►
From YouTube: April 25, 2022 Rental Housing Committee Meeting
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Rental Housing Committee Meeting
A
A
54953E
as
authorized
by
resolution
of
the
rental
housing
committee,
please
contact
MV,
rent
at
mountainview.gov
to
obtain
a
copy
of
the
applicable
resolution.
All
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee
will
participate
in
the
meeting
by
video
conference
with
no
physical
meeting
location
members
of
the
public
wishing
to
observe
the
meeting.
Live
May
do
so
at
mountview.legistar.com
on
YouTube,
at
mountainview.gov
YouTube
and
on
Comcast
channel
26..
A
C
B
A
Okay,
we
will
now
move
to
agenda
item
three
consent
calendar.
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
committee
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
The
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
committee
to
efficiently
and
quickly
consider
routine
or
administrative
business
items
with
one
motion.
Although
committee
members
May
remove
items,
it
is
generally
not
intended
for
the
committee
to
have
a
lengthy
substantive
discussion
on
consent,
calendar
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
committee
like
to
pull
an
item.
A
B
A
A
A
Okay,
oops,
okay,.
A
E
B
A
A
A
That's
quite
amazing:
maybe
this
is
going
to
go
like
really
fast.
I
have
a
feeling.
Okay,
we
don't
have
an
appeal
hearing
or
public
hearing
so
we're
moving
on
to
new
business.
We
will
now
move
to
agenda
item
7.1
monthly
status
reports,
March
2022.
We
will
begin
with
a
presentation
from
staff.
G
G
2325
of
these
were
covid-19.
Rent
relief,
related
we've
held
30
workshops
through
the
month
of
March,
with
273
attendees
37
office
hours.
We've
also
held
64
eviction,
help
center
clinics
and
pop-ups
with
a
total
of
1
311
attendees
we've
had
seven
Mass
mailings
go
out,
729
targeted
eviction,
related
letters,
32,
Mountain,
View,
voice,
ads
and
32,
email
updates,
110,
mediations
or
conciliations
have
been
requested
through
the
Mountain
View
rental
housing
helpline
and
the
Mountain
View
mediation
program.
This
helps
to
reduce
our
workload
of
petitions.
91
of
these
have
been
resolved.
G
18
are
pending,
we've
received
189,
banked,
rent
increase
notices,
859
termination
notices,
one
tenant,
buyout
notice
and
two
additional
occupant
notices.
This
is
what
that
looks
like
graphically.
We
will
start
changing
this
up
as
we
move
forward
and
showing
a
look
back
a
little
bit
further
look
back
for
the
failure
to
pay
rent
notices.
As
you
can
see
here,
we
did
have
a
slight
uptick
in
Q3
of
2021
2022,
compared
to
the
last
quarter
of
those
failure
to
pay
rent
notices.
G
We've
had
no
properties
go
into
Redevelopment
in
2022,
with
zero
units
affected,
and
we
have
had
one
household
that
has
received
a
relocation
assistance
through
our
tenant
relocation
assistance
ordinance.
We
have
nine
petitions
this
year.
So
far,
four
are
in
The
Hearing
Pro,
we're
in
the
hearing
process.
During
the
month
of
March,
with
one
in
review,
we
have
one
decided
and
one
petition-
that's
been
withdrawn.
G
The
market
continues
to
recover.
From
the
height
of
the
pandemic,
we
are
seeing
a
vacancy
rate
for
fully
covered
units
that
continues
to
drop
it's
down
to
5.8
percent
staff
is
anticipating.
This
will
continue
to
recover
according
to
market
trends,
and
it's
units
are
still
being
held
off
of
the
market
as
well.
So
it's
not
a
true
vacancy
rate.
G
We
have
seen
a
significant
Rebound
in
the
in
the
cost
of
fully
covered
units
in
the
cost
of
all
units,
as
you
can
see
represented
here,
the
average
price
of
fully
covered
units
at
this
point
is
2614
dollars
and
we
have
16
properties
that
have
transacted
on
the
marketplace
representing
a
total
of
152
units,
and
there
are
five
properties
that
are
currently
for
sale.
These
are
just
normally
transacting
units.
They
are
not
anticipated
to
go
into
Redevelopment
at
this
time
and
it's
something
very
common
in
the
marketplace.
G
Okay,
seeing
none
I
will
move
on
to
the
eviction
prevention
program,
so
this
is
an
overview
of
the
eviction
prevention
program.
We
will
be
providing
a
more
robust
review
of
the
program
next
month's
meeting
or
in
June,
but
we're
anticipating
next
month.
G
So
we
have
held
51
clinics,
including
two
pop-up
events,
events
with
751
tenants
attending
representing
349,
individual
households
that
were
able
to
apply
for
the
state
rent
relief
program
through
the
city's
eviction
help
center.
That
is
a
significant
number.
We've
actually
helped.
We
think
around
400.
If
we
go
all
the
way
back
to
May
of
2021,
when
we
first
started
helping
people
fill
out,
rent
relief
applications
we'll
know
more
again,
once
we
run
those
more
detailed
numbers.
G
85
percent
of
our
Democrat
of
our
are
households
that
have
come
to
the
eviction.
Help
center
for
assistance
have
needed
assistance
in
a
language
other
than
English.
So
this
is
where
our
wonderful
multi-cultural
engagement
program
from
the
city
manager's
office
has
been
so
crucial
to
Our
Success.
Here
they
have
provided
a
lot
of
support
to
this
program
and
are
one
of
the
reasons
why
it
can
function.
G
91
percent
of
community
members
have
heard
about
our
services
through
other
community
members
or
through
activities
like
hand-to-hand
flyering,
that
was
very
effective
in
our
community
for
the
households,
the
majority
of
them
have
three
or
more
people
living
in
the
household
and
the
majority
of
them
make
less
than
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
as
a
household,
not
as
individuals.
So
these
are
truly
again
our
most
vulnerable
community
members,
49
of
households
have
also
applied
to
the
city's
rent
relief
program
and
they
received
an
average
of
2.3
three
months
of
assistance
from
that
program.
G
24
percent
have
received
termination
notices
and
that
represents
145
clients
that
requested
and
received
legal
assistance
through
our
eviction
help
center.
The
average
household
is
also
2.4
months
behind
on
rent
when
they
come
to
us
and
that's
these
numbers
here
that
you're
seeing
and
then
this
is
some
of
the
details
about
what
we're
doing
and
to
support
the
eviction
help
center
we've
had
2742
public
inquiries
related
to
evictions
or
rent
relief
or
eviction
protections.
G
We've
held
13
pop-up
events
and
reached
490
community
members,
we've
held
21,
webinars
and
trainings,
with
11
of
them
being
bilingual
and
English
and
Spanish,
and
reached
152
community
members.
That
way,
we've
had
three
postcards
go
out:
729
targeted
mailings,
so
these
are
courtesy,
follow-up
letters
for
failure
to
pay
rent
termination
notices.
We
have
seen
a
correlation
between
these
going
out
and
people
coming
into
the
eviction
help
center
and
we've
sent
out
14
targeted
emails.
G
We've
had
we
have
three
website
pages
that
we
maintain
in
three
languages
and
three
informational
Flyers
that
are
routinely
updated
and
maintained
in
four
languages.
We've
had
one
short,
video,
32,
weekly
Mountain,
View
voice
ads
one
press
release,
seven
news,
media
coverage
pieces
in
English
with
one
in
Spanish
and
we've
had
six
multilingual
social
media
posts
that
have
all
been
shared
through
Nextdoor,
WhatsApp,
WeChat
and
other
community
organizations
for
the
termination
notices.
This
is
the
same
information
that
you
saw
on
the
other
chart,
but
we
also
highlight
it
here
for
continuity's
sake.
G
Again,
we
have
353
failure
to
payment
rent
notices,
which
is
a
slight
uptick
compared
to
the
quarter
before,
but
is
anticipated
I'm
giving
an
update
now
on
the
state
rent
relief
program
as
well.
You
can
see
here
they
have
stopped
accepting
applications,
but
they
are
still
reviewing
them.
So
there's
905,
complete
household
applications
so
far
they've
been
able
to
serve
503
of
those,
so
they
have
400
more
to
go
and
it
represents
about
5
million
5.5
million
dollars
in
funding.
G
It
again
does
mirror
our
demographics
of
households
that
are
speaking
a
language
other
than
English
and
are
making
less
than
30
percent
of
the
area
median
income,
which
is
right
about
what
we're
showing.
G
That
concludes
staff's
presentation
on
the
monthly
status
report.
Are
there
any
questions.
F
I'm
just
curious
on
the
eviction
prevention
program
numbers
when
we're
looking
at
like
the
changes
month
over
month
for
things
like
how
many
months
are
we
behind
and
whatnot,
could
we
get
little
UPS
or
Downs
next
to
them
in
the
future
showing
like
if
it
went
up
or
down
or
stayed
flat?
A
G
A
Okay,
so
there
are
no
questions
or
comments
from
other
committee
members,
since
there
are
no
more
questions.
I
now
invite
public
comments.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comments
on
this
item?
If
so,
please
click
the
raise
hand,
button
and
zoom
or
press
star.
Nine
on
your
phone
staff
will
display
a
countdown
timer
on
the
screen.
A
D
I
just
wanted
to
say
thanks
to
staff
for
handling
what
was
probably
a
very
hectic
month
in
regards
to
the
eviction,
moratorium
and
whatnot
I'm
kind
of
curious
to
see
or
I
am
overall
curious,
there's
there's
generally
more
than
data
and
numbers,
but
like
how
was
the
overall
feeling
when
you
met
with
people,
how
had
the
clinics
been
going
or
the
walk-in
sessions
going?
Have
they
calmed
down?
Have
they
are
people?
G
No
we'll
definitely
provide
more
of
the
actual
qualitative
and
quantitative
feedback
from
the
community
that
we've
received
when
we
go
over
the
full
review
of
the
program
that
was
requested,
but
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
insight.
G
We,
it
was
slower
this
month
as
anticipated,
because
we're
not
how
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
any
longer
help.
People
apply
for
State,
rent
relief
since
they're
no
longer
accepting
applications,
but
we
did
have
still
have
a
pretty
good
number
of
people
show
up
for
all
four
well.
That
was
six
six
days
that
we
were
open
this
month,
as
we
kind
of
are
switching
over
to
having
our
programming
be
twice
a
month
instead
of
eight
times
a
month.
G
G
We
are
still
Fielding
calls
and
providing
that
Assistance
or
sending
the
information
for
these
clients
over
to
the
Community
Partners
that
are
appropriate
for
them,
and
we
have
had
interesting
and
different
types
of
assistance
needed
and
this
month
compared
to
the
months
before,
including
more
assistance
related
to
habitability
concerns,
questions
related
to
petitions,
questions
related
to
rent
increases,
and
so
some
of
that
is
Shifting
as
well,
which
we're
happy
to
see
that
the
Outreach
and
efforts
that
were
put
in
to
build
the
relationships
with
the
community
are
continuing.
G
A
The
amount
of
Outreach
in
all
the
different
capacities
that
we
do
is
just
I'm,
always
amazed
at
the
numbers
that
you
present
that's
good.
You.
C
G
A
G
We're
very
lucky
actually
to
have
quite
a
quite
an
impactful
community
of
volunteers
and
other
organizations
that
help
disseminate
and
distribute
information
on
our
behalf
and
I
definitely
want
to
recognize
their
efforts
as
well.
Absolutely.
C
So
I
I
too,
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
all
the
hard
work
they've
done
this
month
and
last
month.
I
do
have
a
question,
so
you
did
mention
that
there's
over
400
applications
still
to
be
served.
G
That's
from
this
state,
this
is
the
State
Processing
applications.
We
don't
have
any
power,
control
or
oversight
or
very
little
insight
as
well
into
into
that
and
those
processes.
The
state
has
made
public
in
past
Communications.
This
is
communication
that
was
about
a
month
old
that
at
their
current
pace,
which
was
a
month
ago,
it
would
take
up
until
potentially.
G
Late
fall
early
winter
to
finish,
but
they
are
processing
applications
much
more
quickly
than
they
had
been
so
I'm,
assuming
that
those
numbers
have
changed
on
theirs.
On
on
the
policy
side,
the
current
eviction
protections
for
people
who
have
active
rent
relief
applications
through
the
state
are
held
in
place
until
June
30th
that
could
be
extended
as
well.
I
think
that
they,
the
hcd
the
department
that
runs
this
program,
requested
an
extension
until
August
because
they
were
anticipating
that
they
might
be
able
to
process
these
applications
by
August.
C
Okay,
well,
thank
you
because
I
just
was
curious,
especially
when,
when
community
members
ask
to
what
they
should
be
looking
for
so
now,
you're
giving
me
a
lot
of
information
like,
for
example,
it's
a
public
information
and
then
and
that
they
can
come
to
us
and
you
can
give
them
a
you
know,
just
a
rough
overview.
Oh
okay,.
G
C
I
I
would
like
to
add
for
what
Patricia
just
said
that
in
the
health
clinics
or
emailing
to
us,
if
they
still
need
help
for
April
May
June
rent,
please
reach
out
to
us
as
well.
We
are
partnering
with
other
agencies
that
might
have
some
funds
available.
I
So
please
don't
don't
let
them
just
move
out.
Have
us
have
them
contact
us
first
to
see
where
and
what
we
can
do
for
them?
Foreign.
G
To
also
definitely
have
them
reach
out
to
us.
We
have
a
steps
flyer
on
what
to
do.
G
If
anyone
receives
an
eviction
notice
and
if
you
hear
of
any
landlord
that
needs
assistance
navigating
the
process
as
well,
we
provide
support
and
help
for
both
landlords
and
tenants
at
the
eviction
help
center
and
we
we
do
have
landlords
that
have
reached
out
to
us
and
received
support
through
the
program
as
well,
and
the
steps
flyer
goes
into
details
about
what
tenants
should
do
if
they
receive
an
eviction
notice,
including
contacting
us
also
on
the
back
side
of
it.
G
It
has
detailed
information
for
contact
who
they
should
contact
when
they
should
contact
them
and
what
they
should
do.
So,
please,
please,
please
have
them
reach
out
to
us
and
we'll
also
send
you
the
eviction,
help
center
flyer
and
the
steps
flyer
as
well.
They
are
also
on
the
website.
A
A
F
F
If
someone
is
looking
to
be
charitable
in
that
way
and
help
those
organizations
like,
could
we
help
them
find
them
it
for
a
while
they're,
like
Los
Altos,
Community,
Foundation
I,
think
was
partnered
with
Mountain
View
and
Silicon
Valley
Community
Foundation
to
try
and
do
some
things
around
this
and
I
really
haven't
heard
much
in
over
a
year
on
it.
So.
G
Those
are
all
things
that
if
people
are
looking
for
rent
assistance,
they
should
reach
out
to
us
again
like
on
key
mentioned,
because
we
can
reach
out
to
the
organizations
that
that
are
essentially
Distributing
those
funds.
So
there's
a
lot
of
different
organizations
that
are
Distributing
funds
that
were
that
are
grouped
together
specifically
for
for
rent
assistance
and
it
is
might
not
any
longer
be
covid.
Related.
Rent
assistance
might
be
broader,
rent
assistance,
there's
also
in
Mountain
View,
the
Mountain
View
solidarity
fund
that
has
specific
qualifications
for
applicants.
G
D
Was
just
adding
on
to
what
Patricia
was
saying?
The
county
has
something
called
the
homeless,
Prevention
Services,
which
is
a
connect
connection
of
a
whole
bunch
of
non-profits,
including
CSA,
and
and
Sacred
Heart
community
services
that
provide
that
kind
of
rent
relief
stuff,
and
that
would
be
a
good
place
to
direct
them.
The
solidarity
fund
offers
direct
financial
assistance.
I,
don't
know
how
much
more
they
have
left
of
that,
but
they
have
direct
financial
assistance
for
other
costs
or
what
we
like
to
call
Shadow
debt,
which
is
the
debt.
D
G
Work
closely
with
CSA
and
CSA
is
actually
at
the
eviction
help
center
with
us
every
time
that
it's
open,
so
people
can
just
come
right
to
the
eviction
help
center
and
receive
that
connection.
Point
excellent.
A
Okay,
then
we
move
on
to
7.2
agenda
item
7.2,
quarterly
Financial
expenditures;
report
fiscal
year
2021-2022
through
March,
31
2022.
We
will
begin
with
a
presentation
from
staff.
I
Thank
you,
chair
almond,
and
the
rental
housing
committee
members,
as
we
do
on
a
quarterly
basis.
We
review
the
financial
expenditures
of
the
csfra
program
and
this
these
numbers
are
through
March,
31st
2022..
I
Just
for
background
information.
Last
year
in
June,
the
rental
housing
committee
adopted
the
budget
for
this
fiscal
year
in
the
amount
of
2
million
one
hundred
sixty
two
thousand
and
sixty
six
dollars,
and
we
are
giving
you
an
overview
right
now
where
we
are
with
this
budget
next
slide.
Please
we
divide
this
budget
in
four
categories:
it's
Personnel,
Services,
non-personnel,
Services,
capital,
outlay
and
interfund
expenditures.
I
In
the
Personnel
Services
category
we
spend
53.65
is
expended,
this
is
below
budget
due
to
the
lasting
impact
of
the
the
filling
of
the
position
of
the
analyst
in
December
of
2029,
and
were
work
that
our
staff
is
providing
for
other
departments
and
that
can
be
charged
to
other
other
index
numbers
programs
that
have
to
really
that
are
related
to
covid-19
and
Talent
relocation,
assistance
and
the
startup
of
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance
in
non-personnel,
Services
we've,
expanded,
35
and
35.61
expand
and
43.45
is
encumbered.
I
This
is
this
covers
all
the
Professional
Services
and
it's
below
budget.
Due
to
the
later
quarterly
billing
of
the
service
providers
lower
than
anticipated
legal
fees
and
fewer
petition,
hearing
requests
with
fewer
need
of
hearing
officer
services,
then
the
capital
outlay
has
been
expanded
for
16.42.
I
This
is
for
the
build
up
and
maintenance
of
our
database
and
it's
below
budget
due
to
further
deliverables
of
3di
for
this
database
and
further
invoicing
upon
completion
of
these
deliverables.
I
And
then
the
last
category
is
the
interfund
expenditures
which
was
for
100
expanded
at
the
end
of
December
295
000
and
270
dollars
has
been
charged
back
to
the
city
for
services
rendered
to
other
divisions
in
the
city.
I
Looking
at
the
complete
budget,
as
you
can
see,
slightly
over
50
percent
has
been
expanded
of
the
budget
by
the
end
of
March,
with
Personnel
being
the
biggest
category
22.8
percent,
followed
by
the
interfund
expenditure
and
the
non-personnel
expenditures.
I
A
B
J
Thank
you
I'm
curious.
What
happens
to
that
50
excess
of
the
budget?
That's
that's
a
surplus
I,
don't
know
if
I
can
ask
a
question
and
get
an
answer,
or
is
that.
I
Yeah
I
can
I
can
definitely
answer
that
any
funds
that
are
not
being
spended
this
year
will
be
carried
over
to
next
year
and
that
provides
the
starting
fund.
So
less
fees
need
to
be
charged
because
we
still
have
leftover
funds
from
this
year.
B
F
I
also
agree:
the
budget
looks
very
nice.
It
honestly
makes
me
happy
to
see
that
we're
having
a
surplus-
and
it
will
be
very
nice
next
year
for
the
fee
reduction
that
it'll
mean,
but
it
also
seems
to
suggest
that
we're
starting
to
see
somewhat
costs
that
we
can
predict
and
that
they're
not
astronomically
High,
which
means
our
fees
don't
have
to
be
astronomically
High,
which
gives
me
encouragement
for
you
know
the
initial
years
of
the
program.
F
I
A
Right,
so
these
cost
savings
will
not
impact
the
mobile
home
budget
because
that's
separate
all
right,
sorry
about
that
confusion,
okay,
any
other
comments
or
Com
or
yeah.
It
looks
really
great.
I
can't
believe
we're
only
spending
50
percent
of
what
we've
laid
out,
but
it
makes
sense.
Okay,
there
are
no
more
I
think.
Then
we
move
on
to
7.3.
A
H
I'm
going
to
be
doing
the
presentation,
so
the
purpose
is
to
amend
the
csfr
regulations,
chapter
7,
the
procedures
for
annual
General
adjustments
to
change
the
contact
information
in
the
mandatory
noticed
tenant
in
the
case
of
a
banked
AGA
and
then
to
also
amend
csfri
regulations.
Chapter
11
registration
to
add
a
requirement
that
landlords
provide
a
notice
of
applicability
of
community
stabilization
and
fair
rent
act
at
the
commencement
of
a
new
tenancy.
H
H
So
this
will
change
the
telephone
number
and
the
email
address
and
the
mandatory
text
of
the
notice
that
goes
out
to
tenants.
It's
just
updating
it
to
clarify
the
the
new
contact
information.
So
attendance
will
have
the
proper
information
when
they
receive
these
notices
like
and
then
the
chapter
11
amendments.
H
So
at
the
November
meeting,
the
committee
adopted
regulations
requiring
mobile
home
landlords
to
provide
mobile
homeowners
and
tenants
with
a
notice
of
applicability
of
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance,
and
this
amendment
is
just
intended
to
bring
the
csfra
regulations
into
line
with
the
mhrso
and
have
them
mirror
each
other
as
closely
as
possible.
So
this
proposed
amendment
would
require
the
a
similar
notice
of
applicability
of
the
csfra
at
the
commencement
of
any
new
tenancies.
H
The
contents
of
that
notice
would
include
the
existence
and
the
scope
of
the
csfra
whether
the
rental
unit
is
covered
partially
exempt
or
fully
exempt,
and
information
about
the
tenant's
right
to
petition
against
certain
rent
increases.
The
information
about
the
exemptions
is
important
in
case
the
exemptions
are
ones
that
expire
and
or
if
the
tenant
now
wants
to
challenge
the
exemption
and
object
to
it
potentially
under
the
regulations
that
were
recently
adopted.
H
So
this
is
one
area
where
it
has
currently
written.
The
this
would
be
applicable
to
Tendencies
commencing
on
May.
1St
staff's
recommendation
would
be
to
actually
push
that
back
to
June
1st
and
give
landlords
some
additional
time,
since
this
was
originally
supposed
to
be
considered
at
the
March
meeting,
which
would
have
given
them
roughly
a
month
to
comply.
H
But
so,
potentially
we
might
want
to
push
that
back
to
a
June
1st
2022
start
date
and
then
lastly
require
a
copy
of
the
notice
to
be
filed
with
the
landlord's
initial
registration
and
any
subsequent
change
in
tenancy.
And
then
the
notice
of
the
applicability
of
the
csfra
would
have
to
be
provided
within
15
days
after
the
expiration
of
any
exemption.
H
Next
slide.
So
staff's
recommendation
is
to
amend
CFR
csfra
regulations,
chapter
seven
to
change
the
contact
info
and
the
mandatory
notice
to
tenant,
in
case
of
a
banked
annual
General
adjustment,
and
also
to
amend
csfri
regulations.
Chapter
11,
to
add
the
requirement
that
landlords
provide
the
notice
of
applicability
of
csfra
at
the
commencement
of
the
new
tenancy,
and
these
should
probably
be
done
as
separate
motions
when
you
all
consider
them
but
happy
to
take
any
questions
before
that.
K
A
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments?
Let's
start
with
chapter
seven.
F
Do
have
a
question
we
received
correspondence
regarding
this
item
right
before
the
meeting
and
I
don't
know
if
anyone
would
be
able
to
answer
this,
but
in
that
correspondence
it
was
indicated
that
this
proposed
chapter
7
resolution
is
the
subject
of
stakeholder
meetings
this
week,
but
I.
Don't
that
was
unclear
to
me
because
I
did
not
think
that
was
the
what
was
being
discussed
in
the
stakeholder
meetings.
Does
anyone
have
Clarity
on
what
that
was
related
to.
I
Into
stakeholder
meeting,
we
are
going
to
discuss
the
definition
of
base
rent
and
how
conciliations
need
to
be
assessed,
digging
into
account
that
definition
of
banked
of
Base
rent
here
we're
just
trying
to
change
the
contact
information.
We
will
review
the
template
to
see
if
there
are
any
ref,
there's,
probably
a
reference
made
to
base
rent,
but
we
will
definitely
after.
We
will
definitely
review
it
after
that
stakeholder
meeting
to
see
if
any
of
that
language
need
to
be
adjusted
or
not.
Of
course,.
D
This
is
a
quick
one
relating
to
this
slide
right
before
this,
the
notice
would
provide
would
be
provided
within
15
days
after
expiration
of
exemption.
Is
that
exemption
when
there's
a
an
owner
living
in
the
the
unit?
Okay,
all
right
I
was
just
curious.
There
are
there's,
no
other
exemptions
are
there.
That
would
change
over
time.
H
Potentially,
if
some
housing
is
a
for,
indeed
restricted,
affordable
and
the
Restriction
expires,
that's
very
unlikely,
but
another
potential
place
where
that
might
apply.
L
Okay,
my
my
question
was
regarding
the
change
of
chapter
11,
also
related
to
the
correspondence
we
received
earlier
today.
L
Would,
if
I'm
understanding,
if
you
go
one
one
slide
back,
would
there
be
a
requirement
that,
for
instance,
single
family
homes,
rentals
would
need
to
include
this
by
by
adding
by
adding
this
to
the
regs?
Are
we
expanding
the
requirement
that
units
that
are
already
exempt
would
need
to
put
that
into
put
that
into
the
lease.
H
No,
this
would
just
be
for
anyone
that
currently
registers
and
claims
an
exemption.
They
would
be
required
to
provide
a
notice
about
whether
the
unit
is
exempt
to
the
tenants.
L
I
see
because
I
I
think
I
was
looking
at
the
exhibit
a.
There
is
an
option,
one
of
the
options
that
I
guess
you
would
check
the
box
for
these
options
of
why
it
is
fully
exempt.
L
But
yeah
sorry,
it
sounds
like
that's
not
a
concern,
because,
if
I'm
reading
it
correctly
was
that
the
concern
of
the
the
correspondence
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
crystal
clear
that
that's
not
a
concern.
A
In
the
meantime,
I
was
hoping
that
we
could
consider
chapter
seven
and
then
separately,
chapter
11,
because
I
don't
know
about
anybody
else,
but
I
I
find
it
confusing
to
keep
jumping
back
and
forth
so
that
maybe
we
could
see
if
we.
If
there
is
agreement
on
chapter
seven,
we
could
take
a
vote
on
that
and
then
look
at
chapter
11..
What
do
people
think
Emily.
D
So
I
don't
mind
splitting
the
question
up,
but
before
we
take
decisions
like
that,
I
would
love
for
us
to
go
to
public
comment.
First
sure.
H
A
question
a
question:
I
guess
for
Anki
or
Patricia.
Currently
you
don't
have
we
don't
have
people
register
if
they
are
fully
exempt?
Is
that
right.
I
H
That's
what
I
thought
yeah
so
I
guess
in
that
case,
that
could
potentially
be
revised
to
remove
that
requirement
for
those
units
that
are
not
covered
so
that
those
landlords
don't
have
to
provide
the
notice.
H
A
H
Yes,
but
there's
I
believe
there's
just
a
subsection
that
refers
specifically
to
single-family
homes,
duplexes
and
companion,
units
that
could
be
removed.
A
J
A
So
do
if
we
want
to
entertain
a
motion
at
after
public
comment.
Do
we
need
to
have
a
friendly
amendment
to
remove
that.
A
F
I
The
landlord
is
written
with
a
capital,
l,
so
I
think
we
need
to
probably
be
a
little
bit
more
clear
who
needs
to
file
this.
So
if
you,
if
you
read
the
definition
of
a
landlord,
you
probably
get
to
own
your
csfra
covered
units,
but
it's
it.
Doesn't
it
behooves
us
to
be
a
little
bit
more
clear
here
and
write
it
full
out?
L
Oh
sorry,
I
I
had
seen
a
very
similar
comment
to
the
vice
chair.
So
maybe
that's
better
left
until
deliberation
I,
don't
and
I
don't
have
any
questions
for
the
chapter.
7
modification
thanks.
A
K
Good
evening
my
name
is
Joshua
Howard,
with
California
Apartment
Association
tonight,
I'm
expressing
significant
concerns
with
the
proposal
outlined
to
amend
the
chapter
11
regulations
to
require
an
unknown
unvetted
information
sheet
be
given
to
every
tenant.
It
seems
only
appropriate
that
this
information
sheet
in
its
totality
is
presented
to
the
rhc
and
adopted,
and
only
amended
by
rhc
resolution,
while
informing
tenants
of
their
rights
is
critical.
Adopting
a
regulation
today
to
supposedly
take
effect
in
four
business
days
is
absurd.
Last
due
process
and
ignores
the
values
of
transparency
and
stakeholder
engagement.
K
Fully
exempt
units
are
not
subject
to
the
csfra
and
they
are
not
subject
to
the
jurisdiction
of
the
rhc.
Appreciate
you
looking
to
remove
B1,
but
you
also
need
to
remove
any
requirements
for
B8.
You
have
no
jurisdiction
over
the
fully
exempt
units.
In
addition,
you
need
to
look
at
giving
more
time
and
more
flexibility
to
how
this
notice
would
be
implemented.
A
notice
should
be
simple,
direct
and,
rather
than
be
a
full
notice,
it
should
be
allowed
to
be
posted
in
a
conspicuous
place,
like
many
other
required
postings.
K
A
landlord
must
post
the
city
of
San
Jose,
for
example,
requires
that
the
apartment
rent,
ordinance
disclosure
is
posted
in
a
common
area
or
provided
as
part
of
the
tenancy
agreement.
It
is
the
landlord's
choice,
so
it
urge
you
to
look
at
other
ways
to
make
this
less
bureaucratic
and
less
burdensome.
Additionally,
who
maintains,
who
updates
the
information
sheet?
K
It's
unfortunate
that
this
is
at
least
the
second
time
in
two
meetings
that
a
major
regulation
has
been
brought
forward
with
no
stakeholder
engagement
or
no
stakeholder
notice.
This
is
lack
of
due
process
and
it's
Troublesome
I.
Ask
that
you
review
this
notice
carefully,
allow
time
to
incorporate
this
idea
of
the
information
sheet
or
notice
into
a
landlord
standard
operating
procedures
and
find
creative
ways
to
reduce
the
burden
in
paperwork
rental.
Housing
providers
want
to
do
what
they
do
best
provide
homes.
All
of
these
regulations
do
nothing
to
make
housing
more
available.
K
A
California,
Apartment
Association
and
its
members
in
Mountain
View
encourage
you
to
one
require
that
the
information
sheet
be
a
posting
that's
made
available
and
posted
in
a
common
area.
Two
is
simple:
is
flexible
and
adopted
by
resolution
of
the
rental
housing
committee
and
that
you
look
to
include
stakeholders
and
stakeholder
review
in
any
information
item.
That's
required
to
be
posted.
Thank
you.
K
A
Thank
you,
Mr
Howard.
Are
there
any
other
members
of
the
public
on
the
line
that
want
to
make
a
comment.
M
Thank
you
so
regarding
correct
contact.
Information
I
have
to
agree
with
that
and
regarding
the
intent
in
the
discussion
of
the
rhc
just
now
to
not
have
the
requirements
for
regulation
about
fully
exempt
units.
I
think
is,
you
know
appropriate.
M
So
there's
you
know
in
this
resolution.
I
think
you
would
want
to
make
you
know,
look
at
it
fully.
One
thing
it
might
say
instead
of
saying:
is
it
fully
or
partially
exempt,
you
might
want
to
say:
is
it
fully
or
partially
covered,
or
you
might
want
to
say
just?
Is
it
partially
exempt,
because
if
it's
fully
exempt
you're
not
sending
those
notices
out
there,
so
some
minor
wording
changes
could
clarify
the
ordinance
about
notice
and
well,
it's
good
to
have
notices
that
aren't
wordy.
M
There
may
be
need
for
changes
to
exact
notices
in
the
future,
so
to
have
the
some
discretion
to
change
the
notice
going
forward
without
it
coming
back
to
the
rhc
I
think
is
appropriate.
M
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
have
both
to
have
the
posting
of
the
that
the
units
that
are
covered
and
also
to
have
it
in
the
packet,
but
because
in
one
building
in
some
Mountain
View
Apartments,
there
are
all
kinds
of
you
know.
All
categories
of
exemption
or
non-exemption
from
the
csfra
I
think.
M
The
most
important
thing
to
do
is
to
provide
to
the
appropriate
units
that
those
that
are
covered,
that
they
are
covered
either
covered
in
full
or
covered
partially
so
generally
I'm,
very
supportive
and
I
hope
you
pay
attention
to
the
details
of
the
ordinance.
Thank
you.
D
So
in
in
to
go
back
to
what
we
were
agreeing
to
beforehand,
I'm
gonna
split
the
question
up
so
that
we
can
pass
chapter
seven
first
and
then
we
can
deal
with
the.
How
do
I
say
this?
The
adjusting
of
chapter
11..
Does
that
sound
good
to
everyone?
I'm,
just
gonna
put
the
motion
out
there
for
chapter
seven,
so
I
move.
B
B
All
right,
let's
go
ahead
and
begin
with
Committee
Member
Grimlock.
E
A
Okay,
now
we
move
on
to
the
more
prickly
chapter,
11.
A
I
More
than
happy
to
take
in
your
feedback
and
come
back
with
a
altered
text,
if
you
guys,
like.
D
F
I
disagree
about
the
qualitative
comment
there,
but
I
will
make
my
comment.
All
the
same.
I
am
trying
to
on
the
Fly
toggle
to
do
this
and
I.
Actually,
my
recommendation
would
be
that
we
do
get
feedback
and
have
this
go
back
to
staff
for
modification
landlord
in
the
csfra
if
I
pulled
it
up
properly,
is
actually
defined
in
such
a
way
that
I
do
believe
that
this
could
have
contradictory
language
in
it.
F
If
we
attempted
to
slice
a
dice
on
our
own
land
or
landlord
doesn't
expressly
involve
covered
versus
non-covered
units
based
on
my
very
quick
30
second
read
here
so
I
think
we
may
want
to
instead
of
looking
to
pass,
this
provide
some
commentary
on
where
we're
trying
to
go
with
it
and
then
allow
this
to
come
back,
maybe
in
the
May
meeting,
with
the
goal
of
having
a
short,
quick
discussion
on
it.
So
that
would
be
my
recommendation.
It's
not
emotion,
it's
just
a
recommendation
and
that's
it.
C
I'm,
sorry,
can
we
go
back
to
the
to
the
text
slide.
Please,
then,
that
way,
it's
visual
for
everyone.
Yes,
thank
you.
C
My
question
is-
and
it
may
not
be
related
to
this,
but
it's
just
a
something
I'm
curious
about.
So
my
question
is:
when
we
talk
about
stakeholders
and
a
way
to
vet
this,
how
is
that
process
done.
I
Yeah,
so
what
we're
doing
is
for
the
issue
that
was
discussed
and
was
not
discussed
in
the
last
meeting,
but
we
decided
to
hold
a
stakeholder
first
to
receive
input
and
feedback
from
people
in
the
community
that
are
interested
in
the
topic.
We
will
summarize
that
and
bring
that
back
to
the
rental
housing
committee
together
with
a
proposal,
and
then
the
rental
housing
committee
can
deliberate
and
learn
about
all
the
stakeholder
feedback
before
they
are
making
a
decision.
I
One
that
is
organized
for
August
the
28th
is
with
regards
to
the
base,
rent
and
concessions
correct
for.
A
Okay,
Committee
Member
Grunwald.
L
Vice
chair,
the
vice
chair,
was
mentioning
something
similar,
but
I
I
don't
feel
comfortable
trying
to
go
through
and
edit.
This
exhibit
a
on
the
Fly
I.
Think
all
of
the
a
lot
of
the
issues
that
were
raised
by
Mr
Howard
are,
you
know
concerning
and
something
we
want
to
get
right
and
and
that
I
don't
think
we'll
be
able
to
do
that
on
the
fly
in
this
meeting,
so
I'd
recommend
a
stakeholder
meeting,
and
you
know
everyone
collaborating
to
try
to
get
to
the
right
language
there.
L
I
would
also
add
for
inserts
in
different
jurisdictions.
I
mean
there
are
many
inserts
that
need
to
be
put
into
a
lease
about
smoking.
L
L
Ideally,
if
we
could
get
the
mountain
everything
that
we
want
to
communicate
about
the
csfra
and
Mountain
View
regulation
into
one
page,
you
know
I
think
we
could
save
save
paper,
make
it
efficient
and
I
think
that
you
know
exhibit
a
kind
of
bleeds
right
now.
I
know
we'd,
probably
we
would
change
the
spacing
in
the
final
version,
but
right
now
it
just
kind
of
bleeds
over
to
two
pages
and
I'm,
not
sure.
L
If
that's
you
know
necessary,
and
it
does
add
up
to
a
lot
of
paper
when
there's
when
there's
thousands
of
units
in
Mountain
View
also,
you
know
we
could
put
the
contact
information
right
at
the
top
or
tenants
right.
You
know
if
you
have
any
questions,
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
language
here.
L
That
would
be
confusing
to
a
lot
of
people
and
a
lot
of
detail,
and
they
may
just
want
to
talk
to
someone
and
we
have
the
funds
and
the
contact
channels
open
to
receive
that
so
I
might
recommend
something,
that's
more
visual
one
page
and
that
lastly,
I'd
ask
that
I
I
feel
like
this
needs
to
be
our
process
whenever
the
flyer
is
or
the
insert
is
being
changed.
L
We've
had.
This
is
as
Mr
Howard
mentioned.
This
is
the
second
meeting
where
there
have
been
implications
that
were
not
considered
to
language
changes
and
when
they
were
put
on
the
agenda
you
know
I
might
have
just
you
know
rubber
stamped
them
through
they
seemed
like
they
were
framed
as
smaller
text
changes
and
with
base
rent,
especially
I,
had
not
thought
of
a
lot
of
the
feedback
that
we
got
from
the
community
about
what
could
happen
if
we
were
just
to
change
that
definition,
so
I
would
like
to
change.
L
I'd
recommend
that
we
formalize
a
process
for
when
some
of
these
regs
or
the
flyer
are
going
to
be
changed
thanks.
D
So
some
generalized
feedback
I'm
not
inclined
to
have
stakeholder
groups
for
every
single
regulation
that
we're
going
to
bring
up,
that
is
that
is
I,
don't
I,
don't
I,
don't
and
I
also
don't
think
that's
committing
my
role's
intention
either.
I
think
I
trust
that
and
staff's
judgment
to
get
this,
and
when
there
are
changes
to
regulations
we
think
it
through.
We
get
feedback
and
that's
the
whole
point
of
having
a
public
meeting
and
having
people
speak
in
public
comment.
D
I
I
do
understand
the
frustration
of
the
time
frame
from
when
agendas
drop
versus
regulate
versus
when
we
pass
them.
I
asked
staff
to
find
ways
to
maybe
not
have
such
a
shortcut
I.
Remember
we
early
on.
We,
we
had
a
discussion
about
having
agendas
out
earlier,
even
if
it
was
incomplete,
although
it
doesn't
really
affect
this
issue
in
particular,
but
at
least
people
would
have
a
heads
up
that
a
particular
item
is
up
so
I
I
would
love
for
us
to
get
back
to
that.
D
I
also
do
not
want
us
to
have
us
vote
on
exact
how
we
want
exactly
the
form
to
be.
That
is
also
something
I
rely
on
staff
to
Think
Through
connect
through
and
and
use.
Their
best
judgment
on.
Our
job
is
to
understand
the
regular
relations
and
empower
the
staff
with
the
regulations
that
we
have
to
clarify
our
understanding
of
the
csfra.
D
So
I
actually
understand
why
we
are
doing
this
I
think
when
I
read
the
the
the
comment,
the
letter
from
the
I
believe
it
was
Prometheus
that
we
got
sent
earlier
today,
I,
my
understanding
is
I
think
they
were
just
concerned
that
they
they
I.
My
understanding
is
that
Prometheus
actually
has
a
lot
of
new
units
that
are
not
covered
under
the
csfra
at
all
and
seeing
this
they
assumed
or
thought
that
we
were
requiring
their
completely
uncovered
uncovered
units
to
to
be
under
this
regulation.
D
I
think
I
think
that
is
that
that
that's
what's
causing
a
lot
of
the
issues
right
now
now
that
we
know
that
it's
that
that's
not
the
purpose
of
this
regulation,
I'm
actually
overall
fine
with
it
I'm,
okay,
with
taking
it
staff
taking
a
stab
at
it
or
or
our
brilliant
Vice
chair,
taking
a
stab
at
language
for
it
to
make
it
more
clear
that
that
is
the
case
and
I'm
also
prepared
to
pass
it.
D
If
we
managed
to
come
with
that
language
tonight,
if
not
I'm
perfectly
fine
with
it
coming
back.
So
that's
that
is
where
I
am.
B
F
So
I
will
say
that
the
way
that
this
is
written
is
not
the
expressed
intention,
I'm
confident
of
that
at
this
juncture.
This
would
actually
do
the
thing
that
Prometheus
says
letter
was
concerned
about,
because
anyone
who
is
in
essence,
a
housing
provider
based
on
our
definition
of
landlord,
which
does
not
include
covered
versus
uncovered,
would
be
required
to
have
this
notice.
F
F
We
need
to
allow
this
to
be
modified
not
today
on
the
dice
but
taken
away
and
modified
I
think
that
we
also
need
to
give
clear
instructions
to
staff
as
Oppo
as
to
what
we're
going
for
here
and
what
we're
wanting
to
see
of
this,
because,
right
now
this
is
written
like
we
are
just
looking
for.
Basically
a
notification
of
here's.
What
the
csfra
is
that
it
exists
and
you
are
exempt
or
partially
exempt
or
not
so,
which
I'm
not
sure.
F
If
that's
actually
the
only
goal
here
or
not,
it
somewhat
makes
sense
on
a
partially
exemption
unit.
I'm,
not
sure
it
does
in
any
other
context,
because
we
already
have
a
required
notice
that
the
csfra
exists,
I
believe
for
coverage
units,
so
I'm
also
wondering
if
we're
Maybe
going
at
this
the
wrong
way
in
terms
of
the
stakeholder
component.
You
know
I
think
stakeholder
input
is
valuable.
F
I
do
wonder
if
we
need
to
have
instead
of
full
stakeholder
meetings
all
the
time,
something
like
a
trusted
board
or
sources
that
we
could
go
to
for
some
feedback
that
doesn't
require
opening
a
whole
stakeholder
meeting,
but
just
having
sounding
boards,
it
can
be
valuable
to
be
able
to
sit
down
with
people
and
say
hey.
This
is
what
we're
thinking.
What
are
what
would
your
in
distinctual
response
to
this?
F
Be
so
that
things
are
not
in
a
vacuum
where
it
doesn't
require
the
notice
and
planning
and
all
of
that
of
a
stakeholder
meeting,
it's
more
of
a
conversational
back
and
forth.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
have
that
back
Channel,
but
it
might
be
something
valuable
to
build
out
that
would
negate
the
need
for
full
stakeholder
meetings,
while
also
allowing
us
to
have
some
back
and
forth
and
some
feedback.
So
that's
just
an
idea,
but
in
the
short
term,
I
don't
think
we
can.
F
L
Thank
you
yeah,
just
to
clarify
your
comments
to
community
members,
Ramos's
Point
yeah,
not
necessarily
stakeholder
meetings
for
every
item
for
sure,
but
something
like
editing
the
flyer
or
inserts
that
have
to
be
put
that
have
to
be
notices
that
have
to
be
given
to
each
person.
I
think
just
like
formalizing
the
amount
of
lead
time
that
we
that
we're
going
to
give
at
least
60
days
before
you
have
to
reprint.
L
You
know
reprint
that
insert
or
ideally
just
more
lead
time.
I
would
be
frustrated,
I
think
if,
if
I
saw
this
on
an
agenda
and-
and
it
says
four
days
to
to
the
vice
chairs,
Point
yeah,
not
necessarily
Maybe,
not
a
full
stakeholder
meeting.
I
know
that
takes
a
lot
of
lead
time
to
to
set
up
one
I
think
talking.
Other
jurisdictions
right,
like
I,
think
the
base
rent
issue
would
that
have
gone
through
the
same
way
to
the
agenda
phase.
Had
it
like.
L
Did
we
collect
all
the
feedback
from
other
jurisdictions
about
how
they
Define
base
rent
and,
and
so
that
can
be
a
separate
discussion.
I'd
like
to
learn
more
about
that
when
we
get
to
when
we
bring
that
up
as
a
full
agenda
item,
because
you
know,
did
they
have
any
feedback
on
us
having
a
different
definition
and
what
the
implications
could
be
there.
L
But
you
know
like
okay.
If
we
talk
to
other
jurisdictions
and
do
our
due
diligence
there,
maybe
then
you
know
see
as
as
the
vice
chair
mentioned,
other
stakeholders
who
could
give
us
that
input
on
either
the
landlord
side
or
tenant
groups.
I.
Think
would
be
that
if
we
could
say
we're
going
to
do
that
as
part
of
a
process
for
a
certain
small,
just
changing
the
insert
I
guess
or
what
needs
to
be
noticed
to
it
directly
to
the
tenants
thanks.
D
Oh
man
I
hate
to
do
this
should
in
in
our
list
of
work
plan
items
to
do.
Should
we
have
a
policy
on
at
what
point
should
we
have
a
stakeholder
meeting?
I
I
feel
like
that
might
be
also
some
clarity
to
had
as
well.
D
I
also
agree
with
giving
some
more
time
for
for
housing
providers
to
if
we're
requiring
making
the
requirement,
giving
them
at
least
a
little
a
month
or
60
days
what
Committee
Member
criminal
said
to
to
comply
once
we
pass
it,
but
other
than
that
that
that's
all
I
have
for
feedback.
That
was
wasn't
already
said.
G
And
staff
would
like
to
provide
a
little
input
into
what
we
had
planned
regarding
Community
meetings
before
the
pandemic
hit
in
2020,
we
had
planned
to
have
quarterly
Community
meetings,
just
to
provide
an
opportunity
for
community
members
to
give
feedback
and
insights
into
what
they're
experiencing
what
they're
hearing
and
provide
more
of
an
opportunity
for
dialogue.
Perhaps
that
is
that
was
something
that
staff
was
planning
to
start
up
again
in
fiscal
year
2022-23,
and
perhaps
that
would
provide
a
Avenue
for
the
the
Avenue
for
feedback
that
you
are
looking
for.
A
I
think
that
would
be
very
helpful
and
hopefully
mitigate.
Some
of
this
I
mean
I.
Think
part
of
the
problem
that
we're
coming
up
against
is
that
we're
we're
trying
to
you
know,
move
all
of
these
regulations
through
relatively
quickly
so
that
we
have
the
full
package,
and
you
know
I,
don't
think
we
could,
even
if
we
put
it
into
the
work
plan,
I,
don't
think
we
could
predict
what
what
items
are
going
to
require
stakeholders
or
input
for
from
Community
and
I
agree
with
Emily
that
that's
why
we
have
public
meetings.
A
A
C
So
in
the
in
interest
of
being
more
transparent,
I
think
that
if
staff
can,
if
they're
already
thinking
about
doing
quarterly
meetings,
I
would
agree
that
that
would
be
a
good
idea.
Obviously
I
don't
want
to
overburden
them
because
I
know
they
do
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
so,
but
that
that
sounds
to
me
like
a
good
idea.
I
am
in
the
in
the
idea
that
we
should
bring
this
up
with
more
clarity,
specifically
because
it's
there's
lots
of
language
here.
C
That
needs
to
be
looked
at
a
lot
more
carefully.
So
I
am
supporting
Emily's
ideas,
so
staff
can
get
more
Clarity
in
terms
of
what
we.
What
we
would
like
to
see
with
the
addition
of
the
quarterly
meetings,
if
that's
all
possible,.
A
A
So,
at
least
at
this
point
we're
on
at
7.4
now
mobile
home,
rent
stabilization
program
recommended
budget
for
fiscal
year
2021-22
and
fiscal
year,
2022-23
an
establishment
of
a
space
rental
fee.
We
will
begin
with
a
presentation
from
staff
that
was
a
tongue
twister.
I
Foreign
chair
almond
and
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee,
as
we've
discussed
in
the
last
rental
housing
committee
meeting,
a
budget
was
presented
for
your
review
and
feedback
next
slide.
Please,
and
today
we're
going
to
adopt,
hopefully
a
resolution
of
this
budget,
as
discussed
in
the
last
meeting
and
set
the
space
rental
fee
support
supporting
the
fiscal
years,
2122
and
22-23
budget
foreign.
I
I
And
the
initial
startup
costs
were
incurred
once
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance
was
went
into
effect
on
October,
the
28th,
using
City
staff
and
outside
Services,
as
well
as
operational
expenses.
We
received
interim
funds
from
city
council
until
the
rental
housing
committee
could
collect
annual
rental
space
leaves
fees
and
a
total
amount
of
for
almost
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
was
Advanced,
of
which
107
000
was
provided
as
a
one-time,
non-reimbursable
startup
fund
and
292
000
as
a
loan
to
be
reimbursed.
I
Oh
so,
for
the
2122
budget,
the
following
key
expenditures
were
discussed
in
the
last
meeting
and
agreed
upon
I'm,
not
going
to
mention
all
the
numbers
they're,
also
in
your
package,
so
moving
on
with
these
numbers,
the
calculation
of
the
space
rental
fee
comes
out
to
258
dollars
and
40
cents
per
space.
I
I
Similarly,
for
the
budget
of
2022-23,
a
total
budget
was
presented
for
200,
346
and
410,
with
Sim,
with
the
following
key
expenditures,
as
we
discussed
in
the
last
meeting.
So
I
will
not
repeat
those
numbers
again
leading
to
the
calculation
of
the
space
rent
fees
of
307
dollars
per
space.
I
I
So
for
tonight
we
recommend
that
the
city
that
the
rental
housing
committee
adopt
this
resolution
to
adopt
these
budgets
and
the
establishment
of
the
space
rental
fees
are
sufficient
to
support
those
budgets.
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
A
I
have
a
question
the
last
time
when
we
looked
at
2021-22,
the
space
rent
was
going
to
be
something
like
298
or
something
no.
I
A
L
Thank
you,
I.
Guess
the
question
Anki
what
what
would
occur.
It
is
there
language,
since
this
is
establishing
the
fee.
Do
we
have?
We
already
decided
what
would
occur
if,
if
they're
an
mou
for
a
particular
Park,
would
that
would
would
they
still
pay
the
fee?
If
there
was
an
mou.
I
That's
a
good
question
and
that
has
not
been
discussed
at
all
and
the
end
of
June.
I
The
city
council
will
be
receiving
us,
a
staff
report
analyzing
what
happened
in
the
stakeholder
meetings
and
the
public
meetings
and
evaluating
the
mou
proposals
that
were
received.
It
also
needs
to
add
some
chapters
on.
I
How
are
these
mou
is
being
enforced
or
complied
with,
and
also
do
we
recommend
what
types
of
fees
commiserate
with
the
amount
of
work
that
the
city
still
might
need
to
provide
if
an
mou
was
decided
upon?
So
those
are
all
very
preliminary
items
that
still
need
to
be
discussed
towards
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year.
Foreign.
A
A
Okay,
I
believe
at
this
point
we're
open
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
budget
thanks
chair.
F
B
Okay,
let's
start
with
Committee
Member
Grunwald.
L
D
I
Thank
you
again
next
slide
me
please.
I
I
And
as
a
background
section,
1709a
of
the
csfra
provides
for
this
annual
happening
within
the
rental
housing
committee
and
also
describes
the
roles
and
responsibilities
of
a
chair
and
the
vice
chair.
As
you
can
see,
the
chair
presides
over
all
meetings,
signs
to
written
resolutions
and
meets
with
staff
to
set
the
agenda
for
the
meetings
and
in
case
of
an
absence
or
disability
of
this
chair.
The
vice
chair
will
take
over
those
roles.
A
Thank
you
very
much
and
I'm
hoping
we
can
have
an
open
discussion
here.
There
have
been
a
couple
of
developments.
I
Julian,
as
you
know,
is
not
at
today's
meeting
so
I,
since
he
and
I
are
on
the
same
term.
A
I
asked
him
whether
he
was
interested
in
being
either
Vice,
chair
or
chair
at
this
point,
and
he
respectfully
declined
both
so
that
eliminates
one
person,
I
guess
at
this
point,
we're
open
to
first
nominate
a
chairperson
and
then
a
vice
chairperson,
but
I
I'd
also
like
to
find
out
what
the
interest
is
in
various
committee
members
height,
where
you
you
stand
on
whether
you're
interested
in
these
roles
and
I
know.
Historically,
the
vice
chair
becomes
the
chair,
so
I
I
want
to
open
it
up.
A
Okay,
so
that
well
I
I
guess
we
could
first
just
go
ahead
and
nominate
Vice,
chair,
Haynes,
lipsey
to
chair
and
then
we'll
deal
with
the
vice
chair
role.
J
Sorry,
I
think:
do
you
want
to
take
nominations
before
you
take
public
comment,
because
at
this
moment
it's
all
just
procedural
or
a
public
comment.
But
if
you
would
like
to
take
nominations
from
the
members
of
the
rhce
yeah
for
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair.
A
A
I
would
I'd
like
to
nominate
Vice
chair
Hans.
Let's
see,
she's
been
a
part
of
the
planning
throughout
the
year
at
least
once
I
brought
her
into
the
planning
meetings
and
I
think
she's
fully
capable
of
executing
it
beautifully.
A
A
J
A
J
To
take
public
comment
on
that,
okay
and
then
you
should
ask
if
there
are
any
other
nominations.
Thank.
J
A
E
Hey
I
think
Nikki
would
be
a
great
chair,
I
think
he's
going
to
bring
a
a
great
deal
of
fiscal
knowledge,
confidence,
competence
and
the
goodest
languaging
of
all
the
goodness.
So
I
can't
wait
to
see
her
as
a
chair.
A
L
J
A
C
I'm
I'm
seriously
thinking
about
this,
but
I
cannot
make
a
nomination.
Yes,
yes,
okay,
so
I
guess:
I
would
like
to
nominate
member
Ramos
for
Vice,
chair
I
think
this
would
be
a
good
combination
of
the
chair
in
the
vice
chair,
I.
Don't
look
so
sad!
You
died.
A
D
On
principle,
I
believe
that
everyone
should
have
their
shot
at
at
this
wonderful
job
at
being
chair
and
vice,
but
I've
I've
known
Committee,
Member
roses
and
I
understand
that
she
has
a
lot
on
her
plate
right
now.
D
That's
that's
causing
her
some
concern
and
then
wanting
to
step
up
I
and
I
I,
and
we
heard
from
Committee
Member
or
from
the
report
from
the
chair
that
Committee
Member
part
of
the
Zella
is,
is
declining
as
well,
so
I,
don't
I,
don't
mind
I
enjoy
being
but
I
enjoy
being
on
the
committee.
I
find
you
all
fun
in
your
own
special
ways.
F
C
At
this
at
this
time,
no
I'm,
not
maybe
next
year,
maybe
the
following
years,
but
but
this
year,
I
yeah
I.
F
A
A
L
D
A
Okay,
so
we
have
a
new
Administration,
congratulations
to
both
of
you,
you're
going
to
be
fantastic.
D
We
move
on
from
this
agenda
item.
I
did
want
to
say
that
I
did
appreciate
the
Almond
administration
of
rhc
for
the
past
year.
You,
you
did
a
very
good
job
and
a
difficult
year
for
all
renters
and
landlords.
This
is
this
was
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
multitasking
and
a
lot
of
managing
and
a
lot
of
urgency
that
we
had
to
move
this
year
and
and
needed
a
wonderful
job.
Gentlemen,.
C
No
I
wanna
Shadow
and
shadow
Committee
Member
Ramos's
a
comment
in
regards
to
our
chair.
You
did
a
wonderful
job.
I
really
learned
a
lot
from
you
yeah
well.
This
is
why
I'm
like
I
think
I
can
wait
another
year
because
it's
a
huge
responsibility
and
so,
and
it
was
because
how
easily
you
made
it
theme,
but
once
you're
really
doing
the
role
you're
like
okay.
F
Listing
I'd
like
to
Echo
of
my
appreciation
of
chair
almond,
but
also
personally,
it's
been
wonderful
working
with
you,
I
really
enjoyed
getting
to
get
the
peak
behind
this
curtain,
which
I
know
maybe
wasn't
always
done
historically
of
doing
some
of
the
agenda
setting
together
and
just
the
time
that
we've
spent
together.
So
it's
been
really
special
to
me
and
I
really
do
appreciate
you.
Okay,.
A
Thank
you
all
you've
been
wonderful
to
work
with
and
I
really
enjoyed
our
team
building
session,
and
you
know
to
finally
have
mobile
home
regulations
it's
almost
completed
and
and
to
after
all,
the
things
the
ping
pong
back
and
forth,
whether
they
were
going
to
be
covered
or
not
covered
and
who's
going
to
administer
it
and
now
we're.
Finally,
administering
it
I
think
it's
a
wonderful
thing
that
we've
pulled
off
all
of
us,
so
I
appreciate
all
of
you
and
the
staff
especially
has
been
marvelous.
The
hand-holding
that
they
did.
A
I
was
quaking
in
my
boots
at
the
first
meeting,
as
some
of
you
know,
so
it's
been
a
wonderful
growing
process
for
for
me
and
I
appreciate
all
of
you
and
the
time
that
you
set
aside
for
this
and
the
thousands
of
hours
that
the
staff
puts
in
thank
with
great
appreciation.
Thank
you
all,
and
if,
if
there
isn't
anything
more
and
do
we
still
have
staff
announcements
and
updates
okay,
so
I
can
go
cry.
Okay,.
B
Okay,
so
let's
look
at
the
upcoming
events
and
workshops
so,
as
Patricia
mentioned
earlier,
I
just
want
to
start
off
by
mentioning
that
the
housing
and
eviction
prevention
help
center
is
going
to
start
being
the
first
and
third
Thursdays
of
the
month,
starting
in
May.
So
we
will
have
one
this
Thursday
and
then
next
month
we'll
we'll
move
to
the
first
and
third
Thursdays.
We
will
continue
to
be
in
the
library
on
the
first
floor
in
the
program
room.
So
that's
right.
B
Next
to
the
front
doors
and
the
elevator
and
again
you
can
get
help
with
your
rent,
relief
application,
follow-ups,
understanding,
any
sort
of
notices
that
tenants
are
receiving
from
landlords
or
maybe
any
notices
that
landlords
are
intending
to
give
to
their
tenants,
and
we
also
have
our
lawyer
referrals
there
and
now
looking
oh
also
I
do
want
to
mention.
We
do
also
have
the
help
center
on
Zoom
still.
B
So,
if
you
can't
make
it
in
person,
you
can
join
us
on
Zoom
at
mountainview.gov
addiction,
help
clinics,
all
right
and
now
looking
at
our
webinars,
so
we're
still
doing
those
virtually
at
the
moment.
We
have
our
first
mobile
home
park
registration
webinar
tomorrow
and
that
will
be
at
3
pm
and
each
mobile
home,
landlord
and
property
manager
received
an
invitation
to
that.
B
Following
that
this
week
we
will
have
our
stakeholder
meetings
and
that
will
be
going
over
the
definition
of
base
rent.
So
those
will
both
be
this
Thursday
April
28th,
the
landlord
focused
webinar,
is
at
10
30
in
the
morning,
and
the
Tenant
focused
bilingual
English
Spanish
webinar
will
be
at
6
pm
on
Thursday
and
the
next
webinar
we
have
is
for
our
csfra
landlords
and
we'll
be
doing
another
registration
webinar
for
them.
That
will
be
Wednesday,
May
11th
at
3
pm
and
any
questions
about
our
events.
Our
workshops.
G
And
I
also
wanted
to
mention
that
coming
up
later
in
May,
I
believe
on
the
17th
and
18th,
but
I
would
need
to
double
check.
We
have
mediation,
webinars
for
landlords
and
tenants.
One
is
landlord
focused
and
to
help
with
answering
questions
related
to
mediation,
for
unpaid,
rent
and
one
is
tenant
focused
for
mediation
related
to
unpaid
rent
and
that
one
will
be
English
and
Spanish.
B
D
I
just
wanted
to
throw
in
a
webinar
idea:
I
had
a
friend
of
mine.
She
was
sad
because
she
was
told
that
she
couldn't
have
a
pet,
because
the
csfra
wouldn't
allow
that,
because
there
would
be
a
pet
rent
and
so
I
said
no
there's
a
vault.
We
have
this
voluntary
agreement,
so
it'd
be
nice
to
have
maybe
a
webinar
for
landlords
and
tenants
on
how
to
do
that.
D
Recent
regulation
that
we
did
about
voluntary
increases
for
adding
a
roommate,
adding
a
pet,
adding
a
roommate
pet
or
or
what
whatever
they
that
might
be
of
interest
I,
feel
like
that
might
be
a
fun
webinar
for
some
people
and
I.
Think
that
might
be
that
might
be
well
received
to
see
the
wiggle
room
that
we
we
can
have
within
our
laws.
That's.
G
A
great
idea,
thank
you
for
that.
We
do
have
some
petition
focused
workshops
and
webinars
plans
for
the
summer,
and
we
were
planning
on
putting
that
information
into
them
as
well.
So
we
can
definitely
do
that.
A
Also
I
had
a
question
I
think
I
know
the
answer
to
this,
but
with
the
stakeholder
meetings
can
tenants
attend
the
landlord
meeting
and
vice
versa.
These.
G
A
A
I
have
854.
yep.
The
next
rental
housing
committee
meeting
is
scheduled
to
be
held
on
Monday
May,
23rd
2022
at
7
pm,
good
night
and
hugs
to
all
of
you.
Thank
you.
So
much.