►
From YouTube: City of Oldsmar Work Session, 3/25/2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
C
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
A
B
D
The
next
two
items
on
the
agenda
are:
is
the
invocation
and
pledge
of
allegiance
which
will
be
led
by
our
city
attorney
mr
tom
trask?
Everybody
could
please
rise.
I'd
ask
that
before
we
be
before
the
city
attorney
begins,
that
we
observe
a
moment
of
silence
meditation
for
those
who
were
lost
in
the
tragedies
in
atlanta
and
also
out
in
boulder.
A
D
Please
be
seated
before
we
continue
on.
I
just
want
to
mention
that
we
are
practicing
the
cdc
guidelines
and
so
for
those
of
you
who
are
at
home,
but
mostly
for
those
of
you
who
are
here
in
the
audience.
We
ask
keep
your
mask
on
unless
you're
speaking
at
the
podium,
then
you
can
remove
it
up
here.
We're
spread
out
as
you
can
see,
and
we
do
a
lot
of
talking.
So
we
take
the
mass
off
and
we
leave
it
there.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
citizens
open
forum.
D
B
D
B
Since
the
city
attorney
in
the
city
mayor
told
me,
I
can't
speak
hours
other
than
at
the
at
the
time.
I
am
I'm
up
here.
How
long
do
I
have
as
long
as
I
want.
B
Council,
congratulations.
Thank
you.
You
have
just
now
begun
to
get
it.
I
I
gave
the
advice
to
to
the
mayor
when
he
ran
before
you
want
me
to
repeat
it:
yeah
yeah,
yeah
yeah.
Would
you
repeat
that.
D
When
I
first
got
elected
to
council,
I
had
the
privilege
of
serving
with
mayor
beaverland
for
a
short
period
of
time,
and
he
said
I
want
to
give
you
some
advice,
while
you're
new
on
council-
and
I
said,
what's
that
he
goes
for
the
first
year
and
I'm
repeat
repeating
him
shut
up.
That's
what
he
told
me
to
do,
and
so
I
tried
my
best.
But
I
don't
know
that
it
worked
too
well.
But
it
was
good.
B
B
The
the
only
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
is
that
you're
talking
about
increasing
in
the
pay
for
the
council.
I
I
just
want
to
tell
you
that
I've
been
on
council
for
29
years
when
I
ran
the
first
time.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
What
you
have
to
do
is
determine
if
the
work
they've
done
is
what
you
want
now,
if
you
want,
if
you
want
to
examine
something
or
which
is
which
is
very
odd,
it
doesn't
usually
happen.
I
mean
you
may
go
to
an
event
here
in
the
event
there
an
event
there
you
don't
have
to,
and
I
went
to
the
league
of
cities
when
I
for
I
was
first
elected
as
mayor.
B
I
couldn't
go
into
the
league
of
cities,
sorry
about
that
it
became
political
in
me.
This
guy
here
was
put
up
for
the
attorney
of
the
year
and
by
then
they
gave
it
to
some
hick
down
in
south
florida
that
always
got
it,
which
turned
me
against
the
league
of
cities.
It
was
political
same
with
the
city
manager.
B
Anyway,
you
don't
have
to
go
to
anything
like
that.
You
go
to
osmar
days
and
that's
fine.
So
is
everybody
else
if
you're
going
to
make
a
pay,
raise.
B
Forgive
me
for
this
don't
go
to
what
you
they
proposed
to
me.
That's
ridiculous,
and
you
can't
you
can't
compare
yourself
to
saint
petersburg
safety,
harbor
or
anybody
else.
This
is
oldsmar
owes
more
quit.
Comparing
yourself
to
everybody
else,
always
mark
takes
the
lead
in
a
lot
of
things.
B
B
A
D
D
All
right
is
there
anybody
else
who
has
any
other
comments
from
the
citizens
for
the
citizens
open
forum
all
right,
seeing
none
we'll
go
ahead
and
close
the
citizens
open
forum
and
move
into
matter
at
hand.
D
So
I've
spent
some
time
talking
with
our
city
attorney
and
also
with
our
city
manager
and
assistant
city
manager.
Talking
about
a
good
approach
to
this,
I
want
to
start
off
by
once
again-
and
I
think
everybody
up
here
agrees
with
this,
and
that
is
thanking
the
ordnance
review
committee
for
all
the
work
that
they
put
into
this.
D
D
D
We
in
this
group
here
today
will
will
not
approve
anything
right,
so
it'll
be
an
opportunity
to
make
some
progress
on
the
72
pages
that
we
have
before
us
right,
but
this
is
a
housekeeping
as
much
as
it
is
some
new
concepts
that
I
think
makes
sense.
We
we
do
this
over
a
period
of
time,
we're
not
going
to
try
to
load
everything
all
into
once
in
part
because
think
of
it.
This
way,
even
the
items
that
we
all
agree
on.
100
percent-
let's
just
grab
a
number
there's
30
of
them.
D
Let's
say
right:
every
one
of
those
have
to
go
through
two
readings.
They
still
have
to
be
voted
on
on
council,
and
so
I
mean
that
alone
on
what
the
stuff
we
agree,
the
things
we
don't
agree
on.
That's
obviously
going
to
take
more
time,
as
it
should
also
for
our
citizens.
Every
one
of
these
items,
by
going
through
the
ordinance
process,
gives
them
the
opportunity
to
know
what's
being
voted
on,
even
if
they
miss
the
notification.
First,
they
hear
the
first
discussion.
D
They
can
come
and
participate
under
the
citizens
open
forum
before
the
second
and
final
vote.
So
my
point
to
that
is,
if
it's
the
pleasure
of
the
council,
the
kind
of
collective
thought
was
today
what
we
would
try
to
accomplish
as
much
as
we
can,
and
that
is
that
we
try
to
get
consensus.
D
Let's
identify
those
items
that
we
have
a
consensus
on,
and
that's
really
all
we
hope
to
accomplish
today.
I'm
not
even
convinced
we'll
get
through
all
of
what
we
have
a
consensus
on,
because
we
literally
have
to
go
page
by
page,
okay
and
so
and
it's
okay.
If
we
don't
have
it
all
finished,
even
on
the
consensus
side,
why?
Because
it
will
at
least
allow
the
city
staff
and
the
city
attorney
to
start
the
process
on
what
we
have
a
consensus
on.
Does
that
make
sense?
D
Absolutely
so
so
what
I'm
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
go
through
this
and
and
go
let's
just
open
up
to
to
page
four,
I'm
I'm
gonna
say
recommendations
we're
on
page
four
chapter,
one
recommendations:
zero,
one
point:
zero
one
add
live
estate,
language
to
the
owner's
definition.
I'm
going
to
say
this.
D
Do
we
have
a
consensus
that
we
wish
to
move
forward
with
that
change,
show
a
hands?
Okay,
all
right.
So
then
that
goes
on
the
list
and
we
go
on
to
the
next
one.
Now,
if
nobody
raises
their
hand,
that's
a
consensus
too.
That
means
we
leave
it
on
the
table.
We're
not
going
to
take
it
off
for
discussion
at
a
council
meeting.
Okay,
because
remember
we're
not
obligated
to
take
action
on
these
items
and
we
could
choose
to
walk
away
from
the
whole
report.
I
mean
I
don't
I
don't
think
we
should.
D
D
D
Somewhere:
okay,
okay,
you
maybe
you
point
that
out
as
we
go
on
and
and
the
reason
I
asked
that
question,
because
let
me
just
say
this
what
I
would
do,
for
example,
and
I
will
use
a
recommendation
02.02
and
say:
does
everybody?
Is
there
a
consensus
to
move
forward
this
as
amended
by
the
city
manager's
office?
So
we
just
incorporate
that
right.
So
we
don't
go
both
steps,
we're
just
going
to
incorporate
it
and
that
way
we
can
just
kind
of
go
through
the
process.
Just.
C
D
It
just
means
it's
going
to
get
agendas
differently
right
because
we're
going
to
have
their
report,
we
have
to
vote
on
it
right.
So
if
there
is
someone
who
wants
to
move
forward
with
something,
it
will
ultimately
end
up
on
an
agenda
item
as
a
recommendation
that
we
then
take
action
on
and
debate
and
vote
down
which,
if
it's
one
person
wanting
to
move
forward,
it
doesn't
sound
very
promising
for
it.
But
at
that
point
that's
essentially
what
we
would
do
makes
sense.
Yes,
question.
A
So
if
we
get
unanimous
consent
on
any
of
these
items,
is
that
in
essence,
directing
the
city
attorney
to
draft
the
ordinance
at
that
time?
Or
is
it
that
that
that
then,
at
the
next
meeting
or
a
subsequent
meeting
is
then
we
would
vote
on
the
city
attorney
to
draft
the
ordinance.
D
Correct
what
we
would
do
is
at
this
point
we
would
have
a
list
of
all
the
items
in
here
that
we've,
we've
by
consensus,
agreed
that
we
want
to
take
action
on.
So
we
know
that
so
the
city
attorney.
That's
where
we're
going
to
start
with
those
items
right.
So
then-
and
this
is
a
question
for
our
city
attorney-
because
we
didn't
discuss
this-
let's
just
use
that
example
that
we
have
30
items
that
we
have
consensus,
that
we
want
to
move
forward
and
taking
action
on.
D
D
You
know
so
what
I
would
say
is
that
what
we
discussed
was
we're
probably
going
to
take
a
few
at
a
time
right,
because
there's
no
fire.
Now
what
I
have
yeah,
I
mean
otherwise
we're
going
to
have
meetings
that
are
completely
full
of
doing
ordinance,
reviews
even
full
of
ordinance
reviews
that
we
all
agree
on
right
yeah.
So
it's
not
going
to
really
be
productive.
D
So
we're
going
to
take
our
time
like
I
said
if
we
did
nothing
but
this
and
we
put
the
same
time
into
it,
that
the
ordinance
review
committee
did
it'd,
be
five
months
worth
of
meetings
for
us
right
and
just
to
give
some
perspective.
The
other
thing
that
I
did
say-
and
I
hope
it's
you
know
the
indulgence
of
of
of
the
council.
D
I
did
make
it
clear
to
the
city
manager
that,
if,
if
there
is
something
in
these
recommendations
that
he
and
the
staff
feel
are
time,
sensitive
they're,
an
issue
that
certainly
that
we
would
ask
and
give
the
indulgence
for
that
to
be
brought
forward,
much
quicker
right.
So
whatever
that
might
be
all
right,
we
all
good
with
that
good
to
go.
All
right,
let's
get.
A
D
D
No
you're
just
trying
to
mess
me
up
all
right,
all
right
so
chapter,
one
recommendation:
zero
one
point:
zero
one!
I'm
not
going
to
read
it
off!
That's
okay!
Everyone!
Good
with
that,
but
I
will
read
the
number
that
work.
Okay,
recommendation:
01.01!
D
D
Okay,
we're
going
to
leave
it
on
the
table.
There'll
be
no
voting
on
increasing
pay.
Okay,
just
so
you
know,
mayor
must
have
been
that
speech.
D
D
Sorry
page
five
recommendation:
zero,
two
point:
zero:
three:
is
there
a
consensus
to
move
forward
with
that
we
have
a
consensus;
zero,
two
point:
zero!
Four:
do
we
have
a
consensus?
A
A
D
A
recommendation
number
that
whole
thing
was
a
recommendation:
okay,
recommendation,
10.03.
D
D
D
D
All
right,
chapter,
14
recommendation,
one
four
point:
zero
one:
we
have
a
consensus.
C
But
absolutely
on
page
9,
section
14.35
subsection,
the
new
subsection
a
subject:
paragraph
four
just
needs
a
period.
Sorry.
D
A
There's
no
period
at
the
end
of
paragraph
four,
the
blue
sub-section,
other
funds
allocated
just
to
help
tom,
so
that
he's
not
searching
for
where
we
said.
There's
typographical
errors.
D
Very
good
moving
on
chapter
18
recommendation:
18.01:
do
we
have
a
consensus
to
move
forward
with
we
do
18.02?
Do
we
have
a
consensus
to
move
forward
with
we
do
18.03?
Do
we
have
a
consensus
to
move
forward
with
we
do
yeah?
Do
we
yep
okay,
chapter
22
recommendation
22.01.
C
C
But
if
we're
not
talking
about
the
vacation
of
a
city
council
seat,
we're
talking
about
no
longer
qualified
candidate
or
someone
who's
withdrawn.
D
Make
a
suggestion-
because
we
might
have
a
few
of
these
where
there's
some
discussion
as
it
relates
to
the
wording
of
something
that
we
move,
that
out
of
the
consensus.
Okay,
we
take
it
as
an
item
that
we
want
to
take
individually.
Does
that
make
sense
sure?
Okay,
so
we're
not
22.01
we're
not
moving
forward
as
a
consensus?
It
still
will
come
to
council
all
right,
so
maybe
that's
the
best
way
to
handle
it
sure.
D
So
that
way
we
can
keep
going
and
try
to
get
through
as
much
as
we
can
all
right
recommendation,
26.01
on
chapter
26.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
move
forward,
we
do
26.02.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
D
D
D
D
Right
recommendation:
26.06:
do
we
have
a
consensus.
D
26.07,
do
we
have
a
consensus,
we
do
26.08.
Do
we
have
a
consensus
26.09?
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
do.
C
Yeah,
I
guess
I
held
it
back
only
because
I
just
want
to
be
sure,
go
ahead,
that
to
the
leisure
services
department,
or
is
that
going
to
come
from
the
city
manager,
because
there
was
a
consistent
change
throughout
the
documents
that
the
city
manager
would
take.
So
just
in
terms
of
the
specific
trees
I'm
talking
about
26.09
without
written
permission
of
the
leisure
services
department.
I
just
wanted
to
be
sure,
because
I
was
noticing
it
throughout
the
document.
E
I
would
assume
that
we
missed
it
and
it
should
be
coming
from
me.
I
would
rely
on
them
to
provide
it
to
me
to
go
through
you,
okay,
but
I
I
think
we
just
missed
that
because
it
didn't
name
a
department
director.
It
was
just
information
from
the
department
itself,
but
I'd
be
willing
to
handle
it.
However,
the
council
wants,
in
that.
D
Okay,
then,
why
don't
we
do
this,
since
that's
a
pretty
easy
one,
why
don't
we
say
that
there's
a
consensus
with
it
being
amended
to
read
as
the
other
one
as.
A
D
D
26.01,
do
we
have
a
consensus
on
this.
D
D
D
C
E
E
D
D
Chapter
third
page
17,
page
30
chapter
excuse
me
page
17,
chapter
30
30.01.
Do
we
have
a
consensus
30.02?
Do
we
have
a
consensus.
D
All
right,
let's
see
a
chapter,
excuse
me
page
20
39.02.
Do
we
have
a
consensus.
D
A
A
It
was
at
a
definition
and
then
that
the
back
part
of
4201
also
was
added
definition,
but
that
was
lumped
in
with
like
the
definitions
on
the
prior
page.
So
does
that
need
to
be
a
separate
one
or
or
should
4202
also
really
be
combined
with
4201,
because
it's
the
same
section
under
definitions,
they're,
just
separate
recommendations?
That's
why
they're
numbered
42.01
but
they're
all
going
to
they're
all
going
to
section
42-32
on.
D
Yeah,
and
so
is
okay
42
we're
at
42.04
correct.
Okay,
do
we
have
the
consensus.
D
A
D
D
A
A
D
D
A
D
One
zero
I'm
reading
my
my
sheet
and
this
at
the
time
do
we
have
a
consensus.
We
do
have
a
consensus.
4211,
do
we
have
consensus,
we
do
42.12.
Do
we
have
consensus.
D
Yes,
okay,
we
have
good
sense.
You
know
it's
funny
to
me,
I'm
I'm
watching
I'm
watching
the
the
new
council
member
over
there
and
he
served
on
this
committee
and
he's
like
going
wait.
I
don't
remember
if
I
like
that
or
not
so,
which
chapter
did
you
get?
What's
that
return
yeah?
What
chapter
did
you
do.
D
D
B
D
C
I
had
the
same
issue
with
city
manager
at
designee,
okay
in
the
blue,
where
it
says.
D
Okay,
so
let's
as
amended
as
let's
just
say
that
we've
amended
the
amendment
to
say
city
manager
or
design,
do
we
have
a
consensus
very
good?
Thank
you.
A
D
D
A
A
D
A
D
A
D
D
Yeah,
okay,
all
right
so
we're
on
page
35.
D
Reasonably
you
got
the
typo
yeah
good
shape
there
right
excellent.
Thank
you,
sir.
All
right
item
recommendation
number
42.28
between
consensus.
D
A
D
D
All
right,
page,
37
item
number
recommendation
42.28.
I
know
we're
not
in
consensus.
D
B
D
C
Same
issue
for
me:
in
new
subsection
b,
it's
on
it's
on
the
top
of
page
39.,
no
livestock
or
other
farm
animals
are
allowed
within
any
city
parks
except
by
department
authorization.
Does
that
need
to
be
changed
to
city
manager,
designee.
D
D
D
C
In
subsection
a
it
says,
unless
permission
has
been
obtained
by
the
department
director
or
design,
should
that
be
city
manager
or
designee?
Yes,
okay,.
D
Okay,
I'm
going
to
make
a
recommendation
if
it's
a
pleasure
to
council
in
any
one
of
these
situations
where
it
does
not
state
city
manager
or
their
designee,
that
we
consider
that
to
be
amended
and
corrected
before
it's
brought
to
us
is
that,
okay,
with
the
city
manager.
E
With
grateful
appreciation,
so
I
don't
look
like
a
bigger
idiot
for
having
missed
so
many
of
them.
C
D
D
Michael,
so,
thank
you,
though,
because
that
makes
that
point
and
then
as
they
go
through
and
prepare
them
of
course,
they'll
be
able
to
identify
those
as
they
go
all
right
recommendation.
42.31.
Are
we
in
consensus?
D
42.33,
are
we
in
consensus,
okay,
moving
on
page
40.,
40
recommendation
42.35,
or
do
we
have
a
consensus.
D
E
With
the
council
of
agrabah,
I
think
we
might
even
need
to
clean
it
up
more
I'd
like
to
accelerate
this
to
the
front
burner.
However,
the
council
wants
to
do
it
partially
because
we've
kind
of
just
discovered
a
I
mean
the
special
events.
Preventing
process
is
pretty
important
to
us.
Anyway.
I
think
we've
discovered
a
need
to
maybe
distinguish
it
depending
on
the
exact
circumstances.
With
regard
to
fee
waivers,
so
I
would
say
we
need
to
probably
enhance
this
wording,
even
some
more
I'd
be
glad
to
do
that.
D
Okay,
all
right,
so
why
don't
we
do
this?
Why
don't
why
don't
we
ask
the
city
manager
to
make
additional
amendments
to
it
before
before
it's
brought
to
council
and
that
he
can
bring
it
to
council
as
soon
as
he
feels
it's
ready?
D
All
right
all
right
recommendation:
42.3,
do
we
have
a
consensus,
we
do
42.36.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
D
D
D
D
Let's
see
nothing
in
chapter
50
50
was
good.
It's
a
good
chapter.
D
All
right
recommendation:
54.01
do
we
have
a
consensus.
D
D
D
All
right
recommendation,
five,
four
point:
zero.
Five:
do
we
have
a
consensus.
D
D
D
E
There,
yes,
this
is
the
other
one.
I
consider
to
be
the
most
important
it's
not
necessarily
in
play
and
it's
old,
but
the
reason
I
requested
our
recommendation
to
make
that
for
us
to
continue
the
right
to
invoice.
An
owner
has
a
lot
to
do
with
bad
debt.
The
real
estate
lobby
is
very
strong
in
tallahassee.
E
It's
statutorily.
It's
our
choice,
to
decide
to
build
tenants
once
we
do.
We
can't
go
back
against
an
owner
for
a
bill
until
there's
a
bunch
of
restrictions
and
taking
back
possession
there's
a
bunch
of
rules
to
that.
We
always
have
had
trouble
over
the
years
in
situations
where
almost
habitually
some
properties,
which
are
rental
properties,
just
always
have
tenants
that
never
pay
the
bill
so
because
restates
are
totally
allowed
to
decide
not
to
agree
to
build
a
tenant.
I'd
like
to
bring
that
forth
now,
so
that
we
maintain
that
right,
we
rarely
use
it.
E
D
A
D
A
D
D
We
do
recommendation
58.04,
whoever
consensus
recommendation
58.05.
Do
we
wanna
talk
about
that
one
first,
I
wanna
leave
this
one,
as
is.
D
It
might
be
my
last
time
all
right
consider
recommendation
58.06.
Do
we
have
a
consensus,
raise
it
up.
D
58.11,
do
we
have
a
consensus
we
do
58.1?
Do
we
have
a
consensus
we
do
58.13?
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
do.
D
Page
fifty
five
eight
point:
one
four:
do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
do
not
five,
eight
point.
One
five:
do
we
have
a
consensus.
C
E
A
D
All
right,
let's
see
where
we're
at
recommendation,
yes
to
din
consent,.
D
Is
correct?
Okay,
so
we're
on
recommendation
five,
eight
one!
Six
do
we
have
complete
go
for
one
four?
Yes,
for
one
five,
that
is
correct.
Okay,
do
we
have
a
consensus
on
5816?
C
Sub
paragraph
I,
if
the
owner
installing
dealer
installing
the
no
that
was
good,
no
we're
good
there,
I'm
sorry
in
subsection
q,
it
says,
shall
locate
their
facilities
located
in
the
path
of
construction.
I
thought
facilities
should
be
utilities
used
in
that
context
and
then
later
on
in
the
same
subsection
on
page
52
at
the
top
at
the
discretion
of
the
city.
If
facilities
are
impossible
or
extremely
difficult
to
locate,
I
thought
that
should
be.
E
Don't
know
I
don't,
I
would
agree
with
steve's
take
on
the
city's
discretion
needing
more
specificity.
I
do
not
have
a
problem
with
referencing
facilities,
because
sometimes
it
involves
a
lot
more
infrastructure.
It
might
be
a
601.
Do
you
have
any
compelling
reason
why
we
should
say
one
way
or
the.
A
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
You
do
chapter
70,
page
57,
let's
see
recommendations,
seven,
zero
point!
One!
Zero!
Excuse
me
point
one
point:
zero
one:
how
about
that?
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
do
okay
recommendation
70.02.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
D
C
D
It's
seven
zero
point:
zero,
seven
on
page
58.
D
Recommendations
70.08.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
D
D
D
We
do
recommendation
70.13.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
do
recommendation
70.14.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
do
recommendation
70.15.
Do
we
have
a
consensus?
You
do
page
62
63.
Excuse
me
at
recommendation.
70.16,
do
we
have
a
consensus?
We
do
recommendation
70.17.,
you
see
what
I
did
there
do.
We
have
a
consensus.
D
D
D
D
C
I
have
one
language
thing:
one
thousand
dollars
per
day
or
by
imprisonment
in
the
county
jail
for
not
to
exceed
60
days.
Just
you
can
take
out
four.
C
D
D
That
was
70
70
35,
that's
correct.
D
D
D
This
next
one
I'm
going
to
read
by
title
only
no
I'm
just
kidding,
I
couldn't
help,
but
all
right,
page
71
recommendation
70.41
do
we
have
a
a
consensus
we
do
and
finally,
last
but
not
least,
recommendation
70.42.
D
Do
we
have
a
consensus
outstanding,
good
job?
Give
yourself
a
round
of
applause,
really
quite
impressed
frankly,
all
right.
So
I
think
that
probably
gives
us
an
awful
lot
of
ordinance
ordinances
to
start
with.
D
I
think
that
that's
kind
of
the
approach
tom
and
I
discussed
it
and
I
think
we
limit
it
to
three,
because
you
know
it
is
a
reading.
It
takes
time.
Even
if
there's
no
debate
on
it
there
might
you
know,
and
who
knows,
maybe
it's
an
ordinance,
that's
being
modified
that
to
us
there's
not
an
issue
with,
but
maybe
it
adds
to
the
agenda
where
there's
public
comment
on
it
and
because
something
we
did
not
think
of
and
so
that
process
will
be
able
to
to
take
place
and
well.
A
D
It
will
yeah
it
will.
It
will
still
be
a
lot
all
right.
Well,
listen!
Once
again,
let
me
thank
the
ordinance
review
committee.
I
hope
they
feel
that
we're
doing
their
recommendations,
justice.
D
This
exercise
we
went
through,
was
kind
of
a
way
to
get
the
ball
rolling
and
do
it
as
efficiently
as
possible
and
still
setting
aside
anything
that
requires
some
discussion.
So
I
hope
everyone
out
here
feels
good
about
that.
Any
comments.
D
Is
they'll
be
added
to
the
agenda?
They'll
come
after
the
fact,
unless
it's,
in
other
words
after
we've
gone
through
the
ones
we
do
have
consensus
on,
then
they'll
start
appearing,
and
I
would
assume
we'll
just
do
them
in
the
in
the
way
that
they're
numbered
in
the
book
unless,
unless
there
is
something
the
city
manager
wishes
to
have
come
forward
beforehand,
city
attorney.
Anything
to
add
to
that.
A
The
way
I
think
that
I'd
like
to
approach
the
ordinances
so
that
we
don't
have
500
of
them,
because
we're
supposed
to
do
these
ordinances
in
what
we
call
a
single
subject,
and
so
I
think
that
if
we
could
do
them
by
chapter,
we
can
maybe
limit
it
to
the
chapter
of
like,
for
example,
parks
and
recreation.
That
would
be
a
single
issue.
A
The
reason
I'm
suggesting
that
is
is
that
we
save
a
lot
of
money.
If
we
can
advertise
fewer
ordinances,
it's
and
I
don't
know
the
exact
cost,
but
seven
or
eight
hundred
dollars,
probably
for
each
notice
that
we
we
advertise
so
every
ordinance
we
have
that
cost.
D
A
Can
point
out
which
items
within
or
just
for
reference
of
what
may
need
discussion,
or
you
know
to
remember
what
the
sticking
points
were
right.
The
staff
memo
that'll
be
attached
to
it.
It'll
say
we
had
you
had
consensus
on
all
of
these
items,
except
for
section
42-12
42-18,
you
know,
and
then
you
can
focus
on
those
all.
D
Yeah,
well,
why
don't
we
do
this?
I
mean
why
don't
we
start
with
the
smaller
chapters?
I
think
that's
probably
in
the
meantime,
we
can
like
tally
up
whatever's,
pressing,
precise
whatever's,
pressing
that
we
could
tally
up
what
the
numbers
look
like
for
the
others,
because
what
you're
potentially
saying,
if
I
understand
you
correctly,
is
saying:
okay,
here's
one
ordinance
by
title
only
right,
which
makes
all
of
the
changes
that
we
have
accepted
and
also
those
that
are
proposed,
that
we
want
to
debate.
A
A
Maybe
we
only
read
two
instead
of
four
ordinances
or
five
ordinances
that
night,
but
I
I
don't
think
it's
a
good
use
of
your
time
to
do
two-thirds
of
leisure
services
and
then
in
a
month
from
there
on
the
ones
that
you
want
further
discussion
on,
come
back
and
then
revise
it
again.
I
I
think
it
just
makes
more
sense
to
do
it
all
at
one
time
for
that
one
chapter
they're
just
going
to
require.
E
One
two:
there
is
legislative
help
being
considered
on
that
front,
but
I
appreciate
tom's
point
about
the
cost.
There's
a
digital
there's
legislation
considering
digital
advertising,
but
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
get
as
far
as
it
needs
to
for
that
to
help
us.
So
I
think
his
point
about
economics
is
very
good.
My
third
point
was
that
there's
131
of
them
today
that
there
is
consensus
on
recommendations.
D
Sorry,
who?
Who,
by
the
way,
who
brought
all
those
recommendations
to
the.
C
It
wasn't
it
wasn't.
Vice
mayor
or
myself,.
D
C
D
Well,
I
guess
so
you
know
what
we'll
deal
with
it.
I
mean
we,
don't
you
know,
look
it's,
let's
not
kid
ourselves.
This
is
a
process,
that's
supposed
to
take
place
every
five
years
that
has
not
so
unfortunately,
like
with
some
of
our
infrastructure.
D
This
council
is
being
forced
to
deal
with
the
bills.
Yeah
I
mean
that's
just
the
reality.
I
I
don't
know
how
well
that
works
in
terms
of
us
pulling
out.
If
I
understand
you
clearly,
if
there
are
42
changes
within
chapter
42
and
15
of
them
are
debatable,
so
we
would
have
it
on
one
agenda,
and
so
we
would
then
say
item
42,
section.
42.23
was
one
of
them.
So
let's
pull
that
out
and
debate
this
now
and
then
we
keep
doing
that
until
we
get
through
all
15.
right.
D
No,
I
I
understand
that
part
of
it.
Okay.
Well,
we'll
we
will
figure
it
out.
It's
going
to
make
for
some
long
meetings,
a
lot
of
meetings,
but
we'll
work
it
we'll
get
it
done,
we'll
get
it
done.
As
long
as
we
apply
the
rules
to
the
new
councilman,
I
think
we'll
be
all
right.