►
From YouTube: Charter Review Commission 6-1-2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
C
D
So
long
as
everybody
can
hear
us,
I
guess
it
is
seven
o'clock,
so,
let's
kind
of
start
off
our
meeting,
I
don't
know
if
we're,
I
think
we
are
being
recorded
or
we're
live
on
youtube.
So
I
hereby
announce
that
the
meeting
for
june
1st
the
charter
review
committee
is
in
order
and
go
through
a
roll
claw
call.
D
Here
all
right,
denise
mullins
alan
stokes
here
and
I
don't
think
it's
for
some
reason,
I'm
going
blank,
is
it
john
or
josh
smith,
josh
josh
won't
be
here
all
right,
josh
is
not
here
and
then
is
it.
John
isaac.
A
D
All
right
so
well,
I
wanted
to
wait
for
justin
to
come,
come
through
to
go
through
a
few
things,
but
last
time-
and
I
I
made
some
notes-
and
I
don't
know
if
you
had
a
chance
to
see
my
additional
comments
to
the
charter
review.
D
But
I
know
last
time
we
were
hoping
that
we
all
had
a
chance
to
spend
a
little
bit
of
time,
seeing
if
there's
any
additional
things
that
we
wanted
to
put
in
play
and
I'm
going
to
see
if
I
can
share
my
screen
here
and
I'll
pull
my
stuff
up,
and
we
can
use
that
as
a
tool
to
capture
everybody
else's
too.
C
So
let
me
just
oh
there's
justin
we'll
wait
for
justin
to
get
on
then.
F
On
I
am
on
I'm
not
from
the
computer,
though,
so
I
won't
be
able
to
do.
F
Yeah
go
ahead
I'll,
say,
and
I
believe
josh
had
emailed
me
yesterday
that
he
was
going
to
be
unavailable.
So
he
had
a
personal
commitment.
D
Okay,
it's
not
a
not
a
problem
and
we
just
started
off
talking
about
how.
Last
time
I
was
hoping
that
one
of
the
things
we
wanted
to
do
today
is
go
through
any
additional
comments
or
or
edits
that
we
propose
that
might
have
been
in
addition
to
what
the
administration
or
any
other
members
of
the
council
had
thrown
our
way.
D
So
since
you
don't
have
a
computer
justin,
I
was
gonna
bring
in
the
the
word
document
I
sent
yesterday,
and
we
can
use
that
and
capture
some
additional
comments
that
I
have
in
anybody
else's.
Oh
shoot.
I
can't
share
my
screen.
F
I
think
I
asked
I
think
robert
can
robert
fowler
should
be
able
to
give
you
that
control.
I
don't.
F
He's
probably
on
mute,
let
me
let
me
text
him,
but
that's
why
I
took
yeah.
D
I
can
I
can
talk
about
some
of
the
things
as
well
and
why
why
justin's
checking
in
on
that
one
of
the
other
things
that
we
had
on
a
list
of
things
to
do,
and
I
did
talk
to
the
mayor
if
you
remember
last
last
time
we
were
talking
about
getting
a
little
bit
more
of
a
detailed
list
of
responsibilities
and
maybe
some
additional
qualification
like
items
that
we
might
want
to
put
in
the
list
to
kind
of
go
along
with
our
idea
of
a
a
little
higher
salary
rate
for
the
mayor's
position.
D
So
I
talked
to
the
mayor
yesterday.
He
didn't
see
my
email.
I
originally
sent
him
so
he
said
for
sure
between
now
and
and
the
next
meeting,
which
we'll
have
probably
one
more
in
two
weeks
I'll
have
a
list
in
front
of
us
and
if
we
get
it
sooner,
then
I'll
I'll
definitely
pass
it
along
as
soon
as
we
get
that.
D
So
we
can
all
look
at
that,
but
I
didn't
I
didn't
tell
him
I
I
said
we
don't
need
to
have
anything
extremely
detailed,
but
I
think
to
quantify
some
of
the
additional
duties
that
that
I
think
we've
observed
that
we
kind
of
like
to
maybe
document
and
and
capture
in
the
charter.
At
least
we
want
to
consider
that
that's
what
we're
looking
for.
So
I
think
he
understands
and
he
was
going
to
go
through
developing
that
list
for
us.
D
D
C
D
C
C
D
So
we
can,
we
could
do
this
without
seeing
it
if
you
guys
have
access
to
the
current
charter.
I
can
start
off,
go
through
my
comments
and
then,
if
then,
we'll
go
around
the
room
and
if
anybody
else
has
additional
ones,
then
we
can
capture
them.
That
way
and
I'll
just
take
notes
right
on
the
on
the
word
document,
I
sent
everybody
yesterday,
so
does
everybody
have
that
available?
D
Yeah,
I'm
looking
at
it
now
all
right.
So
the
first,
the
first
proposed
consideration.
I
threw
out
there
last
night
had
to
do
with
the
the
awards
and
and
and
how
we
determine
the
division
of
the
awards.
I
think,
is
what
it
is
and
and
if
you
look
at
the
the
original
charter
or
the
current
charter,
it
was
established
back
in
1991
the
the
idea
of
looking
at
this
every
10
years,
and
I
just
started
thinking
about
this
the
other
day.
D
D
F
G
F
D
Well,
I
never
thought
of
that
and
I
guess
the
one
thing
we
have
going
for
is
it's
going
to
happen
this
year
right,
that's
right!.
F
D
Yeah,
I
think
I
sort
of
was
around.
I
can't
remember
what
capacity,
though,
if
it
was
on
the
bza
or
I
can't
I
can't
even
oh
well
ten
years
ago,
who
knows
what
I
was
doing
then
I
was
probably
on
council.
D
Well,
I
guess
what
are
some
thoughts
on
that?
Let's,
let's
say
the
cost:
isn't
an
object?
Are
we
able
to
you
know
we
go
through
and
we
do
this
and
how,
when
you
tie
it
to
the
census,
I
mean:
how
does
that
really
make
a
difference
if
we
actually
go
through,
is
that
the
only
way
to
get
the
numbers
is
from
the
census.
F
Yeah
I
mean
what
you
have
to
the
risk
you
have
and
robert
did
just
text
me
that
you're
the
host
now
so
you
should
have.
You
should
be
able
to
share
your
screen
todd.
D
F
So
todd
I,
I
think
the
concern
I
would
have
as
the
law
director
again
you
can.
The
commission
can
review
recommend
whatever
they
want.
My
concern
would
be.
If
you
don't
have
a
census
that
tells
you
the
number
you
don't
have
a
way
to
really
figure
out
how
to
reallocate
the
residence
right.
There's
no,
there's
no
changes
so
that
that
and
it
could
be
challenged
in
a
legal
proceeding
and
you'd
have
no
basis
to
say.
Well,
we
just
sort
of
guessed
right.
D
Okay,
well
that
that's
a
that's
a
good
concern,
it
might
be
dead
in
the
water.
I
didn't,
I
didn't
realize
I
didn't
even
think
about
it,
put
it
on,
so
anybody
got
any
other
thoughts
to
to
not
consider
this
idea.
H
B
D
I
don't
know
if
anybody
would
know
I
haven't,
I
haven't
heard
any
I
was
just
thinking
like
ellen
was
thinking
you
see
this,
the
you
know
the
new
developments
coming
in
there's
one
over
there
off
of.
D
F
D
D
All
right,
I'm
just
gonna
all
right,
so
that
was
that
I
only
got
a
few
things
here,
I'll
just
go
down
to
where
I
oh,
I
added
this
in
here
and
and
justin.
This
kind
of
goes
along
with
what
we
were
talking
about
last
time
or
last
few
times
kind
of
putting
a
little
bit
more
of
a
a
description.
D
That's
really
clear
as
far
as
the
duties-
and
you
know
the
section
2.06
is
actually
you
know
the
executive
and
administrative
power
and
we
added
the
word
duties
and-
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
it
clear-
that's
that's
kind
of
where
I
was
going
with
this
thing.
I
didn't
know
how
important
that
is
to
everybody
else,
but
you
know
if,
if
we're
going
to
have
a
position
described,
there
was
a
few
things
that
I
noticed
in
other
positions
too.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
describe
the
qualifications
of
that
position.
D
I
think
it
the
duties
of
that
position
and
then,
in
some
places
the
the
compensation
for
that
position,
some
of
them
it's
there,
some
of
them-
it's
not
there.
So
I
have
some
questions
on
that.
But
the
first
comment
I
had
was
adding
this
into
this
section:
is
that
appropriate
to
do
that?
There
justin.
F
I
can
see
it,
I
I
I'm
looking
at
it
on
my
phone,
so
yeah
I
mean
I
I
don't
think,
there's
anything
wrong.
I
think
it's
implied
and
I
think,
there's
probably
a
number
of
places
throughout
the
charter
that
the
mayor
or
other
positions
could
be
listed,
and
I
guess
my
only
concern
is,
if
you
say,
if
you
just
list
one
section
here,
that
there
may
be
some
question
about
whether
it
implies
all
the
other
sections
and
I
haven't
gone
through
the
charter
to
see
if
there's
other
sections
where
that's
there.
F
D
D
Right
and
and
that's
a
good
point-
and
I
guess
that's
some
of
the
things
that
I
noticed
too-
that
it's
not
every
every
different
position
isn't
laid
out
the
same
way.
So
there
may
be
a
you
know
several
places
where
they
talk
about
the
mayor's
responsibilities
or
any
other
positions
responsibility.
So
as
long
as
as
long
as,
if
anybody
challenges,
because
the
reason
why
it
comes
up
in
my
mind,
is
when
we
start
talking
about
where
the
council
or
or
has
the
opportunity
to
remove
the
mayor.
D
B
Yeah,
I
have
a
question,
though,
when
we're
trying
to
so
very
specifically
codify
the
mayor's
duties.
He's
he's
not
like
a
stock
clerk.
He
has
a
lot
broader
managerial
latitude
and
to
try
to
pigeonhole
him
like
that.
I
think
in
a
way
is
a
disservice,
because
there
are
going
to
be
instances
that
he's
going
to
have
to
act
on
a
one-time
only
and
to
then
say
well,
this.
B
It
hasn't
been
stated,
I
think
that
detracts
from
you
know
the
confidence
that
we're
saying
we
instill
in
him
that
he
has
this
ability
to
think
in
novel
situations.
D
That's
a
good
point.
I
mean
I.
I
definitely
agree
with
that
thought.
As
far
as
yeah
I
I
just.
I
got
into
my
mind
that
if
we're,
if
we're
going
to
give
the
opportunity
for
council
to
remove
somebody
because
of
them
not
following
their
duties,
what
are
the
duties?
You
know
if
you
know
that's.
D
Let's
just
I'll
leave
it
in
there
for
right
now
and
then
we'll
we
can.
Maybe
justin
can
kind
of
just
kind
of
see
if
there's
places
that
are
scattered
throughout
here.
That
would
make
this
a
little
problem.
G
D
D
Yeah
since
yeah
right
so
if
we
say
the
duties
of
the
mayor,
well
they're
they're
right
here,
so
in
section
2.06,
that's
all
I'm
putting
all
my
note
from
for
us
to
see
is
that
I'm
waiting
for
the
mayor
to
give
me
his
updated
list
and
then
we
can
kind
of
look
to
edit
this
section
2.06.
D
A
D
I
didn't
have
too
many,
but
I
mean
I
I
can't
remember:
who
brings
it
up
all
the
time
about
overloading
the
charter
overload
a
charter
change
overload
or
whatever
it
was.
I
I
think
that's
something
to
consider
to
this
one
here
I
just
saw
last
last
night
believe
it
or
not
effective
upon
passage
by
the
electors
is
this
kind
of
obsolete.
Now.
F
A
D
F
F
D
Had
to
do
with
this
metoo
clause
and
stuff,
let's
say
we
get.
You
know
administrative
officers
in
there
and
he
starts
off
with
a
salary,
because
council
gave
him
a
salary
that
he
agreed
to,
and
then
you
know
how
we
were
writing
that
into
the
mayor.
You
know
for
the
council
to
consider
the
me
too
type
of
increases
and
stuff
like
that.
Do
we
do
that
with
all
these
other
ones,
or
is
that
again
done
by
state
law
and
other
ways
that
I
don't
know
about.
F
For
the
mayor,
you
would
need
because
of
the
way
the
mayor
is
written.
If
you
want
to
do
something
like
a
me
too
clause,
you'd
have
to
put
it
in
the
charter
or
if
the
limits
on
how
the
mayor's
compensated
were
lifted,
then
council
could
do
it
themselves
yeah.
So
those
are
sort
of
the
two
options.
G
G
In
section
3.08,
it
says
that
council
shall
set
by
ordinance
compensation
of
each
officer
and
employee,
remember
of
any
board
and
commission
excluding
the
mayor
and
members
of
council,
so
it
is
in
there
that
they're
supposed
to
do
it.
D
F
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
one
you
would
just
want
to
leave
that
with
council
that
responsibility
to
set
salaries
wages,
that's
pretty
normal,
okay
from
a
from
a
division
of
government.
You
know
checks
and
balances
perspective,
and
then
the
other
thing
is
once
you
lock
something
in
the
charter.
There's
always
you
never
know
the
problem
with
there's
good
and
bad
with
the
charter.
The
bad
with
the
charter
is
once
you
lock
it
in
there's,
no
flexibility
right.
So
there's
there's
always
circumstances.
You
may
not
be
able
to
anticipate.
F
So
I
would
be
leery
about
locking
something
in
like
that.
If
some
for
some
reason,
circumstances
change
that
we
would
need
to
be
flexible.
D
D
So
I'm
not
worried
about
that.
What
about
the
qualifications?
I've
had
this
question
in
my
mind
before
as
far
as,
especially
when
we
say
like
engineering
qualifications,
for
that
particular
position,
sometimes
you
get
into
arguments.
Does
it
require
somebody
to
be
an
engineer,
or
is
it
better
to
say
that
he's
got
engineering
experience
number
of
years.
D
A
B
D
H
You
know
there
are,
there
are
curriculum.
There
are
curricula
in
colleges
to
become
a
administrator
or
an
administrative
officer.
There
are
graduate
degrees
to
become
an
administrative
officer.
I
mean
it
all
depends
on
the
qualities
of
the
individual.
It
may
just
be
executive
experience.
I
think
they
put
in
executive
engineering
qualifications
so
that
you
can
review
engineering
drawings
and
talk
with
engineers.
I
don't
know
if
you
have
to
be
an
engineer,
I
think
most
right.
I
agree
you
don't
need
to
be
yeah.
D
D
It
creates
a
question
as
far
as
what
we're
looking
for
or
again
is
it
self-policed
by
the
the
the
idea
that
the
mayor
brings
the
person
to
the
table
and
then
the
council
does
its
thing
to
approve
it
approve
that
nomination.
So
maybe
it's
maybe
it's
a
moot
point.
B
Isn't
that
why
the
city
has
what
is
it
egd,
the
engineering
firm
that
acts
on
the
behalf
of
the
administrator.
D
Yeah,
but
it's
usually
not
a
you
know,
my
experience
is
you
know
the
90
of
the
problems
in
the
city
are
engineering
related
and
we
don't
have
a
full-time
engineer
that
can
really
act
so
the
administrator
does
a
lot
of
practical.
Practical
engineering
makes
a
lot
of
practical
engineering
decisions.
D
That's
what
I've
seen,
and
so
it's
an
important
it's
an
important
part
of
managing
this
or
having
you
know
being
in
that
position.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we,
if
we
needed
to
do
anything.
This
is
where
I
thought
it
was
kind
of
too
vague,
or
you
know
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
these
qualifications
in,
in
my
opinion,
is
they
they
seem
to
be?
D
A
D
That's
that's
I
mean
we
don't
have
to
solve
the
problem
right
this
minute.
I
at
least
think
about
it
for
a
second.
If,
if
we
think
that
these
qualifications
that
we
list
here
are
appropriate
for
how
we
want
our
city
to
be
managed,
you
know
because
sometimes
you
you
put
you
know-
maybe
we
maybe
we
believe
that
I
have
a
little
bit
more
stringent
qualifications
there.
D
So
we
you
know
we
get
a
certain
candidate
to
consider
rather
than
you
know,
counsel
feeling,
like
you
know
they,
you
know
we
got
a
buddy
instead
or
something
like
that.
I
don't
know,
then
I
said:
do
we
need
to
review
this
until
council
provides
otherwise
why'd?
I
put
this
down
here.
D
F
Yeah,
I
think
it's
there
because
it
leaves
the
option
open
of
really
creating
those
as
separate.
Let's,
let's
say
the
city
grew,
you
know
doubled
size
right
now.
You
need
all
this
staff,
I'm
not
saying
I'll
happen.
It
gives
count.
You
know
the
flexibility,
then
the
future
council
may
create
those
positions
right,
and
it's
really
a
council
decision
to
do
that
and
and
then
to
staff
those
positions.
So
I
think
that's
why
that's
there?
I
don't
think
it
causes
any
harm.
D
Okay,
no,
I
could
sometimes
when
you
read
it
the
first
time
you
get
a
different
opinion.
When
I
read
it
now,
I
I
read
it
like:
it
just
happened.
You
know
they
just
made
that
decision,
but
I
could
see
it
going
both
ways,
so
not
a
problem
in
my
mind,
and
then
I
made
this
general
comment
about
the
other
departments.
D
The
same
way
as
some
of
these
other
ones
do
we
need
to
address
qualifications
required
compensation.
No,
we
don't
need
that,
but
qualification
specifically
do
we
need
to
kind
of
go
through
and
make
sure
that
these
other,
these
other
discipline
or
these
other
positions
are
kind
of
quantified.
As
far
as
that
goes
or
are
we
good.
G
D
So
again
it
could
be
done
basically
by
a
council
saying:
hey
what
are
your
qualifications,
let's
see
it
and
they
can
compare
notes,
but
my
thought
was:
do
we
want
to
start
off
with
a
minimum
standard
or
year's
experience,
or
something
like
that?
That's
where
I
was
that's
what
I
was
thinking
and-
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
happen,
but
it
might
take
a
lot
of
the.
D
It
might
take
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
of
issues
out
of
the
away
from
the
hands
of
the
council,
again
you're,
getting
a
few
things
that
are
important,
but
that
may
be
not
for
us
to
decide
because
we
might
not
know
all
those
those
things
that
are
required.
D
It's
just
it's
a
general
thought.
I
I
don't
if
you
guys,
don't
really
have
a
huge
headache
from
that
and
it
can
work
and
it
works
the
way
it
is
now.
It's
just
up
to
council
to
make
sure
they're
searching
out
for
those
qualifications
before
they
say
yes
to
that
nomination,
and
that's
that's.
I
guess
that's
just
as
good
as
anything
else
right
all
right,
I'm
going
to
say
it's
not
not
needed.
C
A
D
This
is
this
was
my
own
pet
peeve
here
as
related
to
competitive
bidding,
and
I
know
for
a
lot
of
things,
material
things,
construction
related
things,
it's
important
that
it's
competitively
bid,
but
other
things
and
I'm
speaking
more
in
the
in
the
behalf
of
my
profession
as
an
engineer
should
not
be
competed.
D
D
So
I
always
had
this
problem
for
the
longest
time,
and
I
guess
this
is
my
opportunity
to
to
maybe
redefine
it
a
little
bit
and
you
know
where
certain
services
that
we
would
hire
as
a
as
a
city
you're
not
doing
yourself
justice
by
doing
it
based
on
the
low
price
and
but
a
lot
of
people.
Don't
understand
that
and
that's
why
there's
always
a
dilemma.
D
So
I
don't
know
justin.
Has
there
been
any
more
ever
more
conversation
about
that
kind
of
scenario,
yeah.
F
So
yeah,
no,
no
I'm
very
familiar
with
it
and
right
now
we
don't
bid
the
services
that
aren't
to
your
point:
engineering,
other
architectural,
positive,
professional
services.
Those
are
not
bid
because
you're
not
permitted
to
bid
those
under
state
law.
So
we
follow.
Basically,
we
our
charter
says
we
follow
state
law
and
competitive
bidding.
Now
because
I
agree
in
the
past,
it
used
to
be
less
clear.
F
A
F
D
D
And
I
guess
you
guys
can
think
about
that
as
well.
It's
it's.
It's
probably
meaningless
to
an
extent,
but
because
we,
if
we
start
doing
it,
then
we
got
to
do
it
everywhere
and
then
it's
then
there's
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
redline
going
on.
So
I
think
this
might
be
my
last
chance.
Let
me
just
look,
but
if
not
we'll
keep
going
again
when
we
talk
about
an
engineer
for
the
city
again,
I
believe-
and
I
actually
I
believe
I
know
for
a
fact.
D
The
majority
of
the
big
issues,
especially
for
any
city,
is
engineering
related,
and
I
think
it's
important
that
we
get
somebody
with
experience
on
the
table
and
you
know
you
hire
somebody
right
out
of
school
to
be.
Our
municipal
engineer
would
be
a
huge
mistake.
It
won't
happen
unless
it's
a
buddy
of
a
buddy,
and
you
know
you
get
that
kind
of
thing
and
everybody
council
loves
this
guy,
but
you
know
but
you're
hiring
somebody
because
you
you
really
like
him.
D
You
trust
him,
but
he's
he's
got
he
just
graduated
well,
he
would
have
his
professional
engineer.
So
he's
got
four
years
experience
to
some
degree,
but
to
me
that's
an
important,
that's
an
important
position
that
we
have
on
board
and
I've
seen
it
where
you
get
unqualified
people
and
they
don't
help
the
city
at
all.
And
then
it
falls
back
on
that
administrative
director
to
to
make
these
decisions
and
that's
kind
of
what
I've
seen
firsthand
in.
When
I
was
on
council.
D
A
D
We'll
let
somebody
tell
me
no
all
right,
I
think
I
think
that's
all
I
might
have
had
on
there
and
I'm
going
to
go
back
up
to
the
I'll.
Just
go
around
the
world
around
the
room
here
and
just
see.
If
anybody
else
has
any
proposed
changes
that
they
want
us
to
consider,
and
then
we
can
kind
of
go
through
and
get
rid
of
the
ones
that
I
had
in
there
that
are
just
dead
rick.
Do
you
do
you
have
any
no.
B
G
Yeah,
I
did
not
have
to
find
him
again.
It's
in
3.06.
A
D
G
Vacancies
we're
still
talking
there
about
the
president.
G
If
the
president
can't
do
it,
the
vice
president
shall
become
president
and
then,
if
the
president
declines
it,
they
could
remain.
President
of
council,
the
vice
president
shall
there
become
mayor
and
then,
if
the
vice
president
shall
decline
it,
I
thought
we
got
rid
of
all
that
and
changed
the
changed,
the
wording
so
that
we
took
out
decline.
Didn't
we
we.
We
took
that
out
that
I.
B
D
Yeah
we'll
go
through
this
argument
because
I
still
believe
that
the
president
of
a
council
should
not
be
the
president
council,
if
he's
not
willing
to
serve
as
the
mayor
now
if
he
became
sick
or
something
like
that,
where
you
know
from
he's
unable,
but
that
kind
of
thing
would
make
sense
to
me.
But
you
know
you,
don't
you
don't?
As
a
council
member,
you
shouldn't
be
electing
somebody
to
be
the
president
of
council
if
that
person
isn't
willing
to
serve
as
mayor.
That's
that's
my
opinion.
B
The
mayor
of
our
city
is
more
of
a
figurehead
and
much
more
of
a
public
presence,
and
if
someone
is
uncomfortable
in
that
role,
I
could
still
see
where
they're
very
effective
as
a
council
person
and
work
with
their
ward
and
their
contingency
or
even
at
large.
But
they
choose
not
to
have
that
more
public
role.
D
B
G
I
had
another
question
on
3.06,
but
it's
just
grammatical
stuff
or
it
looks
like
there's
a
partial
sentence
or
something
that
should
be
a
comma.
G
G
D
Yeah,
it
should
be
a
comma
unless
that's
ending
this
sentence.
F
No,
let
me
let
me
double
check
just
make
sure
it
didn't
get
copied
over
incorrectly
I'll
I'll
I'll
go
back
because
yeah.
I
agree
that
this
sentence
doesn't
mean
even
with
a
comma,
doesn't
make
any
sense.
So
let
me
see
if
I
miss
if
I
accidentally
delete
something
when
copying
it
over.
G
Yeah,
just
where
the
change
was
made,
I
think
we
need
the
who
just
on
that
first
sentence
there.
I
think
we
need
to
leave
the
who
and
take
out
the
and
shall
to
make
that
make
sense.
G
G
G
G
G
F
C
D
D
This
idea
of
being
really
specific
with
the
sections,
at
least
as
it
relates
to
the
mayor,
do
we
do
we
think
we
need
it
or
do
you
think
it's
it's
it's!
Okay
to
not
have
it
because
it's
it's
it's!
You
know,
justin
kind
of
made
me
feel
like
it's.
Okay,
not
to
have
it.
E
D
D
I
just
put
this
in
here
just
double
check
the
grammar
we're
back
on
this.
We
we
need
to
be
consistent
with
2.04,
and
if
we
agreed
that
you
know
they
don't
have
that
opportunity
to
decline
it
that
way,
the
wording
ought
to
be
the
same
way
as
2.04,
so
I'll
put
that
in
your
hands,
justin
to
kind
of
double
check.
Okay,.
A
D
D
B
D
D
E
B
H
H
H
D
No,
no,
we
don't
need
to
say
anything
that
I,
this
is
just
what
I
saw
that
if
we
were
going
to
hire
somebody
to
be
our
musical
engineer,
even
if
it's
even
if
it's
a
company,
you
want
to
have
a
company
with
experience,
similar
experience
and
with
summit,
you
know,
but
again
the
council
can
use
their
judgment
on
you
know.
D
Are
we
getting
somebody
that
we
deserve,
so
that
kind
of
goes
along
with
everything
else
I've
been
saying,
I
was
just
trying
to
take
some
of
the
some
of
the
questions
that
council
may
want
to
debate
over
out
of
the
equation,
but
I'm
gonna,
I'm
hearing
it's
better
in
it,
like
somebody
said
earlier.
If
it's
not
broke,
don't
fix
it,
but
I
personally
believe
this
has
been
somewhat
broke
in
the
past.
G
H
D
All
right
so
the
I
agree
with
that
thought
process
too.
So
I'm
going
to
read
I'm
going
to
reject
it.
I'm
going
to
reject
my
comment
because
I
believe
that
you
know
it's
going
to
be
up
to
council
to
look
for
that
proper
qualified
candidate
or
proper
qualified
company,
and
they
could
ask
whatever
questions
they
want
to
get
that
information.
So
all
right,
I'm
cool!
That's
all
right!
D
D
I
appreciate
you
letting
me
go
through
my
own
little
thought
process
here
guys.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
I
felt,
like
I
at
least
thought
about
it,
a
little
bit
more
than
what
I
had.
D
So
that's
all.
I
have
and
there's
only
a
couple
things
on
there
that
are
different
than
I
think
the
version
you
had
before
justin
so
I'll,
send
this
same
one
back
out
and-
and
I
didn't
see
last
the
other
day
when
I
pulled
up
the
document
from
the
share
site,
you
had
the
most
recent
one
up
there
right
justin.
F
So
I
believe
that
I
did
the
one
I
emailed
was
definitely
the
most
recent,
but
I
I
can
confirm
that
the
one
on.
D
The
website
yeah
cause.
I
pulled
that
one
off
the
share
site
when
I
started,
I
didn't
get
it
from
your
email.
I
pulled
it
off
the
share
site,
not
looking
for
email.
A
D
All
right,
okay!
Well,
that's
all
I
had
on
my
my
agenda
and
I
think
I
think
we're
still
shooting
to
be
done
with
this
thing
by
july.
Right
in
in
the
I
forget
what
date
we
wanted
to
get
everything
wrapped
up
july
august
right,
so
we
got
in
two
weeks.
We'll
have
another
meeting.
D
Is
that?
Does
that
sound
good
with
everybody?
What
date
of
the
week
is
that
that's?
What's
today,
the
first
so
next
meeting
two
weeks
same
time,
is
that
all
right
with
everybody.
D
So
that'd
be
june,
15th
all
right
and
the
only
the
only
focus
that
I
that
we
should
have
unless
somebody
brings
something
to
our
attention
now
will
be
to
go
through
the
mayor's
mayor's
duties
and
and
see.
If
we
want
to
change
that
and
and
then
make
sure
that
you
know,
justin
can
get
those
other
little
simple
edits
marked
up
for
us
to
kind
of
consider
to
make
sure
that
it
all
reads
properly
and
then
we
should
be
able
to
kind
of
get
towards
the
end
of
our
task.
D
G
E
Okay,
hey!
This
is
david,
just
think
about
one
thing
here,
a
little
bit,
I
I
I
just
about
artifacts,
I
mean
we're
lucky
that
we
have
justin
here
and
he
remembers
what
happened
before
and
things
like
this,
but
you
know
during
this
process.
We
don't
know
anything
about
what
the
previous
people
thought.
I
was
that
because
we
never
asked-
and
there
may
be
their
artifacts
laying
around
that-
that
tells
us
what
other
people
were
thinking.
E
E
F
D
E
D
Yeah
but
I
don't,
I
don't
believe
that
we
should
consider.
Maybe
the
next
one
will
do
something
I
mean
you
know
if
we
believe,
or
if
we
see
something
as
this
group
goes,
that
should
be
changed,
whether
they
thought
about
it
in
the
past
or
whether
we
say
somebody
else
will
think
about
it
in
the
future.
We
should
we
should
still
address
it,
but
but
there
may
be
some
philosophy
that
might
help
us
decide
when
we're
on
the
edge
of
moving
forward
with
something
or
not
that
we
might
not
have
considered.
D
True,
I
didn't
think
about
that.
Okay,
well,
good
good
idea
dave.
I
appreciate
that
and
all
right
anything
else
from
anybody.
A
D
All
right:
well,
I
guess
with
nothing
else
said
we
have
a
couple
things
on
our
plate
for
next
meeting
and
then
justin
you'll
send
the
meeting
invite
out
for
that
as
well.