►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
B
E
G
G
Okay,
well,
if
they
don't
appear,
when
called
we
can
move
that
to
the
end.
Okay,
we
go
to
everyone.
H
G
Looks
like
we're
recording
cindy.
We
ready
to
begin.
G
All
right
welcome
everyone
to
the
oklahoma
city
board
of
adjustment
meeting.
For
I'm
sure
we
have
the
right
date
here
september,
17
2020,
which
is
now
called
to
order.
If
the
meeting
is
disconnected
at
any
time,
it'll
be
stopped
and
reconvened
once
a
connection
is
restored.
G
If
a
connection
cannot
be
restored
within
30
minutes,
the
remaining
items
under
consideration
will
be
continued
to
the
next
regularly
scheduled
board
of
adjustment.
Meeting
the
agenda
and
documents
are
located
at
okc.gov
for
anyone
to
wishing
to
speak
on
an
agenda
item
or
to
speak
under
citizens
to
be
heard,
hopefully
have
previously
notified
staff
by
phone
or
email,
and
I
will
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time
to
speak.
G
We
will
call
the
case
and
I'll
recognize
the
applicant
or
representative
that's
signed
up
to
speak
then
we'll
recognize
any
protests
and
return
with
the
applicant
and
board
deliberations
board.
Members
are
able
to
ask
questions
or
make
comments
at
any
time.
We
ask
that
all
other
people
that
are
on
the
line
keep
your
device
on
mute
until
you're
called
upon
to
speak.
G
G
So
we
need
to
hear
both
both
people
in
order
to
have
an
adequate
record.
So
please
only
one
person
speaking
at
a
time
and
please
don't
interrupt
board
members
while
they're
speaking
looks
like
this
is
being
recorded
now,
so
we're
good
there.
The
meeting
is
called
to
order
and
cindy.
Can
we
call
the
role?
Please.
I
G
H
I
H
B
We
have
three
items
today
for
continuance
item
five:
fourteen
seven:
seventy
four
defer
to
october
first
item
6
14
741
to
october
15th
and
item
7
14
729
to
october
15th.
G
Okay,
hearing
none
I
had.
I
did
notice
that
a
few
of
these
have
been
continued
several
times.
One
of
them
looks
like
they're
trying
to
deal
with
one
of
the
protests
and
then
the
other
one.
I
don't
the
other
ones.
I
don't
really
see
so
at
some
point.
We
might
want
to
have
the
applicants
in
here
just
to
explain
the
repeated
continuances,
but
I'm
okay
with
these
so
far
jj,
do
you
have
any
light
on
these
jj
or
cindy.
G
G
Okay,
yeah
I'm
okay
with
kind
of
one
more,
but
I
think
it's
getting
about
time
where
we
need
to
to
hear
what's
taking
so
long.
I
didn't
hear
anyone
on
the
line
that
wanted
to
speak
on
these
so
board
members.
I
think
we're
able
to
receive
a
motion.
G
D
F
H
G
G
G
B
D
Yes,
and
thank
you
guys
for
hearing
me,
my
wife,
taylor
and
I
have
lived
at
the
property
at
844
northwest
49th
street
for
over
seven
years.
We
recently
purchased
another
home
and
would
like
to
offer
home
sharing
at
this
property.
D
G
Okay,
mr
phillips,
how
long
were
you
seeking
a
special
exception.
G
So
the
code
allows
us
to
do
up
to
10
years,
although
we
have
not
granted
any
of
these
up
to
10
years,
just
because
it's
a
very
new
code
provision
and
we're
kind
of
seeing
how
it
shakes
out
this.
I
agree
with
you.
It
seems
like
a
good
area
for
home
sharing.
The
one
kind
of
question
I
had
is:
if
you
could,
the
board
has
the
power
to
add
any
restrictions
that
we
think
are
appropriate,
given
a
particular
application
for
this
one.
D
Yes,
and
actually
we
we
did
address
that
in
our
airbnb
posting,
so
they
have
two
spaces
in
the
driveway
and
garage
access
as
well,
and
what
we
planned
on
doing
in
light
of
some
concerns,
we
we're
gonna,
really
try
and
ban
street
parking.
We
wanna
we
wanna
kind
of
take
that
away,
especially
if
we're
gonna
have
folks
come
in.
D
You
know
for
a
limited
basis,
so
they
should
have
at
least
two
possibly
three
full
spaces,
depending
on
what
kind
of
vehicle
and
then
we're
just
gonna
write
stipulate
in
our
posting
that
street
parking
is
prohibited
to
make
sure
that
it's
free-flowing.
G
Okay,
that
was
gonna,
be
my
question.
If,
if
you
could
one
of
the
conditions
that
we
do
often,
it
sounds
like
you've
seen
a
couple
of
these
board
meetings,
but
in
some
areas
we
we
add
a
condition
that
it
needs
to
be
advertised
as
street
parking
only,
and
so,
if
you're
willing
to
add
that,
I
think
we
can
add
that
to
the
to
the
list
of
things,
and
I
can
support
this
application,
but
I'm
only
one
board,
member,
so
board
members.
Any
questions
or
comments
of
the
applicant.
G
G
Okay,
hearing
none
board
members
I
could
get
on
board
with,
I
think
four
to
five
years.
I
don't
know
what
your
temperature
is
on
the
temporal
limitation,
but
that's
kind
of
what
I
think
in
this
area
and
and
given
this
application,
they're
going
to
live
nearby,
and
I
could
see
four
to
five
years.
F
All
right
that'll,
be
my
motion
approve
a
special
exception
or
sorry
yeah
for
case
number,
one
four,
seven,
seven,
seven
for
a
period
of
five
years.
G
B
C
G
A
Yes,
my
name
is
caitlin
diesen.
I
work
with
lifetime
homes,
we're
basically
just
filing
a
variance
full
side
yard
setbox
of
25
feet,
and
since
this
is
a
well
and
septic
property,
we
want
to
apply
the
setbacks
that
are
set
on
the
site
plan.
As.
A
A
A
F
Is
it
a
developable.
A
F
G
So
on
the
south,
they
won't,
you
don't
think
it's
developable,
but
I
think
my
my
issue
is
probably
the
north,
the
south,
not
so
much
just
because
it
didn't
look
like
anything
clear
would
be
developed
and
but
on
the
north
it
certainly
looks
like
someone
could
and
you'd
be
right
there,
a
few
feet
from
their
property
line.
So.
A
Yeah,
it's
it's
a
pretty
big
drop
off
on
the
north
side
of
that
house,
so
the
the
two
levels
of
the
lots
are
fairly
different.
So
it's
not
something
that
I
think
would
continue
to
pose
an
issue,
especially
since
their
private
lines
there
wouldn't
be
anyone
going
between
the
homes
except
for
the
homeowners.
So.
G
Yeah,
I
mean
I'll
kind
of
tell
you
where
I'm
sitting,
I'm
only
one
board
member,
but
I
don't
really
have
an
issue
with
that
south
of
variance
to
the
south
as.
L
A
How
much,
how
much
more
do
you
think
would
would
qualify
us
for
the
variance
we
can
slide
the
house
to
the
south,
since
we
have
an
area
that
probably
will
not
be
developed
to
the
south,
and
that
way
that
would
give
us
a
little
bit
more
room
on
the
north
side
of
the
property.
A
On
the
south
side,
I
mean
we
could
move
it
over
about
four
feet
and
we
could
deal
more
with
a
smaller
or
a
smaller
setback
on
the
south
side.
Since
that
area
cannot
be
developed
and
there
would
be
a
greater
space
between
the
house
that
we're
proposing
and
a
potential
house
on
that
south
corner,
and
then
that
would
create
a
bigger
setback.
On
that
north
side.
To
create
more
of
a
distance
between
the
house
that
currently
sits
there
and
the
house
that
we're
proposing.
H
A
On
the
south
side,
we
just
right.
K
K
F
B
B
Pipelines
or
a
electric
substation.
F
It's
still
not
it's
still
a
big
variance.
A
I
think
the
the
the
biggest
thing
that
we
would
like
to
bring
into
play
at
this
point
is
there
is
access
to
the
back
of
that
lot.
You
can
see
it
off
of
122nd
at
the
back
part
of
that
property.
There
is
an
access
road
that
will
go
back
there
to
the
back
of
the
property,
so
there
is
a
way
to
get
back
there
without
going
through
the
side,
setbacks.
G
A
But
if
we
were,
I
mean
no
matter
how
far
back
we
go.
It's
that
house
is
going
to
it's
going
to
be
that
ranch
style,
because
the
home
buyers
want
to
build
out
not
up,
because
this
is
going
to
be
their
home
for
an
extended
number
of
years,
and
so
stairs
is
not
really
an
option
at
this
point,
because
that's
really
the
only
the
only
way
that
we
could
build
a
house
on
this
lot
is
if
we
were
to
go
up
to
a
second
story.
G
Yeah,
I
didn't
want
to
suggest
that,
but
that's
that's.
The
only
conclusion
I
kind
of
saw
as
well
is
just
a
different
style
house,
like
maybe
that
style
house
just
isn't
going
to
work
on
this
piece
of
land
and
I
understand
moving
it
back,
isn't
going
to
help,
but
you
know
east
to
west,
isn't
really
your
issue.
Your
issue
is
the
width
going
north
to
south.
C
G
G
G
G
G
G
Yeah
you
or
someone
else
in
the
future,
you
know
maybe
has
a
crazy
idea
to
make
that
piece
work,
but
because
of
what
we're
doing
here
with
this
variance,
it
might
interrupt
that.
You
know
something
like
that,
but
just
some
more
information
on
that
and
then
the
key
here
is
one
of
the
elements
that
we
have
to
find.
Is
that
the
variance
that
we
grant
is
the
minimum
necessary?
A
G
Okay,
maya
was
continuance
to
the
october.
The
next
october
meeting
gonna
be
okay
for
your
purposes.
That's.
G
G
G
L
We
have
been
working
on
a
backyard
development
plan
which
includes
a
yeah
you're
on
the
aerial
view
there.
Basically,
as
it
sits
right
now,
there's
there's
really
nothing
in
our
backyard,
but
we
are
proposing
to
build
a
a
shop
large
enough
that
we
can
store
an
rv,
and
then
we
have
very
little
shade.
As
you
can
see
from
this
ariel,
there
are
very
little
trees
in
the
neighborhood
and
the
ground
is
a
pretty
poor.
L
To
my
knowledge,
the
1250
square
foot,
maximum,
you
know
includes
all
structures,
even
playground,
equipment,
etc.
In
terms
of
the
side
yard
setback.
You
can
see
that
this
is
a
somewhat
high
shaped
lot.
L
We
would
like
to
be
able
to
drive
around
side
of
the
house
with
enough
clearance
if
you'll
go
back
to
the
3d
view,
I'll
I'll
point
out
back
back
one
side.
L
While
it's
not
there
yet,
we
would
like
to
also
put
a
home
generator
with
the
house,
and
the
panel
is,
is
there
on
the
west
side
of
the
property?
So
it's
really
about
the
only
place
that
we
could
put
the
generator
which
which
and
also
the
gas
meter
is
on
the
side
of
the
house.
L
L
F
L
Yeah,
so
if,
if
you'll,
the
staff
report
indicates
that
we
have
already
received
a
revocable
permit
there,
while
there
is
an
easement
there,
there
are
no
utilities
in
it.
This
was
the
edge
of
the
phase,
one
and
phase
two
edition,
so
I
believe
the
engineers
when
they
made
the
flat.
You
know
they
just
put
an
easement
along
the
border
between
phase
one
and
phase
two,
but
that
is
an
unused
easement
and
we've
received
no
objection
from
any
of
the
utility
companies.
With
this
proposal.
G
G
G
it
just,
I
think
I
needed
to
hear
why
it
seems
like
you're,
pretty
close
to
being
able
to
meet
that
setback.
So
I'm
wondering
why
you
couldn't
kind
of
rotate
that
building
and
follow
that
setback
line
and
not
get
a
variance
for
that.
L
So
I
wish
I
had
control
of
a
pointer,
but
but
essentially
the
further.
We
move
this
building
to
the
west.
The
garage
door
starts
getting
behind
the
corner
of
the
house
and
not
only
behind
the
corner
of
the
house.
L
So
that
that
creates
an
obstacle
in
itself
and
so
basically
any
any
further,
we
move
it
west
it'll
make
it
more
challenging
to
pull
a
large
vehicle
in
and
out
of
that
building.
I
I
played
with
this
for
probably
two
months
and
I
I
actually
drew
these
plants
myself
and
I've.
I
worked
with
physician
for
for
quite
some
time
to
try
to
try
to
find
the
best
position.
L
I
have
yes
and
I
I
have
talked
to
everyone
and
I
in
the
in
the
attachments
that
precedes
this.
I've
received
signatures
from
just
about
everyone
surrounding
me
in
approval
of
this
application,
with,
with
the
exception
of
juan.
L
So,
okay,
let's
stop
right
there.
One
thing
I
didn't
see
in
the
staff
report
that
I've
seen
in
some
other
staff
reports
is
kind
of
a
reference
to
the
area.
These
are
just
the
properties
that
I've
identified.
You
know
within
my
vicinity
that
are
also
exceeding
the
current
standards.
So
that's
just
more
of
a
visual
reference.
L
So
the
protest
letter
from
mr
mccaslin
states
something
along
the
lines
of
crowding
his
property
line
if
you'll
notice,
his
property
line
only
abuts
my
property
at
the
very
rear.
This
building
is
planned
to
be
four
to
that
corner.
L
So
I'm
I'm
really
not
beside
his
property
line.
I
mean
I
I
am
at
the
corner
of
it,
but
it
will
be
the
very
very
corner.
You
know
his
his
current.
His
his
concern
was
not
wanting
to
be
able
to
see
my
building.
L
He
has
a
building
himself
of
which
blocks
his
own
view
of
my
property
and
that's
what
I'm
displaying
here
and
I
actually
have
some
slides
looking
from
my
property
back
to
his,
if
you'll
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
the
picture
in
the
upper
right
hand
corner
is
basically
the
view
from
the
rear
of
my
property
towards
his
house,
and
essentially,
all
you
see
is
his
accessory
building
the
view
at
the
bottom
right
hand,
corner
is
a
view
from
essentially
the
middle
of
where
the
shop
would
be
and
and
that's
the
view
I
mean
you
potentially
see
some
trees
that
are
in
poor
condition
and
and
again
his
accessory
building.
L
And
I
was
just
going
to
point
out.
I
that
the
the
view
there
to
the
left
and
one
of
the
statutes
in
the
code
is
that
the
accessory
building
should
not
be
taller
than
the
house.
L
His
building
is,
in
my
opinion,
taller
than
his
house,
so
I
just
kind
of
find
it
ironic
that
he's
protesting
my
application
when
he
himself
is
potentially
in
violation.
G
Yeah-
and
I
will
say,
there's
some
comments
in
that
packet-
that
we've
received
that
kind
of
call
out
neighbors
call
out
neighbors
for
violations.
We
don't
know
anything
about
what
went
into
those.
He
may
have
a
variance
he
that
might
be
properly
within.
He
might
have
a
spud,
I
don't
know,
but.
F
G
But
you.
G
L
But
I
can
also
say
if
you
go
back
to
you,
go
back
to
that.
L
Go
back
a
couple
of
slides
with
you
please
now,
I'm
sorry,
one
four.
L
Two:
two:
okay,
yep,
sorry
back
right
there,
these
these
aren't
numbered
back
one,
please
right
here,
so
the
property
owner
that
this
west
line
affects
the
most
is
mr
pennington
who
lives
there
at
the
corner
of
sundance
in
107..
L
G
Most
one
of
the
issues
that
stuck
out
to
me
on
this
was
this-
is
this
would
be
a
pretty
massive
variance
to
the
know.
I
mean
it's
almost
200
percent
of
the
lot
coverage
that's
allowed.
So
if.
L
I
I
understand
that
the
majority
of
that
is
a
pergola
and
a
patio
and
playground
equipment.
The
size
of
the
shop
itself
is
only,
I
believe,
roughly
50
square
feet.
L
The
the
rest
of
it
is
structures
which
are
mostly
air
and-
and
you
see,
and
I
mean,
is
not
uncommon
in
this
area
or
other
areas.
B
Out
of
the
application,
okay,
yeah
they're
structures,
but
for
this
for
your
consideration,
I
took
them
out
the
large
animal
enclosure.
I
wasn't
sure
what
that
was,
so
I
left
it
in
and
then
I
noted
that
the
pergola
and
the
patio,
although
under
roof
and
constitute
a
structure,
are
open
and
not
enclosed.
F
G
I
mean,
I
think,
the
the
best
argument
that
they've
got
would
be
to
try
to
have
us
ignore
the
pergola,
which
would
knock
off
almost
a
thousand
square
feet
and
then
maybe
disregard
the
covered
patio,
because
it's
open
on
three
sides
so
that
knocks
off
almost
another
500
feet,
but
under
the
tournaments
of
the
code,
as
jj's
noted,
I
mean
we
can't
just
ignore
that.
That's
I
think
I.
B
G
Okay,
cindy
did
we
have
anyone
sign
up
to
speak
in
support
of
the
application.
C
I'm
not
sure
if
they're
in
support,
I
do
know
we
have
the
homeowners
association
signed
up.
We
may
just
have
to
ask,
but
I
didn't
have
anyone
signed
up
specifically
for
support.
G
G
Okay,
so
before
we
get
to
that,
I
would
like
to
just
to
keep
it
organized
if
there's
anyone
signed
up
that
intends
to
support
the
application.
G
G
And
I
will
note,
even
if
no
one's
here
to
speak
in
support,
there
are
several
support,
letters
and
and
emails,
and
things
like
that
in
the
record,
so
we're
taking
that
into
consideration.
Now
we'll
move
on
to
anyone,
who's
signed
up
in
protest
and
we'll
start
with
whoever
this
was
that
that
raised
their
hand.
M
Hi
I'm
laura
swingle.
I
am
on
the
hoa
board.
I'm
not
the
hoa
representing.
I
just
I've
listened
to
quite
a
bit
of
this.
The
things
that
I
would
point
out
is
yeah.
That
he's
got.
That
lot
has
plenty
of
room.
I
still
believe
from
looking
at
the
site
plan
that
he
could
make
that
building
work
within
the
space
that
he
has
allowed,
that
those
are.
We
are
on.
M
One
acre
lots,
one
acre
plus
lots,
because
we
want
faith
between
us
and
our
neighbors
and,
having
listened
to
his
critique
of
the
one
protest
from
the
neighbor
he's
only
taking
into
account
the
view
from
the
person's
patio
he's
not
taking
into
account
the
view
from
their
lot
and,
if
they're,
in
their
backyard,
trying
to
enjoy
their
backyard
they've
got
building
closer
than
it's
supposed
to
be.
M
At
this
time
he
has
not
received
approval
from
the
board
our
bigger
issue.
One
of
our
issues
would
be
and
again
our
rhoa
replica.
We
do
not
allow
large
animals
for
our
covenants,
and
so
he
has
not
even
informed
the
board
of
his
intent
to
build
a
large
animal
filter.
M
G
J
G
Now
we'll
get
through
all
the
protests
first
and
then
we'll
get
back.
L
L
J
My
name
is
laverne
strow,
I'm
the
vice
president
of
the
homeowners
association
and
the
president
couldn't
make
it
today,
so
I'm
filling
in
for
him.
J
F
Does
your
hoa
require
homeowners
to
submit
plans
before
they
build
on
their
lot
or
yes,.
J
F
J
G
Oh
I'm,
I'm
I'm
mentioning
the
actual
variants
we
would
grant
if
we
approve
the
application.
F
L
C
G
Okay,
cindy,
do
you
have
anyone
else
signed
up
to
speak,
but.
C
G
G
L
G
L
Okay,
well,
I'm
just
going
to
point
out
that
I
I
don't
know
we're
miss
swingle
lives,
but
basically
all
but
one
of
my
immediate
surrounding
neighbors
have
signed
off
on
this
proposal.
L
She
mentioned
that
the
covenants
does
not
allow
any
large
animals
well.
Well.
Okay,
I'd
like
to
back
up
one
statement.
I
asked
cindy
if
I
could
submit
the
covenants
and
bylaws
as
background
to
this
application,
and
I
was
told
that
the
board
doesn't
really
get
into
disputes
between
the
property
owner
and
the
hoa.
L
However,
since
it
has
been
said
that
no
large
animals
are
in
the
covenants
that
that
is
not
accurate
item
15
in
the
covenants
specifically
says,
only
one
horse
shall
be
kept
on
any
of
the
lots
and
sundance
lakes.
So
I
I'm
I'm
not
sure
where
that
comment
is
coming.
L
L
G
Yeah
I've
got
some
kind
of
larger
concerns
so
far,
so
I'll
voice
those
and
then
we
can
see
what
the
board
you
know
see
what
other
opinions
the
board
has.
But
for
me
I,
my
thought
with
this.
The
whole
time
was
the
biggest
problem.
You'd
have
is
the
hardship
issue,
and
you
know,
as
I
mentioned,
on
the
prior
application
generally
a
hard.
G
You
know
the
easiest
case
for
hardship
is
maybe
if
the
code
is
changed
and
you're
no
longer
in
in
compliance
or
something
like
that,
through
no
fault
of
your
own,
you
know
wanting
a
pergola
is
generally
not
a
hardship.
You
know
wanting
a
pool
is
generally
not
a
hardship.
Well,
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
content
in
our
packet
that
people
should
be
able
to
do
what
they
want
with
their
land
and
all
that-
and
I
completely
understand
I
completely.
G
I
just
don't
know
that
this
board
is
your
remedy
for
that
issue.
You
know.
Obviously
you
still
have
to
comply
with
the
city
codes
with
whatever
you
want
to
do
with
your
land.
I
just
think
our
board
is.
We
have
very
narrow
powers.
G
We
can
grant
kind
of
very
small
variances
here
and
there
for
things
that
hit
the
statutory
elements.
This
to
me
seems
like
a
major
deviation
from
the
code
and
from
what
our
normal
allowances
are
in
these
types
of
cases.
So
you
know
if
you're
looking
for
a
couple
feet
over
variance
and
you've
got
a
good
reason.
G
It's
a
normal
case
for
a
variance
here,
you're
looking
for
again
almost
200
percent
of
the
lot
coverage
for
a
variance
that
would
be
the
largest
variance
that
I
can
think
of
that
I've
ever
seen
in
application,
the
setback
variants,
I
could
probably
get
on
board.
I
think
I
agree
with
mr
privit
that
probably
five
feet
and
that's
it.
G
You
know
I
I'm
struggling
on
this
one.
I
think
this
might
be
a
planning
commission
issue
or
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
issue.
For
me
personally,
I
hate
to
defer
things
to
mr
privet
all
the
time
in
planning
commission,
but
that
looks
like
kind
of
where
I'm
going
on
this
so
far.
Unless
there's
some
substantial
changes
well,.
G
Yeah
not
really
an
issue
yeah.
G
I'd
also
think
one
of
the
at
least
one
of
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors
could
be
alleviated
with
the
stormwater
and
the
flooding
issue,
using
some
permeable
substance
there
instead
of
concrete.
I
think
that
can
help.
But
that's
again
I
mean
you
could
modify
your
application
here,
but
that's
just
a
minor
issue,
but
I'll
just
throw
that
in
there
while
we're
talking
about
things,
but
that's
all
right.
Any
board
members
with
questions
or
comments.
H
Yeah,
my
thought
is,
I
hate
for
mr
craig
to
have
a
denial,
because
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
going
if
he
would
like
the
opportunity
to
try
and
rework
this
and
submit
a
different
site
plan,
make
it
a
little
bit
smaller
a
little
bit
different.
This
is
pretty
substantial
and
I'd
hate
to
give
him
a
denial
without
an
opportunity
to
rework
this.
H
I
Also
I'll
just
jump
in
here
too
and
kind
of
re
reiterate
some
of
the
concerns
that
our
chairman
identified,
but
beyond
that
I
just
you
know
if
you're
trying
to
kind
of
get
a
feel
for
what
the
board
is
thinking
on
this.
If
you
are
thinking
of
reworking
your
application,
I
just
had
a
couple
of
thoughts.
You
know
you've
mentioned
that
you,
this
is
necessary
in
order
to
get
a
large
rv.
I
You
know,
I
think
that
there's
other
options
here,
maybe
you
get
a
smaller
rv,
maybe
you
you
know
that
I
think
some
of
the
other
board
members
have
have
mentioned
some
other
things,
but
to
the
comment
about
you
know,
only
one
neighbor
is
complaining
about
this.
I
think
from
the
larger
community
aspect
this
you
know
these
sorts
of
things,
especially
a
variance
of
this
degree,
isn't
just
impacting
immediate
neighbors
you're
talking
about
the
entire
community
and
there's
clearly,
you
know
several
people
in
the
community
that
are
not
on
board
with
this.
G
I
think
that's
a
good
point.
I
mean,
I
think
the
presidential
value
of
this
is
an
issue
that
I
think
about
as
well,
and
I
know
the
hoa
representative
mentioned
that
as
far
as
you
know,
if
we
grant
this
five
other
neighbors
are
going
to
come
in
and
say,
I'd
love,
a
pool
and
a
pergola
and
a
new
shed
to
work
on
my
cars,
and
you
know
store
it
on
me
and
what
are
we
going
to
say?
Then?
We
have
to
sort
of
grant
that
I
would
think
so.
Mr.
L
Merchant
of
regards
to
that
specific
item,
I
did
find
another
case
number.
I
don't
have
that
in
front
of
me
now,
but
I
had
asked
when,
following
this
application,
if
case
president
had
any
weight-
and
there
is
another
and-
and
I
mean
it
does
appear-
we're
looking
at
a
continuance
which-
which
I'm
fine
with,
but
if
I
can
have
that
case-
number
ready
to
present
it
next
time
I
mean
is:
is
that
something
that
would
sounds
like
it
would
bear
weight
with
y'all.
G
Each
case
stands
on
its
own,
so
we
do
look
at
each
application
independently.
Also
the
board
makeup,
you
know
changes
and
the
city
changes
and
the
city's
initiatives
change
and
all
that
so
I
it
wouldn't,
it
wouldn't
hurt
I'll
put
it
that
way,
just
to
see
maybe
what
the
deliberations
were
in
that
application,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
each
application
kind
of
stands
on
its
own.
I'm
just
more
concerned
about
not
only
this
neighborhood,
but
you
know
every
neighborhood
in
the
city.
G
L
Well-
and
that
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
showed
the
first
map-
you
know,
though
I
mean
within
within
less
than
a
mile
there,
there's
over
a
dozen
that
are
currently
out
of
compliance.
L
G
That
I
know
we,
we
certainly
appreciate
that,
and
I'm
not
saying
you
can't
do
it
or
anything,
I'm
just
saying
the
this
border,
and
this
is
probably
no
fault
of
your
own
city.
The
city
staff
probably
told
you
to
try
out
a
variance
first
and
kind
of
see
what
the
port
of
adjustment
thought
about
it
for
taking
some
other
options.
G
So
again,
again,
not
any
fault
of
your
own,
but
we
just
have
very
limited
powers,
and
I
think
this
currently
kind
of
exceeds
those
powers.
Although
you
know,
planning
commission
might
approve
this
as
as
it's
rendered,
who
knows
so.
They
just
have
more
discretion
than
we
do
on
stuff
like
this.
So
and
I
will
ask
kind
of
jj.
Is
this
something
that
if
he
did
want
to
pursue
plenty
commission,
he
could
potentially
do
that
and
roll
this
application
over
into
that.
B
G
F
G
Well,
I
think,
board
members
any
other
questions
or
comments.
I
The
last
comment
I'll
make
chairman
and
mr
craig
is
that
you
know
you
did
show
us
the
map,
there's
a
lot
of
other
properties
around
there
that
that
you,
as
you
said,
are
out
of
compliance
or
maybe
you've
had
various
granted.
But
what
degree-
and
I
think
that's
kind
of
what
I
am
hearing
is
the
main
issue
here
is
just
the
degree
of
what
you're
requesting
here,
and
so
there
may
have
been
minor
variances
to
those
other
properties.
But
that's
my
last
comment.
G
Yeah,
maybe
they
don't
have
the
pergola
or
they
don't
have
the
pool,
but
they
have
the
shop
building.
You
know
if
you
came
here
with
a
400
square
foot
shop,
building,
request
with
a
minor
variant
and
none
of
the
other
stuff
it'd
be
a
much
different
application,
and
so
you
know
maybe
that's
what
is
the
case
and
some
of
those?
Maybe
those
are
1200
square
foot
shop
buildings
in
those
other
cases
who
knows,
mr
craig
is
two
weeks
or
a
month
or
how
much?
How
long
do
you
think
you
would
need.
L
I
I
would
let's
go
for
a
month.
Okay,
give
me
a
month
to
look
at
it
and.
G
Okay
again,
I
think
working
with
some
of
the
neighbors,
obviously
you're
gonna
have
to
live
there
for
the
foreseeable
future
and
get
along
with
your
neighbors
and
and
all
that,
so
it
seems
like
you're,
pretty
close
to
being
able
to
work
some
things
out
with
your
neighbors
again
that
I
think
you
could
work
with
a
smaller
setback
requirement.
I
think
the
permeable
payment,
I
think,
would
help
the
flooding
thing.
G
Even
if
it's
partial
and
then
spreading
some
of
these
items
out,
you
know
you
might
be
able
to
get
something
to
wherever
all
the
neighbors
agree.
Who
knows
cindy
are
we
meeting
in
a
month.
H
G
G
B
G
G
I've
just
unmuted
you
like
to
present
your
application.
E
Okay,
so
everyone
can
hear
me
now:
yep,
okay,
my
name
is
amanda
labross,
I'm
with
miller
architects,
and
this
is
actually
a
revision
to
the
original
application.
During
the
design
process.
We
came
to
the
conclusion
that
a
larger
generator
was
needed
and
it
was
taller.
So
we
had
to
raise
the
height
from
the
original
accepted
10
feet
to
the
14
feet,
and
then
the
integral
fuel
tank
below
requires
a
special
exception.
G
E
G
Okay,
I
seem
pretty
straightforward
to
me
board
members
any
questions
or
comments.
G
G
H
G
E
G
Okay,
the
next
items
were
continued,
so
we'll
next
move
to
additional
items,
seeing
not
well
board
members
did
you
have
any
additional
items?
G
G
G
G
Set
up
well
good,
I
thought
we'd
save
a
couple
whales
while
we're
here.
So
let's
save
a
little
save
a
little
paper,
so
I
guess
we'll
do
that
going
forward,
but
for
particularly
long
packets.
I
usually
do
like
to
have
a
hard
copy
just
to
mark
them
up,
so
I
might
still
request
one
but.
G
It
sounds
like
we're:
okay,
with
digital
versions,
cindy
or
municipal
counselor.
We
don't
need
emotion
or
anything
for
that
do
we.
G
Yeah,
just
kind
of
an
internal
housekeeping
is
what
I
thought
it
was:
okay,
any
other
business
over
here,
all
right,
we're
adjourned.
Thank
you
thanks.
Everyone.