►
From YouTube: 07-06-2020 Regular Council
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
F
E
B
A
E
A
B
We
have
under
Committee
of
the
Whole.
We
will
acknowledge
receipt
of
the
budget
reports
for
June
of
2020
I.
Think
that
we
did
not.
We
looked
around
I
know
that
Charlotte
looked
around
and
her
email
and
stuff
I
don't
think
that
we
got
the
may
ones.
So
we
will
get
those
resent
to
us.
They've
been
sent
or
we'll
get
them
sent,
and
then
we
will
acknowledge
those
next
meeting.
H
H
I
would
like
to
move
this
where
it
looks
like
we're
moving
this
with
a
hope
to
waive
the
second
and
third
readings
add
to
tonight's
agenda.
So
unless
there's
some
questions
about
this
is
just
simply
the
concrete
work
on
Brooklyn
and
I
would
like
to
move
to
add
this
to
tonight's
agenda
Oh.
Second,
we.
B
G
D
D
A
I
J
F
My
understanding
that
this
was
the
only
bid
that
we
put
out
there
was
from
Brooklyn
itself,
and
it's
a
strictly
for
Brookline
and
yeah
and
I
just
wanted
to
add.
I
think
that
mr.
Fowler
had
mentioned
or
week
two
weeks
ago,
that
this
is
actually
in
preparation
for
the
roadwork
could
be
done
on
Brookline
next
year.
K
B
D
Thought
it
was
a
pretty
good
price.
Actually
I
see
it
was
700
some
feet
of
curbing
and
forty
seven
dollars
a
foot
I
believe
it
said,
which
is
I,
I,
didn't,
say
anything
wrong
with
the
price
at
all:
I'm
not
familiar
that
much
with
it.
But
that
sounds
reasonable
for,
like
you
said
Robert,
almost
the
entire
street
yep.
F
A
J
J
D
I
I
B
K
L
K
The
base
work
is
done
on
my
down
line.
They
still
have
to
do
the
topcoat
all
the
way
to
Ridgewood
no
mind
you
were
only
paying
for
the
portion.
That's
a
more
10%
concrete
work.
While
you
are
all
on
break
the
Worcester
Road
talk
to
Josh
today.
We
anticipate
awarding
that
when
you
return
so
with
everything
going
forward,
Worcester
Road
the
stormwater
be
bid
and
then
subsequently
we
will
bit
the
paving
in
September.
K
C
B
H
H
H
J
D
I
J
B
J
E
H
D
I
B
I
E
Resolution
determining
to
proceed
with
the
submission
of
the
question
of
the
replacement,
an
increase
of
a
tax
levy
in
excess
of
the
ten,
no
limitation
for
the
purpose
of
providing
and
maintaining
fire
apparatus,
appliances,
buildings
and
sites.
Therefore,
sources
of
water
supply
and
materials.
Therefore,
the
payment
of
permanent
part-time
or
volunteer
fire
fighting
from
emergency
medical
service,
administrative
and
communications
personnel
to
operate
the
same,
including
the
payment
of
any
employer
contributions
required
for
such
personnel
under
sections
one.
Forty
eight
point:
forty
eight
and
I'm
sorry
or
seven.
E
I
B
I
I
E
Gein,
yes,.
D
A
E
Wimpy,
yes,
mr.
peel,
yes,
Mr,
curry,
yes,.
I
I
J
J
This
state
said
you
cannot
if
it
can
be
heard
83
well,
then
you
could
be
in
violation
and
it's
a
$250
fine,
most
people
if
shards
are
greater
than
80
feet,
I
mean
if
they're
playing
a
radio
outside
going
yard,
work
or
something
just
because
their
neighbor
has
an
issue
with
them
or
something
they
could
potentially
get
fined.
I
think
these
levels
are
ridiculous.
J
You
know
I've
heard
numerous
complaints
so
far
about
where
the
we
want
to
set
these
heavy
traffic
or
a
window.
Air
conditioned
or
noisy
restaurant.
Anything
like
that
you're
talking
80
to
90
when
the
decibel
levels-
and
we
want
to
set
these
at
the
levels
that
we're
looking
at
I
mean
that
makes
no
sense.
I.
I
Would
add
I
don't
disagree
with
you
mr.
polite?
Well,
one
thing:
if,
if
I'm
correcting
the
way,
I
read
the
ordinance,
those
decibel
levels
are
from
where
the
complaint
is
made.
So
it's
it's
not
going
to
be
the
noise
at
the
source.
It's
going
to
be
where
you're
hearing
it.
Although
I
still
agree
with
you,
those
are
awful
low,
yeah.
D
J
J
H
J
J
C
B
Well,
I
mean
I
would
hope
that
our
police
are
professional
enough,
yes
to
be
able
to
weed
through
those
types
of
things
and
that
just
because
someone
calls,
because
they
don't
like
their
neighbor
and
they're
running
their
vacuum,
cleaner
in
the
living
room,
with
an
open
door
that
the
police
are
gonna,
aren't
gonna
ticket
them.
For
that
I
mean
there
is
some
ability
by
the
police
to
be
able
to
use
their
discretion.
B
J
D
I,
don't
know
the
decibel
levels
that
would
be
correct
or
appropriate,
but
I
do
know
it's.
All
of
these
things
are
complaint,
driven
just
like
90%
of
the
things
we
have
problems
with
or
complaint,
driven
and
and
truthfully,
if
you
have
your
radio
so
loud
that
it's
affecting
your
neighbors
after
11
o'clock
at
night,
you
should
turn
it
off.
You
really
should.
D
I
don't
care
what
day
it
is.
Scott
is
my
opinion.
If
you're
affecting
your
neighbors
with
a
loud
radio
after
11
o'clock
at
night
and
and
they're
complaining
about,
if
they're
complaining
about
it,
I
would
suggest
that
more
than
likely,
like
Joe
said,
the
police
officer
would
come
and
say,
sir,
your
neighbors
complaining
about
your
radio.
Could
you
turn
it
down
please
and
I'm
certain
that
90%
of
the
people
would
so
I,
don't
know
how
you
would
arrive
at
the
right
decibel
well,
I've
got
trucks
going
by
here
every
day
that
would
violate
this
ordinance.
D
J
I
D
Any
place,
but
if
it's
interfering
with
somebody's
with
some
neighbor
in
the
neighbor
calls
and
he's
already
violating
the
500
foot
restriction
plus
he's
loud
then
follow
means
I.
Think
police
officer
has
every
right
and
obligation
to
say:
please
shut
her
down
or
be
quiet,
but
I
I,
don't
believe
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
what
the
decibel
level
could
be
and
I
would
be
willing
to
go
along
with
just
about
any
amount.
D
If
you
want
to
raise
it
to
85,
that's
fine
with
me,
but
I,
don't
think
it's
going
to
cause
a
problem
anywhere
and
we've
already
I
find
not
mistaken,
made
allowances
for
lawn
mowers
and
such
if
you're
mowing
your
lawn
or
everything.
These
things
are
taken
into
consideration.
The
noise
from
the
mowers
and
all
my
lawn
mower
is
loud,
so
I'm
sure
it's
over
65,
but
that's
covered
am
I,
not
correct,
Paul.
Yes,
that's
good.
D
I
understand
I'm,
just
saying:
I
hear
a
lot
of
motorcycles
and
a
lot
of
people
on
motorcycles
included
when
I
wrote,
I
like
to
crank
them
pretty
good,
you
know.
But
but
you
know
it's
like
everything
else.
Like
I
say
you
have
to
be
complaint
driven
and
nobody's
complaining
about
it.
There
are
certain
instances
in
our
city
that
people
complain
about
the
noises
and
and
up
until
11
o'clock
is
I.
Think
with
with
most
noise
11
o'clock
at
night.
D
I
would
not
appreciate
it
if
I
was
a
working
person
again,
which
I'm
not
and
I
had
to
get
up
at
5
or
6
o'clock
in
the
morning,
I
wouldn't
appreciate
it
Friday,
Saturday
or
any
other
day
of
the
week
that
somebody's
cranking,
his
stereo
at
11:30
or
11
12
o'clock
at
night
so
loud
that
I
can
hear
it
in
my
house.
That's
ridiculous!
Yeah!
F
I
understand
what
you're
saying
jack,
but
what
everybody
else
is
saying
is
for
the
people
who,
like
to
I,
like
your
word,
to
Eve
used
a
couple
weeks
ago,
weaponized
the
ordinances
just
because
they
do
have
a
grudge
against
somebody.
Think
that's
where
the
concern
lies
here.
My
question
would
be
for
mr.
Markey:
do
we
not
have
a
codified
section
that
nuisance
calls
for
people?
D
Whatever
decibel
that
we
would
set
this
at
for
anything,
it's
only
going
to
apply
well,
it's
only
going
to
apply
when,
on
occasion
you
know
the
same
person.
It's
not
going
to
be
very
few.
Very
seldom
is
the
same
person
going
to
be
cranking
up
his
stereo
just
for
an
example
that
you
gave
was
God
at
eleven
twelve
o'clock
at
night
and
if
he
is
consistently
doing
that,
then
by
all
means
issue
him
a
noise,
spirits
ticket
or
whatever
you
call
it.
D
But
if
he's
you
know,
if
he
does
it
once
a
month
or
once
a
year,
something
tell
the
police
officer,
a
police
officer
would
automatically
say,
sir,
you
know
don't
do
this,
please
and
I'm
sure
he
would
stop.
That's
the
cases
where
the
guy
next
door
might
be
complaining
about
something,
because
the
guy
who
he's
complaining
about
is
doing
it
constantly.
But
why
would
you
I
wouldn't
have
any
problem
with
the
person
reporting
someone
who
makes
the
same.
D
B
I
K
A
B
Right
so
we
removed
the
motion
in
the
second
to
adopt
and
we
have
a
motion
and
a
second
to
increase
the
decibel
levels
from
65
to
85,
and
so
any
further
discussion
regarding
that
I
guess:
I,
wonder
where,
where
that
85
came
from
I
mean
I
know
that
when
this
was
written
up
by
mr.
markey,
he
used
the
65,
because
that's
generally,
what's
used
in
an
ordinance
and
now
all
of
a
sudden
were
just
using
85.
Just
because
should
be
a
little
higher
I'm.
H
The
crux
of
this
is
the
fact
of
where
you
are
getting
the
complaint
from
versus,
where
the
the
noise
is
generated
from
and
so
that
dissipates
a
lot
over
distance,
especially
with
open
air.
The
with
open
air
are
very
poor,
so
I
would
agree
with
the
original
motion.
I
don't
see
any
reason
to
change,
it
gives
at
least
some
teeth
to
the
police.
Okay,
if
they
had
to
make
a
case
for
it,
I
don't
see
any
reason
to
change
it.
I.
B
Just
really
think
that
we
really
should
have
more
confidence
in
the
police
that
they
will
be
able
to
use
they're
trained
to
make.
These
judgment
calls
to
try
and
defuse
these
types
of
situations
and
and
I
understand
Scott.
What
you're
saying
that
you,
you
might
have
a
neighbor
that
doesn't
like
you
and
so
one
day,
you're
out
there
doing
something
they
don't
like
and
they
call
the
cops.
But
that
doesn't
mean
the
cops
have
to
give
somebody
a
ticket.
No.
J
B
B
F
Like
to
add
mr.
Craig,
yes,
we
can
always
come
back
and
revisit
this
if
we
have
to,
but
it's
been
my
whenever
I've
seen
that
the
police
I
understand
mr.
P
lot
that
you
would
like
to
keep
the
police
from
being
called
out
done
necessary
calls,
but
anytime
I've
seen
this
used
as
they
come
out
they've,
given
him
a
warning
and
go
from
there,
it's
not
like
they
rush
right
out
and
is
passing
out
tickets
or
anything,
so
that
does
give
them
some
discretion
as
well
and
I.