►
Description
Live teleconference meeting of the Mountain View Rental Housing Committee Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, October 12, 2021.
Live Video Conference: YouTube, mountainview.legistar.com, and Comcast Channel 26.
A
A
B
B
A
B
A
G
C
A
A
A
These
items
will
be
approved
by
one
motion
unless
any
member
of
the
committee
wishes
to
remove
an
item
for
discussion.
The
purpose
of
the
consent
calendar
is
for
the
council
to
efficient.
I
think
it
means
committee
to
efficiently
and
quickly
consider
routine
or
administrative
business
items
with
one
motion.
A
A
A
A
A
A
motion
to
approve
should
include
reading
the
follow
item
items
a
motion
to
approve
agenda
item
4.1
approve
the
minutes
for
september
20,
2021
rhc
meeting
a
motion
to
approve
agenda
item
4.2
approve
a
resolution
making
findings
regarding
continuance
of
virtual
meetings.
Pursuant
to
the
government
code,
section
54953.
C
F
A
J
K
A
A
We
will
now
open
the
meeting
for
oral
communication
from
the
public.
This
portion
of
the
meeting
is
reserved
for
persons
wishing
to
address
the
committee
on
any
matter
not
on
the
agenda.
Speakers
are
allowed
to
speak
on
any
topic
for
up
to
three
minutes
during
this
section.
State
law
prohibits
the
committee
from
acting
on
non-agenda
items.
Would
any
member
of
the
public
on
the
line
like
to
provide
comment
on
non-agenda
items?
A
A
C
Is
patricia
starting
the
staff
presentation,
or
am
I
you
are
okay,
excellent,
okay.
So
the
item
you
have
before
you
is
not
a
formal
appeal
of
a
rental
housing
petition.
It
is
a
somewhat
new
procedure.
You
have
not
encountered
this
before,
but
under
the
regulations
that
you
have
adopted,
there
is
language
that
requires
that
appeal
of
hearing
officer
decisions
be
filed
within
10
days
of
receipt
of
the
hearing
officer's
decision,
but
there
is
also
language
that
allows
the
rhc
to
accept
late
appeals
if
that
would
further
the
interest
of
justice.
C
C
C
That
is
the
method
that
decisions
have
been
sent
to
all
the
parties
since
the
pandemic
started
so
based
on
when
the
decision
was
sent
to
the
parties.
The
appeal
deadline,
10
days
later,
would
have
been
september.
21St
the
petitioner
filed
the
appeal
on
september
28th,
so
staff
originally
accepted
the
appeal
in
part.
C
C
C
So
all
of
those
due
process
rights
need
to
be
considered
as
part
of
this
and
once
again,
like
your
appeals
hearing,
you
are
acting
in
a
quasi-judicial
fashion
in
this
action,
so
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
consider
everybody's
rights
the
next
slide.
So
I
think
I've
already
gone
over
this,
but
anybody
can
appeal
the
decision
and
the
regulations
do
state
that
the
appeal
has
to
be
filed
within
10
days.
C
C
Once
again,
just
as
a
reminder,
we
are
not
looking
at
the
substantive
issues
in
the
petition
or
the
likelihood
of
success
on
the
appeal.
So
we're
really
only
looking
at
this
very
narrow
question-
and
I
did
just
want
to
suggest
we
don't
really
have
a
procedure
in
your
regulations
for
this
kind
of
consideration.
C
C
So
it
would
be
my
suggestion
that
the
rhc
allow
the
parties
that
we
take,
that
we
handle
this
sort
kind
of
like
a
mini
appeal.
The
way
we
handle
our
appeals
on
petitions
that
we
take
public
comments
from
anybody,
who's,
not
a
party,
but
then
we
allow
each
of
the
parties
to
have
some
period
of
time.
I
would
not
suggest
the
full
10
minutes,
but
maybe
each
could
have
five
minutes
with
a
couple
minutes
of
rebuttal
and
then
it
would
come
back
to
the
rhc
for
consideration
if
you
want
to
handle
it.
C
A
A
C
D
F
L
F
M
H
K
C
C
A
C
N
If
a
law
regulation
includes
specific
language,
in
this
case
mail-
and
in
this
case
it's
in
the
appeals
to
a
rental
housing
committee,
section
1,
part
b,
if
no
prior
request
appeal
within
10
calendar
days
after
the
mailing
date
of
the
decision,
the
decision
will
be
considered
a
final
decision.
However,
I
never
received
any
mail
at
all.
N
N
In
this
case,
I
don't
think
I
ever
submitted
any
information
to
the
effect
that
I
actually
received
the
actual
document,
and
so
all
I'm
saying
is
at
this
point.
I
know
that
this
is
probably
the
first
time
this
situation
has
occurred,
but
in
reality
you
do
know
that
since
I'm
not
the
tenant-
and
I
have
no
lawyer
representing
me
at
this
point-
you
can
imagine
that,
if
a
regular
person
you
know,
I
consider
myself
somewhat
intelligent,
any
normal
regular
person
would
have
turned
around
and
probably
ran
into
the
same
situation.
N
N
The
fact
that
he
did
not
do
so
literally
put
me
in
a
situation
where
I
couldn't
do
anything
other
than
wait,
and
I
basically
said
to
myself
I'll
wait
for
a
short
a
period
of
time.
In
this
case
I
waited
10
days
and
then
I
said
to
myself.
No,
this
is
not
I'm
not
getting
any
any
mail
and
I
responded
accordingly.
N
The
fact
that
I
can
clearly
say
that
there
was
no
abuse
of
delay
in
this
case,
but
well,
if
it's
been
in
this
case
within
approximately
a
week
of
the
deadline.
That
means
that,
if
anything
else
I
I
was
not
trying
to
exploit
anything
here.
I
was
just
trying
to
make
sure
that
I
was
following
the
instructions
and
I
waited
thank
you.
O
Fantastic
okay.
So
first
I
want
to
thank
ms
tiedemann
for
the
staff
report.
I
think
that
can
make
it
easier
for
me
to
address
some
of
these
points
just
going
through
the
factors
that
she
had
listed.
I
believe
all
five
of
those
factors
work
here
in
upholding
the
decision
in
denying
the
appeal
in
this
case.
First
and
foremost,
I
just
want
to
know
that
the
email
that
was
sent
that
contained
the
notice
of
the
hearing
officer's
decision.
O
O
If
a
party
does
not
have
adequate
access
to
email
or
other
electronic
tools,
parties
are
instructed
to
notify
the
hearing.
Administrator
and
alternate
arrangements
will
be
made
that
same
notification
was
provided
on
in
the
email,
with
the
written
notice
of
the
hearing
officer
decision
on
september
10.
At
no
point
did
mr
goldstein
ever
indicate
that
he
did
not
have
access
to
email
at
the
time.
He
actually
doesn't
even
argue
that
he
didn't
receive
that
email
with
that
order
or
with
that
notice.
Rather
so
he
has
actual
notice
as
well.
O
If
you
go
through
the
timeline,
the
timeline
provided
by
mrs
tiedemann
in
the
staff
report,
you
can
see
that
every
step
of
the
way
the
parties
were
communicating
the
email
with
the
city,
the
city
was
communicating
back
via
email.
All
communications
were
in
email.
All
evidence
submitted
was
all
the
documentation
submitted
was
via
email.
There's,
no
reason
to
suspect
that
the
final
notice
of
the
written
decision
would
vary
from
that
rule
that
was
put
in
place
during
cover
19,
which
is
that
all
notices
are
provided
by
email.
O
O
Yes,
he
did
he
received
notice
at
the
same
time
that
we
did
on
september
10th.
The
question:
did
he
take
ordinary
care
improvements
to
file
the
appeal
in
a
timely
manner?
I
would
argue,
given
the
notice,
as
part
of
the
initial
petition
form
the
fact
that
the
parties
were
notified
throughout
this
process,
that
all
communications
and
notices
would
be
via
email.
I
think
the
fact
that
he
was
expecting
anything
else
to
now
all
of
a
sudden
expect
the
order
to
be
via
mail
and
not
being
emailed.
O
I
don't
think
that's
reasonable
and
the
fact
that
he
never
responded
the
email
to
that
or
even
asked
the
question
earlier.
I
don't
think
it's
showcasing
ordinary
care
or
proves.
I
think
that
there
isn't
really
any
conditions
outside
of
his
control.
That
would
have
prevented
that.
I
think
again,
throughout
this
whole
process,
the
party's
expectation,
you
know
the
city's
own
instructions.
The
parties
was
that
everything
would
be
done
via
email
and
I
don't
believe,
there's
any
other
outside
conditions.
O
I've
expected
that
he
had
the
opportunity
to
submit
the
via
email,
and
he
never
did-
and
you
know
I
think
another
thing
to
keep
in
mind-
is
how
many
other
decisions
have
been
made
in
this
way.
So
for
other
cases,
where
there's
been
a
notice
of
a
hearing
officer's
decision
and
informing
the
parties
of
that
decision,
how
many
other
cases
do
we
have
where
that
was
provided
via
email
per
the
cfra's
amendment,
saying
that
all
these
sorts
of
notices
and
communications
are
being
emailed?
How
many
other
cases
of
that
does
that
occurred?
Then?
O
If
we
now
say
that
okay,
we
do
have
to
actually
insist
on
mailing
it
that's
what
kickstarts
the
deadline
that
sets
a
precedent.
That's
going
to
have
to
affect
all
these
other
cases
in
which
this
has
happened.
So
now,
all
of
a
sudden
parties
in
these
other
cases
state
that,
even
though
all
the
communications
and
notices
to
that
point
would
be
email
because
they
were
provided
with
a
mailed
copy
of
this
particular
form.
N
Okay,
so
thank
you
very
much
for
more
for
your
time.
The
argument
that
is
made
by
the
attorney
here
is
saying
that
in
other
forms
there
were
instructions
saying
that
things
were
going
to
be
done
only
by
email.
However,
unfortunately,
if
there
was
an
amendment
to
the
regulations,
then
the
regulations
would
have
had
to
have
been
modified
and
they
have
not
been
modified.
N
I
sent
an
email
to
the
rhc,
it's
showing
the
link
to
the
regulations
that
were
posted
on
this,
the
csfra
website,
and
that
has
shown
that
the
information
was
never
modified
as
per
the
regulations
text
itself.
At
the
same
time,
again,
the
situation
with
the
form
that
was
used
for
submitting
the
appeal
had
not
been
updated
since
november
of
2018,
it
should
have
been
updated
if
there
was
such
an
amendment
that
would
have
basically
provided
the
appropriate
information
that
would
have
said
clearly
that
an
emailed
decision
was
considered
a
delivered
message.
N
The
simple
fact
is:
what's
going
on
is,
unfortunately
again,
I
simply
said
to
myself:
I'm
gonna
wait
until
I
get
my
letter
and
unfortunately
it
never
came
now.
I
do
not
know
what's
going
on
with
regards
to
other
appeals
that
have
occurred
during
this
time.
I'm
I
would
am
very
open
to
discovering.
Has
there
been
appeals
that
occurred
in
this
prior
to
this
particular
time
in
which
a
non-attorney
was
being
expected
to
read
outside
the
text
of
of
forms
and
outside
the
text
of
the
regulations?
N
O
Okay,
okay,
so
first
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
petition
does
not
actually
argue
any
of
the
factors
brought
up
in
the
staff
report
and
significantly
doesn't
argue
that
he
actually
lacked
actual
notice
because
he
didn't
he
would
receive
the
email
just
like
we
did
that
had
the
notice
that
had
the
copy
of
the
hearing
officer's
order.
And
specifically,
I
want
to
call
to
attention
the
language
used
by
joanne
fam
in
that
email
to
the
parties
that
had
the
written
notice
and
the
order
attached.
O
O
So
I
that
argument
just
completely
lacks
merit.
I
don't
see
anything
in
the
cfra
either.
That
would
require
this
sort
of
vague
amendment
he's
referring
to.
But
the
fact
is
that
the
regulations
under
the
cf
cfra
were
amended
to
address
this
issue
during
the
pandemic.
You
can
see
that
again,
that's
part
of
the
cfra
petition
for
adjustment
of
rent
hearings,
paragraph
13
in
the
exhibit
a
that
was
submitted
by
our
office.
O
He
didn't
didn't
do
that
and
he
didn't
do
so
in
response
to
this
email,
where
the
parties
were
specifically
told
that
hard
copies
would
not
be
sent
and
again
even
on
the
written
notice,
it
says
only
this
is
only
going
to
be
by
email.
The
fact
is,
he
had
actual
notice.
I
don't
know
why
he
waited.
It
wasn't
reasonable
for
him
to
do
so.
O
A
G
C
H
E
C
A
G
I
do
struggle
with
this
when
I
struggle
with
the
understanding
the
idea
of
waiting,
because
I
believe
the
appellate
said
that
he
did
wait.
He
chose
to
wait
after
I
believe
he
stated
that
he
received
the
email
or
he
saw
that
the
email
had
come
in
or
he
had
some
awareness
of
the
email
and
he
chose
to
wait.
I
believe
he
said
10
more
days
which
put
him
outside
of
the
period
of
time.
G
If
I'm
understanding
the
timeline
as
it
was
presented,
if
one
disagrees
with
a
decision,
I
feel
like
the
prudent
behavior
would
be
to
not
wait
or
to
call
and
clarify
or
or
to
take
some
proactive
action
to
verify.
Am
I
receiving
a
physical
copy
of
this?
Will
a
physical
copy
be
coming?
The
word
mail,
especially
in
2021,
tends
to
have
an
ambiguous
definition.
G
I
I
I
After
the
fact,
you
can
try
to
find
a
reason
to
explain
this
away,
but
I
think
most
people,
especially
today
as
the
vice
chair,
said,
you
really
know
things
are
going
to
come
by
email.
I
think
all
of
us
have
had
stuff
come
from
me
by
email,
more
important,
even
than
somebody's
notice
of
appeal.
I
mean
you
get
things
from
your
doctor.
You
get
all
kinds
of
things
now
that
are
electronic
and
you
expect
to
get
them
that
way.
I
I
F
B
F
C
F
A
D
H
E
For
background
purposes,
the
city
council
did
adopt
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance
on
september
28th,
and
the
effective
date
of
this
ordinance
is
going
to
be
october.
28
2021,
the
mhrso
has
our
new
new
logo
for
the
ordnance
provisions
and
projections
are
based
on
the
csfa,
with
adjustments
as
needed
to
reflect
the
mobile
home
residency
law
and
the
rental
housing
committee
was
granted
to
implement
and
administer
this
ordinance.
E
Just
like
the
csfra,
the
key
elements
of
this
ordinance
is
to
protect
the
mobile
home
community
by
stabilizing
the
rents
by
providing
eviction
protections
in
this
case
for
the
mobile
home
tenants
and
to
ensure
a
fair
rate
of
return
for
the
park
owners
and,
as
mentioned
before,
the
effective
date
is
october.
The
28th,
which
is
in
about
a
week
and
a
half.
E
E
There
are
a
couple
of
exemptions
from
the
ordnance
and
these
the
first
to
lean
back
to
the
mobile
home,
residency
law
and
the
first
one
is
if
there
is
a
lease,
in
effect
for
a
duration
of
over
12
months,
and
this
is
no
longer
applicable
for
leases
that
are
signed
after
february.
The
20
of
2020
and
this
exemption
will
be
completely
abandoned
by
2025..
E
The
definition
of
rent
is
a
little
different
from
the
csra
as
well.
It
does
refine
periodic
payments
for
use
of
a
mobile
space
or
the
occupancy
of
a
mobile
home,
as
well
as
the
communal
facilities
and
housing
services,
but
not
included
are
incidental
charges
separately,
billed
utility
fees
and
local
government
fees
and
charges,
and
these
non-inclusions
refer
back
to
the
mobile
home,
residency
law.
E
E
E
E
E
Unless
a
legal
termination
took
place
that
was
in
compliance
with
the
mobile
home
residency
law,
there
was
an
abandonment
of
a
mobile
home,
or
there
was
a
commercial
purchaser
that
replaced
the
mobile
home,
and
the
vacancy
decontrol
for
mobile
home.
Tenants
means
that
a
land
mobile
home
landlord
can
set
an
initial
rent
at
market
rate.
E
E
E
E
E
As
you
can
imagine,
further
regulations
need
to
be
deliberated
and
approved
by
the
rental
housing
committee
to
further
detail
this
process
evictions
process
efficient
protections
are
different
for
mobile
home
owners
versus
mobile
home
tenants.
The
mobile
home
owners
are
subject
to
the
mobile
home
residency
law
and
the
protections
are
listed
on
this
slide.
E
If
we
look
at
the
next
slide,
the
ordinance
provides
also
eviction
protections
for
mobile
home
tenants
since
d
are
not
covered
by
the
mobile
home
mobile
home
law,
so
this
is
in
the
local
ordinance.
These
are
the
same.
Nine
just
causes
that
we
see
in
the
csfra
and
also
there's
requirement
of
a
notice
to
cease
before
a
termination
notice
can
be
given
for
a
couple.
All
of
these,
except
for
failure
to
pay
rent
and
the
no
fault
evictions
will
become
subject
to
tenant
relocation
as
well.
E
So
it
is
upon
you,
the
rental
housing
committee,
to
adopt
rules
and
regulations
to
determine
an
annual
budget
and
set
fees
to
set
the
annual
general
adjustment
of
rent
and
adjudicate
petitions
and,
as
we
all
know,
members
of
the
rental
housing
committee
are
mountain
view.
Residents
appointed
by
the
city
council.
E
We
also
provided
a
communications
plan
and
part
of
these.
This
plan
is
already
in
execution.
We're
planning
on
sending
postcards
emails.
Frequently
asked
questions
have
been
drafted.
A
web
page
is
up.
A
press
release
is
in
the
works,
as
well
as
social
media
postings,
we're
planning
to
organize
webinars
office
hours.
The
helpline
is
available,
one-on-one
consultations
and
to
provide
contact
information
for
anyone
who
may
have
a
question
regarding
this
new
ordinance.
E
So
the
questions
tonight
before
the
rental
housing
committee
are,
if
the
rental
housing
committee
would
like
to
provide
directions
to
implement
a
different
alternate
work
plan,
and
if
the
rental
housing
committee
would
like
to
provide
direction
to
implement
further
outreach
reform
efforts.
This
and
concludes
the
presentation
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
G
My
question
is
just
around
and-
and
maybe
I
don't
fully
understand
it,
so
that's
why
it's
a
question.
I
think
there's
a
there's
an
ab
bill.
It's
861.
I
think
that
just
passed
that
says
that
if
a
mobile
home
park
rents
units
beyond
two
put
to
the
side
for
employees,
then
the
residents
may
also
rent
their
homes
like
they
are
no
longer
prohibited
from
doing
so.
G
C
Yeah,
I
can
answer
that
so
yes,
that
bill
did
pass
and
it
was
signed
by
the
governor.
So
what
861
says
is
that
if
park
owners
have
a
prohibition
on
renting
of
the
mobile
homes
in
the
park,
then
that
prohibition
applies
to
the
park
owner
as
well.
There
are
a
couple
exceptions.
One
is
the
park
owner
can
have
up
to
two
rentals
and
any
rentals
that
were
in
place
as
of
january.
1St.
2022
can
continue.
C
So
essentially,
what
it's
saying
is:
if
you
prohibit
rentals
from
your
tenants
who
rent
spaces
from
you,
then
you
can't
rent
yourself.
So
some
perks
may
have
to
reconsider
their
policy
against
rentals,
but
in
terms
of
the
mobile
home
rent
stabilization
ordinance,
because
the
ordinance
covers
both
mobile
home
spaces
and
it
covers
mobile
home
tenants
if
there's
an
increase
in
rentals
of
mobile
homes,
they're
still
going
to
be
covered
by
this
ordinance.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
861
is
going
to
have
a
big
impact
on
what's
covered
or
not.
F
F
E
D
D
D
D
So
I
wonder
if
we'd
have
a
similar
adjustment,
then
to
make
as
we
made
for
the
covered
units
that
that
doesn't
need
to
be
resolved.
Now
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
question
for
we.
We
can
resolve
that
once
we
get
there,
but
just
it
brought
up,
we
may
need
terminology
to
talk
about
either
either
side.
The
other
the
question:
I
think
that
is
more
urgent
once
this
goes
into
effect.
E
D
D
D
C
No,
the
the
so
if
the
mobile
home
is
not
occupied
by
the
mobile
home
owner
as
its
primary
residence,
then
it
is
exempt
from
the
mobile
home
space,
rent
control
and
that's
the
state
state
law.
But
if
it
is
rented,
then
that
mobile
home
owner
becomes
a
mobile
home
landlord
and
the
tenant
is
protected
under
the
ordinance.
C
B
A
E
A
E
A
A
B
J
M
M
P
P
I
know
you've
been
doing
yeoman's
work
with
very
few
people
as
it
stands
over
the
last
two
years
and
I
think
there's
a
great
opportunity,
given
you
know
a
slightly
larger
scope
with
more
funding
associated
with
it
to
staff
up
and
get
more
powerful,
welcome,
nazanin
good
to
see
you.
I
know
that
some
of
the
members
of
this
committee
would
not
be
doing
this
at
all,
but
I'd
like
to
thank
you
anyway
for
working
to
protect
my
neighbors,
and
I
look
forward
to
following
all
the
regulations
discussion
over
the
next
few
months.
P
F
F
D
I
could
see
this
with.
Let's
say
let's
say
we
did
have
one
staff
head
count
which
which
everyone
from
the
comments
would
like
to
see
additional
staff.
If
you
just
put
a
round
number
on
staff,
headcount
cost
of-
let's
say
you
know
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
annually
over
split
over
1130
units.
You
know
that's
somewhere,
I
think
in
the
90
range
and
then
and
then
outreach
outreach
on
top
of
that
it
and
karen's
time
and
then
hearing
officer
time
and
petitions
things
like
that.
D
I
I
think
the
annual
fee
could
could
start
to
run
up,
and
I
wonder
if
prior
to
that,
for
instance,
for
their
outreach,
this
is
a
very
tight-knit
community.
I
know
they
have
kind
of
meetings
and
probably
email
communication
between
one
another
and
are
pretty
up
to
speed
on
what's
happening,
since
this
has
been
a
topic
for
a
while
and
something
they've
been
asking
for.
G
You
know,
I
think
we
need
to
be
mindful,
of
course,
of
cost,
but
I'm
not
necessarily
understanding
this
to
be
exactly
like
the
csfra,
where
it
needs
to
be
self-funding
immediately,
because
I
believe
in
the
staff
report,
it
said
that
we
can
get
appropriations
from
places
such
as
the
city
to
pay
for
the
costs
associated
with
some
of
the
implementation
and
whatnot.
So
I'm
not
sure
that
we
need
to
be
as.
G
Cost
equal
fee
in
the
first
year
or
two
as
we
do
the
ramp
up
period
as
we
did
necessarily
with
the
csfra,
where
we
really
needed
to
make
it
self-sustaining
right
away.
So
I
think,
while
it's
important
to
be
mindful
of
the
costs,
we
don't
want
to
say
hey,
let's
minimize
our
communication
plan
because
of
cost.
Since
there
are
other
pools
of
money
we
can
tap
before
we.
You
know
I
I
totally
don't
want
to
see
like
a
per
unit
fee
of
you
know,
250
to
350
a
year.
G
That
does
seem
a
little
high,
especially
compared
to
what
we
do
for
the
coverage
units
covered
under
the
csfra.
But
I
also
don't
want
to
say:
hey.
We
can't
hire
a
full-time
head
count
because
we're
worried
about
the
cost,
so
I
just.
I
would
like
to
dig
a
little
bit
more
when
we
do
talk
about
the
budget,
about
the
authorization
to
request
and
really
receive
funding
when
and
if
necessary,
from
any
available
source,
including
the
city
for
the
expenses.
G
I
think
that's
going
to
be
important
at
least
initially
to
float
the
onset,
and
one
thing
we
probably
do
need
to
consider
is
that
we
will
need
to
pay
for
things
like
translation
services.
I
know
it's
a
later
agenda
item
to
talk
about
translation
services
with
regards
to
the
eviction
protection
initiative,
but
we
probably
do
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
appropriate
languages
being
spoken
and
being
communicated
in
and
then
my
final
comment
would
be
while
it's
a
closer
knit
community
or
it
may
be
perceived
as
a
closer
knit
community.
F
I'm
it's
one
of
those
things
where
I'm,
assuming
that
you
are
talking
in
the
back
channels
with
the
city
in
regards
to
funding,
to
make
sure
that
those
fees
aren't
going
to
go
so
high,
like
how
we
had
when
we
first
implemented
the
csfri
where
we
had
to
we
had
there
was
an
initial
funding
and
we
had
to
pay
that
back
within
the
first
year,
which
led
to
the
fees
being
so
high
if
we
could
just
sprinkle
that,
and
so
it
just
elongates
that
that
that
initial
increase
cost.
I
think
that
would
be
wonderful.
F
I
think
the
council
seems
to
be
it
well,
it's
the
council's
program
technically,
so
they
they
I'm
hoping
that
they'll
be
willing
to
fund
that
to
ensure
that
the
burden
is
not
too
much
on
the
park
owners.
When
it
comes
to
these
fees,
I
would
hold
really
fast
on
getting
the
communication
out
there
via
mail,
reiterating
the
vice
chairs
messaging,
not
messaging.
Reading
the
vice
chair's
point
that
there
are
some
senior
communities
about
80
to
85
percent
of
mobile
home
park.
D
D
I
think
to
to
prioritize
how
we're
going
to
spend
that
money
and-
and
if
you
even
said
300
so
so
vice
chair
throughout
250
to
300.,
I
I
do
think
there
should
be
an
understanding
of
like
what
seems
what
would
seem
punitive
to
the
park
owners
and
also
what
I
mean.
What
happens
if
there
is
an
mou
and
a
significant
portion
of
the
units
are
no
longer
part
of
the?
Are
we
still
charging
a
fee
to
units
that
aren't
that
are
that
are
covered
by
an
mou?
D
I
would,
I
would
assume,
not
but
again
that's
a
decision
that
needs
to
be
made
by
this
group,
but
I
think
it's
just
I.
I
think
our
plan
would
be
affected
by
having
that
general
budget
right.
So
I
mean,
even
if
you
have
an
assumption,
like
anki,
it's
25
of
your
time,
25
of
everyone's
time
plus
you
know
some
reserves
plus
something
else.
I
think
you
could
easily
get
to
300.
D
So
I
guess
that's
all
that
I
would
pull
forward
is
some
some
just
like
straw
man
budget
based
on
assumptions,
and
then
you
might
say
we
only
have
twenty
thousand
dollars
for
outreach.
How
are
we
best
going
to
leverage
this
money
without
getting
to
a
not
getting
to
a
fee
that
that
the
committee
sees
as
punitive
for
park
owners.
A
I
think
it's
my
turn
that
would
echo
the
concern
about
communications.
I
think
the
mobile
home
community
is
at
an
advantage
at
being
so
well
organized
within
the
mobile
home
alliance.
However,
I
imagine
not
every
mobile
home,
renter
or
owner
is
a
member
of
the
alliance
and,
of
course,
there's
the
concern
about
seniors
and
even
possibly
the
digital
divide,
whether
they're
people
who
have
or
don't
have
computers.
A
A
I
think,
in
this
case
we're
talking
about
an
increased
budget,
because
we
have
a
whole
new
category
of
residents
who
will
be
covered
and,
aside
from
just
really
leeching
the
owners
we're
going
to
need
some
financial
support
from
the
city
and
I'm
very
happy
to
hear
over
and
over
that.
There
are
now
good
lines
of
communication
on
a
weekly
basis
with
city
staff.
A
So
we
have
a
framework
in
which
to
negotiate
this,
and
I
think
our
committee
should
stand
in
alliance
with
staff
how
we
want
to
proceed
and
that
we
proceed
sort
of
judiciously
and
not
rationally
come
up
with
a
budget
we
then
have
to
amend.
We
may
have
to
amend
it
a
year
from
now.
We
may
need
two
people
on
staff,
or
we
may
need
one
person
on
staff
and
contractors
during
the
implementation
phase.
A
G
G
I
think,
as
we
go
through
the
discussions-
and
I
do
think
budget
should
be
on
the
earlier
side,
so
that
we
can
hash
out
some
of
the
costs
and
whatnot
and
also
you
know,
get
together
a
proposal
to
possibly
hire
staff
members,
which
requires
a
search
process
and
all
that
stuff.
I
think
we
just
want
to
keep
in
mind
that
not
everything
in
this
program
needs
to
be
born
by
the
landlords
or
by
the
park
owners.
G
It's
not
needed
to
say
dollar
for
dollar
every
dollar
that
is
spent
comes
from
the
park
owners
pockets
in
the
way
that
the
csfra
does.
We
have
more
flexibility,
and
I
just
want
us
to
keep
that
in
mind.
As
we
talk
through
costs,
we
don't
always
need
to
see
it
as
a
zero-sum
game.
Here
we
have,
we
have
an
extra
pot
of
money,
it's
a
rare
thing,
take
advantage
of
it
and
that's
all.
Q
Good
evening
committee
members,
I
did
want
to
provide
just
quick
clarification
on
the
costs
associated
with
mailings
for
the
csfra
or
for
that
matter,
the
emergency
protection
work
that
we've
been
doing
during
covid.
The
costs
for
printing
the
items
are
are
not
in
any
way
prohibitive.
It
is
the
mailing
of
the
items
that
is
expensive.
Q
D
Thanks
sorry,
this
will
be
my
last
comment
but
or
hopefully,
but
I
think
the
vice
chair
makes
a
good
a
good
point.
I
I
just
think
kind
of
pulling
forward
those
assumptions
the
earlier.
We
can
know
that
we're
going
to
need
to
ask
for
money
and
how
much
we're
going
to
be
asking
for
for
an
overage,
I
think,
would
kind
of
help
us
with
the
plan.
Also,
I
just
tactically,
I
guess
there
isn't
a
deadline,
maybe
there's
a
question
for
either
anki
or
karen,
but.
D
D
D
E
In
this
case,
we
probably
it's
not
such
a
huge
project
every
year,
because
the
amount
of
invoices
that
need
to
go
out
are
very
limited,
as
we
first
see
it
so
yeah.
So
if
we
can
charge
them
in
january,
I
mean
we
can
char
start
your
invoicing
as
soon
as
a
budget
has
been
finalized
and
approved,
but
that's
up
to
the
rental
housing
committee,
and
I
mean
it's:
it's
not
stuck
to
a
certain
date
in
time
as
we
speak.
D
M
E
I
also
want
to
remind
you
that
having
an
mou
in
place
and
then
getting
80
of
all
the
park
residents,
signing
on
to
this
mou
might
probably
be
a
longer
time
frame
than
one
year.
Maybe
so
I
think
we
have
time
to
kind
of
see
and
get
all
the
basics
in
place
before
we
probably
have
to
deal
with
mou
move
overs
if
at
all,.
E
E
So,
as
we
explained
before,
and
if
you
look
at
the
csf
array,
it
limits
rent
increases
to
aga
and
it
limits
rent
increases
to
one
per
12
months
and
limits
rent
increases
to
10
per
year.
So
if
a
landlord
were
to
voluntarily
lower
the
rent
temporarily
and
that
period
of
time
has
lapsed,
returning
the
rate
to
a
rent
to
the
prior
rate
might
exceed
either
an
aga
increase
or
even
rent
that
goes
over
to
10
per
year.
That
is
stipulated
by
the
csf
array.
E
B
A
G
I
will
motion
to
approve
the
resolution
of
the
rental
housing
committee
of
mountain
view,
adopting
amendments
to
regulation,
chapter
7,
voluntary
agreements
to
temporarily
reduce
rent.
I
actually
thought
we
had
already
done
this
and
found
out
that
we
only
limited
it
to
covet.
So
let's
fix
that
and
adopt
this
motion.
Thank
you.
D
I
B
The
committee
requested
staff
implement
the
eviction
prevention
and
defense
program
and
incorporated
the
following
services
in
order
to
prevent
evictions
mitigate
potential
displacement
because
of
coven
19
financial
impacts
and
promote
community
stability.
So
the
following
services
were
to
be
provided
a
multi-pronged
outreach
to
tenants,
landlords
and
various
community
organizations.
B
In
mountain
view,
early
intervention,
informational
contact
from
the
city
to
both
tenants
and
landlords
after
a
termination
notice
is
filed
with
the
city
and
staff,
is
sending
out
informational
letters
to
both
tenants
and
the
landlords
when
we
are
receiving
these
termination
notices
and
the
letters
are
including
information
about
rent
assistance
as
well.
As
our
mountain
view,
eviction
help
center.
B
B
B
Seven
application
assistance
and
eviction
help
center
clinics
have
been
held,
14
webinars
have
been
hosted,
half
of
those
or
seven
of
those
are
bilingual.
Both
english
and
spanish
and
171
courtesy,
letters
and
information
packets
are
mailed
to
tenants
and
landlords.
These
are
those
letters
that
are
going
out
after
the
city
receives
a
copy
of
the
termination
notice
that
was
served
to
the
tenant.
B
B
B
So
when
looking
at
our
clients
served
you'll
see
that
80
81
actually
require
assistance
in
spanish
and
91
of
all.
Our
eviction
help
center
clinic
clients
are
require
requiring
some
sort
of
non-english
language
services,
so
we've
actually
had
spanish.
Of
course,
some
mandarin
and
russian
be
requested
at
the
eviction
help
center.
B
So
96
of
clients
are
requiring
assistance
with
rent
and
utility,
receive
relief.
68
need
help
with
their
past
due
rent
76
are
needing
help
with
rent
that
includes
their
future.
Rent
59
are
needing
assistance,
paying
some
sort
of
utility
bill
and
27
are
needing
help
with
other
expenses,
so
that
could
be
really
a
large
swath
of
things
that
including
many
households
have
paid
bills
on
their
credit
cards
during
cobit.
So
there's
some
assistance
for
that
through
csa.
B
B
We
have
our
web
page
in
three
languages:
english,
spanish
and
chinese,
which
are
all
updated.
Frequently,
two
flyers
in
those
same
four
main
languages
have
been
widely
distributed,
so
you
can
see
that
not
about
9,
000,
flyers
or
so
have
been
printed
and
distributed
to
various
community
leaders
which
then
go
out
through
our
different
volunteer
systems
into
the
community
itself.
So
again,
I
think
committee
member
ramos
had
mentioned
a
lot
of
the
door-to-door
outreach
and
we
were
doing
some
car.
B
B
We
tried
different
locations
at
different
times,
based
on
you
know
what
the
community
thought
would
work
best
for
for
them,
and
so
that
was
pretty
successful.
We
had
a
nice
event
at
the
church.
Just
last
month
as
well-
yes,
so
next
we'll
look
at
the
actual
eviction
help
center
and
the
information
there.
So
on
september,
23rd
of
this
year,
we
actually
have
our
first
eviction
help
center
clinic.
These
clinics
are
also
bilingual.
B
M
B
All
right,
so
the
eviction
prevention
program
is
robust
and
again,
like
I
mentioned
it
is
time
intensive
and
the
implementation
requires
multiple
staff
members
from
different
city
departments,
and
this
includes
our
multicultural
engagement
program,
our
mep,
who
is
the
city's,
the
city's
translation
team.
So
we
rely
heavily
on
them
to
do
this
work.
B
If
you
don't
have
someone
who's
done
it
before
helping
you
and
again
just
the
city
of
mountain
views.
Translation
mep
provides
the
bulk
of
those
translation
support
at
our
thursday
eviction
help
center
hours
and
it's
crucial
to
the
success
of
the
program
we
sort
of
have
built
in
at
least
at
least
five
five
or
six
translators
who
come
with
us
every
week
and
they're
able
to
individually
provide
assistance
in
spanish.
B
And
again
just
an
overview
at
this
time
we
do
have
klespa
and
the
community
law
clinic
who
are
providing
us,
no
cost
legal
assistance
to
those
members
who
are
attending
the
eviction
help
center
and
while
staff
does
anticipate
changes
in
the
client's
needs
towards
the
legal
assistance.
In
the
coming
months
again,
we
are
currently
providing
the
majority
of
assistance
with
the
rent,
applica
rent
assistance
application,
which,
at
the
at
this
moment,
can
limit
or
just
entirely
eliminate
and
prevent
the
eviction
from
taking
place.
B
F
F
So,
okay,
that's
that's
a
great
answer
to
my
question.
The
other
question
is:
do
you
need
us
to
send
a
letter
to
council
saying
please
fund
translation
services,
not
necessarily
for
the
eviction
prevention
program,
but
the
fact
that
a
more
robust,
city-wide
translations
translation
services
program
is
beneficial
to
the
entire
city,
including
our
program.
E
Yes,
I
think
the
the
program
is
expanding,
quite
a
bit
as
we're
speaking
and
at
some
point
in
time
we
might
need
more
than
the
just
the
translation
staff
we
might
have
to
get
people
from
outside
the
city.
So
that's
also
where
part
of
our
request
is
coming
from,
because
they
are
very
busy
and
they
have
a
lot
of
events
and
and
other
situations
to
attend
to.
M
M
D
Sure
thank
you
to
emily
to
committee
member
ramos's
last
point.
I
am
somewhat
concerned
about
about
the
blending,
so
this
is
also
city
program.
I
think
we
put
in
forty
five
thousand
dollars
the
city
put
in
forty
five
thousand
dollars,
or
maybe
more,
I
can't
remember
from
that
agenda
item,
but
it
was
originally
intended
specifically
for,
I
believe,
legal
counsel
when
an
eviction
has
been
served
and
to
defend
that
person
in
court
because-
and
I
think
the
rationale
was
typically,
you
know
a
lot
of
these
tenants.
D
Don't
don't
have
legal
representation,
and
so
I
think
that
was
what
the
pilot
was
intended
to
do,
and
and
now
this
ask
again:
let's
let's
get
the
people
to
services,
but
it's
almost
an
accounting
issue
for
me
of
now,
it's
filling
out
rent
relief
applications
which
I
believe
like
wouldn't
project
sentinel,
do
that.
If
we,
if
someone
called
into
the
number,
would
they
help
them
fill
out
everything
they
need
to
fill
out
and
then,
when
they
have
translation
services
as
part
of
that,
or
am
I
mistaken.
E
D
B
A
Think
it's
come
to
my
attention
that
we
may
be
the
only
city
in
the
state
of
california
offering
these
kind
of
eviction
services
and
I
think
it's
kind
of
like
a
startup
program
and
in
the
back
of
our
minds.
We
do
know
that
the
city
council
allocated
50
000,
but
I
don't
believe
any
of
that
has
been
invoiced
or
come
to
help.
A
P
Well,
the
purpose
of
the
csfra
is
to
promote
neighborhood
and
community
stability,
healthy
housing
and
affordability.
It's
not
to
make
numbers
small
and
do
less
matt.
If
all
you
care
about
is
numbers,
and
what
are
you
doing
here,
but
also,
if
you're
gonna
try
and
complain
about
spending
money
at
staff
time
to
help
people
stay
housed?
Could
you
at
least
pay
attention
to
the
presentations
and
not
keep
asking
questions
that
were
covered
moments
before?
Thank
you.
G
Okay,
so,
first
and
foremost
on
the
the
accounting
concern
of
are
we
taking
money?
Out
of,
I
think
the
accounting
concern,
if
I
understood
properly,
is
we're
taking
money
out
of
a
bucket
that
we
called
legal
dollars
and
we're
potentially
moving
them
over
to
administrative
dollars,
and
is
that
a
co-mingling
of
funds
that
we
can
live
with?
I
think
that
was
the
accounting
concern.
G
In
my
view,
I
don't
want
to
go
into
a
whole
treatise
on
this,
but
I
believe
that
when
they
sign
the
sign
the
documents
they're
making
a
legal
attestation,
so
I
do
believe
that
services
to
support
completing
the
the
paperwork
to
get
the
rent
relief
money
would
be
considered
considered
legal.
Even
if
it
has
administrative
undertones.
I
think
it
would
still
fall
in
the
right
bucket,
so
I
don't
think
it's
a
a
complete
commingling
of
legal
money
over
to
administrative
dollars.
If
I
think
that
was
the
original
concern
of
committee
of
our
committee.
F
Starting
with
commentary,
I
actually
had
the
privilege
or
wherewithal
or
fun
learning
of
visiting
the
eviction
health
center.
This
past
thursday
it
was
wonderful,
tiny
room,
but
but
overall,
wonderful
from
hearing
the
clients,
I
didn't
speak
directly
to
the
clients,
but
I
kind
of
just
wandered
around
and
heard
the
ambient
conversations
in
place
and
at
the
time
I
visited,
every
single
one
of
them
was
speaking,
had
had
some
form
of
translation
happening.
F
So
I
I
do
see
the
incredibly
strong
need
of
of
getting
some
translation
services
available.
My
I
have
been
able
to
see
throughout
the
county
how
they
are
dealing
with
these
eviction
prevention
services.
Mountain
view,
isn't
the
only
one
san
jose
also
has
an
eviction
help
center.
That
is
they.
Actually,
I
think
they
have
two
and
they're
looking
at
a
third
site
as
well,
but
san
jose
is
also
10
times
the
size
of
mountain
view
and
then
some
so
I
I
actually
view
it
as
something.
F
That's
a
very
proud
thing
for
our
city
that
we
have
been
dedicating
these
kinds
of
resources
to
help
people
stay
in
their
homes
and
the
eviction
help
centers
aren't
just
there
to
help
tenants.
They're,
actually
also
there
to
help
landlords
as
well,
and
I
have
been
able
to
learn
about
how
some
difficulties
landlords
were
having
with
with
their
non-evictions
but
their
rent
relief
applications
because
it
actually
takes
both
of
them
to
actually
make
it
work,
and
this
is
an
application
that
is
run
by
the
state
that
may
not.
F
Government
is
not
known
to
make
paperwork
easy,
unfortunately,
and
the
resources
that
have
been
given
that
have
been
set
aside
by
our
city
and
partially
through
our
staff,
who,
I
really
can't
say
enough,
how
wonderful
that
they
are
I'm
in
some
meetings
where
they
are
talking
about.
Oh
and
then
the
mountain
view
did
this
and
mountain
view
did
that
and
all
the
other
cities
are
looking
at
them
with
so
much
envy
wishing
that
they
can
do
the
same
for
their
residents.
F
So
I,
the
the
things
that
I
am
looking
for
on
this
item
is,
is
ways
to
make
this
easier
for
our
staff
to
continue
doing
the
great
work
that
they
are
doing.
So,
instead
of
the
recommendation
I
am
inclined
to,
we
can
do
a
recommendation,
but
also
I
would
be
inclined
to
allow
the
rest
of
that
funding
to
be
approved
for
the
eviction
prevention
program
as
fast
as
fit
rather
than
having
to
come
for
each
bit
new
thing.
F
F
F
Ask
I
I
I'm
not
in
the
habit
of
demanding
things
from
council,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
just
put
that
in
their
ear
that
these
are
needs
that
we're
hoping
that
the
city
can
fill
it
as
well.
I
mean
we'd
also
take
as
much
money
from
them
as
we
as
they
would
like
to
give
us
for
eviction
prevention,
because
it
serves
the
whole
city.
D
D
This
this
committee
is
measured
on
how
much
of
a
fee
we
charge
as
one
of
the
outputs
of
or
one
of
the
metrics
that
we're
measured
on,
and
this
is
something
that
does
benefit
the
city
at
large.
I
think
we
had
an
original
intent
that
this
money
would
be
used
for
the
for
the
purpose
that
that
we
set
out
and
that
we
were
going
to
track.
D
You
know
and
do
a
post-mortem
perhaps
on
how
many,
how
often
did
we're
covered
units
was
it
somebody
who
was
in
a
covered
unit
and
how
successful
you
know
when
we
gave
legal
help.
How
successful
were
we
in
overturning
those
evictions?
I
mean
those
are.
That
was
my
interpretation
of
of
when
the
pilot
program
was
put
into
effect.
D
That's
just
for
landlords
for
this
program,
as
opposed
to
the
city
which
you
know,
landlords
are
also
paying
property
taxes
and
everyone's
paying
property
taxes
that
go
into
a
large
pool
which
is
much
bigger
than
our
pool,
and
when
we,
you
know,
add
services,
then
that
goes
directly
it
just
split
up
by
you
know
a
certain
number
of
units
and
and
that's
the
number-
that's
that's
charged
there.
So
that's
it!
It's
just
to
think
about
that
and
yeah.
If
we.
D
D
So
if
we
are
sharing
this
program
with
them
and
they're
also
putting
funds
in
you
know,
maybe
there
could
be
some
sort
of
charge
back
where
we're
just
recording
what
kind
of
units
the
folks
are
in
what
kind
of
help
is
being
needed
and
if
it,
if
we
do
have,
perhaps
if
we
have
project
sentinel
folks
on
site
who
are
providing
the
services,
they
can
just
charge
it
to
our
project.
Sentinel.
D
The
project
sent
no
line
item
in
the
budget
because,
right
now
as
it
is,
this
then
will
be
assessed
as
another
ten
thousand
dollars
that
gets.
This
is
incremental
on
top
of
what
our
budget
was
prior
to
when
we
put
its
pilot
program
into
place.
I
I
think,
or
I
mean
it
was
part
of
our
last
budget,
but
it
was
an
incremental
program
that
was
added
on
that
as
a
pilot.
E
E
Actually,
what
I
would
like
to
clarify
here
as
well
is
that
the
city
also
made
funds
available
for
the
eviction,
prevention
and
defense
program
in
the
amount
of
fifty
thousand
dollars
and
we're
equally
going
to
see
if
we
can
get
approval
to
use.
Also
ten
thousand
dollars
of
those
funds
for
our
immediate
translation
and
one-on-one
support.
F
I
could
provide
a
response
to
matthew's
committee
member
greenwald's
question.
I
was
just
going
to
send
a
letter.
I
was
largely
looking
at
focusing
on
translation
services
at
that
and
for
in
that
manner,
asking
the
city
to
expand
their
the
city-wide
translation
services,
because
it's
one
of
those
things
that
hopefully
that
we
can
pull
from
and
it's
a
much
more
stabler
resource
in
terms
of
instead
of
using
csfra
funds
for
that
which
I'm
hoping
you're
supportive
of.
F
But
what
we're
hoping,
I'm
hoping
to
do
with
the
45k
of
legal
funding
that
we
set
aside
was
essentially
the
goal
of
it
was
to
prevent
evictions
related
to
covid.
As
we
face
this
eviction
cliff.
A
lot
of
people
have
been
thinking
that,
once
september
30th
roll
around,
we
would
suddenly
see
like
this
falling
cliff
of,
like
all
these
people
losing
their
homes,
and
it
kept
me
up
at
night.
But
what
we're
probably
seeing
more
is
a
trickle
where,
but
the
trickle
just
doesn't
stop.
F
F
Quite
yet
it
was
everyone
just
rolling
in
with
with
help
for
the
rent
relief
program.
But
the
day
I
came,
that's
when
people
started
talking
to
legal
representatives
showing
up
with
three
day
notices-
and
not
quite
my
understanding-
is
that
we
have
not
seen
the
unlawful
detainer
yet,
but
it
worries
me
that
I
want
to
make
sure
our
staff
is
ready
for
whatever
comes
with
the
the
eviction
protect
prevention
program.
F
So
and
that's
why
I
wanted
the
flexible
funding
with
the
45k,
with
the
translation,
the
10k
for
the
translation
service
and
just
asking
in
general,
the
city
beef
up
the
translation
services.
If
the
should
they
should
they
be
deciding
that
anytime
soon,
although
I
do
agree
with
committee
member
grim
roles,
ask
about
seeing
the
results
of
some
of
that
funding.
So
perhaps
staff
could
also
include
stats
from
the
clinics
in
the
monthly
report
or
have
a
separate
agenda
item
for
it.
I
I
don't
mind
either
way,
love
to
see
those
stats.
D
I
I
think
so
maybe
if
I
could
respond
quickly,
as
I
know,
there's
other
hands
up,
but
but
I
guess
I
guess
the
confusion
for
me
just
comes
in
that
I
believe
I
thought
anybody
could
call
into
the
helpline
for
any
reason
and
just
get
help
and
that
they
had
translation
sent.
You
know
if
you
called
in
the
headline
you'd
get
translation
services
with
that
help.
D
If
you
had
a
question
and
not
in
english
and
that
we
couldn't
the
the
pilot
program
was
because
we
couldn't
take
that
then
to
the
next
step
of
like
providing
legal
defense
for
someone.
But
we
could
help
someone
like
fill
out
an
application,
but
maybe
maybe
I'm
mistaken
as
to
where
I
guess,
where,
like
an
inbound
request,
stops
and
we
can
no
longer
under
project
sentinel,
provide
assistance.
E
E
So
it
is
all
very
legally
related,
although
when
we
first
saw
what
kind
of
legal
action
we
were
thinking,
we
needed
was
a
little
bit
different
at
the
time
when
we
explained
it
to
you
so,
but
there's
also
some
legal
steps
that
tenants
need
to
take
in
order
to
have
their
ud
process
stayed
and
that's
where
legal
comes
in,
to
help
them
file.
This
request
for
a
stay
to
notify
the
landlord
that
an
application
has
been
filed.
So
it's
all
part
of
the
legal
defense
of
a
tenant.
E
So
did
we
foresee
that
that
was
going
to
be
part
of
the
legal
work?
No,
we
did
not,
but
it
is
now
so
and
then
the
majority
of
the
work
for
legal
department
is
also
to
look
at
these
termination
notices
and
to
see
if
these
new
laws
that
have
been
adopted
are
are
followed
to
the
letter,
and
these
requirements
have
been
changed
quite
a
few
times
over
the
past
few
months.
E
So
it's
a
quite
of
detailed
work
to
look
at
each
of
these
termination
notices
to
see
if
all
the
different
requirements
for
all
the
different
periods
of
time
and
have
been
complied
with,
and
that
is
not
something
that
project
sentinel
all
can
do
themselves.
This
is
where
we
now
use
our
legal
support
for
and
again
for
them
to
give
that
legal
support.
They
need
the
translators
because
majority
of
the
clients
speak
spanish.
D
D
Interpreting
the
laws-
and
I
mean
laws-
will
continue
to
change
for
sure
and
we
are
focusing
everyone
on
calling
into
the
helpline
in
most
cases.
Right
so
is
will
we
need
when
we
needed
in-person
components
going
forward
even
after
this
particular
set
of
laws
or
the
moratoriums
are
kind
of
things
get
processed
through
and
there's
no
longer,
you
know,
hopefully
we're
in
a
world
a
postcode
world.
You
know,
would
the
helpline
still
provide
that
interpretation
in
those
services,
or
is
that
not
the
case.
E
So
we're
talking
about
two
different
things
right
now,
the
helpline
is
like
a
phone
number
where
people
can
call
in
to
ask
for
landlord
tenant
related
questions
on
thursdays.
We
have
the
eviction
help
center,
which
is
an
in-person
clinic
where
people
come
with
their
termination
notices
with
other
questions
related
to
evictions
and
the
eviction
moratorium
ending
last
month
and
where
we
can
provide
them
next
steps
to
do
in
order
for
them
to
prevent
being
affected.
So
that's
a
very
specialized
type
of
help
that
we're
providing
in
the
in-person
clinics.
E
We
also
notice
that
people
cannot
get
across
their
needs
over
the
phone.
They
all
come
to
the
library
to
get
help.
They
give
us
the
notice
they
give
us
what
they
need,
and
we
have
to
do
intensive
one-on-one
counseling
with
these
people
to
actually
get
them
to
the
next
steps
so
that
they
will
not
get
affected.
E
A
A
C
G
G
I
think
we
do
want
to
be
mindful
of
the
fact
that,
if
they're
not
accepted
for
reasons
that
perhaps
there
could
be
cause
to
prevent
the
ud
we
could
we
don't
want
to
not
have
the
money.
We
don't
want
to
give
up
the
money
to
have
those
types
of
cases
done.
So
my
motion
would
be
to
unrestrict
15
000
of
the
45
000,
which
could
be
used
for
translation
assistance,
one-on-one
support
and
other
unrestricted
needs
associated
with
the
eviction
prevention
program
and
to
keep
the
other
30
000.
G
At
this
time
still
restricted
for
legal
services,
I
think
that,
given
that
it
is
a
five
month
period
since
mar
since
may
that
this
has
been
running
and
right
now,
pro
bono
assistance
is
being
provided,
but
that
doesn't
mean
it
will
forever
be
that
way.
I
think
that
might
be
a
happy
compromise
where
we
unrestrict
15,
but
we
keep
the
other
30
restricted
just
for
now,
and
we
can
always
have
this
come
back
to
us.
G
C
A
F
F
D
Is
there
any
way
we
could
authorize
just
tapping
into
any
light
items
that
we
have
in
the
in
the
existing
budget
and
that
it's
for
translation
services
in
general,
I
mean
for
our
outreach.
We
use
translation
services
on
many
lineups
that
we
have
and
then
even
keeping
the
whole
45
thousand
dollars
for
this
pilot
program.
I
I'm
just
looking
to
keep
it
from
a
pure
accounting
standpoint
that
this
is.
You
know
to
its
original
intent.
I
guess,
and
the
translation
services
that
they're
needed.
D
E
D
D
Specifically,
we
don't
have
the
flexibility
to
just
say
this
is
a
translation
issue
and
then
the
original
intent
again
of
of
like
defending
against
ud's,
I
believe
in
in
or
sorry
my
interpretation
was
in
court,
but
yeah
just
more
like.
Why
not?
Why
not
just
have
it
in
the
general
one-to-one
budgetary
item
of
helping
anyone
figure
out
what
their
options
are
seems
like.
We
already
have
a
significant
portion
of
our
budget.
E
Q
D
I
I
won't
I
I
will
I
don't
belabor
the
point
I
guess
I'll
I
need
to.
I
will
do
offline
research
to
figure
out
where
our
services
for
the
helpline
stop,
and
that
will
help
me
understand.
I
think
when
additional
specific
budget
is
is
warranted,
so
I
will
be
supportive
of
the
motion.
As
it
has
been
said,.
A
E
No
so,
and-
and
I
can
also
provide
they
have
a
a
couple
of
people
available
and
it
is
what
patricia
said
if
there's
10
people
coming
at
the
same
time
having
one
project
sentinel
person
that
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
speak.
Spanish
is
just
not
enough
and
so
same
with
the
legal
support
that
we're
getting
we're
getting.
Maybe
two
or
maybe
three
people
in
or
sometimes
one
and
and
they
need
translation
and,
in
the
meantime,
there's
eight
other
people
there
also
needing
help.
A
E
M
D
H
I
A
F
F
D
P
F
D
Sure-
and
I
I'm
not
sure,
if
you're
open
to
the
language
there,
but
if
you
know
if
we
can
tap
into
that
and
actually
pay
on
a
per
some
sort
of
unit
basis
right.
So
if
we
have,
if,
if
we
have
an
ask
or
if
we
start
sending
people
there
to
get
translation
or
using
those
services,
you
know
we
could
pay
out
of
certain
budget
items
for
those
translation
services
similar
to
what
I
think
we're
trying
to
do
here,
but
it
would
be
more
centralized.
D
E
D
D
I
A
Q
Good
evening,
thank
you,
chair
almond,
and
thank
you
committee
members
item
9.1
is
our
quarterly
more
in-depth
update
of
the
monthly
status
support
fiscal
year
to
date
numbers
so
I'm
going
to
go
over
these
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
and
you'll
see
a
few
slight
changes
in
formatting
for
a
variety
of
reasons.
We've
broken
down
the
public
inquiries
topics
we
no
longer
have
the
covid
separate,
subset,
we've
combined
them
into
one
chart
again,
so
you
can
see
all
the
categories
here.
Q
A
lot
of
the
in
the
calls
coming
in
to
us
and
into
the
helpline
are
related
to
coping
19.
Rent
relief
right
now,
and
that
is
is
separate
from
the
eviction
protection
calls
that
are
coming
in
so
just
a
reminder.
We
do
provide
eviction,
protection,
support
outside
of
covid19
related
evictions,
and
we
are
still
receiving
inquiries
and
information
necessary
to
implement
the
csf
array
as
well.
Q
We've
had
365
public
inquiries
made
so
far.
That
is
a
increase
of
more
than
100
public
inquiries
from
last
year
and
61
of
those
have
been
for
bilingual
services,
which
again
compared
to
what
we
normally
see.
That's
a
10
increase
overall
across
all
of
our
all
of
our
requests
for
community
workshops.
We've
held
nine
so
far,
which
is
an
increase
of
about
a
hundred
percent
over
where
we
were
last
year
and
we've
doubled.
The
number
of
attendees
we've
had
86
people
join
us
for
those.
Q
So
now,
when
we
receive
eviction,
notices
from
landlords,
we're
sending
out
letters
to
both
the
tenant
and
the
landlord
informing
them
of
all
of
the
support
services
that
are
available,
including
the
state
rent
relief.
Again,
landlords
are
able
to
apply
for
that
on
behalf
of
their
tenants
if
they're
interested-
and
I
would
like
to
note
that
everyone
who
has
come
into
the
eviction
health
center
and
answered
the
question
as
to
whether
or
not
their
landlord
has
applied
for
relief
on
their
behalf,
they
have
all
answered.
Q
No,
so
we
do
want
to
note
that
that
we
are
trying
to
do
an
equitable
outreach
to
both
tenants
and
landlords.
Here,
we've
also
had
a
few
postcards
go
out
as
well:
we've
had
six
email
updates
that
have
gone
out
and
through
the
month
of
september,
and
we
have
about
707
email
subscribers,
which
is
nearly
double
what
we
had
last
year.
Q
You
can
see
here
some
of
the
overview
of
the
termination
notices,
we've
had
and
other
notices
that
are
required
by
our
regulations.
We've
had
73
banked,
rent
increase
notices,
be
filed
with
the
city
and
we've
received
266
termination
notices.
So
far
this
fiscal
year
there
have
been
no
requests
for
tenant
buyouts
and
no
request
for
additional
occupants
through
september.
Q
Additionally,
this
is
a
further
breakdown
of
those
eviction
notices.
We've
had
15
withdrawal
from
marcus,
that's
a
from
a
past
project
and
we've
had
a
few
we've
had
one
breach
of
leads
at
those
at
fault
notices.
Otherwise,
everything
else
has
been
failure
to
pay
rent
notices.
You
can
see
we
are
kind
of
evening
out
and.
Q
Hopefully,
seeing
as
emily
noted
a
trickle
that
maybe
we
can
catch
as
we
as
we
continue
to
move
forward
in
the
fiscal
year
from
from
our
peak
back
in
q3
of
2021
of
272
notices,
I
do
want
to
notice
note
that
this
isn't
significantly
different
than
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
for
our
trends
for
these
type
of
notices.
However,
the
reason
for
the
notices
are
are
different.
Q
This
time
around
we've
had
no
properties
go
into
redevelopment
this
year
and
have
had
no
units
affected,
and
we
have
had
29
households
that
have
received
assistance
this
calendar
year.
So
again,
this
is
through
the
calendar
year
for
2021
and
those
households
that
have
received
assistance
are
related
to
projects
that
went
into
redevelopment
outside
of
the
2021
time
period
for
petitions.
We
have
two
that
are
in
review,
including
a
landlord
petition
for
upward
adjustment
of
rent
for
mnoi
adjustments,
and
we
have
one
tenant
petition
that
was
settled
this
month
for
the
market
conditions.
Q
As
you
can
see,
things
are
starting
to
stabilize
a
little
bit
from
the
peak
of
instability
due
to
due
to
covid
we're
starting
to
see
the
vacancy
rate
stabilize
a
little
bit
from
what
we
had
at
the
beginning
of
covid,
and
we
are
flattening
out
to
about
eight
percent
right
now
for
fully
covered
units.
We
expect
that
to
potentially
go
up
in
the
next
few
months
and
then
again,
flatten
back
out
as
the
market
recovers
for
prices.
Q
Q
There
have
been
six
properties
that
have
transacted
so
far
this
fiscal
year
for
a
total
of
39
units,
and
there
are
seven
properties
that
are
on
the
market
right
now
for
a
total
of
105
units,
so
again
just
not
a
lot
of
transactions
in
the
sales
market
and
not
a
lot
of
if
any
transactions
in
the
redevelopment
market.
Those
are
not
happening
currently
and
haven't
for
a
little
while.
Q
L
F
F
J
F
Okay-
I
I
really
just
I
don't
want
to
make
things
any
more
difficult
for
y'all,
but
I
I
would
love
to
get
that
kind
of
information
as
well.
I
would
also
love
to
get
information,
including
the
report.
I
I
really
liked
the
highlights
that
we
got
from
item
8.4
about
who
we
were
serving,
what
percentages
were
in
other
languages.
Q
We
have
that
data
for
the
eviction
help
center
and
the
people
that
we're
serving
through
that
we
we
don't
gather
that
data
for
in
in
general,
when
we're
you
know
getting
phone
calls
into
the
into
the
into
our
program.
I
think
the
helpline
does
gather
some
of
that
information
for
cases
that
they're
actually
working
on,
and
we
can
see
more
about
that
as
well,
but
for
our
general
day-to-day
that
would
be
far
more
challenging
for
us.
Q
F
A
A
B
H
B
This
okay
upcoming
events,
so
we'll
just
highlight
sort
of
some
things
that
the
run
stabilization
staff
are
are
holding,
so
the
eviction
help
center.
Of
course,
every
thursday
it
is
every
thursday
these
are
just
the
next.
Two
dates
are
again
at
the
public
library
in
mountain
view.
On
the
second
floor
in
the
program
room,
they
are
held
between
one
o'clock
and
five
o'clock
and
there,
of
course,
we
help
with
the
rent
relief
applications,
understanding
the
eviction,
notices
and
lawyer
referrals.
B
We
also
are
having
some
webinars
that
are
upcoming,
so
tuesday,
next
tuesday.
I
believe
not
this
tuesday
october
26th
at
3
00
pm
we're
having
a
landlord,
focused
webinar,
where
we'll
be
discussing
eviction,
basics
and
rent
relief
on
the
same
topic.
We
are
having
a
tenant
focused
webinar,
the
next
day,
wednesday
october
27th,
and
that
will
be
held
at
6,
30
pm
and
again.
Our
tenant
webinars
are
bilingual
in
both
english
and
spanish.
B
We
also
have
the
walk
in
office
hours,
we're
now
holding
these
in
person,
and
there
are
zoom
appointments
available
as
well,
and
so,
whichever
the
community
feels
best
suits
their
needs,
they
can
join
us
in
person
or
over
the
computer,
and
these
are
again
for
every
topic
about
run
stabilization.
It's
not
just
focused
on
the
eviction
help
center
topics-
and
these
are
every
tuesday
from
10-
am
to
1
pm.