►
From YouTube: 1-22-18 - Regular Council Meeting - Part 1
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
D
before
we
start
tonight's
meeting
I
would
just
like
to
make
an
announcement
and
remember
or
pay
tribute
to
two
members
of
our
community
that
passed
away
in
the
last
few
weeks
here,
both
extraordinary
men
that
have
done
so
much
for
the
community,
one
being
Charlie
lemon
just
recently
passed
away.
It
was
a
former
council
member
he
volunteered.
So
much
of
his
time
to
so
many
different
organizations
even
received
an
award
from
President
Ronald
Reagan
at
one
point
in
time,
a
very
special
individual,
very
sorry
and
saddened
that
is
no
longer
with
us.
D
D
G
A
A
H
E
D
D
E
I
If
one
is
operational
at
this
point,
we
have
it
at
the
service
garage
should
an
event
happen,
but,
prior
to
that,
we
only
had
three
vehicles
and
in
service
at
one
point.
Fortunately,
we
got
a
fourth
up
and
operational
before
the
last
snow
event,
because
of
that
situation,
we're
looking
to
purchase
a
second
vehicle
a
little
bit
larger
than
the
normal
sized
vehicles
is
a
tandem
axle
vehicle.
It
holds
between
7
and
10
tons,
provide
us
some
flexibility
in
our
operation.
I
It
comes
fully
equipped
for
snow
plow,
ice
and
snow
control
comes
with
actually
two
plows
one
on
the
main
cab
one
wing
plow
on
which
will
be
installed
on
the
dump
bed,
if
you've
seen
the
o
dot
trucks.
Typically,
trucks
that
Oh
dots
operating
is
a
tandem
with
a
wing.
Plow
it'll
also
can
have
a
V
box
spreader,
which
will
auger
the
salt
out
rather
than
having
to
raise
the
bed.
D
D
Then
I
I
gone
down
to
the
service
garage
last
week
and
I
was
talking
with
Larry
Hess
and
the
condition
of
the
trucks
and
stuff
I
was
looking
to.
Maybe
try
to
you
know,
stagger
the
purchases
some
considering
we
had
just
purchased
a
truck,
but
when
I
went
down
there
and
saw
the
condition
of
our
trucks,
I
I
was
actually
very
embarrassed
that
we
hadn't
kept
up
on
a
kind
of
systematic
rotation
of
our
vehicle
and
equipment
and
I
know.
Mr.
D
Fowler
is
going
to
be
working
on
that
and
implementing
a
replacement
policy
on
on
our
equipment.
So
we
don't
run
into
the
same
issues
in
the
future.
Some
of
our
trucks,
while
one
of
them
dates
back
to
I
believe
he
said
it
was
a
97
a
couple.
Others
are
like
a
2000.
We
have
one
newer
vehicle
dump
truck,
which
is
I,
believe
a
2013,
so
it's
definitely
needed.
D
I
K
J
K
B
G
G
I
G
I
It
raises
in
order
to
do
the
salt
application
we're
going
to
a
different
system.
The
current
system
that
we
implement
in
the
city
requires
the
bed
to
elevate
right
to
move
the
salt
understand
the
system
we
have
will
be
implementing
I'll
just
draw
a
quick
picture
here.
If
I
can
find
something
essentially.
A
I
B
I
O
O
J
I
I
K
I
D
D
O
E
E
A
D
D
I
So
what
if
you
to
go
to
the
the
easiest
explanation
is
on
the
back
of
the
cover
sheet:
I
prepared
a
small
little
spreadsheet
for
you
to
review
option
a
is.
We
do
nothing,
and
that
means
that
little
Boulevard
from
shell
heart
to
the
call
to
sac
remains
in
current
state
Brookside,
the
same
shell
heart
the
same
and
that's
from
Brookside
to
Easton
option.
B
is
strictly
paving
and
I
received
a
slightly
lower
estimate
that
on
show
Hart
it's
about
$47,000
now,
so
it
came
down
about
$12,000.
I
So
if
we
were
just
to
do
paving
on
those
three
streets,
we'd
be
at
about
a
hundred
and
fourteen
thousand,
that
would
be
general
fund
contribution,
because
the
project
would
would
not
be
able
to
cover
that
I
did
submit
some
cost
from
the
engineer
based
on
the
quantities
that
were
submitted
in
the
in
accordance
with
a
bid
for
the
project
and
that's
item.
C
I
believe
I
also
included
the
specifications
for
running
sewer
lines
to
both
little
and
Brookside
I
know.
We've
had
many
conversation
about
what
we're
going
to
do.
I
We
do
have
two
connections
on
little
to
a
lady
has
and
they're
two
people
or
two
locations
on
little,
which
want
to
purchase
their
sewer
connection
now,
which
totals
about
twenty
I,
think
we
said
twenty-three,
almost
twenty
three
thousand
dollars.
So
the
question
is:
how
do
we
address?
You
know
we
sent
them
fringe
letters
and
now
they're
they
have
they've
asked
to
be
included,
I'm,
just
looking
for
a
decision
from
Council
how
we
wish
to
proceed.
O
B
I
I
O
I
G
I
G
I
No
and
just
mystery,
I,
don't
know
if
you
recall
we
had
many
discussions
in
October
relating
to
the
project
and
when
we
sent
the
fringe
letters,
we
even
had
that
discussion.
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
Charlotte,
we
had
the
discussion
about
the
assessment
in
that
letter
because
the
original
draft
we
had
said
that
we
would
do
that,
and
one
of
the
discussions
we
had
here
I
believe
was.
We
didn't
feel
they
had
that
opportunity
to
get
in
and
therefore
because
they
chose
not
to
get
in
the
project.
I
G
D
G
I
I
O
M
A
G
K
Unless
there's
you
know
an
EPA
mandate
or
something
like
that,
so
I
get
a
little
uncomfortable
about
that,
because
I
do
know
that
we
have
a
process
within
our
code
for
people
to
request
lines
and
I
think
it's
got
to
be
2/3
of
the
residents
or
something
like
that.
Maybe
that's
for
water,
or
maybe
it's
for
sewer.
Maybe
it's
for
both
I,
don't
know,
but
we
have
that
process
to
do
that
and
and
I'm
more
comfortable
with
that.
K
If,
if
like
a
super
majority
of
people
say
on
the
street,
we
want
sewer-
and
we
say:
okay-
we're
gonna
put
sewer
in
then
we
go
ahead
and
do
that
and
then
we
assess
that
separately
or
we
figured
that
out
separately.
My
concern
is,
is
we
run
these
lines
down
this
road
and
I
was
just
looking
at
the
map
and
I?
K
Don't
know
how
many
people,
let's
take
shell
herd
for
our
little,
for
instance,
I,
don't
know
how
many
people
are
on
that
street,
but
that's
a
long
run
with
few
houses
as
I
recall,
so
the
question
then
becomes
is:
does
does
the
11
5
really
work
for
that
I
mean
I.
Think
that's
something
we
need
to
look
at
is
whether
or
not
that
that
number
works
for
that
particular
project.
K
I,
don't
know
that
we
have
bound
ourselves
in
the
future
for
every
project
that
everybody's
gonna
be
paying
11:5.
It
depends
on
the
area
if
there's
more
people
in
a
concentrated
area.
My
guess
is
that
more
people
mean
that
that
the
assessment
might
be
lower.
I,
don't
know
it
may
not
work
out
that
way,
but
it's
something
we
have
to
look
at
I
don't
know
so
so
that
first
concern
is
about
what
we
talked
about
when
we
first
started
this
project
I
remember
people
coming
in
down
golfcourse
Drive
and
can
be
inconsiderate
here
and.
K
K
There
needs
to
be
more
discussion
about
this
and
I
think
people
have
to
be
better
informed,
I
understand
they
got
the
letters
and
they
should
I.
Don't
know
and
I
can't
remember
what
the
letter
said
at
this
point:
I'm
not
so
sure
that
that
letter
said
we
might
be
thinking
about
running
a
line
down
your
street
and
so
I
think
that
they
need
to
know
that
and
then
we
need
to
take
a
look
at
this
thing.
K
G
But
but
but
my
question,
which
was
how
much
will
a
homeowner
pay
it's
answered?
Eleven-Five
is
what's
decided
now
and
then
I
said:
how
much
will
the
city
pay
for
that?
That
line?
That's
going
down
and
I
see
the
figures
here
and
and
the
way
I
read.
Your
interpretation
is
11
5
and
11
5
we're
going
to
be
getting
$23,000
back
and
we're
gonna
be
expending.
B
L
G
Have
a
sewer
line
in
place
already
already
in
place,
which
was
in
the
mandated
area,
and
it
runs
down
the
south
side
of
show
heart
or
north
I,
don't
know
which
one
or
the
other
anyway
it
runs
by
on
shell
heart.
It
runs
past
two
homes
between
Brookside
and
little
on
the
north
side.
There's
two
homes
on
the
north
side
or
Brookside,
and
shell
harsh
or
you
can
say
the
one
is
on
Brookside,
there's
a
driveway.
It
shows
on
this
map.
G
Okay,
so
anyway,
all
I'm
saying
is
I
think
we
should,
if
we
haven't
already
and
I
I,
would
think
that
you
already
have
contacted
each
and
every
homeowner
and
said:
do
you
want
to
be
included
in
this
line
and
and
if
all
of
those
homes,
except
for
the
said
this
is
in
my
mind,
if
they
said
no,
we
do
not
want
to
be
included
in
this,
then
I
would
say
to
them,
including
the
we're
not
going
to
run,
that
sewer
line
down
there
at
our
cost
at
the
city's
cost.
Unless.
G
50%
of
you
at
least
hook
up
to
the
sewer
line,
I
mean
I,
want
to
see
the
sewer
lines
ran
down
there
because
it's
gonna
increase
the
value
of
those
homes
and
when
they
sell
them,
they're
gonna
realize
a
greater
value
on
their
homes,
but
but
I
think
we're
spending
truthfully.
I
think
we're
we're
saying
we're
spending
money
just
to
avoid
the
fact
that
we'll
have
to
repave
the
road.
If
they
do
it
in
the
future.
Worse,
then
we're
spending
money
on
those
sewer
lines
just
for
their
benefit
of
those
two
people.
I
G
I
The
whole
project
cost
the
289
will
be
funded
by
the
project.
It
makes
no
difference
we
just
if
we're
going
to
do
the
paving
like
we
did
Easton.
We
kind
of
need
to
make
a
decision
here
very
soon.
We
need
to.
It
would
be
it.
It
would
be
say
it
in
a
nice
way,
disingenuous
to
the
three
streets
for
us
not
to
spend
a
hundred
and
fourteen
thousand
dollars
to
complete
the
paving
a
those
that
area
yeah.
E
P
I
K
K
L
C
C
C
M
C
K
C
G
G
C
A
Added
another
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
on
to
what
it
is.
We
have
to
get
for
nine
people
which
basically
it
comes
up
to
like
over
$30,000
per
resident,
roughly
well
I'm,
using
all
nine
of
them
into
biting
it
in
there,
because
eventually,
they'll
have
to
pay
it
that
we're
going
to
be
picking
up
over
half
of
that.
If
we
give
it
and
I
understood,
it
was
11,
not
11,
5
I
thought
11
5
was
after
net
was
11
to
begin
and
we're
gonna.
A
Let
them
have
it
for
the
11
when
twice
they
said
no,
we
don't
want
it
and
we
rewrote
our
resolution
of
necessity
to
do
it,
the
other
they
added
this
and
then
we're
going
to
pick
up
more
for
them
than
we
did.
The
other
people
or
the
people
up
on
Cleveland,
Massillon
and
they're
asking
for
it.
I
have
an
issue
with
that
that
there
needs
to
be
more
than
just
that.
A
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
putting
sewers
in,
but
we
fought
and
fought
with
these
people
out
here
on
the
prices
and
said
we
couldn't
do
any
more.
We
couldn't
do
any
more.
We
kept
put
people
in
take
people
out.
They
had
two
opportunities
to
get
in
here
and
they
could
have
had
an
impact
on
the
overall
price
to
begin
with
and
what
we
could
have
done
with
it.
And
now,
at
the
last
minute,.
K
I
K
Sent
out
yeah
and
I
suppose
I
guess
my
biggest
thing
is
what
I
I
guess
what
I
want
to
know
at
this
point,
I
and
I
realize
that
we're
working
with
change
orders
and
we
need
to
have
a
decision
somewhat
quickly,
but
I
would
like
to
see
these
folks
contacted
and
said
the
city
is
contemplating
running
a
sewer
line
down
this
road.
Do
you
want
it?
I
mean
I
I,
just
really
want
it
to
be
that
clear.
K
G
We
have
do
we
have
the
authority
or
the
option
or
what
are
we
going
to
call
it
to
start
with
with
little
and
Brookside
cul-de-sac,
just
like
we
did
only
under
a
mandate
from
EPA.
Can
the
city
not
say
we're
gonna
run
a
sewer
line
down
those
two
streets
and
there
are
already
two
people
who
are
interested
and
if
we
run
the
sewer
line
down
those
streets,
wouldn't
they
be
required
to
hook
up
now.
I
I
K
The
concern
for
me
is,
is
that
I
and
I'm
thinking
most
of
these
houses
are
fairly
new.
So
you
know
their
septic
systems
probably
have
15
20
years
left.
If
they're
taken
care
of
it
could
be
more
than
that,
I
mean
you
know.
How
long
is
the
city
gonna
sit
and
wait
for
people's
septic
systems
to
fail,
and
then
they
have
to
they
have
to
hook
in
they.
G
O
I
E
B
Golf
Course
yeah
heading
to
Easton.
Okay,
when
you
go
down,
you
go
down,
show
heart
heading
towards
east
and
it
makes
an
immediate
right-hand
turn
on
to
Brookside
mm-hmm.
Okay.
Well
from
that
immediate
right-hand
turn
from
that
point,
they're
down
to
Easton,
well,
you're
still
on
show
heart
that
would
count.
There's
a
white
house.
There
is
mrs.
zeners
house,
there's
bridge
way
home,
and
then
you
go
into
the
gray
house
on
the
corner.
B
Every
year
a
lot
of
pavement
gets
read,
gets
redone,
gets
more
asphalt
and
dumped
in
there,
because
it's
it's
it's
a
I,
don't
know
if
it's
a
bad
spot
soft
spot
whatever,
but
historically
a
lot
of
extra
asphalt
in
dollars
get
kind
of
dumped
on
that
road
in
that
portion
right
there.
So,
basically
the
prey
at
the
the
project.
The
road
will
get
paved
from
on
shell
heart
as
you
go
down
to
Brookside,
and
then
it
will
go
to
the
south
on
Brookside.
So
from
that
point
down
to
east
and
will
be
unpaved
as
a.
B
E
A
G
Q
G
G
G
K
A
K
But
the
reason
really
it's
11,
but
the
reason
that
number
is
where
it
is
is
because
that
was
the
assessment
that
we
came
up
with
people
in
NASH
Heights.
That
does
not
necessarily
mean
that
if
we
ran
a
sewer
line
down
little
or
down
whichever
one
that
it
would
cost
that
much
for
each
person,
it
might
be
more
I
doubt
it
would
be
less,
it
might
be
more,
and
so
we
can't
really
tell
them.
It's
gonna
cost
you
11
5,
because
we
don't
know
that.
G
K
K
K
B
K
Q
K
Head
all
right
now,
one
of
the
things
that
we
really
need
to
look
at
and
I
may
be
remembering
this
wrong,
but
when
they
kind
of
widened
shell
heart
remember
used
to
be
very,
very
narrow
street
there,
and
then
they
just
kind
of
threw
some
asphalt
on
to
the
side
of
it.
I,
honest
to
goodness,
don't
know
that
they
ever
really
did
what
they
needed
to
under
the
base
of
that
road.
K
M
I
I
K
A
P
K
Had
I
mean
I
certainly
have
no
problem,
looking
at
finishing
up
the
paving
in
that
area,
doing
it
right
getting
done,
I
think
we
still
need
to
I
still
have
some
questions
about
running
the
sewer
lines
out,
which
is
obvious
from
the
comments
I've
made,
but
I
think
we
can
start
out
answering
some
of
those
questions
by
being
very
clear
with
the
folks
on
those
roads.
This
is
what
we're
proposing
do
you
want
this
well.
A
H
I
Want
to
comment
one
thing
on
the
sewer
timing:
we're
just
due
to
the
sheer
timing
of
it-
probably
not
gonna
happen
with
sewers.
Now,
just
because
of
the
way
the
project's
going
projects
gonna
be
done,
the
excavation
is
gonna,
be
done.
We
have
time
to
do
the
pavement,
because,
probably
not
going
to
do
it
to
March,
but
kind
of
one
of
the
reasons
I
want
to
have
this
discussion
tonight
was.
M
I
N
I
K
I
I
M
I
D
O
I
I've
been
going
through
the
codified
ordinances
one
by
one
specifically
on
this
ordinance.
It
talks
about
volunteer
firefighters,
which
we
haven't
had
volunteer
firefighters
for
for
quite
some
time,
some
of
the
stipulations
that
required.
You
know
no
members
of
the
volunteer
fire
division
should
be
60
years
of
age,
etc.
I
B
I
He,
yes,
yes
and
and
more.
This
is
not
something
it's
one
of
those
things
we're
just
trying
to
clear
up
the
codify
ice.
It's
not
urgent,
but
we
just
wanted
to
get
it
before
you,
because
it
really
isn't
something
we
do
any
longer
and
we
felt
like
if
it's
really
not
something
we're
doing
really
shouldn't
be
in
the
do.
I
Mean
the
collective
bargaining
agreements
covers
some
of
these
activities,
the
police.
Do
you
know
in
their
job
descriptions,
etc.
These
are
either
articulated
you
know,
so
we
feel
according
to
the
chief
I.
Just
so
you
are
clear.
The
Mayor,
Ron,
Justin
and
I
circulate
this
amongst
ourselves.
Once
we
determined
it
was
something
we
wanted
to
review.
We
sent
it
out
to
all
the
Chiefs.
The
police
and
fire
chiefs
asked
them
for
their
input.
They
felt
it
was,
was
not
something
that
was
needed
any
longer,
and
then
we
brought
it
to
you
all.
D
K
D
K
E
D
I
O
K
Does
this?
Does
this
prevent
I
think
we
had
a
situation
a
few
years
back
where
we
had
a
lieutenant
who
was
actually
making
less
than
an
officer,
or
there
was
some
because
of
the
collective
bargaining
it.
It
ended
up
that
somebody
at
a
higher
level
was
making
less
than
somebody
at
a
lower
level.
There.
I
A
I
I
G
H
A
C
P
C
I
G
D
G
G
D
A
K
M
K
But
I
guess
the
way
I
read
that
ordinance
is
is
that
the
police
chief
must
make
at
least
a
thousand
dollars
more
than
the
captain.
It
doesn't
mean
just
because
the
captain
is
established
and
that's
a
thousand
more
bucks
that
the
police
chief
gets
a
thousand
more
bucks.
I
think
all
that
says
is.
He
must
make
at
least
a
thousand
four
dollars
he's
already
making
more
than
a
thousand
more
dollars,
so
it
doesn't
affect
his
salary
is
the
way
I
read.
G
G
K
P
A
G
D
G
M
G
I
O
E
O
O
K
I
E
D
Do
we
have
a
second?
Yes,
then
I
have
one
more
question
as
to
redoing
this
and
adding
this
position
under
234
or
240
point
oh,
four,
part-time
patrolmen
and
to
40
point
0,
5
special
patrolman
says
the
duties
of
these
individuals
will
be
determined
by
the
chief
of
police
and
director
of
Public
Safety.
D
I
D
F
D
O
I
One
thing
we
we
identified
is
in
the
in
the
codifies
we
have
bonds
listed,
that
we
have
to
buy
a
surety
bond
well,
Ron
discovered
that
we
can
get
bonds
through
our
insurance
agent
and
we're
while
we're
reducing
the
amount.
We
still
have
blanket
dishonesty
bonds
which
will
reduce
our
costs.
It's
just
just
clarifying
what
we're
gonna
do
here.
I
K
I
Essentially,
it's
a
protection
of
the
city.
If
someone
were
to
steal
money,
it's
like
insurance
insurance
and
typically
the
only
people
that
are
required
to
get
bonds
are
those
that
handle
the
money.
The
mayor,
nor
I,
will
tell
you
we
don't
handle
money
so
for
us
honestly,
there's
really
not
an
interest,
but.
A
I
I
K
I
Didn't
want
us
to
be
held
to
this
40-hour
eight
hours
overtime,
while
we'll
have
a
collective
bargaining
agreement
that
covers
them.
Should
we
hire
seasonals
that
now
fall
under
this
ordinance?
They
will
be
allowed
to
work
the
for
tens
as
well,
okay
and
we're
working
through.
Typically,
we
haven't
finalized
it
yet,
but
we're
looking
at
May
through
September
right
for
the
summer
months
to
do
four
times,
one
that
gives
us
two
extra
hours
of
daylight
and
and
gives
us
the
opportunity
to
work.
So
that's
why
that
changes
in
there?
How.
I
It'll
reflect
with
our
now.
The
collective
bargaining
will
supersede
this
ordinance,
so
any
collective
bargaining
agreement
that
we
have
that
doesn't
have
this
language.
They'll
still
get
their
overtime
in
eight
hours.
The
problem
is,
if
we
have
seasonals-
and
they
are
here
ten
hours
a
day
according
to
this
ordinance
will
have
to
pay
them
two
hours
overtime
for
every
day
that
they're,
here
more
than
eight
hours.