►
From YouTube: 03-13-17 Council Meeting
Description
Description
C
A
A
D
D
B
A
F
E
D
D
F
F
A
D
A
E
A
C
C
E
G
D
A
H
C
H
I
I'll
check
I'll
be
happy
to
check
our
file
and
see
if
anything's
come
in
I'm.
Not
that
is
not
ringing
a
bell,
but
and
if
it
there's
certain
things,
if
it's
under
a
certain
height
there's,
not
a
lot
of
regulations,
we
can
do
if
it's
over
certain
height
and
Planning
Commission
stuff
reviews
that
so
I
don't
know,
I'll
see
what
I
can
find
out
even.
D
A
I
E
There's
there's
a
lot
of
controversy
right
now
surrounding
these
closed-cell
monopole
towers
that
are
going
up
they,
if
they're
in
the
right
of
way
they
have
to
file
a
permit
to
access
the
right
away
there.
Their
position
I
think
PCO
sort
of
agrees
with
them
that
they're
exempt
from
local
regulation.
So
when
they
get
cited,
they
can
just
go
in
there.
They
can
access
the
right
away,
but
they
they
go
where
they
go.
C
This
up
before
we
talked
about
it
and
mr.
Markey
I
believe
you
ever
did
get
back
or
address
it.
I
still
would
like
to
see
any
outside
vendor
coming
in.
Our
community
must
register
with
the
city
and,
depending
on
what
they're
doing,
they
should
be
posting
a
bond.
I
guess
my
question
would
be
the
mr.
Markey
on
the
situation,
mr.
lino,
if
they
were
encroaching
over
the
15-foot
easement
now
they're
on
private
property,
you
mean
to
tell
me
that
they
don't
have
to
gain
his
or
the
property
owner's
permission.
That's.
C
I
think
by
read
people
registering
when
they
come
in
our
community
as
a
commercial
entity.
You
would
have
these
answers
already
answered.
Like
I,
said
the
situation
up
in
Ward
1
with
the
drilling
the
mud
on
the
roads
and
destruction.
If
he'd
had
a
bond
at
that
point,
you
would
have
had
monies
to
repair
these
things
when
they
were
done
well.
I
Just
to
clarify,
if
someone
is
using
our
right
away,
the
only
thing
that
we
have
that
for
sure
that
I
can
enforce
is
a
$50
fee,
a
permit
fee,
which
is
that
much,
but
it's
something
we
might
want
to
think
of
looking
at
in
the
future,
but
so
to
your
point.
That
is
a
way
to
get
them
to
register
as
long
as
they
come
in
and
they're
telling
us
now.
If
we
see
something
going
on,
we
have
had
our
Sony
persons
stop
and
see.
What's
going
on
so
I
would.
H
H
I
H
I
H
Maybe
did
maybe
I
don't
want
to
know
what
it's
for,
but
it's
kind
of
wonder
what
why
are
they
putting
it
there?
My
wife
s,
then
this
is
this
is
were,
was
designated
to
go
and
they
you
know
they
have
surveyors
and
whatnot
I'm
glad
it
was
in
my
driveway
another
hundred
foot
down
the
road
we'll
never
seen
it,
but
that's
something
I'll
get
used
to
be
I'm,
just
curious.
J
J
People
just
kind
of
sitting
there
so
do
two
full
and
the
purpose
we
speak
me
isn't
everyone
to
employ
you
guys
to
get
rid
of
that
I
used
to
go
shooting
beyond
books.
Second
thing
is
what
you
do
with
that
money.
There's
obviously
smartly
considerate
consider
what
the
people
want,
since
you
didn't
get
this
boat
on
in
the
first
place,
maybe
give
us
a
boat
on.
K
31
john
kz
31
41,
Monterey
Drive,
there's
a
few
things
I
want
to
address
is
the
committee
meeting
over
February
21st.
A
lot
of
time
was
spent
on
hiring
mr.
Marquis
from
a
contracted
employee
to
a
part-time
employee
for
$24,000
a
year
benefits
we
heard
from
that.
As
we'd
get
his
taxes,
those
taxes
would
be
around
four
hundred
and
eighty
dollars
a
year.
Downfall,
for
that
is
what
we
have
to
pay
for
the
PRS
and
other
benefits.
My
destination
will
be
between
three
and
four
thousand
a
year.
K
So
this
is
another
example
of
putting
your
once
in
front
of
the
needs.
That's
something
that
won't
benefit
the
the
resident.
Don't
keep
them
in
the
place.
He's
in
now
keep
everything
going.
The
way
it's
going,
save
the
taxpayers
some
money.
Second
of
all,
I
haven't
heard,
counsel
or
anyone
else
in
that
matter.
Very
little
talk
about
the
crime
in
Norton.
We
just
ended
an
11-year
high
in
no.
According
to
the
reports
that
came
out
with
the
Chief
of
Police
2016
felony
arrest
was
144,
the
OPI
is
122
712
that
was
299.
K
Sex
offense
is
doubled,
drug
offenses
was
246
and
overdoses
was
66
with
a
community
of
IRAs
of
12,000
ish
till
those
numbers
should
be
a
little
less.
You
know
we
paid
these
prosecutors
and
we
paid
the
judges
to
try
to
do
the
right
thing.
It's
a
perfect
example
of
them
not
doing
the
right
thing.
There
was
a
gentleman
who
lived
in
Norton
not
going
to
mention
his
name
out
of
the
respect
to
the
family
four
times
last
year,
in
five
months
he
was
arrested.
He
was
arrested
on
February
6th
for
drug
abuse.
K
Instruments
was
fined
$100
with
fees
and
everything
else
was
around
749.
He
was
arrested
again
February
24th
on
drug
abuse
instruments,
again
fined,
$100
miscellaneous
fines.
Added
on
to
that
was
three
hundred
and
sixty-five
dollars.
July
18th.
He
was
arrested
for
possession
of
drugs
later
to
be
proven
to
be
heroin
and
it
was
charged
with
that
and
charged
with
the
possession
drug
abuse
instruments.
K
Drug
charges
were
dropped.
He
was
only
charged
with
B
of
drug
abuse
instrument
by
$94
after
the
fees
122
in
total
did
this
gentleman
paid
one
thousand
three
hundred
and
thirty
dollars
on
September
13th.
This
gentleman
died
of
a
drug
overdose.
He
was
22
years
old.
He
went
in
front
of
our
judges
that
we
pay
four
times.
Not
one
time
did
he
get
probation,
he
get
jail
time.
He
could
offer
rehab,
nothing
just
pay
the
fines
so
before
we
go
ahead
and
increase
the
prosecutors
salary.
How
about
asking?
D
D
D
I
Only
thing
I
do
want
to
get
on
people's
calendars
is
Norton.
Cleanup
day
is
April
22nd.
That
will
also
be
the
day
that
we
will
be
planting
the
tree
for
Arbor
Day
plans
for
that
are
being
finalized,
so
once
I
can
announce
that
I
will,
but
if
you
can
hold
April
22nd
like
I
said
that
is
our
norton
clean-up
day
and
we
are
so
accepting
donations
for
adopter
spot
and
for
any
new
caretakers.
So
if
anyone
wants
to
plant
some
flowers
this
year,
let
us
know
and
we'll
get
you
a
spot.
Thank
you.
G
D
F
You,
madam
president,
as
I
said
earlier,
this
is
a
resolution
of
appreciation
for
Judy,
Dinah
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
she
started
serving
on
the
Civil
Service
Commission
back
in
2008,
and
thank
her
very
much
for
her
service
and
with
that,
I
would
like
to
ask
mr.
Markey
to
please
read:
Resolution
392
7
2017,
a.
E
A
A
A
G
A
F
A
A
F
E
C
A
A
F
F
F
E
C
C
I
I
I
C
I
mean
I
think
the
greatest
example
of
why
it's
needed,
as
we
just
filled
the
north
end
of
it
if
anybody's
travel
on
the
north
end
of
East
and
it's
worse
than
it
was
with
the
holes,
it's
a
washboard,
it's
horrible
I
get
a
lot
of
complaints
on
that,
so
maybe,
by
limiting
the
weight
we'll
be
able
to
resolve
some
of
it-
probably
not
a
lot,
but
some
but
I
appreciate
you
getting
that.
Thank
you.
It's.
I
I
I
F
I
I
Have
a
bad
box,
so
we
it's
a
little
bit
bigger
repair
this
with
he's
referring
to
Greenwich
and
Lazarus
Road.
So
it's
on
a
four
sorry,
Cleveland
Massillon
you're
right.
It
is
on
a
four
way
flash
and
that's
gonna
stay
that
way
until
we
can
get
the
new
box
I'm
getting
a
proposal
from
the
company,
hopefully
by
tomorrow
we
did
put
up
additional,
stop
signs
as
well,
because
you
would
think
most
drivers
know
you
stop
at
a
four-way
flashing,
but
apparently
not
so
we're
taking
all
the
precautions
we
can.
B
I
D
B
Like
that's
fine
I'm,
just
gonna
I
was
just
going
to
wait
till
unfinished
business
and
try
to
address
it
then,
but
it
is
$24,000
and
what
we've
done
we've
gone
through,
in
fact
less
than
that
to
cover
the
cost
of
the
the
PIRs,
which
is
his
public
employment
retirement
system.
So
in
essence,
it's
not
additional
funds.
It'll
still
it'll
still
be
the
same
amount
of
money.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
it's
just
he's
actually
taking
less
because
we're
paying
into
the
purse
worm
and.
D
G
C
I
C
It's
changing
it
you're,
making
somebody
a
part-time,
employee
and
I
brought
this
up
before
as
practices
of
separating
company
for
lack
of
better
terminology.
That's
it
starts
to
change.
It
is
the
part-time
employee.
You
don't
vote
this
to
dismiss
the
company.
You
don't
want
to
deal
with
now.
That
needs
to
be
addressed
and
I'd
like
to
see
that
addressed,
because
it's
no
longer
just
a
simple
majority
vote
on
console,
but
the
mayor's
wishes
to
change
law
firms
or
their
their
wishes
to
leave
us.
You
need
to
have
something
on
paper
here.
Well,.
C
C
E
I
could
just
weigh
in
a
little
bit
the
appointment
and
the
removal,
the
solicitor
it's
an
appointed
position
of
the
seat,
just
like
the
finance
director
or
the
administrative
officer,
is
an
appointed
position.
The
removal
is
not
by
simple
majority.
It's
by
there's
the
procedure
set
out
in
the
Charter
it's
for
cause
and
that
doesn't
change
whether
I'm
part
time
employee,
whether
it's
a
contract
employee,
the
appointed
Officer
of
solicitor,
can
only
be
removed
for
cause
under
the
Charter.
It's.