►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting - December 3, 2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
All
everyone
welcome
to
the
city
of
oklahoma
city
board
of
adjustment
meeting
for
december
3rd
2020,
which
is
now
called
to
order.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
call
the
rule
now
that
we're
on
video,
but
I
do
want
to
note
for
the
record
that
we
only
have
three
board
members
present
today,
and
so,
if
that
changes
any
of
the
applicants
analyses
for
whether
they
want
this
matter
hurt
today
or
they
want
it
heard
in
front
of
a
full
board.
B
We
have
a
small
agenda
today
and
I
think
that
the
applicants
and
applicants
representatives
are
familiar
with
the
procedure,
but
for
those
of
you
who
aren't,
if
you're
here
on
a
matter,
we'll
call
your
matter,
ask
you
to
present
the
matter.
The
board
will
ask
questions
and
then
we'll
recognize
any
protests.
B
If
there
are
any
protests,
hopefully
you
have
already
signed
up
with
the
city
officials
to
speak.
Today
we
ask
that
you
limit
your
comments
to
five
minutes
in
that
instance,
given
the
covet
19
pandemic,
we're
asking
that
everyone
keep
their
mask
on
the
entire
time.
We're
spaced
out
the
applicants
and
the
public
are
spaced
out
back
there,
but
we
ask
that
you
keep
your
mask
on
even
while
you're
presenting
and
when
you're
at
the
podium
there's
some
hand
sanitizer
there.
B
B
B
B
B
E
B
F
F
It
was
rezoned
to
bring
it
into
the
dtd
and,
as
part
of
our
project,
to
make
the
building
and
the
sidewalk
all
work.
On
the
north
side,
we
vacated
a
portion
of
park,
place
avenue,
and
in
doing
so
it
created
a
situation
where
our
building
facade
is
greater
than
10
feet,
away
from
the
right
of,
and
so
we're
here.
F
We've
been
before,
the
downtown
design
review,
they've
recommended
approval
and
we're
here
to
seek
a
variance
on
the
mandatory
setback
of
no
greater
than
10
feet
along
park
place,
and
you
can
see
by
the
exhibit
attached
here
that
our
greatest
is
17.75,
but
it
varies
back
and
forth
and
as
is
as
low
as
3.47.
F
So,
as
I
said,
downtown
design
review
approved
it
and
we'd
seek
your
approval
as
well.
G
B
F
Correct
yeah,
the
the
only
concern
I
would
have
about
as
drafted.
If
something
moves
an
inch
or
two,
then
we'll
be
back
here
so
right,
it
would
be
a
waiver
of
that
along
the
north
frontage.
F
F
C
Well,
let
me
get
on
my
screen
I'll
move
for
approval
based
on
the
meet
the
statutory
requirements
for
variance.
C
B
E
E
E
C
B
A
Good
afternoon,
wow,
david
box,
522
call
cord
drive
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant.
Also
with
me
is
mr
david
burridge,
with
mathis
brothers.
What
we
have
before
you
today
is
a
variance
to
the
parking
requirement.
This
is
similar
to
some
other
variance
applications.
We've
done
for
mathis
brothers
at
their
their
main
store.
A
A
Many
municipalities
throughout
the
country
have
different
parking
standards
for
furniture
retail
as
an
acknowledgement
that
that
type
of
retail
is
very
different
than
your
traditional
retail.
It
is
anticipated
that
in
this
new
code
update,
we
will
in
fact
have
a
differentiation
between
traditional
retail
and
other
types
of
retail,
but
we
don't
now
when
you
look
through
plan
okc,
you
will
see
in
that
section
picture
after
picture
of
what
not
to
do
and
what
not
to
do
is
what
is
required
by
the
code.
A
Now
that
is
a
big
box
with
a
sea
of
parking
next
to
an
arterial
street,
and
that
is
the
scenario
in
which
the
code
would
require.
What
we
are
seeking
to
do
is
to
expand
the
the
existing
building
slightly
to
the
east,
perfect
cindy.
Thank
you
slightly
to
the
east
to
encompass
some
of
that
parking
to
to
ensure
that
we
are
over
parked.
I
want
to
talk
about
a
few
things
one.
A
You
know:
mathis
brothers
is
a
very
sophisticated
retailer.
They
know
the
parking
count
they
need
based
upon
decades
and
decades
of
experience,
multiple
stores.
They
would
not
under
park
themselves
they're
not
here,
because
it
would
be
cheaper,
they're
here
because
they
simply
don't
need
it.
So
to
be
sure,
if
you
look
at
the
image
before
you
and
I
can't
get
that
mouse
to
work,
but
if
you
look
at
the
parking
lot,
you
will
notice
some.
A
Can
I
control
that
now?
If
you
does
everybody
see
the
white
dots
in
those
parking
places?
Yes,
well,
I
think
everybody
is
aware,
and
in
traditional
retail,
the
retailers
will
require
their
employees
to
park
in
back
or
somewhere
far
away
to
thereby
re
reserve
those
prime
spaces
out
front
for
customers.
Well
with
mathis
brothers.
They
see
such
little
parking
demand.
It's
the
opposite.
A
Where
you
see
those
white
dots
is
where
the
employees
are
encouraged
and
oftentimes
required
to
park,
to
show
that
one
the
store
is
open
but,
more
importantly,
generate
a
level
of
interest
seeing
that
other
people
are
in
that
store.
Okay.
So
what
you
see
before
you
sorry
a
typical
day
where
it
simply
doesn't
need
the
required
parking
when
we
build
this
building,
it
will
not
change
the
parking
count
in
terms
of
what
is
needed
again,
it'll,
be
in
addition
to
what's
already
there,
you've
got
a
sleep
center.
A
You've
got
an
ashley
home
and
you've
got
a
lazy
boy
store
it'll,
be
there.
You
go
an
expansion
of
that
to
the
east.
Simply
put,
we
don't
need
the
required
parking
that
the
code
would
have.
So
when
we
go
through
the
statutory
elements,
the
hardship
is
the
code
would
require
us
to
to
build
parking.
That
would
be
a
detriment
to
the
public
unnecessary
and
simply
increase
the
amount
of
hard
surface
paving.
That's
there.
It's
unique
because
of
the
specific
nature
of
this
use.
A
It
is
not
a
traditional
retail
use,
yet
the
code
has
requirements
as
if
it
were,
there
is
no
detriment
to
the
public
or
an
impairment
of
the
purposes
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
Rather,
I
think
this
is
exactly
what
the
conference
plan
would
ask
for
today.
Puds
and
spuds
actually
have
a
matrix.
That
requires
and
encourages
a
reduction
in
parking
for
commercial
uses.
Mr
privette
sees
these
every
other
thursday
back
when
this
pud
was
put
into
place
all
those
years
ago.
A
It
didn't
have
that
this
was
the
old
way
of
thinking,
but
if
this
came
through
today,
we
wouldn't
even
need
to
do
a
variance
because
it
would
be
demanded
upon
us
by
planning
staff
to
come
up
with
a
matrix,
thereby
reducing
what
is
required
and
finally,
is
the
minimum
necessary,
because
all
other
code
requirements
within
this
pud
and
otherwise
will
be
met.
I
do
want
to
briefly
visit.
We.
We
got
a
a
protest
letter
objecting
to
this.
A
I
want
to
focus
on
the
last
two
sentences
of
the
first
paragraph,
which
I
think
sums
it
up.
I
I
don't
take
their
their
protest
to
really
be
concerned
about
parking,
but
rather-
and
I
quote,
a
building
expansion
would
completely
block
our
visibility,
which
will
cause
a
severe
hardship
in
regards
to
leasing
our
property.
Our
property
value
would
be
negatively
impacted
by
this
variance.
I
do
not
think
that
the
property
value
will
be
impacted.
I
certainly
don't
think
the
use
and
enjoyment
will
be
impacted.
A
The
the
letter
comes
from
an
individual
that
owns
the
property
to
the
south
of
where
the
expansion
will
be.
So
what
looks
like
that
vacant
lot
right
now,
so
what
they're
really
concerned
about?
Is
they
don't
want
a
building
to
be
built
there
to
block
their
view?
Well,
that's
not
what's
at
issue
before
the
board
today
we
could
build
a
building
right
now
and
do
a
different
use
other
than
retail,
and
we
probably
don't
need
a
parking
variant.
So
we'd
never
come
before
this
commission
or
this
this
board.
A
So
what's
before
the
board
is,
is
whether
or
not
we've
obviously
met
the
elements
for
parking
variants.
We
believe
that
we
have
understanding
that
there
are
only
three
of
you
here.
I
would
avail
myself
to
the
opportunity,
if
somebody
has
big
concerns,
we'd
like
to
continue
it,
but
we
do
believe
this
is
very
straightforward,
based
upon
the
specific
and
unique
nature
of
the
furniture
retail
use.
So
with
that
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
B
Okay
and
then
I
don't
know
what
the
board's
temperature
is,
but
obviously
we'll
give
you
an
opportunity
if
we
needed
a
continuance
to
do
that,
but
one
primary
question
I
had
I
did
not
see
in
here
something
that
we
always
like
to
see,
which
is
whether
you've
accounted
for
the
25
percent
concession
that
you
might
be
able
to
get
for
bike,
racks
and
landscaping
under
the
code.
B
The
kind
of
irony
of
a
bike
rack
at
a
furniture
store
is
not
missed.
On
me.
I
have
the
image
of
someone
riding
off
with
a
mattress
on
their
back
on
their
bicycle,
but
nonetheless,
I'm
sure
your
client
would
would
deliver
a
mattress
if
someone
wrote
up
on
a
bike.
You
know
something
like
that
so
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
that
is
what
the
code
allows
and
the
code
requires
us
to
look
at
so.
A
So
we
have
availed
ourselves
of
everything
we
think
we
can
do
you
know
in
terms
of
landscaping.
Otherwise,
to
your
point
you
know
we
are
at
memorial
and
the
hefner
parkway.
So
frankly,
the
idea
of
somebody
riding
a
bicycle
seems
you
know
not
likely
in
to
your
point
unnecessary,
but
no,
we
we
believe
we've
availed
ourselves
of
everything
possible
under
the
code,
but
it's
still,
it
just
requires
an
excessive
excessive
amount.
B
A
A
You
know,
if
you
look,
if
you
look
at
that
sea
of
parking
to
the
east,
it's
clear
to
me
that
the
only
thing
it's
been
used
for
are
donuts
and
burnouts,
presumably
by
you
know
a
high
school
kid
and
a
really
fast
fun
car,
and
I
think
that's
a
worst
case
scenario
right,
that's
worse
than
I
think
getting
the
variance.
So
I
really
think
here
you've
got
crucially
is
that
that
third
element,
whether
or
not
the
granting
the
variance
will
cause
a
detriment
to
the
public
good
or
impair
the
purposes
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
A
I
think
this
does
exactly
what
the
comp
plan
is
begging
people
to
do
and
what
you
will
see
in
the
code
update
whenever
that
may
be.
B
I
agree
with
you
on
principle:
I
think
that
individuals
driving
their
own
cars
is
rapidly
going
to
kind
of
come
to
an
end
and
we'll
get
to
kind
of
a
place
where
you'll
have
shared
ownership
of
you
know
autonomous
vehicles,
and
things
like
that.
I
think
that's
coming
within
10
years,
20
years,
something
like
that,
but
we're
not
there
yet
and
the
code
hasn't
been
updated
and
revised
yet
and
so
we're
kind
of
guessing
at
what
city
council
might
do.
So
that's.
A
A
I
do
think
it's
a
hardship
to
require
a
bunch
of
parking
that
would
just
go
unused.
I
mean
it
actually
goes
against
multiple
policies,
not
just
the
the
unattractiveness
of
a
sea
of
parking,
but
then
you
know
drainage
issues.
You
know
you
put
a
bunch
of
more
hard
surface
out
there
you
know,
creates
other
issues,
so
we
think
that
the
purposes
are
served
by
the
variants
that
we
seek
here
and
there
again.
This
isn't
a
scenario
where
the
there
is
potentially
a
detriment
to
the
surrounding.
You
know
public.
A
There
is
no
scenario
envisioned
even
at
the
height
of
a
of
a
christmas
rush
that
the
parking
that
we
will
still
have
in
the
after
isn't
adequate
to
service
the
needs
that
this
store
will
produce.
B
Yeah,
I
think
that's
the
strongest
argument
from
my
perspective,
just
given
this
use
these
properties
here,
to,
I
guess,
that's
the
east-
is
that
also
a
part
of
the
kind
of
maths
brothers
chain.
A
C
B
Correct:
okay
board
members:
any
questions
or
comments.
A
C
A
You
know
it's
similar
if
you
look
at
what
the
main
store
has
at
reno.
It's
very
similar
to
that
in
that,
when
we
converted
the
what
was
warehouse
space
to
additional
retail
space,
we
had
to
avail
ourselves
of
you
know
the
variance
process
there.
This
has
been
several
years
ago
to
get
a
variance
for
you
know
similar
reasons
here,
and
I
can
tell
you
that
there
has
never
been
an
instance
in
which
that
parking
lot
has
not
been
able
to
provide
the
necessary
parking
for
patrons
coming
there.
B
Any
other
questions
or
comments,
I
don't
have
anyone
signed
up,
but
we
might
have
any.
I
know
we
got
a
protest
letter.
Is
there
anyone
that
was
hoping
to
speak
on
this
matter
other
than
the
applicant.
B
H
Perry
rice,
one
of
the
principals
in
penric
llc,
we
own
the
property
immediately
to
the
south
of
the
proposed
expansion,
which
is
you
see
the
building
that's
designated
office
is
one
of
ours
and
then
the
one
to
the
west
of
it
is
a
spa
building
blush
spa,
that's
primarily
the
one.
When
we
bought
the
property,
we
of
course
look
at
location
and
how
it's
going
to
affect
anything
that
we
may
decide
to.
Do.
H
If
they
build
a
building,
it's
I
think
you
can
understand
it
all.
That's
going
to
totally
be
blocked
off
and
totally
affect
the
value
of
our
building,
and
I
will
make
a
comment
before
covid.
I
can
tell
you
that
that
parking
lot
was
full
on
a
saturday
just
normal
customers,
so
I
we
feel
the
parking
is
needed
and.
H
We
built
our
buildings
using
the
parking
requirements.
We
have
all
the
parking.
We
just
think
it's
not
right
for
now.
You
know
a
store
to
come
along
and
say
well
would
sure,
be
nice
if
we
had
more
square
footage
over
there
that
you
know
we
could
get
more
sales
from
so
let's
just
go
down
and
get
a
variance
and
see
if
the
city
will
let
us
change
what
we
initially
did.
H
B
You
don't
have
to
answer
this
if
you
don't
want
to,
but
I'll
tell
you
my
hesitation
here
is:
if
they
wanted
to
slide
this
building
over
these
parking
spots
and
build
parking
spots
on
the
west
side,
they
could
do
that
and
it
would
still
block
your
building
and
there's
not
much
you
can
do
about
it.
You
know.
B
I'm
saying
hypothetically
they
could
put
hypothetically,
they
could
put
that
on
the
west
side
of
the
building
and
there
you
know,
and
so
we
need
to
the
primary
concern
that
that
we
look
at
in
general,
for
these
parking
variances
is
not
necessarily
the
structure
of
the
building
or
blocking
the
view
or
things
like
that.
It's
it's
I
mean
at
the
end
of
the
day.
It's
are
they
going
to
come
in
and
impose
on
your
parking
lot
as
an
adjacent
property
owner.
B
You
know
that's
what
we're
really
looking
for,
and
here
we
don't
know
that
and
so
that
those
are
those
are
my
concerns,
I'm
not
saying
support
or
oppose
the
application
or
anything,
but
those
are
kind
of
the
ideas
that
are
in
my
head.
I
just
thought
I'd
give
you
the
opportunity
and
the
benefit
of
sharing
those
with
you,
while
you're
here
and
the
board
members
any
questions.
H
B
H
H
A
The
comments
briefly
further
to
your
point:
we
could
build
a.
We
could
build
the
exact
building
we
want
now
make
it
an
office
use
or
make
it
some
other
use.
It's
the
use,
that's
driving
the
need
for
the
variants,
because
it's
a
retail,
it's
not
just
the
mere
fact
that
we're
building
a
building
we
could
build
a
host
of
other.
We
could
build
that
building
with
a
host
of
other
uses
in
it
and
not
need
a
variance.
B
Well,
we
can
invite
comments
from
the
board
if
you
have
any
or
take
a
motion,
one
way
or
the
other
one
thing
I
did
want
is
the
municipal
counselor,
while
you're
here
you
don't
have
to
answer
this,
but
one
thought
I
had
is
the
variance
would
be
would
be
granted
if
it's
granted
as
the
application
is
drafted
and
this
retail
use.
B
I
see
the
municipal
accounts
are
shaking
their
head,
so
apparently
we're
not
too
far
off
on
the
legality.
Is
there
a
motion
or
any
further
comments.
B
A
A
B
I
I'd
rather
have
it
in
the
variance
for
the
specific
number
of
requests.
Just
you
know.
I
understand
you
don't
want
to
come
back
and
you
know
honestly.
I
obviously
don't
want
to
hold
up
the
project
if
the
board's
going
to
improve
it.
B
A
B
Okay,
that
was
my
understanding,
is
the
total
amount
that
the
variance.
B
Is
175
plus
71,
whatever
that
is,
I'm
not
a
mathematician
and
you're
seeking
a
variance
for
71
spaces?
What's
your
does
that
accurately
reflect
your
emotion
right.
E
A
B
B
Okay,
do
we
would
you
like
us
to
revoke
or
to
move.
D
B
E
Remove
approval
parking
spaces,
remove
approval
of
the
variants
parking
spaces
175
limited
to
this
use.
B
The
retail
yes,
oh
retail,
furniture
right,
yeah,
okay
and
then
mr
privet
you're
still,
second
okay.
So
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
to
approve
the
variance
request
in
case
number
14808.
For
the
reason
it
meets
statutory
conditions
for
a
variance
subject
to
the
following
conditions:
one
there'll
be
a
minimum
of
175
parking
spaces
and
two
it'll.
The
variance
only
applies
so
long
as
the
use
is
retail
furniture
store.
B
E
A
I
We
are
requesting
a
variance
to
the
parking
requirements
for
an
existing
apartment
development
off
a
youngs
boulevard.
As
you
could
see
the
existing
site,
a
majority
of
the
parking
or
sorry
a
majority
of
the
apartments
already
exist.
The
developer
is
seeking
to
construct
30
additional
apartments,
as
you
can
see
from
the
aerial.
That's
not
a
much
of
a
difference
between
peak
parking
from
when
this
air
area
was
taken,
the
apartments
are
95
occupied
currently
and
the
parking
is
about
50
percent
utilized.
I
So
some
of
you'll
hear
some
of
the
same
reasons
why
we
believe
that
this
variance
is
justified.
Plano
kc
calls
for
reductions
in
parking
under
a
new
code
as
well
as
adapt
okc,
which
was
recently
adopted
by
a
planning
commission
and
received
by
city
council,
calls
for
the
elimination
of
parking
requirements
altogether.
I
I
It's
reasonable
reasonable
for
us
to
believe
at
this
point
that
the
parking
is
just
simply
not
needed,
so
our
request
is
simply
a
variance
to
for
20
parking
spaces
to
the
requirements
under
the
municipal
code.
The
developer
is
here
to
answer
any
questions,
and
so
am
I.
B
Right
there
was
a
comment
in
here
from
traffic
management
division
that
I
no
doubt
you
saw
and
they
expressed
my
initial
hesitation
with
this
application.
So
if
you
wanted
to
address
those
comments,
I
think
that'd
be
helpful.
I
Yes,
the
traffic
comment,
I
think,
stated
subjectively
that
this
parking
variance
could
place
a
strain
on
the
existing
neighborhood
in
the
area.
To
this
point,
we
have
a
track
record
of
that
not
being
the
case
at
95
occupancy
with
half
full
parking.
I
Some
parking
might
be
picked
up
in
there,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
we
believe
that
the
tenants
in
this
are
one
to
no
car
families
that
are
utilizing
public
transportation,
and
this
is
when
you
look
at
we
reference
it
in
our
write-up
in
the
urban
planning
field.
Right
now,
you
are
seeing
so
many
developments
being
over
parked
because
of
municipal
codes
that
were
written
in
the
70s
before
public
transportation,
investments
before
bike
lanes
being
added,
and
I
think
this
is
a
prime
example
of
of
that
case.
I
B
I
mean
this
one
to
me
seems
substantially
different,
given
that
it's
residential
then
the
prior
application.
We
just
heard
where
people
might
come
and
go
and
spend
30
minutes
hour.
However
long
you
know,
I
I
assume
you
saw
this
objection
coming
and
if
you
didn't,
I
guess
it
was
in
the
comments
from
traffic
management,
but
that
was
my
hesitation.
I've
lived
in
an
area
I
lived
in
deep
deuce
and
for
a
time-
and
there
wasn't
enough
parking
in
deep
deuce
and
people
were
parking,
all
kinds
of
wonky
places,
and
I
just
foresee
that
happening
here.
B
You
know
20
spaces
to
me
just
seems
like
a
lot
in
this
development.
I
could
see
a
few
here
and
there,
but
20
to
me,
is
just
a
little
much.
I
If
I
may,
I've
also
lived
in
deep
deuce.
I've
lived
in
midtown
and
I
currently
live
at
avair
up
the
street.
Cornerstone
development
did
a
study
several
years
back
where
they
looked
at
the
parking
garages
in
the
surface,
parking
lots
of
residential
developments
in
the
downtown
area
and
found
that
they
were
all
significantly
overbuilt.
I
What
you're
seeing
in
deep
deuce
is
not
residential.
It's
not
the
residence
parking,
it's
the
commercial
for
what
the
grocery
store
for
bars
for
night
clubs.
B
I
agree,
except
I
mean
on
the
streets
that
are
tiny.
I
totally
agree,
but
I'm
talking
about
in
the
private
parking
area.
That's
gated
residents
only
permitted
parking,
they
don't
have
enough
parking
and
people
are
doing
all
kinds
of
stuff,
especially
if
you
have
guests
or
something-
and
I
just
not
to
say
I'm
applying
that
to
you,
because
it's
a
totally
different
development,
but
I
foresee
those
problems
happening
here
and
if
we
have
a
chance
to
to
maybe
fix
that
you
know
I
don't
know.
I
I
I
would
also
contend
that
the
demographic
between
deep
deuce
and
the
residents
at
this
apartment
project
are
vastly
different.
I
Yes,
so
part
of
this
development
plan
we're
utilizing
the
25
reduction
allowed
in
the
municipal
code.
Currently
so
we'll
be
adding
bike.
Racks
and
bike
storage
will
be
adding
additional
landscaping,
and
I,
I
think
again
that's
what
speaks
to
the
antiquated
requirements.
In
our
municipal
code,
we've
taken
a
25
reduction
and
we
believe
the
developer
believes
we're
still
over
parked,
adding
30
additional.
G
G
The
project
has
been
in
need
of
an
upgrade
for
quite
some
time
in
terms
of
maintenance
and
just
bringing
the
property
up
to
market
standards.
It
does.
It
is
nestled
within
this
community,
and
so
we
feel
a
real
obligation
and
a
real
opportunity
now
to
be
able
to
do
so,
given
the
fact
that
it
is
underwritten
with
low-income
housing
tax
credits.
That
means
that
the
demographic
group
that
will
be
housed
here
will
all
be
sixty
percent
of
the
median
income.
G
Sixty
percent
of
the
median
income
of
oklahoma
city
is
for
a
single
individual
means
that
that
person
will
be
making
less
than
thirty
thousand
dollars
annually
for
family.
That
means
that
those
persons
will
be
making
less
than
somewhere
around
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
annually.
G
Currently,
the
demographic
that
is
housed
there
are
all
under
60,
and
some
of
them
are
maybe
even
30.
The
parking
requirements
are
over
over
abundantly
over
for
this
demographic
group.
They
simply
cannot
afford
they're,
not
too
car
families
in
many
and
what's
driving
the
parking
requirement.
While
we
have
to
build
apartments
to
accommodate
a
family.
G
These
families
are
one
car
families.
They
are
not
two
and
a
half
families,
and
so
they
are
absolutely
families
who
will
utilize
public
transportation.
So
by
adding
the
30
units,
we
are
actually
fulfilling
a
need
here
in
oklahoma
city
to
meet
the
affordable
housing
issue
or
to
meet
the
demographic
that
needs
affordable
housing.
G
B
B
On
top
of
that,
on
the
theory
that
your
demographic
can't
afford
two
cars
or
even
one
car,
I
would
like-
and
again
you
might
be
able
to
do
this
here-
you
might
not,
but
a
breakdown
of
how
many
units,
how
many
units
are
one
bedroom,
how
many
units
are
two
bedroom
based
on
that
breakdown?
How
many
spaces
you're
required
for
that
and
then
to
see
the
variance
as
it's
applied
to
those
figures?
That's
that
would
make
me
feel
more
comfortable
personally.
I
B
I
That
I
think
our
our
view
of
this
application
is
slightly
different.
The
code
allows
for
a
reduction,
and
that
is
not
a
variance
to
the
code,
so
the
code
requirements,
if
you're
providing
bike
racks
and
other
things,
is
what
allows
the
parking
to
be
essentially
reallocated
to
bike
parking.
So
our
I
think
our
position
is
that
we
are
only
seeking
a
variance
of
20
spaces,
not
20,
plus
a
reduction
sure.
D
B
I
There
are
51
bedrooms,
18,
studios
and
22
beds.
Some
of
these
will
be
renovated
to
where
a
bedroom
might
might
change
and
we're
proposing
I'll
do
it.
This
way,
this
will
be
easier.
There
will
be
51
bedrooms.
I
I
So
gina
might
correct
me
if
this
is
wrong,
but
looking
at
the
numbers,
it
would
appear
that
maybe
some
of
the
two
bedrooms
are
being
converted
to
one
bedrooms.
I
B
B
But
I
just
can't
get
on
board
with
20
and
for
my
own
interest
of
the
surrounding
properties.
The
future
tenants
that
are
gonna
have
to
deal
with
this.
You
know,
for
all
those
reasons
I
I
just
can't
get
on
board
with
20..
I
think
that's
too
much
of
a
variance
for
me
personally.
I
If,
if
I
could
add
one
one
last
thing
and
a
question,
I
do
serve
on
the
stakeholder
development
committee
for
the
zoning
code
update-
and
I
understand
this-
is
our
zoning
code
today,
but
there's
a
strong
feeling
that
parking
requirements
are
going
to
be
eliminated,
particularly
in
areas
like
this
around
significant
public
investment,
because
the
parking
demands
are
drastically
changing,
and
I
I
know
you
generally
don't
take
the
financial
concern
into
your
decision
making
here.
But
a
study
was
quoted
in
here.
I
This
is
a
low-income
project
that
every
parking
every
new
parking
space
has
130
toward
monthly
rent.
That's
what
we're
up
against,
and
this
is
a
demographic
that
doesn't
need
the
parking
and
if
you
require
the
parking
to
be
built,
it
further
increases
rent,
making
it
harder
and
less
obtainable
for
families
of
lower
income.
I
B
B
C
B
C
I,
like
the
motion
to
approve
variants
based
on
the
main
suspect
statutory
requirements
with
the
variance
of
10
parking
spaces.
B
B
Okay,
the
remaining
items
are
deferred
or
withdrawn,
so
that
moves
us
to
additional
items
have
nothing
on
the
agenda,
communications
and
board
reports.
I
have
nothing
on
there
either
citizens
to
be
heard.
I
don't
see
anyone
else
out
there.
Other
business
board
members
in
the
other
business
or
staff,
any
other
business
yeah.