►
From YouTube: Airport Commission | Oct 19 22
Description
Meeting of the Palm Springs International Airport Commission, held October 19th, 2022
A
B
A
F
G
C
D
H
A
D
D
A
A
K
A
A
A
D
D
M
I
I,
first
of
all,
I
appreciate
you
taking
time.
I
know
this
is
probably
not
the
most
important
of
things
that
the
airport
is
dealing
with
at
the
moment.
These
are
two
items
that
this
is
part
of
the
pro
forma
approval
process
that
the
different
commissions
do.
One
of
the
items
that
you
saw
in
the
report.
M
Inertia
is
in
existence
in
the
airport
right
now,
and
that
was
a
temporary
art
piece
that
was
donated
and
they
would
like
to
make
it
a
full
acceptance
into
the
Palm
Springs
permanent
public
Arts
collection
and
keep
it
in
place
in
the
airport.
The
public
Arts
commission
has
approved
that
motion,
and
now
we
bring
it
to
the
airport
commission
for
their
approval
before
it
then
moves
on
to
city
council
to
finalize
it.
The
second
item
is
a
piece
that
was
the
the
estate
of
of
the
artist.
M
M
He
was
upon
notable
prong
spring
citizen,
very
involved
in
Social
and
cultural
issues
and
that
his
representative
presented
this
piece
to
us
called
ban
booty,
and
it
was
a
a
collection
of
pieces
that
were
banned
during
the
911
crisis
and
what
things
were
not
brought
and
allowed
into
the
airports
he's
created
this.
This
sculpture,
which
the
information
is
on
the
report
they're
using,
can
see,
and
his
representative
has
confirmed
that
they
will
donate
the
peace
in
full.
They
will
donate
all
installation
costs,
as
well
as
all
future
maintenance
costs.
M
M
However,
we
found
a
place
that
we
we
were
at
the
airport
the
other
day
and
there's
a
place
that
we
thought
it
would
work.
Well,
not
knowing
what
was
part
of
your
future
plans
for
renovating
the
airport
and
that's
right
when
you
walk
in
the
front
doors,
there's
an
opening
over
to
the
right
hand,
side.
M
M
M
B
B
I
certainly
would
be
of
a
mind
to
continue
that
in
its
place,
I
can
see
the
photos
that
you
included
in
staff
report
they're
a
bit
of
a
side
view,
so
all
I
can
discern
is
there
are
things
like
scissors
and
and
some
other
items
in
there,
so
I'm
I'm
pleased
to
see
that
we're
not
considering
this
post
security,
so
my
initial
concern
would
be
anything
that
could
be
security
related
and
that's
the
only
comment
I
have
on
that.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
thanks
for.
K
Yes,
my
my
only
concern
is
I
think
the
pieces
are
are
fine,
I
mean
I.
Think
art
is
for
art
itself
is
sake
for
itself
and
whether
we
like
that
art
or
not
like
that
art
I,
think
it
should
be
displayed
and
I'm
happy
that
the
airport
is
participating
in
the
public
art.
So
I
think
that's
fine.
The
one
question
I
would
have
for
airport
staff.
K
Is
that
there's
a
lot
of
Renovations
planned
right
and
so
I
really
need
to
make
sure
that
Harry
and
his
staff
are
in
agreement
with
the
locations
that
you're
recommending,
because
space
is
tight
in
the
terminals
and
there
are
long-range
plans
out
there
and
so
before
I
think
I
could
vote
on
it.
I'd
like
to
get
what
Harry's
feelings
are
about
this,
not
necessarily
that
he
likes
the
art
or
doesn't
like
the
art.
But
you
know
the
location,
because
that
one
piece
is
rather
large
and.
M
K
L
Commissioner
Miller
thank
you
for
the
question
so
where
the
proposed
location
of
the
art
is
going
right
now,
the
only
concern
I
have
is
that
we've
relocated
Flair
Airlines
to
the
ticket
counters,
just
north
of
that,
so
their
queuing
would
go
just
past
that
art
piece
and
I'm
not
necessarily
concerned.
You
know
about
the
visibility
I
think
it
would
get
a
lot
of
visibility,
but
I
am
concerned
about
the
constraints
we
have
in
terms
of
circulation.
K
So
maybe
what
I'd
like
to
request?
The
art
commission
is
to
have
a
a
plan
and
a
b
plan
and
for
the
placement
of
the
pieces
and
work
with
airport
staff
for
the
a
plan
and
the
B
plan,
because
I
have
no
again
I
have
no
problems
with
the
place
in
the
art
there,
and
as
long
as
staff
feels
it's
safe
safety
for
the
public
and
there's
no
damage
to
the
art.
Because
I
think
that's
really
important.
Then
you
know
I'm
all
for
it.
E
Did
thank
you
just
a
question
of
protocol
Gary.
Did
you
arrange
a
time
with
Harry's
staff
and
you
walked
around
with
the
airport
pre-security
post
security
and
you're
recommending
this
particular
place
after
consultation
with
airport
staff
or
or
did
you
do
something
else?
I
was
a
little
unclear
when
you
first
began.
Oh.
M
M
E
E
E
It
so
my
two
cents
would
be
maybe
more
formalized
work
with
airport
staff
so
that
to
commissioner
Miller's
point
A
lot's
going
to
come
down
very
quickly,
understand
that
you're
flexible
in
moving
things
around,
but
airport
staff
probably
knows
from
a
phasing
standpoint.
What's
going
to
happen
when
and
it
might
be
much
more
efficient
and
effective.
If
you
became
back
with
Harry
and
his
staff
and
said,
we've
talked,
we
think
this
is
for
this
time
Etc
and
then
we
could
vote
on
it
because
I
I
don't
know
what
I'm
voting
on
so
I
think.
E
N
L
Yes,
that's
usually
negotiated,
so
you
know
the
airport
you
know
can
negotiate
that
one-on-one
with
the
artist
can
negotiate
with
the
Arts
Commission
on
that
we
don't
necessarily
have
a
preference
on
a
term
mostly
because
we'd
like
to
build
out
our
arts
program
here,
so
the
more
art
that
we
get
in.
You
know
it's
helpful
to
that
cause,
but
you
know
there's
no
set
established
term.
We
can
certainly
be
flexible
on
that.
N
Okay
he's
the
gentleman
Gary
mentioned
that
some
of
the
art
is
getting
stale
and
I
do
feel
like
we
should
have
a
term
that
can
be
extended,
but
there
should
be
some
term
that
everybody
knows
this
is
coming
to
an
end.
I
used
to
live
in
San
Francisco
SFO
had
pretty
much
I,
don't
know
what
their
term
was,
but
in
the
United
terminal,
which
is
mostly
what
I
used
you
would
know.
Basically,
every
three
months
and
I'm
not
suggesting
three
months
is
the
term.
N
They
have
a
long
exhibition
space
and
you
knew
you'd
see
something
new
and
interesting
or
new
and
not
interesting.
Whatever
the
case
may
be,
I
just
have
concerns.
I
know
the
Arts.
People
are
very
excited
about
getting
art
in
public
places
and
I.
Think
that's
wonderful,
but
I
I
also
see
kind
of
the
possibility
that,
like
lots,
of
arches,
gets
placed
and
is
kind
of
left
there
forever,
because
there's
no
end
point
in
time
to
discuss
is
a
time
to
move
on
or
is
a
time
for
it
to
stay.
L
H
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
Echo
that
I
agree
with
commissioner
Miller's
thoughts
that
it
did.
We
really
do
have
to
clear
this
with
the
airport
staff
and
make
sure
that
it's
not
going
to
impact
the
airport
operation
and
but
I
also
wanted
to
add
that
I
really
do
think.
The
piece
is
awesome.
It's
really
cool
and
it'd
be
a
great
addition
to
the
airports.
H
H
M
Sorry,
I'm
going
to
jump
in
the
state
of
the
artist
said
they
will
cover
all
costs
for
future
maintenance
or
any
moving,
or
things
like
that.
I
would
even
suggest
a
piece
of
this
scale
could
be
used
if
there
is
an
area
where
there
is
future
construction
and
you're
doing
some
sort
of
wall
before
you
unveil
something
this
Arc
could
be
a
way
just
to
sort
of
say.
There's
something
interesting
happening
here.
Come
back
into
your
sort
of
component.
M
The
thing
I
like
about
this
piece
is
it's
substantial,
but
it's
movable
yeah,
it
doesn't
feel
it
doesn't
feel
sort
of
Picayune.
You
know
like
a
lot
of
pieces
of
public
art
it
there
and
and
there's
something
engaging
about
it.
It's
you're,
not
just
walking
by
and
saying.
Oh
it's
a
nice
metal
Circle.
You
know.
G
J
I'd
love
to
see
the
art,
commission
or
the
staff.
Consider
that
as
well,
because
right
now,
there's
nothing
there
and
again
I'd
refer
to
you
Harry.
If
there's
some
reason
why
that
is
or
temporary
walls
or
whatever
let
us
know,
but
it
just
seems
like
that.
First
impression,
when
you
walk
into
checking
your
bags,
it's
pretty
bland
and
wondered
if
there
was
any
ways
that
we
should
be
looking
at
that
or
working
with
the
art
commission.
We
can
get
their
help
to
try
to
consider
insulations
for
that
area.
L
J
M
I
will
say
on
top
of
that,
and
this
was
going
to
be
the
last
part
of
my
presentation
with
you.
Guys
is
I'm
sort
of
doing
a
effort
of
going
to
every
commission
that
we're
involved
with
and
when
I
joined.
I
was
really
dismayed.
How
many
commissions
are
sort
of
sacrosanct
and
they
don't
interact
with
each
other
whatsoever
and
I
think
we
all
should
be
interacting
with
each
other.
M
As
I
was
driving
up
to
look
at
the
airport
today,
I
noticed
there
was
a
lot
of
areas
where
you
turned
off
the
irrigation
and
the
dead
grass
and
I
thought.
You
know
that'd
be
a
great
place
for
a
big
piece
of
art.
You
know
you
don't
need
Landscaping
everywhere
you
could
use
some
great
art
and
then
you
just
have
DG
and
it
would
look
amazing
and
it
would
really
show
the
beauty
of
Palm
Springs.
M
M
And
we
are
we
we're
moving
those
because
we
think
they
need
to
be
recited
and
they
need
to
be
shown
in
a
beautiful
fashion.
And
so
that's
why
we're
sort
of
revisiting
all
the
artwork
that
we
have
in
our
collection,
not
only
because
a
lot
needs
to
be
redone,
but
it
can
be
better
displayed
and
that's
again,
one
of
the
goals
we're
doing
with
the
Promenade
area
within
the
the
airport
as
well.
What
can
we
do
better
and
what
needs
to
be
reinvigorated?
As
you
said,
you
want
to
make
things
look
good.
K
K
Okay
and
I
would
like
definitely
to
Second
the
commissioner
about
San
Francisco's
airport
I'm.
Sure
many
of
us
have
been
up
there
and
it's
beautiful
and
I
would
also
like
to
push
the
art
commission
to
help
us
with
our.
If
we
could
get
even
two-thirds
of
the
way
to
where
San
Francisco
airport
is
I,
think
we'd
have
a
spectacular
collection,
great
yeah
and,
and
that,
and
that
really
would
be
great
and
I
think
you
you've
heard
many
of
the
Commissioners
want
a
lot
more
art,
so
I
think
you're.
M
Great,
if
there's
no
other
questions,
I
will
just
end
and
say
I
as
I
said:
I
agree.
We
need
to
be
working
together
and
Christina.
Brown
has
my
contact
information
and
perhaps
one
or
two
Commissioners
could
volunteer
to
interact
with
me
and
we
can
sort
of
walk
through
the
airport
and
identify
places
that
need
to
be
enlightened
and
be
Unified.
F
A
Any
opposed
seeing
them.
Thank
you
again,
one
more
time
at
this
time.
I
just
would
like
to
let
all
of
you
know
that
due
to
a
conflict,
I
will
be
exiting
and
vice
chair
Cochran
will
take
over
and
I
believe
we're
gonna
move
to
item
10c,
which
is
I,
believe
our
City
attorney
Jeffrey
Bellinger.
So
thank
you,
Jeff
and
thank
you
all
and
I
will
see
you
and
I
believe
our
next
meeting
before
I
leave
will
be
November
22nd
same
time
at
5,
30.
D
Chairman
dot
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
we
haven't
had
any
communication
with
the
commission
to
let
them
know
that
we
were
considering
moving
the
November
16th
meeting
the
regularly
scheduled
November
16th
meeting.
We
are
going
to
move
that
to
Tuesday
November
22nd
in
order
to
allow
more
time
to
prepare
the
documents
to
present
to
the
commission
on
the
concessions
RFP
award.
So
we,
when
we
adjourn
the
meeting,
we
will
be
adjourning
to
Tuesday
November
22nd
at
5
30.
O
Hello,
everybody
and
I
apologize
I'm
driving
back
from
a
meeting
in
Long
Beach,
so
I
apologize
for
the
background
noise,
I'm
I'm
certainly
happy
to
answer
any
legal
questions
in
terms
of
the
process
as
I
understand
it.
The
bids
are
moving
forward.
I
think
there
is
a
evaluation
process
that
occurred
either
earlier
this
week
or
last
week
by
the
evaluation
panel
and
I
believe
they're
going
to
be.
The
results
are
going
to
be
finalized
this
week,
maybe
tomorrow
maybe
Harry
has
more
information
in
terms
of
the
process.
O
P
D
P
The
commission
voted
for
the
airport
concessions
program
to
be
a
priority
of
focus
for
the
city
council's
visioning
session
that
took
place
back
in
2021,
so
that
was
one
of
the
priorities
of
the
commission
to
move
the
RFP
forward
so
that
we
can
start
soliciting
for
new
concessions,
because
the
program
or
the
existing
concessions
agreement
expires,
April,
30th
2023..
So
in
may
we
had
the
airport
commission.
Some
of
the
members
of
the
the
commission
take
a
look
at
the
RFP.
P
We
also
requested
their
financial
performance,
and
then
we
even
gave
them
a
sample
agreement
that
the
airport
and
the
city
were
working
with
the
attorneys
to
to
make
sure
that
was
already
prepared
and
ready
to
go.
So
once
we
were
ready
to
award
that
agreement
was
already
completed,
we
had
advertised
for
the
RFP
for
a
total
of
98
days,
which
is
a
lot
longer
than
our
normal
process.
We
wanted
to
allow
the
opportunity
for
Regional
local
National
Brands
to
to
submit
for
their
proposals.
P
We
did
our
pre-proposal
conference
back
in
I,
want
to
say
July
and
we
had
about
40
attendees,
local
and
National
and
Regional
Brands
were
here
so
I
mean
we
had
a
really
good
turnout,
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
last
turnout
was
when
we
started
this
process
the
first
time,
but
we
had
a
good
turnout.
We
walked
all
the
attendees
through
some
of
the
most
problematic
areas
that
would
most
likely
require
most
of
the
capital
investment.
P
We
showed
the
blank
slate
places
that
we
that
were
ideally
for
local
companies
to
bid
on,
but
we
allowed
it
for
everyone,
of
course,
and
then
we
walked
through
all
of
the
retail
and
food
and
beverage
locations
and
then
the
other
Blank
Slate
vocations
to
show
everyone
this.
This
is
what
you're
getting
they
have
they
ask
questions.
We
ask
them
to
put
it
in
writing
so
that
we
can
respond
in
writing.
So
everybody
got
the
same
answer
on
on
everything.
P
P
We
had
over
30
registered
local
participants
on
planet
bids
and,
out
of
all
that,
we
ended
up
having
a
total
of
three
proposals
for
the
retail
per
packet
retail
package.
Two
proposals
for
the
food
and
beverage
package
and
two
proposals
for
the
blank
slate
number
two,
so
Blank
Slate
number
one
and
number
three.
They
were
not
bid
on
by
by
anyone.
P
P
After
this,
we
intend
to
take
this
contract
or
take
our
recommendations
to
the
full
commission
and
allow
the
commission
to
make
a
recommendation
on
our
selection,
based
on
the
procurement
process
that
we
followed,
and
then
we
intend
to
award
the
concessions
agreement
on
December
15th.
That's
the
last
City
Council
of
the
year.
J
L
Of
a
couple
of
answers
to
that
I'm
going
to
weigh
in
here
so
the
first
is
many
of
those
memory
of
the
proposers
or
vendors
or
interested
parties
that
came
out
are
actually
partnered
with
master
concessionaires.
So
while
there
were
40
attendees
and
while
there
were
only
two
or
three
proposals
based
on
the
package
that
was
being
bid
more
than
a
number
of
those
proposals
have
more
than
10
or
20
different
vendors
assigned
to
them
already
so
there
it's
the
joint
ventures
that
are
kind
of
consolidating
that
number.
L
So
the
areas
that
were
not
bit
at
all
really
are
truly
Blank
Slate
areas,
in
other
words,
they
were
never
occupied.
To
begin
with,
we
were
just
trying
to
make
extra
Revenue
with
the
proposals
that
we
have
in
front
of
us.
We
have
more
than
enough
in
terms
of
not
only
provisions
and
concessions
for
the
passenger,
but
also
local
talent
that
frankly
bid
on
these
these
packages,
where
we're
able
to
serve
the
airport
for
a
little
while
without
a
problem.
P
And
I
do
want
to
add
to
that
Harry
that
those
blank
slates
there
there's
no
infrastructure.
There's
no
water
utilities,
nothing,
so
they
so
literally.
It
would
be
coming
in
and
bringing
in
that
pop-up
that
infrastructure
and
bringing
that
into
the
airport
so
and
and
like
Harry
said,
there
was
a
lot
of
local
participation
that
partnered
with
the
the
bigger
companies,
and
it
was
quite
impressive.
N
N
O
O
N
That
that's
helpful
Jeff.
That's
helpful.
Jeff
I
appreciate
that
I
want
to
just
ask
a
further
question
which
is-
and
this
is
really
for
Harry
and
Victoria.
Are
we
going
to
have
a
meaningful
opportunity
to
ask
in-depth
questions
and
to
receive
those
answers
and
then
to
be
able
to
review
them
again?
Are
we
going
to
face
a
urgent?
L
So
the
idea
behind
taking
an
extra
week
for
the
regularly
scheduled
Commission
meeting
is
so
that
we
have
the
opportunity
to
assemble
those
packages
for
you
and
really
kind
of
walk
you
through
not
only
the
process
but
walk
you
through
all
the
decision
points
that
led
to
the
recommended
concessionaire
so
you'll
have
an
opportunity
to
see
you
know
at
all
levels
what
we
were
working
with.
What
decision
points
were
made?
What
negotiations
happened?
All
of
those
things
will
be
presented
to
you
in
that
that
review
on
the
22nd
and.
K
K
O
I
think
that
if
you're
talking
about
selecting
you
know
a
new
city
manager
or
selecting
a
new
fire
station
site,
I
think
that
we
we
often
see
that
I
think
again
in
the
procurement
world.
Where
you
are,
you
know,
spending
funds,
and
you
know
at
least
since
the
Truman
era.
You've
you've
had
Protections
in
place
and
oversight
in
place
to
make
sure
that
there
isn't
fraud
and
Corruption.
The
the
the
the
I
wouldn't
say
rules,
but
the
expectations
and
standards
and
in
practices
are
a
little
bit
tighter.
J
So
so
Jeff
you
made
one
comment:
I
think
Harry.
You
may
have
mitigated
this
you're
saying
that
this
decision
process
in
this
group
was
there
to
bring
kind
of
the
first
recommendation.
I'm,
not
sure,
that's
true,
that
my
understanding
is
they're
going
to
bring
the
final
recommendation
now.
Harry
you've
said
that
you're
going
to
share
in
the
extra
time
we're
taking
between
the
16th
and
the
22nd
you're
going
to
be
able
you're
going
to
share
with
all
of
us.
The
original
proposals
and
the
different
decision
points
that
led
to
this
recommendation
did
I
hear
that.
G
L
J
So
I
also
think
for
futures
Jeff
I,
don't
I
don't
get
it
nor
do
I
understand
this
whole
conflict
of
interesting
I
really
feel
that
that's
flimsy
that
we're
letting
people
from
greater
Palm
Springs
on
this
on
this
decision
process
and
not
Commissioners
and
I-
think
that's
something
we
should
take
offline.
We
should
have
a
discussion
because
this
may
not
be
the
first
time
when
the
commission
has
been
left
out
of
what
is
one
of
our
two
priorities
for
the
year
and
delegated
this
to
staff
and
to
City
people
whatever
I.
J
J
You
know,
discuss
that
offline,
but
it
doesn't
make
sense
and-
and
also-
and
we've
discussed
this
with
staff-
the
fact
that
this
proceeded
without
any
discussion
with
accounts
with
the
commission,
this
decision
process
the
selection
criteria,
whoever
wound
up
on
that
deal,
you
know,
is
something
else:
we're
dealing
with
staff
with
now.
I
mean
it
should
not
have
happened.
We
should
have
been
advised
about
who
was
on
this
decision
commission
or
decision
process.
This
group
now
I'm
happy
to
hear
Harry
your
commitment
to
show
us
all
the
process.
J
It's
going
to
mean
it's
going
to
take
some
pre-work
and
some
time
for
all
of
us
to
look
through
all
the
proposals
and
to
kind
of
understand
the
decision
process
in
each
of
the
phases
of
this
and
I
went
through
this
with
the
Plaza
theater
The
Selection
process
for
The
Architects,
the
Plaza
theater
I
was
one
of
the
those
people
who
did
it.
So
it's
a
very
detailed
process
when
it
works.
J
It
works
really
really
well,
I
mean
if
we're
going
to
open
up
and
be
transparent
with
the
commission
and
all
the
steps
involved
in
this.
That's
great,
that's
great
I
still
think
we
should
have
been
on
it
and
but
for
now,
as
long
as
we
have
access
to
the
whole
process,
so
the
commission
can
understand
the
trade-offs
and
the
decisions
and,
most
importantly,
is
the
final
recommendation,
consistent
with
with
the
criteria
that
we
suggested
we
work
so
hard
to
put
together.
J
J
We
need
to
challenge
this
thinking
that
there's
some
conflict
of
interest
I
mean
I,
really
need
to
understand
what
this
looks
like,
because
I
don't
get
why
someone
in
Greater,
Palm
Springs,
is
on
this
thing
and
the
commission
is
not
I,
don't
buy
it
I,
don't
understand
it,
but
we'll
save
that
from
another
day,
but
for
Commissioners.
You
should
all
know
that
we
will
have
now
as
a
result
of
Harry's
update
on
this,
which
I
think
is
good
news.
The
opportunity
to
see
everything
that
was
proposed.
P
Gonna
have
a
caveat
to
that.
So
some
of
these
proposals
are
considered
confidential
information,
and
so
that
might
be
so
I'm
not
sure.
If
you're
expecting
to
receive
the
full
proposals
from
the
everybody
that
provided
the
information,
we
could
do
a
synopsis
of
it
and
write
that
into
our
staff
report,
but
there's
some
information
that
they
strictly
have
asked.
That
is
confidential.
That
is
not
something
that
is
provided
to
the
public.
P
So
unless
it's
something
that
so
I
I,
don't
mind,
I,
think
and
Harry,
you
know
and
Jeff
you
definitely
let
me
know
if
I'm
incorrect
on
this,
but
there
were
some
proposals
that
had
confidential
listed
on
them,
and
so
it's
not
going
to
be
something
that
we're
going
to
give
you.
Here's
the
whole
proposal
take
a
look
at
it.
P
It's
going
to
be
just
a
synopsis
of
what
what
the
different
proposers
had
the
relationship,
the
things
that
they
proposed
on
and
and
what
was
according
to
the
RFP
and
how
they
were
selected
and
going
through
that
RFP
process.
So
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
so
I'm
not
I,
don't
want
the
commission
to
think
that
they're
going
to
get
the
full
proposals
from
the
the
concessionaires
that
were
not
selected
for
it.
P
P
F
Please
so
here
we
are
a
commission
I
mean
from
what
I
understood,
I
mean
and
everything
I
every
time,
I've
applied
to
an
airport
or
anybody
any
governmental
agency
I
mean
we
were
always
told
once
it
hits
that
governmental
entity.
Anybody
could
see
it
any
public
person,
any
private
person
period.
So
that's
that's
the
way.
I.
M
P
O
Thought
yeah
I
thought
Kim
mentioned
that
there
was
a
non-disclosure
type
attestation,
so
there
might
be
a
way
to
do
that
and
in
with
regard
to
closed
session,
that
would
that
would
certainly
protect
a
conversation,
but
I
think
we're
talking
here
about
the
actual
document
that
the
commission
is
asking
to
see
the
actual
document
itself.
So
let
us
let
us
work
with.
Let
me
work
with
airport
staff
to
see
if
there's
a
way
we
can
get
that
to
you
in
a
confidential
way.
J
So
Jeff,
with
all
due
respect,
this
is
another
example
of
you
say
that
you're
bringing
the
decision
committee
is
bringing
this
to
us,
but
there's
restrictions
on
what
we're
going
to
see
for
all
those
reasons
that
may
be
totally
legal
and
correct.
We
can't
see
the
whole
thing
so
in
one
respect,
we're
saying
that,
because
there's
a
conflict
of
interest,
members
of
the
committee
can't
be
on
the
decision
committee
and
yet
we're
not
getting
the
whole
story.
We're
not
going
to
get
the
whole
story.
J
J
J
If
this
happens
again,
we
need
to
talk
about
this
before
a
committee
of
decision
makers
are
put
in
place
because
we're
not
getting
the
whole
story
and
now
we're
going
to
get
a
truncated
story
for
all
the
reasons
it
may
make
sense
in
terms
of
confidentiality,
but
that's
not
what
we
expected,
and
that
certainly
was
not
part
of
the
deal
that
we
had
in
moving
forward
with
this
being
a
priority
with
the
city.
So
wherever
we
are
we'll
move
forward
now,
I
understand
the
operations
committee.
Is
that
still
the
case
Victoria?
L
J
J
G
G
D
H
Second
I
think
it's
possible,
certainly
for
us
to
fulfill
Our
obligation
to
be
a
check
and
balance
by
if
that's
truly
something
we
have
to
fulfill
by
being
purely
an
observer
and
not
actually
contributing
to
that
deliberation.
So
that's
an
option
if,
if
that
is
a
true
legal
need,
that
needs
to
be
abided
by,
I
think
the
last
thing.
H
We
really
need
to
think
about
now
we're
dealing
with
a
logistical
issue
where,
realistically,
the
committee
needs
two
sessions
in
order
to
provide
an
actual
recommendation
on
this
one
session,
to
digest
the
information
and
ask
questions
which
might
require
follow-up
and
another
session
after
we've
digested
the
information
to
actually
vote
on
it,
and
that
needs
to
take
place
before
the
deadline
that
you
need
to
provide
a
an
answer
to
the
city
council
for
their
last
meeting
of
the
year.
So
I
think
we
have
to
find
a
way
logistically
to
make
these
two
meetings
happen.
J
H
L
J
P
With
as
long
as
we
can
get
it
ready
by
then
and
make
because
it's
going
to
be
a
very
long
document,
so
we're
making
our
final
determination
on
Friday
and
so
I'm,
sorry,
Thursday
and
I
believe
we're
meeting
that
Thursday
or
that
Wednesday
sorry.
So
we
just
got
to
make
sure
that
it's
prepared
by
then
so,
hopefully,
that's
something
we
might
be
able
to
take
care
of
I'm,
not
100,
committing
on
it,
but
I'll
try
my
best
on
it
is.
J
I
can
answer
that
question.
No,
once
once
the
decision
team
is
put
together
and
they've
gone
through
this
process,
we
had
people
at
the
at
the
very
end
of
the
architectural
selection
for
the
architect
selection
for
the
Plaza
theater
wanted
to
sit
in
on
the
final
deliverations.
You
don't
you
don't
have
the
context
of
the
whole
story
and
so
to
have
someone
even
observe,
really
pollutes
the
the
decision
process,
and
it
raises
issues
of
someone
who's
not
been
part
of
the
whole
process
is
going
to
raise
questions.
E
Be
quick,
so
I
I
lost
you
guys
in
part
of
the
discussion,
but
I
think
I
get
the
gist
of
it
and
I
Concur
and
probably
amplify
by
a
factor
of
two
Kevin
Cochran's
position.
We
can't
let
this
keep
happening.
So
let's
fix
this
last
time
if
it
takes
another
month
to
get
this
approved
with
the
commissions,
understanding
and
enthusiastic
endorsement,
but
then
it
bleeds
into
January.
I
did
just
the
way
it
is
I've
done
this
for
20
years,
I've
I've
done
literally
a
billion
plus
procurement.
It's
very
simple!
E
E
E
I
will
tell
you
that
the
the
because
I
get
I
talk
to
everybody
and
they
talk
to
me
Jeff
if
you're
still
on
the
call.
There
is
a
potential
protest
around
not
having
concession
people
on
the
selection
panel.
So
my
question
is
to
Harry
who,
on
the
panel,
had
deep
cons
session
experience
and
had
done
this
for
multiple
years
in
multiple
places
from
an
airport
perspective
that
brought
that
to
the
table
to
do
the
scoring.
L
C
P
Yes,
so
just
to
give
you
an
idea,
the
packages
that
came
through
are
about
500
pages
that
have
a
bunch
of
detailed
information
about
what
their
proposal
is
and
who
they're
working
with
and
what
the
the
shared
Revenue
rate
is
going
to
be.
So
that
would
take
a
lot
of
time
for
us
to
do
that
in
order
for
us
to
redact
everything.
Q
It's
it's
all
part
of
bedtime
reading
I'm
happy
to
see
that
it's
back
with
the
operations
committee,
if,
if
some
of
you
remember
who
were
there
in
2019
and
2020,
when
we
were
first
dealing
with
this
ROP,
it
initially
and
subsequently
was
going
through
the
the
operations
committee,
one
of
my
questions
would
be
yes,
we're
we're
geared
to
have
the
meeting
next
Wednesday
on
the
26th
is
it
is
a
potential?
Is
a
potential
slip?
Q
E
Q
L
In
terms
of
the
logistics
no
I
mean,
it
obviously
gives
us
more
time
to
prepare
the
documents.
The
only
challenge
for
me
personally
is
that
my
mom
is
having
surgery
the
week
after
and
so
I
will
be
in
Kansas
City
attending
to
her,
but
I
can
certainly
log
in
remotely
and
answer
any
questions
or
provide
context
as
needed.
J
So
why
do
we
wait
and
see
how
things
progress
on
Friday
and
Victoria?
Maybe
you
give
us
an
update
early
next
week
and
say
now
what
the
decision
made
here
is
the
scope
of
what's
going
to
take
to
put
this
together
the
operations
committee
and
then
we
can
back
into
if
we
have
to
move
the
date.
We
move
the
date,
but
we're
locked
in
on
the
22nd
of
November.
What
we're
proposing
as
operations
will
see
it
first
and
that
we'll
all
have
it's
all.
J
E
O
J
Was
made
clear
as
soon
as
we
found
out
the
heads
of
the
commission
that
this
process
had
been
initiated
without
representation
for
the
commission,
so
we
found
out
about
this
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
don't
know
I
can't,
remember
Victoria
exactly
when
you
sent
us
that
update,
but
the
operations
committee
was
there
and
it
was
a
discussion
that
it
would
go
to
operations
first,
because
it
was
one
of
the
priorities
on
their
budget
on
their
agenda.
J
The
process
Jeff
was
laid
out.
What
was
missing
from
the
process
was
the
decision
process
and
the
composition
of
that
team.
In
sharing
that
information
with
fellow
commissioners
on
the
commission
that
was
never
disclosed
to
anyone
in
the
Commission.
In
fact,
it
was
only
after
a
comment
was
made
in
our
strategic
planning
meeting
that
the
committee
was
in
a
dark
period
that
we
raised
the
issue
to
clarify
what
that
meant
and
how
far
we
were
and
who
was
part
of
that
process
and
the
rest
of
the
discussions
happened
from
there.
J
J
There
is
a
pattern
of
behavior
that
we've
been
trying
to
manage
around
appropriate
Communications
with
the
Commissioners,
maintaining
appropriate,
swim
Lanes
in
terms
of
what
a
roles
or
responsibilities
for
Commissioners
and
relative
to
working
with
staff
and
with
the
city.
So
there's,
if
there's
a
heightened
sensitivity
to
this
Jeff
and
why
we
need
to
be
careful
as
we
move
forward
is
because
there
are
other
issues
where
this
has
happened,
where
Commissioners
felt
that
they
deserve
to
understand
what
was
going
on
and
didn't
and
in
the
context
of
this
particular
issue.
J
This
is
one
of
our
two
priorities
that
was
important
for
Justin
and
the
city
council
for
us
to
decide
so
something
as
significant
as
decisions
around
this
should
have
been
discussed
with
the
commission
and
that's
something:
we're
gonna,
we've
all
agreed
to
work
carefully
on
and
more
sensitively
moving
forward
and
and
I.
Think
part
of
that
will
be
to
challenge
a
legal
point
of
view
around
what
is
appropriate,
inappropriate
or
a
conflict
of
interest
and
having
that
discussion
before
any
type
of
decision
team.
Like
this
is
added,
it's
it's
just
totally
inappropriate.
J
This
happens
after
the
fact
and
frankly,
there
are
a
lot
of
people
who
really
disagree
with
the
legal
interpretation
that
was
brought
into
this
decision,
and
so
we're
going
to
talk
about
this
moving
forward,
and
but
we
don't
need
to
do
it
tonight.
We
appreciate
you
being
here
and
explaining
your
perspective
in
the
city's
perspective,
the
legal
perspective
of
the
city
and
now
all
the
council
knows
what's
going
on,
and
the
commission
knows
what's
going
on,
we
have
two
next
steps
and
moving
forward
we'll
be
more
careful.
That's
all
we
ask.
L
N
J
J
You
know
they're
the
pieces,
and
we
want
to
be
very
sensitive
to
this.
Is
that
on
you
know
the
30th
of
April
this
kicks
in
and
we're
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
created
this
timeline
was
to
make
sure
that
there
was
enough
lead
time
for
the
whoever
succeeds
and
wins.
This
bid
to
be
able
to
plan
an
intimate
and
Implement
their
recommendations
and
hit
the
ground
running
on
the
first
of
May
to
make
the
the
Capital
Improvements
they
have
to
make
over
the
summer.
So
we're
up
and
running
in
the
fall.
J
So
I,
don't
think
any
of
the
discussion
tonight
should
impact
that
timeline
at
all
and
at
least
I
hope.
So
now
again,
we
don't
know
but
I'm
going
to
choose
to
take
the
high
road
here
and
say:
let's
hope
that
that
this
decision
committee
has
done
their
work
and
that
if
those
criteria
that
we
set
up
as
a
commission
are
reflected
in
the
recommendation,
you
know
let's
go.
Let's
go
to
work
and
I.
J
Think
any
city,
council,
previous
or
future
city
council
will
be
excited
about
this,
because
people
will
have
done
the
work
and
and
I.
Think
at
this
point,
that's
pretty
much
all
we
know
and
I'm
going
to
choose
to
pursue
to
to
continue
with
that
assumption
that
we'll
be
able
to
move
forward,
because
what
we
don't
want
to
do
is
get
in
a
situation
where
we
would
have
to
negotiate
with
the
existing
vendor
to
prolong
into
the
summer,
because
there's
some
delay
in
the
decision
process.
J
J
Any
other
final
comments
on
that
we
have
a
plan
we're
going
to
operations
the
date
to
be
decided
Victoria.
Let
us
know
we're
all
teed
up
for
the
22nd
and
we'll
have
time
to
review
all
these
documents,
so
we're
prepared
to
have
this
discussion
on
the
22nd
and
and
Jeff.
Thank
you
for
coming,
and
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you
proactively,
as
we
move
forward
on
this,
and
hopefully
other
issues
thanks
folks.
G
J
N
N
K
N
K
Before
we
each
other
can
I
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
appropriate
time
in
the
agenda
or
another
point.
But
one
of
the
discussions
that
were
brought
up
today
that
Ike
was
keenly
aware
of
was
special
projects
and
the
bonds
that
are
out
there
and
the
dollar
amount
of
bonds
that
we
have
available
for
special
projects.
K
And
so
at
some
point
and
I,
don't
know
if
it's
appropriate
now
or
if
it's
appropriate
under
commissioner
requests
and
reports.
But
I
think
we
need
to
have
a
bit
of
a
discussion
on
that
and
I'm
thinking
of
asking
for
an
ad
hoc
committee
regarding
this,
because
there
are
some
fairly
large
consequences
in
terms
of
the
limit
of
the
monies
available
for
capital
projects
that,
under
the
current
bonding
scenario,
that
was
pointed.
J
Out
Scott,
let
me
just
interrupt.
Let
me
interrupt
you
here.
Yes,
we'll
put
in
the
commissioner's
report.
Let's
get
through
this
agenda,
I
saw
those
emails
I.
Think
it's
more
appropriate
there.
Okay
people
aren't
up
to
speed
of
what
we're
talking
about.
Let's
go
through
the
agenda
items
that
have
been
shared:
let's
bang
through
it.
We'll
pick
up
your
comments
there
on
commissioner
reports,
foreign:
let's
go
ahead,
Victoria,
let's,
let's
do
the
budget
report.
P
Go
over
our
our
net
balance
for
the
four
different
funds,
our
cash
reserves
and
then
highlight
something
on
the
grant
so
fund
405.
Is
our
customer
facility
charges
there's
a
net
balance
of
five
hundred
and
six
thousand
dollars.
We
haven't
had
any
expenses
posts
for
this
fund
fund
410
has
a
net
balance
of
331
000
and
no
expenses
have
posted
for
this
fund.
This
is
our
passenger
facility
charge
fund
fund
415
is
our
maintenance
and
operations
fund.
P
P
The
September
quarter,
one
post
for
labor
benefits
administrative
Services
as
well
as
some
terminal
building
operation
expenses,
so
that
we
could
gear
up
for
this
upcoming
season
and
capacity
constraints
that
we
have
going
into
the
season.
So
we
are
starting
to
prepare
for
that.
So
we've
received.
We
have
a
lot
more
expenses
this
this
month.
K
P
P
Yes,
exactly,
this
is
just
a
breakdown
of
our
Airline
Revenue
versus
our
non-aireline
Revenue,
so
it
could
be
considered,
aeronautical,
Revenue
versus
non-aeronautical
Revenue.
As
you're
aware,
our
airport
on
Airport
parking
is
one
of
the
highest
revenue
generators,
as
well
as
our
lease
parking
and
then
our
terminal
non-airline,
rentals
and
land
rentals.
P
P
Some
passenger
boarding,
Bridge
Project,
where
we
had
to
do
some
additional
expenses
to
the
passenger
boarding
bridge,
and
then
we
did
a
storage
build
out
for
airline
ticketing
offices
in
the
north
ticket
Wing
that
wasn't
a
part
of
the
rehabilitation.
It
was
a
separate
project
that
we
had
and
then
the
last
project.
P
Sorry,
here's
my
notes
is
the
LED
ribbon,
so
you
may
or
may
have
not
seen,
but
we
have
a
new
ribbon,
that's
above
all,
of
the
ticket
counters
in
the
North
and
South
ticket
Wing
they're
not
active
yet
with
any
type
of
data
on
there,
but
we
completed
the
installation
for
it.
We
now
just
need
to
work
with
another
company
to
get
the
the
the
Digital
Data
up
on
those
screens
and
get
them
ready.
P
We
have
the
grants
that
are
remaining
I,
just
wanted
to
give
y'all
an
update
that
we
have
submitted
for
reimbursement
for
our
cares
grants
as
well
as
for
our
Chrissa
Grant.
So
you
will
most
likely
see
those
revenues
coming
in
next
month
whenever
I
present
the
financials,
and
that
is
it
for
the
September
financials.
B
I'll
make
a
crisp.
We
had
a
whopping
six
minute
meeting
today
of
the
noise
committee,
no
public
comments.
Christina
did
acknowledge
receipt
of
one
email
from
a
member
of
the
public
and
airport
executive
director
Barrett
shared
with
us
that
for
the
period
of
September
excuse
me
July
through
September,
the
airport
received
a
total
of
four
noise
complaints,
including
both
commercial,
actually
commercial,
General
and
military
operations
very
normal
for
the
time
of
year,
and
we
should
expect
that
those
will
increase
as
flights
do
for
the
season
and
that's
it.
G
R
C
R
Right
so
quick
update
on
the
logo,
we
had
public
sessions
on
September,
28th
and
October
6th
Community
stakeholder
meeting
we
held
on
October
10th.
We
had
a
great
response
receipt
from
the
public
over
500
public
surveys,
our
Consultants
reviewing
all
the
feedback
and
we
are
going
to
meet
with
them
after
the
review
and
determine
next
steps
from
there.
R
Air
Service
update
passenger
numbers
in
September
up
19.
19.1
percent
over
September
21
2021,
which
is
another
new
record.
14
passenger
records
now
been
set
since
June
of
21..
We
have
also
officially
surpassed
our
total
passenger
count
for
calendar
year
2021
and
the
way
we
were
scheduled
out.
I
fully
expect
us
to
have
a
record
year
based
on
how
we
are
scheduled
right
now.
2019
was
our
previous
record
year
and
I
would
bet
that
this
year
is
going
to
end
up
being
our
new
record.
R
We
attended
Roots
World
2022
in
Las
Vegas
this
week
with
visit
greater
Palm
Springs.
As
an
air
service
development
conference,
we
met
with
16
different
airlines.
Seven
airlines
that
currently
serve
PSP.
All
of
the
existing
Airlines
we
met
with
are
very
happy
with
our
Market
and
update.
Since
our
last
meeting
Alaska,
unfortunately
canceled
Austin
Texas,
the
route
will
end
on
November
30th.
R
However,
quick
to
note
that
we
are
not
losing
service
to
Austin,
as
American
will
begin
operating
on
November
17th
through
November
19th,
they
will
return
on
December
15th
and
then
we'll
run
daily
I
believe
almost
into
June.
If
I
remember
correctly
Southwest
they
are
going
to
be
taking,
they
look
and
they
started.
Las
Vegas
one
daily
went
to
double
daily
in
July
and
in
March
they're,
going
to
do
three
daily
for
March
and
April
in
the
height
of
our
season.
R
Their
current
schedule
is
out
till
mid
April,
so
when
they
publish
that
their
full
April
schedule,
I'm
sure
are
April,
2022c
count
will
be
more
than
we
had
last
year.
If
you
guys
know
from
the
last
Commission
meeting,
we
were
showing
down,
but
that's
again,
because
Southwest
hasn't
fully
published
so
not
concerned
about
that,
because
we
should
exceed
April,
21
or
22.
Excuse
me
when
they
do
publish
that
schedule
scheduled
departing
seats.
We
have
October
is
up
to
1.
over
22
over
21.
Excuse
me,
November
22
is
at
18.6
percent.
R
December
is
up.
20.7
percent
over
October
21,
which
is
again
why
I'm
saying
this
is
probably
going
to
be
a
record
year
Force
as
long
as
the
passengers
show
up
and
so
far
they
have
been
looking
ahead
of
2023
January
is
up
25
over
January
22
February
of
19.7
March
up
9.7
I
went
ahead,
removed,
April
simple,
because
the
Southwest
schedule
I
found
out
is
a
fully
published
and
so
I'll
put
those
back
in.
Whenever
that
schedule
does
come
out
any
questions.
R
Well,
first,
thank
you
on
the
scope
of
work.
I
did
the
research
and
wrote
that
myself
and
I
consulted
with
some
industry
peers
of
mine,
so
I'm
glad
you
liked
it.
Second,
we
had
original
project
original
timeline
of
four
months.
We
were
hoping
to
be
ended
in
November,
but
giving
the
missteps
and
The
Branding
and
having
to
add
the
public
meetings,
the
two
public
meetings,
the
stakeholders.
We
are
now
not
on
a
schedule
we're
hoping
to
launch
in
Spring
of
2023.
Also
the
original
cost
was
when
you
guys
were
going
to
remember.
R
N
Not
now
on
this
call,
we
obviously
don't
have
time
but
I
I
think
again,
like
the
concession
project,
where
sort
of
things
seem
to
reveal
themselves
that
we
caught
up
on
later
and
again
with
this,
you
know
the
logo
and
being
presented
to
the
council
that
we
caught
up
on
later
I
think
it
would
be
prudent
for
staff
to
share
with
the
commission
what
the
project
timeline
revised
and,
if
you're
not
done
revising
it.
Maybe
in
time
for
the
next
commission
meeting,
you
could
share
a
timeline
with
us.
R
R
R
Well
sorry,
I
heard
880.
on
the
timeline
Fortress
we
as
again
direction
from
the
chair
and
vice
chair.
We
are
not
searing
the
timeline
right
now
we're
taking
it
step
by
step.
So
previously
we
were,
we
agreed
to
do
the
public
meetings
and
stakeholder
meetings
then
review
the
data
and
then
look
forward
to
the
next
steps.
R
After
that,
so
we
have
not
refined
the
timeline
just
yet
and
I
don't
know
quite
enough
initial
I'll
be
meeting
with
aviatrics,
probably
in
the
next
actual
meeting
from
tomorrow,
we'll
see
what
their
update
is
on
there
and
then
I
will
be
on
vacation
next
week
and
we'll
touch
base
in
November
and
go
from
National
half
I
have
an
update
by
November.
I
will
provide
that.
J
R
I
haven't
seen
everything
just
a
few
kind
of
very
high
level
details.
I
have
not
gone
into
gone
into
deep
information
from
aviatrix,
yet
the
vast
majority
of
the
comments
that
they
stated
are
actually
regarding
more
towards
the
state
of
the
terminal
and
the
facilities,
not
so
much
just
the
logo
and
a
lot
of
the
majority
of
the
over
500
public
statements
were
received.
A
majority
of
those
were
in
agreement
with
it
being
more
of
a
Coachella
Valley
than
just
Palm,
Springs
singular,
but
and
that's
about
all.
R
R
J
B
No
I
mean
I
would
Echo
I
I
set
in,
like
many
of
my
fellow
Commissioners
did
on
the
public
meetings.
I
also
sat
in
on
the
stakeholder
meeting.
I
have
not
yet
been
privy
to
all
of
the
details.
That
aviatrix
has
found,
of
course,
the
stakeholder
meeting
much
much
more
engaged
and
much
more
passionate
comments
than
we
did
in
the
public
meetings.
B
It
did
definitely
feel
a
little
bit
more
like
they
were
more
concerned
about
the
airport
and
operations
and
airport
in
general,
and
not
necessarily
the
function
of
the
logos,
I
I'm
happy
if
we
need
to
if
it
doesn't
work
for
timing-
and
we
need
to
take
this
to
the
full
commission
happy
to
do
it
and
also
thrilled
to
to
get
the
ad
hoc
marketing
Community
together
on
fairly
short
notice
and
provide
that
update
to
them.
First.
So,
honestly,.
Q
J
R
J
L
J
P
P
I
have
the
detail
on
the
next
few
slides,
but
the
fir
the
the
teal
column,
the
First
Column
is
our
five
year
and
it
pretty
much
shows
the
focus
of
what
the
commission
is
interested
in
primarily
the
terminal.
So
there's
a
bunch
of
terminal
projects
that
we
have
proposed
that
are
strategic
planning
session
and
Commissioners
selected
39
different
projects
that
they
would
like
to
see
happen
over
the
next
five
years
and
then
in
the
Airfield.
P
P
So
the
one
that
did
have
the
most
selection
for
the
projects
was
the
terminal,
so
the
design
and
construction
of
the
main
terminal
facade
restoration,
the
arrivals
of
the
baggage
claim
renovation
and
expansion,
design
and
construct
the
design
and
construct
of
the
baggage
handling
system,
terminal,
building
expansion,
the
federal
inspection
station
design
and
construct
main
terminal
expansion,
construct
the
bag
screening
TSA
checkpoint.
Then
the
master
plan
and
GIS
study,
the
outbound
baggage
handling
system
and
passenger
screening
facility
expansion,
design
and
construct
confession
space,
and
our
master
plan
will
help
with
that.
P
J
J
They
were
kind
of
bleeding
into
the
master
plan.
The
next
agenda
of
item,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
the
report
coming
out
of
our
strategic
planning
meeting
that
that
it
is
memorialized
and
that
it's
some
place
for
us
to
look
at
moving
forward.
It
would
include
what
you
just
presented,
Victoria
and
also
the
notes
from
our
meeting.
So
as
long
as
we
ensure
that
we
don't
lose
those
notes
so
that
we
have
a
paper
trail
on
what
happened
in
that
day.
That
would
be
helpful.
Can.
J
D
J
L
I
was
gonna,
go
through
the
master
plan
timeline
with
the
group.
That's
okay,
and
essentially,
where
we
are,
is
we
are
in
the
selection
process
for
a
consultant
we're
at
the
end
of
that
process.
Actually,
so,
we've
identified
a
potential
consultant
to
lead
that
effort
for
us
we
believe
they're
capable
of
doing
so.
L
We
are
working
through
the
negotiation
on
cost
at
the
moment
and
scope.
The
next
steps,
once
we've
kind
of
nailed
that
down
we
do
have
to
take
this
to
the
airlines
for
approval.
The
cost
of
the
project
does
exceed
our
our
threshold.
So,
under
our
current
agreement
we
will
have
to
take
it
to
the
airlines
for
approval.
It'll
then
come
to
the
commission
and
then
subsequently
the
city
council
for
approval.
L
The
idea
is
to
start
the
planning
process,
probably
around
the
December
January
time
frame,
I've
already
spoken
with
chairman
data.
We.
What
we
intend
to
do
is
to
assemble
a
working
group
specifically
for
the
master
plan
and
that
will
involve
a
handful
of
Commissioners
as
well
as
visit
representative
from
visit,
greater
Palm,
Springs,
potentially
other
representatives
from
the
city,
such
as
the
planning
department,
Etc,
and
that
group
will
help
facilitate
the
planning
process
as
we
go
along
the
way.
L
K
L
Scoped
the
project
for
a
30-month
process.
It
appears
that
all
the
the
respondents
thought
it
was
aggressive
but
doable.
What
we
also
did
was
we
phased
the
projects.
So
we,
the
idea,
was
to
focus
on
the
terminal
facility.
First,
all
the
constraints
that
we
have
with
the
terminal,
the
roadways,
the
identification
of
a
Consolidated
rental
car
facility.
They
would
go
through
that
process
and
then,
once
we
solidified
that
piece
of
it
then
focused
on
the
Airfield
in
a
subsequent
phase
of
the
project.
L
K
So
do
you
think
it
would
be
wise?
We
do
a
similar
process
that
we're
doing
because
this
is
I
think
as
important
as
the
concession
process,
that
we
do
a
thing
where
we
send
it
to
a
committee.
First
and
other
Commissioners
can
listen
to
the
discussion
at
the
committee
get
themselves
familiarized
with
it
so
that
it
doesn't
hit
people
cold
on
a
commission
meeting
and
and
then
move
forward
at
the
commission
meeting
and
they
can
vote.
K
Know
all
right,
I'm,
just
thinking
that
that
sounded
like
a
good
process
for
the
concession
and
this
as
I
feel
is
very
important,
and
we
can
probably
follow
a
similar
process
to
help
the
commission
and
help
everybody
get
on
board.
With
the
decision
points
that
were
made
in
the
final
selection
of
the
vendor.
So
sure.
L
E
E
E
E
So
by
next
commission
meeting
you'd
say
it's
yada
yada,
that's
who's,
doing
our
master
plan.
That's
accurate!
Okay,
fair
enough!
We
had
a
budget
meeting
this
morning
and
had
a
long
conversation
around
bonds
and
I
submitted
Something
Christina
to
you
and
the
chair
and
Kevin
and
Harry
I'll
defer
it
to
the
next
meeting.
E
J
J
I
just
think
we
need
to
do
more
pre-work
to
really
understand
some
of
the
questions
and
make
sure
that
all
of
us
are
kind
of
smarter
about
it
before
we
eat
up
a
lot
of
commissions,
I'm
doing
it,
but
I'll
commit
to
put
it
on
a
future
agenda
and
see
if
we
can
work
with
the
staff
to
prepare
for
all
to
get
those
and
those
questions
answered,
be
part
of
the
pre-work
process
in
a
discussion.
One
of
our
meetings
can
we
do
that.
E
J
I
think
it'll
be
enough
time
to
do
it
for
that
commission
and
we'll
just
for
that
meeting
and
yeah
and
again
we'll
take
a
look
at
that.
Pre-Work
see
what
it
see.
What
it
looks
like
the
intent
would
be
to
edit
under
the
22nd
unless
that
agenda
for
reasons
we've
discussed
issue
here
earlier
becomes
Gone
With,
the
Wind
I
hope
that's
not
the
case.
E
J
L
G
E
J
E
Hearing
what
Harry
has
to
say,
I
understood
that
then
just
a
clarification
Harry
tell
me
if
this
is
a
correct
assessment
per
Nancy
in
the
bonds
meeting,
we're
using
PFC
money
to
pay
back
the
bonds.
The
bonds
are
22
million
and
change
based
on
where
we
are.
We
have
Headroom
of
maybe
another
10
million
that
we
could
use
PFC
money
for
if
we
so
chose,
but
clearly
the
master
plan
has
significantly
more
projects
and
monies
allotted
to
it.
E
If
you,
if
I,
did
my
sums
right,
it's
like
150
million
year,
one
through
five
750
million
in
20
years.
If
we
did
everything
that
we
have
on
the
plan,
realizing
that
we're
not
going
to
do
everything,
but
we'll
do
something
so
with
that
said,
then,
is
it
not
true
that
we
must
go
to
compensatory
and
get
off
a
residual?
So
we
now
have
the
ability
to
go
to
the
bond
market
and
then
pay
off
those
bonds,
because
the
10
million
Headroom
under
the
pfcs
that
we've
got
now
and
the
structure
being
residual.
J
From
an
airport
perspective,
John
John
John,
timeout
timeout.
This
is
the
level
of
detail,
but
I
don't
want
to
eat
up
a
lot
of
time
when
the
rest
of
us
don't
have
the
context
of
what
you're
talking
about.
Can
we
please
take
that
question
and
other
things
related
to
bonds
and
move
them
to
our
next
meeting
and
do
the
proper
pre-work
with
the
rest
of
the
commission?
J
So
you
know
what
you're
talking
about
I
mean
this
is
way
over
my
head
and
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
study
it
and
I
think
it's
unfair
to
put
the
rest
of
us
through
this
time
until
we
have
a
chance
to
really
prepare
so
can
we
Pro
agree
to
postpone
that
we'll
put
it
on
the
next
the
next
agenda
and
we'll
have
those
questions
part
of
the
pre-work,
so
that
everyone's
prepared
to
answer-
and
we
know
what
you're
talking
about?
Can
we
do
that?
Please
Okay.
L
Yeah,
so
we've
got
a
couple
projects
that
we
started
on
that
are
stalled.
The
reason
they're
stalled.
Well,
there
are
two
reasons:
they're
installed.
The
first
is
frankly
just
because
of
operations,
so
our
common
use
project
we
had
anticipated.
That
would
be
a
lot
further
along
that
has
not
moved
as
quickly
as
we
thought
it
would
move
mostly
because
of
lead
time
on
supplies,
so
we're
still
getting
it
equipment
in
and
things
in
to
the
airport
that
should
have
been
here
over
the
summer.
L
The
same
applies
to
our
restroom
project.
Just
the
lead
time
to
get
materials.
Costs
have
gone
up
so
we're
reworking
that
project
as
well.
It's
still
moving
forward,
but
it
won't
move
forward
while
we're
in
the
middle
of
season.
It
just
doesn't
make
sense
to
to
put
anybody
through
that,
so
some
of
our
projects
are
sliding
a
lot
that
has
to
do
with
supply
chain
issues,
but
we
are
committed
to
to
continuing
on
with
those
projects.
L
So
as
we
start
to
get
into
the
2023
operating
season,
our
focus
is
going
to
be
on
getting
a
lot
of
the
study
elements
of
those
project
done
because
that's
a
lot
easier
to
manage
versus
the
actual
operations
and
construction
parts
of
those
projects.
So
we've
got
people
working
on
Wildlife
studies
right
now
and
on
Hotspot
studies,
hotspot
being
the
geometry
of
the
air
field,
but
we
won't
do
so
much
construction.
L
J
Okay,
let's
move
on
commissioner
requesting
reports.
Scott
we
had
the
conversation
about
putting
the
the
bond
issue
in
our
next.
Our
next
meeting.
We
will
work
out
we'll
work
out
with
you
and
David
and
John
to
make
sure
we
have
the
right
questions
and
the
information
give
the
staff
time
to
put
that
on
assuming
we
have
the
bandwidth
to
do
it.
The
for
the
22nd.
K
Okay,
my
question,
though,
is
a
little.
My
concerns
are
a
little
more
versus
the
compensator
compensatory
versus
residual
airport
process.
It's
not
necessarily
the
special
projects,
and
but
they
are
connected
because
they
they
follow
hand
in
hand,
but
they
are
two
separate
topics,
and
so
how
would
you
like
to
handle
that.
J
R
J
J
D
J
J
Otherwise,
anyone
who
has
not
said
yes
and
we
can
go
to
the
folks
who
are
off
this
meeting
on
a
one-off
basis,
ask
them
the
same
thing,
and
so,
when
we
publish
this
list,
we'll
have
a
list
of
all
of
our
email
addresses
and
if
someone
is
uncomfortable
for
whatever
reason
doing
it,
their
name
will
be
on
the
list
with
no
email
address
and
then
we'll
know
and
we'll
respect
that.
Can
we.
K
Yeah
that
would
be
do
it,
and
the
city
clerk
did
indicate
to
me
that
they're
willing
to
give
if
a
commissioner
doesn't
want
a
personal
email
address,
they're
willing
to
set
up
a
city
email
address
that
people
can
get
their
information
too.
But
that's
adding
another
email
address
to
I'm
sure
people's
other
email
addresses
and
that
may
not
be
the
most
ideal
thing.
But.
B
K
Commissioner,
and
so
at
the
time
of
the
that
request,
the
rule
of
thumb
was
that
only
the
city
could
have
communications
between
the
commissioners
and,
as
we
learned
that
wasn't
the
case,
that's
not
the
the
Brown
act,
and
so
you
know
I
had
some
great
ideas
for
that,
commissioner,
who
was
asking
for
that
input,
but
couldn't
get
it
to
that,
commissioner,
because
I
didn't
have
any
way
to
contact
them.
Thank
you.
J
J
I
said
when
I
sent
this
recent
I
saw
the
the
note
about
the
Austin
Airport
and
what
they've
done
with
local
Brands,
and
so
the
process
I
followed
before
this
Scott
I,
sent
it
to
Christina.
Christina
said
out
to
all
of
you,
because
I
don't
have
everybody's
email
address,
so
I
know
that's
the
protocol
we
followed
before
and
I
think.
J
If,
if
like
I
said
earlier,
if
commissions
have
submission
issues
about
sharing
private
or
personal
emails,
we
can
either
offer
them
the
opportunity
to
have
a
city,
email
or
respect
their
decision
not
to
have
this
in
the
list
and
then
we'll
take
it
from
there.
I
I
think
most
people
will
participate.
I
R
Commissioner
Miller
mentioned
a
speaker's
Bureau
that
is
actually
part
of
the
established
marketing
Communications
plan
we
had
created
by
our
consultant,
that
is
in
process.
If
we're
going
to
do
that,
we
need
to
make
sure
everyone's
gonna
have
a
unified
message
that
we're
all
on
together
on
the
same
points
and
have
the
correct
information
that
should
be
embedded
through
the
air
force,
Market,
Department,
City,
Communications
and
working
with
the
chair
of
the
marketing
committee.
So
just
FYI.
R
L
H
J
I
think
that
we
continue
to
look
for
a
path
forward,
we're
looking
for
Best
Practices,
we're
looking
to
get
more
people
engaged
and
make
sure
we're
smart
before
we
talk
about
options
or
items
here
on
our
agenda.
Optab
and
I
are
committed
to
try
to
make
these
as
efficient
as
we
possibly
can.
Thank
you
for
the
time
you're
spending
in
your
subcommittees.
J
This
airport
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
and
the
staff
for
the
work
you've
done
tonight,
and
your
patience
and
working
a
few
extra
minutes
and
all
the
options
we
talked
about,
and
we
will
get
smart
before
the
next
Commission
meeting,
both
about
the
rfps
and
about
our
bonding
process
and
other
topics
that
may
come
on
board.
We,
you
will
only
use
commissioner
time
for
topics
that
we're
prepared
to
discuss
so
I.
J
Ask
your
Indulgence
to
help
get
us
smarter
before
we
add
things
to
the
agenda
and
promise
you
that
once
we
get
on
the
agenda,
we'll
give
people
ample
time
to
share
their
thoughts
and
ideas.
So
with
that,
thank
you
for
your
time
tonight
and
can
I
have
a
motion
to
end
this
meeting
so
moved
Ken.
Second,.