►
From YouTube: 02-21-17 Special Council & Committee Meeting
Description
Description
A
B
D
D
B
First
item
up
new
business
were
basically
here
for
an
executive
session
and
that
would
be
to
consider
the
purchase
of
property
for
public
purposes
or
the
sale
of
property
at
competitive
bidding.
If
premature,
disclosure
of
information
would
give
an
an
unfair,
competitive
or
bargaining
advantage
to
a
person
whose
personal
personal
private
managers
is
adverse
to
the
general
public
interest,
as
defined
in
section
one.
Twenty
one
point:
twenty
two:
two
of
the
hyoe
Revised
Code
in
Section,
three
point:
twelve
of
norton
city
charter.
B
Just
for
the
public's
information.
When
we
go
into
executive
session,
the
audio
and
video
is
still
recording,
live
and
uninterrupted.
If
you
don't
want
to
be
recorded
at
least
go
out
into
the
hall.
Thank
you.
When
we
go
into
this,
I
would
like
to
invite
Mary
Zeta,
mrs.
Carr
mr.
Mesner,
mr.
Markey
and
twenty
funk.
E
F
C
B
C
G
C
H
A
B
C
G
C
I
I
H
B
B
B
D
B
B
J
K
J
Thank
You
mr.
Maron
at
this
time,
I
would
like
to
add
I'm
real
happy
to
see
that
there's
other
officers
here,
because
for
me
personally,
I
know,
even
though
we
had
two
gentlemen
rise
to
the
occasion.
I
know,
all
of
you
would
have
done
the
same
and
I
take
great
heart,
knowing
that
that
stranger
could
have
done
me,
so
he
would
have
done
it
for
them.
You'd
have
done
it
for
any
citizen
in
the
in
the
city
and
the
whole
city.
J
B
L
A
B
Actually,
if
there's
anybody
in
the
audience
who
would
like
to
make
a
comment
now's
a
good
time
to
do
it
you're
allowed
to
during
this
particular
period,
if
not
thank
you
again
and
it
says
we're
a
little
behind
both
go
on
and
let
you
get
about
your
business
and
thank
you
all
for
coming.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
B
It's
been
mentioned
by
mr.
Pearson
on
council
that
he
would
like
to
get
into
these
funds
to
put
into
the
road
program
as
I
understand
it.
Fund
127,
which
is
actually
the
sewer
and
water
fund
coming
in
from
the
surcharges
which
are
no
longer
gonna,
be
coming
in
very
soon
that
can
only
those
were
already
allotted
by
statute
and
those
have
to
go
to
repairing
or
replacing
where
sewer
and
water
would
already
be.
Would
that
be
fair
to
say
mr.
Markey?
Yes,.
B
Predisposition
we
have
850,000
of
that
tied
up,
so
there
would
only
be
421
thousand
even
available
for
use,
which
could
only
be
used
where
the
sewer
and
water
already
is
nothing
for
extending
it
to
new
areas
or
anything
else.
So
that's
kind
of
a
a
done
deal
as
far
as
that
one
goes.
The
other
idea
would
be
looking
at
the
fund
128,
which
is
rollback
fund.
That
I
believe,
is
due
to
end
and
2034,
and
there
are
some
I
believe
you
all
got.
B
The
handout
for
that
tonight
was
broke
down
a
little
bit
that
there
is
the
fact
that
we're
going
to
be
spending
a
hundred
seventy
eight
thousand
per
year.
Out
of
that,
just
on
mass
Heights
alone.
We
also
have
obligation
for
the
Cleveland
Maslin
Phase
two
for
a
million
dollars,
barber
Road
we
have
about
around
five
thousand
five
hundred
thousand.
It
needs
to
go
on
that.
What
is
this
outstanding
encumbrance
for
the
238
633?
Mr.
Mesner
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
look.
Madam
chairman.
M
B
Looking
at
the
fact
that
we're
looking
at
spending
one
hundred
and
seventy
eight
thousand
a
year
for
Nash
Heights-
and
this
is
going
to
end
unless
we
were
to
extend
the
life
of
this
particular
fund,
we
would
have
to
be
taking
more
money
than
this
hundred
and
seventy
I
ate
out
in
order
to
cover
that.
For
after
what
19
or
20
34
mr.
markey
mr.
Messner
its.
M
E
D
D
B
G
I
E
I
B
E
I
A
bad
deal
we
passed
and
Barberton
got
a
bad
deal
and
now
we're
gonna
help
barber
it
and
bail
out
that
bad
deal.
But
some
member
that
council
chose
to
go
that
direction.
I'd
like
to
see
if
we
could
at
least
get
the
50,000
out
of
the
fund,
which
we
have
very
little
Avenue
of
use
for
to
cover
that,
so
it
doesn't
hit
the
taxpayers.
Those
dollars
are
already
there.
I
think.
I
E
I
E
E
Set
up
if
you
have
a
special
fund
like
a
sewer
fund,
if
it's
no
longer
needed
for
the
purpose
in
which
it
was
created,
you'd
have
to
go
and
get
a
court
order
allowing
you
to
transfer
it.
So
that's
one
option:
did
you
go
to
court
and
ask
a
judge
to
transfer
the
money
to
whatever
fund
that
that
you
choose,
but.
I
E
D
E
I
H
I
E
B
Hundred
and
twenty
one
thousand
it's
even
if
we
can
even
think
about
spending
on
anything
as
far
as
the
sewers
or
water
goes,
because
we've
got
the
Adair
case,
holding
up
all
the
the
balance
of
that
and
with
the
fifty
thousand
coming
out
of
that.
That
only
leaves
three
hundred
and
seventy
one
thousand
and
is
fifty
thousand
the
most.
We
would
ever
have
to
pay
correct.
F
B
I
F
K
I
I
I
F
It's
two
million
I'm
just
making
up
numbers.
Let's
say
it's:
two
million
dollars
to
clean
up
whatever
and
we're
contributing
50
the
other
1.5.
Well,
one
point:
nine,
five
or
whatever
it
would
be.
They
would
be
handling
and
and
if
we,
if
we
can,
if
we
can
work
together
regionally
to
get
some
grants
or
low-interest
loans
that
helps
the
customer
base.
That's.
I
D
D
B
M
B
So
we're,
instead
of
just
as
178,000
we'd,
be
looking
there's
basically
550,000
it
comes
in
per
year
from
the
rollback
fund
is
that
we
can
pretty
we've
had
a
couple
years
where
we've
got
more
than
that,
but
basically
the
550
is
what
we
can
actually
count
on.
It
could
go
down
from
that
out
of
that
550.
B
We
know
that
this
178,000
is
going
to
come
out
of
that
off
the
bat
and
we
would
probably
have
to
increase
that
178
more
in
order
to
offset
what
won't
be
coming
in
any
questions
on
that
or
anybody
else
want
to
point
that
out
any
more
there,
because
I
did
have
a
question
on
the
rollback
revenues.
Sorry
I
didn't
get
to
the
last
row
back
revenue
we
have
is
two
hundred
seventy
five
thousand.
Why.
E
F
B
F
H
F
H
D
There's
not
going
to
be
any
more
of
throwing
chip
and
seal
on
shell
Hart
Road
to
widen
that
not
doing
anything
underneath
it
except
throw
some
gravel
down
it.
Just
it
doesn't
last
it
doesn't
make
sense.
You
know
we're
gonna
start
doing
borings
and
roads.
I
know
we're
doing
that,
all
in
Houston
we're
doing
it
on
Johnson
Road.
So,
having
said
all
of
that,
what
I'm
looking
at
is
what
of
this
fund
and
going
forward,
even
if
it's
only
through
2032
or
whatever,
what
of
this
fund
can
we
use?
D
How
much
of
that
can
we
use
to
fix
some
roads
in
this
city?
In
addition
to
what
we're
already
doing
I
mean
the
road
programs
certainly
are
funded
better
than
they
had
been
when
I
was
around
before
and
that's
a
good
thing,
but
it
still
could
be
better,
and
so,
if
we
have
that
money
there
available,
then
we
ought
to
be
able
to
use
it
to
benefit
all
of
the
citizens
in
the
city.
A
lot
of
people
are
putting
money
into
that
fund.
So
my
question
is:
what
of
that?
D
Can
we
use
and
how
do
we
craft
legislation
to
do
that?
My
understanding
is,
is
that
this
is
a
little
different
than
127
that
we
can
amend
the
legislation
to
expand
it
to
be
used
for
other
things
too,
to
allow
a
certain
percentage
of
it
to
be
used
for
roads.
I
mean
there's
any
number
of
things
that
we
can
do
and
I
think
that's
what
the
discussion
needs
to
be
to
decide
how
we
want
to
proceed.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
anyone
I
could
be
wrong,
but
I
don't
know.
D
B
I
don't
know,
we've
mentioned
the
balance
it's
in
here
at
currently,
which
is
1
million
two
hundred
seventy
one
thousand
eight
hundred
and
thirty
six
dollars.
Please
correct
me
by
getting
this
wrong.
Mr.
Mesner
I
greet
roads
need
fixed
I,
also
know,
there's
other
people
out
here
with
septic
systems,
and
they
ought
to
be
able
to.
We
have
to
make
sure
that
they
have
the
same.
Aids
that's
been
given
to
everyone
else.
It's
going
to
be
paying
assessments
if
they
have
some
relief
given
to
them.
B
We
just
can't
take
get
into
this
and
change
it
around
and
get
take
it
all
out
for
roads.
I
would
never
agree
to
that.
If
there's
something
that
can
be
kicked
over
into
the
road
program,
yes,
but
as
far
as
saying
oh
we're
just
going
to
take
it
all
and
put
it
into
the
roads,
I
would
never
agree
with
that.
I'm
I've
talked
to
a
lot
of
citizens
and
none
of
them
have
been
happy
with
the
idea
of
taking
the
128th
fund
and
just
putting
it
into
the
roads.
I've
not
had
one.
I
Mr.
whippy
I
don't
know
who
you've
talked
to,
but
that
seems
to
be
the
number
one
concern
of
the
people.
The
echo
joke
number
one.
This
council
works
for
the
people,
we're
a
conduit
of
them,
which
the
administration
etc.
You've
got
to
show
the
people
in
this
community.
Their
tax
dollars
are
being
used
to
their
advantage.
That's
why
they
pay
taxes
sitting
on
money's,
not
one
of
them
I'd
like
to
show
them
that
and
do
something
to
improve
it.
I
We
don't
no
one
suggested
we
take
all
of
it,
but
we
need
to
do
something
to
solve
it
before
the
voters
referendum
and
put
it
on
the
ballot
and
they'll.
Do
it
for
you
and
I
think,
is
getting
to
that
point.
Some
of
the
roads
in
your
ward
are
absolutely
appalling.
There
are
streets
over
in
Ward
one.
You
can't
even
drive
down
now
the
Nash
Heights
there
are
more
than
one
two.
Not
only
is
it
appalling,
it's
dangerous!
B
I
We
could
extend
it
further
and
I,
don't
think
you'd
probably
get
too
many
complaints
from
citizens.
Even
if
then,
the
time
comes,
the
most
of
us
will
not
be
here
then,
to
extend
that
tax
if
they
see
a
value
in
what
they're
getting
people
colouring
things
that
they
see
a
value
if
you're
bringing
something
to
the
table
they
benefit
from,
but
just
sitting
on
the
money
and
paying
it
out
to
is
ridiculous.
I
I,
don't
we
had
a
fund
here,
the
PPG
fund
years
ago
there
was
almost
a
million
dollars
that
ended
up
in
the
general
fund
and
is
gone
and
I.
Don't
want
to
see
this
going
the
same
direction
like
Joe.
We
got
concrete
streets
in
this
town
we
put
asphalt
over.
We
should
have
fixed
them
correctly.
We
didn't
have
a
road
program
three
years
ago.
We
do
now
when
the
five
hundred
thousands
not
a
lot
of
money
to
do
much
with,
but
we
do
need
to
start
doing
something.
I
J
J
To
be
fair,
when
this
started,
the
citizens
had
no
choice
in
the
matter.
They
weren't
asked
if
they
wanted
to
take
it.
So
we
don't
really
know
what
the
citizens
I
guess.
My
question
would
be
for
you,
mr.
Markey
is:
is
it
possible
going
forward
for
us
to
put
it
on
the
ballot?
What
the
citizens
want
say
starting
next
year,
or
is
that
not
possible?
J
E
So
I
believe
you
can
submit
an
ordinance
generally
under
your
charter
authority.
As
a
home
rule
municipality,
submit
an
ordinance
for
review
by
the
residents
in
citizens
of
the
city
of
northern
I've
I
want
to
double
check
that
I've
looked
at
it
for
other
communities.
Just
this
idea
of
this
general
ordinance
going
before.
Instead
of
having
you
know
something
in
the
revised
code
or
something
in
the
Constitution
that
says
you're
you
can
submit
to
the
voters.
So
I
can
confirm
that,
but
I
my
suspicion
is.
You
can
do
that.
Okay,.
J
Personally,
I
would
be
a
little
bit
more
in
favor
of
that.
Only
because,
like
I
said
this
is
another
issue.
That's
just
going
to
split
us
all.
It
just
is
because
there's
there's
people
who,
like
I,
said
they've
they're,
gonna,
say
I've
been
paying
for
them
once
my
turn.
I
want
some
of
it,
but
there's
other
people
or
is
going
to
say
I'm,
never
gonna
get
that
and
I've
been
paying
in
it.
So
I
want
my
roads,
fixed
and
I.
J
L
When
this
was
first
passed,
it
was
passed
under
the
premise
that
this
was
to
be
used
for
infrastructure
to
expand
sewer
systems,
water
things
like
that
to
bring
additional
business
into
the
city.
We
can
try
to
steal
this
money
out
of
here
and
use
it
for
something
that
it
wasn't
originally
intended
for
and
fixing
the
roads
and
and
throwing
a
band-aid
out
on
these
roads,
but
it
still
hasn't
done
anything
to
generate
more
money
come
to
the
city.
We
can't
continue
to
live
off.
L
L
521,
that's
what
this
money
was
originally
intended
for,
and
and
that's
what
we
told
the
residents
when
we
passed
it
and
to
go
back
against
that
and
put
it
into
the
roads.
I
mean
look
at
look
how
bad
the
road
program
it's
been
years
and
years.
Somebody
put
a
road
program
on
the
levy
on
the
ballot
and
there's
no
way
people
when
they
do
that.
But
this
was
supposed
to
be
for
infrastructure
to
bring
additional
revenue
in
here
by
putting
the
roads
in
and
fixing
the
roads
I've
granted
I
agreed
her
our
roads
need
help.
L
We've
been
putting
anywhere
from
five
to
a
million
dollars
in
roads
here,
the
last
few
years,
and
before
that
it
was
three.
You
know
there
was
a
few
gaps
in
there,
but
that
wasn't
due
to
a
necessarily
a
lack
of
funding.
That
was
just
due
to
a
lack
of
execution
that
certain
points
in
time.
But
again
that's
what
this
one
was
intended
for
was
to
generate
additional
revenue
coming
in.
We
have
to
look
at
the
big
picture.
We
have
to
make
sure
that
we're
doing
things
today
to
make
sure
that
we
have
more
money.
I
I
Residential
area
is
not
going
to
improve
or
bring
business
to
your
doorstep,
but
improving
it's
been
brought
up
here
many
times
the
overall
general
appearance
and
feeling
people
get
when
they
come
to
the
community
and
your
roads
are
falling
apart.
Mr.
Beale
y
know
gives
the
impression
the
city
the
first
thing:
I
can
I
go
in
any
given
business.
They
look
at
the
parking
lot
and,
if
I
see
in
that
business,
25
50
junk
cars
I
probably
won't
walk
in
the
door
because
they're
not
paying
their
people
enough.
I
That's
the
impression
I
get,
and
it's
generally
reluctantly
correct.
You
need
to
do
something
with
the
streets
in
this
town.
We
go
and
have
one
done
by
the
state
of
Ohio
here
over
the
next
two
years,
and
we
could
develop
a
downtown
which
we've
never
had
here.
That
needs
to
be
done,
but
we
need
more
than
just
develop
one
or
two
streets.
We
need
to
start
fixing
roads.
There
was
no
road
program,
but
before
we
were
elected
with
Council
had
that
road
program
we
did
know.
I
It's
a
mess
and
I'll
tell
you
what
you
just
got
a
two
years
ago:
a
company
committed
to
the
overall
estimate
I
think
it
was
70
million
dollars
that
do
it
correctly.
Every
street
in
this
town
will
never
have
that
kind
of
money.
Correct.
We
don't
have
the
growth
we
haven't
had
the
growth.
This
is
an
opportunity
to
use
some
funding
to
start
beyond
stopgap
to
fix
the
streets.
If.
B
B
The
floor
at
the
moment,
as
far
as
that
goods
need
fixed,
I
agree
with
Mr
P
lot.
This
was
put
there.
Others
should
be
able
to
see
a
benefit
from
it.
Not
everybody's
roads
are
going
to
get
fixed,
even
if
we
gave
all
this
money
over
into
the
road
program
of
which
I
will
reiterate.
I
have
not
had
one
person
who
tell
me
they
were
good
with
taking
this
money
and
put
it
into
the
road
program
and
I
think
it's
wrong.
B
B
They
all
got
a
piece
of
this
money
and
these
other
people
want
to
make
sure
that
they
are
going
to
have
some
of
it
if
and
when
they
have
to
have
to
go
through
the
same
things
or
if
sewers
do
come
along
and
they
aren't
entitled
to
it.
It's
not
right
to
say
that
we're
going
to
take
it
and
put
it
in
the
roads.
Well,
so.
B
But
just
it
would
have
to
be
a
small
amount,
because
we're
still
looking
at
paying
off,
like
I,
said
nanites
and
a
couple
these
other
bills,
and
we
need
to
also
think
that,
after
phase
two
on
Cleveland
Massillon
phase,
three
is
going
to
be
coming
these.
Both
these
funds
aren't
funny
they're
going
to
end
unless
this
is
extended
out
and
before
I
would
go
along
with
extending
this
any
more
I
believe,
as
mr.
Tousley
does,
that
it
should
go
to
the
ballot.
I
I
think
it's
gonna
go
to
the
ballot
and
I
think
they're
gonna
take
care
of
it
for
you,
but
as
far
as
Nash
Heights
goes
I'm
sure
the
residents
in
my
ward,
particularly
that
section
of
it,
was
certainly
a
rather
paid
$11,200
to
fix
their
roads
and
drop
in
20
plus,
amend
and
having
a
bill
that
goes
on
for
life.
They
didn't
their
roads
are
getting
fixed
or
they're,
gonna
tear
them
all
up
real
bad
and
them.
You
know
what
hurts
are
low
and
long
or
still
screwed
up
they're
still
not
right.
I
You
know,
you're,
you,
don't
you
don't
understand
people
pay
taxes
off,
they
keep
looking
on
paying
and
paying
what
value?
What
are
you
bringing
to
the
table?
You're
dictating
me
I'm,
getting
sores.
Well
great
I!
Don't
really
want
that,
but
I'm
getting
it,
but
I
can't
drive
my
car
crossed
it.
They
said
do
as
you
please,
but
I
think
in
the
end,
you're
gonna
probably
see
referendums
filed
and
they're
gonna
decide
it
for
you
because
they
won't
have
to
it
as
mr.
tozzoli
so
they're
just
gonna.
I
A
D
I
D
Fund
128,
if
we
use
some
of
it
for
roads,
no,
not
everybody's,
going
to
get
the
benefit
of
that
right
away
on
their
road,
but
not
everybody
is
going
to
get
the
benefit
of
pursuers
either
I
mean
frankly,
I've
been
paying
into
one
fund
128,
since
the
rollback
happened
and
I've
got
sewers,
not
in
the
roads
paved.
So
you
know,
but
that's:
okay,
that's
what
you
do
in
a
community.
D
Secondly,
you
know
when
people
vote
for
us,
they
entrust
us
to
make
decisions,
and
there
are
some
things:
I
guess
that
that
certainly
should
go
to
the
the
voters,
but
the
vast
majority
of
things
I
think
they
expect
us
to
make
that
decision.
That's
why
there's
a
council!
Otherwise
we
could
just
have
a
direct
democracy
and
we
could
put
everything
out
for
a
vote
of
the
people,
especially
in
this
electronic
age.
People
could,
you
know,
get
on
their
computer
and
and
vote.
D
That's
not
how
we
do
it.
This
isn't
a
direct
democracy
and
and
certainly
I.
You
know
I
think
that
that
we
should
and
could
make
this
decision
now.
Maybe
when
you
talk
about
extending
the
tax,
maybe
that
is
something
that
you
go
to
the
voters
for
and
say:
hey,
do
you
want
this
extended
or
not?
I,
don't
know,
but
I
mean
to
decide
how
to
use
some
of
the
money.
That's
what
council
does
that's
what
we
were
elected
to
do
to.
H
I
J
I
understand
your
point,
mr.
Kernan,
but
one
thing
we
have
to
remember
when
this
rollback
was
first
taken.
There
was
almost
800
signatures
on
a
petition
saying
we
want
this
to
go
before
the
voters
they
needed
400
a
technicality
got
it
thrown
out.
The
citizens
never
had
a
choice.
To
me
this
makes
the
citizens
whole.
We
say:
hey.
We
as
a
council,
actually
respect
you
for
once.
We
want
your
opinion.
J
I
I,
don't
see
how
that's
I
agree
with
you
councils
there
to
make
decisions
I'm
not
trying
to
shirk
my
decision
I'm
trying
to
respect
the
voters,
but
believe
me,
I'm,
one
of
the
ones
who
felt
extremely
disrespected
when
that
was
passed
and
I
didn't
even
sign
the
petition
because
nobody
had
come
to
me.
But
to
me
this
is
just
I.
Don't
understand
that
the
difficulty
with
hearing
what
the
voters
have
to
say
well,.
D
D
Do
think
we
should
listen
to
the
voters,
that's
why
we
have
open
meetings.
That's
why
our
telephone
numbers
are
on
the
website.
We
should
listen
to
the
voters
absolutely
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
then
we
make
a
decision,
but
beyond
that
yeah.
My
position
you
know
is
is
that
we
can
expand
the
uses
of
this
fund
and
use
some
of
this
money
to
do
roads.
Scott
I
understand
what
you're
saying
when
this
first
was
was
voted
on.
It
was
for
infrastructure,
things
have
changed.
D
D
So
with
that
change,
in
my
mind,
I'm
thinking,
we
don't
need
as
much
of
this
money
for
just
water
or
just
sewer.
We
can
use
it
some
of
it
for
other
things.
I'm
not
I,
certainly
am
NOT
talking
about
using
all
of
it.
I,
don't
even
know
that
I'm
talking
about
using
half
of
it
I'm
talking
about
using
some
of
it
I,
don't
know
what
that
number
is
I
mean
if
there's
obviously,
if
there's
three
people
in
council
that
are
opposed
using
any
of
it,
we
might
as
well
stop
the
discussion
now.
I
agree.
A
M
I
Talked
about
this
two
months
ago,
mr.
master
brought
it
up.
Our
revenue
stream
is
going
down.
You
don't
have
the
revenues,
so
you're
gonna
have
to
start
being
wiser
and
sharper
on
how
you
spend
these
people's
money
and
as
the
community
grows
older-
and
this
is
an
older
community
and
as
they
retire,
their
income
levels
are
going
down.
You
know,
most
of
them
are
sitting
on
homestead
exemptions,
they're,
not
paying
the
property
taxes.
I
The
property
values
are
going,
we
don't
have
the
revenue,
so
we
really
need
to
start
considering
these
folks
and
figure
out
ways
to
stretch
their
dollar
and
provide
the
most
service
we
can
until
it
gets
to
the
point,
then
we're
going
to
have
to
look
at
other
ways
to
do
things
that
that's
cutting
budgets,
etc.
Then
it'll
have
to
be
there.
Ken
I
mean
we
got
the
money
now
Joe
said
it.
Mr.
Kernan
said
it
Paul
said
I
prefer
it
doesn't
end
up
on
the
ballot.
I
I'd
rather
show
them
some
value
for
their
money
that
we're
really
working
hard
to
fix
their
roads.
That
people
aren't
out
in
the
middle
of
the
night
dumping
concrete
in
the
holes
like
in
your
neighborhood
I,
understand
someone's
doing
the
fix
and
they
shouldn't
have
to
do
that.
They're
already
paying
taxes.
I
This
I
don't
know
you
know
what,
if
it's
tied
to
the
127,
and
we
got
this
an
obligation
coming
up
with
Barberton
where
we
prevail
in
the
Adair
case
you
have
and
that
will
stop.
It's
already
stopped
correct.
Mr.
marking,
we
have
no
more
assessments,
come
out
assessments,
but
surcharges
coming
in
correct,
that's
great
okay!
So
now
it's
just
the
only
interest-bearing
yeah.
E
I
I
I
would
like
to
see
some
thought
given
to
what
absolutely
is
necessarily
needed
and
maybe
increase
that
amount
by
10%
for
a
safeguard
or
pull
10%
out
and
put
in
a
rainy
day
fund
designated
for
and
then
take
the
balance
of
it
and
do
the
most
the
streets
that
are
in
the
most
dire
condition,
regardless
of
whose
Ward
it's
in
it's
all
the
people's
money.
I
mean.
That
would
be
my
idea.
I
can't
give
you
a
number
I,
don't
know
the
exact
degree.
I
I
To
descend
in
it
start
to
disintegrate
the
curbs
or
a
massage
I
agree
with
Joe
were
as
conceivable
and
it's
cost-effective
to
go
back
in
and
do
them
originally
if
they
were
in
concrete
for
the
material
costs
or
such
for
the
oil
prices.
Fine,
let's
do
it
that
way,
but
let's
repair
roads,
so
we
can
get
at
least
a
life
out
of
them
and
increase
our
overall
maintenance
program
on
new
roads,
new
construction
or
what's
been
brought
up
to
par
to
maintain
them,
so
we
can
get
10
15
or
whatever
the
life
is
an
engineering.
I
D
We
at
this
point,
maybe
get
some
numbers
taken.
Can
we
put
this
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
work
session?
Maybe
we've
kind
of
fleshed
out
some
position,
but
I
think
maybe
people
need
to
think
about
it.
A
little
bit
between
the
next
work
session,
maybe
get
some
numbers
as
mr.
Pearson
has
asked
for
and
then
you
know
next
work
session.
I
think
we
really
need
to
know
I
mean
is
our?
Is
there
four
of
us
on
this
council
that
want
to
spend
some
of
this
money
on
roads
or
not?
D
B
B
B
L
Thank
you.
This
piece
of
legislation
is
to
repeal
the
sewer
surcharge
that
we
were
just
referring
to,
that
was
funding
127
there,
and
now
that
Barberton
owns
the
system.
The
city
is
not
collecting
that
surcharge
and
the
city
of
Barberton
is
collecting
their
fees,
so
we
need
to
just
get
this
off
our
books,
miss
Carr
mayor
anybody
happen.
F
J
H
J
And
that's
not
the
case
whatsoever.
The
bills
are
going
to
be
exactly
the
same.
Barberton
is
now
just
taking
a
surcharge.
This
was
the
one
thing.
I
was
really
against
in
the
sewer
agreement.
We
don't.
We
no
longer
will
save
that
money
for
our
infrastructure.
The
same
surcharges
will
be
paid,
but
it
is
going
to
Barberton
right.
J
F
That
is
true.
The
only
thing
I
would
like
to
point
out
is,
as
you
pointed
out,
there
now
handling
they
own
the
system.
They
continue
to
be
responsible
for
the
maintenance
and
I.
Don't
want
me
to
think
that
no
money's
gonna
be
spent
and
reinvested
in
Norton.
Obviously
this
they
will
be
doing
that
so
I,
just
I,
don't
want
anybody
to
think
they
don't
have
a
value.
There's
not
a
value
here.
For
the
city
of
Norton,
there
is
a
value
to
have
the
this
is
some
maintain
properly
if.
H
E
L
F
We're
in
the
Nash
Heights
area
I
can
certainly
cover
this
under
a
newer
old
business,
but
I
did
bring
I
do
have
an
update
just
on
the
nash
heights
project.
I
didn't
know
if
you
wanted
to
do
it
under
utilities
or
if
you
want
me
to
wait
till
unfinished
or
new
business.
I'm
okay,
either
way.
Just
remind
you
of
that.
Why.
B
L
K
C
C
B
Pass
next
step,
we're
done
with
this
anybody
else,
anything
else,
the
Barbican
prosecutors
agreement.
This
is
we've
had
Barberton
prosecutors,
taking
care
of
our
court
handling
the
court
things
for
us
for
years,
since
at
least
1988,
or
something
like
that,
we
have
a
new
agreement
in
front
of
us
I.
Believe
it's
been
since
1988.
We
just
had
this
discussion
98.
They
have
been
collecting
a
little
over
$5,000,
a
piece
$10,000
a
year
for
the
prosecutors
alone.
B
Since
that
time
we
have
ended
the
mayor's
Court
of
which,
so
we
don't
pay
the
clerk
of
courts
of
our
pocket
anymore
in
this
saves
us
close
to
$80,000
a
year
and
it's
increased
their
load
as
I
understand
it.
They
also
go
out
on
some
of
the
calls
with
our
police
and
between
the
few
prosecutors
they're
handling
everything
as
far
as
it
goes
down
as
the
courts,
so
they're
asking
to
up
that
price
to
ten
thousand
dollars
a
year
per
prosecutor,
or
just
a
little
under
that,
let
Joe
back
going
back
to
January.
First.
B
E
E
You
do
have
an
agreement
in
place.
We
actually
employ
them,
that's
one
of
the
reasons
that
they
do
those
additional
services
for
the
police
department
like
the
assisting
with
stings
and
some
of
the
investigatory
things
that
they
wouldn't
necessarily
do
with
those
other
communities
because
they're,
not
their
contract
employees.
If
you.
E
I
I
I
And
we
had
to
with
a
mayor's
court,
we
don't
have
a
Barris
Court,
maybe
we'd
be
wise
to
go
to
a
1099,
because
there
is
obviously
a
cost
of
doing
the
deductions
any
compensation
the
state
requires.
Maybe
we
should
look
at
that
and
do
we
need
to
prosecutors?
How
often
do
they
go
with
our
police
department,
I.
I
F
E
The
amount
charges
are
fine
and
fees
still
collected
and
paid
to
Norton.
So
it's
it's
I.
Just
don't
know
what
the
amount
is.
I
mean
that
the
court
costs
for
the
barbarian
court
are
add
on
top
of
the
fine
and
fee
for
the
municipality.
So
there
may
be
some
service
charge
related
to
that,
but
we
can
get
that
we
get
those
a
man-hours.
The
court.
E
E
I
F
E
F
E
B
I
M
M
Just
agents
Lisa
Miller,
pretty
much
emphatically
told
us
that
if
we
go
because
remember,
I
asked
the
question
but
I:
don't
why
don't
I
have
a
contract?
These
people,
because
they're
our
employees
and
she
said
they're
your
employees
and
you're
gonna
lose
services.
We
can
do
that,
but
you'll
lose
services
and
the
chief
doesn't
want
to
lose
the
service
so
well.
The
Chiefs.
F
I
Find
out
what
the
additional
service
cost
is
to
get
whoever
out
of
bed
at
2:00
in
the
morning?
Should
they
be
needed
and
then
take
a
look
at
it?
That
way,
I
mean
that's
the
service
they're.
Providing
mr.
Minister.
Don't
shake
your
head.
You
said
they
were
calling
people
I
mean.
Is
there
any
other
service
they're
providing
other
than
the
prosecutor.
A
I
F
Mr.
master
I
think
you
need
to
be
more
in
Phatak.
We
have
reviewed
that
we've
reviewed
if
we
could
do
a
la
carte
in
reviewing
it
with
our
Police
Department
and
what
we
get
in
terms
of
their
services
under
a
solid
number.
Instead
of
you
know
paying
for
this
paying
for
that,
it
is
well
worth
it
to
go
this
route
because
they
could
be
caught
out
40
times
in
a
month
or
they
could
be
caught
out.
One
no.
F
I
F
B
F
E
K
H
K
D
H
F
D
F
I
I
B
D
F
D
L
F
It's
a
similar
situation,
I
guess
is
and
Justin
feel
free
to
jump
in
as
well.
There
was
a
request
to
look
at
the
solicitors
compensation
and
instead
of
it
being
a
contract
employee
that
we
would
we
would
add
mr.
Markey
on
as
an
employee,
the
cost
to
the
city
is
exactly
the
same.
We
deducted
out
what
it
would
cost
in
terms
of
for
towards
pension,
etc.
So
the
cost
of
the
city
I
want
to
be
really
clear
on
that
is
not
constants
any
extra
money.
The
benefit
we
get
is
we
get
his
tax
dollars.
F
E
E
D
F
E
Thing
that
would
change
in
the
original
retention
agreement
would
be
the
method
and
how
that
twenty
four
thousand
dollars
would
be
paid.
So,
instead
of
having
a
retainer
paid
quarterly
in
six
thousand
dollar
increments,
twenty
four
thousand
dollars
to
be
paid
as
a
salary
amount,
but
everything
else
would
stay
in
effect.
E
F
K
J
E
E
I
E
I
Part
time
now,
if,
in
the
current
situation,
if
I
read
your
contract
correctly,
if
we
have
four
people
or
the
mayor
should
so
desire,
we
can
give
you
60
days
notice
and
that's
it
right
correct.
So
there
is
a
difference.
Now
we
have
to
show
just
cause,
should
we
become
disenchanted
or
for
whatever
reason,
that's
one
point:
two:
if
we're
gonna
hire,
you
part
I
hate
to
do
it
like
this.
Mr.
markey
doesn't
seem
altogether
fair
to
you,
but
now
we're
in
the
future.
Should
we
hire
you
part-time?
It
does
bring
in
a
question.
I
E
Ethical
obligations,
whether
I
was
paid
as
a
part-time
employee
or
as
a
contract
employee
or
exactly
the
same
so
I
deal
with
my
ideal
of
my
clients
in
the
client
would
be
the
city
of
Norton.
If
there
was
a
conflict,
we
would
address
that
and
get
waivers
as
appropriate.
I
would
never
represent
two
communities
across
from
each
other
or
two
parties
across
from
each
other.
E
So
if
I'm,
representing
city
of
Norton
I
only
ever
represent
the
city
of
Norton,
when
we've
talked
about
these
conflict
waivers
in
the
past,
it's
because
my
firm
has
represented
other
entities
on
unrelated
matters.
Never
on
the
same
matter
has
never
across
the
table
from
another
person.
For
my
firm,
so
that's
that
that
doesn't
change
one
way
or
the
other.
That's
illegal!
That's
an
ethical
obligation
on
me.
As
a
lawyer,
oh
yeah,.
I
I
Compensated
by
wrestling
and
it's
a
trifle
firm
as
an
employee
of
that
law-
that's
correct
and
I
just
don't
see
why
we
bring
with
the
possibility
of,
should
there
be
a
problem,
just
cause
possible
conflict
personally,
I'd
like
to
see
this
day
just
where
it's
at
I
think
it's
cleaner
setup.
The
way
it
is
I
mean
I
would
make
bring
more
of
the
people
in
under
the
city's
wing
as
1099s
private
contractors.
I
It's
just
cleaner
for
business,
most
businesses.
They
are
doing
that
I,
don't
see
hiring
a
city
attorney
thing.
Our
legal
costs
have
been
pretty
substantial
last
couple
years.
I
think
that
there's
more
than
enough
compensation
I
do
also
do
believe
it
has
like.
Tonight
we
had
another
representative
of
the
firm,
their
billable
hours.
The
different
people
I
think
you're,
mixing
it
up
too
much
convoluting.
It
I
think
we
better
off
the
stay
right.
I
We're
at
personally
council
could
decide
how
they
want,
but
I
think
the
a
number
the
biggest
thing
to
me
is
potential
for
a
conflict,
and
secondly,
should
we
decide
that
we
need
a
separate
company.
It
makes
it
a
little
more
challenging
instead
of
a
nice
clean.
You
know
it's
been
great,
but
this
isn't
working
anymore
goodbye.
So.
I
In
the
past
we
is
for
the
Ritz
on
a
decision
say
more
adjuster
has
dealt
with
the
city
of
Barbie.
We
worked
in
a
sewer
agreement
with
the
city
of
Bartlett.
There
could
be
possible
they're,
a
large
firm
they're,
all
over
the
state
of
Ohio.
There
could
be
other
situations
I'd,
rather
we're
gonna
hire
somebody
as
a
city
solicitor,
I
like
to
have
somebody's
independently
working,
possibly
somebody's
their
own
firm,
not
tied
to
a
large
law.
Firm
I
think
is
potential
conflict.
You
don't
know.
I
What's
going
to
come
down
the
road
we
discuss
something
tonight,
I
think
they
possibly
could.
Then
that's
my
opinion.
I
know
there
again.
If
you
decide
to
discipline
or
remove
somebody
and
now
they're
employee,
you
better
show
just
cause,
and
particularly
a
law
firm
because
they
have
the
pockets
and
the
time
to
fight
it.
I
assume,
keep
it
nice
and
clean.
I
Think
that
it's
a
lot
easier
should
it
be
a
reason
to
separate
coffee
to
keep
it
this
way
it
it's
just
clean,
it's
clean
way
of
doing
business.
No,
there's
no
fault
either
side
see
you
later
in
it
and
the
conflict
is
that
I
think's?
Just
that's
it's
a
potential
problem
and
I,
don't
I
think
we've
had
enough
problems
but
I
think
it's
food
for
thought.
You
need
to
consider
it
as.
D
To
the
conflict,
I'll
just
say
that
I,
don't
I,
don't
necessarily
see
it,
but
I
would
hope
that,
since
mr.
Markey
is
a
licensed
attorney
in
the
state
of
Ohio
and
bound
by
the
ethical
rules
that
he
would
comply
with
the
ethical
rules
and
I've
never
seen
anything
from
him.
That
would
make
me
think
not
I'm,
not
suggesting
that
you're
saying
that
I've.
I
A
E
We've
never
asked
for
the
actually
I
think
under
mr.
Kosloff
for
3%
was
given
a
few
years
that
was
reset
when
I
took
over
back
to
the
original
$24,000
amount.
We've
never
asked
I've
never
asked
for
the
3%
just
to
be
clear.
Under
the
under
the
agreement,
the
retainer
can
be
increased
3%
every
year,
so
the
24,000
could
be
increased
3%
by
the
mayor
who
have
to
be
budgeted
by
council.
So
that's
the
control
by
council.
We've
never
asked
I've
never
asked
for
that.
I'm
I'm
glad
to
say
that
goes
away.
E
E
F
F
I
I
J
E
F
F
J
F
F
They're
under
the
same
ordinance:
well,
first,
no
they're
not
they're
in
a
different
order,
because
they're
their
conversation
is
based
on
a
percentage
based
on
the
union
contracts
or
in
a
totally
different
ordinance.
The
only
ones
I
guess
that
are
kind
of
complete
mercy
of
this
of
the
City
Council,
and
they
don't
mean
that
in
a
bet,
negative
way
is,
is
the
appointed
people
in
Carla
and
Anne's
position.
Those
are
the
non
bargaining
positions
now
under
that
ordinance,
where
we
do
a
weighted
average,
there's
nothing
in
there.
That
includes
part-time.
A
E
F
H
F
F
I
J
B
F
K
M
D
H
D
F
D
I
E
B
F
B
F
I
I
This
is
whip
he's
referring
to
if
we're
hiring
somebody
had
already
worked
in
a
municipal
situation
was
already
part
of
the
PRS
public
environment
fund.
So
we're
saying
that,
since
he
did
this,
one
sorry
did
like
this
Justin,
but
the
fact
that
he
had
did
this
when
he
was
in
college
or
elsewhere.
We've
considered
him
a
existing
public
employee.
So.
E
F
F
F
I
K
A
A
C
J
H
A
C
J
A
J
J
Bza
Ward
4
would
be
a
reappointment
to
a
second
term
expiring
in
229
2020
Mariam,
Norris,
bza,
at-large,
reappointment
to
a
second
term
expiring
again
to
29
2020
James
Latta,
Planning,
Commission,
Ward
1.
This
would
be
a
reappointment
to
his
first
full
term,
Bruce
again
expiring.
The
same
date:
Mary
Ann,
Peterson,
Planning,
Commission,
Ward,
2,
reappointment
to
a
second
term
same
date,
Ref
Ralph,
Dowling,
Planning,
Commission,
Ward,
3,
reappointment
to
his
fourth
term,
again
expiring.
J
E
C
C
J
K
J
A
L
F
Just
want
to
say
again,
this
is
you
know
not
simple
or
not
to
believe
her.
The
point
this
was
agreed
to
in
this
new
agreement.
Part
of
it
is
to
encourage
you,
know
regional
cooperation,
and
this
is
not
I
mean
for
this
case.
This
happens
to
be
has
to
do
with
the
sewer
project.
However,
opw
see
they
encourage
this
kind
of
partnership
and
all
of
their
loans
and
grants.
F
So
if
we
we've
had
like
I
said,
for
example,
we've
had
a
road
road
replacement
and
I'm
blanking
out
what
one
it
was
when
I
first
got
here,
but
summit
county
had
agreed
to
put
fifty
thousand
towards
that.
So
this
goes
back
and
forth.
I
think
it's
very
important
when
you
do
that
with
other
communities
and
they're
willing
to
do
it
with
you.
F
So,
let's
just
say
you
know,
I
understand
the
sewer
issue
can
be
controversial,
but
if,
if
Barberton
was
willing
to
do
a
joint
project
with
us
on
a
road,
it
might
be
worth
our
while
because
they
might
be
giving
us
$50,000
to
try
to
help
move
that
along.
So,
like
I,
said
it's
clearly
in
the
agreement,
it's
the
minimum,
we're
not
asking
more
than
the
minimum.
F
We
don't
even
know
if
we'll
get
the
grant
or
the
loan,
but
not
to
try
would
be
silly
and
in
the
end,
if
we
get
a
grant,
particularly
it
lowers
the
cost
to
you
know,
get
to
improve
that
infrastructure,
which
in
turn
keeps
the
cost
down
on
rates.
So
to
me,
I,
don't
wanna,
say
it's
a
no-brainer,
but
to
me
it
kind
of
a
no-brainer
that
I
think
we
should
be.
You
know,
being
cooperative.
That's
the
whole
spirit
of
why
we're
doing
some
of
the
things
that
we're
doing
and.
L
J
J
K
C
B
Item
H
auditor
of
the
state
contract.
Again
this
is
one
of
those
yearly
things,
and
this
is
for
the
ohio
state
auditor's
office.
They
come
in
here
and
they
audit
us
every
year
with
the
services
that
they
deliver.
You
have
that
cooperative
agreement,
the
agreement
that
what
they
give
us
in
front
of
you.
Basically
it's
the
same.
This
is
for
a
twenty
seven
thousand,
eight
hundred
and
eighty
dollar
annual
cost
and
again
it's
something
that
we
really
don't
have
much
choice
that
we're
gonna
have
to
pay
somebody
to
do
it.
C
B
C
B
B
We've
said
that
we
haven't
been
able
to
set
up
I
guess
we've
started
on
this
somewhat
last
year,
and
this
is
for
us
to
participate
in
this
at
a
total
cost
of
fifty
three
thousand
six
hundred
and
forty
five
dollars,
and
we
say
it's
the
VIP
which
its
software
solutions
and
the
time
frame
we
need
to
have
this
set
up
so
that
we
can
get
started
on
it.
I'll
have
it
up
and
running
by
April,
correct
we're
going
to
convert.
M
April,
the
10th
basically
council
will
recall
this
was
a
two-year
project.
This
is
upgrading
our
VIP
accounting
and
payroll
software.
We
presently
run
on
ego
as
our
software
system.
The
new
VIP
system
will
basically
bring
all
of
these
other
abilities
to
us,
namely
the
Ohio
checkbook,
which
we've
had
residents
clamoring
for
we've
not
been
able
to
do
it
with
the
ego
software.
We
will
be
able
to
do
it
with
a
VIP
I
know.
People
are
listening
tonight.
M
I
want
everybody
to
hear
what
I
say
when
I
convert
on
April
the
10th
Ohio
checkbook
will
not
be
there
yet
I've
got
to
get
this
software
under
control.
The
bugs
worked
out
with
any
new
program.
I'm
anticipating
it
probably
will
be
later
this
fall,
but
we
will
get
there.
I
have
promised
the
state
treasurer's
office
that
we
will
do
it
I've.
Given
my
word
I
stand
by
my
word.
It
will
happen.
M
M
Is
not
part
of
this?
It's
an
it's
another
piece
of
that
in
that
every
and
I
don't
want
council
to
get
hung
up
this,
but
you've
heard
me
say
it.
Every
software
package
has
support.
Support
does
two
things.
First,
it
guarantees
that
there
will
be
people
on
a
hem
outlined
to
be
there
to
help
you.
It
also
gives
a
lot
of
these
companies
a
little
bit
of
the
seed
money
for
research
and
development
to
keep
upgrading
the
product
in
that.
So
there
is
a
different.
M
M
A
G
M
Yes,
we
are
there's,
there's
a
lot
of
enhancements,
it's
more
windows-based,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
this
will
bring
will
help
us
with
our
productivity.
It
will
give
all
of
our
department
managers
real
time
look
at
their
budgets.
They
can
go
and
see
exactly
how
much
they
have
in
that
account
at
any
given
time
they
can
put.
Instead
of
writing
out
a
paper
requisition
for
a
purchase
order,
they
will
do
it
online.
It
will
come
through
the
electronic
process
to
be
approved
by
the
department
head
by
Valerie
myself.
M
B
M
In
getting
this
done,
so
I
put
my
faith
in
Council
to
the
fastest,
but
I
think
I
kind
of
told
you.
Last
year
there
was
a
two-step
roast.
Last
year
we
paid
for
the
hardware
the
service,
the
licenses
startups,
some
of
the
training
this
year.
It's
the
software
and
the
pace,
training
and
implementation
with.
M
B
B
M
M
B
B
The
readings
it's
already
money,
it's
not
affect
any
future
effect.
This
is
just
cleaning
up,
basically
clerical
error,
almost
in
the
figures
from
the
seventeen
three
it
never
we
never
lost
it.
We
just
didn't:
have
it
labeled
correctly
to
waive
the
readings
and
have
emergency
language
and
add
this
to
the
agenda.
February
27th.
L
C
B
C
I
F
F
Again,
I
just
want
to
be
clear
in
the
ordinance
that
doesn't
call
for
that.
If
you
want
a
special
sign,
I
think
legally,
we
probably
can
do
that.
I
know
you
referred
to
the
sign
on
Rose,
Bay
and
Monterey.
That
isn't
that
all
that
is
is
a
truck
with
the
circle
and
the
line
through
it.
No
trucks
so
I
mean
we
can
do
something
like
that,
but
you
want
a
specific
weight.
Well,.
I
It's
just
the
fact
that
north
of
the
bridge
crossing
76,
the
entire
roadway
and
travel
is
starting
to
really
come
apart
and
I
think
the
heavy
truck
traffic
and
other
heavy
equipment
across
it's
probably
as
a
stir,
baiting
the
situation
further
along.
We
prepared
to
fix
it
again
this
year
and
if
we
do
that,
you
know
we
fix
roads,
I
like
to
see
more
of
a
looked
at
them.
Yeah.
F
F
I
mean
I
guess
we
can
do
that.
I
just
think
it's
a
little
cumbersome.
I
will
tell
you
in
talking
with
mr.
white
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
suggesting,
and
this
would
be
probably
from
funds
that
we
would
have
to
talk
about.
Personally
speaking
and
I
drive
east
and
a
lot
as
well.
Obviously
you
do
too,
since
you
live
there,
it
is
used
as
a
cut
through.
F
Instead
of
us,
just
you
know
overlaying
it,
maybe
we
should
really
look
at
doing
an
upgrade
to
accommodate
it
as
a
cut-through,
because
that's
not
gonna
change,
that's
just
not
I
mean
that's
not
going
to
change
and
we
can
perhaps
at
least
evaluate
it
to
see
if
we
could
bring
it
up
to
a
better
standard
to
accommodate
some
of
those
those
trucks.
It's
just
a
suggestion.
H
I
Real
point
and
I
don't
have
children,
but
if
you
had
small
children,
you
would
probably
be
concerned
about
it.
Well,
they
were
at
the
building
school.
We
had
dumps
coming
down.
45
50,
plus
mile
an
hour
I
talked
to
mr.
della
sander
on
a
weekend
and
they
finally
slowed
a
few
of
them
down.
Wait
time
velocity
they
could
go
right
through
a
house
and
it's
easy
to
say
afterwards.
Gee
I'm,
sorry
they
don't
cut.
I
It
was
this
property
damage,
if
possible,
as
it
was
just
avoid
the
situation,
the
residential
area,
not
only
that
area
I
know,
Mr,
McGlone
Street
is
also
a
huge
cut
through.
We
don't
have
to
have
to
put
up
at
other
communities
doing
other
way.
We
always
have
to
seem
like
well
accommodate
accommodate
know.
These
are
taxpayers.
Let's
try
to
limit
the
traffic.
I
F
I
No
illusion
that
they
do
I'm
actually
not
looking
forward
to
when
you
first
start
digging
they're
going
down
on
certain
sections
of
East
and
the
shale
heart
28
to
30
feet.
The
screams
are
going
to
be
loud,
I
know
it
right
now,
because
I
know
what
it
was
and
hearts
all
low
and
long,
and
that
was
a
small
project,
so
I'm
sure
there'd
be
people
very
dissatisfied.
G
G
F
G
I
Say
to
that
two
points:
261
is
a
designated
state
highway.
I've
heard
many
people
complain
about
the
speed
on
261
I
agree,
Eastern
is
restricted,
is
a
residential
street
and
frankly,
I,
don't
particularly
care
and
I
know
a
lot
of
people
to
me
about
this
care.
Less
that
a
non-resident
commercial
vehicle
has
to
use
a
primary
Road
being
Cleveland
mass.
Look,
they
don't
pay
taxes
in
this
time,
I
mean
that's
I'm,
not
arguing,
and
it's
saying
that's
the
way
they
feel
I
mean.
I
And
that's
also
my
word
and
if
they
do
I
old
addresses
I
don't
want
to
see
commercial
traffic
on
us
I'm,
tired
of
getting
the
complaints
arm
up
and
down.
The
people
complain
to
me
now
that
I've
never
talked
to
before,
and
it
is
a
lot
more
noise,
etc.
Far
as
commercial
traffic
go,
they
will
use
any
route.
They
can,
unless
there's
a
consequence
and
word
gets
around,
and
particularly
companies
that
have
drivers
and
routes
that
if
they
got
fined
seven
eight
hundred
bucks,
they
probably
won't
use
it
again.
I
That's
not
so
I
think
it
needs
to
be
restricted.
I
don't
want
to
see
heavy
truck
traffic
on
any
residential
street
in
the
city,
not
only
safety
of
preserving
the
roads
and
that's
an
ongoing
argument.
We
need
to
fix
the
roads
tonight.
Easton
wasn't
fixed
right
to
begin
with
it
closed
it
five
years
ago,
I
believe
the
effect
was
falling
apart
and
at
that
same
section,
that
was
really
coming
apart
on
the
north
then,
but
let's
see
if
we
can't
stop
some
of
them.
Regarding.
F
Me
just
wrap
up
on
easting,
because
that
was
one
of
the
other
updates
on
Eastern
Road,
especially
mr.
Pearson,
for
your
knowledge,
the
school
zone,
the
permanent
there's
a
school
zone
there
already,
but
it's
not
marked
real
well,
because
the
light
wasn't
in
yet
the
lights
are
now
here:
they're
gonna
be
setting
the
foundations,
probably
at
the
end
of
the
week
or
the
beginning
of
next
week,
that
will
become
a
flashing
school
zone.
F
A
F
F
F
K
Concrete
sectional
structure.
Winners
excavating
is
doing
the
work
under
contract
with
the
Summit
County
engineer
and
the
project
is
covered.
A
hundred
percent
by
summit
county
engineer
funds
and
then,
like
said
any
engine,
any
concerns
can
be
directed
to
Summit
County
3
306
4
328
50
is
the
number
like
I
said
we
did
Sunday
I
press
release
out
to
the
newspapers
today.
My.
L
F
Check
the
Chiefs,
they
have
been
informed
about
the
closure
on
the
contractor.
I
will
say:
I
mean
it's
not
our
projects,
the
counties
but
they've
been
very
cooperative
and
working
with
us
and
they're
gonna.
Try
to
do
this
quickly.
Actually,
their
contract
allows
them
45-day
closure
and
we
said
no
way
so
they
were
willing
to
work
to
you
know,
do
try
to
do
it
within
the
two
weeks.
Iii.
L
F
B
F
B
M
Mr.
Kernan
requested
last
week
to
have
the
representative
from
blue
technology
who's
handling
the
scanning
project
present.
To
answer
questions
I
did
put
out
an
email
to
everybody
today.
Mr.
Evans,
who
is
the
sales
rep
is
was
not
was
already
scheduled
for
this
evening.
He
does
plan
to
be
here
next
Monday
night.
So
if
you
have
questions,
please
get
them
to
me.
He's
coming
down
from
Cleveland
he's
hoping
it
will
be
profitable
that
he
just
does
come
and
nobody
has
any
questions
and
he
drives
an
hour
and
nobody
asks
and
and.
M
Project,
so
if
you
have
questions
or
concerns,
I
need
to
hear
about
them,
so
I
can
kind
of
get
him
primed
for
if
not
I
I
told
him
buddy
said
they
can
come
down.
I've
seen
him
asked
for
somebody
to
come
and
then
ask
no
questions
and
I
said:
if
that
happens,
all
I'm
gonna
say
is,
is
give
them
a
30-foot
thousand
foot.
Do
you
overview
like
I
did
and
we'll
call
it
a
day
so.
M
K
B
C
Basket
challenge
I
had
sent
out
a
memo
to
everybody
all
departments,
all
employees
I'm
really
asking
for
your
help
and
we're
doing
I'm
gonna
make
it
a
challenge
for
whoever
brings
in
the
most
gifts
certificates
baskets
cash,
whatever
I'm
gonna,
throw
you
a
pizza
party,
so
make
it
worth
your
while
we
already
have
25
baskets
that
just
came
in
in
the
last
few
days
from
mr.
and
mrs.
Mullins.
C
B
F
K
F
Just
hand
it
out
to
you
is
the
correspondence
our
first
group
of
correspondents
going
out
to
the
nanites
project.
Obviously,
as
mr.
Pearson's
are
alluded
to,
this
is
a
big
project.
It's
going
to
be
somewhat
painful,
but
we're
trying
our
best
to
lay
out
as
much
as
we
can
ahead
of
time
so
that
people
understand
what's
going
on
so
the
first
piece
of
information
that
you
see
is
there's
a
joint
letter
from
mayor's
EDA
and
mayor
judge,
basically
explaining
our
cooperation,
our
sewer
agreement
a
little
bit
and
what
is
expected
in
that
letter.
F
Also,
we
talked
about
Rudd
zyk
excavating
is
the
contractor
and
kind
of
the
expectations
that
were
working
through
with
them.
We
had
a
pre-construction
meeting,
February
6
and
out
of
that
pre-construction
meeting
the
as
a
reminder
under
our
orders
from
the
EPA,
we
have
to
start
work
by
April
1st.
However
thank
God
for
the
nice
weather.
Hopefully
that
continues
Rudd
zyk
is
already
gearing
up
and
they
expect
to
actually
mobilize
by
March
1st.
So
it
was
very
important
that
we
got
this
information
out
to
the
residents
it's
dated
for
Friday.
F
We
actually
sent
these
letters
this
morning,
so
they
should
be
hitting
the
mailboxes
here
soon.
So
you
may
get
some
questions.
In
addition,
what
we
put
o
also
work
time
will
be
basically
7:00
to
5:30
daily.
They
will
not
be
working
on
Fridays
and
they
don't
probably
not
be
working
on
weekends.
Now
that
could
change
during
depending
on
the
circumstances,
but
right
now
it's
a
four
day
week
workweek,
so
it
kind
of
gives
the
people
a
little
bit
of
relief
going
into
the
weekend
and
over
the
weekend
you
know
if
they
have
guests
parties
etc.
F
Obviously
we
will
work
with
the
residents
as
much
as
we
can.
The
contractor
is
been
made
very
aware
in
the
pre-construction
meeting,
and
the
city
of
Barberton
has
been
made
very
aware
that
these
are
residents
that
need
to
be
looked
after
in
terms
of
their
needs
because
of
the
inconvenience
that
they're
going
to
be
going
through.
So
I
have
to
say
everyone
was
very
positive
about
that.
Just
so
you
know,
I
have
been
and
will
continue
to
be,
doing
progress,
reports
and
meetings
with
Barberton
throughout
the
entire
project.
F
Just
because
Barberton
owns
the
sewer
system
does
not
mean
that
we
will
not
be
involved,
in
fact
most
of
the
street.
Well,
all
of
this
material
is
pretty
much
created
by
us,
because
we
want
to
control.
You
know
to
make
sure
the
message
was
got
out
there
very
clearly
to
the
people.
The
next
page,
hopefully,
I-
didn't
staple
yours,
wrong,
I,
stapled
Meyer
on
here,
so
the
next
page
is
actually
the
yellow
page.
That
is
the
frequently
asked
questions.
So
what
we've
tried
to
do
again?
F
I
will
not
go
through
every
little
piece
of
this
I
should
say
like
the
safety
green
more.
This
is
what
people
sure
refer
to.
If
they
have
a
question
about
during
the
project,
it
probably
will
not
answer
every
single
thing,
although
I
think
we've
done
a
pretty
good
job.
Addressing
most
of
the
potential
questions,
I
want
to
thank
Carla.
She
was
very
helpful
because
she
gets
a
lot
of
phone
calls
and
I
said:
I
want
to
make
sure
we're
hitting
all
the
things
that
get
called
in
about.
F
Obviously,
the
mayor,
Justin
Ron
all
looked
at
this.
This
wiki
looked
at
this
as
well
and
I
think
we've
hit
everything.
Obviously
the
City
of
Newark
City
of
Barberton
has
looked
at
it
and
both
of
the
engineering
companies
involved.
One
thing
I
do
want
to
point
out
at
the
very
end
of
that
page
is
we
are
setting
up
what
we're
gonna
call.
The
national
service
mailbox
is
going
to
be
three
three
zero,
eight,
two,
five,
seven,
eight
one,
five
extension,
three
twelve.
F
That
doesn't
mean
that
we
will
not
take
live
questions,
but
we
wanted
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
clearing
house
where
people
can
leave
a
question
if
they
have
and
we
will
get
back
to
them
within
the
next
day
of
what
that
that
question
is
so
we'll
be
monitoring
that,
obviously,
if
there's
something
big
going
on,
they
can
call
City,
Hall
and
we'll
get
right
on
that,
but
it
just
it'll
be
a
little
bit
more
organized
if
we
have
that.
In
addition,
we
are
gonna.
F
How
long
do
I
have
to
tie
into
the
sewer
once
it
is
installed
throughout
this
entire
process?
Summit
county
was
pretty
much
60,
90
or
6
months,
60
days,
90
days
or
six
months,
depending
on
the
severity
of
your
problem,
to
make
it
a
little
bit
easier
for
everyone,
we
are
go
as
the
lines
are
released
in
each
on
each
Street.
From
that
point,
all
of
everyone
will
have
six
months
to
tie
in
so
those
people
that
maybe
have
a
crucial
problem.
They'll
want
to
probably
get
tied
in
earlier,
but
you
know
that
was
reconsidered.
F
That
maybe
60
days
is
just
too
much,
so
everyone
will
be
required
to
be
tied
in
within
six
months
after
their
line
is
released.
The
other
thing
I
want
to
point
out.
I
should
have
on
the
yellow
page,
and
it's
in
the
left.
I
think
it's
in
the
letter.
No
it's
in
the
yellow
page.
If
you
remember
under
our
sewer
agreement,
because
this
is
a
mandated
project,
the
city
of
Barberton
will
cut
their
tie-in
fee
the
six
hundred
sixteen
hundred
dollars.
F
They
will
cut
that
into
half
at
eight
hundred
dollars
if
people
are
tied
in
within
that
six
months,
so
it's
an
incentive
to
make
sure
things
get
done
after
that,
for
whatever
reason
you're
gonna
want
to
be
in
trouble
with
the
Health
Department,
but
you
want
to
take
advantage
of
that.
There
is
a
separate
letter
that
we
developed
this
afternoon
just
for
the
fringe
properties,
there's
11
properties
that
are
considered
fringe
properties.
All
of
the
supplies
to
them,
except
for
the
fact
that
they're
voluntary
tie-in.
I
F
Me
back
up
the
fringe
properties.
I
am
talking
about,
are
the
11
property
owners
that
opted
into
the
project,
but
you
are
correct
if
you
have
a
feeling
septic,
so
I
would
suggest
that
if
you
have
a
failing
septic
on
any
fringe
lines,
you
might
want
to
get
that
updated.
Because,
yes,
if
you,
if
you
have
a
feeling
sceptic
at
some
point,
the
Health
Department
could
make
you
tie
in
the.