►
From YouTube: 4-5-2021 Committee Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
B
A
D
D
D
I
get
I
get
my
my
second
shot
this
saturday,
so
we'll
be
a
little
bit
more
comfortable
and.
A
D
E
A
A
E
E
E
A
F
H
A
C
All
right,
everyone
ready,
okay.
I
now
call
the
committee
work
session
of
february
april
5th
2021
at
7
00
p.m.
Please
rise
for
the
pledge
of
allegiance
and
a
moment
of.
A
H
D
C
Here,
communication
from
the
public
pamela
hickson
stevenson's
going
to
talk
robert's
gonna,
let
her
in.
A
E
A
C
Just
to
say
your
name
and
address
and
go
on
and
say
what
you
have
to
say.
I
Oh
sorry,
that's!
Okay!
Okay!
I
will
make
this
brief.
First
of
all,
thank
you
very
much
for
inviting
me
to
join
you
this
evening
to
make
just
a
few
comments
about
the
library's
levee
renewal
that
will
be
on
the
ballot
this
spring.
I
appreciate
it
very
much.
I
We
are
seeking
a
renewal
of
our
current
1.9
mill
operating
levy.
Early
voting
starts
tomorrow,
but
election
day,
as
I'm
sure
you
all
know,
is
tuesday
may
4th
it's
important
for
everyone
who
is
going
to
vote
on
this
issue
to
understand
that
that
operating
levy
is
a
renewal.
It
is
not
a
new
tax
and
it
is
not
additional
or
an
increase.
I
It
also
is
very
important
to
know
that
it
makes
up
55
of
our
operating
revenue.
So
without
those
funds
it
would
be
disastrous.
Frankly,
if
we
were
not
able
to
pass
this
levy
this
year
in
2021
the
levy-
and
I
will
use
the
standard
measure
that
folks
use
with
levees
for
a
100
000
value
home,
the
levy
would
cost
approximately
four
dollars
and
21
cents
per
month
that
can
be
divided
out
to
about
15
cents
a
day
and
the
last
time
that
I
went
and
got
a
fancy
coffee
drink.
I
One
of
my
favorite
fancy
coffee
drinks.
It
was
about
that
4.21.
So
for
the
cost
of
one
fancy
coffee
drink
per
month.
Your
support
of
the
library
makes
available
to
you
a
wealth
of
resources.
Far
more
than
any
of
us
could
buy
individually.
Of
course,
the
library
is
an
important
asset
to
the
community.
I
know
I'm
biased
in
saying
that,
but
I
I
would
suspect
you
would
expect
that
of
me.
I
We
provide
important
services
that
young
children,
students,
job
seekers
and
senior
citizens
rely
on,
and
one
thing
that
I'm
very
pleased
to
announce
is
that
the
library
was
recently
recognized
as
a
star
library
by
library
journal,
which
is
in
a
national
library
publication
here
in
the
u.s
we've
been
receiving
levy
funds
for
over
35
years,
and
I
am
very
appreciative
that
you
are
willing
to
look
at
endorsing
this
levy.
I
C
You
pamela-
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
talking
tonight
and
I
think
all
of
us
have
one
way
or
another
been
to
the
library.
We
have
always
all
supported
it
and
I
think
you'll
probably
get
our
support
tonight.
E
Forget
yeah
just
for
clarification.
This
is
exactly
what
we're
already
paying
now.
I
I
It's
possible:
it
varies
greatly.
It
varies
greatly
from
community
to
community,
from
homeowner
to
homeowner
and
without
without
that
kind
of
detailed
knowledge.
I
could
not
answer
a
question
specifically.
I
My
understanding
is
from
the
county
fiscal
office
that
if
your
property
value
went
up
more
than
11
or
12
percent,
you
might
see
some
kind
of
an
increase,
but
that
that
does
not
mean
that
the
library
will
be
getting
an
increase
based
on
that
new
property
value.
It's
all
part
of
balancing
out
the
millage
and
spreading
that
across
the
entire
taxing
district.
I
C
You
all
right
with
that.
That's
all
we
have
for
tonight
for
communications
for
the
public
committee
of
the
whole,
since
we
just
talked
about
that.
I'm
going
to
move
c
summit
county
library
levy
up
mr
kernan.
D
Thank
you,
mr
president.
We,
as
you
indicated
we
just
heard
regarding
the
levy.
Obviously
we
have
a
branch
of
the
public
library
in
norton.
I
think
it's
a
fantastic
asset
to
the
city
of
norton
yeah.
We
go
all
the
way
back
to
our
founding
fathers.
When
we
talk
about
public
libraries,
benjamin
franklin
all
the
way
up,
so
this
this
is
an
asset
to
our
community
that
I
think
that
we
need
to
support
as
members
of
council.
D
Obviously
we
are
not
telling
people
what
to
vote
for
we're,
not
telling
them
what
to
do,
but
we
can
certainly,
as
leaders
of
the
community,
indicate
our
support
for
something
as
important
as
the
public
library.
So,
having
said
that,
I
will
move
to
add
this
resolution
to
next
week's
agenda
for
first
reading.
C
C
C
J
Thank
you,
mr
president.
This
is
just
a
annual
thing
that
we
do.
We
have
our
codified
ordinances,
updated
it
eliminates
any
where
we
have
things
that
kind
of
don't
line
up
and
kind
of
butt
heads
against
each
other
straightens
out
those
things
it
includes.
Everything
from
I
believe
it
was
january
12th
of
last
year,
looks
like
the
last
one
was
on
12
14
of
2020,
so
this
updates
them
so
they're
in
the
books
or
on
the
books.
J
J
Again,
it's
just
an
annual
boilerplate
kind
of
thing
that
we
do.
Anybody
have
any
questions.
E
J
I
believe
this
is
just
deals
with
with
ours.
Oh
okay,.
G
G
E
That's
what
I
thought
is
there
any
way
that
we
can
get
what
these
are
yeah,
yeah
and
you've
listed
here,
but
you
know
I'd
like
to
have
the
language
with
it.
G
E
G
Yeah-
and
I
would
refer
that
to
mr
markey.
H
We're
kind
in
this
funny
loop,
but
I
I
agree.
I
don't
think
that
there's
anything
there
that
we
are
going
to
as
council
argue
with
or
have
an
issue
with,
but
I
too
would
like
to
know
what
the
changes
were.
So
I
I
think
most
of
them
were
were
state.
It
wasn't
things
that
happened
in
the
city
of
norton,
but
right
and
I'd
like
to
know
what
changed
I.
D
Our
codified
ordinances
are
only
our
codified
ordinances.
It
doesn't
include
ohio.
The
ohio
revised
code
is
the
ohio
revised
code,
so
I
think
there
were
certain
things
that
we
did
that
brought
us
into
into
line
with
what
the
state
would
require.
I
and
right
off
the
bat.
I
can't
come
up
with
an
example
right
off
the
bat.
H
I'm
just
looking
at
things
like
the
earphones
while
driving
signal,
preemption
devices
prohibited
and
just
some
of
the
things
that
are
on
there.
The
topics
right
we've
not
ever
talked
about
some
of
these
things.
E
H
J
Well,
if
there's
no
other,
then
I
will
make
a
move
to
motion
to
add
this
to
council's
next
agenda.
And
if
we
have
all
the
information
backed
by
next
council
meeting,
then
I
would
look
to
wave
readings.
C
Okay,
that's
me.
G
C
C
G
C
C
B,
agricultural
district,
mr
gainer.
B
Thank
you,
mr
president.
This
is
a
renewal
for
eric
and
kristen
betto's
property
at
3631,
south
medina
line
road,
a
renewal
for
the
agricultural
district,
designation.
B
B
H
E
Thank
you,
mr
president.
As
I
understand
this,
dr
lainer
is
the
owner
of
what
used
to
be
the
median
property
out
on
cleveland,
road
and
loyal
oak,
and
he
was
supposed
to
be
putting
up
a
called
the
meeting
place.
E
He
would
like
to
have
it
extended
for
20
to
30
years,
which
I
believe
is
what
our
regular
citizens
done.
As
I
understand
it,
I
believe
some
of
the
businesses
through
there
have
already
paid
their
assessments
that
they
were
required
to
pay
for
tying
into
those
particular
amenities
and
that
money
would
have
come
off
of
what
he
owed
us.
In
the
meantime,
the
city
has
actually
paid
for
all
this.
E
E
This
was
a
group
of
our
residents
and
they
have
approached
us
for
putting
in
different
lines
and
when
they
heard
the
prices
they
said,
no,
they
weren't
or
couldn't
pay
that
type
of
money
out
now
he's
claiming
he
didn't
know
he
was
going
to
be
responsible.
Well,
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
buy
that
for
one
second,
and
I
said
he
signed
his
papers
back
in
2018.
I
do
know
he's
requested
a
bunch
of
documentation
from
the
administration
in
reference
to
these
and
he's
also
talking
about
a
tip.
E
I
don't
remember
ever
doing
a
tip
on
his
particular
property.
There
was
a
tip
done
for
the
dollar
general
store
and
did-
and
I
had
a
question
I
wanted
to
know
if
we
ever
got
our
70
000
back
for
the
engineering
that
we
paid
out,
of
which
I'm
going
to
point
out,
24
000
of
that
money
did
come
out
of
our
rollback
fund,
which
you
all
know
how
I
feel
about
the
rollback
fund.
E
E
He
just
didn't
realize
that
the
deal
might
fall
through
and
he
would
be
the
one
who
would
be
held
responsible
for
it
and
I
can't
in
in
any
conscience,
give
or
even
back
giving
him
an
extension
of
10
or
20
years
on
on
this,
and
I
said
I
don't
recall
any
tip
or
anything
being
done
because
there
hasn't
been
any
improvements
really
to
his
to
that
property
as
yet,
because
there's
nothing
been
built
outside
of
the
house
that
had
been
there
had
been
torn
down.
E
But
I
got
an
awful
lot
of
other
businesses
that
have
met
their
responsibilities
and,
like
I
said,
I
don't
believe
that
he
wasn't
aware
of
this.
We
talked
about
it
numerous
times.
There's
been
numerous
ordinances
involved.
With
this,
the
original
one
for
the
petition
and
for
the
engineering
was
77
2018..
E
We
had
136
2019
for
discussions
on,
and
that
was
in
january
13th,
and
then
we
had
the
meet
and
play
70
2020,
where
we
actually
did
pass
the
assessments
for
that
that
again
back
in
2020,
I
do
I'm
aware
the
covet
has
probably
affected
somewhat,
but
it's
affected
all
of
us,
as
well
as
the
citizens
that
are
currently
paying
for
assessments
to
sewer
lines
that
they
did
not
ask
for.
E
E
B
All
right,
you
done
charlotte's,
okay,
I'd
just
like
to
read
the
the
email
that
I
did
send
to
dennis
and
all
and
and
then
I'll
make
a
few
comments.
I
referring
to
the
sewer
and
water
extensions
on
cleveland
mason,
north
of
261
to
the
meden
property.
B
B
However,
here's
his
yearly
amount
for
the
cost
of
the
entire
project
is
just
unsustainable,
especially
until
he
gets
a
new
developer
to
do
something
with
the
property,
because
the
the
planned
on
development
went
fell
through
and
he
he
couldn't
do
what
he
had
planned
to
do,
and
I
agree
he
did
sign
the
paperwork.
He
did
agree
to
pay
100
of
everything.
I
don't
think
anybody's
disputing
that,
except
he
said
he
doesn't
remember
it,
but
but
he
did
sign
it.
B
I
feel
that
it's
possible
that
if
we
do
not
extend
this
to
the
20-year
period
time
period,
it's
a
possibility
that
we
could
own
that
property
by
a
path.
You
know,
taxation,
that's
not
paid,
and
I
surely
don't
want.
I
don't
think
the
city
of
norton
wants
to
own
that
property
and
and
have
it
because
of
the
expense
and
everything
involved.
So
I
think
it
in
the
long
run.
I
just
think
it's
it's
a
a
good
idea
to
amend
the
original
timetable
for
repayment
to
20
years
from
10.
A
B
And
as
he
is
paid
back
from
the
people
who
do
tap
into
the
sewer
and
water
up
through
there,
he
will
be
getting
some
of
his
money
back
and
as
he
gets
it
back,
then
he
can
pay
it
towards
this,
but
as
far
as
requiring
him
to
pay
48
000
some
dollars
a
year
with
no
development
being
done
at
the
present
time.
B
B
The
original
agreement
to
be
required
20
years
instead
of
10
and
and
I
think
that
would
still
get
us
our
money
back,
meaning
the
city
and
also
would
allow
him
to
continue
looking
for
development
or
developers
and
and
anybody
who
develops
a
property.
Then
this
could
all
be
taken
care
of
in
the
future.
D
D
You
know
not
long
ago
and-
and
I
realized
the
the
scale
is
different
with
what
I'm
going
to
say,
but
not
long
ago
we
decided
to
forgive
all
kinds
of
fees
and
stuff
for
these
games
of
chance
in
the
city
of
norton,
because
a
cove
did
and
they
weren't
making
as
much
money,
and
so
we
decided
that
we
were
going
to
forgive
that
money
and
it's
nowhere
near
48
000
a
year.
I
understand
that
or
maybe
it
is
I
don't
know,
but
we
decided
to
make
that
particular
allowance
because
of
what
was
going
on.
A
B
B
Exactly
we're
not
asking
that
he
not
pay
it,
I'm
not
asking
or
recommending
that
this
gentleman
not
pay
it.
I'm
recommending
that
we
give
him
more
time,
just
like
a
bank
would
if,
if
he
came
to
them,
they
would
I'm
sure,
understand
the
problems
that
he's
had
with
the
developers
and
they
I
believe
most
banks
would
be
willing
to
extend
it
rather
than
foreclose
on
property
for
lack
of
payment
or
lack
of
mortgage
or
whatever
the
case
might
be
with
a
bank.
B
But
I
I
don't
believe
that
we
want
to
own
that
property
in
case.
Something
would
happen
that
he
pos,
I
think
he
could
maybe
make
the
payments.
I
don't
know,
but
I
don't
know
his
financial
situation,
but
but
I
know
if
I
had
planned
on
having
a
piece
of
property
developed
and
then
it
fell
through,
and
I
had
agreed
to
pay
48
000
over
a
10-year
period.
I
would
also
come
to
the
city
and
and
ask
for
an
extended
period
of
time,
not
a
forgiveness,
an
extended
period
of
time
to
pay
so.
J
You
know
when
a
builder
developer
or
financer
when,
when
something
happens
like
covet
here
granted
his
his
deal
fell
through,
not
because
of
covid,
but
it's
probably
been
very
difficult
to
get
somebody
else
in
there
because
of
kovic,
and,
like
joe
said,
you
know,
we've
made
concessions
for
for
others
because
of
this
whole
thing
going
on,
even
if
we're
not
willing
to
go
20
years,
you
know
at
least
15
minimum
and
basically
just
have
an
agreement
with
him
that
hey.
J
When
you
get
this
up
and
going
you
get
a
developer
in
there
and
they
build,
and
you
receive
the
money,
then
you
paid
off
early,
but
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
working
with
them
and
seeing
what's
what's
plausible
for
for
both
parties
to
come
ahead,
I
mean
it.
Does
us?
No
good
to
take
that
a
hard
stance
and
say
no
take
it
or
leave
it.
J
J
But
it's
still
to
go
against
the
reputation
of
the
city,
put
a
bad
taste
in
other
people's
mouths
of
moving
here
to
the
city.
I
think
it's
worthwhile
to
to
go
ahead
and
at
least
sit
down
talk
with
him.
Let's
find
out,
what's
going
to
work
with
him.
B
I
agree
and
I
think
it
should
be
scott,
not
disagreeing
with
your
15..
I
just
believe
it
should
be
20,
because
that's
a
more
workable
figure
for
a
business
person.
I
I
just,
I
think
it
would
be.
I
I
haven't
talked
to
him
about
what
he
could
or
could
not
afford,
but
I'm
pretty
sure
he
did
state
the
fact
that
if
it
could
be
extended,
his
was
his
words
to
me.
If
it
could
be
extended,
he
would
it
would
be
highly
appreciated
and
he
thought
he
could
handle
it.
Then.
B
So
I
thought
if,
if
we,
if
we
changed
it
to
20
years,
that
would
give
the
man
an
opportunity
to
to
look
for
developers
and
and
as
far
as
making
an
agreement,
I
don't
know
I'm
no
a
lawyer,
so
I
I'd
have
to
have
mr
fowler
or
justin
sat
down
with
him.
Of
course,
in
my
mind,
and
and
come
up
with
the
plan
that
would
like
you
said
if
he
sold
the
property
and
it
was
developed,
maybe
there
could
be
something
where
he
would
pay
it
back
immediately
as
he
sold
it.
B
J
J
Time
around
that
he
has
something
written
up
where
he
holds
whoever
responsible
as
well.
B
B
Been
billed
it's
he's
already
got
his
tax
billing,
and
so
of
course
it
needs
to
be
paid
and
we
need
to
either
extend
it
or
not,
extend
it
one
or
the
other.
I
mean.
B
J
See
him
contact
or
if
you
want
to
set
it
up
jack
but
get
with
robert
and.
B
Move
something
forward
right,
I
would
say
that's
up
to
robert
and
justin
to
handle
that
I
don't
want
to
get
involved
in
in
negotiating
or
anything.
That's
not
my
place,
but
but
I
he
called
me
because
I'm
the
ward
councilman
in
that
area
and
and
and
I
did
got
all
the
paperwork
and
everything
from
kerry
and
looked
into
it
to
see
exactly
what
was
signed
and
what
wasn't
signed
and-
and
I
think
robert
will
agree
that
he
there's
no
question
about
he.
B
He
did
sign
to
to
agree
to
pay
100
percent
of
so
I
don't
think
he's
you
know
he.
He
doubted
it
because
he
don't
remember
signing
it
says.
Well,
I
looked
at
it.
Mr
mead,
mr
meaden
was
the
I
forget
the
word
that
they
used
for
it,
but
he
was
the
one
that
handled
it
and
and
it's
a
possibility
in
my
mind
that
mr
lerner
I
mean
mr
laner
was
sort
of
working
with
the
advice
of
other
people
and
and
went
ahead
and
used
an
electronic
signature
on
this
thing.
B
He
didn't
physically
sign
it.
He
used
an
electronic
signature
that
was
authorized
by
the
proper
authorities
and,
as
the
way
is
the
way
I
can
read
it
at
least-
and
so
I
I
I
sort
of
he
sounds
and,
and
he's
been
around
for
several
years
in
the
community
here
at
columbia,
high
columbia.
What
do
you
recall
it
down.
B
Yeah,
medical,
and
so
I
I
don't
doubt
that
the
man's
an
honest
person
and
that
he
is
he's
willing
to
work
in
norton,
to
develop
this
property
in
the
future
and-
and
I
think
it
will
absolutely
be
a
benefit
to
the
city.
If
robert
and
and
justin
come
up
with
an
equitable
situation,
or
you
know
something
to
help
the
fellow
out,
I
think
it
would
be
the
way
to
go.
So
as
again,
I
I
recommend
it
myself.
K
K
Okay,
yeah
just
just
I'm
kind
of
sympathetic
to
both
sides
on
this,
I
can
see
both
sides,
but
you
know
the
games
of
chance
were
mentioned
and
really,
if
I
remember
right,
the
city
was
an
error
in
how
they
were
collecting
those
so
that
that
was
really
it
was
the
circumstances
and
and
the
city
was
correct
in
their
own
era,
because
they
were
collecting
them
backwards.
If
I,
if
I
recall
correctly,.
K
No,
I
did
okay,
but
but
regardless
another
concern
I
have
is
the
representative
of
the
rest
of
the
citizens.
Is
you
know
that
this
the
city's
is
at
risk,
no
matter
what,
when
they
do
this,
so
what
happens?
If
he
goes
to
develop
it
good
faith,
honest
guy
and
the
next
development
falls
through.
Then
it
puts
us
that
much
farther
back
before.
K
In
that
case,
what
would
be
the
inevitable?
I'm
not
saying
it's
going
to
be
inevitable
by
no
means
I'm
rooting
for
him,
but
that
just
increases
our
risk
to
ms
whiskey's
point,
so
I'm
willing
to
work
with
the
man,
but
I
want
to
do
what's
fair
as
well,
and
you
know,
10
years
does
seem
extreme
to
me
a
year
maybe
to
to
get
himself
back
on
track.
J
Miss
keener:
do
we
have
funds
available
that
we
could
use
to
cover
that
or
since
we've
already
paid
it,
are
we
really
covering
anything
it's
just
kind
of
replenishing
what
we
already
paid
out
correct.
F
Whatever
council
decides,
the
administration
will
support.
I
think
what
mr
gainer
said,
though,
has
some
validity.
We
don't
need
more
property
to
maintain
and,
I
think,
work
whatever
the
is
20
years
too
much
is
15.
Whatever
that
sweet
spot
is
again,
that's
that's
up
to
you
all
to
decide.
We
will
support
it.
We
think
anything
shows
good
faith
in
trying
to
work
with
the
petitioner
to
make
sure
that
one
they
pay
the
full
assessment
and
two
something
successful.
I
F
Successful
because,
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
all
benefit,
so
I
think
whatever
I've
already
talked
to
justin
about
what
we're
going
to
try
to
put
together.
I
think
to
mr
gaynor's
point
that
if
the
property
were
to
transfer
we'd
want
that
payment
in
full
and
and
if
it's
not
the
case
council
I'd
like
to
know
sooner
than
later,
but
if
but
if
there
was
a
property
transaction,
I
think
we'd
want
that
payment
up
in
full.
D
Well,
it
seems
to
me
that
if,
if,
if
he
sells
the
property,
we're
going
to
get
our
money
back
out
of
the
sale
price,
if
he
loses
the
property,
I
guess
we're
going
to
get
it
and
we
can
sell
it
and
get
our
money
back
or
whatever
we
need
to
do
so.
I
think
we're
fairly
well
protected.
At
this
point
I
mean.
D
I
think
it's
a
matter
of
fairness
if
we
are
going
to
help
out
and
I'll
go
back
to
the
games
of
chance,
because,
frankly,
I
think
we
did
forgive
some
of
those
fees,
even
though
we
we
reset
the
payment
schedule,
the
way
it
was
going
to
be-
maybe
not
maybe
I'm
wrong
about
that,
but
I
I
don't
know
why
we
help
one
business
and
not
another.
If,
if
that's
the
especially
during
covet,
I
think
that's
the
thing
that
is
that's
where
I'm
at
with
this
whole
thing,
I
mean
maybe
under
different
circumstances.
D
E
That
was
a
gamble
too
for
us,
but
we
felt
secure
in
it
just
like
he
did
his
but
to
sit
there
and
then
act
like
oh.
I
did
not
know.
How
could
you
not
know-
and-
and
I
I
don't
know
about
you
guys,
but
I
personally,
I
have
a
real
bad
feeling
about
the
fact
that
somebody's
trying
to
say
I
didn't
know
I
was
signing
my
life
away
for
500
and
some
thousand
dollars,
and
particularly
it's
not
like
he's
unlearned,
you
keep
saying
mister.
This
is,
madam
mister.
E
This
is
a
doctor,
I'm
sure
he
had
attorneys
as
well.
He
just
said
walk
into
this
blind
and
I
just
think
that
10
years
is
far
too
long.
If
he
had
an
issue
like
I
said
one
or
two
years,
that's
good,
but
in
the
meantime
it
is
our
funding.
It's
out
there.
We
did
pay
for
it
and
we
could
have
been
using
it
in
different
ways
and
I'm
not
going
to
do
anything.
That's
going
to
jeopardize
a
128
fund
for
a
business
when
I
have
a
lot
of
residents
out
here.
E
That's
counting
on
that
when
they
have
a
sewer
coming
in
front
of
their
house,
just
like
the
ones
that
are
sitting
down
there.
Now
that
didn't
ask
for
a
sewer
line
to
be
put
there
and
we're
not
part
of
a
mandated
program,
so
some
extension
yeah
a
couple
but
10
years
because
of
clovid
and
put
it
on
that.
No,
I
I
just
can't
see
that
and
he
should
have
come
before
not
now.
B
Okay,
I
don't
think
two
years
would
would
do
the
man
any
good.
I
I
don't
think
it
would
help
him
at
all.
I
I
think
that,
in
order
to
to
make
it
viable
for
him,
I
I
would
suggest
the
10
years
and
that's
I
I'm
not
going
to
argue
about
it
anymore.
I
I
think
it's
a
fair,
equitable
solution
to
the
man's
problem
and
to
ours.
I
don't
want
to
see
the
city
of
norton
own,
any
more
property.
That's
for
sure
that
that
comes
from
taxation
failure
so.
C
No
and
again,
I
think
this
is
just
to
talk
to
him
right
now.
We
have
not
set
no
timetable
when
he
has
to
pay
it
off
yet
so
that
just
gives
administration
something
to
work
with.
C
Okay,
that's!
If,
for
communications
of
the
committee
of
the
whole,
is
there
any
topics
for
next
work
session?
We'll
probably
be
discussing
that
again,
anything
else.
K
C
K
It
has
to
do
with
the
hometown
road
water
line.
I
I
got
a
call
from
a
resident
today
and
they
just
they
had
a
couple
questions.
They
want
to
know
a
timeline
on
it.
They
want
to
know
if
they
will
be
receiving
letters
alerting
them
of
when
it's
done
and
what
their
fees
would
be
if
they
want
to
join
in
the
project.
F
Mr
tiles,
we
can
talk
offline,
but
I'm
curious
is
that
between
585
and
the
metro
parks?
Is
that
correct?
Okay?
We
won't
have
a
final
cost.
Remember,
there's
some
grant
money
in
there,
so
some
of
that
money
is
going
to
be
covered
by
the
grant,
so
that
wouldn't
be
the
property
owner.
But
I'd
be
glad
to
have
a
conversation
with
you
and
we
won't
have
that
final
cost
until
the
project's
done.
But
I
can
I.
F
I
can
do
that.
You
know,
I
think
we
did
that
last
year.
I
think
we
sent
letters
to
anybody
who
wanted
to
connect,
so
I
think
envision
us
they're
doing
the
same.
K
Yeah
I
mean
we
can
talk
in
greater
detail
like
you
said
offline,
but
this
gentleman
was
actually
interested.
Okay,
you.
F
Know
depending
yeah,
and
I
think
I
think,
there's
a
there's
a
the
good
thing
there
is.
We
have
some
grant
money
and
it's
going
to
cover
a
portion
of
it.
So
you
know
that's
and
I
think
that's
a
conversation
for
council
to
consider.
Maybe
what
you
do
to
help
somebody
who's
in
a
situation.
If
they're,
you
know,
don't
have
the
means
do
we
do.
We
have
you
know
a
way
to
help
somebody
out
like
that
by
by
setting
the
fee
schedule
accordingly,
if
that
makes
sense,
okay,.
C
I
think
that
helps
okay,
all
right,
then,
if
there's
no
other
further
business
to
come
before
council
and
I
can
make
a
motion
to
adjourn
tonight
at
7,
45.