►
From YouTube: Regular Council Meeting
Description
08-30-21 7:00 PM
A
C
D
D
H
E
B
B
J
C
B
B
E
B
B
J
They
have
been
guaranteed
a
placement
at
norton
high
school
and
if
you
are
not
able
to
host
them
for
the
whole
school
year,
if
you
could
just
host
them
for
say
a
two
to
eight
week
period
as
a
welcoming
family,
it
would
be
greatly
appreciated.
The
vetting
program
to
sponsor
a
child
is
really
very
easy.
It's
very
painless.
J
J
My
husband-
and
I
have
done
this
program
personally
for
a
number
of
years
and
we've
developed
relationships
that
have
lasted
more
than
three
decades.
So
it's
something
that
I
would
strongly
suggest.
If
you
have
just
a
little
bit
of
space
in
your
home
and
an
interesting
interest
in
broadening
your
family's
cultural
background,
it
would
be
a
great
opportunity.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
J
J
A
H
H
Three?
Just
for
clarification.
As
I
understand
it,
the
payments
would
be
added
to
the
sewer
service
bill
for
anyone,
claiming
that
that's
what
they
would
like
to
have
done,
who
wants
to
tie
in
and
that
would
be
collected
by
barberton
and
then
barberton
would
submit
those
payments
to
us
every
four
months
or
quarterly.
H
H
This
was
also
the
same,
almost
exact
same
thing
that
we're
looking
at
for
84
2021
was
presented
back
in
2019
for
loyal
oak.
That
would
be
136-2019
for
anybody
interested
and
that
they
were
offered
the
payment
plan
as
well,
and
nothing
was
being
increased
on
them
either.
I
have
no
intentions
of
doing
anything
with
this
until
we
fix
what
happened
with
the
phase.
One
part
like
if
you
can
show
me
where
we
needed
a
500
difference.
I
have
no
that's
not
my
big
problem,
but
I
have
a
major
issue
with
fact.
H
These
people
weren't
offered
payments
and
the
fact
that
every
year
they're
going
up,
500-
and
I
understand
at
least
one
person
has
tied
in
late
last
year,
so
I'd
like
to
know
what
they
were
charged
and
anybody
that
has
tied
in
at
a
higher
rate
that
we
fix
this,
bring
it
into
compliance
with.
Even
though
loyal
oak
isn't
a
part
of
the
road
widening,
they
were
still
given.
They
were
the
first
ones
that
got
this
type
of
a
payment
plan
and
no
increases
on
their
tap
in
benefits.
A
H
A
So
your
concern,
though
I
guess,
is
what
I'm
getting
at,
is
that
there's
not
that
graduated
as
time
goes
on.
It
gets
more
expensive
and
the
reason
for
that
I
think,
as
I
recall
was
we
were
trying
to
encourage
people,
save
some
money
and
tie
in
now,
as
opposed
to
down
the
line,
because
it's
going
to
get
more
expensive
plus
we
were
trying
to,
I
think,
look
forward
and
say:
okay,
what
what's?
What
is
14
000
now
isn't
the
same
as
14
000.
A
ten
years,
and
so
we
were
trying
to
increase
that
to
cover
that.
What
you're
saying
here
is
that
is
not
part
of
this
legislation.
It's
x
number
of
dollars.
It
stays
that
way
and
that's
not
fair,
because
the
other
people
it
went
up
on
them
and
what
I'm
saying
is
there
was
a
reason
that
we
did
that
graduated
scale.
So,
if
we're
trying
to
bring
if
we're
trying
to
look
at
fairness
and
make
them
the
same,
then
we
ought
to
have
a
graduated
scale.
For
this.
H
A
To
your
taxes,
so
you're
looking
at
those
are
the
your
two
concerns,
though
there's
there's
disparity,
because
this
one
doesn't
go
up
as
the
other
ones
did.
What
you
would
prefer
to
see
is
that
the
other
people,
if
they
had
to
pay
a
higher
amount
they
get
reimbursed
and
they
only
have
to
pay
the
lowest
amount.
What
I'm
saying
is
is
that
there
was
a
reason
we
did
that
and
that
was
to
encourage
people
to
hook
in
and
or
if
they
wait
20
years
and
decide
they're
going
to
pay
14
000.
A
A
It's
different
as
time
goes
on,
so
if
we
were
going
to
make
this
quote
even
then,
what
we
should
do
is
allow
for
some
type
of
payments
to
be
made
on
this.
This
particular
piece
of
legislation
like
we
have
on
others
and
institute
a
graduated
scale,
increasing
the
amount
per
year
people
want
to
tie
in.
A
H
No,
I
want
what
loyal
oak
got
and
what,
when
what
phase
three
is
being
offered,
I
don't
care.
This
can
stay
the
same.
I
don't
have
an
issue,
it
just
seems
to
me
and
what
happened
to
phase
two.
This
must
have
been
phase
one
phase,
two
phase
three,
but
yet
we've
seen
nothing
that
addresses
the
the
sewers
or
water
or
anything
for
phase
two.
We
just
went
phase
one
and
then
phase
three
and
phase
two
may
be
in
here,
but
I
don't
know
that
and
I
don't
guess
any
of
us
anybody.
A
I
I
you
know
I
I
certainly
don't
have
a
problem
with
allowing
people
to
make
payments,
not
everybody
has
ten
thousand
dollars
or
fifteen
thousand
dollars
or
twenty
thousand
dollars
to
lay
out
for
a
tap
in
I
mean
they
just
we
just
don't.
So
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
payments
and
I
don't
know
that
we
can
fix
what
was
done
in
the
past
by
penalizing
these
people
and
saying
you
can't
make
payments.
J
A
H
H
Well,
what
I'm
sure
what
happened
is?
Yes,
we
just
came
out
of
nash
heights.
This
was
the
first
one
to
come
up
and
we
kind
of
based
it
on
what
we
did
there.
But
after
that
then
we
come
to
we
somehow
we
got
up
to
loyal
oak
as
opposed
to
finishing
up
on
cleveland
maslin
down
here
at
the
road
widening.
C
C
You
have
a
500
increment
increase
each
year
and
so
forth
and
allow
it
to
be,
you
know,
deferred
over
20,
30
years
or
whatever
the
case
may
be
until
we
standardize
it
we're
going
to
keep
getting
the
same
thing,
because
people
aren't
going
to
recall
what
happened
last
time
and
this
one's
going
to
be
a
rush
project.
You
know
because
people
are
in
a
hurry
poor,
you
know
whatever
the
case
may
be.
We
just
need
to
make
a
standardized
formula
to
be
able
to
tap
then
across
the
board
and
that
way
in
the
future.
D
D
Change
change
their
their
amounts
and
legislation
to
match
the
present
legislation.
I
don't
see
anything
wrong
with
today
with
the
legislation
that's
before
us
now
and
and
if
we
had
two
or
three
people
who
have
already
tapped
in
and
paid
the
extra
amounts
in
phase
one
unless
it's
40
people
which
would
cost
a
fortune.
D
I
think
if
justin
would
like
to
comment
on
it,
it
could
be
explained
that
we
want
to
make
it
the
same
and,
as
scott
said
in
the
future,
any
of
these
projects
that
we
do
it
should
be
on
a
percentage
basis
of
of
the
amount
that
the
individual
or
the
business
pays
and
the
time
period
to
repay.
It
should
be
exactly
the
same
for
a
business
for
a
for
an
individual
and
in
that
way
nobody
in
the
future
can
say.
D
Well,
you
did
this
for
so,
and
so
or
you
didn't
do
this
for
so,
and
so,
as
charlotte's
indicating
now
she's
concerned
that
we
we
did
not
give
the
people
in
phase
one
a
payment
option
and
we're
giving
them
an
option
now,
and
we
also
charge
them
500
extra
per
year
that
they
did
not
hook
up
and
also
in
phase
one.
If
everybody
remembers,
we
changed
the
zoning
to
the.
E
D
D
D
D
J
D
Somebody
could
change
my
mind,
I'm
not
saying
like
charlotte,
said:
she's
hardly
wanting
to
change
her
mind,
but
if,
if
I'm
wrong,
then
they
can
change
my
mind
pretty
easily,
but
I
believe
it
would
not
be
a
great
expense
to
maintain
the
same
percentage
I
believe,
like
in
nash
heights.
I
believe
we
ended
up
with
42
or
43
percent
that
the
individuals
paid
and
the
city
paid
the
rest.
I
don't
remember
the
exact
figures,
but
I
don't
have
a
problem
personally
with
anyone
who
hooks
up
to
sewer
or
water.
L
So,
as
everyone
knows
sorry,
I
joined
a
little
late,
as
everyone
knew,
and
I
sat
through
a
lot
of
counseling
back
in
2017,
where
we
discussed
exactly
what
mr
kern
talked
about,
encouraging
encouraging
captains
by
having
that
graduate
scale
on
it,
and
then
we
had
another
project
where
we
implemented
this
different
approach.
All
I
did
for
this
last
ordinance
is
use
our
more
recent
approach.
L
I
think
the
administration's
fine
using
a
uniform
approach
and
talking
through
with
robert,
the
mayor,
it's
difficult
to
administer
a
lot
of
different
approaches,
so
I
don't
think
there's
any
problem
going
back
and
adjusting
that
phase,
one
ordinance
so
that
everything's
uniform
going
forward.
So
it
wasn't
like
we're
picking
winners
or
losers.
It
was
different
councils,
council
2017
to
one
thing:
council
2020
did
everything
right,
different
method
and
we're
fine.
Whatever
method
council
wants
to
use
going
forward,
I
think
the
administration's
okay.
L
B
L
A
A
C
C
It's
the
people's
money
here
in
the
city
that
paid
the
expense
so
the
longer
it
takes
for
people
to
tap
in
and
pay
that
money
back.
That
money
is
just
out
there
on
loan.
Basically,
so
the
sooner
people
tap
in
the
sooner
that
money
comes
back
into
the
city
and
we
can
put
that
money
in
use
elsewhere
to
help
out
others.
H
A
I
don't
have,
I
don't,
have
a
problem
going
back
and
looking
at
it.
I
certainly
I
don't
disagree
that
it
should
be
what's
good,
for
one
is
good
for
everybody,
so
I
don't
have
a
problem
going
back
and
looking
at
136
and
implementing
okay
from
here
on
forward
we're
going
to
start
doing
500
increments
and
everybody
has
pain.
You
can
get
a
payment
point.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that
at
all.
I
don't
disagree
with
you
charlotte
that
it
should
be
even
across
the
board.
A
H
A
H
That's
the
way
I
understood
the
500
dollar
increments
and
due
to
the
fact
that
it
was,
it
was
an
assessed
thing.
Then
it
went
on
their
taxes,
neither
and
as
far
as
I,
I
believe
that
this
one
would
too
we
never
had
it.
I
don't
believe
we
had
a
resolution
of
necessity.
If
we
had
one
for
phase
one,
I
could
not
find
it,
and
I
looked
several
times.
H
H
H
H
So
that's
why
I
think
there
was
a
difference
of
the
500
increments,
not
so
much
because
it
was
a
sewer
project
and
blah
blah,
because
the
only
thing
that
these
people
are
going
to
have
to
do
at
that
point
is
pay
for
the
assessment.
But
everything
else
is
there.
The
laterals
and
everything
are
there,
so
their
prices
are
going
to
go
up
for
them
as
far
as
tying
in.
A
D
If
I
could
one
more
thing,
I
I
remember
what
joe's
talking
about
and
that's
exactly
why
the
500,
I
think,
was
added,
but
my
question
would
be
to
justin
or
robert.
Whoever
did
it
work,
how
many
people
actually
tied
in
and
how
many
people
tied
in
and
paid
the
extra
500
and
and
if
there
was
not
very
many
who
tied
in
and
paid
the
extra
500,
I
only
suggest
that
it
didn't
work,
so
wait
amen.
D
So
if
it
didn't
work,
if
it
didn't
entice
them
to
tie
in,
I
still
think
that
it
would
be
simpler
to
reimburse
if
it
was
only
one
or
two
people
or
a
few
to
reimburse
those
people
the
extra
money
that
they
paid
by
waiting
that
year
or
two
years
and
then
from
now
on,
do
whatever
we
decide
to
do
as
council,
but
make
it
exactly
the
same,
starting
with
phase
one.
I
I'm
not
saying
that
that
500
is
a
bad
idea
or
a
good
idea.
I
one
way
or
another.
D
If
it
worked,
then
by
all
means
leave
it
in
place,
but
if
it
did
not
work
and
it
did
not
entice
enough
people
to
sign
up
in
that
time
period,
then
I'd
say
it
was
a
good
idea
that
didn't
work.
So
if,
if
justin
or
robert
or
somebody
should
know
how
many
people
have
tied
in
in
phase
one
and
if
it's
a
matter
of
one
or
two
or
three
people
like
might
be
true,
then
I'd
suggest
that
we
do
like.
A
D
A
B
B
A
Thank
you,
mr
president.
This
is
an
ordinance
for
the
city
of
norton
to
consent
to
the
state
doing
some
work
on
state
route,
21
reconfiguring
the
interchange
there
at
21
and
eastern
road.
I
know
that
this
was
discussed
last
week.
This
is
something
I
think
that
we've
looked
at
a
little
bit
in
the
past
that
this
may
be
coming.
It'd,
be
the
same
as
it
was
down
at
585
in
eastern
road
difference.
E
A
A
There's
potential
in
that
area
for
further
development,
which
this
type
of
an
intersection
would
completely
mess
up,
and
so
I
mean
I
don't
see
any
reason
at
this
time
for
norton
to
give
its
consent
to
this
legislation
to
the
to
the
state.
To
do
this,
I
I
I
mean
I'm
happy
to
hear
from
everybody
else,
but
I
I
only
see
minuses
here
and
not
pluses.
Well,.
B
C
J
C
A
I
think
what
I'd
like
to
do
at
this
point
in
order
for
there
to
be
some
definitive
decision
by
council
on
this,
I'm
going
to
be
moving
to
add
this
to
the
agenda,
but
then
voting
against
it,
because
I
think
we
should
move
forward
on
it.
So
as
odd
as
that
sounds
I'm
going
to
move
to
add
ordinance
number
90
2021
to
the
next
agenda
for
first
reading.
Let.
D
A
A
H
D
H
I
I
completely
agree
with
mr
kernan
as
I
stated
last
week,
but
I
guess
I
wouldn't
I
don't
believe
the
state's
going
to
stop
their
project
for
one
intersection,
so
this
would
be
an
encouragement
to
them
to
come
up
with
an
alternative.
I
guess
is
what
I'm
saying,
and
hopefully
that
will
be
forthcoming
and
they'll
work
with
our
administration
and
something
a
little
different.
Hopefully.
E
H
See
us,
since
this
doesn't
interfere
with
the
grant
money.
We're
already
got
we're
already
supposed
to
be
receiving.
I
just
want
to
reassure
the
people
on
kungle.
That's
had
the
complaints
about
their.
You
know
waiting
for
the
bridge
to
get
fixed.
It's
not
going
to
affect
that
by
us.
Turning
this
down
or
whatever
it's
not
going
to
have
any
effect
on
kungle
road
and
the
bridge
there
that.
A
B
A
H
H
I
I
L
L
When
I
had
told
them
that
we
would,
we
would
submit
that
to
council
for
their
consideration
to
try
again
on
this
year.
The
board
of
elections
is
up
on
a
pretty
tight
deadline
on
getting
their
ballots
printed,
so
in
order
to
just
help
them
make
a
final
decision
and
get
their
ballots
printed,
we
told
them
that
we
would
recommend
that
you
guys
pull
it,
there's
no
primaries.
That
would
occur
for
two
years
in
any
event,
so
there's
plenty
of
time
next
year
to
consider
this.
L
If
you
want
to
move
forward,
then
move
it
forward.
Then,
at
that
time,
and
that's
that's
consistent
what
we
said
coming
out,
trying
to
review
as
well
that
you
weren't
going
to
move
anything
this
year.
I
just
because
we
had
told
the
more
collections
we
would
move
it.
That's
why
I
was
introduced,
but
there's
perfect,
there's
no
urgency
at
this
time.
E
B
M
M
It's
for
electronics,
recycling,
it's
a
it's
it'll,
be
a
one
day
event
on
october,
the
9th
from
10
until
2
here
at
the
city
of
norton
over
at
city
hall.
Basically,
it's
an
electronics
recycling,
it's
for
desktop
computers
and
laptops
printers,
all
types
and
sizes,
cell
phones,
mobile
devices,
telephones
and
phone
systems,
modems
routers
and
servers,
dvd
players,
vcrs
and
stereos
game
consoles,
radios,
cables,
wires,
power,
adapters,
ink
and
toner
cartridges
and
anything
that
plugs
in
or
uses
batteries,
computer
monitors
and
televisions.
M
What
they'll
be
doing
is
a
hard
drive
shredding.
It
says
we
will
have
our
mobile
hard
drive
shredder
on
site.
Ask
our
attendants
on
arrival
where
you
can
park,
so
you
can
bring
your
desktop
or
laptop
computer
to
our
shredding
station
and
have
the
hard
drive
removed
and
witnessed
it
being
destroyed
on
site.
B
B
B
M
Yes,
there
will
be
a
charge
for
this
if
you're
bringing
a
television,
I
believe
it
says
here
there
will
be
a
charge
for
each
crt
tube
tv
dropped
off
five
dollars
for
12
inch
and
smaller
and
10
for
anything
over
12
inches.
So
it's
just
television
screens
or
the
tubes
that
are
in
televisions
so
anything
other
than
that
it
appears.
It's
it'll
be
a
free
event.
B
B
B
A
H
B
A
G
B
B
A
B
G
A
G
B
A
A
A
It's
not
always
a
beautiful
thing
to
behold.
There
are
things,
I'm
sure
in
it
that
some
people,
like
some
people,
don't
like,
but
the
fact
of
the
matter
is
this-
is
the
settlement
that
the
judge
has
approved.
We
can
either
take
it
or
leave
it.
If
we
leave
it,
we
leave
money
on
the
table
and
we
don't
get
it.
We
take
it.
We
get
the
money,
so
I
would
suggest
that
we
pass
this
tonight
and
get
our
share
of
the
funds.
K
Any
other
discussion-
yes,
I
agree
with
mr
curran
about
the
expenses
that
we
had.
That's
that
would
have
been
my
general
approach
to
this
earlier,
but
after
researching
exhibit
e
in
that
320
page
document
and
going
over.
I
have
it
with
me
by
the
way
it
lists
the
opioid
remediation
uses
and
it's
very
onerous
and
tedious,
but
I
I
don't
see
anything
in
there
to
let
it
be
reimbursed.
It
is
really
being
used
for
future
use
for
training
primarily
and
mitigation
of
future
opioid
addictions,
and
but
I
agree
with
him.
J
K
But
it's
very
likely
there
won't
be
any
money
left
and
30
percent
of
the
fund
is
going
to
go
to
a
super
fund.
In
probably
ohio,
each
state
has
their
own
we're
at
like
four
points:
three
six,
five
percent
of
the
total
26
billion
and
so
the
amount
that's
distributed
after
the
attorney's
fees,
which
that's
also
in
question.
The
attorney's
fees
may
be
paid
for
by
another
entity,
but.
E
K
K
H
G
H
A
I
C
H
I
would
just
like,
I
believe
it
was
brought
up
on
the
floor
last
night
or
not
last
night.
Last
week
about
we
were
wondering
no,
we
can't
pursue
any
further
legislation
once
this
is
accepted
and
also,
I
think
it
was
asked
about
the
cost
there
or
the
money
that
norton
was
looking
to
get
and
I
believe
we
were
told
52
000
to
75
000..
H
H
L
Yeah
yeah,
so
I
think
they're,
I
think
they're
separate
issues
and
I
think
voting
yes
on
this
doesn't
impact
any
halfway
house.
I
know
there's
going
to
be
funding
regionally
for
whatever
they're
going
to
fund,
because
we're
not
in
control
of
what
they
do
with
that
money
that
regional
trust
fund,
but
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
impact
anything.
You
talk
about
charlotte
halfway
houses,
anything
like
that.
J
A
I
I
B
G
A
K
B
K
G
B
B
H
H
H
H
B
N
H
Maybe
I'm
remembering
this
incorrectly
and
without
that
in
front
of
me
right
now,
but
I
thought
we
had
been.
We
were
told
that
we
didn't
get
it.
We
weren't
doing
the
driftwood
and
cherrywood
with
grant
money
that
we
were
going
to
use
our
own
money
is
the
way
I
understood
it
that
the
rest
of
that
was,
but
we
were
still
going
to
go
ahead
and
do
those
two
streets
or
you
know,
what's
left
of
driftwood
we
did
the
majority
of
it.
H
Okay,
big
bump,
I'm
going
out
my
driveway
there's
a
big
bump
there
and
I
could
possibly
bottom
out
or
coming
into
my
driveway
and
it
it's
coming
off
of
either.
You
know
off
the
street
as
if
the
should
the
citizen
go
ahead
and
put
their
money
out,
repairing
that
and
get
tore
up
or
is
there
something
the
city
can
do
to
take
care
of
that.
A
J
B
B
E
E
B
B
B
B
D
I
B
B
K
K
H
B
H
G
A
B
G
B
E
E
A
G
B
B
A
I
A
B
E
B
B
M
F
M
Street
band,
which
is
a
local
band
here
in
town,
we'll
be
having
a
concert,
benefit
at
cancer
benefit
concert
at
columbia,
woods
park
and
six.
The
show
starts
at
6.
45
gates
will
open
at
six
o'clock,
so
the
asbury
all-stars
that
will
be
about
it'll
be
a
tribute
to
south
side
johnny
the
tribute
band,
an
opening
for
them
will
be
called
in
the
heartland,
which
is
the
michael
stanley
tribute
band.