►
From YouTube: City of Oldsmar Board of Adjustment Meeting, 2/24/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
C
C
C
C
E
C
E
Good
evening,
everyone
tatiana
childress
blending
and
redevelopment
interim
planning
and
development
director.
This
is
a
request.
This
is
a
variance
request
to
request
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
20
feet,
to
construct
three
town
homes
in
the
roi
residential
office,
retail
zoning
district.
E
The
subject
property
is
comprised
of
the
two
inner
lots
located
at
507,
south
bayview
boulevard
lot.
3.
lot,
3
is
vacant.
While
lot
4
has
a
wood
frame
residential
house
that
was
built
in
1925
city
council,
approved
rezoning
of
the
subject:
property
from
r2
residential
single-family
district
to
ror
residential
office
retail.
In
august
of
2020.,
a
restrictive
covenant
agreement
was
added
to
the
rezoning
allowing
all
future
development
of
the
subject
property
to
be
residential.
Only
at
the
time
of
rezoning
the
applicant
proposed
to
demolish
the
existing
structure
and
to
construct
three
new
town
homes.
E
E
The
special
circumstances
or
conditions
applying
to
the
structure
or
premises
in
questions
are
peculiar
to
such
structure
or
premises
and
do
not
generally
apply
to
other
structures
or
premises
in
the
vicinity.
The
subject
property
has
a
zoning
designation
of
ror
residential
office
retail
and
the
future
land
use
designation
of
roi
residential
office
retail.
The
rr
district
includes
all
the
permitted
uses
allowed
in
the
rm15
residential
multi-family
district.
E
All
such
uses
shall
be
in
accordance
with
the
district
requirements
pertaining
to
building
height
regulations,
building
site
area
requirements,
minimum
area
of
land
coverage,
yard
regulations
and
off
street
parking
under
the
rm15
regulations.
The
two
and
three
multi-family
dwelling
structures
have
the
following:
yard:
setback,
regulations,
front,
25,
feet,
side,
seven,
feet,
rear,
15
feet.
The
applicant
is
proposing
a
three
unit
residential
development
and
requesting
a
variance
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
20
feet
to
allow
for
a
staggered
facade
of
the
proposed
town
homes.
E
The
majority
of
the
reduction
is
for
the
front
steps.
The
majority
of
the
main
structure
has
a
proposed
setback
of
25
feet:
9
inches.
The
middle
unit
has
a
proposed
setback
of
23
feet
for
a
structure
and
20
foot
for
the
front
steps,
as
demonstrated
in
the
provided
sketch
and
exhibit
a
the
granting
of
the
application,
is
necessary
for
the
preservation
enjoyment
of
the
property
right
and
does
not
merely
serve
as
convenience
for
the
applicant
approval
of
the
variants
will
allow
to
create
a
functional
design
with
staggered
facades,
providing
both
privacy
and
aesthetics.
E
E
The
variance
is
the
minimum
variance
that
will
make
possible
the
reasonable
use
of
the
structure,
and
the
request
is
not
based
on
the
applicant's
desire
to
secure
a
greater
financial
return.
Approval
of
the
front
setback
variants
will
not
be
detrimental
or
injurious
to
other
property
or
permits
in
the
neighborhood.
The
applicant
provides
a
25
foot,
nine
inches
front
side
back
for
the
majority
of
the
structure.
E
Based
upon
the
above
discussion
in
the
review
against
the
10
conditions
outlined
in
section
3.17.3
of
the
land
development
code,
staff
recommends
approval
of
the
variant's
request
to
reduce
the
front
yard
setback
from
25
feet
to
20
feet
in
order
to
construct
three
town
homes
in
the
ror
residential
office.
Retail
district.
C
F
F
F
F
The
reason
that
we
staggered
the
design
instead
of
having
three
townhomes
in
a
row
that
looked
identical.
This
is
better
for
the
neighborhood
it'll,
be
a
nicer
looking
development.
It
looks
like
in
some
ways
either
three
smaller
units
or
one
big
house-
that's
kind
of
pushed
forward
in
the
middle
and
back
on
the
side.
So
I
really
think
that's
a
better
design
than
having
them
all
even
and
pushing
that
middle
one
back
the
other
point
again
about
the
stairs.
F
It's
something
I'm
sure
you
guys
are
going
to
deal
with
more
in
the
future,
as
the
fema
maps
are
being
changed
right
now.
The
city
only
allows
for
a
three
foot
encroachment
into
that
front
setback
for
the
steps
and,
as
the
structure
gets
taller,
the
steps
get
deeper
and
so
you're
probably
going
to
have
more
of
those
applications,
possibly
so
kind
of.
In
line
with
that
and
again,
the
existing
structure,
that
is,
there,
is
about
16
feet.
8
inches
currently
set
back
from
the
property
line
it
here
for
any
questions.
Okay,.
B
B
F
B
G
You
can
ask
a
question:
you
just
need
to
make
sure
that
your
decision
is
based
upon
the
factors
that
that
confine
the
board
sure,
but
certainly
in
the
broader
interest
of
making
sure
the
project
works
or
whatever
any
of
you
have
specialized
knowledge.
You
can
certainly
pose
a
question
and
suggest
that
they
follow
up
with
the
appropriate
city
staff
person,
but
that
fact
neither
informs
or
neither
makes
you
vote
for
or
against
it
if
it's
not
relevant
to
what
you
are
considering.
Does.
B
F
F
B
F
C
C
D
A
C
E
This
is
a
variance
request
to
reduce
the
rear
yard
setback
from
10
feet
to
eight
and
a
half
feet
in
order
to
construct
a
swimming
pool
and
decking
for
a
single
family
home
in
the
r2
residential
single
family
zoning
district.
The
request
was
reviewed
against
the
following
10
conditions
outlined
in
section
3.17.3
of
the
land
development
code.
E
The
subject
property
has
a
zoning
designation
of
r2
residential
single-family
district
and
the
future
land-use
designation
of
residential
low
for
section
5.4.4
of
the
lane
development
code.
R2
zoning
district
require
requires
the
following:
setbacks:
25
foot,
front
setback,
6
foot,
side,
setback,
10,
foot,
rear
setback,
yard
setback.
The
applicant
is
requesting
a
variance
to
reduce
a
rear
yard
setback
from
10
feet
to
8
and
a
half
feet
in
order
to
construct
a
swimming
pool
in
a
decking.
E
E
However,
since
the
property
tapers
down,
the
rear
setback
is
reduced
to
an
average
of
8.5
feet
on
the
northwest
side,
as
demonstrated
in
the
provided
sketch
in
exhibit
a
approval
of
the
variants,
will
permit
will
permit
the
applicant
to
construct
a
swimming
pool
of
an
adequate
width
and
decking
in
the
backyard
area
and
is
necessary
for
the
preservation
and
enjoyment
of
his
property
right.
The
request
is
not
the
result
of
an
action
by
the
property
owner
beforehand.
E
The
variance
is
not
the
minimum
variance
that
will
make
possible
the
reasonable
use
of
the
land.
The
applicant
could
reduce
the
size
of
the
swimming
pool
and
decking
to
meet
the
setback
requirements.
However,
due
to
the
uneven
backyard,
this
will
result
in
a
very
narrow
swimming
pool.
The
request
is
not
based
on
the
applicant's
desire
to
secure
a
greater
financial
return
and
approval
of
the
rare
earth's
back
variants
will
not
be
detrimental
or
interest
to
other
property
or
improvements
in
the
neighborhood.
The
applicant
provides
the
wider
side
setbacks
allowing
for
proper
drainage
runoff.
E
Granting
the
variance
will
will
be
in
harmony
with
serves
the
general
intent
and
purpose
of
and
is
consistent
with,
the
county-wide
future
land
use
plan,
the
oldsmar
comprehensive
plan
and
these
regulations
granting
the
variance
will
not
constitute
an
an
amendment
to
the
old,
smart,
comprehensive
plan,
the
oldsmar
land
development
code
or
the
county-wide
comprehensive
plan.
An
amendment
to
another
land
use
category
would
not
be
appropriate
at
this
time.