►
From YouTube: City of Oldsmar 10/28/2020 Board of Adjustment Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
Okay,
this
time
I
like
to
have
the
citizens
open
forum,
anybody
wishing
to
speak
on
any
items
tonight,
nobody
wishing
to
speak
the
open
forum
is
now
closed.
Okay.
Next
item
is
the
agenda
items
I'd
like
to
have
approval
of
the
minutes
stated
august
26
2020.
I'll
make
a
motion
to
approve
that's
second:
okay:
we've
got
two
seconds
all
in
favor,
say
five
by
saying:
hi
hi
hi
gary
doll.
Thank
you
very
much
we're
a
rating
of
variance
20-12,
the
clark
variance.
C
Has
a
zoning
designation
of
rpd
residential
plan
development,
the
city
future
land
use
designation
of
residential
low
it's
located
on
a
cul-de-sac
at
cedar.
Key
court
was
developed
with
a
single
family
resident
that
was
built
in
1984
and
has
an
existing
12
by
34.
Concrete
slab
in
the
backyard
variant's
request
is
for
a
reduction
to
the
rear
yard
setback
from
20
feet
to
10
feet,
to
construct
a
family
room
over
an
existing
concrete
slab
in
the
rpd
residential
plant
development.
C
Zoning
district,
I'd
like
to
add,
had
it
been
a
swimming
pool,
cage
the
applicant
would
not
have
needed
to
come
to
the
board
of
adjustment
for
pools
and
cages
are
permitted
to
be
10
feet
from
the
rear
property
line.
The
request
was
reviewed
against
10
conditions
outlined
in
section
3.17.3
of
the
land
development
code.
These
conditions
must
be
affirmative
shown
to
exist
before
variants
shall
be
granted.
C
The
properties
setbacks
for
the
single
family.
Rpd
district
are
25
feet
from
the
front
seven
and
a
half
feet
to
the
side
and
20
feet
for
the
rear.
The
applicant
is
requesting
reduction
of
the
rear
setback
from
20
feet
to
10
feet
so
that
he
can
construct
a
family
room
addition
over
an
existing
concrete
slab,
as
shown
in
figure
figure
1
on
the
next
page,
due
to
its
location
on
the
cul-de-sac.
C
The
granting
of
the
application
is
necessary
for
the
preservation
enjoyment
of
the
property
the
applicant
states.
The
house
is
too
small
to
accommodate
the
large
family
gatherings.
It's
not
the
result
of
any
action
by
the
applicant
beforehand,
and
approval
of
the
variance
will
not
confer
on
the
applicant
a
special
privilege,
as
setback
variances
for
residential
uses,
have
been
approved
in
the
past.
C
It
is
the
minimum
variance
that
will
make
possible
the
reasonable
use
of
land
and
the
quest
is
not
based
primarily
upon
the
desire
of
the
applicant
to
secure
a
greater
financial
return
on
the
property
the
owner
is
requesting
this
variance,
so
he
can
accommodate
his
large
family
by
construction.
Constructing
an
addition
on
an
existing
slab.
C
Approval
of
the
variants
will
not
be
detrimental
to
the
surrounding
properties.
The
building
addition
is
over
an
existing
slab,
which
is
approximately
12
by
30
feet.
34
feet
in
size.
It
won't
exceed
the
building
coverage
of
the
rpd
district
to
40
runoff
will
remain
unchanged.
In
addition,
at
the
time
of
permitting
the
applicant
will
be
required
to
ensure
that
any
work
associated
with
the
building
addition
will
not
result
in
shedding
water
onto
their
neighbors
or
trapping
it
in
their
yards.
C
Granting
of
the
variants
we'll
be
in
harmony
with
serves
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
and
is
consistent
with,
the
county-wide
future
land
use
plan
old,
smart,
comprehensive
plan
and
these
regulations.
It
doesn't
constitute
an
amendment
to
the
oldsmar,
comprehensive
plan,
land
development
code
or
the
county-wide
comprehensive
plan.
It
was
determined
that
an
amendment
to
another
land
use
category
would
not
be
appropriate
this
time
and
would
not
meet
the
objective
of
the
requested
variants.
C
B
C
Wasn't
there
a
variance
for
that
or
there's
things
have
happened
over
the
years
and
could
have
happened
quite
a
long
time
that
you
know,
staff
doesn't
have
any
evidence
of
existence
or
whatever
they'll
be
building,
but
also,
I
have
to
admit
people
interpreted
structure
differently
in
the
past.
At
times
you
know.
C
A
concrete
slab,
for
example,
might
not
have
been
interpreted
as
a
structure
but
interpreted
more
of
like
a
you
know,
no
more
than
five
feet
from
the
edge
of
the
line
like
sheds
and
things,
because
we've
had
different
people
involved
in
interpretation
over
the
years,
we've
kind
of
gotten
more
holding
fast
to
it.
A
D
E
John
arthur
clark,
the
owner
of
208
cedar
key
court.
I
had
lived
at
210
cedar
key
court
for
over
20
years
and
we
sold
that
to
our
son.
E
This
house
came
up
on
foreclosure,
the
prior
owners,
the
one
that
built
this
slab
originally
started
out
with
a
he
built,
a
roughly
six
by
six
slab,
maybe
six
by
eight,
and
then
he
extended
it
to
its
its
dimensions
that
are
now
on
that
slab.
E
E
We've
totally
renovated
it
in,
in
conjunction
with
the
the
city
old,
smart
building
department,
approving
every
every
step
of
the
way
we've
completely
renovated
from
top
to
bottom,
but
we
have
a
large
family.
Now
in
210
we
had
we're
a
blended
family
and
seven
children
of
ours
circled
their
way
through
because
of
their
age.
Differences
in
210
now
they're
married,
and
we
are
blessed
to
have
15
grandchildren.
E
If
you're
familiar
with
the
hamlets
of
forest
lakes,
those
are
little
tiny
houses
and
we
want
to
entertain
on
thanksgiving.
We
want
to
entertain
at
christmas,
easter,
maybe
even
the
fourth
of
july,
but
we
can't
do
so
in
the
house
the
way
it
is
now.
E
D
I
think
the
question
that
popped
up
with
with
it
was
it's
already
there
yeah.
E
C
Its
original
variants
had
been
approved,
variances
go
with
the
land
right,
so
it's
not
like,
and
normally
what
we've
done
in
the
past.
If
somebody
does
come
in
and
wanted
like
a
concrete
slab
variance,
we're
kind
of
suspicious,
you
know,
okay,
it's
going
to
be
a
slab
now.
Is
it
going
to
be
something
else,
so
we
kind
of
even
when
we
do
our
recommendations,
wording,
we
try
to
make
sure
that
the
wording
is
kind
of
precise
as
to
what
the
intent
is,
and
so
there's
been
no
record
of
the
variance
in
the
past.
D
Okay,
I
did
have
another
question
on
a
separate:
if
we
can,
it
lost
anybody
else
how
to
follow.
B
D
D
Sure
the
reason
I
was
asking
was
yeah:
would
they
be
the
proper
party
to
ask
for
yeah?
That's
the
same.
That's
the
same
one
down
there
at
the
bottom.
D
So
I
just
wanted
to
clear
up
that
confusion.
C
D
E
C
D
D
Okay,
those
are
the
only
two
contracts.
A
A
Okay,
I
mean
we
can
jump
all
the
way
down
to
there,
but
that's
fine,
because
let
me
go
through
the
other
ones.
I
mean
the
applicant
did
speak
so
we
covered
that
one
and
I
guess
we've
got
to
just
go
through
the
the
regular
procedure.
Did
anybody
in
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
request.
A
I
mean
you,
you,
okay,
anybody
in
the
audience
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
this
request.
Okay,
they're
being
done
on
either
floor
is
not
closed.
B
B
I
make
a
motion
that
we
go
ahead
and
accept
his
variance
as
reg.
A
Yeah
there
being
none,
okay,
okay,
we
did
call
for
the
vote.
Okay,
I'm
always
in
favor
and
unopposed.
Okay-
and
I
say
thank
you
very
much
and
the
city
will
take
care
of
you.
B
Pay
the
cashier
on
your
way
out.
Okay,
and
the
next
step
is
to
call.