►
From YouTube: Human Rights Commission Taskforce
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Okay,
here
is
mariana
adams.
With
this.
A
Okay,
clinton,
hughes,
okay,
is
councilwoman
hammond
with
us.
D
A
A
Okay,
you
know
what
I'm
going
to
say:
we're
here,
we're
I'm
not
I'm
not
going
through
all
those
names
y'all
come
on.
Okay.
I
am
going
to
trust
that
everyone
is
here.
That
is
a
part
of
this
committee,
so
first
good
evening,
and
we
just
I
don't
want
to
waste
any
more
time,
because
I
know
we
have
a
lot
of
things
to
discuss.
I
do
need
to
read
our
video
conference
meeting
information
and
I
want
to
again
thank
you
for
joining
this
conference
meeting.
We
do
have
a
few
announcements
to
make
regarding
this
teleconference
meeting.
A
So
if
the
video
conference
is
disconnected
at
any
time
during
the
meeting,
the
meeting
shall
be
stopped
and
reconvened
once
the
audio
and
video
connection
is
restored.
If
communications
are
unable
to
be
restored
within
15
minutes,
items
remaining
for
consideration
will
be
placed
on
the
special
meeting
agenda
for
october
29th
at
6
pm
via
video
conference.
The
agenda
and
documents
are
located
on
okc.gov
and
anyone
wishing
to
speak
about
an
agenda
item.
Please
text
405.
A
Four,
two,
please
provide
your
name
phone
number.
The
item
number
and
the
reason
you
wish
to
comment
speakers
will
be
allowed
two
minutes
to
comment.
So
I
do
ask
that
all
participants
keep
your
phones
or
your
screens
on
mute
until
you
are
recognized
to
speak
and
committee
members
will
be
allowed
to
ask
questions
or
comment
at
any
time
during
the
meeting,
and
I
do
want
for
those
who
are
fairly
new
or
have
not
used
the
portion
of
raising
your
hand
in
the
screen.
A
Please
know
that
you
can
see
it
in
the
you
see
up
top
where
participants
are
more
depending
on
where
your
screen,
where
it
may
be
located.
There
is
a
feature
for
you
to
raise
your
hand
or
a
chat
for
you
to
add,
ask
questions
or
for
us
to
communicate
in
that
way.
So
with
that
being
said,
I
I
believe
I
already
called
the
meeting
to
order.
If
not,
I
call
it
to
order
now.
A
Thank
you
and
again
welcome
to
everyone,
and
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
out
all
of
our
task
working
groups
that
have
met,
and
I
know
there
were
a
lot
of
great
things
and
details
discussed
and
also
the
chairs
and
co-chairs
for
those
working
groups
have
also
been
determined,
and
I
know
we'll
go
into
more
information
about
that
and
with
that
I'll
ask
if
our
other
co-chairs
have
any
words.
But
before
you
go
dr
benjamin,
I
do
want
to
let
everyone
on
this
call
know
as
well.
A
We
had
an
opportunity
to
present
the
human
rights
task
force
information
for
an
interim
study
that
senator
young
is
doing
in
establishing
or
reestablishing,
should
I
say,
the
human
rights
commission
for
our
state.
So
we
were
able
to
present
the
information
of
how
we
are
working
to
reestablish
ours
on
the
city
level
and
gave
all
the
great
information
of
what
we're
doing
in
the
work
that's
being
done.
So
that
will
play
a
part
in
the
conversations
to
come
for
the
state
human
rights
commission
to
possibly
be
reinstated.
A
So
I
wanted
to
thank
senator
young
for
allowing
us
the
opportunity-
and
I
also
want
to
thank
dr
benjamin
and
mariana
and
and
also
dr
hughes,
for
the
work
that
they've
done
and
getting
us
thus
far
and
using
that
information
is
what
we
were
able
to
present
on
this
past
tuesday,
if
I'm
not
mistaken
at
this
interim
study.
So
thank
you
again
to
all
of
our
co-chairs
for
the
work
that
you
all
are
doing.
C
A
A
B
A
Them,
okay,
we'll
receive
the
minutes.
Thank
you
for
that.
We
will
go
ahead
and
receive
the
minutes,
and
maybe,
if,
if
possible
and
correct
me,
because
I
don't
know
how
that
works,.
G
A
C
Actually
I
talked
to
mariana
and
she
said
that
we
can
use
the
link
to
just
read
them,
and
so
it's
offered
more
as
just
a
document
so
that
we
can
see
how
human
rights
are
considered
and
thought
about
across
the
globe
and
how
the
un
decided
to
adopt
them.
And
I
will
talk
about
it
a
little
bit
in
my
presentation.
But.
A
Okay,
perfect,
and
to
add
to
that
I
will
say
our
council
received
information
from
a
resident,
I'm
assuming
a
resident
of
oak.
I'm
not
sure
I
can't
remember
if
they're
from
oklahoma
city
that
is
asking
that
we
acknowledge
and
recognize
intersex
month
for
october,
so
obviously
that
that
is
a
human
rights
issue
as
well.
A
So
I,
if
you
have
have
not
heard
of
intersex
as
far
as
our
youth
are
concerned,
with
intersex
youth
awareness
month,
I
would
ask
that
you
all
research
that-
and
we
can
all
be
more
familiar
with
that
topic
and
how
it
relates
to
our
young
people
that
live
among
us
in
our
society
today
that
we
definitely
want
to
make
sure
we
are
giving
them
their
equal
rights
and
acknowledging
their
presence
and
and
how
they
represent
themselves.
A
C
Sure,
thank
you
all
again
for
cr
for
responding
to
that
again.
We
we
heard
from
about
27
task
force
members,
so
you
have
it
in
your
packet,
but
I
am
going
to
still
just
go
through
a
very
brief
presentation
of
the
results
and
again
in
my
normal
life,
I
wouldn't
present
27
respondents,
but
this
is
a
questionnaire
and
this
is
for
our
task
force.
So
I
think
it's
a
good
way
to
think
about
where
we
are
currently
and
hopefully
as
we
move
through
it.
C
You
can
sort
of
here
for
yours
or
see
for
yourself
where
you
know
there's
some
consensus
that
has
already
been
built
and
then
thinking
about
as
we
move
forward.
What
are
some
things
that
that
we're
going
to
have
to
discuss,
and
hopefully
the
work
coming
out
of
the
working
groups
will
help
us
answer
any
questions
or
really
refine
our
plan
as
we
move
forward.
So
let
me
try
to
act
like
I
can
use
technology
and
share
my
screen.
C
E
You
should,
I
saw
your
screen,
so
if
you
were
presenting,
you
were
sharing
your
screen
and
then
just
run
the
powerpoint
there
you
go,
you
know
and
then,
if
you
you
go
to
present,
yes.
C
Okay.
Okay,
okay,
sorry,
thank
you.
Yes,
okay,
so
sorry,
thank
you
all
for
your
patience
as
I
had
both
my
technology
issues
again,
so
we
did
hear
from
27
of
you
all.
So
thank
you
again
just
getting
started
as
I
was
just
mentioning
for
five
people.
They
offered
the
definition.
The
un
definition
of
human
rights
as
their
definition,
and
so
as
you
can
see,
that
includes
human
rights
are
inherent
to
all
human
beings
right,
oh,
no,
sorry
so,
regardless
of
race,
sex,
nationality,
ethnicity,
language,
religion
or
any
other
status.
C
Human
rights
include
the
rights
to
liberty,
life
and
liberty,
freedom
from
slavery
and
torture,
freedom
of
opinion
and
expression,
the
right
to
work
and
education
and
many
more
everyone
is.
Everyone
is
entitled
to
these
rights
without
discrimination.
So
that
was
what
some
people
said
and
then
I
tried
to
just
quantify
other
answers,
so
four
people
did
add
sexual
orientation,
sexuality
and
again
we
do
know
that
that's
not
in
the
current
statute,
but
we
do
know
that
norman
has
added
it
to
their
hrc.
So
I
think
this
is
an
area
open
for
discussion.
C
Eight
different
respondents
mentioned
dignity
and
respect
and
slash
humanity,
just
that
that's
a
basic
human
right
that
we
are
treated
humanely
and
then
three
people
mentioned
ability
and
accessibility
right.
So
we
want
to
think
about
where
that
fits
into
our
definition.
As
we
move
forward.
C
How
do
residents
in
the
city
of
oklahoma
city
currently
report
human
rights
grievances?
So
seven
people
correctly
mentioned
the
attorney
general's
office.
That
is
the
current
process
that
that
is
used.
Eight
people
were
honest.
Thank
you
for
that
and
said
they
didn't
know.
I
think
many
people
don't
know
three
people
did
mention
the
police
department.
Two
people
mentioned
going
to
the
city
council
and
one
person
set
a
human
rights
commission.
So
someone
was
optimistic
in
their
survey.
Their
questionnaire
responses.
C
Let
me
ask
what
are
some
of
the
primary
barrier:
primary
barriers
to
the
exercise
of
human
rights
in
oklahoma
city?
I
thought
about
the
answers
and
broke
them
down
into
two
different
categories.
12
people
mentioned
things
that
we
might
consider
structures
right.
So
the
policies
maybe
are
a
barrier,
a
budget
right
that
we
we
don't
you
know.
Maybe
there
are
some
financial
constraints,
discrimination
generally
classism
racism,
language
right.
How
is
the
information
made
available
to
our
residents
and
then
poverty
right?
C
Those
are
more
structural,
but
then
people
mention
sort
of
this
lack
of
information
as
another
thing
right
that
we
don't
know
the
mechanisms
or
a
lack
of
education
or
lack
of
support
system
or
that
there's
no,
no
formal
process.
So
again,
the
consensus
here
sort
of
is
that
there
are
some
structures
right
and
the
fact
that
we
don't
currently
have
a
human
rights
commission
might
be
a
barrier,
but
also
that,
even
if
we
did,
it
would
be
really
important
that
people
understand
the
process
by
which
a
human
rights
commission
works.
C
So
then,
in
trying
to
think
about
what
can
we
do
to
remove
some
of
those
barriers?
Obviously
you
know
education,
training,
provide
information.
Some
people
said
collecting
data
and
doing
some
research.
People
did
mention
community
centered
mechanisms
right
that
it
could
should
come
from
within
the
community.
People
mentioned
allocating
funds
getting
some
up
getting
some
budget
allocation.
C
Obviously
three
people
said
get
an
hrc.
So
again,
people
are
being
optimistic.
People
mentioned
accountability
and
then
transparency,
which
again,
I
think
some
of
these
themes
are
going
to
come
up.
As
we
have
our
discussion.
What
is
the
process?
You
know
we
might
think
about.
What's
the
role
there
of
transparency,
how
do
we
hold
people
accountable?
Those
types
of
things?
C
So
when
we
ask
what
role
do
you
think
the
task
force
or
human
rights
commission
should
have
in
addressing
the
barriers?
People
said
that
that
you
know
naming
some
specific
powers.
They
do
think
that
a
human
rights
commission
should
educate
right.
It
can
mediate,
investigate
collect
data,
adjudicate
or
recommend
policies
and
coordinate
outreach
right,
and
so
in
that
sense
people
were,
you
know
very
specific
about
what
they
think
that
a
human
rights
commission
should
do
if
it
was
reestablished.
C
And
then
in
asking
about
whether
or
not
the
task
force
would
have
an
ongoing
role.
I
know
that
there
are
rules
about
this,
so
we
sort
of
just
asked
this
question
and
trying
to
think
about
it.
Oh
sorry,
about
guaranteeing
access
to
basic
human
rights.
People
said
you
know:
10
people,
the
27
said
that
the
human
rights
commission
should
guarantee
access
equal
access.
Three
people
said
it
should
have
a
limited
role.
Again.
C
Sorry.
This
is
where
I
think
that
there
is
a
rule
and
rita
knows
it,
but
we
still
asked
about
it.
So
I
wanted
to
present
on
it
again.
It's
pretty
split
50
50
that
people
want
to
abolish
the
task
force
once
we
sort
of
present
and
decide
to
move
forward
with
an
hrc
or
not.
Some
people
thought
that
the
task
force
should
continue
and
then
some
people,
three
people
did
say
that
maybe
the
task
force
could
continue
with
an
advisory
role.
C
Next,
we
we
wanted
to
know
what
people
thought.
The
role
for
staff
should
be
right,
and
so
what
one
thing
that
was
said
was
to
fully
fund
the
staff.
You
know
fully
fund
a
staff
and
hrc
right.
So
that's
a
budget
question
people
do
think
there
should
be
staff
to
support
the
hrc.
So
I
think
that's
something
we
need
to
think
about
is
what
does
that
ask
look
like
what
does
that
budget?
C
Look
like
mostly
because
we
sort
of
recognize
that
there
are,
you
know
real
knowledge
bases
with
the
staff
and
obviously,
even
if
you
were
to
form
a
human
rights
commission,
we'll
just
people
will
just
be
volunteers,
and
so
that
would
be
sort
of
that
connection
that
firming
that
institutional
knowledge
again
provide
guidance
with
administrative
support,
connect
hrc
to
the
mayor
which,
if
it
is
established
as
a
commission,
that
relationship
is
already
built
in
and
then
offering
help
with
reporting
and
then.
C
Finally,
I
think
this
is
really
important
that
people
picked
up
on
this
right
that
some
of
the
human
rights
things
might
be.
There
might
be
some
sensitivity
or
privacy
issues,
so
helping
us
with
the
data
collection.
Might
also
be
a
good
use
of
staff
again
keeping
in
mind,
though,
that
first
bullet
that
obviously
staff
requires
budget.
So
we'll
need
to
think
about
that
for
our
proposal.
C
What
processes
do
you
see
as
effective
in
addressing
the
human
rights
addressing
human
rights
in
oklahoma
city
right
people,
sort
of
mentioned,
the
the
things
that
they
mentioned
earlier
right,
that
they
would
want
a
commission
that
can
legislate
and
recommend
policy,
obviously
run
investigations,
collect
data?
Do
research,
educate
and
train
right
that
sort
of
that
component
of
it,
and
then
collaborate
and
do
outreach
right?
So
we
see
some
consensus
from
earlier
questions
that
what
should
hrc
do?
What
do
you
think
is
effective?
Some
some
overlap
there
and
then
also
again.
C
This
is
important
to
some
things
that
we've
thought
about.
Are
the
current
protections
adequate
people
said
a
people
said
that
the
current
protections
were
appropriate.
Three
people
said
they're
appropriate
for
now,
but
let's
revisit
it
later,
which
I
think
might
might
be
a
good
point.
Three
five
people
said
they
that
they
wanted
to
lobby
for
additional
protections
and
they
specifically
mentioned
sexual
orientation,
which
we
saw
earlier
in
the
definition
and
then
lobby
for
different
protections,
but
also
people
weren't
specific.
C
When
trying
to
think
about
what
would
be
the
process
that
that
we
would,
you
know
if
the
commission
is
reestablished,
what
would
be
the
process?
People
were
pretty
clear
about
what
they
think
should
happen
right.
So
people
should
know
the
dates
who
to
contact
where
they
need
to
show
up
again
one
person,
whoever
that
was
thank
you
for
laying
out
a
very
clear
process
that
I
just
you
know,
was
able
to
trans
for
over
people
want
to
know
who
will
be
reviewing
their
complaint
right
when
they
expect
an
answer.
C
C
So
again,
I
think
this
and
we
have
more
here,
but
someone
else
also
mentioned
something
very
thoughtful
too,
which
is
like
there's
not
a
blanket
answer
right,
so
recognizing
that
these
types
of
issues
can
be
complex
and
so,
depending
on
the
nature
of
the
complaint,
there
might
be
that
we
need
to
explain
that
there
are
different
processes
depending
on
the
complaint.
I
think.
C
That's
also
a
really
good
point
for
us
to
consider
as
we
move
forward
and
again
people
just
asking
for
that:
transparency
right
that
that,
when,
when
someone
files
a
complaint
with
us
that
I'm
sorry
with
the
commission,
if
it
were
to
be
reestablished
that
we
offer
them
a
clear
process
from
start
to
finish
so
that
they're,
not
you
know,
feeling
confused
or
unsure
that
we've
offered
them
all
the
information
they
need
to
know
from
start
to
finish,
this
is
what
your
process
will
look
like
again.
C
Next,
next
steps:
what
to
expect
information
about
how
the
process
goes
and
again
that
we
we
commit
to
a
timely
response
right
that
this
is
not
a
long
process
that
we
offer
them
some
sort
of
time
frame
that
we
will
try
to
respond
to
them
and
their
case
people
wanted.
You
know
again,
you
know
asking:
should
there
be
an
ad
hoc
or
established
committee
for
every
complaint
right
again,
this
is
sort
of
if
it's
reestablished.
What
does
the
process
look?
Like
some
people
suggested
just
doing
an
initial
review.
C
People
said
it
should
be
ad
hoc,
so
we
only
meet
as
needed.
Some
people
set
a
full
hearing
for
any
case
again
those
people
sort
of
thinking
ahead.
It
depends
on
the
nature
of
the
complaint
and
then
two
people
did
offer
that.
C
Maybe
if
we
had
staff
support
that
there
would
be
a
way
to
screen
it
and
then
sort
of
distribute
it
based
on
some
sort
of
rules
that
that
would
be
decided
upon
by
the
commission-
and
this
was
a
big
question
so
the
way
I
broke
it
down,
here's
the
full
question,
but
then
we'll
get
to
individually-
and
I
think
here
you'll
see
that
that
we
have
some
decisions
to
make
or
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
discussion
around
this.
So
I'm
thinking
about
the
size-
and
I
actually
have
two
slides
for
this.
C
So
you
know
people
had
a
lot
of
thoughts
right.
So
you
know
some
people
said
six
to
nine.
Some
people
said
seven,
seven
to
twelve.
You
know
some
people
put
cats,
no
more
than
fifteen,
then
as
we
move
forward.
I
just
did
it
by
size,
but
people
advocated
for
more
some
people
offered.
You
know
an
odd
number
which
I
guess
would
maybe
be
to
break
ties.
C
If
there
was
a,
you
know,
split
vote
and
then
someone
again
was
kind
of
thoughtful
thinking
through
this.
Well,
it
depends
on
how
many
complaints
we
get
right,
and
so
it
depends
right.
So
again
we
might
think
about
what
this
looks
like
they
suggested
up
to
up
to
60,
but
then
maybe
reducing
it
right
so
again.
Thinking
about
what
what's?
C
What's
the
commission
going
to
look
like,
and
then
you
know
someone
said
15
18,
depending
on
populations
represented,
so
I
think
these
are
again
just
things
that
we
we
should
plan
to
discuss
as
we
move
forward
again
large
enough
to
handle
the
business.
C
Someone
suggested
40
with
the
sunset
once
certain
aspects
are
fulfilled
right.
I
think
this
person
was
maybe
thinking
initially,
we
might
receive
a
lot
of
complaints
because
maybe
there's
a
backlog,
but
then
eventually
40
would
be
too
many.
So
again,
these
are
just
things
for
us
to
consider
as
we
move
forward
again,
as
we
think
about
designing
the
proposal
and
thinking
about
what
the
commission
will
look
like,
we
need
to
think
about
what
terms
look
like
people.
C
You
know
11
11
people
did
say
two
year,
a
two-year
term.
People
thought
about
initially
like
a
two-year
term,
but
then
initially,
because
we
can't
all
be
on
the
same
where
people
can't
be
on
the
same
two-year
term
that
there
might
be
some
initial
staggering
just
for
continuity.
But
then,
after
that
it
would
stagger
some
people
said
three
years
again.
People
offered
rotations
three
years
with
term
limits
and
a
maximum
of
three
terms
right
again.
C
Thinking
about
sort
of
you
know,
really
designing
it
and
being
very
transparent
about
how
the
commission
will
be
staffed
and
and
and
filled
five
year
max
right.
People
mentioned
again
the
staggering
so
that
there's
some
continuity
and
then,
when
we
asked
about
whether
or
not
hrc
members
should
represent
the
geography
of
the
city.
Again,
eight
said
yes,
three
said
no
people
said
there
might
be.
It
might
be
good
to
think
about
doing
ward
appointments
so
that
we
do
cover
the
geography
of
the
city.
C
Someone
did
mention,
it
shouldn't,
be
anything
about
geography
or
demographics.
Let's
focus
on
skills,
so
that
might
be
part
of
it.
The
way
that
we
write
it
or
even
part
of
the
application
process
for
people
applying
to
the
commission
asking
what
skills
people
have
when
asked
about
demographic
representation
right
14
said:
yes,
three
said
no,
and
then
people
laid
out
different
types
of
demographics
that
might
need
to
be
represented
again.
I
think
we
can
return
to
this,
but
it
is
to
again
just
to
get
our
minds.
C
Thinking
about
this
is
hopefully
some
we'll
have
some
information
coming
out
of
some
of
the
working
groups
to
help
us
think
about
what's
the
best
practice
about
this,
and
how
should
we
think
about
it
for
our
city
and
then?
Finally,
I
did
include
this
miscellaneous
slide,
just
because
I
thought
that
people
made
some
good
points
here.
I
think
that
we
do
need
to
think
about
what's
the
process
by
which
people
are
removed
right.
C
So,
if
you
don't
show
up
for
several
meetings,
if
you're
serving
on
the
commission
is
that,
is
that
a
reason
to
remove,
or
is
it
only
you
know
right,
so
I
think
again,
this
person's
thoughtful.
Let's
try
to
think
about
the
ways
in
which
we,
both
you
know,
fill
the
commission
and
then
what
would
be
some
reasons
why
someone
might
not
be
asked
to
serve
again
or
maybe
be
asked
to
not
serve
currently
and
again.
I
think
this
person
we
are.
C
We
are
looking
so
we'll
hear
from
the
case
studies
report,
but
other
people
are
doing
research
right.
So
I
think
it's
true.
We
should
think
about
what
other
people
are
doing
and
then
assess
that
in
relation
to
the
best
needs
of
our
city
and
then
again,
someone
said:
let's
talk
about
it
in
the
meeting,
and
I
respect
that.
So
that's
it
I'll.
Take
any
questions
now,
let
me
stop
sharing
my
screen.
I
don't
know
if
I
can
see
everyone.
Okay,.
A
H
Thank
you.
So
my
question
is
as
simple
as
just
knowing
how
the
council
processes
work
as
it
relates
to
the
budget.
H
Will
the
policy
and
legislation
committee
need
to
be
the
ones
to
sort
of
quote,
unquote,
write
it
write
that
budget
piece,
or
will
that
be
something
that
we
do
as
a
larger
group.
C
I
think
it
I,
I
think
it
could
go
either
way.
It
might
be
that
the
policy
and
legislation
group
does
some
initial
research.
What
our
other
budgets
look
like,
what
do
other
budgets
look
like
for
hrcs
and
other
places
just
to
give
us
a
range.
We
would
want
to
know
how
big
those
cities
are.
C
Obviously,
probably
the
new
york
city
budget
isn't
going
to
inform
our
budget,
but
also
a
small
town
budget
isn't
going
to
inform
our
budget
either,
and
then
I
think,
maybe
to
my
mind-
and
I
don't
want
to
speak
for
the
other
co-chairs.
But
to
my
mind
it
would
be
something
that
if
it
came
out
of
that
committee,
it
would
be
something
to
be
discussed
because
at
the
point
we
are,
you
know
asking
for
the
re-establishment.
C
If
there's
a
budget
request,
I
think
it
would
need
to
get
a
consensus
out
of
this
group
as
well,
but
I
think
that's
a
really
good
question
and
it's
something
I
know
for
case
studies
we're
also
considering
and
it's
part
of
one
of
our
evaluation
tools
as
well
as
what
budget
does
the
hrc
have
or
the
department?
So
our
our
committee
will
also
have
some
of
that
data
as
well,
but
that's
a
great
question:
yep
ayanna,
I
see
you
go
ahead.
C
I
Can
you
hear
me
now?
Oh
yeah,
all
right
go
ahead,
yeah!
Okay!
Sorry
about
that,
the
quick!
I
guess!
What
I'm
thinking
about
is
that
how
do
we
make
this
a
priority?
Because
you
were
talking
about
the
new
york
city
or
the
new
york
budget,
you
know.
Needless
to
say,
there
been
monies
put
into
a
variety
of
things
in
this
town
that
you
would
think.
Oh
wow,
they
spent
that
much
money
on
that
and
then
so,
how
do
we
from?
I
C
I
don't
know
if
I
have
the
answer
that
I
want
recorded
on
this
live
youtube,
so
I
think
that's
something
that
we
will
discuss,
but
I
I
take
your
point
right
that
as
we
move
forward,
you
know
the
recommendation
that
comes
out
of
this
group.
I
think
that's
an
appropriate
question.
C
I
I
guess
the
councilwoman
nice
from
the
perspective
of
and
she
may
be
able
to
provide
some
guidance
there,
or
even
some
of
the
staff
people.
When
they've
been
situations
where
there
have
been
designated,
you
know
budgets
required
for
different
things.
What
has
been
the
best
approach
in
terms
of
being
able
to,
in
the
one
case,
have
a
staff
person
or
several
staff
people
are.
I
A
Think
that
would
be
what
you
said
would
be
the
best
approach,
in
my
opinion,
as
far
as
with
this
working
group
in
this
committee,
that's
what
we
want
to
figure
out
how
how
we
want
this
to
operate
and
the
best
way
to
move
forward
with
the
process
so
that
that's
what
we
will
be
deciding
as
far
as
if
we
want
a
staff
member
to
be
a
part
of
this,
how
what
that
looks
like
and
again
comparing
to
the
peer
cities?
That's
how
I
received
that,
and
I
know
there.
A
I
I
was,
I
do
have
one
little
quick
question.
I
was
a
little
confused
whether
the
the
the
committee,
that's
looking
at
other
cities,
is
that
the
case
study
research
on
hrc's
working
group,
correct,
okay-
is
that
what
you
wrote
with
dr
benjamin,
I'm
not
over
it,
but
we
are
going.
I
C
F
F
C
D
C
Perfect
all
right,
let
me
scroll
am
I
missing
anyone
else
that
has
their
hand
up
okay,
so
yeah.
I
will
make
that
I
will
get
that
email
to
everyone,
so
you
can
see
the
raw
responses.
I
think
that's
great
yep,
perfect.
A
A
We
also
have
status
of
human
rights
in
the
city,
data
collection
and
analysis
and
working
relationships,
so
we'll
go
in
order
of
which
they
are
listed
for
and
dr
benjamin,
I'm
not
sure
if
he
wanted
to
facilitate
that
part
as
well.
J
So
councilwoman,
I
have
the
action
plans
that
I
can
share
on
my
screen
and
we
can
go
through
them
in
order
if
that
works.
J
C
C
I
think
we've
set
up
a
nice
framework
in
our
first
meeting
and
we
have
some
people
that
are
handling
some
of
the
larger
tasks
like
someone
is
organizing
the
doodle
to
set
our
meeting
someone's
setting
up
a
group
me.
So
really,
if
there's
someone
who
wants
to
co-chair,
I'm
really
asking
please
please
volunteer,
we
have
almost
everything
we
need.
We
just
need
to
do
the
work.
So
ayanna
is
that
you,
volunteering
to
co-chair.
C
I
C
Yes,
so
I'll
just
do
this
briefly,
because
I
don't
wanna
because
the
other
person
I
didn't
ask
them
to
do
it,
but
basically,
as
I
was
just
explaining
and
sort
of
through
the
q,
a
our
working,
this
working
group
is
really
tasked
with
doing
research,
so
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
selecting
peer
cities,
those
that
have
an
hrc
and
a
department,
those
that
only
have
an
hrc,
those
that
only
have
a
department
and
those
that
have
neither-
and
we
are
reading
a
report
about
hrc's
out
of
columbia
so
that
we
can
evaluate
what
is
the
way
that
human
rights
violations
are
handled
in
this
city,
and
we
we
have
some
criteria
that
we've
tried
to
lay
out
here.
C
You
know
how
you
know
how
basically
just
what
did
they
do,
we'll
ask
about
their
budget
we'll
try
to
understand
how
do
they
build
their
commission?
What
are
the
membership
requirements?
What
are
the
terms
what's
the
capacity?
What
do
they
actually
do?
C
How
many
cases
do
they
review,
which
each
year,
how
many
reports
do
they
issue
and
anything
special
about
that
hrc
and
again
we're
currently
just
doing
some
research
on
hrc,
so
that
we'll
have
that
and
then,
within
that
we
are
sort
of
breaking
up
into
groups
to
pick
our
cities
and
we'll
complete
google
forms
that
will
help
us
sort
of
consolidate
that
data,
so
that,
when
we
present
to
you
all
we'll
be
able
to
answer
questions
such
as,
where
did
they
get
their
money
from
how
many
staff
work
for
them?
C
What
do
they
actually
do,
and
so,
as
we
move
forward,
we're
going
to
try
to
examine
those
cities
again,
do
the
in-depth
research
come
together
and
try
to
then
evaluate
each
city
based
on
what
we
found
try
to
develop
some
best
practices,
maybe
pull
some
language
and
see
how
they
were
able
to
do
things
again,
figure
out
what's
missing
right,
and
one
thing
I
should
keep
in
mind-
is
that
even
the
cities
that
don't
have
an
hrc
or
a
department?
C
The
research
question
there
is:
how
is
that
city
handling
any
potential
human
rights
violations?
And
again,
we
think
that
that
will
be
useful.
We
do
have
the
charter
language
from
the
last
our
last
hrc
here
in
the
city,
so
we
will
use
that
as
also
a
guide
post
for
for
what
we
do.
We
think
that's
really
important
and
then,
hopefully,
by
by
december,
we'll
be
able
to
make
some
recommendations
about
the
best
practices
as
it
relates
to
human
rights
and
what
we
consider
our
peer
cities,
so
I
will
leave
it
there.
J
All
right,
thank
you,
okay,
so
the
next
group
I
have
a
re
action
plan
for
is
the
policy
and
legislation.
J
H
So
for
the
policy
and
legislation
for
us
we
have
that
our
objective
is
to
determine
the
current
or
proposed,
enabling
or
prohibiting
local
or
state
law,
as
it
relates
to
the
hrc
for
our
indicators.
Just
because
as
policy
and
legislation
there's
really
not
much,
we
can
do
other
than
you
know.
H
We
have
the
statute
or
the
I
should
say
the
framework
or
we
don't
that's
really
our
end
goal
so
right
now,
ours
is
kind
of
broad
in
that
we
have
statutory
and
administrator
frameworks
researched
and
made
available,
and
then
we
have
statutory
administrative
frameworks
researched
and
proposed
for
the
city
of
oklahoma,
city,
human
rights,
commission
and
city
of
oklahoma
city
with
that
we
did
not
go
too
far
in
our
action
plan
as
far
as
dates
go
only
because
our
specific
committee
will
need
to
be
very
reciprocal,
and
this
is
just
sort
of
an
fyi
to
everyone.
H
H
But
that
said,
we
are
at
least
sort
of
getting
to
high
levels
in
that
we
are
going
to
be
researching
protected
classes
in
quote-unquote
places
of
rights.
So
you
know
public
accommodations
things.
You
know
environmental
justice
things
like
that
human
rights,
commission
structures,
sort
of
sort
of
you
know
like
you
guys
are
you
all
are
doing
and
I'm
sure
some
of
what
we'll
find
will
come
from
there
and
we'll
share
what
we
find
as
well
and
then
with
that.
H
H
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you,
yes
and
then
just
in
case
anyone
missed
it.
Sorry
we
are
also
gonna,
be
making
sure
just
the
enforcement
pieces
is
a
very
important
aspect,
so
we'll
also
be
researching
a
little
bit
with
that
of
how
people
ensure
that
whatever
they've
done
is
actually
enforced
and
then
just
as
far
as
authority
goes,
you
know,
relationship
of
human
rights
involved
agencies,
whether
that's
the
ag
or
not.
H
We
do
have
some
clarifying
questions,
but
those
will
be
more
offline
that
we
need
to
find
out
and
then
just
as
far
as
you
know
how
far
our
role
might
go
and
then
and
then
we're
also
going
to
research,
the
former
city
of
oklahoma
city
statute,
that
had
the
human
rights
commission
in
it
just
as
sort
of
not
to
say
that
we're
going
to
use
that
you
know
copy
and
paste,
but
you
know
it
has,
has
already
been
in
there
past,
all
the
legalese
etc.
H
So
it
is
nice
to
know
what
the
quote
unquote
base
would
look
like
other
than
that
our
plan
is
to
have
a
quote-unquote
broad
goal.
Don't
worry,
we'll
think
of
a
better
version,
but
a
a
broad
proposed
framework
that
is
sort
of
our
end
goal
that
encapsulates
everything
we
think
truly
needs
to
be
addressed
within
human
rights.
H
Whether
we
are
able
to
put
that
in
statute
or
not
and
then
a
and
then
we'll
have
a
tailored
like
taken
from
that.
We'll
have
a
sort
of
tailored
proposal
that
we
know
for
a
fact
can
work
within
the
legal
confines
that
we
have
as
a
human
rights
commission.
A
Okay,
I
know
we
have
some
hands
raised,
miss
jane,
so
I
do
want
to
before
we
go
to
the
first.
The
second
two
see
just
see.
If
we
have
any
questions,
I
know
we
had
questions
for
maybe
the
first
two
combined,
so
I
don't
want
to
get
too
far
ahead.
If
we
before
we
answer
those
questions
and
I
see
hands
raised
and
I
would
like
to
make
sure
I
get
them
chardet.
K
I'm
well
so.
My
question
is
that
I
received
an
email
saying
that
I
was
supposed
to
participate
in
the
policy
and
legislation
meetings
working
group,
but
I
never
received
like
a
zoom
invite.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
can
participate
in
the
next
group
of
working
sessions.
A
Yes,
ma'am
well
make
sure
I
have
a
correct
email
for
you
and
I'll.
If
you'll
text
me
your
email
address,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
what
we
have
recorded
we'll
make
it
in
the
conversation
and
we'll
have
david.
If
you
don't
mind,
we'll
have
you
reach
out
and
we
can
connect
to
to
play
our
day
where
we
need
to
in
in
this
group.
I
Yes,
you
david,
you
mentioned
something
about
collaborating
with,
I
guess
the
status
of
human
rights
in
the
city
group,
because
you
had
mentioned
something
about
looking
at
what
the
policies
may
have
been
in
the
past,
is
that
your
intent.
H
So
I'm
not
understand
sure
I
understand
your
questions.
I
There's
a
group,
another
working
group
called
the
status
of
human
rights
in
the
city,
I'm
not
sure
if
that
was
part
of
their
their
mission,
or
was
that
some
was
what
you
were
talking
about
in
terms
of
previous
policies
separate
from
the
I
guess,
the
question
would
probably
go
to
you
councilwoman
nice,
where
the
status
of
human
rights
in
the
city
was
different
in
terms
of
looking
at
previously
previous
policies.
H
So
it
was
more
just
for
that
specific
piece.
It
was
more
just
knowing
that
we
would
have
an
actual
actual
language
that
we
could
use
and
understand
how
it
worked.
We
would
just
look
at
the
four,
the
former.
Basically,
you
know
law
around
how
the
human
rights
commission
was
actually
established
for
us,
and
then
we
would
just
like.
H
I
said
we
would
have
that
as
more
like
a
sort
of
a
draft
that
we
would
edit
ourselves
while
we're
waiting
to
you
know
to
establish
all
that
we
to
establish
all
that
we
do
through
our
committee
through
working
with
other
committee
members.
Things
like
that
and
waiting
on.
Basically
you
know,
city
attorneys,
to
you
know,
actually
write
the
language
for
real.
I
A
L
Hi
everyone,
it's
jason
henderson,
so
we
met
on
tuesday
to
go
over
our
plan
of
action
there.
So
we're
going
to
basically
use
the
tulsa
quality
indicators
and
kind
of
mirror
their
framework
on.
What's
been
done.
There
we
kind
of
broke
into
different
markets
because
it
is
a
broad
spectrum.
It
does
cover
housing,
education,
public
health,
economic
opportunities,
justice
and
then
services
across
the
board.
L
We're
doing
individual
research
to
see
what
indicators
we
have
in
the
city
today
within
a
five-year
window
of
current
data
and
building
from
that,
so
we
really
get
into
those
things
there
is
if
you've,
if
you
all,
haven't
heard
of
the
tulsa
equality
indicators,
it's
a
very
broad,
robust
website
that
they
spent
a
ton
of
money.
L
On
that
I
know
we
don't
have
the
resources
for,
but
we're
trying
to
see
what
we
can
do
to
kind
of
mirror
that,
because
there
is
some
great
resources
there,
that
could
be
a
good
blanket
for
the
entire
city
to
target
different
areas
that
would
touch
all
markets
there.
So
we're
going
to
meet
in
a
couple
weeks
again
to
go
over
those
kind
of
things.
J
Okay
and
then
the
last
group
is
the
working
relationships
group.
D
Good
evening
everyone,
so
we,
our
objective,
we
decided-
was
to
establish
interagency
understanding,
as
it
relates
to
education,
investigation
and
enforcement
of
hr
related
matters.
Dr
benjamin
mentioned
earlier
during
her
presentation
that
there
were
several
comments.
I
think
in
the
questionnaires
about
hey.
Are
we
going
to
expand
the
scope
of
what
a
potential
hrc
could
do?
So
that
is
something
that
could
also
be
altered?
I
guess
in
what
we
look
at
so
our
indicators.
D
We
wanted
to
first
develop
an
internal
type
of
matrix
or
an
evaluation
checklist
for
these
identified
agencies,
and
we
did
that
we
identified
basically
a
handful
of
agencies
and
we
want
to
further
examine
the
depth
of
their
relationship
so
that
commitment
from
the
agency.
What
does
that
look
like
how
many
cases
have
been
brought
to
hr?
D
Mainly?
What
does
resolution
look
like
because
a
number
of
cases
could
be
brought
or
a
number
of
issues,
but
what
happens?
Do
they
stall
out?
What
is
what
is
their
process?
What
does
resolution
look
like
evaluation
of
each
of
those
agencies
that
we
identify
at
what
is
their
overall
human
rights
response?
Do
they
have
sops?
Do
they
have
so
standard
operating
procedures?
Do
they
have
some
type
of
formal
identified
hr
education?
D
Is
there
a
handbook?
Is
there
maybe
for
lack
of
a
better
term,
an
ombudsman
person
in
a
role
in
their
in
that
agency
or
in
that
job?
What
else
did
we
think
about?
We
wanted
to
be
sure
that
we
were,
if
necessary,
educating
employers
on
laws.
D
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
had
the
a
matrix
of
best
practices
and
what
I
like
to
call
a
bingo
card
of
sorts
to
kind
of
check
off
what
they
do
and
what
they
don't
do,
and
we
also
wanted
to,
let's
see
one
of
our
indicators
we
want
to
get
in
touch
with
the
different
agencies
for
data
definitely
eeoc,
but
also
get
with
non-profits.
D
I
think
we
did
also
highlight
a
the
center
for
community
and
justice
in
tulsa.
D
D
To
achieve
that
objective,
like
we
said
identifying
these
agencies,
we
want
to
determine
the
scope
of
work
for
each
agency
and
the
key
points
of
contact,
develop,
that
internal
matrix
or
evaluation
checklist
again,
a
bingo
card
for
us
and
then
lastly,
possibly
finalize
that
objective
with
an
executive
summary
that
synthesizes
everything
that
we
did
in
the
steps
that
we
took.
A
Thank
you,
dr
angel.
Are
there
any
overall
questions,
and
thank
you
all
because
these
obviously
we
are
ready
to
do
the
work
and-
and
we
have
a
lot
of
work
to
do
and
that
that
shows
from
the
presentations
from
our
working
groups
and
thank
you
all
and
we'll
make
sure
for
those
who
were
not
able
to
participate
in
the
last
one
that
you
will
be
a
part
of
the
next
conversation
and
going
forward.
A
So
again,
us
miss
ayanna.
I
I
just
had
one
quick
question:
when
you
were
talking
about
the
agencies,
you
were
going
to
look
at
was
the
department
of
commerce,
because
I
at
one
point
I
understand
there
was
a
some
designation
around
contracts
being
given
out
to
in
some
equitable
way,
as
it
were,
was
the
department
of
commerce
down
your
list
by
chance.
I
I
don't
know
who
gives
out,
I
don't
know
who
gives
out
the
contract
money,
but
I
would
think
the
department
of
commerce
would
be
maybe
could
possibly
be
at
the
top
of
the
list
in
terms
of
who
gets
what
in
terms
of
major
contracts-
and
you
know
I
understand
they
did
away
with
that.
At
one
point,
maybe
one
of
the
other
committees
was
going
to
look
at
that
as
it
relates
to
the
economic
component.
That's
what
I
was
concerned
about.
M
D
A
All
right,
I
have
members
members
to
be
heard.
Do
we
have
any
members
that
would
like
to
be
heard?
Please
unmute
and
I
see
david
hall
first.
That's
the
one
hand
that
I
do
see
if
they're
anymore,
please
mute
and
speak
afterwards.
H
I
just
wanted
to
say-
and
I
I
can
just
maybe
go
through
jane-
to
make
it
easier
on
everyone,
but
I
just
want
to
say,
like
I
said,
we're
our
policy
legislation
is
going
to
need
to
be
much
more
reciprocal
for
sure
with
other
groups.
So
just
know
that
after
you
guys
meet
that
in
the
future
and
I'll
again
I'll
get
all
this
sorted
out
myself.
H
But
you
guys
me
it'd
be
great
if
we
could
just
receive
your
notes
after
so
that
way
we
can
sort
of
have
that
feedback
loop,
and
I
promise
I
won't
bug
you
unless
we
actually
have
questions
about
it.
I
I
have
I
do
have.
I
do
have
one
thing
to
say:
I
just
want
to
congratulate
all
the
different
working
groups.
They've
been
working
like
little
beavers,
and
so
congratulations,
and
also
to
you,
a
councilwoman
and
dr
benjamin,
I'm
so
happy
that
I'm
a
around
a
bunch
of
smart
people.
That
makes
me
warm
my
heart.
A
A
Okay,
I
know
we
had
do.
We
have
any
public
comment.
A
A
And
again,
thank
you
for
all
of
your
dedication
and
work
because,
as
you
see,
this
is
going
to
to
need
our
dedication
in
order
for
us
to
ensure
that
we
are
protecting
the
human
rights
of
of
our
city
and
to
protect
everyone
that
comes
to
our
city
and
decides
to
call
it
home.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
doing
that.
So
thank
you
for
all
of
your
dedication
and
your
work,
dr
benjamin,
do
you
have
anything
before
we?
Let
everyone
go.
C
Yeah,
I
I
do
want
to
see
if
mariana
wants
to
say
anything
since
she
just
hopped
on,
but
also
if
for
some
reason,
I
know
we.
If,
if
you
didn't,
receive
an
email
about
what
working
group
you're
in
please
email
me,
my
email
is
a
benjamin59,
gmail.com
or
contact
jane.
You
know
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
people
were
aware-
and
I
know
within
each
working
group-
please
be
on
the
lookout
for
an
email
from
your
new
co.
N
Apologize,
I
had
a
conflict
this
evening,
but
I'm
really
excited.
I
touched
base
with
several
working
group
members
across
the
different
work
groups
and
it
sounds
like
you
all-
were
really
productive
and
able
to
provide
some
meaningful
contributions.
So
I
just
look
forward
to
what
comes
from
the
work
groups
and
the
task
force.
C
I
see
anna
harmon
has
her
hand
raised.
Is
that
a
question,
and
I
also
see
oh
someone,
someone
else
put
their
hands
down.
I'm
sorry.
G
I
had
a
question.
I
was
wondering
if
there
was
anyone
that
can
provide
notes.
You
know,
because
when
I'm
watching
the
interpreter
on
the
computer,
it's
hard
for
me
to
get
notes.
So
is
there
any
way
I
could
get
a
copy
of
notes.
G
G
H
No
ma'am,
that
was
a
mistake.
I'm
sorry.
A
I
Could
I
make
one
announcement
right,
quick
for
all
the
groups?
I
just
want
to
encourage
you
to
encourage
your
organizations
to
continue
to
register
the
vote.
I
know
this
is
a
human
rights
meeting,
but
we're
getting
closer
to
the
election
and
it's
so
important
that
everybody
is
registered
all
over
the
city.
I
What
lies
between
us,
which
is
one
of
the
groups
I
represent,
we
launched
a
campaign
called
make
your
vote
count,
and
so
you
should
you
possibly
saw
yard
signs
all
over
the
city,
just
encouraging
people
as
well,
as
you
know,
flyers
around
town
with
the
churches,
the
mosque
and
the
synagogues,
and
I
wanted
to
say,
tell
councilwoman
nice
that
you
know
com,
congratulate
you
on
the
work
of
trying
to
get
people
to
the
polls,
that's
so
important,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
announcement.
I
My
final
announcement
is
between
now
and
the
time
we
meet
again.
I
will
be
turning
70.
so
I'll,
be
accepting
congratulatory
messages,
gifts,
money
for
the
whole
month
of
october.
I
A
Abs,
absolutely
2020
has
helped
us
realize.
A
lot
of
things
are
very
precious,
including
you
turning
70..
So
thank
you
for
sharing.
We
wish
you
a
beautiful
birthday
next
month,
so
we'll
sing
and
what
everybody
will
have
our
party
hats
on
for
next
month,
all
right
y'all,
it's
time
to
go
so.