►
From YouTube: AAB Meeting | August 27, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Now
solution
with
the
number
of
people
and
the
people
at
the
table
and
I
would
suggest
that
we
request
an
ad
hoc
committee
from
the
City
Council
and
parks
and
recs
to
develop
and
design
a
solution
for
this.
Otherwise
we
might
end
up
in
the
same
situation
that
you
found
yourself
with
programs.
Well,.
B
D
Be
a
Taj
Mahal
after
our
last
meeting
I
started
doing
some
research
and
called
a
few
of
the
vendors
around
town
and
it
was
kind
of
right.
The
first
time
I
talked
to
did
court
construction
and
it's
explained
to
mine.
I
was
looking
for
that.
The
fact
we
have
you
know
tennis
courts
and
the
concept
would
be
that
we
take
and
convert
those
tennis
courts
or
we
build
new
pickleball
courts
and
leave
the
tennis
courts
as
tennis
courts
and
probably
in
less
than
five
minutes
in
conversation
with
the
guy.
D
He
says,
you're
going
to
take
a
tennis
court
and
you're
going
to
drill
holes
in
the
concrete
to
put
Nets
in
and
I
said,
yeah.
That's
the
concept,
that's
what
we
did
before
you
guys
I,
don't
be
a
part
of
I
want
to
involved
if
you're
going
to
damage
tennis
courts.
Okay,
so
on
to
the
next
vendor
someone
I'd
work
for
before
he
actually
did
the
court
conversions.
For
us.
His
recommendation
is
not
to
build
tennis
courts
but
to
build
actual
new
pickleball
courts.
D
D
The
courts
I
didn't
talk
about
shade
or
anything
at
that
point,
because
I
don't
know
if
they
would
do
the
shade
would
nothing
or
somebody
else
for
for
shade
and
it's
a
shade
mean
we're.
Gonna
have
shaded
area
where
we'd
have
benches
bleachers.
We
just
put
shade
over
the
bleachers
to
provide
that
at
that
for
the
participants
and
even
to
the
point
of
not
just
two
muth,
but
maybe
we
add
pickleball
courts
somewhere
in
some
location
at
ruth
hardy
park.
That
way.
D
Those
who
live
in
that
neighborhood
still
have
access
to
be
able
to
go
and
play
pickleball
if
they
don't
want
to
travel
to
DeMuth.
Just
the
same
as
we
kept
the
two
tennis
courts
at.
If
we
want
to
play
tennis
I
could
go
to
Duluth
and
play
tennis.
So
that's
kind
of
the
numbers
I
had
I.
Think
counselor
host
egg
was
kind
of
looking
at
something
like
that.
So
what
is
the
magical?
Number
is
it?
You
know
two
hundred
thousand
and
we're
gonna
put
in
maybe
told
pickleball
courts.
D
We
could
put
eight
at
the
mood,
so
maybe
four
with
Hardy
you
know.
Is
there
me
some
inks?
If
we
don't
put
as
many
it
retardant,
we
do
it
DeMuth,
you
know,
I,
don't
know,
but
at
least
they
give
would
give
that
those
that
live
in
that
neighborhood
for
courts
to
play
on
so
I
guess
it
would
be
a
decision
in
what
direction
you'd
like
to
go
and
and
maybe
recommend
make
a
recommendation
that
you
know
City
Council,
look
at
so.
B
A
D
Actually,
it
was
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
increased
allocated
to
and
I
start
working
on.
Today
is
a
RFP
to
look
at
basically
someone
to
monitor
the
tennis
courts
and
pickleball
courts,
one
first
priority
being
that
pom
swings
residents
have
prior
to
use
of
the
courts
during
season
when
it's
being
monitored
and
I'm
gonna
be
starting
working
on
that
probably
trying
to
put
it
together
and
try
to
get
it
to
a
budget
at
our
committee,
hopefully
by
the
end
of
this
month,
so
they
can
review
it.
That's
what
they
want
in
it.
B
Thought
would
be
Ruth.
Hardy
Park
has
always
taken
care
of
itself
very
effectively
and
DeMuth
part
pickleball
people
have
I
mean
they
have
an
entire
process
for
getting
on
and
I
mean
there's
sort
of
a
rules
thing
that
they
do
it's
very
very
organized,
so
my
thought
would
be
if
there's
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
without
benefits,
and
you
know
that
we
would
say
wow
that
was
solve
our
part
of
our
problem
right
here.
B
I
mean
I
have
been
looking
at
this
for
two
years
and
I've
would
love
to
have
separate
tennis
courts
and
convert
only
because
I've
heard
from
all
parties
who
are
involved,
which
I
pick
up
all
the
tennis
people
that
they'd
like
to
be
a
little
bit
removed
from
each
other.
They
don't
want
to
be
elbow
to
elbow
because
there's
just
a
different
style
there.
So
it
seemed
to
me
that
you
got
four
tennis
courts.
If
you
could
convert
those
and
build
two
new
courts,
it
really
could.
A
Serve
so
and
I
had
said
last
month
that
you
know,
maybe
we
just
really
look
at
a
pickleball,
Center
and
so
and
knowing
city
government
it
will
take
six
months
or
more
to
get
a
pickleball,
Center
or
two
get
that
hundred
thousand
over
150,000
actually
established
and
spent
and
up
and
running,
and
so
it
really
I
appreciate
that.
Like
we
had
said,
our
immediate
solution
is
not
a
final
solution,
but
it
is
something
that
can
accommodate
all
of
the
players
in
the
morning
and
so
I
love
that
and
I
do
think.
A
The
City
Council
is
getting
new
sources
of
revenue
and
opportunities
should
be
increased.
I
took
with
this
a
great
place
and
a
great
way
to
spend
the
extra
money
that
they
have
and
I
still
think
we
should
meet
with
pickleball
to
map
out
where
in
the
parks
and
what
that
could
look
like
and
how
many
courts
and
come
back
in
and
make
a
more
solid
recommendation.
Oh
go
ahead,
and
yes,.
E
D
F
D
B
F
D
So
he
just
said
his
preference
would
would
recommend
to
be
be
probably
easier
to
build
the
pick
of
all
courts
from
from
ground
up
then,
for
even
though
obviously
it's
more
costly
than
converting.
But
then
again,
if
you're
gonna
build
new
tennis
courts,
are
they
gonna
be
lighted
and
that
increases
your
cost?
She's
gonna
have
higher
fences
which
crease
your
cost.
So
you
know
now
your
tennis
court
may
cost
you
more
than
it
well.
B
One
of
the
things
that
I
did
hear
in
all
the
times
that
I
went
to
pickleball
is
like
tennis,
there's
a
community
with
pickleball
there's
community,
so
I
was
hearing.
We
would
like
to
be
able
to
have
sanction
and
unsanctioned
competitions,
and
today
we
have
just
ate
pickleball
courts
and
we
do
a
little
taping
to
renting
a
court
to
get
an
additional.
You
know
so
they
get
to
12
courts.
But
it
kind
of
concerns
me
that.
B
Together
in
one
community
that,
if
you
start
to
split
them
up
to
multiple
parks,
then
they
can't
really
accomplish
their
their
competitive
thing.
That
is
really
a
part
of
what
they're
attempting
to
do
as
a
community.
You
know
not
that
we
have
to
be
the
the
resource
that
Indian
Wells
will
be
with.
You
know,
40
courts
or
whatever,
but
it
tends
to
be
a
community
thing
if
I
Drive
by
there
at
six
o'clock
at
night,
I
see
sometimes
40
or
50
players
playing
and
people
waiting
to
play.
B
Even
if
me,
if
I
got
go
by
at
8
o'clock
in
the
morning,
it's
the
same
thing.
There's
a
community
there,
so
I,
don't
know.
I
would
say
the
subcommittee
should
look
with
with
you
know,
would
would
it
satisfy
to
be
separate,
I
kind
of
am
liking.
Your
idea
now
of
hard
striping
and
although
I
I
can't
imagine
I'm,
not
a
tennis,
player
and
I
pick
a
ball
player,
but
all
those
lines,
if
you
were
able
to
do
four
to
a
single,
maybe
a
little
confusing,
but.
C
B
B
C
You
know
what
do
you
call
them
not
permanent,
but
the
standards
and
stuff,
and
while
the
City
Council
takes
this
process
that
they
will
take
of
whatever
our
recommendation
is
for
building
new
courts
permanent
courts,
because
we
know
that
will
take
a
long
time
and,
as
we
know,
they're
looking
for
a
more
rapid
at
least
fixed
for
now.
So
so
we
all
know
that
pickleball
is
not
going
away.
So
you
know
I,
think
that
we
should
do
something
with
the
courts
over
at
DeMuth.
C
What
we
can
do,
convert
them
over,
at
least
that
one
east
one,
but
that
the
one
in
the
middle
convert
that
over
the
four
courts
that's
gonna,
take
the
pressure
off
the
ruth
already
part.
The
community
is
strong,
I've
spoken
to
over
20
of
them
and
they're
very
comfortable,
but
we
got
to
move
this
forward.
We
got
to
just
make
a
move
and
then
bring
it
to
the
City
Council
and
take
it
to
the
other
direction.
I'd
love
to
see
a
little
Valley.
You
know
can't.
G
G
A
It
would
really
be
a
shame
if,
three
years
from
the
time
that
that
investment
was
made,
it
doesn't
accommodate
the
the
velocity
of
it
and
for
it
for
a
very
small
amount.
In
addition,
three
years
prior
to
grow
it.
So
it
could
be
a
sport
we
could
grow
into
and
then
ends
up
costing
us
the
two
times
or
three
times
the
amount.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
take
the
time
to
really
look
at
option
a
B
and
C
and
make
those
recommendations.
B
I
would
say:
I
come
from
the
corporate
world,
I
didn't
grow
up
in
the
government,
world
and
September
seems
like
a
lifestyle
way.
So
let
me
let
me
ask
a
question
and
ask
how
you
all
feel
about
this.
We
aren't
dark
or
were
planned
to
be
dark
in
August
and
I.
Don't
know
that
we
as
a
commission.
So
so
let
me
ask
you
this.
Would
the
subcommittee
consider
making
a
recommendation
to
do
the
temporary
conversion
of
the
two
courts
that
are
today
tennis
courts
to
a
temporary
situation?
Well,
a
temporary
correction?
B
Would
you
consider
a
meeting
at
the
Med
Center
with
the
tennis
and
pickleball
people
from
that
community,
because
we
do
have
and
and
I
know,
Travis
will
remind
us
that
we
do
have
a
community
obvious
small
and
not
a
professional
community
of
tennis
players
who
play
at
that
part
and
said
they
wouldn't
be
allowed
on
the
courts
that
at
Ruth
Hardy,
because
they
just
weren't
good
enough
and
they
didn't
want
to
be.
You
know,
pushed
some
good
people
off.
B
B
Yeah
except
I,
thought
you
were
talking
about
the
free
striping,
the
free
striping
I
do
not
believe
well
what
I'm
telling
you,
though,
is
the
free
striping
is
a
single
single.
It
is
not
four
courts
on
a
tennis
court
and
that's
not
what
you're
asking
for
right,
you're
asking
for
four
courts
on
a
tennis
court.
So
it's
not
free.
It's
gonna
that
that
what
they
were
saying
is
to
be
able
to
use
both
is
a
one
for
one
and
that
would
I
don't
think.
A
B
B
A
I
can
I
just
say
one
more
thing.
My
suggestion
of
September
was
for
a
long-term
solution
and
not
a
temporary
solution,
and
that
is
just
because
cities
are
dark
in
August
and
so
I
mean
I.
Think
in
the
next
few
weeks
we
could
have
many
meetings
with
the
pickleball
community
and
have
a
we're
I
think
we'll
need
a
little
bit
of
time
for
a
more
permanent
solution.
So
that's
where
September
was.
H
A
K
432
62
north
mica
driving
Palm
Springs
was
found
on
airbnb.com
under
the
title
of
Palm
Springs
bungalow,
with
pool
and
spa
under
advertisement
number
one,
seven
one.
Three,
eight
two:
six,
eight,
the
department's
code
officer
inspired
online
as
to
a
short-term
availability
of
the
property
for
the
dates
of
September
20th
through
September
25th,
for
a
total
of
five
nights
and
the
host
advised
that
the
property
was
available
advertised
with
the
property
and
inquiry
contained
that
the
owner
was
identified
themselves
as
Daisy.
You
can
find
it
on
page
28
of
your
packet.
K
K
As
a
vacation
rental,
not
a
home
share
by
the
host
administrative
citation
number,
a
B,
zero,
seven,
zero
and
amount
of
$5,000
was
issued
to
Daisy
Torres
individual
in
title
for
operating
a
vacation
rental
without
a
vacation
rental
registration
certificate,
the
administrative
citation
was
mailed
by
vocational
compliance
department.
Today,
dress
on
title
and
receipt
was
confirmed.
I
do
have
the
code
officer
that
did
investigate
an
issue.
This
administrative
citation
present
if
the
bohr,
if
the
board
does
allow
I'll,
be
more
than
happy
to
him
up
and
ask
him
a
couple
of
questions.
Thank
you.
H
L
K
K
H
Received
I
think
it
was
three
or
four
inquiries
about
properties
on
this
street.
So
when
we
received
that
money
I
try
to
investigate
every
property
on
the
street
and
this
one
raised
a
red
flag
simply
because
the
ad
states
that
it's
for
an
entire
house
so
when
I
see
something
like
that
I
say:
okay,
let
me
see
the
ID
number
and
I'll
check
that
with
our
records
to
make
sure
it's
valid.
Well,
the
ID
number
she
had
listed
started
with
an
8.
H
H
I
H
F
L
M
The
only
thing
that
comes
to
mind
is
the
evidence
that
it's
a
home
share
versus
a
vacation
rental.
If
there's
evidence
that
it's
a
vacation
rental,
it
will
convert
from
the
home
share
to
vacation
rental,
for
example,
if
the
person
it
has
a
the
like,
in
this
case,
the
vacation
rental
permit,
if
they're
renting
it
out
as
I'm
sorry,
the
home
share,
permit
and
they're
renting
out,
is
to
patient
mental.
Then
it
then
the
the
board
or
the
the
city
views
that
it
doesn't
matter
what
the
application
is.
It's
the
conduct
that
defines
the
violation.
K
During
the
exchange
between
code
officer
Williams
and
a
host
miss
Torres,
he
does
ask,
will
there
be
anybody
else
on
site
and
the
Storace
does
identify
says
that
there
would
be
nobody
else
at
the
property
except
yourself
or
your
party,
and
based
on
that
owner
not
being
on
site.
It
is
a
then
does
become
a
vacation
rental.
That
is
the
major
significance
between
the
two.
H
E
Have
one
question
and
I
think
you've
answered
it
when
I
read
under
the
space
on
page
29,
it
says:
permit
number
eight
three,
oh
nine,
this
home
is
officially
registered
with
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
as
a
vacation,
rental
and
you've
already
stated
that
what
any
registration
of
the
starts
with
eight
is
in
fact
not
a
vacation
rental,
but
a
home
share.
Is
that
correct,
correct.
K
There
are
a
series
of
numbers
that
we
use
for
our
staff
to
be
able
to
identify
a
home
share
versus
a
vacation
rental,
and
this
was
a
perfect
example
of
that
system.
Working
we're
code
officer
saw
permit
number
and
based
on
what
the
ad
stated
in
the
number
it
it
didn't
match,
which
then
further
escalated
into
further
inquiry
of
the
property.
Thank
you.
L
L
N
O
L
G
Yes,
we
did
get
a
permit
for
home,
sherry
and,
yes,
we
have
rented
the
home
at
in
the
home,
share
where
we've
had
guests
stay
with
us
and
in
the
explanation
that
I
that
we
put
was
I
said
something
like.
We
were
toying
with
the
idea
of
switching
over
to
vacation
rental,
which
in
fact
it
wasn't
that
we
were
thinking
of
it.
G
L
G
G
I
was
just
kind
of
playing
with
it,
not
thinking
that
I
was
gonna,
get
a
request
for
inquiry
and
when
I
did
get
the
inquiry,
I
still
kind
of
like
went
along
with
it,
but
kept
it
a
secret
from
her
and
she
didn't
find
out
until
you
know
we
got
legal
documents
and
then
I
changed
the
back.
So
no
one
has
stayed
there
using
the
entire
home.
G
G
I
do
have
an
I.
It
was
maybe
a
few
days
because
I
after
I
got
that
inquiry
and
it
didn't
go
through
I
just
try
to
switch
it
back
or
at
least
I
thought
I
switch
the
back.
But
then
when
we
got
the
documents,
then
I
realized
that
it
was
probably
still
on
there
as
an
entire
home.
So
I
want
to
say
maybe
like
a
week
or
two,
because
we
you
know,
we
got
legal
documents
from
you
guys
almost
immediately
when.
G
G
So
then,
when
that
expired
24
hours
later,
I
switched
it
back
or
at
least
I
thought.
I
did
because
I
believe
that
it's
the
Airbnb
sites
a
little
bit
confusing
or
hard
to
you
know,
work
with.
So
I
switched
one
back
one,
because
they're,
like
the
series
of
buttons
and
I
switched
one
button
back
thinking
that
I
was
gonna
fix
it.
But
then,
when
I
got
the
legal
documents,
I
went
in
there
to
verify
and
there
was
still
one
more
button
to
press
and
then
I
switched
and.
E
E
G
M
G
E
One
for
all
of
these
reviews,
the
hundred
and
eight
reviews-
it's
unclear,
at
least
from
the
ones
that
I
read
whether
they
are
vacation
rentals
or
whether
you
maintained
your
residence
in
the
house.
Are
you
telling
us
that
all
those
hundred
and
eight
reviews
were
for
Home
Sharing
correct?
That
is
correct?
Yes,.
K
Just
vice-chair
I
mean
we
had
a
couple
of
comments.
Thank
you.
Home
chair
was
designed
and
passed
by
the
subcommittee
and
the
City
Council
as
a
way
for
individuals
to
make
extra
income,
especially
the
city
of
Palm
Springs,
because
we
have
so
many
individuals
retiring,
and
it
was
meant
to
allow
my
first
erectile
home
owners
to
rent
out
parts
of
their
home
to
offset
to
offset
some
of
the
expenses
that
they
have
and
they
were
supposed
to
be
on
site
during
an
entire
guests
stay.
K
K
The
other
concern
that
the
city
had
when
we
reviewed
the
site
was
that
included
a
keyless
entry
and
a
statement
before
you
stay.
We
send
you
the
code
from
convenient
to
access
of
the
property
and,
in
addition,
during
the
investigation,
you
will
notice
on
page
31.
There
is
a
review
by
an
individual
Claudia
that
says:
Daisy
was
very
responsive.
We
had
a
few
questions
and
she
replied
immediately
and
in
a
way
we
could.
K
K
I
think
that
what
is
really
important
to
understand
is
that
an
individual
may
not
shift
between
a
home
share
and
a
vacation
rental.
It
requires
a
different
type
of
a
permit
and
those
permits
require
have
different
requirements
with
the
within
our
ordinance
and
I.
Think
that's
what's
important
to
recognize
and
because
it
does
have
different
requirements.
There
is
a
different
fee
and
there's
a
different
level
of
enforcement
that
this
department
has
to
do.
Thank
you
that
completes
the
city's
comments.
Oh.
E
G
Tell
you
the
truth:
I
don't
know
what
I
would
have
done,
I,
don't
know
where
I
would
have
gone,
I
mean
I,
don't
have
a
plan.
B
is
just
like
I
said:
I
was
just
kind
of
playing
with
the
notion
and
then
I
started
getting
that
inquiry
and
then
I
switched
the
back
because
of
that
cuz
I
don't
want
to
serve
I,
don't
know
where
I
would
go.
M
I'll
start,
if
I
concur
Riddick
well,
it
appears
that
the
cities
that
position
is
that
the
investigation
that
was
conducted
where
they
sent
inquiry,
that
the
response
that
the
entire
house
was
available
for
rental
constitutes
a
violation,
because
the
entire
house,
by
definition,
means
that
there's
no
one
else
sharing
the
house
I
seem
to
recall
reading
some
reviews.
Maybe
it
was
in
this
case.
M
Maybe
it
was
in
some
others
where
there
was
Home
Sharing,
and
there
was
some
clarification
about
one
of
the
guests
wanting
to
home
share
that
they
showed
up
and
there
was
other
couples
in
the
house
and
they
thought
when
they
had
booked,
that
they
would
get
the
entire
house
themselves
and
when
they
showed
up
you
know
one
bedroom
was
one
couple
and
then
they
rented
another
bedroom.
And
then
you
know
there
was
this
kind
of
misinformation.
You
know
like
in
this
world
of
texting
where
people
you
know
not.
M
The
full
idea
is
conveyed
when
people
are
using
these
interaction
type
devices.
But
what
I
didn't
hear
from
the
city
was
evidence
actually
that
you
guys
were
not
present
at
the
residence
you
know
other
than
they
referenced.
That
in
the
response
that
you
were
responsive
and
that
you
would
there,
with
a
few
questions,
you
have
replied
immediately,
which
I
think
the
city's
position
is
that
that
was
some
type
of
text.
Reply
that
you
weren't
present
or
something
like
that.
I
think
it's
my
understanding
of
that.
M
E
Those
of
cases
are
pretty
clear-cut
in
terms
of
the
violation
whether
or
not
there
was
an
intent.
So
this
is
a
little
bit
different,
a
case
I'm
sympathetic
to
the
situation
between
the
two
of
you.
It's
it's
it's
unfortunate,
but
it's
a
little
more
difficult
for
me
and
as
much
as
up
until
this
state.
If
we
take
the
appellant
at
their
word,
it
had
been
a
home
share.
It
had
been
only
offered
due
to
this
your
words
tinkering
for
a
very
short
period
of
time.
You
have
no
place
else
to
live.
E
Were
this
to
actually
go
through,
so
it
sounds
like
it
wasn't
a
particularly
well
thought-out
financial
plan
on
your
part,
as
has
been
the
case
in
a
number
of
the
appeal,
so
I'm.
This
is
more
a
more
difficult
case
for
me
as
to
how
we
resolve
it.
My
my
assumption
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
that,
when
you
walk
out
of
here,
regardless
of
how
we
find
your
appeal
and
and
the
amount
that
you're
going
to
be
doing
home,
sharing
in
any
event,
is
that
correct,
I.
L
L
L
Understanding
and
sympathy
of
my
fellow
board
members
toward
the
situation,
but
I
don't
find
there
to
be
any
facts
in
dispute
here.
It's
pretty
much
established
what
happened
this
was
a
registered
home
share.
It
will
continue
to
be
a
registered
home
share,
but
with
whatever
intentions,
this
misadventure
into
the
vacation
rental
market
occurred
deliberately.
L
E
When
prefaced
by
some
sympathy
for
the
appellant
here
and
the
some
economic
hardship
tand
having
to
pay
a
$5,000
fine,
based
on
your
tinkering
with
your
with
your
Airbnb
account,
I
would
move
that
the
resolution
of
the
city
making
this
property
the
days
of
tourist
property
at
thirty
to
sixty
two
mica
permanently
ineligible
to
operate
a
vacation
rentals
should
be
adopted
and
likewise
I
would
move
that.
We
adopt
the
resolution
of
the.
L
G
L
All
right
we'll
move
to
item
two
on
the
agenda.
This
is
an
appeal
of
the
administrative
decision
that
Janie
cooker
is
permanently
ineligible
to
operate
a
vacation
rental
in
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
and
the
administrative
fine
for
operating
an
unregistered
vacation
rental
property
located
at
8.
Sorry.
J
You
vice
chair
the
property
located
at
2821,
North,
Los
Feliz
a
circle
unit.
K21
3
did
not
hold
a
valid
vacation
rental
registration
certificate
from
our
office.
As
of
the
date
of
the
administrative
citation
which
was
July,
2nd
2018
staff
has
determined
that
the
current
owner
has
without
a
registration
certificate
advertised
and
operated
the
property
as
a
vacation
rental.
We
are
noting
that
short-term
renting
is
not
permitted
in
this
particular
community
and
our
office
has
been
noticed
as
such,
we've
included
a
copy
of
that
letter
from
the
HOA
president.
J
At
page
23,
we've
included
the
Palm
Springs
municipal
codes
and
regulations
that
apply
to
this
case,
specifically
on
June
28th
2018,
the
violation
occurred.
Our
office
did
find
an
advertisement
for
this
property
on
Airbnb.
The
website
stated
cozy
cute
and
convenient
under
the
advertisement
number
that
we've
included
in
the
staff
report.
Our
department's
code
officer
inquired
online
to
see
of
short-term
availability
of
the
property
from
23rd
to
the
27th,
which
is
four
nights,
of
course,
would
be
accepted,
and
the
host
responded.
Affirmatively
to
that
inquiry,
the
ad
of
the
property
and
the
inquiry
included.
J
J
The
entire
condominium
is
available
for
rent,
as
you
can
see
on
page
30.
Check-In
time
is
flexible.
That's
on
page
31.
The
host
/
owner
also
provided
personalized
replies
to
our
officer
during
the
communication
regarding
inquiry,
and
that
can
be
found
on
page
26,
based
on
the
advertisement,
information
and
the
inquiry
to
the
property
being
offered
as
a
vacation
rental
by
the
host.
Our
office
did
issue
administrative
citation
163
to
the
owner
on
title,
the
citation
was
mailed
to
the
address
on
title.
Our
department
confirmed
receipt.
J
L
M
J
M
M
J
M
M
J
K
You
see
were
you
referring
to
in
your
packet
a
never
view
that
that
the
host
has
cancelled.
There
is
a
cancellation
policy,
did
every
host
can
set
up
within
what
they
prefer
some
host
set
up
that
you
cannot
cancel
30
days
before
you
arrival
date
or
your
money
doesn't
or
you
don't
get
your
full
rear?
You
know
full
refund
or
50
percents,
but
there
is
a
cancellation
policy
that
host
can
set
up
per.
K
You
know
how
they
wish
to
set
it
up
in
that
particular
case,
from
what
I'm
seeing
in
the
packet
is
that
the
host
did
and
the
host
agreed
with
the
guest
to
host
them
at
their
home
and
for
whatever
reason
to
host
cancel
that
that
booking
and
the
reason
that
it
goes
on
the
review
page,
is
for
any
future
bookings.
People
that
may
inquire
air
baby
wants
guests
to
be
aware
that
the
host
has
canceled
previously
set
booking
in
a
transaction
that
was
supposed
to
take
place.
J
M
J
Just
to
clarify
sense
in
terms
of
our
protocol,
since
advertising
is
operating,
we
find
the
ad
we
reach
out.
We
don't
actually
go
through
with
the
booking,
we
don't.
We
don't
give
the
to
credit
card,
we
inquire
as
part
of
the
investigation
and
if
they
accept
the
short-term
booking
and
it's
clear
to
us
that
there's
some
personalized
response
and
not
an
automated
response
that
also
the
the
host
can
set
up.
Then
we
believe
that
that's
sufficient
evidence
that
there
was
an
intention
to
rent
short-term.
M
J
Know
there
are
two
cases
today
where
the
same
HOA
is
involved.
In
this
particular
case,
our
office
has
been
notified
specifically
regarding
the
HOAs
CCN
ours.
In
this
regard,
our
our
policy
is
and
the
ordinance
requires.
The
new
ordinance
requires
that
we
obtain
a
letter
from
the
HOA
when
someone
applies
or
or
when
someone
who
had
a
certificate
renews
and
because
we
couldn't
necessarily
rely
on
self-certifying
at
the
application
time.
Some
owners
didn't
know.
J
Sometimes
it
was
unclear,
so
our
new
ordinance
that
became
in
to
effect
last
April
2017
requires
that
we
actually
get
a
letter
from
the
HOA
or
the
management
company
that
states
if
the
city
issues
a
permit
that
the
owner
will
not
be
in
violation
of
the
CE
CNRS
for
that
HOA
community
and
that's
the
practice
that
we
follow.
We
included
the
package
here.
J
Just
does
a
note
that-
and
let
me
just
back
up
so
in
this
particular
HOA,
like
many
HOAs-
have
made
it
clear
to
the
city
that
they
do
not
allow
vacation
rentals
and
we
honor
that
and
that's
why
I
included
this,
and
this
particular
HOA
has
provided
us
a
copy
of
the
CCN
ARS
they've
provided
us.
They
updated
their
rules
and
regs
this
year
and
they
provided
the
city
with
a
copy
of
those
they're
not
required
to,
but
they're
very
proactive
as
they
their
community.
N
Peter
Kings
I
asked
to
actually
get
a
copy
of
the
CC
and
Aris
and
get
a
copy
of
rules
and
regulations
and
that
having
done
legal
work
for
other
age
for
HOAs
in
the
past
and
what
I
found
is.
It
was
very
clear
in
their
original
documents
that
they
did
not
want
Hotel
type
stays
and
as
late
as
2018,
they
revised
their
rules
and
regulations.
To
specifically
say
that
you
cannot
do
vacation
rentals
and
miss
Severn.
J
P
So
I
first
off
want
to
start
off
by
saying
that
I
know
that
ignorance
of
the
law
is
never
defense.
However,
when
listing
my
property
on
Airbnb,
it
was
pretty
much
just
to
gauge
interest
in
the
property,
because
I
am
in
the
process
of
us
in
the
process
of
deciding
what
I
want
to
do
with
the
property,
and
so
I
do
have
evidence
here
of
how
I
listed
it.
I
did
get
an
inquiry
which
was
a
month
before
the
person
was
supposed
to
stay
there,
and
so
the
property
first
of
all
is
empty.
P
It's
not
even
operational
or
I
can't
wait
that
illegally
and
I
have
pictures
to
show
that,
so
the
person
did
inquire
and
it
was
almost
a
month
in
advance,
so
I
kind
of
played
with
the
idea
of
doing
what
was
necessary
to
get
it
set
up.
Then
I'm,
the
last
I'm
not
gonna,
be
able
to
do
that
and
so
I
did
cancel
the
inquiry
or
though
whatever
the
person
did.
So
that's
one
thing,
I
wanted
to
say
in
my
letter
to
you,
I
said
that
the
property
I
would
provide
is
that
it's
empty.
P
First
of
all,
so
I
remember
getting
numerous
packets
of
letters
from
them
and
it
said
stuff
like
we're
voting
to
see
if
we're
gonna
be
a
rental
copy,
and
things
like
that,
so
I
did
call
twice
again.
That's
just
me
trying
to
find
out
what,
if
I
do
decide
to
go
with
the
short-term
rental.
What
do
I
need
to
do
to
in
order
to
do
it?
I
deactivated
the
Airbnb
as
soon
as
I
received
your
citation
letter
or
whatever
is
called
so
I
have
evidence
of
that.
As
well,.
I
I
E
P
Not
because,
like
I
said
I
was
deciding
and
if
I
don't
necessarily
believe
that
I'm
committing
a
crime,
I
didn't
think
to
deactivate
it,
but
I've
never
rented
it.
So
if
I,
if
I,
didn't
know
that
advertising
on
Airbnb
is
a
crime
until
you
notify
me,
I
wouldn't
have
any
other
reason
to
deactivate
and,
as
I
said,
I
was
using
a
period
of
time
to
decide
what
I
wanted
to
do
with
the
property.
P
If
I
want
to
do
a
longer
term
rental,
which
is
legal
in
our
community
or
if
I,
wanted
to
sell
it
or
try
to
go
this
route,
not
knowing
whether
the
HOA,
because,
like
I
said
it
was
always
a
vote
and
I
call
twice
and
left
two
messages.
So,
yes,
that's
true:
I
did
deactivate
it
once
I
received
it.
Let's.
L
P
Honestly,
don't
remember
but
I
believe
I
just
for
purposes.
I
printed
bank
statements
from
May,
cuz
I
think
maybe
it
was
Maye,
but
like
the
gentleman
before
the
the
website,
once
you
get
on,
it
is
a
little
hard
to
navigate.
It
took
me
a
few
days
to
actually
figure
out
how
to
deactivate
it.
So
honestly,
I
I
can't
tell
you
when
I
had
to
listen,
I
want
to
say
maybe
late
me.
M
What
happened
at
the
beginning
of
when
this
board
written
initially
started
to
wrestle
with
these
issues
of
as
to
whether
there's
an
operation
of
a
vacation
rental
or
not?
One
of
the
questions
that
came
before
the
board
was
this
exact
same
situation
that
urine
that
someone
is
maybe
doing
a
test
rental
trying
to
see
what
the
market
is.
Is
there
any
value
to
renting
their
place
out?
Can
they
buy
a
second
home
and
rent
it
and
make
them
make
a
go
of
it
and,
and
the
ordinance
was
was
prohibiting.
M
M
So
I
looked
at
your
photographs,
it's
clear
that
you
know
that
you,
you
couldn't
operate
a
vacation
rental.
If
you
wanted
to
there's
no
product,
there's
no
furniture
there,
you
know,
but
you
don't
have
to
eat
either,
and
so
so
this
the
city
wants
to
include
and
the
people
that
are
prohibited.
Are
people
like
you
who
are
merely
testing
I.
P
Do
realize
that
once
I
received
the
citation
in
the
mail
that
advertising
it,
you
know,
acts
in
this
city
says
that
advertising
is
a
violation,
so
I
do
realize
that
and
I'm
hoping
that
the
evidence
shows
that
I
didn't
benefit
in
any
way
and
make
any
money
that
the
city
should
have
made
or
I.
Didn't
my
actions
didn't
prevent
the
city
from
making
money
or
losing
them
and
I'm
very
apologetic
for
advertising
illegally
in
in
your
in
this
city,
which
considers
as
operation.
H
P
P
M
I'll
begin:
this
is
one
of
those
cases
that
you
know
it's
kind
of
like
one
of
those
gotcha
cases
where
you
know
technically
you're,
in
violation
of
a
very
technical
aspect
of
what
is
defined
as
the
operation
of
a
vacation
rental,
but
they
think
that
I
know
the
intent
of
the
ordinance
was
to
private
actual
renting
of
the
vacation.
Rentals,
you
know,
that's
the
the
real
intent
of
the
or
of
the
ordinance
is
to
prohibit
people
from
turning
their
condos
into
hotels.
M
It
seems
to
me
that,
for
someone
like
you
who
may
have
mistakenly
done
a
test
market,
you
qualify
for
a
violation
under.
What's
the
city
defines
its
operation,
but
I?
Don't
I,
don't
think
that
really
you're,
the
heart
and
soul
of
what
the
city
is
trying
to
prohibit
or
punish
you
never
you've
indicated
you've,
never
rented
the
place
out.
You
never
got
any
income
for
it.
There's
no
evidence
that
anybody
stayed
there.
The
pictures
showed
that
it's
empty.
M
M
A
real
violation
and
the
idea
of
prohibiting
you
from
vacation
rental
aim
for
life
and
when
you're
intent
and
you've
shown
us
that
you're
listing
the
place
for
sale,
and
that
is
a
on
August
15th.
You
know
recently
that
you've
entered
into
an
agreement
to
to
risk
list
of
the
the
vacation
when
the
the
home
that
was
alleged
the
subject
of
the
vacation
rental
for
sale,
so
I
I,
just
don't
I
mean
maybe
you
could
be
snared
into
the
net,
but
I,
don't
think
that's
the
intent
of
the
statute
and
I
know
and
I.
E
Not
surprisingly,
I
guess
I
would
disagree,
we
don't
know
what
the
heart
and
the
soul
of
the
city
was
in
drafting
this
particular
provision,
and
we
cannot
rely
on
that
heart
and
soul,
or
real
intent
in
making
our
decision
today
and
in
fact
it.
Although
I'm
sympathetic
to
the
appellant
case.
E
This
is
not
a
technical
violation,
it
is
a
real
violation
of
a
real
ordinance
and
there
was
care
taken
in
drafting
this
portion
of
the
ordinance
to
include
advertising
of
any
sort,
and
it
goes
on
to
describe
all
the
methods
of
advertising
and
it
is
a
separate
violation
to
advertise
not
simply
to
rent
the
property
pay
at
EOT
and
make
a
profit
for
it.
So
I
would
disagree
that
you're
you're
not
you're
not
being
caught
up
in
a
web,
that
you
are
being
caught
in
a
violation
of
the
statute
as
written.
H
H
H
P
J
The
property
located
at
2821,
North,
Los
Feliz,
is
circle.
West
unit
K
to
0-8
did
not
hold
a
valid
vacation
rental
registration
certificate
from
our
department.
As
of
the
date
of
the
administrative
citation
which
was
July
3rd
2018
staff
has
determined
that
the
current
owners
have
without
a
certificate
advertised
and
operated
the
property
as
a
vacation
rental.
We
would
like
to
note
that
the
owners
previously
did
hold
a
valid
registration
certificate
for
this
property.
It
was
issued
on
April
14
2016,
with
our
new
vacation
rental
ordinance
that
was
effective,
April,
16,
2017,
new
and
renewal.
J
Applicants
must
provide
a
letter
from
their
HOA
board
or
their
management
company.
That
short-term
renting
is
allowed.
The
vacation
rental
department
issued
administrative
procedure
covering
this
requirement
on
March
1st
2018,
that's
included
in
your
packet
at
page
27,
the
O
net.
By
way
of
history,
the
owners
did
send
a
renewal
check
to
our
department
in
March
2018,
but
they
sent
no
renewal
application
with
it
and
required
HOA
letter
with
that
application
staff
reached
out
to
the
owners
by
email
to
request
the
required
documents
that
was
on
page
20
on
May
10th.
J
Our
office
advised
the
owners
via
email
and
letter
that
the
HOA
associated
with
this
property
had
provided
notification
to
our
department,
specifically
that
short
term
renting
is
not
allowed,
and
therefore
the
owners,
application
and
renewal
fee
check
was
being
returned.
Our
email
to
the
owners
clearly
states
that
they
may
not
advertise
and
operate
as
a
result
of
this,
I
will
note
that
the
owners
did
send
us
pieces
of
an
application.
J
Our
office
determined
that
a
violation
occurred
on
June
25th
2018.
Our
officers
found
an
advertisement
on
VRBO.
The
property
was
advertised
as
happy
house
Palm
Springs.
Under
the
advertisement
listed
in
the
staff
report.
Our
department's
code
officer
inquired
online
to
see
if
the
owners
would
accept
a
short
term
inquiry
specifically
from
August
3rd
to
the
10th,
which
of
course
is
seven
nights
and
the
host
did
respond.
Affirmatively,
the
advertisement
of
the
property
and
the
inquiry
that
we
sent
or
included
in
your
package.
J
Also,
the
advertisement
specifically
says
a
minimum
stay
of
two
nights.
There
was
a
personalized
reply
from
the
owner
to
the
inquiry
that
our
officer
made
and
there's
other
information
included
in
your
staff
report
to
represent
that
advertising
did
occur
so,
based
on
this
advertisement
and
the
inquiry
into
the
property,
our
our
office
determined
that
a
violation
occurred.
We
issued
citation
a
B
zero
one,
six
six
to
the
owners
on
title
and
we
confirmed
that
that
citation
was
received
officer
Rasmussen,
who
did
the
investigation
and
issued
the
citation
is
here?
E
E
There
are
a
number
of
check
offs
that
you
need
in
order
to
renew
the
permit
and
that
one
of
those
is
a
letter
from
the
HOA,
and
in
this
case
you
did
not
receive
that
letter
because
they
prohibit
this
kind
of
short-term
rental
and
without
putting
words
I
guess:
I
am
putting
words
in
your
mouth
and
because
that
letter
was
not
received
the
permit
or
the
renewal
of
the
permit
was
not
allowed.
Is
that
correct,
I
see
you're
shaking
your
head?
J
No,
what
you're
stating
is
correct.
We
do
have
an
application
and
renewal
process
and
there
are
a
number
of
pieces
to
the
application.
The
requirements
need
to
be
met.
We
do
have
a
checklist
and
we
make
sure
that
we
have
that
information.
That's
required
by
the
ordinance
before
we
issue
a
renewal.
Permit.
J
I
will
say
that,
with
respect
to
HOA
letters,
I
mentioned
earlier
today
that
our
office
issued
a
an
administrative
regulation
that
you
have
in
your
package
specific
to
this
requirement,
and
we
did
some
outreach
to
owners
that
had
certificates,
but
we
did
not
have
a
letter
for
those
so
during
the
March
April
May
time
frame.
In
addition
to
the
information
that
I've
stated
today
in
terms
of
the
administrative
regulation
that
we
issued,
we
did
send
letters
to
owners
and
asked
them
to
provide
the
HOA
letter.
J
E
J
In
this
case,
we
sent
we,
we
had
several
HOAs
that
were
very
proactive
during
the
March
April
May
time
frame
with
our
office.
They
wanted
to
make
it
very
clear
that
they
did
or
did
not
allow
vacation
rentals
Palm
Springs
villas
to
made
it
very
clear
to
us
by
way
of
letter,
that's
included
in
the
package
from
the
HOA
president
that
they
do
not
allow
short-term
vacation
rentals,
and
it
was
at
this
same
time
that
we
received
an
applicator
renewal
check
from
the
owners
of
this
property
to
renew
their
their
certificate.
J
The
check
is
not
enough.
We
reached
out
to
them
and
said
we
also
need
these
other
things
in
order
to
renew
and
at
and
probably
a
month
and
a
half
later,
we
got
very
specific
guidance
from
this
HOA.
That
said,
do
not
renew
the
following
properties:
they
have
certificates,
we
don't
allow
it
and
please
don't
renew
these
properties,
it's
in
violation
of
RCC
and
ours,
so
we
had
very
clear
direction
from
a
number
of
HOAs
one
way
or
another.
M
Just
one
December
in
you
indicated
that
there
was
a
CC&R
letter
that
came
from
the
city
kind
of
indicating
the
requirement
that
there
be
verification
that
there
are
no
rules,
regulations,
covenants
and
restrictions
prohibiting
vacation,
Rantala,
that's
in
your
packet
on
27
and
28.
Is
that
the
same
document
we're
talking
about.
J
This
is
the
administrative
reg
issued
signed
by
the
city
manager
in
the
city
attorney.
There
were
two
separate
letters
that
I
did
not
include
in
this
package
that
were
letters
that
went
to
all
owners
and
all
agents
that
manage
these
properties.
We
issued
that
letter
on
March
12th
and
it
basically
said
that
this
letter
is
an
important
reminder
that
the
ordinance
requires
a
letter
from
your
HOA
or
governing
management
company,
and
we
asked
them
to
send
us
the
letter
by
April,
13,
2018
and.
J
J
J
Sent
a
final
notice
out
in
April
I:
don't
have
that
letter
handy,
but
it
basically
said
that
if
you
can't
get
the
letter
the
HOA
letter
and
you're
currently
registered,
you
either
need
to
close
your
account,
because
we
can't
continue
to
allow
you
to
operate.
We
can't
rely
on
anything
except
a
letter
from
your
HOA
or
you
would
be
cited
for
continuing
to
operate
and
I'm.
Sorry,
I
don't
have
the
date,
but
that
was
in
April
and
I
believe
we
gave
everybody
until
May
12th
to
send
that
to
us.
J
M
Is
there
any
anything
to
the
discrepancy
regarding
the
fee
schedule,
that's
set
by
the
ordinance
signed
by
dr.
Reidy
and
mr.
Kotkin,
where
they
indicate
that
the
first
violation
for
is
$500
and
it
escalates
from
there
versus
the
citation
that
was
issued
in
this
case,
which
is
the
first
violation
for
a
$5,000
penalty?
Is
there
a
reason
there
was
a
discrepancy
there.
J
In
this
case,
the
owners
specifically
were
told
that
we
would
not
be
able
to
issue
a
certain
era,
newel
certificate
to
them
and
that
we
had
specific
instructions
from
the
HOA
and
that
the
city
honors
those
the
CCN
ours,
because
it's
the
community
speaking
so
they
take
precedence
over
our
ordinance.
In
this
case,.
J
J
Let
the
owners
know
that
we
would
be
sending
back
their
check
and
the
pieces
of
their
application
that
they
did
submit,
because
our
office
was
not
in
a
position
to
give
them
a
renewal
certificate.
So
that
was
that
and
then
our
officers
I'm
sorry
and
then
our
officers
actually
found
them
advertising.
So
in
this
case
there
it
was
clear
that
the
owners
got
the
email.
It
was
clear
that
the
owners
understand.
They
said
that
they
were
further
discussing
this,
but
the
email
did
state
that
advertising
and
operating
is
a
violation.
So.
M
I
guess
my
question
is:
is
the
fee
schedule
indicated
in
the
CC
in
our
requirement
a
fee
schedule
that
goes
to
failure
to
provide
the
letter
from
the
HOA
subjects,
the
the
permit
holder
to
a
$500
for
the
first
offense
$1,000
for
the
second
offense
and
not
to
exceed
$5,000?
Is
that
what
that
is?
Is
a
fee
schedule
to
the
permit
holder
for
failure
to
provide
a
notice
from
the
HOA
that
the
vacation
rental
doesn't
violate
to
CC
and
ours?
Please
it's
a
different
fee
schedule.
J
Yeah
I
understand
so
so
there
were
owners
who
were
attempting
to
get
those
letters
I'll,
be
it
slowly,
but
we
we
knew
that
they
would
be
able
to
get
those
letters.
We
had
information
and
we
communicated
with
owners.
We
we
at
that
at
at
a
certain
point
we
reached
out
to
HOAs
and
said:
are
you
gonna
give
us
the
letter.
D
J
And
if
someone
was
having
a
hard
time
getting
that
letter
and
not
putting
a
lot
of
effort
into
that,
we
our
office
expended
a
lot
of
resources
over
those
three
months
trying
to
get
all
of
this
squared
away.
Like
I
said
earlier
previous
to
the
ordinance
we
relied,
we
didn't
ask
for
a
letter.
We
were
light
on
the
owners
and
this
the
statements
they
made
in
the
application.
J
J
M
H
C
L
L
M
M
N
I
made
Peter
King,
the
the.
If
you
look
at
the
5.20
5.090,
the
the
ratcheted
first
violation.
Second,
violation
is
related
to
somebody
that
I've
Eve
is
related
to
somebody
that
is
has
registered,
but
they've
had
other
violations
failing
to
post
on
the
property.
The
five
thousand
dollar
fine
comes
in
section
D
and
our
excuse
me
see
of
five
point:
twenty
five
point:
zero,
nine
O
and
that's
somebody
that
just
hasn't
registered
at
all.
N
Never
it
has
not
received
a
certificate
as
they
should
receive
a
certificate,
and
this
is
being
treated
as
if
somebody
has
not
received
a
certificate
because
he
didn't
have
a
certificate
he
may
have
had
one
once
before,
but
he
didn't
have
one
now
and
that's
why
they're
applying
the
five
thousand
dollar
fine,
because
it
was
clear
and
it
I
made
I
might
argue.
It
should
have
been
clear
to
him
through
his
HOA
and
through
the
letters
that
he
got,
that
he
couldn't
register
and
he
was
going
ahead
to
do
it
anyway.
N
N
The
type
of
thing
that
you've
seen
before,
and
and
so
so
that's
the
distinction
here
and
I-
think
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
rare
I
wouldn't
get
caught
up
in
the
fact
that
what
they
were
asking
for
was
what,
whether
the
HOA
allowed
it
or
not
as
a
violation
of
something
where
he
was
already
registered.
He
just
was
couldn't
register
right.
M
Right
so,
but
what
I'm?
Actually?
What
I'm
seeing
is
an
individual
who
had
a
vacation
rental
certificate.
The
HOA
passed
a
law
saying
I'm,
just
assuming
here,
somehow
it
their
rule
and
regulations
became
known
that
it
was
prohibited
and
that
terminated
his
certificate
for
vacation
rental.
It
wasn't
because
he
violated
the
law.
He
wasn't,
he
was
doing
it
for
less
than
you're
nodding,
no
but
manat.
What
factually
happened
here
that
that
that
certificate
was
was
not
renewed
because
he
ate
the
CC&R
said
no.
M
M
E
I
may
interject,
though,
and
the
CCR
was
was
one
of
their.
The
letter
from
the
CCR
was
one
of
many
items
on
the
checklist.
We
wouldn't
be
having
this
conversation.
If
one
of
the
other
items
wasn't
received,
for
instance,
a
notification
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me
of
proper
insurance.
There's
the
the
CC
and
our
letter
was
just
one
of
many
requirements
that
he
had
to
comply
with
to
re-register
his
vacation
rental.
E
So
I
don't
think
we
should
be
getting
hung
up
on
which
of
those
frankly
which
of
those
items
on
the
checklist
he
could
not
or
would
not
provide.
He
did
not
complete
the
checklist.
We
wouldn't
be
having
this
conversation.
If
it
was
about
the
insurance
provision
which
he
also
had
to
you
know,
he
also
had
to
comply
with
so
I
think
we're
muddying
the
waters
by
zeroing
in
on
what
his
condominium
you
know,
bylaws
stated
or
didn't
state.
E
M
L
I
I
So,
as
you
heard,
we
have
convenience
of
this
neighborhood
called
Palm
Springs
bill
is
too
purchased
it
with
my
good
friend,
Tracy
I
married
Tracy's,
not,
and
we
purchased
it
in
2006
with
the
intent
of
my
family
and
any
time
to
spend
time
here,
renting
it
clear
in
the
wintertime
to
the
snowbirds.
That
I
know
are
very
common
coming
here
and
my
friend
Tracy
as
well.
I
At
the
same
time,
we
found
out
there's
the
ability
to
do
their
East
aisle
rentals
we
registered
with
the
city
and
at
the
time
that
we
purchased
the
home,
we
received
a
letter
from
the
management
company
which
has
now
changed,
but
it's
the
same
physical
people
that
are
doing
the
management.
That
says
there
are
no
rental
restrictions
in
Palm
Springs
villas
to
here
one-line
statement
on
their
letterhead
when
we
registered
the
property
with
the
city
that
was
in
2006.
I
I
And
then
again
through
2017
and
then
I
came
and
learn
even
more
about
all
the
various
rules,
changes
and
their
restrictions
and
obviously
the
struggle
that
the
city
is
going
through
to
figure
out
how
to
deal
with
this,
and
we
always
felt
that
our
1-bedroom
condominium
that
we
rented
people
on
a
week-long
basis
or
you
get
a
couple
of
months
long
basis.
It
was
really
not
the
main
target
of
the
city's
rules
and
regulations.
I
There's
where
these
kind
of
homes
that
were
having
baby
house
parties-
and
we
followed
the
rules
and
I
try
to
follow
those
rules
as
well,
so
we
registered
in
2018
we
sent
and
nine
hundred
dollar
fee.
We
sent
in
a
copy
of
the
letter
that
we
had
received
when
we
purchased
the
home.
That
said,
there's
no
rental
restrictions
at
Palm,
Springs
Veloz,
and
that
was
set
back
by
the
city.
We
also
had
to
change
our
insurance
policy.
We
had
a
different
carrier
that
couldn't
do
something
appropriate
with
the
city
required.
I
So
we
changed
our
insurance
policy
and
there
were
a
few
other
things
that
we
had
to
attest
to,
including
being
within
a
one-hour
drive
24
hours
a
day
at
that
point
or
shortly
thereafter,
and
she
laid
out
the
time
we
received
at
home
from
the
city
that
our
HOA
had
sent
a
letter
to
the
city,
saying
that
short-term
rentals
were
not
allowed
and
I
heard
I
believe
is
mr.
king.
Yes,
mr.
I
King
stated
earlier
during
the
prior
meeting
a
couple
of
things
that
don't
match
what
I
had
experienced
from
going
to
the
actual
HOA
meetings
for
the
conference
villa
to
number
one
is
that
there
were
no
rules
changes.
There
was
a
vote
in
early
2018
by
the
association
that
gave
three
options.
The
first
option
was
to
change
the
CC
NRS
to
remove
the
ability
to
rent
for
anything
less
than
28
days.
The
second
option
was
to
say
that
there
would
be
no
restrictions
and
the
third
was
to
have
no
change.
I
The
third
option
is
the
one
that
prevailed.
There
was
no
change,
so
there
were
no
changes
to
the
CCR's,
but
the
board
decided
to
reinterpret
and
there
has
been
since
then
and
remains
today,
a
big
question
about
what
really
is
or
isn't
allowed,
there's
a
bit
of
a
circular
logic,
that's
being
used
by
the
HOA
and.
I
So
that
was
that,
though,
that
in
early
2018
I
also
noticed
that
the
city
didn't
answer
your
question
about
what
the
HOA
does
or
doesn't
allow,
and
they
were
saying
well,
they
did
and
they
didn't
HOA
never
allowed
rentals
and
that
I
had
somehow
registered
the
property
through
my
own
promise
that
there
was
no
restrictions
and
that's
not
the
case.
There
was
in
fact
a
letter
from
the
HOA.
We
purchased
the
property
and
remained
until
sometime
this
year
when
they've
written
a
letter
to
the
city
saying
it's
not
well.
I
At
that
time
we
began
to
we've
removed
all
of
our
short-term
advertising,
so
I
thought
we
had
it
on
Airbnb.
That
was
the
place
that
we
had
advertised
and
we've
rented
that
home
for
a
long
term
period
for
one
year
and
the
tenant
moved
in
about
a
month
ago.
I
guess
that
this
VRBO
advertisement
was
to
let
my
partner,
whose
name
is
Tracey,
did
respond.
I,
don't
have
all
of
the
details.
I
actually
never
received
this
information
that
you
know
in
front
of
you.
I
don't
want
to
dispute
that.
I
I
The
way
that
I
understand
the
rules
is
that
if
you
break
the
rules
that
you
personally
are
banned
forever,
all
future
in
the
city
of
Palm
Springs,
but
the
way
that
I
have
heard
it
today
in
previous
cases
that
occurred
in
the
last
hour
or
so
is
at
the
individual
unit.
Maybe
you
could
advise
them
what
that
means.
H
I
I
We've
registered
with
the
city
for
two
years
the
property
was
allowed
and
purchased
the
property
when
we
first
registered
the
first
year
and
the
second
year,
the
third
year
registration,
which
is
this
year,
there's
some
type
of
change,
we're
just
not
doing
it's
now
rented
for
one
year
the
city
know
what
the
right
term
is.
I
might
call
it
a
state
that
kind
of
tested
to
see
what
the
owners
would
respond
to
my
partner
Tracy
did
apparently
respond
that
it
was
never
rented
or
occupied
where
the
funds
received.
I
E
I
E
The
regulations
state
that
we're
talking
about
rentals
for
28
days
and
less
that's
what
the
regulation
is
focused
on
for
for
rentals
of
more
than
that.
Certainly
a
rental
of
one
year
is
not
even
a
subject
of
this
regulation,
so
you
don't
have
the
sort
of
Hester
Prynne
mark?
Aren't
you
you
know,
except
for
short-term
rentals,
so
running
it
for
a
year
is
fine
going
forward.
N
I
Peter,
King
assistant
city
attorney
I
want
to
put
this
a
little
bit,
maybe
by
analogy
into
context
so
failing
to
have
the
registration
certificate
is
like
failing
to
have
a
driver's
license.
It's
a
big
fine,
but
if
you
have
a
driver's
license
and
you
get
a
ticket,
it
goes
against
your
license.
It's
it's
a
smaller
find
typically,
and
so
the
ordinance
seems
to
be
set
up.
That
way.
Now
I
notice,
on
page
27
that
mr.
my
colleague,
mr.
khat,
keen
kotkin
and
the
city
manager,
this
regulation
was
effective.
Just
this
March
2018.
N
However,
when
I
go
through
the
documents
and
somebody
that
buys
a
property
in
a
in
a
homeowner's
association
is
charged
with
knowing
in
fact
they
get
a
copy
of
this
before
they
close,
and
this
is
their
CCR's
okay
and
it's
very
clear
in
their
CC
and
ours
that
no
owner
shall
leases
unit
for
transient
or
hotel
purposes.
I,
don't
know
what
vacation
rental
is
if
it
isn't
a
transient
purpose,
as
opposed
to,
as
you
pointed
out,
a
month-to-month
lease
or
a
year
lease
month
month,
tenancy
rear
lease.
N
J
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
we
did
reach
out
to
the
HOA
regarding
the
letter,
the
previous
letter
that
we
had
that
this
gentleman
mentions
was
in
the
application
package
and
they
did
acknowledge
in
writing
that
there
that
was
their
previous
HOA,
our
previous
management
company
and
one
of
the
reasons
that
they're
no
longer
using
them
is
because
this
particular
letter
went
out
in
escrow
packages.
So
there
was
some
which.
J
J
I
Briefly,
absolutely
so,
I've
just
heard
two
people
from
the
city
state
in
very
forceful
terms
and
a
tone
of
voice
that
I'm
somehow
not
aware
of
what's
in
the
rules,
and
then
there
was
a
reading
of
the
rules.
They
don't
define
days.
That
does
lead
to
some
confusion.
That
does
lead
to
further
questions
and
at
the
time
that
I
purchased
the
home
and
in
subsequent
years,
I
did
request
that
information.
Now
miss
Suzanne
stated
that
oh
there's
this
letter
that
he
brought
up
it's
not
just
some
letter.
I
I
J
H
E
E
You
know,
as
this
isn't
prosecutors
stated
a
pretty
simple
case
of
you
know
there
were
there
were
certain
requirements
that
the
appellant
was
required
to
fulfill
in
order
this
time
around.
Let's
put
aside
2017
2016,
those
are
not
relevant.
Those
issues
are
not
relevant.
Any
letter
that
was
provided
at
that
point
is
not
relevant
to
obtain
the
renewal
of
his
license.
This
time
around,
he
was
required
to
comply
with
a
checklist
of
items.
E
M
Yes,
thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
your
comments.
I
think
that
the
facts
of
each
case
are
important
and
that
to
just
put
the
blinders
on
and
to
see
whether
or
not
this
particular
application
checklist
was
complied
with,
ignores
the
facts
and
the
and
the
history
and
the
facts
in
this
case
showed
that
he
was
a
permitted
vacation
rental
certificate,
holder
that,
when
he
intended,
when
he
purchased
property
and
and
created
the
if
the
RPO
account,
he
was
perfectly
within
the
law
and
had
a
valid
certificate.
M
And
then
whether
or
not
this
you
know,
I
agree
that
it's
difficult
for
us
to
delve
into
HOA
law.
But
I
would
wonder
what
an
HOA,
if
you
were
advising
the
HOA,
and
you
were
the
lawyer-
advice
in
the
HOA,
what
you
would
say
to
a
board
that
made
regulations
contrary
to
the
CNRS,
without
putting
it
to
a
vote
of
the
HOA.
Is
I
bet
you
your
advice.
M
M
What
we're
doing
is
the
city
is
giving
to
this
board
the
power
of
regulating
this
individuals
rental
certificate,
because
it
is
up
to
this
board
that
decides
whether
what
the
meaning
of
the
CCN
ours
are
and
what,
anyway,
if
an
HOA
wants
to
ban
permanent
homes,
they
can
do
so.
They
can
put
it
to
a
vote.
They
can
ban
temporary
rentals
just
like
the
city
did
legally.
M
One
notice
of
regulation
provided
in
our
packet,
which
was
in
effect
at
the
time
that
this
citation
was
issued
was
the
CC
in
our
vacation
rental,
administrative
procedure
that
an
individual
provide
a
letter
from
the
CC
NR
and
failure
to
do
so,
wouldn't
subject
him
to
a
loss
of
his
permit.
He
wouldn't
be
denied
a
vacation
rental
certificate.
He
would
be,
he
would
a
property
that
rents
without
without
failing
to
provide
the
VR
Co
within
30
days.
M
M
Just
don't
see
the
city
as
I
mean
I,
understand
that
they're
that
they
wish
to
take
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
that
they
that
they
contact
HOAs
and
find
out
what
is
the
position
of
the
HOA,
but
it's
not
to
give
the
H
or
the
power
of
the
permit
manat
up
to
them.
It's
a
it's
a
that's
a
separate
entity.
The
city
has
passed
a
regulation
and
determine
what
the
regulation
you
know
what
individuals
should
do.
M
The
C
does
not
say
you
can
rent
short-term
rentals
if
your
CC&R
says
so
in
violation
of
the
ordinance
of
the
city
prohibits
D
or
it's
still
prohibited,
no
matter
what
the
CC&R
say
or
some
vacation,
rental
or
HOA
says
so
you
know
I
just
I'm
struggling
with
it,
because
I
I
think
that
the
the
true
facts
of
it
it's
you
can't
just
look
at
the
citation
and
say:
oh
well,
we
didn't
give
him
a
certificates
of
therefore
he's
in
violation.
$5,000
I
mean
we
didn't.
M
L
L
So
forget
the
whole
HOA
CC&R
thing:
there's
a
failure
of
the
renewal
and
the
Express
communication
back
to
the
owner
that
the
renewal
has
failed,
the
monies
being
returned,
and
then
a
period
of
six
weeks
elapses
with
no
action
by
the
owner
except
to
advertise
the
property
and
accept
an
engagement
of
the
property.
So
I
suggest
that
would
ease
your
struggle.
If
you,
if
you
find
those
facts
as
I,
do
and
I
don't
have
any
blinders
on
so
no.
M
I
I
don't
see
any
blinders
for
the
record,
but
I
still
note
that
the
the
fee
schedule
or
fine
schedule
is
indicated
by
the
the
administrative
regulations
cited
different.
The
homeowners
presented
a
proposition
that
is,
you
know
much
greater
than
the
the
three-tiered
fine
schedule
that
is
outlined
in
the
in
the
regulation.
The
administrative
regulation,
the
homeowners
suggested
that
the
fine
be
$2,500
we
have
in
the
past.
M
M
E
E
Refer
to
an
existing
registration
where
the
CCN
RS
have
changed,
and
it
states
that
you
know
they
have
a
compliance
period.
If
that
CC&R
has
changed,
and
it
does
say
that
the
revocation,
revocation,
not
institutional
but
revocation
of
an
an
existing
registration
certificate
does
not
itself
Dean
the
owners
ineligible
to
apply
for
another
registration
certificate
for
the
same
property.
E
It
doesn't
really
address
the
renewal
of
at
least
in
my
looking
at
over
address
a
renewal
of
a
registration
certificate
without
the
appropriate
documentation
from
the
homeowners
association.
So
I,
just
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
clear
that
this,
even
though
I
think
this
doesn't
even
apply
to
our
situation.
We're
talking
about
a
new
certificate.
E
L
F
Or
am
I
sure
now,
if
I
just
make
a
comment,
I
have
a
request
to
speak
from
janae
Hooker.
F
However
I
just
wanna
point
out
that
testimony
taken
during
Appeals
is
specifically
to
that
person's
appeal,
and
then
we
have
a
general
public
comment
period,
but
that's
in
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
so
there
there
is
no
opportunity
to
speak
on
general
comments
at
this
time
unless
the
board
wants
to
we'll
use
discretion.
When
was.
L
F
F
L
K
You
vice-chair,
how
are
the
members
of
the
board
the
property
located
at
695
South
Highland
Drive
in
Palm
Springs,
and
not
hold
a
vacation
rental
registration?
As
of
the
date
of
the
administrative
citation
issues
on
July
23rd
2018
staff
has
determined
that
the
current
owner
has
without
a
registration
certificate
advertised
and
operated
the
property
as
a
vacation.
K
The
vacation
rental
ordinance
allows
an
owner
to
retain
an
agent
or
representative
to
assist
a
compliance
with
the
vacation
rental
chapter,
which
includes
filing
of
a
complete
vacation
rental
registration
to
register
property,
the
management
of
the
property,
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
collecting
taxes
for
a
city
and
payable
to
the
C
section
specifically
that
affects
this
particular
case
is
located
on.
It
starts
on
page
2
or
a
section
5.2
506,
o
item
D.
K
It
says
vacation
rental,
registration
requirements,
States
the
following
in
the
event
of
a
change
in
agent
or
the
occurrence
of
any
other
material
fact
set
forth
in
the
annual
registration.
A
new
registration
for
a
vacation
rental
shall
be
required
to
continue
operation
of
the
vacation
rental
and,
within
seven
days
of
said,
change.
The
owner
or
his
or
her
exclusive
listing
agent
shall
submit
the
required
registration
fee.
K
The
prop
advertisement
of
the
property
on
695
Highland
was
found
by
the
VR
City
Department
on
airbnb.com,
under
the
title
Indian
summer
under
advertisement
number
two,
one,
three,
six,
eight
one:
eight,
seven,
the
department's
code,
compliance
officers
and
an
inquiry
for
seven
nights
and
the
host
responded.
Affirmatively
the
own.
The
ad
identifies
the
owner,
Ezrin
Rena,
Machiko
co-host,
that's
on
page
46
of
your
packet.
The
ad
shows
a
two
night
minimum
stay.
K
We
show
27
reviews
of
the
property,
including
several
of
them
after
May
11th,
which
was
the
termination
date
by
the
owner,
as
requested
in
her
email
to
vacation,
Palm
Springs.
We
all
show
we
show
check-in
and
check-out
times
we
have
a
personalized
reply
from
the
host
to
the
inquiry:
page
40
and
41
of
your
packet
and
a
pre-approval
to
book
the
property
on
page
40,
based
on
the
advertisement,
information
an
inquiry
into
the
property
being
offered
as
a
vacation
rental,
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
vocational
compliance.
K
Department
proceeded
with
issuing
an
administrative
citation,
a
B
zero
one,
seven
two,
five
in
amount
of
$5,000
to
the
owner,
untitled
Grenade
Stallworth,
and
for
operating
a
vacation
rental
without
a
vacation
on
a
registration
certificate.
The
admission
citation
was
mailed
to
the
mailing
address
on
title
and
a
receipt
was
confirmed.
I
we
do
have
the
co
compliance
officer.
Who
did
do
the
inquiry
and
investigation
present
or
any
questions
the
board
may
have
I
do
not
have
any
questions
of
him
at
this
time.
K
K
The
the
individual
homeowner
on
title
requested
in
an
email
in
writing
to
vacation
Palm
Springs
that
that
miss
stall,
apologist,
myth
Stallworth,
is
terminating
their
relationship
and
terminating
them.
Managing
of
the
property
who
said
that
the
owner
of
the
property
miss
Rene
Stallworth,
it's
an
email
in
your
packet,
where.
L
K
H
K
Agency
notified
you,
the
agency
notified
us
via,
what's
called
a
deletion
form,
they
sent
us
a
list
of
properties
that
it
will
be
no
longer
managing
that
are
no
longer
associated
with
their
Tod
number
that,
basically,
those
permits
are
no
longer
in
effect,
because
those
homeowners,
some
of
them,
may
choose
to
go
to
a
different
agency.
Some
of
them
may
choose
to
manage
on
their
own
and.
K
Correct
requires
want
a
new
application
for
the
property.
What
becomes
very
important
is
when
property
terminates
a
relation
with
an
agency.
We
don't
have
all
the
information
on
file
for
the
owner.
So,
for
example,
when
an
agency
manages
a
property,
they
are
the
local
contact
in
case
of
any
nuisances
or
issues
that
arise
at
the
property.
K
By
having
a
new
application
come
in
to
the
city
we
get
to,
we
get
updated
information
from
the
homeowner
with
respect
to
the
local
contact
is
where
is
their
mailing
addresses
where
we
can
send
communication,
and
in
this
case,
once
the
homeowner
terminated
a
relationship
with
their
agency?
No
further
communication
came
into
the
city
relating
this
relating
to
this
property.
If.
L
K
Homeowner
will
have
the
remainder
of
that
term.
They
will
not
need
to
pay
an
additional
$900.
We
will
continue
to
to
have
their
property
registered
for
that
fee
that
they
paid
and
also,
if
I
may,
do
your
previous
question.
Another
reason
why
why
a
homeowner
needs
to
apply
is
they
no
longer
have
a
tax
ID
number?
K
They
don't
have
a
transient
occupancy
tax
with
an
agency
agency
files
on
their
behalf
under
the
agency
transient
occupancy
tax
number,
and
when,
when
that
relationship
gets
terminated,
the
homeowner
does
not
have
a
way
to
file
taxes,
and
if
you
may
recall
its
previous
cases
where
we've
had
is,
we
are
not
able
to
issue
a
vacation
rental
permit.
Unless
somebody
has
a
transient
occupancy
tax
ID
number
to
be
able
to
file
taxes
from
their
bookings.
Thank.
K
The
so
the
on
page
39
is
a
list
of
properties
that
vacation
Palm
Springs
is
informing
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
that
they
are
terminating
for.
The
record.
I
will
note
that
vacation
Palm
Springs
did
provide
us
with
a
copy
of
an
email
that
the
appellant
did
provide.
We
we
do
have
a
copy
of
an
email
for
our
records,
that
is
on
page
32.
We
did
get
that
we
did
not
include
it
in
a
packet
as
it
was
already
being
referenced
by
the
appellant.
Those
are
the
two
communications
that
we
have
received
from
the
agency.
K
K
L
F
H
O
And
vacation
Palm
Springs
brought
the
original
permit
in
my
house,
and
my
husband
got
it
and
he
asked
them.
Did
you
create
the
permit?
And
he
said
no
so
I
didn't
know.
What's
going
on,
I
really
I'm
really
totally
surprised
because
I
paid
900
and
they
said
the
permit,
is
on
the
house
not
on
the
maquette
vacation,
Palm
Springs.
They
don't
own
this
permit
only
it's
because
of
the
house
and
it
was
2017
and
we
knew
for
2018
and
so
I'm
totally
depressed
about
that
case,
because
I
did
nothing
wrong.
O
O
It's
my
daughter,
because
she's
better
in
English
I'm
from
Germany
she's,
but
she
lives
longer
than
yeah
I'm,
really
I
I
can't
get
it
because
in
Germany
you
get
a
warning
or
something
like
that,
but
nothing
only
that
one
letter
I
have
to
pay
five
thousand
and
I
will
never
get
that
permit
again.
So
I
don't
know,
what's
going
on
here
and
really
I
know:
vacation
Palm,
Springs,
Owens,
five
hundred
houses
and
there
I
guess
perfect
relationship
to
Palm
Springs,
because
it's
it's
obviously
but
I.
They
didn't
say
to
me
that
very
cancelled.
O
H
M
L
A
M
And
then
your
your
notice
that
your
your
appeal,
which
we
did
get
a
copy
of
and
reviewed,
and
that
your
defense
basic
claim
is
that
you
were
it.
Was
you
had
paid
for
the
entire
year
and
that
the
certificate
was
cancelled
without
your
knowledge,
Yeah.
O
M
O
H
O
F
L
O
C
C
It
said
that
they
would
act
on
her
behalf,
but
not
that
they
could
actually
cancel
it.
I
mean
how
would
we
know
if
this
was
actually
purchased
for
a
whole
year
in
advance
and
so
so
yeah
she
she
she
didn't
know
it
was.
It
was
not
in
effect
and
just
acted
in
in
good
faith
that
that
she
was
doing
the
right
thing
and
yeah.
If
she
had
known
that
it
was
canceled.
C
She
would
have
done
something
about
it,
but
she
didn't,
she
didn't
know
and
she
never
received
some
kind
of
a
warning
or
something
that
she's
doing
this
without
permission,
because
if
that
was
the
case,
she
would
have
gone
to
the
city
and
asked
why
why
it
was
without
permission
because
she
knew
or
she
thought
the
house
itself
was
had
a
permit
to
be
renting
the
house,
short-term
and
yeah.
So.
C
L
C
L
C
C
Yes,
she
she
cancelled
I
think
in
May,
because
she
kept
asking
them
please
rent
out
my
house.
Please
do
something
because
I'm,
depending
on
this
money,.
C
Well,
she
never
knew
about
that
that
how
was
she
supposed
to
know
if
she
purchased
this
whole
permit
that
for
a
whole
year,
no.
H
L
C
L
C
E
K
C
H
J
Was
just
gonna
clarify
the
owner
does
have
to
sign
the
application,
because
the
owner
is
responsible,
even
though
they
have
an
agency
assigned
it
doesn't
relieve
the
owner
from
any
obligation.
So
the
owner
does
sign
the
application,
but
the
applicant.
The
application
is
submitted
by
the
agency
on
behalf
of
the
owner
and
they
let
us
know
that
they
are
the
representing
agency,
but
the
owner
does
have
to
sign
on
the
application
itself.
Do.
K
C
K
Mr.
Weiss
chairman,
is
this
a
calm?
This
is
a
proprietary
for
the
city
to
make
additional
comments.
After
testimony,
would
you
like
us
to
hold
off
until
for
the
review
of
the
application
proceed?
Okay,
thank
you.
Do
you
know
I
do
have
to
echo
my
partner,
mrs.
Severn,
the
section
of
the
Municipal
Code
5.25
is
zero-five-zero
under
agency
sections.
Title
agency
does
say
that
owner
the
vacation
rental
shall
execute
all
application
and
documents
requirements,
as
provided
in
this
chapter
and
shall
remain
responsible
for
compliance
with
the
provisions
of
this
chapter.
K
The
failure
of
an
agent
to
comply
with
this
chapter
shall
not
relieve
the
owner
of
the
owners
obligation
under
the
provisions
of
this
chapter
and
based
on
that
section,
we
acted
on
the
owner,
executing
application
and
the
owner
being
ultimately
responsible.
Still
for
the
compliance
of
the
chapter.
I
do
want
to
make
note
that,
through
communication
with
Miss
stallworth
that
we
did,
we
were
made
aware
that
her
husband
operated
a
vacation
rental
property
and
there
are
five
guests
stay
reviews
since
May
through
July
and
the
cities.
K
E
I
might
I
think
it
really
comes
down
to
just
the
appellant
lack
of
awareness
of
section
five
to
five
point:
zero,
six
OD
that
she
was
required
once
the
agency
ended
to
put
the
registration
I
guess
in
her
own
name,
cuz.
She
wouldn't
have
to
pay
an
additional
nine
hundred,
but
that
that
was
her
obligation
to
get
a
train
which
you've
gotten
to
transferred
over
to
her
own
name
or
how?
What's
the
mechanical.
K
Correct
the
mechanic
would
have
been
that
upon
context
in
our
office,
the
home
owner
we've
been
guided
to
either
submit
a
new
application
as
a
owner
operator
or
if
they
chose
to
go
with
another
agency.
The
Department
have
guided
him
and
give
him
all
the
necessary
paperwork
and
they
would
have
been
processed
based
on
the
complete
application
and
and
we
would
have
been
issued
and
they
would
been
issued
at
their
own
tax.
Id
number.
You
know
there
would
have
been
any
issues
from
what
we
can
see
at
this
time.
I.
M
M
So
it
that's
in
there
that
they
are
agreeing
to
the
exclusivity
of
that
agency.
To
that
to
that
agency,
I
mean
you
know.
So
it's
not.
It
appears
that,
although
it
may
be,
the
homeowners
permit
that
permit
is
based
on
an
exclusivity,
meaning
that
only
that
agency
can
rent
for
that
homeowner.
That's
what
it
says.
That's
what
you
signed,
and
so
you
don't
own
the
permit
in
the
sense
that
you
think
of
you
own
the
permit
that
they
own
the
permit.
M
So
so
it
does
appear
that
there
is
your
hands,
are
kind
of
tied
as
to
who
manages
ranges
and
everything
else.
Your
rentals,
as
per
your
agreement,
may
be
in
the
city
in
the
future.
Would
having
the
ability
having
the
homeowners
email
you,
you
could
notice
the
homeowner
out
of
a
courtesy
that
hey
you've
been
your
permits,
terminated.
M
M
E
Will
offer
a
motion
I
would
offer
a
resolution
upholding
the
administrative
decision
that
written
at
am
Stallworth
is
permanently
ineligible,
top
rated
vacation
rental
in
the
city
of
Palm
Springs.
That's
including
the
property
located
at
695
South,
Highland
Drive
that
is
2a
and
3a
upholding.
We
would
uphold
the
administrative
fine
of
$5,000
issued
to
the
same.
H
L
F
F
M
F
Board
members
city,
official
staff
and
fellow
residents
I
respectfully
request
that
this
email
be
read
at
the
next
Administrative
Appeals
Board
hearings
and
be
made
readily
available
to
the
public
it
has
been
with.
It
has
been
a
great
pleasure
being
part
of
the
Administrative
Appeals
Board,
for
almost
for
the
last
almost
three
years,
I've
enjoyed
my
time
on
the
board
and
have
worked
with
some
great
people,
staff
and
officials
in
the
city.
F
However,
unfortunately,
due
to
the
inability
of
the
city
to
accommodate
the
official
deployments
with
the
federal
government,
I
am
ordered
to
be
on
I'm
left,
with
no
available
choice
other
than
to
issue
my
resignation
from
the
Administrative
Appeals
Board,
effective,
immediately
board
city
officials
and
staff.
If
you
have
any
questions
regarding
this
feel
free
to
contact
me.