►
From YouTube: January 24, 2022 Rental Housing Committee Meeting
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Rental Housing Committee Meeting
A
The
January
24
2022
rental
housing
committee
meeting
the
meeting
is
called
to
order
at
701
PM.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
city
of
Mountain,
View
rental
housing
committee
resolution
number,
56
and
city
of
Mountain
View
city
council
resolution
number
1-8618.
In
accordance
with
assembly,
Bill
361.,
all
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee
will
participate
in
the
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting.
Live
May
do
so
at
mountainview.leggestar.com
on
YouTube,
at
mountainview.gov
YouTube
and
on
Comcast
channel
26.
A
C
B
A
We
will
now
move
to
agenda
item
three
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
committee
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
The
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
committee
to
efficiently
and
quickly
consider
routine
or
administrative
business
items
with
one
motion.
Although
committee
members
May
remove
items,
it
is
generally
not
intended
for
the
committee
to
have
a
lengthy
substantive
discussion
on
consent,
calendar
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
committee
like
to
pull
an
item.
A
E
F
A
You
perfect
perfect
in
that
case,
there's
nobody
with
a
raised
hand
right:
okay,
okay,
public!
We
can
now
have
public
comment.
Public
comment
can
be
on
any
Edge
item
agenda
item,
regardless
of
if
it
was
pulled
for
discussion,
would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raised
hand
button
in
Zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
A
D
B
A
Okay,
now
we'll
go
to
oral
communication,
we
will
now
open
the
meeting
for
oral
communication
from
the
public.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
committee
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
committee
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comments
on
non-agenda
items?
A
H
H
So
the
purpose
of
this
presentation
is
to
receive
a
presentation
from
staff
and
meet
the
hearing.
Officers
that
provide
facilitation
and
hearing
services
for
the
rental
housing
committee
give
a
little
background
this
evening.
The
rhc
appoints
hearing
officers
and
this
is
authorized
under
Section
1709
D4
of
the
csfra
and
the
rental
housing
committee
contracts,
with
project
Sentinel
to
provide
hearing
officer
Services
as
authorized
by
regulation.
Chapter
5,
Section
B
project
Sentinel
provides
these
services
on
behalf
of
the
city.
Thank
you.
H
They
recruit
hearing
officers
on
behalf
of
the
rental
housing
committee
and
that
goes
through
a
RFP
process
which
was
last
performed
in
fiscal
year.
2018-19.
The
hearing
officers
that
are
reached
out
to
and
examiners
are
server
often
serve
on
other
run
stabilization
programs,
and
also
we
have
sent
out
the
RFP
to
ADR
panels
in
the
Tri-County
area,
with
background
in
landlord-tenant
matters
and
or
experience
with
financial
matters,
and
then
the
potential
recruits
go
through
a
panel
interview
process
to
be
approved
for
the
position.
H
H
The
first
one
that
they
provide
is
petition
settlement
conference
facilitation,
so
one
part
of
one
option
when
a
tenant
or
a
landlord
files,
a
petition
for
Upward
or
downward
adjustment
of
rent
is
to
have
the
opportunity
to
receive
facilitation
services
for
a
settlement
conference
instead
of
going
through
the
public
hearing
process.
This
is
much
like
a
mediation.
It's
a
formal
and
binding
process
that
is
also
private
and
our
hearing
officers
do
facilitate
those
on
behalf
of
the
parties.
They
are
not
the
same
hearing
officer
that
would
hear
the
petition.
H
Should
it
not
go
through
the
full
settlement
conference
or
should
the
settlement
conference
not
be
successful?
They
are
the
same
batch
of
hearing
officers,
but
if
you
had
a
petition
that
was
being
adjudicated
and
someone
chose
a
settlement
conference,
we
would
have
one
hearing
officer
from
our
hearing
officer.
Poole
provide
the
settlement.
Conference
facilitation
and
a
different
hearing
officer
go
through
the
hearing
process.
If
that
was
still
needed,
and
then
they
also
adjudicate
our
petition.
H
So
they
take
them
through
the
full
formal
hearing
process
after
the
staff
hands
off
the
process
to
the
hearing
officers,
and
that
includes
through
the
decision
making
process.
They
are
the
body
and
the
people
who
make
the
formal
decisions
for
the
program
instead
of
an
administrative
process
from
staff
and
also
should
they
receive
a
reman,
an
appeal
on
their
decision
and
should
that
have
a
remand,
they
would
also
be
the
people
responsible
for
adjusting
the
the
remand
as
well.
H
So
to
be
qualified
to
be
one
of
our
hearing
officers,
they
must
have
a
Juris
doctor
or
equivalent
degree.
An
active
or
inactive
membership
in
the
California
State
Bar,
with
good
standing
or
other
State
Bar,
be
a
trained
mediator
with
experienced
mediating,
landlord
or
and
tenant
disputes
have
completed
a
csfra
training
and
orientation
program
and
not
currently
be
a
member
of
a
tenant
or
landlord
advocacy
group
or
Trade
Organization
to
ensure
neutrality.
H
But
I
do
want
to
give
you
a
heads
up
on
who
you'll
be
speaking
with
this
evening.
This
is
Barbara
answer.
She
has
experience
as
an
attorney
and
as
a
legal
educator
and
has
been
a
dispute
resolution
professional
since
1998
and
I'll.
Let
her
go
into
more
detail
when
she
introduces
herself,
but
I
did
want
to
give
you
just
a
quick
overview
of
her.
H
Also
with
us.
This
evening
is
Derek
Chandler
he's
a
graduate
of
Golden
Gate
University
School
of
Law
and
has
been
licensed
to
practice
law
since
2012.,
and
he
has
quite
a
depth
of
experience
as
well
and
I'll.
Let
him
go
into
that.
We're
very
lucky
to
have
a
very
experienced
hearing
officer
team
for
our
program.
Next
up
is
Sandra
De,
La
Tour.
She
is
an
attorney
mediator
and
hearing
officer
and
has
practice
law
for
25
years.
H
Martin
Eichner
is
also
a
critical
part
of
our
team,
he's
a
graduate
of
Stanford
law
school
and
has
been
a
member
in
good
standing
of
the
State
Bar
for
more
than
30
years,
and
we
have
Karen
Lipinski
with
us
as
well.
She
has
15
years
of
experience
as
an
attorney
and
her
primary
area
of
practice
is
Estate,
Planning
and
administration.
H
So
that's
our
hearing,
officer,
team
and
I'm
going
to
allow
them
to
introduce
themselves
and
after
we
go
over
just
some
of
the
details
of
everything
that
our
hearing
officers
have
provided
for
our
program.
They
have
heard
107
petitions
19
landlord
petitions,
including
two
that
are
currently
pending,
one
of
which
right
now
is
actually
for
an
exemption
process
to
a
the
applicability
of
the
csfra
for
a
property
88
tenant
petitions
have
also
been
heard
by
our
hearing
officers.
We
have
21
petitions
that
they've
settled
through
settlement
conferences.
H
67
petitions
have
gone
through
the
full
adjudication
process,
with
15
being
decided
on
appeal
and
the
average
duration
from
acceptance
to
the
settlement
or
hearing
decision
being
served
as
91
days,
so
they
are
pretty
efficient
in
this
process.
At
this
point
and
with
that
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
bring
them
into
the
the
meeting
as
panelists
excuse
me,
I
had
a
little
moment
there.
So
if
we
can
do
that
now,
Andrea
that
would
be
great
and.
I
J
I
have
been
in
alternative
dispute
resolution
since
1998
prior
to
that
I
went
to
law
school
at
Stanford
and
I
was
a
lawyer
for
a
few
years
and
then
I
went
into
legal
education.
I
was
a
professor
of
law
at
Golden,
Gate
Law
School
in
San
Francisco
for
10
years,
and
so
in
1998
I
started
doing
arbitration
and
then
in
2004,
I
decided
to
devote
myself
to
a
full-time,
ADR
practice
and
I
started
doing
mediation.
Also-
and
my
experience
is
pretty
broad
I'm
on
a
number
of
panels.
J
K
Sure,
as
long
as
Barbara
gets
to
go
first
and
the
pressure's
off
good
evening,
ladies
and
gentlemen
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Derek.
Chandler
I
am
an
attorney,
but
don't
hold
that
against
me.
I
have
the
pleasure
of
working
with
your
city
and
serving
as
a
hearing
examiner
under
your
ordinance
and
several
other
ordinances
around
in
the
Bay
area
as
well.
K
L
I
also
was
working
as
staff
for
project
Sentinel
and
got
a
really
good
idea
of
some
of
these
programs,
while
I
was
at
project
Sentinel
as
well
as
volunteering
in
the
community
and
so
I've
really
developed
a
niche
in
landlord
tenants,
ADR
and
I
really
enjoy
working
with
the
Mountain
View
staff
and
working
for
the
city.
If
you
have
questions
for
me,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
questions.
N
N
Good
evening
so
I
started
I
got
involved
with
project
Sentinel
after
being
involved
with
the
County's
ADR
program
and,
let's
say
I
had
experience
representing
landlords.
I
spent
some
time
in
UD
court
and
then
I
also
volunteered
through
project
Sentinel
and
at
the
ud
and
so
I
guess
primarily
I.
Do
the
mediations
and
I?
Do
the
I
take
an
occasional
arbitration
because
I
think
that
I
should,
if
I'm
on
the
panel.
H
O
O
L
Well,
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
like
to
do
this
kind
of
work
is
I
feel
like
we
are
helping
people
get
through
difficult
times
in
a
fairly
timely
way.
They
don't
have
to
wait
for
months
or
years
for
resolution
and
especially
with
housing.
That's
critical
and
I
also
enjoy
working
with
the
people
out
outside
of
the
adversarial
system,
somewhat
like
what
Martin
said,
people
sort
of
change
who
they
are
as
they
go
through
litigation
that
adversarial
system
doesn't
really
help
people
get
along.
L
M
Let
me
just
add
one
more
important
thought
is
that
litigation
is
extremely
expensive
and
most
citizens
can't
afford
to
hire
an
attorney
and
pay
the
expenses
of
a
lawsuit
which
can
be
extremely
high,
and
a
program
like
this
gives
people
a
chance
to
participate
without
that
kind
of
expense
or
that
kind
of
financial
burden
facing
them.
And
even
if
they
win,
the
financial
burden
can
be
overwhelming,
and
this
program
is
a
whole
alternative
way
for
people
to
bring
their
disputes
forward
and
get
them
resolved.
B
G
Oh
great
hi
I
have
a
lot
of
questions
so
feel
free
to
write
them
down
as
I
I'm
gonna
put
them
all
out
there,
so
you
can
choose
how
you
want
to
answer
them
all
together.
So
the
first
question
I
have
are
any
of
you
bilingual
and
have
you
had
mediations
or
hearings
that
needed
a
bilingual
component
and
we're
gonna
broaden
out
to
other
accessibility
factors?
G
K
K
My
experience
is
they're.
All
very
professional
we've
had
Spanish,
we've
had
Chinese
and
sorry.
Mandarin
is
former
Chinese
and
one
other
Asian
language
which
off
the
top
of
my
head,
I,
don't
actually
remember,
but
it's
come
through
fairly.
Well.
Everything
they
translate,
of
course,
is
in
the
recording
or
the
written
transcript,
so
that
somebody
can
go
along
later
on
who
has
more
intelligence
than
I
do
and
make
sure
that
what
they
actually
translated
was
what
was
actually
said.
L
One
of
the
things
that
we
want
to
make
sure
of
is
that
no
one
comes
to
a
proceeding
like
this
and
feels
like
they
can't
communicate
so
I
would
not
go
forward.
If
we
didn't
have
proper
translation
services,
I
would
not
rely
on
a
family
member,
or
you
know
some
some
friend
to
do
that
kind
of
service.
I.
Think
it's
critical
for
communications
work
to
have
a
professional.
J
I'm
not
bilingual
either,
although
I
do
have
a
fairly
decent
Proficiency
in
one
foreign.
Language
and
I
agree
that
even
if
I
were
in
a
position
to
translate
in
that
foreign
language
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
a
good
idea,
because
the
hearing
officer
needs
to
be
able
to
concentrate
on
what's
going
on
in
the
hearing
and
not
have
to
think
about
what
am
I
going
to
use.
To
say
for
this
particular
word.
J
But
I've
had
experience
with
both
foreign
language
interpreters
and
sign
language,
interpreters
and
generally
from
my
experience
there,
as
Martin
mentioned
they're
very
well
trained
in
the
terminology
that
they
would
need,
and
the
the
trick
for
the
hearing
officer
when
you're
working
with
interpreters
is
to
make
sure
that
you're
speaking
to
the
party
and
not
to
The
Interpreter.
So
I
always
try
to
be
very
cognizant
of
that.
H
And
staff
would
like
to
mention
that
we
have
a
formal
process
in
place
for
this.
If
the
need
is
present
presented
to
to
staff
in
the
hearing
officer
during
the
petition
process,
we
actually
had
a
petition
hearing
this
past
last
week
that
was
continuously
translated
for
the
Spanish-speaking
Community
for
members
of
the
parties
that
required
that
service.
H
L
To
other
kinds
of
accessibilities
I
haven't
faced
much
many
requests
at
this
point
for
other
types
of
accessibility,
but
I'm
sure
we
have
processes
in
place
for
that
as
well,
because
there
are
alternatives.
Now
that
we
are,
we
can
do
meetings
on
Zoom
as
well
as
in
you
know,
we
used
to
do
them
in
person.
I
think
there
are.
We
can
do
things
on
the
phone,
so
I
do
believe
that
accessibility
is
not
a
a
big
challenge
at
the
moment.
E
I
just
I'm
curious,
you
know
when
working
with
a
committee
such
as
ours,
we
have
the
ability
to
remain
the
decision
and
also
to
modify
the
decision
and
if
my
question
is
too
dangerous
to
answer
completely
understand.
But
what
are
your
general
feelings
in
terms
of
a
body
such
as
ours,
in
terms
of,
should
we
generally
remand
or
modify
decisions,
or
is
it
really
Case
by
case
in
your
own
View.
K
Unsurprisingly,
no
one
else
is
jumping
in
on
that
one,
so
I
I
guess
I'll
give
it
a
go
for
both
chairs.
It
is
Case
by
case
I'm,
going
to
start
with
that.
I
definitely
agree
from
my
perspective.
I
am
as
capable
of
getting
something
wrong
as
the
next
person
down
the
street
I.
Do
everything
I
can
to
not
do
that,
of
course,
and
if
I'm
not
comfortable
with
a
written
decision,
then
I
you
know,
keep
working
on
it
until
I
am
comfortable
on
it.
K
Having
said
that,
it
is
nice
to
have
someone
like
the
board
there
to
turn
around
and
say
well
yeah.
You
know
you
might
have
missed
this
and
send
it
back
to
me
to
say:
hey
did
you
think
about
this,
and
maybe
I
did
think
about
it
and
didn't
write
it
down
in
the
decision,
and
maybe
it's
something
brand
new
that
a
new
set
of
eyes,
looking
at
the
facts
of
the
case,
has
identified
that
I
haven't.
K
L
I
think
it's
a
case-by-case
situation,
it's
so
the
the
decisions
are
based
on
so
many
facts
and
so
much
depth
of
of
detail
that
it
could
make
a
very
big
difference
to
someone
on
the
committee
to
you
know
to
have
a
particular
fact
involved
where
it
didn't
hit
the
hearing
officer
that
way
so
again,
I
agree
it's
good
to
have
another
set
of
eyes
and
opinions,
but,
as
a
hearing
officer,
I
appreciate
the
chance
to
try
to
modify
my
own
decision,
but
we
would
accept
whatever
you
choose
to
do.
Of
course,.
E
Well,
thank
you.
Both
I
really
appreciate
that
input.
I
I
was
more
just
curious
for
my
own
sort
of
edification
and
as
we
go
through
our
appeals.
Thinking
about
you
know
a
lot
of
times.
I
feel
like
at
least
personally
I'm
in
the
well.
We
could
remand
or
we
could
modify.
You
know
pros
and
cons
of
each.
So
it's
interested
to
hear
your
opinions
on
that.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
L
O
A
A
H
Good
evening,
thank
you,
chair
almond
item
7.2
is
our
monthly
reports
and
we're
going
to
go
over
these
relatively
quickly
this
evening,
since
our
agenda
is
so
very
full.
So
the
first
one
that
we'll
review
this
evening
is
our
rent
stabilization
program,
monthly
status
report
for
the
fiscal
year
2021-22.
As
of
December
2021
for
community
outreach
and
education,
we've
had
1295
public
inquiries
made,
547
of
which
were
requesting
bilingual
Services,
the
Spanish
as
a
primary
language,
and
the
bulk
of
that
right
now
is
for
covid
rent
relief.
H
So
what
you're,
seeing
here
in
this
increase
in
numbers,
is
that
we
received
assistance
from
the
county
of
Santa
Clara
to
help
with
phone
calls
for
follow-up
on
rent
release
applications
through
the
city's
rent
relief
program
that
was
administered
by
CFA.
The
county
was
able
to
assist
us
through
their
emergency
staff
and
provided
incredible
support
for
our
team
and
making
sure
that
everyone
who
applied
to
csa's
administered,
rent
relief
program
for
the
city
of
Mountain
View
was
followed
up
with
and
received
assistance
with
filling
out
a
state
rent
relief
application
as
well.
H
Target
here
you'll
see
our
workshops
and
trainings
office
hours
and
events.
We
are
holding
addiction,
help
center
clinics
pretty
much
every
twice
a
week
once
on
Tuesdays
and
once
on
Thursdays
and
then
as
needed
for
people
who
need
additional
support.
These
have
gone
fully
virtual
to
deal
with
the
Omicron
surge.
H
We
are
no
longer
at
the
library
during
this
high
risk
time,
and
the
services
will
continue
to
be
virtual
until
for
the
first
for
for
the
foreseeable
future
and
until
the
the
case
rates
do
decline,
we
have
not
seen
much
of
a
drop
in
attendance.
However,
it
is
so
very,
very
busy
at
the
eviction
help
center
and
right
now,
we've
had
quite
a
big
jump
in
attendees
at
575
attendees
for
our
eviction
help
center
clinics
and
pop-ups.
Since
the
start
of
the
fiscal
year,
we've
provided
five
math
mailings
and
375
targeted
letters.
H
So
every
time
we
receive
a
termination
notice
from
a
property
owner,
We
are
following
that
up
with
courtesy
letters
to
the
property
owner
and
to
the
tenant.
This
number
reflects
just
the
tenant
Outreach
and
the
targeted
letters
include
our
eviction
help
center
Flyers,
as
well
as
a
four-step
eviction
prevention
info
sheet.
H
We
have
also
placed
18
Mountain
View
voice,
ads,
specifically
mostly
focused
on
the
eviction
help
center
and
on
the
rent
release.
Webinars
this
the
fiscal
year
we've
had
72
mediations
and
conciliations
through
the
Mountain
View
mediation
program,
57
of
which
have
already
been
resolved
with
14.
Pending
and
again,
the
Mountain
View
mediation
program
provides
mediation
services
through
the
city
of
Mountain
View.
H
As
you
can
see
here,
this
is
the
total
breakdown
of
termination
submittals,
as
received
by
the
city,
and
we
have
not
seen
a
significant
increase
or
decrease
in
failure
to
pay
rent
notices
for
the
past
year,
and
this
holds
true
aside
from
the
time
when
the
eviction
moratorium
was
fully
in
place.
These
numbers
are
averaging
out
to
be
very
similar
to
what
we
saw
before
the
pandemic.
H
H
So
we
have
one
landlord
petition,
that's
related
to
an
mnoi
upward
adjustment
of
rent
and
one
landlord
petition
that
is
separate
and
not
petition.
Related
upward
adjustment
of
rent
petition
related
petition
just
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
clear
as
possible
for
the
market
conditions
fully
covered
units
are
at
6.9
percent
vacancy
and
that's
very
close
to
what
we're
seeing
for
a
fully
covered
unit.
H
Newly
built
units
are
all
the
way
up
at
10.3
percent,
but
that
is
dropping
and
partially
covered
units
are
at
four
percent,
so
we
are
seeing
Market
recovery
across
the
board
for
rent
rent
is
increasing
once
again
full
of
fully
covered
units,
it's
up
to
2525
dollars
on
average
for
Market
rent
and
since
the
start
of
the
tracking
that
we
do
here
going
all
the
way
back.
Looking
at
2009
10
fiscal
year,
that's
a
54.8
percent
increase
in
price,
so
I
do
want
to
mention
that.
H
The
reason
why
we
take
a
look
back
that
far
is
to
show
what's
happened
during
the
Great
Recession
to
the
market
and
how
that
was
affected
and
then
how
it
has
rebounded
over
time
and
for
properties
sold.
We
have
12
properties
that
have
been
sold
this
year,
that
our
CSI
fully
cut
csfra
fully
covered
units
and
for
a
total
of
116
units.
Right
now
there
are
for
the
month
of
December.
There
are
51
units
representing
three
properties
for
sale
and
before
I,
move
on
to
the
eviction
prevention
program.
E
H
And
those
letters
have
everything
provided
in
English,
Spanish,
Mandarin
and
Russian,
so
when
we
send
them
out,
we
send
out
quite
a
little
packet
with
all
of
those
languages
included
and
for
reporting
purposes.
I
do
want
to
mention
that
there
is
a
change
in
the
number
related
to
the
primary
language
being
spoken
or
requested
in
Spanish.
For
this
report
there
was
an
error.
It
was
being
reported
monthly
in
the
previous
reports
and
this
one
is
corrected
and
up
to
date
as
the
actual
fiscal
year
total.
So
please
note
that.
H
Next,
we'll
move
on
to
the
eviction
prevention
program
and
for
the
month
of
December,
give
me
one.
Second,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
my
computer's
a
little
picky
tonight
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
eviction
prevention
program
has
been
very
busy.
We
have
held
24
clinics,
including
two
pop-up
events,
and
when
I
speak
about
pop-up
events,
and
when
we're
talking
about
the
numbers
here
for
the
eviction
prevention
program
and
the
eviction
Health
Center,
you
will
see
slight
discrepancies
in
the
numbers
and
that's
because
we're
talking
about
slightly
different
things.
For
this
particular
part.
H
This
is
the
eviction
help
center
pop-up
event
where
we're
actually
helping
people
apply
for
rent
relief
before
we
opened
the
actual
formal
eviction
health
center
clinic.
So
there
have
been
24
clinics
held
representing
313,
tenants
and
four
landlords,
and
we've
been
able
to
assist
203
individual
households
with
applying
for
State
rent
relief
as
the
city's
eviction
help
center
and
we've
assisted
in
some
capacity,
317
total
clients.
So
this
these
this
number
also
shows
the
number
of
people
who
are
coming
in
repeatedly
for
follow-up
assistance.
H
So
the
203
is
the
individual
households
and
the
317
represents
how
many
people
we
see
in
total
85
of
our
clients
are
speaking
a
language
other
than
English
as
their
primary
language
and
require
translations
assistance.
You
can
see
here
that
the
bulk
of
that
is
in
Spanish.
However,
we
are
seeing
clients
in
Mandarin,
Russian
and
other
languages,
including
Turkish.
H
89
of
our
clients
heard
about
the
services
through
the
community,
including
through
our
community
organizations
through
each
household,
has
a
majority
of
three
or
more
people
at
71
percent
living
in
their
household
and
on
average,
the
households
are
making
less
than
25
25
000
annually
for
the
entire
household.
So
that's
55
of
the
households
that
we're
seeing
make
less
than
25
000
a
year
and
a
few
more
statistics
and
demographics
on
who
we're
serving
at
our
eviction
help
center
49
applied
for
assistance
through
the
city's
rent
relief
program.
H
That's
the
one
that's
administered
on
behalf
of
this
city,
through
CSA
they've,
received
2.3
months
of
assistance
from
the
city
for
rent
relief,
18
received
termination
notices
and
on
average
people
are
1.4
months
behind
on
their
rent
and
46.
Clients
have
requested
and
received
legal
assistance
through
the
program,
and
there
was
a
question
about
this
number.
There
was
a
data
discrepancy
issue
and
we
have
adjusted
it
to
be
to
reflect
the
number
of
people
that
have
been
actually
referred
to
and
received
legal
assistance
in
the
program.
So
that's
why
the
number
is
higher.
H
H
The
postcards
have
reached
36,
000
households
and
655
landlords,
and
then
finally,
this
is
some
of
our
detailed,
multimodal
multilingual
Communications.
We
have
three
web
pages
in
three
languages
related
to
the
eviction,
help
center
and
eviction
protection
programs,
two
informational,
Flyers,
just
one
short
video,
a
fillable
form
and
we've
had
18
weekly,
Mountain
View
voice
ads
one
press
release,
three
news:
media
coverage
opportunities,
including
one
in
Spanish
and
four
social
media
posts,
have
gone
out
and
then,
finally,
this
is
the
termination
notices
that
we've
already
discussed
this
evening.
H
G
I'm,
so
sorry,
I
keep
on
being
the
only
one
that
asks
questions
here,
but
before
the
holidays,
the
the
the
help
center
had
legal
assistance
from
a
couple
of
non-profits
offering
their
services
pro
bono
I,
remember,
I,
thought
I
read
that
it
was
until
the
end
of
the
year.
Do
we
still
have
those
services
offered
pro
bono?
Have
we
continued
that
contract
with
Stanford
law
clinic
and
cluster.
H
Stanford
law
clinic
in
cuspa
are
working
with
us
and
attending
every
virtual
clinic
in
some
capacity.
They
offer
they
rotate
weeks.
So
one
week
we
have
the
Stanford
law
clinic
in
one
week.
We
have
Costa
and
they
provide
services
just
like
they
were
providing
before
the
end
of
the
calendar
year,
they're
all
pro
bono
and
they
are
providing
assistance
to
the
community.
G
H
The
commitment
from
from
them
is
continuous,
until
otherwise
noted
from
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
wonderful,
thank
you,
and
before
before
we
went
fully
virtual,
the
I
believe
it
was
the
Stanford
law
clinic
that
they've
been
virtual
this
entire
time.
So
oh
no
is
the
other
way
around
Andrea
claspo
was.
E
H
I
E
B
O
B
A
A
A
A
P
B
B
R
Very
detailed
information
thanks
for
providing
that
not
so
much
comments
as
questions,
but
last
year
there
was
I,
think
40
000
allocated
toward
eviction.
Protection
Program
I
like
to
see
how
that
money
was
spent
and
and
if
it
was
actually
used
or
not
because
I
think,
if
you
remember
correctly,
I
was
adamant
like
it's
a
waste
of
money,
so
I'd
like
to
see
that
detailed
on
how
that
was
spent.
R
A
B
S
Okay,
I
was
waiting
for
an
answer
to
the
gentleman's
question:
I
guess
there
isn't
one.
The
last
slide
that
was
shown
in
the
report
had
an
item
under
eviction
snow
or
it
was
not
no
fault
but
fault
evictions,
and
there
was
an
item
that
said
nuisance
and
it
occurred
to
me
that
landlords
could
decide
that
an
a
tenant
was
creating
a
nuisance
and
how
does
that
get
mediated,
or
is
that
something
that
the
tenant
has
to
file
a
report
denying
that
they
were
a
nuisance
or
whatever
before
they
actually
get
evicted?
Q
Q
A
tenant
can
then
always
contact
us
or
project
Sentinel,
to
request
mediation
and
in
mediation,
gives
both
parties
the
opportunity
to
address
maybe
underlying
issues
that
were
not
very
clear
and
before
this
notice
was
received
and
hopefully
find
a
solution
that
works
for
both
parties.
If
all
of
that
does
not
work,
then
usually
a
landlord
does
follow
the
termination
process.
H
The
applications
here
I
did
want
to
highlight
the
state
rent
relief
data
from
for
the
city
of
Mountain,
View
From,
the
covid-19
rent
relief
program,
they've
received
a
total
of
830
applications
and
so
far
297
of
those
have
been
paid
and
received
assistance
for
a
total
of
three
million
672
dollars
being
spent.
So
again,
we've
assisted
over
200
families
and
households
and
applying
for
this
program,
and
they
are
reflected
in
the
numbers
that
you
see
here
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
hand
it
over
to
Anki
for
item
7.3.
H
These
are
what
I
think
will
be
the
final
two
chapters
so
far
that
have
not
been
adopted,
that
sort
of
mirror
the
csfra
so
I'm
going
to
go
over
their
contents
briefly
as
proposed,
so
we
can
go
on
to
the
first
slide.
So
the
purpose
of
this
item
is
just
to
review
and
adopt
the
chapter
8
regulations
which
discuss
the
procedures
for
annual
General
adjustments
and
Banking,
and
also
outline
tenant,
hardship
conditions
and
then
to
also
review
and
adopt
chapter
nine
of
the
mhrso
regulations
which
discuss
new
and
additional
occupants
next
slide.
H
Please
so
as
a
reminder,
the
goal
of
the
ordinance
is
to
stabilize
rents
for
mobile
homeowners
and
mobile
home
tenants,
while
providing
mobile
home
park
owners
and
mobile
home
landlords
with
a
fair
rate
of
return.
As
I
mentioned
at
the
November
and
December
meeting,
you
all
adopted
a
number
of
regulations,
including
upward
adjustment
regulations
and
just
cause
for
eviction
regulations,
and
these
these
two
chapters
sort
of
build
on
on
those.
H
So
again,
the
authority,
the
the
ordinance
itself,
provides
the
rental
housing
committee.
Has
the
authority
to
establish
rules
and
regulations
for
administration
and
enforcement
of
the
ordinance
next
slide.
Please
so
starting
the
chapter
eight,
which
talks
about
thinking
and
tenant
hardship,
the
mobile
home
ordinance
as
the
similar
to
the
csfra
allows
a
park
owner
or
mobile
home
landlord
to
bank
rent
increases
that
are
not
imposed
in
a
given
year
and
to
impose
those
increases
in
subsequent
subsequent
years
for
a
maximum
of
of
a
10
increase
in
one
year.
H
Next
slide,
please
so
chapter
8
of
the
ordinance
regulations
would
clarify
the
banking
procedures.
Specifically,
it
would
require
a
park
owner
or
a
mobile
home
landlord
who
wants
to
bank
an
increase
to
provide
or
to
impose
rather
a
banked
increase,
to
provide
notice
to
the
mobile
home
owner
or
mobile
home
tenant.
That
includes
the
dollar
and
percentage
amount
of
the
requested
increase,
as
well
as
information
about
banked
increases
and
the
right
of
the
mobile
home
owner
or
mobile
home
tenant
to
file
a
hardship
petition
next
slide.
H
The
right,
the
chapter,
8
regulations,
also
outline
the
required
content
and
the
deadline
for
filing
of
hardship
petition,
as
well
as
the
petition
and
hearing
process
for
a
hardship
petition,
and
these
pretty
closely
mirror
what
is
in
the
csfra
regulations
next
slide.
And
finally,
the
regulations
Define
the
following
hardship
conditions-
and
you
know
a
hardship
condition-
is
just
one
factor
that
can
be
taken
into
consideration
by
a
hearing
officer
when
determining
whether
or
not
to
impose
a
an
increase
above
the
annual
General
adjustment.
H
households,
with
at
least
one
person
with
a
disability,
households
with
at
least
one
terminally,
ill
person
and
households
with
other
extenuating
circumstances
that
they
can
demonstrate,
and
each
of
these
obviously
the
first
one
have
an
income
component
or
a
means
test,
as
do
the
rest
of
them.
So
it's
you
know
someone
who
is
of
lower
income
as
well
as
have
a
minor
child,
or
you
know
a
person
with
a
disability
next
slide.
H
Nine
of
the
regulations
would
clarify
the
process
for
housing
an
eligible
family
member,
specifically
a
tenant
who
wants
to
house
an
eligible
family
member,
has
to
provide
their
landlord
with
the
person's
name,
who
they're
adding
as
well
as
the
qualifying
relationship.
And
then
the
landlord
has
the
ability
to
request
documentation
bearing
verifying
that
relationship
and
the
regulations
would
require
the
tenant
to
provide
that
documentation
to
the
landlord
slide.
H
And
then
the
regulations
also
clarify
the
process
for
replacing
a
departing
roommate
or
a
departing
tenant.
So
again,
the
tenant
must
provide
the
landlord
with
notice,
including
the
person's
name
and
the
proposed
terms
of
payment
of
rent,
either
between
the
mobile
home
tenant
and
the
subse,
or
between
the
landlord
and
the
sublasses,
and
then
the
mobile
home
landlord
can
screen
the
roommate
or
the
incoming
tenant
and
charge
a
screening
fee.
However,
the
screening
process
and
criteria
that
they
use
must
be
the
same
process
and
criteria
that
they
use
for
any
tenant.
H
Lastly,
the
chapter
9
regulations
would
provide
the
if
there's
no
original
mobile
home
tenants
residing
in
the
mobile
home.
So
that
means
that
you
know
everyone
who
was
on
their
original
lease
has
departed
and
been
replaced.
The
mobile
home
landlord
can
renegotiate
rent
with
the
sub
tenants
and
raise
that
rent
subject
to
proper
noticing
under
state
and
local
laws,
and
then
Additionally
sub-tenants.
The
regulations
allow
or
actually
require
sub-tenants
and
mobile
home
landlords
to
share
rent
information
to
ensure
that
there's
no
price,
gouging
gouging,
that's
occurring
by
the
master
tenant
next
slide.
H
So
staff
to
recommendation
is
that
the
committee
review
and
adopt
the
banking
and
tenant
hardship
regulations,
including
the
procedures
for
Bank
rent,
increases
hardship
criteria
and
hardship,
partition
petition
process
and
to
review
and
adopt
the
new
and
additional
occupants
regulations,
including
procedures
for
replacing
a
departing
roommate
or
housing
and
eligible
family
member.
Not
happy
to
take
any
questions
you
all
might
have.
G
I'm
getting
all
active
today,
so
thank
you
for
all
the
pre-
answers
that
we
set
with
our
our
former
questions
that
we
sent
before
I.
Think
in
following
up
in
one
of
them.
I
asked
about
the
criteria
for
for
what
can
be
determined
as
a
hardship
and
one
of
the
answers
was.
It
was
recommended
that
we
would
have
the
same
that
we
have
for
apartments
as
mobile
homes.
H
I
H
So
it's
not
necessarily
a
new
lease,
but
if
a
new
lease
were
signed,
then
it
would
be
subject
to
the
vacancy
control
rules
that
are
in
well
actually
I,
don't
know
that
there
is
vacancy
control
for
for
the
mobile
homes
themselves.
It's
only
for
the
spaces,
so
the
so
and
the
the
just
cause
regulations
apply
only
to
mobile
home
Tendencies,
not
mobile,
home
space,
tenancies.
T
T
A
Okay,
since
there
are
no
more
questions,
I
now
invite
public
comment
with
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item.
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
nine
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
Do
we
have
any
hands
raised.
B
B
T
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
great?
Thank
you.
Yeah
I
just
want
to
say
thank
thanks
thanks
to
everyone
here
for
all
this
hard
work,
you
guys
are
really
doing
some
good
work.
I
wanted
to
make
a
general
comment
or
make
a
or
have
some
questions
about
banking,
I,
I
haven't
read
all
the
the
details,
so
I'm
not
up
to
speed
on
all
the
nuances.
T
So
what
I'm
about
to
say
may
already
be
addressed,
but
to
me
the
whole
the
whole
concept
of
banking
is
it's
not
a
case
where
you
you
either
use
it
or
you
lose
it.
It's
a
case
for
the
landlord
where
they
either
use
it
or
they
pocket
the
increase
or
carry
the
increase
forward,
and
one
of
the
main
goals
of
the
csfra
is
to
create
a
stability
and
rent
increases
and
minimize
volatility
of
the
rental
increases.
T
So
what
what
the
rental
families
are
experiencing
in
Mountain
View,
there's
200
families
roughly
is
typically
what
happens
is
the
landlord
will
present
people
with
a
one-year
six
month
or
month-to-month
lease
and
I
anticipate
that
the
month-to-month
lease
will
go
up
to
the
equivalent
of
the
Aga
and
a
one
year
and
six
month
will
be
less
than
that
amount
in
order
to
provide
an
incentive
to
the
tenant
to
stay
in
their
unit
longer.
So
my
question
is
or
my
comment
is.
T
U
Hell
I'd
like
to
Echo
what
my
Ally
said:
I
think
that
one
solution
to
this
might
be
to
require
that
mobile
home
landlords
and
park
owners
register
any
proposed
updates
to
the
lease
or
proposed
lease
addenda
as
part
of
the
right
registry,
so
that
there's
a
record
of
the
offered
terms
in
case
of
banking.
So
it's
clear
when
the
banking
is
applied.
What
terms
were
negotiated
in
the
process
of
getting
to
that
point?
I
V
V
I
also
want
to
Echo
what
was
said.
I
also
want
to
add
that
banking
does
not
provide
stability
to
the
tenant
and
I
think
it
would
be
really
important
to
have
offers
included
in
the
registry.
So
we
have
all
that
information
and
we
can
take
that
into
account
and
get
the
big
picture
of
things.
Just
to
kind
of
you
know
be
really
transparent
with
everything
and
removing
income.
When
considering
the
other
options,
I
think
would
be
important
as
well
means
testing
doesn't
always
work
a
lot
of
times.
V
I
would
like
to
see
addressed
to
kind
of
help
those
people
who
possibly
wouldn't
fit
into
that,
but
would
need
the
help
just
the
same
and
would
be
just
as
a
serving,
but
because
of
the
means
testing
they're
not
able
to
be
included
in
that
that
group
again,
thank
you
all
for
the
hard
work
and
I
will
pass
off.
Thank
you.
So
much.
I
P
W
Hi
yeah
I
raised
my
hand
before
and
I
know
it,
because
Edie
and
Anna
pretty
much
stated
my
objections
to
always
having
low-income
be
part
of
the
case.
However,
it's
not
necessarily
the
case.
I
would
like
to
see
that
removed
and
I
just
want
a
second
part,
Anna
and
Edie
mentioned
about
that.
Thank
you.
X
X
If
you
do
not
reach
the
specific
Target
that
does
change
over
time,
you
are
completely
out
of
any
kind
of
benefit
that
the
law
provides
and
inherently
also
provides
a
burden
on
staff
who
has
to
deal
with
the
you
know
the
the
drudgery
of
booking
your
paperwork,
making
sure
they're
correct,
seeing
if
they
match
the
whatever
recent
income
limits
have
been
posted
by
the
state
which
change
you
know
yearly
due
to
circumstances
that
remaining
out
of
our
control.
So
fundamentally,
it
is
a
case
of
you
know.
B
R
Ahead,
yeah
I'm,
going
to
probably
provide
the
flip
side
comments
of
this
basically
by
eliminating
or
putting
handcuffs
on
the
banking
Provisions
you're.
Basically
saying
the
tenants
are
going
to
get
a
raise
every
year,
regardless
no
one's
ever
going
to
get
a
break
nothing's
ever
going
to
be
banked.
R
A
A
G
F
A
G
So
after
I
got
the
staff's
answer
from
the
question
beforehand,
I
I
looked
up
the
meeting
where
we
determined
the
criteria
for
the
tenant,
hardships
and
the
criteria
as
it
stands
is:
there's
there's
one
criteria,
which
is
an
income
one.
You
could
even
look
at
the
slides,
the
slides
don't
get
as
specific
as
what
we
are
passing,
but
but
the
criteria
it
currently
stands
at
the
there's,
a
basic
just,
an
income
criteria.
G
N
G
I
G
Was
only
committee
gruenwald
and
I
were
the
only
ones
that
were
there
at
that
meeting.
I
believe
a
Committee
Member
part
of
the
cell
was
actually
absent
for
this
one,
but
what
which
kind
of
shows
an
interesting
turnover,
which
makes
me
very
sad
but
I
back
then
even
I
had
issues
with
adding
an
additional
income
criteria
for
the
hardships
that
do
not
require
an
income,
if
that
makes
sense,
because
moving
with
children
I
don't
have
spawn
on
my
own.
G
So
but
my
understanding
is
that
moving
with
children
is
awful
and
very
hard
and
Incredibly
disruptive.
That
is
still
a
hardship,
no
matter
what
income
you
have,
if
you
are
terminally,
ill
and
immediately
dying
soon.
That
is
a
hardship
regardless
of
your
income.
If
you
have
a
disability-
and
these
are
one
of
the
few
apartments
that
can
handle
your
disability,
for
example-
it
you,
you
have
a
wheelchair
and
you
need
wheelchair
access,
and
these
are
one
of
the
few
apartments
that
have
it.
G
You
still
have
that
hardship,
even
without
the
ink,
even
if
you,
regardless
of
your
income,
if
you
are
old
and
that's
where
you
live
for
the
last
50
years,
that
is
still
a
hardship
regardless
of
of
your
income
and
so
I.
I
know
that
there
were
some
comments
about
against
means
testing
in
general,
but
I'm
more
than
happy
to
split
the
difference
in
keeping
that
there
is
a
hardship
for
inadequate
income
at
100.
G
Ami
I
actually
even
be
willing
to
raise
that
just
even
slightly
to
120
Ami,
because
rents
are
still
expensive
and
also
the
but
have
the
other
criteria.
The
dependent
minor
children,
elderly
disability
terminally
ill
to
remove
the
income
requirement
on
being
able
to
file
that
hardship,
and
this
is
just
allowing
them
to
file
a
hardship
petition.
It's
going
to
be
up
to
the
hearing
officer
to
determine
how
that
gets.
Shuffled
out
and
I.
Don't
talk
about
this
often
but
I.
G
Faced
a
landlord
filing
petition
for
my
apartment,
complex
earlier
on
in
my
my
term
at
the
rhc,
and
we
did
have
people
able
to
file
hardship.
Petitions
I
did
not
file
a
hardship
petition
myself,
because
I
was
terrified
to
do
so.
That
is
other
issues,
but
all
it
did
was.
My
understanding
is
that
the
people
who
filed
hardship
petitions
were
able
to
they
they
adjusted
who
paid
what
based
on
those
hardship
petitions.
G
So
my
my
understanding
is
that
the
agreement
was
we
would
get
10
increases
for
two
years
each,
but
those
who
filed
hardship,
petitions
filed
got
five
percent
increases
for
each
of
those
each
year
for
two
years
and
I
I
don't
want
to
limit
those
if
they
need
help
be
giving
the
the
hearing
officer
the
flexibility
to
do
that.
So
that's
why
my
recommendation
is
to
essentially
pass
staff
recommendation,
but
remove
the
means
testing
aspects
for
the
hardships
that
do
not
require
an
income
or
or
do
not.
That
is
not
required
on
income.
Q
I
just
want
to
clarify-
maybe
that's
not
clear
enough-
that
this
is
just
to
assess
whether
these
households
have
enough
income
to
pay
a
rent
increase
if
that's
banked.
So
sometimes,
if
people
have
a
very
high
income,
they
could
still
have
minor
children
and
there
should
be
no
income
testing
for
them
to
fight
a
hardship,
I
I'm,
just
trying
to
understand.
G
Q
H
I
Steph
would
like
to
provide
a
little
a
little
clarification
in
there
as
well
for
the
for
the
hardship
petitions
that
are
filed
in
relationship
to
a
landlord
petition.
It's
one
typically,
one
of
the
considerations
used
in
the
final
decision
for
the
overall
petition
for
tenant
hardship,
petitions
that
are
filed
in
relationship
to
a
banked
rent
increase.
The
criteria
is
typically
very
strictly
applied
by
the
hearing
officer,
not
one
of
not
considered
as
one
of
the
considerations
in
a
petition.
H
It
is
the
consideration
in
the
petition,
so
those
are
they're
slightly
different
in
how
they're
utilized
in
the
petition
process,
because
essentially
they're
different
types
of
petitions.
One
is
a
tenant
coming
to
the
city
saying
I've
received
this
banked.
Rent
increase
and
I'm
filing
a
petition
against
the
saint
rent
increase
and
the
other
is
a
landlord
has
filed
this
petition
against
me
and
I'm
responding
to
the
petition
with
this
other
petition.
So
hopefully
that
provides
some
clarification
as
to
how
they're
adjudicated
it
is
adjudicated
and
utilized
differently.
G
If
I
could
ask
for
something
I'm,
so
sorry
by
Shaheen's
Lucy,
but
they
just
will
have
some
clarification
while
it's
still
fresh
in
my
head.
So
currently,
if
a
tenant
receives
a
notification
that
they
will
get,
that
there
were
increases
that
were
banked
and
they
got
a
notification
we're
using
the
bank.
Now
they
can
still
file
a
hardship
petition
on
it,
even
if
they,
if
they
make
over
120
Ami
but
they're
terminally
ill.
H
No,
that's
where
the
means
testing,
the
100,
20
Ami
and
the
criteria
that
are
in
place
come
into
into
play.
So
that
is
what
is
utilized
by
the
hearing
officer
to
determine
whether
or
not
a
hardship
petition
is
accepted
by
this
is
decided
upon
in
a
positive
fashion
for
the
petitioner
yeah.
So
those
criteria
are
what
the
hearing
officer
used
to
determine
the
outcome
of
the
petition,
the
100
percent,
Ami
or
or
50
of
your
rent
is
paid
of.
Your
of
your
income
is
paid
toward
rent.
H
So
it's
not
just
100
of
Ami,
it's
100
of
Ami
or
50
of
of
your
income
is
goes
toward
rent.
That's
one
of
the
criteria
and
then
the
other
one
are
ones
are
100
120
percent
of
Ami
or
50
of
your
income,
plus
those
special
special
groups
that
we
have
there's.
Also
an
other
category
for
extenuating
extenuating
circumstances.
Beyond
these
options
that
the
hearing
officer
is
able
to
consider
as
well
when
making
the
determination.
G
H
It
could
be
argued
that
someone
in
that
circumstance
could
request
the
other
extenuating
circumstances,
caveat
that
is
allowed
in
the
petition,
and
that
would
then
be
more
up
to
the
hearing
officer
to
determine
so
there
it.
The
hearing
officer's
discretion
is
always
there.
However,
the
criteria
do
provide
them
with
a
an
opportunity
to
more
quickly
and
easily
adjudicate
the
petition.
G
I
G
E
E
So
if
you
go
I'm
a
person
with
a
terminal
illness-
and
it
is
going
to
be
a
hardship
for
me
to
move-
you
don't
have
to
cite-
you
know
section
whatever
one
that
was
C2
e,
you
cite
c2f
and
you
say
yes,
I
might
make
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
and
I
live
by
myself.
So
I'm
over
the
120
threshold,
but
I'm
terminally
ill
and
my
doctor
says
I'm,
probably
gonna
pass
in
the
next
three
months
and
the
hearing
officer
has
the
flexibility
to
go.
Yes,
that
makes
sense.
E
Having
you
spend
six
months,
looking
for
a
new
home
when
you're,
possibly
going
to
pass
away
in
three
months,
doesn't
make
any
sense,
we're
obviously
not
going
to
hold
you
to
a
means
test.
Maybe
that's
how
we
build
that
flexibility
that
I
think
you're
looking
for
in
to
it,
without,
while
still
keeping
some
of
the
Streamline.
That
I
think
is
where
staff
is
saying.
E
You
know
having
a
repeatable
process
that,
where
hearing
officers
are
not
constantly
asked
to
use
their
own
discretion
on
whether
or
not
a
banked
increase
makes
sense
for
people
with
no
limits
and
creating.
You
know,
potential
of
inequality
and
potential
of
arguments
and
mediations
Etc
going
into
lawsuits.
Potentially,
even
maybe
we
just
use
f
as
the
catch-all
so
that
that's
a
thought
I
wanted
to
throw
it
out.
There
number
two
though
I
think,
regardless
in
these
regulations
we
need
to
have.
E
E
We
need
to
have
documentation
that
that
was
withdrawing
and
I
think
the
way
that
we
have
to
get
that
documentation
is
by
making
that
withdrawal,
a
form
that
is
filed
with
us,
because
we
have
the
ability
for
basically
a
hardship
petition
to
be
put
to
the
side.
If
the
mobile
home
landlord
indicates
that
they
withdrew
the
proposed
rent
increase,
but
I
don't
know
how
we
would
know
that
that
actually
happened
and
be
able
to
enforce
that.
It
actually
happened
unless
we're
having
banked
increased
withdrawal
forms.
E
But
then
would
they
and
maybe
I'm
just
not
understanding
the
process
properly,
but
so,
if
they
say
their
response
is
oh
sorry
we're
going
to
withdraw
that
never
mind
it
goes
away.
How
do
we
ensure
that
that
is
actually
true,
meaning?
How
are
we
going
to
monitor
and
trust
but
verify
that
they
don't
then
come
back
to
their
tenant
and
say:
oh
see
a
month
later?
E
F
H
And
staff
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
this,
but
if
the
landlord
will
was
to
respond
and
say
I'm
withdrawing
the
petition
or
I'm
withdrawing
the
rent
increase
as
their
response,
then
that
response
would
be
forwarded
by
staff
to
the
the
tenant.
So
they
would
get
the
notification
in
that
way
and
probably
get
additional
information,
like
with
all
outcomes
and
notices
of
determination
that
are
made.
A
A
D
So
you
know,
you're
kind
of
in
a
sense
got
the
rest
of
these
regs
when
you
say
extenuating
circumstances
and
don't
Define
it
and
a
hearing
officer
can
use
their
own
discretion
and
basically
find
a
hardship
for
any
reason
they
want
to
when
you
don't
Define
extenuating
circumstances.
So
to
me,
that's
a
real
problem.
I
think.
If
we
there's
there's
a
good
basis
to
say
they're,
there
should
be
extenuating
circumstances
that
constitute
a
hardship
but
I
think
we
should
Define
them.
Otherwise,
the
regs
don't
mean
anything,
I
mean
we
can
talk
about.
D
You
know
income
or
minor
children
or
whatever,
but
if
a
hearing
officer
himself
or
herself
gets
to
make
up
their
own
new
category
at
their
own
discretion,
then
they're
the
ones
writing
the
rules
essentially
and
not
us.
So
that's
my
my
biggest
problem.
It's
such
a
huge
catch-all.
It
renders
all
the
other
Provisions
here
essentially
meaningless
right.
C
Sure,
thanks
clarification
for
this
section.
Would
this
apply
both
to
tenants
and
individual
owners,
yes,
okay,
and
so
for
the
income
requirement
for
owners?
Is
it
just
the
space
rent
or
also
space,
rent
plus
when
it
comes
to
50
of
your
income,
you
know
goes
towards
housing.
Would
it
also
include
if
they
have
a
mortgage
on
the
on
the
structure
or
at
the
other
costs
associated
with
the
structure.
F
C
Okay,
but
that
didn't
have
a
recommendation
there,
just
just
interested
my
other
question:
I
guess:
staff
I
Emily
reminds
me
of
the
I.
Remember
having
this
conversation
a
while
back
but
I,
don't
necessarily
remember
the
presentation
what
we
were
presented
with
staff,
if
perhaps
staff,
if
you'd
like
the,
if
you
know
or
what
an
opportunity
to
refresh
us
on
how
common
is
the
means
test,
you
know
it's
yeah.
H
That's
correct
and
we
from
the
petition
history
we've
not
received
a
tenant
hardship
petition
in
in
quite
a
while,
and
it's
always
across
I'm,
not
sure
if
we've
ever
received
any
that
are
specific
in
the
criteria.
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
double
check,
but
the
bulk
of
them
have
been
the
100
Ami
are
below
so
just
to
clarify
that
as
well,
and
we've
never
received
one
that
has
had
an
other
extenuating
circumstances,
except
for
one
related
to
a
landlord
petition.
Q
B
G
Thank
you
so
so
much
thanks,
I
love,
Vice,
chair,
Haynes,
Lucy's,
elegant
solution
of
keeping
the
essentially
the
automatic
part
there
and
then
having
a
nice
little
addendum
to
that
to
eat
at
least
allow
for,
for
that,
I'd
like
to
say
option
to
have
based
on
the
discretion
of
the
hearing
officer,
I
I'm.
Actually,
after
listening
to
Committee
Member
part
of
the
Zella
I
I,
do
understand
the
other
extenuating
circumstances
can
be
a
big
catch-all.
G
So
if
we
don't
include
that
in
the
what
Vice
chair,
Haynes
lives
say
put
in
the
item,
F,
that's
fine
with
me.
That
seems
like
a
pretty
good
compromise
there
and
thank
you
Committee
Member,
gruenwald,
I'm
thinking
about
it.
We
we
focus
so
much
on,
like
oh
50
of
rent,
and
it
doesn't
include
at
all
the
mortgage
and
that's
a
very
unique
position
for
the
mobile
home
rent
residents
who
rent
their
face
own
their
home
I
I,
would
love
for
the
the
mortgage
to
be
included
in
that
50.
G
G
If
anyone
else
has
a
a
thought
on
that,
that
would
be
I,
I
am
open
to
lowering
it.
I,
wouldn't
know
what
percentage
to
lower
in
that's.
That
is
my
concern.
I
know
that
statistically
you're
supposed
to,
if,
if
you
pay
more
than
30
of
your
income
on
rent,
you
are
usually
considered
rent
burden
but
I
think
the
50.
G
Was
this:
what
the
severely
rent
burden,
and
so
at
least
at
the
very
least,
the
very
minimum
to
include
the
mortgage
of
the
house,
including
included
in
that
that
persp,
that
50
of
rent
and
I'm
open
to
lowering
that
percentage.
I
just
don't
know
to
what
point
I
mean
of
your
income
being
paid
toward
rent.
A
E
Just
have
a
question
for
staff:
are
these
numbers
derived
from
your
adjusted
gross
income
or
your
gross
income,
meaning
if
I
have
a
small
business
and
I
can
do
my
write-offs,
which
I
totally
know
that
people
can
do
and
get
myself
a
lower,
adjusted
gross
income?
Because
of
my
write-offs?
Are
we?
Are
we
taking
that
into
consideration
when
we're
talking
about
your
Ami,
because
I
think
when
we're
talking
about
income,
not
everyone
earns
income
in
the
same
way
and
not
everyone.
E
You
know
we
have
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that
two
people
who
make
income
in
different
ways
and
do
their
deductions
a
different
way,
could
derive
vastly
different
results
and
actually
be
similarly
situated.
So
I
think
if
we're
talking
about
changing
a
percentage,
we
need
to
know
what
the
Ami
actually
is
derived
from.
If
we're
talking
about
changing
the
word
rent
to
housing
costs,
meaning
mortgage
plus,
rent
for
space,
rent
I,
think
that's
a
different
conversation.
E
Q
E
H
well
then
I
guess
we
have
to
change
it
everywhere.
I
think
in
that
subsection
to
change,
I
think
the
goal
there,
as
I
heard
it
was
potentially
to
change
the
language
so
that,
instead
of
rent,
we
say
overall
housing
cost,
including
rent
plus
structure,
cost
and
I'm
not
being
very
elegant
there.
So
I.
E
D
B
A
F
A
D
I
A
E
W
Q
Thank
you
chair
and
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee.
We
would
like
to
update
you
on
some
amendments
that
are
going
to
be
proposed
to
the
EPC
and
to
city
council
shortly
as
a
result
of
the
city
council,
adopting
the
mobile
home,
rent,
stabilization,
ordinance
and
tenant
relocation,
assistance
benefits.
Q
Q
As
mentioned
before,
on
September
28th,
the
city
council
adopted
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance
and
it
also
directed
staff
to
draft
some
tenant
relocation
benefits
and,
first
right
of
refusal
for
mobile
home
tenants.
Similarly
to
the
rights
already
provided
to
apartment,
tenants,
the
mobile
home
residency
law
addresses
just
cause
for
eviction
and
relocation,
benefits
and
protections
for
mobile
home
owners.
Q
What
type
of
relocation
assistance
is
being
provided
for
in
the
trio?
A
full
security
deposit
refund,
a
subscription
service
to
a
rental
agency,
a
cash
equivalent
of
three
months,
rent
based
on
an
immediate
monthly
rent
for
a
similar
size
unit
in
Mountain,
View
and
special
circumstances.
Households
receive
an
additional
eight
thousand
dollars
per
rental
unit,
which
include
persons
over
62
years
old,
disabled
or
handicapped,
or
with
minor
children
who
are
legally
dependent.
Q
Q
So
next
steps
would
be
that
these
proposed
amendments
will
be
submitted
to
the
environmental
Planning
Commission.
Who
will
review
these
amendments
and
provide
recommendations
to
city
council,
and
then
these
proposed
amendments
and
recommendations
will
be
submitted
to
city
council
for
review
and
approval.
C
Yeah
thanks
again,
one
of
more
I
want
to
try
to
be
mindful
of
the
differences
between
mobile
homes
and
other
units.
So
I
and
pardon
me
if
I
miss
this
in
the
changes
it
just
highlighted
kind
of
what
sections
change,
but
not
necessarily
the
specific
text,
but
like
for
right
of
return.
If
it's
a
space,
that's
being
rented.
O
Q
B
E
The
the
modified
Trio,
if
it
does
pass,
would
cover
mobile
home
tenants
who
are
leasing
from
a
park
owner
only
correct,
so
if
and
when
mobile
home
unit
owners,
those
who
own
their
their
unit
and
pay
space
rent
if
they
are
able
to
ever
lease
their
units
to
other
individuals,
they
would
not
be
subject
to
Treo
if
they
later
decided
to
like
move
back
in
and
stop
running
to
their
tenants
right.
I.
E
Q
P
G
A
So
I'm,
assuming
there
are
no
more
hands
raised
from
the
committee,
am
I
right
before
I
go
on
correct.
Okay.
So,
since
there
are
no
more
questions,
I
now
invite
public
comments.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
Stacks
will
display
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
B
T
Oh
okay,
yeah
I,
wanted
to
comment
on
the
trail,
so
at
a
high
level,
the
the
csfra
is
intended
to
stabilize
the
community
and
prevent
displacements
that
that's
really
the
objective
here
and
I.
Don't
know
if
any
of
you
have
ever
been
displaced
but
being
displaced
is
traumatic.
It's
depressing.
It's
life-altering,
losing
one's
home
through
no
fault
of
One's
Own
is
an
event
that
completely
upends
people's
lives
and
we
need
to
take
this
threat
seriously.
There.
T
The
landlord
sent
a
letter
to
city
council
September
28th
of
last
year,
threatening
displacement
of
all
of
the
200
rentals
in
the
mobile
in
his
mobile
home
parks
in
Mountain
View.
So
we
need
to
not
take
these
as
Idle
threats,
so
I
would
like
to
propose
or
reinforce
the
following
changes
to
the
trio.
The
first
would
be
to
eliminate
all
means.
Testing
for
relocation.
Expenses
means
testing
just
encourages
the
landlord
to
rent
to
wealthy
folks.
T
We
we
need
to
make
it
more
costly
for
the
landlord
to
go
through
on
his
threats
of
displacing
people
not
make
it
less
costly
right
now,
there's
a
lot
of
wealthy
people
renting
their
homes
and
Mountain
views.
In
fact,
if
you
fill
out
a
recent
rent
application,
you
have
to
show
three
times
the
rent
and
income
and
rents
are
approaching
four
thousand
a
month.
T
The
second
change
should
be
lengthening
the
time
for
giving
people's
notice,
particularly
if
you're
a
senior
if
you're,
disabled
or,
if
you've
lived
in
your
home
a
long
time
you
should
be
given
extensive,
noticing
requirements.
Somebody
that's
been
in
their
homes
for
15
years
should
be
given
plenty
of
time
to
find
a
new
place.
T
S
V
Hello,
thanks
for
all
your
hard
work
on
this
I
agree
with
our
previous
caller.
I
also
agree
that
we
should
eliminate
all
means
testing
for
relocation
expenses,
that's
going
to
be
hard
and
stressful
for
everyone,
and
we
know
that
someone
making
you
know,
150k
I,
think
someone
uses
as
an
example
of
someone
who
would
not
qualify
for
help.
That
could
be
nothing
here.
They
could
have.
You
know
they
could
be
disabled,
I'm,
a
disabled,
my
mom's
disabled,
and
we
have
incredibly
High
expenses
for
things.
V
I
hope
that
is
part
of
it,
and
it
should
definitely
include
Provisions
for
first
right
of
return
and
in
the
event
of
sale.
First
right
of
purchase
would
also
be
I,
think
important,
I
know
living
in
Sahara,
Mobile
I
have
not
felt
secure
living
in
this
house
in
this
park,
and
knowing
that
that
is,
there
would
make
me
and
my
mother
sleep
a
lot
better
at
night,
I'm
sure
as
many
other
residents
too
I'd
love
for
that
to
be
thought
about
and
again.
U
Go
ahead,
I
just
wanted
to
say,
I
agree
wholeheartedly
with
my
friends,
neighbors
and
allies.
The
previous
speaker
I
think
that
the
more
that
we
can
do
to
protect
the
vulnerable
people
in
our
community,
the
better
and
that
Treo
is
something
that
is
necessary
to
help
protect
people
in
an
event
that
otherwise
would
be
intensely
traumatic,
so
reducing
the
friction,
making
sure
that
they
have
what
they
need
to
cope
in
any
way
possible.
Please
do
thanks.
P
Thank
you.
So
when
the
csfra
was
passed,
there
was
in
the
language
of
the
csfra
a
hard
cut
off
for
that
120
percent
was
the
highest
income
for
providing
relocation,
assistance
and
I,
don't
believe.
That's
the
case
with
the
mobile
home,
rent
stabilization
ordinance,
and
you
know
similar
to
my
prior
comments.
If
you
earn
one
dollar
more
over
the
120,
then
you
shouldn't
receive
any
relocation
benefits.
P
Y
So
we
don't
want
to
force
landlords
into
that
situation
at
all.
Those
are
the
two
points
I'd
like
to
raise
I'd
point
out:
I
am
a
mobile
home
resident,
but
will
not
be
impacted
by
this
because,
as
Anki
said,
the
mrl
covers
mobile
home
owners.
So
this
is
just
being
said
in
support
of
tenants
in
the
Parks.
Thank
you.
S
That's
number
one
number
two
I'm
concerned
about
the
well
I
agree
with
what
Eddie
Keating
said
about
some
kind
of
flexibility
relative
to
120
percent
and
I.
Think
that
an
issue
or
an
item
that
was
presented
a
while
back
in
this
meeting
Sid
stayed
at
120
percent,
plus
five
thousand
dollars
and
I.
Think
that
makes
sense,
rather
than
perhaps
having
two
tears.
B
A
E
I
have
questions,
can
I
ask
questions,
of
course,
okay.
First,
first
and
foremost,
first
question
I
am
under
the
impression,
perhaps
wrongly,
that
we
are
not
actually
passing
this.
This
belongs
to
city
council
and
at
maximum.
All
we
would
be
doing
is
providing
commentary
on
the
item
that
could
be
passed
to
city
council
I'm,
getting
a
nod
from
ankles.
S
E
E
So
the
the
modifications
and
I
I
sort
of
wasn't
in
the
same
situation
as
as
Committee
Member
grinwald
that
because
it
was
the
sections
with
the
new
language
and
not
redlined,
I,
wasn't
keeping
it
100
straight.
But
the
real
modification
that
we're
seeing
here
is
to
include
the
mobile
home
tenants
not
to
materially
tweak.
Anything
else.
Is
that
really
what
we're
seeing.
Q
That
was
the
intention
of
staff,
because
there
were
concerns
being
brought
in
front
of
the
rental
housing
committee
that
tenants
felt
unprotected.
So
we
did
our
utmost
to
bring
this
back
as
fast
as
possible,
which
we
are
now
doing
so
without
tweaking
any
other
essential
elements
of
the
trail.
We
just
want
to
include
the
mobile
home
tenants
right
now,
so
that
has
a
hopefully
a
faster
path
to
to
have
amendments
approved
by
city,
council
and.
E
G
G
I
would
just
like
to
add
a
small
asterisk
of
like
if
they
wanted
to
expand
to
a
larger
than
120
percent
I'm,
totally
okay
with
that,
especially
if
they
do
it
quickly,
if
it
I
mean
if
they
want
to
bring
it
back
to
like
if
they
pass
this
and
then
say
we're
going
to
revisit
another
time
and
say
that
we
don't
even
want
means
testing,
I'm,
actually,
okay
with
that
as
well,
so
those
options
are
there
and
I'm.
Supportive
of
those
comments
that
were
given
by
public
comment.
G
I
also
feels
super
warm-hearted
that
a
lot
of
the
mobile
home
residents
seeing
most
protections
that
have
been
fought
for
and
organized
for.
When
you
look
in
other
cities,
a
lot
of
mobile
home
residents
only
focused
on
those
who
owned
their
home
and
they
didn't
look
at
the
protections
of
those
who
rented
homes,
and
it
was
mostly
forgotten
in
many
other
cities
and
in
their
ordinances,
I
believe
even
sunnyvale's.
G
They
have
an
mou
and
they
they
don't
cover
those
who
rent
and
I'm
so
very
happy
that
we
are
looking
at
making
sure
that
we
protect
those
who
who
do
rent
their
home.
The
mobile
homes
here
as
well,
so
kudos
to
Mountain
View,
because
they're
just
so
much
better
than
all
the
other
cities,
but
should
should
we
want
to
be
more
creative
in
expanding
Trio.
I
am
not
opposed
to
that,
but
a
priority
is
getting
it
passed
quickly.
Thank
you.
O
She
had
a
business
that
took
care
of
the
elderly
here
in
Mountain
View
and
because
she
was
not
eligible
to
get
the
Trey
you,
we
no
longer
have
her
living
in
Mountain
View.
So
for
us
here
in
Mountain
View.
We
have
a
great
loss
because
since
she
doesn't
live
here
close
by
us
anymore,
she's
not
serving
all
those
elderly
people
that
she
was
serving.
Q
Q
Q
This
next
section
in
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance
also
States
that
the
rental
housing
committee
will
finance
this
program
and
also
charge
Park
owners,
an
annual
special,
a
space
rental
fee,
but
is
also
empowered
to
request
and
receive
funding
from
any
other
available.
Source,
including
the
city.
Q
So
in
in
regards
to
that,
the
monk,
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance
does
need
Advanced
funding
from
the
city
to
support
the
startup
costs
of
the
program.
The
the
key,
the
key
components
of
such
startup
costs
are
to
develop
the
the
mhrso
rules
and
regulations
which
we
are
deep
in
our
knees
with
today
establish
a
process
for
petitions
and
hearings,
but
also
for
Capital
Improvement
pass-through
processes.
Q
Q
So
a
little
bit
more
comments
about
the
annual
rental
space
fees
and
the
methodology
that
the
rental
housing
committee
chose
to
use
was
calculate
the
annual
renting
housing
fee
by
dividing
the
total
budget
each
year
by
the
total
amount
of
covered
rental
units
and
similarly,
an
mhrso
budget
amount
would
be
divided
by
the
number
of
mobile
home
units.
It's
11
30
for
each
fiscal
year,
foreign.
Q
That
the
per
space
fee
for
a
mobile
home
park
would
be
considerably
different
than
the
amount
that
is
going
to
be
charged
every
year
under
this
year
secretary
and
although
we
probably
have
a
much
lower
budget
than
a
series
of
array,
the
much
much
lower
amount
of
space
units
will
still
make
that
annual
per
space
fee
higher
than
the
csfree
annual
fee.
So
to
mitigate
these
fees
per
Space
Unit.
Q
In
the
startup
year,
City
staff
has
proposed
to
city
council
to
assist
with
startup
costs
and
the
city
council
will,
in
its
meeting
on
February
the
8th,
take
a
look
at
it
and
decide
on
that
request.
After
that.
That
information
will
then
be
dispersed
again
to
the
rental
housing
committee
and,
if
Council
approves
startup
costs
that
will
help
for
the
21
22
fee
calculation.
Q
So
next
steps,
as
mentioned
before
after
the
February
8
city
council
meeting,
we
will
come
back
to
the
rental
housing
committee,
with
whatever
the
city
council
has
decided
and
that
will
influence
the
fee
level
and
a
drive
budget
will
be
presented
to
the
rental
housing
committee
to
provide
feedback
and
then
subsequent
meeting
approved
a
budget
and
the
space
fees.
Also
noteworthy
is
that,
probably
two
months
later,
you
will
have
to
start
discussing
the
budget
for
the
fiscal
year.
Q
I
O
A
A
P
P
A
A
V
Thank
you,
I'll
make
this
quick
I
just
also
wanted
to
voice
my
support
for
this
city
staff
does
so
much
and
I
think
the
city
should
give
money
to
to
help
in
any
way
that
rhc
is
asking
for
help.
This
is
something
that's
critically
important
and
we
don't
want
people
to
burn
out,
probably
any
more
so
than
they
already
have
and
again.
Thank
you
for
all
your
hard
work.
A
A
A
G
Let
that
be
work
itself
out.
I
feel
like
I'm,
being
very
Committee
Member
gruenwald
in
this
sense,
but
I
would
like
to
see
if
there's
a
preference
from
Council
for
that
like.
Would
they
rather
have
us,
pay
it
all
back
at
once,
but
that
trade-off
would
be
that
it'd
be
a
higher
immediate
fee
to
the
park
owners.
Or
would
they
rather
allow
us
to
pay
it
back
in
segments
and
have
that
that
be
a
little
less
of
a
sticker
shock?.
Q
A
The
fees
would
be
so
high
that
there
would
be
potential
lawsuits
from
Park
owners
if
we
were
to
just
turn
just
base
it
on.
You
know
the
costs,
so
I
don't
want
to
get
us
stuck
in
this
whole
idea
that
we're
going
to
model
it
on
the
CSF
right
Payback,
the
the
council
decided
to
go
with
an
ordinance
and
they
need
to
fund
it.
That's
my
feeling.
E
Okay,
I
was
just
gonna,
say,
I,
think,
given
that
this
is
a
February
item
and
we
are
getting
a
little
long
on
tonight's
meeting
and
this
is
just
informational.
Perhaps
we
save
some
of
the
discussion
around
this
item
too
February
when
we
actually
know
what
we
might
be
receiving
as
opposed
to
putting
too
many
hypotheticals
out
there
right
now,
the
more
hypotheticals
you
put
out,
the
more
likely
folks
are
to
go
down
those
hypothetical
paths,
whereas
if
you
leave
it
more
broad
based,
you
might
be
pleased
to
see
what
you
get.
Q
Q
So
what
is
an
mou?
It's
a
contractual
agreement
between
the
city
and
a
mobile
home
park
owner
which
stipulates
modified
protections
and
procedures
and
following
a
model
mou
approval
by
the
city
council,
the
park
owner
and
80
of
residents
in
a
mobile
home
park
agree
that
would
create
an
exemption
from
the
ordinance
and
instead,
everyone
has
to
abide
by
the
stipulations.
As
written
down
in
the
mou.
Q
These
are
the
key
topics
to
be
covered
by
the
mou.
It's
no
surprise
that
these
are
also
the
key
elements
in
an
ordinance,
so
these
need
to
be
discussed
in
park
owner
and
in
Resident
meetings
to
see
what
what
the
stakeholders
would
like
to
see
different
from
an
ordinance
and
what
they
would
like
or
not
would
not
like
to
see
in
an
mou.
Q
This
is
an
overview
of
the
meetings
that
have
been
organized
this
Wednesday.
We
have
a
first
resident
meeting
introducing
this
process
and
talk
a
little
bit
about
potential
resident
representation.
It's
followed
by
a
park
owner
meeting
on
Thursday
again
to
introduce
this
mou
process
and
to
hear
what
the
park
owners
would
like
to
see
and
then
again
in
February,
not
a
resident
meeting
to
discuss
the
park
owners
proposals
and
we
were
City
staff
to
receive
input
from
What.
A
Y
Hi
all
I
just
wanted
to
comment
that
this
process
I'd
like
to
thank
the
city
for
getting
involved.
We
have
heard
that
some
draft
mou
samples
have
been
provided
their
residents.
These
were
worrying.
They
included
pass-through
Provisions
with
no
limits
and
no
buffer
or
hardship
exemptions
that
could
cause
rent
increases
as
high
as
50
or
more
on
some
residents
and
I
invite
the
committee
and
staff
to
do
their
own
analyzes,
but,
as
you
guys
are
considering
any
potential
mou
that
you'd
have
to
sign
off
on.
Y
Please
do
a
thorough
and
quantitative
analysis
in
such
a
way
that
you
can
make
it
clear
to
all
of
the
residents
what's
going
on
with
any
modifications
to
what
they
already
have
in
the
Productions.
Under
the
rent.
Stabilization
ordinance
I
spend
most
of
my
professional
days
doing
business
development
and
trying
to
analyze
complex
Financial
things
and
I
found
some
of
the
language
and
quantitative.
You
know
Finance
implications
in
the
draft
mou
to
be
very
difficult
to
work
through
and
I
had
to
put
together
spreadsheets
to
understand.
You
know
what
the
actual
financial
implications
were.
F
Y
Y
I,
don't
see
that
there's
really
much
of
a
path
forward
for
many
of
the
parks.
I
know
that
some
parks
have
better
relationships
and
may
find
a
common
ground
with
some
of
the
park
owners,
but
as
much
as
possible,
I'd
like
to
try
to
quickly
find
out
where
there
might
be
agreement
and
where
hard
lines
are
drawn.
So
good
luck
in
this
process,
it's
not
going
to
be
easy.
I!
Don't
don't
have
you
the
problem
that
you
have
to
deal
with?
Thank
you.
U
F
U
I
just
like
to
Echo
what
Tim
said.
Thank
you
guys
for
taking
over
the
process
and
making
sure
that
this
is
going
to
be
fair,
that
everyone
is
going
to
be
heard
and
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
organization
structure
to
this,
so
that
residents
know
what
to
expect
that
the
owners
feel
like
they
have
a
voice
in
this
I
really
appreciate
all
the
leadership
that
you
guys
have
been
providing,
which
is
another
good
reason
for
you
to
have
adequate
funding
and
staff
to
continue
to
do
the
excellent
work.
W
W
A
B
B
Helping
people
understand
the
eviction
notices
that
they
may
be
receiving
or
of
their
landlord
that
they
may
be
planning
on
serving,
and
we
also
help
with
loyal
lawyer
referrals
for
tenants
who
are
facing
eviction
so
we're
also
having
virtual
webinars
and
meetings
at
this
time.
So
we
have
a
couple
coming
up.
We
have
eviction
protections
and
rent
relief
webinars
this
week.
So
we
have
a
landlord
focused
webinar
on
the
26th,
which
is
Wednesday
at
three
o'clock
and
we
have
a
tenant
focused
I'm.
Sorry
about
that
Andrea.
B
We
are
also
having
those
Mobile
Home
Run
stabilization
stakeholder
meetings
this
week,
so
we
have
one
meaning
Wednesday
January
26th
at
6
PM,
which
will
also
be
bilingual,
and
we
will
be
finally
having
a
landlord
registration
webinar
this
week,
also
on
Wednesday
about
three
o'clock
and
then
we
will
also
be
holding
one
February
16th
at
3
o'clock
as
well.
So
there's
one
this
week
and
then
there's
one
on
February
as
well.