►
Description
Live teleconference of the Regular Mountain View City Council Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 13, 2022.
Live Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26.
A
Speeding
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
section
5495
e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
city
council
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting.
Lives
May
do
so
at
mountainview.legistar.com
youtube.com
forward,
slash
Mountain,
View
gov
and
on
Comcast
channel
26..
B
Thank
you.
There
are
two
items
on
the
closed
session
agenda
for
this
evening.
Item
2.1
is
a
conference
with
legal
counsel
regarding
existing
litigation
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
549-56.9,
the
name
of
the
case
is
Ching
Lee
Shea
versus
the
city
of
Mountain,
View
820
through
860
Villa,
Street,
LLC,
Frederick,
Chen,
Mark,
Chen,
Don,
Baker
Douglas
and
Douglas
T
Watson,
Santa,
Clara,
County,
Superior
Court
case
number,
20,
CV,
365-876,
and
the
second
item
is
item
2.2.
A
A
A
C
C
A
Have
you
seen
everyone
welcome
to
the
regular
meeting
of
the
city
council
of
September
13
2022.
I
will
now
read
the
usual
announcement
as
required.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
California
government
code,
section
54953e,
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
Please
contact
city.clerk
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
city
council
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting.
A
Live
May
do
so
at
Mountain
view.lexstar.com
youtube.com
forward,
slash
Mountain,
View
gov
and
on
Comcast
channel
26.
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda.
Members
of
the
public
May
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
by
visiting
mountainview.gov
forward,
slash
meeting
to
Enter,
The,
Zoom
webinar
or
by
phone
by
dialing
669-900-9128
and
entering
webinar
ID
843-5126-7142.
A
A
A
D
C
A
Very
much
we'll
now
move
on
to
item
three
presentation.
Please
note
that
this
is
a
presentation.
Only
the
city
council
will
not
take
any
action.
Public
comment
will
occur
after
the
presentation
item
and
this
is
the
national
Hispanic
Heritage
Month
Proclamation.
A
So
if
somebody
can
invite
Mary
Lou
Cuesta
to
join
the
panel
and
in
the
meantime,
translation
services
are
available
for
this
item.
We
will
now
hear
from
our
interpreter.
A
They
are
civil
rights,
leaders,
Community
organizers,
First,
Responders,
Health,
Care,
Professionals
teachers,
artists,
athletes,
entertainers,
colleagues
and
friends,
and
whereas
the
Hispanic
and
Latino
communities
make
incalculable
contributions
to
our
neighborhoods
and
community
in
every
sector
of
the
economy,
and
we
are
a
greater
and
more
vibrant
City
because
of
them
now.
Therefore,
I
Lucas
Ramirez,
mayor
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
along
with
my
colleagues
on
the
city
council,
do
hereby
Proclaim
September
15
through
October
15th
as
National
Hispanic
Heritage
Month
Mary
Lou.
Would
you
like
to
say
a
few
words.
F
Good
evening
my
name
is
my
honor
to
accept
the
national
Hispanic
Heritage
Month.
A
proclamation
today
is
September
13
2022.
I'm
very
I'm,
very
grateful
for
the
contribution
of
the
and
Leadership
of
the
Hispanic
community
in
Mountain
View.
Thank
you
city
of
Mountain
View,
and
thank
you
for
all
amazing
city,
council
members.
A
G
I'm
going
to
say
very
few
words
I
just
want
to
thank
you,
Mary
Lou,
for
all
the
work
you've
done,
the
Fantastic
work
over
the
past
couple
of
years.
That
I'm
particularly
aware
of,
and
also
say
it's
really
nice,
to
see
your
face
here,
more
or
less
in
person.
You
know
we
well
they
since
we've
been
meeting
on
Zoom,
we
get
to
see
very
few
members
of
the
public
and-
and
it's
just
good,
really
good
to
see
your
face.
Thank
you.
A
Any
other
members
of
the
council
wishing
to
speak
not
I'll,
just
say
that
I'm
very
proud
to
be
mayor
in
providing
this
Proclamation
and
also
to
be
a
part
of
a
council
that
has
had
that
has
more
Hispanic.
You
know
latinx
council
members
than
ever
in
our
history
in
council,
member
kume
and
I,
both
mixed
race
so
very
proud
to
to
join
you,
council,
member,
to
May
and
being
on
this
Council
and
accepting
this
Proclamation
will
now
turn
to
the
public
we'll
we
will
now
take
public
comment
for
the
presentation
item.
A
A
Seeing
no
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak.
We
will
end
the
presentation
and
move
on
to
the
consent
calendar.
Thank
you
again.
Buddy
Luke,
so
item
four
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion.
Unless
any
member
of
the
council
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
Would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
pull
an
item
compared
to
rent
them
down?
Council
member
matishek.
A
I
A
Okay,
thank
you
we'll
make
sure
those
get
recorded
in
the
motion
council,
member
shelter.
J
I
would
just
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to.
This
is
about
four
point
4.9,
which
is
the
advisory
Body
Work
plans
and
I'd
just
like
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
all
of
the
people
who
serve
on
our
advisory
bodies.
They
put
in
a
tremendous
amount
of
time.
As
most
of
us
know,
we've
served
on
them
before
they
learn
a
lot,
but
they
they
really.
They
really
give
a
lot
to
the
city
of
Mountain,
View
and
I
just
want
to
thank
them
all
for
their
service.
A
Very
much
no
other
member
at
the
council
would
like
to
pull
an
item.
Then
we'll
turn
to
the
public.
What
any?
Member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
any
item
on
the
consent
calendar?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen
and
given
the
number
of
speakers
will
go
ahead
and
allocate
two
minutes,
the
first
speaker
is
SP.
K
Hi,
everyone
I'm
just
curious
if
the,
if,
if
someone
can
enable
the
closed
captioning,
so
that
members
of
the
public
who
are
hard
of
hearing
can
actually
participate
in
this
conversation,
thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
I
think
that's
something
that
we
will
work
with.
Our
staff
to
address
next
speaker
is
Tim
McKenzie.
L
Hi
everyone
I
Tim
McKenzie,
he
him
pronouns
seven
year
resident
of
Mountain
View
I'd
like
to
make
a
comment
on
four
nine
The
Advisory
body
work
plan
specifically
about
psab.
L
One
of
the
items
is
looking
for
extreme
views
in
in
within
the
police
department,
based
on
a
recent
report
that
there
has
been
infiltration
by
white
supremacists
of
police
departments
in
California.
Ideally,
we
don't
have
that
in
Mountain.
View
I
think
that
that,
like
that
we
don't
have
white
supremacists.
But
it's
great
to
check
that
box.
L
We
should
make
sure
that
there
are
no
white,
supremacists
or
extremists
in
the
police
department,
but
I
think
that
we
should
go
A
Step
Beyond
that
and
I
would
like
to
see
on
the
advisory
body
work
plan
ways.
Recommendations
are
building
up
ways
to
make
sure
that
we
maintain
the
lack
of
white
supremacists
moving
into
the
future
and
adopting
best
practices
to
make
sure
that
they
are
never
ever
able
to
come
and
take
root
in
our
community
and
a
little
bit
more
action
oriented
rather
than
just
receiving
a
report.
Thank
you.
M
Thank
you,
mayor
I
have
two
comments.
I
want
to
to
say
for
myself
for
all
the
work
plans
I'd
like
to
see
The
Advisory
bodies
have
entries
for
legislative
priority
recommendations.
M
I
noted
that
none
do
in
the
drafts
for
this
year,
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
you
make
any
changes
to
them
for
this
year.
That's
asking
too
much,
but
for
next
year
would
be
great
if
the
advisory
bodies
would
have
that
direction
to
at
least
consider,
including
that
and
also
I'd
like
to
see
the
work
plans.
Review
process
by
city
council
happen
earlier
in
the
year
in
the
future,
so
the
advisory
bodies
can
have
them
approved
by
the
start
of
each
fiscal
year.
M
N
Great
hi,
Albert
Chase,
first
of
all,
I'd
like
to
say
thank
you
very
much
and
neighbors
and
I
were
really
really
pleased
to
see
this
item
on
the
consent
calendar
for
the
purchase
of
these
two
watts
in
the
terrible
area
I
mean
this
area
really
needs
new
parks,
especially
since
Shoreline
Gateway
and
the
Alta
housing
project
will
be
coming
along
pretty
soon.
Well,
maybe
four
or
five
years
next
slide.
Please
and
yeah.
It's
it's
a
good.
N
You
know
I'm,
certainly
the
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
we've
still
got
a
long
ways
to
go:
I
mean
between
Shoreline
Gateway
and
the
Alta
housing
project.
That's
over
400
units
of
housing,
which
is
estimated
to
be
almost
probably
about
900
new
people.
So
this
1.66
acre
Park
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
still
doesn't
come
up
to
the
three
acres
per
thousand
people,
that's
sort
of
our
aspirational
goal
and
for
the
entire
area
of
sterile
Sterling
planning
area.
N
My
estimate
is
that
you
know,
with
the
next
five
or
seven
years
about
three
thousand:
more
people
will
be
coming,
given
all
the
currently
approved
projects,
especially
big
ones
like
the
sevens
which
used
to
be.
You
know
the
really
nice
two-story
Apartments,
three
thousand
people,
you
know
again.
The
aspirational
goal
is
to
have
nine
acres
of
Parkland,
and
you
know,
given
that
the
price
of
parks
is,
you
know
something
like
10
or
12
million
dollars,
an
acre,
that's
very
challenging
and
I
know
we'll
talk
a
lot
that.
O
N
A
P
Hello,
this
is
Erica
Valentine
I'm,
the
political
director
for
local
393.
We
represent
over
3
100
members
for
the
Plumber's
pipefitters
team,
Fitters
and
hvacr
technicians
in
Santa,
Clara
and
San
Benito
County
I'm,
here
to
speak
on
agenda
item
4.3.
Thank
you
for
your
time
tonight
to
discuss
the
wage
theft
and
responsible
Construction
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
as
I
mentioned
in
my
comments
last
session,
I'm
here
today
to
encourage
the
city
of
Mountain
View
to
include
protections
of
public
contracts
and
Public
Works
in
this
discussion.
P
As
a
leader
in
the
valley,
the
whole
world
is
watching
and
following
your
leadership
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View
today,
with
thousands
of
housing
units
being
proposed,
permitted
and
developed
today
is
a
day
to
take
action
to
ensure
that
the
homes
being
built
for
the
future
are
built
responsibly,
that
they
are
built
paying
local
prevailing
wage
and
that
they
are
built
with
quality
and
craftsmanship
that
does
not
exploit
or
put
profit
over
people
today,
I
ask
Mountain.
View
include
a
public
contract
and
Public
Works
in
their
protections.
P
C
Q
Yes,
I.
Thank
you.
Yes,
my
name
is
Frank
Austin
and
I'm,
a
business
representative
with
local
393
as
well
and
like
Erica
had
mentioned
previously.
We
represent
over
3
100
plumbers,
pipefitters
and
steam,
Fitters
and
HVAC
service
technicians.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
your
time
and
attention
to
wage
theft
and
responsible
Construction
in
the
city
of
Mountain
View
today,
I'm
here,
because
I
ask
that
you
create
a
policy
for
the
city
of
Mountain
View
to
address
the
public
contracts
and
Public
Works
in
this
discussion.
Q
Being
a
leader
starts
in
government,
Mountain
View
has
led
the
way
in
the
Bay
area.
Today,
as
we
discuss
construction,
there
is
a
need
and
opportunity
in
Mountain
View
to
commit
to
responsible,
Contracting
and
Public
Works
projects.
These
policies
require
all
bidders
for
City
contracts
to
disclose
unpaid
wage
theft,
judgments
or
final
administrative
decisions
and
disqualification
of
bidders
who
have
unpaid
judgments
or
are
repeat
offenders
with
paid
judgments.
Q
We
urge
Mountain
View
to
follow
in
the
footsteps
of
the
city
of
San,
Jose
City
of
Morgan
Hill,
the
city
of
Milpitas,
City
of
Sunnyvale
and
Santa
Clara
County,
responsible
construction
is
for
everyone,
private
and
public
works.
We
ask
that
you
protect
all
of
them.
Thank
you
for
your
time
today
and
we
hope
that
the
city
of
Mountain
View
will
join
local
393
in
passing
ordinances
that
include
Public
Works
protections.
Thank
you.
Q
A
You
very
much
seeing
no
other
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak
will
return
to
the
council
and
I'll
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent
calendar
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
ordinances
attached
to
items
4.2
and
4.3,
and
the
resolution
attached
to
4.4
and
also
incorporate
the
No
No
votes
registered
previously
councilmember
robito.
I
Thank
you,
mayor
I
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
there's
fire
trucks
going
in
front
of
my
house,
but
I'd
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
consent.
A
Great
thank
you
very
much.
We'll
now
move
on
to
item
five
oral
Communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
Council
on
any
matter,
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
during
the
section
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items
as
previously
announced
item
6.1's
commercial
development
project
at
365
to
405,
San,
Antonio,
Road
and
2585
to
2595
California
Street
was
postponed
at
the
request
of
the
applicant,
will
not
be
heard
tonight
and
will
be
re-noticed
for
a
future
date.
A
If
anyone
is
present
that
would
like
to
speak
to
that
topic,
you
may
do
so
at
this
time
when
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen
and
we'll
go
ahead
and
allocate
three
minutes.
Bruce
England.
M
Thank
you,
mayor
yeah.
Just
one
item
I
wanted
to
bring
up
given
the
approval,
the
recent
approval,
the
590
Castro
project
and
anticipating
the
Castro
Commons
project
coming
along.
There
are
questions
about
use
of
public
space
being
asked
for
by
developers,
and
my
understanding
is
that
some
of
those
decisions,
at
least
for
590,
were
made
in
closed
session
during
contract
negotiations.
I
strongly
request
that
those
closed
sessions
not
include
details
that
are
in
the
public
interest,
but
be
tightly
focused
on
details
on
in
contracts
about
what
Mountain
View
would
pay
for
things
like
that.
M
So
I
hope
that
you
will
consider
that
in
future
meetings,
including
for
the
Kestrel
Commons
when
that
comes
up.
Thank
you.
A
Very
much
and
now
we
will
proceed
to
our
public
hearings,
so
we
will
not
hear
6.1.
That's
it
we'll
start
with
6.2
Community
Center,
resiliency,
Hub
project,
various
captions
assistant,
Public,
Works,
director
and
city
engineer.
Ed
orengo
will
present
the
item.
Can
somebody
help
promote
Ed.
R
Great,
thank
you
just
give
me
a
minute
to
share
my
screen.
R
Okay,
you
should
be
seeing
the
presentation.
C
R
R
Staff
reviewed
facilities
and
projects
that
would
be
eligible
for
the
grant
and
due
to
the
community,
center's
importance
of
not
only
being
a
known
Gathering
Place
for
many
events
and
also
providing
critical
services
to
the
community,
serving
as
a
emergency
shelter
recently
serving
as
a
vaccination
Center
and
even
last
week
as
a
cooling
center
during
the
extreme
and
prolonged
heat
wave
that
was
at
risk
of
power.
Outages
staff
identified
a
battery
storage
system
as
a
priority
resilient
project
that
could
provide
several
days
of
power
when
connected
to
the
existing
solar
system
at
the
community
center.
R
During
the
evaluation
of
the
project,
two
options
were
identified
for
the
battery
storage
system,
where
the
higher
level
of
energy
storage
was
recommended,
based
on
balancing
the
capital
costs,
with
the
benefits
of
longer
run
times,
the
delivery
model
to
install
the
improvements
within
the
grant
timelines
and
the
space
needs
and
constraints
at
the
community
center
to
accommodate
this
additional
equipment.
Option
A
provided
for
the
best
balance
of
these
criteria.
R
In
May
this
year,
the
city
submitted
a
Grant
application
and
was
successful
in
meeting
the
grant
requirements
due
to
the
expedited
timing
of
the
granted
grants.
Sorry,
which
requires
construction
to
be
completed
by
the
end
of
next
year,
staff
is
recommending
the
design,
build
delivery
model
and
enter
into
a
contract
with
sagico
Energy
Solution.
R
R
The
recommendations
as
outlined
in
the
council
report
are
outlined
here,
but
to
quickly
summarize
the
highlights
staff
is
recommending.
Council
approving
mid-year
cap
and
appropriate
funding,
adopt
a
resolution
identifying
the
findings
made
and
awarding
a
contract,
deciser
Co
and
authorizing
the
city
manager
into
it
into
a
grant
agreement
and
apply
for
rebate
funds.
A
Not
seeing
any
so
we'll
turn
to
the
public
with
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen
and
there
are
a
couple
of
speakers
so
we'll
allocate
three
minutes.
The
first
speaker
is
Mitch
Vince
siguera.
O
Good
evening,
I
I
was
trying
to
speak
on
number
five,
but
I
I'm,
not
sure.
If
I
didn't
hear
you
correctly
and
it
got
skipped
over
am.
A
Unfortunately,
We've
we've
already
moved
past
the
non-agenda
public
comments,
so
I'm
not
on
this
item,
regrettably,
but
please
feel
free
to
follow
up
by
email
with
the
city
council.
Thank.
M
Thank
you
mayor,
yes,
Bruce
England
speaking
for
Mountain
View
Coalition
for
sustainable
planning.
This
is
a
very
worthy
project
in
our
view,
and
so
we
enthusiastically
support
it.
Thank
you.
A
I
I
Sometimes,
though,
it's
challenging
for
cities
to
take
advantage
of
these
opportunities,
especially
with
staffing
issues
and
whatnot,
so
I'm,
actually
very
pleased
that
we
are
moving
forward
with
this,
and
so
I
just
want
to
thank
staff
for
their
willingness
to
to
work
on
the
project
and
I'd
be
I,
know,
there's
a
couple
of
other
hands,
but
I
would
be
happy
to
make
a
motion
when
the
time
comes.
Thank
you.
J
Yeah
I
was
just
going
to
mention
what
a
worthy
project
I
think
this
is
and
I'm.
It
really
is
kind
of
emblematic
of
what
we
hoped
for
when
we
started
Silicon
Valley,
clean
energy
that
there
would
be,
you
know,
economies
of
scale
and
and
also
the
economies
of
the
expertise
that
they
would
get
together,
that
we
could
all
benefit
from,
and
so
I'm
really
pleased
to
see
this,
and,
in
addition
to
that,
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
this
is
kind
of
a
pilot
project.
J
In
a
sense
I
mean
with
this.
We
are
really
Inc,
improving
the
resilience
of
our
community
center
as
also
an
emergency
center,
and
that's
I
think
you
know
doing
it
for
the
community
center.
J
That's
a
good,
a
good
first
first
step,
but
but
in
the
future
we
may
want
to
do
that
for
our
some
of
our
fire
stations
and
our
police
station,
maybe
even
for
City
Hall
one
day
and
with
this
project
we
should
learn
a
lot
about
how
these
battery
backup
systems
work
and
so
I
I'm
really
pleased
to
see
that
that
this
is
going
forward
and
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
of
both
Silicon
Valley,
clean
energy
and
also
our
staff
for
putting
it
together.
J
A
Thank
you
very
much
council
member
leaver
and
then
we'll
go
back
for
a
second
round.
S
Thank
you,
mayor
well,
I
also
want
to
add
my
kudos
to
those
that
have
already
been
voiced.
I
think
this
is
a
very
important
project
and
it's
going
to
be
a
great
teachable
moment
for
families,
in
particular
in
the
community
who
have
students
who
are
learning
about
energy
and
and
where
our
energy
comes
from
and
all
of
the
science
behind
that.
So
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
really
wonderful
project
and
I
was
just
curious
in
terms
of
Silicon
Valley,
clean
energy.
S
When
we,
when
we
buy
our
power,
are,
are
we
buying
one
of
the
green
sources
coming
from
svce.
T
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
get
back
to
you
on
that,
and
we
will
confirm
that
we
are
using
the
greenest
possible
source
for
our
PG
E
power.
S
That
would
be
great
and
I
know
it's
available
to
households
and
businesses,
but
I
didn't
know
about
government,
but
I
would
be
very
interested
and
I
think
that
this
is
just
a
wonderful
project
and
the
community
center
has,
as
others
have
said,
become
very
important
to
the
resiliency
of
of
the
community,
and
we
saw
that
in
particular,
with
the
pandemic
and
the
recent
use
as
a
cooling
center
and
I
I.
S
G
All
the
council
members
previous
to
me
have
said,
and
members
of
the
public,
that
this
is
a
wonderful
project
and
and,
as
you've
said
a
teachable
moment,
one
of
the
things
that
I
learned
in
reviewing
this
project
is
that
we
set
our
temperatures
in
the
buildings
whether
air
conditioning
is
on
or
heat
is
on
at
70
degrees,
plus
or
minus
a
degree
or
two
and
I'm
I'm.
One
of
the
things
I'm
wondering
in
this
teachable
moment.
G
I
know
other
places
that
I
go
to,
such
as
Kaiser
set
the
air
conditioning
a
little
higher
and
the
heating
a
little
lower
in
order
to
save
even
more
energy
Naturally.
By
the
way
you
set
your
thermostat,
so
that
was
the
the
teachable
thing
that
I
got
out
of
one
of
the
teachable
things.
I
got
out
of
this
session
and
I'm
hoping
maybe
in
the
future.
The
city
can
add
that,
to
its,
you
know
as
another
way
to
cut
our
Energies.
I
Thank
you
mayor
and
before
I
make
the
motion.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
a
lot.
I
I
once
know
we
once
someone
get
emails
about.
Where
does
energy
come
from
and
I
know?
Councilmember
labor
asked
a
question,
but
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
the
sourcing
of
the
energy
is
now
done
by
Silicon
Valley,
clean
energy,
and
we
know
we
Source
from
carbon
free
sources,
PG
e
transmits
that
energy
into
the
homes,
but
they
are
not
providing
the
energy
that
that's
what
clean
energy
does
so
I
know.
I
But
with
that
I
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
adopt
a
I
guess
it
would
be
to
move
staff
recommendation
that
includes
adopting
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
Awarding
a
contract
is
size
or
co-energy,
Solutions
Inc
for
the
community
center
resiliency
Hub
project
for
a
cost
not
to
exceed
one
million
213
357
dollars,
including
a
110
dollar
110,
305
dollar
contingency
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
the
reading
wave.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
remaining
questions
or
comments?
If
not
we'll
start
the
roll
calls
of.
C
D
C
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We're
going
to
be
out
by
7,
30.
I
can
feel
it
in
my
bone.
The
next
item
is
7.1
Ulta
housing,
notice
of
funding,
availability
proposal,
10,
20,
tarabella,
Avenue
senior
housing
officer,
Deanna,
Talavera
and
Senior
planner
Edgar
maravia
will
present
the
item
and
if
staff
can
help
me
promote
the
staffs
to
panelists
or
to
the
panel.
U
You
okay
great
well
good
evening,
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members.
My
name
is
Deanna
Talavera
and
I'm.
The
senior
housing
officer
here
with
the
city
of
Mountain,
View
and
I'm,
joined
this
evening
by
my
colleagues,
Michaela
Hellman
Tincher
housing
and
neighborhood
services
manager
and
Edgar
monavia
senior
planner
with
the
city
this
evening.
U
This
evening
will
provide
the
full
council,
with
a
brief
overview
of
Ulta
housing's
proposal
at
10,
20
terabella,
a
summary
of
all
of
the
public
meetings
and
feedback
received
to
date,
staff's
review
of
The
Project
funding
and
whether
or
not
we
think
it
meets
our
nofa
objectives
and
finally,
we'll
ask
the
council
make
a
reservation
of
funding.
Edgar
is
here
and
he'll
walk
us
through
the
planning
process
that
the
project
has
gone
through
to
date,
Edgar.
V
Thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
council
members
and
members
of
the
public.
As
mentioned
by
senior
housing
officer
Talavera,
my
name
is
Edgar
Maravilla
project
planner
and
I
will
present
the
following
three
slides.
You
can
go
to
the
next
slide
location.
This
project
is
located
at
1020,
tarabella,
Avenue
at
the
intersection
of
Terra
Bella
and
tamrako
Avenue.
The
parcel
has
a
general
plan
and
Zoning
designation
of
General
Industrial
in
order
to
allow
for
housing
on
the
site.
The
project
is
requesting
a
general
planned
amendment
to
be
designated
high
density.
V
Residential
is
only
map
amendment
to
be
designated
P
planned
Community
District.
In
a
general
plan
tax
amendment
for
the
1040
turabella
site
to
increase
the
floor
area
ratio
from
0.55
to
2.5.
You
will
note
two
sites
are
shown
on
the
images
to
the
right
hand,
side,
10,
20
and
1040
terabela.
This
project
was
submitted
as
a
gatekeeper
application
in
2020,
where
1040
terabella
a
public
storage
facility
with
only
over
half
an
acre
to
Alta
housing
in
return
for
an
increase
to
the
allowed
floor
to
area
of
ratio.
V
The
top
image
shows
the
existing
boundary
lines
orange
for
personal
storage,
blue
for
Alta
housing.
Bottom
image
shows
the
proposal,
those
property
lines,
including
the
half,
an
acre
donation
given
to
Alta
housing.
Next
slide
here,
you'll
see
the
public
meetings.
To
date,
the
project
has
gone
through
a
gatekeeper
authorization,
a
study
session
with
the
environmental
Planning
Commission,
a
study
session
with
city
council
and
applicant-led
neighborhood
meeting
a
development
Review
Committee
Innova,
Review
Committee,
and
today's
council
meeting
next
slide
comments
from
the
public
at
all
the
public
meetings.
V
There
has
been
General
support
for
the
project
with
some
members
of
the
public,
highlighting
concerns
about
the
lack
of
parks
in
the
area.
Design
feedback
was
also
given
on
the
importance
of
landscape
in
tree
canopy,
addressing
the
boxy
appearance
of
the
building
and
integrating
a
warmer
color
palette
staff
is
actively
working
with
the
applicant
to
incorporate
the
design
feedback
into
this
project.
With
that
said,
I
will
turn
the
mic
back
to
senior
housing
officer.
Talavera.
U
U
The
project
will
utilize
the
state
density
bonus,
which
adds
an
additional
24
units
to
the
project,
and
what
really
makes
this
project
special
is
the
inclusion
of
much
needed
family-sized
units
it'll,
provide
28
two-bedroom
units
and
27
three-bedroom
units
staff
has
evaluated
all
aspects
of
The
Proposal,
including
its
sources
of
funding
with.
While
the
developer
is
still
in
the
process
of
securing
the
full
funding
necessary
to
build
the
project,
there
are
six
anticipated
sources
of
financing
that
they
do
plan
to
pursue.
U
Second,
the
developer
intends
to
Source
22
million
dollars
in
either
the
state
multi-family
housing
program
or
the
affordable
housing
sustainables
community
Grant.
The
project
will
need
entitlements
in
place
first
to
be
competitive
for
either
source
of
funding.
Third
is
the
city
of
mountain
View's
loan?
The
developer
is
requesting
a
13.5
million
dollar
loan
from
the
city
and
it
should
be
noted
that
the
city
will
seek
to
obtain
ownership
of
the
land
as
part
of
our
loan
agreement.
U
Fourth
is
funding
from
Santa
Clara
County.
The
developer
will
apply
for
13
million
dollars
in
County
funds,
and
the
developer
is
currently
working
with
the
County
Office
of
Supportive
Housing
to
apply
for
that
funding,
as
mentioned
prior
per
the
city's
mou
between
the
city
and
county.
If
the
city
contributes
more
funds
than
the
county,
the
city
will
have
the
option
to
own
the
site.
U
The
noticeable
increases
in
total
and
per
unit
costs
over
the
past
three
years
can
be
attributed
to
a
few
things,
including
inflation
High
interest
rates,
along
with
the
high
cost
of
materials
labor
and
land,
which
is
impacting
projects
not
just
here
in
Mountain
View,
but
in
the
region,
and
the
state.
U
Staff's
review
of
the
costs
show
that
the
project
is
actually
cost
efficient
and
it
shows
reasonable
comparable
per
unit
costs.
Note
also
that
the
city's
per
unit
conservation
contribution
for
this
project
is
lower
than
in
past
projects.
As
the
developer
is
taking
advantage
of
several
other
sources
of
funding,.
U
Our
review
and
evaluation
of
the
project
determined
that
it
meets
the
city's
goals
and
objectives
to
expand,
affordable
housing
opportunities
to
households
who
are
otherwise
left
out
of
the
Mountain
View
housing
market,
particularly
families
as
they're
highly
needed
two
and
three
bedroom
units
that
it
meets.
The
city
of
Mountain
View,
strategic
roadmap,
goal
of
increasing
the
quantity
and
diversity
of
housing
options,
including
assistance
to
the
unhoused.
U
It
meets
the
housing
element,
goal
of
providing
assistance
to
households
at
different
income
levels
and
that
address
their
housing
needs.
Finally,
the
development
is
financially
feasible.
We've
reviewed
and
Alta
housing
has
demonstrated
success
in
developing
high
quality,
safe
and
well-designed,
affordable
housing
in
the
city.
U
I
am
joined
Now
by
our
team
and
we
are
available
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
council
may
have.
We
also
have
Ulta
housing
here
in
the
audience.
If
there
are
any
questions
for
them,.
A
Fantastic,
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
Are
there
any
questions
from
the
counselor
and
if
we
don't
mind
removing
the
screen
share,
so
I
can
better
see.
There
are
questions
I'm,
not
seeing
any
questions,
so
I
will
turn
to
the
public
with
any
member
of
the
public.
On
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
and
once
again
a
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
We'll
go
ahead
and
allocate
three
minutes:
Bruce
England.
M
Thank
you,
mayor,
I,
know
that
you
had
some
letters
on
this
and
that's
in
your
questions
to
staff,
but
there
are
concerns
about
the
sidewalk
along
there,
and
even
though
there
are
improvements
that
I
guess
are
going
to
happen
through
public
works,
that's
great,
but
maybe
the
improvements
need
to
go
even
further
than
their
plan
to
be,
because
the
street
is
not
very
friendly
for
bicyclists,
which
means
bicyclists
are
going
to
tend
to
want
to
go
up
on
the
sidewalk,
which
means
that
compromises,
pedestrian
travel,
so
I
know
Dawn
was
in
the
session
earlier.
M
I,
don't
know
if
she's
still
there,
but
that's
something
really
for
Public
Works
consideration,
I
suspect,
but
otherwise,
very
supportive
of
the
project.
Thank
you.
W
Evening
Council,
my
name
is
Kevin
ma
representative
the
League
of
Women
Voters.
Tonight
the
League
of
Women
Voters
is
in
support
of
increasing
the
stock
of
affordable
housing
to
decrease
the
number
of
residents
at
risk
of
becoming
homeless.
As
such,
we
have
been
consistently
in
favor
of
10
20
tarabella,
as
has
been
going
through
these
many
months.
We
concur
with
the
nofa
Review
Committee
and
staff
recommendations
for
this
project
so
that
we
can
get
this
product
faster
to
completion
and
we
also
follow
the
work
of
Alta
housing
in
keeping
costs
low.
Thank
you.
K
A
hi
everyone,
thank
you,
I'm.
Actually,
a
neighbor
of
this
particular
Community
I
think
this
is
a
wonderful
project.
One
thing
I'm
just
curious
about
is
you
have
the
neighborhood
meeting,
but
when
are
we
going
to?
Are
you
going
to
have
any
other
meetings
that
will
identify
what
you've
come
up
with
the
solution
that
you've
come
up
with?
Based
on
that
meeting.
A
And
so
we
can't
respond
to
resident
questions
at
this
moment,
but
we,
a
member
of
the
council,
May,
ask
that
question
at
another
time.
Did
you
have
anything
else
you
wanted
to
add
SP.
A
A
I
Thank
you,
mayor
I,
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
Mr
England's
comments.
If
I,
if
I
heard
correctly
in
terms
of
bike
safety,
I
know,
we've
talked
about
this
before,
but
I
was
hoping,
staff
could
confirm
or
clarify
I
believe
in
is
I,
don't
know
if
it's
a
bike
plan,
but
there's
a
plan
that
includes
bike,
Lanes
I
believe
on
Terra
Bella.
Is
that
correct
if
I'm,
like
my
recollection,
is
right.
T
Good
evening,
Council
Don
Cameron
Public
Works
director,
and
thank
you
for
that
question:
councilmember
Abby
Koga.
Yes,
we
do
include
in
the
capital
Improvement
program
funding
to
do
a
feasibility
study
to
add
bike
Lanes
along
tarabella,
Avenue.
We
are
just
waiting
until
we
have
the
Staffing
capacity
to
start
that
project.
We're
estimating
will
probably
start
it
by
next
spring
or
summer,
have
an
assigned
project
manager
to
start
looking
at
a
feasibility
study.
I
Great,
thank
you
very
much
and
then
in
response
to
I
think
it
was
Miss.
Sp,
I,
I,
don't
know
what
her
I
guess.
Community
input
items
were,
but
I
I
had
some
questions
or
I
had
some
concerns
about
the
design
of
the
building
and
I
know
I
see
Mr
suda
here,
but
he
was
very
kind
to
talk
with
me
more
and
follow
up,
and
there
is
it
sounds
like
there
is
quite
a
bit
of
refinement
happening
in
terms
of
for
me.
I
It
was
like
the
bulk
of
the
building
the
color
scheme,
some
elements
I
believe
on
the
corner,
and
it
sounds
like
all
of
that
is
being
addressed
by
the
architect.
So
if
that
was
some
of
the
concerns
that
were
raised
in
the
community
by
the
community,
it
sounds
like
those
are
being
worked
on
and
I
know
tonight
is
just
for
the
nofa
appropriation
but
I
believe
we'll
probably
see
this
project
again
for
approval
down
the
road.
Thank
you.
J
Yes,
well,
I
was
very
excited
when
this
project
came
to
the
nofa
committee
a
few
weeks
ago,
because
we
I've
known
that
this
has
been
work.
We've
been
working
on
this
for
a
long
time
and
it's
really
been
fascinating
to
watch.
It
evolve
that
I
think
that
we
we
really
are
to
commend
both
public
storage
and
Alta
for
working
together
to
sort
of
rearrange
their
space.
J
So
it's
better
for
both
of
them,
but
particularly
it
will
be
better
for
the
the
people
who
live
in
the
apartment
building
because
they
they
will
be
largely
sheltered
by
the
public
storage
facility
from
the
freeway,
and
that's
that's
a
great
thing.
You
know
that
will
make
their
living
conditions
much
better.
It's
also
really
exciting
to
see
that
it
includes
so
many
family
units.
Many
of
our
affordable
housing
stock
is
just
one
bedroom
or
Studios,
and
but
we
have
a
lot
of
families
who
need
affordable
housing.
J
So
having
such
a
high
number
of
two
and
three
bedroom
Apartments
is
is
a
great
thing,
then.
The
other
thing
I
would
just
like
to
to
do
as
as
kind
of
one
of
the
members
of
Nova.
The
chair
know
for
this
year
is
to
welcome
Deanna
Talavera
to
the
Mountain
View
City
staff.
J
I
believe
this
is
the
first
time
she
is
presenting
to
the
council
and
she
has
come
to
fill
the
big
shoes
that
Vera
Gill
had,
and
fortunately
she
and
Vera
were
able
to
work
together
for
a
while,
so
that
bear
could
impart
some
of
her
institutional
knowledge
to
to
Deanna
and
so
I.
Just
want
would
like
to
you
know,
welcome
Deanna
and
thank
her
for
the
great
work
she's
done
and
on
at
this
part
of
the
project
and
for
many
years
of
great
work
to
come.
Thanks.
H
Thank
you,
yeah,
so
welcome
Deanna
and
two
comments.
I
specifically
had
I
appreciate
the
changes
that
I
saw
in
the
plans
to
the
architecture.
There
were
a
couple
of
pages
in
there
that
showed
the
previous
version
and
the
current
thinking
and
I
like
the
way
it's
heading.
So
thank
you
for
making
those
and
I
look
forward
to
any
additional
changes
that
are
being
made,
and
second
I
want
to
particularly
call
out
the
use
of
funds
from
many
different
sources.
H
I
appreciate
that,
because
it
certainly
reduces
the
city's
contribution,
which
means
we
have
more
for
other
projects
and
on
attachment
two,
you
know
what
I
look
at
is
the
subsidy
per
bedroom
and
it's
the
lowest
one
on
the
list.
So
that's
awesome
and
the
subsidy
per
unit
is
one
of
the
lowest
so
I
feel
like.
Maybe
this
makes
up
for
the
other
project
that
I
know
I
had
concerns
about
where
the
subsidy
was
pretty
high.
So
thank
you
very
much.
H
I
appreciate
it.
Thanks.
S
Thank
you,
mayor,
well,
I
also
wanted
to
give
my
compliments
to
all
of
the
staff
that
are
working
on
this
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
wonderful
project,
and
also
the
staff
of
of
Alta
housing
and
the
regional
manager
of
public
storage
and
I,
especially
wanted
to
call
out
Ms
RT
srivastava
for
being
the
Matchmaker.
That
noticed
that
there
was
a
better
use
of
space
that
would
allow
this
project
to
go
forward
as
it
is,
and
that's
a
really
wonderful
development
in
this.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
that.
X
Great
thanks,
so
I
won't
make
the
recommendation
because
I
see
the
vice
mayor
after
me
and
I'm
sure
members
of
the
nofa
committee
want
to
make
the
recommendation,
but
I
want
to
Echo
the
the
thanks
to
to
staff
as
well
as
the
the
applicant.
The
partnership
here
I
know
that
it's
been
many
years
in
the
making,
so
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
your
patience
with
us
with
the
project.
X
X
I
I,
too,
find
that
we're
getting
really
creative
in
the
different
type
of
funding
sources.
We
can
use
and
really
want
to.
Thank
you
for
that.
Having
affordable
housing
for
our
families
is
something
that's
extremely
difficult,
and
here
we
are
showing
that
it
can
be
done
so
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
that.
I
also
want
to
call
out
the
13.5
that
the
city
will
contribute.
I
know,
there's
been
discussion
on
the
council
about
you,
know,
owning
the
land,
the
county
or
the
city.
X
Just
want
to
reiterate
that
as
much
as
possible,
I
really
like
opportunities
where
the
city
can
can
own
the
land
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
can
see
even
more
creative
Partnerships
like
this
in
the
future.
Thank
you.
G
So
first
I
want
to
say
to
council
member
May
you're
welcome
to
make
the
motion
if
you'd,
like
I
as
a
member
of
the
committee,
I
I,
take
absolutely
no
offense,
but
I
just
wanted
to
Second
what
other
council
members
have
said
that
this
is
a
great
project.
I
won't
list
all
the
reasons
because,
because
you
all
have
done
a
good
job
and
and
thank
you
to
staff
as
well,
I
also
wanted
to
thank
members
of
the
public.
G
In
particular
Joel
Dean
and
Bruce
England
who've
brought
our
attention
to
the
sidewalks,
which
is
an
ongoing
concern
of
mine.
Whenever
we
build
projects
that
are
a
little
over
the
one
and
two
stories
that
you
know
that
have
constituted
Mountain
View
in
the
past.
You
know
when
we
put
more
people
on
the
side,
taller
buildings
put
more
people
on
the
sidewalks
and
I
I,
like
that.
G
Members
of
the
community
are
making
sure
that
there
is
room
for
more
people,
we're
also
trying
to
get
people
out
of
the
car
out
of
their
cars,
and,
if
we're
we're
going
to
do
that,
we
need
to
to
make
sure
that
there's
room
for
them
and
that
they'll
be
safe
on
our
sidewalks
and
hopefully
bike
paths
as
well.
So
I
I
want
to
thank
everyone
very
much
for
bringing
that
up.
That
item.
G
C
A
Very
good,
thank
you
staff,
thank
you,
Alta
housing
and
everyone
for
your
work
on
this
project.
We're
looking
forward
to
approval,
but
later.
Thank
you
with
that.
We'll
move
on
to
7.2
SB,
330
replacement
requirements
and
I
have
blurb
to
read.
The
council
is
being
asked
a
narrowly
scoped
question
about
replacement
units
for
projects
subject
to
SB.
330.
state
law
is
prescriptive
in
cases
where
previous
tenants
incomes
are
either
below
80
Ami
or
where
the
household
income
of
previous
tenants
is
unknown.
A
However,
state
law
gives
cities
two
options
where
units
required
to
be
replaced
have
or
have
tenants
with
household
incomes
over
80
percent.
Ami
staff
is
asking
the
council
for
direction
regarding
replacement
units
only
for
this
particular
category,
where
tenants
incomes
are
above
low
income
or
80
Ami.
A
This
does
not
represent
the
forthcoming
work
on
the
displacement
response
plan,
which
is
part
of
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
its
expected
to
come
to
council
at
a
study
session
early
next
year,
housing,
specialist
Anna,
Reynoso
housing
and
neighborhood
services
manager,
Michaela,
Hellman,
Tincher
and
assistant
city
manager
and
Community
Development,
director
Artesia
vastava,
will
present
the
item,
even
though
I
feel
like
I've
just
given
the
staff
report.
If
there's
more
to
add,
please
do.
O
O
As
some
of
you
may
know,
SB
330
went
into
effect
Statewide
on
January,
1st
2020
and
sunsets
in
2030.
This
bill
includes
several
requirements
that
must
be
met
by
residential
projects
since
going
into
effect,
the
city
has
reviewed
several
residential
projects
for
compliance
with
the
requirements.
One
of
the
key
purposes
of
SB
330
is
to
prevent
the
loss
of
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
through
the
replacement
of
protected
units
and
to
address
the
displacement
of
lower
lower
income
tenants.
O
O
As
you
can
see
here,
SB
330
has
different
definitions
for
protected
units.
They
include
units
subject
to
recorded
Covenant,
to
make
rents
affordable
for
low-income
households,
units
subject
to
rent
or
price
control.
This
is
the
case
for
most
of
the
protected
units
in
Mountain
View,
as
they
are
covered
by
csfra
units
occupied
by
low
or
very
low
income,
households
and
units
withdrawn
from
the
rental
market.
O
Sp330
has
different
replacement
requirements
for
protective
units
depending
on
the
household
income
of
the
prior
tenants
occupying
the
demolished
units
for
the
units
where
the
former
tenants
earn
low
incomes
or
below
the
unit
must
be
replaced
with
units
that
are
affordable
to
those
tenants
for
units
where
the
former
tenant
income
is
unknown.
Staff
utilizes
Federal
data
on
Mountain
View
renters
to
make
an
assumption
about
the
former
tenant.
As
you
can
see
by
the
table
column
three
is
where
the
city
has
discretion.
O
Sp
330
allows
the
city
to
decide
what
to
do
in
cases
where
the
prior
tenants
of
a
protected
unit
earned
or
were
presumed
to
earn
more
than
80
percent
of
the
area
median
income.
In
those
cases,
the
city
can
decide
to
require
that
the
units
be
replaced
as
deed,
restricted
units
at
80
percent
area,
median
income
or
below,
or
to
be
replaced
as
rent
stabilized
units
starting
at
market
prices,
but
stabilize
going
forward.
O
This
provides
an
opportunity
for
the
city
to
decide
the
course
of
action
in
cases
where
the
previous
tenants
earned
above
80
percent
of
the
area.
Median
income
commends
option
A
replacing
the
units
at
80
percent
area,
median
income
deed,
restricted
units
Council
Direction
on
this
will
help
staff
provide
direction
to
developers
as
projects
move
through
the
entitlement
process.
O
One
of
the
reasons
staff
recommends
option.
A
is
because,
when
we
analyze
the
actual
rents
of
csfra
units,
we
found
that
they
were
rather
close
in
rent
to
what
a
deed,
restricted,
80
percent
area
median
income
unit
rent
would
be
thus
making
the
units
naturally
occurring,
affordable
housing.
If
the
units
are
replaced
as
new
rent
stabilized
units,
the
initial
rents
will
be
at
market
rate
for
new
units,
which
would
likely
be
considerably
higher
than
prior
rents.
O
However,
if
the
units
are
deed,
restricted
to
80
percent
area
median
income,
they
would
remain
affordable,
resulting
in
known
net
loss
of
affordable
units.
We
also
recommend
option
A
due
to
the
administrative
issues
associated
with
creating
new
csfra
units
staff,
recommend
that
Council
approve
a
policy
to
replace
SB
330
protected
units
where
the
prior
tenants
earned
over
80
percent
of
the
area.
Media
income
with
deed,
restricted
units
at
80
percent
area,
median
income
or
below
should
Council
approve.
This
recommendation
staff
will
immediately
integrate
this
into
its
policies
and
procedures.
A
Very
much
Hannah
and
if
you
wouldn't
mind
removing
the
screen
share
that'd
be
helpful.
Thank
you
very
much.
Council
member
show
Walter.
J
Yeah,
thank
you
for
this
staff
reported
for
getting
to
this
issue.
I
mean
it's
something.
That's
really
important
to
our
community,
but
I
I,
just
like
to
kind
of
ask
you
a
sort
of
a
basic
question.
If
I'm
somebody
who
lives
in
a
in
one
of
these
apartments,
that's
going
to
be
redeveloped
and
I
make
just
a
little
bit
over
80
Ami.
What's
the
process
going
to
be
like
for
me,
what's
going
to
happen
to
me,
you
know:
can
you
kind
of
go
through
that,
for
us?
Y
Question
council
member
I'll
ask
our
housing
and
neighborhood
services
manager,
Michaela
Hellman
Tincher,
who
can
probably
go
through
that
for
you
thanks.
Z
Thanks
council
member
Showalter,
so
if
you're
in
that
case,
you'll
get
a
notice
that
your
property
is
under
consideration
to
be
demolished
just
like
everyone
else
and
you'll
also
get
noticed
with
information
about
your
rights
under
the
city's
tenant
relocation
assistance
ordinance
that
you
can
exercise
if
you
qualify,
which
you
may
not
do
to
your
income,
then
when
the
property
is
demolished,
you'll
you'll
get
a
notice
about
six
months
in
advance
to
to
move
and
you'll
have
to
move
to
another
location.
Z
Sometimes
developers
have
other
properties
on
site
or
in
the
city
that
they
can
offer
to
tenants,
and
sometimes
people
of
all
incomes
take
advantage
of
that
opportunity.
So
that
may
be
available
to
you.
But
we
can't
guarantee
that,
although
it
is
something
we're
actively
pursuing
in
cases
like
this
and
then
when
the
property
is
rebuilt,
there
will
be
market
rate
units
and
there
will
be
deed,
restricted,
affordable
units
and
you
will
be
able
to
exercise
your
first
Rite
of
refusal
for
one
of
the
market
rate
units,
not
one
of
the
deed,
restricted
units.
J
Okay,
so
first
right
of
refusal
that
means
that
I'll
be
able
to
show
up
to
the
rental
office
and
I'll
I'll,
essentially
be
at
the
front
of
the
line
for
people
who
are
trying
to
rent
for
this
to
rent
these
new
apartments
right,
correct
and
will
I
be
given
notice
that
this
rent
process
is
starting
because
sometimes
well,
it
seems
like.
Sometimes
these
things
aren't
well
advertised.
Z
Yes,
I,
don't
think
we
have
a
lot
of
experience
with
this
part
of
the
process.
Yet
we've
not
encountered
this
end
of
the
story
very
many
times,
but
we
work
really
hard
to
maintain
contact
information
through
our
relocation
specialist
for
anybody
who's
been
displaced,
and
then
we
send
notices
out
when
there's
opportunities
to
rent.
The
good
news
is
that
in
these
cases,
we'll
also
have
an
a
really
good
understanding
that
the
property
is
available
for
rent
because
they'll
be
notifying
us
to
make
them
available
through
our
BMR
program.
J
Okay,
thank
you
that
that
helps
I,
think
we
need
to
you
know
it
helps
to
hear
it
as
a
story.
Thanks.
H
Thank
you,
so
I
was
wondering
if
we
have
any
projects
either
in
the
pipeline
or
anticipated,
where
this
issue
is
going
to
come
up
either
going
to
the
zoning
administrator
or
the
council.
Y
Council,
member
matter
check,
we
have
one
item:
that's
actually
going
to
come
to
council
at
the
next
meeting.
There's
a
project
at
870,
El
Camino,
where
this
issue
is
coming
up.
In
addition,
I
believe
there
was
one
other
project
that
was
ministerial
Michaela.
You
could
tell
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
there
was
one
and
we
we
needed
this
determination
in
order
to
apply
to
the
project.
Z
H
But
it
hasn't
been
approved
yet
because
you
needed
this
exactly
okay
and
I.
I
was
just
wondering
if
staff
had
considered
another
option,
which
is
let
the
applicant
decide
which
they
want
to
do.
Or
can
we
not
do
that.
Y
Council
member,
we
don't
have
that
option.
We
only
have
two
one
is
the
80
percent
of
below
or
you
could
have
it,
go
back
to
market
rate
and
then
be
subject
to
rent
control.
So
there
was
no
third
option
that
the
state
allows
us
to
think.
Okay,.
H
X
Great,
thank
you.
I
do
have
a
question,
but
I
think
the
project
that
staff's
referring
to
is
the
reserve
is
that
right,
yeah
I
just
had
a
meeting
with
them
yesterday.
So
that's
why
it's
top
of
mine,
so
you
know
kind
of
with
that
particular
issue.
Given
two
weeks
ago,
when
we
talked
about
the
affordable
housing
strategy,
I
think
I
have
like
a
more
high
level
question,
which
is
you
know?
How
do
we
see
this
playing
into
the
displacement
strategy?
X
You
know
because
I
think
one
of
the
things
it's
great
to
hear
they
get
for
Shrine
of
refusal,
they'll
be
in
the
front
of
the
line.
Should
they
go
over
the
80
Ami,
but
I
think
we're
still
in
the
I
think
there's
still
some
some
issues
there
and
maybe
staff
could
illuminate.
You
know
the
different
puzzle
pieces
we're
looking
at
to
address
it
aside
from
what
we
need
to
talk
about
tonight,
which
is
option
A
or
B
for
SB
330..
Thank
you.
Y
Y
You
know,
strategy
to
protect
units
that
needed
to
be
replaced,
and
so
it
is
going
to
take
the
place
of
SP
330.
Should
it
sunset.
Y
Obviously,
state
law
will
continue
to
control,
but
beyond
that,
I
think
our
experience
with
just
projects
in
general
have
made
us
better
prepared,
as
as
Michaela
mentioned,
we're
learning
more
about
how
to
put
policies
in
place
to
be
able
to
offer
Trail
understand
when
there
are
additional
requirements
that
apply,
making
sure
that
we
can
work
with
the
property
owner
to
to
find
other
places.
Y
Even
if
people
don't
qualify
and
then
you
know
make
sure
that
we're
putting
a
framework
in
place
to
contact
people
when
it's
time
for
them
to
come
back
to
exercise
their
first
writer
return,
so
we're
working
holistically
in
procedures,
but
the
displacement
response
will
essentially
look
at
you
know.
If
if
a
project
removes
units,
then
you
know
what
percentage
of
the
units
should
be
replaced.
Y
You
know
what
level
of
income
should
it
be
replaced
and
it
would
we're
doing
a
lot
of
analysis
this
year
in
order
to
bring
it
to
council
early
next
year
in
the
form
of
a
study
session.
So
the
council
can
review
and
provide
us
Direction
before
we
go
ahead
and
Implement
these
policies
for
the
city.
G
Well,
I
thought
expected
a
wonderful
analysis
of
the
of
the
various
choices
we
had
and
which
would
be
the
best
choice
and
had
no
questions
at
all
and
was
just
going
to
go
with
the
staff
recommendation
until
and
I
still
want
to
do
that
until
council
member
Showalter
asked
for
the
the
story
of
how
of
of
what
would
happen
if
you
were
a
tenant
involved.
Confronted
with
this
particular
situation
and.
G
Just
brought
up
the
importance
which
maybe
this
is
maybe
what
council
member
show
older
was
getting
after,
but
the
importance
of
clear
noticing
to
to
the
tenants
and
in
particular,
what
what
it
brought
to
my
attention
was:
if
I
were
a
tenant
and
I
were
moving
that
you
might
lose
me
at
some
point
and
I
might
no
not
be
aware
that
you
needed
to
keep
in
touch
with
me.
G
So
the
piece
that
I
learned
from
you
telling
that
story
was
that
I
think
it
would
be
very
important
to
give
people
give
people
that
story.
Give
people
a
notice
up
front
about
as
I
move
out
the
importance
of
staying
in
touch
because
sort
of
the
spring
of
events
that
I'm
going
to
confront
and
that
at
some
point,
I'm
going
to
want
to
walk
back
into
into
that
office
and
be
the
person
who
goes
to
the
front
of
the
line
and
that
you
don't
want
to
lose
me
in
the
interim
so
I.
G
So
the
the
thing
that
I've
learned
tonight
is
the
importance
of
clear
noticing,
up
front
and
and
I
I
hope
that
you
can
all
take
that
into
account.
Otherwise,
I
I
completely
endorse
the
staff
recommendation.
Thank
you.
S
Thank
you,
mayor,
I
I
had
similar
thoughts
come
up
about.
Are
we
getting
multiple
ways
of
reaching
folks
so
that
you
know
and
pointing
out
like
if
you
want
to
text?
If
can
you
give
us
a
backup,
email
and
all
those
good
things,
because
I
think
it's
really
easy
for
things
to
go
to
a
spam,
filter
and
folks
to
not
get
what
they're
entitled
to
you
know
right
now,
so
I'm
seeing
heads
nodding
in
the
affirmative?
So
that's
great.
Thank
you.
Y
If
I
may
just
clarify
we,
this
is
a
fairly
new
process
for
us
and
we're
learning
more
and
trying
to
improve
and
we're
making
this
a
key
communication
feature
in
the
initial
notice
that
goes
out
to
people
to
tell
them
what
is
going
to
happen
depending
on
their
income
levels,
and
we
also
are
now
including
a
notice
to
say
you
you,
if
you,
you,
may
qualify
for
us
first
right
of
refusal
when
the
newer
units
are
built
or
if
the
project
doesn't
move
forward
and
the
property
owner
decides
to
return
the
units
back
to
the
rental
market.
Y
A
P
AA
C
AA
All
right,
my
name
is
Emily
Anne,
Ramos,
I'm
speaking
on
behalf
of
Silicon
Valley
at
home
or
SP
at
home,
before
the
passage
and
implementation
of
SB
330
not
to
be
experienced.
Significant
loss
of
rent
controlled
units
as
properties
were
demolished
and
replaced
by
new
homes
that
were
unaffordable
to
the
vast
majority
of
those
being
displaced.
Now
the
passage
of
SB
330
provided
a
framework
to
address
this
very
problem,
and
we
are
in
strong
support
of
City's
ongoing
work
to
create
their
own
local
replacement
requirements
ordinance.
AA
Now,
as
for
this
item,
we
support
staff's
recommendation
to
require
replacement
units
be
heat,
restricted
at
low
income,
low-income
affordability,
level
or
lower
when
csfra
units
are
being
replaced
under
sp330
and
the
former
10
of
the
former
tenants
earn
above
80
Ami.
Now
this
is
an
important
piece,
but
only
a
piece
of
a
more
comprehensive
policy
framework
that
is
under
development
as
part
of
the
city's.
This
plus
that
displacement
response
strategy,
Mountain
View
Council,
will
be
creating
their
own
local
replacement
requirements.
With
the
goal
of
improving
on
the
foundation,
that's
created
by
SB
330.
AA
When
the
study
session
comes
before
Council,
it
will
also
be
an
opportunity
to
explore
incentives
to
create
more
affordable
housing
beyond
their
replacement
requirements
upon
Redevelopment
FDA
at
home
is
proud
to
be
a
part
of
the
partnership
for
the
base,
future
breakthrough
Grant
with
the
city
and
the
Housing
Trust
of
Silicon
Valley,
which
will
be
providing
supportive
resources
and
assistance
in
facilitating
public
engagement,
refining
policy
details
and
supporting
implementation
of
this
local
policy.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time
and
your
work
on
this.
L
I'll
first
second
previous
speaker,
who
was
more
comprehensive
and
eloquent
than
I,
have
any
hope
of
being
so.
I
won't
bother
trying
to
compete,
but
ever
since
I
I've
lived
in
Mountain
View,
it
felt
like
there
was
always
a
rent,
controlled,
Apartments
being
torn
down
for
market
rate
units.
So
it's
great
to
see
this.
Thank
you
staff
for
a
really
clear
presentation
about
sort
of
what's
at
stake
and
setting
at
80
Ami.
L
It
sounds
like
an
excellent
way
to
and
to
do
this
it
seems
great
and
since
SB
330
is
sunsetting
and
at
the
future
Council
study
session
I
mean
as
a
I'm.
Not
a
lawyer
I,
don't
understand
how
all
this
stuff
works,
but
as
a
member
of
the
public
I'd
love
to
see
a
municipal
adoption,
Mountain
View,
adopting
a
local
version
of
SB
330
and
doing
as
much
as
we
can
to
maintain
naturally
affordable
housing
in
our
Community.
It
really
struck
me
at
the
human
Relations
Committee
housing
presentation
earlier
in
the
year.
L
How
many
people
talked
about
growing
up
in
Mountain
View
is
always
an
economically
diverse
Community,
but
they're
not
seeing
that
anymore.
I
know:
there's
someone
who
comes
to
Council
meetings
and
speaks
fairly
frequently
and
says
says
that
that
they
grew
up
here
and
they
know
that
all
their
friends
can't
afford
to
live
in
the
place
that
they
grew
up
so
being
able
and
taking
concrete
action
to
make
sure
that
Mountain
View
remains
an
economically
diverse
Community,
that's
open
to
all
I
think
is
fantastic.
So
thank
you.
That
seems
great.
W
Evening
gang
Council,
my
name
is
Kevin
ma
again
representing
the
League
of
Women
Voters.
The
League
of
Women
Voters
supports
the
retention
of
subsidized
housing
as
affordable
housing.
As
such,
we
agree
with
the
staff
recommendation
that,
for
the
discussion,
Council
has
that
it
should
be
placed
on
deed,
restricted
in
perpetuity
units
as
opposed
to
units
under
csfra.
We
also
thank
the
council
for
asking
the
question
to
be
proud
of
in
our
letter
about
the
use
of
Chas
data,
though
we
are
concerned
that
again
that
the
child
status
may
not
be
the
most
accurate.
W
N
A
Thank
you.
No
other
members
of
the
Public
Public
wishing
to
speak
I
will
now
bring
the
item
back
to
council
for
deliberation
and
action.
I
Thank
you
mayor
I'd,
like
to
ask
thank
staff
as
as
usual
for
the
staff
report
and
for
the
work
on
this
as
we
try
to
navigate
through
all
of
the
state
legislation.
That's
been
implemented
in
our
our
adoption
of
the
of
those
pieces
of
legislation.
I
do
support
staff
recommendation.
I
I
think
that
to
have
units
subsidized
units
in
perpetuity
that
are
Income
qualified
is
very
important
to
me
and
so
I
think
this
is
a
a
good
decision,
so
I
will
be
happy
to
support
it,
and
you
know:
council,
member,
our
vice
mayor
has
her
hand
up,
but
if
I
could
go,
I
can
just
go
ahead
and
make
the
motion.
Yes.
Okay,
so
I
will
move
staff
recommendation
and
I.
Don't
think
I
need
to
I
need
to
read
anything
I,
don't
think
so.
C
A
I
Thank
you
mayor.
Just
a
couple
of
report
outs
at
the
last
VTA
board
meeting
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
I
There
was
an
item
that
was
approved
to
approve
mous
with
the
city
of
Mountain
View
and
the
City
of
Palo
Alto,
but
this
was
to
move
forward
with
our
ringsdorf
grade
separation
project
and,
if
I
remember,
the
exact
amount,
I
believe
it's
42
million
dollars
that
was
approved
through
the
measure,
B
funds,
so
that
project
is
moving
along
and
very
excited
about
that
and
in
it
and
related
to
that,
I
was
asked
by
the
chair,
VTA
board
chair
to
serve
on
a
new
ad
hoc
committee
on
grade
separation.
I
So
I
will
be
doing
that
for
the
at
least
the
rest
of
the
year,
and
so
yes,
I'm
very
excited
that
that's
project
is
moving
along
and
there's
discussion
at
Caltrain
as
well.
I've
been
I'll,
be
talking
with
them
about
how
to
maybe
to
look
at
all
of
the
grade
separations
projects
and
see
how
we
can
move
them
along
more
quickly.
I
But
I'm
excited
because
from
everything
I'm
hearing
are
rankster
project
is
at
the
top
of
the
list
of
potential
funding.
So
hopefully,
that'll
happen
sooner
than
later,
I
also
attended
the
Bay
Area
Housing
Finance
Authority
committee
meeting,
and
there
are
several
projects
that
are
moving
forward
pilot
projects.
One
is
a
doorway
portal
pilot
and
this
is
like
a
website
where
they
compile
all
of
the
affordable
housing
units
that
are
available
in
the
Bay
Area.
I
So
folks
can
go
there
to
to
look
if
they're
looking
for
affordable
units,
they
can
go
onto
this
website
and
and
find
what's
available
in
the
whole
Bay
Area,
and
so
we
approved
A
Milli
or
we
are
recommending
approval
of
a
million
dollar
contract
for
the
web
design
of
that
that
doorway
portal,
and
also
we
are
looking
or
we
are
moving
forward
with
some
preservation
projects
and
offering
pre-development
and
technical
assistance
through
our
reap
funds
that
we
receive.
I
So
we
are
just
trying
to
get
some
program
pilot
programs
up
and
running
as
we
prepare
for
a
potential
ballot
measure
and
then
I'll
set
a
happy
note.
I
I
know
several
of
us
attended
the
fire
department,
Academy
graduation
for
lateral,
firefighters,
and
it
was
just
a
very
impressive
group
of
firefighters,
who've.
I
Well,
you
know
why
are
you
sacrificing
so
much
to
come
to
Mountain
View
and
his
response
was
that
he
just
you
know
he
came
to
visit
on
recommendation
of
one
of
our
firefighters
and
was
just
really
impressed
by
the
the
warmth,
the
the
team
family
Spirit
of
our
fire
department.
Our
chief
is,
you
know
great
leader,
and
so
that
was
just
very
you
know.
It
was
very.
It
was
a
proud
moment
for
for
I
thought
for
us
and
our
fire
department
so
kudos
to
our
fire
chief
and
the
entire
department.
I
X
Great
thank
you
wanted
to
share
that
I
attended
the
league
of
California
City's
annual
conference
last
week
and
represented
the
city
as
the
voting
delegate.
It
also
ended
my
tenure
as
president
for
the
women's
caucus
so
a
great
year
of
service.
So
that's
it.
Thank
you.
J
Sorry,
my
mute
button
got
slid
down
to
the
bottom
lock
screen
two
things
quickly.
One
I
went
to
the
firefighters
ceremony
too,
and
I
was
really
impressed
by
it
all
the
things
that
Margaret
said
are,
you
know
were
so
true,
but
another
thing
about
it
that
really
struck
me
was
that
one
of
the
parts
of
it
was
to
take
the
oath
of
office,
and
you
know
with
all
the
talk
there
is
on
in
the
national
news
about
Oaths
of
office.
J
It
was
really
moving
to
me
to
watch
these
individuals
who,
were
you
know,
joining
the
Mountain
View
staff
to
take
the
oath
of
office
to
support
and
defend
the
constitution
of
the
State
of
California
and
the
United
States,
just
like
we
all
did
so.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
that.
You
know
that
that
oath
of
office
is
really
woven.
You
know
into
the
fabric
of
our
community's
life,
not
just
it's
not
just
something
that
we
see
on
the
national
news
and
that
you
know
that
kind
of
kind
of
hit
me.
J
J
Remember
we're
talking
about
two
plants,
a
smaller
one
will
be
at
the
Palo
Alto
treatment
plan
itself
and
that
one
will
produce
water
for
our
use
and
the
use
of
other
of
the
treatment
plant
partners.
That's
basically
us
and
the
City
of
Palo
Alto
East
Palo
Alto
in
Los
Altos
are
also
members
of
the
of
the
treatment
plant,
but
they
don't
have.
J
They
haven't
asked
for
any
recycled
water,
yet
so
that's
one
plant
and
then
and
we
would
control
that
water
I,
think
that
is
an
important
takeaway
message
for
everybody.
You
know
long-term
control
of
that
water,
the
second
plant,
and
that
would
treat
a
lot
of
the
remainder
of
the
water
that
isn't
treated
by
the
small
plant
would,
as
planned,
to
be
built
on
the
site
of
the
Los
Altos
water
wastewater
treatment
plant
that
has
been
out
of
service
since
the
mid
60s.
J
That
is
at
the
the
Terminus
of
San
Antonio
Road
kind
of
across
the
street
from
well.
It's
on
the
Palo
Alto
side
of
of
San
Antonio
Road,
and
so
that
site
would
would
treat
water
that
would
be
used
for
the
whole
County
and
Valley
Water
would
control
that
water
supply,
not
us.
J
The
first,
the
first
plant
they're
they're
at
90
percent
design
that
plant
the
90
Divine
is
expected
to
be
finished
in
a
few
months
by
the
end
of
the
year,
so
they're
well
Along
on
that
project.
One
of
the
main
things
that
was
discussed
at
this
study
session
was
the
cost
escalation
that
has
occurred.
J
Apparently,
the
cost
estimate
that
was
initially
done
was
based
on
a
very
not
a
sufficiently
detailed
feasibility
study,
so
it
wasn't
very
robust
and
now
that
they've
gone
and
done
it
in
detail
and
of
course,
we've
had
a
lot
of
there's
been
a
lot
of
inflation
of
building
costs
and
stuff.
J
J
The
Palo
Alto
Council
has
asked
their
staff
to
develop
a
detailed
business
plan
about
the
include
the
costs
of
these
two
plants
to
look
at
them
if
they
were
combined
and
to
look
at
them
individually,
and
that
would
include
the
cost
to
produce
those
plants
to
build
the
plants
design.
The
plants
build
the
plants
permit
the
plants,
as
well
as
the
cost,
to
operate
the
plants
and
the
revenue
that
we
might
expect
to
receive
over
the
years
by
selling
that
recycled
water.
J
So
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
as
it
happened,
and
you
know
it's
I'm
sure
that
we
will
be
hearing
more
about
it
from
our
staff.
In
the
end.
So
many
months.
I
S
I'm
sorry,
mayor
I
forgot
one
other
thing:
I've
been
approached
by
other
council
members
in
other
cities,
about
what
our
plans
are
in
terms
of
going
back
into
in-person
meetings
and
offering
hybrid
meetings
and
some
issues
that
came
up
issues
that
have
come
up
or
things
like
you
know,
whatever
I
I
I
know,
the
intent
is
to
allow
the
public
to
continue
to
call
in
in
hybrid
meetings
but
for
Council
Members.
I
I
I
So
I
was
hoping
to
get
Council
support
on
looking
at
those
policies
and
having
the
CC
cppc
come
back
with
recommendations
on
that.
But
the
other
part
of
this
is
in
you
know
discussing
this
also
with
staff.
There's
a
lot
of
noticing
issues
that
you
know
we
have
and
it's
a
little
challenging
because
we
don't
have
a
date
certain
as
to
when
we
plan
to
come
back
into
in
person.
I
So
I
know
that
we
had
agreed
to
follow
the
county,
what
they
were
doing
but
and
just
procedurally
it
seems
like
it's
challenging
if
we
don't
have
a
certain
date.
Certain
so
I
was
going
to
I'd
like
to
propose
that
we
look
at
setting
a
date,
and
you
know
it
can
be
in
like
December,
even
just
to
give
everyone
time
to
prepare
and
be
ready
to
come
back
in
person,
but
that
I
think
we
should
set
a
date
certain.
I
So
we
can
actually
begin
to
prepare
for
all
of
that,
so
could
I
I
guess,
should
I
ask
for
a
show
of
hands
for
the
first
part
about
policy's
cppc,
making
policy
recommendations
and
then
I
don't
know
if
I
have
to
bring
it
back.
The
second
piece
about
a
date
search
for
in-person
meetings.
I
A
You
don't
want
any
app
staff.
I
know
we
have
a
cppc
meeting
coming
up.
Pretty
soon
is
the
Turner
time.
Is
this
something
that
we
could
realistically
incorporate
into
that
agenda
or
what?
What
staff's
sense
of
timing
for
consideration.
B
Good
evening
this
is
Jennifer
Logue,
City
attorney
I
think
that
we
could
open
the
discussion
on
policies.
We
could
agendize.
You
know
as
a
discussion
item
for
the
cppc
on
policies,
for
you
know
hybrid
meetings.
We
may
not
have
it
all
drafted.
You
know
by
the
28th,
but
I
think
we
could
certainly
open
the
discussion
and
and
present
some
ideas
and
then
come
back
with.
You
know
a
proposed
policy
so
I
think
that
could
be
done
by
the
28th.
J
I
I,
just
I,
would
like
sort
of
to
hear
a
strong
motion.
Is
there
anybody
who
expects
that
they're
not
going
to
come
right
back
regularly?
I
mean
I'm
wondering
if
this
is
a
real
problem.
We
have
because
I'm
certainly
expecting
to
come
back
regularly.
I
know
when
we
discussed
it
previously,
council
member
matacek
said
she
was
she
so
is.
Is
that
is
that
a
problem
we
expect
I
mean
we
certainly
have
a
strong
custom
of
showing
up
at
Council
meetings
very
regularly
and
I.
A
I,
if
I,
could
we
I
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
deliver
it
deliver
it
at
length
here,
but
I
think
that
the
technical
issue
is
I.
Believe
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
staff
council
members
are
currently
able
to
participate
remotely
if
they
want
to,
and
so
it
would
be
a
policy
question
of
a
requirement
that
members
of
the
council
participate
in
person
or
if
we
want
to
allow
exceptions
to
that
to
that
requirement.
So
there
is
a
policy
question
I
mean
this
happens
in
San
Jose,
all
the
time
regularly.
A
Members
of
the
council
are
not
physically
present
for
their
hybrid
meetings
and
there
is
no
requirement
for
them
to
to
be
physically.
Personally,
so
I
think
I'm
not
mistaken.
That
would
be
the
policy
question
for
the
cppc
and
then
the
city
council.
A
X
Yeah
I
mean
I,
don't
I'm
not
looking
to
necessarily
discuss,
but
I
I
do
want
to
say
that
I
thought
that
there
was
an
existing
policy
that
we
had
where
in
extending
circumstances.
If
a
council
member
was
you,
know,
traveling
or
something
when
we
used
to
work,
that
we
would
be
able
to
do
a
telepresence
in
I
mean
I.
X
I
would
assume
that
that
would
be
the
exception
and
I'm
hopeful
that
you
know,
as
we
are
coming
back
to
Council
meetings
as
people
are
having
to
go
back
to
work
or
to
travel
for
conferences
that
that
would
remain
an
option
and
I
don't
know
if
there
would
be
synergies
with
what's
getting
proposed
in
that
policy,
which
I'm
assuming
still
exists,
and
so
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
out
there
not
for
necessarily
discussion
today
but
for
the
cppc.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
yes,
I
think
there
there's
a
this
is
a
more
complicated
matter
than
it
may
appear
to
be
superficially
so
I'm,
looking
forward
to
the
staff
presentation
on
that
item,
but
but
it
has
been
referred
to
the
cppc
and
then
for
the
second
item,
I
I
and
turning
to
staff
again
typically,
we've
we've
had
this
discussion
about
when
we're
coming
back.
A
C
B
I
mean
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
that
you
have
to
provide
direction
or
take
action
on
that
tonight.
I
mean
I.
Think
that's
up
up
to
you.
You
know
I,
don't
know.
If
are
you
going
to?
Are
you
interested
in
picking
a
date
or
is
this
I'm
I'm?
Not
sure
can
you
council,
member
Abaco,
but
can
you
remind
me
of
what
exactly
the
request
was
with
regard
to
that?
B
I
So
it
was
to
pick
a
date
because,
according
to
my
conversations
with
some
of
your
staff,
it's
very
hard
like
if
we
have
to
schedule
public
hearings
and
so
forth.
We
have
like
certain
right,
I
believe
dates,
the
days
that
we
have
to
do
it
in
advance
and
we
have
to
notice
whether
it's
going
to
be
in
person
or
hybrid,
and
so
it
just
sounded
like
it
was
time
for
us
to
pick
a
date
to
come
back
in
person
for
all
of
those
procedural
issues.
I
And
yes,
so
I
guess
I
felt
that,
in
light
of
the
new
booster
coming
out,
I
look
checked
at
the
county
numbers
and
I
know:
there's
not
a
there's
some
non-reporting
going
on,
but
our
numbers
are
like
under
300.
Now,
it's
probably
you
know,
I
think
it's
safe
to
at
least
to
pick
a
date,
and
then
you
know
I
would
suggest
just
to
give
folks
and
staff
time
to
prepare
the
first
meeting
in
December
I,
don't
know
what
that
date
is,
but
just
go
ahead
and
pick
a
date.
B
Okay,
sorry
now
I
understand,
and
it
is
true
that
there
are
some
complications
with
not
knowing
you
know
when
exactly
we're
going
to
come
back
in
person.
I
don't
have
any
issues
in
mind.
There's
there's
a
past
one
that
we're
having
to
deal
with,
because
we
thought
we
would
be
back.
B
You
know
in
person
in
hybrid
by
now,
and
a
notice
of
intention
went
out
among
you
know,
maybe
more
than
30
days
ago
and
so
we're
having
to
adjust
because
we're
not
back
in
person,
so
I
think
what
councilmember
abacova
is
is
talking
about
is
to
the
extent
that
happens
again
where
we
have
to
provide
ex.
You
know,
notice
that
is
well
in
advance
of
the
meeting.
B
Knowing
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
be
in
person
or
hybrid
is
is
helpful,
so
I,
don't
know
that
you
need
to.
You
know,
decide
on
a
date
tonight
you
could
you
could
or
you
could.
You
know,
discuss
it
at
the
next
meeting,
but
I'll,
let
you
know
I,
don't
know
if
Kimbra
has
any
thoughts
on
this
issue
with
regard
to
you
know,
picking
a
date.
AB
AB
Certainly
you
can
refer
it
to
the
CPVC.
As
the
City
attorney
said,
they
will
have
a
discussion
about
it
at
the
end
of
the
month
and
then
we
could
bring
that
update
back
to
council
and
well,
it
would
be
in
October
is
when
it
would
come
back
to
council.
But
if
you
all
have
a
preference
tonight,
it
would
be
easier
to
take
a
straw
poll
and
give
us
Direction.
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
Lieber,
I
think
you're.
Next,
in
the
queue.
S
Well,
just
it
was
I
think
was
several
meetings
ago
that
we
discussed
this
last
and
took
a
vote
on
it,
and
our
vote
at
that
time
was
to
continue
our
practice
of
looking
to
the
what
the
county
was
doing
and
to
look
at
them
as
good
source
of
Public
Health
Information,
rather
than
just
kind
of
sticking
a
stake
in
the
ground.
S
So
if,
if
Council
policies
and
procedures
takes
a
look
at
this
I'd
love
to
have
staff,
look
at
what
the
County's
thinking
is
on
it,
because
I
know
that
different
entities
have
have-
and
indeed
we
did
pick
a
date
and
then
pull
that
back
and
then
pick
a
different
date
and
pull
that
back
and
and
I
think
that
the
county
is
the
public
health
authority
really
has
the
the
best
information
and-
and
sadly
none
of
us
are
fully
in
control
of
the
the
virus.
S
So
I
I'd
like
to
see
information
coming
forward
from
the
county
rather
than
just
sort
of
a
seat
of
the
pants.
How
do
we
feel.
AB
Them
yes
mayor,
thank
you
just
to
clarify.
So
the
latest
update
that
staff
has
received
from
the
county
is
that
they
were
intending
to
talk
about
coming
back
in
October
I
should
know
more
I'm
attending
a
city-wide
or
excuse
me
a
county-wide
meeting
tomorrow.
AB
So
I
will
hopefully
know
more
if
their
board
is
intending
to
come
back
in
October
or
later.
I
will
note
that,
just
recently
the
county
did
rescind
all
of
the
its
Health
orders.
So
we
have
made
changes
to
some
of
our
covid-19
policies
due
to
those
Health
orders
being
rescinded.
So
just
just
I
want
Council
to
Just
note
that,
but
certainly
we
can
take
this
to
cppc
and
then
land
on
a
date
and
hopefully
we'll
know
more
by
then
what
the
county
is
going
to
be
doing.
G
G
The
cppc
was
generally
how
we
would
run
hybrid
meetings,
and
we
talked
about
several
permutations
of
that
which
I
won't
review,
because
you
probably
all
remember
them
from
several
moments
ago
and
then
I
thought
that
the
the
second
question,
which
is
kind
of
different
that
council
member
Abby
Koga
brought
up,
is,
should
we
set
up
a
date
cert
fairly,
certain
I
mean
you
can
never
be
completely
certain
with
pandemics,
but
a
date
fairly
certain
for
coming
back,
because
we've
run
into
problems
with
noticing.
G
If
we
don't
do
that,
so
I
don't
know
if
that,
if
we
can
do
that
and
I
thought,
that
was
not
really
a
cppc
thing,
although
I
suppose
it
could
be
I
thought
that
that
particular
piece,
if
we
set
it
far
enough
in
the
future,
like
council
member
Abby
Koga
had
said,
was
one
that
that
we
could
either
make
tonight
or,
as
somebody
else
had
suggested,
when
we
make
our
next
vote
on
continuing
hybrid
meetings.
Maybe
it
would
fold
into
that.
G
So
that's
my
understanding
and
so
I
think
we
have
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
decided
to
refer
how
the
hybrid
meetings
will
operate
to
the
cppc.
But
the
the
question
about
the
date
seems
to
be
one
that
we
either
make
tonight
or
with
the
or
along
with
the
next
time
we
revisit
the
the
whole
issue
of
meeting
remotely.
B
Thank
you,
after
listening
to
the
discussion,
I'm
thinking
that
it
might
be
best
so
that
we
can
have
public
participation,
you
know,
since
this
is
really
something
that's
going
to
probably
be
action
is
maybe
to
refer
this
to
the
CPVC
to
you,
know,
discuss
it
and
maybe
get
a
report.
B
You
know
from
Kimbra
on
what
the
County's
doing
and
then
we
can
bring
this
back
and
discuss
this
under
the
item
where
we
adopt
the
ab361
resolution
and
at
that
time,
because
it's
appropriate
under
that
item
to
discuss
coming
back
and
and
maybe
setting
a
date
and
then
that
way
we
can
have
public
comment.
You
know
proper
public
comment
before
actions
taken.
A
Thank
you,
everyone
comfortable
with
the
city,
attorney's
recommendation.
It
looks
like
yes,
we
are
comfortable
with
that,
so
that
is
when
we
will
have
this
discussion.
Thank
you
any
other
items
or
questions
or
comments.
A
B
I
do
in
closed
session
this
evening,
city
council
took
final
action
on
item
2.2
on
the
closed
session
agenda,
which
was
a
conference
with
legal
counsel
regarding
a
liability
claim
filed
by
Chandra
Arnold
against
the
city
of
Mountain,
View
Chandra
Arnold
submitted
a
claim
to
the
city
of
Mountain
View,
seeking
two
million
dollars
for
injuries
and
damages
she
sustained.
While
writing
a
Valley,
Transit
Authority
bus
Ms
Arnold
claims
that
the
bus
driver's
negligent
driving
caused
her
to
fly
forward
from
her
seat
and
injure
her
head
her
neck
and
her
back.
B
Council
voted
with
seven
eyes:
zero,
no's
and
zero
abstentions.
To
deny
the
claim,
because
the
valid
Transit
Authority
owns
and
operates
the
bus,
Miss
Arnold
was
writing
at
the
time
of
her
accident
and
the
Valley
Transit
Authority
is
a
legal
entity
separate
from
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
Thank
you.
That's
the
only
report.