►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Great
great
okay,
where
did
wonderful?
So
this
is
the
council
policy
and
procedures
committee
meeting
of
December
15th
and
during
this
declared
State
of
Emergency,
the
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
54953e
AS
authorized
by
resolution.
Please
contact
city.clerk
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
A
Members
of
the
public
wishing
to
comment
on
any
item
may
do
so
in
the
following
ways:
email
comments
to
city.manager
at
mountainview.gov
by
12
noon.
On
the
meeting
date,
emails
will
be
forwarded
to
the
cppc
and
entered
into
the
record
for
the
meeting.
Please
identify
the
agenda
item
number
on
the
subject.
Line
of
your
email
provide
oral
comments
during
the
meeting.
A
A
Speakers
will
be
notified
of
their
turn
shortly
before
they
are
called
on
to
speak
and
if
you're
participating
via
phone
you've
figured
out
what
the
dial-in
number
is,
but
as
a
reminder,
it's
669-900-9128
and
it's
webinar
ID
836-5185-9262.
A
And
if
you
wish
to
speak,
when
the
chair
announces,
the
item
on
which
you
wish
to
speak,
hit
star
nine
on
your
phone
and
we
will
call
you
by
the
last
two
digits
of
your
phone
number
okay.
So
let's
call
the
meeting
to
order
at
3
34.
C
A
Okay,
seeing
none
is
there
any
comment
from
attendees
Mr
England.
E
Excited
to
get
the
unmute
thank
you,
chair,
yeah,
in
the
minutes.
It
has
for
the
open
public
comments
at
that
time
it
mentions
that
I
raised
several
issues
and
highlight
some
of
them
there,
but
it's
not
at
all
clear
to
me
where
they
go
from
here,
so
I
might
bring
this
up
again
during
the
open
public
comments,
just
trying
to
find
a
path
forward
on
those
items
that
I
raised
at
that
time.
Thanks.
A
Okay,
I'll
bring
it
back
to
the
committee
Committee
Member
Ramirez.
A
Thank
you,
Committee
Member
Hicks.
Second,
thank
you.
Let
me
take
a
roll
comp
vote.
Committee
Member.
A
Yes,
that
passes
unanimously.
Thank
you.
So
the
next
item
is
oral
Communications
from
the
public,
and
this
item
is
reserved
for
people
wanting
to
speak
on
items
that
are
not
on
the
agenda.
But
the
committee
will
not
be
able
to
act
on
any
of
the
items
that
might
be
raised.
So
we'll
start
with
Mr
England.
E
Hi
thanks
again
chair.
So
as
I
mentioned
a
number
of
items,
I'm
not
going
to
repeat
them,
but
would
be
helpful
for
me
to
have
a
path
forward.
Somehow
I
could
put
them
in
an
email
and
send
them
off
to
you
for
possible
action
next
year,
but
I
again
not
clear
entirely
where
to
go
forward.
Some
of
these
things
I
am
committed
to
bring
back
to
outside
Community
groups,
and
so
it
is
important
for
me
to
be
able
to
find
you
know
close
the
loop
on
them.
E
The
one
that
is
particularly
interesting
at
the
moment
is
the
advisory
body
handbook
update,
which
has
I
need
to
check
that
again,
but
last
time
I
checked.
It
had
not
been
updated
for
the
psab
and
it's
been
a
while
now
since
psap
has
started
so
seems
to
me,
the
handbook
should
be
updated,
anytime,
there's
a
change
like
a
new
advisory
body
or
renamed
body
or
new
changes
and
procedures
Etc.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
so
yeah
I
would
suggest
if
you
want
to
put
the
items
in
an
email
and
send
it
to
the
city
council
and
then
the
staff
members
responsible
for
those
areas
do
respond.
A
And
I
don't
see
anyone
else,
so
we
will
close
this
item
and
we'll
move
to
item
five,
which
is
amendments
to
the
council
code
of
conduct
and
Council
policy.
K2
and
oh
sorry,
yes,
sorry
go
ahead,
no
I
was
just
gonna
say:
did
you
want
to
do
any
sort
of
summary
presentation
or
anything.
G
So,
basically,
what
we
recommended
is
outlined
an
attachment
to,
and
that
would
suspend
a
member's
participation
on
the
body
to
which
they
are
appointed
until
a
proper
filing
is
made
and
we're
recommending
that
those
missed
meetings
during
that
period
are
qualified
as
unexcused.
So
a
variety
of
other
miscellaneous
changes,
but
nothing
too
too
sensitive
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
So
thank.
A
You
any
questions
from
the
committee
Committee
Member,
Ramirez.
F
Thank
you,
I
I,
there's,
really
nothing
I
found
an
actual
in
the
modifications
proposed,
but
I
did
want
to
ask.
This
is
a
question
that
actually
came
to
the
council
or
I
think
it
was
item
4.7
on
Tuesday
regarding
the
weakness,
and
so
we
identify
applications
that
are
late.
F
You
know
to
the
park
and
one
of
the
questions
I've
been
interested
in
better
understanding
is:
do
we
need
to
have
a
but
defined
deadline,
or
can
we
simply
say
as
long
as
you
get
your
application
in
before
the
agenda
is
published
for
the
carc
meeting,
then
that's
acceptable.
G
I
would
not
recommend
that
that
be
the
case
and
for
the
simple
reason
that
it
takes
staff
some
time
to
compile
everything
and
get
it
all
published.
So
if
we
just
say
before
you
know
the
meeting
or
even
before
it's
published,
that
runs
the
risk
of
someone
applying
and
then
they're
not
included.
What
I
could
recommend
to
the
body
is
that
you
know
we
can
add
some
language
to
the
policy
that
basically
dictates
that
we
would
set
the
deadline
as
near
as
practicable
to
the
interview
date.
G
You
know
so,
if
it's
EPC
or
rhc
or
psab
for
Council
to
interview
that
we
would
set
an
application
deadline
that
was
closer
to
the
time
that
we
could
reasonably
get
the
application,
get
all
of
the
information
together
and
create
the
packet
historically
and
I
think
this
was
part
of
the
answer
that
was
provided
to
the
council
for
that
item.
G
Historically,
the
deadline
has
run
with
the
publication
or
advertisement
of
the
vacancies,
and
so
that's
kind
of
what
happened
this
last
time
is
that's
just
kind
of
the
path
that
staff
has
taken
in
the
past.
I
know
for
our
upcoming
advertisement
for
terms
ending
in
April
for
Public,
Safety,
Advisory,
Board
and
rental
housing
committee,
that
we
pushed
that
out
past
the
time
that
we're
advertising
so
we'll
advertise
it
for
about
six
weeks,
but
we'll
continue
to
accept
applications
up
to
the
point
where
we're
comfortable,
we
would
be
able
to
pull
everything
together.
G
I
would
also
point
out
that
we
need
to
have
some
sort
of
deadline,
because
there
is
a
portion
of
your
policy
that
requires
that
we
give
persons
already
serving
a
second
term
a
shot
at
applying
if
we
don't
receive
enough
qualified
applicants
right.
So
that
kind
of
inherently
means
that
we
need
to
be
able
to
provide
a
deadline
by
which
people
can
apply.
F
That's
that's
helpful.
I
I
feel
like
we
had
an
unusually
long
period
of
time
between
the
application
deadlom
and
the
interview
is
conducted
and
I
I.
Don't
think
that
that
happens
very
often,
but
it
was
it
might
it
wasn't
part
of
the
modifications
proposed,
but
it's
something
to
think
of,
since
we
did
the
council
policy
open
and
then
the
other
question
I
had
was
related
to
an
interpretation
about
ending
excuses.
Sorry
absence
is
excused
or
unexcused.
F
There
was
a
human
relations
commission
meeting
I
watched
the
recording
of
and
I'd
never
seen
this
time
before,
but
the
the
commission
voted
to
determine
whether
an
absence
was
excused
or
unexcused.
G
That
I
haven't
had
a
lot
of
experience
with
since
I've
been
here.
I
do
know
that
the
policy
provides
that
each
advisory
body
would
determined
by
General
consent
or
majority
vote,
whether
the
status
of
an
absence
is
excused
or
unexcused
so
per
the
policy
that
was
not
an
incorrect
way
of
handling
it.
F
We
haven't
done
this,
it's
it's
not
common,
but
we've
had
absences
in
Council
meetings.
You
know
what.
How
would
we
handle
that
scenario?
Would
we
take
a
formal
vote.
F
Okay,
okay
I
forgot
about
that.
Thank
you,
I,
just
I
feel
like.
It
might
be
also
helpful
to
think
about.
How
do
we
make
sure
there's
there's
a
common
understanding
and
interpretation
of
that
provision,
since
it
would
be
strange
for
some
commissions
to
handle
it
one
way
and
other
commissions
to
handle
it.
You
know
with
this
particular
way
right.
G
Yeah
before
the
part
that
talks
about
General
consent
by
the
body,
it
does
say
that
the
advisory
body
chair
in
consultation
with
the
staff
liaison
would
propose
whether
or
not
an
absence
was
excused
or
unexcused.
And
then
that
would
be
something
that
the
the
body
would
accept
or
not
accept,
because
that's
something
that
needs
to
be
in
the
minutes.
A
Yeah
I
just
want
to
note
that
your
first
issue
I
had
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
our
city
clerk
about
it,
because
I
had
the
same
questions
and
thought
we
address
that
here,
and
so
she
was
kind
enough
to
put
together
some
suggested
changes
that
we
could
do
yeah.
H
A
Have
seen
the
discussion
of
excused
or
not
at
an
EPC
meeting
so
but
yeah
I,
don't
think
there
is
a
common
understanding
across
all
of
the
different
advisory
bodies.
Committee
Member
Hicks.
C
A
So
I
think
well,
I,
think
the
question
of
absences
excused
or
not
is
already
in
our
policy.
So
we
don't
need
to
do
anything
about
that.
A
C
The
other
one
is
whether
people
had
attended
a
meeting
or
not
might
be
something
that's
more
prominent,
but
that
maybe
we
can
take
up
as
a
whether
applicants
had
ever
attended
a
meeting.
Maybe
that's
something
we
should
discuss,
but
I
guess
I'll
maybe
bring
that
up
at
another
time
anyway.
C
My
question
the
reason
I
raised
my
hand,
was
I
just
wanted
a
little
I
have
no
objection
to
the
proposal,
but
I
just
wanted
to
know
is
Staff
having
trouble
getting
advisory
body
members
to
complete
the
fppc
filings
is
that
is
that
the
and
and
needs
some
clout
for
that?
Is
that
the
reasoning
behind
this.
G
G
We
have
had
a
handful
of
you
know,
kind
of
difficulties,
but
definitely
not
a
overwhelming
issue,
but
yeah
we
have
had.
You
know
some
some
difficulties
in
impressing
upon
people,
the
the
need
to
comply
with.
You
know
the
council's
resolution
and
dictating
who
would
be
a
filer.
C
A
It's
my
understanding
that
there
are,
you
know,
has
been
a
handful
but
I.
Think
the
city
clerk
does
a
lot
of
takes
a
lot
of
action
to
try
to
explain
the
importance
and
help
the
person
before
it
becomes
actually
a
real
issue
like
with
the
fppc
say
all
right,
city
manager,
McCarthy,.
I
Thank
you
chairman,
so
I
can
say
that
we
have
one
smaller
Commission
in
particular
that
we
may
have
challenges
with
with
form
700s
in
the
future.
The
DRC
and
I
have
been
working
with
the
community
development
director,
Artesia
vastava,
on
the
options
going
forward
for
what
the
DRC
might
have
to
look
like
or
might
need
to
change
to,
because
it
is
absolutely
going
to
be
a
challenge
for
that
commission
which
really
isn't
like
a
commission.
I
C
I
Challenge
is
that
there's
very
few
people
on
that
and
they're
generally
Architects
and
in
the
future
it
may
be
very
difficult
to
find
people
who
are
willing
to
serve,
who
want
to
file
form
700s.
I
Would
be
more,
the
latter,
the
Consultants,
but
they
might
still
have
to
file
form
700s
so
and
I
think
if
our
city
clerk
may
have
some
more
context
on
this
as
well.
But
yes,
I,
think
regardless
you
know
it
sounds
like
they
would
likely
have
to
file
a
form
700s,
but
we
are
still
working
through
what
what
the
options
are
and
the
challenges.
But
it's
certainly
something
that
we're
going
to
need
to
be
thinking
about,
because
it
could
prohibit
us
even
having
anyone
from
serving
on
that
in
the
future.
A
Is
that
it
Committee
Member
Hicks.
A
A
Okay,
so
first,
let's
open
this
up
for
public
input.
A
And
I
don't
see
any
hands
raised
so
back
to
the
committee.
C
So
I
think
I'm
not
going
to
be
supporting
it
until
it's
more
worked
out
with
the
DRC,
because
I
would
just
hate
to
like
lose
the
DRC.
So
that's
where
I'm
at
at
this
point,
I.
G
Yeah,
so
it's
it's
ordinance
created
anytime.
The
council
creates
a
body,
it's
automatically
a
legislative
body
that
has
to
follow
the
burn,
Act
and
they're,
subject
to
all
the
same
things
that
any
other
body
is,
and
by
virtue
of
the
decisions
that
they
make
and
the
recommendations
that
they
make.
F
I
was
actually
prepared
to
move
the
staff
recommendations
and
include
it
sounds
like
you
had
discussed
with
the
city
perks
on
potential
solutions
to
the
application
deadline
issue.
So
if
there
was
language,
I
should
manage
technology
open
to,
including
that,
but
I
feel
pretty
strongly
about.
I
I
would
want
to
know
if
members
of
the
DRC
had
a
financial
conflict
of
interest
right.
If
we
have
an
architect
who
has
worked
with
a
developer,
you
know
on
a
routine
matter
and
has
accepted
compensation
from
them.
F
That's
really
important
for
us
to
know,
because,
as
a
member
for
team,
we
accept
their
recommendations
generally
uncritically,
so
I
I,
I'm,
actually
very
I,
didn't
realize
that
they
didn't
file,
form
form
700,
so
I'm
glad
that
they're
now
supposed
to
and
I
I
I
think
it's
it's
important
that
anybody
who
is
required
to
file
the
form
700
be
in
compliance
with
the
law
if
they
want
to
serve
on
any
of
our
appointed
bodies.
F
F
Personally,
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
sympathy
for
folks
who
say
I
don't
want
to
file
a
form,
700,
that's
their
prerogative,
but
then
they
wouldn't
be
in
compliance
with
the
law
and
want
to
file
I
formed
700
that
I
shouldn't
be
on
the
city
council
right,
but
I'll
go
ahead,
and
rather
than
make
a
motion
I'll
see.
If
there
are
other
things
we
wanted
to
consider.
F
City,
it
sounds
like
you've
been
mentioned,
I'm
holding
a
lot
of
hands
as
people
who
are
not
accustomed
to
following
the
form
700.
You
know
now
our
I.
A
Yeah
so
I'm
actually
also
supportive
of
including
this
change
that
you
have
to
file
a
form
700,
and
if
you
don't,
then
until
you
do,
you
can't
participate
because
I
agree
with
what
the
mayor
said.
It's
important
to
know.
It's
got
a
financial
interest
in
something.
A
The
I
also
appreciate
all
of
the
other
small
changes
that
were
made
to
the
policy
to
clean
it
up
a
bit.
So
thank
you
for
doing
that.
The
and
I
I
did
get
some
changes
and
I.
Don't
I,
don't
know
if
the
other
committee
members
have
their
packet
open
because
it'd
be
easy
to
reference.
The
changes
to
address
the
deadlines
for
applications,
but
to
give
the
city
clerk's
office
a
little
bit
more
wiggle
room.
A
G
I
think
it's
one
a
is
the
five
month
reference
and
and
to
get
the
the
other
members
kind
of
some
context.
The
issue
that
we're
having
is
this.
G
It
would
give
my
office
more
flexibility
if
we
just
removed
the
the
prescriptive
time
and
just
say
prior
to
term
expirations,
and
and
leave
it
to
us
to
make
sure
that
that
we're
you
know
getting
the
advertisements
out
well
in
advance
and
and
we're
aligning
the
deadlines
more
closely
to
the
the
interview,
dates.
A
Sorry,
I
misstated
that,
yes,
so
it's
procedures
1A
to
be
very
specific,
so
we
would
remove
five
months.
A
And
then
on
the
next
page.
A
It
says
b,
says
four
months
and
we
would
remove
four
months
and
C
says
and
I'm
looking
at
the
red
line
version
two
to
three
months.
But
we
would
just
remove
that.
F
Thank
you
I,
so
I'm
I'm
comfortable
with
this,
just
just
to
pair
it
back
away
or
be
a
dentist
to
give
the
city
or
stop
this
flexibility
to
discern
the
time
frame,
and
that
would
include
also
the
deadline
to
submit
an
application,
and
then
that
would
allow
us
to
have
a
deadline
that
is
as
close
as
reasonably
possible
to
the
date
when
the
interviews
would
occur.
A
G
That
would
be
1B
under
procedures
yeah,
so
one
B
where
it
talks
about
you
know
how
we
would
appropriately
advertise.
G
We
could
add
a
little
language
there
and
just
if
the
committee
is
comfortable
recommending
language
that
says
that
the
deadline
for
applications
should
be
set
as
near
as
practicable
to
the
date
interviews
will
be
held
by
the
recommending
body,
so
that
would
cover
both
the
council
appointment
to
Review
Committee
and
the
and
the
city
council,
making
recommendations
to
itself.
D
G
Insufficient,
it's
that
very
next
paragraph.
It
says
Additionally,
the
city
clerk
shall
send
all
current
applicants
a
new
application
form
right
and
then
the
event.
An
insufficient
number
of
new
applications
are
received
by
the
end
of
The
Advocate
advertised
application
period.
The
city
clerk
shall
provide
an
application
form
to
incumbent
serving
a
second
term,
so
that
would
give
us
the
flexibility
to
make
that
date
align
properly
and
and
get
the
packet
out
as
well.
A
Do
you
guys
see
where
that
is
I
just
want
to
make
sure
Allison,
okay,
Committee
Member
Ramirez
thank.
H
F
C
Yeah
and
then
while
and
then
I'm
not
going
to
be
voting
for
it
and
while
I
appreciate
you
know
what
you're
saying
about
people,
should
you
want
people
to
do
disclosures
and
you
want
to
be
able
to
see
if
their
conflicts
of
interest,
but
the
problem
that
I
have
is
that
I
feel
that
and
many
people
believe
that
the
DRC
is
very
important,
particularly
as
there's
you
know,
kind
of
the
state
is
cutting
back
on
the
ability
to
comment
on
projects
and
I.
Don't
we
haven't
had
this
policy
in
the
past
and
I?
C
Don't
see
I,
don't
know,
what's
going
to
happen
to
the
DRC?
Is
it
going
to
you
know?
Is
it
going
to
disappear,
or
you
know,
is
nobody
and
for
a
while
and
we
have
no
DRC
or
is,
are
less
qualified
people
going
to
be
put
on
and
maybe
aren't
Architects
I,
don't
know
where
we're
going
with
this
in
that
particular
and
I.
Don't
feel
that
that
particular
aspect
of
this
has
been
thought
out
and
it's
really
important
to
people
so
I
will
not
be
supporting
the
mission.
F
I
Yes,
Committee
Member
Ramirez.
That
is
accurate,
so
if
we
have
to
remove
DRC
from
the
ordinance
as
a
as
a
review
body
or
as
an
advisory
body
so
that
medians
can
be
held,
form
700s
would
still
be
required.
So
that's
what
we're
trying
to
navigate
through.
I
I
But
you
know
again:
we
are
not
the
ones
that
that
are
saying
who
can
and
can't
file
them.
It
is
set
by
by
law,
and
the
city
attorney's
office
has
advised
specifically
on
which
boards
and
commissions
do
need
to
be
filing
them.
So
you
know
we
this.
I
This
may
be
a
challenge
for
us,
which
is
why
we're
having
to
kind
of
think
about
how
it
functions
and
because
it's
Architects
that
serve
on
that
board
and
they
function
more,
almost
more
like
Consultants,
so
we're
having
to
talk
about
it
further
I,
don't
have
all
the
the
answers,
but
you
know
it
is
potentially
a
challenge
and
it
could
just
be
a
personal
personal
reason
for
it.
C
So
now
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
that
this
has
always
been
the
law?
It's
just
not
in
our
I.
Don't
remember
the
name
of
this
chat
sitting
on
the
table.
You
know
it's,
it's
just
hasn't
been.
We
just
don't
have
it
on
the
books
yet,
but
it's
the
law
anyway.
So
we're
not
really
the
okay.
Well,
that's
kind
of
different
I'm
still
worried
about
the
bigger
seat
belt.
H
Yes,
yeah
sorry,
Committee,
Member,
Hicks.
C
H
Committee
Member
Ramirez,
yes,
chairmanicek.
Yes,.
B
J
And
this
item
is
a
brief
item
for
the
committee,
which
is
an
update
on
your
work
plan,
your
action
plan
for
the
year.
We
are
doing
this
at
each
meeting
that
we
hold
on
to
ensure
you're,
aware
of
what's
currently
on
the
agenda
and
you'll,
see
that
a
number
of
your
items
have
been
accomplished
through
your
first
two
meetings
and
going
into
2023.
You
have
two
items
that
would
be
Beyond.
This
update.
J
That
is
also
noted,
which
would
be
Council
policy
A2
to
look
at
some
minor
level,
cleanup
items
that
would
be
in
conjunction
with
our
finance
team
working
on
that,
and
you
also
have
a
council
policy
a15,
which
is
the
shoreline
ticket
policy.
There
are
some
additional
modifications.
J
You
may
recall
that
came
to
you
not
so
long
ago,
but
there
are
some
additional
modifications
that
our
community
services
department
would
like
to
be
making
sometime
in
the
spring,
so
both
of
those
items
will
be
carried
forward
and
then
we'll
also
include
an
update,
as
well
as
any
other
items
that
come
before
us
for
referral.
A
Great,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
from
committee
members.
H
F
You,
for
my
benefit,
is
this
an
appropriate
time
to
suggest
an
additional
item,
no
urgency
this.
This
would
be
okay.
B
F
Thank
you,
I
had
intended
to
bring
this
up.
Tuesday
night
vote
was
incapacitated
and
unable
to
do
so
so
I
figured
you
might
as
well
bring
up,
and
the
city
manager
and
I
have
talked
about
this,
but
it
may
not
be
the
right.
This
might
not
be
the
right
body
to
consider
it,
but
I
figured.
It
would
be
worth
a
discussion
we
right
now.
There
is
no
guidance
or
policy
that
provides
a
process
for
private
developers
who
would
like
to
use
public
land
in
their
developments.
F
Right
sometimes
they
go
to
the
council.
Sometimes
they
don't
right
and
the
two
examples
like
adventures
in
Stephanie
Castro,
which
went
to
Council
in
closed
session,
and
there
are
other
instances.
Oh
actually
there
wasn't
the
best
friends.
Fairmont
also
went,
but
we
don't
actually
have
a
policy
that
says
here's
when
it's
okay,
here's
when
it's
not!
You
know,
if
you're
for
the
parameters
of
a
discussion,
and
maybe
that
doesn't
need
to
be
a
council
policy
but
I
figured.
D
F
It
okay
for
me
to
ask
the
city
whether
I
can
include
a
street,
you
know
or
a
cul-de-sac
or
some
other
public
property
I,
don't
know
if
you've
had
a
chance
to
look
that
into
this
city
manager,
but
I'm
open
to
suggestions.
Thank
you.
I
So
the
only
thing
I
would
say
about
this
and
I
need
to
talk
further
with
staff,
but
I
would
caution
the
cppc
making
policy
about
land
use
it's
a
little
bit
different
when
we're
talking
about
land
use
and
development
projects,
because
cppc
is
typically
focused
on
more
of
the
administrative
policies
of
council
and
how
you
do
things
now,
not
saying
you
you
couldn't,
but
there
could
be
another
vehicle
that
gets
you
all
the
same
thing
without
necessarily
coming
to
cppc.
I
Now
it
could
be
something
that
you
direct
to
do
as
part
of
your
work
plan,
even
that
we
would
bring
back
to
council
with
some
sort
of
process
and
I'm
saying
this
in
the
context
of
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
work
plan,
items
that
that
are
going
to
be
on
the
work
line
related
to
various
actions
that
Council
wants
to
take
related
to
development.
F
You
and
I'm:
that's
that's
fine
with
me,
I'm
agnostic
on
the
vehicle,
but
I
think
we
already
do
this
right.
We've.
There
have
already
been
instances
where
private
developers
have
approached
the
city
and
said
we
want
to
use
public
property,
and
so
presumably
there's
at
least
an
internal
process
or
something.
But
it's
not
it's
not
publicly
accessible.
It's
not
way
transparent
to
anybody.
F
E
F
It
go
to
council,
when
do
you
just
categorically
reject
it?
You
know,
and
maybe
some
understanding
if
this
has
never.
F
E
D
A
So
I'll
just
add,
I
think
that's
an
interesting
item
to
bring
up
and
I
do
think
it
is
good
to
have
things
known
rather
than
have
people
guess
what
the
process
is
and
different
people
use
different
processes,
but
I
by
and
all
for
figuring
out.
What
is
the
right
forum
for
this
to
be
addressed?
A
It
doesn't
have
to
be
the
cppc
in
my
book
and
I'm,
okay
with
it
being
someplace
else,
but
I
do
think
it's.
It
would
be
good
to
have
information
on
it
and
understand
it,
and
so
I'm
fine
with
a
memo
for
now
and
if
we
want
to
bring
it
up
as
a
work
plan
item
that
works
for
me,
Committee
Member,
Hicks,.
C
Yeah
I
think
it's
a
I
mean
it's
definitely
a
good
topic,
I'm
glad
you
brought
it
up.
I
think
it
is
something
that
we
need
to
talk
about
and
bet
a
little.
The
the
I
can
see
why
you
wouldn't
want
to
put
it
on
the
cppc.
You
know
as
a
land
use
policy.
C
On
the
other
hand,
the
good
thing
about
giving
it
to
a
committee
is
that
there's
so
much
on
our
work
plan
I,
you
know
I
honestly,
don't
know
what
I'd
take
off
to
put
that
on
and
to
some
degree
I
I
kind
of
like
the
I,
like
the
idea
of
putting
some
of
these
things
that
are
maybe
not
as
big
as
some
of
the
things
that
we
discussed
during
Council
meetings
say
housing
on
it.
C
Some
of
these
smaller
items,
giving
them
to
committees
might
be
a
way
to
kind
of
break
that
Log
Jam
I'm,
not
sure.
If
this
is
the
right
committee,
but
I'm
not
totally
behind
putting
everything
on
our
work
plan
and
then
saying
we
can't
do
half
of
them
because
I
don't
know
what
I
would
ditch
for
this.
Even
though
I
want
to
talk
about
this.
I
Thank
you,
chair,
so
I
think
it's
absolutely
doable
for
us
to
prepare,
at
least
for
now
and
off
agenda
memo
for
Council.
Just
so
that
you
all
can
understand
right
now,
just
the
context
of
decision
making
and
then
once
we
give
you
that,
maybe
if
there's
interest
to
take
it
further,
then
that's
something
the
council
can
raise,
and
you
know
if
it
should
come
via
cppc
or
otherwise.
But
we
can
at
least
give
you
the
lay
of
the
land
first,
so
that
you
understand
and
I
will
say
that
you
know.
I
There's
probably
some
things
that
are
like
decisions
are
made
because
of
certain
precise
plan
rules
or
determinations
or
general
plan
rules
or
determinations
and
others
may
be
more
of
an
art
than
a
science.
But
I
can
definitely
I'll
talk
to
staff
and
we'll
get
you
information
in
a
memo
so
that
you're
better
informed
about
it.
And
then
we
can
go
from
there.
If
you
want
to
codify
something
or
really
think
more
about
digging
deeper
into
what
you
may
or
may
not
allow
staff
to
decide
versus
counsel.
A
E
Thank
you
chair
so
on
this
agenda
item.
This
is
where
you're
talking
about
future
agenda
items
and
items
on
your
work
plan.
This
is
where
the
advisory
body
handbook
maybe
should
appear.
I
did
meanwhile,
have
a
look
at
the
current
version.
It's
from
late
2021.
It
does
include
a
piece
app.
So
that's
good,
but
it
is
ambiguous,
not
ambiguous.
It's
not
consistent
as
far
as
whether
members
can
be
non-residents
or
not.
E
The
Performing
Arts
committee,
senior
advisory
committee
and
visual
arts
committee
all
say
one
member
can
be
a
non-resident
and
none
of
the
others
say
you
know
either
way.
Meanwhile,
the
code
of
conduct
in
the
K2
documentation
just
say
resident
of
Mountain
View.
So
it's
really
unclear
and
the
information
I
and
the
reason
it
came
up,
is
that
there
was
a
member
of
psab
who's,
a
student
and
so
she's
kind
of
living
at
home
with
her
parents.
E
So
she
has
established
residents
at
her
parents
home
but
she's
actually
going
to
campus
that's
outside
of
Mountain
View,
so
it
was
ironed
out
and
that
member
was
able
to
continue.
But
that's
how
the
issue
came
up
and
it
seems
to
us
those
of
us
looking
at
this,
that
this
should
be
codified
and
made
clear
in
the
supporting
documentation.
E
That's
why
the
ask,
but
it's
not
in
this
document
that
you
have
for
this
agenda
item
so
again,
I'm
a
bit
lost
in
what
to
do.
I
can
send
a
an
email
to
all
city
council,
as
the
chair
suggested,
I'm,
not
sure
it's
the
right
way
to
go,
but
that's
what
I'll
plan
on
doing
unless
I
have
further
guidance
thanks.
A
So
man
this
is
whatever
I
have,
is
hanging
on
I
I
think
we
have
resolved
the
first
one
that
we
will
have
a
memo
on
the
topic.
Is
there
anything
else
anyone
wants
to
bring
up.
A
I
do
still
think
sending
an
email
on
Mr
England
is
the
right
way
to
go,
because
then
our
city
clerk
can
answer
your
question
regarding
the
brush.
The
handbook
couldn't
think
of
the
word
handbook,
yep.
A
Okay,
if
there's
nothing
further
on
this
one,
okay,
then
we'll
move
to
item
six,
which
is
committee,
staff,
comments,
questions
and
committee
reports.
Does
anybody
have
any
I
don't
see
any
hands?
A
Okay,
then
we
will
adjourn
the
meeting
at
4
17..
Thank
you
all
very
much
and
good
meeting.
Thank
you.
Thank.