►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting | May 8, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Are
we
on
air
we're
on
air
I'd
like
to
call
the
may
8th
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission
to
order
and
I'd
just
like
to
make
a
quick
announcement?
The
water
seems
to
be
off
in
City
Hall
if
you
need
to
use
a
restroom,
there's
a
restroom
on
the
side
of
the
building
towards
the
parking
lot
on
the
east
side.
And
if
you
come
up
to
speak
to
us,
there
is
a
microphone
and
a
chair
right
up
here
in
the
corner
and
that's
where
you'd
come
to
address
us.
A
C
A
D
B
A
A
Been
moved
and
seconded
all
in
favor
all
right,
it's
been
passed.
The
agenda
is
accepted.
This
time
has
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
Planning
Commission
on
the
consent,
calendar
non
public
hearing
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject
matter
of
the
Commission.
If
you
wish
to
speak
on
items
numbers
for
a
this
would
be
your
time
to
come
up
and
speak
to
the
Commission
comments
at
a
public
hearing.
Item
may
be
made
at
this
time.
Is
it
presented?
A
F
Thank
You
honorable
chair
mission,
members,
my
name
is
Mario
Gonzalez
3:08.
Seventy
five
date
palm
drive,
Cathedral
City,
California
I'm,
president
CEO
of
GHA
companies,
we're
a
development
group
that
currently
doing
some
work
over
at
the
project,
known
as
vibe
on
the
corner
of
ferrell
and
Portola.
That
development
has
two
different
type
of
product
types.
One
is
condominium,
we're
doing
a
single-family
residential
and
our
request
was
to
get
some
consideration
to
we
have
we
have
single-family
homes
and
kind
of
a
shared
easement
use
to
our
neighbors,
but
they
are
single
family.
F
They
are
freestanding,
and
this
was
a
project
that
went
through
all
the
you
know,
PUD
process
and
I.
Think
at
one
time
the
density
was
even
lowered.
It's
been
through
a
couple
different
developments,
but
we're
fortunate
to
be
able
to
start
building
it
out.
We
are
opening
our
models,
the
18th
of
this
month
and
as
we
started
developing
the
property,
you
know
we
were
getting
trying
to
get
a
good
feel
of
how
that
side
yard
would
work,
because
that
side
yard
that
we
have
is
basically
our
most
common
area
that
we
have.
F
The
pools
are
in
and
if
this
made
a
lot
of
sense
for
proper
planning
to
try
to
go
ahead
and
move
them
and
I
know
that
you
know
we
all
go
through
a
lot
of
you
know
the
norm
and
we
have
you
know
we
have
certain
rules
and
regulations
and
a
lot
of
times.
You
know
we
need
to
because
they
make
sense,
but
we're
always
looking
to
try
to
you
know
be
better
by
design
and
I.
Think
that
this
request
that
we're
asking
has
no
effect
on
on
the
neighbor.
F
The
neighbors
already
is
aware
that
that
is
a
common
area
that
it
could
be
used
by
the
adjacent
neighbor
and
we're
asking
that
you
kindly
work
with
us
and
allow
that
to
increase
or
decrease
down
to
two
feet
from
where
it
normally
is
I
think
at
five
feet.
Flint
is
that
word
is
yes,
so
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
something.
If
I
may
we.
A
A
There
anyone
else
in
the
audience
wanted
to
speak
to
the
Commission
on
a
non
public
hearing
item
on
the
agenda.
There
are
agendas
on
the
table
over
there.
Okay
hearing
none
we'll
move
on.
We
have
no
consent
calendar
today,
so
we're
going
to
move
to
the
first
public
hearing,
but
before
we
do
so
I
believe
we
have
a
recusal.
D
A
Thank
you
very
much
give
Commissioner
Gardner
a
moment
to
leave
the
room
as
she
reduces
herself
and
before
we
start
with
the
staff
report.
Can
I
just
have
a
show
of
hands
of
people
in
the
audience
that
are
expecting
to
speak
on
the
topic
of
colony,
29.
A
G
So
this
is
a
request
from
Johnston
family
trust,
doing
business
as
colony
29
for
a
general
plan,
amendment
to
change
the
land,
use
designation
from
a
state
residential
to
medium
density,
residential
for
a
portion
of
the
property,
a
negative
declaration
under
sequa
and
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
kitchens
and
the
unit's
the
hotel
units
located
at
137,
South
acquits
Drive.
So,
as
I
mentioned,
the
Planning
Commission
reviewed
this.
This
request
at
the
previous
meeting
and
it
was
a
continued
hearing.
The
Planning
Commission
may
decide
to
reopen
the
public
hearing.
G
If
you
choose
to
accept
additional
testimony
at
that
meeting
on
the
24th,
the
Planning
Commission
wanted
staff
to
provide
to
you
conditions
of
approval
that
were
part
of
a
previous
project
called
infusion.
Beach
Hotel,
if
you
remember
that
hotel
is
located
on
North,
Palm,
Canyon
Drive
and
it
was
operating
as
an
outdoor
music
venue
and
with
outdoor
music
in
their
pool
area.
So
there
were
several
extensive
conditions
that
were
assigned
to
that
approval
and
the
Planning
Commission
would
wanted
us
to
provide
those
to
you.
G
The
applicant
shall
be
required
to
install
noise
monitoring
system
and
there's
a
specific
model
called
the
Ryan
NL
42
or
similar
capable
of
monitoring
sound
levels
at
the
property
line
adjacent
to
the
event
space.
So,
as
we
mentioned
earlier
in
the
last
hearing
in
the
slide,
that's
before
you,
this
shows
the
colony
29
compound,
which
includes
a
cluster
of
vacation
rentals
that
cannot
operate
as
a
vacation
rental
according
to
the
new
ordinance.
G
So
that
is
one
of
the
reasons
why
they're
here
today
to
go
as
a
hotel
and
you'll
see
at
the
bottom
of
the
slide.
The
green
area
is
the
event
line
where
they
currently
have
ceremonies
events,
corporate
meetings
and
so
on.
So
this
sound
system
that
is
proposed
shall
be
capable
of
monitoring
noise
once
each.
Throughout
the
event,
the
system
shall
be
capable
of
logging
data
to
internal
and
external
memory
for
reporting
purposes,
so
that
the
system
will
be
able
to
keep
track
of
the
noise
that
is
conducted
on
the
site.
G
There
shall
be
a
sound
level
meter.
The
meter
shall
be
calibrated,
a
recommended,
regular
interval
and
the
event
that
there's
a
noise
complaint.
The
project
applicant
shall
provide
the
noise
level
measurement
data
to
the
city
of
Palm
Springs,
so
that
we
can
verify
that
their
system
also
registered
a
noise
violation.
G
Other
conditions
that
are
included
in
your
conditions
of
approval
state
that
the
event
breakdown
or
tail
det
teardown
of
an
event
shall
be
limited
to
Monday
through
Friday
between
the
hours
of
8
a.m.
and
5
p.m.
so.
This
would
not
allow
them
to
remove
event
equipment
on
Sundays.
So
it's
more
of
a
quiet
time
for
the
neighborhood
and
last
condition
would
be
the
Planning
Commission
shall
review
the
Cu
P
at
a
public
hearing
in
12
months
from
the
effective
date
of
the
general
plan
amendment
to
monitor
and
see
how
everything
went
over
the
year.
G
So
in
your
staff
report
there
are
new
conditions
of
approval
that
corporated
these
measures
and
the
Planning
Commission
may
choose
to
add
or
subtract
or
modify.
If
you
like,
I
would
like
to
mention
that
in
your
packet
there
are
some
additional
information
that
was
provided
to
you
today.
Let
me
go
down
to
some
of
those
slides
first
off
I'd
like
to
show
you
this
slide.
This
is
a
new
slide
that
shows
the
current
general
plan
amendment
designations.
G
The
top
slide
is
the
current
situation,
where
the
colony
29
is
a
designated
as
a
state
residential
and
the
second
slide.
The
lower
slide
is
what
will
this
new
action
will
incorporate
it
into
the
MDR
and
you'll
see
that
there
is
high
density
residential
around
this
and
also
continues
on
the
MDR,
which
is
to
the
south
of
the
property.
G
So
in
your
additional
information
packet,
there
is
an
exhibit
that
shows
a
noise
wall
that
the
applicant
has
built,
that
is
about
24
feet
from
the
neighbor's
property
to
the
south.
It's
that
red
line
and
it
runs
about
60
feet
along
the
property
line,
and
there
are
photographs
of
it
that
were
handed
out
to
you
today
and
in
the
photograph
you'll
you'll
see
a
shorter
wall
and
then
you'll
see
a
tall
brown
wall.
G
So
once
again,
then
the
photographs.
This
shows
a
little,
the
lower
walls,
a
decorative
wall
and
then
behind.
It
is
the
taller
wall
that
is
acts
as
a
noise
barrier,
so
chair.
That
concludes
my
report.
The
the
environmental
consultant
is
here.
If
you
have
additional
questions
based
upon
the
negative
declaration
that
was
prepared
and
reviewed
by
the
Planning
Commission
at
the
previous
meeting,
Thank.
D
G
So
the
area
photograph
was
probably
taken
two
years
ago
from
our
GIS
system:
okay,
I
and
since
then
the
taller
wall
has
been
built.
The
last
time
I
was
on
the
property
which
is
about
a
year
ago.
The
lower
wall
was
there,
the
taller
wall
has
been
added
and
I
haven't
even
seen
the
taller
wall,
but
the
applicant
is
here,
and
he
may
be
able
to
answer
that
question.
H
B
I'll
go
ahead
and
respond
to
that
question.
I
was
the
one
who
worked
on
those
conditions
for
infusion
Beach.
You've
got
to
keep
in
mind
that
we've
got
two
slightly
different
uses
in
fusion.
Beach
is
a
concert
venue
and
it's
something
that's
going
to
be
more
continuous
during
the
week.
This
is
only
on
occasion
that
they
do
special
events
here
at
this
property.
So
what
we've
done
is
we've
tailored
those
conditions.
B
We've
kept
the
important
things
in
there
in
terms
of
being
able
to
record
the
sound
continually
and
being
able
to
print
that
out,
the
limitation
on
the
subwoofers
and
the
sound
limiting
equipment.
So
we've
taken
what
are
the
most
essential
components
and
the
most
important
components
from
infusion
beach
and
then
tailored
them
to
the
specific
operating
conditions
here
for
colony,
29.
B
G
A
More
questions
of
staff,
so
I
have
a
question
of
City
Attorney.
There
seems
to
be
the
audience
people
in
the
audience
who
want
to
speak
on
this.
How
do
I
reopen
the
public
hearing
do
it?
Is
it
need
to
be
a
motion
for
the
chair,
provocative
reopening.
C
The
public
yeah
mr.
chair
reopening
the
public
hearing
would
be
the
chair
perogative.
It
would
also
be
important
to
note
that
anyone
who
provided
any
written
correspondence
would
also
have
to
be
part
of
the
record
as
well.
So,
okay,
if
you
know,
is
be
important
to
go
back
and
check
to
see
if
anybody
provided
any
letters
after
the
public
hearing
closed.
Given
that
we're
now
14
people
here
an
opportunity
to
speak.
Okay.
A
A
J
Hello
Kelly
McLain
here
on
behalf
of
dave
johnston
for
colony
29.
I
want
to
answer
a
few
of
the
questions
we
did
review
these
sound
restrictions
and
everything
that
is
listed
there.
We
are
comfortable
with
we
believe,
we've
already
implemented,
most
of
those
we've
taken
it
a
step
further
by
creating
a
sound
wall,
which
is
what
you
have
been
asking
about
prior
to
this
year.
We
did
not
have
that.
J
It
was
because
of
a
complaining
neighbor
that
we
decided
that
it
was
important
to
try
any
measures
to
make
her
life
better
and
since
adding
that
sound
wall,
it
is
a
it's
a
movable,
sound
wall.
It
comes
up
for
the
events,
it
does
not
I
know
I'll
go
up
there
to
show
you,
but
it
basically
is
right
by
the
residential
condominium
apartment.
We
are
surrounded
by
a
hotel,
so
the
motors
come
here.
J
Surrounded
by
multiple
different
types
of
properties,
we
have
a
hotel
right
here
and
then
we
have
some
units
right
here.
An
additional
hotel
here
on
this
side
is
residential
homes.
We
have
the
Mallory's,
find
us
the
Willows
and
then
O'donnell.
So
we
have
noise
coming
from
a
lot
of
places
not
to
mention
over
here
there's
a
tennis
court.
So
we've
got
a
lot
of
noise.
What
we
did
was
we
put
this
sound
wall
directly
here
to
mitigate
noise.
Coming
this
way
and
it's
reduced
our
decibels
about
five
five
decibels
is
what
we've
been
reading.
J
We
did
Institute.
We
did
Institute
a
noise
level
monitor
that
is
there
at
the
property
that
comes
out
on
during
events,
and
it
can
record
the
sound
and
it
can
be
provided
to
the
city
if
they
wish.
I
do
want
to
be
very
clear
that
there
reason
why
we
are
here
is
because
three
colony
29
can
no
longer
operate
as
a
vacation
rental.
Each
parcel
is
is
a
separate
parcel
owned
by
a
different
individual.
You
cannot
apply
for
a
vacation
rental
for
different
parcels.
You
also
cannot
have
a
cluster
of
homes
be
a
vacation
rental.
J
So
because
of
that,
that
has
really
forced
us
to
come
here
to
figure
out
how
do
we?
How
do
we
move
forward
the
event?
Space
really
is
a
very
minimal,
minimal
concept
that
doesn't
take
place
every
single
weekend,
majority
of
the
time.
It's
a
vacation
rental,
where
we
have
no
complaints.
It's
very
quiet.
The
people
that
rent
there
love
the
space.
It's
seven
acres,
it's
a
very
large
space,
that's
contained
for
the
noise.
We
do
not
have
noise
complaints
for
the
event
space.
We've
taken
great
measures
to
reduce
all
impacts
to
the
neighborhoods.
J
We
believe
we've
done
a
great
job,
being
good
neighbors
and
doing
everything
we
can
to
mitigate
the
noise
and
we
feel
comfortable
with
these
restrictions-
and
we
believe
we
will
be
here
in
a
year
and
you'll-
be
happy
here
to
answer
any
other
additional
questions
with
regards
to
operations
or
things
that
are
making
sense
with
regards
to
the
wall.
There
is
an
additional
regular
wall.
That's
there
across
the
entire
property.
We
added
that
sound
wall
barrier
to
break
up
the
noise,
because
it's
not
about
really
music.
A
Thank
you,
I'll.
Have
you
back
up
to
answer
questions
I'm
sure
Kelly?
Thank
you
very
much.
I'd
like
to
just
take
a
moment.
It
was
a
continuing
item,
so
I
did
not
read
the
item
into
the
record.
So
let
me
read
the
item
into
the
record,
so
we
know
exactly
what
we're
talking
about.
It's
public
hearing
item
2a,
it's
the
Johnson
family
trust,
doing
business
as
colony,
29
for
Jen,
an
amendment
to
change
the
land
use
designation
from
a
state
residential
to
medium
density,
residential
for
a
portion
of
the
property.
A
It's
a
negative
declaration
in
the
sequa
and
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
the
site
to
operate
as
a
seven
unit
hotel
located
at
137,
South
tackett's
of
Drive
in
zone
r2.
So
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
minute
to
read
that
into
the
record.
Is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
that
wants
to
speak
for
or
against
this
project?
Please
come
forward
and
just
state
your
name.
H
Well,
mr.
chairman
members
of
Planning
Commission
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
Dave
Barrett,
1800,
tahquitz
canyon,
Way,
Palm,
Springs
I'm.
Just
here
to
support
the
project.
My
firm
holds
a
charitable
event
there.
Every
year
the
Business
Awards
of
the
valley
and
it's
just
a
fabulous
property
I
will
say
that
I've
attended,
probably
I,
don't
know
15
or
20
events.
H
There
I've
been
aware
of
the
sound
issues
that
the
city
had
and
I've
walked
around
the
property
during
the
events
and
then,
since
the
since
more
of
the
enhanced
sound
attenuation
systems
been
in
place,
and
all's
I
can
say
is
that
it
appears
to
be
a
model
program
that
can
can
be
used
and
in
other
and
other
applications
in
the
city
or
noise
is
an
issue.
I
would
want
to
recommend
or
compliment
staff
and
Commission
for
coming
up
with
this.
H
The
the
criteria
that
you're
implementing
for
this
use
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
for
properties
like
this
unique
properties
like
this
that
are
going
to
be
event
spaces,
and
we
want
to
keep
these
event
spaces.
It
kind
of
makes
it
it's
special
for
the
town
and
get
some
major
major
celebrities
and
corporate
folks
coming
in
town
and,
as
you
know,
when
they
come
to
town
they
they
often
fall
in
love
with
the
town,
buy
properties
here,
etc.
H
A
K
Braun
from
great
developments,
I
was
not
prepared,
but
I'm,
definitely
in
full
support
of
this
project.
What
I
heard
the
applicant
has
worked
with
staff,
as
you
know,
we
own
a
hotel
in
Palm
Springs.
We
have
invested
a
lot
of
money
in
new
retail
and
restaurants,
tenants
and
we
needed
more
event
spaces.
K
That's
the
critical
part
to
help
the
economy
here
locally
and
especially
to
fill
it
outside
the
period
of
February
1st
until
June
1st,
so
I'm,
not
granting
those
approval,
I
think,
would
be
detriment
to
our
economy
and
locally
here,
in
also
to
our
tax
revenue.
70%
of
our
tax
revenue
comes
from
our
visitors.
Spaces
like
this
accommodations
and
the
option
to
have
events
here,
will
fill
our
tell
rooms
our
restaurants
and
our
local
business
very
important.
In
addition,
I
live
at
tempura
stone.
The
Tennis
Club
area
I
have
never
heard
a
peep.
K
From
that
event,
space
I've
been
myself
several
times
at
events
that
I
was
invited
there
and
they
go
above
and
beyond
to
mitigating
noises
or
intrusions
to
the
neighbors.
If
you
all
recall,
we
have
the
O'donnell
house,
which
is
above
the
internal
golf
course.
They
are
blasting
their
music
every
weekend
from
6
o'clock,
until
10:30,
exact
blasting
in
all
of
the
Tennis
Club
area.
K
A
J
I
G
I
J
It
starts
at
2:00
p.m.
on
Saturday
and
it
goes
all
the
way
until
Sunday
Monday.
So
what
we
were
doing
was
it's
it's
specific
about
one
person,
so
we
do
not
receive
complaints
from
anywhere
else.
This
was
our
way
of
showing
good
faith
to
the
city
that
we
will
take
additional
measures
to
reduce
any
sort
of
noise,
and
it
has
to
do
with
this
one
specific,
individual
and.
I
J
Not
allow
parking
during
the
event
from
any
guests
I
think
we
addressed
this
at
the
last
meeting.
It's
either
shuttles
that
are
provided
from
Kimpton
Hilton
or
that
or
uber
type
of
lift
drop-off.
So
this
is
not
activated
at
all
the
the
blank
dirt
space
is
not
activated
at
all.
During
events,
it's
static
where.
J
The
green
space,
where
there's
some
looks
like
some
tables
up
in
assembly,
that
is,
that
can
be
used
for
like
Davis,
it's
used
for
a
corporate
event.
It's
a
sit-down
dinner
spot.
A
ceremony
would
take
place
on
the
there's
another
green
space
at
the
top.
Here
it
has
a
little
mini
amphitheater,
a
lot
of
brides
like
to
get
married
there
and
it's
also
been
used
for
a
branch
space
and
it's
simply
grass,
with
a
small
little
amphitheater
at
the
top.
One
of
the
commissioners
was
asking
about
the
difference
with
the
aerial.
J
A
J
J
Livable
like
when
they
were
putting
it
together,
they
were
painting
it
and
camouflage
it
like
that,
and
then
they
put
it
in
that
area
to
stay
there
again.
These
spaces
are
not
used
at
all
Monday
through
Friday.
Really,
we
have
very
minimal
events
that
take
place.
That's
why
I
really
wanted
to
implore
you
to
know
that
this
is
really
about
the
vacation,
rental
aspect
of
the
homes
and
the
events
that
take
place.
We've
done,
you
know
everything
we
can
to
make
sure
that
it's
as
minimal
impact
for
for
the
neighbors.
Okay,
thank.
A
You
is
there
a
here.
We
know
more
questions
of
the
applicant
I'll
close
the
public
hearing.
Thank
you
very
much,
and
it's
now
amongst
the
Commission
I
do
want
to
mention
that
there
are
two
letters
of
support
that
are
in
the
record.
That
will
now
be
part
of
the
record
as
well.
So
at
that
point,
in
any
discussion
hearing
no
discussion
later.
I
I
would
move
to
adopt
the
staff
report
I
think
that
adding
in
these
sound
mitigation
are
very
good.
They
were
quite
rigorous,
I
think
when
we
prefer
to
put
them
in
it
will
apply
here
and
I'm,
satisfied
that
it's
an
important
part
of
our
tourist
offerings
to
our
visitors
and
so
I
would
I
would
now
support
the
staff
report
and
support
the
project
so
I
would
move
to
approve.
The
staff
report
is.
E
I'll,
second,
that,
with
the
comment
of
the
fact
that
now
Glen
has
added
the
information
about
the
secondary
wall
behind
this
sort
of
screen
wall,
and
that
is
movable
and
is
sick
to
absorb
sound
and
that's
now
part
of
the
documentation
of
how
they
are
mitigating
the
issues
with
the
neighbor.
So
that's
part
of
the
document
today,
as
well,
so
in
combination
with
that
I
think
we
should
move
I
support.
You.
I
B
E
A
D
D
A
Okay,
let
the
record
show
the
Commissioner
Gardner
re-entered.
The
room
is
part
of
the
meeting
again.
Thank
you.
We're
gonna,
move
on
to
public
hearing
to
be
what's
is
a
request
by
the
Palm
Springs
modern
construction,
the
for
the
reversion
of
acreage
of
a
previously
subdivided
final
tract
map,
3
3
162
for
the
development
of
132
unit
condominium
complex
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
North
Palm,
Canyon,
Drive
and
tramway
Road
king
of
the
staff
report.
Please
good.
L
L
So
in
this
particular
case
this
is
for
the
application
was
filed
by
Palm
Springs,
modern
construction,
and
the
parcel
in
question
is
the
pedigo
project
that
was
approved
by
City
Council
in
2006
for
the
construction
of
her
and
32
unit
condominium,
complex
and,
as
you
all
can
see,
this
is
the
this.
Is
the
current
look
of
that
particular
site
at
this
point?
So,
as
you
all
can
see,
and
as
you
know,
the
practical
project
never
proceeded
because
right
about
when
the
mask
reading
for
the
project
took
place.
L
The
recession
hit
and
I
think
them
have
affected
the
ability
of
the
owners
had
time
to
proceed
with
the
construction.
Now,
a
revised
Anto
acreage
is
governed
by
chapter
nine
point:
six,
six
point:
zero:
four:
zero
of
the
municipal
code.
There
are
basic
five
criteria
that
has
to
be
fulfilled
by
the
applicants
to
when
submitting
our
request
for
a
reversion
to
acreage
so
I
enumerated.
Those
in
your
staff
report
also
have
them
here
and
I.
L
Think
chief
amongst
them
is
that
there
has
to
be
evidence
of
title
to
the
real
property
and
that
evidence
of
the
consent
of
all
of
the
owners
of
an
interest
in
the
property
and
that
evidence
that
none
of
the
improvement
required
to
be
made
have
been
made
within
two
years
from
the
date.
The
final
map
or
pasture
map
was
fired
for
record.
L
All
of
those
will
be
carried
out
by
the
time
define
a
map
that
has
been
reverted
is
presented
that
it
canceled
so
based
upon
that
staff
will
be
making
a
recommendation
of
approval
by
the
Planning
Commission
that
the
City
Council
subject
to
those
five
conditional.
That
is,
it
attached
to
your
staff
report.
So
basically
that
will
conclude
my
staff
report.
The
applicants
are
here.
If
you
have
any
questions,
but
staff
is
also
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
the
Commission
may
have.
Thank
you.
M
Good
afternoon
members
of
the
Commission,
my
name
is
Ernie
Vincent
with
Palm
Springs,
modern
construction,
I
reside
at
seven
Kern
Court
Oceanside
California
I.
Don't
have
an
extensive
statement
to
present
I
think
the
staff
covered
it
well
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I'm
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
come
up.
B
I
B
H
M
D
M
It
doesn't
look
like
a
wall.
I,
don't
think
the
border
on
Palm
Canyon
will
be
moved
as
part
of
it.
It's
the
boulder
piles,
don't
have
the
landscaping
and
the
coloring
north
of
there
mm-hmm.
D
E
E
E
M
E
M
B
E
E
E
B
C
Chair
if
I
may,
as
well
as
the
zoning
code
being
applicable,
the
city
would
also
conduct
the
necessary
environmental
review
in
base
case
the
city
determined
that
this
project
is
consistent
with
the
prior
mnv
for
the
site,
and
you
know,
certainly,
if
something
comes
up,
that's
similar,
there's
a
chance.
It
might
fall
within
the
same
mnb,
but
the
city
will
still
conduct
that
review
on
an
individual
basis
based
on
the
applications.
Yes,.
A
And
I
would
just
caution:
I
would
emphasize
the
word.
Might
a
10
year
old
sequa
is
very
old
with
adjacent
neighbors.
So
was
there
any
other
questions
for
the
applicant
okay,
as
anyone
in
the
audience
who
wants
to
speak
for
or
against
the
project
or
about
the
project
in
general
I
see
no
one.
Did
you
have
any
rebuttal?
Oh
I,.
M
Would
just
say
that
under
California
law,
the
secret
is
good
as
long
as
there's
it's
substantially
the
same
project
and
there's
been
no
substantial
change
in
circumstance.
Now
what
the
city
might
do
is
to
have
the
applicant
demonstrate
that
that's
the
case.
Of
course,
yeah.
A
H
E
A
A
B
A
A
4A
is
a
request
by
G
H,
a
vibe
Palm
Springs
LLC
for
a
minor
amendment
to
a
final
PDD
to
allow
a
minimum
two
foot
setback
to
the
property
line
for
courtyards
Falls,
spas
and
small
pools
at
the
vibe
development
located
at
the
northwest
corner
of
South
Farrell
Drive
and
East
barista
Road
give
me
the
staff
report.
Please
Thank.
L
You
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
so
this
item
before
you
now
is
a
minor
modification,
a
request
for
a
minor
modification
to
a
previously
approved
final
development
plans
for
the
vibe,
developed
and
development.
So
if
you
recall
those
commissioners
that
were
on
board
in
September
of
17
of
2014,
the
council
approved
preliminary
plan
to
32
for
the
vibe
project
and
in
February
of
2017.
The
Planning
Commission
approved
the
final
development
plans
for
this
project.
So
what
you
have?
L
What
we
have
today
is
a
request
by
one
of
the
builders
of
vibe
are
precisely
it's
the
alcohol
vibe
GGH
a
by
PS
LLC.
They
are
the
applicants
for
this
minor
and
men.
Men,
and
specifically,
they
are
asking
for
a
reduction
of
this
idea,
is
set
back
from
five
foot
that
you
fit
in
the
property
line.
So
if
you
look
at
this
slide,
that's
up
on
the
monitor
those
that's
the
property
line
or
those
are
the
locations
of
the
property
lines
of
the
single-family
residences.
L
So
the
development
standards
that
you
approved,
along
with
the
preliminary
PVD
and
the
final
PDD,
was
five
feet,
but
as
the
builders
and
farm
staff
as
the
construction
commenced,
they
realized
that
making
that
amendment
and
granting
them
a
setback
of
two
instead
of
five
feet,
who
make
that
shared,
Eastman
area
more
usable,
precisely
that
location
for
response,
small
pools
or
sparse.
Where
are
their
to
be
located?
L
So
in
reviewing
this
application
staff
met
with
the
building
official
who
opined
that
this
would
not
have
any
effect
upon
the
structural
integrity
of
any
building
that
may
be
located
nearer
to
that
to
the
pools
once
again,
because
the
structure,
if
I,
can
just
move
to
the.
But
let
me
just
show
what
I'm
talking
about.
L
This
is
a
setback
yeah
and
it
doesn't
call
for
any
structure.
So
there's
no
wall
is
just
the
imaginary
line
where
the
property
line
is
that's
where
the
setback
is
being
requested.
This
is
a
shared
easement
area.
This
this
wall
here
is
for
the
next
building,
we'll
also
review
the
issue
of
privacy
and
determining
that
there
are
no
windows
or
does
that
lead
into
this
area
that
might
impact
privacy
issues
and,
as
a
result
of
that,
staff
made
a
determination
that
this
request
is
minor
in
nature.
L
It
will
not
affect
the
intent,
the
original
intent
of
the
PD
and
therefore
are
make
a
recommendation
of
approval
to
the
Planning
Commission
again.
My
report
is
very
brief.
Staff
is
recommending
approval,
based
on
the
on
the
input
from
the
building
official
and
also
from
staff,
making
a
determination
that
it
is
a
very
minor
amendment
and
will
not
affect
the
overall
development.
L
I
L
That
is
explained
to
me
is
that
so,
if
you
look
at
the
the
courtyard
area,
it's
mostly
for
the
benefit
of
this
plan,
one
plan
to
will
enjoyed
the
same
benefit
in
plans.
Pre
will
enjoy
supposed
to
enjoy
the
same
benefit
in
this
area,
so
it
just
create
an
additional
space
in
this
area.
For
the
use
of
these
of
this
property,
they
all
will
have
a
poor
benefit,
so
you
can
look
at
the
way
that
it
that
the
site
plan
is
laid
out
is.
B
I
B
Issue
isn't
actually
addressed
in
the
planned
development
district
ordinance
in
the
city's
zoning
ordinance.
It
requires
a
5-foot
setback
from
property
lines.
However,
under
PD
DS
that
we've
approved
in
the
past,
we've
allowed
a
three-foot
setback
from
the
property
line.
This
is
actually
one
foot
closer
than
what
we
have
done
in
the
past.
Our
primary
concern
was:
would
it
encroach
onto
the
adjacent
property
in
terms
of
structure,
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
have
reviewed
this
with
our
building
official?
B
E
E
So
in
I
live
in
a
similar
development
in
which
we
get
to
enjoy
that
easement
towards
our
property,
and
what
you're
saying
is
that
still
the
pool
or
the
spa
pool
still
is
in
my
property,
but
there's
only
a
two
foot
setback,
correct
and
all
the
windows
that
are
actually
placed
along
that
wall,
exterior
wall
up
and
high
or
something
so
it's
visually
not
imposing
onto
the
swimming
pool.
That's.
L
A
E
A
A
C
Mr.
chair,
yes,
it
would
depend
on
how
the
easement
is
written
generally
in
reciprocal
easements.
Of
this
nature,
there
is
typically
a
provision
that
would
allow
that
type
of
customary
use-
I
have
not
reviewed
this
easement,
and
so
I
cannot
speak
with
certainty
as
to
what
conditions
may
or
may
not
be
in
that
easement,
but
generally
in
easements
of
this
nature,
you
know,
there's
not
usually
a
hard
backstop
that
would
all
of
a
sudden
prevent
somebody
from
using
that
space
for
what
it
customarily
be
used
for.
Thank.
A
E
A
E
Think
that
the
modifications
are
acceptable
in
the
sense
that
I
think
the
from
the
billing
department
point
of
view
was
the
thickness
of
the
shotcrete
concrete
material
that
is
made
for
and
that
within
the
two-foot
of
easement
is
well
under
lower
than
that
dimension.
So
it
was
all
survive
or
be
located
within
the
property's
ownership.
I
think
sort
of,
if
we're
not
setting
a
precedent
that
this
is
a
PD
V
special
situation
in
which
I
think
it
smartly
used
on
how
we
can
use
side
yards.
E
So
it's
more
beneficial
to
the
backyard
feeling
for
a
residential
unit.
So
we're
looking
at
sort
of
case-by-case
and
I
think
that's
what
it
was
being
done
at
vibe
and
we're
not
setting
up
at
presidents
for
other
projects
who
now
use
two-foot
setbacks,
because
those
will
be
in
a
different
condition.
So,
having
said
that,
I
I'm,
bypassing
and
making
a
motion.
E
A
Just
if
I
don't
see
another
comment,
so
I'll
just
make
a
comment.
It
seems
very
appropriate
for
this
PVD
in
this
case,
and
it
gives
somebody
an
amenity
they
may
not
have
and
I
think
amenities
actually
help
property
values
and
help
your
enjoyment
of
the
property
I.
Think
as
we
move
forward
with
small
Lots
I'm,
not
clear
on
how
big
these
Lots
are
in
the
future.
We
might
be
addressed
with
a
similar
thing
on
our
small,
a
lot
type
of
thing,
but
I,
don't
believe
because
it's
a
TPD
D.
A
A
H
I
B
It's
already
been
approved
in
terms
of
the
zoning
regulations
for
cannabis.
Businesses
in
our
commercial
zones,
dispensaries
and
lounges
are
permitted
use.
They
are
subject
to
distance
separation
requirements.
That
particular
facility
did
require
a
distance
separation
to
be
approved
by
the
City
Council,
which
was
done
by
the
City
Council
back
in
December,
so
it
doesn't
require
Planning
Commission
approval.
B
A
Any
more
comments
I'll
make
a
comment
just
for
those
of
you
who
did
sign
up
for
your
free
registration
as
a
planning
Commissioner.
The
California
preservation
conference
is
currently
going
on
over
at
the
Hilton.
If
you
did
not
sign
up,
and
you
want
to
go
see
me
I
mean
have
a
solution
for
you
to
learn
more
about
preservation
on
a
statewide
basis,
which
is
very
good.
Okay.
Hearing
no
more,
there
are
city
council
liaison
is
not
here,
planning.
B
Directors
report
I,
don't
have
any
items
for
the
Planning
Commission
we
will
have
our
meeting
on
the
22nd
of
May
city
council
will
be
following
us
directly
that
evening
I,
don't
believe
we'll
have
a
long
agenda,
so
I
don't
think.
There's
gonna
be
any
issue
with
the
overlap,
but
just
wanted
to
make
you
aware
that
City
Council
would
also
be
on
the
same
evening
as
Planning
Commission.
We're.