►
From YouTube: Historic Site Preservation Board | October 9, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
B
A
A
Okay,
ladies
and
gentlemen,
this
time
has
been
set
aside
from
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
historic
site,
Preservation
Board
on
agenda
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter:
jurisdiction
of
the
board,
although
the
historic
site,
Preservation
Board,
values
your
comments
pursuant
to
the
brown
act,
it
generally
cannot
take
any
action
on
items
not
listed
on
the
posted
agenda.
There
will
be
three
minutes
assigned
for
each
speaker.
Testimony
for
public
hearings
will
be
taken
at
the
time
of
the
hearing.
We
do
not
have
a
public
hearing
this
morning.
A
D
Good
morning
my
name
is
Barbara
Marshall
I'm,
with
the
Palm
Springs
Preservation,
Foundation
and
I
have
an
item
that
I
would
consider
just
as
general
interest
for
you
and
the
public.
It
is
fall,
and
that
means
modernism
week
fall
preview
and
the
Palm
Springs
Preservation
Foundation
is
excited
to
have
a
great
schedule
this
morning
for
everyone
on
Thursday
the
18th.
We
have
a
tour
of
the
Frank
Sinatra
Twin
Palms
estate,
and
while
that
is
nearing
sold
out,
we
encourage
everyone
to
get
online
and
get
their
ticket
on
Saturday.
D
We're
really
thrilled
to
have
three
steel
houses
on
tour.
Two
of
the
steel
houses
that
we
have
on
our
tour
are
rarely
available
for
touring
to
the
public.
So
it's
a
great
opportunity
to
get
to
see
these
steel
houses
on
Sunday,
the
21st.
We
have
our
free
lecture
series.
I
emphasize
that
free
lectures.
The
first
lecture
in
the
morning
is
Gary
John's,
wildly
popular
law
saved
and
endangered
lecture
and
then
later
that
morning,
we'll
be
having
a
lecture
on
concrete
screen
block
the
power
of
pattern.
D
I
know
that
sounds
like
a
dull
subject,
but
it
really
is
a
lot
of
fun.
I
know
if
you
go
online
and
you
see
that
events
are
sold
out,
please
don't
be
disappointed
because
we
always
have
been
able
to
accommodate
a
small
number
of
walk
ups
at
the
door,
so
we
look
forward
to
seeing
everybody
at
modernism
week
fall
preview.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
E
A
A
Last
month,
in
September
we
had
Sam
cliff
before
us
and
the
consideration
on
the
painting
of
the
air
conditioning
units.
The
applicant
proposed
a
beige
color
to
match
the
buildings,
and
mr.
Lavoie
suggested
an
alternate
color,
and
we
did
create
a
subcommittee
to
look
into
that,
and
will
we
get
some
update
from
that
subcommittee
today?
I'm
just
curious
I
can
provide
you
an
update
on
that
excellent.
Thank
you.
My
next
question
was
at
last
month's
meeting.
A
There
was
a
considerable
amount
of
discussion
about
the
removal
of
mature
palm
trees
along
Palm,
Canyon
Drive
in
front
of
the
new
development
at
mesquite
and
Palm
Canyon
Drive
fast
forward,
30
days
later.
That
project
is
almost
nearing
completion
and
I
think
the
city
should
be
commended
for
the
size
of
the
tree
that
they
put
back
in
there.
That
was
very
good
and
also
I
had
made
it.
A
Some
I
had
expressed
some
concerns
about
the
Mesa
gatehouse
and
my
concerns
about
it
not
being
fully
protected
from
the
construction
site
next
door
and
I
did
follow
up
with
Flynn
since
then.
But
yes,
no,
the
gatehouse
is
completely
enclosed
in
its
own
construction,
fencing,
and
so
that
is
I,
think
safe
during
the
construction
of
the
project.
Next
door
can
one
item
here
when
also
talked
about
the
del
Markos
hotel
and
their
improvements
to
their
parking
and
a
new
wall
that
was
constructed
there
to
replace
an
old
wood
fence.
The
notes
call
it
a
screen.
A
Wall
I,
don't
know
whether
it's
really
a
screen
wall.
It's
a
wall,
privacy
wall,
yes,
a
privacy
wall
or
yeah.
Alright.
So
those
are
my
only
comments.
A
A
All
right,
Thank,
You
Vincent,
welcome
good
morning.
Alright
number
two
on
our
agenda
is
public
hearings
and
we
have
none
this
morning
under
unfinished
business.
We
have
none
this
morning,
but
we
do
have
some
new
business
item
number
four
for
a
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
owner
for
approval
of
minor
modification
to
the
West
facade
of
the
Palm
Springs
International
Airport,
a
class-one
historic
site
located
at
3400,
east
tahquitz
canyon
way.
B
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
the
administration
at
the
airport
is
proposing
alterations
to
the
West
facade
of
the
Palm
Springs
International
Airport,
which,
as
you
know
as
a
class-one
Historic
Site.
The
primary
part
of
the
building
which
receive
this
designation
is
just
the
West
facade,
it's
about
the
entire
terminal
building
or
any
other
parts
of
it
in
your
packet
this
morning
and
on
your
slides
here,
there
are
two
components
to
this
project:
one
is
the
removal
of
a
non
original
door
that
you
can
see
in
this
particular
photo.
B
B
The
airport
is
reconfiguring
that
space
in
order
to
increase
the
capacity
in
the
baggage
claim
area
and
to
make
the
circulation
flow
around
the
car
rental
desks
more
smooth,
so
the
office
is
being
eliminated
and
therefore
the
door
can
go
away
as
well.
Returning
this
portion
of
the
facade
back
to
the
way
it
was
originally,
the
second
part
of
this
project
is
a
relocation
of
an
existing
door
to
the
next
structural
Bay.
B
So
what
you
see
in
the
photo
on
the
left
is
that's
where
the
door
presently
is,
and
you
can
see
the
red
dashed
line,
and
that
is
where
the
door
is
proposed
to
be
relocated.
So
the
mullions
system,
the
glass,
the
glazing
and
all
the
components
that
you
see
that
are
part
of
the
existing
curtain
wall
will
be
carefully
disassembled
and
relocated
so
that
when
this
door
is
in
its
new
location,
the
curtain
wall
and
the
glass
storefront
that
you
see,
there
will
be
continuous
as
it
currently
exists
in
its
current
condition.
B
That
one
shows
where
the
door
is
being
removed
so
that
completes
my
presentation.
Tom
Nolan,
the
director
of
the
airport,
is
here
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
and
the
consulting
architect,
Jim
Chafee
is
here
as
well.
That
completes
my
presentation.
As
you
will
note
in
the
staff
report,
staff
believes
that
this
is
a
project
that
is
approvable
as
a
certificate
of
approval.
B
It
is
improving
the
overall
historic
integrity
of
the
West
facade
and
the
work
is
being
done
in
a
way
that
matches
this
reflects
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards
for
treatment
of
historic
structures.
So
I
remain
available
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have
the
applicant
is
here.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
D
D
So
that's
all
going
to
come
out
and
it's
going
to
restore
that
facade
a
lot.
So
we're
happy
with
that
and
the
other
one
is
kind
of
inconsequential.
But
there's
some
revisions
happening
in
the
car
rental
area
that
are
going
to
require
the
relocation
of
this
sliding
electric
exit
door
and
I.
Don't
know
when
those
were
installed.
They're,
obviously
not
original,
but
we're
gonna
pick
that
up
and
just
move
it
over
a
couple
of
bays
and
put
it
to
where
you
see
in
the
on
the
right
side.
There
doesn't
affect
anything
really.
D
It
just
allows
us
to
expand
a
car
rental
booth.
That
is
that
is
in
that
location,
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
There's
lots
of
other
improvements
going
on
inside
the
terminal
as
part
of
a
new
renovation
project
were
working
on.
It's
going
to
really
upgrade
two
things:
we're
working
with
mr.
Roberts
he's
part
of
the
Subcommittee
on
that.
Maybe
he'll
share
some
right
with
you
later
Jim.
A
I
have
a
couple
of
comments
sure
this
feels
similar
to
the
work
that
was
done
at
the
JW
Robinson's
building,
whereas
some
doors
were
changed
or
glazing
was,
was
altered
to
adaptively,
reuse,
the
space
and
all
I.
Think
it's
a
it's.
A
good
project.
A
I
certainly
would
not
to
the
layperson
indicate
that
these
changes
were
ever
made.
You
know
several
months
from
now
they
look
like
they
were.
Always
there
sure
I
had
a
question
of
staff.
You
know,
I
have
been
here
on
this
board
for
five
years
plus
and
I
do
recall
other
projects
that
came
before
us
relative
to
the
airport,
and
there
was
discussion
about
these
columns
here
on
the
front
of
the
building.
These
are
squared
off
columns
that
hold
up
the
call
of
not
the
column
but
the
ceiling
beam.
A
Thank
you
and
I
remember
that
there
was
some
discussion
that
there
could
very
well
be
under
those
boxed
in
columns
the
steel
needle
points
that
are
similar
that
hold
up
the
the
the
main
entrance
to
the
airport
and
I
remember
also
a
conversation
that
they
would
stay
the
way
they
were
until
such
time
that
there
were
any
alterations
made
to
the
West
facade
and
at
that
time
these
columns
would
be
exposed,
am
I.
The
only
person
with
that
memory.
D
Good
morning,
Tom
Nolan
executive
director
of
the
airport,
by
the
way,
thank
you
to
everybody
around
the
table
here,
we're
hitting
historic
record
traffic.
Two
million
passengers
last
year
were
about
10%
over
that
this
year
extraordinary,
and
this
is
a
reason
for
the
impetus
I
remember
about
seven
eight
years
ago,
Chris,
Mills
and
I
standing
out
in
front
of
the
building
with
mr.
D
Wexler,
and
that
was
when
we
were
doing
the
ticket
modification
project,
which
is
scheduled
now
for
2020
summer
of
2020,
that
we
would
do
some
modifications
to
expose
those
metal
columns
underneath
there
and
unfortunately,
that
that
did
change
in
the
respect
that
we
are
not
dealing
with
any
major
revision
to
the
facade
in
that
area.
If
you
recall,
during
the
ticketing
wing
approval
by
the
City
Council,
they
decided
they
did
not
want
to
do
any
bump
out
of
that
front
facade
so
that
work
went
away.
Therefore,
we
couldn't
do
the
column
work.
D
Then
this
interior,
Ramada,
T
I'm,
not
sure.
We
would
consider
that
a
major
project,
but
we
do,
but
we
do
have
a
major
project
in
about
two
to
three
years
for
a
car,
a
completely
new
car
rental
facility,
which
would
go
out
across
the
street
where
that
hangar
is,
it
would
be
a
multi-level
parking
deck
and
to
be
able
to
house
the
800
to
a
thousand
cars
that
we
need
during
peak
demand
in
the
season.
Once
that
project
is
done,
the
entire
baggage
claim
interior
will
be
remodeled.
D
A
A
As
you
need
him
and
I'm
confident
that
this
board,
or
some
makeup
of
this
board,
said
no
to
that
and
I
believe
that
we
did
get
the
support
of
the
City
Council
on
that
and
that's
why
all
of
the
work
is
being
done
on
the
inside.
You
know,
I
would
defer
to
staff,
certainly
to
define
this
as
changes
to
the
front
facade
that
would
warrant
the
exposure
of
those
columns
and,
if
not
today,
then
certainly,
let's
keep
in
mind
what
mr.
A
Noland
is
telling
us
about
projects
down
the
road
and
we're
very
proud
of
this
airport,
and
if,
with
this
increased
traffic
to
it,
I
think
that
we
only
benefit
from
keeping
it
and
enhancing
its
mid-century
modern
qualities
because,
as
we
know
so
many
people
are
coming
here
for
that
and
why
not
have
the
first
impression
of
their
arrival
here?
Be
this
dramatic
Airport.
A
F
D
F
A
E
A
A
A
F
Mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
as
you'll
recall
at
last
month's
meeting,
we
gave
an
overview
of
the
progress
of
the
demolition
Subcommittee
on
changes
to
our
stork
preservation
ordinance
and
at
that
time,
I
also
outlined
general
revisions
to
the
historic
preservation
ordinance.
We
are
happy
to
have
before
you
today
a
copy
of
that
draft
ordinance
for
your
review
and
comment
and
and
hopefully
action
with
that.
Let
me
go
through
the
proposed
changes
to
our
ordinance
again,
just
going
back
to
our
demolition
subcommittee,
they
were
tasked
with
two
primary
functions.
F
Number
one
was
to
ensure
that
entitlements
must
be
in
place
prior
to
the
demolition
of
a
structure
and
then
number
two
was
to
revise
our
current
process
for
demolition
and
alteration
review.
The
subcommittee
met
five
times
between
May
and
September,
and
they
were
also
joined
by
members
of
the
Planning
Commission
subcommittee,
who
also
have
an
interest
in
the
topic
of
entitlements
being
in
place
prior
the
demolition
in
terms
of
the
requirements
for
an
entitlement
prior
to
demolition.
F
What
we
are
proposing
as
part
of
this
ordinance
change
is
the
following
number
one:
that
the
applicant
would
need
to
come
before
the
HSB
be
for
review
of
the
demolition
step
two.
They
would
then
need
to
obtain
entitlements
for
the
new
development
and
then
step
three.
They
would
need
to
obtain
a
building
permit
upon
completion
of
those
steps.
F
We
would
then
be
able
to
issue
a
demolition
permit,
and
so
the
key
is
tying
it
to
making
sure
that
the
applicant
has
a
building
permit
in
place,
and
so
that
way
we
aren't
demolishing
a
building
and
leaving
a
site
vacant
for
many
years.
The
idea
is
that
by
tying
it
to
a
building
permit,
that
indicates
that
typically,
the
applicant
has
the
financing
to
move
forward
with
the
project.
F
What
we
would
also
need
to
do,
in
addition
to
making
the
proposed
change
to
our
historic
preservation
ordinance
is
also
have
that
same
language
in
the
zoning
code.
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
to
have
it
in
both
places,
and
so
that's
an
Associated
change
that
we
as
staff
will
be
making
here
in
the
next
couple
of
months.
F
Moving
on
to
the
demolition
process
as
you're
aware
our
current
definition
of
demolition,
if
you
will,
is
basically
entire
demolition,
removing
everything
down
to
the
foundation.
What
we
are
proposing
as
part
of
this
process
is
a
revised
definition
of
the
term
demolition
and
what
that
is
proposed,
as
is
modification
alteration
or
expansion
of
more
than
25%
of
the
lineal
footage
of
a
street
facing
elevation.
F
So
what
we
see
from
the
street,
essentially
or
modification
to
50%
of
the
lineal
footage
of
all
elevations
of
the
building
or
structure
or
50%
alteration
to
the
cumulative
area
of
the
footprint,
either
removal
or
expansion
of
that,
and
so
with
this
new
definition
of
demolition.
Anything
that
exceeds
those
threshold
amounts
would
then
come
forward
to
the
historic
site
preservation
board
for
review
and
to
action
in
terms
of
the
actions
that
you
would
be
able
to
take.
F
Let
me
then
talk
with
general
ordinance
revisions.
I,
don't
know
if
any
of
you've
done
a
remodeling
project,
you
like
change
out
the
carpet
in
a
room
and
find
that
you
need
to
do
other
things.
This
is
similar
to
that
in
making
these
changes
to
our
demolition
procedures
and
our
entitlement
requirements.
There's
also
the
need
to
make
some
other
revisions
and
modifications
to
our
historic
preservation
ordinance,
and
so
what
I
would
propose
to
you
is
that,
as
part
of
this
process,
we
also
make
those
changes
at
this
time.
F
Let
me
go
through
some
of
the
changes
that
we
are
proposing
number
one-
and
this
has
been
a
topic
that
we've
discussed
for
a
number
of
years
here
in
the
historic
site.
Preservation
board,
is
we're
changing
the
term
historic
site
to
historic
resource
in
doing
so,
we're
then
expanding
what
a
historic
resource
can
be.
So
it
conclude
everything
from
the
site
which
would
be
any
natural
features,
landscaping,
garden
walls
etc.
F
It
could
be
something
such
as
the
archway
that
we
have
on
the
orchid
tree
site,
and
so
by
changing
that
definition,
it
will
hopefully
eliminate
confusion
when
we
say
Historic
Site,
now
we're
saying
a
historic
resource
and
then
in
the
designating
ordinance
we're
defining
what
that
historic
resource
is
and
what
really
deserves
protection
in
terms
of
our
three
different
classes
of
historic
resources,
we
are
making
a
couple
of
minor
changes,
number
one
to
the
class
one
historic
resource.
This
will
be
more
aligned
with
what
other
cities
call
their
landmark
structures.
F
What
we
are
doing
is
proposing
to
revise
the
criteria,
we'll
have
our
standard,
seven
items
that
we
always
have,
but
we're
also
proposing
to
include
an
assessment
of
integrity
as
you'll
recall.
This
is
something
that
was
requested
by
the
Palm
Springs
Preservation
Foundation
several
months
ago,
in
some
documentation
that
they
provided
to
you.
F
F
And
so
what
we
would
do
is
for
class
well
and
it
would
have
to
have
an
assessment
of
integrity
for
class
two.
We
are
expanding
this
currently
class.
Two
is
basically
structures
that
have
been
removed,
such
as
the
Desert
Inn,
that
is
a
class
two
historic
site
Lee
or
another
example,
is
what's
called
the
mousey
Powell
house,
William
Powell's
house,
which
has
been
modified
significantly
and
doesn't
retain
its
original
integrity,
and
so
we
would
expand
this
to
include
anything
that
might
be
worthy
of
designation.
Any
significant
structure
that
might
be
worthy
of
designation.
F
F
Another
thing
that
we
are
proposing
is
under
the
establishment
of
the
Historic
Site
Preservation,
Board
and
staffing,
for
that
board
is
that
we
designate
a
city
staff
member
as
a
historic
preservation
officer
later
in
today's
agenda.
I'll
talk
about
that
position,
but
for
now
let
me
just
indicate
that
we
would
then
designate
a
staff
person
as
the
historic
preservation
officer
to
be
specifically
tasked
with
the
responsibilities
associated
with
historic
site
preservation
board.
As
you'll
recall,
the
City
Council
has
given
us
funding
for
an
additional
position.
F
That
position
would
be
the
historic
preservation
officer
and
I
estimate
that
about
75
to
80
percent
of
the
time
spent
with
that
position
will
be
in
historic
preservation
duties,
so
that
will
be
nice
for
us
to
be
able
to
designate
a
staff
person,
particularly
for
that
function.
So
that's
another
change
that
we're
proposing
one
of
the
things
that
our
current
ordinance
lasts
is
any
discussion
about
the
procedures
for
designation
of
historic
districts,
and
so
what
I'm
proposing
to
do
is
to
add
those
procedures
to
our
code.
F
Looking
at
procedures
that
other
cities
have
established
in
terms
of
the
application,
one
of
the
things
that
we
would
require
is
that
at
least
51%
of
the
property
owners
within
the
boundaries
of
that
district
have
a
signature
supporting
the
designation
of
the
district.
Also
that
we
would
require
at
least
three
neighborhood
outreach
meetings
to
talk
about
the
boundaries
of
the
district
and
what
being
part
of
the
district
would
mean.
F
We
also
established
criteria
for
approval
again
we're
using
our
seven
basic
criteria
and
then
two
additional
new
criteria
in
terms
of
the
district
being
logical
and
in
terms
of
making
sure
that
we
have
a
substantial
number
of
contributing
structures
within
the
proposed
boundaries
of
that
district.
And
then
we
go
on
to
add
definitions
for
contributing
resources
within
the
district
and
then
also
defining
non-contributing
resources.
Later
on
in
the
alterations
section,
we
also
talked
about
the
criteria
for
modifications
and
alterations
to
contributing
resources
and
non-contributing
resources.
F
F
Another
change
is,
we
are
changing
the
terminology.
We
currently
use
certificate
of
approval
to
talk
about
alterations
to
designated
resources,
we're
proposing
to
change
that,
to
something
that's
more
standardized
that
other
cities
use,
and
that
is
certificate
of
appropriateness.
We
also
don't
really
have
any
adopted
criteria
in
our
code
in
terms
of
the
findings
that
you
make
for
assessing
alterations
to
designated
structures,
so
we're
proposing
to
add
that
and
then
also
adding
language
relative
to
maintenance
requirements
for
historic
resources.
F
That's
something
that's
been
a
discussion
point
here
at
historic
site,
preservation
board
on
a
regular
basis
and
basically
by
adding
these
maintenance
requirements.
It
goes
a
little
bit
beyond
the
standard
maintenance
requirements
that
we
have
generally
for
properties
in
our
zoning
code,
and
it
gives
our
code
enforcement
team
additional
authority
to
issue
citations
so
that
we
can
avoid
the
demolition
by
neglect
situation
that
we
see
in
some
cases,
and
so
those
maintenance
requirements
would
also
apply
to
class
three
structures.
F
Another
one
of
the
things
that
our
subcommittee
discussed
was
having
a
violation
section
and
I'll
go
into
a
little
bit
of
detail
on
this.
What
was
included
in
your
packets
was
what
the
subcommittee
saw
at
their
last
subcommittee
meeting
in
September
at
that
subcommittee
meeting.
They
had
requested
additional
changes.
Unfortunately,
mr.
priest,
our
attorney
was
not
able
to
get
those
changes
to
me
by
the
time
that
we
published
our
agenda
last
week,
and
so
I
have
a
handout
page
for
you
here,
which
it
discusses.
F
Those
changes
in
terms
of
the
two
types
of
action
that
can
be
taken
under
the
violations
section
the
city
can
take
can
issue
both
criminal
penalties,
which
is
a
misdemeanor,
and
this
is
our
standard
enforcement
tool.
Under
code
enforcement,
we
can
assess
penalties
up
to
$1,000.
In
addition
to
that,
what
we're
also
adding
is
the
ability
to
take
civil
action
and
assess
civil
penalties.
Here
is
one
of
the
changes
over.
F
F
One
of
the
key
things
as
part
of
this
violations
section
is
really
the
next
one,
and
that
is
the
ability
of
the
city
to
withhold
any
future
permits,
either
building
permits
or
any
certificates
of
appropriateness
that
the
HSP
be
may
issue
for
up
to
a
three
year
period,
I
think
more
so,
rather
than
the
dollar
fines
that
we
could
have
available
to
us.
It's
the
withholding
of
permits
that
I
think
will
be
a
great
tool
that
will
help
us
in
any
unauthorized
changes
to
designated
structures
or
to
class-3
structures.
F
One
of
the
other
changes
that
I'm
proposing
is
to
clearly
identify
what
the
process
is
for
historic
preservation
on
tribal
lands
and
to
clarify
this
is
for
historic,
designation
within
the
boundaries
of
the
reservation
or
the
checkerboard.
As
people
know
it
there
has
been
discussing
about
the
let's
see,
Todd
you
and
I
were
talking
about
this.
What's
the
term,
that's
used
the.
F
No,
it's
it's
the
historic
area
of
the
tribe
or
something
along
those
lines
which
excuse
me
no,
actually,
it's
they
have
a
different
term
for
it.
No,
no
it's
something
else,
but
it
describes
basically
the
entire
Valley,
the
extents
of
where
tribal
members
have
been
in
terms
of
their
occupation
of
the
valley.
It's
not
that
and
so
I
just
want
to
clarify.
F
However,
the
city
may
continue
to
designate
on-feed
lands
within
the
boundaries
of
the
reservation.
What
we
would
do
in
those
instances
is,
we
would
route
any
proposed
application
to
the
tribe
first.
They
would
review
that
and
then
give
that
back
to
the
city
to
proceed
under
our
own
process,
and
so
we
have
outlined
that
in
the
last
section
of
the
proposed
changes
in
the
draft
ordinance
and
again,
that's
to
make
it
clear
what
the
relationship
is
on
land
within
the
boundaries
of
the
reservation.
F
F
It's
difficult
to
say
how
many
applications
we'll
have
coming
before
the
historic
site,
Preservation
Board,
one
of
the
things
that
I
provided
to
the
subcommittee
is
looking
at
the
permits
that
the
Building
and
Safety
Department
has
processed
for
additions
and
alterations
to
buildings.
In
2017
there
were
395
permits
for
additions
and
alterations
in
2018,
they've
processed
311
permits
to
date.
That
is
through
the
month
of
September,
so
that's
without
October
November
December,
and
so
you
can
see
that's
basically
the
overall
number
of
additions
and
alterations.
F
The
question
is
how
many
of
those
alterations
and
additions
would
fall
under
our
definition
of
demolition
and
would
be
applicable
to
class
three
structures.
My
rough
top
of
the
head
estimate
is
just
something
along
the
lines
of
about
sixty
percent
is
what
I
would
guess.
A
certain
percentage
of
those
may
be
able
to
be
reviewed,
administrative
Levi,
the
historic
preservation
officer,
and
so
there
would
be
a
lesser
percentage
that
would
actually
need
to
come
forward
to
the
historic
site
preservation
board
for
action.
But
again
it's
a
little
bit
difficult
for
me
to
estimate.
F
How
will
this
change
the
workload
for
the
historic
site
preservation
board?
What
I
anticipate
is
that
it
will
most
likely
require
us
to
add
an
additional
meeting
each
month,
and
so
they
would
then
be
asking
historic
site
preservation
board
members
to
be
available
for
two
meetings
a
month,
but
again
it's
something
that
we
would
need
to
look
at
once.
F
One
of
the
other
things
that
we
might
need
to
take
into
consideration
is
more
streamlined
procedures
for
staff,
so
that
might
mean
that
maybe
our
minutes
for
Historic
Preservation
Board
aren't
as
descriptive
as
they
are
now.
That's
something
that
takes
us
a
long
time.
It
also
might
mean
that
we
may
reduce
the
staff
reports
the
length
of
our
staff
reports.
F
This
is
intended
to
mean
if
they,
for
example,
an
applicant
is
changing
out
the
windows
right,
a
structure
not
enlarging
them
just
changing
right
out
for
something.
That's,
perhaps
more
energy
efficient
that
if
it's
currently
a
casement
window,
then
it
would
need
to
be
replaced
with
a
casement
window.
So
that
is
what
that
line
means:
okay,
where
you're
just
changing
something
that
is
not
altering
the
character
with
a
like-for-like
right
right,
a
replacement,
then
that
could
be
approved
at
an
administrative
or
a
staff
level.
Okay,
all.
E
Mr.
Lavoie
mr.
chair
on
page
one,
an
alteration
is
fairly
complete,
but
when
you
go
back
to
page
fourteen
exemptions,
alterations
to
non
character,
defining
features
are
exempt
so
in
in
a
recent
case
of
like
the
Bank
of
America,
the
lights
that
were
replaced
were
not
character.
Defining
features,
but
the
new
lights
that
were
proposed
would
definitely
affect
the
resource
and
in
a
favorable
way,
but
they
they
could
have
been
horrible.
E
So
I,
you
know
I'm
I'm,
always
thinking
about
where
I
live
and
they've
got
this
long
list
of
non
character.
Defining
features
that
should
we
ever
have
the
money
they'll
be
happy
to
take
away.
But
you
know
I
want
some
reassurance
that
what
gets
put
back
is
appropriate
to
the
resource
and
not
perhaps
you
know
the
HGTV
favorite
this
week.
F
One
of
the
key
things
that
the
Historic
Preservation
officer
will
need
to
do
as
part
of
the
assessment
of
changes
to
a
designated
site
is
even
if
things
are
exempt
from
going
to
the
Historic
Site
preservation
board.
There
still
needs
to
be
an
assessment.
Do
those
changes
impact
the
defining
characteristics?
C
C
C
Under
that
same
item,
do
we
need
to
define
what's
correctable
like
if
they
tear
down
a
garage?
Well,
they
could
rebuild
the
garage,
so
that
is
correctable
in
the
case
of
the
one
where
they
tore
out
the
second,
this
middle
section
of
the
house
mm-hmm.
They
could
conceivably
rebuild
the
middle
section
of
the
house.
So
I
guess
my
question
is:
what's
defined
as
or
how
do
we
define
correctable,
okay.
F
Let's
go
ahead
and
do
that
as
part
of
these
revisions
before
we
send
this
on
to
City
Council
as
defined
correctable
versus
non
correctable,
and
then
we'll
go
back
to
Jim
priest
and
have
him
incorporate
that
in
the
violation
section.
And
we
may
also
want
to
put
that
into
the
definition
sections
as
well.
So
we'll
go
ahead
and
develop
that
and
include
that.
Okay.
F
F
G
F
F
G
A
How
do
we
know
what
is
and
what
isn't,
as
a
Realtor
I
know
if
something
is
leased,
land
or
fee
simple,
but
I
think
lease
land
now
becomes
something
more
than
just
lease
land.
It
might
be
a
tribal
trust
land
or
it
might
be
an
allotted
trust
land.
So
if
my
next-door
neighbor
comes
to
me
and
says,
I
want
to
get
my
house
designated
I
would
say
well,
gee.
You
know
we.
First
of
all,
we
have
to
figure
out
whether
it's
on
a
tribal
trust
or
if
it's
on
allotted
trust
or
what?
F
Have
the
exact
same
tool
that
I
have,
which
is
the
map
that
the
tribe
provides
and
updates
on
a
regular
basis
showing
what
is
tribal,
trust
land?
What
is
leased
land
and
what
is
feed
land
in
terms
of
leased
land
leased
land
will
be
allotted
plans,
so
that
is
where
the
land
is
still
owned
by
a
member
of
the
tribe,
but
they
have
leased
it.
That's.
F
Trust
land
will
not
be
leased
land,
it
is
try
its
land
that
is
owned
directly
by
the
tribe
for
the
tribes
purposes,
such
as
their
museum
site
and
then
land
that
they
proactively
develop
on
their
own,
and
so
again
it's
owned
directly
by
the
tribe
and
it
is
not
leased
land.
It's
unlikely
that
you
will
encounter
tribal
trust
lands
in
your
day-to-day
duties
as
a
real
estate
agent.
F
A
A
F
F
F
A
C
A
F
So
we
would
have
to
meet
not
only
significance,
but
also
the
test
of
integrity,
as
outlined
in
the
Secretary
of
the
Interior
standards,
and
so
that
would
make
it
more
difficult
to
designate
as
a
class
1
structure
really
giving
at
the
landmark
status
and
that
what
we
would
probably
do
is
designate
it
under
a
class
2
structure
of
merit,
and
so
that
would
be
a
significant
change
over
how
we
do
things.
G
A
G
A
Every
house
is,
gonna
have
a
celebrity
component
attached
to
it,
but
in
Palm
Springs
we
are
fortunate
that
so
many
you
mentioned
mousey
Powell
and
William
and
William
Powell.
Now
that
house
comes
certainly
doesn't
have
any
integrity
issues
anymore,
but
would
it
not
qualify
on
its
own
because
of
the
ownership
of
the
house,
but
that
integrity
issues
would
overrule
the
ownership
of
the
house
and
the
the
parties
that
were
there
and
the
many
many
people
who
came
there
and
the
governor
came
and
visited
them
and
slept
there?
The
integrity
issue
is
gonna
overrule
that
and.
F
A
I
would
say
it's
of
lesser
importance
than
significance
in
a
town
like
ours
with
the
number,
but
that's
just
my
opinion.
That's
just
my
opinion,
so
that's
I'm
putting
it
out
there
because
it
caught
me
last
night
and
I
did
make
some
you
know
highlights
here
and
so
I
would
like
some
further
discussion
on
that.
Mr.
E
Chair,
please
so
the
mousey
Powell
house,
okay,
it's
it's
an
historic
site
because
something
important
happened
there,
but
the
the
remaining
resource
no
longer
looks
anything
like
it
did
when
those
people
were
partying
there.
So
to
say
it's
a
landmark
is
to
imply
that
what
you're
looking
at
is
what
they
looked
at.
Then
it's
not
anymore.
E
So
you
know
it's
and,
and
and
sometimes
historic
sites
are
important,
because
something
important
happened
there
and
the
building
that's
on.
It
has
nothing
to
do
with
that
that
that
event-
and
so
therefore
it
it's
sort
of
like
if
you
define
when
when
you
when
we
define
landmarks,
we're
defining
the
site
as
because
something
happened
there,
the
structure
because
it
retains
its
integrity
features.
E
So
when,
when
historic,
designating
documents
get
written,
they
talk
about
how
the
site
will
resource
responds
to
the
different
criteria
and
and
and
it's
then
up
to
bodies
like
ours
to
say
it
meets
enough
criteria
to
be
a
landmark
or
it
doesn't
mean
enough
to
be
a
landmark.
But
it's
worth
remembering
and
preserving
so
therefore
structure
of
Merit
to
me,
it's
sort
of
like
to
call
everything
either
a
landmark
or
not
dilutes.
What
makes
a
landmark
I
mean
it's
sort
of
like
that's
a
landmark.
A
A
C
A
C
F
C
F
A
A
A
A
A
E
A
A
The
elevation
more
than
25
percent
or
the
50
percent
of
the
street
front
of
vegetable
elevation
has
been
changed,
but
to
make
that
a
class
to
instead
of
a
class
one
and
so
those
alterations
to
the
exterior
of
that
house
override
the
fact
that
William
Holden
lived
there,
a
well-known
movie,
star,
etc,
etc.
I
just
don't
want
the
integrity
issue
to
override
the
other
criteria
or
what,
if
a
property
came
forward,
and
it
met
four
or
five
of
the
criteria
and
an
argument
made
well,
no
sorry,
the
integrity
is
lost.
A
F
F
A
A
And
I
appreciate
that
Vincent
hold
that,
for
just
don't
I
mean
and
and
I
don't
want
to
minimize
the
importance
of
integrity.
I
think
it's
a
character
that
we
look
for
in
people
all
day
long.
We
like
people
who
have
integrity
I
want
my
historic
sites
to
have
integrity
as
well.
I
just
don't
want
the
integrity
issue
overriding
the
other
criteria
that
have
defined
our
ordinance
up
into
this
point.
So
if
that,
if
that
indeed
does
it,
and
if
you
wouldn't
mind
repeating
that
again
in
just
a
second
because
I.
B
Class
2
is
not,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
same
distinction
is
one
that
you
want
to
carry
forward
or
not,
but
the
the
ability
to
recognize
sites
of
historic
significance
where
the
object
or
the
structure
or
the
building
is
no
longer
there,
such
as
the
Desert
Inn
or
the
Potter
clinic
or
the
Sheol
house,
or
the
Indian
Oil
building,
which
has
been
so
modified
that
it's
no
longer
in
the
way
it
was
originally.
These
are
all
class
two
sites,
the
majority
of
which
I
just
mentioned.
B
The
structure
that
was
the
historic
structure
is
gone
right.
If,
for
example,
the
William
Holden
deep-well
house
were
to
have
been
given
class
2
designation
under
our
current
ordinance,
it
would
not
be
protected
now
I'm.
The
person
who
doesn't
always
argue
about
protection
I
argue
about
the
notion
that
does
this
particular
resource
help
educate
the
public
about
our
history,
but
the
question
that
happens
as
you're.
B
Looking
at
this
revision
and
you're
looking
at
changing
the
distinction
of
what
is
a
class
two
is
whether
or
not
class
2
is
going
to
have
any
type
of
protective
status
or
not.
Because
if
you
follow
the
scenario
and
if,
for
example,
Holden
deep-well
was
to
have
been
designated
class
to
the
next
day,
it
could
be
demolished
and
so
I
don't
think.
That's
where
you
want
to
go
with
this.
But.
G
B
To
raise
I
think
that
bringing
in
the
consideration
or
the
evaluation
of
integrity
is
extremely
important,
as
you
guys
look
at
potential
class
1
historic
sites.
I
think
you
just
need
to
look
at
how
you
bring
these
distinctions
together.
The
way
that
that
mr.
Lavoie
was
saying
is
that
I
kind
of
don't
have
one
in
between
you.
A
F
A
F
A
A
H
I,
don't
know
if
it's
if
we
should
cite
within
this
ordinance,
the
actual
National
Register
criteria
for
integrity
I
mean
these
words
refer
back.
There
are
definitions
in
terms
in
the
National
Register,
for
each
of
these
words
and
the
the
adding
the
phrase
one
or
more
or
a
majority
of
these
characteristics
shall
deem
a
property
eligible
for
you
know
for
class
one
Historic,
Site
and
or
structure
of
merit
site.
H
So
it's
just
I'm
tossing
that
out.
Okay
and
I.
Also
wonder
in
terms
of
this
ordinance
is
since
I:
don't
have
the
existing
ordinance
in
front
of
me.
Does
this
go
back
and
correct
all
the
language
and
the
existing
ordinance,
for
instance,
this
new
terminology
that
new
use?
Does
it
go
back
and
modify
in.
C
C
So,
when
you're
talking
about
seven
or
eight
different
things,
here's
how
were
here's,
what
we're
using
as
a
guideline
and
I
totally
agree
with
Bill
that
you
know
that
I,
don't
think
this
item,
even
as
it
stands,
would
negate
the
nomination
of
the
William
Holden
house.
I,
think
it
just
adds,
for
it
makes
a
more
thoughtful
process
that
people
are
not
just
looking
at
future
boards
or
not
just
looking
at
the
items,
the
seven
they're
looking
at
this
also
and
so
they're.
C
A
I
I
think
I've
made
my
point.
This
is
still
this
is
item.
One
criteria
for
the
designation
of
class,
one
historic
sites
provided
both
of
the
following
findings
are
met
a
and
B,
and
they
neither
one
is
good
enough
on
its
own.
They
have
to
meet
both
so
I'm,
hoping
that
this
language
that
it's
a
few
word
changes
here
a
little
bit
of
wordsmithing
relaxes
the.
In
my
opinion,
the
ability
of
B
to
override
everything
on
the
a
list.
A
E
A
Yeah
I
won't
further.
The
discussion,
I
think
Flynn
I
think
you
understand
what
it
just
needs
a
little
relaxing
of
that
terminology,
and
if
the
board
is
okay
with
that,
I
would
just
simply
say.
Is
there
further
discussion
on
this?
The
city's
staff
reporters
to
Rebecca
recommend
approval
to
the
City
Council.
Is
it
ready
to
go
to
the
City
Council
now
or
is
there
should
be?
We
see
another
little
secondary
draft
of
this
I
know.
A
F
F
We
had
the
discussion
about
integrity
and
so
I'll
make
that
change
to
the
language
there.
We
also
had
proposed
changes
to
exceptions
from
the
certificate
of
appropriateness,
the
removal
to
non
character,
defining
features
as
being
the
exception
to
not
being
the
change
to
language
there
and
then
also
the
changes
to
the
violations
section
that
under
the
civil
action
the
$1,000
per
day,
is
until
corrected
and
that
we
also
need
to
add
definitions
for
non
correctable
activities
and
correctable
activities
under
the
violations
section.
F
So
those
are
the
proposed
modifications
that
I
have
from
the
board,
thus
far,
I
feel
that
those
are
relatively
easy
changes
to
make
and
I
am
comfortable
if
you
are
with
sending
these
changes
forward
to
the
City
Council.
Just
in
terms
of
the
the
City
Council
has
already
designated
a
subcommittee,
and
so
what
would
happen
is
that
I
would
forward
this
draft
ordinance
with
your
changes
to
the
subcommittee.
They
would
then
review
it
and
then
take
it
forward
to
the
City
Council
as
a
whole.
So
that's
the
process
that
would
occur
from
this
point
forward.
F
A
H
A
H
A
A
great
day
well.
G
G
That,
of
course,
I
wasn't
thinking
about,
because
that
wasn't
high
on
my
priority
list,
but
in
reality,
if
it
was
certainly
needed
to
be,
and
by
having
the
preservation
officer,
it
makes
a
huge
difference
in
being
able
to
admit
stur
what
we
wanted
to
happen.
So
you
know,
not
only
did
we
on
upwards,
with
some
significant
changes
and
and
requirements
that
have
a
lot
of
teeth
in
them
now,
but
also
the
historic
preservation
officer,
so
I'm
just
really
a
bit
overwhelmed
with
all
of
this
with
joy.
G
Think
that,
really
by
doing
that,
we
flushed
out
a
tremendous
amount
of
things
and,
as
Flynn
said,
we
just
kept
discovering
well,
but
now
we
need
to
go
this
direction
and
in
that
direction
and
I
would
like
to
see
us
do
more
of
these
when
it's
when
it
calls
for
these
joint
meetings
with
planning,
because
there's
so
many
times
that
we
do
go
hand
in
hand
in
moving
things
forward.
So
I
just
think
it's
one
heck
of
a
great
day
for
for
Palm
Springs
and
for
this
board.
I.
E
Would
add
to
that?
It
was
very
nice
to
have
legal
counsel
there
in
the
meeting,
rather
than
you
know
you,
you
send
a
document
off
and
they
redline
everything
off
of
it
leave
the
period
at
the
end
and
you
go
well,
so
it
was
really
nice
having
them
as
part
of
the
team
actually
in
in
drafting
this
ornaments,
as
well
as
staffs
participation.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
any
further
discussion
on
B.
We
took
the
vote.
You
have
two
returns
of
that
vote.
Yes,
okay!
Thank
you.
We're
moving
on
to
item
number
five
on
our
agenda.
These
are
discussions.
5A
HSP
be
number
22.
Progress,
update
on
Tilly's
reported
in
Plaza
theater.
If
mayor
pro-tem
shows
up
we'll,
have
him
take
a
seat
but
we'll
move
on
to
5b
hour.
Modernism
show
October
19,
20
21.
It's
just
a
reminder:
staff
that.
A
Excellent
and
staff,
the
booth
does
have
these
pamphlets
that
I
requested
from
and
I'm
showing
them
for
the
audience
at
home.
The
booth
will
have
these
two
informational
handouts.
Yes,
these
are
valuable
and
the
reason
I
asked
for
them
again
this
morning
is
because
probably
most
of
us
are
constantly
being
asked
about.
You
know,
class
one
and
on
all,
and
the
information
is
really
here
and
it's
very
succinct
and
it's
something
that
we
can
give
to
anyone
asking
and
they're
just
valuable
resources.
A
B
B
So
the
Cornelia
white
house
has
gone
undergone
the
knife
fabulous.
This
is
the
construction,
wrap
and
I
want
to
take
a
moment
and
thank
staff,
member
Philippe
romera
for
helping
me
with
the
graphics
on
this.
It
gives
a
little
bit
of
information
about
the
project
about
Cornelia
white,
about
the
house
and
about
the
team.
That's
been
put
together
to
assemble
it.
B
The
house
has
currently
been
taken
apart
on
the
backside,
so
this
is
a
temporary
cover
or
temporary
enclosure,
because
the
board-and-batten
siding
that
was
on
the
back
part
of
the
house,
which
is
basically
the
1914
Edition,
has
been
removed.
Those
boards
are
now
laid
in
all
marked
and
numbered
the
boards
and
the
battens
along
the
south
side
of
the
construction
area
and
we're
doing
some
assessments
on
figuring
out
which
ones
of
these
are
going
to
be
reusable
and
which
ones
are
too
far
gone
to
really
put
back
in
place.
B
B
We
would
call
it
beadboard
and
it
was
laid
horizontally
almost
like
sheathing,
so
well,
and
even
worse
than
that,
we
thought
there
was
a
two-by-four
stud
wall
type
of
conventional
stud
wall
partition
in
there
turns
out
that
was
about
a
two
inch
by
three
inch,
almost
like
a
furring
strip
placed
about
four
feet
on
center,
so
how
this
building
has
stood
for
this
long
is
truly
a
mystery.
Yes,
so
I'll
have
more
to
report
on
this
as
well,
and
I
just
wanted
to
show
you.
B
This
is
the
back
of
the
house
where
the
board
and
batten
cladding
has
been
removed,
and
then
they
say,
I'll
bring
more
to
you
in
the
coming
months.
On
this
very
briefly,
as
you
know,
we're
also
doing
a
video
documentation
of
this
project,
because
it
is
such
an
unusual
project
for
the
city
and
in
general.
We
think
that
we're
going
to
have
some
interesting
material
to
share
with
the
public.
B
Earlier
this
week
they
began
opening
up
the
floor.
As
you
may
recall,
the
building
is
sitting
on
a
concrete
stem
wall
footing
if
you
will
and
then
the
middle
part
of
the
floor.
The
area
underneath
the
floor
are
is
basically
or
was
basically
held
with
what
you
would
think
of
as
a
trailer,
jack,
concrete
blocks
and
other
things
kind
of
shoved
up
underneath
there
to
kind
of
hold
the
floor
up,
those
are
all
being
removed
and
concrete.
Piers
that
will
be
set
back
in
place
will
be
put
in
place
to
reinforce
that
floor.
B
So
as
I
say,
I'll
be
bringing
more
detail
forward.
I
tried
to
get
some
pictures
together
this
morning,
but
when
I
went
over
there,
I
wasn't
able
to
get
anything
more
fresh.
The
thing
I
would
like
to
ask
mr.
chair
is:
there
are
going
to
be
times
when
we're
going
to
have
some
issues
come
up
on
this
project
that
we're
going
to
need
some
immediate
decisions
on
I'm
going
to
give
you
an
example:
I
made
a
decision
on
this
last
week.
The
building
apparently
had
some
outdoor
porch
lights.
B
If
you
will
that
we're
on
by
the
back
door,
these
porch
lights
also
served
as
security
lighting
for
the
back
area
of
the
building
and
the
contractor,
encountered
them
and
said.
Well,
what
do
we
do
and
came
up
with
an
alternative
possible
replacement,
light
fixture
that
looked
kind
of
like
a
little
kerosene
lantern,
if
you
think
of
that
from
like
a
railroad
times?
B
B
So
let's
not
put
on
a
fake
or
a
false,
interpretive
light
fixture
there
that
we
don't
know
it's
conjectural
as
there's
a
term
that
would
be
used
that
if
we
have
security
lighting
that
we
need
to
place
back
there,
that
perhaps
it
should
be
pole
mounted
or
some
other
means
to
provide
good
security
lighting.
But
there
are
going
to
be
those
kinds
of
questions
and
things
that
we
encounter
on
the
fly.
That
I
would
like
at
least
a
couple
or
two
or
three
board
members.
B
If
you
would
be
available
to
be
my
backup
resource
to
bounce
these
questions
off
from,
so
that
it's
not
just
me
or
it's,
not
just
staff
making
decision
on
some
of
these
things,
I'd
like
to
have
the
ability
to
say
hey,
this
goofy
thing
has
come
up.
This
is
how
we're
thinking
about
approaching
it.
Do
you
concur
so
that
we
can
keep
the
project
moving
quickly
and
not
be
bogged
down
with
small
problems
like
this?
So
would
that
be
something
that
you
would
be
amenable
to
having
some
of
the
board
members?
Yes,.
A
F
A
No
and
I
appreciate
it
also
any
questions
of
staff.
On
on
this
presentation.
We
just
saw
on
the
cornea
why
I
think
it's
fantastic
I
really
do
I
mean
this
board
has
been
devoted
to
this
project
for
quite
a
long
time,
and
you
know
I'm
very
proud,
present
downtown
a
lot
and
I
was
downtown
that
they
had
just
finished.
Putting
this
wrap
up
on
the
fence.
I
stopped
the
car
I
had
to
just
stop
the
car
get
out.
I
took
a
lot
of
pictures.
It
was
on
a
Facebook
post.
A
It
got
a
lot
of
very,
very,
very
positive
and
favorable
responses
from
Facebook
people,
but
I
got
it
I
gotta
say
the
city
really
hit
it
out
of
the
ballpark.
With
that
banner,
it
brings
a
lot
of
attention.
It's
colorful,
it's
entertaining
its
informative.
It
does
so
many
things
it
does
so
many
things
so
I
think
it
was.
Terrific
I
would
think
that
maybe
not
this
presentation,
but
maybe
the
next
time
you've
got
some
more
photos.
A
I
think
a
presentation
at
the
council,
because
a
lot
of
people
are
sitting
home
watching
the
council
meetings
on
television.
They
see.
What's
going
on
downtown
and
and
this
little
presentation
did
there
was
I-
think
really
adding
to
the
whole
educational
component
of
what
we're
doing
there
at
the
house,
though
I
think
it
should
see
the
light
of
day
somewhere
else.
I'll
coordinate
with
this
gentleman
here,
thanks
Sam
and
just
to
make
a
point
on
the
floor.
Jax
you
for
that
they
found
under
the
house.
A
A
Green
was
moved
in
79
79
and
our
local
architect,
William
Cody
was
overseeing
that
movement
of
the
house,
where
there's
some
wonderful
photos
of
that
house
coming
down
palm
Canyon
Drive
on
the
back
of
a
truck,
but
it
is
I
mean
those
are
wonderful
photographs
and
the
little
jacks
are
there
yeah
under
that,
so
they
literally
just
picked
it
up
and
they
they
just
said
they
just
sat
it
down
on
whatever
it
wasn't
that
they
had
used
to
lift
it
up
and
move
it.
Yes,.
F
A
B
Quick
comment
in
that
you
may
recall
there
was
a
member
of
the
Palm
Springs
Preservation
Foundation
board,
who
came
to
one
of
your
meetings
several
months
ago,
Steve
Kalan,
indicating
that
their
board
was
interested
in
making
a
donation
toward
the
cost
of
the
video
documentation
of
this
house
and
director
Frank
put
out
a
letter
to
the
Palm
Springs
Preservation
Foundation
earlier
this
week,
thanking
them
and
acknowledging
their
contribution
for
the
portion
of
the
portion
of
the
funding
for
the
video
documentation.
Wonderful
is.
B
A
C
Is
there
any
way
to
do
something
like
that
on
the
Town
and
Country
I,
get
asked
about
the
Town
and
Country
all
the
time,
and
it
is
so
confusing
for
people
as
to
what
that
is
and
I
don't
know
like
I
think,
there's
a
fence
on
the
back
on
the
Indian
Canyon
side,
but
I.
Don't
think,
there's
really
any
possibility
for
doing
anything
on
the
Palm
Canyon
side,
because
those
are
active
businesses,
I,
I'll,.
B
Defer
this
to
director,
but
I
know
that
when
the
fencing
was
discussed
at
council
level,
there
was
a
concern
that
there
be
a
visible
transparency
for
that
chain-link
fence.
So
though,
the
idea
of
putting
a
wrap
over
it
begins
to
kind
of
cover
up
that
site
where,
if
there's
somebody
that
gets
in
there,
that
has
bad
intentions,
the
police
can't
see
them
now.
Maybe
there's
some
other
way
of
communicating
what
the
site
is
about
and
what
the
project
is
about,
maybe
via
a
sign
but
I'll
defer
that
to
mr.
F
C
C
F
A
F
A
A
No
I
thought
that
was
a
good
thing,
that
a
class
1
historic
site
has
designation.
A
historic
resource
is
just
almost
anything
that
falls
within
this
35-year.
Is
that
I
see
Bill
shaking
or
nodding
his
head,
yeah
I
think
that's
how
we
understood
it,
but
you'll
double
check
it
yeah
all
right,
excellent.
B
There
was
a
letter
that
came
from
the
historic
tennis
club,
neighborhood
organization
in
which
they
were.
It
seemed
to
me
in
reading
that
it's
been
awhile
since
I've
read
and
so
I
beg
your
pardon
on
this.
They
wanted
to
sort
of
hold
off
a
little
bit
in
terms
of
getting
some
better
understanding.
I
need
to
circle
back
around,
remember
Burkett
on
that
and
see
what
that
letter
said
and
see
how
they
were
looking
for
us
to
move
forward
with
it.
But
I
think
there
was
some
hesitancy
on
their
part,
so
I.
B
G
G
B
Belts,
they've
adults
to
do
a
landscape
design
that
was
presented
to
the
board.
The
board
had
questions
and
some
concerns
regarding
historic
context,
and
so
the
library
hired
Stephen
Kalin
to
do
a
a
historic
assessment
of
the
lone
Murray
courtyard
and
did
a
pretty
good
job
of
digging
things
up
in
terms
of
what
that
courtyard
used
to
be.
B
There
was
a
meeting
that
was
held
in
July
of
the
library
board,
the
HSP
B
board
and
the
city
staff
person
who
was
overseeing
the
project,
which
was
Tom
Garcia
at
the
time,
was
a
director
of
engineering
Nia
since
left
the
city.
That
meeting
apparently
much
was
discussed.
I
was
not
at
the
meeting,
but
there
was
difficulty
in
reaching
consensus
on
a
lot
of
the
scope
of
the
library
courtyard.
B
So
it
was
requested
that
the
project
be
submitted
to
the
city's
architectural
Advisory
Committee
right
for
some
suggestions
and
recommendations
back
to
the
librarian
HSP
B
subcommittees
for
consideration
of
bringing
in
some
of
the
historic
characteristics
into
this
design.
So
that
is
scheduled
for
the
AAC
meeting
of
Monday
October
15
October
15th
right!
That's
when
that
matter
will
be
brought
before
the
AAC,
the
AAC
will
be
reviewing
the
current
design.
B
It
will
be
reviewing
the
Steve
Kalan
report,
which
had
some
recommendations
in
it,
and
then
they
will
be
offering
their
recommendations
to
the
subcommittee's
to
the
joint
subcommittees
for
consideration
right.
What
that
will
then
yield
is
based
on
those
recommendations.
The
library,
I
presume,
will
make
some
modifications
to
the
design,
and
then
it
will
be
ready
to
bring
to
the
full
board
the
HSP
B
board
for
its
final
certificate
of
approval
right
and.
B
B
G
B
Certainly
I
put
together
a
PowerPoint
presentation
that
was
sort
of
a
spin-off
of
the
last
workshop
that
we
did
as
part
of
last
summer's
historic
preservation.
Symposium
I
can
modify
that
presentation
once
the
City
Council
takes
action
on
these
the
ordinance
revisions
and
take
that
material
back
out
to
the
realtors
board
to
give
them
a
refresher
on
that
I'm
happy
to
do
that
right.
G
No,
they
they
mentioned
that
that's
when
they're
there,
a
big
meeting
was
going
to
be
and
I
think
we
could
be
included
in
it,
but
in
no
way
are
they
in
saying
that
we
should
hold
off
until
then.
We
should
be
moving
forward
right
now
and
and
reviewing
that
letter
again,
I
think
it's
quite
obvious
and
I
know
in
my
follow-up
discussions.
There's
no
question
that
they,
you
know:
they're
they're,
fine,
that
board
individually
they're
fine
with
moving
this
forward
from
city
doing
their
their
next
steps.
H
A
Okay,
I
just
had
a
few
things
and
I
brought
these
all
up
in
September,
I'll,
repeat
them
in
October
and
probably
again
in
November
and
December.
But
I
did
want
to
just
address
the
letter
from
the
historic
Tennis
Club
organized
neighborhood,
I
thought
the
letter
and
I'd
asked
staff
to
sort
of
refresh
your
memories
on
it.
I
thought
the
letter
was
supportive,
but,
as
dick
indicated
they
didn't
want
to
be
the
they
didn't
want
to
carry
the
water
on
this.
A
A
This
board
tasked
with
city
ownership
of
properties,
we've
got
the
Cornelia
white
house
wrapped
up
and
and
going-
and
this
was
a
long
time
coming
and
I
asked
in
October
that
this
board
turned
its
attention
and
and
I
know.
Dicks
attention
is
laser-focused
and
that's
a
good
thing
on
La
Plaza
we've
got
to
get
the
Laplace
a
theater
up
and
running
and
bring
800
people
back
downtown
every
single
night
for
whatever
it
is
a
magic
show,
whatever
it
might
be,
whatever
it
might
be,
and
I'm
so
happy
that
mr.
A
mayor
is
in
the
audience
right
now,
I
went
to
the
library.
The
library
has
a
fantastic
series
called
Palm.
Springs
speaks
and
I
went
the
other
night.
It's
at
the
Richardson
Center
the
High
School
Auditorium.
That
was
a
full
venue.
The
Palm
Springs
Historical
Society
has
a
Palm
Springs
talks.
There's
a
Palm
Springs
speaks
there's
a
Palm
Springs
talk
series.
The
talk
series
is
at
the
historic
I'm,
not
I'm.
A
The
little
Plaza
theater
should
be
a
venue
that
is
open
and
operating
and
attracting
Michelle
Obama
to
speak,
I
mean
there's,
there's
so
many
opportunities
and
and
we've
got
the
auditorium,
let's
keep
our
focus
on
them
and
then
again
I
just
like
to,
and
it
was
in
our
minutes
this
week
this
month
and
I
appreciate
that
and
I
meant
to
comment
on
earlier,
but
I
floated
the
idea
of
tenant
improvements
on
class,
one
properties
when
and
if
that
business
should
fail,
they
have
to
take
with
them
their
tenant
improvements
and
I.
F
A
B
Had
asked
about
the
status
of
the
stance
and
cliff
mechanical
rooftop
units
resolution,
there
was
a
subcommittee
of
mr.
Lavoie
mr.
Hayes
and
miss
Dixon.
The
homeowners
association
proposed
three
colors,
the
color
of
the
building
and
like
light
gray
and
a
dark
gray,
and
the
subcommittee
recommended
the
light
gray
that
has
been
forwarded
to
the
homeowners
association
and
so
that
work
should
be
implemented
in
the
coming
months.
B
This
is
an
application
that's
being
submitted
to
the
city
by
the
homeowner
and
what
I
want
to
point
out
to
you
about
this
particular
application
is
some
time
ago
I
had
worked
on
creating
a
way
to
streamline
class
1
designation
applications.
There's
a
perception
in
the
community
that
it's
difficult,
it's
onerous,
it's
expensive
its
voluminous.
It
takes
horrible
amounts
of
time
and
so
on.
It
needn't
be,
and
in
some
cases
like
this
particular
building,
which
happens
to
be
a
Hugh
Kaptur,
designed
post
and
beam
style
home
from
I.
B
Believe
1960,
there
are
instances
when
an
85
page
historic
resources
report
is
not
necessary
that
the
building
or
the
sites
or
the
resources
credentials
are
quite
clear
and
have
already
been
well
documented.
In
those
cases
we
may
be
able
to
bring
forward
what
I
will
call
a
simplified
or
abbreviated
application,
and
that's
what
you're
going
to
see
in
what
I'm
handing
out
today.
So
this
is
an
application
for
a
class
1
nomination
of
1577
kiya
Marcos.
B
A
A
I
am
assuming
that
the
sand
cliff
HVAC
units
on
the
roof
painted
in
this
light
gray
will
be
successful
and
based
upon
that,
can
we
work
something
it.
Can
this
be
an
option
provided
to
a
homeowner
or
a
condominium
developer
or
not
developer
but
Association
where,
instead
of
the
required
screening,
will
this
become
an
option
of
the
units
being
colored
painted
a
light
gray
in
lieu
of
required
screening?
Can
we,
if
it
is
successful,
do
we
think
it's
going
to
be
successful,
I
believe.
B
It's
going
to
be
successful,
the
gray
wouldn't
have
been
the
first
color
I
chose,
but
that
doesn't
matter
the
way
that
the
ordinance
is
written
on.
Mechanical
screening
of
rooftop
units
is
that
the
screening
must
be
integral
with
the
architecture
of
the
building
on
which
it
is
placed
subject
to
the
discretion
of
the
Director
of
Planning.
B
So
when
we
have
these
kinds
of
instances
come
along
where
there
may
be
an
alternative
way
of
resolving
this
issue,
the
director
has
the
discretion
to
refer
it
to
the
HS
PB
or,
if
it's
non
historic,
they
could
refer
it
to
the
AAC
and
that's
happened
in
the
past.
You
have
also
considered
this
type
of
situation
on
the
city,
National
Bank,
building
the
Bank
of
America
building.
B
If
you
recall
a
year
or
two
ago
that
one
had
a
bit
of
a
well
in
which
the
mechanical
units
were
placed,
so
the
screening
was
not
necessary
there,
the
other
one,
that's
probably
more
familiar
to.
You
is
the
taqwa
--ts
Plaza
buildings,
where
there
is
some
screening
work
ongoing
and
before
those
buildings
have
been
granted
their
class
1
designation.
There
was
screening
already
on
the
rooftop,
and
so
what
you
did
in
that
case
was
to
require
the
building
owner
to
continue
in
a
consistent
manner.
B
The
mechanical
screening
that
had
previously
been
installed
so
mechanical
screening
of
rooftop
mechanical
units
is
required
by
the
city's
ordinance.
It
isn't
required
to
be
integral
with
the
architecture
of
the
building
and
the
Director
of
Planning
has
the
discretion
to
refer
it
to
a
board
or
committee
for
further
consideration
of
alternatives.
All.
A
A
F
Have
one
please,
as
I
alluded
to
in
my
presentation
earlier,
we
have
an
additional
staff
position,
that
of
the
historic
preservation
officer.
We
had
an
interview
panel,
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
Vice
Chair
Burkett
sat
on
that
panel
with
me
and
we
had
a
number
of
qualified
applicants.
However,
we
have
selected
mr.
Lyon
to
be
our
historic
preservation
officer
and
while
this
is
a
lateral
move
for
mr.
Lyon
I
think
that
he
will
do
a
fantastic
job
in
administering
our
historic
preservation
program,
so
just
wanted
to
announce
that
to
the
board.
Well,.