►
Description
Architectural Review Committee Meeting held on February 7th, 2022
B
Okay,
this,
it
is
5
35,
and
this
is
the
monday
february
7
2022
meeting
of
the
architectural
review
committee
of
the
city
of
palm
springs.
Mr
newell,
would
you
please
do
roll
call.
C
Yes,
member
thompson
here
remember
walsh,
is
excused
member
payline.
A
B
Thank
you-
and
I
do
want
to
point
out
that,
because
mr
walsh
is
gone,
dan
thompson
will
be
participating
in
the
discussion
and
voting
on
all
of
our
items.
Tonight.
Maybe
we
have
a
staff
report
on
the
posting
of
the
agenda.
C
B
Okay,
robert
most
look
like
john
mccoy.
Second,
all
in
favor,
aye
aye,
any
opposed.
Thank
you.
Comments
on
an
item
appearing
on
to
tonight's
agenda
are
made
at
the
time
the
item
is
presented.
If
you
want
to
speak
on
an
item
not
on
today's
agenda,
you
may
speak
now.
If
anybody
in
the
waiting
room
has
any
items
they
would
like
to
discuss
with
the
committee,
please
identify
yourselves.
B
C
Oh
chair,
we
don't
have
any
minutes
ready
for
you
tonight
so
at
your
next
agenda.
We'll
have
the
previous
minutes
for
you.
B
Okay,
then,
we
can
skip
over
that
and
get
to
the
consent
agenda,
which
has
two
items.
Item
number
one
greens
keepers
llc
doing
business
as
hits
studio,
requesting
the
approval
for
use
of
a
portable
open
sign
for
an
existing
cannabis
dispensary
located
at
155,
south
palm
canyon
drive.
The
recommendation
is
to
prove
that,
subject
to
conditions,
item
number
two
hunter
j
dog
llc
owner
requesting
a
land
use
permit
and
a
waiver
to
continue
the
use
of
an
enlarged
parklet
located
at
315
east
branus
road,
and
that
is
recommended
for
approval
subject
to
conditions.
A
B
Aye
any
opposed
okay.
Maybe
we
can
get
through
the
rest
of
it
that
quick,
too
no
new
business,
number
three
jack
rivers
of
canyon,
print
and
signs
on
behalf
of
height
and
an
existing
cannabis
dispensary
for
the
approval
of
a
sign
permit
application
to
install
a
22.3
square
foot
permanent
wall
sign
at
3395,
north
indian
canyon,
drive.
F
Okay
as
introduced,
this
is
a
sign
permit
application
for
an
existing
cannabis,
dispensary
called
heighten
located
at
3395
north
indian
canyon
drive.
The
project
site
is
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
san
rafael
and
indian
canyon
drive,
and
this
is
just
a
view
of
the
property
taking
from
the
street
intersection.
F
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
install
one
permanent
wall
sign
and
the
square
footage
of
the
signage
is
22.3
square
feet.
This
proposed
wall
sign
is
going
to
be
individual
channel
letter
world
channel
letter
sign
and
it's
going
to
be
eliminated.
F
A
F
A
F
The
first
one
is
that
the
sign
installation
shall
be
contingent
upon
the
installation
of
additional
landscaping
materials
along
the
southern
border
of
the
parking
lot
and
the
removal
of
the
unpermitted
light
fixtures,
and
the
second
is
that
the
business
owner
obtained
a
building
permit
prior
to
the
installation
of
the
wall
sign
when
it's
ready.
F
B
F
Correct
the
business
previously
had
permitted
banners
that
I
installed
the
building
innovations.
However,
those
banners
have
been
removed
and
the
business
is
proposing
a
one
more
sign
at
this
moment.
B
Okay,
then,
let's
move
ahead
to
the
applicant,
I
believe
noriko
said
the
applicant
is
here
you
have
10
minutes.
Please
give
us
your
name
and
address
and
explain
the
project.
A
A
Rivers,
our
address
is
67993
east
palm
canyon
for
canyon,
print
and
signs
in
cathedral
city.
The
project
is
is
basically
what
noriko
said
is
just
an
illuminated
channel
letter
sign
on
the
south
facing
building.
That's
in
coordinates
with
the
city,
sign
programs
or
sign
ordinances.
I'm
sorry.
B
Okay,
that's
pretty
clear
and
pretty
straightforward.
Thank
you.
Does
anybody
on
the
committee
have
questions
for
the
applicant.
B
Okay
at
this
point,
if
there
are
any
members
of
the
public
who
would
like
to
make
to
to
make
a
presentation
or
discuss
this,
I
item
now
is
your
time
to
do
that.
B
Okay,
I
don't
hear
any
discussion
amongst
the
committee.
G
I
have
a
question
for
noriko
sure
tom.
Could
you
go
back
to
the
recent
photos
you
had
of
the
front
elevation.
G
And
the
reason
I
bring
that
up
is
it
looks
a
little
different
than
the
photograph
that
they
placed
the
sign
on.
F
This
was
actually
taken
from
the
google
street
view.
The
staff
went
to
the
site
and
took
the
picture.
However,
the
picture
did
not
turn
out,
though
it
was
very
clearly.
You
know
something
that's
clear
to
really
convey.
What's
going
on
on
the
property,
what's
just
a
lighting
issue
and
using
this
signage
was
used,
I'm
sorry,
this
image
was
used.
The
size
you
see
here.
This
is
the
unpermitted
banner
that
has
been
removed
from
the
site.
Okay,
there's
nothing
on
the
innovation
right
now,.
G
F
The
city,
the
planning
division,
particularly
has
not
received
any
landscape
plan.
At
this
moment.
G
I
I
guess
I
have
a
comment:
are
we
talking
about
the
design
that's
proposed?
At
this
point,
I
think
when
I
look
at
the
front
elevation
and
the
proposed
location
of
the
sign,
it
doesn't
do
anything
to
enhance
any
of
the
architecture.
G
I
feel
like
the
location,
makes
the
building
even
feel
taller
than
it
already
is,
and
when
I
look
at
the
front
elevation,
I
feel
like
there's
a
couple
different
locations
that
where
the
sign
could
become
more
of
the
front
elevation
and
create
a
better
composition,
you
know
whether
it
be
to
the
left
of
the
door
or
just
something
to
give
some
type
of
design
element
to
it,
versus
everything
on
that
right-hand
side,
kind
of
being
stacked
up
and
then
we're
all
the
way
up
to
the
the
eve
of
the
roof.
A
E
Make
a
motion:
okay,
damn
I'll,
make
a
motion
to
approve,
subject
to
the
recommended
corrections.
B
B
Tom
dosey's
opposed
anybody
else.
Okay.
Thank
you
very
much
now
we'll
go
to
item
number
four
best
signs
incorporated
on
behalf
of
margaritaville
resort
for
signed
program.
Amendment
approval
for
the
two
existing
wall
signs
installed
on
the
front
entry,
canopy
fascia
at
the
margaritaville
resort
palm
springs,
hotel
located
at
1600,
north
indian
canyon
drive,
and
do
we
have
a
staff
report.
A
F
Thank
you.
This
is
a
sign
program,
sign
program,
amendment
application
for
the
littleville
resort,
located
at
1600,
north
indian
canyon,
drive
project
site
is
located
at
the
northeast
corner
of
north
indian
canyon,
drive
and
east
vista
china.
It's
a
16.2
acre
lot
and
the
african
is
proposing
this
sign
program.
Amendment
up
to
include
two
after
the
fact
was
signs
in
the
approved
sign
program.
The
property
currently
has
an
existing
monument
sign
at
the
corner
of
indian
canyon.
F
The
vista
chino,
the
proposed
use
to
be
included
in
sign
program
are
located
on
the
fascia
of
a
front,
a
driveway
canopy
and
again
these
are
after
the
fact
signs.
As
you
see
one
facing
the
south
elevation,
the
canopy
fascia
and
the
other
one
is
located
at
the
the
fascia
of
the
porque,
which
faces
the
corner
of
the
indian
canyon
and
the
vistacino
behind
the
monument
sign.
F
This
is
me,
casa,
espresso.
This
is
a
a
wall
sign
with
color
palette.
That's
consistent
with
the
monument
sign,
and
this
is
a
second
sign
design
for
the
fascia
of
the
driveway.
F
Based
on
the
submitted
sign
plan,
the
proposed
signs
do
not
meet
the
sign
ordinance
regulations
as
as
analyzing
a
staff
report
and
the
insulation.
The
two
signs
is
not
necessitated
by
the
site's
physical
physical
features
or
setting,
and
no
supporting
evidence
which
indicates
that
the
deviations
from
the
sign
ordinance
are
necessary
for
the
effectiveness
of
the
sign
program
and
in
the
the
submitted
justification.
F
The
business
explains
that
the
signage
will
function
to
identify
the
entrance
to
the
resort
and
also
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
state
of
mind
into
the
customer,
finds
that
such
goals
or
intent
can
be
served
by
other
architectural
and
design
means.
In
other
words,
it
does
not
have
to
be
signage
to
achieve
those
goals
and
for
the
reason
staff
is
recommending
denial,
this
application
and
about
the
draft,
which
is
attachment
number
two
in
the
staff
report,
and
this
concludes
the
staff,
presentation
and
stuff
in
the
applicant
available.
If
you
have
any
questions.
B
B
Okay,
the
applicant,
please
give
us
your
name,
tell
us
about
your
project.
You
have
10
minutes
to
present
and
two
minutes
of
rebuttal
if
needed,.
H
Yeah
hi,
my
name
is
john
cross,
I'm
with
the
sign
company,
best
signs
and
yeah
the
background
on
this
sign
program,
or
you
know,
sign
design
package
was
essentially
given
to
us
from
the
client
from
the
margarita
brand
schedule,
and
you
know
these
these
locations
were
identified
by
the
client.
H
The
signs
were
fabricated
and
installed.
So
as
far
as
you
know,
presentation
on
you
know
why
why
we
think
these
signs
should
be
there.
I
don't
you
know.
Personally,
I
don't
know
that
these
signs
hurt
anything.
I
mean
it's
a
large
corner
project.
You
know
large
corner
building,
you
know,
there's
a
there's
a
monument
on
the
corner,
but
the
the
me
mikasa
sukasa
does
does
definitely
help
to
identify.
H
You
know
that
entry
onto
the
property-
you
know
their
their
theme
is
not
like
a
you
know,
a
streamlined,
modern.
You
know
simple
identification,
I
mean
that's
that's
kind
of
the
brand.
Is
that
you
know
you've
got.
I
don't
know
if
anybody's
been
on
the
property,
but
you
know,
there's
there's
you
know
fun.
Directional
signs,
there's
quotes
everywhere.
There's
you
know
quite
a
bit
of
that
margaritaville
theming,
so
it
it
is
part
of
their
theme.
I
know
that
you
know
not.
Everybody
can
have
their
theme,
but
it
definitely.
H
It
definitely
does
help
solidify
that
brand
continuity
that
you
know
people
come
to
expect
or
you
know,
in
the
bahamas
or
in
florida
it
kind
of
serves
to
establish,
establish
their
brand.
B
B
Okay,
with
no
public
comments,
there's
no
need
for
rebuttal.
Obviously
the
committee
any
questions
for
the
applicant.
G
Tom,
I
have
a
question
for
staff.
As
part
of
I
know,
we
looked
at
the
sign.
Originally,
the
monument
sign
was
the
blue,
color
or
turquoise
color
of
the
fascia
was
that
something
that
was
approved
by
the
city,
or
was
that
part
of
the
approval
when
they
submitted
the
original
sign.
F
B
My
comment
would
be,
I
think,
with
the
signs
having
different
materials,
different
fonts,
different
graphics.
It
just
makes
the
thing
look
really
cluttered
and
it's
something
that
in
palm
springs,
sign
ordinance.
One
of
the
goal
has
been
to
keep
things
simplified
and
clean,
and
I
just
think
this
goes
against
the
principle
and
thought
behind
most
of
our
sign
regulations.
So
I'm
not
favor
of
this.
E
I
would
I
would
agree.
I
would
think
that
especially
the
the
non-illuminated
sign.
You
can't
see
that
and
if
that's
one
of
the
things
is
to
have
fun
little
quotes
and
directional
signs,
that's
something
that
you
won't
even
see.
I
think
it's
too
obscure
by
the
front
sign
on
the
on
the
corner
of
the
monument
sign.
So
by
the
time
you
get
there
you're,
you
can't
even
see
it.
So
I
don't.
I
don't
think
it's
necessary
for
one.
A
I
would
concur,
it
does
not
support
their
arrival
experience
when
it's
not
in
the
arrival.
D
I
I
agree
that
the
change
in
attitude
or
is
not
really
a
necessary
sign,
but
I
could
see
an
argument
for
keeping
me
casa
su
casa
simply
because,
as
you
drive
into
the
portico
you'll,
you
will
see
it
and
it
would
potentially
from
the
owner's
side,
start
to
create
a
certain
brand
or
image.
And
if
we
were
to
allow
any
of
them,
I
would
say
that
might
be
the
one
we
keep
and
then
get
rid
of
the
other
one.
E
See
I
would,
I
would
think
that
even
if
you
were
going
to
allow
that
one,
but
its
location
isn't
great,
I
mean
it's.
You
know
that
it's
the
portica
share
just
from
pulling
up
to
the
building.
I
don't
think
you
have
to
be
told
that,
and
so,
if
they
wanted
to
do
something
like
that,
I
think
there
may
be
a
blade
sign
above
the
front
door
as
your
inner
would
be
more
appropriate,
because
then
you
it's
eye
level
with
you.
As
you
come
into
that
port
of
cashier.
E
B
F
Thank
you.
This
is
a
proposed
single
family
residence
at
220
ridge,
mountain
drive,
a
huge
hillside,
parcel
from
banks
and
macmillan
residents.
F
F
The
flat
area
is
limited
in
the
northwest
corner
of
the
law,
as
you
see
right
over
here,
and
this
is
where
the
proposed
license
is
going
to
be
located.
This
is
just
to
show
the
project
site
images.
F
F
The
purple's
residence
is
5223
square
feet,
which
includes
a
3866
square
foot,
primary
residence
and
a
969
square
foot.
Four
car
garage
and
a
631
square
foot,
guest
room
and
the
proposed
load
coverage
is
10.1
percent,
which
is
significantly
less
than
the
35
percent.
That's
permitted
in
this
area
and
africa
is
proposing
the
maximum
building
height
of
19.3
feet
and
applicants
submitted
an
administrative,
minor
modification
application
for
the
proposed
building
height.
F
This
is
a
proposed
site
plan.
The
progress,
residence
primary
is
a
single
family.
Excuse
me
single
story,
residence
with
the
exception
of
the
guest
room
which
is
located
at
the
corner
over
here,
which
is
gonna,
be
a
partially
two-story.
F
In
addition
to
the
residence
applicants
proposing
the
installation
of
landscape
landscape
materials
which
consist
of
tolerant
landscape
materials
such
as
acacia,
olive
oak
and
desert
ironwood,
and
this
is
a
renderings
that
are
submitted
by
the
applicant
just
to
show
the
location
of
the
purple's
residence
and
the
topography
of
the
site
and
at
its
vicinity.
F
And
this
is
the
the
rear
iteration
of
the
red
zens,
which
faces
a
steep
topography
and,
as
the
staff
mentioned
earlier,
the
applicant
is
proposing
a
partial,
two-story
construction,
which
is
going
to
be
a
guest
room
over
here,
and
this
is
the
the
opposite
side
of
the
property.
It's
actually.
F
This
is
the
south
elevation
of
the
proposed
residence.
Again,
you
see
a
steep
topography
and
a
large
boulders
that
are
existing,
which
will
be
part
of
the
new
landscape
for
the
residents,
and
this
is
the
north
elevation
the
residence.
F
This
is
the
the
side,
innovation
of
the
purple's
guest
room,
which
is
going
to
be
a
partially
two
story,
and
africa
is
proposing
to
install
the
landscaping
materials
along
this
elevation
right
here
to
soften
the
the
concrete.
F
This
is
a
purple's
floor
plan,
a
folka
garage
guest
room
at
the
edge
of
the
primary
residence
and
the
entrance
to
the
residence
is
over
here.
It
does
exhibit
a
really
linear
form
in
terms
of
the
design
of
the
residence
and
african
is
proposing.
This
is
a
roof
plank.
Excuse
me:
the
africa
is
proposing
wood
trellis
in
some
areas
of
the
residence
to
differentiate
the
materials.
F
F
The
project
meets
the
development
standards,
except
for
the
building
height
for
the
the
guest
room
area,
which
is
partially
two-story
and
african
submitted
an
administrative
amount
of
modification
for
the
19.3
foot,
building
height
in
accordance
with
applicable
law
and
applicant's
request
for
amm
approval
is
justify
the
site's
topography
and
for
this
reason
the
staff
is
recommending
approval
of
the
project
subject
to
conditions
of
approval
included,
in
exhibit
a
of
the
draft
resolution,
and
this
concludes
the
staff,
presentation
and
africa
is
available.
B
Thank
you,
noriko
committee
members.
Anybody
have
questions
for
the
staff.
E
F
E
F
So
this
project
was
a
pretty
part
of
a
part
of
a
plant
development,
district
155
and
the
staff
reviewed
the
resolutions
for
the
approval
of
pdd
and
did
not
find
anything
that
relates
to
the
minimum
size
of
the
residence.
Okay.
B
E
Yeah
hello,
my
name
is
dave
banks,
I'm
here
with
ty
mcneill.
Just
just
I
wanted
to
thank
you
for
having
us
here
this
evening.
E
We
we
moved
down
here
to
palm
springs
from
the
seattle
area
about
two
years
ago,
right
during
the
beginning
of
the
pandemic,
and
like
so
many
before
us,
I
think
initially
thought
we
wanted
to
be
her
part
time,
but
shortly
after
being
here
decided
that
we
really
wanted
to
put
roots
down
here
permanently
and
we're
fortunate
enough
to
find
this
property,
and
I
think,
even
more
fortunate
to
find
sean
to
to
help
us
through
this
process
and
design,
something
that
we're
super
excited
about.
E
J
Yes,
right
here,
nick
lafaro,
hi
hi,
thank
you.
Noriko
you've
been
busy
tonight
dan.
To
answer
your
question.
First
off
we
did
get
hoa
approval
back
in
october,
I
wanna
say
maybe
september,
but
it's
gone
through
the
hoa
process
review
process
and
has
been
fully
approved.
J
Thank
you
yeah,
so
we're
very
excited
about
this
project
very
unique
site.
We
started
the
design
process
by
going
out
and
walking
the
site
with
the
clients
to
gauge
primary
views
and
really
the
buildable
area
of
the
site,
which
kind
of
became
apparent
that
it
needed
to
be
located
in
in
that
flat
area
of
the
northeast
or
the
northwest
corner.
J
Primary
views
are
to
the
east
really
great
down
valley
views
of
the
whole
valley.
However,
when
we
were
out
there,
we
did
encounter
some
bighorn
sheep
across
the
street
on
the
west
to
the
west.
So,
even
though
privacy
is
a
very
important
thing
on
this
project
and
for
the
clients
we,
we
did
create
these
little
moments
with
this,
this
window,
that
extends
above
the
roof
line.
We've
got
another
window
from
the
pantry
because
we
didn't
want
to
miss
out
on
potentially
seeing
those
big
horn
sheep.
Again.
J
J
An
important
element
for
the
clients
was
the
casita
for
a
casita
to
be
located
somewhere
on
the
project,
and
we
found
that
creating
an
attached
split
level
casita
that
kind
of
steps
down
the
site
to
be
the
best
use
of
the
site,
and
it
helps
create
this
multi-level
architectural
feature
that
faces
the
valley
with
this
kind
of
two-story
glass.
So
we
are
applying
for
an
amm
for
this
project
because
that
north
wall
of
the
casita
noriko
are
you
able
to
go
to
that
elevation?
J
Because
this
is
a
hillside
home
with
a
steep
slope.
You
can
kind
of
see
jenna
annotate.
J
J
So
that
that's
what
that's,
why
we're
applying
for
the
am
for
this
project
for
materials?
We
we
want
to
choose
natural
and
low
maintenance
materials
that
are
again
very
of
the
earth,
so
the
first
selection
was
this
dark
natural
stone,
that's
kind
of
characteristic
of
the
boulders
on
the
site.
We
didn't
want
it
to
compete
with
it
and
we're
going
to
be
laying
these
the
stone
material
in
a
very
natural,
organic,
free
form,
kind
of
manner
to
also
enhance
the
linear
design.
J
We
selected
a
horizontal
board,
formed
concrete
and
we're
using
it
here
at
this
entry
wall,
and
we
we
really
like
the
way
we
want
to
pick
a
material
that
was
going
to
contrast
and
not
really
fight
with
the
natural
dark
stone.
So
we're
going
with
a
standard,
gray
concrete
here.
We
also
played
with
the
form
to
grant
like
this
subtle,
curving
entry
feature
kind
of
reminiscent
of
the
the
natural
topography
of
the
site
as
well.
Other
materials
like
noriko,
mentioned
we're
using
gray
integral
stucco.
J
We've
got
these
black
eaves
and
other
black
steel
accents
around
the
property.
When
approaching
the
landscape,
we
we
chose
a
simple
plant
palette
using
native
desert
plants
and
also
incorporating
the
numerous
natural
boulders
and
contours
of
the
site.
So
we're
we're
just
very
pleased
to
be
presenting
this
contemporary
and
minimal
design,
and
it's
a
it
was
a
great
result
of
months
of
design
with
the
clients
and
scientists.
J
So
that
ends
my
presentation.
B
Thank
you
committee
questions
for
the
applicants.
B
E
I
seem
to
have
all
the
questions
tonight
on.
I
think
it's
a
really
great
looking
project,
but
I
have
one
question
on
on
the
roof.
I
don't
know
if,
just
on
our
board
material
board
that
the
roof
looks,
it
says
it's
light
gray.
E
J
We
did
consider
like
a
dark
gray
tone
for
this.
Also,
we
we
found
that
the
light
gray,
I
don't
know,
is
a
little
more
true
to
the
the
rest
of
the
colors
that
we're
using
here,
but
we
do
have
a
really
good
spec
on
a
dark
gray.
Dan
and
we'd
be
open
to
changing
that.
E
B
Looking
on
your
site
plan,
it's
really
tough
to
see
the
grade
lines
and
if
we
could
look
at
the
front
elevation
noriko,
I'm
not
quite
getting
it
where
you
to
the
right
of
the
entry
stairs,
there's
a
depression
where
you've
got
that
cactus
and
then
it
rises
up
quite
a
bit
till
you
get
to
the
far
right
corner.
Could
you
explain
what's
going
on
there,
please
yeah?
So
that's.
J
Actually,
the
natural
slope
of
the
topography
there
and
we
wanted
to
keep
it.
We
don't
want
to
flatten
this
site
too
much
and
we
really
like
the
way
it
makes
this
stone
grow
out
of
the
earth-
and
you
know
finish
floor
is
actually
right
here
in
the
house.
So
we'll
be
doing
quite
a
bit
of
retaining,
and
you
know
we
are
building
this
wall
fairly
tall
then,
but
it
was.
It
was
our
intent
to
to
keep
the
side
as
natural
as
possible.
B
Tom
okay
makes
sense
another
question
on
the
trellises
that
have
the
olive
wood
in
fill.
I
don't
see
any
columns
or
posts
holding
up
the
corners
of
those
trellises.
J
Well,
we
we
do
have
our
full
structural
design
now
and
I
know
he's
using
a
wide
flange
beam
here.
That's
going
pretty
deep
into
our
building
to
help
with
that
corner.
There
same
here
he's
using
some
some
beefy
bean
material.
B
J
Yeah
we,
what
is
he
using
he's
using
hss's
eight
inch
by
three
inch
hss
to
to
achieve
this,
and
no
no
columns
required.
B
J
So
we've
got
a
lot
of
land
here
and,
like
noriko
pointed
out
where
the
house
has
only
taken
up
about
10,
so
we're
trying
to
create
these
little
areas
around
the
site
to
kind
of
go
and
wander
to
that
one
in
particular,
I
think
you're
talking
south
of
the
spa
in
the
pool
that
one
in
particular
we're
thinking
of
building
this
wood
deck
with
a
fire
pit
built
in
it.
So
just
kind
of
like
a
nice
observation
deck
for
going
wandering
too.
Okay.
D
Yeah,
so,
on
the
same
thing,
there's
these
other
amoeba-shaped
places
on
on
the
plan
are
those
patios
or
what?
What
are
those
yeah?
Okay,
all
right
question:
my
real
question
was
about
solar
and
what.
A
J
J
We
do
have
some
dog
houses.
We
really
have
like
two
levels
to
our
roof.
We've
got
this
low
roof
that
extends
in
front
of
the
building
over
to
the
garage,
and
then
we've
got
this
higher
roof.
We're
going
to
keep
our
solar
panels
off
of
the
higher
roof.
We
have
these
hvac
mechanical
enclosures
or
what
we
call
dog
houses
on
the
roof,
and
we
are
going
to
get
our
solar
panels
north
of
those
there
here
over
these
guest
rooms
and
we're
also
going
to
get
some
on
the
garage
here.
J
We're
currently
working
with
with
hyperbola
energy
to
nail
down
this
solar
design
and
the
required
panels
that
we
need.
D
Okay,
great
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
your
hvac
system.
I,
if
I
recall
I
remember
seeing
one
closet
way
over
at
the
southeast
corner
and
I
think
I
saw
something
tucked
under
the
loft
of
the
guest
room,
but
where,
where
is
it
elsewhere
for
the
rest
of
the
house?.
J
Yeah
so
we're
gonna
have
four
zones.
We
do
have
this
zone
c
over
here
and
that's
gonna
feed
all
of
the
master.
Then
we
have
in
the
garage.
We've
got
two
zones
zone
a
and
zone
b
zone;
a
is
going
to
feed
all
the
great
room
and
then
zone
b
we're
going
to
be
building
a
drop
soffit
in
here,
so
that
hvsc
is
going
to
be
coming
through
this
way
and
then
all
of
our
structure
is
running
east
west.
J
We've
got
it
here,
though,
we've
got
an
hvac
closet,
that's
going
to
be
accessed
from
the
lower
level
through
here
or
under
the
stairs.
B
A
B
J
The
sides
are
going
to
be
the
same
material
as
the
roof
membrane,
so
we're
going
to
take
that
single,
ply,
roof
membrane
and
run
them
up
the
sides
and
then
they're
going
to
continue
on
top
of
the
dog
houses.
We
will
also
have
some
vents
custom
vents
made
for
the
size
of
these
dog
houses.
That
will
be
the
same
color
as
the
as
the
roof
material,
but
that's
just
those
vents
are
doing
a
lot
of
are
doing
double
duty
for
us.
J
We
hide
all
of
our
plumbing
vents
that
are
required
in
there,
and
it
also
helps
with
our
tji
joists
and
attic
ventilation
through
those.
A
G
I
have
a
question
tom
yeah
tom
nick
on
the
plan
in
in
I
don't
know
if
it's
still
the
same
quantities
proposed,
but
it
shows
a
total
of
143
landscape.
Light
fixtures
is
that
this
still
the
same
proposed
quantity.
J
Is
the
same
proposed
quantity
tom?
Some
of
these
are
very
small
fixtures
like
this
is
just
a
little
accent
kind
of
pin
light
that
we're
just
kind
of
using
as
accents
around
the
property.
So
I
think
that's
why
it
kind
of
tallied
up
so
high,
because
these
very
small,
low
lumen
fixtures
that
we
have
lighting
boulders
and
pathways
around
it.
G
The
because,
when
you
look
at
the
legend,
it
does
call
out
some
of
them
to
be
up
to
5
watts
led,
and
you
know,
from
from
led
that's
a
lot
of
lumosity.
I
think
the
lowest
was
about
a
3
watt,
but
my
concern
is
is
how
much
light
is
being
put
up
on
the
hillside,
right,
particularly
from
I
believe
it's
called
kawia
hills,
though
the
ancient
stone
houses
way
above,
if
those
would
be
looking
down
on
to
this.
So
so
that's
one
concern
I
had.
G
The
other
question
I
had
is
the
the
trees
that
are
placed
in
the
back
in
somewhat
of
a
linear
fashion,
but
they're
offset
somewhat.
Are
those
then
to
screen
the
hot,
the
roof
of
the
house
below
so
they'll
be
set
at
a
lower
elevation?
That's.
J
Right
so
you're
talking
these
guys
here.
These
are
all
of
the
trees
that
we're
proposing
and
what
we're
going
to
do
is
we're
going
to
kind
of
create
these
pockets
and
flatten
them,
and
those
are
going
to
be
about
16
feet
lower
than
the
finished
floor
of
our
house.
So
it's
not
going
to
block
the
the
homeowner's
views
down
valley,
but
it
is
going
to
help
screen
the
roof
line
from
people
down
the
valley.
Looking
up.
G
Now
has
there
been
any
consideration
of
me
of
varying
those
species
to
to
give
a
more
natural
look
than
just
all
being
proposed
as
olive
trees?
There.
J
Has-
and
I
think
we're
doing
that
so
these
four
here
are
olive
trees.
These
green
guys,
we
have
here,
are
sircidine
pracocks,
so
the
the
palo
brea
and
these
four
that
we're
proposing
here
are
going
to
be
a
variety
of
oak
that
are
native
to
the
desert.
G
Okay
and
then
one
final
question
in
in
you
and
chairman
jake
way
we're
talking
about
it
earlier
on
the
front
elevation,
the
natural
topography,
and
when
you
look
at
the
toppo,
it
looks
like
there
are
some
boulders.
But
I
guess
my
recommendation
is
the
the
wall
that
projects
out
into
the
landscape
at
the
very
far
right
of
this
elevation?
J
I
think
it
is
going
to
be
this.
This
side
is
covered
in
boulders
and
I
don't
think
that
this
these
renderings
are
really
doing
it
justice
to
to
show
the
sheer
amount
of
boulders
there.
So
it
is
going
to
be
a
very
kind
of
design,
build
site,
specific
activity.
When
we
do
that
and
we
we
will
be
incorporating
more
boulders
here.
G
A
B
Nick,
I
think,
instead
of
some
of
these
calling
and
boulders
I'd,
call
them
rock
out
croppings.
It's
just
got
some
beautiful
natural
stone
work.
Last
question
I
had,
I
don't
see
any
way
to
get
from
inside
of
the
main
house
to
the
door
of
the
guest
casita.
A
J
Thought
about
getting
access!
Oh!
This
is
taking
a
while
to
load
here
about
about
putting
a
door
here,
but
ultimately
discussing
with
the
clients
and
stuff
the
people
that
are
going
to
be
living
or
staying
temporarily
in
the
in
the
casita.
They've
got
a
a
small
kitchenette
here
that
they'll
be
able
to
use,
and
then
they
they
do
have
access
to
to
the
rear
yard.
J
Yeah
the
the
clients
don't
see
a
whole
lot
of
people
needing
to
to
come
in
and
out
often.
A
J
B
J
This
is,
this
is
going
to
be
a
pool,
equipment
vault,
and
you
can
see
we're
going
to
have
a
concrete
roof
on
top
of
the
vault
and
our
intent
is
to
have
about
12
inches
of
soil
above
that,
so
we
can
really
disguise
it.
So
it's
just
going
to
kind
of
daylight
out
here
and
you'll
have
to
walk
around
to
get
into
the
pool
equipment,
but
from
above
you
won't
be
seeing
it.
B
G
I'll
start,
I
think
my
only
concern
is
the
number
of
landscape
lights
and
I
would
probably
request
that
the
quantity
be
reduced
and
that
they
be
on
separate
circuits,
so
they
could
be
better
controlled.
B
I'll
comment
that
I
think
it's
a
great
project
materials
are
perfect
for
the
area,
though
I
agree
with
da.
It
was
dan
comment
that
the
roof,
I
would
think,
would
be
better
in
a
tan,
color
range,
so
that
you
are
as
you're
looking
down
seeing
the
same
colors
out
beyond
this
project
and
other
than
that,
I
I
think
you
hit
it
on
nail
on
the
head.
D
Sure
I'll
I'll
move
to
approve,
with
the
conditions
that
the
landscape
lighting,
the
quantity
of
landscape
lighting
be
reduced
and
that
the
color
of
the
roofing
be
revised
to
a
more
natural
color
that
fits
the
site.
G
B
G
B
Okay,
thank
you
tom.
Can
we
get
sean
back.
A
B
Okay,
we're
looking
at
item
number
six
one
las
palmas,
llc
for
a
major
architectural
application
for
the
review
of
four
single-family
house
types
on
11;
hillside
lots
in
an
administrative,
minor
modification
for
a
front
yard;
setback
reduction
for
three
lots
in
increasing
building
height
for
four
house
elevations
located
at
las
palmas
estates,
drive
staff
report.
Please
thank.
C
But,
mr
malacca,
you
have
both
screens
on
the
video
here,
so
you
want
to
switch.
The
presentation
is
that.
K
Good
now
yep
great
okay.
So,
as
chair
jackway
read
into
the
record,
this
is
one
less
promise.
K
The
project
was
first
planted
in
2002
for
19,
I'm
sorry,
17,
single-family
lots,
and
over
the
years
there
has
they
have
come
in
for
lot
splits
and
other
light
line.
Adjustments.
So
there's
a
total
of
20
lots
in
the
one
less
pumice
project.
So
today
the
architectural
review
committee
is
to
review
four
house
types
with
six
elevations.
K
They
are
requesting
an
administrative,
minor
modification
for
a
front
yard
setback
reduction
and
an
increase
in
building
height
on
a
side
yard.
In
looking
at
the
development,
as
I
mentioned
there
are,
will
be
20
lots.
The
north
side,
which
is
along
crescent
drive,
is
not
considered
architectural
review
and
some
houses
are
currently
under
construction
and
I'll
show
you
a
picture
in
just
a
minute.
K
It's
the
lots
on
the
south
running
from
the
spillway
of
the
riverside
county
flood
project
along
the
south
end
of
the
development
and
you'll
notice.
In
these
in
this
picture
there
you
can
see
that
the
lots
are
are
graded.
The
street
is
in
the
curbs,
are
in,
and
the
toe
of
the
slope
is
the
darker
brown
and,
if
you've
been
to
the
site,
this,
the
mountainside
really
becomes
steep
quite
quickly.
K
The
app
the
applicant
has
provided
a
a
diagram
showing
how
the
lot
the
houses
could
be
cited,
and
this
is
a
flipped
version
of
what
we
just
saw.
So
the
mountain
is
on
the
the
top
portion
of
the
of
the
slide
and
then
the
non-architectural
review.
Lots
are
on
the
bottom.
So
currently
this
house
on
lot
3
is
under
construction.
K
K
Let
me
zoom
in
here
involves
these
lots
here:
lots
14,
15
and
17,
based
upon
the
way
the
topography
is
where
the
mountains
located,
and
these
chicanes
and
other
islands
in
the
street.
K
K
K
They
have
provided
a
streetscape
design
showing
how
the
houses
will
relate
to
each
other,
and
no
one
house
could
be
cited
next
to
another,
meaning
you
can't
have
a
plan,
one
a
next
to
another
one,
a
or
across
directly
across
the
street,
and
that's
what
this
is
showing
how
these
different
houses
will
be
sited
along
the
world
street.
K
As
I
mentioned,
there's
a
house
under
construction.
This
actually
is
the
plan
number
four.
I
was
out
there
right
at
sunset,
so
the
next
picture
is
a
little
bit
darker.
The
sun
had
set
and
you'll
notice
that
the
houses
are
white.
It's
a
stuck
a
clear
plaster
finish
with
the
all
of
the
these
houses.
K
The
outdoor
area
living
area
faces
west.
So
you
have
a
view
of
the
dry
falls
and
the
mountain
to
the
west.
So
looking
at
these
chair,
I
have
a
bunch
of
slides
I'll
try
to
go
through
them
quickly,
so
we
don't
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
them,
but
this
is
the
plan
1a.
A
K
Comprised
of
stucco
white
quartz,
stacked,
stone,
metal,
vertical
louvers,
dark
accent,
colors
and
then
the
concrete
driveway
there
are
visualizations
that
in
your
packet
the
applicant
gave
us
an
extensive
packet,
so
you
could
see
what
these
houses
will
look
like.
As
I
mentioned,
all
the
houses
face
west
with
pools,
outdoor
barbecues,
dining
areas
and
so
forth,
and
you
notice
the
mountain
is
steep
behind
it.
K
The
transition
from
the
level
portion
to
the
mountain
is
not
worked
out
yet
there's
there
is
not
proposed
to
be
any
retaining
walls
at
this
time,
but
how
that
transition
will
happen,
has
not
been
presented
by
the
applicant,
we'll
talk
about
the
landscaping
and
how
it's
very
formal,
with
artificial
turf
in
the
front
barrel,
cactus
rocks
rubble
and
other
desert
appropriate
plants.
K
This
is
the
material
board
for
the
1a.
Looking
at
the
elevations,
as
I
mentioned,
this
1a
has
a
16
foot
elevation
on
the
left-hand
side
of
the
house.
The
code
requires
it
to
be
12,
so
they're
asking
for
an
increase
in
height.
This
is
the
great
room
on
the
interior.
K
And
this
is
a
landscape
plan
showing
the
palms,
the
ficus,
the
lantana
and
so
forth.
All
the
landscape
plans
are
similar
in
their
design
and
then
we
have
a
floor
plan.
As
I
mentioned,
the
16
foot
tall
section
of
the
house
is
the
back
portion
or
the
right
left
side
side
of
the
house,
which
is
the
great
room
master
bathroom
in
the
garage
moving
on
to
1b.
K
K
The
entryway
is
on
the
left,
which
actually
you
enter
through
this
little
courtyard
to
a
door,
and
then
you
enter
actually
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
house
see
the
door.
The
front
door
is
here.
K
This
also
has
a
16
foot
left
side,
the
landscape
plan
and
then
the
floor
plan.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
you
come
through
this
door
here
on
the
left
and
it
enters
into
the
great
room
on
the
left
hand,
side
of
the
house
plan
2b
also
has
the
garage
in
the
center
of
the
house,
but
this
has
breeze
block
that
you
with
the
front
door
here
that
you
enter
into
a
courtyard.
K
K
Plan
three
garage
on
the
left
there's
this
decorative
overhang
here
that
provides
shade
the
front
doors
leads
into
a
courtyard,
so
there
it's
not
does
not
lead
directly
into
the
house
but
leads
into
the
outdoor
living
area.
K
In
this
house,
I'd
like
to
mention
that
the
12
foot
height
is
on
the
left
hand,
side,
and
then
the
taller
portion
at
16
feet
is
on
the
interior
portion
above
the
great
room.
So
this
plan
does
not
need
the
amn.
F
K
K
It's
a
textured
foam
and
concrete
wall
with
these
circles,
which
is
kind
of
the
the
image
that
when
you
come
into
the
front
gate,
the
aerc
reviewed
the
front
entryway
about
a
year
ago,
and
these
circles
are
the
theme
that
is
throughout
the
development.
K
This
has
a
shed
roof
over
the
great
room.
K
Moving
through
these
here's
the
floor
plan
plan
five.
This
is
specifically
cited
on
a
at
the
very
end
of
the
cul-de-sac,
there's
a
driveway
that
leads
back
to
several
houses
in
the
rear.
This
has
a
side
loaded
garage,
so
the
garage
is
actually
behind
this
wall
here
and
you
notice
it
has
different
angles
to
the
front.
K
So
this
is
the
side
loaded
garage,
and
this
is
a
shared
driveway.
That
goes
back
to
two
other
lots
in
the
back
and
the
living
area
of
the
living
area.
Here
with-
and
this
is
just
conceptual
design-
they
tell
me-
could
be
the
app
the
prospective
owner
would
pick
the
type
of
outdoor
configuration
of
the
pool
and
barbecue
areas.
K
K
Landscape
plans
and
floor
plans
and
share
that
we
did
notify
residents
that
are
adjacent
along
crescent.
I
did
get
a
phone
call
from
a
resident
who
was
just
asking
if
they
could
see
the
plans,
I
sent
them
to
them
and
I
did
not
receive
any
other
comments
other
than
just
knowing
what
what
was
what
was
going
on
behind
them.
So
that
concludes
my
report.
K
The
applicant
is
here
and
if
you
would
like
there's
a
set
of
conditions
of
approval
in
your
packet,
along
with
the
resolution
that
approves
the
setback
reduction
and
the
increase
in
building
height
for
those
for
plan
plan
types.
B
K
B
Glenn
question
glenn:
is
there
parking
allowed
along
this
street
or
is
it
all
a
fire
lane.
K
B
K
B
K
B
K
Been
plotted
yet
so
I'm
not
sure
if
we
need
a
line
adjustment
or
how
that
would
work.
The
applicant
may
have
have
thought
this
through
more
than
than
what
we're
seeing
here.
B
K
B
K
A
K
There's
no
grading
plan
other
than
the
lots
are
already
graded
themselves,
they're
flat
pads
right
now
and
in
your
packet
there
is.
There
are
site
plans
that
show
the
setbacks,
but
not
with
the
houses
on
them.
Yes,
the
pages
aren't
numbered
in
this
booklet,
but
if
you
go
halfway
back.
K
I
I
K
So
as
an
example
on
lots,
20
and
19,
there
was
one
large
house
that
was
on
these
three
lots
that
was
raised
and
when
I
was
there
on
the
site
today,
there
is
a
white
low
knee
wall
that
runs
along
the
back
of
these
locks.
That
delineates
where
the
flat
portion
ends
and
the
slope
of
the
mountain
begins.
K
B
B
It
would
be
so
much
more
helpful
if
the
sheets
were
numbered,
so
we
could
refer
our
ways
through
this
large
packet,
but
like
nothing's
labeled,
it
doesn't
say
front
elevation,
rear
elevation
on
the
roof
plan.
It
doesn't
say
any
parapet
heights
doesn't
show
any
roof
mounted
equipment
doesn't
show
any
solar
doesn't
show
any
drainage.
I
think
there's
just
an
awful
lot
more
information
that
we
need
before.
We
can
really
make
a
reasonable
discussion
of
this
project.
I
Agreed
site
plans
with
setbacks
an
overall
site
plan,
good
grading
plan
like
if
I'm
surprised
this
even
got
submitted
without
you
know,
pad
heights
and.
A
D
Yeah
just
to
clarify
glenn,
so
there
are
only
four
house
types
that
we
are
reviewing.
The
1a
1b
2a
and
2b.
Is
that
right.
D
Right
and
then,
and
then
that
affects
the
lots,
11
lots,
although
I'm
not
sure
what
the
11th
lot
is,
but
because
I
think
when
you
go
from
lot
11
through
20,
unless
lot
10
is
also
considered
hillside.
D
10,
okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
for
clarifying
that,
and
would
you
just
breathe
the
16
foot
height
issue
with
the
side
yard?
Can
you
tell
me
what
that
code
is
what
that
says.
K
Right
so
any
side
yard
setback
at
that
setback
line.
The
building
height
is
to
be
no
taller
than
12
feet,
they're
requesting
16..
So
in
as
being
a
hillside
lot,
they
are
allowed
to
request
up
to
18
feet.
Well,
they
could
go
up
to
30
feet,
but
that
would
be
not
appropriate.
So
that
is
why
they're
requesting
the
16
is
that
it's
permissible
when
you
have
a
hillside
lot.
D
So
so
the
the
is
that
specific
to
this
development
or
hillside,
because
I
believe
you
know
you
have
a
at
the
front
yard-
you
have
a
height
of
12
feet
that
you
can
slope
up
to
18..
D
If
you
have
a
pitched
roof,
you
could
have
a
a
height
of
a
wall
on
the
side
yard
that
would
exceed
12
feet
right.
K
K
Well,
this
is
a
solid
wall
that
is
right
at
the
setback
line,
so
there's
really
no
four
to
one
ratio
that
would
get
it
up
to
18.,
it's
it's
where
the
wall
meets
the
setback
and,
unfortunately
it's
they're
asking
for
16..
Okay,
none
of
these
houses
will
be
built
on
the
north
side
of
the
street
because
they
they
have.
They
can't
ask
for
the
setback
reduction.
K
There's
no
justification
to
allow
them
to
have
the
the
additional
height
on
the
north
side
of
the
development,
but
it
does
work
on
the
south,
because
they're
considered
hillside.
D
B
L
Sure
my
name's
brian
foster
developer
of
the
one
last
bombus
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
you're
raising
are
probably
more
specific
than
they
need
to
be
simply
for
the
fact
that
the
certain
lots
have
not
been
specifically
cited.
So
these
are
just
standards
that
you're
looking
at
buyers
will
have
the
opportunity
to
select
lots
and
options
and
so
forth.
So
you
see
some
variables
we're
just
we're
just
planning
on
not
having
the
same
elevations
right
next
door
to
each
other.
L
Obviously,
as
far
as
the
some
of
the
comments
about
the
height
on
the
this
at
the
16
foot,
16
foot
height
at
the
side
yard
setback,
it's
only
at
the
high
roof
area.
The
garages,
the
garage
and
the
master
bedrooms
are
set
at
12
feet.
So
it's
just
that
one
area
that
pops
up,
but
with
the
orientation
of
the
homes
looking
west
and
the
homes
being
set
back
differently
instead
of
from
front
to
back
or
north
to
south,
I
guess
you'd
say
or
some
are
north
to
south
with
the
east
west
orientation.
L
It's
appropriate
to
do
the
the
modification
that
we're
asking
for.
As
far
as
the
some
of
the
driveways,
most
of
them
will
be
much
deeper
than
18
feet,
the
one
that
you
were
talking
about
at
lot,
13,
that
set
back
where
it
pinches
in
the
corner
of
the
cul-de-sac.
I
believe
that's
set
at
18
feet,
so
there's
plenty
of
room
there.
L
There
are
some
areas
that
are
not
figured
out,
we're
working
with
the
soils
engineer
on
the
hillside
or
the
rockfall
mitigation
on
the
hillside
area,
so
that
will
probably
be
sacrificial
impact
walls
or
berms.
L
Things
like
that.
So
at
this
point,
we're
trying
to
leave
enough
space
back
there
to
do
what
we
need
to
do
to
comply
with
the
mitigation
and
the
termination
between
the
toe
of
the
slope
will
be
natural
into
kind
of
working,
its
way
into
the
site
before
plant,
material
and
gravel
and
things
change,
but
overall
the
homes.
L
I
think
the
orientation
is
important
for
all
of
you
to
understand
that
the
homes
are
cited
opposite
of
the
way
the
lots
are
cut
and
that's
why
it's
important
for
the
setback
modification
and
we
wanted
to
have
some
variable
roof
lines
and
create
architectural
interest,
and
we've
already
established
the
palette
and
colors
on
the
north
side
of
the
street.
We
have
several
homes
under
construction
now
and
we
have
some
others
coming
there.
L
There
will
be
some
plans
that
are
on
the
south
side
of
the
street
that
will
be
built
on
the
north,
but
those
would
be
further
away
from
the
side
yard
setback,
so
it
would
be
within
the
with
that
sloping
envelope,
so
we'd
be
fine
there,
but
that's
only
going
to
be
probably
two
lots
and
lots.
One
and
nine
probably
have
that
condition
other
than
that.
I'm
open
for
questions.
If
you
have
any.
B
M
You
know
input
from
the
city
bending
input
from
you,
but
I
do
want
you
to
know
that
the
the
buyers
that
we
have-
and
I
can't
even
think
of
anybody
that
said
otherwise
they
want
the
look
and
the
feel
to
be
the
same
as
they
don't
move
down
this
community.
It's
pretty
unusual
to
have
all
that
feedback.
I'm
I'm
over
a
hundred
people
that
have
come
in
wanting
to
tour
the
site
that
are
qualified
buyers,
I'd
be
at
thousands.
M
If
I
let
everybody
in
you
know,
what's
going
on
with
that
neighborhood,
but
this
hillside
lots
of
some
unusual
conditions
in
that
you
have
a
hillside
there
and,
like
brian,
talked
about
having
to
deal
with
the
rockfall
study
and
mitigation.
M
B
Thank
you,
mr
lyle.
I
have
a
question
for
staff.
Before
we
move
forward.
Brian
mentioned
that
there's
still
the
capability
for
buyers
to
have
options
and
change
things.
Will
we
be
getting
working
drawings
once
the
specific
plan
is
developed
for
each
of
these
lots.
K
That
is
not
the.
This
will
be
your
review,
so
once
you
approve
the
the
front
elevations,
the
landscape
plans,
the
setbacks.
They
would
not
be
coming
back
to
you
for
specific
siting.
D
So
again,
a
question
for
glenn
yeah,
just
to
clarify,
so
our
review
is
just
on
the
plans
for
one
a
one
b
to
a
two
b.
It
will
not.
Our
review
is
not
of
plan
five,
three,
four
five
or
six.
Is
that
right?
No,
you.
K
Are
approving
the
architectural
designs
of
all
all
the
lots
of
all
the
designs
that
are
before
you
today,
so
you'll
give
us
you'll
give
the
applicant
direction
today.
If,
if
you
want
additional
information
we'll
you
can
continue
it
for
more
additional
information
or
you
could
deny
or
or
approve
either
way,
but
it
is
for
those
all
the
house
types
elevations
and
the
setback
reductions
and
increasingly
great.
Thank
you.
B
I
I
There's
no
north
arrows
setbacks
site
plan,
I'm
anxious
to
make
a
motion
to
continue
this
or
deny
it
until
we
get
better
drawings
with
more
accurate
detail
on
them.
Like.
I
think
this,
the
outline
in
the
in
the
draft
from
city
halls
pretty
clear
on
what's
required
on
a
site
plan,
elevations,
roof
plan,
floor
plans.
B
B
I'm
just
making
some
comments
so
that
they
can
understand
for
a
reason,
the
other.
My
biggest
concern
is
the
16
foot
height
at
the
side
yard,
because
the
locks
are
all
situated
so
that
justice
take
lot
15.
Its
swimming
pool
is
on
the
east
side
of
the
house.
So
it's
looking
directly
at
this,
the
side
of
the
house
next
door.
That's
just
10
feet
away
and
is
four
feet
higher
than
is
allowable.
I
don't,
I
don't
see
any
reason
to
approve
height
increases
when
it's
has
an
impact
on
the
neighboring
house.
B
If
the
pools
were
in
the
backyard-
and
it
was
just
side
yard
to
side
yard-
it's
something
that
I
think
would
be
easier
to
consider,
but
because
you're
having
the
neighbor
look
directly
at
that
and
there's
even
some
overhangs
over
those
doors
that
are
very
difficult
to
see.
So
I'm
with
sean
to
resubmit
and
revise
and
resubmit.
I
I
B
Okay,
thank
you.
So
that
concludes
our
agenda.
Does
anybody
or
do
you
have
any
committee
member
comments
on
any
any
topics.
C
Yes,
so
yeah,
if
there's
no
other
comments
from
the
committee
members,
only
just
a
couple
of
updates.
In
the
past,
we've
talked
about
doing
electronic
submittals
and
the
city
moving
towards
online
permitting
processes
so
we're
still
working
through
those
technological
advances.
The
system
isn't
ready.
C
Quite
yet,
I
know
we
talked
about
going
live
early
this
year,
but
we're
in
february
now
and
we
still
haven't
gotten
it
figured
out
quite
yet
so
as
we
finalize
the
system
and
get
it
ready
for
implementing
and
going
live
at
that
time,
we'll
look
to
create
only
online
submittals
and
have
packets
delivered
electronically,
only
right
now,
you're
still
getting
the
print
packets,
but
once
we
move
into
that
that
new
system,
which
I
don't
expect
would
happen
for
a
couple
of
months,
perhaps
maybe
three
or
four
months
it
just
depends
on
once
we
get
the
online
system
up
and
running
and
and
we
have
all
that
ready
to
go.
I
G
C
C
Only
thing
that
I
also
want
to
mention
is
that
the
planning
commission,
at
their
meeting
last
month
continued
a
project,
a
develop,
a
final
development
plan,
it's
for
the
next
phase
in
the
miralon
development.
C
So
that
is
something
that
we
will
need
some
assistance
from
the
chair
and
the
vice
chair
for
the
direction
of
the
planning
commission.
So
we
will
have
a
subcommittee,
hopefully
here
in
the
next
week
or
two
so
mr
jakeway,
mr
rottman,
we
hope
you're
available
because.
C
You've
been
volunteered,
so
just
just
keep
an
eye
out
for
an
email
from
me
or
one
of
the
other
staff
about
that.
That
subcommittee
and
that's
all
I
have.