►
From YouTube: Architectural Advisory Committee | September 17, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
B
C
B
A
B
B
B
C
B
Okay,
so
we
accepted
the
agenda.
We're
gonna
continue
the
meeting
notes
and
here's.
This
is
a
public
meeting
audience
members
are
permitted
to
comment
on
any
comment.
That's
within
this
committee's
purview
comment
on
an
item
appearing
on
today's
agenda
are
made
at
the
time
the
item
is
being
presented.
If
you
want
to
speak
on
an
item,
that's
not
on
today's
agenda.
You
may
do
so
now.
Anyone
here
to
speak
on
an
item,
that's
not
on
today's
agenda.
B
B
C
Need
to
go
back
to
the
consent
calendar
and
get
a
vote
on
the
consent
calendar
items.
We
will
note
for
the
record
that
the
minutes
of
June
18th
will
be
continued
to
your
next
meeting.
However,
we
still
need
action
on
the
minutes
of
July
2nd,
as
we
do
have
a
quorum
for
those
minutes
and
then
you've
moved
item
number
five
to
the
consent
agenda.
So
we
need
a
vote,
a
motion
and
a
vote
on
those
items.
Okay,.
C
D
C
Okay,
so
madam
chair
on
items
number
two
number
three
and
number
four
mr.
dozy
has
indicated
that
he
must
recuse
himself
from
those
items,
as
he
has
had
business
dealings
relative
to
that
specific
development.
So
consequently
we
do
not
have
a
quorum
for
those
items.
However,
if
there
are
any
comments
from
the
AAC
that
you
would
like
to
pass
on
to
the
applicant
at
this
point
in
time,
it
would
be
appropriate
for
you
to
do
so.
But
again
you
cannot
take
any
action
on
these
items.
C
What
we
will
do
is
we
will
continue
these
items
to
our
next
AAC
meeting,
I
believe
on
October,
the
first
on
October,
the
first,
and
so
we
will
schedule
those
for
AAC
discussion
on
October
the
first.
But
again,
if
you
have
any
comments
for
the
applicant,
it
would
be
appropriate
for
you
to
do
so
now,
mr.
doe
C,
we
will
ask
you
step
down
from
the.
C
Madam
chair,
that
there
are
individuals
here
from
the
neighborhood
who
are
here
to
speak
on
these
items.
Although
we
have
passed
the
public
comment
portion
of
the
agenda,
if
you
want
to
open
that
at
this
point
in
time,
I
think
that
would
be
appropriate
or
else
you
may
also
ask
for
the
public
comment
to
be
continued
to
the
October
1st
meeting.
B
F
Hi
Tom
Ford
1635
Ridge,
more
drive-in,
Andrea
sales
I
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
going
by
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
general
plan,
p2
238
proposed
hillside
development
should
utilize
low
lighting
levels
to
avoid
glare.
Such
lighting
should
be
consistent
with
standards
developed
by
the
Palomar
Observatory
to
protect
astronomical
observation
and
research.
I've
talked
to
everyone's
out
of
town.
Of
course,.
G
F
The
other
thing
is
Lu
9-8
use
of
native
plant
species
or
hillsides
to
naturalize,
open
spaces
and
mountain
areas,
because
I
don't
know.
What's
on
the
renderings
for
his
plantings,
I
I,
don't
think
Richmond.
Any
of
us
were,
even
though
we
look
right
at
this
or
the
next
street
I.
Don't
think
any
of
us
have
been
gotten
anything
out.
This
we've
just
been
finding
out
about
this.
I
want
to
know
that
that
make
sure
the
expensive
glasses
are
to
code,
the
grading
and
the
retaining
walls,
the
solar
panels.
F
Just
the
inside
lighting
just
make
sure
it's
not
too
bright.
I
know
today
they
disbanded
the
board
and
they
sort
of
put
the
developer
and
his
assistant
as
the
two
people
that
get
to
vote
on
the
HOA
board.
So
I'm
a
little
I,
don't
know
if
that's
illegal
I,
don't
know
how
that
works
and
I've
got
the
names
of
other
residents.
If
you
want
that
or
also
there's
other
in
my
neighborhood
I'm,
not
good
at
speaking,
sorry,
you
guys.
F
B
H
H
According
to
the
Palm
Springs
2007
general
plan
pages
2
3
5
through
2
3
8,
the
proposed
plans
do
not
fit
with
the
guidelines
for
mountains
and
hillsides.
These
homes
do
not
fit
with
the
natural
environment
myself,
and
many
others
who
cannot
be
here
today
would
like
to
see
the
project
continued
for
further
review
and
public
input,
retaining
walls,
linear
features
and
the
landscape.
Large
reflective
walls
of
glass
and
other
items
do
not
fit
with
the
existing
community.
H
B
G
Michael
hart,
1635
rich
mart
drive.
My
partner
spoke
most
of
things.
My
same
concern
appreciate
the
addressing
the
color
of
the
houses,
there's
still
a
little
on
the
bright
side,
but
the
changes
are
appreciated
at
this
time.
There
are
three
houses
that
are
up
there
in
what
was
once
a
that
reptilian
center.
I
think
we
don't
really
notice
them
at
night
and
for
our
house,
we've
were
spending
a
lot
of
money,
redoing
our
house,
to
enhance
the
views
of
the
of
this
mountain
that
has
always
been
there,
and
the
bright
lights
again
is
important
thing.
G
This
is
a
pitch
for
up
here's,
an
excellent
example
so
we're
far
below
so,
if
you're
looking
up.
This
is
what
you
get
to
look
at
in
the
night
sky.
So
it's
really
important
for
us
to
know
what
kind
of
lighting
is
proposed
as
an
angled
light.
That'll
be
shining
directly
at
those
of
us
who
are
in
that
development
who
wanted
to
have
a
very
natural
experience
in
our
living
place
there.
So
that's
really
important
to
see
you
don't
see
any
any
lights
under
these
divisions
of
the
sheets
that
are
that
are
sent
out.
D
G
The
back
of
these,
these
rocks
are
lightened
a
little
bit
that
reflect
a
kind
of
a
white
side
that
you
might
see
in
santorini
or
something
like
that,
so
just
houses
that
are
more
in
alignment
of
what
we
have
already
in
the
desert.
I
know
that
this
is
a
different
style,
that's
fine,
but
just
so
that
it
can
be
a
happy
resolution
so
that
the
people
that
who
are
already
living
in
this
area
aren't
ellie
affected
by
very
obtrusive
lighting
and
bright
colors,
something
that
those
are
my
basic
concerns.
B
E
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Scott.
Lyle
I
live
at
28,
98,
North
sunrise
way.
I
am
a
real
estate
broker.
I
was
the
real
estate
broker,
who
originally
handled
the
land
for
Friends
of
the
desert
Mountain
when
the
property
was
originally
sold,
I
handled
all
three
home
sales,
when
the
three
homes
were
built,
I
named
the
project
I've
been
involved
in
it
from
the
very
start
and
I'm
currently
handling
the
sales
of
the
Lots
and
the
new
homes
are
being
built,
they're
very
intimate.
E
What's
what's
going
on
at
Pinnacle
and
I
want
to
address
you,
since
things
have
been
addressed
here
today,
I
can't
be
here
for
the
meeting
in
two
weeks.
I
was
really
disappointed.
We
couldn't
get
a
quorum,
so
I'm,
hoping
that
you
might
share
my
comments
too,
with
the
other
members
when
they're
here
next
in
two
weeks.
First
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
is
that
we
have
a
developer
when
we
talk
about
developer.
This
is
a
little
different.
E
E
They
self-appointed
themselves
on
the
architects
review
committee
when,
when
the
board
members
were
not
available,
we
and
that
we
were
fine
with
that,
so
we've
brought
them
every
time.
We
when
I
say
we
every
time
the
developer
has
gone
to
them
with
something
they
keep
shooting
it
down.
Saying
start
over.
That's
really
unfair,
fret
to
acid
opera.
Do
that,
but
he
has
done
it.
He
has
made
so
many
modifications
and
changes
to
color
palette
and
everything
to
try
to
appease
them.
But
it's
gotten
to
the
point
now
where
it's
just
getting
ridiculous.
E
E
E
They.
The
the
whole
idea
of
what's
being
built
up
there
is
is,
is
to
be
harmonious
with
the
hillside
and
they've
accomplished
that
so
I
think
I'm.
Listening
to
these
comments
today
and
I'm
hearing
the
same
thing
that
I'm
hearing
from
one
of
the
neighbors
we
just
repeated
hear
from
other
people
who
obviously
are
being
told,
get
up
there
and
say
this
get
up
there
and
say
that,
and
that's
just
how
it's
coming
across
to
me.
It's
really
I've
been
doing
this
for
40
years.
E
I've,
never
seen
anything
like
it,
so
this
isn't
really
appropriate,
for
you
guys
have
to
deal
with
this.
This
should
just
be
you
know
the
HOA
approves
it
and
you
guys
should
be
looking
at
the
individual
homes.
I've
sat
down
many
of
these
meetings.
This
committee
does
a
great
job
of
helping
end
up
with
a
better
product
and
I.
E
Think
that's
what's
going
to
happen
here
eventually
and
I
just
want
to
speak
my
mind,
because
I'm
just
so
surprised
that
this
thing
has
been
going
on
and
going
on
at
this
committee
level,
and
we
have
you
made
the
Planning
Commission
yet
so
I'd
urge
you
to
vote
these
to
approve
it
through
this
final
revisions
that
have
been
made
a
lot
of
compromising.
So
we
can
get
these
wonderful
homes
built
up
here
and
finish
this
community.
One
last
thing:
I'll
leave
you
with
my
hand
with
a
similar
community
in
Tuscany
Heights.
E
We
had
three
homes
sit
for
10
years.
The
neighbors
didn't
like
it
when
the
developer
was,
as
far
west
came
in
to
finish
the
homes
they're
all
finished
now
the
neighbors
are
thrilled
to
have
their
own
community.
Finally
finished
and
they've
got
new
friends
and
new
neighbors
and
pride
of
ownership.
I
think
that
that's
what
we're
gonna
have
happen
up
in
Pinnacle
if
we
have
these
homes
built.
Thank
you.
B
D
I
I
A
Last
meeting
on
a
lot
too,
we
made
the
comment
that
different
drawings
of
different
elevations
and
things
weren't
accurate
with
each
other
I'm
still
seeing
that
inaccuracy
in
the
site
section
your
sheet.
Five,
the
staff
report
indicates
that
there's
an
8
foot
elevation
change
from
side
to
side
on
that
lot
and
your
site
section
shows
the
lot
as
being
sloping
down
from
the
east
a
flat
lot
and
then
sloping
down
from
to
the
west
with
no
retaining
walls.
That's
not
the
truth.
A
Situation
I
think
we
need
to
see
the
actual
section
of
how
the
walls
are
going
to
be
built
on
those
side
yards
and
that
will
also
then
affect
your
pool,
fencing
at
a
certain
point.
The
retaining
wall
on
the
west
side
can
act
as
the
pool
fence,
because
it's
five
feet
tall
on
itself.
You
don't
need
to
put
the
picket
fence
on
top
of
that,
so
I
think.
A
If
you
were
to
look
at
the
grades
where
all
these
walls
go,
you're
gonna
find
there's
a
lot
of
issues
that
haven't
been
resolved
and
then
on
lot
to
on
your
roof
plan.
There's
no
indication
of
where
the
water's
going.
There's
no
roof
drain
shown,
there's
no
scuppers
shown
and
where
the
where
the
big
high
18-foot
roof
is
pitching,
where
it
then
sits
on
top
of
the
lower
roofs.
A
Does
the
water
just
run
off
the
eave
down
the
side
of
that
roof,
or
is
there
some
sort
of
something
that
transports
the
water
from
the
high
roof
to
the
low
roof
and
that
those
comments
really
go
on
all
three
houses
on
both
lot
7
and
10?
You
have
a
detail
that
shows
an
exposed
gutter
on
the
side
of
the
house,
but
I
don't
see
a
gutter
shown
on
the
elevations
on
all
your
roof
plans.
A
It
doesn't
show
a
chimney
and
there's
several
chimneys
and
the
chimneys
aren't
shown
on
the
elevations
either
so
I
think
we're
seeing
inaccurate
drawings.
My
biggest
concern
is
on
both
Lots
7
in
lot
10,
but
especially
lot
10
I,
don't
see
as
a
to
sing
architect.
I,
don't
see
any
way
those
houses
can
structurally
be
built.
There's
no
columns,
there's
no
place
for
beams
you're
showing
unlocked
an
a
roof.
That's
about
15
to
16
inches
thick,
but
how
where's
the
drainage
on
top
of
that
roof?
A
I
May
address
this:
can
I
address
your
comments
so
most
your
comments
are
not
something
I'm
familiar
with.
It
would
seem
that
esthetics
committee
or
architectural
Advisory
Committee,
is
looking
at
the
aesthetics
of
this,
and
once
we
get
to
the
approval
stage
that
the
design
is
acceptable,
then
of
course
we
would
move
towards
the
things
that
you're
pointing
out.
We
don't
know
exactly
what
a
structural
engineer
is
going
to
do,
but
I
could
encourage
you
to
come
and
look
at
the
homes
that
we
have
done,
that
have
extreme
structural
components.
I
That
will
do
the
things
that
we're
trying
to
do.
These
are
nothing
compared
to
some
of
the
homes
that
we're
doing
currently
and
I'd
like
to
have
you
take
a
tour
and
see
some
of
the
houses
that
are
in
the
structural
stages
and
have
large
expanses
of
glass
and
we're
able
to
accommodate
these
things
that
you're
concerned
about
I?
Don't
see
any
issues
with
the
designs
the
way
they
are.
The
only
comment
that
I
think
that
would
make
senses
the
tapered
structural
beam
on
lot
10.
I
What
the
overall
thickness
will
end
up
being,
depending
on
the
projection
of
how
far
the
cantilever
is,
so
it
may
be
10
inches,
it
may
be
8
inches,
it
may
be
12
inches,
but
we're
talking,
you
know
the
thickness
of
something
varying
like
this.
So
it's
not.
It
shouldn't
be
an
issue
for
an
architectural
advisory
committee
to
focus
on
point.
I
It
just
doesn't
seem
appropriate
to
engage
all
of
these
consultants
and
then
keep
modifying
a
plan
if
we
were
able
to
get
the
plan
according
to
the
design,
it
should
just
not
be
an
issue
and
I
think
we're
capable
of
doing
that
and
again
I
would
encourage
you
to
see
some
of
the
houses.
So
that
way,
you
have
an
understanding
of
how
we're
able
to
accomplish
this.
A.
A
Lot
of
our
other
projects
that
we've
reviewed
we
have
been
talking
directly
to
the
architect
or
to
the
design,
team
and
I
think
it
could
be
very
helpful
for
us.
If
you
had
at
least
one
person
from
your
design
team,
be
able
to
explain
the
project
and
walk
us
through
the
technical
issues.
I
would
say
on
lot
10
that
roof
the
cantilever
is
so
huge.
Yes,
your
roof
might
only
be
12
inches
thick,
but
you're
gonna
need
a
24
inch
tall
steel
beam
under
that
and
that
changes
the
look
and
the
effect
of
the
house.
A
So
that
means
it
just
has
to
come
back
to
us
again
and
start
over.
We
don't
want
to
have
to
do
these
things
multiple
times.
I
think
we
need
the
proper
information
to
start
with,
so
that
we
can
just
review
them
once
and
and
get
you
on
the
road,
because
I
too
would
love
to
see
that
neighborhood
built
up.
Thank.
I
You
and
just
to
note
homes
that
were
doing
based
on
the
3d
models
and
the
renderings
that
I'm,
showing
you
were
probably
at
90%
of
that
the
completed
house
is
probably
within
90
percent.
The
same.
It
always
varies
a
little
bit
on
the
structural
depth.
Then
you're
concerned
a
lot
10
I,
don't
know
if
Glen
has
a
photo
of
lot
10
the
structural
beam
to
carry
that
cantilever
would
be
set
back
on
top
of
the
columns
that
are
inside
the
house,
they're
shown
on
the
rendering
we
haven't
structurally
engineered
the
house.
I
C
I
C
They
do
need
to
be
consistent
for
the
architectural
advisory
committee
to
accurately
review
them,
so
we
will
ask
you
in
the
intervening
period,
if
you
could
make
sure
that
all
the
drawings
are
correct
and
I
would
also
advise
you
to
have
your
architect
here.
So
he
can
respond
to
the
questions
of
the
architectural
Advisory
Committee.
That's.
I
I
G
B
B
B
B
I
Because
this
is
that
photo
is
taken
beyond
the
coldest
act
at
the
front
door.
So
I
don't
think
it's
really
relevant
and
if
a
homeowner
were
concerned
about
that
they
could,
you
know,
put
a
shade
inside
the
home
with
a
button
to
drop
the
blinds
down
for
privacy
if
they
needed
to,
but
I,
don't
think
there's
a
privacy
issue
there
at
all.
B
I
see
on
on
your
on
your
roofline
inside
is
there.
Is
that
the
mechanical
ducts?
Are
there
gonna,
be
exposed,
how's
the
air-conditioning
going
to
be
installed
in
that
back
open
space,
because
if,
by
some
reason
you
need
a
room
to
run
your
ductwork
and
your
ceiling
height
is
going
to
be
lower,
then
that's
a
different
look
than
what
you're
proposing
here
in
the
rendering
like.
B
And
therefore,
it
changes
now
the
configuration
of
the
building
composition
that
you're
proposing
in
front
of
us
today,
and
therefore
it
goes
back
along
to
the
comment
of
we
would
love
to
review
your
project.
We
want
to
be
constructive
criticism
based
on
the
findings
in
the
planning
guidelines
and
in
composition
right
now,
if
we're
saying
that
this
is
good,
or
this
is
that
this
isn't
harmonious
or
this
is
harmonious
but
then
later
on,
you
have
to
come
back
or
you
don't
come
back,
because
you
don't
think
it's
important
to
us
to
say.
I
And
we
we
don't
design
homes
that
way
the
that
fascia
might
vary
a
couple
of
inches
at
best
the
HVAC.
If
you
look
on
the
plan,
you'll
show
you
the
where
the
FAU
is.
It
can
push
air
from
the
kitchen
straight
across
and
then
the
pastor
bedroom
side
fa.
You
can
push
air
the
other
direction.
So
that's
we've.
I
I
Saying
there's
plenty
of
area
for
the
HVAC
to
run
across
the
softening.
That
would
be
behind
the
kitchen
island
Oh
above
the
kitchen
cabinetry.
There
would
be
a
soffit
that
the
cabinet's
terminate
into
and
that
ductwork
would
run
right
through
there
and
push
air
directly
across
towards
the
fireplace
on
the
opposing
side.
And
then
the
FAU
on
the
other
side
can
push
air
into
the
great
room,
living
room
area
and.
C
I
B
Nine-One-One
being
at
the
front,
rendering,
okay,
so
that
circular
roof
that
engages
the
two
garages,
it's
sloping
back
towards
a
parapet
and
how
is
that
composition
relating
to
the
harmony
of
the
neighborhood
and
then
the
mountains
that
curvilinear?
How
do
you?
How
does
how
did
that
composition
come
about.
I
I'm
about
as
a
curvilinear
design,
it's
not
anything
that's
foreign
to
the
desert
and
it's
not
it's
clearly
not
the
same
as
the
other
three
houses.
But
this
is
a
custom
home
community
when
the
home
should
be
dissimilar,
not
the
same
so
we're
trying
to
create
architectural
homes
that
are
uniquely
different
from
one
another
and
not
being
exactly
the
same
as
it's
not
attract
development
and.
I
I
B
I
I
Well,
the
point
is
probably
finer
than
it
looks:
it's
it's
a
tapered
structural
beam
and
we've
done
this
before
on
many
homes.
It's
part
of
the
roof
isn't
necessarily
sloping
at
that
dramatic
angle.
The
roof
is
generally
sloping
back
slightly
for
water
to
drain,
but
the
line
that
you're
seeing
above
the
window
is
creating
the
effect
of
that
roof.
Raking
up.
I
But
the
roof,
the
top,
the
top
of
the
roof,
is
generally
flat
and
then
the
projection
from
where
the
back
sliding
glass
doors
are
on
the
house,
the
cantilevered
portion
of
it.
That
is
a
continuation
of
that
same
line.
That
comes
to
a
probably
about
a
hoping
for
about.
Maybe
an
eighth
inch,
thick
fascia
rear
elevation.
B
I
did
it
composition?
Why
is
the
front
this?
It's
not
in
harmony,
I
can't
make
sense
of
it.
What
has
hierarchy?
What
doesn't?
Why
is
the
CMU
all
there
and
you
have
plaster
wall
and
then
now
you're
gonna
see
different
types
of
roof
material,
and
then
you
have
this
white
beam
very
fragile,
connecting
a
very
strong
CMU
wall,
that's
kind
of
levering
the
other
two
sort
of
have
some
resemblance
of
what's
happening
in
the
backyard.
B
I
I
B
B
B
A
I
think
one
thing
that
could
help
us
a
lot
to
understand
the
ruffs
is,
if
you
put
parapet
height,
elevations
and
show
us
the
height
of
how
the
roof
is,
is
sloping
or
not
sloping?
The
other
issue
I
have
that
I
forgot
to
mention
earlier
is
on
both
Lots
7
and
10.
I
think
the
driveways
are
really
problematic
on
lot
7.
A
The
driveway
is
pitching
down
six
feet
from
the
street,
and
so
somebody
is
going
to
have
to
back
out
of
one
of
those
garages
on
about
a
40
foot,
long
driveway
on
a
curve
going
uphill,
not
able
not
being
able
to
see
the
street
I
think
I
think
the
garage
is
in
a
total
wrong
place.
I
think
it
should
be
on
the
low
side
of
the
lot
so
that
you're
coming
in
much
more
of
a
flat
driveway
from
the
street
into
the
garage.
I
And
that's
a
good
point
that
you
bring
up,
but
if
the
garage
were
on
the
opposite
side,
it
would
that's
the
view
side
of
the
house,
so
the
garage
would
take
up
the
majority
of
the
back
of
the
view
of
the
house
and
trust
me.
We
started
with
a
garage
there
and
went
round
and
round
on
it
and
it's.
This
is
where
it
ended
up
and
we
also
have
another
condition
that
is
primarily
important
for
the
neighbors,
as
well
as
keeping
the
profile
that
houses
down
so
we've
depressed
the
house
into
the
grade
down.
I
So
it's
not
obstructing
views
from
above
lot.
9
sits
right
above
this.
So
if
this
house
were
elevated
at
a
higher
elevation
it
would
it
would
obliterate
the
view
from
lot
9.
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
it's
like
that
and
that's
the
other
reason.
The
driveways
wide
is
to
maneuver
in
and
out
so.
But
your
comments
are
well
taken
and
we
have
addressed
it
for
sure.
The.
A
Other
issue
I
have
with
the
roofs,
and
you
can
see
it
very
clearly
on
this
one
where
the
roof
is
pitching
towards
the
street,
we're
actually
seeing
the
roofing
material
and
if
the
roofing
material
is
a
welded
in
the
bonded
piece,
we're
not
looking
at
a
very
attractive
roof
and
and
I
believe.
It's
specifically
on
lot
10.
It's
called
out
as
off-white
on
the
drawings
and.
C
A
I
I
A
A
This,
on
top
of
it,
because
it's
pitching
up
when
you're
and
you
can
see
it
on
your
elevation
but
I
mean
we're
not
here
today,
specifically,
you
know
solving
all
the
issues.
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
some
of
the
things
that
I
saw.
This
elevation
is
fine,
but
if
you
look
at
it
coming
up
the
street
you're
saying.
I
That's
elevated
up
at
about
20
feet
so
coming
up
the
street
I.
Don't
think
you
would
see
that
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
visible
at
all
and
if
it
is
just
so,
you
know
the
current
roofing
systems
that
were
using
or
membrane
which
almost
look
like
a
smooth
stucco.
So
they
do
have
a
very
nice
finish,
although
they're
not
seen,
but
they
do
look
good.
D
I
Have
not
submitted
any
plans
for
solar,
but
I
was
told
by
that
the
city
of
Palm
Springs
does
require
solar
on
all
houses,
so
I
would
imagine
we
would
properly
put
a
starter
kit
on
and
which
might
be
a
two
kilowatt
system,
I'm,
not
sure
what
the
requirements
are.
But
this
just
came
to
my
attention
today.
So.
D
I
And
we've
been
going
round
and
round
on
this
and
I'm,
not
quite
sure
if
the
neighbors
above
who
have
solar
on
their
houses.
If
we
put
two
solar
panels
on
these
roofs,
we
can't
foresee
what
somebody
else
will
do
in
the
future,
but
that
will
be
up
to
them
to
comply
with
the
city
standards
and
also
comply
with
the
HOA
from
an
aesthetic
perspective.