►
From YouTube: City Council Study Session | Jun 8 2022
Description
Palm Springs City Council Study Session discussion the FY 22-23 Budget, held June 8th, 2022
A
A
D
Chair
soto,
here
virtually
chair.
E
A
This
time
time
has
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
city
council
on
agenda
items.
Only
two
minutes
will
be
assigned
to
each
speaker,
city
clerk.
Do
we
have
any
registered
speakers.
F
First
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
the
measure,
j,
commission
and
also
the
city
staff
for
recommending
the
city
invest
two
million
dollars
towards
the
restoration
of
the
plaza
theater.
We
appreciate
the
support
and
the
recognition
of
the
importance
of
this
project
and
I
think
the
impact
its
completion
will
have
not
only
on
downtown
but
also
our
city.
F
First
of
all,
the
plaza
is
a
city-owned
asset
and
the
theater
board
will
raise
our
board
will
raise
over
80
percent
of
what
it's
going
to
take
to
completely
restore
this
theater
from
sources,
both
private
and
perhaps
some
additional
public
sources.
So
we
share
this
stewardship
for
this
property,
both
the
board
and,
I
think
the
city,
the
investment
of
2
million
dollars.
Now,
however,
will
not
only
bring
our
current
number
up
to
9.5
million
out
of
the
12.
F
F
We
think
that
the
city
support
now
will
help
to
motivate
large
and
small
donors,
corporations
and
others
to
help
us
reach
the
finish
line.
We're
confident
that
our
fundraising
efforts
as
a
result
of
this
now
will
help
us
to
raise
all
this
money
by
the
end
of
the
year,
so
we
can
start
to
actually
build
and
construct
and
do
the
restoration
in
early
2023
we're
working
hard
with
staff
right
now
to
in
the
bidding
process
for
qualified
architects
preservation,
consultants,
historic
theater
specialists
and
a
contractor
to
move
forward
with
these
restoration
plans.
F
Now,
when
many
of
the
citizens
passed
measure
j,
there
was
a
promise
of
a
new
palm
springs,
a
commitment
to
sales
tax
dollars
to
bring
back
the
glory
of
our
town.
This
project,
we
think,
is
the
last
piece,
the
last
piece
in
restoring
downtown
and
if
you
would
imagine
spring
of
2023
when
this
thing
is
open,
we're
going
to
have
lectures
film
festivals
programs
for
youth
community
services,
ability
for
non-profits
do
fundraisers.
All
of
that
will
be
made
possible
and
it's
realistically
ability
our
our
ability
to
do.
This
is
realistic
for
early
spring
of
2024..
F
So
we
think
that
this
is
an
investment
that
will
add
value
across
all
the
districts,
and
we
know
working
closely
with
staff
and
with
city
leadership.
We
can
make
this
happen
and
with
your
support
today,
we
will
make
this
happen.
So
thanks
for
your
consideration,
I'll
stick
around
if
you
have
other
questions,
but
we
really
look
forward
to
making
this
a
wonderful
opportunity
for
the
city,
and
we
appreciate
everybody's
support
for
making
it
happen.
Thank
you
all.
G
Good
afternoon,
mayor
and
city
council,
my
name
is
ron
willis
and
I
produce
palm
springs,
speaks
in
conjunction
with
the
palm
springs,
public
library
and
the
friends
of
the
palm
springs.
Library
and
the
palm
springs
cultural
center.
And
we
are
very
interested
in
using
the
plaza
theater
as
a
future
venue.
For
our
speaker
series.
I
don't
know
if
you're
somewhat
aware
of
the
speakers
we've
had
in
the
past,
but
we
featured
jane
fonda
deepak
chopra
bob
woodward
on
march
8th,
which
was
pretty
prophetic
since
we
stopped.
G
In
the
school
district,
but
unfortunately,
we're
limited
there
on
dates
and
also
on
the
fact
that
we
can't
serve
alcohol
and
alcohol
always
helps
sponsor
donations,
and
so
we
think
that
would
be
an
excellent
conjunction
also
as
well
as
show
off
a
building
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
time,
an
effort
trying
to
restore
the
wellwood
and
hopefully
the
same
thing
with
the
plaza.
I
do
remember
in
1991
92,
when
we
were
doing
the
film
festival
there
for
the
first
few
years.
G
It
was
amazing
to
see
that
the
theater
full
of
people,
particularly
for
things
like
strictly
ballroom
and
cinema
paradiso,
where
they
were
crazy,
and
we
really
had
a
lot
of
fun
using
that
theater.
It's
a
beautiful
location,
and
I
really
hope
that
we
can
partner
on
that.
We
want
to
restart
our
season
here.
In
january,
we've
already
started
our
fundraising
efforts
and
have
feelers
out
to
several
speakers,
and
this
speaker
series
is
really
meant
to
feature
larger
speakers.
We
need
a
larger
venue
than
the
500
seats
at
the
cultural
center.
G
We
need
the
800
to
1000
seats,
to
make
it
a
profitable
enterprise
and
also
to
get
the
type
of
speakers
we
want
if
we
want
michelle
obama
or
dolly
parton
or
anyone
like
that,
we
need
a
large
venue
and
I'm
not
saying
we're
going
to
get
either
one
of
those.
But
I
just
thought
I
thought
the
biggest
names
that
I
we
would.
You
know
we
came
very
close
at
one
point
getting
hillary
clinton,
but
that
would
have
been
in
april.
G
H
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
start
by
thanking
mayor
middleton
for
her
kind
words
about
my
counsel
of
the
13
14
years.
We
I
spent
on
council,
but
I
think,
one
of
the
most
important
things
that
I
recognize
as
a
council
member
was.
The
budget
is
the
most
important
thing
that
you'll
ever
vote
on,
because
it's
the
future
of
the
city-
and
I
was
on
the
council
when
there
was
very
little
money
and
we
decided
to
spend
money
because
that
was
the
future
of
the
city.
H
We
created
the
the
hotel
program,
we
the
hotel
renovation
program.
We
also
created
measure
j
with
a
wonderful
vote
from
the
citizens,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
the
measure
j
commission
today
for
the
things
that
all
the
time
they
took
to
make
these
recommendations,
and
there
are
some
wonderful
recommendations
for
you
to
consider.
But
there's
three
in
particular.
I
just
wanted
to
to
talk
about,
and
one
is
the
animal
shelter
shade
structure,
because
that
is
so
important
for
us
in
the
summer
time.
H
It's
really
important
that
people
going
to
adopt
animals
get
to
meet
with
the
animals
if
they
have
another
dog
or
pet
in
their
home,
that
they
want
to
bring
to
introduce
to
see
how
they
get
along.
They
need
those
get
acquainted,
structures
that
we
have.
We
have
two
in
the
front
and
we
have
several
in
the
back,
but
we
need
those
we
need
that
shade
so
that
they
ca
the
pets.
Both
the
both
the
animals
and
the
citizens
can
go
out.
We
have
a
wonderful
record
of
doing
adoptions.
H
I
also
want
to
say
for
the
mizell
senior
center,
which
I
have
a
great
association
with
you've,
got
to
approve
that
kitchen.
We
serve
so
many
people
meals
every
day
from
that
center
and
then
finally,
for
the
theater,
because
the
theater
is
going
to
be
an
absolute
wonderful
thing
for
the
city
not
only
culturally,
but
for
also
the
non-profit
organizations,
we've
already
been
in
talks
to
have
some
sort
of
a
joint
fundraiser
at
the
theater.
So
I
encourage
you
to
to
approve
the
spending
in
all
three
of
those.
Thank
you.
B
I
It
would
be
very
important
to
us
to
be
able
to
have
the
ability
to
have
a
partnership
where
we
could
have
events
have
adoption
events
be
able
to
bring
the
animals
to
central
downtown
area
for
adoption
for
awareness
and
education
opportunities.
I
think,
as
you
all
know,
to
find
private
venues
that
can
support
our
mission.
That
would
be
so
centrally
located.
I
First
of
all
is
very
limited
and
then,
when
you
do
find
it
it's
very
expensive
for
non-profits,
so
to
be
able
to
have
a
partnership
with
the
plaza
actually
be
able
to
do
some
of
our
events
down
there
in
a
state-of-the-art
theater
where
we
can
highlight
our
mission,
highlight
the
animals
that
we're
trying
to
adopt
out
would
really
help
move
our
mission
forward
as
well.
I
We
also
have
grand
plans
to
really
expand
our
education
opportunities
to
the
public
as
well
related
to
our
mission
about
taking
care
of
animals
in
our
community
in
ways
the
public
can
help.
So
to
have
a
venue
that
would
have
state
of
the
art
presentation
systems
to
be
able
to
do.
That
would
be
amazing
as
well,
so
we
are
full
full
support
of
the
support
of
the
plaza
and
would
love
to
be
able
to
have
that
place
up
and
running,
so
we
could
partner
with
them
as
well.
I
Also
to
just
briefly
say
thank
you
for
also
considering
our
shape
structures
at
the
shelter
as
well.
Thank
you.
B
J
Oh
hello,
good
afternoon
my
name
is
candace
spann
I
am
born.
I
was
raised
and
born
in
palm
springs
and
I'm
fortunate
enough
to
be
living
in
this
city.
Now
that
I'm
older,
I
am
requesting
today
for
shade
structures
over
ruth
hardy
and
victoria
park
playgrounds
in
addition
to
a
splash
pad
at
rue
party.
J
J
So
please
accept
my
request
for
shade
structures
over
the
playgrounds
at
ruth
hardy
and
victoria
park.
In
addition
to
a
splash
pad
at
rue
party,
we
will
appeal
more
to
families
throughout
the
year
for
vacation,
rentals
and
less
for
parties.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
your
time.
B
K
K
I
wanted
to
thank
staff
in
particular
for
the
inclusion
of
the
10
million
dollars,
which
would
be
transferred
to
the
affordable
housing
fund.
This
city
needs
more
affordable
housing.
We
need
family
housing,
we
need
works,
workforce
housing
and
we
need
subsidies
for
new
built,
single-family
housing
so
that
it's
affordable
to
some
of
our
residents.
K
K
B
J
J
So
we're
hoping
that
you
can
see
us
as
your
partners
in
this
I'm
getting
an
sb1383
and
following
and
complying
with
that,
we
ask
you
to
consider
the
education
activities
of
desert
compost
as
part
of
your
funds
for
this
year.
Funding
your
local
community
compost
to
do
the
much
needed
work
of
educating
our
citizens.
B
J
Thank
you,
I'm
nara
gladstone,
a
10-year
resident
of
palm
springs
a
homeowner
and
a
parent
of
two
children
who
are
born
here.
I'm
asking
your
city
to
allocate
access
funds
to
update
the
playgrounds
in
our
parks
with
inclusive,
accessible,
shade,
abundant
and
well-designed
21st
century
playgrounds
for
our
youth.
If
you
have
children,
you
know
how
much
energy
they
have
and
how
important
play
is
for
physical
and
mental
childhood
development.
J
Please
be
advocates
for
populations
here
who
live
here
year
round,
who
may
not
have
the
ability,
time
or
political
representation
to
advocate
for
their
needs
that
the
city
is
allocating
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
yearly
to
a
pickleball
court
attendant
indefinitely
and
regularly
updates.
Our
dog
park
suggests
that
new
playgrounds
in
every
park
in
this
city
with
shaded
areas
and
water
play
should
not
be
out
of
reach
for
all
of
us.
Here
I
guarantee
they
will
rebuild,
will
be
used.
So
thank
you
very
much
for
considering
this.
As
you
look
at
your
budget
surplus.
B
J
J
The
way
a
city
maintains
and
presents
its
playground
says
a
lot
about
how
a
city
values
its
families,
community
and
next
generation
palm
springs
has
neglected
to
allocate
appropriate
funding
to
its
playgrounds.
Our
playgrounds
are
outdated.
We
have
had
the
same
play:
structures
we've
had
for
over
30
years,
they're
unusable
in
the
higher
temperatures,
and
these
temperatures
are
only
rising.
J
J
Many
cities
such
as
brooklyn,
have
passed
measures
making
it
so
that
only
adults
accompanied
five
children
are
permitted
on
or
within
a
certain
distance
of
place
structures,
even
in
the
housing
projects
where
I
used
to
do
home
visits
as
a
social
worker
in
brooklyn
and
the
bronx
I
never
saw
new
york
allow.
The
kind
of
activity
palm
springs
seems
to
tolerate
so
close
to
where
its
children's
play.
J
J
J
B
K
Thank
you,
hello.
My
comments
are
directed
towards
the
capital
plan,
but
in
fact
this
principle
could
apply
to
everything.
Palm
springs
does
and
considers
doing.
I
spoke
to
the
city
manager
at
a
neighborhood
meeting
last
month.
I
thanked
him
and
the
staff
for
including
sustainability
as
a
priority
in
the
planning,
but
asked
him
specifically
how
the
city
intended
to
implement
this
sustainability.
K
It
gave
me
all
the
talking
points
that
everybody
says
and
commitment
and
sustainability,
and
he
wrapped
it
all
up
in
that.
You
can't
change
what
you
don't
measure.
Well,
I'm
here
again
in
front
of
you
to
say.
After
looking
at
the
capital
plan,
I
don't
see
anywhere
where
you've
provided
any
means
to
measure
the
carbon
costs
for
any
plan
that
you've
made
this
year
or
into
the
future.
K
I'm
imploring
you
now
to
budget
for
and
direct
the
staff
to
implement
a
way
to
cost
these
serious
costs
into
the
budget
immediately.
It's
time
for
all
of
us
to
put
our
money
where
our
mouths
have
been
and
to
walk
the
talk
that
we've
all
been
talking.
So
I
would
greatly
appreciate
it
if
this
year
was
the
year
that
you
maybe
hired
a
consultant
to
teach
the
staff
how
to
use
carbon
bracing
to
make
good
decisions
for
all
of
us
appreciate
the
time
and
good
luck.
B
I
Of
the
measure
j
commission,
my
name
is
scott
nevins,
I'm
a
resident
in
district
1..
I
know
that
you
guys
have
a
lot
of
important
items
before
you,
so
I
just
want
to
call
today
to
show
some
public
support
for
the
funds
that
were
requested
for
a
shade
structure
for
the
beautiful
palm
springs.
Animal
shelter.
I
I
And
when
I
was
looking
through
this,
I
saw
that
the
funds
would
be
used
for
a
section
where
animals
can
go
to
meet
possible
new
owners
or
possible
new
owners
with
their
pets
and
unfortunately,
as
it
stands
now,
this
space
in
question
is
unusable
for
almost
half
of
the
year
due
to
safety
and
comfort
reasons
for
the
animals,
and
that
really
got
me
thinking.
What
really
means
is
that
it
has
ripple
effects,
as
this
can
hinder
the
shelter's
ability
to
combat
the
issue
of
overcrowding.
I
So
with
these
funds,
a
shade
structure
can
easily
be
built
on
the
area,
giving
it
a
year-round
purpose
and
usage
and
giving
these
animals
a
much
better
shot
at
finding
a
loving
family
and
new
home.
So
please
give
them
the
allocated
money
and,
let's
support
our
beautiful
animal
shelter.
Thank
you.
So
much.
A
We
have
a
tremendous
amount
of
material
to
cover
today
and
we
are
going
to
take
the
time
it
takes
to
go
through
all
of
it
and
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
today
is
a
study
session.
It
is
not
a
time
that
we
make
final
decisions.
Any
recommendations,
decisions
that
we
generate
today
will
have
to
be
confirmed
in
our
regular
agenda,
which
will
be
coming
up
for
further
discussion
on
june
16
and
june
30.,
and
it
is
a
pleasure
to
welcome
back
the
measure
j
commission
to
to
these
chambers.
A
It's
been
too
long
since
we've
had
the
opportunity
to
meet
with
you
and
we
thank
you
in
advance
for
everything
you
have
already
done
and
what
you
are
going
to
do
during
the
course
of
the
day.
Today,
with
that
the
city
manager
is
going
to
get
us
started,
I
know
he
has
a
lot
to
cover
and
justin.
Please
take
it
away.
L
L
I'm
sorry
can
I
get
the
other
powerpoint
there
we
go
so.
As
you
know,
we've
held
two
study
sessions
prior
to
today,
where
we've
introduced
all
of
the
major
funds,
the
general
fund,
capital
and
airport.
We
received
a
lot
of
input
and
feedback
and
direction
from
a
council,
and
now
we
are
here
for
our
third
study
session,
anticipating
that
we
have
two
meetings
after
today
to
resolve
any
remaining
outstanding
items
for
the
budget.
That's
june
16th,
where
that's
also
a
regular
session.
L
So
this
will
be
an
agenda
item,
but
we
won't
have
quite
as
much
time
to
focus
on
the
budget
strictly,
but
that
will
be
a
follow-up
to
any
direction
that
we
receive
today,
especially
questions
that
remain
unanswered,
and
then
we
anticipate
having
the
public
hearing
and
final
budget
adoption
on
the
30th.
That's
obligated
to
be
passed
by
june,
sorry
july,
1st,
so
we're
just
really
at
the
last
possible
day
to
do
that
with
that
regularly
scheduled
meeting.
L
L
In
fact,
if
we'd
made
not
one
additional
decision
beyond
what
we
have
today,
we
still
have
the
vast
majority
of
the
budget
established
with
our
base
level
of
programming,
and
we
can
amend
the
budget
throughout
the
year.
So
any
things
that
we
don't
resolve,
it
really
is
okay
to
defer
those
items
into
the
current
or
sorry
the
next
fiscal
year.
So
again,
goal
is
going
to
be
to
make
as
many
decisions
as
possible.
L
What's
in
what's
out
and
what
needs
further
discussion
now,
for
today
we
have
a
handful
of
categories
that
we
would
like
to
address.
First,
we
are
scheduled
with
the
measure
j
commission
so
that
the
commission
can
help
council
to
understand
its
recommendations,
which
are
largely
capital
projects
for
use
of
measure
j
funding.
I
think
the
goal
there
is
really
mostly
to
understand
those
recommendations,
ask
any
questions
and
make
sure
you
have
that
information.
Should
council
want
to
also
weigh
in
on
where
you
would
like
to
ultimately
see
that
measure
j
money
directed.
L
You
can
do
that
at
the
conclusion
of
this
portion
of
the
conversation
or
you
can
do
that
later
as
we're
looking
at
the
capital
improvements
fund
in
a
little
more
holistic
way
and
in
with
more
context
either.
One
is
okay,
after
that
we
plan
on
looking
at
the
airport,
because
we
think
that's
a
relatively
small
fund
and
one
where
most
of
the
money
is
allocated
as
we
work
with
our
airline
partners,
faa
compliance
and
the
like,
and
then
we'll
use
the
balance
of
our
time
to
review.
L
L
M
Thank
you
for
having
me,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
council,
joel
montalvo
city,
engineer
I'll,
wait
for
the
powerpoint
presentation.
So
throughout
the
year
staff
and
and
myself
work
with
the
measure
j
commission,
we
have
our
regular
meetings.
We
discuss
projects
through
the
previous
years
in
2019
we
had
the
pandemic,
so
we
didn't
follow
the
typical
process.
M
So
on
october
1st
2021,
the
commission
put
out
an
application
for
individuals,
citizens
neighborhood
organizations
to
submit
their
application
for
measure
j
funding
for
their
community
for
the
community,
the
1
million,
essentially
that
we
typically
have
for
community
initiative
projects.
In
december
we
received
59
applications.
The
commission
then
proceeded
to
review
them
rate
them
on
january
20th.
They
met
and
talked
about
those
projects,
and
they
also
met
again
in
february
17th
and
march
17th
to
make
recommendations
and
then
the
the
following
table,
which
I'll
bring
up
shortly,
will
show
those
14
recommendations.
E
Thank
you
joel
thank
you,
mayor,
middleton,
mayor
program,
garner
council
members,
and
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
submit
the
measure,
j
oversight,
commission
recommendations
for
the
2022-23
fiscal
year,
so
just
to
clarify
the
total
available
funds
for
measure
j
programming
for
22.23
is
39
million,
which
includes
approximately
20
million
in
estimated
revenue
and
19
million
in
on
reallocated
unexpended
funds
from
previous
years.
E
Historically,
there
was
a
million
dollars
annually
in
community
initiated
projects
intended
to
cover
smaller
projects
initiated
by
the
public.
For
several
years,
these
projects
focused
on
neighborhood
safety,
hot
spots,
foot
put
forward
primarily
by
1ps
for
fiscal
year,
2020
to
21
21
to
22.
The
community
initiated
project
funds
were
set
aside,
but
not
spent
assuming
that
city
council
does
not
reverse
those
funds
previously
set
aside
and
continues
this
for
the
22
23
fiscal
year.
There
would
be
approximately
three
million
dollars
in
phones
available
for
programming
community
initiated
projects.
We've
based
our
recommendations
on
that.
E
The
call
for
applications
were
put
out.
On
october
1st
2021
there
was
a
total
of
20
59
applications
received
of
those
staff
removed
14
as
ineligible
for
various
reasons
such
as
they
were
sponsorship
or
grant
requests
or
on
tribal
land.
Now
the
remaining
projects.
These
are
the
14
that
are
currently
recommended
as
community
initiative
projects.
There
are
also
eight
which
the
commission
recommended
come
from
the
regular
measure
j
fund.
E
As
was
done
in
past
years,
and
the
measure
j
commission
has
agreed
on
the
importance
of
moving
forward
with
these
parks
improvements.
Then
there
are
those
which
require
further
staff
for
applicant
verification
and
one
that
needs
input
from
the
public
arts
commissions
and
those
are
in
the
staff
report.
E
I
should
clarify
the
total
amount
requested
for
the
wellness,
centers
and
school
gardens
at
the
local
schools
is
180
000,
not
the
1
million
and
44
000
listed
on
the
staff
report.
The
balance
of
the
project
are
expenses
that
will
be
covered
by
the
school
district,
which
measure
j
was
only
asked
for
the
initial
setup,
so
the
total
for
the
14
projects
is
one
million
six
hundred
and
sixty
seven
thousand
nine
hundred
and
seventy
five.
E
E
E
One
of
projects
which
came
to
the
commission
is
community
initiated
projects
and
the
commission
is
recommended
be
funded
by
regular
measure
j
funds.
The
second
are
projects
which
were
initiated
by
engineering
and
which
have
measured
concurs,
and
the
third
are
projects
where
engineering
and
the
commission
have
different
recommendations.
E
Those
are
the
community
for
the
use
of
the
regular
measure.
J
funds
I
should
mention
there
are
certain
projects
which
are
obligations
and
multi-year
projects,
so
the
street
repairs
has
been
three
million
dollars
every
year
and
and
we
have
recommended
that
that
go
up
to
six
million
dollars
this
year,
there's
also
an
airport
reserve
on
aviation
fuel
sales,
debt
service
and
downtown
property
maintenance.
E
Ada
access,
900
000
for
life,
safety,
improvements,
600
000
for
backup
generators
at
the
city
facilities,
five
hundred
and
seven
thousand
for
city
water
treatment
programs.
Four
hundred
thousand
for
the
sunrise,
plaza
hvac
improvements,
two
hundred
thousand
for
phase
four
of
the
arnica
track,
sewer
and
1.6
million
set
aside
for
the
relocation
of
fire
station
1..
E
The
last
category
to
discuss
are
those
projects
which
regular
measure
j
funds
presented
by
the
engineering
fund,
but
which
the
measure
j
commission
either
recommends
not
to
fund
or
fund
at
a
reduced
rate,
and
the
first
is
the
police
fire
city
replacement.
Radio
radios,
the
commission
recommended
a
million
dollars
of
the
estimated
3.5
million
expenses
come
from
measure
j.
This
project
came
to
us
last
month
and
the
commission
would
like
staff
to
explore
other
options
to
share
in
the
funding.
E
The
commission
does
not
recommend
funding
an
engineering
project
manager.
The
measure
j
commission
is
historically
steered
away
from
using
measure
j
funds
for
staffing.
We
certainly
agree
that
the
engineering
needs
more
staffing,
but
this
is
also
a
long-term
recurring
cost.
And,
lastly,
the
commission
does
not
recommend
the
400
000
for
the
roundabout
at
indian
canyon,
south
palm
canyon
and
camino
paris
parisiela.
The
measure
j
did
previously
fund
100
000
for
the
initial
design,
but
has
not
reviewed
it
since,
and
that
includes
the
recommendations
which
approximately
are
for
30
million
dollars
for
the
next
fiscal
year.
E
N
E
So
the
san
rafael
came
from
the
sustainability
department
in
the
city
and
basically
it's
converting
turf
to
desert
landscaping
and
they
estimated
a
hundred
thousand
along
along
the
roadside.
Okay.
E
And
the
rocket
club
road
diet
is
where
the
curve
turns
into
feral
and
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
have
a
separated
bike
lane
similar
to
that
is
on
feral
south
of
ramon,
and
that
came
from
the
neighborhood
organization.
M
I
I
wanted
to
kind
of
jump
in
really
quickly
just
to
make
the
council
aware
that
staff
has
not
reviewed
any
single
one
of
these
projects.
We
have
not
done
a
thorough
review
for
for
engineering
design.
True
cost
estimates
we've
taken
applications.
I
think
some
of
them
we've
adjusted
some
of
the
pricing
as
we
typically
do
for
engineering
construction
management.
A
Joel
thank
you
and
please
feel
welcome
to
jump
in
at
any
time.
Councilmember
course.
O
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
to
the
commission
for
all
of
your
work,
a
couple
things
one
just
when
we
get
to
actual
discussion
of
specific
projects
club
community
initiative
projects,
I
need
to
abstain
as
I'm
chair
of
the
board,
so
I
think,
speaking
to
the
city
attorney
when
we
get
to
that
those
specifics,
we
should
do
that
one
first
or
anything.
Anyone
else
might
have
to
abstain
on
a
couple
questions
so
number
eight
on
the
community
initiative
projects
is
the
new
to
muth
dog
park,
upgrade
to
address
immediate
needs.
O
362
500
just
want
to
check
with
staff.
O
O
Okay,
so
maybe
I
I
don't
know
the
last
time
we
checked,
but
it'll
be
good
to
have
that
follow
up
before
we,
when
we
have
to
vote
on
these,
because
that
would
obviously
change
probably
some
of
our
opinions
on
what
to
do
and
when
on
the
palm
canyon,
theater
maintenance,
repairs
of
280
000.-
and
I
know
they
obviously
you
know
had
a
tough
time
with
being
closed
during
the
pandemic.
O
But
you
know
we
didn't
an
rfp.
We
had
two
bids.
O
You
know
there
were
agreements
regarding
maintenance
and
who
was
paying
for
what,
and
so
I
don't
think
measure
j
had
that
contract
when
they
looked
at
this
since
I
inquired
after
I
saw
this,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
looking
at
what
our
agreement
with
them
says
regarding
maintenance,
because
that
impacted
there
were
there's
definite
negotiations
regarding
rent
versus
putting
the
money
into
maintenance
funds,
and
you
know
that
was
probably
at
least
what
three
years
ago.
O
I
don't
know
if
the
mayor
and
councilmember
hostage
were
on
then
when
we
did
that
so
yeah,
but
I
don't
think
mayor,
pro-tem
and
councilmember
woods
were
on,
so
it
would
just
be
good
to
know
what
that
contract
says,
and
I
don't
know
if
you've
had
a
chance
to
review
it.
No
again,
okay.
M
We
have
not
vetted
any
one
of
these
applications
to
take
it
through
the
process,
there's
14
of
them,
so
we
just
decided
we're
going
to
move
through
the
process
measure.
J
commission
was
going
to
recommend
moving
forward
in
the
budget.
What
we
have
done
for
community
initiated
projects.
We
have
essentially
a
round
number
that
says
the
1
million
or
the
3
million,
but
doesn't
really
specify
which
projects
are
going
to
be
done
with
that.
O
Okay
yeah,
so
I
want
to
flag
those
both
now
for
you,
the
public
and
council
and
the
commission
and
the
other
thing.
I
also
wanted
to
note
and
apologize
because
in
going
through
my
questions
with
the
city
manager,
this
one-
I
don't
remember
if
I
remember
this
then
or
today,
but
when
you
know
we
were
dealing
with
all
the
reductions
in
kovid-
and
we
were
talking
about-
I
think
the
downtown
park.
O
I
think
part
of
the
motion
which
I
think
I
made,
if
I
remember,
was
the
next
three
million
in
revenue
that
we
got
in
for
the
city
would
go
to
neighborhood
parks.
So
I
think
that
was
the
direction
of
council
would
be
good
to
check
that
and
then,
where
that
money
would
be
come
from,
but
I
think
we
right
that
was
that
was
our
plan
and,
of
course,
in
the
middle
of
covid.
Some
of
those
things
get
lost,
which
I
understand,
but
I
do
think
that
we
voted
on
that
right.
O
So
if
we
have,
then
we
should
factor
that
in
for
the
budget
next
week
in
as
we
look
at
capital
improvements,
because
I
think
all
five
of
us
voted
for
that
that
we
wanted
to
see
money
come
in,
obviously
more
than
three
million
came
in
since
kovid,
which
is
great
to
see,
but
I
think
we
already
took
a
position
on
that
and
understandably
you
know
we
have
different
city
manager
and
the
folks
who
are
working
on
that
all
three
of
them
no
longer
with
the
city.
O
A
Thank
you,
councilmember
holstich,.
P
Thank
you,
madam
mayor,
just
to
follow
up
on
council
member
course's
point.
If
you
could,
let
us
know
with
the
dog
park
state
funding
if
there
are
ways
that
either
our
lobbyists
that
the
state
retains
can
influence
that
or
advocate
for
that
money
to
come
forward
or
if
there's
work
that
the
council
members
can
personally
do
to
reach
out
to
find
where
that
is
in
this
in
the
hopper
for
the
state.
P
That
would
be
really
helpful,
because
that
was
a
huge,
huge
win
for
our
community
to
get
those
funds
and
so
much
of
the
dog
park.
Problems
is
because
of
overuse
at
our
one
small
dog
park,
and
so
to
be
able
to
do.
That
is
is
really
important.
I
I
have
some
big
picture
questions.
If
I
can,
I'm
sorry
we're
at
little
picture
right
now
approving
a
budget,
but
so
the
1
million
dollars
in
community
funded
projects.
P
M
P
I
know
that
it's
hard
to
pick
from
these
are
all
really
really
important
projects
and
there's
so
many
more
to
fund
and
then
it
seems,
like
you
know,
we're
doing
minimal
amounts
when
we
could
really
think
broadly
about
how
to
invest
these
funds
in
the
community
and
then
for
staff
generated.
So
primarily,
nearly
all
of
the
measure.
J
funds
are
staff,
generated
recommendations,
other
than
council,
and
then
the
community
driven
through
measure
j
and
our
public
process.
So
is
there
a
way,
I
know
joel
you've
done
an
amazing
amazing
job
staffing.
P
M
Yeah,
definitely
there
is
a
process.
We
do
invite
other
departments
and
other
commissions
to
come
forward
to
measure
j
to
ask
for
funding
in
this
budget.
You
will
see
certain
several
of
those
situations
where
the
convention
center
has
come
forward.
The
fire
department
has
come
forward,
parks
and
rec
is
always
at
the
forefron
has
been
coming
forward
and
they
have
projects
that,
because
of
their
recommendations,
we're
moving
them
through
the
process
to
get
funded
and
then
ultimately
constructed.
M
Correct
and
we
then
determine
because
we
have,
as
the
city
manager
pointed
out
at
the
beginning,
there
are
multiple
funding
sources,
so
we
end
up
looking
at
what
funding
sources
apply
to
what
particular
project.
If
it's
good
for
measure
j
or
if
it's
a
road
project,
we
use
measure
a
or
gas
tax.
So
then
we
distribute
and
the
projects
that
are
eligible
for
measure
j.
We
bring
them
forward
to
the
commission.
P
Thank
you
appreciate
it
and
for
council
what
I'm
asking
is,
I
think,
a
lot
about
the
use
of
measure
j
and
what
we'll
have
to
show
for
it
by
the
end
of
it,
and
I
think
it's
really
important
to
show
concrete
items
that
we've
added
to
our
community.
I
know
measure
js,
we've
been
working
on
that
for
years
and
years,
and
so
I
was
just
wondering,
like
big
picture,
how
we
add
those
items
like
a
library
or
other
things,
and
not
just
a
lot
of
the
requests
for
measure.
P
O
One
other
question:
I
just
didn't
mark
it
because
I'm
on
the
new
handout,
so
in
the
main
library
renovations
it's
if
we
receive
the
state
grant
we'd
set
aside
four
million
one
hundred
thirty,
eight
thousand.
What's
the
reason
not
setting
it
aside,
if
we
don't
receive
the
state
grant
yeah.
M
I
I
don't
see
there
is
a
reason
not
to
set
it
aside.
I
would
say
the
the
reason
why
we're
asking
for
the
funding
is
to
match
the
dollars
from
the
grant.
If
we
do
not
get
the
grant,
that
would
be
the
initial
you
know
set
aside
and
then
we
can
come
back
to
the
commission
or
to
the
council
for
more
money.
O
Okay,
no,
I
appreciate
that
because
unless
we
start
sending
aside
that
money,
you
know
as
we're
doing
with
the
fire
station
and
the
recommendation
as
well.
It's
never
going
to
happen,
so
I
just
want
to
support.
I
was
doing
the
set-aside
regardless
of
the
grant,
and
hopefully
we
get
the
grant.
That
would
be
great,
but
I
think
we
need
to
start
setting
the
money
aside.
So
thank
you
for
that.
That
was
all
thank
you.
If.
E
P
C
Thank
you
and
we're.
I
think,
we're
talking
about
the
measure
j
recommendations
at
this
point
of
the
meeting.
Is
that
correct,
and
can
I
get
clarification
on
the
1.6
million
that
was
set
aside
for
the
library
and
where
that
sits.
M
M
M
Before
the
pandemic
we
were
setting
aside,
I
think
there
was
a
1.6
million
that
was
being
set
aside
right
and
then,
when
the
pandemic
hit,
I
think
those
funds
were
then
removed,
but
I
don't
I
don't
know
the
specifics.
I
think
it
did
go
back
into
the
measure
j
fund.
Once
we
didn't
okay,
yeah,
that's
right.
It
went
from
being
dedicated
to
a
particular
project
to
going
to
an
unscheduled
fund
to
a
pool
of
money.
M
C
M
I
think,
for
my
purposes,
the
1.6
doesn't
exist
anymore.
It.
A
C
Right-
okay,
great,
that
that
makes
it
yeah,
because,
during
during
the
pandemic,
we
were
laying
off
staff
and
cutting
programs
and
doing
everything,
and
we
didn't
do
any
measure
j
allocations
whatsoever.
Is
that
correct,
at
least
in
the
community
project
side
of
things?
Correct
right?
Okay?
So
we
didn't
do
that,
because
we
were
at
that
point
suffering
from
a
potential
deficit
and
laying
people
off
right
all
right.
So,
but
now
we've
seen
that
we've
actually
the
pandemic
we've
generated
some
money.
So
we
have
some
money
now
to
spend.
Is
what
we're
really
looking
at.
M
Yeah
essentially,
yes,
we
now
have
the
current
revenues
that
are
coming
in.
We
now
have
the
money
for
measure
j,
and
now
we
can
actually
start
doing
what
we
were
doing
in
the
past.
Looking
at
projects
bringing
them
forward
and
having
council
either
approve
them
or
not,
approve
them.
C
So,
on
the
on
the
community
projects,
there's
winners,
there's
14
winners
or
recommended
recommended
winners,
let's
say-
and
there
are
a
lot
of
losers
and
a
lot
of
in
between
out
of
five
or
six
in
between
and
we
had
when
we
put
out
the
application
process
for
people
to
apply,
we
had
very
distinct
criteria
in
that
application
process
and
everyone
answered
their
or
submitted
their
applications.
Based
upon
that
criteria,
I
understand
that
criteria
was
not
used.
E
About
that,
so
the
commission
received
all
the
applications
and,
as
you'll
see,
the
criteria
also
included
its
objective
one.
So
we
basically
defined
made
it
into
three
categories
which
were
recommended
for
use
of
measure,
j
community,
initiated
projects
or
move
forward
to
capital
improvement,
or
do
not
consider
so
the
only
ones
so
far
that
have
been
taken
off
are
the
14
which
staff
took
off
and
then
the
nine
which
which
were
taken
off
either
because
they're,
mainly
public
arts,
or
because
they
were
basically
incomplete
applications.
C
E
C
And
what
were
those
recommendations
based
on
a
person's
individual
feelings
about
a
project
or
I'm
just
trying
to
try
to
figure
out
how
we
got
you
know,
because
it
was
a
very.
It
was
a
very
scientific
process
and
it
seems
like
we,
the
measure
j
commission
decided
not
to
use
that
and
has
gone
to,
and
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
what
each
of
the
commissioners
like
if
they
said
considered,
not
considered
what
did
they
use?
What
was.
E
I
believe
each
of
us
used
that
initial
applica,
that
initial
point
system
on
our
own
and
then
came
up
with
whether
it
applied
to
consider
or
not
consider.
I
can't
speak
for
the
others,
but
that's
how
it
all
went
into
each
one
then
submitted
it
directly
to
staff.
D
This
is
naomi
soto
vice
chair,
if
I
could
just
add
as
well.
We
went
through
a
pretty
lengthy
process
in
developing
the
application
itself,
both
as
a
cohort
of
commissioners
as
well
as
staff,
and
one
of
the
feedback
that
we
got
from
staff
was
how
intense
the
previous
process
was
for
community
initiated
projects.
D
So
finding
efficiency
was
one
of
was
a
key
priority
and
making
sure
that
what
ended
up
going
to
engineering
was
something
that
were
projects
that
were
viable
that
were
feasible,
that
we
weren't
doing
you
know
six
months
of
data
entry.
Those
were
all
real
concerns
by
staff
that
we
took
seriously
as
terms
of
the
three.
You
know
buckets
of
recommend
for
community
initiative
projects
recommend
for
capital
improvement
projects
or
do
not
recommend
each
commissioner
had
the
application
itself
and
those
criterias
to
help
kind
of
answer.
D
C
C
M
I
heard
engineers
say
some
of
them
or
not
and
sort
of
reiterate
what
I
mentioned
earlier.
These
are
all
applications
that
were
submitted
from
folks
that
did
their
own
estimating
and
engineering
couldn't
verify
through
the
process.
Whether
those
estimates
were
correct
or
not,
we've
always
said,
and
we
were
very
forward
with
the
measure
j
commission
is.
We
can
take
these
recommendations,
but
once
we
go
through
the
process,
we
can
review
each
one
of
them
for
validity
for
cost
and
and
really
come
back
and
say
this
project.
We
can't
move
forward
with
it.
M
That's
why
I
also
mentioned
earlier
for
the
pr
the
budget
itself
we're
setting
aside
a
certain
amount
of
money,
but
not
necessarily
dedicating
it
to
these
individual
projects.
It's
for
community
initiative
projects,
but
this
is
the
list
that
we
will
be
working
with.
We
may
end
up
eliminating
two
or
three
that
are
not
viable,
but
that
is
yet
to
be
determined,
so
cost
hasn't
been
estimated.
M
We
simply
did
a
first
run
to
look
to
see
if
we
can
increase
a
little
bit
of
the
cost
based
on
what
we
typically
do
for
other
projects
by
increasing
for
design
fees,
construction
management
fees,
administration
fees.
So
we
did,
we
bumped
them
up
a
little
bit,
so
the
number
is
and
what
we
were
hoping
to
show
the
commission
that
if
they
decided
it
was
a
million
dollars
to
truly
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
more
than
that.
Once
we
really
review
these
projects
in
depth.
C
So
I
guess
this
is
for
the
measure
j
commission-
I
don't
know
who
wants
to
answer,
but
the
I
think
of
an
oversight.
Commission
is
looking
at
past
projects,
whether
they
came
in
on
budget
on
time.
If
it
met
its
goal.
You
know
that
kind
of
that's
the
oversight.
I
think
of
what
I
read.
Have
you
been
doing
that
and
has
it
been
occurring.
E
So
for
the
projects
that
have
existed
in
the
past,
we
do
review
them
and
get
the
final
budget
each
time
and
what
it
what
it
goes
before
city
council
to
approve.
So,
yes,
we
do
that.
On
these
on
the
community
initiated,
there
was
59
and
engineering
said
we
need
to.
We
can't
review
all
59
before
they
come,
so
make
your
recommendations
on
what
we
should
look
at
and
then
we'll
go
they'll
review
the
cost
specifically
on
each
of
those.
C
E
Well,
each
project
does
both
have
an
accounting.
There
is
supposed
to
be
an
audit
that
is
done
each
year.
We
have
not
seen
it
this
year
and
I
have
raised
that
issue.
I
know
in
20
20
20
that,
because
of
the
pandemic,
it
was
delayed,
but
normally
under
the
ordinance.
The
the
commission
should
review
the
audit
each
year.
M
There
is
a
an
audit
and
then
there's
a
true
up
as
well.
So,
prior
to
the
pandemic,
we
were
presenting
a
true
up
every
year
of
our
projects,
where
we
were
how
much
money
was
allocated,
how
much
we
spent
how
much
is
remaining.
If
we
closed
them,
we
were
closing
them,
so
we
were
doing
that.
The
pandemic
has
thrown
the
wrench
and,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we're
trying
to
get
back
on
track.
C
Yeah,
I
think
it
would
definitely
help
measure
j
would
help
the
city
it
would
help
the
staff
if
we
knew
you
know,
like
exact
as
an
example,
if
we're
looking
at
a
two-point
excuse
me
with
my
glasses
on
all
right,
two
and
a
half
million
dollars.
If
that's
true,
if
that
you
know
if
those
are
true
cost,
if
they
weren't,
so
if,
if
any
of
these
are
approved,
hopefully
we
do
that
in
the
future.
You
know
I.
I
really
think
that
is
the
purpose
of
an
oversight.
C
Commission
is
to
really
look
at
those
type
of
things
and
to
make
sure
we're
getting
benefit
for
what
we're
spending
right.
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
cost-benefit
analysis,
that's
done
as
well
or
not
on
that.
I
think
I
think
our
council
members
have
mentioned.
You
know
we.
You
know
that
I
think
you
know.
Maintenance
is
one
thing,
but
people
like
to
see
measure
j
used.
I
just
want
to
repeat
what
christy
said.
C
You
know
they
want
to
see
something
done
with
their
dollars,
and
I
tried
to
look
up
what
the
purpose
of
some
measure
j
was.
You
know
when
it
was
first.
I
wasn't
around
or
I
don't
remember
it
and
I
we
had
a
hard
time
finding
that
out.
Maybe
the
some
of
the
commissioners
might
know
when
we
approved
it.
What
was
the
selling
point
of
measure
j.
E
E
The
actual
language
of
the
bond
and
the
ballot
measure
leaves
it
a
little
bit
more
at
the
discretion
at
least
wide
open,
because
it's
sort
of
including
but
not
limited
to,
but
that
is
the
main
projects
and
we
agree.
The
the
commission
has
really
pushed
hard
to
have
visible
projects
that
the
community
can
see
we've
been,
we
are,
we've
been
pushing
very
hard
for
having
public
publicity
and
social
media
about
the
projects,
as
well
as
signage
at
the
actual
projects.
E
You
know
we
recognize
that
that
there's
staff,
the
city
probably
does
not
have
enough
communication
staff
and
what
they
do
have
is
worked
very
hard.
So
we
we've
understood
that,
but
we
have
pushed
to
have
plaques
up.
We've
pushed
to
have
every
project,
there
should
be
signage,
so
the
community
understands
what
a
community
service
is
that
it's
not.
It
may
be
a
library,
it
may
be
a
playground
or
maybe
the
street,
paving
that's
on
their
street
great.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
Are
you
finished
council
member
woods,
okay,
council
member
hostage,
I.
P
P
The
public
can
see
this
a
document,
a
proposal,
but
she
cited
the
language
so
we'll
have
to
double
check,
but
it
says
measure
j
proceeds
can
be
used
for
projects
such
as
the
downtown
revitalization
project,
as
well
as
for
street
improvements,
pothole
repair,
the
palm
springs
library
park,
enhancements,
trail
projects
and
other
quality
of
life,
improvements
and
projects.
So
just
what
chair
bernstein
said,
I
just
wanted
to
call
those
out,
because
I
think
in
our
discussions
that
language
is
really
important.
A
The
downtown
revitalization
that
we
see
is
a
direct
product
of
measure.
J
funding
and
yeah.
I'd
I'll
certainly
provide
opportunity
for
any
of
the
measure
j
commissioners
to
to
weigh
in
many
of
whom
have
been
have
had
a
number
of
years
of
service
on
the
measure.
J
commission,
but
the
community
initiative
initiated
projects
are
very
very
near
and
dear
to
my
heart.
A
A
But
when
it
comes
to
these
community
projects,
I
will
be
fighting
for
them
till
the
day.
I
leave
this
diocese,
commissioner,
gazan.
J
When
it
comes
to
the
community
initiated
projects,
we
don't
always
know
the
exact
budget,
for
the
cost
of
these
projects
case
in
point
is
the
hot
spots
project
that
came
out
of
1ps
many
years
ago
and
as
those
projects
came
to
fruition,
they
costed
more
or
we
knew
that
it
was
going
to
be
more
than
that
1
million
allocated
for
the
year,
so
hot
spots
actually
turned
into
a
three-year
community
project
using
three
million
dollars
so
that
we
could
complete
sidewalks
where
sidewalks
didn't
exist,
and
it
was
all
pretty
much
safety
measures
if
it's
the
lighted
crosswalks
that
you
see
on
palm
canyon
drive
and
the
list
goes
on
and
with
what
we're
presenting
today,
as
you
can
see,
we're
under
the
budget
at
1.6
million.
J
Councilmember
holstedge
brought
up
a
really
good
point
that
we
would
love
a
raise.
So
you
know
the
1
million
is
you
know,
that's
been
in
effect
for
at
least
10
years
and
measure
j
has
gone
from
probably
collecting
9
million
to
19
million.
J
E
O
Thank
you
mayor
and
given
we're
talking
a
little
bit
about
how
much
in
the
community
initiated
projects,
I
think
before
we
get
into
specifics,
staff
is
recommending
my
reading
is
we
do
this
year's
community
initiative
projects,
but
the
two
last
years,
a
million
dollars
each
that
council
deferred
not
be
put
back.
So
I
just
want
to
because
I
see
the
difference
in
the
one
and
three
and
from
the
staff
report.
M
So
when
I
was
putting
the
recommendation
you
know
I
was
it
was,
I
was
behind
no
or
I
really
didn't,
have
a
true
understanding
of
what
the
total
amount
was,
the
carryover
what
we
had
in
the
past.
So
I
just
in
my
recommendation.
I
just
kept
the
one
million
dollars,
but
I
would
absolutely
defer
to
3
million
if
we
had
it
to
use
it,
so
staff
doesn't
have
a
preference
of
the
not
I
mean
not
that
we
don't
have
a
purpose.
C
O
C
M
So,
with
everything
going
on
me
personally,
I
didn't
really
understand
fully
where
the
money
was
for
the
measure
j
initiate
community
initiative
projects-
I
didn't
understand
if
it
was
1
million,
2
million
or
3
million
and
as
we
were
going
through
the
budget
and
finally,
it
came
to
a
fruition
that
it
was
3
million.
So
I
for
me
personally,
I
just
left
that
at
the
1
million,
because
that's
what
we
typically
do
but
would
obviously
use
the
3
million
if
it
was
available.
So
I
didn't
make
a
financial
decision.
N
M
Well,
it's
interesting
because
community
these
14
community
initiative
projects
run
a
very
wide
range.
There
are
some
that
we
could
give
money
and
it
could
be
implemented
immediately
as
soon
as
we
verify
that
the
money
is
so
we
can
do
that
and
staff
is
has
very
little
involvement
with
that
the
others
they're
so
different.
Each
individual
application
is
distinct
and
has
its
own
requirements
that
we
need
to
investigate
and-
and
I
think,
if
the
million
dollar
three
million
dollars
gets
approved,
we
then
will
start
evaluating
each
project.
M
I
think
it
would
probably
take
me,
maybe
three
to
six
months
to
say,
because
we're
also
doing
other
projects
to
really
get
down
to
a
true
list
that
we
would
recommend
moving
forward.
It
may
be
it
may
as
well
be
it
may
be
all
14
projects,
but
today
I
can't
really
speak
to
that,
but
yeah.
Definitely,
if
council
has
a
preference,
we
could
prioritize
someone
and
get
after
those
immediately.
N
Yeah,
thank
you.
I
I
appreciate
that.
You
know
I
think
we're
seeing
that
there's
within
the
community-based
projects
there's
a
lot
regarding
our
parks.
Like
we've,
we've
talked
about
what
we
heard
in
our
public
comment
and
that
we
have
discussed
as
as
a
council
for
quite
some
time,
so
I'm
just
interested
in
how
we
make
sure
that
we're
doing
this
in
a
way
that
upgrades
our
parks
and
we're
not
just
like.
We
don't
want
to
double
our
efforts
on
the
dog
park.
N
If
we
have
funding
coming
in,
how
do
we
make
sure
that
we're
taking
a
holistic
approach
with
the
parks?
You
know
they
have
been
updated
in
the
last
30
years,
because
I
remember
when
they
took
away
the
wooden
park
at
ruth
hardy,
which
I
was
opposed
to,
but
I'm
sure
my
parents
were
very
happy
about
so,
but
they
were
also
when
the
parks
were
redone.
N
They
left
remnants
of
the
old
parks.
That's
why
you
see
that
tunnel
at
ruth
hardy.
That
seems
just
random.
Well,
it's
because
there
was
this
old
wooden
structure
that
was
like
a
mining
shaft
and
it
was
a
whole
thing.
So
I'd
love
to
see
a
cohesive
development
of
our
parks,
but
I
also
want
the
kids
to
play
on
them
now
as
well.
So
if
we
needed
shade
immediately
great,
but
how
do
we
kind
of
look
at
the
measure?
J
funding
for
the
parks
versus
the
capital
improvement
funding.
M
Everything,
that's
yeah,
that's
exactly!
What
I
was
going
to
say
is
that
that
that
conversation
is
in
a
bigger
context,
right
the
what
you're
going
to
see
later
on
in
the
presentation
is
the
actual
capital
projects,
the
the
the
ones
that
I
mentioned
in
our
last
meeting.
That
staff
is
also
working
on.
So
these
are
14
projects
in
one
of
my
requests
of
55
or
60
for
capital
projects.
So
those
14,
then
that
one
particular
request
multiplied
into
14
versus
the
55
that
we
have.
M
You
know
before
you
as
well
today,
to
fund
it
is
a
bigger
picture
and
I
think
staff
seeks
direction
from
council
if,
if
we
get
direction
at
the
end
of
this
meeting
and
through
the
budget
to
focus
on
parks
and
the
the
result
of
that
will
be
some
projects
that
we
have
bringing
have
been
on
the
books
or
are
bringing
forward
kind
of
slide
down
in
priority,
and
we
don't
get
to
those
in
year
ones,
two
or
three.
So
that's
sort
of
the
guidance
that
we
need.
P
Not
only
do
we
have
random
pieces
from
old
parks
like
tunnels,
we
have
old
gates
that
are
rusted
and
we
have
we
used
to
have
turtles
that
were
the
water
features
for
the
community
and
now
they've
been
removed
and
they're
just
empty,
and
there
is
no
water
feature.
So
we
need
a
comprehensive
plan,
but
we
also
have
urgent
projects
so
like
how
do
we
balance
that?
But
I'm
wondering
if
we
have
enough
staffing
to
really
execute
on
the
full
measure,
j
scope
right?
This
is
kind
of
the
palm
springs
story.
P
We
have
a
great
idea:
the
council
approves
it.
We
think
it
might
be
a
nine
million
dollar
fund.
Now
it's
turning
into
a
20
plus
million
dollar
fund,
even
more
as
our
revenue
grows
and
our
city
grows,
and
we
haven't
planned
for
the
staffing
of
executing
a
larger
fund
like
that,
because
I
agree
measure
j,
I
would
support
giving
them
a
raise
so
making
sure
that
we
at
least
allocate
the
minimum
of
what
the
community
deserved
over
the
last
three
budget
cycles,
but
also
looking
at
some
of
these
other
projects.
P
It
always
just
makes
me
so
sad
because
these
are
just
deserving
projects
for
parks
and
rec,
and
I
don't
know
why
or
like
basic
city
facilities
and
then
they
have
to
apply
for
this
community
funding.
Like
the
you
know,
library
meeting
room
like
we
should
just
do
that.
You
know,
and
some
of
these
are
cheaper.
So
sorry
there's
a
lot
in
there
but
yeah.
If
you
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
staffing
shouldn't,
we
just
allocate
a
portion
for
a
dedicated
staff
for
measure
j
or
for
a
consultant
to
lead
this
effort.
A
M
Project
manager
for
a
position
it
could
be.
You
know,
a
full-time
position
in
our
engineering
department
to
dedicate
themselves
to
projects,
and
I'm
going
to
be
careful
saying
that
if
we
bring
them
in
to
just
dedicate
themselves
to
measure
j,
it
becomes
sort
of
tricky
because
sometimes
projects
are
not
going
on
that
are
measure
j.
So
I
I
would
need
you
know
one
or
two
people
that
could
help
out
with
that
and
one
of
the
I
think
the
city
managers
bringing
forward
certain
requests
for
for
positions.
M
So
definitely
the
engineering
department
would
need
more
staff
and
we
are
actively
seeking
more
staff
to
be
able
to
to
deliver
projects,
not
only
measure
data
community
projects,
but
the
big
infrastructure
project
like
the
100
million
dollar.
You
know
vistacino
bridge
and
you
know,
psycho
the
hsip
cycle
projects,
the
local
road
safety
plan.
All
these
other
projects
that
we
have
before
you.
We
do
need
more
staff.
So,
with
the
staff
that
we
have
today,
we're
challenged
we're
working,
we
keep
projects
moving
forward,
but
definitely
more
staff
would
help.
A
So
I'm
going
to
raise
this
simply
as
a
process
point
where
and
I'm
looking
at
the
clock
in
terms
of
how
long
we've
taken
for
this
and
we're
doing
okay.
But
the
the
issue
of
staffing
is
something
that
we
will
be
addressing
as
part
of
the
general
fund
and
perhaps
dealing
with
all
of
the
staffing
issues
in
a
holistic
fashion
at
one
time
might
make
sense.
A
There
are,
within
these
recommendations,
some
very
discreet
specific
projects.
I
I
struggle
to
understand
how
australia's
shade
structure
at
a
specific
park
is
something
that
we
can't
make
a
decision
on
in
the
absence
of
having
a
master
plan
for
our
complete
parks.
P
So
I
would
also
like
council
to
consider
if
there
are
direct
allocations
for
measure
j
in
addition
to
the
community
fund
that
we
should
create.
So
you
know
we
have
this
3
to
six
million
dollar
annual
allocation
for
streets
and
road
repairs.
Great
it's
been
really
important
to
getting
that
under
control.
I
think
we
should
have
a
direct
annual
allocation
for
measure
j
for
parks.
P
I
think
we
should
think
about
having
that
set
aside
for
the
library,
and
so
it's
not.
This
amorphous
21
million
22
million
dollar
fund
that
can
be
used
for
you
know,
staff
recommendations
which
are
always
really
great,
but
that
also
allows
council
to
get
the
work
that
we
need
done
at
the
parks
and
library,
et
cetera,
done.
A
So
from
a
process
standpoint,
would
it
be
appropriate
for
us
to
take
all
of
the
projects
that
we
have
recommendations
for
here?
Where
staff
and
the
measure
j
commission
have
agreed?
O
No,
I
think
that
makes
sense
and
a
very
good
time
management
effort,
so
I
just
would
say
on
the
community
initiative
projects,
if
we're
gonna,
you
know,
if
we're
gonna,
do
it
in
one
fell
swoop,
just
that
I'm
abstaining
on
the
drainage
of
the
boys
and
girls
club
and
I
think
for
the
dumuth
park
upgrade
and
palm
canyon
theater
maintenance.
We
need
more
information,
so
it
would
be
dependent
on
that
information.
O
Coming
back
to
us,
I'm
fine
with
those
depending
on
you
know
what
our
agreement
with
palm
canyon
theater
company
is
and
where
we
are
on
the
state
grant
on
the
dog
park
right
the
others
to
me
all
seem
you
know
not
to
have
any
ques,
at
least
for
me,
any
questions
all
right.
A
And
city
attorney
the
council
member,
of
course,
does
not
have
to
leave
the
room
when
we're
having
a
discussion
on
the
boys
and
the
girls
club.
Is
that
correct.
C
I
do
have
a
question:
it's
going
to
refer
to
the
boys
and
girls
club,
so
I
don't
know
if
council
member
course
has
to
leave
or
not,
but
let
me
ask
the
question
and
then
we'll
make
a
decision:
okay,
so
the
drainage
for
the
boys
and
girls
club,
which
is
I
understand
we
lease
that
to
the
boys
and
girls
club.
Is
that
correct.
M
C
Okay,
so
so
they
owned
the
building
and
then
the
palm
canyon
theater
we
actually
own.
That
building
is
that
correct.
J
I'm
sorry,
apparently
we
own
we
own
the
building.
It's
a
it's
a
long-term
lease,
though.
C
C
Is
that
the
same
thing
with
the
palm
canyon
theater
we
lease
it
to
okay
and
then
the
the
palm
springs,
the
pc,
the
pscc,
is
that
owned
by
the
city,
or
is
that
owned
privately
that
I
I.
M
C
It
I
don't
think
it
is
either
okay.
I
just
just
want
that
on
the
record.
So
do
we
know
what
those
leases
say?
C
M
Is
our
agreement
with
them?
So
one
of
the
things
I
can
offer
council
is
these
14
projects
as
we
review
them
and
vet
them
and
we
do
have
agreements
or
we
own
buildings
that
we
will
look
through
each
one
of
those
agreements
make
sure
that
that
it
doesn't
conflict
with
what's
being
requested.
If
it
does,
then
we
don't
move
forward
with
that
particular
project.
So
I
don't.
M
I
can't
speak
up
here
today
about
each
one
of
those
leases
what
we
do
have
and
what
we
don't
have,
but
I
can
commit
to
reviewing
those
before
we
move
any
of
these
projects
forward
as
we're
vetting
each
individual
project.
P
Answer,
at
least
for
we've
negotiated
the
palm
canyon
theater
a
number
of
times
while
I've
been
on
city
council.
So
I've
raised
this
issue
too,
because
typically
so
we
own
the
land
for
some
of
these
projects,
some
have
not,
and
then
we
on
the
building,
but
typically
we're
requiring
our
lessees,
the
the
leaseholders
to
have
all
the
tenant
improvements
which
is
super
problematic,
especially
for
places
like
the
palm
canyon
theater.
It's
a
non-profit,
it's
an
historic
building,
it's
extremely
expensive
to
keep
up,
and
so
that's
what
the
problem
has
been.
P
I
think
is
that
we
see
these
maintenance
issues.
You
know
really
grow
because
the
non-profit
lessees
aren't
able
to
keep
up
the
maintenance.
When,
fundamentally,
you
know
the
city,
in
my
opinion,
city
has
an
interest
in
keeping
those
buildings
beautiful
and-
and
you
know,
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
own
it
so
yeah.
C
I
I
guess
I
would
like,
as
we
go
through
the
process,
which
I
think
council
member
coors
asked
for
this-
to
get
a
better
understanding
of
that
right
and
and
really
what
does
the
lease
say
what's
going
on?
What's
our
obligation?
What's
not
our
obligation,
you
know
and
kind
of
I
think
the
public
deserves
to
know
that
as
well.
I
see
for
the
project
13
and
14.
13
is
the
wellness
center
at
local
schools
and
14
is
school
gardens
at
local
schools.
C
M
C
It's
on
school
property.
You
know
the
school
has
its
own
funding
source,
its
own
tax
thing,
everything
of
that
nature,
but
yet
we
are
looking
to
fund
that,
but
not
fund,
something
you
know
like
a
dog
park
or
turf
conversion
or
the
mizell
scene,
or
you
know
a
kitchen.
I
you
know
I
just
I'm
curious
how
you
came
up
with
that
kind
of
a
recommendation.
So.
E
Just
in
terms
of
the
school
I
mean,
the
the
the
city
has
measure
j
has
funded
things
that
are
on
non-city-owned
buildings
before
they
did
the
put
money
into
the
richards
center
at
the
palm
springs
high
school
and,
I
believe,
also
in
the
architectural
design
museum.
E
So
we
felt
that
fell
under
the
aspect
of
community
services,
especially
in
this
case,
there's
been
a
lot
of
input
to
the
measure
j
commission
about
serving
children,
both
in
playgrounds
and
other
areas,
and
especially
because
in
the
schools
the
school
district
was
committing
the
vast
majority
of
the
money.
So
they
were
just
asking
us
for
the
for
the
the
setup
costs
in
terms
of
those
other
ones
that
we
mentioned
that
they,
which
ones
are
saying
were
not
approved.
They
were.
The
dog
park
was
recommended.
E
It's
a
similar
with
the
cultural
center
too,
because
it
will
serve
the
community
and
that's
what
that's
why
we've
recommended
doing
it:
they're
raising
the
vast
majority
of
their
funds
on
their
own,
and
we
for
the
sewer
line.
We've
recommended
that
that
come
from
measure
j.
C
E
Just
trying
to
understand
the
logic
we
left
that
one
off
the
list,
because
it
wasn't
clear
there
was
actually
a
a
pro
a
space
for
it,
and
I
think
engineering
engineering
needed
to
look
at
it.
It
wasn't
clear
whether
it
was
on
a
homeowner's
estate
or
as
a
city-owned
property.
J
That
was,
it
was
so
general.
It
didn't
even
give
us
a
parcel,
so
there
was
very
little
information
on
that.
So
we
couldn't
even
we
couldn't
get
clarification
from
the
entrant
and
we
didn't
know
it
would
give
such
a
huge
parameter
of
land
that
we
didn't
even
know
what
they
were
referring
to
and
if
that
land
was
even
public
or
private
or
so
okay.
D
Much
this
is
vice
chair,
virtually
just
a
couple
additional
comments.
There
has
been
recommendations
for
other
dog
parks,
so
you
know
in
terms
of
measure
j
community
initiative
projects
going
to
dog
owners
there.
There
is
that
kind
of
allocation.
We
thought
a
lot
about
in
terms
of
the
populations
that
would
be
served
and,
and
that
was
kind
of
met
and
just
around
the
kind
of
the
lease
concerns
or
other
contractual
obligations
and
just
to
kind
of
expand
a
little
bit
about
what
joel
is
saying.
D
Each
application,
you
know,
has
information
that
we
aren't
certain
will
make
it
move
forward.
It
might
be
a
contract
with
the
city.
It
might
be
that
the
number
that
the
entrant
provided
us
is
way
far
from
what
the
actual
costs
are,
and
there
might
be
other
things.
So
I
just
want
to
kind
of
clarify
that
whether
it
was
a
resident
or
or
a
parent
who
submitted
that
application
or
the
ceo
of
a
major
nonprofit
organization
here
in
the
city
they're
still
going
to
have
to
go
through
that
vetting
process
equally,
and
so
that.
D
But
we
didn't
want
that
to
stop
the
we
didn't
want
to
get
stuck
in
the
vetting
without
these
applications
actually
going
forward
to
you.
A
Okay,
mayor
pro
tim.
N
Thank
you.
I
do
want
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
wellness
center
in
the
school
gardens,
because
I
think
this
is
actually
the
types
of
projects
I
want
to
see.
The
city
do
more
of
because,
when
we're
partnering
with
things
like
the
schools
right,
that
means
that
the
school
is
going
to
be
in
charge
of
this
local
garden
for
their
students.
Our
residents
get
the
benefit
of
having
a
community
garden.
We,
as
the
city
are
not
having
to
upkeep
it,
which
is
the
problem
right.
N
So
I
really
do
love
seeing
things
like
this,
because
we
are
supporting
our
community,
but
we're
also
taking
some
of
the
burden
off
the
city.
So
I
want
to
just
let
mr
j
know
that
I
really
appreciate
these
types
of
projects.
I
want
to
see
more
of
them
and
I
I
think
it's
great
and
I
I
do
appreciate
the
clarification
that
it
came
from
the
school
district.
That
was
some
of
my
questions
for
these
is.
N
I
was
a
little
bit
confused
and
the
staff
report
where
some
of
them
came
from
so
I
think
just
from
staff.
If
we
can
get
that
clarification
in
the
future.
I
think
that
helps
because
at
first
I
thought
well,
what's
the
good
in
the
garden
if
the
school
district's
not
involved,
but
to
know
that
it
came
from
them.
Obviously,
that's
great.
A
So
I'm
gonna
in
the
interest
of
time
try
to
call
the
question
in
the
in
the
reference
that
we're
using
it
here
today.
Notwithstanding
that
councilmember
coors
is
recusing
himself
from
the
boys
and
girls
club
when
it
comes
to
the
1.66.
A
M
So
for
clarification,
the
decision
is
really
on
this
slide
right
here.
If
we
agree
that
those
community
initiative
projects.
M
M
Right
so
yes,
in
a
whole,
in
this
slide
here
pro
line
item
number
10,
which
is
city
project
2220,
is
a
measure
j
community
initiative
projects.
The
staff
had
put
one
million
measure
j's
recommending
three.
If
the
council
can
decide
versus
three
and
one
and
then
we're
vetting
all
the
other
projects
within
the
community
initiative
projects
fair.
A
A
Right
then,
all
those
who
are
supporting
it,
please
raise
your
hand
all
right.
So
there
is
consensus,
then
we
can
move
forward
with
the
other
items
which
are
not
highlighted
in
yellow
that
are
ones
where
staff
recommendation
and
measure
j
recommendation
are
the
same
as
their
consensus
on
in
support
of
those.
A
E
C
C
So
one
of
the
things
is
for
the
the
jackie
lee
houston,
plaza
upgrades
and
I
think
it's
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
does
that
take
away
from
anything
where
we're
looking
at
redoing.
The
palm
tree
I
mean
is
this:
is
this
a
this
or
that
type.
C
O
I
hate
to
raise
this
one,
but
on
pickleball,
of
course,
and
I'm
supportive
of
you
know,
150
to
start
coming
up
with
a
plan
right.
O
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
don't
have
there's
nothing
specific
yet
in
that
plan,
right
necessarily
where
they're
going
to
be
or
because
I
think,
as
we
talk
more
and
I
think
it's
sort
of
come
up
already,
we
and
we
have
a
new
parks
and
rec
commissioner,
really
need
to
look
at
our
parks
in
a
broader
sense
right,
there's
some
requests
for
lots
of
other
things
in
parks
and
requests
for
two
more
tennis
courts.
O
P
And
I
think
that
should
definitely
say
pickleball
court
planning
or
a
more
defined
explanation
for
the
community,
because
that's
going
to
get
people
excited
and
we
did
commit
to
doing
more
pickleball
courts
years
ago
and
looking
at
it
in
sunrise,
park
and
other
places,
and
we
have
to
do
dual
tracks.
I
know
it's
hard
because
we
don't
have
master
planning,
so
we
have
to
make
these
investments
and
also
you
know,
plan
for
it
for
the
future.
But
I
support
all
of
those
recommendations.
C
C
C
C
M
To
the
what
we
would
call
the
measure,
j
capital
improvement
projects,
where
staff
makes
a
recommendation
and
the
measure
j
commission
either
agrees
with
the
recommendation
or
makes
their
own
recommendation
or
disagrees
with
staff.
So
I
think
right
now,
what
was
being
discussed
is
where
the
projects
that
are
not
highlighted
where
both
staff
and
measure
j
agree
on
the
recommendation
and
the
slide
is
uc
1
of
17
up
here
and
then
it
would
be
continued
to
this
slide
as
well.
C
Okay
and
then
the
the
roundabout
for
indian
canyon
and
south
south
palm
canyon
is
not
being
recommended,
but
staff
is
recommending
some
design
work.
Design
work
has
been
done
right.
M
M
So
the
way
the
five
year
cip
and
we
can
get
into
that
discussion
later-
is
we
are
asking
for
money
for
year,
one
two
three
four
five
typically
year,
one,
we
use
it
for
construction
or
we
start
setting
aside
money
for
years,
two
three
and
four
until
we
get
to
a
point
where
we
have
enough
money
to
build
a
project.
In
this
particular
scenario,
we
have
we're
asking
for
four
hundred
thousand
to
start
setting
aside
money
for
construction.
I
think
we
have
one
of
the
chairs
that
wants
to
speak.
I
I
wanted
to
make
a
comment
about
the
pickleball.
If
I
may,
six
years
ago
I
was
the
chairman
of
parks
and
recreation,
and
I
came
before
this
console
and
recommended
you
fund
a
thing
called
pickleball,
and
I
sent
you
all
at
that
time.
The
former
members,
a
video
done
by
nbc,
that
it
was
the
largest
sport
upcoming
in
america
for
seniors,
and
I
just
wanted
to
compliment
when
I
see
what's
going
on
now.
Is
that
what
I
predicted
from
what
we
did
as
a
commission,
then
at
parks
and
recreation
has
all
come
through.
C
So,
just
to
go
back,
I
I
would
support
that
roundabout
starting
to
you're
starting
you're,
doing
the
design.
I'm
sorry.
A
If,
if
I
could,
the
question
that
was
before
us
are
support
for
all
of
the
items
that
are
listed
here,
for
which
there
is
agreement
between
staff
and
measure
j,
and
so
the
roundabout
is
one
that
there's
not
agreement
on
and
that
will
come
up
for
discussion.
If
you
forgive
me
as
soon
as
we
finish
with
this
one
got
it
got
it.
Okay,
so
is
there
consensus
where,
for
us
to
agree
where
staff
and
measure
j
have
agreed.
C
Well,
I
have
one
other
question:
it's
one
point:
six
million
the
amico
track
sewer
line.
I
I
think
in
the
staff
report
it
talked
about.
Residents
of
green
are
not
agreeing
to
that,
because
you're
going
to
do
an
assessment,
district
and
we'd
be
adding
that
here.
So
where
are
we
at
with
that?
And
the
other
sewer
lines
that
are
needed
in
the
city.
M
So
in
the
staff
report
under
attachment
number
two
item:
24,
we
go
into
the
full
discussion
on
arnical
track
and
not
necessarily
honorable
track,
but
what
the
city
does
when
communities
are
lacking
sewer
service
right.
So
the
explanation
really
goes
into
the
city
typically
creates
an
assessment
district
or
tries.
If
a
community
wishes
to
move
forward,
funding
sewer
the
city
creates
an
assessment
district.
It's
it's
put
to
the
voters
and
the
voters
have
to
agree
to
be
assessed
over
time
to
recuperate
the
money
that
is
being
invested
into
the
sewer
system.
M
That's
created
to
serve
them
in
lieu
of
doing
an
assessment
district.
The
city
can
fund
projects.
In
this
case
the
arnical
track
was
one
of
those
projects
where
the
city
decided
to
use
or
measure
jf
approved
using
measure
j
funds.
To
finish
the
final
phase
of
the
four-phase
article
track
that
was
originally
promised,
I
believe
in
2010
was
started
with
cd
cdbg
funding.
Eventually,
cdbg
funding
ran
out
and
then
the
because
the
city
wanted
to
continue
moving
forward
with
the
project
they
used.
Other
funds,
one
of
the
funds
was
measure
j.
M
We
brought
that
back
because
the
last
phase
of
the
four
phase
project
was
not
constructed,
so
we
brought
it
back
to
measure
j
measure
j,
agree
that
we
could
use
measure
j
fundings
for
that
particular
tract,
and
we
have
and
the
the
the
funding
that
you
see
before
you
item
22
on
the
on
the
slide,
which
is
project
1923,
is
to
start
funding
the
construction
of
the
last
phase
of
the
arnold
tract
for
any
other
track.
I
think
in
the
answer
to
an
attachment
two
of
the
staff
report.
M
We
go
into
the
discussion
of
eight
particular
communities
within
the
city
of
palm
springs
that
still
do
not
have
sewer
the
cost
to
actually
facilitate
the
sewer,
for
those.
Eight
tracks
is
about
nine
million
dollars.
So
in
order
to
move
forward,
if
we
cannot
create
an
assessment
district
or
if
it's
put
to
a
vote
and
those
communities
wish
not
to
proceed
being
assessed
for
the
construction
of
the
sewer,
we
would
then
bring
it
back
to
a
commission
or
if
the
commission
measured
a
commission
or
try
to
find
other
funding
sources.
C
M
C
P
You,
madam
mayor,
so
I
we're
not
doing
motion,
but
I
would
ask
that
we,
I
heard
consensus
around
all
of
the
projects
that
staff
and
measure
j
commission
recommend
to
be
funded.
I
heard
a
council
member
say
right.
This
says
main
library
renovations
if
we
receive
state
grants,
so
I
would
like
to
allocate
that
money
regardless.
I
think
that's
a
council
member
course.
So,
regardless
of
that,
and
then
this
total
number
here
29
is
that
what
is
that
the
total
cost?
M
P
Thanks,
I'm
just
thinking
through
the
one
we
could
do
that
later
after
that,
but
the
1.6
that
was
taken
away
from
the
library
fund,
I'd
very
much
like
to
fund
and
then
again
for
council
to
consider
here
in
the
general
fund
like
a
direct
annual
allocation.
Just
like
we
do
for
road
repairs
for
parks
and
library.
P
C
There
was
a
plan
for
the
whole
park
around
the
library
and
everything
is
that
included
in
this,
and
it
was
put
on
hold.
M
M
For
the
whole
area
yeah,
this
particular
grant
really
is
for
is
dedicated
for
the
infrastructure.
Essentially,
what's
inside
the
building
to
revamp
it,
you
know
so
it's
not
outside
of
the
building
and.
C
M
The
building
itself,
if
we
talk
about
it
as
a
building,
the
building
itself
needs
these
renovations
to
bring
up
to
code
structural
retrofits,
all
these
things
that
the
grant's
actually
going
to
pay
for.
So
if
you
don't
look
at
it
as
a
library
but
a
silly
facility,
we
need
to
do
this
work
anyway.
So
it'd
be
I
mean
it
is
a
library,
but
for
now
this
is
a
project
that
needs
to
be
done,
and
if
we
get
the
grant
money
we
can
definitely
use
it.
We're
getting
half
the
funding
for
it.
C
So
this,
I
guess
you
know
we're
spending
we're
looking
at
spending
four
million
dollars,
which
you
know,
I
think
our
library.
But
there
was
many
alternatives
and
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
putting
four
million
dollars
in
and
it's
not
ultimately
what
we
want
and
has
that
been
decided
yet,
and
maybe
ms
keys
can
say
that
just
I
just
I
want
to
be.
P
B
The
the
grant
project
is
infrastructure
only
and
it
doesn't
include
carpet,
paint,
furniture
and
any
of
the
cosmetics,
so
there
are
going
to
be
extra
costs.
For
that,
let's
see
what
was
your
other?
Oh,
is
there
a
plan?
The
right
was
that
the
question
I'm
sorry.
B
So
currently,
the
only
thing
that
was
decided
was
that
the
community
wants
it
to
be
at
sunrise
park.
That
was
the
only
thing
that
had
been
decided
in
2013.
We
had
a
plan,
but
it's
a
decade
old.
So
we
need
to
revise
that
plan
and
make
sure
that
it's
up
to
today's
standards
and
needs
so
part
of
if
we
do
get
this
grant.
B
The
nice
thing
is,
it
does
include
money
for
planning
architectural
design
and
and
whatnot,
but
that
all
needs
to
be
done,
whether
we
get
the
grant
or
not,
and
we
should
they've
said
that
they're
going
to
announce
now
it's
spring
or
summer,
so
we're
looking
at
probably
summer
time
before
we
know.
A
So
do
we
have
agreement
all
right,
good
again,
just
trying
to
deal
with
process,
we
increased
the
measure
j
initiated
projects
to
the
3
million
instead
of
the
1
million.
A
Are
we
okay
with
moving
forward
with
all
of
the
recommendations
of
measure
j
that
are
on
page
five?
In
light
of
the
fact
that
we
added
two
million
dollars,
councilman.
O
Okay,
first,
first
on
that,
I
want
to
hear
from
staff
if
the
reason
they
didn't
recommend
them
was
funding
or
for
other
reasons,
and
so
that's
one
just
if
we
go
through
each
one.
So
we
understand
if
it
was
just
a
funding
thing
it's
different
than
if
there
are
other
reasons,
sure
two
one
thing
was
left
off
right,
just
under
200
000
for
the
commercial
sewer
upgrade
to
the
cultural
center.
That
was
also
recommended
by
measure
j,
and
I
don't
know
if
it
was
recommended
or
not
by
staff.
O
And
I
would
just
if
we're
going
to
have
that
discussion.
We
should
talk
about
the
two
things
staff
recommended
that
measure
j:
didn't,
because
what
is
the
total,
if
we
add
all
those
together,
knowing
that
all
these
are
going
to
end
up
costing
a
whole
bunch
more
than
expected?
So
so
I
want
to
look
at
those
because
there
are
two
you
know:
staff
recommended
the
project
manager
and
the
roundabout
was
which
I
have
some
thoughts
on
as
well.
J
J
So
because
the
budget
is
so
small,
we
get
that
teeny-weeny
little
million
dollars
a
year.
We
can't
do
all
59
projects
or
after
we
vet
49
of
those
projects
or
whatever.
So
some
of
them
we
felt
were
important,
but
maybe
they
cost
more.
So
we're
saying:
okay,
let's
not
make
them
community
initiated
projects,
we're
going
to
move
them
into
the
category
of
where
staff
lives
at
city
hall
and
have
have
them
join
forces
where
that
was
staff's
list.
So
staff
doesn't
recommend
these
because
they
didn't
come
from
staff.
J
They
didn't
come
through
city
hall,
they
came
from
the
public,
but
we're
recognizing
that
hey
these
might
some
of
these
might
be
valid
and
important,
so
we
are
engaging
staff
to
consider
it
and
then,
if
we
recommend
it,
then
we're
looking
at
council
to
approve
that
recommendation.
So
I
hope
that
clarifies
all
right.
Thank.
A
You
councilman
records.
You
raised
a
very
valid
point.
Would
it
be
appropriate
for
us
to
talk
specifically
about
the
police,
fire
city
replacement
radios
first,
since
that
has
the
largest
financial
consequence?
A
M
A
Here
I
thought
we
had
agreed
that
this
in
another
forum
that
we
were
going
to
do,
the
replacement
of
the
radios.
E
Correct:
that's
what
the
question
is,
where
the
money's
going.
We
believe
it's
important.
We
believe
it
should
be
done.
It
just
came
to
us
a
couple
weeks
ago
that
should
all
be
funded
by
measure.
J
and
part
of
our
discussion
was
about
having
visible,
tangible
things
to
the
public,
and
this
was
a
lot
of
money,
and
so
our
request
was
really
whether
staff
could
or
find
other
sources
of
funding
for
this
right.
P
L
Yeah,
what
might
be
more
apparent
as
we
move
on
through
today
is
the
other
buckets
of
funding
that
we're
working
with
so
we
started
the
year
with
or
were
projecting
to
start
next
fiscal
year
with
approximately
a
45
million
dollar
reserve
balance.
So
those
were
funds
not
spent
in
the
general
fund
in
previous
years,
so
that
would
be
the
alternative
source.
Currently,
the
city
manager
recommendation
proposes
spending
about
35
of
that.
So
there
is
funding
available.
The
reason
to
propose
measure
j
was
one.
L
I
believe
the
cat
rms
was
one
example
and
in
although
as
a
single
project,
it's
relatively
large
in
the
context
of
the
overall
funding
over
years,
I
thought
it
was
relatively
small
and
and
really
some
of
the
other
recommendations
that
haven't
been
solidified
yet
by
council,
like
an
investment
in
the
affordable
housing
fund
and
other
things,
we're
kind
of
competing
to
bring
that
balance
down
to
about
2
million,
and
I
was
aware
that
there
were
other
things
that
council
was
interested
to
pursue,
that
we
haven't
yet
come
up
with
dollar
amounts.
L
O
You
know
given,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
right
infrastructure
and
capital
needs,
and
we
have
a
lot
of
staffing
needs
and
even
with
the
great
budget
numbers
we
have,
we
can't
do
all
of
them
and
obviously
this
is
one
that's
a
high
priority
where
it
comes
from
I'm
somewhat
ambivalent
on,
but
we
have
right
in
the
regular
budget.
I
think
we
have
two
million
from
the
general
fund.
We
typically
move
to
capital.
O
Could
that
be
spent
for
this
absolutely
given
we
have
an
extra
so
much
extra
money
currently
sort
of
in
measure
j.
Why
move
this?
You
know?
Maybe
we
just
keep
that
in
the
general
fund,
and
you
know
we
then
there's
then
we're
just
short
500
000,
which
we
can
find
somewhere
right,
whether
it's
for
measure
j
or
not.
But
if
we
use
the
two
million
that
we
that
we
have
in
the
budget
right,
so
we
don't
have
to
go
into
fund
balance.
A
I
think
that's
a
good
option,
any
objection,
and
I
think
we
have
a
decision
on
that
one
next,
just
because
we've
got
a
dispute
here
that
has
some
large
dollar
figures
attached
to
it.
Measure
j
did
not
recommend
the
roundabout
be
funded.
Could
you
talk
about
why.
E
Measure
j
did
fund
the
design
and
the
feeling
was
that
we
haven't
seen
what
the
design
or
the
plan
was
yet
and
they
were
being.
We
were
being
asked
to
put
aside
the
money.
So
that's
why
we
voted
against
it.
I
know
there's
some
people
on
the
commission
who
don't
agree
with
a
roundabout
at
all,
but
this
was
mainly
because
we
haven't
seen
the
design
or
reviewed
it
as
to
what
the
funds
are
going
to
go
to.
M
So
from
my
standpoint
as
measure
j
had
already
approved
it,
the
council
approved
the
project
allowed
us
to
move
forward
with
the
design
the
design
is
in
process.
I
just
didn't:
have
it
available
to
show
measure
j,
but
the
project
for
me
from
council
from
what
I
understand
from
council
should
move
forward.
So
I
thought
measure
j
was
a
perfectly
good
use
of
those
funds.
A
I
it's
it
for
me
is
a
project
that
I
would
like
to
see
us
move
forward
with
I'm
again
somewhat
neutral
as
to
whether
or
not
it
comes
from
measure
j
or
from
the
general
fund.
P
P
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I
agree
so
I'm
trying
to
remember
back.
We
don't
have
all
the
details
for
all
these
projects
in
our
package,
so
the
other
funding
that
might
be
available
for
that
project
like
measure
a
or
gas
tax
money
or
other
infrastructure
dollars.
You
know
I've
always
been
concerned
about
using
additional.
You
know
measure
j
funds
as
much
as
we
do
on
streets
when
there
are
other
funds
for
street
repairs.
P
O
M
We
would
have
to
either
go
with
measure
a
funding
and
then
that
reduces
the
amount
of
money
for
other
projects
that
we
typically
use
measure
a
for,
or
we
would
actually
go
out
for
grants
to
see
if
we
can
get
it
funded,
but
those
those
funds
are
not
always
readily
available
and
the
way
I've
set
up
the
cip
I'm
going
to
be
building
up
the
budget
for
at
least
four
years
before.
I
think
I'm
gonna
construct
this
project,
so
we
could
always
come
back,
and
I
think
I
mentioned
to
the
measure
j
commission.
M
If
you
guys
don't
allow
me
to
use
the
money
this
year,
I'm
going
to
come
back
next
year
and
ask
for
the
money
again,
because
it
is
a
funding
source.
It
is
for
a
city
project.
The
council
already
approved
it
so
and
it's
the
way
I
have
to
manage
all
these
projects.
I
don't
have
the
funds
always
available.
I
have
multiple
funding
sources
and
I
have
to
use
them
in
different
ways
for
different
projects.
Right.
We
have
six
bridges.
I
think
the
total
is
over
100,
some
million,
so
that
money.
M
So
that
would
be
something
we
would
look
at
if
we're
applying
for
grants.
Some
grants
do
award
for
roundabouts.
C
Remember
woods
but
the
project
we
have
supported
it
already
reported
it
already
already.
I
think
if
we,
if
we
couch
it
into
traffic,
calming
safety,
add
pedestrians
and
bicyclists,
we
still
are
going
to
have
to
any
grant.
We
get
we're
likely
going
to
have
to
match,
so
I
would
be
for
funding
it
at
this
point
as
we
keep
moving.
Obviously,
it's
a
long
cry
from
actually
building
it.
M
O
A
I
agree
all
right,
so
we've
got
consensus
on
that
and
I
believe
when
it
came
to
the
engineering
project
manager,
we
agreed
to
have
that
discussion
deferred
to
the
larger
discussion
of
all
staffing.
So
that
brings
us
down
to
items
13
through
17.
If
I'm
correct
that
we've
resolved.
A
C
Thank
you,
I
think,
just
what
we've
heard
from
both
staff
and
what
we've
heard
from
measure
j
having
support
with
these
measure
j
projects,
both
its
history,
how
they're
planning
out
would
be
a
good
thing.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
why
measure
j
was
here,
I
know
there's
some
frustration
of
not
being
able
to
get.
You
know,
quality
information
and
part
of
it
is
our
staffing
issues.
So
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
clear.
As
my
point
of
view,
thanks.
O
M
So
my
point
of
view
on
these
projects
is
from
the
bigger
cip
picture
of
the
55
projects
that
we
already
have
in
the
queue
that
we're
bringing
forward.
I
just
felt
that
as
far
as
staff
is
concerned,
our
workload
is,
you
know
it's
pretty
big.
Adding
more
projects
just
means
that
those
projects
are
going
to
sit
there
for
quite
a
while
before
we
actually
get
to
them.
So
that
was
why
I
wasn't
recommending
bringing
any
more
projects
forward.
We
didn't.
M
We
did
say
that
those
projects
may
be
valid
and
we
could
we
already
have
the
applications
and
the
measure
j
commission
can
bring
them
forward
at
any
time.
But
at
this
point
in
time,
as
the
discussion
we
had
in
our
previous
meeting,
we
do
have
lots
of
projects
already
on
the
books,
and
I
was
just
simply
trying
to
to
avoid
adding
more
to
them.
If
they
are
added
today,
they
will
go
on
and
we
will
get
to
them
eventually.
Okay,.
O
M
M
M
O
Okay,
so
the
mizell
center
one
is
not
a
staff
issue,
so
that
makes
that
one
a
little
simpler,
in
my
view,
and
obviously
an
important
project
and
good
to
see
that
we're
not
being
asked
to
do
the
whole
thing
you
know,
which
is
what
we
originally
had
so,
and
the
only
other
thing
I
want
to
ask
is
you
know
we're
looking
at
some
of
these
lighted
crosswalks
right,
which
one
neighborhood
asks
for,
would
those
be
the
first
choice
for
lighted
crosswalks
in
the
city
or
just
because
that's
the
only
one
that
a
community
member
asks
for,
because
I
think
that
needs
to
be
part
of
a
broader
plan
like
where
are
the
most
dangerous
ones
to
look
at,
and
I
think
we
need
to
do
more
of
those,
but
I
think
we
need
to
I'm
a
little
uncomfortable
taking
these
out
of
that
unless
staff
and
the
commission
decided
no,
these
are
the
most.
M
They
haven't
embedded
by
staff
and
two
we
do
have
other.
You
know
another
process,
which
is
the
community
action
forums
that
we
use
for
traffic
calming.
I
believe
we
are
working
on
traffic
stops
of
stop
signs
for
these
intersections,
so
this
would
just
go
with
that,
but
we
haven't
vetted
it
and
it's
not.
I
wouldn't
say
this
is
the
the
one
intersection
that
I
would
put
the
money
on,
because
it's
the
most
important.
O
I
don't
have
that
information
too.
I
think
each
of
us
probably
participated
with
a
consultant,
I'm
just
remembering
this
right
and
the
residents
in
each
district
about
and
getting
input
on
these
so
I'd.
Rather,
we
do
that
in
a
structured
way.
I
think
it's
an
important
thing
and
this
might
be
in
the
top
of
the
list,
but
I
don't
see
taking
those
one
out,
but
that's
a
separate
question.
Oh
just
picking
that
up
for
lit
up
instead
of
having
that
a
plan
for
how
we're
doing
them
based
on
safety.
C
If
they
submit
for
a
traffic
call
me.
M
M
C
And
that
would
cover
that.
Can
I
just
go
back
to
council
member
coors
comment
on
the
the
mizell
kitchen
center.
We
asked
for
in
any
of
the
as
well
as
the
palm
canyon,
theater
and
the
boys
and
girls
club.
We
have
to
see
I'd
like
to
actually
know
do
we
do
it?
Do
they
do
it?
How
does
that
work?
If
it's
our
building
but
they're,
you
know
under
tenant
improvements
right.
M
C
Out
correct
so
on
the
the
piece,
the
cultural
center,
the
palm
beach
cultural
center
sewer
lateral.
What
is
the
need
for
that?.
E
M
Just
like
the
other
projects
that
I've
mentioned,
that
we
would
look
at
them
and
we
may
either
ask
for
more
money
because
the
the
funding
is
not
adequate
to
support
what
the
request
was.
So,
yes,
it's
every
single
one
of
these
projects
falls
into
that
category.
Thank
you.
N
Thank
you
in
terms
of
the
road
diet
and
the
crosswalks.
One
thing
that
we
haven't
had
come
before
us
yet,
but
is
pending.
Is
that
pedestrian
safety
plan,
so
I
I
would
be
in
support
of
taking
those
off
for
now,
so
that
we
can
look
at
that
comprehensive
plan
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
working
on
well,
the
consultant
worked
on,
but
we
also
contributed
as
a
community.
So
I
think
that
would
just
be
a
little
more
helpful.
First.
N
M
From
my
perspective
record
club
road
diet,
it's
such
a
huge
project
that
it
would
be
completely
you
know,
we'd
have
to
first,
our
circulation
element
would
have
to
support
it,
and
if
it
doesn't,
we
wouldn't
even
do
the
project.
So
I
think
it's
way
too
early
to
even
put
money
aside
for
that
particular
project.
N
A
A
I
still
want
to
do
them,
but
council
member
hostage.
P
Thank
you.
I
support
that,
if
there's
some
urgency
there,
this
is
my
district
and
those
are
really
dangerous.
Intersections
the
neighborhood's
been
asking
for
a
long
time,
so
I've
personally
gotten
in
a
car
accident
in
one
of
those
intersections
after
years
of
lobbying
from
the
community
right.
Those
are
so
it
might
be
needed,
but
I
agree
on
a
comprehensive
plan.
The
problem
is
that
our
I
raised
this
up
the
last
time
when
we
were
talking
choosing
those
projects
that
it
isn't
a
comprehensive
engineering
driven
product
process.
It
is
all
that's.
P
Even
that
process
is
designed
by
the
community
and
community
requests
too
so,
but
yeah.
I
support
removing
those
ones
to
look
at
the
pedestrian
and
safety
plan
and
having
engineering
look
at
look
at
it,
but
knowing
that,
if
sometimes
when
we
defer
these
things,
they
just
go
away
and
never
come
back.
P
M
So
the
comprehensive
pedestrian
master
plan
and
the
local
road
safety
plan
will
be
coming
back
and
that
those
two
particular
plans
identify
areas
of
the
city
that
we
would
seek
to
to
improve.
Do
projects
for
and
in
the
cip.
I've
actually
have
line
items
requesting
funding
for
those
two
plans
so
that
we
can
build
it
up
over
the
five
years.
So
we
can
construct
those
projects
that
are
being
requested
in
those
plans
and.
C
So
for
the
record
club
road
diet,
you
know-
I
know
the
neighbors
have
worked
very
hard
on
that.
It's
in
the
plan.
It's
it's
recommended
in
the
plan
that
you're
bringing
forward
to
us.
Maybe
you
know,
leaving
the
funding
in
there
to
fund
projects
in
that
plan
might
not
be
a
bad
thing,
or
are
you
saying
that
you
are
going
to
come
up
with
alternative
funding
for
that
plan?.
M
In
the
capital
program,
the
five-year
cip,
there's
a
line
item
specifically
set
aside
for
local
road
safety
plans
and
for
pedestrian
plans.
So
I'm
asking
for
money
because
it's
such
a
huge
plan
both
of
them
there's
lots
of
improvements,
infrastructure
improvements,
we're
asking
for
funding
to
do
those
projects
over
time.
High
priority
most
risky
are
where
there's
more
danger
we're
going
to
work
on
those
first.
M
E
C
M
Is
no
no,
it's
unrealistic
yeah,
it
hasn't
been
vetted,
it
might
be
just
to
start
the
design
or
contemplating
the
project,
but,
as
I
said
in
the
local
road
safety
plan
and
the
pedestrian
master
plan,
some
of
these
have
been
identified
and
we
are
asking
for
funding
for
those
plans
separately
over
the
next
five
years.
C
Okay,
so
I
just
don't
want
it
to
be
lost,
I
think
is
councilmember
said
I.
A
C
E
O
I
mean
my
only
concern,
but
it's
on
all
of
this
right
is
what
we
just
heard.
Is:
there's
no
there's
in
staff
to
do
a
lot
of
these,
so
you
know,
and
then
on
right,
gazebo
or
pavilion
in
victoria
park,
I
mean
the
more
we
can
have
in
the
parks,
the
better
just
whether
that
should
be
part
of
if
you're
not
going
to
get
to
it
until
we
have
a
park
plan.
Does
it
make
sense
to
do
it
right
now,
because,
right
in
that
plan,
what
we
may
hear
is
actually
you
know
more
important.
C
All
right,
so
I
just
I
don't
know
if
I
agree,
but
I
could
be
the
lone
wolf
on
this.
C
A
park
plan
could
take
a
very
long
time
to
build.
We
put
this
out
and
it
was.
It
was
the
measure
j,
commission,
city
staff,
city,
council
members,
went
out
to
the
neighbors
and
said
tell
us
what
you
want
and
they
don't
have
full
information
they
and
we
gave
a
rating
system
of
which
they
would
get
points
for
things
right.
You
know
they're,
not
city
staff.
They
are
residents
who
know
what
they
want
or
what
they
desire
in
an
area.
A
gazebo
doesn't
do
anything,
it
can
be
moved.
C
O
C
Now
we're
we
were
down
to
17
and
we're
removing
a
few
of
them.
So
I
you
know,
I
just
think
the
process.
I
think
we
want
these.
I
definitely
want
to
see
these
community
projects,
but
I
don't
want
to
see
people
frustrated
with
city
council,
the
measure
j
or
city
staff
in
the
process
when
we
tell
them
we're
doing
it
one
way,
and
then
we
switch
and
do
it
another
way
already
into
the
process.
A
I
think
there's
clearly
some
issues
as
to
how
long
it's
going
to
take
us
to
put
together
a
large
master
plan.
If
we
set
aside
six
hundred
dollars
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
measure
j,
it
is
going
to
take
time
before
that
master
plan
gets
developed
and
before
this
would
be
implemented.
So
it's
basically
a
placeholder
at
this
point
and
if,
as
a
part
of
the
master
plan,
they
come
back
and
say
you
know,
is
gazebo
really
isn't
the
best
use
of
the
six
hundred
thousand
dollars?
A
N
Thank
you
mayor
to
to
go
along
with
that.
I
I
do
think
we've
one
thing
that
hasn't
been
fully
addressed,
yet
is
council
member
hostage's
comment
about
having
with
the
community
based
projects
a
library
about
parks
amount,
and
I
think
that's
what
we're
kind
of
hearing
with
this
is.
N
A
I
think
that
makes
sense,
would
it
be
appropriate
for
us,
since
we've
got
the
measure
j
commission
sitting
here,
to
ask
them
to
come
back
to
us
with
some
recommendations
regarding
revisions
to
the
process.
That
would
reflect
the
kind
of
conversation
that
we're
having
here
today,
all
right,
so
we
just
gave
you
some
more
work.
O
Yeah
and
I've
one
more
question,
especially
with
measure
j
here
so
given,
I
think
our
rec,
all
our
recollection
is
we
sort
of
had
a
motion
that
we'd
spend
three
million
dollars
when,
when
he
came
back
in
after
the
cuts
we
had
to
make
for
neighborhood
parks,
and
we
haven't
said
whether
that
would
come.
I
don't
think
we
said
where
it
would
come
from.
Was
there
general
fund
or
measure
j?
So
maybe
that's
something.
O
I'm
not
sure
what
the
best
process
is
to
figure
that
out.
Maybe
the
city
manager
could
could
weigh
in
because
that
could
cover
some
of
these
as
well
right
so
and
then
we
could
have
a
chance
for
them,
then,
to
discuss
the
process
for
an
ongoing
park
allocation.
L
Yeah,
so
this
might
fast
forward
a
little
bit
to
the
conversation
with
the
capital
improvements
plan
more
generally,
but
what
staff
have
anticipated
is
seeking
general
direction
from
council
exactly
along
the
lines
you're
discussing.
So,
for
instance,
if
council
said
we
wanted
to
pledge
three
million
or
perhaps
more
to
parks,
because
we
want
parks
to
be
a
focal
point
of
the
next
handful
of
years.
Progress
in
capital
construction.
L
I
think
the
first
thing
we
do
is
go
pull
the
projects
that
are
already
identified
for
parks,
some
of
which
you've
reviewed
today,
some
of
which
might
be
slated
for
future
years
and
then
start
to
look
at
it
and
analyze
number
one.
How
much
is
committed
help
really
paint
a
picture
right,
because
numbers
are
one
thing,
but
you
throw
a
shade
structure
and
a
gazebo
up.
L
O
J
P
Support
that
recommendation
by
staff-
I
think
that's
smart,
because
I
also
I
can't
sit
in
here
say
that
a
victoria
park
gazebo
is
more
important
than
xyz
other
needs.
So
I
think
that's
really
smart
and
you
know
yeah
we're
if
we
have
this
annual
pavement
rehabilitation
for
six
million
dollars
every
single
year.
You
know
personally,
I
think
that
the
park
investment
for
the
city
should
be
at
least
that,
if
not
more
so
yeah
some
some
planning
around
and
recommendations
from
staff
on
that
would
be
great.
Thank
you.
D
D
Right
and
particularly
around
community
initiative
projects,
just
a
reminder
that
they
came
from
a
variety
of
different
places,
so
some
of
the
parks
projects
came
from
residents,
some
of
them
came
from
commissioners,
some
of
them
came
from
staff,
and
so
there
is
kind
of
a
wide
variety
of
parks
projects
that
we
need
to
kind
of,
determine
you
know
one
scale
and
and
how
quickly
they
could
be
done,
but
I
think
there's
a
wide
variety
in
terms
of
urgent
needs
and
also
long-term
investments.
P
Thank
you
appreciate
that
vice
chair.
I
just
wanted
to
add
to
that,
because
I
think
that
there
are
some
projects
not
selected
recommended
for
other
funding
that
is
on
the
community,
initiated
projects
that
I
mentioned.
That
might
just
you
know,
be
included
in
a
parks
and
rec
or
maintenance
budget.
That
again
is
sort
of
sad,
sometimes
to
see
applied
for
so
yeah
staff
and
measure
jacob.
J
E
A
A
We're
going
to
discuss
next
meeting
the
gazebo
we
are
going
to
discuss
as
a
part
of
the
master
plan.
A
Okay,
the
16,
the
lighted
crosswalks
is
coming
back
to
us
next
week
and
17
the
mizell's
kitchen.
We
have
agreement
to
fund.
A
Center
all
right,
which
I
think
somebody
correct
me,
but
I
think
we've
completed
business-
that
involves
the
measure
j
commission.
C
I
have
to
recuse
myself
from
the
cultural
center
to
let
you
know
so.
I
can't
vote
on
that
screen
can't
hear
me.
I
have
to
recuse
myself
from
the
cultural
center
on
that
one
so
on
and
that's
fine.
I
just
want
to
go
back
and
say
on
the
community
initiative
projects
I'm
13
and
14
with
school
district.
I'm
not
necessarily
in
support
of
that
when
we
have
other
projects
that
are
demand.
That's
all.
P
Just
have
one
more
question:
the
people
called
in
about
the
animal
shelter
so
shade
and
other
animal
structure.
Animal
shelter
improvements.
Is
that
a
discussion
for
here
or
later
or
it's
already
included.
P
O
A
So
to
the
measure
j
commission,
thank
you
for
all
of
your
work
and
thank
you
for
taking
on
the
additional
work
that
we
have
given
you.
We
look
forward
to
hearing
your
recommendations.
A
Let's
take
10
minutes
to
do
the
movement
of
staff
back
to
the
seating
there.
Unless
there
are
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
everyone,
I
think
we
can
excuse
with
great
thanks
the
measure
j
commission.
A
There
and
get
started.
It
is
my
understanding
that
the
planning
commission
will
be
in
this
room
at
5
30
and
therefore
the
amount
of
time
that
we
have
limited
and
we
had
set
aside
30
minutes
for
the
transfer
of
this
room
to
the
planning
commission.
But
we
may
go
over
by
a
couple
of
minutes,
but
we
can't
go
about
over
by
very
much.
L
L
So
we
think
that
is
the
focal
point
of
the
conversation,
but
we
are
here
to
answer
any
other
questions
you
have
so
with
that.
I'd
like
to
welcome
veronica
or
sorry
victoria
to
the
zoom
room
who's
going
to
present,
and
if
pstv
could
please
queue
up
her
powerpoint.
I
will
be
flipping
through
slides,
so
victoria.
Just
let
me
know
when
to
advance.
Q
Yeah
justin
I'll
be
starting
on
slide.
Five.
Thank
you
justin
good
afternoon,
madam
mayor
members
of
the
city
council.
My
name
is
victoria
carpenter,
the
airport
administration
manager
and
I'll
be
presenting
the
five-year
airport
capital
plan
so
slide.
Five
gives
council
a
better
understanding
of
the
capital
projects.
Q
It
lists
the
projects
which
are
proposed
to
be
completed
over
the
next
five
years
for
the
airport,
starting
with
the
first
fiscal
year
in
fiscal
year.
22-23,
please
note
the
numbering
is
mislabeled,
so
please
reference
any
duplicate
lines
with
an
a
or
b,
for
example.
The
second
project
is
zero
emissions
and
infrastructure,
so
we
would
identify
it
as
item
2a.
Q
The
airport
is
one
of
the
city's
enterprise
funds
and
currently
operates
under
a
residual
agreement
where
the
airlines
collectively
assume
financial
responsibility
by
agreeing
to
pay
any
cost
of
running
the
airport,
including
capital
projects,
also
on
an
annual
basis.
The
airport
qualifies
for
entitlement
grant,
funding
provided
by
the
federal
aviation
administration
for
projects
that
best
carry
out
the
purposes
of
the
federal
airport
improvement
program
with
highest
priority,
given
a
safety
security,
reconstruction
capacity
and
standards.
Q
On
the
side,
you'll
see
the
first
nine
projects
highlighted
in
green,
which
are
the
proposed
fiscal
year
2223
budget
and
a
total
of
about
13
million
in
projects.
The
airlines
and
the
airport
commission
have
approved
approximately
5
million
in
special
capital
projects
and
the
ram
the
remaining
8
million
are
approved
by
the
faa
for
grant
funding.
Q
The
remaining
17
projects
are
for
future
years
and
the
total
for
the
estimated
five-year
plan
is
about
47
million.
Some
of
the
projects
identified
in
fiscal
year.
2223
include
terminal
upgrades
and
beautification
within
the
project.
For
instance,
item
3a
janitorial
equipment
replacement
will
include
intelligent
and
automated
systems
to
keep
the
facility
clean
item.
3B
design
baggage
claim
will
include
upgrades
to
carpeting
new
paint,
public
art
and
ada
improvements.
Q
Like
I
previously
stated,
some
of
the
projects
that
we
have
listed
on
the
airport
project
listing
is
has
other
projects
that
happen
within
it,
so
we
are
always
considering
beautification
within
the
projects
that
are
identified
on
the
screen.
So
thank
you
for
your
consideration
and
I'm
available.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
any
of
the
projects.
A
Q
The
capacity
improvements
for
the
restrooms
is
something
that
we
have
planned
for
this
fiscal
year
22-23
and
it's
actually
gonna
over
overlap
a
little
bit
and
I'm
sorry
in
this
current
fiscal
year,
that's
ending
at
the
30th
and
it
will
overlap
into
the
upcoming
fiscal
year.
So
that's
not
something
that
we
have
in
the
proposed
budget.
A
So,
given
that
how
many
projects
have
are
currently
underway
that
are
already
approved
and
not
a
part
of
what
we
are
being
asked
to
approve
now.
Q
Q
The
other
items
is
an
automated
vehicle
inspection
system.
That's
going
to
help
improve
some
of
the
ground
transportation,
including
tnc's,
which
are
the
the
transportation
network
community.
That's
so
there's
some
items
there
that
is
going
to
be
considered
on
our
land
side.
Q
That's
going
to
be
making
improvements
to
improve
the
passenger
experience
and
we're
also
going
through
a
common
use,
upgrade
that's
happening
here
and
it's
going
to
overflow
to
next
year,
which
actually
allows
the
gates
at
each
of
the
concourses
to
have
the
airline
share
the
gates
so
that
the
customers
can
have
more
room
to
sit
inside
of
the
hold
rooms.
They
can
have
a
better
experience
with
relaxing
and
waiting
before
they
hop
on
a
plane
right.
Now,
it's
a
little
congested
in
there,
the
the
carpets
look
like
they
need
100
replacement.
Q
It's
a
little
bit
outdated
when
it
comes
down
to
the
way
the
look,
the
design
the
design
is
great,
but
the
look
of
it
needs
to
have
some
new
paint,
some
new
colors,
some
new
carpeting.
Q
So
with
this
common
use,
installation
we're
going
to
be
opening
up
the
whole
rooms,
adding
additional
seating,
and
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
different
from
your
normal
chair,
seating.
We're
gonna
try
to
put
in
some
actual,
like
nice,
mid-century,
modern,
couches
and
and
areas
for
our
passengers
to
be
able
to
work
and
actually
plug
in
and
utilize,
their
their
phones
for
charging
and
and
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
different
things
that
are
going
to
happen
within
the
whole
room
area.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
You've
got
one
million
dollars
devoted
to
landscaping.
How
much
of
that
will
involve
turf
removal
to
move
to
desert
scape.
Q
Yes,
well,
that
was
just
a
projected
amount
that
we
have
you
you
may
have
seen.
We
are
already
starting
kind
of
killing
off
the
grass
there
within
the
airport,
there's
some
areas
that
we've
stopped
watering
on
so
we're
already
starting
to
plan
for
that,
so
that
we
can
eventually
put
in
the
desert
landscaping.
Q
Maybe
you
and
other
customers
residents
have
seen
that
we
went
and
did
a
demonstration
garden
right
at
the
the
main
focal
point
of
getting
into
the
airport
so
that
we
could
save
on
water
from
watering
the
grass
and
we
put
in
a
lot
of
desert
landscape
there.
So
we're
planning
on
doing
the
same
thing
at
other
areas
around
the
airport,
where
you
see
grass.
A
I
applaud
that.
I
would
also
suggest
the
earlier
that
we
can
make
known
to
the
public
what
our
plans
are
in
terms
of
turf
removal
to
desert
scape
that
we
get
that
out
there
to
the
public.
There
are
an
awful
lot
of
folks
that
are
very,
very
interested
in
seeing
that
happen.
At
the
same
time,
we
also
have
a
number
of
folks
who
believe
that
grass
is
a
part
of
the
original
design
of
the
airport,
and
we
want
to
be
respectful
of
both.
A
But
clearly
the
need
to
to
be
more
water-wise
is
something
that
all
of
us
believe
in
council
member
course
great.
O
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
those
comments
and
nice
to
meet
you
and
thanks
for
your
work.
So
two
two
things
one.
So,
as
you
know,
you
talked
about
some
of
the
beautification
things
and
I
know
we're
going
out
to
bid
for
new
concessions.
O
And
the
only
other
question
is,
I
know
for
several
for
years
there's
been
discussion.
I
know
the
airport
commission
I've
heard
from
some
of
them.
You
know
just
wanted
us
to
start
looking
at
what
would
be
needed
to
have
customs.
O
I
think
you
know
there's
particular
interest
in
flights
with
mexico
both
for
tourism,
but
for
a
number
of
people
with
family
and
friends.
O
So
I
know
that's
not
in
here,
but-
and
I
know
it's
a
long
process.
I
just
wonder
if
there's
any
plan
to
start
the
process
at
all
right,
because
until
we
start
it
I
know
we
we
tend
to
put
some
things
off,
because
it's
such
a
long
process.
So
I'm
just
wondering
what
the
thinking
or
discussions
or
current
updates
on
that.
Q
Yeah
absolutely
good
question
to
do
the
planning
process.
For
that
I
believe
you
will
see
on
the
the
powerpoint.
I
want
to
say
it
is
item
4b
the
master
plan,
ngi
implementation
phase,
one.
Q
Q
So
we
are
looking
into
that
already
and
we
are
already
kind
of
future
planning
ahead
for
that.
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you,
victoria.
I've
heard
great
things,
so
I
appreciate
the
work
that
you're
doing
over
there
and
I
appreciate
the
previous
comments
from
the
mayor
and
council
member
coors.
Just
item
number
five
beige
claim,
redesign
and,
and
then
14.
I
take
it,
they
follow
each
other.
One
is
the
design
and
two
is
the
construction
or
one
excuse
me,
number
five
is
the
design
and
then
14
would
be
the
construction
of
it.
C
Q
Yes,
absolute
question,
so
when
we
go
through
the
master
plan,
that
is
absolutely
one
thing
that
we're
going
to
consider
like
the
location
of
our
consolidated
running
consolidated
rental
car
facility.
Q
We
are
already
in
discussions
with
our
our
rental
car
facilities
in
regards
to
potentially
relocating
them
to
a
temporary
spot
until
we
build
out
the
conrack,
so
we're
kind
of
already
starting
that
design
and
our
that
discussion
of
it.
The
conrack
is
contingent
on
the
airfield
design
and
we
want
to
get
it
right.
C
Great,
no,
I
I
agree,
I
think
it's
congested
there
right
now.
I
think
what
that
master
plan
looks
like
is
of
the
utmost
important,
because
we
have
an
identity
to
our
airport,
that
people
love
the
little
dog,
the
kids
play
area
the
dog
park
and
everything
that
we've
got.
There
is
fantastic
and
I've
gotten
great.
Compliments
on
that.
Thank
you,
but
I
think
the
overall
design,
so
it
doesn't
look
piecemeal,
is
cohesive
in
its
scope,
so
having
an
overall
design
before
doing
it,
I
think
is
excellent
in
doing
that.
C
In
regards
to
bringing
in
you
know
the
customs
that's
needed
for
more
flights.
The
thing
that
I
would
say
is
our
incentive
program
should
be
an
incentive
program
also
on
the
type
of
jets
that
they
bring
in.
We
have
an
enormous
amount
of
residents
who
live
underneath
the
flight
path,
both
on
the
arrival
and
the
departure
end
of
it
and
ensuring
that
we
can
bring
in
and
mitigate
any
noise
as
efficiently
and
possible,
while
potentially
increasing
the
carrier
capacity
would
be
of
the
utmost
importance
to
me.
C
P
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
I
just
have
a
few
questions
about
projects
that
are
listed
that
are
proposed
for
future
years,
so
the
first
is
number
17
hvac
efficiency
upgrades.
If
you
could,
please
explain
more
about
that
and
then
also
number
23
terminal
improvements,
carpet
replacement
and
24
ada
compliance
renovation.
If
you
could
just
detail
those
and
why
they
weren't
selected
to
be
funded
now.
Q
Yeah,
absolutely
so
the
hvac
efficiency
upgrades
that
one
is
so
that
we
can
replace
some
old
equipment
that
we
think
eventually
is
going
to
fail
us
so
prior
to
that
happening,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
planning
for
that,
but
it's
also
previous
pro.
That
was
a
previous
project
that
was
contingent
on
facilities.
Q
So
that
is
one
thing
that
we
have.
You
know
projected
for
our
future,
our
future
projects
and
then
the
terminal
improvements
placement,
so
there's
different
areas
of
the
terminal
that
would
potentially
need
those
carpet
replacements
and
in
one
case
one
is
adjacent
to
the
baggage
claim.
Then
there's
other
carpet
areas,
that's
leading
up
to
that
baggage
claim
area.
So
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
getting
it
piece
by
piece
and
also
putting
in
the
same
type
of
carpet
all
around
the
airport
as
much
as
we
can.
Q
Q
So
as
we
do
projects
like,
for
instance,
when
we're
going
through
our
bathroom
improvements,
we're
definitely
going
to
focus
on
some
ada
compliance,
but
we
will
fund
that
year
over
year
as
well
in
our
operating
budget
as
well.
Q
P
P
We
got
very
behind
on
maintenance
and
it
was
very,
very
stained
throughout
the
terminal
and
then
ada
obviously
raised
that
that's
just
constant,
but
so
I
just
flagged
those
as
maybe
urgent
needs,
and
I
know
we
got
behind
so
I'm
wondering
what
the
planning
is
to
make
sure
that
we
always
have
beautiful
carpet
and
working
ac
and
all
of
those
maintenance
needs
absolutely.
Those
are.
Q
Great
concerns,
so
we
definitely
have
to
have
the
staff
to
help
us
address
some
of
those
items.
So
we
have
projected
out
the
hvac
efficiency
upgrades
during
fiscal
year
23-24
and
then,
as
far
as
the
other
terminal
improvements
we
are
trying.
We
council
recently
approved
a
a
contract
with
a
vendor
to
help
us
with
cleaning
the
airport
and
receive
positive
feedback,
especially
from
like
online
and
social
media,
that
people
have
noticed
a
difference
in
the
cleanliness
of
our
facility.
Q
So,
while
the
the
carpet
replacement
isn't
projected
to
until
fiscal
year
25-26
we
do,
we
are
focusing
on
that.
We
are
focusing
on
the
carpets
and
keeping
it
clean.
We
definitely
want
to
have
a
clean
airport
for
our
passengers
and
the
ada
compliance.
P
Thank
you
and
I
raised
this
before.
I
just
think
this
is
very
much
the
time
to
invest
in
our
airport
as
we're
seeing
higher
and
higher
passenger
levels,
and
I
think
that
we
need
to
retain
those
passengers
and
I'm
concerned
that
the
way
that
we've
fallen
behind
on
capital
improvement,
you
know,
gives
a
lesser
passenger
experience
than
we
might
be
able
to
because
of
the
funds
available.
So
yeah
appreciate
your
work
on
this
and
appreciate
staff
kind
of
analyzing.
P
C
Q
It
may
not
be
that
much
and
you
are
correct.
There
is
some
some
design
components,
but
I
don't
think
it
got
that
far
in
design.
There
was
a
lot
of
work
that
was
done
that
isn't
consistent
with
the
current
operation
of
our
environment.
Now,
so
we
need
to
do
that
again.
C
Okay,
and
as
far
as
the
baggage
handling
the
baggage
claim
design,
you
know,
we've
just
upgraded,
our
baggage
handling
are
behind
the
scenes,
and
how
does
that
integrate
with
that.
Q
They're
they're
kind
of
two
separate
projects,
they're
two
separate
locations
but
ideally
function.
The
same
way
the
baggage
handling
system
is
taking
the
bags
to
the
plane
versus
the
baggage
claim
system
is
dropping
the
bags
off
after
our
passengers
have
a
ride
to
palm
springs
airport.
So
it's
a
little
bit
different,
it's
more
of
like
a
carousel
versus
like
a
conveyor
belt
system,
but
ideally
the
same
thing.
We
just
it's
something
that
needs
to
be
designed
and
specked
out
and
even
look
at
future
growth
and
incorporate
that
into
the
design.
A
So
if
there
are
no
more
questions
or
comments,
do
we
have
consensus
and
approval
to
move
forward
on
this
all
right,
then,
I
think
that's
what
we
needed
to
provide
in
the
way
of
direction
victoria.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
work
and
for
everyone
else's
work
at
the
airport.
L
L
But
there
was
some
conversation
in
previous
sessions
about
the
interplay
between
those
so
for
at
least
this
one
slide,
I
just
want
to
focus
on
what
I
think
are
your
three
available
buckets
of
funding
and
they're
all
a
little
different,
both
in
terms
of
you
know
where
they
come
from,
how
they
work
and-
and
they
tie
a
little
differently
to
the
city
manager,
recommendations
and
whatever
is
left
that's
available.
So
the
first
is
the
general
fund
available
fund
balance,
so
those
are
accumulated
dollars.
L
Revenues
over
expenses
from
previous
years-
as
I
know
you
understand,
but
to
make
sure
the
community
watching
also
understands
so
those
are
generally
one-time
dollars
available
for
one-time
uses,
the
the
what
we
project
for
available
revenue
over
expenses.
So
so
what
we
do
is
you
know
we
forecast
revenues
and
then
we
estimate
expenses
that
include
some
nominal
increases
right,
so
labor
costs
increase
as
we
approve
new
mouse
with
our
bargaining
units,
fuel
prices
increase
supplies.
L
Sometimes
you
know
during
periods
of
inflation
etc,
but
before
we
start
to
add
new
expenses
that
nets
out
at
an
available
7.5
million
dollars
in
revenue.
So
I
know
there
was
the
the
way
this
was
covered
in
the
press.
The
first
time
I
presented
maybe
created
an
incomplete
perception
of
where
we
are.
The
good
news
is,
after
accounting,
for
those
increases
in
costs
that
I
just
described.
L
There
is
still
some
money
left
and
that
money
enables
the
city
to
invest
in
services,
and
that's
very
positive,
and
the
growth
in
the
budget
overall
is
is
substantial,
but
again
7.5
left.
After
you
know,
the
increases
to
the
base
budget
in
the
context
of
our
general
fund
is
about
five
percent.
It's
not
a
huge
windfall
of
money,
and
it's
not
enough
to
cover
all
of
the
things
we'd
like
to
invest
in
so
while
this
is
a
good
thing
that
we're
talking
about
where
we
can
invest
additional
dollars
rather
than
needing
to
cut.
L
So
just
for
one
year,
that
amount
might
be
two
million
dollars
less,
but
generally
speaking
in
all
future
years,
these
these
funds
can
generally
flow
from
the
general
fund
to
the
capital,
but
not
vice
versa.
So
when
you
have
accumulated
fund
balance,
you
could
spend
zero
to
45
million
dollars
to
enhance
the
available
funding
in
the
capital
fund
and
on
an
ongoing
basis.
You
could
spend
an
additional
7.5
on
top
of
the
two
that
you
generally
already
commit
next
year,
being
potentially
an
exception.
L
So
so
that's
really
the
flexibility
that
you
have
to
enhance
the
capital
funding.
I
also
want
to
point
out
that
the
capital
fund
is
comprised
of
numerous
sources,
the
most
significant
of
which
is
really
measure
j
for
a
stable,
ongoing
source
of
revenue.
But
in
the
staff
report
we
outlined
a
number
of
other
sources
like
measure
a
that
contribute
to
those
available
funds.
Almost
half
comes
from
grants.
Those
grants
can
be
pretty
substantial
when
you
have
things
like
major
bridge
projects
and
even
dog
parks
and
libraries.
L
You
know,
I
think
we
have
the
potential
to
get
as
much
as
half
of
our
funding
from
grants,
but
the
total
available
amount
certainly
can
fluctuate
year
to
year,
depending
on
the
types
of
projects
that
we
have
contemplated
and
how
successful
we
are
receiving
grants.
So,
that's
probably
you
know
a
generally
reliable
number.
We
predict
we'll
have
that,
certainly
over
the
next
five
years
of
the
cip,
but
just
the
caveat
there
that
it
is
subject
to
change
any
questions
so
far
about
the
pots
of
money
or
how
they
relate
to
one
another.
L
L
That's
correct,
so
that's
found
in
the
fund
balance
so
just
to
make
sure
it's
clear
what
we
do
is
we
forecast
the
revenues,
look
at
look
at
the
budget
and
then
decide
you
know
what
is
a
reasonable
fund
balance.
This
budget
currently
is
built
on
a
20
reserve,
but
we
build
that
reserve
by
looking
at
ongoing
operating
expenses.
In
other
words,
we
back
out
some
of
the
large
grants
that
are
in
the
general
fund,
because
you
don't
really
need
a
reserve
for
for
grant
dollars.
L
So
if
you
were
to
look
at
it
as
a
percentage
of
the
total
budget,
it
may
be
a
little
closer
to
15..
So
it's
in
that
15
to
20
window,
which
is
reasonably
conservative,
especially
as
we're
seeing
signs
that
the
economy
may
not
be
as
strong
in
future
years
as
as
it
is
now
and,
of
course,
council's
discretion.
If
you
wanted
to
increase
that
measure
of
protection
found
in
the
reserve
balance,
we
also
do
have
the
calpers
set
aside.
That
is
separate.
L
L
We
believe
that
is
pretty
close
to
taking
care
of
the
entire
unfunded
portion,
but
we're
also
proposing
that
we
hire
a
consultant
for
relatively
low
cost,
probably
10
15
thousand
dollars.
That
will
come
back
and
refine
that
analysis
and
also
present
a
handful
of
options
to
city
council
on
how
to
approach
the
set-aside,
in
other
words,
whether
to
sit
on
it,
whether
to
actually
pay
down
some
of
the
liability,
whether
to
invest
the
funds
or
or
take
other
various
approaches.
But
but
you
should.
L
A
O
L
No,
that's
part
what
we're
going
to
determine
as
we
conduct
this
analysis,
but
recognizing
that
some
of
the
pension
formulas
have
changed
right
and
as
our
workforce
evolves.
Hopefully
what
we're
collecting
now
for
new
employees
is
covered,
so
the
unfunded
portion,
the
set-aside
on
top
of
that
is,
is
really
what
we
need
that
set
aside
for.
I
I
think
the
goal
most
likely
is
to
smooth
out
that
number
right.
L
What
we
probably
want,
pending
confirmation
from
council,
is
to
make
level
payments
so
that
there's
no
balloon,
there's
no
big
surprise
where
all
of
a
sudden,
you
owe
a
lot
and
you
haven't
prepared.
We
think
the
30
million
that's
set
aside,
depending
on
exactly
how
it
works
for
us
over
that
amortization
period,
will
cover
a
decent
amount
of
that
unfunded
liability
that
you
won't
need
to
keep
putting
in
six
million
say
for
the
next
10
years,
maybe
the
next
year
or
two
pending
that
analysis.
Okay,.
O
No
that's
helpful
and
I
just
want
to
share
it
just
briefly
and
I'll
send
the
link
to
you,
but
on
the
california,
mayor's
coalition
state,
treasurer,
fiona
ma
sort
of
did
a
preview,
and
then
I
have
two
live
modules
for
elected
officials
and
staff
on
calpers
and
pensions
and
options
and
they're
doing.
I
think,
a
series
of
six
or
seven-
and
I
started
watching
the
first
one,
which
you
know
especially
seven
years
ago,
would
have
been
so
helpful
because
I
couldn't
have
told
you
anything
about
them.
O
So
it's
a
good
thing
and
we
should
share
it
with
council
and
you
know
appropriate
staff
as
well.
So
I'll
get
you
that
it
just.
L
Okay,
we
ready
to
move
on
okay,
so
the
first
thing
I
want
to
focus
in
on
the
general
fund
recall
that
you've
got
about
45
million
in
one
time
and
7.5
roughly
in
ongoing
revenues
over
expenses.
Again,
that's
subject
to
change,
depending
on
how
the
economy
changes
and
how
revenues
shift
just
to
make
clear
when
the
the
city
manager
recommendations,
especially
for
the
ongoing
costs
that
are
primarily
staffing.
L
Those
come
from
a
combination
of
council's
priorities,
listening
to
community
concerns
and
then
occasionally
there
are
things
that
staff
may
see
that
the
community
or
council
doesn't
right
a
facility
that
we're
familiar
with
that's
you
know
in
need
of
restoration
things
like
police
radios.
That
might
not
be
evident
to
someone
else,
but
most
of
these
come
from
really
hearing
our
residents
talk
about
what
they
need,
whether
that's
through
their
representatives
to
city
council
or
literally
firsthand,
when
we're
at
stakeholder
meetings.
L
What
have
you
so
if
we
hear
that
the
downtown
is
not
as
clean
as
it
used
to
be,
and
the
council
says
we,
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
investing
to
keep
up
with
that.
We
go
to
the
staff
team
and
say
what
does
it
take
to
do
a
better
job,
maintaining
the
downtown
and
then
they
come
back
and
say:
we'd
like
one
additional
crew,
so
that
we
have
a
better
seven
day
per
week,
operation
and
someone
that
can
kind
of
move
around
the
downtown
and
make
sure
we're
keeping
it
clean.
L
So
so
I'm
just
pointing
out
that
while
well
there
are
these
different
sources
of
recommendations
and
we've
segregated
the
lists.
Really,
this
is
is
certainly
a
blending
of
all
of
the
people
in
the
community.
Our
commissions,
our
council,
and
even
what
we
call
staff
recommendations
are
really
meant
to
reflect
your
priorities
more
than
our
ideas
right
so
and
and
those
recommendations.
Right
now
that
when
we
went
to
staff
and
said
what
is
it
going
to
take
to
meet
some
of
these
new
priorities?
L
And
these
things
we
talked
about
came
back
with
about
10
million
in
requests,
so
right
off
the
bat
we
had
to
cut
that
back
to
meet
what
we
think
is
the
reasonable
available
resources,
so
that
proposes
funding
about
7.5
and
and
not
funding
about
2.3
or
4,
depending
on
exactly
how
you
look
at
it.
So
that's
the
first
way
that
your
list
is
is
segregated.
L
The
city
manager
recommendations
that
we've
presented
to
you
previously,
along
with
a
kind
of
explanation,
and
then
the
second
part
of
the
list
to
make
sure
you're
aware
are
the
other
requests
that
staff
feel
are
needed
at
some
point
into
the
future.
And
then
the
third
component
of
the
list
that
we're
going
to
look
at
are
things
that
have
come
up
in
our
budget
discussions
or
or
in
other
ways,
primarily
the
budget.
L
Some
were
very
specific
suggestions
from
council
members
and
some
were
more
like
inquiries,
like
you
know,
making
sure
we're
accounting
for
future
economic
development
costs
or,
while
we've
added
a
staff
member
to
our
sustainability
program,
we
haven't
really
programmed
money
for
the
climate
action
plan.
Yet
so
there
really
are
a
lot
of
costs
to
anticipate
into
the
future.
L
All
of
that
added
together
leaves
us
at
about
a
10
million
deficit
and
some
of
the
items
don't
have
dollars
associated
with
them
yet,
or
these
are
broad
placeholders.
So
just
again
to
put
this
in
the
context
of
abundance
or
scarcity,
the
good
news
is,
we
can
invest.
You
know
seven
and
a
half
plus
million
dollars
into
services,
but
it
is
not
enough
to
to
handle
everything
we'd
like
to
do
and
that
we
think
our
residents
need
and
deserve.
L
So
here's
the
start
of
that
list
again
your
two
reference
points.
The
numbers
of
available
funding
is
at
the
top
roughly
45
and
one
times
7.5
in
ongoing,
and
then
we
get
into
the
list.
The
exercise
here
is
very
similar
to
what
we
just
went
through
to
the
extent
we
have
some
consensus
or
majority
on
what
is
in
and
what
is
out.
Those
things
will
be
reflected
in
future
budget
conversations
and
budget
adoption,
anything
that
needs
more
conversation.
L
We
defer
until
a
later
date
and
again,
if
we
make
no
decisions
at
all,
it's
okay,
it
just
means
that
there
would
be
an
amount
unallocated
in
the
budget.
So
as
far
as
we
can
get
down
this
list,
it
will
be
reflected
in
the
future
budget
documents
and
whatever
we
don't
get
to
will
bring
back
to
you
on
the
16th.
L
N
L
My
understanding
is
no.
That
was
something
that
again,
we
had
heard
numerous
kind
of
conflicts
and
things
emerging
and
wanting
to
increase
the
level
of
service
for
some
of
our
recreation
programs
and
thought
that
some
court
attendants
jeannie
can
expound
on.
This
would
be
helpful
in
increasing
that
level
of
service.
B
This
recommendation
came
from
staff
in
the
recreation
department
and
it
was
suggested
that
we
create
a
a
roving,
a
couple
of
ish
couple
of
positions
that
would
be
roving
park,
attendants
that
could
go
and
check
to
make
sure
that
the
parks
are
being
used
as
a
for
their
intended
purpose
and
that
permits
are
being
issued
accordingly
and
whatnot
and
then
for
the
courts.
B
We
we
had
so
much
community
input
for
pickleball
and
tennis
that
we
suggested
that
this
position
would
be
helpful
to
be
more
attentive
to
the
courts
and
be
on
site
be
able
to
help
them
now.
We've
heard
some
conflicting
feedback
from
the
community
on
whether
they
want
this
position
or
not,
but
we
still
believe
that
that
this
would
be
a
strong
help
to
have.
N
Okay,
thank
you
so
much
just
another
question
for
you.
N
B
N
Okay,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
using
the
looking
at
this
properly.
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
there's
for
the
expense
is
not
recommended
to
be
added.
I
saw
there's
a
downtown
maintenance
worker
justin.
So
is
this
not
recommended
because
we
have
enough
right
now.
I
know
that,
for
instance,
the
downtown
park
people
have
been
saying
hasn't
been
kept
up
enough,
but
obviously
we
do
have
funding
for
two
or
more
roaming
parks
people,
so
that
might
take
care
of
that.
Just
want
to
make
sure
we
have
enough
downtown.
L
People,
so
when
you
look
at
the
first
list,
the
the
blue
color
you'll
direct
you
to
number
18
and
19.
that
does
contemplate
three
to
the
downtown
three
crew.
What
was
requested
was
four.
So,
as
we
were
trying
to
balance
this
across
the
board,
there
were
some
instances
where
requests
like
that.
We
said
we
really
do
feel
like
we
need
another
crew,
but
but
maybe
we'll
have
to
get
by
with
three
instead
of
four
just
to
try
to
stretch
the
dollar
and
and
and
make
sure
we
can
invest
in
some
of
the
other
priorities.
N
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
for
the
other
requests
for
expenses
to
be
added.
There's
a
lot
on
here.
I
know
we
we
gave
you
quite
a
bit,
so
I
I
guess
what
I'm
struggling
with
is
is
kind
of
how
we
give
you
the
car.
You
know,
because
we
have
a
what
10
million
dollars
that's
kind
of
available
if
we
accepted
staff
recommendations
and
then
wanted
to
do
more.
Is
that
correct.
K
L
Represented
on
the
left-hand
column
of
the
of
the
two
on
this
chart
about,
35
is
recommended
to
be
spent,
but
that's
really
ideal
for
one
time,
but
not
ongoing,
because
those
dollars
accumulated
in
previous
years
but
aren't
expected
to
come
in
every
year.
So
really
we
have
about
10
million,
with
no
recommendation
for
one-time
things,
but
when
you
look
at
the
numbers
on
the
right
out
of
the
7.5,
the
cm
recommendations
total
7.1,
so
that
only
leaves
a
few
hundred
thousand
dollars.
N
Okay
and
some
of
these
I
mean
it
does
make
sense.
A
lot
of
those
in
yellow
are
almost
all
of
them
are
ongoing,
but
I
do
wonder
if
there's
an
ability
to
move
forward
with
some
of
these
things.
For
instance,
we've
talked
a
lot
about
teen
18
programs.
We
don't
do
a
lot
of
that
right
now
like
would
we
be
able
to
put
a
set
aside
some
one-time
funds
to
get
it
started,
see
how
it
goes.
N
Maybe
look
for
grants
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
grant
money
available,
specifically
for
violence,
prevention
or
workforce
development
with
our
with
teens,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
some
one-time
money
can
just
get
us
started
and
then
maybe
we
can
see
where
we
go
from
there
or,
if
kind
of
how
staff
use
things
like
that.
L
Yeah,
so
it
does
get
a
little
complicated
to
start
look
at
looking
at
the
overall
budget
and
assessing
how
aggressive
is
it?
Is
it
and
how
conservative
is
it
right
so
where
we
build
in
some
more
conservative
practices
or
places
like
the
reserve
balance
or
front
loading,
some
of
the
funding
for
things
like
deferred
maintenance,
most
of
those
dollars
won't
be
spent
at
once.
L
Another
good
example
and
it's
a
one-time
source,
but
the
10
million
for
affordable
housing
unlikely
to
be
spent
entirely
in
a
year,
and
so,
if,
if
something
happens
over
the
course
of
next
year,
those
funds
can
be
used,
they
can
be
shifted
to
ongoing
costs.
While
we
wait
for
the
economy
to
recover,
that
gives
you
some
flexibility,
but
the
more
you
allocate
ongoing
money
with
the
hope
that
the
economy
will
grow
or
will
come
up
with
grants.
L
So
the
answer
is
yes,
but
but
within
some
reason,
if
we
did
a
lot
of
that
and
the
7.5
and
ongoing
became
8,
9
10
and
we
didn't
have
a
source
identified,
I'd
start
to
probably
caution
council
that,
especially
with
a
recession
likely
in
the
next
two
years
and
already
industry
folks
in
the
community
saying
things
are
a
little
different
than
the
real
banner
year.
We
we
just
had.
We
just
want
to
be
careful.
N
A
Know
we
are
going
to
get
short
and
we've
got
a
lot
to
cover
a
couple
of
questions
in
two
very
different
areas.
A
L
That's
a
really
good
question
when
we
look
across
the
board,
part
of
what
we're
doing
again
is
assessing
priorities
from
council's
perspective
in
the
community,
and
then
there
is
a
bit
of
an
analysis
saying
what
is
the
gap
right
and
so
sometimes
big
departments
that
already
have
a
lot
of
resources
nevertheless
have
a
substantial
gap,
one
of
those
that
is
not
yet
defined.
As
the
police
department,
the
police
department
had
some
requests.
L
Some
of
those
were
put
into
the
recommendations,
some
of
those
not
in
part
because
we're
about
to
undertake
a
department
review
and
should
be
bringing
you
a
scope
of
work
soon
to
so
that
we
can
look
at
calls
for
service
and
decide.
Should
they
be
traditional
police
officers
should
they
be
different.
So
that's
a
big
one
where,
depending
on
the
level
of
service
expectation,
the
the
department's
involvement
in
homelessness
and
their
initiatives
to
reduce
crime
could
be
substantial.
L
The
other
things
that
I
highlight
are
the
areas
where
council
has
high
priorities,
but
very
low
capacity.
Sustainability
comes
to
mind.
Economic
development
comes
to
mind
and
housing
comes
to
mind.
Those
are
three
really
big
and
potentially
expensive
programs.
Where
collectively
we
have
two
or
three
staff
members,
they
don't
need
to
be
built
out
to
be
20
person
teams,
but,
as
you
know,
affordable
housing
can
be
expensive
and
things
like
climate
action,
depending
on
how
aggressive
the
city
wants
to
be,
can
be
expensive.
A
And
because
it's
top
of
mind
for
me,
are
you
satisfied
that
the
investment
of
three
additional
people
for
maintenance
in
the
downtown
area
is
sufficient.
L
It's
really
difficult
to
know.
If
that
will
be
enough,
some
depends
on
whether
the
economy
continues
to
grow
and
we
continue
to
see
more
visitors,
but
we
do
think
it
will
be
a
noticeable
difference,
because
my
understanding
is,
it
enables
us
to
be
present
every
day
of
the
week
equally
opposed
to
having
some
gaps
in
the
week.
A
Very
good,
okay:
I
want
to
jump
into
a
different
area.
We've
got
10
million
dollars
set
aside
for
potentially
a
transfer
to
affordable
housing.
What
have
we
spent
in
the
past
in
this
area?.
L
L
L
Really
zero.
There
was
already
allocated
a
position
meant
to
be
split
between
homeless
services
and
housing.
We're
proposing
each
of
those
become
full
positions,
but
that
would
give
one
dedicated
and
then
lots
of
bits
and
pieces
of
planners
and
city
managers
and
community
development.
But
but
that's
not
a
department.
A
So,
in
normal
times,
I'd
stretch
this
out
to
a
half
a
dozen
questions
and
take
a
little
more
time,
but
I'm
going
to
cut
to
the
chase.
A
L
So
the
ideas
for
funding
that
wouldn't
be
resource
intensive
would
be
things
like
purchasing
lots
that
might
be
developed,
especially
larger
ones
that
might
be
well
suited
as
gifts
to
non-profits,
for
leveraged
projects
like
tax
credits
and
honestly
at
today's
prices,
that
could
be
two
parcels
and
two
projects
and
the
money
would
be
gone.
Yeah.
A
Would
it
not
be
more
appropriate
for
us
to
look
at
what
would
be
a
sustainable
number
over
four
or
five
years,
as
opposed
to
a
one-time
infusion
that
we
don't
have
the
capacity
to
spend
and
that's
a
judgment
I'm
I'm
offering,
but-
and
I
don't
know
any
where
anyone
else
is
going
to
be
on
that.
But.
A
O
But
on
that
I
think
just
the
two
projects
we
did
in
the
last
year,
or
so
were
like
8
million
and
10
million
dollars
to
get
the
now
aloe
used
to
be
agave
and
the
one
at
dap
health
plus
2
million
in
land
to
chalk.
But
that
was
just
in
this
year
and
those
three
as
a
result
of
that
extra
money,
after
not
being
able
to
get
it
especially
chalk
got
the
federal
tax
dollars.
So
we're
not
running
those
programs
at
a
staff
level
but
having.
O
I
would
be
very
easy
if
we
had
10
million
to
see-
and
we
let
nonprofits
know
we
have
that
available,
because
they
need
that
local
match
to
get
the
federal
and
state
funding.
So
without
that
there
it's
not
going
to
happen
right.
So
I
think
you
know
if
we
want
to
see
10
projects
built
over
the
next
five
years,
we're
going
to
need
to
probably
put
in
almost
that
amount
every
year
right
I
mean,
if
that's
a
real
priority,
which
I
think
it
is
we're
going
to
it's
a
lot.
O
P
P
So
I
think
it's
bold
and
I
support
I'm
putting
away
a
significant
amount
for
a
housing
fund,
since
we've
spent
it
over
the
last
few
years
in
significant
amounts.
There
is
a
lot.
I
would
just
ask
that
we
leverage
all
the
state
funding
that
is
available
because
so
much
is
coming
down
from
the
state,
but
it
does
sometimes
require
a
local
match.
P
A
P
Oh
two:
I
got
it.
Okay,
I
only
slept
three
hours
last
night
and
I'm
gonna
lose
it
again,
looking
at
a
revenue
source
for
our
housing
fund.
So
I
know
the
council
has
talked
about
doing
impact
studies
or
studying.
You
know
how
to
use
a
portion
of
tot
to
go
directly
into
the
fund,
because
without
a
revenue
source
we're
going
to
just
have
to
keep
building
this
taking
away
from
other
community
services.
I
mean
to
be
honest,
so
I
would
like
to
see
us
at
least
I
think
we're
bringing
that
forward.
P
O
I
have
some
on
other
things,
but
not
that
so,
if
you
were
still.
A
Then,
just
to
close
the
circle
on
this,
I
hear
you.
I
want
us
to
take
and
make
commitments
in
this
area.
A
I
am
going
to
really
struggle
to
agree
to
10,
but
I
I
may
not
be
in
the
majority
on
that.
So.
O
Go
through
just
my
stuff,
quick
just
on
the
court
attendance,
those
were
budgeted,
I
think
in
1718
and
1819
or
two
of
the
years
and
just
never
happened
and
part
of
it
was,
and
then
you
know,
during
covid
we
sort
of
computerized
or
had
a
system
for
people
to
actually
reserve
courts.
Part
of
it.
You
know
not
everyone
and
people
who
are
working.
O
You
know
they
maybe
have
an
hour
they
can
play,
and
there
were
some
issues
that
ruth
hardy
that
got
pretty
intense
with
people
who
sort
of
felt
they
had
the
courts
in
season
from
8
to
11
and
no
one
else
could
play.
I
know
they
didn't
want
a
court
attendant
when
that
happened,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
other
people
who
felt
and
to
be
able
to
set
up.
O
You
know
one
person
who
plays
tennis
but
doesn't
really
you
know,
moved
here
or
no
others
so
to
help
facilitate
some
of
that,
and
then
I
think,
parks
and
rec
also
wanted
that
position
to
make
sure
the
courts
were
clean.
The
lights
were
working
that
kind
of
stuff.
So
that's
just
the
history
I
just
wanted
to
to
share.
I
mean
one
thing:
that's
I
don't
even
think
that's
on
here.
O
I
guess
it's
in
the
yellow
is
you
know
an
extra
communication
staff
person
right
which
we
talked
about
because
it's
a
great
example
we
talked
about
with
measure
j,
there's
so
much
amazing
work
every
time.
I
want
to
call
whether
it's
right
with
the
jam
breakfast
or
any
of
the
business
groups,
and
I
hear
from
staff
and
just
amazed
at
all
the
great
work-
that's
happening
that
we
don't
get
into
the
weeds
on.
So
we
don't
always
know,
but
if
we
don't
know
it,
the
public
doesn't
know
it.
O
So
I
just
wanted
to
raise
the
importance
of
that.
I
think
for
the
community
and
to
know
things
in
that
piece.
You
know
the
problem
is,
and
I
appreciate
that
you
had
to
say
no
to
some
stuff
that,
ideally
we
do
in
the
green,
but
there's
a
lot
in
the
yellow.
We
know
after
the
study
there's
going
to
be
additional
police
staffing,
that's
going
to
happen
annually.
O
We
just
know
that's
going
to
happen
if
we
don't
set
that
aside
now,
and
especially
if
there's
a
recession-
and
you
know
hearing
from
some
of
the
business
that
you
know
may
may
june
july,
or
not
looking
like,
they
did
the
last
two
years
for
businesses
and
hotels-
and
you
know
those
huge
jumps
right.
We
might
hopefully
just
flatter
the
little
increases
and
you're
being
conservative,
but
they
could
go
the
other
way.
O
So
you
know
you
see
that
I
mean
some
of
the
big
numbers
right:
climate
action
numbers,
affordable
housing
staff,
which
you
know
can
be
somewhat
offset
by
being
able
to
put
out
and
say
we
have
money
and
land
available
and
let
the
nonprofit
housing
developers,
affordable,
housing
developers
do
that
work.
You
know
the
wreck,
you
know
youth
and
teen
programs.
O
You
know
some
of
them
are
smaller
numbers
they're
all
important
and
that's
where
it's
a
challenge
right,
but
I
do
think
you
know
we're
adding
some
to
police
now
a
lot
more
to
fire
now.
But
we
know
after
that
study.
That's
where
we're
short
right.
Our
city
is
not
the
city
that
we're
staffed
at
currently
in
that
department,
and
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
a
really
thoughtful
look
at
how
you
what
the
best
staffing
is
to
deal
with
some
of
the
issues,
including
homelessness
and
mental
health
as
well
as
crime.
O
O
I
don't
know
the
answer
for
it
comes
from
right
now
and
I
think
that's
a
longer
conversation
that
we
could
do
in
12
minutes,
but
that
that's
what
really
jumped
out
to
me,
some
of
those
some
of
those
areas,
and
especially
in
the
sort
of
police
area.
A
C
Make
it
quick,
I
support
17,
a
pro
an
engineering
project
manager.
I
think,
with
the
the
amount
of
the
city
manager
said
that
we
have
are
doing
the
new
project
measure.
J
people
want
to
see
it
kind
of
quicker.
Rather
than
later,
that's
really
important.
I'm
questioning
project
number
30..
You
can
come
back
with
more
information.
The
fiber
optic
master
plan.
You
know
cvag
as
I'll
have
an
update
at
one
of
our
meetings
is
putting
in
kind
of
a
middle
mile.
C
I
don't
know
if
that's
last
mile
what
it
is,
what
it
looks
like
where
it
fits
into
that,
but
I'd
like
a
little
more
information.
It's
it's
not
that
much
money,
but
we
then
we
have
to
have
money
to
implement
it.
I
think
you
know
you
talked
about
it
earlier
number
37,
additional
calpers
reserves.
C
L
C
So
just
leaving
it
as
zero
doesn't
give
us
a
true
budget.
I
don't
think
so.
We
can
guesstimate
of
that.
I
just
didn't
know
we
can
get
more
information
on
the
security
services
at
the
three
rec
centers.
I
don't
know
what
it's
needed
or
why
it's
needed,
or
just
kind
of
better
information.
C
I
just
want
to
know
why
we're
not
funding
firefighters
or
whatever
the
reason
that
is
you
can
come
back.
I
don't
need
it
now:
police,
behavioral
specialist.
You
know
I
know
we
have.
I
think
we
have
three
people
now
that
deal
with
homelessness
right
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
also
to
deal
with
homelessness.
On
top
of
that.
L
C
C
C
We
continue
to
kind
of
expand
and
grow
without
really
being
coordinated
enough
to
really
know
what
the
long-term
vision
is
with
smart
cities
and-
and
you
know,
all
the
new
things
that
we're
talking
about
walking
to
grocery
stores,
and
all
of
that
so
I
think
that
position
might
be
might
be
important.
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
P
Thank
you,
madam
mayor
I'll,
just
raise
in
a
list
like
that.
I
also
had
questions
about
13
and
14.
The
park
attendant
park,
ranger
and
court
attendant
and
if
we
might
just
think
of
you
know
having
general
park
attendance
and
having
them
rotate
or
seeing
what
the
need
is,
but
that's
up
to
staff
recommendation
I'd
just
like
more
information,
also
heard
from
community
members
asking
about
a
local
hire
program
or
something
like
that
for
those
positions,
because
people
need
those
jobs.
P
Support
everything
else,
that's
included.
I
also
had
raised
the
firefighters
and
the
difference
between
the
six
and
the
nine.
I
saw
the
explanation
in
the
staff
report
that
was
really
helpful,
so
if
we
could
just
have
a
further
discussion
about
that
together
at
the
next
meeting
and
hear
from
the
chief
and
in
you
to
the
city
manager.
P
I
had
also
flagged
the
literacy
corner
coordinator.
I
think
that
there
are
some
really
minimal
investments
that
we
can
make
that
are
so
worth
the
payoff
and
so
for
me,
I
have
circled
a
lot
of
things
on
this
yellow
list,
too
literacy
coordinator
making
that
full-time.
I
did
know
in
the
staff
report
it
looked
like
there
was
a
fee
based
preschool
program,
and
I
wanted
information
about
that.
P
Obviously
I
had
asked
at
a
previous
city
council
meeting
if
we
can
really
think
more
progressively
about
how
we
provide
services
to
our
community
and
not
charge
not
have
so
many
things
be
fee
based
because
there
is
such
a
need
in
the
community
and
we
have
a
lot
of
people.
You
know
cost
of
formula
is
so
much
and
it's
you
know
it's
it's
it's
nice
to
provide
some
free
services
when
we
can
I've
circled,
guaranteed
income
pilot
program.
I'd
like
to
have
that
conversation
with
the
council.
P
You
know
I
had
circled
student
internship
program,
waiving
fees
for
non-profits,
25
000,
but
think
as
an
investment
from
us,
but
think
about
the
benefit
generated
from
the
community.
Doing
work
in
our
city,
which
they
don't
currently
do,
I
think,
is
worth
the
investment.
P
Other
things
I
heard
from
the
community
is
the
diversity
manager,
sustainability
associate
climate
action
plan.
I
very
much
would
also
like
to
discuss
the
capital
campaign
contribution
for
dap
health
and
teen
programs.
I
had
circled
as
well
74
support
regional
housing
fund
through
cbag.
P
I
know
the
city
manager
discussed
with
greg
rodriguez
who
works
for
cvag
for
housing
first
and
our
housing
work
homelessness,
work,
but
is
going
to
go
to
the
county
and
work
there
full-time,
leading
the
homelessness
efforts
and
they
with
lift
to
rise,
are
doing
a
regional
housing
fund,
and
so
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
think
through
if
it's
10
million
or
5
million
or
whatever
the
amount
is
for
housing,
a
way
that
we
can
set
some
of
that
into
that
fund,
which
is
the
loan
loss
reserve
to
fund
other
housing
because
we're
sitting
on
cash
frankly
that
could
be
used
to
invest
in
housing
projects
moving
forward.
P
I
think
that's
it.
Obviously,
there's
section
14
reparations
here.
That's
just
left
blank,
that's
a
conversation
that
council's
had
that
we
haven't
settled
on
an
amount,
but
to
leave
it.
Blank
leaves
not
a
lot
of
room
there
for
those
conversations,
so
I
really
appreciate
I'll
say
that
city
manager
for
jumping
in
and
being
you
know
a
year
into
the
job,
and
I
know
this
was
a
hard
budget
and
I
think
that
you
did
a
really
good
job
and
all
of
staff
on
looking
for
efficiencies
and
way
to
improve
services.
N
Thank
you.
I
know
I
said
I
wasn't
going
to
say
anything
else.
One
of
the
things
too
that
I
was
looking
at
is
just
we.
We
do
have
a
lot
of
of
park.
Maintenance
positions,
and
one
thing
I
was
just
curious
about-
is
just
more
information
about
why
we
anticipate
the
number
of
them
that
we
have,
because
I
know
that.
N
Obviously,
we've
raised
this
many
to
christina
I've
raised
it
many
times
the
the
need
for
it,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
what
they're
going
to
do,
because
we
have
a
bunch
of
different
parks
positions
and
I
just
am
not
exactly
sure
what
each
of
those
roles
will
be.
So
if
we
can
get
more
clarification,
I
think
that
could
help
us
as
well.
C
No,
I
just
I
just
want
to
add
to
mayor
pro
towns
idea.
You
know
the
parks
and
recreation
up
plan
up.
Excuse
me,
the
park
and
recreation
master
plan
update
that
could
not
only
be
facilities,
but
it
could
be
programs
so
that
we
can
look
at
what
the
needs
are
for
the
program,
because
that
leads
to
what
facilities
are
right
and
I
think
the
two
are
very
combined.
So
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
that.
A
So
let
me
give
you
some
of
my
themes.
One
we've
already
talked
about
parks
and
recreation
master
plan.
I
think
that's
really
important
and
needs
to
be
prioritized.
A
We've
made
a
significant
investment
in
homelessness
over
the
last
year
and
I
think
we
need
to
continue
to
double
down
on
that
investment
and
make
sure
that
we
get
this
issue
resolved
and
resolved
correctly.
There's
a
there's,
a
million
things
we
would
like
to
do
until
we
get
homelessness,
addressed
and
truly
resolved.
A
A
I
prefer
that
we
spend
four
to
five
years
to
get
to
10
million
dollars
in
funding
for
additional,
affordable
housing.
But
that's
that's
my
view.
Last
thing
we're
adding
an
awful
lot
of
staff.
That's
a
major
investment.
A
We've
got
to
make
sure
that
we
have
the
reserves
in
place
so
that
if
the
economy
does
turn
south,
which
it
may
very
well
that
we're
not
facing
a
decision
like
we
had
two
years
ago,
where
we
had
to
cut
staff,
we've
got
to
make
sure
we
have
enough
money
in
reserve
so
that
we
can
hold
out
for
two
or
three
years
of
recession.
If
that's
what
happens?
I
don't
believe
that's
a
20
percent
reserve.
It
is
something
substantially
north
of
that.
L
So
anything
we
do
outside
of
the
aryan
blue.
If
it's
an
addition,
there's
probably
some
reconciliation
that
needs
to
happen.
So
you
know
anything,
that's
in
green,
anything,
that's
in
yellow
or
anything
that
was
mentioned.
That's
not
on
the
list
that
that
becomes
funded,
probably
needs
to
come
out
of
somewhere
right.
That's
not
to
assume
the
things
in
blue
are
more
important.
It
just
happens
to
be
roughly
equal.
O
One
thing
I
would
note
if
we,
which
I
think
we
did
if
we're
going
to
take
2
million-
that
we're
not
going
to
transfer
for
capital,
it
sort
of
reduces
the
radio's
right
number
and
we
have
a
million
for
measure
j.
So
just
that
doesn't
help
us
in
the
issue.
We're
really
dealing
with
it's
sort
of
one-time
funding
right,
but
it
gives
us
a
little
more
room
there
for
things
that
will
come
up
because
they
always
do.
O
No,
I
think
you
having
those
here
are
ways
we
could
scale
back
on
some
things
that
we
think
are
doable
but
like
what
were
the
first
things
you
scale
back,
so
we're
making
informed
decisions
right
and
then
you
know
we
talked
about
the
money
on
the
capital
side
for
parks
as
well
that
we
previously
allocated
so
which
would
eat
up.
You
know
the
money
was
just
another
dollar
yeah.
You.
C
O
So
so
just
so,
we
have
that
you
know
to
make
sure
we're
talking
about
that.
L
I
I
will
try
to
set
us
up
for
probably
more
like
two
hours
instead
of
an
hour
on
the
16th,
so
that
we
can
really
do
some
of
this
work
and
the
capital
fund
work
and
again.
However,
far
we
get
we'll
lock
that
in
for
the
30th
most
likely,
so
we
can
have
a
hearing
and
adopt
a
budget
and
then
every
decision
that's
not
made
at
that
point,
we'll
be
having
conversations
throughout
the
year.
O
And
is
the
the
general
fund
giving
that
staffing
other
things
one?
We
need
to
probably
land
on
sooner
than
the
capital.
L
L
So,
yes,
I
think
that's
one
of
the
reasons
we
start
with
this
fund
and
then,
with
the
time
left,
we
move
to
capital,
where
it's
more
likely
to
be
general
direction,
rather
than
very
specific
something's
in
or
something's
out,
so
that
that
is
the
focus
so
to
the
extent
that
council
members
also
want
to
do
some
of
that
work
between
now
and
next
meeting
to
identify
things
that
you
might
trade
within
these
lists
or
or
any
other
way,
you
might
look
at
it
to
identify
things.
L
C
One
final
question:
I
think
I
heard
from
myself
and
from
others
that
the
public
affairs,
a
digital
communications
manager,
might
be
an
important
position,
but
we
also
have
number
seven,
which
is
the
branding
and
marketing
discretionary
thing
and
number
fifteen,
and
I'm
wondering
if
they
couldn't
do
that.
That's
two
hundred
thousand
dollars
most
of
it's
advertising
whatnot.
But
if
that
can't
be
done
through
a
new
position
here
versus
outside,
you
know,
because
that
that
would
pay
for
the
number
50.
C
and
we'd
have
extra
to
do.
Exit
advertising.
L
The
only
caveat
there
is
some
of
the
the
left-hand
column
is
really
it
should
be
one-time
and
the
other
ongoing.
So
some
of
the
branding
one
of
the
reasons
it
was
easier
to
build.
That
in
is
because
we
had
a
larger
bucket
of
available
one-time
money
than
we
have
a
bucket
for
ongoing
money.
But
but
we
will
look
at
how
we
might
massage
those
things
all
right.
P
L
Yes
and
again,
to
the
extent
that
council
members
are
already
invested
in
looking
at
that
list
and
identifying
areas
where
you'd
like
to
see
more,
it
would
be
helpful
to
identify
some
areas
where
we
might
be
able
to
do
less
so
that
we
can
balance
that.
But
that's
another
area
that
staff
could
probably
come
up
with
some
areas
that
we
think
would
be
the
easiest
to
cut
back,
to
create
space,
to
have
additional
investments
and
things
like
parks.
P
Thank
you
so
for
that
that
would
be
helpful
having
an
attachment
explaining
some
of
those
projects,
because
we
don't
have
a
ton
of
detail
on
them
right
here.
I
know
it's
in
the
plan
overall,
but
some
of
these
we
funded
in
the
past
and
they
were
deferred
right,
some
of
them
weren't,
so
some
of
them
are
brand
new
to
me.
P
I
don't
know
what
skyling
railings
mean
right
so
that
level
of
detail
in
that
way.
We
can,
because
I
completely
agree
with
the
public
comments,
that
our
playgrounds
are
in
such
terrible
shape
and
there's
just
holes
in
them
where
there
should
be
water
features
and
things
like
that
so
yeah.
I
would
love
to
to
talk
about
that
more
in
depth
at
the
next
meeting
for
any
of
the
members
of
the
public
who
are
interested
in
that.
Thank
you.
C
And
one
other
question
about
the
future
meeting.
I
see
measure
j
decided
not
to
fund
the
rainmaker
fountain,
which
I
think
is
in
disrepair
right
now.
Is
it
going
to
come
back
as
something
funded
elsewhere.
A
We
are
adjourned,
everybody
be
safe
out
there
and
our
congratulations
to
our
friend
and
colleague,
us
well,
we'll
just
say:
council
member
wholestitch.
For
now.