►
From YouTube: Charter Review Commission 6-15-20201
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
A
Yeah,
it's
nice,
I
I
went
for
a
little
back
ride
last
night
and
I
had
to
have
some
jeans
and
a
shirt,
long
sleeve
shirt
on
anyhow.
I
mentioned
this
because
people
are
saying:
oh,
it's
so
nice
and
warm
out,
and
I'm
like
it's
perfect.
I
mean
I
was
cold
yeah.
I
know.
B
C
No,
it's
me.
Can
you
hear
me?
Okay,
the
the
bottom
toolbar
is
over
the
controls
to
turn
the
video
on
or
to
change
the
name,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
get
back.
B
B
Okay,
are
you
on
justin?
Are
you
just
sitting
there
making
fun
of.
B
B
B
C
Did
we
finish
the
discussion
on
the
succession
if
the
the
mayor
is
has
to
leave
her
if
he
leaves
the
being
the
mayor,
I
think
sometimes
I
can't
think
they're
white
for
the
right
words.
We
talked
about
whether
the
president
of
council
would
could
stay
on
as
president
if
he
says
no,
I
don't
want
to
be
the
mayor.
All
that.
Did
we
finalize
all
that
what
we
decided?
I
think.
A
E
B
B
Oh
okay,
I'm
sitting
there
I'm
I
will
you
know.
Usually
when
I'm
a
host
of
like
a
team's
meeting,
I
get
prompted
automatically,
but
this
one
here
it
was
a
little
different
thing.
I'm
glad
you
sent
me
a
message
all
right,
so
I
think
we
got
everybody
on
well
did
and
wait
for
john
he's
joining
hang
on
there.
He
is.
B
B
F
B
I
didn't
know
I
didn't
know.
I
was
supposed
to
be
the
one
admitting
you
into
the
I
got.
I
became
the
host,
so
I
had
to.
I
had
to
officially
let
you
in
so
well.
Thank
you.
You
didn't
knock
on
the
door
long
enough.
So
all
right!
Well,
let's
get
the
meeting
rolling.
So
I
hereby
declare
that
the
charter
review
committee
meeting
of
city
of
norton
on
june
15th
is
now
in
session.
A
B
Josh
smith,
here
rick
dobbins,
here
ellen
stokes
here
and
todd
bergstrom,
is
here,
and
we
also
have
justin
markey
and
somebody
else
on.
The
call
is
that
anybody
else
who
am
I
missing?
There's
an
administration
account.
D
Yeah,
that's
that's
robert's
account
so
he's
just
he.
He
won't
be
participating,
but
he
okay,
he
logs
on
to
start
the
meeting
all
right
so.
B
So
we're
ready
to
start
here,
so
I
guess
the
first
order
of
the
business
is
is
really
to
kind
of
go
through
and
recap
what
we
went
through
last
week.
I
guess
you
could
almost
say
old
business.
The
one
thing
on
the
action
item
that
I
was
waiting
for,
I
did
not
receive.
B
I
know
that
the
message
was
received
by
the
mayor,
but
I
never
got
anything
back
from
the
mayor
as
far
as
a
little
bit
more
of
a
robust
list
of
duties,
so
I'm
gonna
take
it
as
it
is
that
the
idea
is
that
we
wanna
they
wanna
leave
it
the
way
it
is
so
if
we
wanted
to
add
a
list
of
duties,
I
guess
it's
in
our
our
our
powers
to
do
so,
but
that's
where
it
stands
there.
We
don't
have
a
list
to
review
like
we
were
hoping
to
I'm.
B
Looking
at
my
notes
from
last
time-
and
I
know
we
have
some
old
questions
so
maybe
before
we
get
too
far
down
the
line
of
new
businesses,
let's
just
kind
of
capture
some
of
the
outstanding
questions
I
know
ellen.
You
started
off
with
a
question.
Let's
I'll
write
them
down,
let's
make
sure
we
all
know
the
answers
that
we
need
to
know.
As
far
as
some
of
the
things
we've
already
discussed
and
in
the
meantime
justin,
maybe
you
could
pull
up
the
current
version
as
it
stands
right
now
of
the
charter.
C
D
A
B
B
B
B
Does
it
sit
here?
It
is
that's
a
revised
code
here
we.
B
C
B
C
B
G
D
D
So
todd
I
just
I
just
sent
that
back
to
you.
What
did
you
say-
charter
version
from
june
1st
and
then
I'm
gonna,
while
working
on
that
I'm
gonna
try
to
get
that
saved
onto
the
sharepoint.
I'm
not
sure
why
it's
not
showing
the.
D
B
B
It
bigger
that's
as
big
as
it
goes.
Is
that
good
enough?
Yes,
all
right,
so
there
were
still
some
questions,
let's
just
kind
of
skim
through
it,
and
if
you
had
notes
that
you
want
me
to
stop
at
but
we'll
go
through
wherever
the
marks
are
or
where
they're
not,
and
let's
just
kind
of
get
into
where
we
we
still
have
questions.
C
B
C
Okay,
and
as
far
as
I
can
see
from
last
time,
we
had,
I
think,
josh
and
todd
wanted
to
take
it
out
and
denise
and
rick
wanted
to
keep
it
in.
C
So
I
wasn't
sure
where
it
ended
up.
I
wanted
to
cast
my
vote
after
thinking
about
it.
C
C
B
Right,
that's
part
of
the
responsibility
of
being
president
of
council.
That's
in
my
opinion
and
that's
why
the
council
members
should
vote
for
that,
because
then
they're
acknowledging
the
fact
that
all
right,
if
something
happened,
then
we're
okay
as
council,
which
represents
the
rest
of
the
community
as
you
serving
as
mayor.
So
that's
the
voice
of
the
community
through
the
council
preparing
for
a
terrible
situation,
but
you
would
have
the
mayor
in
place
that
represents
the
voice
of
the
of
the
community.
B
E
Time
this
is
rick.
Is
there?
Is
there
a
mechanism
that
we're
going
to
arrive
at
to
vote
on
these
differences
of
opinion?
I
mean
I
I
am
certainly
willing
to
discuss.
I
I,
while
I
respect
what
you
what
your
view
is,
I
respectfully
differ
in
that
view.
I
believe
that
that
language
should
remain
there.
I
think
the
president
of
council
should
have
the
right
to
decline
the
office
of
mayor
and
remain
as
president
of
council
for
multiple
reasons.
But
again
these
are
just
differences
of
opinion.
B
D
Yeah,
so
I
mean
there's
there's
one
of
two
ways
to
do
it.
If
there's
everyone's
in
consensus
and
you
can
vote
on
the
document
as
it
stands,
if
there's
individual
provisions
that
you
think
there's
differences
opinion
on,
I
would
recommend
you
go
through,
make
a
motion
and
go
through
each
of
them
individually
to
figure
out
whether
that's
something
you
want
to
accept
or
accept
the
recommendation
or
take
that
out
of
the
current
document.
G
D
B
I,
in
this
particular
case
you
know,
I
think
this
is
we've
had.
I
know
I've
heard
rick's
opinion
before
I.
You
know
there's
a
lot
about
what
he
says
it's
true,
but
I
think
we
should
let's
just
focus
on
this
for
a
minute
and
then
go
around
the
table.
If
anybody's
got
some
additional
opinions,
rick,
you
can
kind
of
go
through
your
opinion
again
and
we'll
just
go
around
the
table
and
then
we'll
vote
on
it.
E
Okay,
well,
you
know
again,
I
I'm
not.
I.
I
have
a
strong
opinion
that
the
president
of
council
accepts
a
nomination
to
be
the
president
of
council,
because
he
or
she
wants
to
be
the
president
of
council,
not
necessarily
the
mayor
in
the
event
that
the
mayor-
and
I
think
the
option
in
the
charter
is
important
to
a
lot
most
of
the
time.
Practically
the
president
of
council
does
succeed,
a
mayor
who
drops
drops
away,
for
whatever
reason
I
think.
If
we
looked
at
practicality,
that
would
always
be
the
case.
E
I
I
believe
the
council
and
the
president
of
council.
I
believe
that
the
president
of
council
wields
more
legislative
authority
and
power
than
does
a
ceremonial
mayor,
so
that
president
of
council
may
want
to
be
in
that
position
because
he
or
she
has
a
vision
for
the
city
and
the
way
they
want
it
to
go,
and
they
may
not
want
to
give
that
up.
So
but
again,
I
am
certainly
willing
to
be
bound
by
the
majority
of
the
charter
review.
Commission,
that's
just
my
view,
but
we
need
a
mechanism
and
justin
explain
the
mechanism.
E
You
know
robert's
rules
of
order
would
say:
let's
have
a
motion
one
way
or
another,
to
leave
it
in
or
to
take
it
out.
Then
a
discussion
we've
already
had
the
discussion
and
then
a
vote.
We
can
vote
yay
or
nay
with
respect
to
the
inclusion
or
exclusion
of
that
language
from
the
from
the
charter,
at
least
our
recommendation.
E
B
So
I
guess
we
can
go
through
and
we'll
start
that
robert's
rule
of
order.
Right
now
and
I'll
say
I
motion
that
we
delete,
as
shown
on
our
our
markup
right
now.
We
delete
that
part
of
the
the
statement
in
section
2.04
that
would
prohibit
the
the
president
of
council
to
have
a
decision
not
to
serve
as
president
of
or
not
to
serve
as
the
mayor
in
case.
If
something
happened,
so
I
I
motioned
that
we
we
we
delete
that
as
shown.
Are
there
any
additional
discussions
we
heard
rick?
F
Yeah,
when
I
first
brought
it
up,
I
just
I
thought
it
looked
sloppy.
I
felt
like
the
president
of
council
would
be
the
best
student
for
the
position
of
mayor
so
yeah.
I
I
definitely
second
your
motion
to
get
rid
of
it.
B
Okay,
so
let's
let's
hear
some
further
discussion
before
we
would
take
a.
G
I
I
think
it
should
be
kept
the
way
it
was,
and
I
agree
with
rick,
because
todd
you
were
almost
making
the
argument
you
you
were
saying
then
that
the
president
of
council
could
decline
it
if
there
were
reasons
of
health
or
whatever
so
right,
there
you're
giving
him
an
out
and
then
what
would
we
have
to
start
incorporating
that
type
of
wording
in?
I
think
it
should
stay
the
way
it
is.
G
B
I
I
got
I'd
like
to
add
one
more
comment
to
it,
just
to
kind
of
maybe
stimulate
a
response
from
everybody
else.
So
you
know
again
my
opinion
is
you
know
the
citizens
elect
council
members
to
represent
their
voice
all
right.
So
if
something
happens
you
know,
and
council
again
will
elect
the
president
to
serve
in
many
different
capac
many
different
positions
or
in
different
capacity.
B
So
that's
that's
what
the
that's!
What
people
who
agree
to
the
charter,
the
citizens
of
norton,
agree
to
they
want
their
ex.
If
they
read
it,
they
would
expect
that
if
something
happened
then
the
president
would
become
the
mayor
and
they
should
expect
their
council
member
to
vote
in
the
best
interest
of
their
award,
which
represents
those
people.
So
again.
In
my
opinion,
this
is
a
way
to
serve
the
citizens
of
having
someone
serve
as
the
mayor
that
represents
the
the
overall
arching
interest
of
the
city.
B
E
B
Okay,
that's
fine,
that's
fine!
So
I
guess
we
can
all
just
go.
I
mean
I
think
we
all
know
each
other
enough.
We
don't
have
to
have
a
secret
ballot
of
any
kind.
So
let's
just
do
a
roll
call
for
if
everybody's
ready,
I'm
for
a
vote
here
so
I'll
start
off
with.
I
got
my
list
in
front
of
me
denise.
B
I
guess
the
vote
is
leave
it
as
is
or
change
it
as
as
written
as
modified.
Now.
B
As
is
okay
josh,
I
mean
john,
as
is
okay
dave,
as
is.
D
B
D
E
B
B
All
right,
so
so,
basically,
just
you,
if
you
guys,
could
see
it
just
read
through
it
see
if
you
see
anything
that
got
deleted
or
changed
by.
B
D
I
mean
yeah,
no,
I
don't
think
so.
If
you,
if
we
go
back
to
the
original
discussion
on
2.03,
that
was
an
administration
recommendation
which
again
charter
review
commission
can
accept
or
reject
what
that
what
we
were
trying
to
get
at
with
that
language
was
there's
times
where
the
mayor
may
be
out
of
town,
but.
D
B
Different
different
type,
exactly
okay,
good,
okay,
so
moving
on
all
right,
since
we
never
got
the
mayor's
list,
section
2.06.
B
We
added
the
word
duties
in
there.
Is
there
anything
that
we
want
to
do
to
move
forward
with
that?
Do
we
have
any
duties
we
want
to
add,
or
do
we
want
to
leave
it?
As
is
I
mean
I
say
we
just
leave
it
as
is,
but
you
know
if
the
mayor
had
some
ideas
to
help
the
cause,
then
I
was
going
to
incorporate
that
discussion,
but.
G
B
B
I
mean
these
are
duties
and
I
think
the
words
I
mean
these
are
technically
duties.
I
think
it's
referred
to
somewhere
else
where
it
says
the
duties,
but
it's
not
it's
not
listed
as
the
topic.
It
probably
doesn't
need
to
be
in
there,
but
justin
actually
added
it
there,
and
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
we
said
or
not,.
B
The
only
reason
I've
responsibilities
it
had
to
do
with
something
I
think
we
read
later
on
as
far
as
the
mayor's
duties
and-
and
it
was
kind
of
completing
the
of
a
paragraph
later
on
in
the
document
that
used
that
word
duties,
but
it
didn't
have
any
reference
in
it.
When
you
read
this
thing,
it
says
executive
and
administration
powers,
but
it
didn't
relate
to
that
other
paragraph
later
on.
That's
why
I
I
was
suggesting
that
I
think
denise.
B
C
B
E
Well
there
there
there's,
I
I
hate,
I'm
not
trying
to
be
a
contrarian,
but
we
looked
at
the
city,
salary
survey
and
again
I'm
not
trying
to
be
I'm
not
trying
to
be
preaching
from
a
pulpit,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
people
in
norton
that
work
two
or
three
jobs
trying
to
pay
their
mortgage
pay
for
their
meals,
their
kids,
their
health
care,
and
I
think
we
need
some.
I
think
we
need
some
kind
of
data
to
support
what
we
are
proposing.
E
We
asked
the
mayor
to
come
in
or
or
whoever
the
proponent
of
this
change
was.
We
asked
for
the
proponent
to
come
in
and
explain
to
us
so
that
todd
when
you
go
in
front
of
council,
you
could
explain
to
council
a
foundation
or
support
for
this
change
in
the
in
the
charter
with
respect
to
compensation,
and
then
justin
told
us
that
the
mayor
and
the
administration
wasn't
even
supportive
of
a
salary
increase.
E
So
I
don't
know
what
basis
we
have
so
when
you
say
I-
and
I
personally
was
of
the
view
early
on
that
our
mayor
is
woefully
underpaid
and
our
council
people
are
woefully
underpaid,
but
that's
kind
of
across
the
board
for
any
legislator
or
any
executive
in
a
city.
But
I
don't
know
if
I
have
ever
heard
any
data
or
any
kind
of
foundation.
That
would
support
at
least
me
saying
that
I
am
fine
with
putting
it
in
the
charter
that
we
should
raise
the
salary.
E
E
F
E
Right,
but
who,
in
the
who
in
the
administration,
even
supports
the
lower
number,
and
just
I'm
not
trying
to
cross-examine
anybody?
I
just
would
like
someone
to
tell
me
who,
who
has
presented
information
to
us,
that
there
is
support
either
on
council
administration
or
salary
figures
or
the
mayor's
duties.
That
would
support
a
raise
from
the
current
mayor's
salary.
I
mean
the
bottom.
B
Line
is
won't,
they
support
it
or
reject
it
once
we
present
it
to
them.
I
mean
I,
I
think,
we've
we
went
through
the
whole
scenario.
I
mean
you
could
justify
it
in
your
own
mind
how
you
want.
I
was
hoping
for
a
little
bit
more
support
that
would
support
it
by
voters,
but
in
my
mind,
when
you
start
doing
some
simple
math,
if
we
ever
want
a
mayor,
that's
you
know
has
a
little
bit
more
interest
into
to
just
doing
a
little
bit
more
it.
B
I
mean
there's
hours,
that
you
do
the
simple
math
for
the
hours
that
it
takes
to
do
the
simple
duties
that
we
have
in
there.
You
know
it.
It
takes
a
lot
of
time
and
I
think
that's
how
I
justify
it.
In
my
mind,
is
just
the
the
effort
and
if
you
ever
want
someone
to
to
possibly
consider
running
for
mayor
down
the
road
you
have
to
have
something
there.
That
almost
makes
it
worth
your
while,
because
otherwise
it's
too
much
of
a
headache.
A
B
E
D
So
there
was
initially
there
was
a
request
from
city
council
to
review
the
mayor's
compensation,
and
I
think
our
question
administration
review
council's
compensation
sort
of
hand
in
hand.
I
think
rick
from
your
your
point.
Both
the
salary
data
doesn't
support
it,
but
I
think,
more
importantly,
the
from
a
budgetary
perspective.
The
city
is
concerned,
although,
although
we're
coming
out
of
pandemic,
there's
still
some
budget
uncertainty
and
they're
concerned,
given
the
state
of
the
finance
is
the
city
that
any
raises
are
justified
for
that
for
those
positions
at
this
time.
D
A
G
I
do
recall
five
years
ago
when
this
suggestion
was
made
to
the
council.
The
complexion
of
the
council
was
quite
different
and
there
were
specific
people
who
were
most
vocally
opposed
to
raising
the
mayor's
salary.
I'm
thinking
now,
even
though
times
are
not
the
best
financially,
they
have
to
just
realistically
look.
G
B
A
Yeah,
I
just
haven't
it's
one
question:
would
the
old
charter
also
be
shown
in
the
in
the
on
the
ballot?
Will
it
say
the
2007?
G
B
John,
yes,
dave.
B
Josh,
yes,
rick,
no,
okay,
ellen.
C
B
And
todd
is
a
yes
all
right,
so
we'll
see
what
happens
at
the
council,
so
the
change
as
written
in
there
will
will
stay
as
far
as
our
recommendations
from
the
commission
to
the
or
to
the
council,
all
right.
B
Okay,
this
is
in
the
same
lines,
I
guess
section
3.08.
B
Just
since
we're
talking
about
it,
we
have
the
salary
rates
of
council
adjusted
as
well.
B
D
E
B
So
I
mean
I'm
okay
with
this,
based
on
my
own
experience
of
what
what
this
city
goes
through.
B
D
E
B
Okay,
all
right:
how
about.
E
Discussion
and
again
from
my
perspective,
we
don't
have
anything
to
base
these
raises
on,
so
I
would
be
in
opposition,
but
again
I'm
respectful
of
what
everyone
says
and
I
I
agree
in
terms
of
philosophy
but
in
terms
of
what
we
have
in
front
of
us.
I
don't
believe
it's
justified.
So
that's
my
position.
Okay,.
G
B
I
agree
with
the
changes
john.
I
agree
with
the
changes.
Okay
and
david
did
and
josh.
Do
you
have
any
comments?
No,
I
agree
with
the
changes
as
well.
Okay,
so
let's
go
through
the
roll
call
of
a
vote.
Denise!
Yes,
john!
Yes,
dave,
yes,
see
josh,
yes,
rick.
E
B
Okay,
moving
on
council,
that
was
just
an
edit.
I
don't
think
we
needed
to
talk
about
that,
we're
good.
With
that
a
lot
of
changes
here
on
the
executive
session.
I
can't
remember
if
we
had
any
issues
with
them
or
not.
I
don't
think
we
did
is
there.
Is
there
a
need
to
have
justin
recap
what
these
were
all
about,
or
do
you
guys
want
to
just
take
a
second.
C
E
A
B
Okay,
rick.
Anybody
want
to
second
that,
oh
who
is
that
josh?
Okay,
all
right,
let's
go
through
a
roll
call,
real
quick!
Let
me
get
my
list
out
again:
denise,
yes,
john!
Yes,.
A
Dave?
Yes,
all
right,
josh,
yes,
rick.
B
B
B
D
B
G
Todd
there
was
one
where
the
administrative
officer
could
okay
from
10
it
went
to
25.
I
thought
that.
B
D
That
was
a
request
from
the
finance
director
for
yeah
increased
authority
on
that
without,
but
I
know
there
was
discussion
and
maybe
some
differences
of
opinion
on
whether
that
was
an
appropriate
change
or
not.
C
E
Can
you
explain
the
administration
reason
for
this
change
I
mean
the
downside
would
be.
Does
the
finance
director
feel
that
this
is
appropriate
for
a
pragmatic
reason.
D
Yeah,
so
I
think
the
I
think
the
logic
behind
it
was
there's
a
number
of,
especially
in
the
last
year
or
two
there's
a
number
of
contracts
that
just
inch
over
that
ten
thousand
dollar
threshold
that
are
pretty
important
to
get
moving
quickly,
but
we
can't
do
without
going
through
the
council
process,
which
can
sometimes
take
six
to
eight
weeks.
D
D
B
C
B
B
I
I
like
the
ability
to
be
able
to
move
forward.
I
mean
you
know.
Sometimes
like
justin
was
saying
some.
You
know
the
if
you're
waiting
for
council
to
award
something
then
next
thing
you
know
you
lost
an
opportunity
for
that
particular
contract
to
be
awarded
when
that
particular
bidder
was
planning
on
doing
the
work
and
all
of
a
sudden.
Maybe
it's
the
time
of
the
season
where
the
weather
goes
from
decent
work
ability
to
not,
and
so
you
want
to
be
able
to
be
nimble.
B
You
want
to
give
our
administration
the
ability
to
move
forward
now,
like
I
said,
if
we
want
to
drop
it
down
to
20
or
something
like
that
to
kind
of
ease
ease
the
change,
I'm
okay
with
that,
but
I
I
like
the
the
intent
is
to
to
keep
things
moving
and
as
long
as
you
know,
we
have
the
right
people.
If,
if
there's
problems
with
it,
then
that's
where
council
would
step
up
and
say:
hey,
I
don't
like
what's
going
on,
we
need
to.
We
need
to
talk
about
this
and
if
it
happens,.
F
B
Should
I
believe
in
empowerment
to
you
know,
you
need
to
give
people
the
responsibility
that
they're
supposed
to
have
so,
but
I
you
know,
I
don't
have
a
problem.
If
the
majority
of
our
our
committee
wants
to
drop
it
down
a
notch,
but
I'm
okay,
you
know
with
that,
but
before
we
would
vote,
let's
kind
of
maybe
just
get
a
feel
if
we
want
to
make
it
20
or
something
like
that,
but
I'm
okay
with
25
I
mean
if
nobody
has
a
real
heartburn
about
it.
G
I
would
rather
see
it
drop
down
to
20.
I
think
it
gives
flexibility
and
takes
into
account
maybe
timely
issues
or
whatever,
but
also
to
keep
the
control
with
council
council
is
elected
by
the
people,
and
they
should
also
be
accountable
for
financial
situations
that
are
more
costly.
So
I
would
like
to
see
some.
You
know,
oversight
to
that.
Well,.
B
Let's,
let's
approach
it
this
way,
then
denise
make
a
motion,
a
formal
motion
and
then
we'll
do
a
second
and
we'll
vote
on
it.
G
Okay,
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
that
the
in
excess
of
twenty
thousand
dollars.
B
All
right,
I'm
sorry,
but
I
thought
I
heard
who
was
that
you
rick.
B
Okay,
all
right,
let's
go
through
the
roll
call
and
vote
denise.
Yes,
john!
Yes,
dave!
Yes,
josh,
yes,
rick,
yes,
ellen.
C
B
B
B
Okay,
this
is
gone.
This
is
gone.
B
Let
me
know
if
I
need
to
stop
somewhere,
but
just
looking
at
what
I
got
marked
up
here,.
B
And
I
guess
you
guys
all
when
I
sent
this
out
last
time,
you
guys
all
did
get
a
copy
of
it
right.
Okay,
all
right!
So
let
me
just
make
sure
I
save
this
change
here.
Real
quick
before.
B
B
B
As
far
as
the
additional
changes
that
we
had
in
that
document,
are
there
anything
that
you
guys
recall
or
we
can,
we
could
skim
through
them
again
that
we
need
to
discuss
or
do
I
have
a
motion
to
accept
all
the
other
comments
that
we
proposed
or
the
edits
that
we
proposed
in
the
document,
and
then
we
can
vote
on
it
that
way
I'll
go
to
the
top
again,
but
that's
what
I
suggest,
but
I
just
I
won't.
I
won't
make
that
motion.
A
Hey
with
the
on
the
whole
vote
b,
br
b,
sections
like
3.19,
I
I
got
three
sections.
I
thought
that
on
the
whole
would
be
3.19,
5.03
and
8.02.
I
thought
that
were
the
only
three
that
we're
going
to
approve
on
the
whole.
B
B
A
B
Okay,
all
right
so
I'll.
I
will
make
that
motion
and
then
we
can
discuss
it.
So
we've
already
talked
about
it,
sections
2.09,
3.08
3.112,
and
then
I
can't
remember
what
section
it
was,
but
paragraph
e,
let
me
get
that.
I
want
to
write
it
down
in
my
notes.
B
5.02
section
e,
okay,
okay,
all
right,
so
in
addition
to
sections
2.09
3.08,
3.12
5.02,
paragraph
e,
I
motion
that
we
accept
all
the
other
edits
that
have
been
presented
in
the
document
as
we're
looking
at
it
now,
which
is
now
considered
with
a
date
on
it
of
june
15th.
B
A
F
C
B
And
todd
is
yes
all
right.
So
with
that,
I
guess
that
really
concludes
our
first
review
of
the
final
draft.
I
suppose
so
you
can
call
it
that.
What
I
I
think
we
need
to
do
now
is
then
justin
you're
gonna,
take
that
and
incorporate
these
edits
into
kind
of
a
final
markup
version
right.
There's
some
loose
ends:
yeah
yeah,
yep,.
D
B
All
right
and
then
and
then
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
get
that
out
to
us
at
least
a
week
before
our
next
meeting,
and
so
we
can
all
review
it
and
then,
at
our
next
meeting
we
kind
of
have
to.
I
feel
we
need
to
have
a
formal
vote
on
the
document
as
it
state
as
it
sits
right
now,
so
that
we
feel
comfortable
taking
that
to
council.
Does
that
sounds
right
to
you
guys,
yep
yep
sounds.
D
Good,
okay,
so
todd
send
that
send
that
charter
version
to
me.
I
will
get
that
turned
around
by
thursday,
so
everyone
has
it
back
out
and
you
have
some
time
to
review
it,
and
then
I
know
council's
meeting.
Probably
next
council
meeting
after
your
next
review
meeting
would
be
july
6th.
D
B
G
B
B
B
F
B
All
right,
I
I
I
fully
expect
to
be
there
on
july
6th,
but
I
say
we
all
go
in
there
arm
and
arm.
D
We'll
be
back
in
person
just
for
everyone's
knowledge,
we'll
be
back
in
person
july
6
council
will
be
back
in
person
in.
D
B
Great
okay,
okay,
so
I
will
get
this
sent
out
to
you
justin
and
I'll
copy
everybody
at
the
same
time,
but
we'll
let
justin's
document
be
the
one
that
we
look
at
between
now
and
our
next
meeting
and
then
the
next
meeting.
The
sole
purpose
is
really
to
just
to
vote
on
what
we
see.
Okay
sounds
good.
Any
other
questions.
B
For
getting
us
going
in
the
right
direction
to
get
through
some
of
these
outstanding
questions,
and
I
guess
everybody
have
a
good
evening.
Oh
thank.