►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
On
the
closed
session
for
this
evening
item
2.1
is
conference
with
real
property
negotiators.
Pursuant
to
government
code,
section
549
56.8,
the
property
is
850
california
street.
The
agency
negotiators
are
angela
lamonica
our
real
property
program
administrator
and
don
cameron.
The
public
works
director,
the
negotiating
party,
is
cvs
and
under
negotiation
is
priced
in
terms
of
payment
item.
2.2
is
conference
with
legal
counsel
for
existing
litigation
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54956.9.
B
A
A
A
Good
evening,
everyone
welcome
to
the
joint
meeting
of
the
city
council
and
the
shoreline
regional
park
community
of
february
22
2022.,
I'm
going
to
read
the
usual
announcement
as
required.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
california
government
code,
section
54953-e
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
city
council.
A
All
members
of
the
city
council
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting
lies,
may
do
so
at
mountainview.legistar.com
on
youtube
at
mountainview.gov
youtube
and
on
comcast
channel
26
noted
on
the
meeting
agenda.
Members
of
the
public
may
provide
oral
public
comments
during
the
public
comment
period
by
visiting
mountainview.gov
meeting
to
enter
the
zoom
webinar
or
by
phone
by
dialing
669-900-9128.
A
A
D
A
A
As
a
reminder,
the
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
council
to
efficiently
and
quickly
consider
a
high
volume
of
routine
or
administrative
business
items
with
one
motion,
although
council
members
may
remove
items,
it
is
generally
not
intended
for
the
council
to
have
a
lengthy,
substantive
discussion
on
consent.
Calendar
items
would
any
member
of
the
council
like
to
pull
an
item
council
member
abby,
koga.
E
E
E
The
city's
amount
is
higher
than
the
counties,
and
so
I
guess
I
just
I
didn't
worry
the
question
well,
but
what
I
was
asking
for
was
not
whether
we
could
move
that
amount
to
the
difference
to
another
project
like
physically
move
it.
But
could
we
get
credit
from
the
county
for
like
the
two
and
a
half
million
dollar
difference?
Sorry,
I
don't
know
if
you
could
to
the
montecito
project.
I
believe
it's
my
theater
project
so
that
we
could
get
ownership
of
the
montecito
site.
A
F
E
G
H
A
I
A
A
If
a
member
of
the
public
would
like
to
speak
on
item
4.4,
which
is
the
programmatic
memorandum
of
understanding
between
county
of
santa
clarita
and
city
of
mountain
view
or
item
4.6,
which
is
the
pg
e
gas
regulator
regulator
station
at
san
barron
park,
heritage,
tree
removal
and
mitigation,
then
I
will
ask
you
to
wait
until
we
speak
on
those
items.
So
after
the
council
dispenses
with
the
balance
of
the
consent,
calendar
will
move
to
the
items
that
were
pulled.
A
J
D
A
K
Over
a
year
ago,
the
city
of
destination
home
made
nearly
a
half
a
million
dollar
grant
to
the
city
of
mountain
view,
for
capacity
building
efforts,
and
it's
exactly
this
type
of
creativity,
thoughtfulness
from
staff
to
work
with
county
officials
to
come
to
an
opportunity.
That's
before
you
tonight
to
leverage
tens
of
millions
of
measure,
a
dollars
with
invaluable
valuable
city
of
mountain
view,
funding
to
create
deeply
affordable
and
supportive
housing
for
some
of
our
most
valuable
and
vulnerable
residents.
K
E
The
city
contribution
is
higher
than
the
counties
and
my
so
my
request
was:
if
we
can
ask
the
county
to
credit
us
or
to
yeah
accredit
them,
the
difference
to
let's
say,
take
montecito,
because
montecito
is
a
two
million
dollar
difference,
whereas
the
lot
12
is
a
two
and
a
half
million
dollar
difference
and
see
if
we
can
retain
the
montecito
site
as
well.
But
as
I
was
looking
at
this,
I
noticed
that
there's
a
land
value
on
lot.
E
12,
that's
not
there's
no
monetary
value
listed,
but
I
also
think
that
we
should
get
credit
for
that
too.
And
so
can
we
look
at
negotiating
that
land
value
as
credit
towards?
You
know
one
of
the
other
projects
as
well,
so
we
can
retain
the
properties
at
the
end
of
the
lease
terms,
and
I'm
hoping
that
I
could
get
council
support
to
do
that.
Negotiation.
F
Hi,
an
apologies
I
didn't
introduce
myself
earlier-
I'm
michaela
hellman,
tincher
housing
and
neighborhoods
division
manager.
So
thank
you
for
the
question.
As
I
mentioned
before,
we
have
not
explored
this
with
the
county
previously,
so
we'd
have
to
renegotiate
some
of
the
terms
with
them
being
honest,
my
assumption
is
that
this
is
an
unlikely
request
that
would
be
granted.
I
believe
there
may
be
a
county
staff
member
on
the
line,
ms
consuelo
hernandez.
L
Good
evening,
council
apologies,
I
am
on
my
phone
so
hernandez
here,
director
with
the
office
of
supportive
housing.
If
I
understand
the
question
correctly
from
the
council
member,
we
did
not
include
the
land
value
of
lot
12,
because
in
other
instances
the
county
also
holds
land,
and
that
value
is
not
factored
in
towards
our
contribution.
L
I
E
L
L
So
the
land
ownership
is
something
new
that
came
up
last
year,
but
the
original
intent
of
this
was
how
do
we
take
the
city's
pipeline
with
funding
that
the
county
has
to
collectively
achieve
mutual
goals?
I'm
happy
to
continue
the
conversations
with
the
staff
about
you
know.
Shifting
funding
from
other
projects.
L
E
E
I
I
don't
I'm
not
as
looking
to
physically
move
the
money
around.
I
guess
I'm
asking
if
we
can
get
credit
for
the
funding
that
the
city
is
putting
in
by
trying
to
retain
the
ownership
of
the
site
and
the
reason
why
this
is
very
important
to
me
is
that
you
know
number
one.
I
think
it's
it
is
the
for
this,
the
best
interest
for
the
city
to
own
as
much
property
as
we
can
it's
done
as
well
in
the
past,
and
then
I
remember,
I
believe
it
was
like
the
count.
There
was
a
county.
E
I
think
it
was
a
work
furlough
site
back
in
the
day
in
the
east
wisman
area
and
the
county
eventually
ended
up
ending
that
program,
and
you
know
and-
and
it
I
I
guess
like
when
things
like
that
happen.
I
think,
as
mentioned
in
the
staff
report,
it's
best
for
I
think
the
city
to
have
control
of
those
properties.
So
they
can
determine
what
use
it
can
go
to
in
the
future
and
that's
why
it's
so
important
for
me
to
try
to
have
ownership
of
these
sites.
E
L
E
I
Thanks,
I
do
think
it's
worth
exploring
and
it's
not
the
value
of
the
land
we're
talking
about
this.
For
the
second
part,
it's
the
additional
contribution
the
city
made
to
the
lot
12
development,
but
I
have
a
strong
interest
in
the
city
having
ownership
of
all
of
the
affordable
housing
projects,
the
property
that
is
because,
sometime
down
the
road,
if
the
county
does
decide
they
want
to
sell
it.
I
You
know
55
years
from
now,
so
I
have
a
strong
interest
in
the
city
having
the
property
up
front.
I
think
council,
member
abbey
koga
shared.
You
know
my
perspective
as
well,
which
is,
I
think,
it's
always
beneficial
for
the
city
to
own
property.
We
don't
really
know
what's
going
to
happen
in
the
future,
but
we're
in
the
best
position
possible
if
we
own
the
property.
J
Great
thanks
so
much
well,
I'm
really
excited
that.
We
are
finally
talking
about
the
mou,
as
was
mentioned,
I
think
by
staff
and
the
county.
This
has
been
something
that's
been
in
the
works
for
a
really
long
time,
and
I
think
some
of
this
some
of
us
expressed
our
opinion
when
this
first
came
forward.
I
think
on
the
montecito
project
and
you're
hearing
a
little
bit
more
of
it
tonight,
so
you
know
I
am
grateful
for
the
county.
J
J
I
I
do
support
that.
I
think
we're
hearing
from
councilmember
ravi,
kovan,
counselor
and
matasha.
Perhaps
you
know
being
able
to
see
if
we
could
do
that
sooner
than
you
know
the
county
deciding
that
they
you
know,
might
want
to
do
something
different
with
the
land.
So
I
am
interested
in
that,
but
I
know
that
we
had
this
discussion
maybe
a
year
or
two
ago,
and
and
so
I'm
not
sure
if
things
have
changed,
but
I
I
do
feel
like
it
addresses
it
there.
J
M
Yeah
I
I
basically
agree
with
council
member
abbott
koga.
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
to
own
the
property,
and-
and
I
don't
I
I'm
wondering
whether
there's
whether
I
mean
it
seems
like
this-
is
an
ongoing
discussion
that
it'll
come
up
over
and
over
again
with
with
various
properties
that
we
partner
with
the
county
on,
and
I
I
don't
see
a
particular
reason
for
the
county
to
want
to
own
them
except
to
sell
them
to
us.
M
I
mean
it
just
seems
in
our
interest,
as
we
do
planning
for
the
benefit
of
our
residents
that
we
own
it.
On
the
other
hand,
I
do
sympathize
with
what
council
member
commae
said
of
not
slowing
down
the
project.
You
know
if
it's
something
that
we
just
can't
do,
then
I
would
rather
not
try
to
do
it,
but
so
I
guess
that's
where
I'm
weighing
in
that.
I
would
like
to
do
it
if
possible.
A
N
If
I
may,
I
think
what
what
we
understand
is
that
there
may
be
those
on
the
council
who
want
to
look
at
specific
project
funding
for
projects
on
which
the
council
hasn't
made
a
decision
on
as
part
of
this
mou.
So
this
mou,
the
terms
of
the
mou
contemplate
both
that
the
city
can
own
the
land
and
the
county
can
own
the
land.
N
N
O
A
Thank
you.
For
my
part,
I
also
support
the
staff
recommendation.
I
agree
with
council
member
show
walter
and
council
member
commae,
I'm
not
interested
in
renegotiating
the
mou.
I
think
we
have
to
be
mindful
that
measure
a
funding
is
being
depleted
pretty
quickly.
Other
cities
are
especially
the
city
of
san
jose
are
taking
advantage,
and
I
am
mindful
that
it
took
a
long
time
for
for
county
staff
and
city
staff
to
bring
the
the
mou
that
we
have
tonight
before
us.
A
A
E
N
I
can
check,
but
our
understanding
is
most
of
the
land
is
owned.
You
know
the
previous
projects
were
owned
by
the
actual
providers.
Alta
rome
and
the
difference
really
is
that
the
city
has
land
use
control
over
these
entities,
but
it
doesn't
if
the
county
is
the
owner
and
that's
really
the
difference.
E
So
I
was
going
to
go
ahead
and
make
the
motion
but
wanted
to
make
the
motion,
according
to
mr
vastiva's
comment
about,
so
I'm
fine
to
move
forward
with
the
mou
but
like
maybe
you
can
help
me
with
the
wording
but
to
bring
each
project
back
as
it
comes
with
decision
point
to
decide.
If
we
need,
we
want
to
add
funds
to
to
retain
site
control.
N
Yes,
at
this
time,
the
council's
already
made
the
decisions
on
lot
12
in
la
venita.
The
funds
have
been
appropriated
and
the
lgda
approved,
so
those
won't
come
back
but
montecito
and
the
pipeline
projects
could
I,
I
don't
think
we
were
planning
to
own
crestview
since
we're
only
putting
3.7.
So
those
are
the
two
we
can
go
back
talk
to
the
county,
see
if
there's
additional
funding,
because
those
have
not
yet
been
appropriated.
A
A
A
D
A
Q
Thank
you,
mayor
ramirez
and
council
members,
I'm
albert
jeans,
a
long-time
resident
and
I
actually
live
about
a
block
from
where
this
pg
e
gas
regular
station
is
going
to
be
installed
in
san
veron
park
and
in
general.
I'm
really
pleased
that
staff
and
pg
e
were
were
able
to
work
together
and
move
this
to
the
park
instead
of
living
on
the
middle
field,
median
where
those
three
huge
redwood
trees
would
have
to
be
taken
down.
Q
Next
slide,
please,
however,
as
you
know,
there
still
will
be
two
heritage,
trees
removed
or
planned
to
be
removed
here,
and
one
of
them
is
this
20
foot
tall
coast
redwood
is
that's.
My
best
guess
is
what
this
is.
The
tree
that's
going
to
be
removed
because
pg
e
needs
to
run
a
pipeline
under
it
to
reach
the
main
line
from
the
sidewalk,
and
so
next
slide.
Please.
Q
Q
You
know
next
to
the
stephens
creek
trail,
so
good
chance
to
support
our
own
businesses,
and
you
know,
although
transplanting
is
expensive,
I
imagine
it
might
cost
a
few
thousand
dollars
trees.
This
size
aren't
worth
that
much.
You
know,
I
think,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
what
the
amount,
but
it
could
be
like
ten
thousand
dollars.
So
I
think
this
is
a
really
good
opportunity.
Next
slide.
A
E
R
R
R
It
is
more
than
just.
Is
there
a
planting
space
for
it?
Transplanting
a
tree
of
this
size
requires
specialized
and
large
equipment
and
unobstructed
access
to
the
tree
planting
location.
So
we
could
find
a
perfect
place
in
the
park,
but
there
may
be
other
trees
or
something
else
in
the
way
and
they
can't
get
the
equipment
in.
This
all
requires
analysis.
We
can't
answer
that
question
tonight.
R
R
We
are
not
able
to
ask
pg
e,
yet,
if
they're
willing
to
cover
these
costs,
because
we
don't
have
quotes
yet
and
that's
going
to
be.
That
is
the
first
question
we
already
talked
to
pg
e.
That's
their
first
question.
How
much
are
we
talking?
We
know
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
expensive
than
them
just
paying
to
plant
two
replacement
trees,
but
we
just
don't
know
what
dollar
amount
to
give
them,
and
we
don't
know
if
they're
going
to
be
willing
to
cover
the
cost.
R
The
final
factor
is:
does
the
city
have
the
staff
resources
to
manage
this
transplant
project?
And
we
say
this
because
pg
e
did
tell
us
today
that,
while
they
were
willing
to
handle
the
replacement
tree
planting,
they
are
not
willing
to
take
responsibility
for
transplanting
the
tree.
If
they
are
willing
to
fund
it,
they
would
give
the
money
to
the
city
and
they
would
expect
city
staff,
then
to
handle
the
transplant.
R
We
do
not
have
the
equipment
or
the
resources
do
it
ourselves.
We
would
have
to
contract
it
out.
So
a
critical
question
for
us
would
be
the
timing,
because
we
here
pg
e,
wants
to
get
started
as
soon
as
possible.
They've
already
delayed
this
project
quite
a
bit
working
with
us
and
what
was
going
to
happen
with
middle
field
road-
and
this
is
part
of
their
gas
pipeline
safety
initiative.
R
R
The
proposed
revised
recommendation,
which
would
give
staff
some
flexibility
to
see
if
we
can
work.
This
out
would
be
still
to
approve
the
removal
mitigation
for
the
pine
heritage
tree
at
a
two
to
one
replacement
ratio,
but
for
the
redwood
heritage
tree
approved
transplanting
the
tree
if
a
feasible
location
is
identified,
it
is
fully
funded
by
pg
e
and
city
can
transplant
the
tree
before
pg
e
needs
access
to
the
site.
E
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you,
ms
cameron,
for
that
explanation
and
alternate
motion.
I
like
the
alternate
motion.
I
guess
my
question,
though,
is
or
I
I
I
don't
see-
the
motivation
for
pg
e
to
to
pay
for
the
transplanting,
and
so
unless
we
have
a
you
know
a
bigger
requirement
on
the
other
end.
So
if
it's,
if
they,
if
we,
if
you
know
it,
turns
out
it's
not
doable
or
impeaching,
he
says
no.
E
R
Not
nothing
that
comes
immediately
to
mind.
I
will
say
that
you
know:
pg
e
has
been
working
with
us
to
be
a
good
neighbor.
If
they
consider
the
cost
is
reasonable
and
within
range
I
I
think
we
could
persuade
them.
However,
you
were
right,
we
cannot
require
it,
and
what
we
have
to
remember
is
they
do
have
franchise
rights
to
just
go.
Remove
those
three
very
large
redwood
trees
from
the
median
and
as
part
of
previously
approved
gas
pipeline
safety
initiatives
tree
removals,
they
have
provided
they
provide
money
to
the
tree
fund
at
a.
R
I
think.
It's
five
replacement
trees
for
every
three
trees.
They
remove
or
something
like
that
or
seven
for
every
three
slightly
more
than
two
to
one,
but
not
much
more,
and
that
is
something
that's
been
set
in
stone
for
a
number
of
years
now
in
terms
of
what
they
do
for
their
gas
pipeline
safety
initiative.
R
S
R
A
O
A
O
I
mean
a
san
bruno
incident
was
egregious
and
horrible,
and
and
that's
very,
very
rare,
but
there
are
other
lesser
problems
and
just
keeping
that
pipeline
safe,
also
means
that
it's
reducing
the
emissions
from
it.
So
there's
lots
of
good
reasons.
For
you
know,
for
us
I
mean
it's
very
much
in
our
interest
to
have
this
work
done
and
keep
these
pipelines
in
just
tip
top
shape.
So
that's
another
reason
why.
O
M
So
I
I
second
that
motion.
I
know,
though,
that
this
community,
this
neighborhood,
is
very
concerned
about
sort
of
loss
of
trees
in
general,
and
I'm
wondering
whether
it
would
make
sense
to
to
also
say
that
if
the
the
city
could
chip
in
a
certain
amount
of
money,
if
pg
e,
if
the
money
were
something
that
the
additional
money
were
something
that
that
pg
e
did
not
want
to
pay,
you
know
nothing
to
slow
it
down.
M
I
agree
it's
important
to
move
forward,
but
I
also
think
if
we
chipped
in
you
know
a
few
thousand
dollars
that
to
ease
the
process,
I
would
be
willing
to
do
that.
So
I
don't
know
if
council
member
show
walter
would
if
that
would
work,
and
if
council
member
showalter
would
agree
to
that
friendly
amendment.
O
R
I
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
there
were
actually
two
recommendations
for
this
item.
One
was
to
authorize
the
necessary
doc
city
manager
to
execute
the
necessary
documents
to
grant
pg
e
the
utility
easement,
as
well
as
the
recommendation
regarding
the
tree
removal.
So
I
just
would
like
to
clarify
that
both
of
these
recommendations
are
included
in
the
motion.
A
A
C
D
A
Thank
you.
We
will
now
move
to
item
5
oral
communications.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
council
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
council
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone.
A
timer
will
be
displayed
on
the
screen.
T
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
I
wanted
to
address
the
issue
of
what
is
going
on
at
590
castro,
which
is
the
sobrato
building.
That's
supposed
to
go
up
upon
reading
the
staff
report.
I
know
that
they
say
they
gave
notice
within
seven
to
property
owners
within
750
feet.
My
view
of
the
map
appears
to
be
said
within
750.
Feet
is
city
hall,
chamber
of
commerce,
performing
arts
center
sobrato's
own
headquarters
across
the
street
pioneer
park
and
the
library
the
notices
that
would
have
gone
to
residents.
It
seems
to
have
been
absolutely
minimal.
T
So
we
have
some
very
serious
issues
with
this
building
that
will
be
addressed
later
when
it
comes
before
the
council,
but
I
think
it's
important
for
the
council
to
understand
that
we
should
not
be
treating
public
spaces
like
castro.
The
same
as
neighborhood
projects
for
apartments
and
townhouses
either
seriously
erodes
public
trust
and
with
the
upcoming
actions
for
considering
how
to
treat
r3
zoning
etc.
T
U
Hi,
can
you
hear
me?
Yes,
okay,
I'd
like
to
discuss
things
in
regards
to
sustainability,
I'm
bruce
nagle.
I've
lived
in
mountain
view
for
over
40
years.
I
am
part
of
several
sustainability
groups,
including
being
on
the
board
of
carbon
free
mountain
view.
I
think
mountain
view
council
for
support
of
a
number
of
powerful
sustainability
efforts.
We
were
one
of
the
first
members
in
the
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
to
to
move
that
forward
the
group
of
people
that
did
that
we
authorized
the
environmental
sustainability
task
force.
U
The
work
that's
being
considered
now
to
go
into
carbon
neutral
for
2030,
as
other
cities
have
been,
is
an
area
that
that
mountain
view
is
taking
on.
Thank
you
for
that.
It's
important
that
we
move
this
forward
and
be
aware
that
other
other
people
are
on
the
same
journey.
In
fact,
the
the
topic
of
this
of
the
the
thing
being
that
and
salmon
is
san
mateo
is
discussing
carbon
neutral
by
2030..
U
I'd
like
you
to
consider
an
action
that
can
be
taken
on
the
way,
and
that
is
that
los
altos
hills
and
half
moon
bay
have
taken
on
and
it's
to
shut
off
the
gas
by
2045.
So
there's
precedence
for
this,
and
I
would
like
to
see
that
as
part
of
the
discussion,
I
think
it's
an
important
foundational
issue
and
will
help
focus
the
intention
on
what's
needed
in
order
to
make
the
thing
work.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
time
and
the
discussion
and
for
all
the
work
you've
done
so
far.
V
V
I
think
that
is
not
at
all
helpful,
so
I
really
want
to
encourage
you
to
change
the
rules
when
there's
any
development
proposed
for
castro
or
side
streets,
that
all
of
mountain
view
has
a
stake
in
the
development,
especially
large
developments
that
heavily
impact
the
street
and
everybody
needs
to
be
notified
before
those
kinds
of
developments
can
be
approved.
Thank
you.
W
W
W
But
it's
not
true,
and
this
isn't
working
and
we
need
to
find
a
way
to
hold
them
accountable
and
make
it
work
before
we
replicate
that
anywhere,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
in
the
name
of
the
people
that
are
still
there,
and
especially
the
name
of
the
people
who
have
already
been
removed
from
that
program
for
unjust
reasons
that
you
will
look
into
this
life
moves
program,
because
right
now,
life's
just
moving
on
for
people
that
it
shouldn't
have.
Thank
you.
X
Good
evening
council,
this
is
christine
keller,
I'm
at
555
west
middle
field.
I
know
you've
heard
from
me
a
lot.
Thank
you
for
your
patience
with
that.
So
just
a
day
or
two
after
the
last
council
meeting,
I
became
aware
of
a
major
issue
here
at
avalon,
which
I
believe
others
have
reached
out
to
the
city
about
as
well.
Trying
to
summarize
it
quickly.
Essentially,
avalon
is
doing
the
hallway
renovations,
but
is
not
letting
the
people
know
that
it
involves
asbestos.
X
After
seeing
how
avalon's
been
not
been
handling
things
well,
and
I'm
wanting
to
ask
the
city
what's
being
done
to
help
us
here
to
help
get
avalon
to
be
able
to
communicate
and
really
just
to
care
about
our
health
and
communicate
to
residents,
so
they
can
safely
get
out
or
safely
make
arrangements
to
stay
elsewhere
and
not
have
to
just
be
out
at
the
last
minute.
But
I
do
have
growing
concerns
about
approving
a
seven
year
infill,
if
they're
not
communicating
well.
Now,
as
it
is,
thank
you
so
much.
Y
Y
I
think
I've
mentioned
that
many
times
before
any
project.
Really
that
takes
place
on
castro
street
in
downtown
is
really
something
that
all
the
residents
should
know
about
and
should
be
able
to
give
input
on.
Downtown
castro
street
belongs
to
all
the
residents
and
ensuring
that
new
development
projects
are
vetted
through
to
serve
the
community.
Well
is
really
essential
for
the
public
good,
and
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
I
actually
attended
the
development
review
meeting
for
this
project
a
few
months
ago.
Y
Back
in
october,
I
I
don't
have
very
strong
confidence
in
the
the
retail
office
mix
use
because
I
hear
that
it's
the
same
developer.
That's
doing
this
project
did
the
wells
fargo
building
across
the
street,
the
new
one
and,
as
you
know,
that
that
project
really
does
not
have,
except
for
the
bank,
it
does
not
have
really
multiple
retail
spaces
offered
to
the
public,
it's
essentially
a
dead
zone
and
I'm
really
worried
about
the
same
thing
happening
at
the
590
castro
street
development.
Y
In
addition,
I
am
very
very
really
concerned
about
all
the
removal
of
of
the
heritage
trees
and
all
these
development
for
the
590
castro
street
nine
heritage.
Trees
are
asked
to
be
removed,
especially
three
very
mature,
redwood
trees
that
are
adjacent
to
pioneer
park
and,
as
you
know,
pioneer
park
is
our
historic.
Y
Z
Yes,
thank
you.
My
name
is
sayo
nomura
and
I
live
on
cypress
point
drive
just
across
the
street
from
555
west
middle
field
apartment
and
then
I'm
supporting
here
for
christine
and
other
friends
living
there.
My
concern
is
that
I
heard
that
when
avalon
is
demolishing
units
on
the
apartment,
555
west
mill
field,
there
is
no
notice
to
the
residents
nearby
and
then
my
friends
living
there
had
to
run
to
close
their
windows
because
the
dust
was
blowing
to
the
balcony.
Z
They
had
to
close
windows
and
stay
inside
all
day.
That
is
really
hard,
and
then
I
wish
they
could
give
notice
to
the
residents
in
advance.
So
the
residents
can
plan
ahead
and
my
another
concern
is
about
the
large
number
of
additional
residents
at
the
end
of
cyprus.
Point
drive
and
there
seems
to
be
a
difference
between
what
we
hear
from
avalon
and
what
we
see
happening
at
the
apartments.
Z
G
Hi,
my
name
is
way.
I
am
a
volunteer
for
the
united
effort
organization,
we're
a
very
small
volunteer
group,
providing
case
management
services
to
people
in
need,
including
many
people
experiencing
homelessness.
We
are,
there
was
a
person
addressing
the
home
key
project
leghorn
in
mountain
view.
I
am
very
familiar
with
that
program
and
I
have
many
referred
many
clients
and
then
we
to
that
program.
G
G
In
the
meantime,
homekey
project
home
key
provides
a
short-term
solution.
It's
not
perfect
solution,
it's
not
permanent
solution,
but
it
does
provide
some
help
to
people
homeless
people,
so
they
can
get
stable
housing
to
go
to
work
to
go
to
school
to
move
on
with
their
lives.
So
I
hope
that,
just
because
some
people
experience
some
some
some
problem,
there
does
not
mean
this
project
is
not
good
project.
It
does
not
mean
we
should
stop
supporting
home
key
projects
like
homekey.
G
AA
West
middle
field,
road-
and
I
have
also
been
concerned
about
the
hallway
renovations
that
are
happening.
My
hallway
has
not
been
renovated
next,
but
is
scheduled
to
happen
very
soon.
In
a
few
weeks.
I
wouldn't
have
known
about
it
unless
I
had
heard
from
others
that
they
got
very
little
notice
from
other
buildings.
AA
AA
I
emailed
them
about
the
construction,
and
they
did
not
tell
me
it
was
asbestos
until
I
asked
specifically
and
then
they
said
yes
and
they're
not
clear
on
the
timelines
either
they
said
it
was
going
to
be
one
day
of
asbestos
work,
but
in
reality
it's
two
days
for
the
whole,
the
whole
hallway,
and
it's
going
to
be
two
weeks
of
construction
for
the
hallway.
They
don't
specify
these
timelines,
even
though
they
know
them
in
advance.
I
just
wish
they
would
be
more
transparent,
especially
with
asbestos.
AA
Another
thing
is,
there
are
renovating
units,
not
hallways
but
units,
and
they
don't
give
us
heads
up
that
they're
doing
that
either
when
there
is
asbestos
involved
a
few
weeks
ago,
there
was
plastic
outside
a
door
across
the
hall
for
me,
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
I
was
asbestos
or
not,
they
are
supposed
to
put
warnings,
but
I
don't
know
I
just
I
don't
I'm
like
I'm
just
concerned.
I
just
wish
they
would
be
more
transparent.
That's
all
thank
you
for
listening.
I
appreciate
it.
A
A
Seeing
no
additional
speakers,
we
will
return.
Sorry,
we
will
proceed
to
item
6.1
fiscal
year,
2021-22
mid-year
budget
status,
report
and
adjustments.
This
item
was
continued
from
the
council's
february,
8th
meeting
city
manager,
mccarthy
and
finance
and
administrative
services
director
jesse
takahashi
will
present
the
item.
H
Thank
you,
mayor,
ramirez
and
council
members.
I
believe
that
our
administrative
services,
director,
jesse
takahashi,
is
going
to
be
driving
the
presentation,
so
I
would
just
ask
for
him
to
pull
it
up
and
while
he
does
I'll
just
give
a
brief
overview
before.
I
turn
it
over
to
him
to
discuss
the
details
with
council
and
the
last
time
that
we
appeared
before
council
was
on
november.
The
16th-
and
this
was
the
first
quarter
update
where
we
appeared
on
track,
and
at
that
point
we
really
didn't
have
all
the
impacts
from
omicron
the
omicron
variant.
H
Yet
so
there
was
still
some
uncertainty
in
where
our
economy
would
be
at
and
what
our
revenues
would
look
like.
Well,
since
november
16th,
we
all
know
that
we
have
still
had
positive
tests
that
have
increased,
but
now
they
are
trending
downward,
so
the
pandemic
has
been
continuing
a
bit
longer
than
we
all
expected.
But,
as
we
all
know,
the
governor
has
recently
announced,
as
of
last
week,
his
smarter
plan
to
where
we
are
now
going
to
move
into
treating
this
as
an
endemic
and
moving
forward.
H
AC
Yes,
thank
you.
Can
you
see
the
the
the
powerpoint?
Yes,
you
can
hear
me-
okay,
great
just
one
minute
here,
so
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
cut
to
the
chase
here
in
our
first
slide,
as
you
can
see
here
in
the
general
operating
fund,
we
have
at
the
halfway
point
of
the
year.
The
general
operating
fund
is
currently
estimated
with
an
ending
balance
of
about
7.7
million
dollars,
and
this
is
due
primarily
to
higher
than
anticipated
revenues
and
expected
improved
budget
savings.
AC
AC
The
green
middle
bar
is
the
adopted
budget,
and
the
blue
bar
represents
the
fiscal
21
actuals
in
all
categories.
Current
estimated
amounts
are
projected
higher
than
the
adopted
budget.
I
just
want
to
mention
a
few
of
our
major
revenues
here.
Property
taxes
continue
to
be
one
of
our
strongest
revenues
and
is
estimated
to
be
2.8
million
dollars.
AC
Higher
than
budget
sales
tax
is
estimated
to
be
a
little
over
three
million
dollars
higher
than
budget,
primarily
due
to
strong
sales
from
autos
general
consumer
goods
and
a
quicker
than
expected
rebound
from
restaurants
as
the
economy
continues
to
recover
and
with
other
local
taxes.
We're
expecting
1.5
million
dollars
higher
than
budget,
and
that
includes
tot,
which
has
done
better
than
expected
thus
far,
but
is
still
less
than
half
of
what
its
historical
level
was.
So
we're
still
pretty
far
down
in
that
respect.
AC
Service
and
supplies
expenditures
are
estimated
to
be
just
under
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
below
adopted
budget
and
that's
it
for
the
general
operating
fund
now
moving
on
to
our
other
major
funds.
These
include
development
services,
shoreline
golf
and
michael's,
restaurant
and
the
shoreline
community.
AC
Revenues
for
the
development
services
and
golf
funds
are
running
slightly
below
budget.
However,
expenditures
are
also
trending
below
leaving
a
net
positive
change
for
the
mid-year.
The
shoreline
community
revenues,
consisting
primarily
of
property
taxes,
are
projected
to
be
higher
than
budget,
while
operating
expenditures
are
slightly
below.
AC
Current
cost
estimate
for
identified
sea
level
rise
projects
at
the
time
is
122
million
dollars.
Staff
is
in
the
process
of
developing
a
feasibility
study
in
order
to
prioritize
the
projects
for
funding,
scheduling
and
implementation,
and
it's
anticipated
this
additional
reserves
will
be
needed
to
provide
for
increased
mitigation
over
what
was
recommended
by
the
initial
study.
AC
Onto
our
utility
funds,
the
utility
funds
are
made
up
of
water
waste
water
and
solid
waste
in
the
water
fund.
Operating
revenues
are
estimated
to
be
lower
than
budget
due
to
water
usage,
trending
approximately
10
lower
as
a
result
of
the
conservation
efforts
that
are
ongoing
due
to
the
drought.
However,
operating
expenditures
are
also
estimated
to
be
below
budget,
primarily
as
a
result
of
the
san
francisco
puc.
AC
AC
AC
Notably,
the
forecast
includes
additional
position
requests
discussed
in
the
recommended
mid-year
adjustments
section
of
the
report.
However,
at
the
time
this
time
the
forecast
does
not
include
any
fiscal
23
ongoing
budget
requests
from
departments
as
those
are
being
currently
evaluated
as
part
of
the
budget
development
process,
and
just
like
to
note
that
the
full
five-year
forecast
will
be
presented
as
part
of
the
23
recommended
budget
that
comes
before
you
in
june.
AC
As
far
as
just
some
of
the
assumptions
in
the
forecast,
we
had
some
broad
assumptions,
such
as
maximum
property
tax
base,
increase
of
two
percent
fewer
restriction
due
to
the
pandemic
and
continued
improvement
in
most
of
our
revenues.
That
said,
there's
still
very
many
variables
that
are
still
in
play
that
make
it
still
challenging
to
determine
how
the
pandemic's
going
to
play
out
and
how
the
local
economy
will
ultimately
be
affected,
as
as
a
result.
AC
AC
A
M
My
question
is
not
so
much
about
the
numbers,
but
I
was
surprised
to
see
that
the
work
plan
we
usually
check
and
tweak
the
work
plan
and
projects
in
february,
and
I
was
surprised
to
see
that
was
embedded
in
the
mid-year
budget
report
rather
than
a
separate
item.
So
I'm
just
wondering
from
staff
if
this
would
be
a
good
time
to
make
any
comments
about
about
tweaking
items
in
the
work
plan,
not
just
about
the
budget
at
the
during
this
agenda
item.
H
M
H
Thank
you
councilmember
hicks,
so
actually
you
can
talk
about
it
now.
Today
would
be
the
time
to
discuss
that.
So
we
are
not
planning
on
bringing
another
item
to
council
about
this.
However,
we
will
include
another
update
in
the
june
in
the
june
recommended
budget,
and
I
also
just
realized
I'm
calling
you
council,
member
hicks
and
not
vice
mayor
hicks.
So
apologies
for
that,
but
now
would
be
the
time
to
discuss
that.
M
A
Thank
you
any
other
questions
from
the
council
did
have
one
and
that's
the
payment
of
the
startup
cost
for
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
orders
is
proposed
to
be
a
loan,
but
if
it
were
not
alone,
if
the
city
were
to
take
on
a
portion
of
that
cost,
does
that
mean
that
it
would
provide
some
relief
to
mobile
home
park
owners?
Would
their
fees
go
down
correspondingly.
A
Thank
you
seeing
no
additional
questions.
We
will
return
to
the
public.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item
and
just
as
a
reminder:
it's
6.1
fiscal
year,
2021-22
mid-year
budget
status
report
and
adjustments,
strategic
roadmap
action
plan
update
and
fiscal
year,
2022-23
preliminary
general
operating
fund
forecast.
A
AD
AD
AE
AF
Hey
y'all
budgeting
is
the
best
right,
I'm
here
as
a
resident
of
a
mobile
home
mountain
view
and
a
beneficiary
of
the
mhrso.
I
really
appreciate
the
city,
allocating
the
funds
to
get
the
mhr
rso
started
on
a
good
foot.
I've
been
lucky
enough
to
see
the
great
work
that
the
rhc
staff
have
done
both
before
and
during
the
pandemic,
and
I'm
very
excited
to
see
what
they
can
accomplish
with
more
hands
and
appropriate
funding.
AF
I
would
like
to
note
that,
even
with
the
292
000
loan,
assuming
it
had
to
be
paid
off
in
the
first
year,
that
only
results
in
a
per
unit
fee
of
around
21
a
month,
which
is
one
percent
of
the
rent
for
homeowners,
who
recently
moved
in
santiago
villa
so
not
not
huge,
I'm
also
very
much
in
favor
of
making
a
nice
dark
again.
One
of
the
microsoft
buildings
by
the
stevens
creek
trailhead
at
la
venita
is
blindingly
bright
at
night
and
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
see
the
stars
again.
Thanks.
A
H
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
can
clarify
the
timing
of
when
the
road
map
which
we
also
call
the
work
plan
when
that
is
coming
back
to
council.
So
it
will
come
back
to
you
all
in
june
of
this
year
as
part
of
the
recommended
budget,
and
then
you
all
will
review
it
again
at
the
one
year
mark
after
adoption,
which
would
be
next
february-
actually
sorry,
the
one
year
after
this
month,
so
next
february
of
23.
H
A
E
Thank
you
mayor.
My
question
was
similar
to
that.
I
guess
I
thought
that
next
year
we
would
be
doing
our
next
two-year
cycle
of
council
goals.
So
you
know
there
are
several
items,
including
the
ones
that
were
brought
up
during
public
comment
and
just
trying
to
figure
out
the
timing
of
that.
You
know
my
inclination
was
to
just
finish
out
the
this
year
and
this
year's
list,
and
then,
when
we
have
the
new
console,
I
guess
you
can
the
new
two-year
cycle
next
year.
We
can
create
a
new
list.
H
Councilmember
abikoga,
that
is
accurate,
so
next
february
we
would
do
the
check-in
of
how
the
last
work
plan
went.
So
you
will
know,
what's
been
accomplished,
if
there's
things
that
are
still
in
progress
that
you
all
want
to
continue
into
the
next
work
plan.
So
this
was
a
two-year
cycle
that
that
you
adopted,
and
so
as
mr
takahashi
mentioned,
75
of
the
items
on
your
plan
are
underway
right
now.
Attachment
three
to
the
council
report
gives
a
status
update
on
all
of
those
items.
E
H
E
So,
in
light
of
that,
are
we
just
doing
questions
right
now
here?
Are
we
making
comments?
Oh
you
can
make
comments
now.
Okay,
thank
you.
So,
in
light
of
that-
and
I
I
my
inclination
has
always
been
to
try
to
just
finish
up
out
the
as
many
projects
as
we
have
currently
before,
adding
more
and
especially
given
our
staff
workload
issues,
I
you
know
I
would
like
I'm
interested
in
the
lighting
policy.
E
I
know
we're
talking
about
gun
safety
later
tonight,
but
there
are
some
other
other
gun
safety
items
that
I'm
interested
in,
but
I
think
I
I'll
just
plan
on
bringing
that
up
next
year
when
we
start
the
new
two-year
cycle
and
hopefully
by
then
some
of
these
current
projects
will
be
cleared
out
and
will
be,
will
have
the
capacity
to
add
new
ones.
Thank
you.
O
So
so
then
I
was
talking
to
some
people
today
and
it
came
up
that
it
really
was
our
work
plan.
But
but
with
that
in
mind,
I
I
was
looking
at
it
in
terms
of
looking
at
this
list.
What
are
the
things
that
the
city's
you
know
doing
in
these
categories
that
I
know
about,
and
are
they
all
on
this
list,
and
there
was
one
that
definitely
wasn't,
and
and
are
there
some
things
on
there
that
I
think
you
know?
O
O
O
You
know
blowing
our
horn
about
it's
it's
a
big
deal,
so
I
was
going
to
sort
of
suggest
that
we
add
that
as
4.6,
if
that
doesn't
really
bring
up
any
more
work
for
staff,
that's
one
thing
I
would
I
wanted
to
to
comment
on
and
I
was
going
to
offer
too.
If
I
mean
I
wonder
too,
do
other
council
members
have
you
thought
of
things
that
we're
we're
working
on
that
that
really
are
in
these
categories
and
we're
not
you
know
we're
not
blowing
our
horn
about
that's.
We
should
be
doing
that
then.
O
The
other
thing
I
I
was
I
I
thought
about
was
7.6,
which
is
the
you
know,
the
tio,
the
idea
of
bringing
a
tot
measure
on
the
putting
that
on
the
ballot
in
the
fall,
and
I
think,
given
the
code
recovery
and
the
the
heavy
workload
of
our
staff.
Perhaps
this
is
not
good
timing,
so
I
would
suggest
that
we
we
consider
removing
that.
O
I
Thanks
so
I'm
also
interested
in
the
dark
skies
ordinance,
I
was
actually
hoping
there
was
a
way
to
get
it
on
the
work
plan.
Sooner
than
this
time.
Next
year
I
was
hoping
staff
could
maybe
come
back
and
say
you
know,
here's
what
would
have
to
be
removed
or
traded
off
for
a
while
to
do
that,
and
maybe
we
get
an
update
in
june
from
staff
on
the
implications
of
prioritizing
that
that
actually
would
be
my
preference
rather
than
waiting
until
february
of
2023
to
prioritize
it.
I
Councilmember
showalter,
you
brought
up
an
interesting
topic
that
I've
had
a
discussion
about
with
the
city
manager,
and
that
is
what
really
goes
on
this
list
versus
what
doesn't
go
on
this
list,
and
you
know
I
think,
we've
done
different
things
over
the
years
that
I've
been
on
council.
But
you
know
where.
Where
do
you
say
something
goes
on
the
list?
If
it's
a
project
that
you
know,
staff
is
working
on
that
wasn't
necessarily
something
council
brought
up
as
a
project.
We
want
staff
to
work
on.
I
You
know
we
could
really
fill
up,
probably
20
pages
of
projects.
The
staff
is
working
on
that
are
things
that
you
know,
we've
prioritized
and
funded
and
we
think
are
important,
but
they
weren't
necessarily
part
of
the
discussion
we
had
when
we
talked
about
our
goals
and
the
projects
to
support
those
goals.
So
I
don't
know
I
sort
of
have
mixed
feelings
about
what's
on
this
list
and
what
isn't
I
think,
it's
kind
of
hard
for
it
to
be
a
mixed
list,
because
you
know
things
that
are
prioritized
by
the
council.
I
You
know
special
projects
that
we
want
staff
to
work
on.
I
feel
like
it's
easier
for
me
to
make
trade-offs
between
those
than
it
is
something
that
staff
is
working
on
that
wasn't
mentioned
as
part
of
our
work
plan
when
we
put
it
together.
So
I
don't
know
have
definitely
mixed
feelings
about
how
we
approach
that
that
doesn't
mean.
We
can't
talk
about
the
great
things
we're
doing
that
are
not
on
this
work
plan,
and
we
absolutely
should
maybe
there's
just
a
different
forum
for
that.
I
I
do
have
one
request
when
it
comes
to
the
budget
as
opposed
to
the
work
plan,
and
that
is
I
I
feel
that
it
would
be
a
good
idea
to
take
a
look
at
establishing
a
reserve
for
the
public
safety
building,
and
I
know
that
in
the
past
the
council
has
provided
direction.
I
think
that
was
before
my
time
that
we
would
use
the
revenue
stream
from
the
aims
well
project
to
fund
public
safety
building.
AC
Yes,
thank
you
manager,
mccarthy,
so,
with
respect
to
the
public
safety
building,
you
are
correct.
The
council
did
decide
and
that
was
effective
around
2018
with
the
ames,
well
development
property
to
essentially
commit
the
revenues
and
the
future
revenues
that
would
be
generated
from
that
that
project
that
property
for
funding
the
public
safety
admin
building
now
back
at
that
time
the
estimate
was
much
smaller
and
so
the
revenues
would
conceivably
cover
a
good
portion
of
the
cost
of
that
building.
AC
A
budget
contingency
reserve
which
council
approved
and
which
we
still
have
has
about
11.8
million
dollars
in
it
currently,
and
it's
funded
from
the
rent
rental
income,
as
well
as
property
tax
and
other
revenue
sources,
generated
off
that
property.
So
this
current
year,
there's
about
2.1
million
dollars
that
is
expected
to
be
deposited
in
in
there,
and
so
it's
certainly
within
council's
prerogative
to
you,
know,
move
and
allocate
and
earmark
funds
and
reserves
as
it
as
it
wishes,
so
that
11.8
million
dollars
is
in
the
budget.
AC
Contingency
reserve,
which
can
be
used
for
you,
know
currently
a
wide
variety
of
things,
as
well
as
limited
period,
funds
for
needed
expenditures,
and-
and
so
that's
where
that
that
dollar
is
now,
you
know,
you're
right
rates,
interest
rates
have
been
rising
or
increasing,
and
so
potentially
the
longer
we
put
off.
You
know
issuing
that
debt
and
moving
forward.
The
cost
of
of
of
issuing
long-term
debt
will
now
begin
to
increase,
and
so
that
is
something
that
certainly
needs
to
be
taken
into
consideration.
AC
At
the
same
time,
setting
aside
this
money
specifically
for
the
public
safety
admin
building
as
a
way
to
start
building
up
reserve
money,
and
that
would
then
potentially
reduce
the
amount
of
money
needed
to
issue
debt
later,
so
it
is
kind
of
a
trade
off,
and
it
really
you
know
what
council
feels
is
in
the
best
interest.
Overall,
you
know-
and
it
really,
I
think
can
be
argued
either
way,
but
certainly
if
you
want
to
earmark
more
money
now
for
that
particular
purpose.
I
A
I
Right
so
when
we
look
at
the
budget-
for
I
I
mean
I'm
assuming,
we
would
start
this
in
the
next
fiscal
year,
and
so
I
would
look
to
staff
to
come
back
with.
Well
here's
one
approach
we
could
do
starting
next
year
when
we
talk
about
next
year's
budget,
as
opposed
to
tonight
that
we're
not
really
focused
on
next
year's
budget.
A
Okay,
so
just
this
is
merely
to
request
some
additional
information
from
staff
when
we
begin
the
budget
process
in
a
few
months.
So
let's
raise
hands
if
you're
interested
in
directing
staff.
So
I
I'm
counting
four
votes.
Five
left,
six.
Okay,
so
that's
a
strong
majority,
so
staff
will
provide
some
additional
information
down
the
road
anything
else.
Council
number
management,
just
one.
I
R
R
I
M
So
I'm
basically
agreeing
with
a
lot
of
the
comments
that
council
members
have
made
about
work
plan
items.
I
would
you
know
so
I
agree
with
people
who
are
saying
I'd,
like
a
lighting
ordinance
of
some
time
at
some
time
whenever
that
can
best
fit
in
and
also
to
take
off
the
t.o.t
tax
and
add
refinancing
shoreline
seems
maybe
like
a
doing.
The
tot
tax
later
would
be
better
timing.
M
In
addition,
I'm
I'm
also
thinking
there
may
be
some
work
plan
items
that
come
out
of
our
work
on
the
the
housing
element.
I
have
talked
to
people
about
some
of
the
discussion
that
the
epc
had
around
housing
element.
You
know,
sites
that
would
be
put
on
and
maybe
some
some
either
working
around
precise
plans,
or
maybe
I'll
just
say,
more
precise
planning
around
some
of
those
sites
that
might
be
put
on,
such
as
village
centers
and
outdated
shopping
districts
that
might
be
put
on
as
sites.
M
So
I'm
wondering
I'm
thinking
this
is
because
we
haven't
had
those
discussions.
This
is
not
the
time
to
put
those
work
plan
items
on
maybe
in
the
six-month
check-in
would
be
the
time,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
to
handle
those
items
and-
and
one
that
comes
to
mind
for
me
that
may
come
out
of
that
is
one
we've
been
talking
about,
which
is
the
moffat
precise
plan.
M
You
know,
I
think
that
that's
something
that
may
not
be
able
to
continually
put
off,
or
else
we
get
into
the
kinds
of
discussions
we
did
around
555,
where
people
feel
that
what's
being
developed,
doesn't
really
it
doesn't
really
fit
into
the
community.
Well,
I'm
hope,
I'm
thinking
that
we
can't
put
some
of
this
kind
of
precise
planning
off
too
long
or
we
get
we
get.
Developments
that
are
are
time
consuming
and
don't
really
serve
the
neighborhood
as
well
as
they
otherwise
could,
but
maybe
the
six
month
point
after
we've
had
the
housing
element.
M
M
P
H
Thank
you,
council
member
show
walter,
so
we
do
have
the
housing
element
as
one
of
the
work
plan
or
strategic
roadmap
same
thing.
We
have
it
as
one
of
the
items
it's
number
2.8,
so
we'll
be
working
on
that
throughout
the
course
of
this
calendar
year
and
we're
required
pursuant
to
the
state
to
have
that
adopted
by
december
of
this
year.
So
you
all
will
be
taking
a
stab
at
your
next
work
plan
or
strategic
roadmap
in
february
of
23..
H
O
Well,
not
really,
I
mean
I
guess
I
just
want
to
say
that
the
housing
element
from
a
planning
point
of
view
is,
is
really
a
a
huge
deal.
I
mean,
we
all
know
that,
and
so
it
would
be
odd
if
things
didn't
come
out
of
it
that
we
need
to
work
on,
I
mean
we
can
expect
that
to
happen.
So
that's
why
you
know
when
I
looked
at
this
continued
work
on
the
housing
element,
I
I
just
didn't.
O
N
A
Thank
you
to
just
as
a
reminder.
This
is
not
a
study
session,
so
a
motion
will
be
necessary
at
some
point
to
to
approve
the
staff
recommendations
or
any
modifications,
and
I
would
recommend,
including
within
the
motion,
if
there
are
suggestions
for
modifications
to
the
strategic
roadmap,
probably
the
best
way
to
approach
it
and
I'll
defer
to
staff
on
this.
But
I'm
I
feel
like
we
don't
have
enough
information
right
now
to
make
specific
adjustments
to
take
out
one
item
and
put
in
a
new
item
because
they
may
not
actually
be
they
might.
A
H
Thank
you.
So
I
do
need
clarity
on
one
item
that
I
heard
just
because
of
the
timing
implications
of
it.
I
think
your
suggestion
to
have
staff
come
back.
We
can
certainly
wrap
that
up
with
the
next
update
that
will
come
to
you
with
the
recommended
budget
in
june,
but
I'm
hearing
some
interest
in
the
tot.
H
I've
heard
it
from
a
few
council
members,
so
I
do
need
to
know
that,
prior
to
june,
where
council
wants
to
head
just
because
of
the
timing
of
any
potential
revenue
measure,
we
would
need
to
move
on
that
well
before
june.
So
I
do
need
direction
from
council
as
to
what
the
majority
wants
to
do.
With
that
item.
A
Thank
you.
So
that's
the
motion
to
approve
the
staff
recommendation
with
the
modification
to
replace
the
tot
work
plan
item
with
the
shoreline
refinancing
and
then
to
return
for
staff
to
return
to
council
with
information
about.
If
we
wanted
to
add
in
a
new
item,
which
is
the
lighting
ordinance,
what
trade-offs
may
have
to
be
made?
Is
that
a
fair
summary
of
emotion?
J
Thank
you,
I'm
happy
to
second,
the
motion
and
just
wanted
to
add.
The
only
other
thing
I
want
to
add
is
my
support
to,
hopefully
fingers
crossed
being
able
to
stay
on
track
with
our
community
workforce
agreement
coming
back
in
q2.
I
know
that
a
couple
people
mentioned
that
so
I
just
wanted
to
add
my
support
to
that
as
well.
Thank.
AG
I
D
A
E
Thank
you
mayor,
so
I
guess
I
just
a
comment
on
the
tot
tax
measure.
I
I
I
probably
won't
vote
no
just
because
of
that
item,
but
I
guess
I
wanted
to
make
one
last
effort
to
try
to
convince
my
colleagues
to
move
forward
with
that
because
as
much,
I
appreciate
the
the
shoreline
bond
refinancing
item
but,
to
you
know
remind
folks
that
goes
to
the
shoreline
fund
and
the
tot
tax
would
come
to
our
general
fund,
and
I
guess
I
was
even
thinking
about
the
police
building.
E
I
might
I
believe,
if,
whenever
generate
view,
gen,
whatever
revenue
generated
from
a
tot
tax
could
potentially
go
to
funding
that
that
project
or
the
bigger
the
more
the
item
that
initially
brought
this
to
mind,
was
all
of
our
sustainability
projects
that
we
have
in
queue,
and
I
guess
I
wanted
to
ask
the
city
manager
if
we
do
delay
going
out
for
tot
for
two
more
years.
What
will
that
do
to
our
ability
to
fund
sustainability,
our
system,
our
ambitious
sustainability
action
plan.
H
Thank
you,
council,
member
abbey
koga.
I
may
need
some
help
from
mr
takahashi
here,
but
we
have
set
aside
funding
to
fund
positions
for
at
least
I
believe
three
years
and
then
for
the
ongoing
funding.
That
is
exactly
what
you're
referring
to,
which
is
where
the
tot
would
help
supplement
the
ongoing
funding.
We
do
have
enough
funding
to
get
us
through.
I
would
also
add
that
there
are
a
few
of
those
positions
that
are
vacant
either
we
have
been
unable
to
fill
them
or
we
have
not
yet
gone
out
to
recruit
for
them.
AC
So
when
the
council
approved
the
sustainability
plan,
I
think
that
was
seems
almost
three
years
ago.
Two
three
years
ago,
we
did
include
is
about
seven
seven
point,
five
million
dollars
and
we
did
set
aside
that
money
in
in
capital
project
for
providing
that
period
of
time.
At
that
time
the
plan
was
to
look
for
and
try
to
secure
funding
beyond
that
for
ongoing.
AC
So
you
know
the
good
thing
is,
as
you
saw
in
the
mid-year
update.
You
know
our
projected
revenues
now
we're
cut
that
we're
coming
out
pandemic
look
a
little
bit
better
and
we
believe,
unfortunately,
because
it's
been
difficult
to
hire
people
right
away,
that
it
has
been
taking
time
and
that
we
believe
we
can,
over
the
period
of
time
kind
of
ease
into
funding
those
positions.
P
Thank
you
mayor.
Well,
I
was
really
struck
in
the
report.
How
how
low
the
amount
was
that
we
were
getting
from
the
tot,
and
I
think
part
of
that
is
just
the
pandemic
and
the
local
economics
and
how
little
hotel
rooms
are
going
for
right
now,
but
part
of
it
is
also
the
fact
that
we
have
the
lowest
t.o.t
around.
AC
Yeah,
thank
you
councilmember.
If
I
can
respond
to
that.
So
actually,
despite
the
you
know,
the
beginning
of
interest
rates
starting
to
to
increase,
there's
still
a
pretty
significant
amount
of
savings
to
be
had
from
doing
a
refunding,
and
so
we
anticipate
even
where
we
are
in
today's
current
environment,
that
we
could
still
realize
over
six
million
dollars
in
that
present
value
savings
over
the
remaining
life,
which
is
about,
let's
see
that
the
bonds
mature
around
2041.
AC
AC
Our
bonds
did
become
fully
callable
just
this
past
august,
and
so
you
know
that
was
about
the
time
I
think
when
we
were
looking
to
the
question
came
up,
should
we
be
refunding
so
that
was
sort
of
a
coincidentally
good
time
to
do
that
staff
does
monitor
sort
of
the
interest
rate
cycle
rates
have
been
low
for
a
number
of
years.
Now,
as
you
know,
and
and
just
just
recently
and
now
starting
to
go
up,
and
so
we
do
try
to
keep
on
top
of
that
as
much
as
we
can
for
the
future.
AC
But
I
would
say
this
is
still
a
good
time,
because
now
we
can
go
ahead
and
move
forward.
You
know
we
think
we
could
probably
start
it
into
the
second
quarter.
So
that
would
be
probably
in
the
next
two
to
three
months
and
it
would
probably
take
three
to
four
months
depending
upon
the
number
of
variables
to
make
to
close,
but
I
think
we
can
still
catch
a
very
significant
amount
of
real
life
savings
for
the
shoreline
community.
P
Well
mayor,
you
know,
given
that
information
I'd
like
to
maybe
put
the
emphasis
on
the
refi
of
the
bonds,
and-
and
you
know
given
that
this
isn't
a
the
greatest
election
ever
to
have
t.o.t
out
there
on
the
ballot,
and
I
think
that,
even
though
we
might
be
limited
in
the
uses
of
the
money,
it
just
really
increases
confidence
of
the
public
that
were
were
making
every
effort
to
get
them.
The
best
deal
possible
to
keep
money
in
our
pockets
and-
and
I
think
that's
always
a
a
good
thing.
A
D
D
C
A
D
AH
Thank
you
and
good
evening
marin,
city,
council
members,
I'm
kimberly
thomas
assistant
to
the
city
manager,
along
with
the
gbi
staff
team
of
john
lang,
our
economic
vitality
manager
and
harsha
ramshandani,
the
management
analyst
in
the
city
manager's
office.
We
are
pleased
to
be
here
with
you
this
evening
to
provide
you
with
the
final
recommendations
for
the
city's
guaranteed
basic
income
pilot
program,
which
is
now
named
elevate,
mv.
AH
The
purpose
of
this
report
is
for
the
city
council
to
adopt
the
guaranteed
basic
income
pilot
program.
This
report
includes
updates
and
incorporates
feedback
from
the
time
the
council
considered
this
in
study
session
on
september,
28th
of
2021
we'll
provide
a
very
brief
background.
The
pilot
program
overall
design
research
areas
benefits
of
the
research
component,
as
well
as
the
refined
recommendations
associated
with
implementation
actors,
budget
and
term.
AH
AH
In
addition
to
conducting
extensive
outreach
before
the
program
launches,
as
there
is
a
brief
time
frame
for
an
application
window
and
to
onboard
and
verify
the
program,
participants,
participants
that
are
randomized,
importantly
for
the
pilot
program,
the
actions
prior
to
giving
cash
payments
are
some
of
the
most
staff.
Intense
and
you'll,
see
that
reflected
in
the
timeline.
AH
In
particular,
a
robust,
widespread
spread
and
accessible
messaging
campaign
well
in
advance
of
the
application
window
is
vital
and
essential.
Doing
so,
allows
eligible
members
of
our
extremely
low
income
community
to
make
plans
to
apply
and
for
the
staff
team
to
provide
appropriate
support
to
ensure
there
is
accessibility
to
the
application
for
the
community.
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
But
what
is
important
to
highlight
are
the
three
core
criteria
in
the
first
box
shown
on
the
screen,
which
is
for
current
residents
of
mountain
view
that
maintain
that
residency
earning
at
or
below,
30
percent
of
ami
are
extremely
low
income
or
eli
community
and,
very
importantly,
having
a
child
or
custodial
caregiving
for
a
child
under
the
age
of
18.
At
the
time
of
application,
next
slide,
harsha.
AH
The
anticipated
outcomes
of
the
project
that
will
include
a
randomized
controlled
trial,
a
survey
conducted
by
the
recommended
partner,
the
center
for
guaranteed
income
research
at
the
university
of
pennsylvania,
will
endeavor
to
understand
the
effects
of
providing
an
unconditional
guaranteed
income
of
what
a
500
per
month.
The
course
survey
includes
key
measures
to
see
the
impact
of
these
regular
cash
payments.
AH
There's
a
lot
of
information.
That's
out
there
on
some
early
studies
that
are
coming
out
of
the
child
care
tax
credit
that
is
showing
significant
alleviation
of
poverty
for
these
first
six
months
of
the
biden,
child
care,
tax
credit
that
was
just
a
little
less
than
300
a
month
for
six
months.
So
already
data
is
being
shared
on
that
major
federal
venture
to
discuss
this
and
other
issues.
Further.
I'd
like
to
hand
the
presentation
to
john
lang,
economic
vitality
manager,
to
discuss
more
about
the
research
design
and
anticipated
outcomes
of
the
pilot.
John.
AH
AI
AI
While
the
program
will
serve
166
participants
as
kimberly
outlined,
the
randomized
control
trial
will
survey
110
participants
of
the
166
as
the
treatment
group,
as
well
as
132
non-participants
as
they
control
those.
So
these
are
the
participants
that
applied
to
the
program
but
were
not
selected
through
the
randomization
process.
AI
The
treatment
and
control
groups
will
be
surveyed
every
six
months,
beginning
with
the
core
survey
at
the
time
of
application
concluding
six
months
after
the
pilot
has
ended.
In
addition,
in-depth
interviews
of
30
of
the
participants
would
be
conducted
by
a
research.
Fellow,
the
yellow
square
represents
the
community
services
agency
or
csa
csa
and
is
going
to
be
our
program
implementation
partner.
With
the
support
of
the
ymca.
AI
AI
In
addition
to
the
core
survey
that's
being
proposed,
the
city
of
mountain
view
has
the
opportunity
to
add
supplemental
research
screens
to
better
understand
our
community.
The
city
is
proposing
two
supplemental
research
screens
for
additional
data
collection,
addressing
the
topics
of
the
digital
divide
and
housing
stability.
AI
These
topics
were
chosen
because
of
their
alignment
with
the
mountain
view,
strategic
roadmap
action
plan,
as
well
as
allow
us
to
capture
additional
information
that
we
don't
get
through
normal
census.
Tracking
cgir
will
be
providing
a
final
report
of
all
findings
from
the
elevate
mv
pilot
12
months
after
the
final
collection
round,
which
occurs
six
months
after
the
final
disbursement.
AI
AI
AI
The
survey
model
is
being
used
across
the
nation
will
enable
comparisons
and
outcomes
with
the
contextual
lens
of
basic
incomes
amount
populations
serve,
etc.
So
we
provide
a
unique
opportunity
from
the
mountain
view,
experience
and
finally,
the
research
partner
is
responsible
for
coordinating
all
the
application
data
collection,
randomization
of
particip
participants,
both
in
the
treatment
and
control
groups
and
then
surveying
the
participants.
Every
six
months.
AH
Thank
you,
john.
As
shown
on
screen
here
and
discussed
at
the
study
session
with
the
council
in
september.
The
complexity
in
establishing
and
operating
a
gbi
program
requires
considerations
that
go
above
and
beyond
a
typical
financial
assistance
program,
such
as
the
emergency
assistance
that
we've
provided
during
covid
program.
Implementation
includes
key
partners
to
accomplish
the
various
tasks
of
launching
and
running
a
successful
pilot.
AH
Each
of
the
partners
that
are
shown
on
screen
with
associated
costs,
including
csa
community
financial
resources
and
the
center
for
guaranteed
income,
research
or
cgir,
brings
unique
expertise
and
resources
to
ensure
the
success
of
the
pilot.
Each
of
the
costs
are
shown
here
and
I
will
call
out
one
key
element
in
that.
AH
The
largest
unfunded
costs
associated
with
this
project
are
actually
programmatic,
related
and
staffing
related,
the
bulk
of
that
being
provided
through
the
facilitation
with
csa,
and
then
the
next
largest
amount
is
for
the
research
component,
which
is
with
a
cgir,
an
update
from
the
staff
report
for
your
reference
as
well.
We
had
noted
we
would
provide
information
about
csa's
board
consideration
of
this
item
at
their
last
week's
board
meeting
on
thursday,
and
they
did
a
vote
put
in
approval
on
this
project
and
so
later
on.
AH
AH
There
are
five
recommendations
before
the
council
tonight
for
the
city
council
to
provide
authorization
for
the
unfunded
budget.
The
contract
authority
and
program
approval
shown
on
screen
here
are
items
one
through
two
for
the
adoption
of
the
envy
pilot
and
shown
on
the
next
screen
are
items
three
through
five.
AH
AH
In
addition,
it
goes
without
saying,
but
we'd
like
to
do
a
shout
out
to
the
community
that
also
provided
us
feedback
through
the
cbo's
that
our
human
services
division
meets
with
monthly.
We
previewed
some
of
the
ideas
associated
with
this
project,
as
well
as
with
the
solidarity
fund
for
the
city
of
mountain
view.
Their
feedback
has
really
been
helpful.
AH
This
concludes
staff's
report
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
answer
any
questions
along
with
john
and
harsha.
In
addition,
we
also
have
partners
joining
us
that
are
available
for
questions
and
can
be
brought
over
to
the
panel
as
needed.
This
includes
the
following
tom
meyers
executive,
director
of
the
community
services
agency,
brandi
joe
tamanti.
She
is
the
director
of
client
programs
for
the
community
services
agency
cameron
burns.
AH
He
is
the
deputy
director
for
the
mayors
for
a
guaranteed
income,
dr
catherine
sagat.
She
is
the
research
and
program
officer
for
mayors
for
a
guaranteed
income
initiative
and
sending
her
regrets
is
aaron
koltera.
She
is
the
associate
director
for
the
center
for
guaranteed
income
at
upenn
due
to
eastern
standard
time.
She
is
unavailable
to
join
us
this
evening.
I
thank
you
and
we
are
available
for.
A
M
M
Some
of
the
answers
I
got
from
staff
is,
we
would
be
advocating
for
basic
income
at
the
local
state
and
national
level,
and
so
I'm
particularly
interested
in
that,
whether
you
think
basic
income
programs
are
better
run
at
all
levels
or
at
a
particular
level
level,
for
example
at
the
city
level,
the
state
level
or
the
national
level.
That
was
a
bunch
of
questions.
If
you
don't
remember
all
of
them,
I
can
come
back
to.
AJ
Mgi's
north
star
and
most
of
our
colleagues
are
aligned
with
the
notion
that
the
federal
guarant
the
federal
government
has
to
step
in
and
adopt
a
federal
guaranteed
income
policy,
the
cities
and
the
states,
notably,
I
think
new
mexico
and
obviously
the
state
of
california,
with
a
35
million
dollar
program,
have
stepped
into
kind
of
the
gap
to
kind
of
lead
the
way
in
terms
of
this
policy
innovation.
What?
In
addition,
the
golden
state
stimulus
which
is
a
one-time
cash
program?
AJ
AJ
That
is
why
we
have
30
plus
pilots
running
under
our
purview
with
our
partners
at
the
center
for
guaranteed
income
research,
so
that
when
we
do
put
forward
a
policy
and-
and
you
know
briefing
after
briefing
that
we're
doing
so
in
an
in
an
informed
way,
that
does
no
harm.
I
know
there
were
a
few
other
questions,
so
let
me
know
what
I
missed.
M
AJ
Perfect
yeah
and
you
know,
opportunities
like
the
us
conference
of
mayors.
Last
year
we
worked
with
them
to
adopt
a
resolution
as
part
of
their
kind
of
2020
presidential
platform.
They
called
on
candidates
to
support
a
guaranteed
income
policy,
the
national
league
of
cities
and
a
few
other
national
organizations.
Results
for
america
are
kind
of
following
in
suit
to
use
this
as
a
best
practice.
AJ
So
it's
it's
kind
of
you
know
creating
that
buzz
moving
moving
forward
the
conversation
in
terms
of
the
national
identity,
identity
of
a
guaranteed
income,
as
you
well
know
a
year
or
two
ago,
it
was
kind
of
unheard
of
that
the
u.s
government
would
hand
cash
over
to
its
residents.
That
paradigm
has
very
much
shifted,
so
yeah
seeking
formal
opportunities
with
with
partners
at
the
national
scale,
with
with
folks
at
the
in
the
state
legislature
with
governor
newsom.
AJ
M
And
so
maybe
this
is
my
last
question.
You
know
when
I
look
at
what
I've
read
articles
about
advocates
for
gbi
or
ubi.
They
they
fall
into
several
camps,
but
one
of
the
camps
is
one
I'm
not
particularly
supportive
of,
and
that's
that's
the
camp
that
says
that
people
are
ashamed
to
receive
subsidies
for
things
like
healthcare
or
housing.
They
prefer
to
receive
cash,
and
it's
kind
of,
I
wouldn't
say
a
libertarian
perspective,
but
it's
more
that
we
should
just
be.
M
We
should
not
be
giving
specific
benefits,
we
should
only
be
giving
people
cash
and
we
should
be
doing
away
with
things
like
health
care
and
snap
and
and
other
benefit
and
child
care
benefits
and
just
be
giving
out
cash.
I've
read
several
articles
like
that,
and
often
the
proponents
of
this
particular
perspective,
don't
frankly
want
to
give
out
very
much
cash,
probably
less
than
you
would
be
getting
from
other
benefits.
AJ
Right,
yes,
and
I'm
probably
the
not
the
best
person
to
speak
to
the
just
multi-layered
big,
tent
kind
of
movement
that
is
moving
forward
in
the
in
the
cash
space
mgi's
perspective
is
very
much.
Cash
is
in
addition
to
the
current
social
safety
net.
If
you
saw
you
know
the
federal
government's
response
to
the
pandemic,
it
was
based.
It
was
predicated
upon
social,
social
security,
unemployment
insurance,
which
was
like
you
know,
innovated
85
years
ago.
AJ
So
we
know
that
the
social
safety
net
does
not
work
as
well
as
it
should
has
to
be
reinforced
and
strengthened,
and
we
see
cash
as
a
component
on
top
of
around
and
supporting
all
of
that.
So
when
folks
look
to
cash
out
the
social
safety
net,
that
is
not
at
all.
What
we
advocate
for,
I
think,
like
50
years
ago,
in
the
federal
government
actually
supported
by
you,
know
milton
friedman
and
then
president
nixon.
AJ
There
was
a
movement
that
libertarian
movement
to
push
forward
the
cashing
out
of
the
social
safety
net,
for
I
think
at
the
time,
like
a
fifteen
hundred
dollar
per
month,
check
for
families,
specifically
families-
and
that
was
I
was
not
passed
because,
of
course
it
was
not
enough
and
folks
families
actually
would
lose
ground.
So
yeah
long
way
of
saying
mgi
does
not
support
that
view,
but
some
folks
certainly
do.
M
And
then
I
guess
my
last
question
is
I'm
sorry.
I
said
the
last
one
was
my
last
question,
but
this
is
my
last
question:
are
people
envisioning
this
people
getting
this?
This
benefit
this
guaranteed
income
as
a
one-year
thing
for
one
like
if
I
were
to
get
it
for
one,
would
I
get
it
for
one
year?
If
we
continue
it,
would
I
get
it
for
two
years
or
would
that
be
a
new
person
who
would
get
it
and
that
or
would
it
be
ongoing
or
is
that
to
be
determined.
M
P
Thank
you
mayor.
I
I
had
a
question
in
sort
of
a
similar
vein
from
what
I've
been
able
to
to
glean
from
the
news
we
we
shouldn't
expect
the
same
kind
of
stimulus
next
year
that
we've
received
this
year
and
so
are.
Are
we
prepared
to
have
this?
Be
you
know
the
one
vote?
That's
that's
going
out
is
just
this
12
months
you
know
pending.
AH
As
staff
responding
that
kimberly
thomas
assistant
to
the
city
manager,
the
the
response
to
that
would
be,
you
know
we.
We
need
to
be
clear
about
what
our
existing
funding
resources
are
so
we'll
endeavor
to
do
so,
but
you
know:
should
there
be
a
threshold
or
additional
philanthropic
results
from
our
outreach?
That
could
be
something
that
could
be
considered.
AH
P
AH
I
I
can't
speak
to
each
each
city
and
what
they're
currently
paying
that
would
be
a
pen
communication,
but
I
think
one
thing
cameron
might
be
able
to
shed
some
additional
light
on
that.
We
discussed
in
the
study
session
was
some
of
the
costs
that
were
associated
with
getting
a
gbi
pilot
of
this
nature
that
the
current
pilots
underway
are
built
upon,
which
was
seed
out
of
stockton
and
how
costly
that
venture
was
at
that
time.
AJ
AJ
P
P
AH
P
AH
P
A
A
My
understanding
is
that
the
research
would
not
merely
contribute
to
some
discourse
around
guaranteed
basic
basic
income,
but
also
would
be
used
to
or
could
result
in
material
changes
to
city
operations
and
and
policies.
So
staff
would
take
what
they've
learned
and
make
recommendations
to
the
council
to
change
things
or
come
up
with
new
programs
in
in
response
to
whatever
we're
learning
from
the
community
benefiting
for
the
program.
Is
that
right.
AH
Yes,
mayor
that
that
is
correct
in
terms
of
how
we're
currently
serving
the
extremely
low
income
residents.
It's
a
lot
of
partner
programs
in
conjunction
with
the
county,
but
we
are
anticipating
that
there
will
be
light
shed
on
various
aspects,
including
the
the
details
that
john
highlighted
about
their
individual
lives.
You
know
an
example
could
perhaps
be
in
the
space
of
digital
divide.
A
A
K
As
you
know,
we
have
some
of
the
highest
rates
of
inequality
in
the
country
here
in
the
silicon
valley,
and
people
can
barely
afford
to
pay
the
rent
every
month,
the
one
financial
emergency
away
from
ending
up
on
the
streets.
We
know
this
lack
of
stability
and
long-term
and
long-term
self-sufficiency
plays
a
major
role
and
leaves
people
teetering
on
the
edge
of
losing
their
homes
every
day.
We
believe
that
guaranteed
income
can
play
an
important
role
in
addressing
this
challenge.
AE
The
limits
for
extremely
low
income
in
santa
clara
county
are
for
a
single
person,
are
thirty
four
thousand
eight
hundred
dollars.
I'd
love
to
believe
that
it's
just
clear
enough
that
if
we
gave
people
who
are
working
full
time
just
enough,
even
the
barest
amount
to
get
above
the
extremely
low
income
level,
then
the
it
would
make
some
things
easier
for
them,
but
some
people,
I'm
not
speaking
of
anyone
in
the
council,
I'm
talking
more
about
in
national
dialogue.
AE
Some
people
just
close
their
eyes
to
issues
like
that
and
having
hard
facts
and
hard
data
is
really
important.
As
a
researcher
myself,
I
understand
that
in
intrinsically.
I
feel
like
it's
pretty
clear,
even
without
having
having
done
the
research,
but
it
is
really
important
to
have
that
data
to
be
able
to
convince
people
who,
either
through
bad
faith
or
unwillingness
to
look
at
the
reality
of
the
situation,
are
unwilling
to
accept
things.
So
I
think
that
this
seems
like
a
great
program,
also
mention
in
terms
of
research
costs.
I
I
work
as
an
academic.
AE
It
is
not
a
lucrative
career
path.
You
don't
make
very
much
money
at
all.
I
I
don't
know
what
this
sort
of
research
looks
like
I'm
more
in
the
lab,
but
I'd
imagine
that
the
costs
themselves
are
sort
of
things
that
are
it's
hard
work
from
people
that
are
that
are
not
compensated,
particularly
well
and
at
mountain
view.
We
are
in
a
position
where
we
can
be
a
leader
across
the
country,
and
we
can
have
something
like
this
take
off,
hopefully,
and
maybe
extend
the
the
I
just
want
to
make
one
plug.
AG
The
reason
that
I've
been
here
today
is
to
expose
myself
like,
like
he
was
saying:
I'm
a
low
income
family
so,
like
51
of
the
earning
and
work
that
I
do
it
goes
for
my
rent.
So
I
raised
two
kids
and
I
still
living
in
the
bay
area
because
of
the
school
because
of
the
safety,
and
I
don't
like
to
move
out.
I
think
the
project
that
you
just
talk
about
tonight.
AG
It
is
way
it's
not
only
for
me
because
I
am
almost
25
and
I
can
barely
make
my
payments
and
over
my
arena,
all
my
daily
living,
and
I
cannot
imagine
if
you
are
17,
so
I
just
thinking
a
lot
for
those
people
that
get
under
20
wage.
So
I
just
please
consider
all
those
families
that
they
really
need,
even
I'm
not
on
that
situation,
but
I
still
this
is
a
good
fit
for
all
of
us,
because
we
are
good
families
like
I'm
a
citizen.
I
could
do
something
else,
but
I'm
raising
my
kids.
S
AG
D
AG
A
E
Thank
you
mayor,
and
I
just
want
to
start
off
by
thanking
staff
for
their
incredible
work
on
this.
It's
quite
enormous
what
the
the
tremendous,
what
with
the
work,
the
work
that
you
put
in
it's
actually
beyond
was
beyond
my
expectations,
and
I
just
also
really
really
appreciate
staff's
enthusiasm
in
doing
the
work
and
doing
the
research.
When
we've
met
a
few
times
to
talk
about
this
project
and
during
the
briefing
I
I
really
sense
that
enthusiasm
and
and
maybe
some
excitement
for
trying
something
new.
E
So
I
just
really
want
to
want
to
thank
all
of
you
on
staff
from
the
bottom
of
my
heart
for
the
hard
work
you've
put
into
this
and
for
coming
up
with
a
very
comprehensive
program.
I
you
know
wholeheartedly
support
this,
just
like
with
minimum
wage
when
we
led
the
effort
to
raise
it
and
became
the
first
to
do
so,
it
did
get
us
to
17
and
10
cents.
E
I
you
know,
I
felt
this
was
a
another
way
to
assist
those
most
in
need,
and
you
know
I
appreciate
how
we
came
to
came
about
this
with
supporting
other
programs
too.
I
think
I
know
that
some
of
my
colleagues
might
have
a
little
heartburn
with
the
extra
cost
in
terms
of
administering
and
doing
the
research,
but
I
think
that
actually
the
research
piece
is
key
and
is
what
makes
this
different
from
other
projects
and
programs.
E
E
E
Through
this
pilot
we
can
see
you
know
where
those
challenges
are
and
then
move
forward
and
advocating
for
the
the
right
changes
that
can
make
you
know
assisting
folks
easier
and
more
efficient
and
hopefully,
more
productive.
So
that
was
really
the
point
of
this.
You
know
I
I
feel
very
fortunate
that
we
do.
E
We
are
in
a
situation
where
we
can
do
this
with
the
arpa
funds,
and
you
know
my
hope
is
that
we
will
have
that
discussion
when
the
second
half
of
the
funds
come
come
to
us
later
this
year.
But
with
that
I
actually
like
to
just
I
don't
seem
too
many
other
hands.
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
make
the
motion-
and
I
that
includes,
adopting
a
resolution
of
the
city
council,
the
city
of
mountain
view,
approving
the
guaranteed
basic
income
pilot
program
to
be
read
entitled
only
for
the
reading
waived.
J
J
You
know,
I
think
something
that
you
know
recently
was
released,
was
the
joint
venture,
silicon
valley,
state
of
the
valley,
and
it
found
that
46
of
children
are
living
in
households
that
cannot
sustain
and
meet
any
of
their
basic
needs,
and
what
I've
always
appreciated
about
mountain
view
is
that
we're
always
willing
to
try
something,
and
I
think
the
pandemic
really
highlighted
that
that
we
need
to
find
things
that
work
meet
people
where
they
are.
I've
talked
about
that
before
and
you
know.
J
I
think
that
this
pilot
with
the
research
component
will
help
us
gather
that
data
to
see
if
something
that
we're
trying
works.
You
know
that
the
pilot
is
for
a
fixed
amount
of
time,
most
gbi
programs
only
last
one
to
two
years.
So
I
think
this
is
kind
of
it's
for
a
fixed
amount
of
time
and
with
that
research
we'll
be
able
to,
I
think,
have
what
we
need
to
help
our
residents.
Even
more.
J
We've
heard
about
the
great
need
I
saw
that
tom
was
on
here
earlier,
we've
heard
from
csa
that
everything
is
a
drop
in
the
bucket,
even
though
we've
contributed
millions
of
dollars
right
to
to
helping
people,
and
so
I
you
know,
I
think
that
this
is
something
that
we're
seeing
at
least
moving
the
needle
the
child
incomes.
Tax
credit
has
been
something
that's
been
working
as
well,
and
that's
also,
you
know
a
small
stipend
each
month.
J
A
AH
Yeah,
of
course,
kimberly
thomas
assistant
to
the
city
manager,
responding
to
that.
We
formulated
that
recommendation
in
large
part
from
some
of
the
dialogue
at
the
study
session,
for
it
to
be
for
mountain
view,
residents
through
the
course
of
the
pilot.
There
are
various
ways
that
this
is
handled
within
other
pilots,
so
some
will
have
it
where
it
is
a
requirement,
some
won't.
So
that
is
at
the
discretion
of
direction.
On
behalf
of
the
city
council,.
O
Well,
I
hadn't
really
intended
to
respond
to
that
question,
but
since
it's
been
asked,
I
I
think
that
we
are
trying
to
help
mountain
view
residents.
So
I
think
that's
a
reasonable
requirement,
but
I
did
raise
my
hand
because
I
just
wanted
to
thank
the
staff
for
all
the
work
that
had
been
done
and
I
will
be
supporting
this,
but
no
I
I
do
feel
that
this
is
mountain
view
dollars
and
we
should
be
helping
mountain
view.
Residents
with
this.
AA
I
You
so
the
last
time
we
discussed
this.
I
did
express
some
concerns
about
this
program
and
I
still
have
concerns
and
I
think,
they've
increased.
Since
now
we
are
tapping
into
city
resources
that
go
beyond
the
arpa
funding
city
resources
that
could
be
applied
to
all
kinds
of
other
needs
that
we
have
within
the
city.
I
A
I
feel
the
the
research
is
justified
because
the
results
will
help
inform
local
policy
and
if
we
learn
something
about
how
we
currently
communicate
with
this
population
or
there's
something
that
we
need
to
do
or
focus
on
to
better
address
the
needs
of
extremely
low-income
people
in
our
community,
then
I
think
it's
it's
valuable
information
to
have
so
I
do
feel
is.
It
is
a
justified
expenditure.
C
D
A
A
AK
In
2019,
council
asked
staff
to
evaluate
and
report
on
potential
gun
safety
measures
following
the
devastating
shooting
at
the
gilray
garlic
festival
tonight
before
you
is
an
expansion
on
the
city's
current
gun
safety
regulations.
Following
last
year's
adoption
of
an
ordinance
prohibiting
the
possession
of
firearms
and
city
property.
AK
AK
AK
AK
In
vehicles,
the
ordinance
requires
that
firearms
be
secured
when
left
in
an
unintended
unattended.
Vehicle
firearms
must
be
stored
in
a
locked
container
within
the
trunk
of
a
vehicle
or
in
cases
when
a
vehicle
is
lacking
a
trunk.
It
must
be
stored
in
a
locked
container
that
is
affixed
to
the
vehicle.
AK
Violations
of
the
ordinance
will
be
in
or
can
be
prosecuted
as
a
misdemeanor,
just
like
other
city
code
violations.
Also,
the
police
department
will
not
proactively
contact
people
to
enforce
these
requirements.
Rather,
they'll
have
discretion
to
cite
for
violations
should
they
observe
them
in
the
ordinary
course
of
their
duties.
A
A
AB
Hi,
thank
you.
As
a
doctor,
I
care
deeply
about
reducing
firearm
injury.
I
was
a
primary
care
doc
at
kaiser
for
santa
clara
for
30
years,
and
many
of
my
patients
were
mountain
view
residents
since
retiring
a
few
years
ago,
I
have
devoted
all
of
my
volunteer
efforts
to
learning
about
and
advocating
for
ways
to
reduce
firearm
deaths.
AB
AB
The
problem
is
only
about
35
of
california.
Firearm
owners
store
all
firearms
in
the
safest
manner,
unloaded
and
locked.
By
passing
this
ordinance
and
following
through
with
a
public
education
effort
to
improve
safe
storage,
we
will
be
able
to
save
lives.
Thank
you
for
proceeding
with
this
ordinance
and
I
applaud
your
work.
AM
My
name
is
louis
pandula.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
speak.
Storing
firearms
in
a
securely
locked
container
can
prevent
unintentional
child
deaths
and
teen
gun
suicides
by
as
much
as
85
percent
of
the
eight
of
the
150
school
shootings
since
columbine
having
firearms
securely
stored
would
have
prevented
two-thirds
of
them.
AM
Storing
firearms
in
a
securely
locked
container
can
also
prevent
gun
deaths
from
being
guns
from
being
stolen
in
a
home
robbery,
and
the
fee
can
be
small
to
purchase
a
safe.
A
dog-approved,
safe
storage
device
can
be
obtained
for
as
little
as
40,
so
the
cost
is
not
at
all
prohibitive
and
trigger.
Locks
are
often
given
out
free
by
the
police
stations.
AM
AM
AN
We
can
hear
you.
Okay,
sorry
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
the
the
opportunity
to
speak,
really
quick,
I'm
a
long
time
mountain
view
resident
and
I've
been
a
member
of
the
shooting
community
in
the
south
bay
for
over
40
years
now
I
had
some
prepared
notes,
but
I'm
going
to
have
to
kind
of
telescope
that
one
of
the
things
that
I
noticed
is
not
addressed
in
this
is
the
the
factor
of
defensive
gun
uses.
There
are
multiple
studies
out
there
that
document
over
2
million
in
defensive
gun
uses
per
year.
AN
There
was
in
fact
one
in
a
well-documented
one
in
san
mateo
not
two
weeks
ago,
and
this
doesn't
even
touch
on
that
issue.
There's
also
the
upcoming
new
york
state
rifle
and
pistol
association
court
case
in
front
of
the
supreme
court.
That's
due
to
be
decided
this
spring,
and
I
think
that
would
have
a
substantial
impact
on
this
and
potentially
would
open
up
the
city
to
substantial
litigation
if
the
sovereignties
were
passed
prematurely.
AL
AL
AL
There
isn't
one
ordinance,
obviously
that's
going
to
bring
the
end
of
gun
violence
here
in
our
communities,
however,
storing
firearms
unloaded
locked
will
save
lives.
Please
vote
yes,
allowing
mountain
view
to
be
part
of
the
growing
list
of
cities
in
our
county
with
this
important
ordinance.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
AO
AO
They
have
this
one
commercial
of
a
man
talking
to
to
his
eight
or
nine-year-old
son.
The
kid
says:
dad
can
I
play
with
our
gun
your
dad's
taken
aback?
What
are
you
talking
about?
You
know
they
have
the
gun
on
the
top
shelf
of
your
closet
under
the
sweatshirts,
your
dad
gets
angry.
That's
not
our
gun,
that's
my
gun!
It's
not
a
toy!
I
needed
to
protect
you
and
mom.
AO
AO
AP
AQ
AQ
I'm
here
today
to
urge
you
to
support
the
ordinance
requiring
the
safe
storage
of
firearms
and
residences
and
vehicles.
In
mountain
view,
this
ordinance
has
become
even
more
urgent
than
ever
during
covid,
given
the
dramatic
rise
in
gun
sales
and
during
covid
we've
seen
a
shocking
43
percent
increase
in
unintentional
deaths
of
small
children
and
a
9
increase
in
teen
suicides
as
a
volunteer
with
mom's
demand
action.
AQ
I've
gotten
to
know
a
number
of
parents
who
have
lived
through
the
experience
of
having
a
child
die
in
an
unintentional
shooting
where
another
child
found
an
unsecured
gun
or
the
experience
of
having
a
child
die
by
suicide.
Using
a
gun
found
unsecured
in
their
home.
I
urge
you
to
support
this
ordinance
to
help
prevent
similar
deaths.
Thank
you.
AR
Hi,
my
name
is
kelly
traver
and
I
am
a
retired
physician.
I
can
tell
you
that
these
incidences
of
children
dying
unintentionally,
teenagers,
killing
themselves
with
unsecured
firearms
and
80
percent
of
school
shootings,
actually
are
also
by
unsecured
firearms.
These
are
not
small
numbers.
I
personally
have
taken
care
of
children
brought
in
dead
on
arrival,
teens
brought
in
dead
on
arrival
from
unsecured
firearms.
I
so
appreciate
you
guys
putting
forward
this
ordinance
and
very
much
support
it.
This
is,
without
a
doubt,
something
that
can
save
lives
and
to
the
previous
person.
AR
Who
said
that
you
cannot
protect
your
home,
you
you
absolutely.
Can
it
takes
seconds
to
get
at
your
gun
if
it's
in
a
secured,
locked
container,
I've
tried
it
myself,
and
there
have
been
multiple
studies
on
this,
so
it
does
not
prevent
defending
your
home
in
a
home
invasion
which,
which
is
not
super
common
anyway.
AR
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
just
for
the
benefit
of
the
public.
If
you've
already
spoken,
I
can't
allow
you
to
speak
again,
just
in
the
spirit
of
fairness
to
everybody,
see
no
additional
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
speak.
We
will
return
to
the
council
for
deliberation
and
action,
and
I
will
note
that
a
motion
to
approve
the
recommendation
should
also
include
reading
the
title
of
the
ordinance
attached
to
the
report.
A
E
M
Well,
I
was
intending
to
second
your
motion
that
now
I'm
not
clear
on
whether
you've
made
it
or
not,
but
but
you
know
I'm
just
going
to
add
that
I
lost
a
friend
in
middle
school
to
an
unsafely
stored
gun
and
I
will
be
thinking
of
leo
when
I
vote
for
this.
For
this
motion,
which
I
assume
I'm
seconding
but
but
council
member
abba
koga.
Maybe
you
can
clarify
whether
I'm
seconding
or
maybe
I'm
making
the
motion.
M
A
P
To
become
an
ordinance
in
mountain
view,
I
think
that
our
next
logical
step
is
to
really
address
gun
sales
in
mountain
view
and
our
surrounding
communities
that
limit
the
areas
of
their
cities,
that
that
can
have
gun
sales
and
limit
the
number
of
of
gun
retailers.
That
can
be
there,
as
well
as
supporting
some
of
the
good
legislation
at
the
state
level,
and
I
think
this
just
impacts.
So
many
more
people
in
the
community.
P
Sorry
so
many
more
people
in
the
community,
then
we
can
really
say-
and
I'm
so
thankful
for
the
people
who
came
forward
to
speak
about
this,
and
especially
like
people.
Parents
like
karen
and
lewis
louis,
christina
and
eric
really
continue
to
be
an
inspiration,
and
I
think
we
just
have
to
continue
to
push
on
every
single
front
that
that
we
can
and
it
just
the
alternative
is
unthinkable.
P
E
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor
just
to
clarify.
I
would
like
to
make
the
motion,
and
I
just
want
to
thank
council
member
libra
for
her
comments.
I
agree,
I
think,
there's
more
work
to
be
done.
I
have
been
concerned
about
locations,
especially
when
they're
very
close
to
schools,
so
I
hope
that
we
can
work
on
those
in
the
near.
S
E
But
with
that,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
introduce
an
ordinance
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
adding
article
5
to
chapter
21
of
the
mountain
view,
city
code
relating
to
the
safe
storage
of
firearms
in
residences
and
vehicles
in
the
city
of
mountain
view,
to
be
read
in
title
only
for
the
reading
waived
and
set
second
reading
for
march
8
2022.
Thank
you.
O
Well,
it's
okay,
I'll
just
go
ahead
and
second,
I
think
this
is
an
excellent
move.
We've
just
all
been
devastated
for
many
many
years
with
report
after
report
after
report
of
incidental
shoot
shootings
that
that
that
were
happen
with
unsecured
guns
and
mass
shootings,
and
it's
you
know
it's
really
a
a
a
national
tragedy
and
we've
heard
from
our
national
leaders
about
thoughts
and
prayers.
O
You
know
just
again
and
again
and
again,
and
that's
really
just
so
incredibly
ineffective,
but
keeping
these
guns
out
of
harm's
way
will
will
will
be
effective,
at
least
here
and
that's
what
we
have
control
over.
So
I
am
I'm
really
glad
to
see
that
that
we're
we're
we're.
We've
brought
this
forward
and
I
think
we're
gonna
pass.
A
AK
Certainly,
the
similar
ordinances
have
been
tested
locally
in
our
district
courts
and
at
in
a
fellow
federal
appellate
district,
art
or
federal
appellate
court
in
the
ninth
circuit,
and
they
have
survived
constitutional
challenge.
So
we're
not
concerned
that
they're
that
this
that
our
ordinance
would
not
survive
a
constitutional
challenge.
A
D
A
C
A
A
E
AS
AS
AS
The
project
is
to
construct
a
new
three-story
690
90,
997
square
foot,
commercial
building
with
ground
floor
retail
and
office.
Above
no
on-site
parking
will
be
provided
the
project
utilizes,
an
architectural
style
that
includes
flat
roof,
light
earth
tone,
colors,
a
recessed
storefront
windows
that
create
shade
and
shadow
and
decorative
columns
and
cornices
that
are
compatible
with
the
existing
surrounding
buildings.
AS
AS
Also
prior
meetings
for
this
project,
two
neighborhood
meetings
were
held
for
this
project.
The
applicant
met
with
the
mountain
view
coalition
for
sustainable
planning
where
about
25
people
attended.
The
applicant
also
met
with
the
old
mountain
view,
neighborhood
association,
where
approximately
15
to
20
people
attended.
The
project
project
was
also
reviewed
by
the
development
review
committee
in
may
of
2019,
and
the
project
was
recently
reviewed
by
the
zoning
administrator
on
january.
26
2022
was
it
recommended
for
approval
to
the
city
council.
AS
As
discussed
the
out,
the
applicant
has
held
two
neighborhood
outreach
meetings.
The
project
is
in
keeping
with
the
general
area,
since
there
is
a
three-story
commercial
building
at
745
california
street,
which
is
across
the
street
and
to
the
right
of
the
project.
The
project
is
not
directly
adjacent
to
single-family
residential
homes
across
blossom
lane
is
a
two-story
apartment,
building,
providing
a
transition
to
the
residential
neighborhood
on
hope
street.
AS
The
downtown
precise
plan
allows
projects
to
pay
for
the
parking
parking
fee
for
all
the
required
parking.
The
preside
plan.
The
precise
plan
recognizes
that
most
of
the
lots
are
too
small
to
provide
on-site
parking
and
lieu
fees,
help
to
construct
and
manage
public
parking
facilities
and
the
parking
district.
AS
The
staff
concludes:
the
project
complies
with
the
general
plan.
Zoning,
precise
plan,
golds
and
policy
staff
has
reviewed
the
proposal
and
based
on
this
analysis
and
the
findings
and
conditions
recommends
conditional
approval
this
project.
This
concludes
my
presentation.
The
applicant
is
also
here
to
make
a
few
comments
and
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
AT
So
first,
I
would
like
to
thank
our
planner
margaret
nettle
for
doing
a
great
job
and
also
for
her
guidance
and
advice
to
get
us
to
this
point
tonight,
I'm
here
on
the
in
the
capacity
of
a
small
business
owner
and
also
as
a
property
owner
to
provide
any
answers
and
questions
that
you
may
have
anything
more
technical.
I
believe
my
architect
is
available
also
to
have
answered
more
technical
questions,
and
I
think
I
will
leave
it
at
that
and
I
think
to
answer
also
to
answer
your
question.
A
M
AT
Yes,
I
think
that
was
in
a
part
of
the
recommendations
from
the
drc,
because
if
we
had
left
the
wall
untouched,
then
that
would
have
been
such
a
a
blank
wall.
A
blank
canvas
that
there
were
some
suggestions
to
do
something
to
make
it
stand
out
and
not
leave
it
as
blank
as
it
was
because
there
was
not
any
any
project
or
any
construction
that
was
projected
at
the
neighboring
parcel
in
the
foreseeable
future.
AT
M
Okay,
interesting,
I
haven't
seen
that
before
that
I
remember
in
the
downtown
and
then
my
second
question
is:
do
you
have
ideas
for
the
ground
floor?
Retail
is
your
your
business
is
going
to
be
above
and
there's
going
to
be
different
retail,
or
are
you
going
to
extend
your
business
through
all
three
floors
or
how
will
you,
how
will
you
fill
the
space
or
how
do
you
intend
currently.
AT
Currently,
the
plan
is
to
have
my
business
on
the
third
floor
and
for
the
retail,
through
recommendations
from
staff
and
through
previous
meetings
with
council
members.
I
think
the
recommendation
was
to
have
some
sort
of
retail
that
actually
sells
some
kind
of
product,
and
I
think
there
was
some
products
that
were
that
we
should
recommend
to
stay
away
from,
I
believe,
along
the
lines
of
cannabis
or
anything
of
that
nature.
O
Well,
first,
I
was
very
pleased
to
hear
that
you
are
going
to
continue
to
practice
in
mountain
view,
while
the
construction
construction's
going
on
that's
good.
So
I'm
glad
that's
working
out.
I
just
had
a
question
about
the
tree
or
trees.
I
it
seems
to
me
that
I
read
in
the
report
that
that
there
aren't
necessarily
trees
going
to
be
added
to
the
site
and
yet
in
the
rendering
picture,
there's
this
lovely
tree
in
the
front.
AT
O
A
S
A
P
P
I
don't
know
if
councilmember
matajak
wanted
to
make
a
comment
beforehand,
but
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
that
we
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
mountain
view,
conditionally
approving
a
planned
community
permit
and
development
review
permit
to
construct
a
three-story,
6997
square
foot,
commercial
building
with
ground
floor,
retail
and
office
above
and
finding
the
project
to
be
categorically
exempt.
Pursuant
to
section
15,
303,
new
construction
or
conversion
of
small
structures
of
the
secret
guidelines
at
756
california
streets
be
read
in
title.
Only
further
reading
waived.
E
Thank
you
mayor.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
on
and
thank
the
applicant.
We
did
meet
many
several
times
and
it
was
a
long
time
ago
and
I
just
wanted
to
thank
him
for
hanging
in
there
and
and
his
patience.
You
know,
we've
had
some
challenges,
workload,
staffing,
I
think,
there's
some
miscommunication
that
happened
too,
and
you
know
I
really
wanted
mr
dough
to
or
dr
doe
to
be
able
to
continue
his
business
here.
E
A
D
A
P
P
P
The
second
one
is
a
very
important
bill,
sb
1327
by
senator
hertzberg,
and
this
is
the
bill
that
would
create
a
right
of
private
action
to
help
fight
ghost
guns
and
assault
weapons
in
our
state.
I
know
that
council
is
aware
that
we
have
a
state
level
assault
weapons
ban
that
has
been
worked
on
over
time
and
and
new
assault
weapons
as
they
come
out
have
been
added
to
it.
Unfortunately,
a
district
court
judge
recently
ruled
that
the
state
was
not
able
to
enforce
our
assault
weapons
ban.
H
Thank
you,
councilmember
lieber.
If
everyone
is
in
agreement,
it
sounds
like
that's
aligned
with
where
council
is
headed
with
your
support
of
gun
safety,
and
so
we
can
add
this
to
our
list
and
I'll
talk
with
our
staff
and
figure
out
where
the
bill
is
going
and
what
we
need
to
do
so
I'll.
Just
make
sure
that
we
provide
these
two
bills.
H
P
So
if
we
can
understand
a
little
bit
more
about
how
the
case
management
is
working
out,
how
clients
are
able
to
access
it,
what
they're
finding
when
they
get
to
the
end
of
their
their
tenure
and
what's
what's
being
offered,
I
think
it
would
be
very
helpful
for
us-
and
I
don't
know
from
staff
if
that's
all
that
we
need
to
put
forward
is
just
that
request.
Or
would
we
need
to
take
us
a
straw
poll.
H
O
Well,
I
just
wanted
to
share
a
few
meetings
that
I'd
gone
to.
One
was
in
bcdc
last
week
we
had
a
a
really
interesting
discussion
about
hybrid
meetings,
particularly
for
regional
boards,
that
we
sit
on
and
as
one
of
the
one
of
the
board
members
said,
the
commissioner
said
now
that
the
zoom
genie
has
been
let
out
of
the
bottle.
Are
we
ever
gonna?
Let
it
go
back,
and
so
you
know
right
now
the
the
requirements
are
going
to
be.
That
will
go
back
to
how
the
you
know.
O
The
rules
were
before
the
the
the
the
crisis,
the
coveted
crisis
and-
and
that's
going
to
be.
I
think
I
I
think
that
there's
legislation,
I
understand,
there's
legislation
now
that
may
help
this,
but
but
it
would,
it
would
require.
If
you
were
going
to
have
your
meeting,
you
know
you're
listening
to
your
meeting
from
home.
You
would
you
know
you
would
have
to
publish
the
you
know
the
address
of
that
meeting
in
the
in
the
agenda.
O
O
There's
a
lot
of
efficiencies
by
coming
to
zoom.
So
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up
that.
That's
something
that
you
know
all
of
us
serving
on
regional
boards
are
gonna
have
to
deal
with,
and-
and
I
know
the
city
manager
is
aware
of
it
and
will
help
with
advocacy.
But
if
there
is
a
bill
related
to
this
specifically,
I
would,
I
don't
know
the
number,
but
I
would
like
us
to.
I
would
like
us
to
advocate
for
it.
O
So
I
want
to
mention
wanted
to
mention
that,
and
then
council
member
commae
mentioned
the
the
the
joint
ventures,
silicon
valley,
state
of
the
valley
that
was
held
on
friday
morning.
That
means
that
the
news
2022
silicon
valley
index
is
out,
and
it's
just
an
amazing
compendium
of
you-
know,
information
about
all
sorts
of
trends,
employment
trends,
demographic
trends
in
our
communities,
and
it's
just
really
fascinating.
To
look
at.
I
urge
everybody
to
take
a
look
council.
O
O
Well,
actually
it
is
a
historical
society,
I'll
mention
we
had
a
great
meeting
and
we
learned
a
lot
about
stephen's
creek
and
let
let
maybe
the
mayor
since
I
think
you're
on
the
board
of
the
historical
society
mentioned
what's
coming
up
on
saturday,
no,
not
anymore,
okay.
Well,
anyway.
Next
next
saturday,
they're
going
to
have
a
they're
starting
to
walking
tours
about
the
history
of
mountain
view
and
there's
going
to
be
another
one
next
saturday
and
I
think
it
sounds
like
a
fun
activity.
So
thanks.
E
Mayor,
I
just
wanted
to
report
out
on
a
couple
of
meetings.
I've
attended
the
first
one
is
silicon
valley,
clean
energy
and
at
our
last
board
meeting
we
authorized
our
jpa
to
implement
rate
changes
that
will
keep
svce
customers
at
a
1
discount
to
pg
e
rates
effective
march
1st,
so
pg
e
will
be
increasing
their
rates
clean
energy-
and
I
saw
this
was
a
question
that
came
up
during
our
with
our
budget
item.
E
But
clean
energy
is
in
charge
of
sourcing
and
so
that
part
of
the
cost
will
be
one
percent
lower
than
what
pg
e
charges,
and
this
rate
discount
has
been
the
same
for
customers
for
the
past
couple
of
years
and
aligns
with
the
agency's
commitment
to
maintaining
rates
competitive
to
pg
e.
The
discount
is
inclusive
of
pg
e's
added
fees
since
launching
in
2017
svc
has
saved
customers,
77
million
dollars
on
their
electricity
bills,
and
I
believe
that
the
cpuc
has
approved
the
pg
e's
rate
increases.
E
This
is
to
deliver
clean
energy
for
eight
hours
a
day,
helping
provide
relief
to
the
grid
during
critical
peak
times,
and
this
actually
was
is
groundbreaking
breaking
it
made
national
news.
This
is
the
first
major
procurement
milestone
for
california
community
power,
a
new
jpa
comprised
of
10
community
choice,
energy
agencies
throughout
the
state
and
ours,
clean
energy,
ceo
and
staff
have
been
very
instrumental
in
creating
this
california
community
power
agency.
E
E
I
think,
on
urban
planning
from
stanford
give
us
a
very
objective
presentation
on
this
initiative.
So
I
found
that
really
interesting.
I'm
sure
we
will
hear
more
as
we
move
forward
and
then
finally,
I
I
I
attended
the
with
the
mayor
and
council
member
kame,
the
opening
of
the
101
express
lanes
that
connects
now
santa
clara
county
to
san
mateo
county.
I've
heard
some
folks,
you
know
some
consternation
about
it.