►
From YouTube: October 17, 2022 Rental Housing Committee Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Good
evening
and
welcome
to
the
October
17
2022
rental
housing
committee
meeting,
this
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
54
95
3E,
and
is
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
rental
housing
committee.
Please
contact
MV
rent
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
A
A
B
C
B
Committee
Member
Rosa
is
absent:
Committee
Member,
almond,
ear,
Committee,
Member,
part
of
dezella
Pleasant
and
vice
chair
Ramos
present
and
chair
Haynes
Lindsay.
Thank.
A
You
okie
dokie.
Now
we
will
move
on
to
the
consent
calendar
and
these
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
committee
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
The
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
committee
to
efficiently
and
quickly
consider
routine
or
administrative
business
items
with
one
motion.
A
D
A
E
Oh
I
was
going
to
well,
actually
we
had
to
do
public.
A
A
A
E
I
moved
to
approve
the
balance
of
the
consent,
calendar
minus
3.2
so
to
approve
the
minutes
for
the
September
19
2022
all
right
see
me
and
to
adopt
amendments
to
the
csfra
regulations,
chapter
3,
rules
of
conduct
and
csfra
chapter
6
and
Mr
mhrso
chapter
7
upward
adjustments.
B
A
Hey
wow,
we
will
start
with
agenda
item
3.2,
which
was
pulled
by
Committee
Member
part
of
Giselle,
and
this
is
the
item
to
approve
a
resolution.
Making
findings
authorizing
continue
remote
teleconference
meetings
at
the
rental
housing
committee,
pursuant
to
the
brown
act
Provisions
as
amended
by
assembly
bill
number
361.,
and
we
can
open
discussion
on
this
item.
D
I
mean
I
would
just
say,
there's
no
state
of
emergency
any
longer
and
I.
Think
at
our
last
meeting
we
talked
about
a
hybrid
model
which
seemed
to
appeal
to
a
number
of
members
of
the
committee
and
I
I.
Think
that's
what
we
should.
We
should
follow
at
this
point
where
we
can
continue
having
people
allowed
to
participate
remotely
by
Zoom
from
the
comfort
of
their
homes,
and
so
people
can
continue
to
participate.
D
That
way,
but
also
I
think
the
meetings
should
revert
to
how
they
were
always
intended
to
be,
which
is
in
person
I.
Believe
we
have
the
space
available,
there's
ample
room
for
social
distancing
and
anyone
that
feels
uncomfortable
in
that
environment
can
participate
remotely.
So
I
can
make
a
motion
or
we
can
talk
about
it
further.
But
that's
what
I
would
like
to
say
about
that.
E
G
Yeah
so
after
last,
meeting
I
did
check
in
with
the
city
clerks
and
the
city
manager's
office,
and
the
city
clerk
mentioned
that
the
city
council
is
not
ready
yet
to
go.
Hybrid
and
committees
can
go
hybrid
after
the
city,
council
has
decided
to
go
hybrid
and
the
most.
The
reason
behind
that
is
that
it
is
not
ready
yet
is
still
tackling
some
of
the
problems
that
come
with
hybrid
meetings
and
every
month.
This
question
is
also
post
to
the
city
council,
which
up
till
now
has
continued
the
virtual
meetings.
H
And
can
I
just
interject
I
do
just
want
to
note
that
there
is
still
a
state
of
emergency.
In
effect,
the
governor
did
announce
that
it
would
remain
in
effect
until.
D
I'm
sorry
yeah.
If
no
one
else
has
anything
I'll
I'll
speak
again.
Clearly
whether
city
council
is
ready
for
this
or
not
doesn't
matter
we're
independent
body
and
their
ability
or
willingness
to
participate
in
in-person
meetings
is
kind
of
irrelevant.
As
far
as
we're
concerned,
I
think
the
only
relevant
issue
is
whether
you
know
there's
a
statutory
requirements
are
met.
Apparently
the
governor
is
still
imposed.
A
state
of
emergency
I'm
hearing.
D
Obviously
leads
most
of
us
to
wonder
when
that
will
ever
end,
because
it
seems
hard
to
believe
that
there's
actually
a
state
of
emergency
still
proclaimed
so
I.
Don't
know
maybe
I'll
ask
council.
Is
that
a
requirement
if
there's
a
state
of
emergency,
that
our
meetings
are
remote
or
does
that
just
give
us
the
ability
to
authorize
a
remote
meeting?
I
guess
that
would
be
my
question
for
Council.
H
Yeah,
it
is
not
a
requirement
that
you
hold
your
meetings
remotely,
but
it
does
give
you
the
ability
to
make
the
findings
that
are
required
under
the
brown
Act
to
hold
your
meetings
remotely.
So
the
existing
state
of
emergency,
both
at
the
state
level
and
I,
do
believe
the
city
still
has
not
lived
at
their
own
state
of
emergency
so
either.
One
of
those
gives
this
body
the
authority
to
make
the
findings
that
are
necessary.
D
D
As
of
the
next
meeting,
notwithstanding
whatever
state
of
emergency
has
been
created
by
the
governor
or
the
city,
and
anyone
who
is
on
willing
to
attend
in
person
or
feels
uncomfortable
is
completely
willing
or
able
to
participate
remotely
and
anyone
that
would
like
to
participate
in
person,
as
these
meetings
have
been
conducted,
not
just
for
this
committee,
but
every
committee
that's
existed
in
California's
history
up
until
2020.
D
We
can
continue
continue
to
do
so
in
person
and
I'm
sure
the
technical
problems,
whatever
they
might
be
in
the
heart
of
Silicon
Valley,
can
be
resolved
within
a
week
or
two
until
our
next
meeting.
So
that's
what
I
guess?
That's
what
I
have
to
say.
You
know
prefer
the
other
members
that
want
to
say
something.
F
I
just
had
a
technical
question,
whether
I
guess
this
is
for
Anki.
Would
our
it
be
ready
for
such
a
meeting.
G
I
just
mentioned
that
I
got
the
message
that
there's
still
IG
is
still
working
on
that
and
they
will
not
be
ready
in
two
weeks.
No.
D
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
know:
when
do
they
think
they
can
be
ready,
so
I
understand
they
already
had
two
or
three
weeks
into
our
last
meeting
and
now
we're
being
told
there's
another
two
weeks.
So
if
five
weeks
isn't
enough
to
get
this
going,
do
we
have
any
indication
when,
in
the
heart
of
Silicon
Valley,
we
can
get
the
technical
capabilities
to
have
these
meetings
hybrid.
G
I
can
definitely
ask
for
an
update
from
IG
yeah.
A
Commuted
in
the
wrong
direction
again,
I
do
have
a
question.
Is
there
a
need
for
a
committee
or
a
group
to
be
willing
to
test
hybrid,
because
perhaps
we
could
volunteer
to
be
the
guinea
pigs
for
lack
of
a
better
term
so
that
it
can
use
us
to
work
out?
Some
of
the
like
headaches
that
they
may
be
encountering
is.
G
That
something
so
again,
I
I,
I'm,
sorry
to
repeat
myself
but
IG,
also
works
on
the
direction
of
the
city
manager.
So
I
can
definitely
ask
for
an
update
and
ask
what
their
next
causes
of
action
are.
A
Sounds
good,
so
I
know
we
did
have
a
motion
to
go
to
hybrid
for
the
next
meeting.
I
think
the
way
that
the
resolution
Works
to
have
this
meeting
stay
virtual.
We
have
to
pass
the
resolution,
but
we
could
probably
do
in
friendly
Amendment
to
the
motion
or,
if
there's
no
second,
the
motion
will
die.
So
do
we
have
a
second
to
the
motion
from
Committee
Member
partisans
out.
I
D
A
You,
okay
now
we
will
open
the
meeting
for
oral
Communications
from
the
public.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
committee
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
the
section
state
law
prohibits
the
committee
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
non-agenda
items?
A
J
First
of
all,
I
just
wanted
to
say
I
wanted
to
compliment
the
committee
for
the
fact
that
the
situation
with
covet
unfortunately
has
not
even
close
to
been
resolved.
J
Yet,
as
the
CDC
has
been
now
indicating,
there
are
far
more
new
barriers
with
significantly
different
structures
that
are
actually
proving
to
be
not
very
affected
by
even
the
most
current
vaccines,
and
so
unfortunately,
we
have
about
four
of
them
that
are
now
in
the
pipeline
and
so
I'm
like
thinking
that,
unfortunately,
we
are
nowhere
near
done
with
covid
and
we
have
to
again
base
our
decisions
on
when
we
actually
can
prove
that
covet
is
under
control.
We
currently
cannot.
J
The
Wastewater
assist
situation
is
still
moderate
to
high
in
in
Santa
Clara
County,
and
that's
the
reason
why
both
the
state
and
the
Federal
emergency
regarding
covet
has
been
continued.
That
I
recently,
we
saw
a
report
saying
that
the
the
Biden
Administration
has
in
fact
extended
the
coveted
medical
emergency
order,
and
so
I
would
suspect
that,
in
effect
that
basically
pretty
much
makes
it
so
there's
going
to
not
be
an
end
of
it
until
I
I
would
say
we
can
prove
that
the
environment,
all
public
environments,
are
safe.
J
Unfortunately,
the
city
council
room
has
very
little
air
circulation.
If
not,
if
any
and
more
importantly,
it
does
not
have
any
means
of
controlling
viral
contagions
in
the
air.
So
I
would
say
that
again.
I
think
that
the
committee
has
done
a
very
good
job
at
understanding
that
and
I
think
some
people
need
to
understand
that
sometimes
things
are.
J
They
look
on
the
face
good
at
the
moment,
but
we
are
definitely
under
the
the
impression
now
that
there's
going
to
be
another
new
wave
of
covet
and
it's
already
started.
11
of
the
new
cases
in
the
CDC
Nationwide
are
the
new
BQ
variants,
not
ba
variants.
Thank
you
very
much
and
have
a
great
rest
of
your
night.
A
K
Thank
you,
chair,
Haines,
Liv,
say
good
evening
committee
this
evening,
we'll
be
reviewing
the
monthly
status
report
for
the
month
of
September.
This
closes
out
our
first
quarter
of
the
year.
K
As
you
can
see.
This
is
what
it
looks
like
right
now,
the
next
time
that
you
see
this
report
so
next
month,
when
we're
reporting
for
the
Q2,
it
will
look
different
because
we
will
be
adding
in
all
of
those
data
points
that
we
talked
about.
We
thought
it
would
make
more
sense
to
start
at
the
beginning
of
the
quarter
instead
of
the
of
at
the
end
of
the
quarter.
K
K
We've
already
had
almost
600
public
inquiries.
A
lot
of
those,
as
you
can
see,
are
still
about
eviction
protections
and
we
are
still
seeing
quite
a
few
allowed.
Rent
increase,
specific
inquiries
and
and
a
lot
of
these
have
been
around
concessions
and
potential
petitions.
So
I
did
want
to
pull
that
out.
We
are
still
seeing
really
high
levels
of
bilingual
Services
about
30
percent
of
all
of
our
inquiries
have
been
in
need
of
Spanish
as
a
primary
language.
K
K
We've
held
nine
workshops
and
had
52
attendees.
So
far,
we've
had
13
office
hours
provided
one-on-one
support
to
147
people,
and
we've
done
Outreach
for
almost
where
we've
been
able
to
reach
nearly
a
thousand
people
at
our
events.
So
this
has
really
helped
us
solidify
our
relationship
with
the
community.
K
We
are
seeing
a
lot
more
I'm,
gonna,
sensitive
and
serious
situations
coming
through
our
office
from
both
landlords
and
tenants,
and
we
have
a
correlation
between
the
higher
touch
points
in
the
community
and
the
that
type
of
participation
from
the
community
with
the
services
that
we're
seeing.
So
that
is
going
well.
K
We've
sent
out
316
targeted
letters,
we're
going
to
start
sending
out
targeted
letters
for
people
who
receive
banked
increases
as
well,
and,
as
you
can
see
here,
we've
had
18
email
updates
for
a
reach
of
913
email,
subscribers
per
email
and
we'll.
We
will
begin
starting
our
Mountain
View
voice,
Outreach
and
probably
a
few
other
news
outlets
as
well
for
our
housing
and
eviction
help
center.
This
month.
K
We
have
the
mediation
program
is
still
going
strong,
we've
had
47,
mediations
and
conciliations
so
far,
36
of
those
have
been
resolved.
This
is
pretty
high
for
this
early
in
the
quarter.
I'll
go
ahead
and
do
that
analysis
between
quarters
or
between
biannually
during
our
next
meeting
where
we
go
over
Outreach
efforts.
K
K
Next
next
month,
we've
seen
a
slight
uptick
in
failure
to
pay
rent
notices,
so
we're
tracking
that
very
closely
and
making
sure
that
people
receive
the
Outreach
and
support
that's
necessary
to
assist
them
as
best
as
possible
during
this
time
and
next
month,
we'll
have
data
that
looks
at
which
one
of
those
are
new
new
eviction
notices
that
we're
receiving
versus
which
ones
are
repeats
for
people
who
are
repeatedly
in
that
cycle.
K
We
do
have
the
ability
to
pull
that
out
and
we
will
next
month
so
far
for
the
calendar
year
again,
this
is
the
calendar
year.
Everything
else
for
the
most
part
is
reported
on
the
fiscal
year.
No
units
have
gone
into
Redevelopment,
no
properties
have
gone
into
Redevelopment
and
two
households
have
received
assistance
and
that
those
two
households
are
carryovers
from
prior
from
prior
calendar
year.
K
Redevelopment
actions,
so
we're
not
seeing
any
any
change
over
in
properties
that
are
resulting
in
tenants
being
displaced
right
now
we
have
have
had
nine
tenant
petitions
so
far
this
fiscal
year.
So
that's
quite
an
uptick
for
us,
nine
and
one
quarter
is
pretty
significant
and
we've
had
four
for
unlawful
rent
and
five
for
tenant
hardship.
K
For
the
market
conditions
you
can
see
here,
everything
is
stabilizing
pretty
solidly
for
fully
covered
units.
We
have
a
vacancy
rate
of
4.4
percent
for
partially
covered
units.
We
have
a
vacancy
rate
of
4.1
percent
and
for
newly
built
units
units
without
coverage.
Again,
that
number
is
always
going
to
be
higher
and
it's
at
16.
When
all
of
that
is
averaged
out,
we
get
a
6.6
percent
across
all
units
vacancy
rate.
K
As
for
Market
rent,
it
has
recovered
past
the
covid
pre-covered
prices
and
we're
seeing
for
fully
covered
units
about
twenty
seven
hundred
dollars
a
month.
This
is
a
increase
of
6.5
from
from
2009.
K
A
A
Okay,
seeing
none
we're
going
to
bring
it
back
to
committee
deliberations
and
providing
feedback.
I
do
want
to
say,
I'm
really
excited
for
the
next
month's
status
report,
because
it
sounds
like
we
have
some
really
cool
new
data
points
that
are
going
to
come
in
and
so
I
super
appreciate
all
the
work
Patricia
and
everyone
on
putting
that
together
because
I'm
sure
that's
a
lot
of
like
additional
time
doing
all
the
layout
and
figuring
out
how
to
do
all
that.
But
I'm
super
excited
about
it.
So
thank
you
for
doing
that.
E
I
always
just
like
to
reiterate
the
same
thing.
Chair
Hensley
was
saying:
I
look
forward
to
the
next
month's
data
to
be
collected
and
and
shown
I
guess
it
really
is
I'm
kind
of
very
curious
about
the
separation
and
separating
out
of
the
mobile
home
park
residents
so
that
we
can
actually
have
more
ingrained
data
there.
That's
something
I'm
excited
for.
E
Is
it
possible
to
also
include
compliance
with
the
registry
numbers
into
that?
Is
that
too
much
too
little
too
rough
already.
K
E
I
Yeah,
thank
you
I
think
Patricia.
You
mentioned
that
the
volume
of
petitions
has
increased
recently.
If
you
could
go
back
to
that
slide.
I
Okay
and
and
what
was
the
I
think
you
were
mentioning
that
you
might
do
a
different
cut
for
the
next
meeting
on
this.
I
J
K
Look
like
this,
this
is
I,
think
shows
all
of
the
relevant
data
points
for
the
for
the
petitions,
where
they're
at
in
the
process
and
whether
or
not
they've
been
decided
and
how
they
were
decided.
I
Similar
to
Vice,
chair
Ramos
has
asked
it.
It
might
be
helpful
to
see-
and
perhaps
you
already
have
this
interview
but
but
helpful-
to
see
petition
volume
as
type
of
petition
over
time.
So
I
mean
this
is
during
the
process,
but
is
that
already
of
you
like?
Have
we
received
any
Capital
Improvement
any
of
those
petitions?
Recently,
we've.
K
Not
yet
received
those
we're
working
on
finalizing
all
of
the
forms
and
then
we'll
be
doing
a
big
Outreach
push
behind
that.
Okay,.
I
Got
it
yeah
do
we
have,
and
maybe
I
missed
this,
but
do
we
have
another
view
that
has
petitions
over
time
by
petition
type.
K
I
Yeah
I
mean
there's
you're,
probably
going
to
get
a
lot
of
asks,
I
think
for
after
the
next
round
of
changes
for
additional
asks.
So
I
would
just
add
it
maybe
to
the
list
to
consider
I'd
also
say
for
the
call,
volume
or
information
on
the
first
slide.
I
I
can't
remember
if
it's
called
information
requests
or
how
we
categorize
those,
but
it
would
be
interesting
to
me
I
think,
to
also
put
on
the
list
to
potentially
look
at
information
requests
over
time
that
volume
I
know
we
we
see
it
by
type
but
seeing
the
general
volume
by
either
month
or
quarter
I
think
could
be
interesting
for
us
to
just
track
whether
we're
getting
more
requests.
A
few
requests.
K
Start
providing
that
during
the
annual
update
for
the
Outreach,
so
perhaps
instead
of
having
it
in
a
monthly
overview,
we
can
provide
that
kind
of
annual
look
back
during
that
time
period.
I
Yeah,
that's
great
and
again,
you
know.
You're,
probably
gonna
have
a
lot
of
requests
if
this
would
just
continue
to
get
longer
and
longer,
so
it
might
after
you've,
you've
assessed
some
of
those
requests
and
made.
I
Some
of
those
changes
might
be
worth
having
a
having
an
agenda
item
I
think
to
by
the
committee
to
highlight
the
most
important,
slides
or
or
things
that
we
want
to
track
on
a
regular
basis
and
then
leave
the
rest
for
maybe
annual
or
lower
frequency,
because
yeah,
it's
going
to
otherwise
it'll,
just
kind
of
continue
to
to
grow
grow,
but
I
am
interested
in
seeing
Ninja
the
new
charts
that
you
mentioned.
K
And
we'll
definitely
do
the
annual
update
so
that
you
can
see
the
comparisons
between
the
the
current
and
the
previous
and
then
we'll.
Look
at
you
know
what
makes
sense
and
to
be
providing
on
a
monthly
data
and
present
that
to
the
committee
versus
what
makes
sense
to
present
in
an
annual
format
going
forward.
A
Their
feedback
before
we
move
to
7.2
go
get
it
seeing
none.
We
will
now
move
to
agenda
item
7.2
and
thank
you
again.
Patricia
and
everyone
for
agenda
item
7.1.
This
is
amendments
to
the
csfra
regulations,
chapter
5,
hearing
procedure
and
amendments
to
the
mhrso
regulations,
chapter
6,
hearing
procedure.
We
will
start
with
a
presentation
from
staff.
D
L
Thank
you
so
the
purpose
of
this
item-
oh.
H
L
L
L
In
addition,
the
csfr
and
mhr
so
authorized
the
rental
housing
committee
to
appoint
hearing
officers
to
administer
the
hearing
process
on
petitions
and
to
make
decisions
on
those
positions.
After
hearing
the
regulations
that
you
know
that
these
proposed
amendments
relate
to
are
csfra,
chapter
5
and
I
met
your
chapter
six,
so
the
hearing
procedures
require
that
the
hearing
officer
will
issue
a
written
decision
within
30
days
of
the
closing
of
the
hearing
record.
L
If
the
decision
becomes
final,
if
no
appeal
is
filed
within
10
days
after
the
mailing
of
the
decision
and
if
an
appeal
is
filed,
then
it
will
go
to
a
hearing
before
the
rental
housing
committee,
which
will
issue
a
decision
after
hearing
and
the
appeal
decision
becomes
final.
The
rental
housing
committee's
appeal
decision
becomes
final.
Unless
judicial
action
is
filed
within
the
required
time
frames.
L
So
the
current
regulations
don't
provide
any
clarification
on
a
process
in
case
an
oncom
ongoing
compliance
dispute
arises
between
the
parties
after
a
decision
has
become
final.
So
examples
include
where
a
hearing
officer's
decision
or
the
rental
housing
committee's
decision
requires
that
the
landlord
pay
back
rent,
that
they
restore
certain
Housing
Services,
that
they
perform
maintenance
or
repairs,
or
that
they
comply
with
registration
requirements
and
and
some
they
typically
provide
a
time
frame
during
which
the
landlord
is
required.
L
To
take
these
actions
to
come
into
compliance
with
the
csfra
or
mhrso
and
in
many
instances
a
tenant's
rent
continues
to
be
reduced
during
the
time
that
the
landlord
is
not
compliant
with
maintenance
issues
or
habitability
issues.
L
L
On
the
other
hand,
if
there's
a
dis,
and
it
allows
both
the
lieutenant
and
the
landlord
to
file
for
a
compliance
hearing.
So
if
a
tenant
says
I'm
not
paying
the
rent
until
you
know,
you
fix
this
issue
and
the
landlord
says
I've
already
fixed
the
issue,
a
petition
can
be
filed
to
determine
whether
the
landlord
has
in
fact
complied
and
the
rent
should
be
restored.
L
So
next,
so
the
proposed
regulations
would
require
any
or
would
permit
any
party
to
a
downward
adjustment
petition
to
request
a
compliance
hearing
on
a
form
provided
by
the
program.
The
requesting
party
must
provide
supporting
documentation
within
10
days.
After
the
filing
of
the
request
for
the
compliance
hearing,
rental
housing
committee
staff
will
send
a
notice
to
all
infected
parties.
The
affected
parties
can
then
object
or
choose
to
do
nothing.
L
L
So
during
the
hearing,
the
landlord
has
the
burden
of
demonstrating
compliance
with
the
final
decision,
since
they
were
the
one
that
was
ordered
to
do
something.
L
Pursuant
to
the
original
order
and
the
hearing
officer
issues
a
new
decision
either
confirming
that
the
landlord
has
complied
including
the
extent
and
the
date
of
compliance,
in
which
case
they
can
also
order
that
the
rent
be
restored
or
they
can
find
that
the
landlord
continues
to
be
in
non-compliance
and
make
adjustments
around
compliance
and
provide
for
other
Equitable
remedies.
L
So
in
addition,
hearing
officers
will
be
required
to
include
an
all
downward
adjustment
petition
decision.
So
this
is
we're
now
talking
going
back
and
talking
about
the
original
decision,
a
requirement
of
a
30-day
notice
to
a
tenant
prior
to
Restoration
of
the
rent,
as
well
as
information
regarding
the
availability
of
a
compliance
hearing
process.
So
that
tenants
are
aware
of
the
of
this
ability
to
file
for
compliance
Hearing
in
case
their
landlord
does
not
comply
with
the
order
I'd.
L
A
L
A
So
does
that
create
any
sort
of
like
Gap
there?
Where
you
know
the
the
petition
is,
let's
say
the
petition
is
made
the
hearing
officer
adjusts
The
Rundown
for
whatever
reason,
and
then
the
landlord
almost
instantly
corrects
it.
Let's
say
that
weekend
they
come
in
and
they
fix
whatever
the
problem
is,
it
is
Lieutenant,
then,
at
risk
of
you
know
not
having
paid
proper
rent,
and
how
does
this
all
go
in
with,
like
the
concessions
and
everything.
L
So,
in
that
case,
you
know
the
they
will
I,
don't
think
they
will
be
at
risk
of
not
having
paid
the
right
rent
since
they're
complying
with
what
is
in
the
order
in
the
interim
because
we're
you
know
this
requirement
is
in
there
that
they
provide
the
30
days
notice
again.
I,
don't
think
that
there's
an
issue
that
they
haven't
paid
the
proper
rent
because
they
need
to
be
provided
the
proper
notice
before
they're
required
to
pay
the
that
rent
and
sorry
I
forgot.
The
second
part
of
your
question.
A
L
I
think
that
they're
they're,
different
and
I
think
that
already
hearing
officers
orders
might
require
this
already
so
I.
Don't
think
that
it's
a
change
that
is
being
made
first
off
and,
secondly,
I
I,
don't
think
that
it's
necessarily.
L
The
same
thing
I
mean
I,
don't
know
Karen.
If
you
have
any
thoughts
on
that
question.
H
A
A
E
Hi
I
moved
to
adopt
like
old
business,
move
to
review
and
adopt
amendments
to
the
csfra
regulations,
chapter
5,
hearing
procedures
to
provide
process
for
determining
compliance
with
final
decisions
of
hearing
officers
or
the
rental
housing
committee
and
to
review
and
adopt
amendments
to
the
mhrso
regulations.
Chapter
6
hearing
procedure
to
provide
processes
for
determining
compliance
with
final
decisions,
a
peering
officer
or
the
rental
housing
committee.
A
B
A
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Okay,
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
I'll
be
giving
a
presentation
for
you
all
to
receive
an
update
on
the
activities
in
fiscal
year,
2021-22
under
the
tenant,
relocation,
assistance
ordinance
or
what
we
like
to
call
the
trio
and
the
housing
crisis
Act
of
2019.
What
we
like
to
call
SB,
330.,
all
right.
So
we'll
start
with
a
little
bit
of
background.
B
The
tenant,
relocation,
assistance,
ordinance
details,
the
eligibility
criteria
for
those
tenant
households,
and
it
tells
us
the
type
of
relocation
assistance
that
is
provided
on
September
28
2021.
The
city
council
adopted
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance.
Following
this,
the
city
council
amended
the
trial
to
provide
tenant
relocation
benefits
and
first
right
of
return
for
mobile
home.
Tenants.
B
B
The
the
trail
applies
to
units
that
are
covered
by
the
cffra
or
mobile
home,
run
stabilization,
ordinance,
mobile
home
tenants
and
also
can
apply
to
other
rental
units
in
cases
where
three
or
more
rental
units
are
vacated
on
one
parcel
of
land
within
a
period
of
one
a
year
and
certain
specified
terminations
would
include
like
withdrawing
the
rental
property
Demolition
and
other
things
like
Rehabilitation
of
the
building
or
condo
conversion.
Some
more
less
common
things
are
included
in
that
as
well.
B
So,
in
order
to
qualify
for
tenant
relocation
assistance,
the
households
must
income
qualify,
so
households
are
eligible
to
receive
relocation
benefits
if
their
annual
household
income
does
not
exceed
120
percent
of
the
Ami
plus
five
thousand
dollars.
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
buffer
on
that
120,
Ami
and
you'll
see
that
in
the
chart
here
it
will
be
the
second
line
of
the
chart,
which
shows
that
120
percent
plus
the
five
thousand
dollars.
B
So,
for
example,
a
household
of
four
would
need
to
make
two
hundred
seven
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
or
less
to
be
able
to
qualify
for
relocation
benefits.
B
So
households
can
also
receive
unlimited
access
to
a
subscription
service
of
a
rental
agency.
So
it
helps
them
see
what
are
available
replacement
housing
that
they
can
find.
They
can
also
receive
a
cash
equivalent
of
three
months
rent
and
that's
based
on
the
median
monthly
rent
for
similar
sized
units
in
Mountain
View.
So
we
mostly
look
there
at
bedroom
size
for
similar
size
units
they'll
also
qualify
for
an
additional
eight
thousand
dollar
per
rental
unit
for
a
special
circumstance,
households
and
that
suggested
annually
for
inflation.
B
So
for
2022
we're
looking
at
eight
thousand
five
hundred
three
dollars
for
a
one-time,
special
circumstance
payment
and
in
order
to
qualify
for
that,
you
have
to
have
someone
in
your
household,
that
is
at
least
62
years
of
age
or
older,
disabled
or
handicapped,
or
one
or
more
minor
children
who
are
19
years
or
younger
and
legally
dependent.
So,
no
matter
how
many
of
that
classification
of
tenants
you
have
in
your
household,
you
only
get
the
special
circumstance
payments
once
so.
Finally,
the
trail
also
provides
for
the
first
ride
of
return
to
the
rental
unit.
B
B
Okay,
so
now
we're
gonna
switch
gears
here
and
talk
about
SB
330.,
so
SB
330
applies
to
rental
units
that
are
being
demolished
in
order
to
build
new
housing
where
tenants
are
displaced
from
certain
types
of
protected
units.
So
I
talked
a
little
bit
about
it
earlier,
but
protective
units,
our
residential
rental
units
that
are
covered
under
rent
stabilization.
So
again
that
includes
our
csfra
here
in
Mountain
View.
B
B
So,
in
order
to
income
qualify
for
SB
330,
a
tenant
household
cannot
exceed
80
of
the
Ami,
and
so
you'll
see
that
there
in
the
chart
here
so
again
as
an
example,
if
they're
the
household
of
four,
you
would
need
to
make
131
750
or
less
in
order
to
qualify
for
SB
330
benefits.
B
B
So
the
first
one
is
a
42
month,
rent
differential
between
the
lower
of
30
percent
of
a
displaced,
household's
average
monthly
income
or
the
rent
for
the
unit
that
is
being
demolished
and
subtracting
that
number
from
the
rent
for
a
comparable
replacement
unit.
So
what
you
would
do
is
you
would
need
to
figure
out.
The
dollar
amounts
for
each
of
those
two
categories
and
you
would
take
the
lower
number
and
then
you
would
multiply
that
by
42
months
and
that's
how
you
get
your
rent
differential
there.
B
So
you
would
also
receive
relocation
advisor
who
would
provide
one-on-one,
really
intensive,
one-on-one
assistance
in
finding
replacement,
housing
and,
finally,
the
choice
of
either
a
moving
cost
allowance
or
reimbursement
of
reasonable
moving
expenses.
B
Unless
we
330
also
has
the
option
for
first
right
of
return,
but
it's
different
than
what's
under
the
trail.
So
SP
330
allows
for
the
first
right
of
return
for
income
eligible
households,
so
they
have
to
be
making
80
percent
of
the
Amir
left
and
they'll
have
the
option
to
rent
or
buy
a
comparable
unit
in
the
new
development
at
an
affordable
rent
or
at
an
affordable
housing
price.
If
it's
for
a
purchase
unit,
and
so
this
is
different
from
the
trio
where
you're
only
allowed.
B
Okay,
so
this
chart
shows
the
benefit
of
sp330
there
in
the
first
columns,
so
that's
80,
Ami
or
less,
and
then
the
tenant
relocation
assistant
is
the
120
Ami
or
less.
So,
if
you're
attendant
household
in
order
to
be
eligible
for
both
benefits,
you
have
to
make
80
Ami
or
less.
If
you
make
above
80
Ami
but
less
than
the
trail
cap,
then
you're
eligible
for
the
trail
column,
so
I
hope
that
makes
sense.
B
And
then
the
shaded
areas
here
are
going
to
indicate
where
the
stricter
of
the
requirements
are,
and
so,
if
both
of
them
are
shaded,
then
a
tenant
who
is
eligible
for
both
so
80,
Mi
or
less
is
going
to
receive
both
of
those
things.
So
they
would
get
the
cash
payment
under
SB
330,
the
42-month
rent
differential,
because
that's
higher
than
the
three
months
under
the
tram.
You
would
get
everything
in
the
relocation
assistance
column
under
both
SB
330
and
Trail,
since
sp330
doesn't
have
a
special
circumstance
or
a
security
deposit
refund.
B
Okay,
so
since
SB
330
took
effect,
you
can
notice
a
decline
in
Redevelopment
projects
which
demolished
csfra
covered
rental
units.
That's
what
we're
looking
at
here,
so
CSF
Ray
units
are
considered
protected
units
under
SB,
330
and
another
part
of
sp330
is
that
any
protected
unit
must
be
replaced
at
an
affordable
price
in
the
new
development.
B
So
unless
a
Redevelopment
project
is
constructing
a
significantly
larger
number
of
units
than
the
number
that
they
are
demolishing
a
lot
of
times,
what
we've
seen
is
our
developers
may
not
consider
that
project
to
be
profitable
and
it
might
not
pencil
out
for
them,
so
I
mean
you'll
just
notice
there.
Since
2021,
there
is
one
Trail
project,
but
it's
actually
not
covered
by
sp330.
We'll
talk
about
it
in
a
second
because
they're
not
building
housing,
so
they
only
stuck
with
a
standard
Trail
and
we
haven't
seen
any
projects
in
the
last
two
years.
There.
B
All
right
so
now
we'll
look
at
what's
sort
of
going
on
and
ongoing
in
the
Redevelopment
projects
that
are
affecting
our
csfra
covered
rental
units.
So
we'll
start
with
1851
Charleston
Road.
This
one
started
in
2020
and
this
project
is
part
of
a
larger
Google
project
that
is
to
construct
The
Landings
office
building,
and
so
there
were
four
CS
defra
covered
rental
units
at
this
location
and
they'll
be
demolished
in
order
to
construct
a
parking
lot
that
will
provide
parking
for
that
new
Google
office
building.
B
B
The
next
project
we'll
talk
about
is
1919
to
1945
Gamel
way,
and
so
this
version
of
this
project
started
in
2019
and
this
project
is
proposing
to
demolish
all
of
the
29's
Nia
separate
covered
rental
units
and
it's
proposing
to
construct
121
for
sale
condominium
units.
So,
while
this
project
is
actually
only
subject
to
the
Treo
because
it
started
before
sb330
as
part
of
the
negotiations
with
the
city
to
purchase
that
actual
Street
of
gamma
way,
they
developed
benefits
that
that
mirror
SB
330..
B
So
that's
why,
if
we
go
over
what
the
benefits
are
they
pretty
much
mirror
what
you
see
in
sp330,
even
though
technically
this
project
is
only
covered
by
the
trail.
B
B
We
have
communicated
that
to
the
tenants
at
this
time,
so
I
just
wanted
to
mention
that
the
current
vacate
date
is
set
for
January
31st
2023,
but
the
developer
again
has
indicated
that
they
will
continue
to
push
that
out
if
need
be,
and
if
the
project
ends
up
not
moving
forward.
The
original
tenants
will
have
the
first
right
to
return
back
into
their
original
unit.
B
Okay,
so
now,
let's
look
at
870
East
El,
Camino
Real,
so
this
property
consists
of
180
csfra
covered
rental
units.
However,
the
Redevelopment
is
only
proposing
to
demolish
42
of
those
total
units
and
they're
gonna
in
its
place,
construct
two
six
story:
buildings
that
hold
233
rental
units,
so
that
property
will
become
mixed
sort
of
with
some
old
and
some
new
rental
units.
B
B
B
B
Okay,
so
Mariposa,
so
next,
we'll
sort
of
take
a
look
at
Redevelopment
projects
that
have
been
completed
this
one
more
recently
and
the
other
two
were
in
the
last
fiscal
year.
So
for
660
Mariposa
in
2019,
the
city
council
approved
a
development
project
of
220,
a
226th
unit
apartment
complex
at
696
through
1758
Villa
Street,
so
at
a
different
property.
B
So
while
this
project
is
not
formally
subject
to
the
trio,
I
wanted
to
sort
of
give
you
an
overview
of
it
because
it's
very
similar.
So
the
following
relocation
benefit
options
were
offered
to
those
tenants
at
660
Mariposa,
so
they
could
relocate
to
a
comparable,
newly
renovated
on-site
unit.
B
Their
temporary
relocation
package
is
that
the
developer
was
going
to
pay
for
costs
associated
with
any
of
the
above
options,
which
included
Moving
and
Storage
costs.
B
B
And
finally,
the
rents
will
not
be
raised
until
one
year
after
the
last
tenant
had
returned
to
their
renovated
unit.
So
that's
September
of
2023
that
the
rents
can
be
raised
and
the
rent
increases
will
be
implemented
in
accordance
with
the
csfra,
but
it
will
have
limitations,
Under,
The
Villa
projects,
conditions
of
approval,
which
only
allow
a
maximum
increase
of
four
percent
a
year,
which
is
less
than
than
that
under
the
CSM.
B
This
project
was
only
subject
to
the
trail
and
the
final
vacate
date
was
September
30th
of
2021.,
so
40
households
who
applied
for
relocation
assistance
ended
up
all
being
eligible
to
receive
the
benefits,
and
these
were
the
benefits,
as
described
under
the
2018
version
of
the
trails
this
they
submitted
their
application
just
before
the
Trail
was
updated,
so
they
got
the
2018
version
of
the
trail.
B
B
B
So
this
included
at
least
ten
thousand
dollars
for
all
households
and
12
500
for
household
earning
between
80
and
120
Ami,
and
then
fifteen
thousand
dollars
for
households
earning
less
than
eighty
percent
am
I,
and
this
was
above
the
standard
2017
trail
that
these
benefits
were
required
for.
B
B
A
A
A
E
This
is
a
really
good
presentation.
Thank
you.
Andrea
I
knew
a
lot
about
these
projects
and
I
followed
a
few
of
them
very
closely,
but
the
the
amount
of
information
plus,
essentially
the
updates
of
what
happened
the
gamma
way.
One
was
an
interesting
thing:
I'm
really
hoping
the
tenants
there.
E
Okay,
777
middle
West,
Middlefield
I,
remember
when
that
came
down,
and
that
was
a
not
older
project,
but
like
a
project
that
was,
they
started,
trying
to
get
that
project
passed
before
rent
control
passed
and
then
they
began
their
demolition
at
around
that
shortly
after
or
went
through
their
final
approvals
through
that.
So
this
is
a
really
good
thing,
especially
I
love
the
breakdown
with
that,
what's
SB
330
requirements
and
our
own
Trio
requirements.
E
This
was
this
was
really
good.
Thank
you.
A
F
I
was
just
gonna
Echo.
What
Emily
said
this
is.
This:
is
the
clearest
presentation
or
documentation
that
I've
seen
around
Trail
and
specifically
about
eligibility
and
also
I,
don't
follow
as
as
carefully
as
Emily
all
of
the
specific
developments
as
they
come
online.
So
it's
wonderful
to
have
this
in
print,
so
kudos
to
Andrea.
G
Yeah,
so
I
want
to
emphasize
that
this
is
the
type
of
work
that
our
team
and
mostly
Andrea,
is
doing
partly
outside
of
the
rental
housing
committee
work.
G
Each
of
these
projects
are
being
followed
quite
intensely
and
Reporting
back
to
the
city
council
happens
for
each
of
these
projects
when
they
get
to
review
and
approve
these
projects.
So
thank
you,
Andrea
all
right.
A
A
G
Thank
you,
chair,
Haynes
and
rental
housing
committee.
This
is
an
annual
agenda
topic
that
will
usually
be
presented
to
you
in
the
fall,
and
we
asked
the
rail
housing
committee
to
review
this
draft
work
plan
for
the
next
upcoming
calendar
year
of
2023
and
provide
feedback
to
staff
both
in
terms
of
the
content
and
also
with
regards
to
the
timeline.
G
As
we've
all
experienced
in
the
past
years,
the
sea
Safari
and
now
also
the
mhrso
charged
the
rental
housing
committee
with
a
great
number
of
tasks,
and
these
include
establishing
rules
and
regulations
for
the
administration
of
the
csfra
and
the
mhrso
to
determine
the
annual
General
adjustments
of
rent,
approving
an
annual
budget
and
Rental
housing
and
space
fees
and
hearing
appeals
in
the
petition
process.
Just
to
name
a
few.
G
So
this
drive
work
lab
plan
that
is
presented,
outlines
a
list
of
tasks
and
issues.
The
rental
housing
committee
may
want
to
bring
forward
in
their
2023
meetings,
either
for
discussion,
consideration
or
potential
adoption
in
order
to
further
Implement
and
administer
the
csfra
and
the
mhr
result,
and
since
this
is
just
a
blueprint,
it's
this
plan
can
be
adjusted
accordingly.
Whenever
the
rental
housing
committee
sees
fit
so
the
agenda
items
are
divided
in
different
categories.
G
G
As
you
can
see
for
next
year,
we
did
include
the
ratio
utility
billing
systems
that
have
been
brought
up
by
several
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee
and
as
well
as
tenants,
tenant,
Master
Lease
issues
for
csfa
recovered
units.
Then
there's
the
category
of
monthly
items
such
as
the
data
reports
and
the
updates
to
outreach
events.
G
And
annual
items,
which
will
also
be
part
of
these
annual
work
plans,
such
as
an
annual
update
of
relevantage
legislation
and
case
law,
the
election
of
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair
preparation
for
an
annual
report
to
the
city,
council,
budgets
and
fees,
determination
of
the
AGA
contract
renewals,
usually
at
the
end
of
the
fiscal
year
and
overview
of
tenant
relocation
activities.
Like
the
presentation,
we
just
received
a
meeting
schedule
and
an
overview,
an
annual
overview
of
Outreach
and
education
as
well
as
this
work
plan
itself.
G
So
we
would
like
for
you
to
review
this
work
plan
and
provide
staff
with
your
feedback
ideas,
suggestions.
A
C
Good
evening
Madam
chair
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee,
Joshua
Howard,
on
behalf
of
the
California
Apartment
Association
first
want
to
thank
you
again
for
your
time
and
commitment
to
the
rental
housing
committee
and
working
collaboratively
with
all
stakeholders.
As
you
work
to
advance
the
implementation
of
the
csfra
want
to
speak
tonight,
specifically
to
the
work
plan
and,
first
of
all,
it's
nice
to
see
a
work
plan
coming
forward.
That
does
specifically
Identify
two
regulations
that
you
may
consider
in
calendar
year,
2023
and
years
past.
It
was
often
not
clearly
delineated.
C
C
At
a
rental
housing
committee
meeting
also
would
like
to
stress
the
importance
of
transparency.
It's
nice
to
see,
as
I
mentioned,
these
two
regulations
being
delineated
on
the
work
plan.
However,
last
year
I,
don't
recall
any
regulations
being
identified
on
the
work
plan
and
if
other
regulations
other
than
this
sort
of
come
forward
in
calendar
year,
2023
would
hope
that
the
committee
would
first
amend
its
work
plan.
C
So
there's
notification
to
the
community,
but
also
that
way
the
rhc
has
given
direction
to
staff
that
these
are
regulations
or
issues
that
they
want
the
staff
to
be
spending
their
limited
time
working
on
and
would
encourage
you
to
continue
working
on
ways
to
make
this
process
more
transparent,
more
inclusive,
bring
stakeholders
together.
C
Also
I
would
comment
to
you
that
it
looks
like
your
first
five
months
are
really
busy,
with
utility
cost,
sharing
and
tenant
sub-tenant
issues
and
might
suggest
that,
for
the
sake
of
the
community,
for
the
sake
of
the
staff
and
the
sake
of
the
rhc
spreading
those
issues
out
throughout
the
year
versus
trying
to
front
load,
everything
in
the
first
five
months
of
2023.
appreciate
your
service
on
the
rhc
and
look
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
you
and
your
staff
on
these
various
issues
for
csfra.
Thank
you.
A
Do
we
have
any
other
public
comment
on
the
work
plan
draft
work
plan,
okay,
seeing
none
I'm
gonna,
bring
it
back
for
committee
deliberations
and
feedback
I
do
want
to
start
off
with
I
did
also
similar
similar
to
our
commenter
notice
that
we
kind
of
packed
it
in
on
the
first
half
of
the
month
or
first
half
of
the
Year
there,
and
my
feedback
on
the
work
plan
would
be
I.
I
think
we
need
to
allow
a
little
bit
more
time,
I
didn't
like
in
the
middle.
A
I
didn't
like
having
to
do
that
and
so
I
as
I
was
looking
over
the
work
plan
over
the
weekend
when
it
came
out,
I
felt
like
we
should
build
more
times
in
more
time
into
the
ratio
of
billing
by
one
month
and
then
move
the
tenant
sub
tenant
study
session
to
821,
which
then
allows
us
to
have
the
regulations
come
back
to
us
shortly
after
having
the
study
session,
as
opposed
to
having
the
study
session
going
away.
Coming
back.
A
E
I
get
the
concern
about
front
loading,
our
our
plan
or
our
work
plan
I
actually
was
going
in
a
slightly
different
direction,
though,
because
I
was
thinking
about
how
that
the
public,
commenter
Mr
Howard
was
correct,
that
we
didn't
have
the
concession
item
on
our
work
plan
initially,
and
they
would
probably
appreciate
a
heads
up,
I'm
wondering
if
it
might
be
worth
it
to
add,
add
into
our
work
plan
an
update
about
our
work
plan
about
halfway
through
the
year,
so
that
we
could
just
check
in
I.
E
I
I
can
see
how
it
might
be.
How
do
you
say
this?
It
might
be
ambitious
to
put
everything
in
our
first
five
months,
but
we
don't
know
what
most
of
the
regulations
that
we
had
to
deal
with
was
almost
immediate
and
quite
honestly,
we
never
had
to
we.
E
We
had
to
do
this
from
the
get-go,
because
we
were
getting
ready
and
running
with
this
law
as
soon
as
it
was
put
through
and
then
getting
all
that
Kinks
out
then
at
some
point
it
would
have
it
we
I
anticipate,
it
could
probably
die
down,
but
then
we
had
the
pandemic,
which
changed
the
whole
rental
market,
at
least
temporarily,
maybe
even
permanently,
and
so
we
had
to
do
regulations
based
on
that
and
that's
why
concessions
came
up.
L
E
Really
was
a
a
response
to
the
pandemic
and
our
Pand
and
their
coveted
recovery,
so
I
I
am
okay
with
keeping
the
front
loaded
and
if
we
have
to
take
time
to
make
that
decision,
then,
because
that's
we
know
that
it's
coming
up
this
year,
I'm
happy
to
see
the
ratio.
Utility
Billing
Services
item
we've
been
asking
for
that,
so
I
I,
don't
want
to
risk.
E
Delaying
that
and
I
also
do
believe
that
if
staff
puts
something
on
the
work
plan
early
on,
that
means
that
it
did
come
up
and
they
probably
want
to
get
it
resolved
as
soon
as
they
can
so.
I
was
thinking,
maybe
more
like
we.
We
tried
to
do
or
the
that
first
first
half
year
as
planned
and
then
halfway
through
seeing
if
we
can
reevaluate
the
work
plan
to
see
if
there
was
like
an
update
to
it.
F
Yeah
I
I.
Could
we
put
on
a
screen
that
the
first
few
months
I
mean
I
I?
Think
having
recently
been
chair
and
seeing
what's
happened
with
Nicole's
chair
workload,
I
think
it
is
important
to
really
evaluate
how
much
can
the
community
and
we
can
digest
in
one
evening-
and
some
of
these
have
been
very
thorny
issues
and
they
deserve
our
attention
and
I
was
really
happy
that
we
postponed
Treo,
so
that
we
tonight
I
really
felt.
I
was
fresh
enough
to
understand
the
specifics
as
an
example.
So.
I
F
A
F
So
it
looks
like
the
spring
gets
very
dense,
starting
in
March
I.
Think.
F
Well
because
I'm
not
sure
what
our
rubs
stands
for
anymore
draft
regulations.
K
A
That
was
sort
of
my
initial
proposal
was
of
giving
us
the
four
sessions
for
rubs,
which
also
would
allow
us
time
for
stakeholder
meetings.
If
we
choose
to
do
that
and
then
moving
tenant
sub
tenants
to
August
and
starting
that
cycle
in
August
with
basically
allowing
it
three
meetings,
because
I
think
otherwise,
you're
going
to
end
up
with
a
holiday
with
the
summer
holiday
break,
you
could
end
up
with
the
summer
holiday
break
after
the
study
session,
which
will
make
it
less
fresh
for
everybody's
brain.
F
F
And
I
just
wanted
to
make
it
sort
of
a
comment
about
stakeholder
meetings.
I
I
have
a
serious
ambivalence,
I
guess
I
would
call
it
because
you
know
staff
puts
a
lot
of
energy
into
giving
us
all
the
options
and
we
present
it
to
the
community
and
the
housing
providers
by
now
are
really
well
organized
yeah
in
and
giving
us
feedback
and
their
inputs
and
talking
points.
However,
it
would
take
a
lot
more
Outreach
to
reach
the
tenant
community
and
have
them
show
up
in
equal
numbers
and.
I
F
Know
I
feel
like
I'm
a
broken
record,
but
I
do
try
to
see
some
balance
in
the
input
that
we
get
and
I
would
hate
to
see
us
get
totally
bogged
down
and
that
every
major
issue
requires
stakeholder
meeting
planning
and
time.
I
Well,
yeah
thanks
I
think
as
I'm
looking
through
this
right,
I
I
focus
on
the
net
new
items,
something
that
the
the
items
that
I
haven't
seen
before
and
so
I
think.
Maybe
one
ask
I
have
of
approaching
the
work
plan
would
be
working
backwards
from
the
constraints
that
we
have
right.
I
So
we
have
a
fixed
number
of
Staff
right
now,
so
fixed
amount
of
staff
bandwidth,
and
we
have
a
pretty
good
idea
how
how
much
time
most
of
these
items,
because
we've
been
doing
it
for
several
years,
how
long
they'll
take
to
administer
and
then
how
long
they'll
take
in
the
meeting
right.
So
it
is
nice
and
we
can
per
committee
committee
member
almonds
comments,
I
think.
Once
you
get
a
meeting
past
10
o'clock,
we
all
start
to
the
quality
of
of
our
attention
wanes
a
bit.
I
So
if
we
looked
at
this
from
the
year
to
say
we
have
12
meetings,
you
know
at
and
we
have
three
hours
for
each
of
those
meetings
you
know.
Might
we
are
some
of
these
items
nice
to
have
right?
So
if
we
look
at
you
know,
for
instance,
the
monthly
activity
report,
if
we
should,
we
go
back
to
a
quarterly
I
think
we're
originally
at
a
quarterly.
I
Maybe
it's
set
as
a
pre-read,
but
we
don't
have
to
cover
it
necessarily
in
the
meeting
that
would
save
committee
time
in
the
meeting
time,
but
not
necessarily
staff
time
so
it'd
be
it'd,
be
good
for
me
to
see
of
the
items
that
we
know.
You
know
how
long
the
budget
is
going
to
take.
You
know
from
an
input
perspective
and
and
in
the
meeting
perspective,
typically
to
go
over
it.
I
What
could
we
use
the
information
that
we
have
to
to
make
this
to
come
back
to
the
committee
with
where
the
staff
might
recommend
taking
some
items
out
for
a
particular
month
right
to
make
the
meeting
either
fit
within
three
hours
or
to
help
staff
be
able
to
put
all
the
information
together?
I
I
think
we
might
be
able
for
for
either
the
overview
of
workshops
or
the
monthly
activity
report
some
months.
I
As
far
as
the
yeah
yeah,
so
I'd
like
to
see
that,
like
version
of
this,
where,
if
we
almost
try
to
predict
how
many
appeals
we
might
have
based
off
prior
years
or
make
assumptions
based
on
prior
years-
and
you
know
trying
to
get
each
of
our
meetings
at
three
hours-
I
think
that'd
be
good.
The
other.
I
The
other
piece
I'd
like
to
see
is,
is
like
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
the
how
how
some
of
these
items
got
onto
the
list
of
interests
like
for
rubs
or
rubs,
for
instance,
maybe
an
item
that
we
should
address
for
sure,
but
is
there
a
process
for
that
case
to
be
made
either
from
staff
they've
hearing
about
something
that's
happening
in
the
community
or
other
jurisdictions
are
doing?
I
Something
similar
is
that
information
given
to
chair
I'd
like
to
learn
more
about
how
those
items
get
on
it
and
then,
if
it
is
coming
from
another
jurisdiction,
can
we
get
a
sense
for
how
many
meetings
it's
going
to
take
and
how?
How
in
depth
that
that
item
is
going
to
be
how
much
debate
there's
been
in
other
jurisdictions?
I
That
would
help
me
know
whether
to
know
whether
it's
going
to
be
something
that
continues
over
three
meetings
or
it's
going
to
be
pretty
straightforward,
so
I
guess
I,
don't
have
any
specific
recommendations
but
I'd
like
more
information
along
those
lines.
A
Thank
you,
Committee
Member,
grimald
I
will
say
I
I,
don't
love
the
idea
of
truncating.
The
status
reports
I
like
I
was
super
excited
that
we're
putting
more
data
on
the
status
reports.
This
upcoming
quarter,
so
hearing
that
we
might
kind
of
put
those
into
quarterlies
I
think
maybe
goes
the
other
direction.
But
that's
just
my
thoughts
on
that,
but
Vice,
chair,
Ramos.
E
So
my
understanding
of
the
agenda
process
so
I
two
comments
and
one
question
for
staff.
My
understanding
of
the
agendizing
process
is
several
months
ago.
I
believe
we
actually
voted
as
a
part
of
item
eight
to
put
ratio,
Utility,
Billing
Services
on
the
agenda
on
a
future
agenda.
It's
just
taken
a
while
for
staff
to
to
research
it
it's
a
very
dense
subject
matter:
that's
not
familiar!
E
E
So
I
really
don't
want
to
delay
that
what
I
am
curious
about
is
the
the
tenant
sub
tenant,
Master
Lease
issue,
I,
don't
know
what
what
has
brought
that
up
if
staff
could
be
more
specific
and
what
what
is
the
change
that
we
are
looking
at
because
I
don't
remember
that
being
brought
up
by
us
and
generally
I've
always
viewed
staff,
putting
something
on
there,
because
something
has
happened
that
we
may
want
to
address
or
several
items.
Several
instances
of
a
recurring
event
has
happened.
G
So
that
topic
has
been
on
our
list,
since
we
were
confronted
with
one
of
the
petition
cases
where
the
master,
tenant
and
sub-tenant
were
both
companies
and
there
were
assertions
being
made
that
were
not
easy
to
answer
straight
from
the
csfra
text.
G
So
we
just
wanted
to
see
a
study,
this
a
little
bit
more
and
see
if
and
how
clarifications
need
to
be
made
with
that
regard.
So
it's
not
a
big
item
about
how
this
whole
relationship
with
tenants
and
sub
tenants
needs
to
be,
but
it
is,
it
comes
out
of
an
out
of
a
petition
case.
E
All
right
now,
I,
remember
probably
what
that
petition
case
was
I,
guess
to
address
Matthew's
question
about
the
agenda
process.
There
is
another
way
that
city
council
does
their
agenda,
not
gender
process,
but
like
they
do
a
goal
setting
session,
we
don't
cover
the
same
amount
of
items
that
the
council
does
that
they
have
to
prioritize
that,
but
so
far
my
understanding
is
that
the
chair
could
put
something
on
the
agenda
or
at
item
eight
of
our
meeting.
Someone
can
bring
it
up
and
get
three
votes.
Yeah.
G
So
our
code
of
conduct
is
exactly
drafted
the
same
in
a
similar
way
as
the
city
council,
as
code
of
conduct,
yeah.
A
I
I
yeah
that
thank
you
for
that
transparency
and
additional
information.
I
think.
Maybe
what
I'm
missing
is
like
I,
don't
actually
know,
what's
like
number
three,
four
five
on
the
list
or
if
there
is
a
three
four
five
right.
So
if
if
this
for
the
master
sub
tenant
that
you
mentioned
on
key
sounds
like
that
was
one
case,
and
we
just
want
to
get.
We
want
to
get
that
resolved.
We
want
to
get
additional,
we
want
to
get
it
figured
out.
I
It
doesn't
feel
good
to
have
the
something
that
that
we
haven't
weighed
in
on
and
finalized,
but
are
there
are
there
other
items
or
other
issues
that
are
out
there
that
are
kind
of
waiting
or
everything
that
we
know
about?
That
is
an
issue
right
now
is
is
on
the
work
plan.
G
That's
a
that's
a
great
question
and
staff
is
making
a
list
during
our
daily
and
weekly
and
monthly
work
with
and
and
we
try
to
make
a
list
of
what
is
coming
up.
I
think
we
are
pretty
much
at
the
end
of
the
list,
but,
as
you
had
noticed
last
year,
this
concessions
issue
just
was
a
thing
that
just
came
up
because
of
covet
situations
and
was
not
on
our
reader
screen,
say
in
2018.
G
So
certain
things
may
pop
up
and
I
really
like
the
idea
of
Emily
to
kind
of
look
at
our
work
plan
again
in
June
and
see
if
there
is
anything
else
that
may
have
come
up
and
planned
for
that
equally,
so
so
that
there
are
no
surprises
in
what
the
agenda
items
are
for
the
rental
housing
committee.
A
G
If
I
can
summarize,
what
I
heard
is
that
I
will
revise
the
work
plan
a
little
bit
and
put
the
masterton
and
subtend
and
topic
to
the
second
half
of
2023
and
then
at
at
least
in
June,
like
a
revisiting
of
the
work
plan,
and
then
I
will
recirculate
that
to
everyone.
A
B
All
right,
so
I
will
be
presenting
agenda
item
a
so
we'll
look
at
some
workshops
and
upcoming
events,
so
we'll
start
with
our
housing
and
eviction
help
center.
So
this
is
how
the
first
and
third
Thursday
of
every
month,
so
that
would
be
this
Thursday
at
the
Mountain
View
Public
Library.
We
moved
to
the
second
floor
program
room,
so
that's
where
we
actually
started
so
we're
back
to
our
original
spot,
I'm
just
due
to
the
library
getting
busier
and
needing
more
space.
B
So
we
have
moved
back
to
our
original
spot
of
the
second
floor
program,
room
and
so
we're
there
every
first
and
third
Thursday
from
1
to
5
p.m,
and
people
can
also
join
online
at
the
linkmountainview.gov
eviction
help
clinics
and
anyone
who
joins
us
can
get
helps
get
help
on
various
housing
related
topics
such
as
our
Housing
Programs.
So
we
can
help
people
apply
for
affordable
housing
or
below
market
rate
housing.
B
We
connect
people
with
rent
assistance
programs.
There's
not
many
coveted
rent
relief
applications
left
outstanding,
but
we
are
still
helping
people
with
those
eviction.
Help
is
also
available,
so
tenants
and
landlords
can
learn
about
eviction
Protections
in
Mountain
View
and
receive
assistance
with
serving
eviction,
notices
and
requirements,
or
if
they've
received
an
eviction
notice,
they
can
come
and
visit
us.
We
also
provide
on-site
through
Zoom
legal
assistance
and
referrals
to
Legal
Services,
so
we're
referring
people
to
a
plus
book
for
Legal
Services
and
any
and
many
other
types
of
Supportive
Services.
B
So
we
have
other
community
organizations
who
join
us
there,
and
people
can
get
information
on
food
distribution,
financial
assistance,
mediation,
homelessness,
prevention,
resources,
resources
for
children
and
much
more
okay,
so
upcoming
office
hours
and
workshops.
So
we
continue
to
hold
our
Virtual
Office
hours,
every
single
Tuesday
from
10
a.m
to
12
p.m.
So
people
can
join
us
there
tomorrow.
B
During
that
time,
you
just
need
to
register
online
or
contact
somebody
from
our
staff
if
you
need
help
making
an
appointment
and
that
website
is
mountainview.gov
RSP
office
hours
so
that
stands
for
rent
stabilization
program
office
hours,
we're
also
having
a
workshop.
This
Thursday
at
the
housing
and
eviction
help
center,
so
that
will
be
between
4
and
5
p.m,
and
we'll
be
going
over
habitability
and
maintenance,
and
that
will
be
in
both
English
and
translated
into
Spanish.
We
will
have
one
of
our
multi-family
housing
inspectors
there.
B
So
that's
really
exciting
for
a
lot
of
our
landlords
and
Tents,
because
you
get
to
ask
very
direct
questions
and
get
answers
from
an
expert.
So
we
encourage
people
to
join
us
at
the
library
you
can
join
in
person
or
on
Zoom
the
other
events
and
Outreach
activities
that
our
staff
is
doing
so
on
Thursday
October
19th
from
two
to
four.
We
have
staff
our
bilingual
staff
doing
Outreach
at
Castro
Mistral
school,
so
they
are
there
while
CSA
is
doing
food
distribution.
B
We
also
have
our
bilingual
staff
English
Spanish
at
ranksdorf
Park,
where
they
join
the
Outreach
for
diaper
distribution.
So
they
have
our
fly.
Our,
Help,
Center
flyers
and
just
sort
of
talk
to
the
community
about
csfra
and
mobile
home
run
stabilization
and
things
like
that.
And
then
you
can
also
find
a
large
group
of
our
staff
at
the
Dio
de
las
Muertos
exhibit
for
the
Monster
Bash.
The
Monster
Bash
will
be
at
the
park
and
rainstorm
Park
and
then
the
exhibit
will
be
in
the
large
Redwood
Hall
at
the
community
center.
B
So
just
across
the
way.
So
that's
Thursday.
Sorry,
that's
a
Saturday
October
29th
from
10
a.m,
to
2
p.m.
So
sorry,
that's
Saturday,
October,
29th
and
we'll
be
there
passing
out
information
and
just
connecting
with
the
community
as
well.
A
B
We
have
seen
an
increase
in
the
last
month
or
so
of
people
coming
into
the
help
center.
For
various
reasons,
I
think
a
few
people
had
petition
questions
last
time,
and
that
was
more
than
we
usually
see
there
from
petitions,
but
I
I
haven't
noticed
a
big
increase
in
specifically
RV
related
questions
or
looking
for
resources
for
our
RV
tenants
or
owners.
E
Just
recording
back
last
week,
I
represented
our
committee
at
the
celebration
of
leader
service
celebrating
us
all
I
guess:
lots
of
good
food,
each
committee,
or
each
committee,
commission
or
board,
was
asked
to
present
their
accomplishments
for
the
last
year
and
recognize
people
who
reach
certain
milestones
and
I
believe
myself,
Committee,
Member,
gruenwald
and
Committee
Member
part
of
Zella
Zello.
Our
got
recognized
for
five
years
in
service
of
the
city.
E
So
congratulations
on
that
Committee
Member
Allman
was
with
me
and
we
we
enjoyed
beating
our
counterparts
of
other
committees,
which
was
quite
fun
so
just
reporting
on
that.
A
F
Well,
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
it
was
a
lot
of
fun
to
actually
you
know
do
this
in
person
and
it's
amazing.
F
What
all
the
Committees
accomplish
each
year
and
to
put
faces
with
names
is
great
and
I
actually
wanted
to
also
say
that
that,
as
part
of
appreciation
that
the
City
offers
us
every
year,
we
get
to
take
the
the
opportunity
of
going
to
a
shoreline
concert
and
I
went
on
Friday
and
I
went
to
the
Willie
Nelson
concert
and
you
get
VIP
parking
and
you
get
a
full
Buffet
at
the
Terrace
Cafe.
You
know
and
I
just
felt
like
royalty.
The
seats
were
like
Orchestra
seats,
I'm,
usually
way
up
on
the
lawn.