►
From YouTube: 04-18-2022 Committee Work Session
Description
04-18-2022 Committee Work Session
A
B
C
C
I'm
pleased
to
announce
that
the
summit
county
board
of
elections
has
come
to
speak
to
us
tonight
about
the
proposed
charter,
amendment
of
moving
the
primary
election
from
september.
To
may
so,
I'd
like
to
welcome
mr
p,
ziegler,
andrew
sheehorn
and
lance
reed.
Whatever
order
you
guys
feel
necessary,
please.
E
B
E
E
So
we
are
here
tonight
to
speak
to
you
about
the
proposed
charter,
amendment
that
if
the
council
should
choose
to
do
so
put
it
on
the
ballot,
my
understanding
is
for
the
november
election.
Is
that
correct?
That's
correct,
just
to
kind
of
cover
some
of
the
costs
that
that
we've
had
in
previous
elections
that
that
may
interest
you
so.
E
If
we
extrapolate
that
out,
it
comes
to
a
cost
of
three
thousand
seven
hundred
eight
dollars
and
four
cents
per
precinct.
Your
community
has
eleven
precincts
within
summit
county
so
that
cost
total
would
be
forty
thousand
seven
hundred
eighty
eight
dollars
and
forty
four
cents.
The
only
reason
I
bring
that
up,
just
as
as
a
comparison
right
now,
your
community,
as
well
as
new
franklin,
are
the
only
communities
that
have
the
possibilities
of
september
elections.
E
G
C
E
E
So
the
only
within
the
election
official
manual,
the
secretary
of
state's
office,
provides
us
the
only
issue
that
anybody
would
potentially
run
in
is
a
signature
outside
of
one
year
prior
to
turning
their
petitions
into
our
office.
So
in
essence,
if
you're
talking
about
going
on
to
the
ballot
for
november
of
this
year,
if
it
were
to
pass,
we
would
certify
end
of
november
if
candidates
are
circulating
their
petition
shortly
thereafter
or
the
beginning
of
the
new
year
and
you'd
have
a
a
february
filing
deadline.
C
E
E
J
J
J
J
H
C
H
K
J
K
C
H
C
C
We
have
a
through
f
that
we
have
marked
down
kind
of
my
intention
unless
council
voices,
otherwise
is,
if
any
of
these
a
through
f.
If
there's
any
council
member
who
feels
that
they
want
to
see
this
push
forward
for
further
discussion
tonight
or
this
week
would
be
the
time
to
mention
it.
Otherwise,
I
don't
really
think
I'm
going
to
keep
bringing
them
back
at
every
work
session,
the
ones
that
have
been
mentioned,
like
miss
whippy,
mentioned
section
3.20.
C
D
H
Well,
I
would
just
assume
leave
it.
The
way
it
is
not
take
anything
out
include
all
the
language,
because
the
way
this
is
written
if
the
law
changes
on
the
state
level
and
if
it's
not
listed
underneath
our
charter,
then
neither
us
definitely
the
public's,
not
going
to
know
because
it's
not
going
to
be
stated
up
here.
If
it
just
says
we
followed
by
the
ohio
revised
code,
I
really
don't
see
the
saving
of
that.
What
is
it
like
three,
two
thirds
of
a
page
of
a
sheet
of
paper?
H
I
would
rather
have
it
spelled
out
and
then
that
way,
if
it
changes
this,
we
would
have
to
update
our
charter
with
it
to
reflect
it
where
he
says
we're
going
to
follow
it,
but
I'd
rather
see
it
designated
out
and
happen
to
go
looking
it
up
whatever,
because
there
are
some
people
that
will
get
curious
and
they'll
want
to
know.
Why
should
they
have
to
look
it
up
for
that?
Little
dab
a
bit,
and
I
said,
it'll
make
sure
the
public
is
made
well
aware
that
there
has
been
changes
as
well
as
us.
H
It
would
be
on
our
next
term
for
anybody
who
ran
it
would
be
the
next
term
starting,
but
I
think
the
people
ought
to
have
the
right
to
decide
if
they
want
to
give
a
raise
out.
I
feel
that
same
way
about
the
state
and
federal
level,
or
else
these
people
wouldn't
be
out
of
control
either.
So
I'm
just
telling
you
now
I'll
be
screaming
about
that.
Every
time
can
we
skip
that
one.
A
C
F
J
Amendment
to
the
charter
that
was
passed
and
the
the
rates
were
set
back
to
the
2007
rate,
so
that
outlined
how
much
in
in
what
compensation
both
positions
of
mayor
and
council
would
receive.
So
I
would
say
it's
safe
to
say
that
since
2007,
the
charter
has
not
changed
right
and
therefore
those
rates
are
at
the
2007
rate.
A
H
H
There's
a
lot
of
elderly
people
that
they're
really
not
online
to
have
access
and
either
they
don't
have
or
they
don't
really
not.
They
don't
use
their
phones
very
well.
I
know
quite
a
few
of
them
that
I
see
no
reason
to
remove
that
from
the
public
library
used
to
be
put
into
four
places.
We've
cut
it
back
now
to
just
the
public
library.
H
K
H
3.2
we
were,
you
know.
I
brought
that
I'd
like
to
see
the
televised
meetings
stated
that
they
had
to
be
done,
but
again
mr
martin
was
supposed
to
get
back
with
us.
I
think
that
is
going
to
have
to
go
underneath
the
boards
and
commissions.
I
don't
think
we
can
stick
it
right
in
under
the
council's
issues,
council's
3.20
for
the
televised
meetings.
Anybody
else.
H
Okay,
I'll
just
move
on
to
the
5.02
competitive
bidding,
I've
done
stated.
You
know
it's
currently
set
at
10
000..
The
proposals
are
changing
to
20
000,
which
means
there
would
be
no
or
little
awareness
for
the
public
of
any
expenditure
under
20
000,
no
opportunity
for
opposing
it
or
petitioning
against
it
to
have
it
changed
to
have
it
stopped,
and
actually
there
would
be
little
input
from
council.
It's
not
like.
I
see
all
council
going
to
the
border
control
meetings
to
begin
with.
Never
have
I
doubt
that
that's
going
to
start.
H
There
was
another
part
in
section
five
also
that
was
looking
to
be
changed
and
I
think
that
was
raising
to
go
to
the
board
up
to
10
000..
So
before
you
even
get
there
again
I'll,
be
saying
nate.
To
that
I
know
you
guys
got
to
have
a
lot
more
meetings,
you're
doing
them
during
the
day,
while
you're
here
anyway.
So
it's
no
harm
no
foul
for
us,
I'm
concerned
for
you
and
it
lets
more
transparency,
be
out
there.
A
Mr
loser,
president,
I
wanted
to
add
on
that
on
the
board
of
control,
with
increasing
that
amount,
I
mean
when
I
look
at
this,
I
have
to
say
well
how
does
this
benefit?
You
know
our
taxpayers
and
us
being
advocates
for
the
citizens
here.
You
know
we
have
checks
and
balances
for
a
reason,
and
I
don't
think
it's
an
issue
of
distrust
or
anything
like
that.
I
just
think
it's
it's
one
of
those
situations
where
I
don't
think
it
needs
to
be
changed.
C
C
C
H
I'll
try
and
clarify
myself
a
little
better
on
a
and
b
we
have
the
right
to
propose
putting
on
the
ballot
asking
the
people
if
they
want
to
give
a
raise.
You
want
to
put
it
on
the
ballot
to
give
raises
no
issue
with
that.
My
issue
is
where
the
verbiage
is
being
changed
and
the
power
taken
away
from
the
people
to
even
have
a
voice
in
it.
C
C
K
K
K
A
H
D
H
A
A
K
K
So
I
guess
I'm
saying
that,
because
I
don't
want
anybody
to
ever
think
that
we
had
a
say
in
what
what
that
paper
said
to
us.
It's
said
by
the
review
board
and
they
go
through
and
do
it,
so
it
has
nothing
really
to
do
with
us
other
than
we
get
the
decision
to
put
it
on
on
a
ballot
for
you
guys
to
say
yes
or
no
to.
H
Well,
yeah,
I
don't
think
any
charter
amendments
made
it,
but
everything
that
was
proposed
out
of
the
charter
review
it
either
came
from
council
or
the
charter
review
or
the
administration
charter
review.
I
don't
think
actually
had
any
much
of
any
input
as
to
what
was
brought
to
us.
If
I
were
called
correctly
and
we
have
one
here
tonight-
that's
actually
was
served
on
that
board
and
I
see
her
shaking
her
head.
Agreeing
with
me.
K
C
C
H
That
what
I
wanted
to
have
addressed-
and
he
said
he
could
do
the
scrivener
marks-
changes
to
make
sure
that
it
reads
as
it's
meant
to
be,
that
they're
going
to
be
continuous.
That'll,
always
be
that
way
that
for
televising
the
meetings-
and
the
other
thing
was
to
put
the
other
boards
and
commissions
under
the
charter
as
well,
so
that
they
continue
to
be
aired
as
well
and
kept.
H
C
H
C
F
Thank
you,
mr
president,
we
were
originally
was
council,
provided
with
a
copy
of
this
to
start
looking
at
about
a
month
ago
to
ask
questions
and
just
kind
of
coming
back
before
us
now
as
a
opportunity
to
discuss-
and
I
asked
a
couple
questions
more
high
level,
miss
keener
and
just
just
to
understand.
So
everybody
realizes
this
isn't
a
this
is
kind
of
a
moving
target.
F
So
this
is
subject
to
change.
It's
not
based
on
hard
bit,
so
you
know
there's
certain
things
that
we'll
get
bids
on
later
that
are
going
to
be
different
than
the
numbers
put
in
here,
just
kind
of
a
point
in
time
for
when
this
happens,
but
so
this
would
be
starting
for
this
year
kind
of
broken
out
by
different
funds.
F
H
C
Yeah
and
any
assuming
this
were
passed,
anything
in
here
would
have
to
be
passed
individually.
I
mean
we're
not
agreeing
to
anything
other
than
we
kind
of
like
the
direction
that
the
administration
is
advising,
so
any
anything
else
would
have
to
come
before.
Council
individually,
I
just
want
to
point
that
out
each
purchase,
correct.