►
From YouTube: Measure J Commission | April 23, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
D
D
I
brought
my
vacation
photos
in
last
month,
or
just
as
some
suggestions
for
measure
J
medallion
issues
and
they
came
across
as
reading
like
I
wanted
to
improve
the
sidewalks
in
downtown,
which
I
would
I
would
do
that,
but
that
wasn't
my
as
the
sidewalks
are
fine.
It's
just
the
utility
covers
are
rather.
B
E
D
D
B
Asked
with
correction:
thank
you.
Public
comment.
This
time
they've
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
measure,
Jay
Commission
on
agenda
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
Commission.
Although
measure
J
Commission
values,
are
comments
pursuant
to
the
Brown
Act,
it
generally
cannot
act
to
take
any
action
on
items
not
listed
on
the
post
of
the
agenda.
Do
we
have
any
public
speaker.
A
B
All
right,
okay,
welcome
and
comments
from
measure
J,
so
welcome.
Everyone
I
have
a
couple
of
things,
a
couple
of
reminders
and
then
one
question
on
the
budget:
Town
Hall.
Tomorrow
we
were
on
the
agenda
if
you
will
or
the
calendar
for
the
26
that
was
cancelled.
Should
the
commissioners
go
to
the
meeting
on
the
24th
I
personally
will
go
just
because
I
think
I
should
be
there,
but.
F
E
B
Just
a
couple
of
other
things
again
May.
Second,
it's
gonna
be
our
joint
meetings,
so
we
need
to
have
visible
everybody
there.
If
at
all
possible,
I'm
gonna
make
a
couple
of
comments
that
would
have
made
in
may
17,
because
I
suspect
we
won't
have
that
meeting
and
that
is
the
in
June
we're
gonna,
let
new
officers
and
hopefully
have
a
little
going-away
party
for
the
commish's
that
are
terming
out
July
and
August
dark.
B
C
F
There
will
be
in
is
I
think
through
this.
This
is
gonna,
be
a
joint
meeting,
so
the
only
question
is:
if
we're
able
to
put
it
in
front
of
the
public
hearings
or
not,
it
may
have
to
be
after
the
public
hearings,
but
it
may
be
before
the
public
hearing,
so
I
need
just
need
to
check
what
that
is.
Thank
you.
Ok,.
G
B
E
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
members,
the
Commission
I'll
direct
you
to
the
multi-year
summary
financial
report.
There
are
a
couple
of
significant
changes
on
here.
First
of
all,
in
the
revenue
lines,
I've
increased
the
revenue
estimates
per
the
projections
given
us
by
our
consultants
for
each
of
those
first
four
years,
it's
increased
by
four
hundred
thousand
five
hundred
thousand
for
the
fifth
year.
E
That
was
done.
I,
don't
recall
his
on
the
April
fourth
meeting.
I,
think
that
was
it
so
the
net
new
funds
available
for
budgeting
have
changed
most,
notably
for
the
the
two
years
the
year
were
in
and
next
year,
so
that
combined
total
went
up
from
3.2
million
to
3.4
million,
with
that
I'll
just
I'll
just
mention
on
the
capital
improvement
recommendation
sheets.
We
created
this
new
sheet
that
there's
a
summarized
version
of
your
five-point
recommendation
at
the
bottom
of
that
we
added
this
estimated
funds
available
information
without
all
entertain.
Any
questions
from
the
commissioners.
B
H
Have
a
question,
sir
item
three,
an
item
for
appear
to
be
the
same
thing,
but
the
dollar
amount
is
different
and
it
appears
that
item
three
page
2
of
2
has
a
$1,300
cost
for
phase
2,
but
on
the
item
for
you're
only
including
400,000,
so
you're
missing,
you're
missing
$1,300.
So
it's
not
4,800.
It's
5200.
B
C
A
B
C
B
C
C
C
C
B
J
I
Just
a
couple
of
items:
17:01
the
fiscal
year,
1718
pavement
rehabilitation
project
is
nearing
completion.
We
have
a
couple
of
parking
lots
left
to
do
and
we'll
be
taking
out
the
City
Council
for
those
completion.
Wrapping
up
the
project,
probably
first
meeting
in
June
1801,
that's
the
fiscal
year
1819
pavement
rehab
project.
I
We
anticipate
bringing
that
to
the
council
for
approval
or
for
authorization
to
bid
the
project
in
May,
2nd
the
may
2nd
meeting
trying
to
get
it
trying
to
get
that
one
out
as
soon
as
possible,
so
that
we
can
start
construction
this
summer
and
have
the
project
under
construction
before
the
season
hits.
The
rear.
Oof
project
is
going
to
acceptance
for
the
City
Council,
also
on
May
2nd.
That
project
is
all
wrapped
up
and
the
projects
that
mr.
I
J
provided
matching
funds
for
the
the
seabag
projects,
the
south
and
east
palm
canyon,
pedestrian
safety
project,
the
north
palm
canyon,
pedestrian
safety
project,
both
those
are
at
about
35%
plans
planning
going
out
to
plan
to
going
out
to
bid
this
fall
with
construction
beginning
before
the
end
of
fiscal
year.
The
Indian
Canyon
to
a
conversion
project,
along
with
the
associated
pedestrian
improvement
projects,
were
about
90
percent
plans.
I
I
D
Is
there
anything
that
we
need
to
do
or
residents
need
to
do
to
reinforce
with
the
City
Council
that
this
is
an
important
pedestrian
and
bicycle
safety?
Probably
well.
This
is
a
pedestrian
safety
project
that
that
residents
are
have
been
planning
for
and
are
very
interested
to
see
accomplished
in
the
next
we've
been
waiting
three
years
for
it.
I
If
the
needs
are
made
known,
then
it's
something
to
counsel
away
their
input
from
the
residents,
as
well
as
the
input
from
others
on
what
the
best
use
of
the
funding
is,
how
this
project,
how
this
pedestrian
safety
project
stacks
up
against
other
public
safety
projects
and
other
needs
within
the
city.
Okay,.
B
D
B
D
B
D
J
Our
intent
is
to
have
the
construction
drawings
done
by
the
end
of
this
calendar
year,
so
we'd
be
awarding
a
contract
next
fiscal
year.
So,
yes,
the
million
dollars
would
be
needed
in
the
next
fiscal
year.
Okay,
all
right
so,
and
what
I
would
suggest
is
on
your
list
of
five
priorities.
The
traffic
restriping
I'd
suggest.
We.
J
H
Didn't
we
just
say,
though,
that
it
looks
like
the
antis
is
not
going
to
need
the
two
million
dollars
in
the
next
fiscal
budget
and
therefore
we
have
the
two
million
dollars
there
and
can't
we
reallocate
some
of
that
money
towards
the
park
I.
If
it's
just
sitting
there
as
a
placeholder
which
I
assume
it
is
it's
really
not
going
to
be
spent.
So
we
will
be
sitting
here
at
this
time
next
year
with
this
two
million
dollars
and
have
to
roll
it
over,
and
then
we
would
have
that
money
for
the
park.
H
I
I,
don't
know
if
it
can
be
asterisk.
Somehow,
in
this
thing
that
we
can,
you
know
that
the
million
dollarsÃ
that
goes
to
the
park
or
goes
to
an
des,
but
somehow
we
should
have
the
money
here
rather
than
taking
something
away.
It
seems
it
just
seems
like
holding
the
two
million
when
we
really
are
pretty
sure
that
that's
not
gonna
come
do
I
would.
F
B
H
The
second
question
I
have
is:
aren't
these
are
recommendations,
and
can
we
I
mean
the
downtown
park?
I,
don't
you
know
you
know
I,
guess
we
need
a
report
of
the
downtown
product
as
to
where
it
really
is
in
its
phase-
and
you
know
you
know
if
you,
if
you
want
to
take
out
$800,000
from
the
capital
recommendations,
but
if
you
need
the
truck
you're
taking
the
truck
away.
So
if
you're
saying
to
us
that
you
don't
need
800,000,
yes,
there's
the
800,000
that
we
have
towards
the
park,
but
that's
not
quite
a
million.
C
This
is
the
question
for
you
Jeffrey
on
your
listing
here.
You
don't
show
that
the
downtown
park
is
changed.
You
just
have
the
old
estimate.
Is
that
correct,
but
I'm
hearing
all
this
about
the
next
two
million
dollars,
but
I
haven't
heard
any
reason
why
we
think
that
who
said
if
it's
official
I
just,
can
you
be
a
little
more
specific.
K
Can
speak
to
that
when
it
comes
to
this?
The
park
is
in
budget,
it's
just
some
extra
things
that
could
happen
after
the
completion
of
the
park
that
well,
some
of
it
might
be
in
conjunction
with
the
construction
of
it,
but
some
are
items
that
could
happen
after
the
park
is
complete
and
we
can
get
into
those
details.
K
J
J
You
know,
Caltrans
assembly
adopted
a
new
standard,
and
so
over
time
we
will
conform
to
that
new
standard
and
the
reason
for
this
change
in
present,
as
just
you
know,
when
we
started
looking
at
all
the
other
projects
from
like
a
more
public
safety
life
safety
type
perspective,
some
other
projects
rose
more
to
the
top
and
then
of
course,
some
of
the
prioritization
has
to
contemplate
some
of
our
active
projects
like
the
downtown
part
and
you'll
hear
from
your
subcommittee.
But
what
I
recall
coming
up
as
a
dish?
J
Potential
additions
was
the
underground
parking
garage
wasn't
designed
and
constructed
originally
anticipating
the
the
live
and
dead
loads
from
a
park
use
on
top
of
it,
and
that
will
inform
how
they
design
that
part
of
the
park.
And
then
we
have
the
issues
with
the
downtown
police
station
and
the
restrooms,
which
the
idea
would
be
to
build
all
of
that
as
one
project.
But
we
don't
know
yet
what
the
collective
subcommittee
that's
going
to
be
reviewing
this
whole
project
design
will
ultimately
decide.
So
it's
a
potential
for
an
overrun.
J
J
B
K
So
right
now
they
want.
The
council
subcommittee
really
wants
to
push
the
design
firm,
so
they're,
looking
at
a
June
next
meeting
date,
they
were
even
discussing
possibly
late,
may
100%
design
development
they
want
to
have
by
or
that
presentation
at
the
end
of
the
summer,
so
yeah
I
think
they
want
to
have
this
pretty
buttoned-up
by
September.
I
know
that
the
subcommittee,
Christi
and
jr.
have
been
really
aggressively
pushing
the
firm
to
move
forward.
K
What
I
passed
around
the
firm
is
confident
that
they're
within
budget
at
that
4.99
1
million,
but
what
that
doesn't
include
I'm,
not
sure
if
that
includes
this
shell
I
believe
it
does
include
the
shell
of
the
building
to
house
the
restrooms
and
the
police
substation.
What
it
doesn't
include
is
any
build-out
of
that
police
substation
right
when
I
think
the
restrooms
are
complete
yeah,
so
they
would
be
they're
included
in
that
it's
just
if
the
police
want
to
do
anything
with
their
space.
K
That
is
not
budgeted
and
then
they've
got
that
373
300,000,
73,000
parking
structure,
demo
and
I
believe
it's
that
ugly
part
that
sticks
out
to
the
South
right
now.
It's
fixing
that
which
they
kind
of
have
to
do
in
order
to
build
the
the
restroom
structure
and
then
I
think
the
rest
of
the
so
that
totals
roughly
and
then
there's
some
escalation
cost.
K
So
we're
looking
at
about
700,000
now
with
the
luminaire
portion
of
there's
no
budget
for
the
luminaire
for
its
foundation,
construction,
that
it's
a
separate
budget
or
star
a
separate
source
funding
that
the
parking
structure
on
that
side
of
museum
way
is
where
there
needs
to
be
some
reinforcement.
A
retaining
wall
built
that
Park
will
actually
expand
larger
than
what
it
is
shown
today.
So
it
will
actually
cross
over
on
top
of
that
pit.
That's
there
right
now!
So
again,
that's
kind
of
all
up
in
the
air
and
who
pays
for
that.
I
K
Would
say
concrete
and
you
guys
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
right
now
we're
just
looking
at
an
overage
of
700,
but
they
during
that
meeting
and
I
should
have
taken
better
notes.
They
were
throwing
up
some
other
numbers
and
I
just
was
kind
of
patting
up
in
my
head
and
I'm
like
well.
This
is
definitely
going
to
be
over
a
million.
K
H
A
H
F
Could
I
comment
on
the
the
it's
all
unknown?
All
we
have
really
are
questions.
The
original
part
of
this
was
if
the
group
that
was
organizing
it
was
gonna,
raise
the
money
and
pay
for
it.
The
city
councilor
talked
about
providing
the
space.
What
also
is
not
known,
and
we
don't
have
any
information
on
any
of
that.
We
do
have
it
in
what
on
our
premises,
Marcus
and
it's
ready
to
be
put
up.
The
other
part,
that's
unknown
is
once
it's
done,
which
is
maybe
even
a
larger
concern.
F
K
K
I,
don't
I
think
at
this
point:
I
want
to
say
that
they
included
the
base
forward,
or
you
know
the
concrete
work
and
lighting
was
all
part
of
the
plan
that
they
showed
us.
They
were
still
talking
a
little
bit
about
additional
lighting
or
something
that
they
would
have
to
do
for
that
statue
so
that
there's
they
didn't
want
to
do
up
lighting
because
it
looks
like
they're
just
lighting
up
her
skirt.
F
C
B
B
Should
we,
as
a
commission,
rethink
our
top
five
based
on
the
new
information
that
we
have
of
at
least
a
million
dollars
and
I
would
I
just
throw
that
number
out
there,
because
it
seems
to
be
the
consistent
one
for
our
meeting
with
the
joint
City
Council?
So
would,
commissioner
Hammond,
would
you
like
to
comment
and
then
we
could
just
go
down
to
the
right
each
person
to
get
a
chance
to
talk
so.
D
H
You
know
when
I
was
on
the
library
board.
We
had
this
all
the
time
and
we
would
say
well
will
it
authorize
a
certain
I'm
up
to
a
certain
amount?
And
then
you
come
back
with
the
real
figures,
and
then
we
have
to
negotiate
that,
but
just
I,
don't
I,
don't
see
how
else
to
really
do
it
because
they're
just
too
many
unknowns
at
this
point,
so
I
don't
want
it
to
be
just
open-ended.
H
If
that's
what
you
would
wish
to
do,
but
then
also
dropping
the
other
one,
but
as
I
said
you
know,
I
I
heard
that
you
know
and
as
can
be
done,
but
you
know
I
know
how
long
things
take
to
be
done,
so
you
know,
does
it
mean
they
actually
have
their
occupancy
permit
and
they
have
all
that
they've
done
things
and
everything's
done,
and
then
we
give
them
the
two
million
dollars.
So
I,
don't
really
know
we're
talking
about
a
year
from
now.
K
I
think
we
take
out
the
line-item,
the
Caltrans
we
can
put
the
park
in
there.
We
could
even
be
conservative
and
just
do
the
700,000
at
this
point.
That's
what
the
design
firm
is
stated
and
given
as
a
as
a
number
I
know,
it's
going
to
be
more
eventually
again
I'm
a
little
nervous
and
I
mean
I'm.
Looking
at
Andaz
and
I'm,
seeing
the
slow
progression
I'd
be
surprised
if
they're
open
for
business
and
in
March
of
2019.
G
Thank
you
on
these
two
items
between
commissioner
gray
and
Jim
both
of
their
statements
on
this
and
then
I
think
that
the
700,000
is
going
to
be
larger.
They
stein
haven't
the
discussions,
but
I
also
agree
with
what
Commissioner
gray
was
saying
in
that
so
I
I
just
follow
the
lead
on
these
two
comments.
C
Seems
to
me
like
Oh
second
in
command
here.
Marcus
has
just
told
us
that
he
doesn't
really
need
that
$750,000,
because
he's
gonna
lob
it
into
the
street
fair
project.
So
the
other
question
is
the
250,000
for
the
truck
and
I.
Don't
didn't
get
a
clear
picture,
whether
that
you
need
that
money
or
not
I
I.
J
Don't
think
we
do
because
we
typically
contract
out
our
traffic
striping
whenever
we
have
a
significant
amount.
Just
because,
honestly,
we
don't
have
the
staff
to
do
that
kind
of
work
in-house,
so
I'll
I
don't
sit.
There
are
many
more
priorities
that
this
commission
can
focus
at
this
funding
on
and
if
a
vehicle
for
striping
is
a
priority
for
the
facilities,
a
maintenance
director,
we
can
consider
that
next
year,
I
think.
C
C
A
That
we
sorry
that
we
had
allocated
money
to
the
parks,
with
the
understanding
that
if
we
did
have
a
overrun
that
this
would
help
fund
the
park
as
well.
So
there
is
some
future
funding
down.
The
road
may
not
be
when
we
need
it,
so
maybe
that
could
be
substituted
for
the
Caltrans
or
other
projects
that
we
need.
J
If
I
might
make
a
another
comment,
because
I
want
to
make
sure
I
point
your
attention
to
page
1
of
2
item
3,
as
I
mentioned,
we
internally
re-evaluated
all
the
unfunded
projects
with
the
fire
chief
police
chief,
the
parks
director
with
facilities
maintenance
director.
One
of
the
items
that
rose
to
the
top
that
I
want
to
bring
to
your
attention
is
something
that
this
Commission
I,
don't
believe
has
ever
talked
about,
and
that's
the
basically
the
911
computer
system.
J
It's
a
big-ticket
project,
it's
over
2
million
dollars,
and
this
list
that
you
see
here
is
what
will
be
presented
to
Council
on
May,
2nd,
so
I
didn't
want
the
Commission
surprised
or
confused
as
to
what
what
they
would
see
next
week.
But
you
can
see
many
of
the
projects
that
the
Commission
has
already
reviewed
and
prioritized
are
high
priority
projects
on
this
list,
with
the
exception
of
this
CAD
system
for
the
9-1-1
system.
J
So
we
will
be
we're
recommending
to
you
that
you
reconsider
your
priority
list
and
you
know
we've
identified
the
bollards
as
a
critical
priority
for
downtown
as
you
have,
and
we
would
push
the
emergency
generators
down
the
list
in
order
to
fund
what
we
think
is
a
pretty
high
priority,
which
is
the
911
cat
system
and
so
there's
a
few
differences
in
in
what
has
been
considered
in
the
past
and
getting
back
to
commissioner
Hammonds
comments
about.
You
know
the
status
of
the
hot
spots
1.0
project.
J
That's
why
the
council
deferred
an
action
on
that
was
to
wait
for
this
meeting
on
May,
2nd
to
look
at
all
of
the
projects
funded
by
measure
J
and
what
has
the
most
current
or
urgent
priority.
And
so
I
would
say
that
conversation
is,
is
ripe
for
next
week's
meeting
on
the
status
of
that
and
the
discussion
of
whether
that
2
million
dollars
in
measure
J
funds
might
be
better
used
unless
they
better
used
but
a
priority
for
another
project.
D
D
J
C
J
We
in
engineering
knew
that
it
was
more
cost-effective
to
bundle
all
those
projects
and
bid
them
in
year
three,
once
we
had
all
the
funding
in
place,
and
that
was
this
current
fiscal
year,
so
we
actually
designed
all
of
the
different
missing
link
sidewalk
projects
and
put
it
together
into
one
one
project,
so
the
funding
has
accumulated
and
is
accrued
from
two
years
ago,
last
year,
in
this
current
fiscal
year
sitting
there
in
that
hotspots
account
ready
to
fund
this
project.
There's
been
some
other.
D
C
C
J
C
J
J
So,
in
the
end,
what
we
ended
up
putting
together
to
bid,
was
about
a
two
million
dollar
project.
I
think
it
was
just
under
two
million
dollars
and
as
commissioner
Hammond
mentioned,
we've
spent
to
or
to
250
thousand
on
design,
which
came
out
of
that
measure.
J
funding
staff,
time
and
they're
soft
costs
so,
but
that
that
two
million
dollars
say
is,
is
appropriated
and
budgeted
and
sitting
there
currently
allocated
for
that
project.
J
My
comment
was:
counsels.
Direction
to
us
was
to
defer
the
contract
award
of
that
project
until
we
could,
they
could
have
a
more
fully
informed
discussion
with
you
and
staff
about
the
whole
list
of
all
the
measure.
J
not
just
measure
J
capital
projects
throughout
the
city
that
lack
funding
and
may
or
may
not
be
more
of
a
priority.
D
So
because
that
will
be
something
that
they
will
want
to
know,
as
some
of
us
won't
be
here
anymore,
and
they
will
want
to
be
able
to
carry
those
on
for
the
the
neighborhoods
and
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
us.
I
usually
carry
it
around
with
me,
but
I
was
lightening
the
load
today
and
it's
sitting
at
home
on
my
desk.
But
but
that
is
something
I
think
I
asked
this
question
last
month.
D
If
it
wouldn't
be
helpful
for
our
new
commissioners,
if
they
could
see
what
what
community
projects
were
already
on
the
table,
so
this
group
of
projects,
but
also
the
Palm
Canyon
east
and
the
South
and
East
Palm
Canyon
corridor
projects
as
well.
That
will
be
funded
with
grants
from
C
vague
as
well
as
measure
J.
So
if
we
could
have
that
for
the
next
meeting
or
even
if
those
could
be
sent
out
before
the
May
2nd
meeting,
so
that
people
could
look
at
that,
that
would
I
think
that
would
be
very
helpful
and
help.
J
D
K
B
B
H
So
that
means
18
projects
with
the
Downtown
Pro
Park.
Added
to
that
list,
I
assume
the
city's
is
going
to
say
that
that's
an
unfunded
project
so
and
and
what
is
it
that
measure
J
is
being
capped
for
for
the
cast
from
the
down
for
the
downtown
project?
I
know
we've
talked
about
a
million
dollars
is
that
is
that
de
extent.
H
A
F
One
other
thing
that
you
may
want
to
consider-
and
this
isn't
anywhere
on
your
list.
So
actually
it's
19,
I
think
with
with
the
news
last
week
that
the
college
of
the
desert
was
able
to
acquire
them
all.
It's
clear
to
me
that
in
the
next
school
year,
council
is
gonna
have
to
start
making
some
decisions
about
what
to
do
now.
F
You
know
if
you
select
one
or
two
ways
in
a
minimum
if,
if
they,
if
they
decide
to
build
a
new
library
with
the
college,
I
mean
obviously
that's
looking
down
the
road
five
years,
probably
at
best,
maybe
a
little
less,
but
that's
going
to
have
a
significant
impact
on
measure
J
in
theory.
To
the
extent
that,
and
just
for
example,
let's
say
the
foundation
is
able
to
raise
half
and
the
city
has
to
pay
in
half
that's
at
least
six
seven
million
dollars
that
that's
one
scenario.
F
An
alternate
scenario,
obviously
is:
if,
if
we
don't
go
down
that
road,
the
current
librarian
use
a
minimum
of
five
million
dollars
just
on
infrastructure,
and
so
that
that
immediately
part
of
that
has
to
occur
even
to
get
the
library
to
where
they
need
to
be
with
a
new
library.
So
so
that
means
ed.
What's
a
little
concerning
to
me,
as
that
doesn't
show
up
anywhere
here
and
I,
think
that
will
be
a
ripe
discussion
for
the
joint
meeting
as
well.
F
H
I
agree
with
what
you're
talking
about,
but
we
are
also
talking
about.
These
are
fiscal
1819
priorities
that
we
are
talking
about,
and
obviously
will.
The
things
you
just
mentioned
are
not
going
to
happen
in
1819
I
do
think
the
new
commissioners
will
have
to
deal
with
that
looming
library
issue,
which
these
are.
H
B
Okay,
so
one
other
thing,
sorry
Jeff,
one
other
thing
that
I
think
we
just
have
to
remind
ourselves
of
is
we're
adding
a
million
dollars
we're
talking
about
another
two
million
for
this
911,
whether
that
could
come
from
the
other
projects.
I,
don't
know,
but
we're
talking
about
the
real
dollars
in
real
dollars.
B
So
everybody
understands
that
correct.
So
we
really
have
to
decide
what
is
it
do
we
want
to
do
with
this
3.4
million
dollars,
knowing
this
now
that
1
million
of
it
is
going
to
go
to
the
downtown
park,
because
just
moving
Caltrans
app
out
really,
that
was
part
of
the
4.8
million
that
won't
get
enough
I.
H
H
H
That
that
we
vote
only
650,000
knowing
that
right
now,
it's
at
700,000
700,000
and
just
have
to
change
that
as
we
see
new
funds
come
in
next
year
to
meet
that
need,
but
I
that
would
be
my
recommendation.
If
it
has
to
stay
at
3400,
I
mean
3.4,
otherwise
it
can
go
up
to
about
3.45
and
then
we'd
make
it,
but
that
those
would
be
my
recommendations.
C
H
I'm
proposing
that
number
3
be
removed
in
our
list
and
number
5
be
removed
in
our
list,
freeing
up
not
quite
not
quite
enough
necessary
money,
but
about
2
million
dollars
for
the
police
department.
Number
2
on
the
city's
new
list
for
the
CAD
RMS
system
and
also
around
650
thousand
dollars
towards
the
downtown
park.
H
A
G
A
C
Our
end
game
is
here:
blue,
obviously,
yeah
they're
talking
about
reconfiguring
this
list
completely.
That
I
presume
we're
going
to
present
to
the
council
over
the
second,
so
we're
gonna
just
throw
out
all
the
previous
work
we've
done
and
do
that
which
is
fine,
but
I
just
think
we
need
to
try
and
figure
out
what
goes
on
there
and
good
get
a
conclusion.
Oh
yeah
yeah.
B
I
mean
still
is
it's
our
recommendation.
I
mean
we
aren't.
We
understand
that
City
Council's
come
back
with
a
different
order.
It's
still
up
to
us
at
the
end
of
the
day,
to
make
our
recommendation.
They
can
take
it
or
not.
It's
what
it
is.
It's
a
recommendation.
They
could
turn
around
and
say
well.
Thank
you
very
much.
However.
We're
gonna
spend
it
this
other
way.
B
K
I
think
we
need
to
make
some
amendments
just
so.
We
look
relevant
I'm
nervous
that
if
we
keep
it
as
is
and
based
on
now
staffs
recommendation,
which
is
a
total
360
from
two
months
ago,
we're
gonna
look
like
we're
not
doing
her
homework
so
and
again,
I'll
Channel,
David,
Vogel
I
mean
council
could
vote
for
five
different
priorities,
completely
opposite
of
what
we
and
you
know
so
I,
don't
think
we
should
spend
a
ton
of
time
on
this
I
just
think.
Okay,
if
staff
is
saying
five
Caltrans
is
out.
Let's
take
it
out.
D
D
C
D
J
This
is
a
completely
different
list
than
you've
seen
before,
but
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we.
We
had
a
full
discussion
of
it
today,
so
that
we're
all
prepared
for
for
next.
For
next
week
you
know
and
so
to
help
clarify
if
we're
only
talking
about
an
above
measure,
J
available
budget
of
3.4
mm
and
that
would
fund
staffs
recommended
priorities.
J
And
when
we
sat
around
this
table
with
the
police
of
fire
chiefs
and
the
other
department
heads,
we
didn't
have
a
way
to
start
prioritizing
those
projects
because
their
their
wants
and
wishes,
and
we
hope
to
do
them
and
and
it's
it
was
difficult,
so
they're
not
on
this
list
on
the
basis
that
even
this
list
alone
without
the
Caltrans
striping
is,
you
know,
1819
million
dollars.
So
that's.
C
F
Mean
there's
a
couple
ways
to
approach
it
and
you
you
don't
raise
good
issues
based
on
a
the
uncertainty
of
this
and
it
is
a
recommendation
and
there's
a
lot
of
competing
things
out
there
for
capital
projects.
That
being
said,
you
know
you
could
you
could
take
the
approach
where,
although
I
personally
like
the
gift
card,
but
you
could
take
the
approach.
F
The
Nessun,
you
could
have
a
recommendation,
I
mean
a
recommendation
of
both
here's,
your
five
and
then
staff
has
this
additional
list
and
here's
our
you
know
here
would
be
our
additional
recommendation.
So
there's
nothing
wrong
with
you
giving
recommendations
on
different
on
different
sort
of
scenarios,
so
you're
sort
of
covering
the
waterfront
more
and
giving
council
to
think
about,
because
they
are
going
to
have
to
think
about
all
these
other
projects
too,
and.
F
You
know
this
isn't
about
council
still
going
to
have
the
hard
decision
and
you
can
help
them
with
their
hard
decisions
by
giving
them
more
to
think
about.
I.
Think
who
do
you
my
guess
so
so
the
more
you
recommend
here
there's
nothing
wrong
with
that
you're
covering
the
waterfront
that
they're
gonna
have
to
deal
with
these
issues,
including
the
library.
C
Let
me
make
a
proposal
here
what
this
came
from:
you,
commissioner,
great
parks,
restrooms,
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
downtown
boards,
nine
hundred
Kiba,
sandrich,
nine
hundred
and
fifty
that's
what's
left
on
this
list,
the
9-1-1
program,
two
million
and
for
the
downtown
park
an
additional
six
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
that
totals
four
million
nine
hundred
thousand,
which
is
almost
it
is
far
more
than
we
have
but
gives
council
something
to
think
about.
Just
like
we
said
before
we
were
going
with
four
point:
eight
million.
C
H
I
agree
with
that
I
think
I
think
we
can.
We
can
say
why
we
want
number
one
to
be
the
the
parks
ad,
a
compliant
bathrooms
that
that
really
serves
the
general
public
and
they
see
that
and-
and
they
realize
that
and
the
bollards
is
also
another
safety
issue,
one
that
that
is
very
important,
I
think.
Once
you
know,
the
the
CAD
system
is
a
little
bit
more
nefarious,
because
you
know
that's
kind
of
nobody's
gonna
see
that
unless
they
you
know,
obviously,
if
they
need
it,
it's
gonna
be
great.
G
Craig
I
wondered
see
the
reason
I
agree
with
Commissioner.
Williams
is
I,
go
to
most
of
the
council
meetings,
and
my
observation
has
been
that
at
least
three
of
the
council
members
turned
his
staff
and
say
what
do
you
think
and
I
see
that
over
and
over
and
over
again
and
I
ten
to
see
that
the
voting
tends
to
go
in
the
direction
of
the
staff
recommendations?
G
So
if
you're
talking
about
these
things
and
you're
saying
the
ones
that
that
Roxas
is
talking
about
with
staff
recommendation
and
they're
our
list,
I
think
they'll
be
given
more
consideration
because
they're
gonna
get
I
know
three
of
them
are
gonna
say
to
staff.
What
do
you
think
on
this
point?
That's
my
observation.
So
I
agree
with
Commissioner.
C
D
B
C
Like
this,
okay,
we'll
go
it
slowly,
item
number
one
would
be
the
bollards
for
$900,000
cuz.
That's
the
first
item
on
the
city's
list.
Right
item
number
two
would
be
the
police
department,
911
program
and
all
of
that
or
whatever
that
is-
and
we
would
suggest
two
million
for
that.
Not
the
full
two
million
three
item.
Number
three
would
be
the
keyless
entry,
because
it's
higher
on
the
list
than
anything
else
and
that's
nine
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
and
then
item
number
four
would
be
the
park.
C
Restroom
renovations
and
that's
item
number
ten
on
their
list
and
that's
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
then
item
number
five
would
be
six
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollar.
The
lack
of
better
word
hold
back
or
cushion
for
the
downtown
park
contingency
and
that
would
make
a
grand
total
if
it's
the
numbers
in
right
on
my
phone,
a
four
million
nine
hundred
thousand
dollars
and.
F
The
curveball,
though,
is
that
you're
gonna
start
to
see
more
and
more
events
like,
for
example,
pride
is,
is
looking
to
be
in
the
new
downtown
area,
not
on
Palm
Canyon,
so
we're
gonna
be
closing
Palm
Canyon
more
and
more.
You
could
even
see
a
scenario
where
village
fests,
maybe
some
day
moves
into
those
areas
with
those
streets
closed
off.
C
A
F
B
Yeah
I
understand
where
you're
coming
from
there,
but
I
mean
this
Toronto
incidents
just
yesterday
right
and
then
we
had
a
list
when
we
discussed
the
bollards
of
30
cities
that
have
had
really
catastrophic
incidents
with
somebody
driving
either
DUI
or
a
terrorist
or
some
Republican
from
Orange
County.
You
know
just
a
little
humor,
sorry,
sorry,
but
anyway,
so
I
I
think
the
Commission
really
felt
pretty
strongly
about
the
bollards
as
well
as
staff
I.
Don't
think
it
was
just
a
staff
issue
and
tell
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
everything,
except
for
the
bad
joke.
B
B
All
right
well,
since
she's
gonna
send
it
out.
I
won't
belabor.
This
discussion,
anymore,
I'll,
just
read
it
after
Ariana
sends
it
out
just
want
to
make
sure
what
we're
gonna
present
to
the
City,
Council
and
I
understand
the
top
five.
Clearly
that
and
everybody's
in
agreement
with
them,
so
I'd.
B
C
I
Indeed,
it
was
composite
utility
cover
I.
Have
that
right?
Yes,
thank
you
previously
known
as
okay
anyway.
I
do
have
a
sample
of
them,
but
I
don't
have
a
cost
for
the
fabrication
of.
I
D
I
I
I
C
Think
the
next
piece
of
the
puzzle
that
we
had
talked
at
length
about
medallions
in
addition
to
this
and
whether
they
could
actually
be
made
into
a
medallion
the
order
of
medallion
and
composite
or
something
and
then
I
mean
it's
a
lot
of
work
where
they
go.
As
you
mentioned,
the
world
would
probably
doesn't
want
one,
but
do
we
want
to
pursue
that,
but
that's
work
for
the
Communications
Committee.
Once
we
get
some
information
from
you,
I
think
that's
okay,
I
just.
D
D
There
are
a
lot
in
the
street,
but
there
are
also
a
lot
on
the
sidewalk
and
there
they
are.
They
do
come
in
different
sizes,
so
there
are
like
the
water
and
the
gas
are
smaller,
but
but
or
triangular
around
there.
But
what
I
observed
downtown
was
there
were
a
large
number
of
very
large
utility
covers
that
were
not.
D
B
A
B
A
B
This
this
this
next
one,
it's
just
something
that
keeps
coming
up.
How
it
got
on
this
agenda
is
the
discussion
around
the
drainage.
Is
you
know
one
of
our
meetings
where
we
had
Outsiders
come
in
and
do
public
comments
and
they
were
having
a
drainage
problems
and
one
of
the
reasons-
and
it
was
a
this
big
of
a
study
that
it
would
probably
not
be
budgeted
for,
was
because
we
had
other
priorities
for
with
the
same
problem
that
we
haven't
done
like
in
Southern
Palm
Springs.
D
Understanding
of
another
project
that
came
up
through
one
of
the
community
projects
was
a
drainage
problem
in
South,
Palm,
Springs
and
I
I
learned
at
that
time
that
the
city
had
a
list
of
like
neighborhood
drainage
problems.
This
one
came
up
because
it
hit
the
paper
when
Coachella
Coachella,
Valley,
vector
control
came
out
because
of
the
mosquitoes
there
and
the
neighbors
were
worried
about
West
Nile
virus,
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
the
city
still
has
that
that
the
remedy
the
fix
for
that
was
a
million
dollars
for
that
drainage
problem.
D
So
my
question
is:
does
the
city
have
a
list
of
neighborhood
drainage
issues
and
do
and
is
there
maybe
this
one
was
unique?
Maybe
this
one
was
just
reported
out
at
a
million
dollar
repair
bill,
because
that
was
the
easiest
number
for
the
newspaper
to
come
up
with.
You
know
I,
don't
know,
but
what
what
are
we
looking
at
and
are
they?
Are
they
working
their
way
up?
The
list
is
priorities,
even
though
they're
not
on
major
streets,
but
perhaps
in
neighborhoods.
We.
I
I
Another
is
going
to
be
managed
as
part
of
the
pavement
rehabilitation
project
for
fiscal
year
1819,
where
a
gutter
didn't
didn't
settle
the
same
rate
the
street
did
and
we
ended
up
with
ponding.
So
the
repairs
going
to
be
done
as
part
of
the
pavement
rehab
smaller
projects
like
that,
we
we
are,
we
are
taking
hold
it
and
doing
them
as
we
can.
So.
Yes,
there
is
a
list.
Yes,
we
do
tackle
the
low-hanging
fruit.
I
I
That
is
a
major
infrastructure
problem
project
that
requires
the
extension
of
an
existing
drain
line,
a
large
capacity
drain
line
and
the
funding
for
that
is
going
to
be.
We
have
to
build
up
funding
for
that
again
once
the
brucite
County
flood
control
project
has
done.
This
is
contribution
to.
That
is
what
took
the
majority
of
the
funds
once
that
one's
completed,
we'll
be
working
on
this.
G
B
B
A
A
C
It's
one
suggestion
Christine,
and
you
would
be
good
at
doing
this
since
we're
meeting
with
the
council
on
the
second.
Maybe
we
can
say
something
that
will
be
a
televised
meeting.
Maybe
you,
as
chair,
say
we're
looking
actively
looking
for
people
to
fill
some
openings,
because
some
of
our
commissioners
are
terming
out
and
we
won't
have,
and
in
your
opening
comments,
maybe
our
closing
comments
or
both
I'm
assuming
you'll,
make
those.
H
H
H
G
B
Anything
else
on
okay
now
this
is
gonna,
be
a
long
discussion,
I'm
sure,
and
that
is
5d
look
at
John,
I'm,
hopefully
being
sarcastic
John.
If
the
Commission
should
keep
or
cancel
the
regular
measure,
J
Commission
meeting
scheduled
May
17th,
we
had
the
may
16
that
was
going
to
be
our
joint
meeting.
We
now
are
having
it
may
2nd.
So
the
question
is:
is
it
necessary
for
us
to
have
this
meeting
on
May
17th
and
if
so,
what
agenda
items
would
we
discuss
I.
B
E
E
K
D
B
D
I
just
wanted
to
say
that,
as
a
commissioner,
I
have
scheduled
a
meeting
with
the
parks
group
that
came
in
last
year
to
make
a
presentation
to
this
group
to
be
considered
for
funding
for
some
parks
projects.
And
while
we
did
agree
to
fund
a
parks
project,
we
haven't
seen
a
project
yet
for
parks,
so
I
am
meeting
with
CID,
as
well
as
with
Ellen
Goodman,
who
was
the
presenter
last
year
and
the
new
chair
of
the
Parks
and
Rec
Commission
less
young
to
just
talk
to
them
about
possible
projects.
D
We
are
headed
to
Birmingham,
to
give
a
presentation
at
a
national
conference
on
how
our
neighborhoods
our
city
wide
neighborhoods
collaborate
with
the
city
and
get
a
lot
of
work
done.
The
challenge
to
this
is
part
of
what
we're
talking
about
are
hotspots
projects,
and
so
what
I
find
in
lieu
of
making
up
stories
about
what
we're
doing
it's?
It's
kind
of
distressing.
G
Great
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
sat
in
the
booth
with
John
for
the
1ps
picnic
and
I.
Don't
know
how
we
can.
This
is
the
site
with
budgeting
and
magic.
We
need
to
have
our
own
tent.
We
need
to
have
a
banner
because
people
walked
up,
we
had
no
signage
literally
and
people
would
walk
up
and
just
say.
So.
What
do
you
guys?
Are
you
talking
about
in
that?
And
we
had
brochures
of
materials
and
we
were
interacting
with
people,
but
it
was
something
that
it
was
I
was
saying
to
Commissioner
Marshall.
G
He
was
getting
in
the
car,
go
to
the
corner
of
Stevens
or
111.
There's
a
measure
J
sign
up
right
now
that
they're
putting
in
the
walkways-
and
he
called
and
said
the
sign,
isn't
there,
because
so
we
needed
something
they
are
at
the
booth,
so
I'm
just
saying
I,
don't
know
how
we
do
this
because
we're
spending
funds,
but
a
tent
and
signage
of
material
I.
Just
think
that
we
have
a
presence
and
importance
that
we
should
consider
having
that
for
the
future.
I
agree,
I,
agree.