
has
to
do
with
that
for
the
larger
units.
K
But
if
you
are
a
smaller
property
owner
or
if
you
are
a
larger
property
owner,
we
do
hold
very
regular
meetings
for
registration
and
how
to
register
where
Andrea
walks
Property
Owners
through
the
process
it's
quite
interactive
and
at
now
because
the
covid
regulations
have
been
lifted.
We
will
start
to
host
those
in
person
at
the
library
and
do
more
one-on-one
workshops
in
person
to
help
people
who
might
have
technological
issues
and
challenges.
K
D
F
A
slight
memory
of
of
trying
out
the
tenant
side
of
the
registry.
It
was
like
a
really
long
time
ago.
I,
don't
know
if
there
was
any
change,
but
is
there
a
way
that
you
can
actually
do
use
that
for
the
tent?
Like
just
say,
it's
like
this
is
my
unit
and
then
see,
but
the
landlord
submitted
I
don't
know
if
that's
like
too
much
extra
work
or
like
no
value
at
all,
but.
B
Okay,
so
I
know
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
and
we
should
do
a
roll
call
vote.
I
believe
the
motion-
and
someone
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
it
is
to
adopt
the
chapter
12
compliance
and
general
remedies
for
both
csfra
regulations
and
mhrso
regulations
with
a
tweak
to
the
date,
the
effective
date
on
the
Mah
RSO
regulation
to
make
that
December,
1
2022
as
well.
B
D
B
G
G
So
these
are
the
proposed
times
very
much
similar
to
what
we
have
done
this
year
and
with
the
note
that,
in
your
discretion,
you
can
always
add
additional
meetings
on
as
needed
basis,
which
we
have
done
in
the
past
year,
for
instance,
to
here
an
appeal
or
even
to
further
extend
our
virtual
meetings,
which
we
had
to
do
in
the
past
every
30
days.
So
I
would
love
to
hear
if
anyone
has
any
remarks
or
comments
on
the
proposed
dates
for
next
year.
B
G
F
F
G
It
is
a
planned
for
the
next
month.
Actually,
every
year
in
October,
we
have
a
work
plan.
We
we
submit
a
very
general
work
plan
and
we
are
happy
to
include
topics
that
you
would
like
to
see
addressed
and
you're
I'm
happy
to
accept
any
proposals
before
the
meeting,
so
I
can
work
them
in
the
work
plan,
or
we
can
discuss
topics
in
the
next
meeting
and
give
them
a
space
where
you
would
like
to
see
them
on
your
agenda.
Absolutely.
F
G
Yeah,
so
if
you
would
first
prefer
to
do
a
goal,
setting
task
setting
before
you
make
a
work
plan,
but
that
work
plan
is
still
and
does
not
need
to
go
to
the
city
council.
But
you
can
decide
whatever
you
want
to
send
up
to
city
council.
That
is
not
limited
to
an
annual
work
plan
that
is
yeah.
Anything
like
we've
sent
letters
to
them
before,
but
if
you
would
like,
if
the
rental
housing
committee
would
like
a
goal
setting
session,
we
could
add
that
to
it.
C
F
J
Well,
we've
talked
about
you
know,
reporting
back
to
city
council
as
things
come
up
and
we've
done
that
and
I
know.
We
always
have
a
work,
a
general
work
plan
for
the
year,
so
I
I
don't
see
that
we
need
to
do
anything.
In
addition
to
that,
I
mean
they're,
going
to
be
issues
that
come
up.
That
will
add
to
our
agenda,
but
I,
don't
I,
I,
think
what
maybe
Committee
Member
process
is
saying
is
we're
an
independent
body.
F
G
B
B
Okay,
do
we
have
any
more
questions
for
staff
on
the
proposed
dates?
If
not
I
will
go
to
public
comment,
okie
dokie
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
comment
on
this
item.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
nine
on
the
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
B
F
Oh,
yes,
we
do
yeah
yeah.
Yes,
all
right,
so
I
move
to
adopt
the
resolution
establishing
a
meeting
schedule
for
the
rental
housing
committee
for
calendar
year,
2023
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
their
being
raped,
but
to
include
the
change
in
June
the
June
date
from
June
19th
to
June
12th
in
honor
of
Juneteenth.
C
C
C
D
B
K
K
That
happens
on
the
first
and
third
Thursdays
of
the
month
in
the
library
on
the
first
floor
in
the
program
room
and
it's
from
one
to
five,
people
can
come
in
from
the
community
and
receive
assistance
with
learning
about
housing
programs,
including
our
own
rent,
stabilization
program
eviction,
help
receive
legal
resources
and
legal
assistance
on
site
and
get
information
on
food
distribution,
financial
assistance,
mediation,
homelessness,
prevention,
resources
and
more.
We
have
quite
a
few
organizations
that
actually
come
and
are
here
on
the
first
Thursday
and
then
on
that
third
Thursday.
K
K
Pardon
me
this
month
we
have
been
providing
support
for
the
city
manager's
office,
guaranteed
basic
income
program,
Elevate
MV
our
office
is
actually
providing
assistance
for
signing
up
potentially
eligible
participants.
We
provided
assistance
on
Friday
for
this.
We
had
20
people
that
came
to
our
office
and
received
one-on-one
support
with
these
applications,
and
also
we
provided
support
on
Saturday
at
the
library.
Our
staff
will
again
provide
assistance
on
Friday,
the
23rd
from
1
to
6
pm
and
on
Saturday
at
the
library.
K
We
will
also
be
at
the
community
health
and
wellness
Fair
on
Saturday
too,
which
is
being
held
at
the
community
center
in
the
Redwood
Hall,
and
then
we'll
have
a
tenant
protections
workshop
at
the
senior
center
on
September
29th
at
one
o'clock
P.M
in
the
Social
Hall,
and
that
concludes
staff's.
Informative
update
on
our
upcoming
workshops
on
October
20th
I
think
we
have
a
meeting
before
then,
but
just
in
case,
we
actually
will
also
be
having
a
workshop
focused
on
habitability
and
maintenance.
F
B
E
I
want
everybody
to
leave
unbelieval
Council
for
the
closed
session
report.
Yes,
so
the
rhc
met
in
closed
session
at
the
beginning
of
this
meeting
to
discuss
two
pending
litigation
matters,
a
matter
of
Redwood
Villa
versus
city
of
Mountain,
View
and
Mountain,
View
rental,
housing
committee
and
the
matter
of
enlightened
Investments
versus
the
city
of
Mountain
View
and
Mountain
View
and
Rental
housing
committee.
No
action
was
taken
on
either
of
those
items
at
this
time,
foreign.