►
From YouTube: City of Oldsmar Planning Board Meeting, 6/8/2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
The
minute's
draft
has
been
distributed
in
your
board
pack.
Are
there?
Oh,
do
we
need
to
approve
board
minutes?
First.
Next,
we'll
look
to
approve
the
board
minutes.
You
receive
those
in
your
pack
as
well
all
in
favor.
D
A
A
C
C
A
A
So
we're
doing
agenda
item
five,
so
back
it
up
to
the
first.
The
second
item
is
the
city
of
oldsmar
code
2018
to
2021
concurrency
reports
listed
as
five
on
your
packet.
E
E
If
you
can,
I
would
say,
on
your
screens,
you
can
see
we.
Currently,
we
had
eight
developments
approved
over
the
last
four
years.
Staff
conducted
the
concurrency
test
statements
for
2018,
2019,
2020
and
2021,
and
found
that
all
water
sewer,
waste
transportation
and
land
facilities
are
within
an
acceptable
level
of
service.
E
E
That
was
projected
given
to
us
by
the
developers
at
the
time
about
that
of
the
application
in
2020.
We
also
permitted
the
huff
offices
of
4
700
square
foot,
retail
and
office
building
in
the
ror
at
the
douglas
road
and
gimgong
road,
with
traffic
impacts
of
16,
daily
trips,
water
impacts
of
2058
gallons
per
day
and
wastewater
impacts
of
2058
gallons
per
day
2020.
E
E
E
D
If
your
presentation
is
different
than
our
slide
deck,
would
you
be
able
to
provide
a
copy,
because
in
this
case
it's
it
is
very
difficult
to
read
and
it'd
just
be
nice
to
be
able
to
follow
along
absolutely
and
and
also
on
on
those
slides,
if
you
can
kind
of
just
maybe
tie
in
but
where
you
know
just
maybe
a
page
reference
or
something
just
sweet,
absolutely,
because
if
we
can
connect
the
dots
in
advance,
it
just
makes
this
easier
to
sure
to
be
here
and
no,
I
know
nothing
yeah.
You
know.
C
Reading
this
from
what
you
were
saying
right,
but
I
know
that
that
building
hasn't
even
opened
yet
so
you're
given
projected
usage
and
the
parking
lot's
not
even
paved
and
there's
weeds,
growing
out
of
the
ground,
so
one's
done,
the
one
on
st
pete
drive
the
hub.
That's
why
I
asked
you
for
his
projected.
A
C
D
Is
it
possible
to
to
help
us
tie
these
two
together,
or
at
least,
if
maybe
someone
could
put
this
in
front
of
you,
and
you
can
just
give
us
just
a
highlight
sure.
E
F
Okay,
so
we
can
start
from
the
beginning.
Basically
what
we
have
is.
We
have
four
different
concurrency
test
statements
in
your
packet,
so
we
have
2018
2019,
2020
and
2021.
Each
one
of
them
summarizes
the
approved
development
for
that
year.
So
anytime
we
approve
a
development.
F
A
developer
is
required
to
submit
a
concurrency
test
statement
demonstrating
how
the
water,
sewer
and
traffic
is
going
to
impact
the
the
city
in
the
future,
and
usually
it's
been
a
projection
so,
for
instance,
and
it
ties
to
the
use
so,
for
instance,
residential
development
has
certain
uses.
Commercial
has
other
when
an
engineer
is
required
to
provide
to
us
the
concurrency
test
statement
and
then
based
on
that
concurrency
test
statement.
F
We
provided
on
these
slides
that
elena
presented
so
each
one
of
these
developments
we're
doing
it
obviously
for
2018,
and
we
already
can
see
the
build
development
most
of
the
time.
We
would
approve
the
case
and
you
wouldn't
even
see
anything
built
unless
the
developer
provided
us
graphics
of
the
future
development.
So
this
is
basically
right
now
we're
doing
one
for
20
2018
and
you
can
see
the
primaries
is
already
there.
You
know
that
they're
operating
the
one
for
2019,
it's
already
billed
as
well
the
one
for
2018.
F
The
sanderson
medical
office
is
the
only
one
that
hasn't
been
built.
So
that's
why
you
see
a
graphic
in
here.
These
are
projected
impact
to
the
city
facility
system.
Yes,
in
the
reports
that
you
have
we
kind
of
like
go
by
the
category,
so
we
describe
the
transportation
category
in
the
transportation
category.
We
rely
on
the
data
that
we
obtained
from
forward
pinellas,
so
forward.
Pinellas
has
annual
accounts
or
bi-annual
accounts
of
their
traffic,
which
then
determines
the
level
of
service
for
the
facility.
F
So
this
slide
pretty
much
summarizes
the
level
of
service
for
the
roadway,
the
roadway
systems
they
operate
from
level
of
service
a
to
level
of
service,
how
they
define
f,
so
a
being
there's
a
free
flow,
no
cars,
pretty
much.
As
you
see
on
the
picture
level
b.
Is
you
have
like
a
steady
flow
still,
not
that
many
cars
level
d?
You
have
a
steady
flow
with
continuous
kind
of
like
car
scene
e
when
it
gets
a
little
bit
congested.
F
F
The
state
highways
are
designed
for
level
of
service
d
in
the
state
of
florida.
I
believe
our
comprehensive
plan
establishes
the
level
of
service
of
c
for
most
of
our
facilities.
F
Primrose
was
approved,
although
they
had
access
to
temple,
road
and
forest
lakes,
because
there
are
upcoming
improvement
to
forest
lakes
boulevard
by
the
florida
department
of
transportation,
but
at
any
case,
your
future
development
cannot
degrade
the
level
of
service
of
your
transportation
facility
to
where
it
becomes.
It
changes
from
d
to
f.
Basically
so,
but
we
haven't
really
observed
it.
It
was
already
operating
in
level
service
of
f,
so
if
they
added
one
more
development,
but
they
expect
the
future
upgrades
to
that
facility,
it
was
approved.
F
F
F
I
think
the
report
goes
in
the
details
of
annexation,
so
any
time
we
annex
in
the
city,
we
also
need
to
kind
of
like
assess
how
that's
going
to
affect,
but
obviously
our
annexations
effort
are
not
huge,
so
we've
annexed
one
property
or
at
a
time
and
bayside
terrace
when
they
were
annexed,
and
that
was
in
prior
concurrency
statements.
So
these
are
not
covered
in
this
report.
F
We
also
go
into
our
water
and
sewer
facilities,
and
you
have
developer
again
provides
to
us
estimated
gallons
per
day
usage
that
use
of
water
comes
from
the
fixture
count
that
they
submit
to
us
at
the
time
of
development,
and
we
just
compare
to
see
if
we
still
have
capacity.
So
if
and
when
our
sewer
plant
is
below
a
certain
level,
then
that's
when
we
start
talking
about
capital
improvements
and
how
we
can
expand
that
sewer
facility,
but
today
we're
within
the
capacity
so
that
threshold,
I
believe,
is
75
for
the
city
75.
F
We
also
described
the
transit
route
as
part
of
our
transportation,
so
we
do
have.
Although
we
don't
have
currently
established
level
of
service
for
transit
roads,
we
do
have
two
buses
that
operate
route,
812
and
67,
and
we'll
also
mention
the
truck
route.
F
And
from
the
table
it's
table
seven,
so
delicious
services
total
facility
counts.
You
can
see
that
anything.
That's
in
the
parenthesis
in
there.
That's
our
deficiencies,
the
only
one
that
we're
deficient
one
is
the
handball:
racket
courts,
everything
else
we're
pretty
much
in
the
surplus
or
we
meet
the
level
of
service.
So
for
parks.
F
F
We
even
exceed
with
some
of
them
so,
for
instance,
with
picnic
sites
we
exceed
by
far
yes.
F
We'll
make
that
correction
when
we
present
to
the
council,
we
can
document
that
page.
A
D
F
E
A
E
A
E
A
Yes,
giancas
any
questions
is
the
applicant
you're,
the
applicant
right?
Okay,
we
don't
have
anyone
here
to
speak
for
or
against.
No
written
comments
were
received
on
this.
I
assume
nobody
wrote
anything
if
there
are
no
others
wishing
to
speak
in
favor
of
or
opposition,
then
is
there
a
motion
on
item
five
on
the
agenda.
A
A
I'm
sorry
discussion,
I
apologize
so
it
is
moved
and
seconded.
Is
there
discussion
on
the
matter.
D
Yeah,
if
you
don't
mind,
I
just
once
adopted
like
what.
How
would
this
be
used?
E
So
because
part
of
these
is
in
the
past
tense,
it
hasn't
been
totally
up
to
the
current
day.
Most
of
it
is
records
keeping
as
for
2021
the
data
that
we
use.
We
essentially
take
into
account
in
terms
of
how
any
future
developments
we
permit
will
impact
based
on
the
level
of
service
that
we
currently
looked
at
the
currency
for
2021
is
used
to
just
make
decisions
based
on
the
impacts
of
future
site
plans.
F
It's
known
for
comparative
analysis,
it's
just
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
degrading
the
level
of
service
established
level
of
service
in
the
city
with
these
developments.
So
this
is
just
a
proof
from
us,
demonstrating
that
everything
that
came
through
planning
department
was
checked
against
the
codes.
They
submitted
the
concurrency
test
statement
and
we're
still
meeting
the
current
level
of
service
for
water,
solar
transportation,
even
though
this
development
occurred.
F
So
this
is
just
the
demonstration
and
each
site
provides
the
specific
traffic
water
and
solar
impacts.
It's
a
requirement
by
code.
So
it's
an
annual
requirement
that
we
have
to
transmit
this
report
to
the
city
manager
and
then
adopt
by
resolution,
demonstrating
that
any
development
that
occurred
again
did
not
degrade
the
level
of
services
and
we
still
have
capacity
in
the
future
for
future
development.
F
Unfortunately,
since
2018,
none
of
the
concurrency
test
statements
have
been
submitted
to
the
planning
board
or
the
council,
so
we're
doing
with
one
resolution
we're
doing
four
different
test
statements.
F
F
G
F
It's
both
so
each
proposed
project
they
supposed
to
submit
a
concurrency
test
statement
as
part
of
their
development
and
then
at
the
end
of
the
year.
So
for
the
fiscal
year
was
supposed
to
evaluate
to
see
what
was
approved
in
that
year
and
presented
to
the
city
manager
by
florida
statute.
A
Yeah,
okay,
because
in
the
report
is
it
okay
for
me
to
speak
now
like
I'm,
not
okay?
So
in
the
report,
I
guess
what
I
was
looking
for,
since
we
were
looking
at
properties
from
2018-19,
I
kind
of
expected
to
see
a
column
that
showed
what
it
was
when
it
was
built
versus
what
it
is
now
so
that
you
could
actually
see
the
impact.
But
that's
not
the
purpose
of
this
actual
report.
It's
just
it.
F
For
instance,
we
it's
just
at
the
time
of
the
approval.
Again,
each
developer
is
supposed
to
submit
the
concurrency
test
statement.
Sometimes
at
the
end
we
approve
the
development,
but
it
never
happened.
So
it
expires,
the
permit
expires
or
actually
the
site
expires
so,
and
it
may
never
happen
so.
D
Curiosity
question:
is
there
ever
a
effort
to
validate
whether
the
proposed
statements
at
the
time
about
of
development,
application
and
actuals
like
coincide,
so,
for
example,
if
if
the
car
wash
ends
up
using
10
times
the
amount
of
water
they
originally
had
stated
they
would
use?
Would
there
be
a
way
to
catch
that
with
that.
F
F
We've
never
recently
done
anything
like
this,
but
most
of
the
time,
so
sometimes
development
undergoes
like
minor
amendments
and
they
undergo
a
change
in
expansion
of
the
use.
For
instance,
it
was
approved
for
certain
use,
but
then
it
was
expanded.
F
I'm
not
sure
if
public
works,
if
they
run
to
see
what
was
approved
in
the
application
compared
to
what
it
is,
but
it's
basically
an
estimate
at
the
time
of
the
development
proposal.
It's
an
estimate,
so
any
of
their
numbers
should
match,
because
the
engineer
puts
his
seal
on
it
and
they
base
them
on
fixture
counts.
So
it's
how
many
gallons
per
water,
your
toilet,
you
know,
goes
down
the
the
sink
or
it's
estimated
because
sometimes
you
may
take.
F
G
Yeah-
and
I
think
that-
and
I
just
wanted
to
add
just
just
because
I
felt
like
this
may
help
is-
that
is
that
annually,
for
especially
for
we,
we
look
at
the
level
of
service
of
all
of
those
things
right.
So,
as
one
of
the
slides
said,
we
have
we're
only
at
69
operating
for
our
potable
water,
so
then
those
numbers,
the
actual,
I
want
to
call
it
the
actual
impacts
versus
the
estimated
impacts
are
captured
annually
in
how
we
know
exactly
how
much
water
is
going
through
our
system.
G
So
whether
or
not
that
is
a
singular
development,
I
mean
we.
We
estimate
the
whole
comprehensive
system,
so
we're
comparing
new
developments
to
really
it's
the
it
to
me.
I
look
at
it.
Kind
of
in
layman's
term
is.
This
is
the
way
that
the
city
ensures
that
that
the
proper
facilities
are
there
to
support
any
given
development.
So,
while
we
don't
go
back
to
see
exactly
what
tidal
wave
is
is
consuming
in
their
water,
we
do
know
that
whatever
they're
consuming
hasn't
made
a
significant
impact
to
the
overall
health
of
our
system.
G
C
D
I
know
that
that's
not
what
this
is
all
about,
because
this
is
just
adopting
what
what's
on
here.
I
was
just
curious.
You
know
what
kind
of
checks
and
balances
are
in
place,
because
you
know
I
can
estimate
300
cars
and
it
could
end
up
being
a
lot
different.
You
know,
based
on
the
success
of
the
location,
so
I
was
just
curious
and
mrs
stalin
lee.
A
At
this
point,
then,
because
we
had
moved
to
discussion-
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
no
one
else
had
any-
has
everyone
asked
their
questions
of
staff
because
I
know
they
came
back
up?
Does
anyone
else
have
questions
for
staff?
Thank
you
very
much.
I
was
curious
if
mr
straddling
duncan
had
any
discussion
on
the
matter.
A
It
was
a
good
idea.
We
were
glad
to
hear
that
they
are
going
to
give
us
one
year
at
a
time
in
the
future.
Yes,
all
right,
so
then
we
need
a
roll
call
vote
on
this
item.
B
A
E
Since
the
early
1990s,
the
city
has
been
purchasing
infill
properties
around
the
cra
area,
to
facilitate
downtown
development,
to
ensure
sustainable
and
well-planned
developments
and
to
facilitate
public
communication.
City
council
is
requesting
an
amendment
to
the
ldc
article
14
supplemental
regulation,
section
14.7.5,
to
require
three
public
open
houses
prior
to
the
adoption
of
a
proposed
development
agreement.
At
the
january
4th
2022
city
council
meeting,
there
was
general
consensus
regarding
the
need
for
public
open
houses
for
development
in
the
town
center.
The
city
council
approved
the
additional
steps
on
february
1st
2022.
C
E
Yes
fairly
well,
so
we're
actually
have
a
presentation
on
item
number
four.
I
believe
that
is
a
development
agreement
that
can
go
into
some
further
detail
on
how
the
process
would
would
theoretically
work.
C
D
B
C
Is
that
we
we're
doing.
A
F
F
So
this
is
the
a2201
development
agreement
for
odeon
side,
tatiana
childress,
city
of
oldsmar
planning
and
development
director
just
to
go
over
what
you
have
in
front
of
you.
So
the
first
10
pages
you
will
have
the
staff
report.
F
F
The
background
on
this
site,
so
the
city
owns
approximately
6.96,
acre
property
adjacent
to
the
city,
library
between
saint
petersburg,
drive,
state
street
and
east
arlington
avenue.
The
city
purchased
the
properties
with
the
intent
of
redevelopment.
F
The
city
will
retain
the
remaining
0.74
acre
parcel
adjacent
to
the
library
site
for
future
public
space
development
that
will
be
developed
by
the
city.
The
property
is
located
within
the
cra
and
requires
a
development
agreement.
The
city's
land
development
code,
section
14.7,
outlines
the
process
for
the
execution
of
development
agreement.
F
So,
on
october,
6
2020,
the
city
council,
authorized
the
city
manager
to
enter
into
the
negotiations
with
the
demon
rationale
for
the
proposed
for
the
purpose
of
entering
into
development
agreement
on
february
11th.
F
So
on
february,
11
2021
john
views
presented
a
proposed
conceptual
plan
that
you've
seen
in
this
packet
on
april
6
2021,
the
city
council,
approved
the
revised
conceptual
plan
on
may
5th
2021
the
city
invited
other
proposals
for
the
site
with
illegal
advertisement
as
per
florida
statutes,
163
330
380.,
the
city
did
receive
inquiries
from
framework
group
and
1118
architecture,
but
no
proposals
were
received.
F
On
february
1st
2022,
the
city
council
approved
another
version
of
the
conceptual
plan
presented
in
the
enlargement
of
the
theater
site
or
the
future
site
for
redevelopment
by
the
city
and
reduction
of
the
82
units,
also
the
orientation
of
the
units
to
promote
walkability
and
the
new
urbanism
concept.
F
On
march
1st
2022,
the
city
council
also
directed
the
city
manager
to
host
three
public
open
houses
that
we've
discussed
earlier.
So
all
of
the
three
open
houses
were
successful
and
on
april
5th
2022,
the
city
council
directed
the
city
attorney
to
reduce
the
development
agreement
to
terms
to
contractual
form
for
further
reconsideration.
F
F
In
your
packet,
you
have
a
table
which
summarizes
the
side
side
data
table,
so
we
basically
run
any
development
that
we
receive.
We
run
it
by
code
to
see
what
the
established
density
and
how
the
this
dens
this
development
meets
the
density,
so
how
many
units
of
residential
could
go
on
site.
We
also
check
for
setbacks,
things
like
floor
area
ratio.
F
All
of
that
information
is
located
within
the
the
zoning
section
of
our
town
center
commercial
neighborhood
district.
So
we
just
strictly
go
to
the
code
and
run
it
by
code.
That's
what
we
call
it
also
meets
the
land
use,
so
land
use
is
something
that's
being
controlled
by
our
comprehensive
plan
and
also
by
forward
canals
by
county,
so
it
meets.
The
current
land
use
was
underlaying.
Lane
use
allows,
which
is
the
community
redevelopment
district
allows
up
to
30
30
units
per
acre,
but
our
zoning
tccn
allows
15.
F
F
F
Relocation
of
the
city's
water
main
to
the
west
side
of
saint
petersburg
drive
performance
of
all
side
due
diligence,
including,
but
not
limited
to
any
additional
surveys
and
environmental
assessment.
Replot
of
the
existing
parcels
of
land
all
site
work,
including,
but
not
limited
to
demolition
of,
or
relocation
of,
the
existing
structures.
F
There
will
be
a
buy-in
to
the
city's
stormwater
system.
Connection,
connect
the
project
to
the
city's
reclaimed
water
system,
submission
of
a
final
site
plan,
including
a
senate
site
plan,
I'm
sorry
the
signage
and
landscape
plan.
Through
the
city's
formal
review
process,
the
developer
will
be
required
to
obtain
all
requirement
required
permits,
demonstration
of
concurrency
and
submission
of
a
concurrency
test
statement,
as
required
by
the
city's
land
development
code.
F
So
this
is
the
only
tc
town
center
area
or
our
cra
areas,
the
only
district
in
the
city,
with
the
exception
of
temporal
court
corridor
overlay,
where
we
have
established
architectural
standards,
so
any
development
within
the
cra.
They
have
to
present
to
us
the
architectural
renderings
of
what
the
future
development
would
look
like.
F
So
here
we
have
the
renderings
that
depict
florida,
vernacular
architecture
and
any
again
architecture
is
required
to
conform
to
the
standards
in
our
show
and
design
pattern
book
the
buildings
they
feature
three
stories
front,
porches,
fixed
glass,
storefronts
and
arm
posts
and
some
other
architectural
features
that
meet
the
florida
vernacular
architecture,
as
demonstrated
on
some
of
these
slides.
F
C
C
H
Good
evening
board
members,
my
name
is
devin
rushdown,
I'm
at
2864
kingswood
circle
in
brooksville
florida
I'm
available
for
for
questions.
You
got
a
pretty
good
sized
staff
report
and
everything
102
pages.
I
see
we
spent
a
fair
amount
of
time,
putting
it
together,
working
with
staff
and
working
with
tom,
trask
and
and
everybody
else,
so
I'm
available
for
questions
really.
I
think
they
did
a
fine
job
presenting
it.
So.
H
I
would
suspect
they're
going
to
probably
be
in
the
high
400s
low
500s
per
unit
is
what
I'm
thinking
all
right.
Thank
you.
Yeah.
C
I
know
a
question
this.
These
little
commercial
openings
downstairs
on
st
pete
drive.
I
think
you
have
them
on
state
street
too.
I'm
not
sure,
because
I
don't.
H
C
H
C
H
An
attorney
could
have
a
small
office.
You
know
that
type
of
thing
we've
been
asked
by
by
staff
and
to
bring
in
the
live
work
element
for
the
for
that
use,
and
so
we
added
that
particular
use.
It's
not
a
requirement
that
it
gets
rented
out
and
it
may
be
somewhat
of
a
bonus
room
for
somebody
if
they
want
to
use
it
for
their
own
home
office
is
one
option,
but
it's
it's
set
up
that
way
that
it
can
be
used
for
commercial
activity.
C
C
D
You
had
when
so
I
see
the
I
see
the
units
with
the
live
work
carve
out
which
basically
it's
a
portion
of
the
the
ground
level
space
right.
The
crack.
H
And
actually,
actually
the
building
is
built
staged,
so
the
live
workspace
will
be
up
on
grade
just
above
saint
petey
drive.
As
you
come
out
of
the
live
workspace,
you
walk
downstairs
into
the
garage
area,
so
it's
staged,
that's
where
the
building's
and
that's
why
it's
a
different
building
element
to
take
that
into
consideration.
D
Okay,
and
may
I
ask
where
would
the
optional
bedroom
four
go.
D
H
No
that's
an
optional
bedroom
for
for
the
actual
unit
itself.
The
live
work
is
on
the
right
side,
where
it
says
ground
floor.
D
H
Main
floor
at
the
very
back
you'll
see,
there's
options
there
and
sort
of
answer
your
question:
it's
13,
8
by
23
8,
is
the
size
of
that
space
for
the
low
point.
C
Well,
the
end
unit's
bigger.
I
mean
I
see
that
488
square
feet
on
the
ground
floor,
end
cap,
but
the
ones
in
the
farther
down
and
the
middle
or
smaller
they're.
A
I
had
a
couple
I
actually
so
there
was
a.
A
I've
made
a
note
here,
oh
and
paragraph
four,
on
page
eight
of
the
of
the
name
it
it
says
something
about.
It's
all
about
give
me
a
second
about
lighting,
and
then
there
was
a
statement
this.
Maybe
this
is
better
for
staff.
I
missed
it
earlier,
there's
a
statement
about
general
nuisance
that
really
isn't
specific
to
light
lighting.
A
It
was
just
a
very
general
statement
on
actually
on
page
10
number
27.
I
think
it
was.
Let
me
say
I
apologize.
I
wrote
it
down,
but
now
it's
page
8
number
24.
G
Yes,
that's
a
general
statement
that
we
include
in
all
of
our
development
agreements,
and
it
has
to
do
with
that
that
they're,
really
that
the
the
lighting
can't
be
in
such
a
way
that
it
would
affect
the
neighbors
enjoyment
of
their
property.
Okay,.
A
A
I
have
it
written
down,
but
I
mean
it's
not
that
important,
so
we
don't
have
to
belabor
it,
but
you've
answered
the
question
all
right.
Thank
you.
The
other
question
I
had
was
about.
It
was
on
page
11
of
the
agreement
and
it
talks
about
it.
It
goes
back
to
credits
from
previous
developer,
so
it
was
the
fee
schedule
and
the
impact
fees
and
totals
on
the
city
impact
fees.
So
that's
for
staff
too,
so
I
guess
I
backtracked
and
where
it
says,
credits
from
previous
developer.
A
I
just
had
a
question
based
on
all
the
other
information
we've
gotten
tonight,
where
those
credits
come
from.
G
Right
so
the
the
credits
for
any
development.
So
when
a
development
pays
an
impact
fee
right,
so
we
assess
impact
fees
at
the
time
of
building
permit.
So
those
are
those
are
paid
for
that
impact.
So
in
our
code
it
allows
for
credit
to
be
given
to
another
development
on
the
same
site,
because
it's
infill
development
right.
So
the
previous
development
has
already
paid
some
level
of
fees.
So
then
the
a
newer
development
would
get
a
credit
to
those
fees
based
on
the
previous
use.
G
So
it's
only
a
partial
credit
based
on
what
the
use
is
and
what
the
square
foot.
So,
for
instance,
there
were
several
it's
infill
development.
There
were
several
properties
on
there.
One
of
them
was
mickey's
peanuts.
Well,
when
do
you
guys
familiar
with
that
place?
There
probably
is,
but
for
instance,
so
they
paid
a
level
of
impact
fees.
So
once
that
building
goes
away,
a
new
infill
development
would
get
credit
for
what
they've
already
paid
into
the.
G
A
So
is
there
anyone
here
that
would
like
to
speak
for
the
agenda
item
yeah.
H
Yes,
we
talked
to
water
management,
about
that
on
may
19th.
We
had
a
pre-application
with
them.
They
had
some
criteria
we'll
have
to
meet
because
there's
a
certain
amount
of
runoff.
That's
in
that
ditch
and
I
believe
that
ditch
has
an
overflow
area
right
into
the
d.o.t
pond.
Yes,
so
water
management
said
we
could
pipe
it,
but
we
have
to
have
a
bubble
up
structure
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
still
can
function.
So
it's
an
engineering
design
consideration.
Will
you
covert
it
all
the
way
to.
H
I
we
you
hadn't,
looked
at
it
from
a
design
perspective
that
deep
we've
done
preliminary
site
plans
and
a
preliminary
meeting
with
water
management
just
to
go
through
it.
Okay,.
C
And
I
see
you're
not
touching
school
street,
which
is
a
good
thing
right.
The
you're
moving
the
dumpster
relocating
the
dumpster,
that's
on
the
property
to
the
west,
the
vacants
vacant,
no
trees
right
at
the
library
edge
parking
lot
right,
you're,
building
type
twos,
but
up
against
this,
the
library
parking
lot
right.
It
appears
there's
a
wall,
but
I'm
not
sure
in
in
some
of
the
pictures.
C
C
C
H
C
H
C
Through
the
theater,
it's
cross-connection,
but
yeah,
and
so
anybody
from
this
development
then
can
like
pedestrians,
can
surge
through
the
library
parking
lot
onto
dartmouth
and
walk
around
the
neighborhood,
and
there
would
be
no
no
way,
no
impedance
to
that
movement
of
humanity.
C
Well,
just
people
walking
their
dogs
on
the
street,
but
okay,
that's
the
only
question
I
think.
Thank
you
other
questions.
A
What
any
written
comments
received?
No,
if
there
are
no
others
wishing
to
speak
and
favor,
our
opposition
to
item
number
three,
the
public
hearing
will
now
close
and
it
is
moved
and
seconded
the
clerk
will
call
on
each
member
for
their
vote.
Or
do
we
need
to
do
a
discussion
again?
Do
we
need
to
do
a
discussion.
A
A
C
C
F
F
C
At
least
I
don't
live
next
to
the
pool.
That's
all
I
had
thank
you.
I
don't
have
any
other
discussion
items
any
other
board.
Members.
A
I
would
like
to
comment
that
I
was
very
pleased
to
see
the
parking
allocated
because
that's
always
a
concern,
so
I
appreciate
that
clerk
will
call
on
each
member
for
their
vote
and
a
roll
call
vote.
Yes,.
B
F
So,
as
stated
in
chapter
163
part
two
florida
statutes,
all
municipalities
in
florida
must
maintain
long-range,
comprehensive
planning
program
and
the
purpose
of
comprehensive
planning
is
to
monitor
and
evaluate
community
characteristics
related
to
development
provisions
of
services,
environmental
protection
and
other
governmental
activities.
In
accordance
with
chapter
163
florida
statutes,
municipalities
are
required
to
evaluate
the
comprehensive
plan
every
seven
years
for
compliance.
What
changes
in
state
regulations
and
requirements,
the
reporting
requirements
for
the
evaluation
and
appraisal
report
transmittal
significantly
changed
since
2011
simplifying
this
process.
F
So
each
municipality
is
required
to
transmit
to
the
department
of
economic
opportunity,
a
letter
stating
that
they
either
in
compliance
with
the
regulations
or
they're,
anticipating
any
changes.
So
basically,
we
have
done
some
research
and
we're
trying
to
we're
notifying
the
state
that
we
are
going
to
be
revising
our
comprehensive
plan
in
the
next
year
and
by
august
2023.
We
will
be
transmitting
to
the
state
the
updated,
comprehensive
plan,
which
means
that
this
letter
will
notify
the
state
that
we're
making
those
changes
to
the
comp
plan.
F
So
this
is
just
kind
of
like
a
formal
formality
for
us
to
to
say
that
we're
working
on
our
comprehensive
plan
in
the
next
year.
With
that
being
said,
so,
we've
already
worked
on
securing
a
consultant
to
help
us
with
the
comprehensive
plan
update.
F
It's
been
approved
by
council
and
we've
already
scored
the
highest
ranking
firm,
which
is
calvin
jordan
and
associates
to
do
the
comp
plan.
Amendment
for
us
and
public
meetings
will
be
coming
up
in
the
next
couple
of
months
for
the
public
participation
and
also
stakeholders
involvement
to
discuss
all
of
the
elements
that
are
currently
in
the
comp
plan.
So
the
last
update
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
including
all
of
the
elements,
was
done
sometimes
in
2008.
F
Since
that
time
we
had
multiple
amendments
to
different
elements.
For
instance,
the
land
development
land
use
element
was
amended
several
times.
A
I
I
have
just
one
you
don't
even
have
to
stand
up.
I
just
have
one:
do
you
foresee
any
opposition
to
changing
this,
because
basically,
this
is
just
approving
to
send
a
letter
saying
you're
going
to
work
on
this
over
the
next
year
to
present
some
amendments
right
correct,
why
the
public
meetings?
What
opposition
do
you
think
that
you
need
to
kind
of
get
ahead
of?
I'm
just
curious.
F
So
a
lot
of
the
items
are
just
in
the
code
and
we
need
to
bring
it
in
front
of
the
board
in
order
to
move
to
the
next
step,
and
it's
also
a
good
public
engagement
process.
So
we're
notifying
you
that
we're
doing
this
so
we're
keeping
informed
the
public.
So
it's
for
public
engagement,
it's
not
necessarily
always
for
opposition,
but
it's
kind
of
like
notifying
the
board
members
and
also
notifying
the
public
that
we're
doing
this
and
and
will
be
conducting
multiple
public
meetings
in
the
future
to
update.
A
C
F
It
I
do
not
have
the
property
rights
element
in
front
of
me,
so
we'll
be
reviewing
it
in
greater
detail
when
we
transmit
it
to
the
state,
which
is
basically
so
it
was
a
new
statutory
requirement
and
state
actually
provided
kind
of
like
a
guidance.
What
needs
to
be
included
into
that
element?
F
We
didn't
go
outside
of
what
was
minimum
required
for
that
element
and
we
just
included
the
language
the
same
one
that
was
suggested
to
us
with
this
new
update.
If
we
wanted
to
expand
on
it,
we
definitely
could
explore
like
what
could
be
added
and
at
that
time,
we'll
we'll
take
the
comments.
So
I
will.
I
will
take
a
comment
and
get
back
with
you
on
that.
I'm
a
note
and
we'll
get
back
with
you
on
that.
F
So
they're
different
right,
different
applications
and
different
municipalities.
They
kind
of
like
tweak
a
little
bit
and
I'm
pretty
sure
the
consultant
will
help
us
to
maybe
find
the
right
language
for
oldsmar
how
we
can
amend
it
so
that
it's
not
like
a
stamp
that
came
from.
You
know
the
stamp
language
kind
of
like
a
template
language,
but
it
will
be
more
tailored
towards
needs
of
ultima
but
at
the
same
time
meet
the
statutory
requirements.
So
it's
kind
of
like
a
balance.
C
And
our
coastal
hazard
area
stops
where.
F
The
coastal
high
hazard
area
actually
changed.
The
map
was
issued
in
september,
it
increased
in
area
and
if
you
picture
oldsmar,
so
anything
south
of
tampa
road
is
pretty
much
chha
and
anything.
F
To
burbank
kind
of
like
well
passive
in
burbank,
so
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
I
can
bring.
It
will
be
a
good
public
meeting
board
post
board
to
demonstrate
what
the
limits
of
coastal
high
hazard
area
so
we'll
bring
those
during
the
work
public
workshop.
So.
F
So
that
was
already
permitted
by
density,
so
the
density
that
was
already
in
place.
So
any
amendments
to
that
established
density.
F
Something
is
a
subject
to
the
regulations
that
we've
discussed
on
the
prior
meetings,
where
you
start
talking
about
mitigation,
so
they're
not
completely
they're,
trying
to
kind
of
like
move
the
population
density
from
the
coastal
areas,
but
at
the
same
time
as
we
keep
growing
they're,
also
talking
about
like
it's
not
the
same
for
saint
petersburg
as
it
is
for
us,
because
we're
so
close
to
evacuation
routes
and
they're
talking
about
mitigations
how
you
can
actually
move
the
residential
on
the
second
third
floor
or
in
put
generators
in
the
in
in
in
your
residential
home.
F
F
So
this
development
agreement-
again,
I
will
repeat
we're
not
increasing
the
density.
The
density
was
already
in
place
since
2006.
right
for
this
particular
they're,
not
increasing
it.
So
why
would
they
if
they
were
to
change
the
density
on
that
site?
That's
when
that
would
trigger
that
code.
That
section
of
the
code.
C
A
All
right
is
there,
a
motion,
am
I
there,
I
sometimes
I'm
getting
lost
with
all
the
comments.
Is
there
a
motion.
A
B
The
motion
to
recommend
that
the
city
council
authorized
staff
to
transmit
the
evaluation
and
appraisal
report
of
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
to
the
department
of
economic
opportunity,
notifying
the
state
of
the
city's
intent
to
amend
the
comprehensive
plan
by
august
2023
for
consistency
with
new
statutory
requirements
is
approved,
with
six
votes.
Four
and
zero
again.
A
I'm
not
sure
protocol
on
doing
this,
but
we've
gone
almost
two
hours
and
I
was
thinking.
Maybe
someone
might
need
a
brief
break
because
then
next
we're
done,
aren't
we
aren't
we
done
yeah.
What's
the.
A
A
This
summer
doing
workshops
for
students
that
are
preparing
to
go
to
college
and
I
had
some
handouts.
There
were
the
all
the
florida
colleges
lined
up
it's
a
matrix,
so
anybody
that
has
a
junior
or
senior
preparing
for
college.
If
you
email
me
I'll,
send
it
to
you,
it's
really
very
yeah.
You
might
want
one
devin,
that's
all.
I
have
anybody
else.
D
Okay,
I
was
just
gonna
say,
and
this
is
for
city
staff.
You
know
I'm
on
the
agendas
you
you
reference
page
packet,
page
numbers
and
like,
for
example,
number
four
says
packet,
page
111.
like
there's,
there's
no
111
anywhere
in
the
book.
It
all
starts
with
one
all
over
again,
and
so
I
was
going
to
say
if
you
guys
can
simplify
that
for
your
own
purposes
and
for
ours.
That's.
B
Generated
by
our
electronic
system,
so
it's
just
the
whole
from
the
very
first
page
to
the
very
last
it
just
automatically.
D
D
B
I
have
an
appreciation
plaque
for
john
andrew
for
five
years
of
service.
These
were
presented
at
the
volunteer
appreciation
dinner,
but
you
were
not
able
to
attend
that.
So
I'd
just
like
to
give
you
this
with
special
appreciation.
We
recognize
you
for
your
dedicated
service
as
a
member
of
the
planning
board
since
2017.