►
From YouTube: Architectural Advisory Committee | June 19, 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
B
A
D
A
Those
opposed
thank
you,
since
this
is
a
public
meeting
audience.
Members
are
permitted
to
comment
on
an
eye
on
any
issue
that
is
within
this
committee's
purview.
Comments
on
an
item
appearing
on
today's
agenda
are
made
at
the
time
the
item
is
presented.
If
you
want
to
speak
on
an
item
that
is
not
on
today's
agenda,
you
may
speak
now.
Each
speaker
has
three
minutes.
B
A
Okay,
so,
under
an
finish
business
item,
resina
v,
LLC
for
a
planned
development
district
and
a
minor
architecture,
application
for
construction
of
a
soundstage
and
outdoor
music
venue
at
the
monroe
hotel
this
item
there
will
be
no
action
on
this
item
today,
since
we
don't
have
a
quorum.
I
would
have
to
recuse
myself
and
that
makes
it
less
than
the
quorum.
A
So
at
this
point,
when
we
proceed
to
unfinished
business
item
number
three
TAC
woods:
Canyon
investors
LLC
for
a
proposal
to
remodel
the
courtyard
at
Palm
Springs,
including
demolition
of
the
three
buildings,
construction
of
the
two
multi-tenant
commercial
buildings
and
improvement
of
landscape
and
hard
scape
areas
on
tap
wits
staff
report.
Thank.
E
You,
madam
chair
and
committee
members
I,
shall
we
call
at
your
March
6th
and
April
3rd
meetings.
You
reviewed
this
project
and
at
your
upper
third
meeting,
you
actually
denied
the
project,
as
it
was
presented
for
a
number
of
issues
related
to
the
architecture,
massing
scale,
roof,
design,
building
composition
and
generally
the
architectural
vocabulary.
In
response
to
that,
the
applicant
has
submitted
a
revised
proposal
and
made
some
adjustments
to
the
architecture
as
well
as
the
landscape.
E
The
revised
architecture
is
I'll
start
with
that
on
the
big
screen
here,
the
revised
architecture
includes
buildings
that
conform
to
the
35
foot
height
limit.
They
do
propose
all
flat
roofs,
with
the
exception
of
the
curvilinear
roof
element,
which
is
near
the
middle
of
each
building
facing
talk
wits.
So
that
is
one
element
that
does
remain.
E
The
other
risks
were
previously
shed
risk,
however,
those
have
been
revised
to
be
a
flat
roof
design
and
as
a
result
of
lowering
the
overall
building
height,
which
again
the
35
foot
height
was,
is
measured
from
the
sidewalk
to
the
top
of
the
curvilinear
element.
The
other
roofs
are
now
lower,
ranging
with
it's
ranging
around
the
22-foot
area.
22
foot
height
limit.
E
E
This
is
an
existing
stone
element
to
try
and
raise
up
so
you
can
see,
but
this
is
the
existing
stone
that
exists
within
the
center,
and
so
what
the
repose
in
is
is
this
stone
here
and
Varion
band
sizes,
so
they're
proposing
three
six
and
nine
inch
band
sizes,
and
you
can
see
some
kind
of
how
that
composition
is
on
the
elevation
in
this
exhibit
and
on.
The
screen
here
see
also
revise
the
color.
E
Previously
it
was
a
gold
er,
a
gold
tone
color
and
so
now,
they're
going
towards
a
brownish
gray
color,
which
is
a
bit
more
in
relation
to
the
existing
block.
The
other
materials
do
include
anodized,
aluminum
windows
that
are
painted
this
this
color
here,
it's
kind
of
a
mustard
yellow,
and
then
you
have
the
the
there's.
The
proposed
wood
siding
as
well
as
wood
doors
for
the
entries
off
of
chocolates,
and
you
see
the
wood
door.
Those
would
be
custom
doors
at
the
entries
for
each
ten
space.
E
E
E
And
this
exhibit
here
does
it
shows
the
section
through
a
north-south
section
through
the
newly
proposed
buildings
and
the
three-story
buildings
behind.
So
you
see
where
the
roof,
the
flat
roof,
is
approximately
at
the
second-story
top
of
the
second-story
balcony
there
or
the
third
story
balcony
at
the
bottom
of
the
third
story
balcony.
E
E
Some
of
that
still
exists,
but
is
predominantly
a
linear
design
in
terms
of
its
layout
along
chocolate's
Canyon
way.
There
were
some
comments
related
to
the
location
of
the
fire
pits
and
the
seating
area
is
potentially
intruding
on
the
public
sidewalk
area.
So
the
applicant
has
moved
some
of
that
back
closer
towards
the
site
and
created
a
nice
wide
sidewalk
area
along
top.
It's
Canyon
way,
so
you
can
see
that
here
in
some
of
the.
E
E
They
are
also
are:
they
do
still
propose
to
install
a
water
feature
near
the
center
along
chocolates.
They
are
considering
or
willing
to
take
recommendations
on
the
center
water
feature
between
the
buildings
and
may
install
planting
instead
of
another
water
feature,
so
there
are
open
to
some
revisions
there
if
the
water
feature
is
not
desired.
E
There
were
some
comments
about
the
type
of
planting.
There
was
a
comment
with
regard
to
the
what
was
the
fern
that
was
used
that
has
been
removed
or
excuse
me
at
the
cypress,
and
so
with
these
changes
staff
reevaluated
the
project
under
the
architectural
review
guidelines
and
felt
that
the
project
did
comply
with
those
guidelines
and
prepared
that,
for
you
and
your
staff
memo
with
that
I'm
available
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
I
know
the
African
is
here
and
would
like
to
do
a
presentation
on
the
project,
and
that
concludes
my
report.
F
William
azzolino
for
the
applicant
ocean
properties.
We've
made
a
number
of
adjustments
to
the
project
in
light
of
the
conversations
and
comments
from
the
committee,
and
we
think
we
satisfied
planning
staff
and
address
the
committee's
concerns.
We
think
it's
a
well-balanced
project
and
we
would
hope
for
your
approval,
happy
to
answer
any
specific
questions
may
have
of
me
other
than
that.
A
C
F
Parking
structures
is
to
the
theater.
All
of
the
circulation
still
goes
through
the
main
central
central
focus
area.
We've
converted
that
from
a
Serie
area
that
had
a
much
larger
area
with
steps,
we've
added
a
Rampton
on
both
sides
of
the
plus
a
water
feature
in
the
center
and
it's
partially
shaded
for
a
good
portion
of
that
central
corridor.
The
walk
is
approximately
25
feet
longer
than
the
way
that
would
have
gone
the
other
way
around.
So
it's
almost
an
equal
distance.
F
A
So
could
you
describe
sort
of
a
a
Performa
of
when
you
were
considering
that
the
people
who
will
be
coming
to
the
restaurants?
Would
they
be
walking
here
or
the?
Would
they
be
parking
in
the
back
and
then
coming
through?
The
courtyard
are.
F
We've
left
them
an
unobstructed
walkway,
that's
about
12
feet
wide,
which
is
double
the
normal
city,
sidewalk
with
to
meander
down
or
walk
past
the
property
and
walk
in,
but
it's
assumed
in
general
that
people
will
come
and
go
from.
Most
of
the
traffic
will
come
and
go
from
the
existing
parking
structure.
Okay,.
F
F
We've
assumed
that
a
single
tenant
might
want
to
take
all
of
it.
If
it's
a
you
know,
the
tenant
fields
of
the
market
is
here
for
it,
so
that
is
an
option
for
them
to
take
it
all,
if
not
it's
designed,
so
that
each
space
can
have
its
own
independent
entry
and
own
independence
on
it.
Excuse
me
so.
F
Okay,
it's
a
I
can
tell
you
more
or
less
giver.
It's
about
18
feet
clear
by
the
time
you
allow
for
structure
and
a
drop
ceiling
in
that
space
on
the
flat
side
of
it
will
be
about
16
feet
and
in
the
mid
section
where
the
ceiling
goes
from
a
low
side
to
a
high
side,
it
will
be
about
four
feet
to
12
feet,
to
10
feet
higher
on
the
other
side,
so
it
would
be
about
22
feet
on
one
side
and
call
it
32
feet
on
the
other
side
of
the
bay.
A
F
A
F
Probably
designed
1500
restaurants
so
I'm
reasonably
experienced
that
design
them
from
the
five-star
restaurants
in
the
Fairmont
Pullman
Dubai
to
local
restaurants
in
all
over
the
valley
in
California
and
the
general
height
that
people
want.
Is
they
want
in
the
range
of
14
to
16,
feet
clear
and
then
that
allows
them.
F
They
do
hanging
of
ceiling,
fixtures
other
pieces
of
art,
whatever
they
want,
and
then
it
just
depends
on
the
theme
as
to
whether
they
want
to
have
a
very
high
restaurant
ie
here
or
a
lower,
more
intimate
one,
but
they
can
drop
their
ceilings
as
they
require.
We
have
a
variety
of
bands
that
are
on
the
face
of
the
building
in
the
high
space
so
that
they
chose
to
drop
a
ceiling.
It
looks
as
though
that
they
don't
see
the
ceiling
against
the
glass.
F
F
A
little
bit
of
both
on
we,
we
had
conversations
with
a
couple
of
tenants
that
wanted
some
higher
space
I'm
that
one
of
the
the
ability
for
their
spaces
if
they
got
large
number
of
bar
patrons,
so
that
the
upper
spaces
can
absorb
the
heat
in
addition
to
what's
being
hit
on
the
building
without
having
to
add
a
lot
of
add
added
air
conditioning
load,
and
so
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
blend
of
both
we've
dropped,
the
building
from
what
it
was
previously
by
about
fifteen
feet
in
height,
and
it
seems
to
be
acceptable.
F
D
A
D
F
We
haven't
designed
one
at
the
present:
it's
a
it's
a
skewed
roof,
so
it
makes
doing
a
mezzanine
a
little
bit
more
difficult,
but
it
can
be
done
even
in
an
18
foot
high
space.
So
there's
nothing
to
prohibit
somebody
other
than
they'd
have
to
come
back
and
ask
for
more
square
footage.
We'd
have
to
do
structural
work
for
it.
It's
not
designed
into
the
project.
At
present,
it's
designed
to
be
a
single
single
storey,
tenancy
space
of
present,
okay.
D
D
Actually,
one
I
lied.
One
additional
question,
I
think
a
second
water
feature
was
mentioned
and
I
was
just
having
a
problem
locating
where
it
was
or
the
option
for
one.
Where
is
that
all
the
way?
At
the
back
kid.
F
D
F
Centers
or
you're,
anticipating
there
is
that
what
I'll
call
a
flat
fountain
means
that
the
water's
about
half
an
inch
thick
and
we're.
Basically,
it's
dropping
over
and
there'll
be
little
drops
of
water
that
go
into
just
to
create
patterns
on
the
on
the
stub,
what's
essentially
a
stone
surface
that
has
a
little
bit
of
water
cascading
over
it
smoothly
at
here.
Okay,
so
it's
not
a
it's.
A
very
low
water
usage
feature
got.
A
F
Have
outdoor
seating
on
either
side
of
it?
We
have
requirements
for
ad
a
ramps
and,
and
we
can't
go
any
further
into
the
site
than
we
have
now,
and
that's
that
space
is
actually
relatively
narrow
for
an
outdoor
plaza.
It's
you
know
it's
comfortable
for
this
scale
of
project,
but
it's
not
a
large
area,
so
we
really
put
seating
about
as
far
back
down
into
it
as
we
are
comfortable
with
being
is
it's
the
landlord
erosion
property
owns
both
buildings
if
they
want
to,
they
could
obviously
allow
additional
tables
to
come
out
onto
that
area.
F
We've
allowed
some
to
spill
out
at
the
back
restaurant
as
well
and
with
the
idea
that
if
they
have
a
large
function,
people
can
pull
additional
table
work
out
into
the
into
the
courtyard
area,
which
is
really
the
more
sheltered
area
from
Sun,
etc.
So
it's
more
usable
space
year-round
and
then
in
middle
area
we've
allowed
for
you
know
if
somebody
wants
to
have
a
small
band
or
whatever
or
three-piece
combo
some
time
for
some
entertainment,
whatever
that
they
could
do
that
there,
in
conjunction,
for
example,
with
a
Film
Festival
or
whatever.
F
G
F
F
G
G
And
the
front
of
the
building
has
a
lot
of
skill
in
its
architecture,
its
elevations
and
the
two
towering.
You
know
architectural
features
and
as
well
as
how
you
have
delineated
the
center
feature
and
I
guess
slash
art
feature.
That's
there
right,
I
just
feel
like
the
landscape
is
not
helping
to
scale
the
building.
Is
there
anything
proposed
that
I
were
not
seen
for
landscape?
To
help
kind
of
you
know,
give
the
architecture
a
little.
G
A
F
Say
there
is
not
a
lot
of
tall
architecture
other
than
the
major
trees
along
the
street,
now
there's
softening
in
planters
that
are
adjacent
to
the
building
along
the
street
frontage,
but
you
have
mostly
patio
sitting
areas
and
we've
surrounded
those
patio
sitting,
areas
with
softening
materials,
including
you
know,
the
fire
features
on
the
ends
to
kind
of
frame
the
the
property
and
then
providing
greenery
all
the
way
at
pedestrian
level,
but
in
terms
of
tall
trees.
The
answer
is
no
little.
F
I,
like
I,
published
a
little
Landscape
Architect
talk
about
this.
This
is
Harry
of
expertise,
so
let
Tom
talk
about
it.
I've
liked
the
quality
of
the
landscaping
materials
that
have
gone
in
he's
worked
with
the
owner
and
the
city
in
the
discussion
of
that.
So
it's
really
he's
really
bitter
best
to
describe.
But
if
you
don't
mind
all.
G
H
H
What
the
modifications
that
we've
done
recently
was
number
one
to
keep
this
clear,
walkway
space
of
at
least
12
feet
wide.
You
know
along
the
front
of
the
building
so
from
the
planters
and
curb
at
least
there's
a
continuous
walkway
that
goes
along
the
front
of
the
building
to
allow
flow
through
traffic,
but
in
terms
of
larger
materials
up
near
you
know
the
front
of
the
building
or
along
the
elevations.
The
only
place
that
we've
really
included
plants
that
have
some
height
to
them
are
in
the
corners
where
the
building
turns
some
angles.
H
Those
are
some
of
the
taller
madagascar
palms,
but
out
in
the
hardscape
area,
it
was
our
really
desires
is
to
let
the
architecture
speak
for
itself
and
also
allow
visibility.
You
know
to
the
project
we
didn't
want
to
kind
of
bury
it
behind
any
trees,
but
use
most
of
the
landscape.
As
a
silhouette
against
the
building
itself,
with
up
lighting
and
really
I,
think
this
kind
of
shows,
when
you
get
the
palm
trees
in
scale
or
showing
the
palm
trees
or
along
the
street,
it
really
brings
that
height
of
the
building
down.
G
G
H
I
could
no,
it
was
basically
to
soften
around
the
edges
and
then,
where
we
had
some
walls
to
silhouette
some
taller
plants
against
those,
but
really
keep
that
space
between
the
patio
areas
and
the
street
open.
E
C
H
H
G
H
In
that
Central
Corridor,
and
there
is
an
exhibit
there
that
shows
the
actual
overhang
of
the
existing
building,
so
that
space
along
the
rear
of
the
building
is
actually
quite
narrow,
and
it's
kind
of
our
opportunity.
If
you're
within
that
space,
that
we
there
is
a
nice
view
to
the
west
kind
of
a
framed
of
you
yet
to
the
mountain.
But
you
know
where
you
can
see
the
hatch
pattern.
There
that's
all
covered
as
you
come
from
the
parking
structure
and
then
even
coming
off
at
the
existing
buildings.
H
You
can
see
it
doesn't,
leave
us
a
whole
lot
of
space
and
between
there-
and
you
know
the
site-
we've
been
working
with
our
client
in
the
owner
to
really
emphasize
a
lot
of
the
site.
Furnishings
so
they'll,
be
you
know,
areas
of
large
pots
in
plant
material
in
inside
of
those
we're
working
with
a
designer
to
pull
all
that
together.
So
we'd
have
some
large-scale
design
elements
that
would
help
provide
some
additional
interest
in
color
into
the
project.
C
F
F
C
C
G
F
F
F
It
doesn't
protrude
above
the
line
of
the
existing
buildings.
It's
basically
flush
with
the
top
of
those
buildings
and
in
fact
the
rear
building
is
actually
about
five
feet
taller
than
than
we
are
at
present.
So
it's
I
think
it's
a
small
amount
of
interest
without
creating
a
lot
of
problem.
Okay,.
B
A
D
In
the
in
that
light,
yes,
this
is
the
third
time
we've
seen
it
and
I
want
to
be
respectful
of
moving
the
project
along
I
think
it
definitely
will
bring
some
life
to
to
that
complex,
which
has
been
somewhat
lifeless
as
long
as
I
can
remember.
I
think
we've
exchanged
comments
back
and
forth
over
the
last
three
sessions
and
I
have
a
feeling
that,
or
a
sense
that
you
know
we
got
some
some
of
the
things
that
we
were
looking
for
in
reducing
the
overall
height,
especially
on
the
curvilinear
sections.
H
D
To
achieve
things
in
a
retail
environment
and
on
a
busy
street
at
40,
I
think
five
miles
an
hour
or
better.
Are
they
the
same
decisions
that
I
would
have
made,
or
we,
as
a
committee,
would
have
made
if
we
were
designing
the
project?
Maybe
not,
but
my
feeling
is.
This
is
as
good
as
it's
going
to
get
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
bad
at
all.
Just
maybe
not
exactly
what
I
would
have
ultimately
like
to
ended
up
with,
but
I
think
it's
got
a
good
chance
of
being
successful.
D
C
Tahquitz
canyon,
revitalized,
I,
think
it's
great
as
far
as
the
revitalization
goes,
I
think
it's
great,
and
this
is
a
recommendation
to
Planning
Commission,
so
overall
I
would
recommend
approval.
I
would
also
recommend
that
the
applicant
continue
to
respond
to
the
context
of
Wexler
architecture
as
well
as,
what's
across
the
street,
the
tahquitz
canyon,
the
Hugh
Kaptur
buildings,
I
think
there
can
still
be
an
improvement
on
the
architecture
to
speak,
a
little
more
to
Palm
Springs
versus
a
Rancho
Mirage
or
a
Palm
Desert.
G
G
A
A
I
think
that
the
buildings
are
still
too
close
to
the
Edwardson
amount
and
the
bank
and
the
reason
I
say
that
is
because,
in
order
to
have
this
kind
of
massive
building,
you
need
to
have
more
relief
to
your
adjacent
honking
building,
so
that
you
can
make
feature
of
your
own
project
that
you're
building
today
and
right
now,
I
think
is
too
close
and
it's
too
chaotic.
At
the
same
time,
I
think
the
architecture
has
potential,
but
it's
almost
like,
where
it
needs
to
have
an
overhang
to
shade
the
outdoor
sitting.
A
You
bring
back
the
fascia
line,
and
so
I
don't
really
understand
the
purpose
of
that
intermittent
intermittent
soffit
or
facial
design.
That
you're
proposing
I
do
still
think
that,
as
far
as
the
building
composition,
that
is
too
high
for
the
service
that
you're
proposing
or
the
applicant
is
proposing
so
I
think
it
has
great
potential,
but
I
think
it
needs
more
work.
So
therefore,
I
will
not
be
in
favor
of
the
project.
A
C
Design
differently
and
I
do
believe
that
the
restaurant
spaces
are
they
really
don't
respond
to
the
scale
that
were
we're
looking
for,
but
I
have
to
defer.
You
know,
there's
going
to
be
a
difference
of
opinion
between
designers,
so
that's
where
we
are
and
I
I
can't
speak
for
anybody
else,
but
I
would
expect
a
different
design
than
what
we're
seeing.
B
What
you
would
be
doing,
the
action
that
you
would
be
taking
is
to
recommend
approval
of
the
project
subject
to
conditions,
and
one
of
those
conditions
would
be
that
the
AAC
review,
the
final
design
before
the
issuance
of
building
permits
or
something
along
those
lines.
That's
typically
a
process
that
we
use
when
the
AAC
would
like
to
review
something
again
that
doesn't
have
any
further
approval
sequence
other
than
Planning
Commission.
Okay,.
C
B
B
D
I'll
make
one
quick
comment:
the
that
you
chair
song
just
mentioned.
That
I
think
is
something
that's
been
on
my
mind,
the
whole
all
three
times,
we've
seen
this
and
I
you
just
put
it
into
words
for
me,
and
that
is
part
of
the
goal
of
this
redesign
of
the
complex,
is
to
direct
people
from
the
parking
lot
to
not
just
go
directly
to
the
movie
theater,
but
to
move
around
into
the
complex
and
I
think
what
you
touched
on
for
me.
Just
now
was
it's
a
bit
of
a
tall.
D
It's
a
bit
of
a
maze
of
tall
hedges,
in
this
case
buildings
that
don't
necessarily
achieve
that
and
I
think.
Maybe
one
of
the
reasons
for
that
is
because
there's
not
enough
relief,
there's
not
enough
open
space.
Sort
of
like
walking
in
I,
mean
look
in
this
room
right
here,
walking
into
a
room
that
has
a
low
soffit
above
your
head,
directs
you
to
where
you're
supposed
to
go
and
I.
Don't
know
that
that
directing
is
happening
me
as
the
non
architect
on
the
committee.
D
D
What
exactly
those
refinements
could
be
remains
to
be
determined
after
Planning
Commission
has
seen
it
and
given
their
approval,
but,
as
we
know,
a
recommending
body
to
the
Planning
Commission,
they
will
receive
all
of
our
comments
and
they
will
also
receive
if
we
were
not
a
unanimous
vote
in
approving
what
we
had
in
front
of
us.
That
will
make
us
itself
so.
A
At
this
point,
I
think
what
we
could
do
is
list
the
issues
that
we're
having
with
the
design,
so
that,
if
somebody
does
make
a
motion
to
a
proof
with
conditions,
then
the
applicant
will
know
what
the
issues
are
same
with
the
Planning
Commission
sure.
So
I
can
start
with
you
know.
Five
items
which
is
one
is
the
the
sort
of
the
urban
design
of
the
project.
Where
do
you
award
or
reward
the
pedestrian?
Where
are
the
shades?
Where
are
the
areas
that
people
paying
purge
because
it
does
have
an
urban
style?
A
I'm?
Sorry,
an
urban
introduction
to
talk
weights.
The
second
thing
is
really:
we
do
need
a
soft
layer
of
landscape
that
is
in
composition,
with
the
building,
meaning
that,
if
there's
a
layer
of
palm
trees
or
if
the
layers
of
trees,
these
are
very
massive
buildings,
so
the
trees
will
not
ever
be
of
steering
them
to
its
entirety
and
Tom
does
an
amazing
job.
So,
but
we
need
to
play
with
a
negative
and
the
positive
with
the
landscape
composition.
A
The
third
I
would
say
is
that
you've
got
quite
a
massive
of
fascia
material
in
between
underside
of
the
roof
and
the
clerestory
I,
don't
know
if
it
is
too
high
the
equipment
or
them
too
high
the
ductwork,
but
there's
so
much
ceiling
height
there
that
you
can
really
work
it
out.
If
we're
truly
looking
at
this
international
style
of
having
this
very
angle,
roof
sitting
on
glass,
then
let
that
be
the
design
and
don't
introduce
another
bulky
framing
around
that
the
the
fourth
will
be
really
look
at
your
column.
A
/
chimney
stacks
that
you're
trying
to
create
here.
If
you're,
really
looking
at
scales,
then
bring
them
low
and
then
make
them
high,
but
don't
introduce
this
32
feet,
column
right
from
where
the
pedestrian
is
standing
up
and
then
the
last
one,
but
the
most
important
is
really
look
at
the
distances
between
the
adjacent
building
and-
and
you
know,
the
perspectives
are
great,
but
maybe
look
at
it
as
a
flat
exterior
elevation,
because
they're
really
not
enough
relief
to
experience
a
project
from
tabloids.
A
B
A
A
D
A
C
That
I
just
I'm,
sorry,
please
yeah
one
more
and
once
again,
there's
creative
license
with
the
individual.
That's
authoring
this
project,
but
from
Palm
Springs
point
of
view,
I'd
say
most
of
the
architecture
that
significant
here
is
timeless
versus
trendy
and
that's
just
something
to
keep
in
mind
as
we
review
these
projects.
I.
C
G
That
okay
I
support
the
comments
fully
in
in
all
context,
I
think
the
central
courtyard
where
the
water
feature
is.
This
is
again
is
lending
to
something
a
little
more
trendy
and
may
lose
some
interest
in
the
future
and
also
there's
an
opportunity
for
this
space
for
gathering
and
I'm,
not
sure
just
a
kind
of
a
cool
water
feature
is
going
to
draw
people
there
to
sit
and
enjoy.
G
So
all
mostly
the
central
core,
our
courtyard
become
a
little
more
of
a
people
space
a
little
more
softening
a
little
more
landscape,
a
little
bit
more
articulated
for
us
certain
use
and
less
of
a
hard
hardness,
I
kind
of
feel
on
the
renderings
and
less
of
just
a
space
to
pass
through
right.
Now,
there's
88
ramps
and
stairs,
and
it's
really
just
kind
of
programmed
just
to
move
through
there.
G
G
G
G
D
Was
going
to
make
one,
but
now
do
we
want
to
make
those
all
conditions
the
days
that
those
come
back
to
us
or
just
the
central
court
erred,
because
a
lot
of
those
are
just
designed
direction
and
I?
Don't
know
that
we're
going
to
see
all
that
come
back
to
us.
D
Sorry,
okay,
okay
I'll,
make
the
motion
then
so
that's
my
I
agree.
I!
Think
we're
in
agreement
on
that.
So
I
would
I'd
like
to
move
that
we
approve
the
project
presented
as
presented
with
those
I.
Think
your
last
item,
randy
kind
of
fit
into
Susan's
of
a
more
timeless
and
simpler
design.
That's
going
to
look
less
dated
so
I'm
going
to
call
it.
Those
seven
conditions
is
what
I
captured
Flynn.
A
A
I
And
we'll
follow
that
up.
Let
me
just
go
back
down
to
the
staff
report
briefly,
so
on
June
5,
this
item
was
presented
to
you
and
after
star
presentation
and
the
applicant
presentation,
the
committee
has
some
discussions
are
relative
to
the
two
four
main
items
really
so
number
one
was
a
site
plan.
You
asked
for
more
clarification
from
that,
in
particular
to
show
how
circulation
will
occur
within
the
sides.
I
Besides,
this,
this
particular
site
is
almost
is
approximately
two
miles
away
from
the
I-10
freeway
in
so
far
far
up
far
off
from
anywhere
in
the
city.
It
is
mostly
surrounded
by
wind
farms,
so
the
project
to
the
west,
to
the
east
to
decide
on
feet
and
not
all
existing
with
wind
farms
or
and
power
stations,
so
because
of
that
start
felt
that
this
would
be
an
appropriate
site
where
there
could
be
where
the
Planning
Commission
could
make
a
requirement
for
to
waive
Landscaping.
I
However,
you
give
some
directions
to
the
applicant
at
the
last
meeting
and
you
made
some
suggestions
that,
for
instance,
the
use
of
boulders
could
be
cooled,
take
place
of
regular
landscaping
and
the
applicant
has
responded
to
that.
So
what
I'm,
having
some
technical
difficulties
in
bringing
this
up
on
the
computer
I,
have
a
revised
site
plan
on
the
body-colored
one.
I
So
in
the
in
the
revised
site
plan
the
applicant
has
shown
on
this
separately
pedestrian
path,
leading
to
the
main
facility
itself
and
and
also
has
placed
on
boulders
around
the
modular
office
building.
You
also
talked
touch
the
security
security
requirement
and,
as
mentioned
at
the
last
meeting,
currently
there
is
an
existing
a
6-foot
chain
link
fence
surrounding
this
property.
I
I
The
police
department
that
has
to
be
there
has
to
be
demonstrated
availability
of
security
in
any
medical
cannabis,
cannabis
site
so,
but
back
to
the
modular
office
building
when
so
looking
at
the
whole
acre
I
mentioned
the
other
time
to
the
AAC
that
the
whole
acre,
the
whole
site
is
approximately
thirteen
point,
nine
acres,
but
this
is
just
a
portion
of
it-
has
been
developed
at
this
time.
The
applicant
does
have
an
overall
plan
to
enlarge
and
changed
change
the
the
plants
perhaps
to
grow,
to
develop
more
medical
office,
medical
cannabis
cultivation
area.
I
Over
time,
he'd
mentioned
that
the
modular
office
building
is
temporary
and
I
did
mention
to
to
the
applicant
what
temporary
means.
In
our
code,
however,
we
will
be
making
a
recommendation
to
the
Planning
Commission
regarding
that,
because
he's
going
to
be
put
up,
removing
the
the
modular
office
building
I,
replace
it
with
the
permanent
building
in
about
six
to
eight
months
according
to
the
applicants.
So
because
of
that,
we
agree
with
him
that
he
probably
would
not
be
necessary
at
this
point
to
invest
too
much
resources
in
in
making
and
enhancing
the
modular
office
building.
I
Based
on
the
comments
you
had
last
time,
the
applicant
is
here
to
make
further
presentations
to
the
ASC
I'm
also
available.
To
answer
your
question,
but
based
on
the
Disney
information
and
what
the
applicant
has
provided
to
you
today,
FF
is
recommending
that
we
move
this
project
forward
to
the
Planning
Commission,
based
on
any
additional
conditions
that
you
may
deem
fit
to
make
this
project
a
more
successful.
One
and
I
will
conclude
my
staff
report.
Thank
you.
Thank.
C
A
C
A
C
A
The
landscape
has
been
clarified
that,
because
there
is
no
water
source,
that
and
because
of
previous
projects,
that
we
have
required
landscape
and
they're
all
dead.
You
know
if
there's
kind
of
a
what
do
we
do
when
we
know
that
they
don't
do
well
and
I
know
Randy.
You
have
spoken
about
funds
that
do
well
well.
G
What
about
I
definitely
respect
the
location
and
the
visible?
You
know
proximity
of
that
project
from
public,
but
are
we
starting
to
dictate
a
standard
for
buildings
out
there
that
they
don't
require
landscape
or
do
we
we
create
some
landscape
that
is
sustainable
for
these
kinds
of
conditions,
and
this
would
be
you
know,
a
starting
point
for
the
city
friendly.
A
A
As
you
know,
each
committee
is
that
we
should
look
at
what
will
be
requiring
from
here
on
as
more
development
projects
will
be
coming
in
and
what
is
actually
possible
and
what
is
actually
successful
and
I
think
that's
a
future,
not
not
future
future,
but
a
near
issue
that
we
do
have
to
deal
with
the
city.
Let.
B
Me
offer
some
thoughts
on
that
I
know.
This
is
a
little
bit
problematic
in
terms
of
the
site
and
its
location.
This
is
a
different
area
than
what
we
have
immediately
adjacent
to
the
freeway.
There
is
an
expectation
at
the
freeway
intersection
where
we
have
the
business
parks
where
we
have
the
other
commercial
businesses
that,
even
though
the
conditions
there
are
also
windy
and
somewhat
difficult
that
we
would
expect
landscaping
there,
because
it's
going
to
be
a
more
dense
if
you
will
area
in
terms
of
its
development.
B
However,
as
you
get
further
out
from
that
area,
we
move
from
an
area
that
is
designated
for
industrial
development
or
regional
commercial
development
into
an
area
that's
designated
as
EEI,
which
is
energy,
industrial,
and
so
in
that
particular
area.
You
aren't
going
to
see
the
density
or
level
of
development
that
you
will
immediately
adjacent
to
the
freeway.
You
will
see
some
occasional
scattered
green
houses
here
and
there,
but
there
is
a
limitation
in
terms
of
the
amount
that
can
be
developed
there.
So
I
think
you
have
to
take
that
into
consideration.
B
Is
this
is
a
different
area
than
what
we
have
immediately
adjacent
to
the
freeway,
so
there
could
be
a
different
standard
applied
to
it
and
again
taking
into
consideration
that
this
is
essentially
a
farming
use
or
an
agricultural
use.
Landscaping
may
not
be
as
necessary.
I
don't
think
it
needs
the
level
of
detail
that
we
would
see
in
other
areas
of
the
city.
B
D
C
B
Our
city
boundaries,
it's
either
unincorporated
or
Desert,
Hot
Springs.
If
you
were
to
go
down
a
little
bit
further
here,
our
industrial
area
extends
out
to
about
here
over
here
over
this
way.
So
it's
basically
in
the
immediate
area
of
the
I-10
freeway
and
Indian
Canyon
or
Indian
Drive,
as
you
get
over
here.
All
of
this
area
is
now
the
e
I
des
Ignatian,
energy,
industrial,
designation
and
so
in
terms
of
development
because
of
the
wind
farms
and
because
of
the
limitation
on
coverage
in
this
area.
B
A
Okay,
so
we
had
I
think
it's
there,
a
first
one
that
right
after
a
staff
report,
we
are
actually
having
a
motion
to
accept
a
project.
A
D
A
Yes,
sorry
so
before
we
further
discuss,
is
there
any
public
comments
related
to
this
case?
Okay,
seeing
none
before
before
we
do
the
usual.
Could
we
could
we
decide
on
approving
the
project
assets
with
the
explanation
of
Edward
on
the
further
definition
of
what
the
applicant
is
proposing,
or
do
we
want
to
proceed
where
to
asking
questions
more
questions
to
the
applicant
and
deliberate
I'm.
B
I
D
I
B
B
I
A
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
ASC,
so
the
Cameron
was
approved
way
back
in
2006
by
the
City
Council
and
at
the
time
was
approved
as
a
mixed-use.
Development
consisting
of
ten
homes
live,
work,
units
and
commercial
space.
So,
but
at
a
time
the
construction
did
not
proceed
because
of
the
economic
downturn,
that
is
city
and
indeed
the
nation
experience
at
a
time.
But
since
that
time
they
are
having
a
change
of
ownership.
I
If
you
recall
in
2015
there
was
an
amendment
that
came
before
you
when
a
request
was
made
to
add
hikes
to
some
of
these
certain
units
within
the
development
and
to
add
some
route
decks
to
them,
but
now
that
the
development
is
also
changing,
ownership
has
changed
ownership,
the
new
owners
at
the
Woodbridge
Pacific
Group.
So
now
they
are
asking
for
a
minor
amendment.
This
does
not
rise
to
the
level
of
major
amendment
in
that
it
would
not
change
the
intent
of
the
planned
development
district.
I
Neither
will
change
this
site
configuration
and
the
overall
makeup
of
the
development.
So,
but
specifically
this
time,
the
applicants
are
asking
for
a
minor
minor
changes
to
some
of
the
massing
and
some
selected
units.
Basically,
what
that
means
is
that
they
will
be
removing
some
massing
in
some
units
to
simplify
the
design
as
the
architect
to
spend
more
time
in
explaining
that
to
the
AC.
Second
Lydia
will
be
a
reduction
of
highs
in
certain
units.
I
They
will
be
removing
some
of
the
architectural
elements
in
some
of
the
units
are
specifically
and
declare
stories
with
that
there
will
be
a
reduction
in
height
of
those
units.
There
are
also
some
introduction
of
some
new
materials
from
building
materials
that
will
make
the
project
and
colors
in
some
areas
in
some
of
those
units.
Look
much
lighter
than
those
previously
approved.
I
I
will
show
those
as
time
goes
on,
so
any
packages
that
you
have
there
is
a
display
or
there's
showing
of
the
2015
Russian
vessels,
the
proposed
ones,
and
so
you
see
a
stark
difference
in
the
colors
that
have
been
introduced.
So
so,
in
addition
to
the
color
palette
that
we
will
also
be
changing
the
garage
doors
to
reflect
a
different
materials
compared
to
what
was
previously
approved
in
the
staff
report,
I
did
them.
I
It
is
an
amendment,
however,
based
on
the
definition
of
amendment
in
our
code,
this
is
regarded
as
a
minor,
a
minor
amendment,
so
that
is
basically
the
staff
report.
If
there
is
any
question
I'm
here
to
answer
them,
in
addition,
the
architect
and
the
applicants
are
here
to
make
a
formal
presentation
to
the
ASC.
That
was
my
Stanford
code.
Thank
you.
Thank.
H
Yes,
my
name's
Todd
Cunningham,
with
Woodbridge
Pacific,
Group,
seven,
five,
four
one:
seven
spyglass
and
Indian
Wells
and
I
want
to
make
a
clarification
to
what
Edward
said.
Woodbridge
specific
group
of
which
I'm
the
president
and
a
partner
in
have
been
retained
by
the
current
ownership
to
manage
and
take
the
project
forward
through
development.
The
the
ownership
is
Rialto
Capital
Group.
They
were
the
capital
partner
with
Davidson
communities
who
bought
the
property
post
recession
and
then
Rialto
capital
continues
to
be
the
owner.
However,
Davidson
is
no
longer
involved
as
the
developer
and
so
Rialto
capital.
H
H
H
So
I'm
not
sure
what
yes,
yes
and
we
have
renderings
that
kind
of
shows
how
that
those
colors
work
together
in
the
project.
You
can
see
the
bottom
and
then
the
top
and
but
J
Reynold's
from
om
jr..
Architects
is
here
to
go
through
a
PowerPoint
and
and
show
you
the
materials
and
the
colors
and
everything
as
as,
as
we've
changed
them.
Okay,.
H
A
H
Yes,
my
name
is
Paul
Crippen
I
live
at
145
East
mesquite
right
across
from
the
entrance
on
the
ski
of
this
project.
I
moved
here
in
2001.
This
is
the
third
developer
and
the
original
one
was
Symphony
development,
but
I
I'm
thoroughly
impressed
what
they're
doing
I
think
that
we
need
this
project.
I
would
hope
that
you
vote
for
this
because
again,
I've
been
here.
15
17
years,
I've
seen
this
a
vacant
lot
I'd
love
to
see
it
develop
I
love
to
see
it
part
of
the
neighborhood
and
bring
in
some
vibrance
to
our
neighborhood.
A
You
thank
you,
okay,
so
to
the
applicant
and
the
architect.
It's
for
25.
One
of
our
members
has
to
leave
at
five
minutes
before
5:00
we'd
like
to
review
and
get
you
some
directions
before
he
has
to
leave.
So
we
still
have
a
quorum
right
so
from
an
architect
to
another
architect.
Can
we
do
the
short
version
of
the
architecture.
J
J
So
we
made
those
changes
and
what
that
did
was
reflect
to
a
more
reductive
vocabulary
on
the
outside,
to
simplify
the
massing
and
really
that's
what
it
comes
down
to
it,
so
that
it's
again
the
idea
when
I
started
on
the
project
2004,
you
know
the
colors
and
who
we
were
working
with
and
materials
and
all
that
was
a
little
bit
different
time.
Obviously
so
what
we
did
now
and
I
think
I'm
very
excited
about
it.
It's
kind
of
a
rebirth
of
the
project.
J
So
again
the
the
floorplan
changes,
the
additional
roofs
that
were
put
on
a
you
know:
roof
decks
things
like
that
that
were
done
in
2015.
We
really
studied
hard
on
how
we
could
reduce
the
vocabulary
to
a
very
timeless
simplicity.
You
know
in
terms
of
massing
and
then
a
very
simple
expression
of
materials
and
not
worrying
about
colors
and
look
at
our
last
board
that
was
gone
in
2004.
It
had
like
15,
16,
colors,
there's
three
and
the
shading
shadow,
the
in
and
out
how
these
buildings
sit
on
the
site
is
enough.
J
A
J
Did
what
Edward
just
kind
of
talked
about
the
units
that
were
if
we
went
back
to
the
site
plan,
they
were
more
internal
to
the
site,
what
we
called
more
the
urban
next
to
the
retail.
They
were
considered
back
in
2004
as
live
work,
and
we
were
going
to
do
rollup
garage
doors
yeah
with
glass
and
metal,
and
that
was
so
that
vocabulary
also
a
previous
project
we
did
on
the
2801.
We
did
that
same
thing.
J
We
ended
up
just
covering
all
the
glass
with
translucent
material,
and
then
that
was
that
that
was
what
the
feel
that
we
wanted
when
you're
driving
down
Palm
Canyon,
that
these
things
would
be
lit
up
at
night.
So
with
this,
as
we
took
that
element
of
the
live
work
kind
of
out
of
the
project,
it
didn't
become
as
important.
So
we
just
thought
the
again
the
simplicity
of
the
street
front
from
the
back
of
the
units
being
a
solid
front.
That's
that's
why
we
made
the
change.
J
J
J
It
did
originally
and
we
also
had
a
larger
interior
la
we
had
weight
our
larger
windows
that
face
the
street
there
originally
and
that
that
actually
ended
up
changing
and
because
one
just
the
mere
fact
that
the
title
24
had
to
change,
and
so
he
had
a
drink
yeah.
So
we
couldn't
make
it
work,
and
so
we
reduced
that
not
what
changed
the
massing,
and
so
we
ended
up
eliminating
that
element
because
it
wasn't
as
necessary.
It
was
back
when
it
was
2004.
We
were
going
to
have
a
lack
of
much
larger
and
more
expressive.
J
B
A
A
J
It
only
the
only
reason
why
we
did
is
we
brought
in
these
new
mint
stone
materials
which
we
kind
of
brought
along
as
we
started
to
bring
before
it
was
all
about
the
second
floor
massing
extending
out
over
the
second
floor,
double
cantilever
things
like
that,
so
we
simplified
that
by
in
where
we
had
the
one
wall
on
the
lower
you
see
on
the
right-hand
elevation,
we
extended
that
wall
out.
That's
the
top
view
on
the
right-hand,
so
yeah.
J
So
so
what
we
did
is
we
added
two
stone
materials
in
there
which
you
saw
on
the
boards.
So
the
idea
was
to
take
that
and
do
more
vertical
integration.
It's
a
really
long,
linear
building.
So
we
thought
to
cut
that
linearity
up
was
to
add
more
of
a
vertical
stone
element
reading
from
the
ground
floor
up
to
the
second
floor,
and
that's
why
we
broke
that
band
and
so
to
allow
for
the
stone
to
kind
of
affect
the
ground
floor
and
the
second
floor
together
to
bring
those
two
together.
Oh.
A
J
A
H
A
H
H
A
And
then
there's
one
more
like
that,
which
is
on
your
unit,
see
a
400
it's
one
page
before
a
400
see.
A
A
J
J
J
We
it's
only,
we
maybe
I
mean
I,
guess
I,
never
really
looked
at
it.
I
thought
because
we're
trying
to
create
it's
only
a
two
and
a
half
for
cantilever.
So
to
do
that,
it
seemed
like
a
lot
to
handle,
because
if
it
was
a
deeper,
you
know
setback
for
the
second
floor
into
a
deck
space
or
something
like
that.
I
probably
would
have
done
something
like
that.
But
we're
trying
to
you
know
again.
As
you
see
what
was
here
box
forms,
whether
it
be
horizontal
or
vertical.
J
With
a
you
know,
a
section
above
we
tried
to
stay
with
that
vocabulary
just
because
and
again
we're
into
certain
situations
where
we
try
to
extend
the
lower
wall
to
support
the
cantilever
a
little
bit
differently
and
a
little
bit
more.
You
know
so,
but
we
didn't
didn't
want
to
again
trying
to
simplify
things
and
not
trying
to
overly
do
them
from
what
they
were
in
2004
2006,
yeah.
B
D
D
C
A
C
G
D
B
B
We
have
only
had
two
applications
in
so
far.
We
do
have
a
requirement.
We
need
an
additional
individual
with
architectural
experience,
a
California
registered
architect
and
so
I'm
scrambling
to
see
if
there
will
be
any
more
applications
in
the
interim
I
would
ask
if
our
three
members
could
continue
serving
in
the
month
of
July.
If
they
wouldn't
mind
doing
that,
and
then
we
go
dark
in
August,
so
all
of
their
bets
are
off
you're
done
speaking
of
July.
Our
next
meeting
date
is
on
July.
The
3rd,
which
falls
right
before
the
July
4th
holiday.