►
From YouTube: City of Oldsmar Board of Adjustment Meeting, 10/26/2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
C
B
C
A
C
C
Well,
that's
why
we
wanted
clarification.
I
mean
he
was
delayed
one
month
already
and
I.
Don't
don't
want
to
delay
at
another
when
I
mean
if
he
needed
to
be
here.
We.
C
C
D
Purpose
of
the
record,
it
appears
as
though
the
applicant
is
not
present
in
situations
such
as
these,
the
board
can
consider
the
application
that
has
been
submitted
as
evidence
in
order
to
render
its
decision
specifically
section
3.8.8.6,
entitled
public
hearing
of
your
Land
Development
code
says
that
a
public
hearing
shall
be
held
by
the
board
of
adjustment.
Any
party
may
appear
in
person
or
by
agent
or
attorney
I.
Don't
read
a
mandate
into
that
that
the
applicant
be
present.
D
The
only
caveat
being
is
that
if
you
have
questions
of
the
applicant
he's
not
here
or
she's,
not
here
to
answer
those
questions
and
you'd
probably
have
to
take
that
into
consider
rate.
Not
probably
you
would
have
to
take
that
into
consideration
when
making
your
decision
so
legally
speaking,
you're,
okay,
to
go
ahead
and
proceed
in
the
applicant's
absence
with
those
caveats
being
understood.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank
you.
D
E
You
Tatiana
Childress
city
of
Oldsmar,
planning
and
Redevelopment
director,
so
this
is
a
variance
for
7
14,
Sutton
Leaf
Avenue.
It's
a
request
for
pool
variants.
The
property
is
located
at
714
satin
life
and
is
developed
with
a
single
family
home.
This
property
has
a
zoning
designation
of
RPD
residential
plan
development.
Zoning
District,
the
RPD
zoning
requires
the
following:
setbacks:
25
for
the
front,
seven
and
a
half
feet
for
the
side
and
20
foot
for
the
rear,
allowing
rear
pool
setback
to
be
10
feet
from
the
property
line
to
the
pool
decking.
E
This
is
a
variance
request
to
permit
accessory
structure
in
the
secondary
front
yard
to
construct
a
pool.
This
variance
is
required
because
the
property
is
a
corner
lot
and
is
considered
to
have
two
fronts
per
section:
5.1.6
of
the
Land
Development
code
in
all
residential
districts.
No
structure
shall
be
permitted
except
building
additions
to
the
principal
building
within
the
front
yard
area,
not
to
extend
beyond
the
front
setback
line.
Variance's
requests
could
be
considered
when
there
is
something
unique
about
a
lot
or
structure.
The
site
is
a
corner
lot,
as
I
mentioned
before.
E
In
the
secondary
front,
setback
varies
in
width
from
32
feet
to
42,
resulting
in
an
oversized
secondary
front
for
this
property,
as
demonstrated
on
the
following
graphics.
So
the
site
side
yard
is
extensive
on
this
property
and
that
grants
some
kind
of
variance.
So
we
consider
variances
when
there's
something
unique
about
particular
parcel.
E
The
lot
maintains
a
wide
space
that
is
suitable
for
an
accessory
use
adjacent
to
the
home
on
the
secondary
front.
Granting
of
variance
is
therefore
due
to
the
unique
lot
shape,
with
an
oversized
secondary
yard.
Approval
of
the
variance
will
not
Grant
the
owner's
special
privilege,
as
setback
variances
and
accessory
structures
located
in
the
secondary
fronts,
including
swimming
pools,
have
been
approved
for
residential
lots
in
the
past.
E
The
applicant
is
meeting
also
the
setback
requirements,
so
the
impervious
surface
area
ratio
is
0.34
which
meets
the
residential
plan
development
zoning
standards,
which
allows
0.65
ISR.
So
the
lot
coverage
is
also
under
the
maximum.
So
he's
not
looking
for
that
variance.
Although
the
pool
will
be
extended,
Beyond,
the
Edge
of
the
house
and
by
definitions,
the
pool
will
be
located
in
the
secondary
front.
The
owner
is
able
to
maintain
a
26
foot,
secondary
setback
and
a
12-foot
rear
setback
to
the
pool
deck
and
to
the
prop
from
the
property
line.
E
C
C
Public
comment:
anybody
in
favor
of
this
request
anybody
in
not
in
favor
of
this
request:
okay,
there
being
none.
The
floor
is
now
closed.