►
Description
The regular monthly meeting of the Oklahoma City Community and Neighborhood Enhancement Advisory Board, via video conference, for August 3, 2020.
E
F
B
H
F
F
B
F
B
B
B
E
D
B
H
J
I
H
The
city
of
oklahoma,
the
video
conference
community
and
neighborhood
enhancement
advisory
board
meeting
as
you're
aware
during
the
state
of
emergency
in
place
during
the
coveting
pandemic
and
in
compliance
with
state
and
local
stay-at-home
orders,
no
physical
location
will
be
provided
for
this
meeting.
The
meeting
will
instead
be
live
streamed
from
remote
locations.
H
We
want
to
remind
everyone
that
you
have
arrived
in
our
virtual
meeting.
We
have
muted
your
mic.
We
have
a
few
announcements
to
make
regarding
the
virtual
meeting.
If
the
video
conference
is
disconnected
at
any
time
during
the
meeting,
the
meeting
shall
be
stopped
and
reconvened
once
the
audio
connection
is
restored.
H
H
Or
email
mark
missed
you
at
okc.gov.
Speakers
will
be
allowed
three
minutes
to
comment
when
you
call
in
staff
will
be
monitoring,
will
be
I'm
sorry
when
you
call
in
staff
will
be
muting
your
line.
Please
keep
your
lines
on
mute
until
you
are
recognized
to
speak
to
unmute
your
phone
press
number
six
sweet
star.
Six!
Excuse
me,
we
ask
all
participants
except
the
board.
Members
keep
their
lines
on
mute
until
they
are
recognized
to
speak
board.
Members
will
be
allowed
to
ask
questions
or
comment
at
any
time
during
the
meeting.
H
H
H
K
F
B
A
H
A
Good
morning,
this
is
mike
clark
with
the
city
of
oklahoma
city,
public
works
department.
Thank
you
for
joining
us
for
the
august
meeting
of
the
community
and
neighborhood
enhancement
advisory
board.
We
would
again
like
to
thank
our
incredible
staff
for
organizing
the
meeting
and
getting
us
all
logged
in
several
of
our
team
are
out
today,
but,
as
always,
we
will
do
our
best
to
provide
any
resources.
You
find
helpful.
A
A
A
I
did
not
include
photos
in
your
presentation,
but
an
updated
map
for
resurfacing
projects
is
provided
in
general.
Work
continues
to
move
forward
in
the
resurfacing
category,
despite
there
being
ample
competition
for
resources
in
and
around
the
metro
area,
from
a
combination
of
private
development,
other
municipalities,
odot
and
the
turnpike
authority
contractors
are
accepting
new
projects
and
assigning
crews.
Accordingly,
while
we
might
like
to
see
pro
see
work
progress
more
quickly,
we
are
probably
seeing
the
upper
limits
of
the
local
labor
pool
and
have
throughout
the
life
of
the
better
street
safer
city
program.
A
We
continue
to
have
a
steady
stream
of
projects,
reach
completion
and
move
to
city
council.
For
final
acceptance.
Moving
to
item
3a2,
we
are
presenting
a
second
round
of
budget
closeouts
for
you
to
consider.
This
batch
includes
one
of
the
trails
projects
in
addition
to
arterial
and
residential
resurfacing
projects.
A
Looking
at
the
list,
there
are
three
projects
that
need
to
have
funding
added
to
their
budgets
before
being
closed
out.
While
there
are
41
other
projects
that
return
funding
to
the
category
for
future
reallocation,
the
total
amount
to
be
returned,
and
reallocated
is
nine
million
one
hundred
fifty
five
thousand
three
hundred
thirty
eight
dollars
and
forty
nine
cents.
G
E
F
B
A
A
A
The
budget
increase
anticipated
to
be
necessary
to
complete
pr1
as
described,
is
1.7
million
dollars
in
evaluating
the
new
budget
estimate
staff,
financed
it
at
13.3
million
for
pr1
to
be
consistent
with
the
cost
to
complete
square
mile
residential
resurfacing
projects
in
other
areas
of
oklahoma
city.
I
would
be
happy
to
try
to
answer
any
questions
before
requesting
your
consideration
and
recommending
the
pr1
budget
revision.
G
L
B
A
The
slide
that
mark
has
shared
with
you
demonstrates
the
changes
that
occur
in
the
arterial
and
residential
resurfacing
categories.
Following
today's
action
you'll
note
that
the
arterial
allocation
has
fallen
back
to
89,
while
the
residential
allocation
remains
at
96
percent.
We
anticipate
bringing
a
new
list
of
arterial
streets
to
your
next
meeting
for
possible
funding
consideration.
A
M
M
And
for
the
status
for
both
the
street
enhancement
projects,
the
sidewalk
projects
and
the
bicycle
facility
projects,
not
a
lot
has
changed
in
the
status
of
the
projects
and
percent
completion
for
these
projects.
But
I
will
give
just
a
brief
over
overview
of
a
couple
items,
beginning
with
the
auto
alley:
project
authorization
to
negotiate
a
contract
with
smith,
roberts,
faldishweiler
or
srb,
was
approved
by
council
on
july,
7th,
the
passana,
paseo
and
walker
projects.
M
Staff
is
reviewed
in
his
coordinated
communications,
with
the
paseo
district
on
the
findings
of
the
rain
garden
report
and
staff
has
continued
to
work
on
establishing
a
streetscape
maintenance
agreement
with
the
district
for
the
north
northwest
39th
street
area.
Project
staff
has
reviewed
and
returned
comments
on
the
90
plans
that
were
submitted
last
month.
L
M
M
However,
I
would
like
to
say
that
planning
staff
has
been
in
continued
communication
with
embark
on
the
opportunity
to
coordinate
on
the
installation
of
ada,
accessible
sidewalk
and
bus.
Stop
pads
embark
recently
celebrated
a
milestone
on
the
installation
of
the
100
on
the
installation
of
100
new
ada,
accessible
bus
shelters.
M
L
Hey
lakisha
tony
carfing
from
ward
2
again,
since
you
mentioned
the
bus
stop
aspect,
I
noticed
something
in
the
news
this
past
week.
I
can't
remember
exactly
where,
but
it's
becoming
a
little
bit
more
prominent
to
see
green
roofs
on
top
of
bus,
stop
shelters
just
some
medium
to
tall
grasses,
just
on
top
of
the
bus,
shelter
and
it
provides
extra
cooling
as
well
as
air
cleaning
properties,
and
so
I
just
thought
that
was
pretty
neat
and
might
be
worth
investigating.
If
that
might
work
in
our
climate.
M
F
M
So
for
our
bike
project
status,
beginning
with
the
walker
avenue
project.
Again,
I
like
to
remind
you.
This
was
not
originally
a
sales
tax
project,
but
we
did.
This
is
one
of
those
locations
where
we
did
work
to
coordinate
the
implementation
of
our
striping
for
our
bicycle
facilities
with
a
funded
resurfacing
project.
M
At
last
month's
meeting,
I
was
asked
about
the
construction
timeline
for
four
bike
projects,
and
so
we
are
expecting
that
the
lotte
avenue
project
and
the
chartel
project
would
be
the
next
two
projects
that
would
begin
construction
likely
upon
completion
of
the
walker
project
in
the
general
purging
project.
So
the
lotte
project
is
designed
at
90
percent,
but
andrew's
ready
for
construction
and
the
chartel
project
is
designed
at
about
80.
But
we
expect
that
it
will
be
completely
designed
and
ready
for
construction.
M
It
will
be
bike
lanes
on
the
portion
from
prospect
to
kelly
and
then
share
mainly
sheriffs
on
the
portions,
from
36th
to
23rd
and
23rd
to
13th
street
for
the
main
street
project,
which
is
from
penn
to
lee.
That
project
is
at
90
percent
design
and
staff
is
working
to
coordinate
with
the
adjacent
businesses
regarding
on-street
parking
options.
M
Protect
parking
protected
bike
lanes
and
we
are
looking
at
this
project,
which
is
considering
it
as
a
pilot
project
for
par
for
these
type
of
bike
lanes
and
so,
and
we're
also
likely
looking
to
modify
the
scope
of
this
project
to
extend
it
where
it
originally
is
to
end
at
chartel.
But
we'd
like
to
extend
it
an
additional
three
blocks
over
to
the
walker
avenue
project
as
and
that
is
as
a
result
of
a
request
from
our
local
developers.
M
And
then
the
25th
street
project
is
a
50
design
and
that
project
too
we're
waiting
on
coordination
for
on
considerations
for
what
will
need
to
happen
for
on-street
parking
and
then
the
villanor.
The
villa
central
project
and
the
wilshire
projects
are
on
hold.
The
bella
central
project
is
still
continuing
to
be
on
hold,
as
we
are
to
working
to
coordinate
with
the
stockyards
project
street
enhancement
project
and
then
the
will
shire
project
we're
looking
to
confirm
the
scope
for
that
project
and
working
to
identify
additional
funding
for
that
project.
L
L
If
not
so,
with
regards
to
lottie
and
chartel
at
90
and
80
designed,
I
know
on
chartel
in
particular
the
the
tree
canopy,
especially
through
the
median,
presents
some
visibility
challenges
for
turning
traffic,
that
might
obscure,
say
a
turning
cars
view
of
a
cyclist
in
a
bike
lane.
Would
it
be
possible
to
see
some
of
the
renderings
of
the
80
percent
design
just
to
potentially
have
some
input
on
that.
M
M
And
so
this
portion
here
that
is
being
designed
will
be
just
the
on-road
portion
that
will
connect
to
the
park
and
then
even
eventually
connect
to,
I
believe,
a
bridge
that
will
cross
over
the
creek
the
deep
fork
and
connect
to
the
deport
trail.
So
we
were
not
looking
at
making
any
modifications
to
the
existing
bike
lanes
south
of
50th
street.
L
Okay,
I
appreciate
that
clarification,
given
the
potential
connectivity
for
recreational
cyclists
who
love
trails
more
than
roads
and
and
especially
the
connectivity
of
bishop
mcginnis,
just
to
have
high
school
students
actually
comfortable
to
ride.
I
still
wouldn't
mind
being
able
to
see
some
of
the
renderings
of
what
that
design
might
look
like.
L
M
No
sir,
the
independence
and
grant
project
is
on
hold
because
it
is
going
to
be
utilized
as
local
match.
With
the
coordination
of
the
northwest
brt
project,
it
falls
within
the
the
the
area
there's
a
portion,
it
crosses
the
northwest
expressway
and
because
it
crosses
northwest
first
northwest
expressway
where
the
brt
will
be
going
through.
We
were
able
to
consider
that
project
as
local
match
for
the
brt
project
and
because
it
is
being
considered
that
those
funds
will
be
utilized
as
local
match.
M
It
has
to
follow
the
federal
highway
administration
or
fta
to
sorry,
the
federal
transit
administration,
design
and
standards
and
guidelines
in
order
to
qualify
and
therefore
we
will
have
to
advertise
the
design
of
that
project,
whereas
originally
it
was
assigned
to
an
on-call
contractor
consultant
for
the
design.
We
will
now
have
to
go
out
to
bid
for
the
design
on
that
project,
so
that
is
the
hold
up.
That
is
the
the
current
status
of
that
project.
M
We
have
done
that
level
analysis
for
the
main
street
project.
I
don't
recall
the
numbers
on
hand
right
now
for
the
main
street
portrait,
and
basically
it
was
a
visual
kind
of
observed
observation
based
on
google
and
and
a
couple
of
drive-throughs.
We
have
not
done
any
official
counts
or
timings
for
on-street
parking
for
that
location,
but
we
made
observations
through
just
a
few
drive-throughs
and
google
google
views
only
for
that
location
for
the
25th,
oh
also
for
the
25th
street.
We
actually
did
do.
M
Staff
did
go
out
and
do
I
think
it
was
a
thursday
evening
and
a
saturday
morning
drive
through
to
do
observations
on
the
fort
on
street
parking
for
the
25th
street.
I
don't
recall
what
the
numbers
are
right
now
and
the
actual
locations
we
did
identify
by
block
where
there,
where
we
observed
on
street
parking-
and
I
we
do
have
that
recorded
and
we
can
get
that
information
to
you.
L
M
What
we
had
was
what
city
staff
has
received
as
it
was
not.
I
don't
recall
that
it
stated
that
we
did
not
have
to
update
it.
I
had
that
open
just
a
moment
ago.
Sorry,
I
could
refer
to
it,
but
I
believe
we
can
also
forward
you
what
the
municipal
counselors
findings
were
on,
whether
or
not
we
needed
to
make
a
change
to
the
ordinance
or
not.
L
Okay,
I
think
the
phrasing
I
was
thinking
of
in
the
municipal
counselors
assessment
was
that
in
the
existence
of
the
bike
lane
to
the
right
of
parallel
parking,
the
quote-unquote
curb
would
be
received
as
the
edge
line
for
motor
vehicle
traffic,
and
so
the
white
line
of
the
bike
lane
would
be
essentially
the
quote-unquote
curb
line
for
that
ordinance.
But
not
a
big
deal
clarifying
the
ordnance
is
probably
the
right
way
to
go
anyway.
M
B
M
M
In
review
this
project,
it
was
determined
that
it
may
be
very
challenging
to
do
the
original
scope
of
the
project
on
as
an
on-road
bike
facility
from
santa
fe
all
the
way
over
to
air
depot.
So
staff
reviewed
the
project
and
modified
the
scope
of
the
project
to
be
along
southeast
59th
street
front,
to
extend
from
eastern
over
to
air
depot
and
then
along
eastern
from
the
grand
trail
down
to
southeast
59th
street
59th
street
is
a
I'm
currently
four
lanes
and
it's
approximately
50
feet
wide
and
the
adt's.
M
The
average
daily
traffic
goes
from
about
8
700
vehicles,
east
just
east
of
I-35,
and
averages
around
5
000
to
6
000
as
you
head
towards
east
at
it
as
you
head
towards
air
depot,
then
the
volumes
jump
up
to
about
13
over
13
000
as
you
go
west
of
the
interchange
at
i2
i35,
and
they
go
somewhere
close
to
about
16
000.
As
you
approach
santa
fe
to
the
west,
eastern
is
a
four-lane
facility
and
it's
approximately
about
48
feet
wide
and
the
average
daily
traffic.
M
So
I
give
you
those
statistics
to
kind
of
tell
you
why
we
looked
at
changing
the
scope
of
the
project,
particularly
along
southeast
59th
street,
because
the
volumes
are
above
that
threshold,
where
we
would
like
to
start
considering
a
project
for
a
lane
reduction
from
a
four-lane
project
down
to
a
three-lane
project
to
receive
bicycle
lanes
and
so
and
then
the
interchange
at
the
highway
would
make
it
challenging
for
transitions.
Therefore
bike
facility.
M
M
Also,
the
other
ideas
as
you're
looking
at
this
map
here,
there's
currently
an
existing
trail
on
sooner
road.
The
green
line
is
is
solid,
coming
down
from
the
north
and
it's
the
trail
exists
from
44th
street
going
north,
but
then
we
maybe
we
would
like
to
look
at
a
proposed
trail
going
from
44
down
to
connecting
to
southeast
59th
street
and
then
also
we
have
a
proposal
to
look
at
consideration
of
a
trail
going
down
south
air
depot
to
connect
over
to
the
draper
draper
lake
trail
next
slide.
Please.
D
M
M
There
was
allocated
2.1
million
for
the
safety
category
and
that's
the
100
category,
and
then
the
maximum
allowable
per
jurisdiction
is
56,
so
about
12
million
is
what
one
jurisdiction
could
possibly
receive
out
of
the
21.56
million
dollars
and
every
year
of
course,
the
city
of
oklahoma
city
strives
to
achieve
that.
56
percent
allocation
and
again
it
is
a
very
competitive
process,
and
so
the
projects
are
ranked
next
slide.
Please.
M
M
Excuse
me,
and
so
again,
with
the
call
the
top
three
ranked
projects
in
the
80
to
20
category
were
from
oklahoma
city
and
the
top
two
were.
The
top
two
projects
were
resurfacing
projects
and
then,
of
course,
the
third
project
was
the
59th
street
side
bike
pet
project,
and
so
just
this
was
just
an
opportunity
for
us
to
share
with
you
how
we
are
working
to
utilize,
our
sales,
tax
funding
and
other
local
funding.
M
In
an
effort
to
secure
additional
funding
outside
additional
federal
funding
kind
of
similar
to
the
brt
opportunity,
where
our
bike
pet
projects
were
considered
for
local
match
there,
so
that
is
all
I
have
for.
As
for
the
presentation
for
our
bicycle
facilities
on
the
southeast
59th
street
project
and
its
award
of
the
stbg
uca
federal
funding,
are
there
any
questions
regarding
this
presentation.
N
H
N
N
N
N
So
having
access
to
do
repaving
of
the
trail
system,
we
have
to
work
out
agreements
with
with
those
businesses,
so
we
are
working
with
dall
to
work
behind
their
facility
trails
that
are
in
design
is
the
north
oklahoma
river
trail
70
plans
completed
the
next
one.
Is
the
the
katy
trail
resurfacing
and
again
that
one
is
also
70
70
plans
completed?
N
N
We
just
have
to
get
through
all
the
review
processes
and
and
other
organizations
that,
where
we
are
putting
signs
on
their
properties,
but
we
hope
to
be
under
construction
or
under
bids
again,
this
fall.
We
hope
to
be
actually
beating
these
projects
in
october
and
then
final,
the
the
biggie
that
we
consider
is
the
default
trail.
F
N
I
I
would
like
to
say
something
about
the
katy
trail
chris
dahlgren.
From
word
six.
I
rode
the
candy
trail
yesterday
and
where
it
crosses
16th
street.
There's
like
not
a
lot
of
visibility
there
and
it
felt
like
a
pretty
unsafe
crossing.
So
I
was
wondering
if
there's
any
sort
of
signage
or
something
that
can
be
added
at
that
intersection,
as
the
katy
trail
comes
to
like
resurfacing
and
everything.
N
As
it
relates
to
the
to
all
of
the
trail
systems,
all
of
them
will
receive
the
same
wayfinding
systems
and
where
we
have
those
crossings,
we
will
have
signage
for
bicyclists
from
both
directions
coming
to
those
intersections
identifying
that
they're
coming
up
to
a
to
an
intersection.
But
we
will
also
take
a
look
at
the
visibility
in
the
bee
sheds
and
we
will
get
with
mike
clark
and
the
public
works
transportation.
N
Folks
to
see
if
we
can
fix
some
of
the
sign
up
side
issues,
but
the
trail
all
of
the
trails
will
be
receiving
the
same
wayfinding
and
the
same
guidance
and
marker
systems
throughout
the
system.
So
as
soon
as
we
get
get
through
those
review
processes
and
we
go
off
with
bids,
all
of
the
trail
systems
will
get
those
identifiers
and-
and
we
will
have
markers
as
people
come
up
to
intersections.
I
K
So
this
is
sandino
thompson
with
ward
7..
So
I'm
happy
chris
asked
that
question,
because
I
had
a
similar
question
about
that
intersection
in
particular,
and
then
also
just
sort
of
what
the
scope
of
the
of
the
resurfacing
would
look
like
for
the
katy
trail.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
there
what
what
from
a
design
perspective,
we're
able
to
sort
of
see
or
or
how
far
along
it
sounds
like
you
guys,
are
pretty
pretty
close
to
being
complete
from
a
design
perspective
on
that.
K
F
N
K
Okay,
thank
you
so
then
my
other
question-
and
this
is
in
part
just
me-
trying
to
jog
my
memory
on
some
of
these
conversations
that
we've
had
over
the
last
couple
of
years
now
and
that
was
there
were
some
talk
about
amenities
and
facilities
that
may
come
alongside
the.
I
think,
the
wayfinding
and
some
of
these
other
things.
K
So
thinking
about
things
like
you
know,
water
fountains,
the
the
little
stands
where
you
can.
You
know
the
bike,
the
bike
repair
stands
and
then
and
then
potentially
restrooms,
as
well
as
certain
intersections
or
certain
spots
where
it
might
make
sense.
So
I
feel
like
we
talked
about
that,
maybe
a
year
and
a
half
ago
or
so,
and
it
was
something
else
that
was
being
considered.
K
So
I
am
curious
about
the
status
of
us
evaluating
that,
particularly
when
I
think
about
16th
and
in
the
katy
trail,
because
of
the
the
terminus
of
that
trail,
obviously
being
up
by
the
zoo
in
the
adventure
district.
I
feel
like
there
are
lots
of
opportunities
there,
but
I
think
that
access
point
at
16th
street
and
some
of
those
surrounding
communities,
though
amenities
and
way
founding
finding,
would
seem
to
go
a
long
way
towards
creating
community
benefit
there.
K
Specifically,
where
I'm
familiar,
I'm
sure
there
are
lots
of
other
trails
who
could
also
benefit
from
some
of
those
things
that
we
discussed
a
while
back.
So,
mr
copper,
if
you
don't
mind,
do
you
have
the
do?
You
have
any
thoughts
or
any
update
on
any
sort
of
evaluation
about
other
amenities
that
might
become
that
might
come
along
on
the
trails.
N
N
We've
had
requests
for
shade
structures
restrooms
throughout
the
systems.
The
west
river
trail
is
a
prime
example.
You
are
on
that
trail,
a
great
long
distance,
the
candy
trail
the
same
thing
we
have
identified
where
most
of
our
high
purpose
trails
touch
park,
lands
or
their
their
parking
nodes
to
identify
where,
where
we
might
have
water
access
to
water,
because
that's
going
to
be
a
big
thing
and
and
obviously,
if
we
put
a
restroom
in,
we
would
put
the
drinking
fountains
there
as
well.
Those
all
have
to
be
planned
out.
N
The
water
in
that
line
to
that
drinking
fountain
can
actually
go
stagnant
if
it
doesn't
get
used
on
a
regular
basis,
so
all
of
that
has
to
be
played
into
it.
We
would
love
to
have
all
of
our
old
trails
resurfaced
and
we've
gone
a
long
ways
with
your
funding
to
do
that,
and
if
we
didn't
have
work
still
to
do,
we
would
be
asking
you
for
those
type
of
opportunities
to
to
look
at
designing
shape
structures.
Look
at
adding
drinking
fountains,
where
we
have
the
parking
lots
now
where
they
are
the
stopping
points.
N
K
So
this
might
be,
it
might
be
more
of
a
conversation,
maybe
once
we,
I
think,
for
a
separate
agenda
where
we're
talking
about
excess
dollars,
and
I
and
I
definitely
acknowledge
one-
you
know
so
we
got
one
of
of
several
parts
of
the
city
to
consider
and
then
and
then
not
a
lot
of
funding.
So
what
I
hear
you
saying,
though,
mr
copper
is
that
we
still
have
a
ways
to
go
on
resurfacing,
what
we
have
and
making
sure
it's
in
good
condition.
K
N
That
loves
our
off-road
cycling
opportunities
is
closing
those
loops
yeah
we
have
had
those
gaps
in
the
deep
fork
is
one
of
those
the
greenway
trail
to
connect
the
river
trail
systems
to
the
kd
trip.
Those
those
end
points
are
of
a
high
priority
because
being
able
to
transverse
the
whole
community
without
technically
getting
off
an
off-road
trail
system
is
a
high
priority.
So
that
would
be
our
first
suggestion.
N
So
you
don't
have
to
drive
five
miles
or
ten
miles
to
get
on
a
trail.
You
might
find
an
access
a
little
closer
to
home,
so
so
that
that
would
be
where
we
would
suggest
at
least
melinda
and
myself,
and
some
of
the
planning
staff
make
sure
that
we
can
close
those
loops
first,
first
and
foremost,
and
then
go
on
to
the
amenities.
K
Yeah
that-
and
that
makes
sense-
let
me
be
clear,
at
least
from
my
standpoint-
I
I
think
it's-
I
think
it's
critical-
that
we
sort
of
be
able
to
complete
those
loops
which
drives
me
to
my
last
question.
I
think
at
least
my
last
question,
for
you
guys
is,
I
kind
of
heard
us
talk
about
the
general
update,
but
I
know
there
were
some
questions
about
about
both
design
and
then
the
multiple
funding
streams
and
things
like
that
for
the
deep
fork
trail
system.
K
So
is
there
anything
else
specifically
that
we
that
we
know
of
or
that
we're
waiting
on
aside
from
time?
Maybe
on
on
those
connection
points,
because
I
my
understanding
is
that
we
have
supplemented
that
funding
in
in
with
the
sales
tax
funding
we've
supplemented
where
there
are
other
dollars.
Also
put
aside
for
the
deep
fork
trail
so
is:
is
there
anything
holding
us
up
aside
from
just
the
fact
that
it's
a
is
a
complicated
process
with
several
funding
sources
and,
frankly,
some
complicated
engineering.
F
N
I
think
it's
our
intent
to
try
to
bring
back
a
more
comprehensive
plan
at
your
next
meeting
to
show
you
what
what
is
what
we're
capable
of
doing
with
the
with
the
funding
we
have
and
really
there
are
new
people
on
your
your
committee
or
the
safer
cities
committee
that
weren't
in
on
the
groundwork
of
the
deep
fork
we'd
like
to
bring
you
all
up
today,
to
see
the
enlightenment
and
see
the
complications
and
and
talk
about
final
final
steps
for
beating
that
project.
And
I
believe
it's
our
intent.
K
To
bring
it
to
you
at
your
next
meeting,
all
right
thanks
and
I
so
I
just
got
one
more,
this
actually
more
comment
than
question,
but
I
think
you
have
the
the
wrong
osu
on
your
mask.
We
had.
We
were
looking
at
it
for
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
and
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
what
was
going
on
if
I
was
in
the
right
meeting
so
anyway,.
K
L
G
K
N
I'll
leave
that
to
either
jeff,
I
think
jeff
might
be
able
to
allude
to
that.
You
are
to
stay
in
position
until
all
the
projects
are
completed,
I'm
hoping
that
the
deep
fork
can
actually
be
completed
by
before
some
of
the
streetscapes,
but
but
we'll
have
to
wait
and
see
what
the
final
final
tally
is
and,
as
I
said,
you'll
have
a
better
understanding
of
what
we're
facing
with
the
deep
fork.
I
believe
next
month.
G
H
Obviously
more
people
are
using
our
trail
system
than
ever
before
during
this
pandemic.
So
we
do
have
a
chance
on
some
of
these
next
items
coming
up
to
find
extra
funding
for
trails,
but
I
do
think
that
once
we
get
our
signage
put
together
on
these
trails,
it's
going
to
certainly
educate
people
and
help
greatly
in
the
way
of
safety.
J
Thank
you,
okay,
I
was
going
to
this
is
jeff
butler
planning
director
just
an
answer.
Hopefully
I
can
provide
additional
clarification,
mr
johnson,
so
yeah
you're
right,
the
the
board
you
know,
needs
to
stay
in
place
for
a
while,
longer
and
yeah,
it's
hard
to
say
whether
whether
it
will
be
street
enhancement
projects
or
the
deep
fork
trail
that
will
be
completed
last,
but
so
once
this
board,
this
board
really
is
pretty
much
finished
with
projects
once
they
once
you
all
approve
the
preliminary
reports.
J
J
But
you
know
this,
you
know
this
group
doesn't
look
at.
You
know,
change
orders
and
all
that
kind
of
thing
as
we
progress
through
construction.
So
really
once
something
hits
a
preliminary
report
stage
and
you
recommend
to
the
council.
I
don't
want
to
say
you're
done
done,
but
pretty
close
for
those
projects.
So
you
know
it's
hard
to
say
when
actually
the
board's
work
will
be
done.
J
You
know
I'll
talk
in
a
minute
about
the
the
access
collections,
but
that
that
could
play
a
part
of
it
as
well,
because
you
know
we'll
we'll
be
we'll
be
adjusting
because
those
those
those
monies
it
takes
a
while
and
I'm
told
even
a
year
or
two
or
more
for
for
those
to
be
finalized,
as
as
the
tax
commission
does
its
thing.
So
hopefully
that
helps
a
little
bit.
But
the
short
answer
is
we're
not
sure
exactly.
G
L
Other
this
is
this
is
tony
carfing
from
ward
2..
I
also
really
appreciate
that
that
chris
and
cindino
talked
about
the
katy
trail
at
the
16th.
There
are
some
peculiarities
about
the
design
and
in
particular,
as
a
driver
approaching
from
the
west,
there's
no
signage
for
the
crossing.
There
are
a
couple
of
other
things
and
I'll
shoot
you
an
email
and
copy
others
with
some
ideas
about
how
that
that
needs
to
be
improved
and
how
it
might
be
improved.
J
L
J
But
we
we
discussed
this
briefly
last
meeting
so
I'll.
Take
you
through
this
time.
Eric
did
last
time
he's
out
on
vacation.
I
guess
he
and
I
kind
of
swapped,
because
I
was
out
last
time
so
I'm
covering
this
time
get
that
powerpoint
back
up
here,
we'll
we'll
go
ahead
and
proceed
like
we
might
have
a
little
bit
of
technical.
J
Difficulty
so
we
have
our
beyond
our
original
projections
there
you
can
see
on
the
screen.
Now
we
are
expecting
240
million
we're
north
of
that
by
roughly
20
million
and,
like
I
said
a
minute
ago,
it'll
it'll,
ebb
and
flow
until
we
get
really
close
to
a
final
number,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
little
while
before
that
happens-
and
I
won't
bore
you
with
the
details
of
why
that
is,
unless
you
want
to
talk
the
intricacies
of
the
tax
commission
and
how
they
work
and
how
revenues
are
collected.
J
But
right
now
we
would
like
to
go
ahead
and
allocate
18
million.
Now
the
you
know,
we've
got
a
little
bit
more
than
that,
but
we
we
wanted
to
save
some
just
in
case
we
actually
have
to
pay
some
back,
not
not
too
likely,
but
more
likely
we'll
be
able
to
retain
some
just
just
as
a
small
amount
of
contingency.
J
So
the
way
we
went
about
kind
of
okay,
so
we
knew
we
had
18
million
dollars
to
deal
with.
Well,
what
should
we
do
with
that?
It
seemed
clear
to
city
staff
that
we
didn't.
You
know
that,
of
course,
the
natural
instinct
is
to
look
and
see.
Well,
how
did
we
spend
the
money
before
well?
The
vast
majority
was
spent
on
the
vast
majority.
The
majority
was
spent
on
resurfacing.
J
J
We
think
we're
okay
on
resurfacing,
so
we
didn't
feel
like
we
needed
to
spend
a
huge
chunk
of
money
on
resurfacing,
but
we
did
kind
of
settle
at
5
million
that
that
we
might
want
to
retain
for
resurfacing
in
in
some
fashion,
and
so
we
thought
well.
We
know
that
we
need
resurfacing
work
for
these
street
enhancement
projects
and
we've
come
to
find
out,
as
we've
worked
on
the
bicycle
projects
that
nearly
all
of
them
require
some
level
of
resurfacing.
J
So
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
mark,
you
can
see
okay
well
I'll
go
through
the
anticipated
results.
So
I
talked
about
the
the
resurfacing
already
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
skip
to
the
next
one
street
enhancements
here
here
are
the
dollar
amounts.
If
we
go
with
this
recommendation,
6.8
million
for
street
enhancements
sidewalks,
4.3
trails,
2.1
and
bikes
4.6.
J
We
think
that
we
could
that
you
know
there
are
a
lot
of
needs.
Some
of
the
projects,
as
we've
gone
through
northeast
23rd,
for
example,
could
use
a
lot
more
funds
and
there
are
some
others
too.
That
probably
could
in
the
way
of
resurfacing
and
in
the
related
opennesses
that
go
into
that
and
then
the
next
one
sidewalks.
J
So
our
thinking
is
we
could
do
several
more
miles
of
pedestrian
priority
area
sidewalks
and
a
mile,
or
so
of
additional
schools
parks
and
transit
sidewalks
and
a
little
bit
more
downtown
sidewalks.
There
was,
I
believe,
1.2
million
for
downtown
sidewalks,
and
that
project
is
still
in
the
design
phases
so,
but
but
it
seems
likely
that
we
might
need
a
little
bit
more
for
that.
J
J
J
H
H
H
You
know,
try
and
find
another
maps
program
that
has
benefited
the
health
of
so
many
in
this
time
of
need
we're.
I
think
we're
truly
blessed
with
this
18
million
dollars
to
spend
and
reinvest
in
our
city,
and
I
would
love
to
recommend
to
the
city
council,
where
these
dollars
can
go
into
these
four
categories
of
trails,
sidewalks,
bicycle
structures
and
streetscapes,
but
with
a
high
priority
on
trails,
because
the
maps
eight,
I
mean
sorry,
maps
four
is
only
going
to
have
eight
million
those
dollars
are
already
dedicated.
H
I
just
I
would
I'd
love
to
see
out
of
this.
If
I
did
the
math
on
this
I'd
want
to
see,
of
course,
money
put
out
of
the
19
plus
million
a
million
put
in
reserve
three
million
to
sidewalks
two
million
streetscapes,
three
million
the
bicycle
infrastructure
and
I'd
love
to
see.
10
million
dollars
go
into
trails,
which
we
so
greatly
need.
H
We
do
not
have
amenities
and
there's
no
money
for
that
at
this
time,
and
since
we
have
this
money
left
over
and
have
found
how
popular
our
trail
systems
have
become,
not
just
the
individuals
but
the
whole
families.
I
would
our
board
I'm
encouraging
to
fund
these
trails
with
10
million
dollars
of
this.
J
J
G
L
Concerned,
if
I
can
jump
in
real
quick
before
we
dive
too
deep
on
this
allocation,
just
as
a
clarifying
question,
I
know
lakisha
mentioned
some
potential
trail
enhancements
being
eyed
from
sooner
near
59th
and
then
from
air
depot.
Would
that
come
out
of
the
service
transportation
block,
grant
elements
that
it's
partially
for
the
59th
street
bike
lane,
or
would
that
be
potential
here
or
something
from
that
for
their
thoughts
for
those
projects.
M
M
M
It
was
second
project
in
that
submittal
and
got
knocked
out
by
an
edmund
project.
So
we
could
resubmit
it
for
sdbg
funding,
but
it
would
need
a
match
and
it
would
likely
need
to
be
sales
tax.
It
could
possibly
be
sales
tax
funding
to
be
used
for
that
match.
I
don't
believe
we
have
anything
identified
yet,
but
it
would
either
be
bond
or
sales
tax
that
would
be
used
for
the
match
for
that
project
if
it
were
to
be
selected
when
we,
when
we
resubmitted,
does
that
answer
your
question,
mr
carping.
E
I'd
like
to
just
comment
that
I
agree
with
chairman
mcknight
regarding
considering
the
reallocation
with
an
emphasis
on
trails,
I
think,
looking
long-term
to
his
point
about
maps,
four
funding
and
potential
future
funding
to
expand
the
trail
system.
There
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
lot
of
opportunity
guaranteed
in
the
future
to
to
put
more
money
into
trails.
I
I
However,
I
do
feel,
like
trails
are
really
used
by
like
the
more
affluent
people
in
our
community
who
are
biking
for
recreation,
and
I
would
recommend
putting
more
of
the
funds
into
bike
infrastructure
so
that
we
can
make
sure
that
there
is
a
safe
way
for
people
who
are
biking
because
they
don't
have
any
other
option
to
get
around
our
city.
So
yeah.
F
L
I'd
like
to
discuss
it
more
before
we
go
into
that
motion
sure
so,
just
to
add
on
to
chris's
point
so
oklahoma
city's
trail
system
is
fantastic.
We
have
110
miles
of
paved
off
street
trail
right
now.
I
grew
up
in
chicago
and
chicago
has
about
25
miles,
so
we
far
exceed
the
recreational
capacity
of
a
much
larger,
much
richer
city.
L
So
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there
and
then,
as
far
as
the
point
of
of
just
how
far
trails
have
come
and
what
they've
done
for
the
health
of
the
city
like
hal,
said
yeah
a
lot
of
people
using
it.
I
think
1.4
million
users
in
a
given
year-
that's
amazing
and
so
much
better
than
it
was
before
maps
two
maps.
Three,
so
it's
it's!
It's
been
phenomenal.
I
love
to
see
the
progress
and,
of
course,
more
people
on
bikes.
L
Recreationally
carries
over
into
considerat
considerate
driving
behaviors
from
those
more
people
biking,
I'm
just
having
that
new
perspective.
So
I
do
very
much
value
that.
The
big
point,
though,
is
that
putting
so
much
money
into
building
a
great
trail
system
proves
that
if
you
build
it,
they
will
come
so
if
instead,
we
love
the
fact
that
we
have
110
miles
of
bike
trail,
so
another
70
80
miles
more
than
chicago
and
most
cities
in
the
country.
L
If
we
then
spend
time
on
building
safe,
on-street
infrastructure
that
serves
commuters,
it
can
also
serve
recreational
riders.
The
fact
that
we
don't
have
many
bike
commuters
proportionally
to
other
major
cities
is
because
of
that
lack
of
infrastructure,
and
if
we
fund
it,
I
think
we
would
see
a
similar
increase
in
bike
commuting
a
little
bit
less
car
dependency
and
that
would
increase
the
health
benefits
that
that
chairman
mcknight
was
talking
about.
So
I
I
really
appreciate
the
logic
behind
the
city's
allocation
proposed
allocation.
H
Anthony
this
is
how
tonight
certainly
appreciate
that,
yes,
the
survey
that
was
done
in
2018
showed
1.4
million
on
the
burke
cooper
trails
alone,
not
the
city-wide
trail
system,
and
I
just
think
that
it's
common
sense,
you
know
a
bicycle
structure-
is
going
to
get
20
million
dollars
in
maps.
For,
I
think
that's,
I
think,
that's
wonderful,
but
oklahoma
city
is
not
chicago.
E
E
There
is
110
miles
of
trails
throughout
the
city,
but
at
to
house
point
we
need
connectivity
and
in
ward
3
and
war
5
we're
grossly
underserved
by
the
trail
system
with
no
connectivity
at
all.
And
secondly,
I
would
say
that
I'm
all
for
bicycle
infrastructure,
but
as
what
we've
seen
what
occurred
when
the
trail
system
was
was
funded
and
expanded.
E
It's
it
starts
in
a
central
area
and
then
spokes
out,
and
it
takes
years
going
on
20
years
to
even
get
access
in
south
oklahoma
city
and
I'm
afraid,
if
we
don't
take
the
opportunity
to
put
money
into
trails,
now,
there's
not
going
to
be
additional
funds
guaranteed
in
the
future.
Like
bicycle
infrastructure
has,
and
I
think
the
bicycle
bicycle
infrastructure
investment,
particularly
over
the
next
many
years-
is
going
to
be
solely
focused
on
downtown
and
that's
not
a
bad
thing,
because
a
system
has
to
be
created.
E
But
to
mr
mcknight's
point
we
have
money,
that's
going
to
be
allocated
in
maps
4
for
that
and
potential
other
funding
sources
that
are
that
are
out
there.
That
are
not
necessarily
guaranteed
for
trails,
and
I
know
we
can't
guarantee
that
ward,
3
or
ward
5
would
see
any
of
that
money
for
the
trails.
I
I
do
think
overall
that
connectivity
is
important
and
something
we
should
consider.
K
K
K
Perhaps
getting
you
know
the
the
lesser
proportion
that's
sort
of
proposed
here.
I
think
that
now
I
think
the
methodology
that
got
us
here
was
pretty
sound,
but
I
do
think
in
context.
If
we
look
ahead,
we
know
that
there
will
there's
to
be
a
lot
both
of
attention
and
other
resources
put
into
some
of
these
other
areas.
K
But
I
think
I
think
the
one
thing
that-
and
I
also
think
it
that
it's
something
to
be
said
for
the
connectivity
that
mr
groves
talked
about
as
well,
and
the
connectivity
around
around
the
the
city
that
the
trails
are
or
have
the
opportunity
to
provide.
So
there's
a
couple
of
things.
One
is
a
little
bit
of
clarity
about
what
these
resources
would
actually
be
able
to
fund
and
support,
and
I
know
we
can't
get
way
far
down
deep
into
sort
of
the
details
until
we
sort
of
approve
some
kind
of
allocation.
K
But
but
what's
not
really
clear
very
clear
to
me
is
like
what
you
know:
what
4.6
million
dollars
of
bicycle
infrastructure,
what
two
point
million
dollars
in
trails
or
four
point
three
in
sidewalks
or
six
point
eight
in
street
enhancements.
What
that
necessarily
buys-
and
so
and
my
last
part
about
this,
which
is
maybe
gonna
sort
of
throw
a
cog
in
this.
Is
that
very
very
similar
to
what
mr
johnston
said.
The
the
one
thing
that
I
can
say
so
I
think
this
whole
program
has
been.
K
I
think
a
very
well
thought
out
a
great
partnership
between
our
sort
of
feedback
as
citizens
and
and
stakeholders
and
the
city
and
thinking
about
how
to
guide
these
dollars.
But
I-
but
I
really
am
also
very
cognizant
of
the
current
circumstances,
we're
in
and
it
has
really
heightened
for
me,
particularly
the
importance
of
street
enhancements.
K
That
will
struggle,
and
I
also
don't
know
that
maps
4
is
going
to
do
anything
to
necessarily
address
those
things
and
those
issues
and
those
resources
either.
So
I'm
so
I'm
a
little
reluctant,
particularly
because
I
know
how
much
the
street
enhancements
are
being
looked
at
as
opportunity
and
a
catalyst
in
my
ward,
but
also
in
some
other
areas
to
really
push
some
commercial
activity.
I'm
a
little
reluctant
to
slash
that
allocation
significantly.
K
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
I
could
support,
for
example,
so
I
do
think
that
that,
generally,
I
think
trails
are.
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
similar
to
what
we
talked
about
years
ago,
to
really
set
a
good
precedent
for
trails
to
really
set
a
good
course
for
them,
and
I
do
think
that
they
are
likely
to
be
funded
at
less
of
a
level
in
some
of
these
other
areas
in
the
future.
K
At
the
same
time,
I
think
that
street
enhancements
in
particular,
are
going
to
pay
up,
are
going
to
play
a
pivotal
role
in
protecting
and
giving
some
and
giving
some
of
these
commercial
districts
and
some
parts
of
the
community
a
fighting
chance
for
being
able
to
sort
of
survive
and
recruit
and
recover
from
the
pandemic.
So
I
just
I
just
think
those
are
things
we
have
to
sort
of
consider.
L
Thank
you
I'll
just
add
one
more
thing
to
this
discussion,
specifically
talking
about
recreational
cyclists
enjoying
the
trail.
I
totally
agree
that
connectivity
is
essential.
There
are
a
number
of
subdivisions
around
lake
hefner,
where
the
only
option
for
that
neighborhood.
Even
though
there
are
houses
within
100
yards
of
the
trail,
their
only
option
is
to
drive
out
to
northwest
expressway
and
go
all
the
way
around
in
order
to
get
on
the
trail.
L
So,
just
building
new
trails
and
demanding
that
people
drive
there
to
use
them,
not
everybody's
gonna
drive
there
to
use
them.
Some
of
them
are
still
going
to
risk
their
lives
on
roads
getting
there.
So
I'm
still
heavily
focused
on
good
connectivity
in
in
the
best
way
that
we
can
achieve
that
if
we
can
put
greenways
all
throughout
the
city.
E
C
G
H
Both
sidewalks
and
bicycle
infrastructures
are
getting
a
lot
of
money
in
maps
for
so
they
certainly
wouldn't
have
opportunities
in
the
future.
But
if
what
you're
talking
about
would
would
be
a
6.8
for
street
enhancements,
1
million
for
sidewalks
multi-use
trails
would
get
8
million
and
bicycle
infrastructure.
We
get
2.2.
H
H
G
G
G
G
A
A
B
B
G
D
A
F
H
G
B
G
G
J
B
L
A
F
O
O
K
B
G
F
F
L
L
J
Debbie,
I
seem
to
recall:
I'm
not
mistaken,
I
think
it
was
twelve
thousand
was
acog's
number
was
the
threshold,
if
I'm,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
but
yeah
you're
right
tony,
there
is
depending
on
whether
you're
going
by
fhwa
or
acog,
or
you
know,
various
other
cities
have
a
seems
like
every
city
has
their
own
guidelines
but
yeah.
So
it's
it
can
be
tricky
and
it
depends
on
what
what
everybody's
comfortable
with
in
a
given
location
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
you
know,
I
guess
the
level
of
service.
L
L
Shawnee
ponca
city,
all
of
them
are
different
from
oklahoma
city
and
so
in
terms
of
what
drivers
expect
as
they
move
through
the
state
as
far
as
expertise
that
contractors
need
to
have
on
policy
depending
on
where
their
projects
are,
there's
there's
the
aspect
of
unifying
something
throughout
the
state
to
streamline
costs
for
construction,
for
construct,
contractor
expertise
as
well
as
safety
and
expectations
in
the
public.
So
I
just
have
those
conversations
ongoing
at
the
state
level
and
happy
to
talk
at
the
city
level
as.