►
From YouTube: 6-1-2020: Rental Housing Committee Meeting
Description
Upload of Zoom video to correct audio issues with original video (7/22/2020)
Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26
7:00 p.m. Monday, June 1, 2020
A
We
are
live
all
right.
Welcome
everyone
to
the
rental
housing
committee
meeting
on
june
29
2020..
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
state
of
california
executive
order.
N2920
dated
march
17
2020,
all
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee
are
participating
in
this
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting
live,
may
do
so
at
mountainview.legistar.com
on
youtube
at
mountainview.gov
youtube
and
on
comcast
channel
26.
A
All
right
roll
call
committee,
member
julian.
B
C
C
A
And
I
am
here
chair,
we
will
now
go
into
our
next
agenda.
Item
minutes
approval.
A
A
A
D
A
C
I
move
to
confirm
the
minutes,
approve
the
minutes.
A
E
F
A
A
A
If
a
speaker
has
submitted
written
public
comment
after
5
pm,
but
wishes
to
speak
during
the
agent.
This
agenda
item.
Please
raise
your
hand
at
this
time
to
avoid
duplicate
comments.
Staff
will
not
read
written
comments
for
those
individuals
who
have
spoken
on
the
agenda
item.
Do
we
have
anyone?
Oh
it
looks
like
we
have
some
raised
hands.
A
All
right
so
we'll
start
with
a
public
comment:
we'll
start
with
b
hanson.
G
Hi,
I'm
just
here
at
like
I
think
other
will
be
to
come
in
first
meeting
we
were
incredibly
appointed
and
I
think
we
know
that.
G
A
All
okay,
thank
you
b,
we'll
next
go
to
anna
marie.
F
H
F
Awesome
good
evening,
I
just
want
to
remind
you
all
that
mobile
home
residents
are
still
vulnerable.
We
still
don't
have
rent
protections,
which
is
especially
devastating
during
the
coven
19
pandemic.
Cases
of
coven
19
are
on
the
rise
again,
which
is
negatively
affecting
the
income
of
many
mountain
view.
Mobile
home
residents
were
scared,
and
even
during
these
uncertain
times,
many
are
facing
rent
increases.
This
is
the
time
for
action
and
to
do
the
morally
right
thing
and
give
mobile
home
owners
and
renters.
The
rent
protections
deserved.
F
A
Thank
you,
anna
marie
up
next
we
have
alex
b.
J
K
I
D
I
A
D
C
D
D
I
lived
at
moore
park
mobile
home
for
20
years,
a
retired
senior
living
on
limited
income.
I
moved
to
my
first
mobile
home
with
a
sense
of
security
to
hopefully
live
out
my
days
in
my
own
home,
but
it
appears
with
unprotected
and
out
of
control,
rent
increases.
My
dream
may
not
become
a
reality.
It
leaves
me
with
a
very
unsettling
feeling
the
social
security
administration
granted
a
1.6
increase
for
2020.,
definitely
not
enough
to
buy
a
bag
of
groceries
nor
help
with
medical
and
dental
care.
D
How
will
people
like
myself
survive,
and
I
would
like
to
repeat
that
there
is
no
place
for
myself
to
relocate
that
is
reasonable
in
the
bay
area
like
an
apartment
or
retirement
community.
I
cannot
move
to
another
state
nor
impose
on
my
family
members
who
have
families
of
their
own.
My
mother
hit
a
major
milestone
of
100
on
june
12th.
D
D
D
A
You
andrea,
are
there
any
additional
members
of
the
public
on
the
line
who
have
indicated
they
wanted
to
speak
on
this
item.
K
K
So
the
community
stabilization
and
fair
rent
act,
section
1708,
b,
1709,
d2
and
1709
e
authorized
the
rental
housing
committee
to
establish
rules
and
regulations
for
administration
and
enforcement
of
the
csfra
in
that,
because
of
that
staff
is
requesting
regulations
that
are
currently
incomplete
or
missing,
be
either
adopted
or
amended.
This
evening,
chapter
1
the
purpose
of
the
csfra
regulations,
chapter
2,
the
definitions
and
chapter
6.
We
are
requesting
an
error,
be
amended
for
chapter
one.
The
purpose.
K
The
intent
of
this
is
to
clarify
the
csf
array
of
regulations
and
chapter
one
broadly
states
the
purpose
of
the
regulations
and
provides
context
to
the
document.
Overall
chapter
2
is
definitions.
The
purpose
of
this
chapter
is
to
define
the
terms
as
presented
in
the
csfra
regulations
in
order
to
improve
clarity
and
understanding.
K
This
is
especially
critical
for
people
who
are
using
the
regulations
to
do
petitions
or
to
administer
the
hearing
process.
This
provides
all
of
the
information
for
people
that
so
that
they
can
reference
the
document
appropriately
and
then
in
chapter
six
section,
c7,
there's
an
error
that
was
found
related
to
fair
return
standards
for
landlord
petitions.
It
states
currently
that
net
operating
income
shall
be
estimated
in
accordance
with
the
calculations
defined
in
subsection
c
2
of
chapter
6..
K
As
stated
in
the
proposed
regulations,
it
should
read
that
net
operating
income
shall
be
estimated
in
accordance
with
the
calculation
defined
in
subsection
c5
of
this
chapter,
using
the
methods
for
calculating
gross
income,
subjection
d
and
operating
expenses,
subsection
e,
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
this
chapter,
so
the
recommendation
from
staff
is
to
adopt
three
resolutions
of
the
rental
housing
committee
of
mountain
view.
The
first
one
is
to
adopt
regulations
for
chapter
one
purpose
of
the
csfra.
A
Thank
you
patricia.
Do
we
have
any
questions
from.
L
Staff,
or
maybe
for
for
legal,
just
wondering
what
are:
how
is
our
ability
characterized
to
amend
the
csf
array
even
for
a
correction
of
this
sort?
I'm
just
wondering
for
number
three.
K
C
Can
we
resolve
to
adopt
all
three
at
once
or
do
we
have
to
vote
on
each
one.
J
Karen,
so
there
are
three
separate
resolutions,
so
we
would
prefer
that
you
do
them
as
three
separate
motions.
A
Would
any
of
the
members
on
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
public
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
keep
time
and
announce
when
one
minute
remains.
If
a
speaker
has
submitted
written
public
comment
after
5
pm
but
wishes
instead
to
speak
during
this.
This
agenda
item.
Please
raise
your
hand
at
this
time
to
avoid
duplicate
duplicate
comments.
Staff
will
not
read
written
comments
for
those
individuals
who
have
the
agenda
item.
A
Do
we
have
any?
It
looks
like
we
have
one
hand
raised.
I
Oh
now,
can
you
hear
me
yep
sorry,
I
had
a
hardware
mute
on
okay,
let's
go
back
to
that's
me,
okay.
I
I
would
just
like
to
read
an
excerpt
from
exhibit
a
of
the
resolution
to
adopt
regulations
for
chapter
two,
which
is
item
s
rental
unit,
any
building,
structure
or
part
thereof,
or
land
a
pertinent
thereto
or
any
other
rental
property
rented
or
offered
for
rent
for
residential
purposes,
together
with
all
housing
services
connected
with
use
or
occupancy
of
such
property,
such
as
common
areas
and
recreational
facilities
held
out
for
use
by
the
tenant
and
also
covered
rental
units,
all
rental
units
not
specifically
exempted
by
this
article.
I
I
A
Thank
you
alex.
I
do
not
see
any
other
hands
raised
andre
did
you
receive
public
comment
on
this
item
since
5
pm
we
have
not
okay,
andrea.
Are
there
any
additional
members
of
the
public
on
the
line
who
have
indicated
that
they
want
to
speak
on
this
item.
A
All
right
so
we'll
bring
it
back
to
the
committee
where
a
motion
will
be
in.
A
A
We
have
a
motion
by
the
vice
chair.
Do
we
have
a
second.
A
With
a
second
by
committee,
member
haines
libsay,
so
we'll
we'll
go
to
a
roll
call
vote
andrea.
If
you
will.
E
C
A
A
Vice
chair,
you
still
have
your
hand
raised.
Did
you
want
to.
C
B
A
Thank
you,
committee,
member
haynes
livesay.
We
have
a
second
by
committee,
member
haynes,
let's
say
andrea.
Can
you
call
the
roll
call
vote.
E
L
A
E
E
L
D
After
having
solicited
proposals
for
a
database
database
management
system.
Through
a
request
for
proposal,
the
rental
housing
committee
approved
a
contract
with
3di
to
develop
a
centralized
data
management
system
capable
of
supporting
the
different
types
of
information
required
to
implement
the
csfra
regulations.
D
D
In
june
of
2019
phase,
two
of
the
implementation
was
released.
The
second
launch
allowed
property
owners
to
comply
with
their
obligation
to
submit
copies
of
certain
notices
to
the
rental
housing
committee.
Once
a
property
owner
had
registered
their
property
online,
they
will
have
had
the
ability
to
submit
the
following
types
of
documentation.
D
D
C
D
D
D
However,
we
have
these
other
fields
optional.
If
they
wanted
to
use
the
database
to
its
fullest
capacity,
they
could
track
their
tenants
information
within
our
database
so
requiring
this
other
type
of
information
would
allow
for
data
collection
on
the
unit
type,
the
occupant
type,
tenant
turnover
and
vacancy
rates
base.
Rent
amounts,
aga
rates,
the
amount
of
aga
applied
to
the
unit
and
also
the
allowable
amount
of
aga-
that's
been
banked
for
future
use,
so
this
could
provide
many
of
those
data
points
that
we
are.
D
D
So
the
the
bulk
email
feature
is
currently
largely
unusable
because
of
the
lack
of
registration.
So
we
don't
have
very
many
owners
emails.
So
we
can't
really
take
advantage
of
that
feature
and
also
once
we
expand
to
have
the
tenant
portal
we'll
be
able
to
do
both
emails
for
both
tenants
and
landlords.
D
D
However,
the
ad
hoc
report
feature
has
the
potential
to
search
and
create
reports
on
any
data
point
that
we
require
be
entered
into
the
system.
So
again,
a
mandatory
database
would
allow
staff
to
run
reports
on
all
of
those
databases
such
as
partially
or
fully
covered
rental
units.
Aga
re
increases
vacancy
rates
and
so
on.
D
They
are
not
all
online,
but
most
of
them
are
required
and
they
do
require
the
owner
and
manager.
Information
at
the
least,
but
as
you'll
see
most
of
them
do
require
some
per
unit
detail
information
as
well,
and
the
city
there.
San
francisco,
that
does
not
have
mandatory
registration
is
currently
looking
into
creating
an
online
registry.
D
A
fully
populated
database
is
key
to
effectively
and
efficiently
running
all
components
of
the
csfra
program.
For
these
reasons,
it
would
allow
for
greater
compliance
with
the
csf
array,
so
requiring
property
owners
to
submit
rental
information,
serves
the
purpose
of
making
lawful
rent
levels
transparent
to
both
the
tenant
and
the
property
owners.
D
So
that
would,
in
the
end,
also
help
us
in
calculating
the
rental
housing
fee
and
providing
more
accurate
invoices,
which
would
cut
staff
time
tremendously,
on
the
back
end
with
either
returned
invoices
or
invoice
corrections,
which
is
a
lot
of
time
staff
time
between
myself
and
the
finance
department.
D
D
A
mandatory
database
is
also
necessary
for
efficient
timely
collection
and
prompt
processing
and
analyzing
of
the
rental
property
data.
However,
due
to
the
lack
of
registration
that
we've
seen
the
pertinent
information
and
pertinent
information
collected,
the
database
currently
only
has
unlimited
use,
so
next
slide.
E
I'd
be
interested
to
hear
from
staff
how
satisfied
you
are
to
date
with
this
data
database
provider
and
if
you're,
you
know,
satisfied
with
them
or
how
you
feel
about
them.
D
Sure
yeah,
we
have
been
working
with
them
for
a
while
now
and
have
created
a
pretty
good
working
relationship.
So
we're
very
pleased
with
the
progress
that
we
have
and
we've
been
working
very
hard
in
this
phase.
Three
for
the
petitions,
which
is
basically
all
custom,
work
that
they're
doing
for
us
and
during
the
testing
process.
Everything
is
working
very
smoothly
and
it's
very
user
friendly.
So
we're
very
excited
to
have
that
pushed
out
and
we'll
definitely
give
you
a
preview
when
it
comes
out.
But
overall
we're
very.
K
Satisfied
yeah.
I
would
like
to
second
that
they
have
done
phenomenal
work
for
us
and
they
really
are
building
a
lot
of
these
systems
in
a
way
that
I
don't
necessarily
think
that
they
were
initially
anticipating
they're
far
more
custom
than
than
they,
I
think
originally
meant
them
to
be,
which
was
a
kindness
in
our
the
way
the
contract
was
worded.
I
I'd
say
so.
K
We
we
are
getting
a
user-friendly
product
that
I
I
I'm
with
the
petition
side
of
it
exceedingly
happy
with
and
the
more
that
we
complete
each
type
of
petition.
I
would
say
that
the
even
the
happier
I
am
so
and
the
especially
for
the
cost
we
we're
receiving
really
good
service
on
on
from
the
staff's
perspective,.
A
Do
we
have
any
other
questions
for
staff
vice
chair
almond?
It
looks
like
you
raised
your
hand,
you
need
to
mute
yourself.
D
Yeah,
thank
you
yeah
we're
working
on
it
here.
So
I'm
sorry,
great
inconvenience,
causing
our
I-team
director
is
on
his
way
to
city
hall
to
try
to
figure
figure
it
out.
So
hopefully
it
will
be
up
soon.
A
All
right,
it
looks
like
committee
member
grunwald
has
his
hand
up.
L
Thank
you.
I
I
just
had
some
questions
for
staff
going
through
the
details.
L
First,
you
know
we
covered
compliance
rate
or
the
percentage
of
buildings
that
have
paid
you
know
a
few
meetings
ago
and
if
we
exclude
kind
of
outliers
like
buildings
that
are
in
litigation
or
buildings
who
are
objecting
to
the
fee,
I
mean
what
is
our:
what's
our
compliance
rate
right
now
on
buildings
that
are
paid
up.
D
I
haven't
pulled
the
latest
numbers,
I
think,
since
our
last
meeting,
but
I
know
we're
we're
pretty
high
on
the
compliance
rate
for
the
for
the
fee
and
the
at
least
on
that
part,
but
again,
they're
not
required
to
pay
the
fee
through
our
website,
so
they
can
just
pay
the
fee
directly
with
the
city.
So
it's
not
really
linked
to
the
registration
compliance.
L
Yeah,
thank
you
I'm
trying
to
ascertain
do
we
do
we
perceive
that
we
would
get
increased
compliance
or
increased
payment
through
through
having
at
least
the
mandatory
registration
of
the
building.
M
I
did,
I
really
think
we
do
when
registering
apart
from
the
billing.
There
are
other
criteria
that
the
landlords
need
to
comply
with,
and
those
can
be
then
monitored
through
the
database.
M
It's
providing
certain
notices
that
andrea
just
pointed
out
in
her
presentation.
It
is
checking
whether
they
correctly
applied
to
aga
on
the
rental
units,
and
we
also
would
like
to
track
the
vacancy
rates,
because
that
is
a
that
is
a
data
point
that
we
do
need
to
monitor.
According
to
the
csf
array,.
K
Want
to
answer
one
of
the
key
pieces
that
andrea
works
very
hard
on
is
to
ensure
that
the
billing
addresses
are
correct
every
year.
She
has
to
go
back
and
redo
that
work,
and
it
is
a
ton
of
staff
work
to
do
that.
Yeah,
like
significant
staff
work,
and
this
having
a
mandatory
database,
would
alleviate
a
lot
of
that
work.
It
is
to
be
honest,
one
of
the
heaviest
lifts
that
we
have
every
year.
L
Yeah
thanks
and
andrea,
maybe
if
he
gives
more
detail,
I'm
just
trying
to
wrap
my
head
around,
so
I
was
kind
of
under
the
assumption
that
many
addresses
wouldn't
change
year
over
year
I
mean
are
we
or
that
we
would?
We
would
get
better
information
each
year
that
we
had
that
the
csfra
had
been
in
place
and
that
some
of
the
returned
invoices,
hopefully
that
number
would
decrease
over
time.
Is
that
like
yeah?
L
If
you,
if
you
could
tell
me
more
about
that
process
each
year,
give
me
a
sense
of
of
how
you
know
how
much
that
yeah.
L
D
Took
on
a
little
bit
more
of
that
this
year,
instead
of
leaving
it
into
to
finance
those
hands,
because
this
is
the
way
we
worked
it
out
if
we
wanted
to
do
more,
complete
follow-ups
with
invoices
that
haven't
been
paid,
we
needed
to
sort
of
do
all
that
research
on
our
own
and
send
out
those
follow-up
invoices
on
our
own.
So
it's
a
huge
lip,
so
we
send
the
invoice
out
on
the
first
and
people
are
supposed
to
pay
by
the
the
first
of
february.
D
We
do
get
a
lot
of
return
addresses,
so
that
is
probably
the
thing
that
takes
the
longest,
because
you
don't
know
really
why
it's
returned.
If
it's
the
owner
has
changed
or
just
the
address
is
incomplete
in
some
way,
so
you're
doing
a
lot
of
hunting
down
and
trying
to
figure
out
what
is
an
alternative
address
to
mail
to
and
then
many
times
the
email
that
or
the
mailing
address
that
you
found
is
also
incorrect.
D
They
come
back
a
second
time
and
then
you're
trying
to
find
you
know
with
different
departments
in
the
city
if
anybody
has
a
new
address
for
them.
So
it's
just
a
lot
of
hunting
down,
collaborating
with
other
departments
and
trying
to
find
the
right
addresses.
E
I
H
D
It
does
pay
off
because
we
do
end
up
with
a
pretty
significant.
You
know
rate
of
people
who
do
pay
their
invoices,
but
it
is
a
lot
of
work.
L
Thank
you,
yeah,
I'm
just
trying
to
trying
to
ascertain.
I
guess
once
we've
found
them,
so
I
I
do.
I'm
sure
that
it
is
tough
to
initially
find
someone
who
you
know
we
have
an
old
address
for,
or
you
know,
doesn't
live
there
anymore
and
is
managing
the
property
remotely.
L
I
guess
the
question
is
tell
me
a
little
bit
more
about
how
the
registration
process
will
will
help
him
be
kind
of
searching
for
those
helping
with
the
returned
invoices.
D
D
So
that's
another
reason
why
I
pulled
that
task
more
into
the
csfra
team,
because
finance
was
doing
a
lot
of
that
follow-up
and
they
weren't
sharing
some
of
the
information
with
us
about
returned
addresses.
So
I
didn't
have
a
good
idea
of
how
big
that
number
was
until
I
asked
to
see
it
this
year
and
I
I
was
surprised
by
the
amount
of
returned
mail
but
yeah.
I
wanted
us
to
also
make
sure
that
we're
correcting
the
addresses
and
have
a
better
idea
of
what
we
were
up
against.
E
L
Okay
and
then
maybe
a
question
for,
thank
you
andre.
That's
that's
helpful.
The
question
for
maybe
karen
would
we
legally
be
able
to
if
we
had
email
addresses
and
we
had
like
a
paperless
opt-in
via
the
website,
we
created
a
separate
field.
Would
we
be
able
to
forego
sending
paper
invoices
or
I
mean?
Is
there
a
way
we
can
make
this
more
efficient
legally
without
having
to
send
a
paper.
J
Yeah
and
I
think
the
way
the
regulations
are
written,
everything
can
be
done
online.
You
know
the
billing
right
now,
as
andrea
said,
is
done
through
the
city
billing,
so
we
might
have
to
coordinate
with
them
and
you
know
andrea.
You
would
need
to
work
with
the
database
providers
to
see
if
they
could
pay
the
fee
online,
but
I
think
the
goal
is
to
try
to
make
it
paperless,
but
we
will
provide
paper
registration
for
those
people
that
don't
feel
comfortable
with
the
online.
L
L
L
L
L
M
Well,
currently,
we
don't
have
any
regulations
for
that,
so
there
is
nothing
in
the
regulations
about
that.
So
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
is
to
have
some
regulations
that
say
that
registration
is
part
of
your
duties
under
the
csf
array,
and
failure
to
complete
the
registration
shall
be
deemed
substantial
non-compliance.
M
L
Yeah,
I
think
my
I'm
more
concerned
that
that
for
landlords
who
don't,
I
guess
first
we'd
still
have
the
paper
option
or
currently
we're
using
the
paper
option
right.
H
L
Also,
I
guess
everybody's
already-
I
mean
everyone's
already
registered
everyone
today
out
of
the
650
buildings
or
sorry
that
number
may
be
lower,
but
today,
in
the
system
we
have
650
and
that
what
would
we
say
is
total.
M
If
each
landlord
were
to
do
that
for
their
property,
it
would
relieve
staff
from
so
many
hours
of
work.
Firstly.
Secondly,
it
would
prevent
staff
from
sending
out
invoices
to
the
wrong
address
or
the
wrong
landlord
when
properties
are
getting
sold
and
things
would,
you
know,
run
way
more
smoothly
than
they
have
been
so
far.
L
Thank
you.
I
think
it
was
specifically
if,
if
they
have
been,
if
those
properties
are
registered
today,
is
there
a?
How
would
would
they
get
out
of
compliance
if
they
had
moved
and
not
notified
us?
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
is.
M
Yeah,
so
we
we,
we
don't
have
a
paper
database,
we
have
an
online
database
and
they
we
ask
for
them
to
update
their
information
once
per
year.
L
A
It
looks
like
a
committee
member
haines.
Livesay
has
her
hand
up,
but
if
she
wants
to
go
now,
that's
fine.
If
she
doesn't
mind
you
continuing
on
with
your
questions,
that's
fine
too.
L
Okay,
thank
you
when
it
comes
to
the
per
unit.
L
Mandating
per
unit
details
what
what
would
be
perceived
as
the
key
benefits
of
of
requiring
that
information.
K
K
We
don't
have
accurate
vacancy
rate
information
and
the
way
that
the
csfra
is
written.
We
would
have
to
do
a
survey,
a
paper
survey
of
some
sort
to
gather
the
information
for
vacancy
rates.
If
we
were
to
look
at
potentially
be
suspending
the
csfra
that
we
can
constantly
track
it
at
the
with
the
the
database.
Your
database
already
has
all
of
these
functions,
we're
just
not
able
to
utilize
them
you're
paying
for
it.
It's
a
robust
system
that
works
very
well.
K
We
just
don't
have
the
ability
to
get
the
data,
so
we
would
also
know
rent
rates.
We
would
be
able
to
track
what
increases
people
are
actually
giving.
We
would
know
thoroughly
if
people
have
provided
rollbacks.
If
people
are
in
compliance,
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
know
if
people
are
in
compliance
with
their
buildings
and
their
properties.
At
this
point,
all
of
that
information
is
a.
You
know.
K
Question
mark
this
would
provide
all
of
that
to
us
and
we
would
be
able
to
know
what
the
actual
rent
rates
are
for
these
units,
so
we
can
tell
people
specifically
right
now
right
now.
So
when
you
look
at
your
monthly
status
report
right
now,
it
shows
the
the
market
rate
rent,
which
is
what's
on
the
market.
Currently
it
doesn't
show
what
people
are
actually
paying
and
whether
or
not
our
ability
to
stabilize
rents
for
the
people
who
currently
live
in
the
units
is
actually
working.
K
K
This
many
are.
You
know
one
bedrooms
with
rent
below
a
thousand
dollars.
This
money
are
many,
are
one
bedrooms
with
rent
below
fifteen
hundred
dollars?
This
many
are.
We
would
be
able
to
tell
you
who's
even
below
the
hud
rates
we
we
would
have
the
ability
to
actually
know
what
people
are
actually
paying,
which
is
actually
pretty
important
for
the
the
purpose
of
the
csf
array.
K
Just
thinking
you
know
all
of
the
terminations
that
we
track,
we
can
continue
to
track
those
as
thoroughly
as
possible,
but
we
can
also
know
when
there's
unit
turnover
why
people
are
moving
out.
We
don't
currently
require
information
for
all
units
when
there's
turnover
only
if
termination
notices
are
submitted.
We
would
now
know
okay.
This
unit
has
turned
over
five
times,
so
we
can
actually
say
in
a
five
year
span.
K
L
Thank
you,
I
mean
I'm
definitely
in
favor
of
more
data,
I
think,
maybe,
on
the
other
side,
what
what
would
be
the
cost
to
a
property
manager,
who's,
managing
a
50
unit,
building
the
level
of
investment.
I
guess
in
supplying
this
this
data.
M
That
is
understandable,
but
we
do
have
features
in
the
database
where
they
can
just
download
an
excel
sheet
and
they're
done
with
it
once
they
log
in.
D
L
L
Did
the
are
we
requiring
that
they
update
it
at
point
of
vacation
whenever
someone
vacates,
and
is
there
also
a
time
frame
in
there
that
they
have
to
update
it
within
x
number
of
days.
L
Okay:
okay,
thanks
just
like
a
couple
more
that
I
had
in
my
notes
here
who
would
have
access
to
the
data
like?
Would
this
be?
If
someone
you
know
in
the
public
made
a
freedom
of
information
act
request
you
know.
To
what
extent
would
they
get
access
to
per
unit
or
building
information.
L
But
you,
but
do
we,
would
we
publish
then
the
address
of
the
building
so
building
x
has
100
units,
the
number
of
rents
for
all
units
and
the
address
of
the
building.
J
Yeah,
I
think
the
address
is
not
sensitive
data.
L
Okay
and
so
for
the
two
holdout
jurisdictions
that
were
on
the
list,
were
they
exploring
exploring
just
mandatory
registration
or
also
per
unit
per
unit
details.
J
D
L
Okay,
thank
you
for
your
patience.
I'll
see
the
floor
too,
nicole.
B
I
just
I
was
surprised
when
I
read
the
report
by
how
low
our
adoption
rates
are
like
they're,
incredibly
low,
and
you
know
I
know
some
people
are
just
not
going
to
want
to
adopt
an
electronic
tool,
but
in
my
experience
with
trying
to
transition
people
from
paper
to
online,
which
I
have
done
many
times,
there's
normally
a
much
higher
percentage
of
people
who
are
interested
in
adopting
an
electronic
solution.
So
do
we
have
any
idea
why
we're
seeing
such
low
adoption
rates
like
what
outreach
we've
done?
M
And
it's
not
just
that
we
are
moving
from
paper
to
online.
It's
moving
it
from
a
voluntary
database
to
a
mandatory
database,
whether
they
fill
it
out
online
or
on
paper,
and
just
because
they
don't
have
to
they.
Don't
I
think
it's
that
easy.
M
Send
out
six
every
half
year
there's
a
newsletter
with
updates.
It
goes
to
landlords,
we
send
separate
letters
to
landlords
every
january,
they
get
an
invoice
and
we
put
our
link
on
there
and
the
benefits
of
of
registering
their
property
yeah.
So
it's
not
it's
not
that
we
haven't
done
any
outreach.
K
A
specific
postcard
went
to
all
of
them
with
again
all
of
the
benefits
of
it
as
well.
We've
done
workshops
specifically
on
registering
interactive
ones
where
people
can
join
us
and
participate.
We
can
help
them
and
we
actually
have
another
one
of
those
scheduled
that'll
be
remote,
but
they
can
join
us
and
andrea
for
all
of
the
work
that
she's
done
with
landlords
regarding
termination
noticing.
K
That's
where
that's
where
these
the
ones
that
are
registered
come
from
is
from
when
people
have
filed,
terminate
have
to
file
termination
notices
with
us,
and
so
she's
she's
worked
with
them
to
help
them
walk
through
any
of
the
challenges
that
they
might
have.
So
you
see
compliance
when
they're
required
to
utilize
the
system.
Okay,.
B
And
in
the
workshops
and
whatnot
we
haven't
heard
like
oh,
I
have
a
hard
time
with
understanding
how
to
upload,
like
I
just
I'm
thinking
about
myself,
and
it
just
boggles
my
mind
that
if
I
had
an
electronic
solution
to
get
something
done,
that
is
a
fee.
I
know
I
have
to
pay
every
year
that
I
wouldn't
adopt
it
and
just
go
with
the
electronic
solution,
rather
than
play
cat
and
mouse
to
pay
the
fee,
but
maybe
I'm
just
more
amenable
to
fee
paying
we
haven't
heard
like
I
really
don't
laugh.
B
We
haven't
heard
like
an
overarching
rationale
in
any
of
the
workshops
of
why
we're
not
getting
people
to
adopt
this.
No
okay,
all
right
that
was.
That
was
my
questions.
L
As
a
follow-on,
though,
I
I
guess
to
go
back
to
your
question
fee,
paying
is
not,
and
maybe
andrew
this
question
for
you
like
fee
paying.
We
are
we're
in
the
high
90s
right
percent,
wise,
like
how
many
buildings
are
have
paid
their
fee
right.
D
L
Okay,
so
I
mean
they're
nicole,
I'm
equally
perplexed.
I
guess
in
that,
but
it
sounds
like
it's
a
regis
to
clarify
from
staff.
It's
a
unwillingness
to
register
online,
but
they're
still
via
the
paper
route,
they're
still
paying
the
fee.
D
D
Right
to
yes,
but
we
did
decide
to
just
go
ahead
and
have
a
link
on
our
system
which
says
pay
fee,
and
then
they
click
on
that
and
it
just
takes
them
directly
to
the
site
for
the
city,
so
it
will
be
available.
There.
B
A
Do
we
have
oh,
it
looks
like
vice
chair
almond.
Has
some
questions.
C
You're
on
mute,
I
got
it.
I
wanted
to
confirm
the
number,
because
it's
so
outrageous
we
only
have
31
that
have
registered
out
of
600.
Is
that
correct.
C
That
really
begs
that
we
make
this
mandatory
we're
just
not
getting
all
the
information
that
we
need.
A
D
To
be
honest,
about,
half
of
them
are
properties
that
have
registered
as
exempt,
so
those
are
usually
larger.
You
know,
affordable
housing
complexes
that
are
just
exempt
from
the
csf
are
all
together,
so
about
half
of
them
are
really
only
csf
or
a
covered
unit.
So
the
number
is
even
about
half
of
that
realistically
and
there's
a
mix,
it's
a
lot
of
larger
properties
because
they're
serving
more
termination
notices
than
some
of
the
smaller
properties,
but
there
is
a
mix
in
there
of
larger
and
smaller
properties.
A
A
I
had
the
day
here
february,
1st
2021.
Do
we
have
like
an
outreach
plan
leading
up
to
that,
because
I
I
imagine
we
don't
want
everyone
coming
in
january
31st.
K
I
would
we
would
we've
already
have
plan
if,
if
this
was
adopted,
we
would
send
out
a
a
letter
as
quickly
as
possible
to
all
the
landlords.
It
would
go
in
the
newsletter
that
is
slated
to
go
out
at
the
beginning
of
july
that
we're
just
about
done
with,
and
then
we
would
continue
with
as
much
outreach
as
possible,
including
we
already
have
a
webinar
workshop
scheduled
for
this
particular
item.
K
We
had
just
planned
it
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
anyway,
so
that
would
go
out
and
then,
of
course,
with
all
of
the
fee
information
that
we
send
out
and
all
of
the
noticing
that
we
send
for
the
fees
it
would
be
in
that
noticing.
So
the
the
way
that
people
that
property
owners
sign
up
and
get
on
to
the
system
is
through
their
ap,
their
parcel
number,
their
ap
apn
and
there's
an
a
pin
with
that,
and
that
is
how
they
get
into
the
system.
K
It's
part
of
the
the
billing
invoices.
So
in
your
invoice
you
receive
all
that
information
in
that
invoice.
There's
a
letter,
and
it
would
have
all
of
that
information
as
well.
So
it
would
be
pretty,
it
would
be
pretty
robust
and
we
already
have
the
ability
to
start
getting
the
information
out
as
quickly
as.
B
Sorry
one
last
question:
so
do
we
anticipate
I'm
just
thinking
about
me
and
pieces
of
paper
with
numbers
on
them?
Do
we
anticipate
that
it
would
be
a
big
amount
of
staff
time
in
the
weeks
leading
up
to
the
compliance
date
of
february
1st
2021
to
have
all
the
oh,
my
gosh,
I
forgot
to
file.
How
do
I
do
this?
D
Yeah
I
mean
hopefully
with
all
the
outreach
we're
going
to
do
beforehand,
we'll
get
a
lot
of
people
in
that
first
wave,
but
also,
I
have
created
a
very
thorough
set
of
user
instructions
that
are
mostly
pictures
and
it's
very
easy
to
understand
and
everyone
I
send
it
to
has
had
pretty
good
luck
following
them
and
even
if
they
have
a
couple
of
question
it
cuts
down.
D
My
call
time
from
you
know
30
minutes
to
maybe
five,
so
we
have
all
of
the
back
end
information
ready
to
go
because
we've,
you
know,
we've
had
this
set
up
now
for
a
year
or
two,
so
I'm
hoping
that
will
cut
down
some
of
that
time
and
I
think
also,
even
if
it
does
take
some
staff
time,
the
amount
of
of
initial
time
it
it
will
take
will
will
be
worth
it
in
the
long
run.
K
You
know
they
provide
services
to
both
property
owners
and
tenants,
and
so
they
they
can
definitely
assist
and
will
will
assist
in
in
helping
property
owners
register
and
walk
them
through
that
process.
So
luckily
we
have
additional
staff
support
there
perfect.
Thank
you.
A
Do
we
have
any
more
questions
from
the
committee
seeing
none,
let's
go
to
public
comments,
all
right,
where's,
my
script
here
we
go.
Would
any
of
the
member?
Would
any
members
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
keep
time
and
announced
when
one
minute
remains.
A
A
All
right,
let's
see
raise
hands,
we
have
two
raised
hands
all
right.
Let's
start
with
ed
heating.
H
H
Many
are
thinking
of
the
coming
importance
of
understanding
eviction
data
as
moratoriums
on
eviction,
expire
and
repayment
timelines
begin.
I
support
this
motivation
to
capture
data
at
the
unit
level
and
as
you're
already
seeing
its
needs
to
be
mandatory,
because
no
one
chooses
paperwork,
that's
not
mandatory.
H
Every
time
I
look
at
the
csfra,
where
I
go
is
immediately
to
the
vacancy
rate
and
every
time
I
look
at
it,
I
wonder
how
accurate
it
is.
I
wonder
as
apartments
empty
for
demolition.
How
does
that
affect
the
vacancy
rate?
When
we've
had
volunteers
out,
we
sometimes
come
across
apartments
that
are
airbnb
rented.
The
people
there
tell
us.
So
are
these
legal
airbnb
rentals?
H
If
we're
capturing
more
data
legal
uses,
are
going
to
be
encouraged?
I
especially
support
b.3
in
the
draft
chapter,
11.
re-registration,
whenever
a
new
tenancy
commences
commences
for
a
covered
rental
unit.
The
landlord
must
update
the
registration
within
30
days
after
such
tenancy
commences,
including
providing
the
new
rental
rate.
This
means
the
database
will
very
largely
stay
up
to
date.
All
the
time
there
will
be
an
initial
effort
to
update
it,
but
then
it'll
be
an
ongoing
update.
That
means
you'll
always
be
getting
accurate
information
out
of
it.
H
H
If
this
is
not
already
required
within
the
regulation,
I
would
add
documenting
apartments
becoming
vacant
within
30
days
as
an
additional
requirement.
Then
you
would
really
have
a
robust
set
of
data.
That
really
will
answer
your
questions
and
tell
us
how
well
the
csfra
is
working
and
how
well
it
is
being
complied
with.
Thank
you.
I
A
Seriously,
okay,
thank
you,
alex
b,
do
we
have
any
other
comments,
or
was
that
actually
a.
A
I
Okay,
yeah.
No,
I'm
really
glad
this
is
coming
back.
I
think
this
is
awesome.
I
think
this
is
how
it
should
have
been
done
in
the
first
place.
I
love
the.
I
think
that
we're
gonna
have
greater
transparency
and
more
ability
to
track
what's
going
on
in
the
city
and
be
able
to
better
target
outreach
solutions
and
also
save
staff,
a
lot
of
toil
that
they
have
heroically
taken
upon
themselves
in
the
absence
of
required
transparency
on
the
part
of
the
landlords
of
the
city.
I
think
this
is
great.
I
I
would
love
to
to
ascertain
why
committee
member
grundwald
is
trying
to
find
any
excuse
to
not
have
this
and
is
so
concerned
with
each
possible
hypothetical
way
in
which
any
landlord
could
somehow
be
inconvenienced
at
some
point,
given
all
these
counterfactuals,
but
is
not
concerned
with
the
benefits
to
tenants
the
city,
the
program
as
a
whole,
you
as
administrators,
who
would
be
able
to
get
more
information
out
of
this
to
be
able
to
better
decide
how
to
allocate
your
resources
and
what
you
can
do
to
better
serve
the
purposes
of
the
charter
yeah.
I
A
All
right,
thank
you,
alex
b.
The
next
speaker
is
anna,
marie
morales.
F
Hi
there
I
just
want
to
say
I
completely
agree
with
everything
alex
said.
This
really
needs
to
be
mandatory.
In
hindsight,
this
probably
should
have
been
done
from
the
very
beginning,
but
it's
not
too
late
to
do
this
now.
Thank
you.
So.
A
Much
you
anna
marie,
it
looks
like
that
is
the
last
of
the
hand
raise
so
city
staff.
Did
you
receive
public
comment
on
this
item
since
5
pm?
No,
we
did
not
all
right
andrea.
Are
there
any
additional
members
of
the
public
in
on
the
line
who
have
indicated
they
wanted
to
speak
on
this
item.
A
All
right,
we
are
now
back
to
committee,
deliberation,
questions
and
action.
If
applicable,
a
motion
to
approve
should
include
the
reading
on
the
following
items
in
red
to
adopt
resolution
and
regulations
for
a
mandatory
database
first
for
csfra
covered
rental
properties.
A
motion
is
in
order,
but
I
will
allow
for
some
deliberations
because
I'm
sure
there's
probably
going
to
be
some
who
would
like
to
go.
First.
E
So
I
think
we
touched
on
this
before
and
so
apologies
if
I
didn't
completely
get
it,
but
can
someone
just
kind
of
refresh
me
on
how
much
of
this
data
would
be
available
to
the
public
if
a
given
person
wanted
to
to
look
at
all
this
data,
because
I
think
it's,
I
understand
the
significance
of
this
data.
My
only
concern
is
you
know
people's
privacy
and
and
how
much
of
it
is
available
to
the
general
public
versus
just
available
to
the
rhc
when
trying
to
administer
this
whole
system.
J
So
a
lot
of
the
data
will
be
available
to
the
general
public.
Any
information
that
is
personal
to
a
particular
individual
that
could
potentially
compromise
their
privacy
will
not
be
available.
K
And
it
would,
I
would
assume,
be
something
similar
to
petitions
where
all
of
the
unit
numbers
are
are
can
be
completely
changed
to
not
be
specific
to
the
unit
or
the
data
could
be
aggregated
in
some
way.
There
are
options
in
how
the
data
can
be
provided
within
the
redaction
code.
E
Do
we
have-
and
maybe
this
has
to
be
by
way
of
a
you
know,
modifying
the
motion,
but
do
we
have
a
a
sense
then
whether
that
actually
would
happen
or
that's
just
an
option?
So
do
we
know
now
that
going
forward
we
would
try
to
strip
some
of
that
data
or
otherwise
make
it
anonymous,
or
is
that
something
that
is
still
kind
of
up
in
the
air?
Unless
we
decide
now
or
some
way
to
point
to
to
do
that.
J
So
we
have
to
comply
with
the
public
records
act
under
state
law,
and
so
the
public
records
act
makes
certain
information
public
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
information.
The
public
agencies
hold
is
public,
but
it
does
require
that
certain
identifying
information
that
either
would
infringe
on
somebody's
privacy
rights
or
that
could
expose
people
to
potential
identity
theft
has
to
be
removed
from
data
before
it's
made
available
to
the
public.
So
we
are
subject
to
that,
whether
we
like
it
or
not-
and
that's
how
we
would
manage
the
information.
K
So,
for
instance,
per
unit
like
an
identifier
we
can,
we
can
have
a
separate
identifier
for
per
unit
information
that
is
not
tied
to
a
specific
unit
for
public
information
requests.
So
if
you
lived
in
apartment
1b
at
333
made
up
street,
no
one
would
see
that
your
rent
for
apartment
1b
at
333
made
up
street
is
2
000.
They
would
see
sparkle
sunshine
apartment
at
333
made
up
street
is
two
thousand
dollars,
so
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
tell
who's
whose
unit
is
specifically
paying
the
rent.
Just
like
we
do
for
petitions
now.
E
Do
we
have
any
sense
in
terms
of
taking
that
additional
step
to
make
it
and
you
know
anonymous
or
the
data
in
that
format,
so
that
you
respect
people's
privacy,
if
that
adds
another
level
of
cost
or
complexity
to
how
we
process
this,
because
I
can
understand
if
we
just
have
the
data
as
input
by
the
landlords,
it's
very
easy
to
manage,
as
is
because
it's
in
that
format.
E
K
We
have
seen
public
records,
requests,
significantly
drop
for
the
program
in
general
and
that
we
can
go
back
to
3di
and
request
if
there's
a
way
when
they
do
the
aggregation
of
data
and
provide
the
reports
to
make
the
per
unit
number
instantly
removed
for
from
the
data.
There
might
be
a
way
there.
To
be
honest:
it's
not
if
we
download
a
spreadsheet
with
the
information
and
we
black
out
and
redact
the
units.
K
K
We
do
this
kind
of
work
really
frequently
working
closely
with
the
city
clerk's
office
to
make
sure
that
it's
fully
done
under
the
government
code.
I
I
have
been
doing
this
now
for
quite
a
few
years
and
in
this
particular
case
it
would
not
be
challenging
for
us
to
strip
out
the
personal
identifiers
for
peer
unit
information.
L
J
D
It
would
be
relatively
easy
to
just
go
in
and
plug
those
fields
in
with
our
reporting
ability
that
we
have
in
the
3di
system
and
just
pull
all
that
information
it'll
just
turn
it
right
into
a
spreadsheet.
For,
for
me,.
L
Is
that
something
that
staff
would
would
like
to
be
doing.
L
L
You
all
do
provide
me
with
a
lot
of
great
reporting
I'll
say
that
I'm
more
concerned
to
to
julian's
point
I'm
more
concerned.
I
don't.
I
don't
think
we're
probably
getting
that
many
requests
now
free
of
information
act
requests,
but
I
mean
imagining
that
you
had
a
database
of
all
rents
of
all
units
in
the
city
of
mountain
view.
You
know,
I
do
think
that
that
the
rate
of
request
that
you
would
get
would
increase
pretty
substantially.
I
could
see
a
lot
of
people
being
interested
in
that
data
and
you
know
it's
not.
L
I
think
we're
trying
to
balance
so
sorry
we're
in
deliberation.
I
guess
now
so
emily
feel
free
to
you
know.
I.
K
Would
say
that
I
think
I
think,
with
the
information
that
we
put
out
people
yeah
from
what
I
gather
at
this
point.
It's
not
so
much
the
unless
you
really
want
to
know
your
neighbor's
rent,
which
this
wouldn't
provide
you
the
opportunity
to
know
your
neighbor's
rent,
it's
not
so
much
the
the
specific
data,
it's
the
aggregated
data
that
people
are
interested
in
and
we
would
be
providing
we
provide
that
every
month
we
would
just
have
a
better
system
to
do
that
with
so
we're
already
out
there.
K
K
K
M
J
M
Yeah
I
mean
patricia,
has
been
doing
all-out
redacting
instead
of
the
city
attorney's
office,
so
she
has
special
software
for
it
and
she
has
been
trained
by
the
city
attorney's
office,
so
she's
turning
them
around
on
a
dime,
and
it
is
what
patricia
said
in
the
beginning.
There
might
be
some
curious
people
wanting
to
get
that
information,
but
after
a
while
that
will
just
level
off
just
like
we
saw
with
the
petition
processes
in
the
beginning,
people
were
interested
now,
they're,
really
not
and.
K
L
Got
it?
Thank
you,
so
I
I
guess
for
the
committee
yeah,
I
I
we
don't
have
mandatory
registration
and
we
don't
have
per
unit
registration
right
now,
and
I
see
that
we
are
with
the
outliers.
L
But
I
would
say
you
know:
maybe
we
adopt
a
crawl
walk
run
scenario.
I
do
think
there
could
be
unintended
consequences
that
could,
from
the
per
unit
data
at
least
especially
the
per
unit
data
that
that
could
create
more
time
and
headaches.
I
I
guess
the
the
risk
reward
isn't
there
for
me.
So
vacancy
rate,
let's
take
that
that's
one
of
the
benefits
of
having
all
this
data
is
getting
a
better
vacancy
rate.
L
Vacancy
rate
seems
to
me
is
primarily,
would
be
used
to
cut
short,
cfra
or,
or
you
know,
discontinue
the
csra.
I
don't
think
that's
anything
that
anyone
on
this
committee
is
really
we
have
not
been
asking
for
a
different
set
of
data
to
try
to
you
know
calculate
a
different
vacancy
rate,
so
you
know
and
costar
yes,
we're
paying
for
it,
but
also
landlords
are
paying
all
the
fees
and
that
that
their
their
budget
goes
to
that.
L
So,
if
you're
saying
should
I
should
we
inconvenience
landlords
to
and
and
implement
this
process,
whereby
every
single
turnover
within
30
days
they
have
to
you,
know,
register
all
this
information
about
each
unit.
L
As
as
opposed
to
you
know
not
asking
them
to
do
that,
you
know,
I
don't
think
like
that
when
it
comes
to
vacancy
rates
and
and
being
able
to
get
a
get
a
more
specific
value
there
I
would
assume.
L
Co-Star
is
like
in
the
range-
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
the
committee
is,
that
we
decouple
the
mandatory
registration,
which
I
would
save
staff
time
and
I
think,
could
save
paper
if
we
could
went
with
a
paperless
option
and
use
that
as
our
first
foray
into
making
some
sort
of
mandatory
data
and
then
the
per
unit
side,
I
mean
see
how
see
how
this
goes
see.
L
If
san
francisco
does
adopt
something,
and
then
we
are
the
last
jurisdiction
and
then
you
know,
essentially
let
them
test
it
out
and
see
what
happens
and
experiment,
but
that
that's
where
I'm
leaning
towards.
I
guess
if
anyone
else
has
any
thoughts
towards
that.
A
All
right,
it
looks
like
vice
chair
almond,
is
up
next.
C
I
think
we
there
are
so
many
benefits
to
mandatory
registration
and
I
don't
see
the
downside.
So
I
would
like
to
put
forward
the
motion
to
accept
the
regulations
as
suggested
by
staff,
and
I
know
you
have
to
read
a
specific
thing,
but
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me.
L
Can
I
ask
a
clearing
fighting
question
yeah
chair,
so
when
you
say
mandatory
registration,
you
also
would
include
per
unit
data
that
needs
to
be
entered
for
every
single
unit
in
that
building
and
that
that
needs
to
be
updated
within
30
days
of
anyone
moving
out
within
that
building.
J
C
J
So
that
does
include
committee
member
grunweld.
The
requirement
that
you
re-register
when
a
new
new
tenancy
commences.
L
Okay
and
and
sorry
and
another
question
back
to
me-
actually
karen,
probably
for
you
so
if,
under
the
current
regulations,
if
that
is
not
updated
for
one
unit
within
30
days
of
someone
leaving
that
unit,
then
any
any
increases
that
happened
from
the
time
that
that
was
out
of
compliance,
which
would
be
after
the
30
days
of
that
one
unit,
leaving
would
apply
to
all
the
buildings
units
because
the
building
is
now
out
of
compliance
and
they
may
have
to
refund
any
increase.
J
J
J
K
L
Well,
I
mean
so
for
rent
control
to
be
in
place.
It
would
be
for
longer
term
units.
Anyway,
I
mean
the
person
who
has
left
they're,
not
they
wouldn't
probably
put
in
a
petition
to
say
that
my
rent,
my
that
my
leaving
was
not
properly
documented.
L
I
think
I
guess
so
it
would
again
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
if
the.
If
the
committee
feels
like
the
punishment
that
we
would
hand
that
and
the
complicate
the
complexity
that
this
would
introduce
for
not
having
each
unit
in
compliance
is
worth
the
you
know
the
benefit
of
a
more
precise
vacancy
rate.
I
we
often
don't
ask
for-
I
guess,
pitching
to
the
committee.
Now
we
often
don't
ask
for
a
vacancy,
more
precise
vacancy
rate
or
other
data.
L
So
I
kind
of
I'm
worried
about
unintended
consequences
from
from
asking
for
this
and-
and
it
seems
like
a
lot
of
and
ask
for
landlords
who
are
property
managers
to
a
50
unit
building.
You
probably
have
separate
software
that
you're
putting
this
all
into,
and
then
you
got
to
go
back
to
our
new
system
and
then
enter
this
and
make
sure
you're.
L
On
top
of
it,
it
feels
like
we're
going
from
a
complaint
based
system
to
me
to
a
you
know,
to
a
proactive
thing,
and
actually
that
was
mentioned
by
staff
and
I'd.
Be
I'd,
be
interested
to
hear
what
staff
says
about
if
you
see
that
somebody
puts
in
a
new
rent
and
the
aga
is
not
calculated
properly,
will
you
then
go
out
and
and
like
make
the
landlord
aware
of
that,
make
the
make
the
tenant
aware
of
that?
How
would
that
work.
A
Do
we
have
a
second
on
the
floor
if
we
do
not
have
a
second,
I
will
second
the
motion,
so
we
can
continue
on
talking.
Thank
you
through
just
to
move
this
forward.
We
I'm
sure
the
vice
chair
could
entertain
mo
friendly
amendments
or
whatnot,
but
we
can
continue
with
committee
member
grunwald's
deliberation.
M
So
he
said
we're
going
to
from
complaint
based
to
more
proactive,
as
we
explained,
and
karen
alluded
to,
that
is
that
a
tenant
who
feels
the
tenant
did
not
comply
has
to
file
a
petition.
So
it
remains
a
complaint
based.
M
L
So
I
I
guess
I'll
ask
you
what
what
what's
the
primary
benefit?
If
it's?
Not,
if
there's
no
proactive
enforcement,
besides
vacancy
rate
precision,
what
is
the
primary
benefit
of
individual
unit
by
unit
data.
K
It
gives
more
than
per
unit
per
it
gives,
more
than
vacancy
rate
information
that
it
provides
the
current
rent
all
of
the
rent
increases
for
the
unit.
It
gives
us
a
full,
robust
understanding
of
what
people
are
actually
paying
for
their
unit,
which
allows
us
to
be
able
to
know
whether
or
not
the
rent
stabilization
law
is
effective
and
being
implemented
affected
in
an
effective
manner.
It
allows
us
to
know
if
people
have
received
their
rent
rollbacks.
L
Thank
you.
So
I
mean
I
guess
to
the
committee.
L
It
does
give
more
information,
don't
don't
deny
that,
but
you
know
again
I'd
say
data
without
a
purpose
asking
for
more
paperwork.
You
know,
without
without
there's,
not
a
strong
ask
from
the
from
the
committee
right.
I
I
I
see
the
mandatory
registration
and
that
it
can
make
it
more
efficient
for
staff
to
implement
the
csfra.
L
L
If,
but
we
are
a
complaint
based
system
right
now,
as
the
csf
array
was
was
mapped
out
and-
and
I
I
think
that's
imagine-
we
have
data
where
maybe
somebody
entered
something
wrong
or
maybe
it's
correct
and
they
or
maybe
maybe
a
landlord
didn't
enter
the
utilities
and
they
are
included
or
something,
and
we
say
that
they've
we
have
data
then
saying
that
the
aga
that
they
calculated
was
incorrect.
L
K
Ability
to
adopt
regulations
for
compliance,
you
always
have
that
option,
and
this
would
provide
you
with
the
information
for
you
to
know
whether
or
not
that
is
something
that
we
should
consider
in
more
thorough
manner.
We
we
do
know
that
there
are
properties
that
are
out
of
compliance,
that
we
cannot
at
this
time,
reach
out
to
based
on
the
current
lack
of
regulations
for
compliance,
and
this
would
be
a
way
for
us
to
potentially
consider
in
the
future
further
regulations
for
compliance.
K
L
Thank
you
I'll,
just
I'll
just
finish
by
saying
I'm
uncomfortable
with
the
second.
With
per
unit
regulations,
I
would
like
to
see
how
the
mandatory
registration
goes.
That's
my
that's
my
stance.
Thank
you.
B
Hi
there,
okay,
so
understanding
that
we
have
some
concerns,
perhaps
as
a
committee
about
privacy,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
all
aware
number
one,
that
it
is
very
easy
to
find
property
right
records
online
I
mean
like.
Maybe,
would
take
me
three
to
four
minutes.
If
I
was
doing
it-
and
I
understand
I
do
it
a
lot,
but
for
most
people
it
is
fairly
decently
easy
and
we
we
need
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that
you
know
not.
All
of
this
is
personally
identifiable
information
that
has
protections
around
it.
B
If
we're
redacting
the
information
properly,
we
can
make
sure
that
this
is
a
database
that
has
value
to
us
without
necessarily
causing
too
many
privacy
concerns.
I
live
in
a
property
that
I
rent.
There
are
clearly
lists
that
exist
on
the
internet
that
marketers
can
buy.
Regarding
my
rent
and
my
landlord
and
all
of
that
information,
I
know
because
I
get
the
mail
here
at
my
home
and
it's
very
clear.
They
know
information
about
my
rent
and
whatnot.
That
is
not
necessarily
information
that
should
be
on
the
internet,
but
it's
there.
B
So
while
I
don't
want
us
to
add
to
information
being
improperly
released,
I
think
that,
assuming
that
this
information
is
being
protected
and
guarded
and
is
not
available
anywhere,
but
here
is
not
true.
In
2020,
some
have
said:
we
live
in
a
post-privacy
world
and
while
I
don't
necessarily
want
to
advocate
that,
that's
the
case,
I
do
think
we
need
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that
there's
a
lot
of
data
on
the
internet,
and
so,
if
we're
building
a
database,
I
don't
think
we're
going
to
be
the
first
people
that
have
it.
B
In
addition
to
that,
though,
one
of
the
attributes
of
a
perfect
competition
or
a
pure
market
is
perfect
knowledge
of
the
market.
A
major
complaint
that
people
have
heard
or
criticism
of
things
of
rent,
stabilization
and
brain
control
measures
is
that
it
makes
a
market
imperfect
because
it
take
it
puts
in
place
price
control.
There's
not
complete
openness
in
the
buying
and
selling
of
goods.
They
can't
change
per
supply
and
demand.
B
So
I
actually
see
this
as
a
way
to
offsite
offset
some
of
the
criticism
that
rent
stabilization
can
take
a
market
to
a
dangerous
place
or
to
a
more
imperfect
state
by
allowing
us
to
have
perfect
knowledge
in
our
market
from
the
buyers
and
the
sellers,
the
housing
providers
and
the
hou
and
the
tenants
that
is,
in
my
view,
a
good
thing
in
addition
to
all
the
data
that
we
get
to
gather.
That
is
also
another
reason.
I
think
that
this
makes
sense.
B
However,
all
of
that
being
said
in
support,
I
would
want
to
make
two
friendly
amendments
to
the
current
motion
number
one.
I
think
that
edie's
comment
regarding,
if
we're
going
to
use
this
to
track
vacancy,
we
should
have
a
re.
We
should
have
in
the
regulation
that
we
have
a
30
day
or
60
day
or
whatever
time
frame
we
feel
appropriate
vacancy
turnover
makes
sense.
I
think
30
days
makes
sense
just
to
keep
it
consistent.
B
I
think
we
should
set
the
date
as
february
1st
and
then
give
a
30-day
grace
before
substantial
non-compliance
occurs
just
to
allow
for
some
flexibility
there
and
then
my
question
or
request
to
staff
is:
can
we
just
because
I'm
I
have
concerns
that
that
will
happen?
We'll
have
an
avalanche
very
close
to
the
deadline?
Can
we
just
ensure
that
the
res
the
resources,
the
photo
steps,
are
posted
such
that?
B
C
Those
and
I
I
think
that
we
won't
get
compliance
until
it's
mandatory.
We
can
do
all
the
outreach
we
want.
People
are
just
not,
and
I
think
that
we
have
to
not
only
bend
over
backwards
to
help
landlords,
but
this
it's
important
that
we
also
protect
rent
the
tenants
in
the
process,
so
the
most
transparency,
the
better.
A
I'll
accept
it
for
now.
I
know
that
the
committee
member
groenwell
also
has
his
hand
up
also
vice
chair
almond
too.
He
has
her
hand
up,
so
I
guess
we'll
go.
A
Oh
nevermind,
her
hand
is
down,
so
we
will,
I
guess,
before
we
get
into
back
to
I'll,
go
to
my
delivery.
I
was
very
fortunate
before
all
the
covid
fun
hit
that
the
last.
What
am
I
called
the
last
workshop
that
our
committee
ended
up
doing
was
the
the
database
landlord
walkthrough
and
it
was
a
lovely
workshop
for
sorry.
A
It
was.
It
was
a
great
workshop
in
the
library
feels
like
such
a
long
time
ago,
but
it
was,
it
was
very
fascinating
to
see
it
was
a
a
simple
enough
process.
A
There
is
a
what
I
was
surprised
with.
The
most
was
a
fear
essentially
of
it.
There
was
this
fear.
One
of
the
landlords
spoke
to.
It
was
patricia
actually
that
she
said
that
she
was
afraid
of
filing
a
petition,
because
she
heard
it
was
just
too
difficult
and
she
she
did
the
the
registration
she
came
in
to
do.
The
registration
patricia
managed
to
talk
to
her
and
and
being
totally
open.
A
She's
like
we
have
a
process
to
like
just
check
to
see
if
it
was
a
viable
thing
or
not.
For
you
to
do
petition
and
I
think
more
interactions
our
staff
have
with
with
the
housing
provider
community
it
is
is,
is
better.
That's
one
of
the
things
that
I
would
that
that
I
liked
about
essentially
really
doing
more
requirements
in
terms
of
getting
that
connection.
I
understand
committee
member
grunwald's
a
concern
about
having
all
the
mandatoryness
available.
I'm
wondering.
A
Is
it
possible
to
make
mandatory
the
the
first
part
that
a
committee
member
grunwald
wanted
to
do
in
november,
and
then
we
we
wait
and
see.
That's
like
three
months
until
we
do
the
until
they
could
add
the
other
information
that
gives
us
three
months
granted.
Unfortunately,
it's
during
the
holiday
kind
of
season,
but
we
would
have
like
the
the
initial
onboarding
right
before
poly
season
that
way
everyone
can
actually
just
log
in
and
then
we
step
to
the
very
first,
where
they
would
have
one
might
call
it.
A
They
would
provide
the
the
individual
information.
I
had
the
ability
to
search
the
other
registries.
I
don't
remember
exactly
which
one
it
was,
but
I
remember
looking
up,
it
might
have
been
yeah.
I
don't
remember
which
city
it
was,
but
they
actually
had
it
all
online
and
how
they
set
it
up
to
make
it
be
all
online.
They
had
the
individual
rent
per
unit,
but
they
had.
They
just
said
unit
a
of
apartment
on
blah
on
the
400
block
of
panda.
A
You
know,
so
it
managed
to
really
hide
that
information.
Another
piece
of
data
that
I
always
liked,
working
with
that's
always
frequently
subject
to
freedom
of
information
act,
is
campaign
finance
data
and,
to
some
degree
it's
almost
automatic
in
that
for
especially
for
our
city,
everyone
files
it
through
netfile.
A
We
do
our
form
700
forms
in
that
file
and
people
can
go
up
and
see
the
forms
and
see
the
redacted
and
it's
automatic
staff
doesn't
actually
have
to
do
anything
to
to
to
redact.
That
is
my
understanding.
It's
automatic
because
it
was
built
into
the
system
and
that's
something
if
we
don't
already
have,
we
can
ask
3di
to
do
so.
A
Those
are
the
things
that
I'm
hoping
that
we
could
we
could
mesh
together
and-
and
I
know
that
we
wanted
to
take
some
of
these
things,
slow
and
and
and
there's
a
concern,
and
I
really
do
feel
that
we
are
starting
to
honor
that.
But
I
do
think
that
it's
it's
it's
to
the
point
where
it's
like
time
to
let
our
database
like
fly
free
and
we
it
doesn't
seem
like
we
could
actually
get
people
to
to
at
least
start
until,
like
we
make
it
mandatory.
A
I
I
do
want
a
heavy
focus
on
outreach.
We
don't
want
to
we.
We
want
to
give
a
lot
of
time
and
a
lot
of
ability
for
our
staff
to
do
outreach
and
for
the
the
housing
providers
to
pro
to
have
any
questions.
A
I'm
concerned
that
so
we
have
31
out
of
the
650
properties
registered,
and
I
I
do
also
worry
with
a
committee
member
haynes,
let's
say
the
the
crush
of
people
who,
because
it's
mandatory
at
this
date,
I
wish
there
was
a
way
we
could
say.
A
Half
of
you
have
this
due
date
and
half
of
you
don't,
but
that's
not
fair
under
any
circumstances,
although
we
could
probably
like
target
larger,
I
actually
don't
think
that's
probably
legal
actually
now
that
I
think
about
it,
but
but
what
we
could
do
is
we
could
pull
an
earlier
date
for
for
what
committee
member
grunwald
was
asking
just
the
just
the
contact
information
at
each
of
the
housing
providers
and
then
do
the
full
one
on
february.
A
First,
that
is
a
possibility.
I
I
worry
that
might
seem
too
much
or
a
turnaround.
I'm
curious
to
see
what
the
what
the
others
are
thinking
about
that
possibility.
We
would
still
have
everything
mandatory
by
february
1st
with
the
grace
period,
but
but
we
would
ease
people
in
a
little
bit
better.
A
E
So
I
you
know,
I
hear
matt's
concerns,
which
I
I
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
legitimacy
to
them.
You
know,
I
think,
I
think,
on
the
the
unit
the
individualized
unit
data
I
mean,
I
think
there
are
going
to
be
instances
where
it
might
not
be
frequent,
but
there
are
going
to
be
instances.
E
Let's
say
where
you
have
a
small
complex,
that
only
has
10
units,
and
so
you
only
have
one
person
moving
out
every
couple
months
and
moving
in
and
there's
likely
going
to
be
a
way
for
someone
to
figure
out
by
process
of
elimination
who
that
person
is
who
moved
in
and
moved
out
what
their
rent
is
or
is
going
to
be
or
was,
and
there
are
probably
other
instances
that
we
can't
quite
think
of.
But
you
know
because
of
unintended
consequences
there
might
be
personal
information
revealed.
E
But
that,
having
been
said
I
mean
my.
My
main
concern
is
really
subpart
e,
that
that
deals
with
compliance,
and
I
think
that's
certainly
something
that
we
should.
We
should
focus
on
because
it
completely
permits
a
very
overzealous
hearing
officer
to
take
one
specific,
discrete
instance
of
a
landlord
not
inputting
the
necessary
information
into
the
system,
registration,
information
and
then
fast
forward.
E
Six
months
later-
and
you
have
a
completely
you
know
unrelated
unit
or
a
completely
unrelated
request
to
increase
rents
and
that
that
information
or
that
failure
to
register
can
be
now
used
against
the
landlord
per
subsection
e
and
understand
in
in
other
jurisdictions.
Maybe
that
hasn't
happened
much
or
maybe
it
has
and
we're
just
not
aware
of
it.
E
But
to
me
I
think
we've
definitely
had
already
hearing
officers
that
have
been
very
aggressive
about
the
enforcement
of
the
csfra
and
we've
had
multiple
landlords
come
in
front
of
us
and
tell
us
whether
accurate
or
not
that
they
felt
like
they
were
not
getting
a
fair
shake
by
hearing
officers
and
that
they
were
not
given
a
full
opportunity
to
present
what
they
needed
to
present
and
and
that
the
decks
were
you
know,
was
stacked
against
them,
and
so
I'm
uncomfortable
with
the
compliance
issue,
because
I
think
it
certainly
has
the
potential
to
be
misused
by
a
very
aggressive
hearing
officer.
E
So
that's
my
primary
concern
about
all
of
this.
I
think,
with
the
individualized
units
to
go
back
to
what
I
was
saying
earlier
and
mass
concerns.
E
I
think
the
the
benefits
might
outweigh
the
costs,
and
so
I
think
I'm
I
might
be
inclined
to
go
along
with
that.
Even
though
I
think
there
are
some
unknowns,
but
I
think
the
non-compliance
is
an
issue
that
we
just
need
to
think
about
more
thoroughly.
A
C
I
I
understand
the
concerns
over
compliance.
I
think
that
what
we
might
want
to
do
is
go
ahead
with
the
regulations
and
then
staff
can.
Let
us
know
when
there
are
things
that
we
might
want
to
amend
later.
I
I
really
want
to
give
the
mandatory
registration
a
real
chance
to
work
and
if
we
start
fiddling
with
compliance
and
other
parts
or
we
decide
that
we
want
to
have
half
the
group
to
have
a
different
deadline.
C
I
think
it
just
gets
confusing
for
people,
and
I
think
we
should
stick
with
the
regulations
that
that
staff
came
up
with
and
and
give
it
a
try.
All
the
other
jurisdictions
seem
to
be
doing.
Okay
with
it.
We
just
have
to
trust
ourselves
that
we
can
make
this
work,
and
I
I
think
the
landlords
will
get
used
to
it.
I
think
I
I
just
don't
think
we
should
tinker
with
it
and
I'd
like
to
call
the.
A
Question
the
question
was
called:
can
we
still
hear
from
people
miss
karen?
Can
you
elaborate
on
that.
J
Technically,
when
the
question's
called
you're
supposed
to
call
the
roll
call
vote,
I
think
there
was
one
other
hand
raised.
Oh
now,
I've
just
checked,
so
I
don't
know
if
by
sure
almond
wants
to
allow
one
final
comment,
I
think
committee
member
sure
that's
fine
and
then
maybe
you
can
call
the
question.
L
Sure
I'll
just
reiterate,
based
off
the
last
couple
comments,
I
just
wanted
to
say
you
know
again,
I
I
agree
with
what
susan's
saying
about
mandatory
registration.
I
think
that's
reasonable.
We
need
to
collect
our
fees
to
nicole's
point
about.
You
know
a
perfect
market.
You
know,
I
think,
there's
this
expectation
that
knowing
all
the
rents
is,
you
know
having
no
one
know
the
rents
of
all
the
individual
units
is
benefits.
L
I'm
here
right,
like
call
me
that
is
that
has
happened
at
our
meetings
and
or
at
least
one
meeting,
and
you
could
see
one
unintended
consequence
of
this
could
be
something
like
someone
pulling
all
the
rents
for
buildings,
finding
small
buildings
that,
where
the
landlord
is
actually
being,
you
know,
gracious
and
is
under
market
and
going
in
and
saying
you
know,
I'll
buy
your
building
right
like
I
can.
L
Essentially,
I
can
make
this
more
profitable
than
you
are,
and,
and
will
that
happen
I
don't
know,
but
I
mean
that
there's
by
collecting
this
data
using
a
third
using
the
third
party
data
provider
that
we
have,
who
isn't
necessarily
verse
in
all
the
ways
to
anonymize
this
data
in
a
way
so
that
if
it
gets
pulled
to
emily's
point,
there's
another
system
out
there.
L
That
sounds
like
it's
anonymizing
it
at
the
block
level
and
let's
say
our
database
just
decides
we're
gonna
have
all
the
addresses
as
they
are
and
and
it's
in
there
at
the
per
unit
basis.
And
then
someone
says
I
want.
I
want
that
information
and
it's
public,
so
we
have
to
give
it
all
to
them,
and
maybe
there
are
some
ways
that
we
can
anonymize
redact,
but
we
just
don't.
L
We
don't
know
it's
a
it's
a
lot
to
go
from
nothing
to
all
of
this,
and
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
is
you
know
if
we
can
do
the
half
step
to
mandatory
registration,
but
not
sure
if
I
have
the
votes
for
that,
so
I'll
leave
it
there.
A
The
question
was
called
and
we
we
let
committee
member
gren
waltz,
speak.
So
I'm
gonna
have
andrea.
That's
sorry,
committee
member
hank
will
say
I'm
gonna
have
andrea.
Do
the
roll
vote.
E
D
L
A
A
To
two,
so
we
did
a
vote
on
that.
Was
there
any
policy,
any
policy
we
wanted
to
put
forth
to
help
staff
go
through
this
as
staff.
Do
you
have
everything
you
need
from
us
in
order
to
move
forward?
Yes,
thank
you.
Okay,
committee,
member
grunwald,
you
still
have
your
hand
up.
M
Good
evening
rental,
housing,
committee,
members
and
chair
ramos,
I
would
like
to
give
you
an
update
on
the
tenant
relocation
assistance
ordinance.
The
city
council
has
modified
this
ordinance
and
it's
directly
related
to
the
csf
array.
M
So
that's
why
we
thought
it
would
be
relevant
to
update
you
of
the
latest
changes
at
the
first
in
2010.
The
trade
was
first
adopted
and
the
last
amendment
before
this
one
was
in
2018
to
conform.
The
trail
to
the
csfre,
including
the
eligibility
of
income
to
120
ami,
to
provide
three
months
of
median
monthly
rent
and
three
thousand
dollars
plus
cpi
for
special
circumstance,
households-
and
this
is
just
an
overview
of
the
changes
that
have
been
passed
by
city
council.
M
So
the
first
one
is
that
the
income
eligibility
has
been
increased
with
5
000.
This
came
directly
as
a
result
of
previous
properties
that
were
redeveloped
and
tenants
were
very
slightly
above.
The
120
ami
and
developers
agreed
to
raise
that
income
a
little
bit
higher,
so
those
people
would
not
be
caught
at
the
cut-off
number,
so
this
is
now
added
to
the
trail.
M
The
second
amendment
is
that
the
special
circumstance
household
benefit
is
now
increased
to
eight
thousand
dollars
and
the
eligible
households
are
62
years
of
age
of
older,
disabled
or
handicapped,
and
then
the
one
or
more
minor
children
under
19,
which
was
previously
an
18
who
are
legally
dependent.
M
Then
the
third
change
that
was
adopted
was
that
the
assistance
from
the
relocation
agency
was
considerably
enhanced
and
they
get
unlimited
access
to
a
subscription
service
to
a
rental
agency.
So
they
can
keep
track
of
what
is
available
out
there
in
the
market
and
they
now
also
get
extended
personalized
services
based
on
specific
household
criteria,
their
preferences,
their
budget,
the
location
where
they
want
to
look
and
other
requirements,
such
as
affordable
housing
options,
wait
list,
opportunities
and
other
leads
on
housing.
M
And
the
fifth
modification
we
requested
as
staff.
M
This
is
also
be
found
in
the
alice
act
requirements
and
we
would
like
the
county
recording
requirements
from
current
property
owners
or
redevelopers
to
put
that
on
the
county
records,
so
potential
buyers
or
future
owners
of
the
property
know
what
type
of
trail
obligations
are
on
the
property
and
then
there
oh,
can
you
go
back
yeah
and
then
there's
also
adopted
that
are
mandatory
translations
for
the
required
notices.
So
the
notice
of
intent
and
other
formal
notices
will
also
go
out
in
other
languages.
M
M
That
puts
stricter
requirements
on
tenant
relocation,
assistance
than
the
trail
in
some
cases,
and
then
there
was
also
a
request
from
city
council
to
waive
a
tenant's
obligation
to
provide
a
30-day
move-out
notice,
unfortunately
putting
that
in
a
local
ordinance.
This
would
not
be.
This
would
be
in
conflict
with
the
state
law.
So,
instead
we
will
put
that
in
the
trail
guidelines
and
as
a
request
to
the
landlord
that
one's
attendant
has
found
a
new
place
to
live
in
that
he
should
not
be
required
to
file
a
30-day
notice
to
move
out.
M
So
I
also
wanted
to
tell
a
little
bit
more
about
sb
330
this.
This
law
went
for
a
long
time
under
the
radar,
but
then
all
of
a
sudden,
everybody
realized
on
january
1st
2020
that
this
law
was
adopted
and
this
law
is
a
state
law
is
applicable
if
a
redevelopment
requires
demolition
of
an
existing
housing
units
and
then
must
comply
with
all
the
specified
provision
in
sb
330,
including
relocation
assistance,
and
then
there
is
also
an
offer
of
a
right
of
first
refusal
for
newly
built
housing
to
the
displaced
rental
households.
M
M
And
sb330
provides
for
a
relocation
advisor
that
is
pretty
much
similar
to
what
we
now
amended
the
trail
for,
but
on
top
of
the
relocation
assistance,
also
moving
cost
assistance
and
up
to
42
months
of
rent
differential
payments
between
the
old
rent
and
the
new
rent
that
tenants
have
to
pay
when
they
move
to
a
new
replacement
unit,
and
the
tenants
have
a
first
right
of
refusal
to
move
in
the
newly
built
homes,
whether
that
is
a
for
sale
or
a
rental
property
that
is
being
built.
M
A
I
see
no
hands
raised,
so
we
will
bring
it
to
public
comments.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
public
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
keep
time
and
announce
when
one
minute
remains.
If
a
speaker
has
submitted
written
public
comment
after
5
pm
but
wishes
instead
speak
during
this
agenda
item.
Please
raise
your
hand
at
this
time
to
avoid
duplicate,
duplicate
public
comments.
A
A
A
No
there's
not
all
right.
So
so
we
have.
We
are
back
to
the
committee
for
deliberations
and
to
provide
feedback.
It's
my
understanding.
There
is
no
action
items
for
us
for
this
item.
Correct.
A
B
I
keep
getting
muted
and
double
muted.
Sorry,
I
just
wanted
to
say
staff.
I
think
this
looks
great
and
I
appreciate
your
patience
since
I
know
this
kept
getting
bumped
from
the
agenda
and
it's
good
work
and
I'm
glad
to
hear
about
it.
So
thank
you.
A
A
K
Item
8.4
is
the
overview
of
the
consumer
price
index
for
fair
return
petitions
and
the
recommendation,
which
should
say
purpose
I
apologize,
is
to
receive
an
informal,
an
informational
overview
of
the
consumer
price
index
for
fair
return,
calculations
for
petitions
of
upward
adjustment
and
section
1710
and
1711
of
the
csfra
charge.
The
rental
housing
committee,
with
permutating
regulations
to
clarify
the
petition
process
and
ensure
rents
are
set
to
allow
for
a
landlord's,
fair
return.
K
Petitions
are
heard
and
decided
by
a
hearing
officer
and
may
be
appealed
to
the
rhc
on
july
24th
of
2017,
the
rhc
adopted
fair
return
standards
for
the
rent
of
primary
residence
and
in
march
26
of
2018,
the
rhc
updated
the
fair
return
standards
to
be
an
applicable
designation
due
to
a
change
from
the
reporting
bureau
and
it's
in
your
purview
to
review
and
revise
these
regulations
as
necessary,
and
in
that
matter,
chair
ortiz
in
2018
requested
monthly
cpi
updates
that
are
in
the
report.
They
are
actually
only
recorded
every
other
month.
K
So,
although
that
data
is
there
every
month,
it's
only
updated
every
other
month
and
quarterly
comparisons
between
the
two
indices
and
also
he
requested
that
the
housing
index
be
included,
as
well
as
the
all
items
index
in
these
reports.
So,
as
you
can
see
here,
we
do
not
currently
have
june
numbers.
Those
will
come
to
us
in
july,
and
so
your
monthly
status
report
will
be
updated
for
that.
K
For
april,
you
see
that
for
the
rent
of
primary
residence,
which
is
the
one
that
we
use
for
the
fair
return
standard,
it's
steady
at
26
same
with
the
housing
index
at
22
percent
and
the
cpi.
All
items
did
drop
by
one
percent
we
have
received.
We
have
one
petition
for
our
landlord
petition
that
is
currently
on
hold
due
to
the
current
situation.
We
all
find
ourselves
in
with
the
pandemic.
K
We
will
be
moving
forward
with
that
petition,
I'll
be
contacting
the
petitioner
this
week
to
let
them
know
that
we
have
processes
in
place
to
be
able
to
fulfill
the
hearing
process
remotely,
as
well
as
have
accommodations
in
place
for
any
kind
of
challenges
and
being
able
to
access
something
through
zoom.
Should
people
not
have
computers
and
we
will
have
translation
services
available
for
those
hearings?
Should
we
continue
to
a
hearing
for
this
particular
petition?
K
So
we
are
starting
to
ramp
up
our
ability
to
to
do
these,
and
I
am
providing
that
caveat
tonight,
because
the
data
that
we
have
is
all
related
to
petitions
that
have
already
been
processed
and
gone
through
our
process.
We
haven't
had
any
new
ones
that
have
made
it
through
a
full
petition
process
with
applicable
numbers.
Since
the
you
know,
the
data
is
now
outdated.
K
I'm
not
going
to
review
it
with
you
because
there's
no
changes
as
applicable
to
the
increases
or
decreases
in
the
indices,
but
as
we
do
start
to
petition
to
process
the
landlord
petitions
that
once
again
we
will,
we
will
be
able
to
track
this
information
once
again.
K
So
I'm
going
to
skip
over
these
slides
and
I
do
want
to
mention
that
we
will
be
taking
petitions
for
tenants
as
well
in
the
coming
months,
does.
Are
there
any
questions
related
to
tonight's
presentation
from
the.
A
Yeah,
sorry,
I
see
no
hands
up
double
checking
everyone.
A
Okay,
so
it
looks
like
we
will
go
to
public
comment.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raised
hand
button
in
zoom
or
press
star
9
on
your
phone
staff
will
keep
time
and
announce
when
one
minute
remains.
If
a
speaker
had
submitted
written
public
comment
after
5
pm
but
wishes
instead
to
speak
during
the
agenda
item.
Please
raise
your
hand
at
this
time
to
avoid
duplicate
public
comments.
A
City
staff:
did
you
receive
public
comment
on
this
item
by
email
since
5
pm?
I
have
not
city
staff.
Are
there
any
additional
members
of
the
public
on
the
line
who
have
indicated
they
wanted
to
speak
on
this
item
there
or
not?
A
A
I'm
checking
no
one's
raising
their
hands
in
person
or
on
the
thing.
Thank
you
so
much
staff
for
this
update.
Sorry,
I
got
delayed
for
so
long.
I
guess
we
are
up
to
the
next
item.
Then
last
call
for
anyone
who
wants
to
speak
we're
good,
we're
good.
Okay,
next
item
council
staff
staff
committee
reports
patricia
you're
on
I
mean
item.
K
K
We
have
had
a
an
increase
in
public
inquiries,
specifically
related
to
eviction
protections
and
covid
related
inquiries.
So
a
lot
of
those
are
the
inability
to
pay
rent,
whether
they're,
looking
for
and
seeking
assistance
for,
rent
payments
through
the
city's
current
rent
relief
program
or.
C
K
Having
questions
about
the
eviction
moratorium,
we're
seeing
questions
related
to
that
we
did
hold
our
first
in
in
may,
we
held
our
first
webinar
remotely,
and
that
was
for
habitability,
maintaining
habitability
and
actually
it
went
pretty
well,
we
were
we
were
happy
with
the
number
of
people
we
reached,
even
though
we
did
not
do
a
lot
of
outreach
as
we
ease
into
it.
We'll
start
ramping
up
our
outreach
again.
K
K
We
did
not
have
any
clinics
in
in
may,
but
we
are
having
them.
We
had
them
in
june
they're
they
were
scheduled
and
we
did
have
quite
a
few.
My
mv
updates
for
the
mediations
and
conciliations
we
had
approximately
20
or
so
and
and
they're
going
they're
still
continuing
and
going
well.
K
K
So,
as
you
can
see
over
there
in
that
far
corner
where
it
says,
failure
to
pay
rent
notices
on
the
screen,
they
have
dropped.
Significantly,
it's
been
a
94
decrease.
During
the
moratorium
we
had
one
property
that
went
into
redevelopment,
it's
a
very
particular
property,
with
a
very
particular
set
of
circumstances.
If
you're
interested
in
learning
more
andrea,
I
can
provide
the
information
for
you.
K
It
affects
four
units
and
we
also
had
a
few
households
that
did
receive
assistance
through
the
through
the
tenant
relocation
assistance
ordinance.
As
I
mentioned,
with
petitions,
we
are
starting
to
ramp
those
processes
back
up,
but
we
received
no
new
petitions
in
that
process
and
I
have
received
inquiries
from
landlords.
So
they
are
aware
that
we
are
starting
to
to
do
this
again
vacancy
rates,
because
the
data
is
you
know,
trending
from
the
past.
K
Vacancy
rates
are
up
just
a
touch
at
4.4.6
percent,
and
that
is
consistent
with
trends
that
we've
seen
for
this
particular
quarter
in
the
past,
and
market
rents
are
stabilizing
a
little
bit,
we're
not
seeing
as
significant
of
an
increase
month
over
month
as
we
have
been,
but
also
not
a
significant
decrease.
Yet,
although
that
is
likely
to
change
due
to
the
due
to
the
effects
of
the
pandemic,
we
still
have
no
properties
that
have
turned
over
according
to
costar
for
this
calendar
year.
K
That
might
have
something
to
do
with
sv330,
and
there
are
five
properties
that
are
on
the
market
for
a
total
of
76
units,
and
we
just
went
over
the
consumer
price
index,
there's
only
the
the
one
change
in
the
all
items
basket
of
goods.
So
a
one
percent
decrease
from
sixteen
percent
to
fifteen
percent.
K
A
I
see
no
hands
up.
I
did
have
a
brief
question
based
on
the
calls
into
the
helpline.
I've
actually
gotten
a
few
more
concerns
from
tenants
who
were
getting
I'm
trying
to
find
a
nicer
way
of
saying
this
that
we're
getting
pressure
from
their
landlords
about
the
back
pay
from
the
eviction
moratorium.
I
directed
them
to
the
rental
help
hotline
have
we
seen
any
increases.
A
K
Have
and
we
they
have
been
fielding
them
when
they
receive
them.
We
are
going
to
be
doing
additional
from
the
eviction
moratorium
program,
additional
communications
with
landlords
we
we
have.
We
have
heavily
targeted
both
landlords
and
tenants
with
outreach
for
the
eviction
moratorium,
but
we
will
be
sending
a
specific
letter
out
about
retaliation,
retaliatory
practices.
K
We
have
now
on
the
on
the
city
website,
specific
language
that
targets
that,
and
we
we
also
are
working
on
for
additional
forms
to
assist
people
with
potential
repayment
plans
in
the
future.
That
also
have
an
additional
form
that
a
notification
form
that
landlords
will
have
to
have
to
provide
if
they
are
choosing
to
enter
into
a
repayment
plan
and
we're
going
to
continue
doing
as
much
we've
been.
It's
been
requested
that
we
continue
to
do
as
much
outreach
as
possible
to
limit
this
kind
of
challenging
situation.
K
Yeah
I
mean
and
we'll
we
can
go
over
when
we
will.
We
will
be
reviewing
all
of
the
outreach
that
we
we've
done
for
the
eviction
moratorium
in
the
next
few
slides.
But
we
are
continuing
to
just
increase
all
of
that
as
much
as
possible
to
limit
the
potential
impact
to
tenants.
D
C
D
D
The
biggest
thing
to
see
here
is
that
city
council
has
extended
that
through
august
31st-
and
they
also
extended
the
repayment
time
from
120
days
to
180
days
after
the
end
of
the
moratorium
and
so
to
take
advantage
of
the
moratorium.
Tenants
have
to
notify
the
landlord
in
writing
within
seven
days
and
then
provide
documentation
within
14
days
from
that
miss
threat
and
like
emily,
was
saying
that
we
are
encouraging
people
to
contact
our
mountain
view,
rental
housing
helpline
number.
D
Of
our
outreach,
so
you
can
see
we
have
had
13
webinars
so
far
and
we
have
sort
of
been
ramping
up
our
bilingual
webinars.
So
we
will
be
doing
a
bilingual
webinar
tomorrow
night
yeah
tomorrow
night
at
six,
so
we're
working
closely
with
our
outreach
team
with
the
city
to
provide
simultaneous
english
spanish
workshops.
D
So
we
are
also
attending
school
district
events
really
trying
to
just
get
the
word
out
as
much
as
we
can
postcards
envy
voice.
We
are
in
the
midst
of
revamping
our
short
films.
We
had
to
redo
them
because
of
the
extension
of
the
moratorium,
so
they're
being
edited
right
now
by
someone
at
city
hall
and
should
be
posted
this
week.
So
we
will
pass
those
around
again
and
post
those
to
our
website,
and
I
believe
this
week
we're
going
to
refilm
our
q.
K
K
And
I
do
want
to
jump
in
really
quickly.
I
forgot
to
mention,
with
the
outreach
for
the
monthly
status
report,
that
one
of
the
positive
outcomes
of
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
related
to
the
eviction
moratorium
and
it's
something
that
we've
been
focusing
on
internally
as
staff
plans
for
future
communications
plan
updates
is
a
language
access,
equity
and
language
access,
and
so
we
will
be
continuing
to
provide
bilingual
webinars
and
more
bilingual
webinars
for
rent
stabilization
program,
webinars
and
as
someday.
Hopefully
we
end
up
having
workshops
in
person
again.
K
We
will
also
continue
to
have
webinars
for
each
of
the
workshops
that
we
would
provide
in
person
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
we're
reaching
as
many
people
as
possible.
We
also
I
do
want
to
let
you
know
we're
recently
approved
for
our
own
facebook
page,
so
we
will
be
working
on
that.
There
will
be
some
challenges
that
we
need.
We
will
need
to
brief
you
on
regarding
brown
act,
violations
and
social
media,
so
we
will.
K
We
will
make
sure
that
it's
functional
on
the
back
end
before
we
ramp
it
up
and
bring
it
to
you.
But
I
do
want
to
let
you
know
that
that
is
in
the
works,
and
one
of
the
exciting
parts
of
that
is
that
we
we
do
push
out
so
much
work
compared
to
other
in
just
internally.
K
It
can
be
really
challenging
for
the
people
who
manage
those
city
stuff
to
have
to
also
be
dealing
with
our
posts,
so
I'm
excited
to
alleviate
their
burden
as
well
and
to
be
able
to
communicate
all
of
the
different
things
that
we
do
as
effectively
as
possible,
and
this
will
provide
a
way
for
us
to
make
short
videos
and
share
all
of
that
content
really
easily.
So
that's
being
worked
on
and
this
summer
we
are
also
working
on
revamping
the
website.
We've
had
it
in
the
plan
for
a
really
long
time.
K
We
just
don't
have
staff
time
to
actually
execute
it.
So
we're
hopeful
that
during
the
the
month
off
we'll
be
able
to
put
in
place
a
lot
of
the
changes
that
we
already
have
mapped
out
and
one
of
the
big
ones
on
that
is
that
some
of
our
basic
pages
will
be
bilingual
and
all
of
the
pages.
So
what
I
mean
by
that
is
that
you'll
see
the
content
in
both
languages
on
the
actual
pages
and
then
for
pages
that
are.
K
K
D
K
That
we'll
we're
excited
to
roll
out
to
you
in
the
future.
Thank
you,
andrea,
for
letting
me
jump
in.
D
So
to
continue
we'll
go
to
the
rent
release
program,
so
we're
still
going
with
with
the
rent
relief
tenants
can
apply
and
they'll
qualify
based
on
their
income
of
120
of
the
ami
or
less
just
a
quick
update.
The
city
did
receive
more
funding,
so
the
total
pot
is
3.8
million
and
I
believe
we
have
about
600
active
applicants
at
the
moment.
D
So
the
city
is
pretty
hopeful
that
they're
gonna
start
being
able
to
give
people
a
second
month's
worth
of
rent
and
the
average
payment
is
just
over
two
thousand
dollars
at
the
moment,
so
hopefully,
they'll
be
able
to
provide
people
and
applicants
with
more
assistance.
D
D
And
the
utility
relief
program
ran
through
the
city's
finance
department.
Well,
you
can
get
a
one-time
50
credit
to
apply
to
any
of
your
utility
bills
and
again,
most
importantly,
they
are
not
shutting
off
any
services
during
this
crisis
and
for
a
time
after,
in
order
to
have
people.
D
D
A
Does
anyone
from
the
committee
have
any
questions
I
see
no
hands
raised?
I
did
have
a
quick
question
about
the
workshops.
I'm
always
quite
curious
is.
Is
it
a
consistent
attendance
throughout
all
of
them?
Do
you
find
that
you
get
increased
attendance
during
certain
times?
Is
it
increased
attendance
when
it's
the
bilingual
ones.
K
K
We
have
had
community
services
agency
join
us
with
staff
once
one
time
that
was
fantastic
because
they
were
able
to
bring
the
information
to
to
community
services
agency
for
the
rent
relief
program,
especially
so
they've
actually
incorporated
a
lot
of
the
information
that
we
have
in
our
eviction
moratorium
stuff
right
into
that
which
is
really
really
helpful,
and
we
are
tracking
the
attendance
by
day
and
time.
K
So
we
have
not
seen
major
influxes
or
changes
based
on
day
and
time,
which
is
actually
really
nice,
because
we
know
that
we're
reaching
a
good
amount
of
people
by
having
two
time
periods
that
people
can
attend.
That.
A
Also,
so
you
did
that
it's
great
to
hear
that
you
did
a
joint
one
with
csa,
because
the
re
I
remember
I
I
I
tried
to
go
to
every
single
eviction-
moratorium
webinar.
I
don't
know
if
I
managed
to
succeed
in
doing
that.
K
They
actually
just
joined
us
and
watched
the
presentation
yeah,
so
they
were
able
to
get
all
of
the
information
that
they
needed
to
and
also,
I
think
that
they
definitely
took
some
of
the
things
that
we
do
and
worked
it
into
their
webinar,
which
is
which
is
great.
A
K
They
actually
are
doing
web
their
own
webinars
every
tuesday
and
they
incorporate
the
eviction
moratorium
information
into
those
webinars,
and
they
do
a
really
really
good
job
with
that,
and
we
have
provided
feedback
on
potential
things
that
they
could
consider
we're
open
to
doing
a
joint,
a
joint
presentation
should
they
they
so
choose.
K
But
we
haven't.
We
haven't
worked
that
out
yet
so.
A
K
We
we
are
actually
choosing
to
do
it
this
way,
because
the
content
is
very
challenging
to
understand
it's
complicated
content
that
we
have
to
narrow
down
as
much
as
possible,
and
we've
found
that
it's
much
easier
to
understand.
If
we
have
it
that
way,
it
would
be
a
lot
harder
for
us
to
actually
have
the
slides,
be
I
don't
know
if
you
noticed,
but
right
now,
we've
updated
the
slides
so
that
the
slides
are
actually
bilingual
during
the
presentation.
K
I
review
the
information
in
english
and
then
I
switch
the
slide
to
the
spanish
slide
for
the
spanish
interpreters
to
be
able
to,
then
you
know
have
the
supportive
material
for
the
people
that
are
watching
the
presentation
be
applicable
to
them.
If
we
had
it
simultaneously
done,
it
would
be
much
more
challenging
to
provide
the
content
in
both
languages
visually
and
we
feel,
like
that's
very
important,
for
people
to
have.
A
K
So
next
item
is
an
overview
of
the
webinars
and
clinics
that
we
have
coming
up
in
july.
We
have
one
on
july,
16th
at
six
o'clock
p.m,
and
this
is
for
csfra
basics
and
updates,
including
the
2020
allowed,
rent
increase
and
hardship
petitions
for
tenants.
This
is
a
tenant
focused
workshop.
In
june
we
had
just
last
week
we
had
our
landlord-focused
one
related
to
rent
allowed,
rent
increases
for
the
2020
aga,
and
we
went
also
went
over
av-1482's
allowed
rent
increases
for
non-covered
units
or
for
units
that
are
partially
covered.
K
The
new
state
law
is
only
allowing
those
increases
to
be
six
percent
this
year,
based
on
the
way
that
they
calculate
the
cpi
increase
so
they're
using
april
as
their
index,
and
we
are
using
february
and
in
that
time,
and
I
think
they
use
a
slightly
different
g-
I'm
not
100
sure
where
their
geographical
locator
is
for
that
increase.
K
K
So
they
we
had
that
workshop
on
july
25th
and
it
went
it
went
pretty
well,
we
had
people
that
we
hadn't
seen
before,
which
was
cool,
where
I
was
excited
when
we
seen
new
landlords
participating,
means
that
we're
getting
information
out
to
different
people
and
that's
something
that
we're
always
trying
to
do
so.
That
being
said,
we
also
have
a
july
23rd
workshop,
so
the
following
week
at
three
o'clock
p.m,
for
landlords
to
help
them
with
calculating
rent
increases
for
2020,
and
this
will
be
an
interactive
one.
K
We
we
have
a
template
that
will
go
up
on
the
website
this
week.
For
the
2020
aga
increases
it's
a
fillable
pdf,
and
it
is
in
english,
spanish
and
chinese,
and
when
you
type
in
the
information
in
english,
it
fills
out
the
pdf
in
all
three
languages,
and
it
does
all
the
calculations
for
people.
Should
they
not
have
some.
Some
of
our
property
owners
do
not
have
property
managers
that
can
help
them
with
this.
So
we
found
last
year
that
this
was
really
great
in
assisting
people.
K
It
also
calculates
all
the
banked
increases
and
I
do
want
to
mention
it.
No
longer
has
the
2016
allowed
rent
increase,
because
that
falls
off
of
being
available
to
landlords
at
the
end
of
august.
K
A
Seeing
none
ain't
no
hands?
Do
we
have
any
committee
member
reports.
A
I
guess
then,
this
meeting
is
adjourned
at
9
46
pm.
The
next
rental
housing
committee
meeting
is
scheduled
to
be
held
on
monday
august
24th
2020
at
7
pm.
I
hope
everyone
has
a
good
night
and
I
look
forward
to
our
facebook
page
having
some
really
fun.