►
From YouTube: 9-8-20 Committee Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
E
D
F
D
G
E
F
G
G
There
was
a
little
bit-
I
guess
our
guys
were
caught
out
yesterday
afternoon-
put
some
some
signs
out.
They
had
some
high
water
at,
I
want
to
say,
taylor
and
eastern
road.
E
G
Out
in
that
area-
and
I
know
that
there
was
a
call
came
in
that
a
tree
was
down
along
across
the
roadway,
but
when
our
the
police
officer
arrived
on
the
scene,
the
some
of
the
neighbors-
I
guess
it
was,
it
was
a
decent
sized
branch
or
so
and
they
drug
it
off
the
road
and.
G
Other
than
that,
that's
about
all
that
I
heard
I
know
larry
was
he
was
on
it
yesterday
too,
and
talked
to
robert
a
couple
of
times.
I
talked
to
robert
a
couple
times
as
well,
just
to
kind
of
get
an
idea
as
to
what
was
going
on,
but
right,
I
think
everything
was
so
dry
and
everything
the
water
levels
were
so
low
that
we
had
places
to
put
it
so
yeah.
E
E
J
J
E
Here
we
have
no
communications
from
the
public.
I
understand
that's
correct.
We
will
move
to
committee
of
the
whole
letter
a
certification
of
tax
levy,
ms
whitke.
F
This
legislation
is
basically
boilerplate.
We
do
it
every
year,
just
certification
for
the
tax
levies
for
the
like
fire
department
and
our
general
levy,
and
my
only
question
for
this
is:
do
we
need
to
go
three
readings
or
do
we
need
to
have
it
waived
and
there
is
no
emergency
language
with
it.
If
we
need
it.
E
I
mean
this
as
far
as
I'm
concerned.
This
is
pretty
much
something
we
do
every
year
I
mean
why.
E
F
I
Yeah,
mr
current.
E
I
Yeah
this
is
justin,
and
this
is
this:
is
the
certification
of
the
tax
rates
without
the
certification,
the
county
won't
levy
the
taxes
that
are
due
to
norton.
So
it
sounds
like
you
want
to
move
it
along
as
administrative
matter,
but
just
so
everyone
understands
what's
going
on
there,
that
that's
why
we
we
do
it
every
year,
it's
in
order
to
get
the
taxes
that
are
owed
to
the
city
levied
and
put
on
the
tax
bill.
So
it's
a
good
thing
to
move
along.
E
E
Yes,
okay,
letter
b,
annexation
of
chippewa
townships
statement
of
services
that
falls
to
me.
E
E
We
have.
The
water
chippewa
township
does
not,
and
working
with
wayne
county
and
chippewa
township
is
difficult
plus
if
we
annex
we
get
those
tax
revenues,
etc,
etc.
So,
mr
fowler,
do
you
have
anything
to
add.
C
Just
it's
three
small
parcels
right
there,
it's
the
first
stuff.
I
have
two
of
another
one
that
will
be
coming,
it'll
be
the
rest
of
the
intersection
on
21.,
but
this
is
the
first
of
of
two
right
now.
E
So
I
think,
honestly,
we
are
seeing
the
benefits
of
having
put
that
water
line
in
quite
frankly,
because
we're
going
to
gain
some
development
for
the
city
of
norton,
some
tax
revenue
for
the
city
of
norton,
some
tap
in
fees
for
the
city
of
norton.
So
anything
else,
questions.
E
H
H
E
Letter
c
kda
access
agreement,
28th
street,
that
falls
to
me
again,
we
are
looking
kda,
is
looking
to
add
some
office
space
to
their
building
and
they're.
Looking
for
this
access
from
28th
street,
mr
fowler.
C
So
we
considered
multitude
of
options
there,
one
vacating
it
because
it
then
would
become
half
his
and
half
the
other
property
owner,
but
then
there
would
be
an
access
question.
It
is
a
currently
a
paper
street.
We
will
have
no
obligation
to
maintain
it.
That's
the
agreement.
C
I
think
mr
markey
did
a
fantastic
job,
developing
an
agreement,
that's
very
favorable
to
the
city
and
again
it's
really
we're
not
in
charge
of
maintenance.
We
don't
plow
it.
We
don't
do
anything
but
allow
him
to
use
it
to
access
his
future
office.
Expansion.
E
F
H
Have
a
couple
of
thousands,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
I
think
I'm
understanding
this
correctly.
This
will
not
have
truck
access
or
tractor
trailer
access,
correct.
C
H
H
I'm
more
concerned
with
tractor
trailers
coming
in
with
deliveries
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
C
This
actually
is
further
north.
It's
actually
two
parcels
north
and
it's
adjacent
to
the
park.
I
can
get
a
map
a
better
map.
I
don't
know
if
there
was
a
good
map
attached,
but
we
can
get
you
a
better
map
attached
to
show
maybe
a
little
bit
zoomed
out.
So
you
can
see
maybe
the
area
a
little
better,
the
way
20.
I
believe
it's
28th
street,
please
don't
it's
28th
or
20th
right.
It's
20.,
20,
okay,
it's
a
very
short
street.
C
There
is
a
general
there's
one
house
that
has
a
garage.
That's
in
norton.
Everything
else
is
in
barberton
again,
there'll
be
no
change
of
access
to
our
residents,
but
I
can
get
you
a
map
to
better
show
you
maybe
a
little
bit
better
view.
So
you
can
see
where
we're
talking
about.
E
C
D
Yes,
I
noticed
in
the
agreement
that
at
the
end
of
20
years,
they
would
no
longer
be
required
to
maintain
it
as
they
are
for
the
first
20.
D
E
D
E
Yes,
could
you
could
you
yeah.
I
Sure-
and
maybe
mr
fowler
can
weigh
in
as
well,
I
believe
under
the
agreement
that
the
park,
the
the
driveway
that's
put
in,
becomes
ours,
and
so
then
it
would
be
our
driveway
at
that
point.
Is
that
correct
robert.
I
He's
talking
about
the
end
of
the
20
years,
though
hold
on.
Let
me
okay,
let
me
look
at
real,
quick.
E
I
D
D
E
All
right
are
we
comfortable
putting
this
on
for
first
reading
before
that
question
is
answered,
I
am
I.
E
All
right,
I
will
move
then
to
add
ordinance,
number
87
2020
to
the
next
agenda
for
first
reading
and.
E
All
right,
I
have
a
motion,
a
second
to
add
87
20
20
to
the
next
agenda
for
first
reading.
Is
there
any
further
discussion?
H
I
Yeah,
absolutely
yeah
I'll.
Take
a
look
at
right
after
this
meeting's
over
perfect
you
guys.
D
Was
I
I
remember
last
meeting,
wasn't
there
supposed
to
be
something
about
the
golf
course
brookside
brought
today
by
justin.
I
Yeah,
mr
gainer,
so
we
do
have
I
I
got
over
to
mr
fowler.
They
have
draft
of
that
memo.
That
summarizes
the
process
and
he
and
I
are
going
to
look
through
that.
It's
not
this
evening
and
then
tomorrow
morning
and
then
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
in
agreement
with
what
says
and
then
we
will
we'll
go
from
there.
I
Yeah
but
tomorrow
tomorrow,
you'll
have
it
and
then
we
can
talk
about
next
week.
If
you
have
questions,
is
that
okay,
jack
yeah.
I
D
Yes,
there's
been
some
discussion
about
a
particular
spot
here
in
the
city
about.
E
D
D
Well,
we're
talking
about
on
261
at
the
top
of
the
hill,
about
signage,
that's
erected
on
the
city
right
away
that
I
don't
think
should
be
there
and
if
it's
not
on
the
right
away,
all
you
have
to
do
is
measure
it
and
tell
me
and
I'll
quit
complaining
about
it.
But.
E
D
Across
from
a
church
where
children
go
to
church
and
nothing's
been
done
about
it,
that
I
felt
is
it
is
it
political
speech
it
is?
It
is,
but
it's
as
I've
indicated
to
the
mayor
in
the
past.
When
I
was
running
for
council,
I
had
signs
up
on
the
city
right
away
and
I
was
asked
and
complied
with
taking
them
down.
I
put
them
on
my
own
property.
A
D
E
If
it's
a,
I
see
you're
mr
fowler
just
give
me
just
a
minute.
I
see
you
if
it's
the
signs,
I'm
thinking
about
it,
looks
like
they're
in
this
front
yard.
Well,.
D
D
D
D
G
Yes,
I
I
have
talked
to
bill
mr
bremen,
about
it,
and
mr
bremen
has
made
two
attempts
one
as
late
as
late
last
week
and
has
still
been
unable
to
get
a
hold
of
the
homeowner.
He
will
try
again
here
this
week.
Hopefully
we'll
get
a
hold
of
him
and
at
least
make
him
aware
that
they
need
to
be
moved
back
closer.
E
E
A
D
Shouldn't
care
less,
I
couldn't
care
less.
What
the
political
side
of
it
is.
I
hear
you
the
point
I'm
making
joe
is
the
fact
that,
as
I've
said
10
times
already,
there's
children
going
to
church
there
every
single
time
you
turn
around
they're
in
and
out
of
there,
and
I
don't
have
to
say
what's
on
those
signs,
because
everybody
here
knows
that
have
seen
it.
A
D
Those
signs
could
have
a
notice
put
on
his
door
saying.
Please
remove
your
signs
from
the
city
right
away,
city
of
norton
zoning
inspector
bill,
bremen.
They
don't
have
to
go
up
and
and
shake
his
hand
and
ask
him
to
move
him.
They
need
to
be
moved,
100
percent,
if
they're
in
the
right
of
way
and
bill
bremen
knows
by
just
by
going
there,
he
will
see
that
they
are,
in
my
opinion,
right
away.
So
that'll
settle
that.
Let's
forget.
I
E
E
If
there's
a
violation
of
the
law,
that's
what
they're
supposed
to
do.
We
legislate.
We
make
the
laws
they
enforce
them.
D
D
E
I
don't
know,
but
if
mr
marky,
if
you
will
send
us
an
opinion
regarding
that,
I
would
appreciate
it.
Okay,
thank
you.
Anything
further
under
topics
for
next
work
session.
E
J
I
spoke
after
last
council
meeting
about
the
possibility
of
bringing
forward
a
maybe
legislation
to
create.
I
think
there
was
a
fund
already,
according
to
ms
keener,
a
method
of
handling
stormwater
other
cities.
Neighboring
to
us
have
such
legislation
have
some
method
of
dealing
with
that
collecting
monies
to
actually
deal
with
that,
and
if
the
administration
has
some
other
plan
or
idea,
I'm
certainly
you
know
I'm
willing
to
listen
to
that.
I'm
just
wondering.
J
E
And-
and
I
agree,
I
think
we
can
take
a
look
at
that-
I
will
discuss
that
with
administration
as
to
talking
about
that
at
some
future
meeting.
If
that
works
dan.
Yes,
that's
fine,
okay,
anything
further.