►
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the City of Mountain View Rental Housing Committee Meeting scheduled for Monday, August 22, 2022.
Live Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26.
A
Of
the
rental
housing
committee,
please
contact
mvrent
mountainview.com
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee
will
participate
in
the
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting
live,
may
do
so
at
mountainview.legistar.com.
A
C
A
A
The
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
committee
to
efficiently
and
quickly
consider
routine
or
administrative
business
items
in
one
motion,
although
committee
members
may
remove
items,
it
is
generally
not
intended
for
the
committee
to
have
a
lengthy,
substantive
discussion
on
the
consent
calendar
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
committee
like
to
pull
an
item.
A
Okay,
so
we
will
invite
the
members
of
the
public
to
comment
on
this
item.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
the
consent
calendar
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
A
A
The
motion
to
approve
should
include
at
minimum
the
language
that
appears
on
your
screen
about
approving
minutes
from
the
rhc
meeting
july
18th
until
and
august
8th
2022,
and
adopting
a
resolution
to
continue
virtual
meetings.
Pursuant
to
the
brown
act,
provisions
is
amended
by
ab361
and
I
see
a
ham
that
is
vice
chair
rimmels.
D
A
F
B
A
A
A
A
A
G
G
Next
slide,
please,
as
you
can
see,
the
information
requests
and
public
inquiries
were
mostly
with
regards
to
covet
19,
rent
relief
and
clovik
19
follow-up,
as
well
as
eviction
protections,
so
all
and
allowed
rent
increases.
So
these
are
all
kind
of
related
to
the
emergency
situation
that
is
still
going
on
and
we
oh
yeah,
and
we
just-
and
we
also
provided
2130
inquiries
in
bilingual
services.
G
In
this
slide,
you
can
see
the
workshops
and
trainings
that
were
offered.
In
the
past
fiscal
year
we
held
about
442
workshops
with
414
attendees
and
281
eviction,
help
centers
and
pop-ups
with
1728
attendees
for
further
outreach.
We
did
14
mass
mailings,
945
targeted
letters,
47,
email
updates
and
currently
we
have
818
email
subscribers.
G
G
G
G
So,
rent
adjustment
petitions
in
the
current
fiscal
year,
as
you
can
see,
there
is
a
total
of
13
tenant
petitions,
two
landlord
petitions
and
one
exemption
petition
in
the
past
fiscal
year.
This
is
slightly
higher
than
the
year
before,
with
11
tenant
petitions
and
one
landlord
petition
this
coming
year.
We
expect
more
petitions,
since
the
eviction
moratorium
has
ended.
G
G
G
G
So
that
gives
us
a
little
bit
of
the
same
overview
than
what
we
give
under
the
previous
data
service.
So
I'm
going
to
skip
the
details
of
this
slide
and
here
is
an
overview
of
the
community
outreach
that
we
provided
with
25
webinars,
trainings
and
community
meetings.
Next
slide
with
direct
mailings
and
three
postcards:
943
targeted
mail,
mailings
and
16
emails.
G
And
these
these
are
the
multi-lingual
multi-modem
communications
that
you
can
see
this
overview
for
next
slide.
Please
this!
We
already
went
over
next
slide.
Please,
and
this
gives
the
final
data
about
how
many
households
in
mountain
view
ultimately
received.
California
state
rent
relief,
as
you
can
see,
712
households
were
served
with
an
average
assistance
of
eleven
thousand
four
hundred
and
thirteen
dollars.
I
think
this
ends
this
presentation.
A
E
A
A
A
A
I
I
If
you
all
remember,
this
was
discussed
previously
at
the
march
meeting,
and
this
is
sort
of
a
follow-up
on
the
direction
that
the
rhc
provided
at
that
time
with
regard
to
a
number
of
compliance
and
enforcement
mechanisms
that
were
researched
and
presented
by
staff
at
that
time.
So
next
slide
just
as
some
background.
I
So
the
csfra
mhrso
and
their
implementing
regulations
impose
a
number
of
requirements
on
landlords.
We
covered
these
at
the
last
at
the
march
meeting.
But
you
know
some
of
these
are
are
considered.
Substantial.
Compliance
with
substantive
non-compliance
with
substantial
requirements
means
a
landlord
or
mobile
home
park.
Owner,
cannot
raise
rents
and
or
file
a
petition
for
upward
adjustment
of
rent.
I
So,
in
addition
to
the
requirements,
the
csfra
and
the
mhrso
also
have
a
number
of
built-in
enforcement
mechanisms.
For
instance,
a
landlord
or
a
mobile
home
landlord
or
park
owner
must
plead
compliance
in
an
eviction
case.
So
if
they're
seeking
to
evict
a
tenant,
then
in
the
pleadings
of
the
eviction
case,
they
must
say
that
they
are
in
compliance
under
penalty
of
perjury.
I
Additionally,
the
landlord's
non-compliance
is
actually
an
affirmative
defense
in
an
eviction
case.
So
a
tenant
can
use
that
as
an
affirmative
defense
to
eviction,
as
I
mentioned
previously
in
certain
instances,
a
landlord
cannot
impose
a
rent,
increase
or
file
a
petition
or
receive
an
upward
adjustment
of
rent.
I
Additionally,
the
tenant
may
file
a
civil
action
in
court.
The
committee
or
the
city
attorney
may
file
a
simple
action
in
court.
Again,
that's
subject
to
city
council's
approval
and
the
tenant
or
the
committee
may
seek
injunctive
relief,
and
the
staff
report
goes
into
more
detail
about
which
one
of
these
enforcement
mechanisms
may
be
used
to
enforce
each
of
the
requirements
that
I
previously
outlined
this
next
slide.
I
So,
as
I
said,
the
rhc
may
reject
a
landlord's
petition
for
upward
adjustment
of
rent
and
require
compliance
with
the
csfra
or
mhrso
before
accepting
the
petition,
but
that's
only
after
the
landlord
chooses
to
file
the
petition.
So
it
it's
not
something.
That's
proactive,
it's
sort
of
in
it's
reactive
to
the
landlord
taking
a
step.
I
So
the
first
option
was
a
non-compliance
letter,
expanding
the
use
of
non-compliance,
letters
to
other
forms
of
substantial
non-compliance
and
including
a
copy
to
affected
tenants.
So
the
rhc
voted
six
zero
in
favor
of
further
exploring
that
possibility
that
option
option
two
was
posting
non-compliant
properties
to
the
city
website.
I
I
That
was
the
third
option
that
the
rhc
chose
to
explore
further
or
directed
staff
to
research.
Further
option
four
was
a
petition
attendant
petition
to
withhold
rent
from
non-compliant
landlords.
The
rhc
at
that
time
voted
two
four,
not
to
research
that
option
further
and
then
option.
Five
was
an
administrative
citation
program
which
would
impose
a
schedule
of
penalties
on
landlords
who
repeatedly
violate
the
mhrso
csfra
or
the
regulations,
and
that
was
a
3-3
but
3-2
in
favor
of
exploring
further.
I
Without
the
alternates
vote,
so
in
response
to
this
staff
has
done
some
additional
research
on
the
four
options
that
the
rental
housing
committee
voted
on
moving
forward,
and
so
this
is
sort
of
intended.
This
study
session
is
intended
to
bring
back
additional
information
on
those
four
enforcement
mechanisms
and
request
additional
guidance
on
which
ones
to
move
further
forward.
I
I
But
staff's
recommendation
at
this
time
would
be
to
expand
the
practice
of
sending
non-compliance,
letters
to
landlords
for
all
five
of
the
substantial
compliance
requirements-
and
this
is
again
intended
and
and
to
also
send
copies
of
these
letters
to
affected
tenants
and
the
the
these
would
come
with
a
cover
letter
explaining
the
tenants
rights
in
each
of
these
situations,
I.e
that
they
don't
have
to
pay
a
rent,
cred
increase
or
that
they
may
file
a
petition
so
on
and
so
forth.
And
again.
I
I
A
E
G
E
J
A
G
Yeah,
so
we
have
the
main
information,
the
property
with
the
amount
of
units
and
a
contact
information.
But
what
we
are
asking
the
landlords
to
do
is
to
update
that
contact
information
confirm
the
information
that
is
in
the
database
and
add
some
extra
information.
For
instance,
the
rent
increase
per
unit.
F
Thank
you
in
the
scenarios
are
the
proposals
that
that
we've
seen
the
document
is
not.
Is
all
non-compliance
considered
non-compliance?
So
sorry,
any
of
these
on
this
slide,
anything
that
would
be
non-compliance
is,
will
will
then
affect
or
have
the
consequences
that
are
in
the
proposal.
Is
that
right.
G
B
F
Got
it
and
so
how?
How
does
it
work,
let's
say:
there's
an
adjustment,
a
tenant
petition
for
downward
rent,
and
it
is
found
out
that-
or
it's
discovered
in
the
process
of
that
petition,
that
the
landlord
had
you
know
incorrectly
asked
for
more
rent
or
adjust
the
rent
too
much
right,
which
would
be
number
four
on
this
list,
and
that
happened
six
months
ago
to
an
indep,
a
specific
tenant.
F
G
Well,
I
think
it
would
handle
the
same
way
as
how
we
handle
it.
Currently,
we
always
contact
the
landlord
and
see
what
their
response
is.
Every
a
landlord
can
always
respond
by.
Oh,
I
see
my
mistake.
I
will
correct
it
and
then
the
petition
may
be
withdrawn
by
the
tenant.
If
that's
what
you're,
referring
to.
F
Correct,
but
I
guess
then
you
know
could,
if
that
is
in
that
scenario
under
the
proposals,
would
other
tenants
be
able
to
go
back
and
say
that
my
if
we
were
to
say
that
they
could
not
make
adjustments
while
they
were
out
of
non-compliance,
could
other
tenants
go
back
and
and
say
for
these
six
months
they
were
non-compliance.
Then
they
gave
me
my
aga
during
that
time,
and
then
that
was
invalid,
like
like.
E
I
They
would
but
it's
complaint
based.
So
if
those
other
tenants
do
not
choose
to
file
a
petition,
then
the
landlord
wouldn't
have
to
repay
it.
It's
really
about
whether
the
tenant
chooses
to
enforce
it
and
that's
how
things
are
now
as
well.
So
if
a
tenant
finds
out
that
their
landlord
had
not
paid
their
annual
fees
or
had
not
registered
the
unit
when
they
impose
the
rent
increases,
even
now,
they
can
file
a
petition
for
any
agas
that
were
taken
during
that
period
of
non-compliance.
B
F
G
F
D
D
G
G
The
vendor
is
just
currently
looking
into
the
complications
of
providing
that
and
the
extra
costs
of
providing
that
software,
which
comes
with
a
risk
of
other
parts
of
the
of
the
program
not
working
optimally,
is
what
we
understood
so
far,
but
we
should
be
getting
a
detailed
report
from
them.
I
hope
by
the
end
of
august.
D
Okay,
is
there
any
kind
of
accommodation
that
we
can
do,
because
if,
if
the
issue
is,
is
that
they
just
want
to
upload
a
spreadsheet,
could
they
turn
in
the
spreadsheet
to
us?
And
we
can
count
that
as
compliance
or
something
like
that?
Just
to
I'm
glad
that
as
we're
starting
to
put
the
the
the
compliance
reap
consequences
essentially
on
and
we're
starting
to
be
more
strict
about
it.
We're
going
to
probably
start
see
coming
out
of
the
woodwork
people
like
things
that
may
actually
be
barriers
versus
the
willful,
not.
G
Yeah,
so
we
we
can
definitely
do
that.
That
means
a
lot
of
more
staff
time
which
we
currently
have
not
planned
for,
and
I
don't
think
it's
a
blockade,
it's
more
of
a
it's.
It's
more
work.
I
think
it's
it
can
be
done,
but
it's
a
lot
of
work
on
the
part
of
the
landlord
is.
I
think
that
she's
referring
to.
D
Okay,
it's
it's
just
that
when
we
finally
get
to
hear
what
barriers
or
what
they
believe
are
barriers
to
the
system.
I
would.
I
would
love
to
accommodate
that
as
best
as
we
can,
because
we
we
usually
don't
hear
about
the
barriers
until
we
really
start
putting
the
compliance
mechanisms
in
and-
and
I
want
that
to
it's-
it's
like
a
a
cupcake
versus
stick
kind
of
carrot
and
stick
mechanism,
so
if
they,
if
they
do
give
us
that
feedback,
I
do
want
to
be
responsive
to
it
and
we.
D
Okay
and
then
the
other
question
I
have
is,
could
you
walk
me
through
a
timeline
about
how
so
once
they
send
this
letter
to
the
affected
tenant
and
a
tenant
files,
a
petition
immediately?
What
kind
of
timeline
are
we
looking
at
in
terms
of
curing
and
the
the
petition
process
now?
I
know
our
petition
process
actually
has
a
set
timeline,
but
how
does
that
work
with.
D
G
I
E
K
You
say
I
apologize
for
the
chopping
of
your
name
last
name,
so
my
question
is
well,
I'm
concerned.
I'm
I'm
really
really
concerned
in
regards
to
60
non-compliant
landlords,
and
I
do
believe
that
they
make.
That
may
be
an
extra
and
overdo
extra
work
on
our
staff,
especially
with
all
the
stuff
that
they
have
to
do.
A
I
K
F
F
F
G
F
Yeah
sorry,
I'm
saying
the
40
who
have
not
who
are
not
in
full
compliance
with
registration,
not
fully
registered.
Do
we
have
a
sense
of
how
many
of
them
have
registered
the
building,
but
not
registered
all
the
units
and
put
the
information
in,
because
that
that
functionality
was
added
later
right,
40
percent.
G
F
But
we
did
add,
I'm
just
trying
to
kind
of
get
a
sense
of
the
problem.
We
added
the
unit
information
as
a
follow-on.
That
was
like
the
second
phase
of
our
website.
The
first
phase
was
just
like
property
information
and
contact
information,
stuff
like
that,
and
is
the
vast
majority
of
the
60
people
who
have
not
filled
out
the
units
yet,
but
they
did
register
in
the
first
phase.
H
Yes,
so
the
majority
of
the
sixty
percent,
the
about
376
properties
or
some
that
I
have
counted
as
not
registered
some
of
them
have
partially
registered
but
haven't
completed
all
of
the
information
I
had.
I
don't
have
it
broken
down
as
to
if
they
only
filled
out
the
landlord
information,
but
not
the
property
manager,
information
versus
property
manager
and
landlord,
but
not
the
unit
information
but
as
far
as
partially
registered
properties
go.
H
F
A
A
Excellent
and
in
terms
of
the
proposed
letters
and-
and
maybe
this
isn't
fleshed
out
yet
would
so-
let's
say
I
own
a
property
that
has
150
units
in
it
and
for
whatever
reason
I
got
95
of
them
registered
fully,
but
then,
for
some
reason
I
didn't
get
the
rest
done.
Would
my
would
the
cc
to
the
tenant
be
just
on
the
units
that
didn't
get
fully
done
or
would
it
be
on
a
property
level.
A
Okay,
so
it
wouldn't
be
a
massive
blast
where
folks,
who
perhaps
were
not
actually
impacted,
would
go.
Oh,
my
landlord
shouldn't
have
taken
the
aga,
I'm
going
to
file
a
petition,
and
then
we
have
to
immediately
say:
oh
actually,
you
were
not
involved.
It
was
unit
3273
over
there,
not
you
yep,
excellent,
okay
and
then
also
final
question
on
the
on
the
letters
that's
currently
drafted.
There's
some
data
that
I
would
consider
somewhat
business
confidential
around
the
pins
and
the
other
login
instructions
that
would
not
be
sent
to
the
impacted
tenants.
A
It
would
only
be
the
first
cover
page,
so
it
would
be
the
very
boiler
plate.
You
haven't
taken
care
of
what
is
needed
and
perhaps
we
would
indicate
maybe
on
their
what
they
failed
to
do
and
then
the
tenant
wouldn't
have
any
ability
to
like
go
into
the
database
as
the
landlord
or
anything
no
excellent
excellent.
Well,
I
guess
one
final
question:
it
would
it
be
an
expensive
undertaking
if
we
hypothetically
did
the
notice
to
the
landlord
and
then
30
days
later,
if
not
cured,
did
the
notice
that
impacted
tenants
rather
than
running
them
together?
A
A
I
Thanks,
so
we
can
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
the
second
option
was
a
website
listing.
This
is
very
similar
to
the
letters,
but
it's
sort
of
just
putting
everything
in
one
database
that's
publicly
available.
So
again,
this
is
intended
to
help
address
the
informational
gap.
You
know
if
a
tenant
doesn't
get
the
letter
or
you
know
it's
just
been
maybe
a
while
and
they
want
to
know,
did
my
landlord
end
up
complying
with
these
requirements.
B
I
I
I
So
I've
listed
out
here
the
some
of
the
potential
or
proposed
fields
for
public
access,
including
the
number
of
units
the
year
built,
partially
or
fully
covered
property
registration,
whether
the
property
registration
has
been
completed.
This
is
all
information,
that's
already
in
the
registration
database,
so
it
would.
It
could
easily
pop
be
populated
over
into
a
public
database
for
these
last
three,
whether
the
annual
rental
housing
fees
have
been
paid,
whether
there
are
code
violations,
outstanding
code
violations
or
whether
there
are
any
outstanding
orders
from
the
rental
housing
committee
or
hearing
officer.
G
H
Right,
yeah
well
yeah,
so
one
two
three
is
they're
already
there
so
that
that
would
be
automatic
number
four
within
24
hours
after
staff
reviews,
the
submission,
I
would
say,
annual
renting
housing
fees
paid
that
that
takes
a
little
bit
more
staff
time.
I
combed
through
the
unpaid
fees,
and
it
took
me
about
six
or
seven
hours
to
do
that,
so
that
plus
entering
it
in
the
database.
So
there
I
don't,
it
could
be
something
like
we
pick
once
a
month.
We
do
it
or
you
know.
H
D
Okay,
would
it,
I
guess
it
might
be
helpful
to
have
like
a
on
the
bottom
last
updated
by
just
in
case,
we'll
have
a
get
a
sense
of
like.
Oh
this.
This
hasn't
actually
been
updated
in
a
while
so
like.
If
the
landlord
is
complete,
it
does
if
it
puts
a
landlord
in
compliance
and
like
a
tenant,
got
their
letter,
they're
not
confused
for
a
sec
or
if
the
landlord
is
not
compliant.
D
I
Yeah,
I
think
that
certainly
there
would
also
have
to
be
some
sort
of
disclaimer
about
the
accuracy
of
the
information,
especially
when
it
comes
to
like
code
violations.
That's
something
that
we're
relying
on
a
different
department
in
the
city
to
send
over
information
about,
and
it
might
they
might
not
always
have
that
or
might
not
update
it
as
as
quickly
so.
Definitely
you
know
having
that
disclaimer
there
and
informing
tenants
to
reach
out
to
staff
or
the
program
to
double
check.
The
information
is
going
to
be
important.
I
F
F
F
G
F
And
that's
for
each
chant,
detail,
change
or
that's
that's
just
like
the
property
owner
or
the
property
manager,
is
a
different
contact
information.
That's
for
each
unit.
If
a
unit
someone
leaves
the
unit
or
if
the
rent
is
increased
in
any
unit.
Over
that
time,
that's
confirmed
by
somebody
on
our
staff.
H
So
we
have
an
open
registration
period
at
the
beginning
of
each
year,
where
they,
the
landlord
or
manager,
can
go
in
and
edit
any
information,
and
once
they
edit
the
information
they
submit.
The
registration
for
review
once
it's
submitted
for
review
and
staff
looked
it
over
and
it
is
complete
after
that.
Each
change
that
the
landlord
does
in
the
system
is
is
per
unit
a
per
unit
change,
so
staff
does
review
each
change
on
the
per
unit
basis
after
the
initial
registration,
which
year.
F
K
G
Yes,
we
have
webinar
trainings
on
a
regular
basis,
and
the
powerpoint
of
those
trainings
are
available
on
our
website
and
andrea
also
made
a
very
extensive
guideline
that
takes
you
step
through
that
step
through
this
registration
of
the
database.
Do
you
know
the
following
dates
that
are
being
planned,
andrea,.
H
I
don't
have
current
dates,
but
I
will
say
when
we
have
the
registration
open.
We
start
in
december
with
our
webinars
and
then
in
january.
We
do
the
first
about
the
first
three
months
january
february
march.
We
do
two
a
month
and
then
we
taper
off
into
once
a
month
until
until
about
the
halfway
point
of
the
year
and
we
sort
of
help
people
as
needed
in
office
hours
and
do
one-on-one
support
and
then
we'll
pick
back
up
again
in
the
at
the
end
of
this
year,
when
the
registration
is
open
again,.
A
Now
I
just
have
one
final
question,
since
my
vice
chair
was
kind
enough
to
bring
up
there's
some
enhancements
to
the
database
that
we
have
heard
from
our
population
that
uses
it
most.
Our
landlords
may
be
desirable
for
some
property
management
needs
when,
if
and
when
we
go
to
the
vendor
for
potential
cost
analyses
on
this.
A
I
I
I
You
know
what
is
the
right
percentage
to
land
on
as
far
as
the
late
registration
penalty,
not
all
of
these
jurisdictions,
so
the
ones
that
say,
n,
a
not
applicable,
are
jurisdictions
that
do
not
require
registration,
whereas
the
other
ones
are
ones
that
do
require
registration
out
of
those
west.
Hollywood
and
mountain
view
are
the
only
two
that
do
not
have
late
fees
for
the
failure
to
register
in
some
instances,
for
instance
with
san
jose,
and
I
believe
alameda
that
falls
under
their
administrative
citation
program.
I
I
So
really
you
know
this
is
a
pretty
straightforward
option:
the
decision
of
whether
to
increase
the
late
fee
for
the
failure
to
pay
rental
housing
fees
and
whether
to
impose
a
late
fee
for
registration.
You
know
the
timelines
for
that
when
those
would
kick
in.
That
is
fully
up
to
the
committee.
We're
not
proposing
a
standard.
That's
really
for
you!
All
to
decide
if
you
do
choose
to
take
this
course
of
action,
so
that
is
all
on
option
three.
I
believe.
D
Yeah,
where
would
the
money
go
for
late
fees?
So
we
have
we.
We
we
have
our
requirements
that
our
our
rental
housing
committee
has
to
be
essentially
self-sufficient,
like
its
own
little
ecosystem.
That
comes
from
the
fees
comes
from
the
the
fees
that
we
leverage
on
landlords.
But
then
these
late
fees,
they're
kind
of
like
a
bonus,
so
these
late
fees
can
we
do
more
with
them
than
we
could
with
just
our
normal.
G
They
go
into
the
same
budget,
they
go
into
the
same
pool
of
money
and
at
the
end
of
the
year
you
decide
each
year
what
you're
going
to
budget
for
next
year.
What
is
left
over
from
last
year,
which
we
always
transfer
the
new
to
the
new
year,
and
you
guys
decide,
then
what
the
the
annual
fee
is
based
on
that
budget
and
what
is
left
over
from
last
year.
D
G
And
that's
how
it
usually
goes
if
you
want
to
earmark
that
money
for
something
specific
it.
First
of
all,
it's
hard
to
predict
what
that
money,
what
money
is
would
be
coming
in
and,
second
of
all,
if
you
want
to
ear
market
for
certain
money
and
the
money
is
not
coming
in.
What
are
you
going
to
do
with
you?
What
you
propose
to
do
with
that
money?
First
of
all,
so
that's
a
project
done.
That
would
not
happen,
or
I
mean
it's
highly
unpredictable
money.
D
G
G
F
F
G
F
F
F
E
E
E
E
And
I
also
think
we
might
need
to
increase
our
annual
fee
payment
penalty
and
I
know
we're
not
into
deliberations,
but
I
just
wanted
to
put
my
two
cents
in
there.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
have
some
kind
of
mechanism
that
that
will
boost
our
mandatory
registration
program
so
that
we
really
have
a
robust,
robust
sense
of
what's
happening
in
our
community.
E
K
K
K
H
I
will
say
the
majority
of
our
are
really
large
property
owners
who
have
big
property
management
teams
have
registered,
and
then
I
think
it
is
between
mid
and
small
is
probably
where
the
most
of
our
non-compliant
landlords
are.
But
for
you
know
our
our
really
small
mom-and-pop
landlords.
We
do
have
a
paper
form.
So
if
they're,
not
tech
savvy,
they
can
fill
it
out
on
paper,
and
you
know,
staff
will
upload
that
for
them,
okay,.
A
One
question
on
the
the
fees
here:
santa
monica.
I
know
we
have
a
cap
at
12
percent
of
max.
So
basically,
if
you're
late
on
your
annual
fee
payment
for
12
months
and
then
in
month,
13
there's
no
more
one
person
being
charged
santa
monica
does
not
seem
to
cap
and
has
that
been
successful
like
there's
not
been
issues
with
that
that
you
know
if
you're
seven
years
late,
you're
gonna
pay
that
four
percent
per
month
month
over
month
for
seven
years.
G
A
A
I
Yes,
and
now
that
you
know
option
four
might
be
coming
back
into
the
mix,
we
will
definitely
stick
with
calling
it
option
five
so
option.
Five
is
the
administrative
citation
system.
There
was
an
indication
that
this
is
unlikely
to
take
action
on
this
at
this
time.
At
the
last
meeting,
nonetheless,
we
figured
we
would
come
back
with
some
additional
information
just
so
you
all
have
a
full
picture
of
what
these
options
look
like.
I
In
addition,
it
would
impose-
or
essentially
it
works
by
imposing
an
increasing
schedule
of
penalties
for
uncured
violations
as
a
requirement
for
an
administrative
citation
program
before
imposing
a
penalty,
you
must
give
notice
to.
The
violating
party
must
provide
an
opportunity
to
cure,
as
well
as
an
opportunity
to
be
heard
before
a
neutral
body,
so
either
a
hearing
officer
in
the
rent,
stabilization
program
or
some
sort
of
other
administrative
hearing
officer.
I
So
an
example
is
is
oakland
we
can,
I
think,
go
to
the
next
slide.
Yeah,
so
oakland's
a
system
you
know
they
use
this
for
a
number
theirs
is,
is
rent
stabilization
specific,
so
there
it's
actually
housed
within
their
rent
stabilization
program,
which
is
different
from
the
other
two
that
I
will
talk
about.
I
So
in
oakland,
notices
of
violation
can
be
issued
for
things
like
failing
to
provide
the
rent,
stabilization
law
notice
to
a
tenant
upon
commencement
of
the
new
tenancy,
demanding
payment
of
unlawful
rent
increase,
failing
to
abide
by
a
final
order
of
the
hearing
officer,
the
rent
board.
Failure
to
pay
the
rent
annual
fees,
failure
to
file
a
notice
for
a
unit
that
is
no
longer
exempt,
as
well
as
failure
to
remove
a
capital
improvement,
rent
increase
on
the
first
month
following
the
end
of
the
amortization
period.
I
So
under
oakland
system,
the
first
uncur,
the
first
cured
violation
of
any
of
these
is
you
know:
they're
sent
a
notice
of
the
violation
and
if
it's
cured
then
there's
no
fine,
a
sec
first
uncured
violation.
So
if
the
landlord
receives
the
notice
of
one
of
these
violations
and
does
not
cure
within
the
time
allowed
to
cure,
then
they
would
be
charged
a
hundred
dollars
for
that
it
would
be
an
administrative
citation.
I
Similarly,
a
second
violation
of
the
same
requirement,
whether
it's
cured
or
uncured,
is
going
to
come
with
a
hundred
dollar
citation
amount.
So
let's
say,
for
instance,
that
a
landlord
demanded
payment
of
an
unlawful
rent
increase
and
they
received
a
notice
of
violation
and
they
they
cured
it.
They
rolled
back
the
rent
increase,
but
then
they
did
it
again.
They
demanded
a
payment
of
an
unlawful
rent
increase,
regardless
of
whether
they
cure
or
don't
cure.
I
I
So
the
second
city
that
has
a
an
administrative
citation
system
for
housing
related
violations
is
west
hollywood.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
west
hollywood
system
is
not
specific
to
the
rent
stabilization
program
and
is
also
not
housed
in
their
rent
stabilization
program.
It
is
a
city-wide
program,
but
nonetheless,
because
it
is
actually
a
requirement,
you
know
a
landlord
who
does
receive
a
notice
of
violation
or
a
citation
for
any
of
these
violations
that
are
housing
related,
can
request.
I
An
administrative
hearing
and
the
decision
of
the
administrative
hearing
officer
is
appealable
directly
to
the
superior
court,
and
so,
as
you'll
see
on
here,
they
have
some
violations
like
not
having
an
on-site
manager
for
properties
that
are
16
or
more
units
that
is
not
necessarily
related
to
their
rent
stabilization
law.
That's
a
state
law
requirement.
I
Nonetheless,
if
they
don't
do
it,
then
they
can't
be
cited
for
it,
and
their
citation
amounts
are
a
little
bit
higher
than
oakland's
citation
amounts
next
slide,
so
san
jose
and
we
actually
attached
the
their
the
update
to
their
ordinance
that
was
passed
in
2019.
That
highlights
all
of
the
violations
that
falls
under
their
administrative
citation
program
but
similarly
to
west
hollywood.
San
jose's
program
is
not
housed
in
their
rental
housing
program.
It
is
a
city-wide
program
and
you
know
the
citation
amount
amounts
are
quite
high.
I
They
range
from
500
to
10
000
and
again,
someone
can
request
a
hearing
before
an
administrative
hearing
officer
in
order
to
challenge
a
notice
or
a
citation,
so
that
is
sort
of
it
for
the
administrative
citations.
I
know
this
is
complicated
and
there's
you
know
a
range
of
how
you
can
approach
a
citation
system
so
feel
free
to
ask
any
questions
that
you
might
have
about
these.
A
I
It's
my
understanding
that
it's
a
little
bit
of
of
both,
so
some
of
these
are
going
to
be
a
you
know:
complaint
based,
for
instance,
if
you're
looking
at
the
at
the
examples
that
I
pulled
from
the
san
jose
one,
which
is
not
at
all
close
to
a
comprehensive
list,
but
an
attempt
to
waive
tenants
rights,
that's
going
to
be
something
that's
in
a
lease
right.
It's
going
to
be
a
landlord
attempting
to
waive
the
tenants
rights
in
a
provision
of
the
lease,
and
so
that's
going
to
be
a
complaint
base.
I
The
the
program
probably
or
the
city
is
not
going
to
know
about
that.
Unless
the
tenant
comes
forward
and
says
hey,
you
know
they
tried
to
do
this,
but
you
know
failure
to
register
units.
That's
much!
It's
proactive
with
something
that
the
city
is
going
to
know
about
and
is
going
to
be
able
to.
You
know,
go
after
proactively,
so
it
really
allows
for
both
situations.
E
I
Not
necessarily
so,
for
instance,
I
think
san
jose
for
unpaid
annual
housing
fees.
They
have
a
late
fee
if
a
landlord
fails
to
pay
the
annual
housing
fees
within
a
certain
amount
of
time,
but
then
I
think
you
know
they
probably
allow
some
sort
of
cure
period
and
then,
after
that
they
might
go
to
an
administrative
citation.
I
D
I
I
So
I
just
have
one
more
slide,
which
is
the
direction
that
staff
is
asking
for
tonight,
so
we're
requesting
guidance
on
these
three
questions.
Are
there
any
compliance
and
enforcement
mechanisms
that
the
rhc
would
like
to
move
forward
with
immediately?
If
so,
which
ones
are
there
any
compliance
and
enforcement
mechanisms
that
the
rhc
would
like
staff
to
move
forward
to
stakeholder
input
so
stakeholder
meetings,
if
so,
which
ones
and
then
are
there
any
compliance
and
enforcement
mechanisms
that
the
rhc
would
like
to
table
for
the
time
being
and
just
indicate
which
ones?
A
Well,
since
we
did
questions
in
real
time
during
the
presentation,
I'm
now
going
to
invite
public
comment,
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
right
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen
and
I
do
see
some
hands.
L
It's
only
a
situation
of
the
property
is
either
not
being
maintained
or
somehow
some
way
some
other
mouthpieces
regarding
mortgage
fraud
might
have
taken
place.
In
any
event,
again,
the
situation
is
that,
as
the
definition
of
the
csfrs
does
say,
reduction
of
services,
this
would
clearly
be
a
registered
reduction
of
services,
especially
if
it's
being
reported
under
the
santa
clara
county
tax,
sorry
property
tax
system,
which
in
this
case
I've
been
able
to
document,
and
so
I'm
saying
that.
L
Yes,
this
should
be
a
proactive
system,
and
it
should
actually
require
that
the
history
of
property
taxes
being
a
part
of
the
system
so
that
the
system
can
then
issue
orders
for,
in
effect,
automatically
issuing
any
potential
rent
reductions.
If
it
can
be
determined
that
the
property
has
lost
such
a
significant
amount
of
value,
in
this
case
again
0.5
in
just
two
years.
L
So,
in
any
case,
all
I'm
asking
for
at
this
point
is
that
that
information
be
a
part
of
the
database
and
also
make
that
into
an
automated
auditing
system,
so
that
all
tenants
in
this
can
get
an
automatic
rent
reduction
upon
right,
the
registration
of
that
information,
and
it
clears
a
certain
threshold
in
this
case,
anything
above
10
of
a
property
tax
reduction
should
be
a
red
flag.
Thank
you
very
much
for
taking
my
time
taking
your
time
to
listen.
M
Hi
my
name's
tim
mckenzie.
He
him
pronouns.
I've
been
a
renter
in
mountain
view
for
about
seven
years
now
I
just
speaking
from
a
renter's
viewpoint,
if
you're
well,
one
I'll
say
yes
and
I
like
to
hear
that
these
different
carrots
or
sticks,
as
have
been
mentioned,
can
be
implemented
together.
So
that
and
that's
good
to
see
also
I'll
just
say
from
a
renter's
side.
M
But
I'd
I'd
love
to
be
able
to
have
the
option
to
opt
in
pay
rent
into
an
account
that
goes
to
the
city
or
something
like
that,
just
holding
it
until
the
landlord
enters
compliance,
because
its
money
seemed
maybe
like
real
teeth
is.
I
think
I
heard
earlier
I'd
like
to
see.
That
would
be
a
thing
with
real
teeth
to
withhold
rent
until
they
comply.
So
thank
you.
N
Evening,
rsd
members,
I'm
kevin,
I'm
a
resident
of
the
city
I
feel
like.
We
still
need
to
keep
all
of
the
options
on
the
table.
Inherently,
the
rrc
is
meant
to
enforce
a
rent
stabilization
law,
which
does
require
a
at
least
some
notice
of
what
was
the
rent.
That
was
there
in
the
first
place,
so
you
can
actually
determine
whether
the
aga
was
properly
applied
as
well.
It
is
useful
for
informational
usages,
like
figuring
out
exactly
you
know
what
is
vacant?
N
N
There
will
be
perhaps
a
lot
of
complaints
that
you
know.
The
brand
registry
is
relatively
new,
but
you
know
when
we
enforce
other
laws.
We
don't
really
necessarily
say
like.
Oh
you
know,
mass
in
compliance
means
we
just
wait
a
few
more
years.
That's
generally
not
a
lot
of
work.
So
generally
you
do
start
twisting
screws,
making
actual
dents
to
actually
ensure
that
the
law
is
being
followed
and
it
will
come
back.
N
O
O
It
seems
to
me
that,
just
starting
back
in
the
last
in
the
monthly
status
report,
it
really
tells
us
how
much
that
the,
how
many
services
the
city
staff
provides
to
residents
and
how
effective
it
is,
despite
not
having
all
of
the
revenue
they
need
to
do
the
really
even
a
better
job.
It's
really
unfair
of
the
landlords
and
park
owners
to
withhold
that
money,
but
he's
not
just
punishing
the
residents.
He's
punishing
the
city
staff
as
well.
O
O
increasing
up
to
75
percent.
Maybe
I
really
think
that
those
two
options
having
people
refuse
to
pay
rent
unless
we
get
what
we
need
from
our
landlords
park
owners
and
having
them
penalize
for
it,
if
they
deliberately
withhold
their
data,
which
makes
makes
it
much
harder
for
the
rental
housing
committee
to
do
its
job
I'll
yield
the
rest
of
my
time.
Thank
you.
C
If
there
are
challenges
with
owners
not
registering
or
not
complying
as
the
way
you've
defined
compliance?
I
think
the
second
question
in
the
council,
the
rhc
questions
tonight,
really
is
the
one
to
address
to
bring
the
stakeholders
together,
like
you
did
with
the
item
on
base
rent
and
concessions
over
the
past
couple
of
months,
where
you
brought
the
stakeholders
together,
heard
concerns
heard
about
the
operational
challenges,
the
logistics
and
what
were
some
ways
to
move
the
item
forward.
C
I
think
that
would
really
be
the
right
approach
on
this
item
tonight
would
be
to
bring
the
stakeholders
together
to
find
out
what
are
those
barriers,
like
you
heard
about
in
the
communication,
it
sounds
like
from
one
large
owner
in
mountain
view.
What
are
other
barriers
that
are
preventing
mass
compliance
before
going
about
creating
a
really
robust
enforcement
mechanism
that
you
could
be
developing
based
on
some
of
the
options
tonight?
C
What
I
also
want
to
call
to
your
attention
is,
I
recently
took
the
liberty
to
watch
the
city
council
meeting
of
july
14
2016
when
julia
brody,
the
author
of
the
csfra
and
joan
mcdonald,
one
of
the
proponents
explained
measure
v
to
the
city
council
and,
at
the
time
stamp
of
42
minutes
and
30
seconds.
The
proponents
and
authors
of
the
csfra
said
there
would
not
be
an
intrusive
enforcement
mechanism.
There
would
be
no
annual
registrations,
it
would
all
be
complaint
based
they
again
emphasized.
It
would
be
a
light
ordinance.
C
What
you
are
doing
tonight
is
going
down
a
path
that
completely
contradicts
the
way
this
measure
and
its
enforcement
was
explained
to
the
voters
on
the
record
by
its
proponents
and
author.
So
I
would
encourage
you
to
step
back,
bring
the
stakeholders
together
and
have
those
collaborative
discussions
which,
as
all
of
you
commented
last
month,
really
was
a
good
outcome
from
your
perspective
on
the
base
rent
item,
because
you
brought
the
stakeholders
together,
heard
their
concerns
and
heard
ways
to
move
forward.
So
I
would
encourage
you
to
again
work
in
that
vein
on
this
issue.
P
It
is
fair
to
have
to
empower
the
rfc
and
staff
with
the
tools
necessary
to
get
the
job
done.
That's
your
job,
that's
their
job.
The
landlord's
job
is
to
be
in
compliance
with
local
ordinances
and
regulations
and
to
to
do
to
do
what
they
need
to
do
in
order
as
a
as
part
of
providing
you
know,
rental
properties
in
the
city.
P
P
P
Q
Hello,
can
you
hear
me?
Okay?
Okay,
I
want
to
start
by
saying
a
huge
thank
you
for
to
staff
for
all
the
hard
work
they
have
continuously
done.
I
think
a
lot
of
it
is
a
little
unfair
that
it
falls
on
them
to
try
to
bring
landlords
into
compliance
a
60
non-compliant
rate.
That's
that
just
seems
a
little
outlandish
and
is
incredibly
concerning.
Q
Q
Giving
them
some
time
to.
You
know,
understand
what
needs
to
be
done
and
how
to
do
it.
If
they
don't
have
the
manpower
or
whatever
their
you
know,
their
barrier
is.
I
would
like
to
see
that
I
think
that
to
actually
get
landlord,
like
the
some
other
landlords
that
maybe
have
some
issues
around
sharing
their
data
or
whatever
their
issues
are
in
compliance
with
this
law,
would
be
to
bring
to
bring
back
option
four
and
to
consider
option
three.
Q
You
know
maybe
starting
at
you,
know
fifty
dollars,
but
then
increasing
over
time.
If
they
continue
to
be
non-compliant,
I
think
would
be
a
really
effective
way
to
get
to
get
landlords
to
you
know,
do
what
needs
to
be
done
so
city
staff
can
do
what
they
need
to
do
and
actually
work
on
other
things,
because
there's
so
much
on
their
plates,
and
I
know
I'm
astounded
every
time
looking
at
their
workload,
so
yeah.
Q
A
J
Hi,
can
you
hear
me
we
can
thank
thank
you
so
much
for
allowing
me
to
squeeze
in
you
know.
First
of
all,
I
did
just
want
to
say
you
know
as
a
as
a
housing
provider.
You
know
we
do
support
the
goals
of
these
agenda
items.
You
know,
many
of
which
I
think
non-compliance
seems
to
be
focused
around
the
rental
housing
registration.
J
So
we
do
understand
and
recognize
you
know
the
goals
to
find
a
solution
where
the
rhc
is
able
to
collect
this
important
information
which
hopefully
does
provide,
maybe
more
guidance
to
you
know
to
future
objectives
that
you
may
pursue.
That
being
said,
you
know.
I
also
think
the
goal
should
be
hopefully
a
collaborative
solution
under
which
you
know
housing
providers
are
also
enabled
to
comply.
J
I'm
not
speaking
for
everyone,
but
you
know.
Not
all
housing
providers
are
specialists
in
technology.
You
know
some
of
these
things
can
be
challenging.
You
know.
I
also
would
like
to
recognize
that
while
there
may
be
instances
of
non-compliance
due
to
a
variety
of
reasons,
I
know
some
of
you
mentioned.
Maybe
you
willful
non-compliance
or
not.
You
know
I
I
did
want
to
point
out
that
many
of
the
non-compliance
related
issues
may
come
up.
You
know
related
to
administrative
error,
either
on
the
part
of
the
housing
provider
or
the
rhc.
J
I
think
that
is
incredibly
beneficial,
but
hopefully
that
notice
could
be
provided
separately
and
prior
to
any
notice.
I
might
go
out
to
tenants.
I
do
think
again.
As
I
mentioned
many
times,
your
theirs
could
not
be
willful,
and
this
would
give
the
housing
provider
an
opportunity
to
either
rectify
it
immediately
or
reach
out
to
the
staff
or
administrative
team
to
hopefully
get
support
and
be
able
to
take
care
of
it
without
confusing
tenants.
You
know
with
misinformation.
J
Additionally,
I
think
a
potential
question
would
be
you
know,
as
the
discussions
related
to
the
website
and
how
to
correct
it.
Once
a
landlord
or
housing
provider
has
come
into
compliance.
How
would
that
work
with
mail
letters
would
updates
go
out
to
tenants
notifying
them
when
a
housing
provider
has
been
brought
back
into
compliance.
J
A
Thank
you
amber
okay.
Now
I
am
gonna,
bring
it
back
for
committee
deliberations
and
discussion.
While
we
don't
need
to
have
a
formal
motion
here
at
minimum.
I
think
we
need
to
get
some
straw
polls
done
and
if
there
is
anything
specifically
that
we
would
like
to
sort
of
fast
track-
or
you
know
really
direct
staff
to
bring
back
for
potential
motions
next
session,
I
think
that
might
be
a
place
to
start.
A
So
with
that
in
mind,
I
think
the
easiest
way
to
take
this
would
be
to
consider
each
of
the
three
questions
in
relation
to
each
of
the
options.
So
I'd
like
to
start
with
option
one
and
try
and
have
some
discussion
there
in
terms
of
the
three
questions
that
were
posed
on
that
slide
around
you
know,
do
we
want
to
move
forward
immediately?
A
D
So
I'll
start
with
some
of
my
thoughts,
I
I
think
about
the
example
that
was
that
I
mentioned
before
how
we
got
a
letter
from
a
representative
from
prometheus
about,
like
the
bulk
uploading.
I
don't
know
if
we
would
have
gotten
that
like
letter
saying
this
is
our:
this
is
our
barrier
until
we
actually
start
saying
yo,
you
really
have
to
do
this,
and
here
are
consequences
for
having
to
do
this.
So
there's
that
that
is
my
conundrum.
I
don't.
I
don't
want
to
be.
D
I
remember
be
pre
pandemic,
going
to
the
the
registration
workshops
and
they
were
lovely
and
what
was
even
better
is
that
it
did
allow
some
opportunity
for
discussions
with
with
some
landlords
and
housing
providers
there
about
what
they
thought
of
the
the
law,
what
their,
what
they
yeah,
what
they
thought
it
meant,
and
sometimes
it
was
right.
Sometimes
it
was
wrong
and
they
actually
had
interaction
with
our
staff
to
to
to
let
them
know
what
things
were
wrong.
D
Things
were
right,
so
the
the
ability
for
us
to
to
have
that
connection
with
our
staff
is
is
is
wonderful,
but
I
don't
think
we
would
have
gotten
people
into
those
workshops
without
saying
there
are
consequences.
If
you
don't
so,
I
am
inclined
to
figure
out
some
way
of
a
curing
time
that
they
have
to
contact
staff.
They
can't
just
say
we're
having
a
problem
and
not
tell
anyone.
D
It's
kind
of
like
a
teacher,
gives
a
deadline
for
something
a
student
can
ask
for
an
extension
for
a
with
a
valid
reason
and
and
staff
can
determine
whether
that
valid
reason
that
that
reason
is
valid
or
not
just
like
a
teacher
would.
But
we
have
to
set
these
deadlines
in
order
for
it
to
go
now
exactly
how
far
we're
going
to
go
with
that.
I'm
not
entirely
sure
I'm
going
to
leave
that
up
to
my
colleagues
to
decide
or
to
mull
through
and
then
we'll
go
from
there.
F
Unmute
thanks
so
actually
each
of
the
options.
I
I
I
think
the
punishment
should
fit
the
crime.
I
actually
would
like
to
see
some
combination
of
all
the
options
to
be
implemented,
but
for
the
landlords
where
we
are
trying
to
incentivize
them
to
do
something
right
and
and
that
that
their
non-compliance
is
significant,
substantial
and
I
think
it's
right
now.
You
can
have
landlord
a
who
has
a
hundred
units
who
doesn't
believe
in
rent
control
has
not
registered.
F
It
doesn't
believe
in
it
in
principle
and
has
ignored
all
of
our
outreach
right.
You
might
also
have
landlord
another
landlord
who
has
a
three
unit.
Building
who
has
registered,
has
put
in
a
lot
of
information
and
then
on
one
of
their
units.
They
did
not
update
the
database
to
recognize
that
there
was
a
tenant
change
one
year
ago,
potentially
both
of
those
landlords
are
treated
the
same
and
that's
what
doesn't
feel
right
as
I
go
through
these
options
I
would
want.
F
I
don't
think
that's
fair
to
the
community
and
to
landlords
actually
like
if
we
are
going
to
put
teeth
into
this
and
say
that
you
have
to
enter
and
keep
up
all
the
records.
How
do
we
plan
to
use
that
I
mean
so
far?
All
of
our
data
that
we've
been
using
in
our
reports
that
we
get
on
a
monthly
basis
is
from
costar
data.
You
know
it's
unclear
to
me
how
we
will
do
our
jobs
differently
getting
if
we
get
that
additional
data,
especially
because
we
are
a
complaint
based
system.
F
F
E
Yes,
I
want
I.
This
is
one
time
when
matt
and
I
agree.
I
think
that
it
would
be
good
to
have
some
semblance
of
all
of
the
options.
I
definitely
think
we
should
move
forward
with
option
one
and
option
two
and
then
I
I
would
like
to
have
staff
come
back
with
some
suggestions
of
penalties
and
citations
that
would
work
in
our
community
that
aren't
oversized,
but
also
put
the
teeth
into
it
that
actually
gets
people.
The
property
owners
registering.
E
I
think,
that's
the
only
way
we're
gonna
get
the
I
mean
people
keep
asking
what
what
do
we
need
this
information
for?
Well,
we
need
to
know
you
know
how
many
units
are
are
increasing
rents
and
how
many
people
are
leaving
town
there's
all
kinds
of
information
that
we
can
get
from
a
very
simple
list,
and
I
don't
think
it's
that
hard
for
housing
providers
to
come
up
with
that
information.
K
K
However,
staff
has
gone
beyond
the
call
of
duty
by
one
six
years
of
the
csfra
staff
has
done
trainings
every
year,
one-on-one
help
reached
out
to
them
by
sending
out
letters.
Letters
have
been
unanswered
or
on
on
just
ignored.
On
on
the
penalties,
I
would
like
to
keep
that
to
a
minimum
because
I
don't
think
it's
a
form
of
punishment,
but
I
think
it's
a
form
of
of
making
people
understand
that
there
was
a
charter
created
in
2016..
K
A
A
A
You
know
you're
capped
at
12
like
that's
your
total
out
of
pocket,
so
you
know
basically
what
your
damage
is,
and
you
can
do
that
for
as
many
years
as
you
want
and
then
sell
the
property.
Another
person
has
to
deal
with
the
fact
that
you
didn't
pay
the
fees
if
you're
four
percent
with
no
cap
or
even
if
we
did
three
or
two
percent.
A
If
four
percent
too
much
of
a
step
for
everybody,
you're
you're,
unlimited
on
your
downside
risk,
so
you
go
five
years
in
and
you
have
some
reason
why
you
need
to
sell
the
property
and
if
there
is
already
transparency
around
whether
it
be
through
the
website
or
the
letters
or.
However,
it's
done
around
whether
or
not
you've
sold
you've
actually
paid
your
fees,
that's
going
to
get
built
in
to
the
offer
for
your
property
and
that's
going
to
have
a
real
actual
business
impact
to
you.
A
So
I
think
that
taking
the
cap
off
of
the
fee
for
failure
to
pay
the
fee,
if
that
makes
sense,
and
possibly
also
raising
it
above
one
percent,
makes
sense.
I
also
would
be
supportive
of
doing
something
around
a
failure
to
register
fee.
I
sort
of
like
what
east
palo
alto
does
there
I
feel,
like
those
numbers,
are
big
enough,
that
it
is
a
fee
without
it
feeling
too
high
too
quick
to
me,
but
that's
just
my
thoughts,
so
you
know
I.
A
I
really
think
letters
need
qr
codes
in
this
day
of
a
nh,
and
I
think
if
we
are
sending
a
copy
of
the
letter
to
the
impacted
units,
there
needs
to
be
either
a
30
or
60
day
period
between
when
it
goes
to
the
landlord
and
when
it
goes
to
the
tenants
to
allow
time
to
cure,
because
if
you
just
genuinely
didn't
know-
and
you
get
the
letter
and
you
go-
I
forgot
to
do
the
thing.
I'm
gonna
do
the
thing
right
now.
A
You
would
be
curing
that
issue
very
quickly
and
there's
really
at
that
point.
I
think
you
know
your
tenant
can
petition,
but
you
you
acted
in
good
faith
and
I've
heard
other
folks
talk
about.
Well,
we
want
to
be
a
cognizant
of,
was
it
willful
non-compliance
or
erroneous
non-compliance?
I
think
if
you
do
the
letters
as
batch,
one
to
the
landlord
and
30
or
60
days
later,
send
to
the
tenant.
A
If
the
situation
is
uncured,
you
sort
of
solve
for
willful
versus
ignorance
in
terms
of
the
fourth
option
that
was
tabled
previously,
I
will
be
very
candid.
I
I
think
that
is
too
strong
at
this
point.
I
don't
like
the
idea
of
a
city
at
administering
an
escrow
account
for
rent
at
all.
I
think
it
vastly
increases
our
litigation
risk.
Escrow
accounts
are
really
hard
to
administer.
A
It's
not
the
easiest
thing
in
the
world
at
minimum.
I
think
that
we
would
have
to
probably
hire
a
professional
to
do
the
accounting
on
that
to
ensure
that
we're
not
creating
risks
around
the
handling
of
that
money,
and
while
I
think
it
sounds
fantastic
on
paper,
hey
landlord,
you
don't
do
what
you're
required
to
do.
You
don't
get
my
money,
but
I'm
still
paying
it,
so
I
am
still
complying
with
the
terms
of
the
lease.
A
I
think
you
know
that,
from
a
logical
point
of
view,
yeah
that
sounds
good
at
that
level,
but
once
you
get
into
what
that
actually
entails,
I
don't
think
that
we
are
ready
to
implement
it.
I
don't
think
that
we're
budgeted
to
implement
it
and
I'm
not
sure
that
it's
a
place
in
terms
of
risk
that
we
should
be
stepping
into
I
just
it's
just
easy
for
that
stuff
to
go
sideways
and,
finally,
with
the
administrative
citations.
Again,
I
don't
love
taking
that
step
right
away.
A
A
They
say
to
you,
basically
hey.
If
you
don't
want
to
do
it,
that's
cool
you
don't
get
to
keep
the
license
and
that's
the
choice
that
you
make.
So
at
a
certain
point.
You
know
there
are
hassles
to
do
in
business
and
while
I
like
doing
business
to
be
as
streamlined
as
possible,
I
don't
think
we
can
say
well,
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
hassle,
so
just
throw
it
on
out
and
say
it's
too
much
work.
A
There
is,
you
know
it
is
a
privilege
to
be
able
to
do
certain
things,
and
I
think
that
it
is
not
an
unreasonable
ask
to
say
the
properties
registered,
especially
since
we
have
said
we
in
several
conversations
around
proposed
changes
or
modifications
and
amendments.
We
have
said
gee.
If
only
we
had
the
data,
we
could
make
a
better
choice
here.
So
that's
what
the
date
is
for
and
I
think
I'll
go
to
committee
member
gridhole
now.
F
If
it's,
you
know,
maybe
they've
been
under
rock
and
did
not
know
they
were
supposed
to
register
and
go
ahead
and
cure
that
quickly.
But
if
not,
let's
just
go
straight
to
the
most
for
those
buildings,
I'd
be
supportive
of
going
to
to
the
utmost
of
our
ability
to
to
chase
them
down
and
get
that
you
know
get
that
fee.
But
then
I
guess
what's
your
what's
your
take
on
the
second
part
of
that
which
is
we
also
registration
as
we've
defined?
F
It
is
every
year
going
in
and
reconfirming
every
30.
You
know
within
30
days
of
when
someone
that
yeah,
that's
that's
one
step.
Okay,
that
seems
like
a
not
heavy
lift,
but
then
you
get
into
you
know
anytime,
there's
a
change
in
tenant
for
each
one
of
your
units.
You
know
you
have
to
register
that
and
there's
no
bulk
upload
right
now.
So
I
mean
to
your
point:
you
did.
F
You
said
you
didn't
think
it
was
unreasonable,
but
the
commenter
before
was
saying
that
we
would
never
get
to
this,
but
that
how
the
how
the
voters
were
what
they
had
in
their
mind
or
what
city
council
had
on
their
mind
at
the
time
was
that
we
would
not
get
to
this
point.
So
I
guess,
what's
your:
what's
your
take
on
differentiating
between
the
different
levels
of
registration
and
or
you
know
we
do
have
the
mobile
home.
The
city
council
owns
the
mobile
home
regulations.
F
We
could
potentially
ask
their
opinion
of
what
they
think
is
reasonable.
What
level
of
registration
is
reasonable
and
then
we'd
have
to
rationalize?
Why
we
need
to
stay
down.
I
mean
again
the
data
could
inform
things,
but
how
does
it
change
what
we
do
on
a
regular
basis?
The
aga
is
set
to
inflation.
So
not
not
saying
we
can't
do
that,
but
we
should
be.
I
do
believe
we
should
hold
ourselves
accountable
for
being
intentional
about
moving
to
a
system
that
is
not
just
complaint
based.
G
G
F
Yes,
I
I
we
have
the
power.
This
group
of
folks
has
the
power
to
decide.
What
is
reasonable.
I
think
my
ask
is:
is
that
as
we,
you
know,
if,
if
something
is
on
the
edge
and
there
we've
gotten
feedback
from
both
landlords
and
tenants
in
our
public
comments,
could
we
if
we
can't
pull
voters
right,
but
I
think
there
are?
F
F
Well,
yeah
it'd
be
interesting
to
get
your
take
on,
because
you
were
talking
about
the
fees
and
things
that
you
would
implement,
but
it
sounded
like
you
were
really
talking
about
those
few
30
landlords
who
who
just
haven't
paid
their
fee
yet,
and
I
just
do
you
also,
do
you
hold
them
in
the
same
regard
as
folks
who
have
not
completely
filled
out
all
their
registration?
Are
those
the
same
in
your
mind,.
A
Yes,
I
think
failing
to
comply
with
something
that
was
passed
two
years
ago.
Is
failure
to
comply.
I
really
do,
I
think,
we're
out
of
the
shoulder
period,
and
I
would
give
time
again
if
I
had
my
droppers.
I
would
give
time
and
notice
and
say
in
90
days
we're
going
to
implement
a
registration
failure
to
register
fee.
You
have
90
days
and
nine
webinars
between
now
and
then
to
get
this
done
and
give
time
to
get
it
done
absolutely
and
accommodate
folks
who
need
help
while
also
saying
hey.
We
gotta
get
serious.
F
Yeah
and
if
I,
if
I
could
just
respond
specifically
to
that,
I
want
to
get
to
the
rest
of
the
comments
so
I'll
make
this
as
short
as
I
can,
but
you
know
other
jurisdictions
in
implementing
this.
I
know
they
have
like
a
year
or
two
year
ahead
of
time
and
more
time
for
smaller
landlords
to
get
on
board
and
that
and
that's
when
the
system
is
set
up
and-
and
you
know
ready
to
go,
we
just
changed
the
definition
of
base
rent.
F
So
all
the
base
rents
that
have
been
put
in
over
the
past
year
potentially
need
to
be
revised
like
we're
in
a
position
where
it's
not
super
stable,
and
I
would
say
that
our
our
tech
is.
We
have
some
tech
debt
to
get
to
that
level,
and
so,
if
we
are
not
absolutely
in
a
place
where
we
feel
like
it's
absolutely
defensible
and
totally
we've
given
enough
notice
to
folks
that
they
need
to
do
this,
and
we
don't
necessarily
know
all
of
the
reason
like
we
don't
know
the
problem
we're
trying
to
solve
like.
F
D
So
I
was
fortunate
enough
to
be
at
almost
every
single
councilman
meeting
since
2015.,
and
I
do
remember
that
meeting
I
do
remember
miss
jones
and
I
do
remember,
miss
juliet
brody
and
yes,
a
lot
of
the
arguments
for
measure
v
was
that
it
was
complaint
base.
However,
that
was
a
while
back.
They
also
said
that
mobile
homes
would
be
covered
under
this,
so
and
look
where
we
are
so
things
obviously
change
and
things
evolve.
We
went
through
an
entire
pandemic
where
we
wished.
D
We
had
this
data
like
like
so
many
people
wish.
We
had
this
data
because
of
the
pandemic
and
the
chaos
that
ensued
from
it
so
and
it
was
even
before
the
pandemic,
where
we
were
trying
to
get
compliance
for
the
rent
registry.
We
made
it
voluntary
to
begin
with
and
then
slowly
when
we
realized
voluntary
wasn't
going
to
happen.
We
we
made
it
mandatory.
D
I
guess
where
we
send
a
letter
to
the
the
the
property
owner
or
the
property
manager
and
then
sent
to
the
tenants.
I
do
actually
like
chair
haynes
libsay's
idea
of
like
hey
30,
to
90
day
buffer
period
before
they
send
it
out
to
the
tenants
and
cause
chaos,
because
I
remember
when
measure
v
first
passed
and
we
were
telling
tenants.
D
Oh
you,
your
rent
will
roll
back
and
then
and
then
there
was
a
lawsuit
prevented
that
and
we
had
to
tell
people
like
you
need
to
pay
that
full
rent
so
that
that
chaos
does.
I
do
remember
that
chaos,
so
I
I
think
that's
that's
kind
of
a
a
beautiful
solution
to
that
issue
and
in
that
30
to
90
day,
depending
on
what
we
want
to
go
for
what
kind
of
buffer
we
want
to
give.
D
If,
if,
if
a
property
owner
tells
the
the
our
staff
like
what's
the
issue,
for
example
the
bulk
uploading,
I
don't
think
that
we're
going
to
punish
that
that
landlord,
when
they
have
already
told
us
the
issue
that
they
are
going
to
do,
we
kind
of
view
that,
as
kind
of
like
a
open
case
and
that's
kind
of
how
I'm
viewing
this,
unfortunately,
that
will
take
a
significant
amount
of
staff
time,
I'm
assuming
if
we
suddenly
get
bombarded
with
landlords
saying
suddenly.
These
are
the
issues
and
that's
what
we
wanted.
D
We
wanted
landlords
to
tell
us
the
issues
that
were
preventing
them
from
signing
up.
So
I
think
that
that
cure
period
is
actually
really
good
now
how
that
interfaces
so
like.
If
we
look
at
our
time
frame
of
like
they
tell
the
landlord,
then
the
30
to
90
day
period
that
buffer
period
they
tell
the
tenants.
I
think
that's
also
appropriate
when
they
put
it
on
on
the
website.
I
think
that
they
can
be
known
at
the
same
time
and
then
the
question
is
at
what
point
do
you
go
to
that
third
step?
D
I
don't
know
what
time
frame
you
want
to
go
for
that,
but
I
think
those
three
really
easy
to
move
forward
with
immediately.
I
agree
with
I'm
hoping
committee
member
rosas
wants
to
bring
back
four
and
five.
We
can
take
that
to
the
stakeholder
meetings.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
already
jumping
to
two,
but
that
is
that
is
the
framework
that
I'm
looking
at
and
I
don't
wanna
table
anything.
E
Real
quick,
I
I
agree
with
what
nicole
was
saying,
and
I
think
vice
chair
ramos
was
agreeing
with
her
as
well.
I
think
that
giving
them
90
they've
had
two
years
and
sending
out
a
compliance
letter
saying
in
90
days.
You
will,
you
know
you
need
to
have
your
properties
registered
and
if
not,
there
will
be
x
penalty,
and
I
bet
you
all
of
a
sudden.
A
large
amount
of
landlords
would
register
their
properties.
E
E
E
K
Sure
so,
thank
you
very
much,
so
I
am
open
to
changing
the
process.
I
guess
of
of
the
option
or
that
you,
if
you
believe
that
having
a
third
party
will
hold
rent
is,
is,
is
too
much
of
an
of
a
problem.
I
can
change
it,
but
the
problem
still
lies
and
the
problem
we're
trying
to
fix
is
that
there's,
60
percent
of
of
landlords
that
have
not
registered
our
staff
is
having
to
chase
them
around.
They
already
have
done
so.
K
They've
done
multiple
webinars
every
year,
they've
done
one-on-one
help
they
reached
out
to
them
multiple
letters
and
they
have
ignored
them.
So
that's
my,
I
guess
the
system
that
we
create
it
does
have
to
have
some
type
of
enforcement
mechanism,
because
I
don't
think
it
it's
working.
It's
already
been
now
specifically
talking
about
the
csfra,
because
it's
been
up
for
six
years
and
we're
still
having
this
issue
for
six
years
I
mean
the
mhsro.
K
Is
it's
a
little
different?
Although
it
was
part
of
the
csf
array
anyway?
So
and
then
I
would
like
to
answer
some
some
type
of
of
of
questions
that
were
set
out
there
in
terms
of
like.
I
don't
think
that
we're
being
intrusive
and
I
don't
think
we
are
trying
to
change
the
complaint
basis
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
today.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
fix
the
problem
that
landlords
are
not
com
signing
up.
How
do
we
do
that?
K
I
think
six
years
has
been
plenty
of
time
for
landlords,
one
grant
and
I'll
grant
you.
I
am
a
woman
of
a
certain
age.
Technology
can
be
a
little
wonky
for
me,
but
I
do
reach
out.
I
I
do
say
hey.
Can
you
help
me?
Because
you
know
I
don't
seem
to
understand
this,
and
we
have
really
smart
people
in
the
city
and
especially
landlords,
because
I
mean
for
them
to
be
able
to.
You
know
have
a
building
it
is.
K
F
F
You
know
registration
of
putting
in
all
the
information
of
your
units
without
without
penalty,
and
that's
I
mean
I,
I
think,
that's
what
I
want
to
make
sure
the
question
that
I
asked
during
the
first
segment
of
legal
to
say
what
happens
if
a
landlord
misrecorded
an
aga
or
or
miscalculated
an
aga
and
gave
someone
an
aga
six
months
ago.
That
was
incorrect.
F
We
could
be
saying
that
when
one
unit
is
out
of
compliance
six
months
ago
or
a
year
ago,
that
that
meant
any
other
increases
given
to
any
other
unit
are
also
not
allowed,
and
so
all
those
units
can
go
back
and
say
we
we
would
like
our
refund.
As
legal
said,
it
is
it's
optional,
but
that's
still
I
mean
there
are
still
the
question
to
the
10
would
be.
F
Would
you
like
to
have
money
or
not
right
if
our
laws
say
that
you
were
non-compliant
during
that
time,
it
could
not
raise
the
rent
for
those
six
months,
then
you
know,
and
then
they
get
that
back
potentially
and
interest
on
top
of
that,
even
though
they
had
no
involvement
with
the
individual
unit
right.
That's,
I
think
what
I'm
trying
to
put
forward
is
that
doesn't
seem
fair.
F
It
seems
like
you
would
actually
go
through
a
petition
or
potentially
put
a
fee
on
top
of
that,
the
first
time
it
happens
that
you
miscalculate
the
aga
no
fee.
Second
time
you
do
that.
You
know
100,
500
or
whatever,
but
I'm
really
concerned
about
this,
putting
them
in
the
same
bucket,
where
all
the
units
can
go
back
and
say
you
weren't
compliant
during
this
time.
F
A
I
Yeah,
that's
correct,
it's!
You
know
it's
only
if
you're,
not
in
substantial
compliance
that
you
cannot.
So
I
don't
think
I
mean
again.
This
is
a
partly
a
decision
for
a
hearing
officer
and
we're
not
by
adopting
you
know
if
you
were
to
adopt
any
of
these
you're,
not
changing
what
the
status
quo
is,
which
is
what
you
described.
I
If
someone
thinks
right
now
that
their
landlord
is
out
of
compliance
with
the
csfra
in
any
way
shape
or
form,
they
can
file
a
petition,
there's
nothing
stopping
them
and
say
this
landlord
imposed
an
unlawful
rent
increase
and
then
it
becomes
up
to
the
hearing
officer
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
landlord
was
in
substantial
compliance
or
not,
and
whether
to
award
that
tenant.
You
know
back
rent
that
was
paid
so
we're
not
chain.
You
know,
none
of
these
enforcement
mechanisms
would
change
what
already
exists.
I
That
petition
mechanism
is
there
and
it
can
be
used
in
that
way.
Right
now
I
I
mean
I
can't
say
what
a
hearing
officer
is
going
to
do,
but
you
know,
as
far
as
sending
letters,
I
think
it
is
reasonable
to
say
we're
only
going
to
send
letters
to
the
units
that
were
not
registered,
not
we're
going
to
send
letters
to
every
single
unit
because
one
unit
is
not
registered.
I
K
F
Yeah
I'll
just
respond
real
quick.
I
mean
that
so
perhaps
I
misheard,
but
it's
still
in
the
the
hearing
officer,
could
still
take
any
any
of
those
actions
with
the
what
I
could
imagine
happening,
let's
say
a
tight-knit
community
that
is
up
with
they.
They
are
going
to
check
the
website
and
know
what
the
status
is
for
any
unit
in
the
building
or,
let's
say
like
for
a
mobile
home
park
right
if
there's
the
potential
that
that
the
the
park
was
out
of
compliance
for
a
certain
amount
of
time.
F
I
could
imagine
several
individuals
in
the
unit
at
least
trying
to
to
put
forward
that
the
the
rent
increase
was
not
reasonable
or
not
allowed,
and
if
I,
if
I'm
hearing
it
correctly,
they
still
have
that
case
and
it
would
be
up
to
the
hearing
officer
and
I
guess
what
I'm
what
I'm
putting
forward
to
the
to
the
committee
is
like.
Could
we
just
at
least
put
that
right
that
into
these
rules,
right
or
or
instruct
staff
to
carve
out
differences
among
the
the
segment
out
who's
in
compliance?
F
And
not
I
mean
again
if
the
whole
building
is
not
registered
versus
one
unit.
I
would,
I
think
it
would
behoove
us
to
to
carve
that
out
differently
and,
like
you
said
about
the
letters
I
was,
I
agree
with
that
I
mean
if,
if
the,
if
individual
units
are
not
registered-
and
maybe
I
was
misreading
the
slide,
if
individual
units
are
not
registered,
it
just
goes
the
individual
unit
and
the
city,
and
obviously
staff
knows
about
it.
That
does
seem
more
reasonable,
but
I
don't
see
a
table.
F
I'd
like
to
see
that
differentiation,
what
you
said
makes
sense,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
recording
it.
While
we
come
back
with
these
rules,
if
that's
what
the
committee,
if
that's
what
the
committee
is
saying,
we
should
say
too:
if
your
whole
building
is
not
registered,
that's
potentially
different,
then
you've
got
an
infraction
on
individual
unit
that
needs
to
get
resolved.
I
And
just
to
respond
to
that,
there
isn't
a
table,
because
that's
really
for
the
committee
to
decide.
You
know
we
didn't
want
to
put
something
forward
and
say
this
is
what
we
think
it
should
be.
It's
up
to
the
committee
to
decide
what
is
reasonable
and
that's
within
your
your
purview.
We
can
just
tell
you
what
the
tools
are
and
how
they
might
be
used.
I
F
Got
it
and
I
yeah,
I
guess
that
sorry
to
respond
again
and
interrupt,
but
I
think
that's
what
I'm
asking
the
committee
to
make
that
differentiation.
If
we
can,
because
I
think
we're
talking
about
it,
but
we're
just
going
to
go
forward
with
everybody
gets
letters
and
everyone
gets
enforcement
potentially
and
leave
it
up
to
hearing
officers
or
other
folks.
D
D
I
believe
that
we,
it
has
been
about
two
years
since
we
made
it
mandatory,
but
it's
been
more
than
that
long,
that
we
had
it
available
for
people
to
actually
do,
but
I
also
want
to
to
poke
a
little
at
having
the
potential
of
like
one
unit,
not
compliant
one,
some
units
not
being
in
compliance
while
others
not.
I
have
some
concerns
relating
to
you.
D
Act
like
the
solidarity
between
tenants
is
kind
of
a
bad
thing,
and
that
that's
not
a
bad
thing
to
me
because,
like
there
are
various
ranges
of
essentially
tenants,
empowered
and
not
you
when
you
were
10,
I
remember
you
mentioned
you
were
a
tenant.
When
you
first
moved
to
mountain
view,
I'm
sure
you
were
a
very
empowered
tenant
to
be
able
to
talk
to
your
landlord
work
things
out,
negotiate
too.
There
are
many
tenants
in
our
city
that
don't
feel
that
level
of
empowerment
they,
the
english,
might
be
a
second
language
to
them.
F
That's
what
we
were
just
talking
about
with
with
the
change
in
base
rent
right
and
it's
up
to
the
scripted
to
say.
What's
fair,
I
think-
and
it
was
more
if
it
was
an
aga
adjustment
on
one
unit
and
that
was
technically
out
of
compliance,
then
the
others
would
have
the
awareness.
I
agree
with
you
on
on,
like
the
power
of
unions
and-
and
you
know,
collective
bargaining
for
sure,
but
just
making
sure
that
we
are
not
allowing
it.
F
G
So
what
I
heard
was
that
everybody
would
like
to
move
forward
with
option
one
two:
three,
with
all
the
recommendations
inserted
there
like
looking.
What
is
the
best
options
with
regards
to
the
technicality
of
the
database,
with
the
options
whether
we
should
differentiate
between
unit
based
versus
property,
based
options
in
option,
one
two
three
and
then
leave
option
four
and
five
out
for
now
and
just
focus
on
the
first
three
options,
and
I
also
did
not
hear
that
you
were
in
favor
of
holding
stakeholder
meetings
but
just
see
the
next
recommendations
from
staff.
E
G
I
You
know
to
have
a
little
bit
more,
since
this
is
like
numbers
to
have
a
little
bit
more
specific
direction
on
this
one,
and
it
can,
you
know
it
can
be
arranged.
But
if
you're
like
absolutely
not
100
or
something
like
that,
then
we
would
want
to
know
that
so
that
we
don't
spend
the
time
coming
up
with
a
proposal.
That's
just
gonna
get
ignored.
K
I
just
want
to
caution
everybody
that
if
we
go
too
high
on
the
penalty
fees,
that's
going
to
be
passed
on
to
the
renter,
so
we
you
should
think
about
that,
especially
for
the
families
who
are
like
you
know,
we're
making
it.
As
we
saw
in
the
report,
we're
making
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
a
year.
I
mean
it's
like.
A
So
we
don't
allow
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
capital
improvement
petitions
to
include
things
like
penalty
fees,
so
passing
it
through.
Would
it
maximum
mean
that
they
take
the
aga?
So
we
should
be
able
to
somewhat
control
for
that,
but
I
do
think
it's
a
valid
concern
that
we
don't
want
to
see.
People
get
hit
that
they're
not
responsible
for
paying
the
landlord's
penalty,
and
I
I
would
say
I
would
take
east
palo,
alto's
late
registration
penalty
and
santa
monica's
annual
fee
payment
penalty
and
smoosh
those
two
together.
If
it
was
me.
K
And
yes,
I
totally
agree
with
you
guys
that
it's
not
I
mean
in
theory
it's
not
supposed
to,
but
in
practice
somehow
my
lord's
gonna
be
doing
that
and
I'm
like
you
guys,
you
know,
wait.
We
do
not
yeah
and
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
mean
I
always
keep
on
thinking
in
terms
of
like
okay,
we
want
to
go
to
our
restaurants.
We
want
to
have
a
good
teachers.
We
want
to
have
good
policemen,
I
don't
want
them
worrying
about.
K
You
know
that
the
landlord
is
going
to
increase,
rents
and
they're
going
to
leave
us
and
I
think,
we're
starting
to
go
to
a
place
where
we
have
a
good
combination
of
of
people
that
can
live
here
and
also
we
can
have
our.
Although
now
with
inflation,
is
it's
a
little
hard
enough,
but
we
can
go
to
our
restaurant
and
eat
our
favorite
food
once
in
a
while,
I
guess
once
a
month.
A
K
I
will
second
it
because
yeah
I
I
want
to
be.
I
want
to
be
one
awake
for
it
and
two
that
we
have
a
robust
one
conversation
with
the
community
and
two,
the
community,
the
community
committee
members
to
be
really
open
or
or
yeah.
You
know
what
I
mean.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
everybody's
awake,
that's
all.
C
K
A
G
I
will
try
to
make
it
as
summarized
as
possible,
but
we
are
proposing
some
amendments
to
csfr
regulations,
5
and
mhrso
regulations,
6
to
expressly
authorize
hearing
officers
and
the
chair
of
the
rental
housing
committee
to
issue
decisions
on
pre-hearing
motions
and
accommodation
requests,
including
requests
for
reasonable
accommodation.
Pursuant
to
the
americans
with
disabilities
act
and
we'd
like
to
give
you
an
overview
of
the
authority
of
the
real
housing
committee.
G
So
chapter
5
of
the
csf
array
outlines
the
procedures
for
the
hearings
on
petitions
and
the
proposed
amendment
seeks
to
authorize
both
hearing
officers
and
in
case
that
might
or
might
not
be
available.
The
chair
of
the
rental
housing
committee
to
decide
and
issue
decisions
on
pre-hearing
motions
and
accommodation
requests.
G
G
For
instance,
if
there
is
a
pre-hearing
motion
to
disqualify
a
hearing
officer,
the
chair
would
be
better
to
decide
this
issue
and
with
the
assistance
of
legal
counsel,
and
these
amendments
will
also
allow
any
sensitive
requests
from
a
party
to
a
petition,
such
as
a
disability
related
reasonable
accommodation
to
be
considered
confidential.
Confidentially.
A
A
I
F
G
A
Just
to
follow
up
on
that
question,
I
think,
if
I'm
understanding
this
proposal
properly,
something
like
the
pre-hearing
motion
would
be
something
that
historically,
the
hearing
officer
has
been
deciding
anyway,
and
this
amendment
would
merely
codify
that.
Yes,
indeed,
the
hearing
officer
is
authorized
to
do
that.
A
If,
for
whatever
reason
the
hearing
officer
couldn't
act,
it
would
give
the
chair
the
ability
to
act,
but
for
item
number,
two
where
the
hearing
officer
may
not
be
as
have
any
historical
background
work
off
of
it
would
allow,
instead
of
opening
something
up
to
perhaps
a
public
forum
to
be
handled
more
privately.
Is
that
sort
of
what
we're
saying
here.
I
That's
correct,
yeah.
I
think.
Ultimately,
it's
going
to
be
within
the
decision
of
the
hearing
officer,
whether
they're
going
to
hear
the
motion
or
the
request
initially
and
then,
if
they
decide
that
they
are
either
not
the
appropriate
person
or
something
needs
to
be
done
more
quickly,
for
instance,
with
a
reasonable
accommodation
request,
then
it
can
go
to
the
chair.
I
The
you
know,
topic
is
not
appropriate
for
a
closed
session,
so
you
know
it
would
be
putting
the
public's
the
tenant
or
the
petitioner's
information
out
there,
medical
information
it
would
be
discussed
openly.
So
that
is,
that
is
another
option
that
could
be
what
the
committee
chooses
to
do
is
to
hear
all
of
these
requests
in
an
open
session.
F
I
A
Any
other
questions
from
the
committee:
okay,
seeing
none,
we
will
now
move
to
public
comment.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
So
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen
and
I
see
a
hand,
let's
advance
stephen.
L
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
I
think
that
the
stat
summary
is
very
incomplete
is
not
determining
whether
the
previous
judiciary
decision
should
apply,
but
it's
actually
happened
was
that
there
was
even
a
previous
hearing
in
2018
that
was
not
considered
during
the
petition
of
2021
that
actually
determined
that
there
was
a
problem
with
maintenance
with
the
building
and,
of
course
again.
L
What
the
current
petition
is
addressing
is
the
fact
that
the
property
has
again
dropped
in
value
by
45
and
that
by
default
would
qualify
a
person
under
the
csfra
with
a
proportional
45
percent
default
reduction
in
rent,
unless,
of
course,
the
the
situation
would
be.
Is
that
somehow
the
situation
would
be
possibly
adjudicated
to
not
happen.
L
Again,
I
was
taken
aback
by
the
fact
that
the
tax
basis
of
the
building
was
reduced
twice
and
there
was
no
notification
to
the
tenants
of
that
fact.
And
so
what
was
really
going
on
here
is
there
was
a
withholding
of
information
and,
of
course,
the
real
thing
is
that,
even
though
the
previous
decision
was
based
on
in
2018
that
the
the
rent
that
was
being
charged
was
appropriate,
given
the
maintenance
of
course
again,
this
all
boils
down
to
the
same
maintenance
behavior
was
being
was
not
being
maintained
properly.
L
Well
then,
it
would
thereby
in
effect,
render
that
the
cap
accounting
for
a
return
on
investment
and
everything
would
have
to
be
completely
recalculated
based
on
the
new
property
tax
status.
That's
all
I'm
saying,
and
I
understand
that
I'm
interfering
with
the
hearing,
but
this
is
very
important
for
you
to
consider.
Thank
you.
Q
Hi,
yes,
thank
you
I'll
keep
this
quick.
I
just
want
to
speak
against
the
option
of
having
a
public
hearing
where
a
person's
personal
private
information
is
shared
for
discourse.
Is
this
enough
for
someone
to
be
just
you
know,
just
to
you
know,
consider
disabled
or
whatever,
that
discourse
is
around,
that?
I
think
that
completely
takes
a
r
takes
away
their
right
to
live
with
dignity,
and
I
really
hope
that
you
all
take
that
into
consideration.
Thank
you.
So
much.
B
A
We
go
a
motion.
Let's
see
a
motion
to
approve
would
include
the
language
to
adopt
amendments
to
the
csfra
regulations,
chapter
five
hearing
procedures
and
mhrso
regulations,
chapter
6,
hearing
procedures
to
expressly
authorize
hearing
officers
and
the
chair
of
the
rental
housing
committee
to
issue
decisions
on
pre-hearing
motions
and
accommodation
requests,
including
requests
for
reasonable
pursuant
to
the
americans
with
disabilities
act.
E
Oh,
I
would
like
to
move
to
review
and
adopt
amendments
to
csfra
regulations,
chapter
5,
hearing
procedures
and
mhrso
regulations,
chapter
6,
hearing
procedures
to
expressly
authorize
hearing
officers
and
the
chair
of
the
rental
housing
committee
to
issue
decisions
on
pre-hearing
motions
and
accommodation
requests,
including
requests
for
reasonable
accommodation.
Pursuant
to
the
americans
with
disability
act.
F
F
It
just
makes
me
a
little
uncomfortable
because
I
don't
know
everything
that's
under
that
umbrella,
but
the
accommodation
request
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
and
that
doesn't
feel
as
though
a
decision
is
being
made
or
someone's
prevented
from
having
their
case
heard.
So
I
guess
my
if
anyone
would
be
open
to
a
friendly
amendment
of
just
limiting
it
to
accommodation
requests.
But
if
folks,
that's
that's
like.
B
B
C
C
A
G
G
G
So
how
does
that
look
with
the
overall
budget?
As
you
can
see,
personnel
is
the
biggest
expenditure
cost
for
this
year
with
34.1
the
non-personnel
made
up
20
of
the
spending
budget
budgets,
the
capital
outlay
1
and
the
interference
expenditure
is
14,
which
leaves
a
remaining
budget
of-
and
I
didn't
mention
the
percentage
here.
But
if
I
do
a
quick,
30,
68.
A
One
very
quick
question:
anki
if
I
understood
that
last
comment
correctly,
you're
saying
that
after
all,
expenses
for
2022
have
hit,
except
for
a
small
amount
that
we
expect
to
be
built
in
arrears,
we
have
about
42
percent
of
the
budget
left
to
surplus,
so
32
yep,
32,
so
we'll
end
up
with
still
a
decent
surplus.
Is
what
you're
saying
potentially.
A
A
K
A
A
G
G
So
goldfarb
and
lipman,
as
you
all
know,
has
provided
legal
services
for
the
rental
housing
committee
since
the
start
of
the
program,
and
it
provides
subject
matter
expertise
for
the
rental
housing
committee.
But
it
also
represents
the
rental,
housing
committee
and
litigation,
and
currently
two
lawsuits
are
still
pending.
The
redwood
villa
lawsuit,
as
well
as
enlightened
investments.
G
G
G
A
A
Very
good
any
other
questions
before
I
go
to
public
health,
okay,
seeing
run.
I
will
now
invite
public
comment
on
this
item.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
and
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
the
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
D
I
moved
to
authorize
the
program,
manager
or
other
degrees
of
need
to
approve
an
amendment
to
this
to
the
agreement
with
goldberg
and
lipman
llp
for
legal
services
relating
to
the
community
stabilization
and
bear
rant
act
for
services
performed
between
july
1st
2021
through
july
30th
2022,
with
an
augmentation
of
95
893
for
a
total
amount
not
to
exceed
320
893
for
the
fiscal
year.
2021-2022.
A
F
E
A
A
H
So,
as
I
do
in
each
rental
housing
committee
meeting,
I
talk
about
the
housing
and
eviction
help
center,
which
we
hold
at
the
library
every
first
and
third
thursday
of
the
month
from
1
to
5
pm.
We
are
at
the
first
floor
program
room,
so
it's
just
right
past
the
front
doors
off
to
the
right
hand,
side
by
the
elevators.
H
If
anybody
wants
to
come
and
see
us
in
person,
we
are
there.
We
are
also
available
for
helping
online
if
people
want
to
join
the
zoom,
it's
mountainview.gov
eviction
help
clinics,
so
we
are
available
on
zoom
as
well
and
we
try
to
provide
all
services
related
to
housing
and
beyond.
They
can
learn
about
rent
stabilization
programs,
apply
for
affordable
housing,
connect
with
rental
assistance
programs
and
check
those
at
19
state
rent
relief
applications.
H
We
also
have
eviction
support,
so
if
anyone
receives
an
eviction
notice
or
if
anyone
is
interested
in
serving
an
eviction
notice,
we
can
answer
questions
about
that.
There's
also
legal
resources
that
are
available
on
the
zoom
only
at
this
moment.
So
we
have
a
legal
representative
from
cluspa
available
from
two
to
four
o'clock:
every
thurs,
first
and
third
thursday
of
the
month
on
the
zoo
and
there's
also
other
types
of
information
such
as
food
distribution,
diaper
distribution,
other
types
of
financial
assistance,
homelessness,
prevention
services,
children,
development
resources
and,
and
the
like.
H
So
we
will
have
staff
at
the
chalk
outreach,
which
is
a
diaper
distribution.
So
that
will
be
this
wednesday
from
two
to
three
o'clock.
We
also
have
a
staff
training
this
wednesday
for
the
pilot
program,
elevate
mv,
which
is
a
guaranteed
basic
income
pilot
program.
So
the
rent
stabilization
staff
will
be
training
with
the
city
learning
how
to
sign
people
up
for
that,
and
we
will
be
hosting
two
dates
at
our
rent
stabilization
office,
which
are
listed
at
the
bottom
of
this
list.
H
Here
also
on
wednesday,
the
24th
there
is
back
to
school
night
at
castro
minstrel
elementary,
and
so
we
will
have
rent
stabilization
staff
there
from
five
to
eight
o'clock
and
then
the
following
wednesday
august
28th
from
two
to
four.
We
will
have
our
staff
at
the
shoreline
west
neighborhood
association
block
party,
so
we'll
have
our
outreach
material
and
we'll
be
passing
that
out
to
all
the
community
members
who
stop
by
other
than
that.
H
We
are
also
having
still
our
zoom
webinars
so
september,
14th
at
6,
30
we'll
have
a
tenant
and
landlord
focused
bilingual
english
and
spanish
hud
mortgage
assistance
and
credit
counseling
webinar
that
will
be
presented
by
a
staff
member
at
project.
Sentinel
we'll
have
a
guest
speaker
there
and
then,
on
thursday
september
15th
at
four
o'clock,
we're
having
a
hybrid
in
person
and
on
zoom
webinar
at
the
help
center
and
we'll
have
guest
speaker
from
csa.
H
Who
will
talk
about
their
programs
and
that
will
be
in
english
and
spanish
as
well,
and
then
you'll
see
here
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen,
that
our
sign
up?
Events
for
the
guaranteed
basic
income
program
will
be
friday,
september
16th,
which
is
the
kickoff
date
for
the
program
signups
and
then
we'll
also
have
friday
september
23rd
from
1
to
6
o'clock
at
our
rent
stabilization
office
at
298
escuela.
D
D
K
Committee
advise
wise,
chair
ramos.
Thank
you
for
flagging
it
because
I
haven't
seen
it,
but
I'll
look
for
it
in
my
email.
I
am
very
excited
to
yeah
meeting.
You
know
committee
member
bonding
that
that's
always
nice
and
then
my
comment
because
I
got
I
have
to
give
credit
where
credit
is
due.
So
I
want
to
thank
andrea
and
I
can
remember
the
other
two
staff
members
that
were
at
the
cafeto
meeting
they
came.
Who
was
there
and
alexa
was
awesome?
K
Okay,
thank
you
because
they
did
a
great
job.
They
answered
a
lot
of
questions,
even
questions
that
have
not
didn't
have
to
do
with
with
the
rhc,
but
they
also
explain
what
what
below
market
rate
means
and
and
what
is
about
so
that
was
very
helpful
and
cafeto
is
very
grateful
because
they
definitely
needed
this
information
so
wanted
to
give
credit
where
credit
is
due.
A
Okay,
none
all
right
well
scene,
none.
I
believe
that
this
means
that
the
meeting
is
adjourned
at
10
26
p.m.
The
next
rental
housing
committee
meeting
is
scheduled
to
be
held
on
monday
september
19th
2022
at
7
pm.
Everyone
have
a
great
night
and
hopefully
see
some
folks
at
the
block
party
coming
up.