►
From YouTube: Planning Commission | July 12, 2017
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
E
A
Public
comments
time
has
been
set
aside
for
members
of
the
public
to
address
the
Planning
Commission
on
the
consent,
calendar
and
non
public
hearing
items
and
items
of
general
interest
within
the
subject,
manner
of
and
jurisdiction
of
the
Commission.
If
you
wish
to
speak,
you
have
three
minutes.
Please
come
forward
and
state
your
name,
madam.
E
G
My
name
is
Judy
deer
track,
I'm
a
candidate
for
City
Council.
You
may
see
me
a
little
more
often
than
normal
on
some
of
what
I
considered
to
be
the
core
issues
for
the
city.
One
reason
for
my
speaking
today
is
I
want
to
be
sure,
because
these
are
televised
that
the
general
public
is
aware.
There
is
a
joint
session
between
the
City
Council
and
the
Planning
Commission
on
what
is
called
the
PDD
study
or
the
PDD
study,
findings
and
recommendations.
G
Apart
from
what
I
understand
that
is
set
for
July
20th
next
Thursday
at
6:00
p.m.
I
believe
mr.
peg,
and
this
is
very
important
to
the
general
public,
because
it
is
from
what
I
understand
I
believe
that
there
were
68
recommendations
from
the
PDD
subcommittee
that
are
before
the
Joint
Council.
It
impinges
directly
upon
the
commercial
permits
how
the
city
is
processing
the
commercial
permits
and
how
they
will
continue
to
process
commercial
permits.
This
is
a
particular
interest
to
the
general
public,
to
developers,
to
investors
and
to
environmental
people.
G
All
of
the
recommendations
impinge
upon
important
public
rights.
So
it
is
a
call
to
participate
and
be
here
for
that.
I
also
want
to
give
a
special
notice
to
people
for
proper
planning.
This
was
a
litigation
outcome
where
people
for
proper
planning
entered
a
settlement
agreement
with
the
city
and
with
mr.
John
Westman
to
requisition
of
study
of
commercial
permits
and
bring
it
forward
for
recommendations
so
many
times
the
people
that
litigate
against
the
city
are
criticized
for
slowing
things
down
and
not
giving
anything
of
benefit
back
to
the
community.
G
But
this
is
one
of
many
sterling
examples
of
where
the
outcome
of
this
includes
recommendations
that
we
are
again
looking
at
the
general
plan.
How
that
plans,
sir?
The
zoning
scheme,
whether
that's
been
followed
to
the
extended,
has
been
broken
from
what
are
the
repercussions
of
that?
What
are
we
going
to
do
about
fixing
that
and
whether
major
recommendations
and
changes
will
occur
to
the
Zoning
scheme
for
the
city?
G
One
of
the
outcomes
of
the
study
is
that
when
there
was
a
journal
plan
update
in
2007,
there
were
certain
fundamental
changes
to
the
underlying
zoning
scheme
that
were
never
made
to
create
the
consistency
between
the
general
plan.
Classification
for
a
particular
lot
development
and
the
zoning
scheme
that
implemented
the
general
plan
and
the
other
portion
of
the
study
that
I
thought
was
particularly
telling
is
that
the
city
has
definitely
drifted
from
the
vision
and
the
standards
of
the
general
plan.
G
In
terms
of
the
findings
that
the
lot
development
is
that
occurs
on
a
pekin
case-by-case
basis.
Is
that
in
fact
serving
the
long-term
interest
of
the
city?
Is
it
a
an
appropriate
fit
into
the
actual
district?
Are
we
consistently
violating
some
of
the
core
principles
of
public
protection,
such
as
height
set,
lurks
open
space
parking
and
if
we
have
drifted
in
our
vision
and
if
we
have
began
to
consistently
set
aside
public
rights,
what
is
necessary
to
return?
G
A
B
Now,
the
only
problem
we
still
face,
we
still
have
some
of
the
old
PD
DS
around.
Some
of
them
are
awful,
and
some
of
them
actually
are
being
constructed
or
plans
right
now,
others
will
still
be
coming
up
for
renewals
and
hopefully
well
before
the
whole
town
is
gone.
There's
nothing
left
to
develop,
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
catch
some
of
those
before,
because
some
of
them
have
absolutely
no
public.
No
real
public
benefits
and
some
of
them
are
really
awful
cheek
to
jowl,
and
so
we
really
hope
that
you
Frank.
A
B
A
E
Chair
and
members
of
the
Commission,
what
you
have
before
you
here
is
a
major
architectural
application
to
do
a
major
remodel
of
the
courtyard
project
on
East,
tahquitz
canyon
way.
This
project,
as
you
can
see
in
the
site
plan
in
on
the
screen
in
front
of
you,
would
remove
the
small
one
storey
buildings
at
the
front
of
the
development
which
is
highlighted
with
the
red
dotted
line.
E
It
would
leave
the
movie
theaters
the
bank
and
then
the
multi
story
office
building
behind
it
would
remove
about
20,000
square
feet
and
then
replace
it
with
two
brand-new
buildings
of
an
equal
square
footage.
So
there
is
no
change
in
the
overall
square
footage
of
the
development
in
terms
of
the
section
14
specific
plan
where
the
project
is
located,
the
proposed
use
for
restaurant
and
commercial
use
is
consistent
with
the
REO
retail
entertainment
office,
land
use,
designation
of
the
section
14
plan
and
then
in
terms
of
the
development
standards.
E
The
proposed
new
buildings
are
consist
with
the
height
setbacks,
floor
area
ratio
and
parking
requirements
that
are
in
place
in
terms
of
the
site
plan.
Let
me
just
walk
that
walk
you
through
that.
Briefly,
here
at
the
beginning
of
the
presentation,
as
I
had
mentioned,
it
does
involve
the
construction
of
two
new
buildings.
E
So
the
overall
purpose
of
that
is
to
enhance
pedestrian
activity
for
the
project
and
to
make
circulation
through
the
project
itself
much
more
successful.
The
landscape
plan
here
shows
the
changes
that
are
proposed
with
the
new
buildings.
There
will
be
new
landscaping
in
front
of
the
project.
The
existing
Washingtonians
will
remain
in
place
there
along
the
street
edge.
E
This
detail
here
just
shows
some
of
the
hard
scape
treatments
for
the
project
itself,
the
differentiation
in
the
paving
materials
for
the
pedestrian
areas,
the
use
of
lighting
in-ground
lighting
for
the
passageways
from
the
garage
to
the
central
courtyard
area
to
help
brighten
those
areas
and
lead
pedestrians.
The
garage
to
the
commercial
spaces.
E
Let's
see
this
is
one
of
the
elevations
of
proposed
buildings
showing
the
materials
and
the
form
of
the
roof
and
the
form
of
the
building
itself.
Again,
these
are
one-story
buildings.
The
sweeping
roof
structure
that
you
see
there
comes
right
up
to
the
35
foot
height
limit
I.
Believe
generally,
the
the
main
plane
of
the
roof
element
is
about
22
feet
in
height
and
I'll.
Ask
the
applicant
to
address
that
if
there
are
questions
in
terms
of
the
height
of
the
building
itself,
primary
material
on
the
front
of
the
building
is
a
stone
veneer.
E
We
do
have
the
sample
and
material
boards
over
here
to
my
left
and
we
can
pass
those
around
to
the
Planning
Commission
if
you'd
like
to
see
those
up
close
so
get
those
in
just
a
moment
for
you
and
then
finally,
we
have
some
3d
renderings
of
the
proposed
project.
The
image
on
the
lower
right-hand
corner
gives
you
an
overview
in
terms
of
how
the
new
buildings
fit
within
the
existing
complex
and
gives
you
the
appearance
in
terms
of
their
mass
and
scale
relative
to
the
existing
buildings.
E
E
During
that
meeting,
the
following
comments
were
made
by
the
members
of
the
architectural
Advisory
Committee.
There
was
a
comment
to
introduce
shade
trees
into
the
central
courtyard
area
for
the
benefit
of
pedestrians.
There
was
also
a
question
about
the
justification
for
the
sweeping
roof
form
in
terms
of
how
that
relates
to
the
architecture
of
the
rest
of
the
complex.
There
was
a
request
at
more
horizontal
elements
into
the
design
of
the
facades,
as
they
were
reading
as
being
very
vertical
in
their
appearance.
Also,
it
was
commented
that
the
project
was
out
of
scale.
E
Originally,
the
project
I
believe
was
about
39
feet
in
height
the
and
has
since
reduced
the
height
of
the
project,
to
be
in
conformance
with
our
height
limits
for
that
particular
area.
Within
the
section
14
plan.
Also,
there
was
a
comment
made
that
there
was
a
need
to
study
the
architectural
vocabulary
of
the
existing
buildings
and
to
better
integrate
the
forms
and
the
materials
of
the
existing
buildings
with
the
new
buildings,
and
there
was
also
a
comment
made
that
the
massing
in
the
vertical
composition
needs
more
study
at
the
conclusion
of
their
comments.
E
The
AAC
voted
to
continue
the
item
to
a
date
uncertain
with
direction
to
the
applicant
to
work
on
the
issues
that
had
been
presented
at
that
meeting,
the
applicant
modified
the
application
submitted
based
on
those
comments
and
went
back
to
the
architectural
Advisory
Committee
on
April
the
3rd.
During
that
meeting,
the
following
comments
were
made
relative
to
the
project.
There
was
concern
about
access
to
the
theatres.
There
was
a
comment
made
that
the
complexity
of
forms
is
too
ambiguous.
The
masses
too
large
was
also
commented
that
the
project
is
over
scaled.
E
The
landscape
needs
to
relate
better
to
the
pedestrian
use
and
I
think
they
were
speaking
specifically
at
the
front
of
the
project.
Thinking
of
how
that
related
to
the
public
sidewalk
and
to
some
of
the
areas
that
they
have
in
front
for
outdoor
dining.
In
addition,
there
was
a
concern
about
the
use
of
cypress
trees.
That
was
one
of
the
treatments
in
one
of
the
early
landscape
plans.
I
believe
that
those
have
been
completely
removed
from
the
project
I'm
looking
at
Tom
and
he's
not
even
said.
F
E
They
were
too
close
to
the
public
sidewalk
there
needed
to
be
greater
separation
between
those
areas.
Also,
there
was
a
comment
that
the
proposed
buildings
did
not
relate
to
the
village
feel
of
Palm
Springs.
They
committee
members
also
commented
that
they
were
in
favor
of
the
site
plan
as
it
was
proposed
as
it
helped
to
activate
the
street.
They
didn't
really
have
any
issues
in
terms
of
how
it
was
laid
out
and
they
commended
the
applicant
for
the
site
plan,
but
they
were
still
concerned
with
the
proposed
material
selection.
E
So
based
on
that
at
the
April
3rd
meeting,
the
AAC
voted
to
deny
the
project.
The
applicant
then
again
made
additional
revisions
to
the
project
and
went
back
to
the
architectural
Advisory
Committee
on
June,
the
19th
on
the
19th,
the
AAC
recommended
approval
of
the
project,
but
with
8
conditions
and
I'll
go
through
those
conditions
with
you
right
now.
First
of
all,
the
condition
number
1
is
relative
to
the
urban
design.
They
said
it.
E
Secondly,
landscape
enhancements
are
needed
up
against
the
fronts
of
the
buildings
and
along
the
sides
of
the
buildings.
The
fascia
is
too
massive
and
the
and
complex
below
the
clerestory
windows.
So
what
they're
looking
for
is
to
simplify
the
building
elevations
and
materials.
They
also
put
a
condition
relative
to
the
columns
or
vertical
elements
on
the
front
facade
that
they
are
not
pedestrian
scaled
and
that
there
needs
to
be
additional
scale
elements
brought
into
the
design
that
relate
to
pedestrian
scale.
E
Also,
there
was
a
condition
relative
to
the
distances
between
the
new
and
existing
buildings
to
review
those
carefully
due
to
the
mass
and
size
of
the
proposed
structures,
I
think
in
particular,
they
were
looking
at
the
area
behind
between
the
office
building
and
the
new
structures,
making
sure
that
there
was
adequate
separation
between
those.
There
was
also
a
condition
that
the
central
courtyard
needs
to
be
softened
with
additional
landscape
and
feel
like
less
of
a
pass-through
space
and
then.
E
Finally,
the
last
condition
of
approval
is
that
the
busyness
of
the
architecture
needs
further
evaluation
to
reduce
the
materials,
simplify
the
shapes
and
the
forms.
So
those
were
the
eight
conditions
of
approval
that
were
imposed
by
the
architectural
advisory
committee.
What
I
might
recommend
to
you,
even
though
this
is
not
a
public
hearing
that
perhaps
if
we
could
have
the
applicant
talk
about
the
changes
that
they've
made
since
the
June
19th
architectural
advisory
committee,
I,
think
that
would
be
helpful
for
the
Planning
Commission
members
to
have
an
understanding
of
what
changes
have
been
made.
E
In
summary,
I'll
just
conclude
my
comments
by
saying
again,
it
does
comply
with
the
development
standards
in
terms
of
height
setbacks,
Floria
ratio
parking.
However,
there
are
concerns,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
conditions
imposed
by
the
AAC
relative
to
its
compliance
with
the
city's
architectural
criteria.
So
that
concludes
my
comments.
I
need
happy
to
answer
any.
A
F
I
read
through
app
we're
a
little
bit
of
a
disadvantage
here,
because
we
have
not
seen
we're
unable
to
compare
what
AAA
sees
last
review
set
of
drawings
were
in
this
one,
so
other
than
the
applicant
describing
what
was
changed.
You
know
we
don't
really
have
any
way
of
of
understanding
what
those
changes
were
and
I
was
hoping
that
maybe
someone
from
staff
could
do
that
I'm,
just
suggesting
that
that's
one
and
the
second
one
is.
B
E
E
H
Flin
he
already
answered
my
question
height
and
setbacks.
This
conforms
my
other
question.
Recently
we
and
then
City
Council
approved
changes
to
extensions
of
time
for
a
project
such
as
this,
which
is
a
remodel.
Are
there
any
limitations
on
the
extensions
of
time
for
this
project
or
if
we
approve
it,
do
they
have
an
entitlement
that
lasts
essentially
forever.
E
H
C
Obviously,
it'd
be
interesting
to
hear
the
applicant
discussion
in
terms
of
what
they've
done
relative
to
the
a
C's
recommendations,
but
we
really
don't
have
anything
to
look
at
to
see
what
the
changes,
whether
the
changes,
really
met.
The
original
plan
versus
this
plan
you
had
a
question
of
God.
Is
there?
Was
there
any
discussion
of
solar
in
this
project
at
all?
No,
there.
D
I've
got
a
series
of
questions
we'll
defer
my
architectural
ones
until
we
get
general
discussion,
but
I
do
have
some
other
questions
about
the
site
plan
itself
as
I
understand
it.
The
parking
Bowl.
Can
everybody
hear
me?
Is
this
close
enough?
The
parking
will
all
be
at
the
rear
of
the
existing
utilize.
The
existing
parking
at
the
rear
of
the
office
building
correct.
D
A
little
concerned
about
the
distance
and
some
of
those,
particularly
if
you
have
to
park
on
the
upper
level
you'll,
have
to
go
down
down
steps
and
then
up
steps
and
just
to
get
to
these
restaurants
around
I'm
concerned
that
that's
going
to
be.
Restaurants
are
really
sensitive
to
the
adjacency
of
parking.
E
Considering
the
layout
of
the
complex
currently
while
the
buildings
are
at
grade
still,
they
are
the
same
distance
away.
I
mean
there's
no
change
in
the
distance
of
the
parking
area
with
the
central
courtyard.
In
addition
to
the
stairs
going
up,
you
also
have
ramps
so
you'll
be
able
to
still
easily
access
the
restaurants
at
the
front
of
the
complex,
keep
in
mind
that
there's
also
spaces
there
at
the
central
courtyard
as
well,
so
either
those
can
be
used
as
a
restaurant
or
commercial
spaces
so
that
the
tenant
spaces
don't
just
face
talk.
D
D
D
E
D
Like
to
see
some
discussion,
maybe
we
don't
have
to
have
in
there.
Maybe
the
applicant
give
you
about
how
we're
activating
that
remaining
lower
courtyard,
it's
kind
of
a
ghost
town.
Today
we
really
appreciate
the
safe
way,
how
much
drawing
drawing
the
talked
woods
but
I'm
still
concerned
about
that
lower
court
yard
is
going
to
get
into
use.
A
I
have
a
couple
at
this
point.
One
is:
can
you
walk
me
if
I
was
a
handicapped
person
in
a
wheelchair
Flynn?
Can
you
just
show
me
the
paths
that
I
can
get
from
the
parking
to
the
the
front
and
to
the
theater,
no
I'm,
knowing
that
someone
who's
handicapped
can't
get
there
now
I,
don't
think
and
get
there
now.
E
So,
looking
here
on
this
image,
we
have
our
parking
structure
here.
Here
is
the
exit
from
the
parking
structure.
This
is
the
three-story
office
building
located
here
so
coming
through
this
passageway
here.
This
is
all
level
to
this
point.
We
have
a
ramp
which
transposes
that
half
level
up
to
the
street
level
here
and
then
they
come
out
here
to
the
level
of
the
street.
So
that
would
be
the
path
of
travel
either
here
or
here.
I.
D
A
A
A
A
E
A
Then
the
last
question
is
that
this
is
the
building
by
are
several
of
the
buildings.
Are
buildings
by
a
famous
local
architect
by
Don
Wexler.
The
Bank
building
is
by
Wexler
all
of
the
buildings
that
be
removed
in
the
buildings
behind
it,
I
don't
believe
the
theater
was,
but
there
was
some
homage
to
Wexler
in
the
theater
building,
using
some
use
of
the
same
materials
in
our
purview.
As
we
look
at
this
and
and
I
did
find
out
a
little
bit
of
mr.
wax
what
might
have
been
mr.
wax
or
his
opinions.
A
He
never
agreed
with
the
reduc
with
the
step
down
and
thought
that
the
complex
would
fail.
I
think
he
would
support
bringing
it
up,
but
I'm,
very
concerned
that
what
we
get
has
some
reference
to
what's
currently
existing
and
also
a
reference
to
chocolates
Plaza
and
the
hue
kaptur
buildings
that
are
across
the
street.
Is
that
something
that
the
AAC
looked
at
in?
Is
that
the
basis
of
their
timeless
architecture
comments
that
in
some
sense
this
needs
to
fit
in?
Yes,.
E
That
was
a
concern
of
the
AAC
and
was
referenced
several
times
in
terms
of
how
the
new
buildings
will
fit
in
with
the
existing
complex
the
architecture.
Looking
looking
at
the
color
and
materials
that
are
used
in
the
project,
looking
at
the
forms
of
the
project,
so
those
were
all
discussions
that
we
had
at
the
AAC
meetings.
E
D
A
F
I
My
name
is
William
azzolino
I'm,
the
architect
for
the
project
to
respond
to
the
changes
in
questions
from
committee.
L
sir,
go
through
these
items
and
if
you
have
questions
on
addressing
this,
we
go
through
and
the
request
was
a
consideration
of
additional
overhangs
for
shade
and
pedestrian
rewards
his
site
as
well
of
a
second
set
of
trees
along
the
building.
We've
increased
the
landscaping
adjacent
to
the
building
to
provide
additional
shade
trees
along
the
both
the
street
and
in
the
interior.
Courtyard.
I
J
In
terms
of
our
response
to
the
AAC's
question
about
some
additional
trees
to
be
to
create
a
second
layer,
what
we've
done
and
there
may
be
a
blow-up
of
the
streetscape
but
the
the
way
the
design
works,
long
talk.
What's
there's
the
existing
Washingtonians
they're,
approximately
60
feet
in
height,
so
one
of
the
concerns
from
the
AAC
was
to
create
another
layer
of
trees
to
mitigate
some
of
the
heights
of
the
proposed
building.
J
So
what
we
did
is
in
the
central
courtyard,
the
public
space
in
the
rear,
courtyard
we've
used
date,
palms
at
that
location,
so
along
the
facade
or
the
front
of
the
building
near
the
outdoor
dining
areas
and
set
back
from
talked
wits.
We've
included
six
additional
date
palm
trees.
So
if
you
look
at
the
elevation
view
that
was
provided
in
that
additional
package
today,
you'll
see
an
example
of
those
three
trees,
so
those
date
palms
help
again
mitigate
the
height
but
also
provide
a
secondary
level
of
landscape
between
the
curb
and
the
building
itself.
J
The
other
area
there
was
a
question
is
to
add
additional
landscape
around
the
buildings
in
the
courtyard.
So
additional
planters
have
been
added
both
around
the
outdoor
dining
areas
and
adjacent
to
the
building
and
then
also
in
the
central
courtyard.
So
the
idea
is,
and
we've
got
a
materials
and
a
site,
furnishings
board.
I
think
that
was
passed
around.
That
shows
you
know
the
actual
in
formal
public
seating
that
will
occur
in
the
central
courtyard.
J
The
concept
was
we
had
this
great
change
that
occurs
right
now.
As
you
know,
the
buildings
sit
lower
and
then
there's
steps
that
lead
down
so
in
the
redesign
of
the
project,
and
this
includes
from
the
parking
area
itself
that
the
height
of
the
risers
and
the
length
of
the
tread
of
those
steps
are
almost
like
you're
going
down
into
a
basement,
they're
like
6
and
12.
J
So
we
took
the
liberty
when
we
were
going
through
the
grading
working
with
the
engineers
and
designing
the
hardscape
to
make
that
access
much
more,
improve
the
ability
for
handicapped,
but
also
make
it
easier
for
pedestrians
to
come.
You
know
both
from
the
parking
structure
or
go
back
to
the
structure,
so
starting
at
the
parking
structure.
We've
actually
on
one
end
of
the
parking
stress
from
the
parking
lot,
there's
a
ramp
on
the
other
end,
there's
steps,
so
we've
widened
those
out.
J
We've
increased
the
width
of
the
steps,
we've
even
added
an
intermediate
landing,
so
it's
not
like
you're
going
down
into
a
basement
there,
so
we've
improved
the
access
and
provided
both
ramps
and
steps
where
the
grade
allowed
us.
This
area
has
steps
in
a
ramp.
This
location
to
the
west
just
has
steps,
but
we've
created
an
intermediate
landing
for
those
steps.
J
So
you
don't
have
7
or
8
steps
just
in
a
row,
then,
as
you
enter
to
the
courtyard,
as
you
remember,
if
you
visited
the
site
in
the
center
areas
of
those
courtyards,
you
know
we
have
the
roof
that
comes
over
and
there's
these
large
kind
of
monolithic
planters.
So
we
wanted
to
improve
the
pedestrians
experience
from
the
parking
structure
and
and
lead
people.
You
know
to
the
to
the
fronts
as
well
as
these
are
all
restaurants
or
possible
restaurants
facing
the
rear
as
well.
J
So
we
added
along
some
of
the
blank
walls
of
the
existing
architecture.
We've
created
these
curvilinear
shape
planters
and
the
idea
is
we
want
to
lead
people
through.
So
the
combination
of
the
curved
in-ground
landscape
areas,
as
the
lighting
begin
to
lead
people
through
the
central
plaza
area.
Now
this
indication
of
color
that's
different
than
the
paving
that
indicates
the
overhang
of
the
rear
building.
So
you
can
see
our
actual
courtyard
area
that's
exposed
is
is
somewhat
narrower
than
then
at
the
actual
building
footprint.
J
A
I
I
Easiest
to
show
you
on
I'll:
do
it
on
this
one,
what
you
can
see?
That's
where
the
problem,
if
you
look
on
on
here,
we
have
an
approximately
12-foot
overhang
here
that
goes
to
about
fifteen
feet.
At
this
point,
it
stays
at
about
fifteen
feet
across
the
front
of
the
buildings.
Then
this
overhang
here
comes
out
nine
feet
over
the
front
of
the
buildings.
It
hangs
as
a
five
feet.
All
the
way
around.
We
have
a
five
foot
overhang
all
the
way
along
this
side
of
the
building.
At
the
back.
I
We
have
no
overhang
at
this
portion.
At
this
portion.
We
have
approximately
a
twelve
foot
deep
overhang
at
this
portion.
Again
we
have
it,
but
it's
really
about
a
two
foot
overhang.
Then
it
goes
back
to
five
feet
all
the
way
along
here,
and
then
it
tapers
from
about
five
feet
to
about
twelve
feet
here
and
runs
about
twelve
feet
across
the
entire
front
of
the
building.
Here,
thank
you
and
in
addition,
what
we
have
added
is
we've
got
an
overhead.
I
Series
of
canopies,
which
provide
shade
through
the
center
of
the
courtyard,
which
you
can
see
three
of
in
this
rendering
there
are
actually
four
of
them,
and
you
can
see
them
again
in
this
overhead
here
you
can
see
the
four
suspended
canopies,
so
the
good
portion
of
the
walking
path
throughout
the
year
is
actually
shaded,
and
the
other
thing
about
this
particular
project
is.
This
is
the
north
side
of
the
project.
I
So
it's
pretty
much
always
in
shade
all
year
round
anyway,
so
that
the
overhangs
are
simply
an
addition
and
the
area
that
you're
actually
exposed
to
walking
in
Sun,
even
in
the
middle
of
July,
is
about
a
50-foot
section
here
in
about
a
50
foot
section
there.
So
it's
really
quite
shaded
the
entire
walkway.
I
That's
sort
of
the
first
two
commentaries
in
terms
of
the
fascia
was
too
massive
and
complex
below
the
clerestory
windows
and
needed
further
evaluation.
But
we
had
had
was
a
number
of
elements
on
that
facade
previously,
including
some
coining
at
the
bottom
of
them
that
extended
up
about
five
feet.
They
felt
that
was
somewhat
inconsistent
with
Wexler's
original
design,
which
took
his
concrete
block.
Materials
continuously
degrade,
so
we
removed
all
of
the
coining
all
the
way
around
the
building.
We
brought
the
stone
back
down
to
grade
like
a
Wainscott,
probably
better.
I
So
it's
a
we
had
a
five-foot
Wainscott
at
various
points
around
the
building
at
the
major
columns
will
remove
that
and
carried
stone.
We
also
increased
the
scale
of
the
stone
to
match
that
of
the
existing
works,
their
buildings
at
about
eight
to
nine
inches
in
terms
of
height.
So
that
was
the
changes
to
the
main
facade.
We
also
dropped
some
materials
on
the
facade
and
simplified
them
at
the
same
time
as
we
did
that
in
terms
of
the
columns
and
chimney
stacks
we
reduced.
I
A
I
I
The
distances
between
the
buildings
and
the
existing
buildings
we've
maintained
the
existing
footprint
of
existing
buildings,
except
that
in
here
we've
widened
the
two
buildings
apart.
We
previously
had
three
buildings.
We
now
only
have
two
subic
we've
taken,
some
of
that
additional
space
and
provided
a
much
wider
courtyard
between
the
two
sets
of
buildings,
wider
than
was
previously
afforded
at
the
back
of
the
buildings
worth
the
same
setback
as
existing
buildings
are
so
once
again,
it
won't
be
any
closer
to
the
existing
two
story.
Office
building
than
the
existing
structures
are
right
now.
I
Yes,
well
you're.
Actually
the
entire
complex
is
actually
select
peoplehood,
the
garage
level
as
well.
It's
the
garages,
let's
say
two
feet
up
and
street-
is
another
three
feet
up
from
that.
Just
to
give
you
an
idea,
so
this
was
let's
call
it
plus
five
feet.
This
is
minus
five
feet
or
zero
at
zero.
The
garage
is
accident
about
plus
two
two
and
a
half.
I
Correct,
yes,
we
have
a
uniform
level
courtyard
at
the
back
as
it
is
now.
What
we've
done
is
we've
enhanced
that
courtyard
in
order
to
make
it
a
more
livable
space,
what
we've
done
is
we've
introduced
fire
pits,
outdoor
usage,
we've
introduced
some
tables
and
an
actual
gas
fireplace,
so
people
have
some
seating
space
that
they
can
work
outdoors,
that
they
want
and
meet
with
friends
informally.
You
know.
A
I
I
Well,
that's
why
people
have
been
using
it.
It's
really
is
a
service
area
in
it
and
with
restaurants.
It
will
now
be
more
what
now
be
closed
off,
because
you'll
have
restaurant
garbage
and
gas
meters
and
other
elements
back
there
for
traversing
the
office
building.
They
were
servicing
the
buildings.
D
I
Yeah,
that's
that's.
The
theaters
have
seen
this
plan
and
they're
content
with
it.
They
don't
have
any
issues
with
it.
Whether
they're,
gonna
they're,
also
renovating
their
theater
on
the
interior.
Whether
they're
gonna
move
their
box
office.
Look
fun,
I,
don't
know
that's
up
to
whatever
they
do
with
their
own
plan,
but
they
they
have
seen
this
designer
in
ok
with
it.
I
Yeah
yeah
we've
we've
adjusted
the
front
entrance
points
as
well.
We've
now
added
a
staircase,
that's
angled
on
this
area,
we've
added
a
a
firewall
for
fire
pit
edge
to
it.
So
it
has
some
indirect
and
soft
lighting
at
night
and
to
lead
you
down
into
the
theaters
and
we've
intentionally
angled
the
building,
so
that
people
can
see
the
theater
rather
than
having
the
corner
cut
off.
It
highlights
the
theater,
as
people
are
coming
down
the
street
and
sort
of
frames.
The
entrance
to
the
theater.
A
B
An
architecture
question
for
you,
because
I
was
I,
think
I
was
at
the
first
AAC
meeting
when
you
first
came
up
with
a
design
and
I
want
to
preface
what
I
have
to
say
by
the
fact
that
I
am
truly
excited
about
the
fact
that
something's
being
being
done
to
what
has
been
a
very
stale
vacant
space
for
an
awful
long
time
and
I
can
understand
where
the
theaters
are
very
interested
in
enhancing
this
experience
for
their
sakes.
So
I
really
appreciate
what
you're
trying
to
do.
B
What
was
your
thinking
about
that?
Because
I
look
at
it
quite
frankly,
I
think
I've
owned
their
own
Airport
or
a
convention
center.
Much
larger
structures
and
I
can
understand.
You
want
some
pop
here.
He
wants
people
to
be
attracted
to
the
space,
so
they'll
get
into
it,
but
I'm
wondering
if,
if
it
all
couldn't
be
brought
down
a
few
notches
and
what
your
thinking
was
in
terms
of
these
being
somewhat
resistant
to
AEC's
concerns
about
this
in
your
final
drawings.
For
us.
I
Okay,
the
the
existing
buildings
in
terms
of
height
are
not
any
other
than
the
center
portion
and
we'll
deal
with
the
rest
of
the
building
is
no
higher
than
the
exactly
it's
almost
within
I.
Think
within
about
12
inches
of
the
height
of
the
existing
buildings,
it
may
have
to
check
exactly
our
high
point,
but
it
we're
basically
the
same
height.
I
That
we've
established
is
the
existing
linearity
of
the
existing
project
and
we've
chosen
to
be
slightly
lower
than
both
the
theater
and
the
bank,
so
that
those
two
buildings
would
remain
more
prominent
in
terms
of
their
physical
elements
at
as
anchors
to
the
end
of
the
project
and
the
street
visibility.
This
is
a
very
long
project
as
you're
all
aware,
I'm
certain
it's
nearly
800
feet
long.
So
this
is
actually
quite
a
large
project.
It
is
in
the
scale
not
dissimilar
than
this
convention
center.
I
In
reality,
if
you
look
at
the
overall
length
of
the
property
in
the
overall
length
of
these
buildings,
it's
a
very
long,
very
large
project.
We've
chosen
to
put
an
element
which
we've
rotated
intentionally
in
the
center
to
provide
interest
for
the
project.
So
it
isn't
at
one
level,
missed
on
the
street
right
now.
What
happens?
Is
you
have
a
long
linearity
your
mind,
catches
that
linearity
instantly
registers
it
as
a
concept
and
then
forgets
about
it.
I
I
understand
that
thing
that
I've
just
passed
physically
in
my
mind
and
I,
don't
have
to
look
at
it
anymore.
However,
much
is
right
and
wexter
and
other
people
have
done
in
the
past.
If
you
introduce
an
asymmetrical
element,
your
mind
stops
and
pays
attention
to
it
and
that's
what
we're
trying
to
get
people
to
do.
I
It's
been
dark,
it's
been
below
the
street
grade
and,
as
a
consequence,
it's
not
been
very,
very
least
able
it
has
had
large
portions
of
the
building
remained
unleased
for
years,
and
this
is
our
effort
in
order
to
change
that.
We've
had
as
an
architectural
group,
reasonable
success
in
projects
that
we've
done
globally
and
they're,
usually
well-received
people
like
them.
We
think
of
scale
of
people
as
they're.
Moving
about
them
and
I
want
the
spaces
to
create
a
warm
welcoming
effect
when
people
are
at
them.
So.
I
The
materials
we've
chosen
and
the
landscaping
then
that
our
partners
have
done
is
a
really
warm
and
friendly
one
and
I
think
when
it's
completed,
that's
what
people
will
find.
That's
generally
the
response
that
I
get
from
people.
They
don't
know
why
they
find
our
projects
calming,
but
they
do
and
we
do
it
because
we've
established
certain
linearities
certain
rhythms
in
a
project.
We
do
transitions
at
the
end,
where
they
can
be
consistent
from
one
material
to
another.
B
Tockman's
talked
with
Sauer
was
a
very
special
street
in
Palm
Springs
and
needs
to
be
handled
very
carefully
with
respect
to
new
development,
and
it
just
seems
to
me
that
there
are
less
ostentatious
ways
to
highlight
this
property.
But
that
will
give
it
the
pop
that
you
want,
but
in
keeping
with
more
of
a
promise,
Palm
Springs
aesthetic,
which
I
don't
think.
I
If
it's
a
curved
roof
in
there
within
two
blocks
of
this
project,
there's
a
project
that
has
a
similar
curb
for
the
roof,
it's
in
two
directions
and
it's
on
a
single
building.
So
it's
its
neighbor
within
two
blocks
on
tahquitz,
fronting
on
tahquitz
in
terms
of
I,
think
it's
the
I
think
it's
a
it's:
either
small
residential
building
or
small
hotel
I'm,
not
certain
which
of
its
two
blocks
on
the
same
side.
Streets
as
tahquitz
canyon
is.
A
I
B
B
Was
behind
this
particular
aesthetic,
which
Casey
found
troubling
all
three
times
it
visited
it
and
I.
Think
you're
gonna
find
that
we're
well
and
I
want
to
give
you
the
benefit
for
your
thinking,
because
I
want
you
to
understand
that
we
take
this
project
very
seriously
and
know
it
is
very
much
needed.
We
want
to
keep
these
theaters
and
we
want
to
keep
this
and
make
this
a
viable
center
again
right.
You.
I
I
I
understand
that,
but
but
and
relatively
comment
about
a
Palm,
Springs
Springs,
aesthetic
I
can
show
you
80
buildings
in
Palm
Springs
and
every
one
of
them
is
different
and
I,
but
I
understand
I.
Think
where
the
flavor
of
committee
has
been
coming
from
and
what
we've
tried
to
do
is
to
say
look.
What
we
wanted
to
do
is
to
capture
existing
flavor.
Let's
call
it
steel
and
steel,
stone
and
glass
buildings
and
with
primarily
a
focus
on
a
flat
roof
and
then
moving
that
kind
of
one
level
up
it's
kind
of
its
next
weirdoes.
I
You
know
you
you
the
stage
you
either
advance
or
you
stay
trapped
in
the
past.
So
what
we're
trying
to
do
say,
look,
here's
a
way
to
start
to
do
a
bit
of
a
transition.
It
isn't
wildly
out
of
character.
It's
it's
slightly
differently.
It
has
the
same
elements
that
are
in
the
desert.
It
has
a
large
portion
of
really
flats,
simply
sloped
roofs,
that
are,
you
know,
flat
for
the
entire
project
and
yet,
at
the
same
time
it
has
one
element
which
starts
to
distinguish
it
and
I.
I
F
F
F
F
I
F
F
D
A
I
A
I
I
A
A
I
The
landscape,
architect,
unfortunately
took
just
an
available
photograph
from
their
website.
We
had
a
custom
block
actually
done
for
this
project.
That
was,
as
the
patterning
is
shown
on
the
LM,
coloured
elevation
that
you
have,
and
these
are
actually
the
same
size.
The
stones
are
actually
the
correct
size.
That's
the
3
inch
stone
the
6
inch
and
the
9
in
stone,
but
the
yeah
they're
continuous
bands,
which,
or
so
the
stone
company
couldn't
get
on
their
board,
so
they
they
just
represented
it.
This
way.
I
The
walls
and
screening
materials
around
the
air-conditioning
units
so
that
you
don't
see
just
a
metal
finish.
You
have
a
nice
warm
cherry,
color
finish:
we've
used
that
same
finish
on
the
walls
of
the
courtyard
and
then
the
landscape.
Architects
have
used
a
nice
grouping
of
trees
and
vegetation
below
that
in
order
to
soften
that
overall
area.
But
we've
done
it
to
warm
up
the
entire
complex
in
an
area
where
it
where
it's
suitable
and
we
then
utilized
basically
one
color
of
material
all
the
way
around.
A
I
We've
added
the
the
the
we've
removed,
some
screening
element,
colors
and
just
went
everything
is
now
cherry.
There's
a
single
color,
all
the
way
around
we've
added
the
landscaping
that
was
in
that
courtyard
area.
That
was
added
since
the
discussions
with
the
committee
asking
for
additional
landscaping
in
that
area.
A
I
When
I
was
in
the
same
time,
comment
at
the
same
time
and
then
the
we've
simplified,
the
materials
on
the
buildings
we've
gone
simply
to
match
the
stucco
in
general,
on
the
both
the
theater
and
the
on
the
bank.
Building
we've
selected
the
same
stucco
finish.
It
will
be
utilized
throughout
the
project.
I
D
A
I
This
is
the
existing
Wexler
block
and
the
material
underneath
is
this
equity
owned,
and
it's
just
underneath
the
windows
where
people
make
it
beat.
It
abuse
it,
and
so
it's
not
when
they're
sitting
in
the
table,
they're
not
rubbing
up
against
hearthstone,
and
it's
only
under
the
areas
underneath
the
windows.
D
I
I
understand
what
it
is:
I've
known
well,
along
what
the
issue
was
and
and
it's
the
one
element
which
is
nonlinear
and
different
and
I-
understand
that,
and
you
know,
as
architects,
we
run
into
this
all
the
time
and
I
just
got
to
stand
my
ground
sometimes,
and
you
know,
work
it
out
with
people
who
are
in
the
community
and
if
you
decide
in
the
end
my
client
will
work
with
you
on
it.
I'm
sure.
That's
why
you
had
no
issue
with.
I
Well,
the
reality
is,
you
won't
see
much
of
it
and
that's
the
part
that
I
can't
communicate
as
well.
But
if
you
look
at
the
buildings
in
what
you'll
see
is
a
bit
of
curved
roof,
that's
what
you're
gonna
see
not
gonna,
see
much
because
it's
sloping
away
from
you
and
it's
it's
set
back
from
the
street
and
and
falls
away
from
you.
So
you
don't
really
see
much
of
it
anyway.
I
That's
the
whole
thing
about
it:
it's
not
like
it
stares
you
in
the
face
and
it's
down
at
ten
feet
in
height
and
you
gotta
walk
into
that
roof.
Its
way,
it's
it's
as
high
as
the
ceiling
is
okay,
and
if
this
was
a
curved
roof
going
that
way.
Think
of
it.
You're
not
gonna,
see
much
but
you'll
see
the
under
hang
of
it
and
that's
what
people
will
see.
They'll
see
a
graceful
under
hang
the
arches
away.
I
I
Yeah,
it's
gonna,
be
probably
from
from
this
point
here.
Going.
This
way
is
which
would
bring
you
to
here.
You've
got
that
distance
to
walk,
but
what
they
understand
is
that
people
will
be
there
longer.
They'll
have
more
people,
they
believe
hanging
around,
and
that
therefore
encourages
them
to
see
the
next
movie
or
look
at
another
movie
that
they
wouldn't
have
thought
about,
and
they
don't
see
it
as
a
really
big
deal,
whether
you
walk
for
one
or
two
minutes
extra
to
get
into
the
theater,
they
don't
really
see
the
big
deal.
D
I
I
D
I
D
I
D
I
A
I
An
existing
ramp!
That's
why
I
said
that
comes
from
the
street
over
here
we're
taking
at
the
moment.
The
plan
is
to
take
that
out,
replace
it
with
additional
landscaping,
because
it
really
isn't
a
necessary
access
point.
We
want
everybody
to
really
use
the
main
focal
point
of
the
of
the
courtyard
to
come
down
into
the
property.
A
I
A
I
You
can
walk
down
this.
Your
choices
are
as
follows
by
in
this,
if
I'm
in
the
parking
lot,
I
can
walk
straight
ahead
down
the
set
of
stairs
I
can
walk
to
the
left
and
go
out
to
the
street
and
then
come
back
into
the
property
if
I'm
an
AV,
a
person
also
from
the
parking
structure
at
the
upper
level.
That
was
another
question.
There
is
an
elevator
that
takes
people
from
the
upper
level
down,
so
you
can
use
an
elevator
to
come
down
to
the
lower
level
without
having
to
go
down
any
stairs.
J
At
this
entrance
from
the
parking
structure
to
the
there's,
both
steps
and
a
ramp
so
you're
not
forced
to
go
down
steps.
This
is
a
ramp
on
this
side.
These
are
steps
on
this
side
and
then
the
other
benefit
to
the
theater.
Was
we
enlarged
this
actual
courtyard?
This
is
used
for
Film,
Festival
events,
I'm
sure
you've
all
been
there.
So
one
of
the
things
we
we
hadn't
pointed
out
is
that
we
enlarge
the
area
or
Plaza
outside.
So
now
we
have
another
area
of
venue
outside
the
theatre
itself
and
then
also
the
central
plaza.
J
A
D
I
H
Most
of
the
struggle
has
been
around
the
two
buildings
that
are
going
to
be
demolished
are
the
building
that
will
be
demolished
and
then
the
two
that
will
replace
it.
Can
you
help
me
as
to
why
you
believe
those
two
buildings
that
you're
going
to
construct
are
necessary?
If
this
was
one
large
courtyard,
you
simply
demolished
the
building,
I
think
you
have
a
much
more
attractive,
looking
location,
the.
I
Project
economics:
don't
let
the
owner
really
just
discuss
that
as
he
wishes,
but
the
project
economics
states
can't
drop
20,000
square
feet
out
of
pretty
much
anybody's.
Performa
and
I
will
include
his
and
make
up
riots.
It
represents
15
percent
of
the
projects,
you'd
be
eliminating
15
percent
of
the
revenue
for
the
project,
which
means
that
you
got
to
get
it
back
from
somewhere
and
also
you've
now
taken
away
the
highest
value
revenue
space,
which
is
a
street
frontage.
I
The
problem
is
that
this
project
was
poorly
designed
as
an
architect
in
the
first
place,
and
it's
been
suffering
from
it
since
its
inception,
and
you
got
to
get
rid
of
the
problem
and
start
over
with.
It
is
what
we're
trying
to
do
here.
H
I
K
K
Currently,
it's
five
feet
below
grade
and
it's
I
can
lease
that
space
for
about
seventy
five
cents,
a
foot
to
an
entry
level
tenant
and-
and
you
get
somebody
come
on
in
and
come
on
out,
but
what
our
desire
was
to
make
this
a
statement
project
for
the
community
really
do
something
where
it's
it
compares
with
your
downtown
project.
This
is
seven
acres,
it's
a
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
square
feet
and
we
want
a
use,
that's
compatible
for
the
community
in
the
long
term.
K
As
you
all
know,
you
come
into
this
parking
lot
right
now
and
I
can
see
everyone's
memory
ingrained
well.
I
just
go
right
into
the
movie.
Theater
I
go
into
the
movie.
The
air
I
come
back
out
and
I
leave.
There's
no
other
tenants.
We've
designed
the
project
now
that'll
mix
with
the
community
and
you
go
in
the
middle
and
you
see
a
okert
on
one
side
and
you
see
a
coffee
on
the
other
side
and
you
get
to
the
front.
I
already
have
four
or
five
letters
of
interest
for
restaurants.
K
That
love
our
design,
think
it's
creative,
don't
think
it's
boxy
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
we
want
to
unify
the
project.
We
want
Regal
Cinema
to
be
part
of
an
entertainment
project
like
other
projects
in
Southern
California
and
not
an
island
sitting
by
itself.
Next
to
empty
buildings
and
the
building
we
have
to
build
has
to
have
energy.
It
has
to
have
glazing,
because
it's
designed
for
retail
and
restaurants
and
and
whatnot,
and
and
not
just
a
little
cookie
cutter
office.
H
K
Have
a
coffee
and
I
have
a
small
sushi
that
that
will
move
into
that
center
courtyard.
And
then
we
are
submitting
a
unified
signage
plan
to
the
city
as
early
as
next
week
and
we're
asking
for
a
little
bit
of
signage,
just
like
gardens
on
El
Paseo,
where
some
of
the
back
tenants
have
a
little
eyebrow
sign
it
or
whatnot,
so
that
our
rear
tenants
can
get
a
little
bit
of
visibility
and
signage
on
the
front
project.
H
C
Do
you
have
a
representation
of
in
this?
The
building
is,
it
stands
alone
appears
to
be
massive,
but
I
think
we'd
get
a
much
better
perspective
of
it.
If
we
had
a
presentation
that
show
did
and
it's
that
integrated
and
with
the
theater
and
the
bank
building,
so
as
you
could
see
the
height
relative
to
those
we.
K
I
A
A
C
A
A
A
H
I
Madam
chair
I
have
brought
up
the
rendering
elevation
from
the
street
as
a
direct
facade.
It's
both
on
the
side
view
here
and
on
the
front
here.
As
you
can
see,
this
is
the
main
canopy
line
of
the
theatre.
This
is
our
main
building
line
underneath
that
canopy,
that
runs
continuously
all
the
way
along
and,
as
you
can
see,
our
roofs
align
with
the
roof
line
of
the
office.
I
And
that's
what
your
Street
facade
looks
like
I'm
happy
to
answer,
questions
about
it
and
we
have
about
40
or
50
additional
views
of
the
property
that
I've
loaded
onto
the
planning
directors.
Computer
that
you
can
you're
welcome
to
have
a
scroll
through
you
if
you
would
like
and
I,
can
do
a
three-dimensional
walkthrough
over
here
from
anybody
who
wants
to
see
a
movie.
I
I
The
intention
is
to
have
an
interesting,
sculpture
and
I.
Don't
I
think
he's
going
to
work
that
out
with
with
staff
and
with
the
Commission,
but
here's
you
can
see.
In
this
view,
we've
added
a
mount,
a
large
amount
of
landscaping.
This
was
the
earlier
concept
in
this
area
here,
along
and
we've
added
taller
landscaping
to
the
views
so
that
we've
added,
if
you
you,
have
the
drawing
actually
in
front
of
you
from
the
Landscape
Architect
in
your
presentation.
That
shows
a
view
from
here
with
his
added
land
added
landscaping.
I
I
D
I
I
You
know
somebody
in
an
airplane
will
notice
it
more.
Obviously
you
know
because
you're
up
above
the
project,
but
from
there
I,
don't
mind
it.
Dual
entries
or
single
entries
depend
upon
whether
the
owner
got
a
combined
cut
yet
no
well,
it's
only.
This
is
only
18
feet,
which
is
a
standard
to
a
restaurant,
restaurant,
height,
yeah
and
and
we've
got
so
in
the
center
one
just
for
interest.
We've
got
somewhere
between
two
feet
and
twelve
feet.
It's
really!
I
You
know
it's
it's
because
it's
a
canted
roof,
it's
it's
low
on
one
corner
and
it
goes
up
twelve
feet
on
the
other
corner.
So,
yes,
technically
we're
at
the
maximum
height.
But
it's
only
four.
You
know
12
inches
across
the
roof
and
then
goes
starting
it
starting
to
fall
from
that
point
again
in
all
directions.
I
D
I
I
You
know
the
only
you
could
do
on
the
second
floor
is
you
could
cover
more
of
it,
but
most
people
are
using
the
ground
floor
because
it's
shaded
and
it's
a
shorter
walk
so
and
you
have
to
follow
human
nature,
which
is
to
park
as
close
to
a
doorway
as
you
can
and
walk
from
there,
and
if
you
do
that,
you
walk
in
the
first
instance
down
a
ramp
of
your
choice
or
walk
down
a
more
gradual
set
of
stairs
than
are
there
today,
we've
enhanced
the
entrance
from
the
garage
so
that
it
is
a
more
statement,
more
of
a
statement
entrance
with
a
bit
of
a
ground,
sign
and
plantings
and-
and
you
know,
we've
upgraded
the
forest.
D
I
I
D
I
We've
discussed
with
the
owner
and
I
haven't
seen
the
final
signage
package,
so
I
can't
really
comment,
but
the
discussion
has
been
that
there
would
be
some
directory
signage
on
the
property,
which
would
obviously
include
directory
to
part
where
parking
is
and
the
the
ground
sign
on
the
corners
are
very
low,
stated
ground
sign
that
simply
states
that
this
is
called
the
scene
and-
and
you
know,
parking
in
that
direction
and
working
in
that
direction.
Yep
on
which
way
you're
coming
from.
E
C
Almost
appears
from
this
point
to
be
basically
flat:
roof
foot
to
higher
hands,
and
you
don't
really
this
curves
don't
stand
out
nearly
as
much
as
they
do.
When
you
have
the
individual
pictures
of
each
of
the
buildings,
which
gives
me
less
concern,
I
was
concerned
about
how
bold
actually
right
then.
C
You
considered
in
terms
of
the
parking
garage
is
a
part
of
this
complex.
Have
you
considered
doing
shade
structures
or
war
solar,
shade
panels?
On
the
second
floor,
there's
going
to
be
a
dramatic
increase
in
the
amount
of
people
parking
in
that
garage
today,
and
probably
when
this
are
good,
we'll
be
playing
anyways.
At
least
you.
D
C
I
It
may
at
this
stage
the
owner
has
not
directed
us
to
do
anything
relative
to
the
second
floor,
he's
a
pretty
responsive
owner
and
forward-thinking.
So
he's
generally
acts
in
his
own
best
interest
so
that,
if
that's
an
opportunity,
I'm
sure
he
would
you
know,
react
to
it
accordingly
and
this
project
up
is
his
demonstration
of
that
because
he's
you
know
doing
it
forward
without
having
to
have
somebody
tell
him
that
he
needs
to
be
done.
C
I
I
F
I
Will
then
they
will
then
come
through
the
back
courtyard
and
either
go
in
this
area,
which
is
the
intended
service
area?
So
we've
closed
this
off
in
here
again
on
this
side
of
the
building,
just
as
we've
allowed
the
theater
to
have
an
expanded
area
both
for
the
film
theater
and
for
activities
that
are
adjacent
to
the
theater
and
then
we've
closed
it
off
behind
the.
F
I
I
Square
foot
unit:
this
is
about
a
1200
square
foot
unit.
This
is
around
2500
square
feet.
This
is
around
1,800
square
feet.
There's
around
2700
square
feet.
H
One
of
the
questions
I
asked
earlier
of
the
director
was
whether
or
not
the
extensions
of
time
changes
that
we
made
would
apply
to
this
project
and
ice.
One
make
sure
you
understand
that,
under
the
changes
that
Palm
Springs
is
now
enacted,
you
have
two
years
to
begin
construction
and
no
more
than
two
more
years
after
that
that
can
be
extended.
Are
you
confident
that
you
have
the
financial
financing.
A
A
A
D
Would
like
to
see
us
maybe
go
out
and
do
a
site
visit
is
that
some
of
this
is
hard
to
visualize,
that's
being
fairly
early
warning
site
visit
he's
down
here.
I
really
would
like
to
go
out
there
and
visualize,
and
have
the
architect
explain
to
us
exactly.
What's
envisioned
at
each
particular
location,
I
think
we've
learned
a
lot
from
the
site
visits
we've
done
as
two
of
the
major
recent
projects
and
I
certainly
like
to
consider
that
for
this
one.
F
A
H
Know
I
I
arrived
this
morning
looking
at
this
project
and
looking
at
the
plans
that
I've,
seen
and
I
had
some
real
concerns
as
to
the
viability
of
the
project
and
I'm,
not
an
architect
but
I.
Don't
think
I
have
seen
a
set
of
plans
in
the
three
years
that
I've
been
on
this
commission
we're
looking
down.
H
H
B
F
F
A
A
I'll,
come
back
to
you
for
emotion,
just
I
wanted
a
chance
to
comment
as
well
before.
Motion
got
made.
I
like
the
site
plan.
I.
Think
the
work
that
you've
been
doing
on
the
site
plan
is
important.
I
do
think
that
the
items
many
of
the
items
that
came
to
us
from
AAC
still
stand.
The
street
trees
are
important.
This
is
section
14.
We
can't
substitute
just
small
palms
and
not
have
Street
trees.
A
It's
something
that
we
agreed
with
the
tribes
that
we
would
do
I
think
we
really
need
to
look
at
what
the
streetscape
looks
like
in
terms
I
think
there
have
been
some
miscues
here
in
terms
of
finding
possibly
the
best
elements
of
the
Wechsler
building
that
can
be
brought
into
this.
Although
you
brought
the
Wechsler
brick,
you
put
it.
A
Horizontal
position,
instead
of
a
vertical
position,
which
I
think
the
the
bank
building
uses,
the
the
theater
uses
and
I
think
there's
some
ways
that
it
could
tie
better
in
I,
still
think
that
the,
although,
when
I
look
at
it
this
way,
it
looks
good
I
think
that
there
needs
to
be
more
work
done
on
the
roof
lines.
I
think
they're,
still
trendy
and
I'm
not
comfortable
with
what
I'm
seeing
but
I
do
like
the
site
plan
and
I
would
like
to
see
this
go
forward.
So,
from
my
point
of
view,
it's
still
too
important.
A
It's
not
there.
Yet
you've
got
the
Kaptur
buildings
across
the
street.
You
have
the
Wexler
buildings
around.
It.
I
think
it
needs
to
work
better
with
those
two,
those
two
components
without
copying
them,
but
still
work
with
them.
So
those
are
my
comments
on
it.
It's
its
street
trees.
There
still
I
really
want
to
see
the
shade
elements
shown
as
I
went
through
the
property.
The
nicest
part
of
the
walk-up
was
that
it
was
mainly
shade,
as
you
walked
up
between
the
buildings.
I,
don't
see
quite
enough
of
that
now.
F
To
support
the
staff
recommendation
to
refer
to
subcommittee
and
I'd,
like
the
subcommittee
instructions
to
the
applicant,
that
the
first
meeting
be
an
information
meeting
that
we
just
sit
down
with
the
applicant.
The
subcommittee
sits
down
with
the
applicant
understands.
Maybe
we
get
some
of
these
better
renderings
printed
out,
because,
as
we
learned
just
recently
that
some
of
the
renderings
portray
the
building
differently
than
other
renderings,
the
colors
on
some
of
the
renderings
are
different
than
the
material
boards
we
need.
A
F
E
F
F
A
F
D
A
F
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
I
think
everybody
agrees.
Everybody
that's
been
on
the
AC
and
planning
that
this
is
an
important
project.
We
want
to
see
it
build,
but
there's
a
certain
bar
in
terms
of
design
that
this
project
needs
to
pass
and
and
and
it's
gonna
be
difficult
for
it
to
get
approved
until
such
time
as
that's.
It's
judged
that
that's
that
that's
happened
so
I,
just
like
the
applicant
understand
understand
that.
E
Madam
chair
and
members
of
the
Commission,
the
next
item
on
your
agenda
is
an
appeal
of
the
denial
of
a
sign
permit
for
a
business
at
12:47,
south
gene
autry
trail.
The
applicant
submitted
a
sign
permit
request
to
us
I
reviewed
that
sign.
Permit
request
relative
to
the
approved
sign
program
for
the
business
complex.
E
The
applicant
was
requesting
to
signs
of
approximately
twenty-eight
point
five
square
feet
in
area
each
one
on
the
east
elevation
of
the
building
facing
gene
autry
and
then
one
on
the
South
elevation
of
the
building.
The
approved
sign
program
would
only
allow
signs
of
five
square
feet
in
area
and
so,
consequently,
based
on
that
I
denied
the
permit
because
it
exceeded
the
size
and
then
the
second
sign
on
the
South
elevation
of
the
building
would
not
be
permitted
either
under
the
sign
program
or
under
the
city
sign
regulations.
E
The
applicant
has
appealed
that
decision
to
you
today,
and
so
that
is
what
we
are
asking
you
to
look
at
is
the
denial
of
that
sign
application.
There's
some
background
information
that
I
think
is
critical
for
you
all
to
understand
in
terms
of
the
property
and
the
proposed
signage.
The
property
in
question
is
part
of
an
11
lot
business
complex.
What
is
unique
about
this
complex?
Typically,
we
would
see
a
business
complex
where
it's
under
one
ownership.
In
this
case
it
exists
as
11,
separate
lofts,
and
so
they
are
under
separate
ownership.
E
The
sign
program
for
the
complex
was
approved
back
in
1991,
I've
included.
What
is
in
our
file
the
sign
program
and,
as
you'll
see
it's
a
single
blueprint
sheet
that
has
a
notation
from
the
assistant
planning
director
at
that
point
in
time,
indicating
that
the
blueprint
drawing
is
the
sign
program
and
that
it
has
been
approved
by
staff
again.
This
was
done
back
in
1991.
E
The
sign
program
itself
identifies
that
signs,
maybe
five
square
feet
in
area
on
the
document.
It
shows
a
sign
of
1
foot
in
height
and
5
feet
in
width.
It
also
identifies
that
it's
to
be
a
plexiglass,
a
bronze
Plexiglas
with
white
Helvetica
lettering,
and
that
is
the
detail
that
we
have
on
the
sign
program
for
the
complex
to
further
confuse
matters.
I've.
Given
you
a
history
of
the
approved
signs
that
we
have
record
of
having
permits
at
the
properties
since
1991,
which
is
included
in
your
backup
materials.
E
What
you
will
see
from
that
is
that
there
are
no
signs
that
meet
those
dimensions.
There
are
three
signs
that
were
8
square
feet
in
area,
but
again
they
exceed
the
5
square
feet
that
is
shown
on
the
document.
That
is
the
sign
program
and
then,
in
one
case
there
was
one
sign
back
in,
let's
see
2005,
which
actually
went
to
the
architectural
Advisory
Committee
for
approval.
A
E
Correct
so
in
terms
of
the
history
again,
what
is
confusing
to
me
is
I
have
a
document
that
is
the
sign
program
and
then
in
the
signs
have
been
approved
for
the
project
that
complex
none
of
them
meet.
Those
dimensions.
I
do
need
to
indicate
that
the
sign
that
was
approved
by
staff
in
2015
for
this
business
prior
staff
made
an
error
in
permitting
the
sign.
That's
the
one
that
was
issued,
the
sign
permit
that
was
issued
on
August
31st
of
2015,
and
that
was
38.5
square
feet.
E
The
subject
building
at
12:47,
and
so
what
would
happen
is
the
signage
that
the
applicant
is
proposing
would
replace
the
existing
signage.
The
intent
is
that
it
would
replace
the
non-conforming
aspects
of
that
signage.
One
of
the
other
things
I
was
going
to
point
out
to
you,
as
we
did
go
to
the
site.
Look
at
the
existing
signage
on
the
site.
There
are
two
signs,
I
believe
that
do
meet
the
dimensional
requirements,
but
neither
of
those
have
permits-
and
there
are
very
few
signs
within
the
complex
currently
that
have
evidence
of
having
permits.
E
My
assumption
is
that,
because
many
of
the
signs
are
not
illuminated,
the
sign
companies
did
not
go
to
the
building
and
Safety
Department
to
get
an
electrical
permit,
which
would
be
the
typical
process.
That's
my
assumption
as
to
why
they
do
not
have
permits.
So
again,
those
are
kind
of
the
background
issues
that
need
to
be
taken
into
consideration
with
this
I've
laid
out
for
you,
two
possible
courses
of
action
number
one
is
to
deny
the
appeal
finding
that
the
proposed
signage
does
not
meet
the
approved
sign
program
for
the
property.
E
What
we
would
then
need
to
do
is
then
do
code
enforcement
follow
up
with
that
on
the
signs
that
do
not
have
permits
and
the
signs
that
exceed
the
area,
that's
permitted.
The
exception
would
be
those
signs.
What
you
do
have
permits
and
have
been
approved
that,
because
they
have
gone
through
that
process
and
do
have
an
approval,
those
would
be
able
to
remain
in
place.
E
The
second
course
of
action
for
you
is
to
approve
the
appeal
finding
that
the
proposed
signage
is,
in
conformance
with
the
city's
sign
code,
as
I
indicate
in
the
staff
report
at
28.5
square
feet
and
area,
the
sign
who
does
meet
the
city's
requirements
relative
to
square
footage,
and
so,
if
this
were
to
be
permitted
under
the
sign
code,
it
would
be
permissible.
I
do
have
a
caveat
to
that.
The
second
sign
that
the
applicant
is
requesting
would
not
be
permissible.
They
would
only
be
able
to
have
one
sign
on
the
elevation
facing
gene
autry.
E
We
would
also
recommend
that,
if
that
is
your
course
of
action,
that
we
contact
the
owners
within
the
complex
and
request
that
the
sign
program
for
the
complex
be
updated.
Ultimately,
the
goal
of
city
is
where
there
are
multi-unit
complexes
that
there
be
a
cohesive
sign
program
for
the
complex,
and
what
we
would
want
to
see
is
something
that
brings
the
signage
for
the
complex
together
as
part
of
a
cohesive
package.
So
with
that.
That
concludes
my
comments.
You
have
both
the
applicant
here
and
the
owner
of
the
building
here.
D
D
D
D
E
Is
the
unusual
thing
in
the
city
sign
code
relative
to
a
sign
program?
It
uses
the
language.
A
multi-tenant
building
shall
have
a
sign
program.
The
intent
again
is
that
where
you
have
multiple
tenants
in
a
project
that
the
signage
more
or
less
matches
that
it's
consistent
throughout
the
project,
this
is
slightly
different.
In
that
you
have
buildings
on
separate
parcels.
It
has
been
the
practice
of
the
City
Council
to
require
even
those
types
of
projects
to
have
a
sign
program.
E
E
A
A
B
Finishing
along
with
it
same
line
of
questioning
me
in
the
owners
letter,
the
representative
of
all
the
owners,
although
that
we
received,
he
is
suggesting
that
they
would
be
willing
to
come
up.
If
we
gave
them
a
four
month
grace
period,
they
would
come
up
with
a
sign
program
and
I
assumed
they.
It
would
be
one
that
would
be
in
compliance
with
our
sign
code.
That's
they're
offering
that
up
as
an
alternative
as
well.
C
E
H
E
In
terms
of
the
city
getting
in
the
dispute,
no,
what
we
have
before
you
today
is
a
request
for
a
signed
permit
that
was
denied.
The
Planning
Commission
is
asked
to
review
that
signed,
permit
application
relative
to
the
adopted
sign
program
in
the
city's
sign
code,
and
that
is
what
you
are
being
asked
to
do
today.
C
E
A
E
We
cannot
require
the
owners
to
come
back
with
a
sign
program,
it's
difficult
for
us
to
say
in
four
months.
You
shall
come
back
with
a
sign
program
right.
There
is
the
possibility,
because
again
there
are,
you
know,
11
properties
to
get
all
of
them
to
agree,
so
there's
nothing
that
we
can
do
to
require
them
to
come
in
by
a
certain
date
to
do
that.
A
E
There's
an
issue
here
with
an
applicant
who
has
submitted
a
permit
that
needs
a
decision.
If
you
will
one
of
the
other
thoughts
that
I
had
was
to
defer
action
on
the
appeal
for
a
period
and
if
a
sign
program
does
not
come
in
from
the
property
owners,
then
we
go
ahead
and
take
action
on
that
appeal.
But
I
would
want
to
hear
from
the
applicant
on
that
in
terms
of
the
time
frame.
F
E
F
A
C
So
the
time
periods
a
little
bit
prohibitive
and
then
also
coming
in
and
requesting
for,
say
us
mobility
to
take
down
their
sign.
That's
approximately
90
square
feet
to
put
this
in
financial
perspective.
My
sign
is
running
around
six
thousand
dollars
for
28
square
feet,
so
you're
asking
somebody
to
take
a
fifteen
thousand
dollar
sign
down
to
conform
with
a
dated
twenty
six-year-old
document.
C
As
far
as
the
time
frame
for
my
facility,
one
of
the
biggest
challenges
for
me
right
now
is
competitiveness
in
the
marketplace
and
there
is
a
Cali
safe
access,
delivery
service
and
people
confuse
that
with
Palm
Spring,
safe
access,
so
you'll
see
a
DBA
for
forte
to
change
that
name
so
that
I
can
enter
into
a
delivery
market
and
generate
more
tax
revenue
for
the
city
of
Palm.
Springs
time
is
of
the
essence:
I
mixed
up
with
less
savory
characters
in
the
cannabis
space
and
I'd
like
to
distinguish
myself
from
those
individuals.
A
B
First
of
all,
just
I
wanted
to
clarify
something
that
Flynn
said.
Is
you
look
at
the
CCR's?
They
give
the
sign
program
and
it's
I
think
it's
five
and
a
half
feet
by
one
feet:
it's
not
plexiglass.
It's
wood.
It
is
outdated.
All
the
owners
are
aware
of
that.
That's
the
first
thing,
I
want
to
say.
The
second
thing
is
I
dropped
off,
I
dropped
off
earlier
in
the
I
mentioned
in
the
pack,
but
I
didn't
include
it.
We've
got
forgotten
is
a
just.
B
The
development
committee
recommended
conditions
of
approval
which
made
it
through
the
Planning
Commission
the
head
of
planning
and
was
approved
by
the
City
Council
and
on
page
four
item
five.
It
says
that
limited
retail
uses
shall
be
allowed
in
buildings.
One
three
four
and
eleven
a
floor
plan
must
be
approved
by
the
planning
director
prior
to
the
issuance
of
a
tenant
improvement
plans.
All
other
buildings
shall
be
used
for
manufacturing
and
industrial
uses.
B
A
B
B
B
The
codes
of
the
medical
cannabis,
the
5.35
only
allow
for
the
name
of
the
business.
Okay
and
Flynn
has
his
idea
about
that
and
I
have
mine
and
there's
a
accountability,
track
ability
with
marijuana
companies
and
the
name
of
the
business
is
Palm
Springs,
safe
access,
Inc,
and
there
should
be
no
other
name
and
that's
for
a
bunch
of
legal
reasons
that
we
have.
B
A
A
C
We're
getting
a
bit
outside
of
yeah,
she
was
before
the
Commission
at
the
moment.
I
think
we're
viewing
I
mean
you
yourself
of
identified
this
as
a
Content
issue
with
which
is
expressly
outside
of
the
considerations
we
should
be
looking
into
at
the
moment.
I
think
the
issue
of
whether
or
not
the
signage
has
to
reference.
The
corporate
structure
of
the
entity
itself
is
a
bit
far
in
a
field
and,
frankly,
not
an
issue.
C
You
have
any
number
of
corporations
doing
business
that
don't
reference
expressly
the
type
of
corporate
structure
they
have
in
terms
of
identifying
their
business
and
I.
Think
Flynn's
summation
of
what
the
code
requires
in
terms
of
identifying
a
business
was
in
fact
intended
to
make
sure
that
you
don't
also
include
signage
that
identifies
product
types
of
varieties
things
along
those
lines.
It
was
intended
only
to
say
that
medical,
cannabis,
cooperative
or
dispensary
were
just
identified
by
a
business
name.
It's
not
going
to
have
additional
signage,
identifying
prices
or
types
of
product
services
excuse.
A
H
Think
there's
an
equity
issue.
Here
we
have
a
complex
where
their
sign
program
is
clearly
and
obviously
out
of
date.
We
have
buildings
that
have
signs
that
have
never
been
before
this
commission.
That
would
not
be
approved
according
to
the
sign
program
that
we
have
I.
Think
the
only
fair
thing
that
we
can
do
at
this
point
is
lock
in
place.
H
F
D
F
D
A
Have
one
unless
anybody
else
has
go
ahead,
and
this
is
a
clarification
if
we're
leaving
it
in
place.
We've
got
cue,
approved
signs
which
may
or
may
not
be
conforming,
but
they
were
previously
approved,
so
I
think
they're
in
place,
I
I'm,
assuming
that
we're
not
locking
in
the
unapproved
signs,
but
that
if
they
don't
come
back
with
us,
it's
a
hodgepodge
right
now.
H
E
H
D
B
No
question
assuming
they
come
up
with
a
plan.
Does
the
plan
have
to
comply
with
the
existing
zone
with
respect
to
the
sign
program,
because
I
do
think
there
are
some
very
unusual
circumstances
about
the
location
of
these
of
these
units.
That
would
requires
perhaps
some
deviations
from
what
is
a
very
restrictive
code
with
respect
to
signs
at
this
site,
so
I
assume
that
when
they
come
up
with
a
sign
program,
if
it
deviates
from
the
from
the
zoning
code,
which
we've
seen
all
the
time,
we
can
make
judgments
accordingly.
Wouldn't
there
before
us
per.
D
E
C
A
B
A
E
Motion
was
to
continue
the
appeal
for
a
period
of
four
months
and
then
to
direct
the
property
owners
to
come
back
with
a
sign
program
for
approval
by
the
Planning
Commission.
During
that
four
month
period,
all
remaining
existing
signs
may
remain
in
place.
No
new
sign
permits
may
be
issued
until
the
sign
program
is
approved.
F
A
B
E
A
In
terms
of
other
Commission's,
its
directors
business,
but
we've
had
sort
of
chock-full,
City
Council
meetings
dealing
with
for
four
or
five
projects
that
we
had
worked
on
and
I
was
wondering.
If
the
director
could
let
us
know
what
happened
with
those
and
they
include
sorrento
park.
The
development
agreement,
boulder
boulders,
isn't
resolved
yet
canyon
canyon
view
nexus
and
discovering.
E
The
cameron
has
not
started,
but
let
me
start
first
with
your
city
council
agenda,
since
that
was
the
first
question
that
was
posed
to
me.
The
multitude
of
questions
that
are
coming
my
way,
looking
first
at
the
June
twenty
first
city
council
agenda
well
in
the
desert,
was
on
the
agenda
for
that
meeting.
You
all
heard
that
on
June
the
14th,
the
City
Council
approved
it
by
a
vote
of
three
to
two
with
additional
conditions
of
approval.
E
One
of
the
things
they
did
was
clarify
the
timeframe
for
the
approval
I
had
in
my
notes
that
it
was
approved
for
a
period
of
24
months
with
a
six-month
review.
What
was
actually
intended
with
the
maker
of
the
motion
was
that
reviews
occur
at
six
months
and
24
months,
and
so
that
was
cleaned
up
in
one
of
the
conditions
of
approval
and
they
did
adopt
your
other
conditions
of
approval
that
you
would
have
imposed
on
the
project,
and
so
that
item
was
approved
there
was
also
was
continued.
E
There
was
also
the
Enclave
at
Bristow
project.
This
was
the
one
that
was
on
Burris
toe
and
air
mosa
and
section
14
for
the
30
condominium
units.
The
item
that
went
before
the
City
Council
was
the
tentative
map
for
the
condominiums.
However,
one
of
the
council
members
had
questions
about
the
architectural
design,
and
so
they
continued
that
item
that
will
go
back
to
City
Council
on
the
ninth.
The
applicant
has
made
some
minor
revisions
to
the
architectural
design,
which
we
think
will
help
to
enhance
the
project.
E
We
had
the
appeal
of
the
Canyon
View
project
as
you'll
recall,
that
was
denied
by
the
Planning
Commission
by
a
vote
of
three
to
two
that
went
forward
to
the
City
Council
on
July,
the
5th.
After
hearing
the
testimony
and
reviewing
the
project,
the
City
Council
voted
to
approve
the
project
by
a
vote
of
five
to
two.
As
part
of
that
they
did.
Excuse
me
five
to
zero.
E
I'm
used
to
our
seven
members
on
Planning
Commission
with
that
approval,
however,
they
did
incorporate
the
conditions
that
Commissioner
Warlick
had
suggested
in
the
initial
motion
to
approve
the
project,
so
those
were
all
included
as
conditions
of
approval
I'm.
Sorry,
mr.
Callaghan
I
mean
with
them
I'm.
Sorry,
I
don't
have.
E
E
D
D
E
Going
on
to
the
other
item
that
we
had
on
July,
the
fifth,
the
other
appeal
was
the
denial
of
the
andreas
project.
That
was
the
one
behind
tahquitz
Plaza
and
that
was
denied
by
Planning
Commission.
The
City
Council
reviewed
that
case
in
the
testimony
that
was
given
and
voted
5-0
to
deny
the
appeal.
They
also
found
that
the
architecture
of
the
project
and
the
massing
did
not
meet
the
city's
architectural
criteria.
A
E
Rescinded
three
of
the
five
resolutions
and
ordinance
that
approved
the
project
back
in
April
of
this
year,
when
the
discussion
on
how
to
deal
with
the
judgement
on
the
case
was
first
presented
to
the
City
Council
the
other
item
on
July,
the
6th.
There
was
a
special
city
council
meeting
at
that
council
meeting.
They
discussed
the
development
agreement
for
sarena
Park
I'm,
going
to
give
you
the
short
version
of
the
story
in
that
they
generally
agreed
with
the
suggested
terms
of
the
agreement.
However,
they
did
want
a
performance
schedule
attached
to
the
development
agreement.
E
There
was
some
discussion
on
the
timeframe
you
all,
as
the
Planning
Commission
had
recommended
the
20-year
time
frame
with
the
five-year
escalation
clause
for
the
fees.
City
Council
was
fine
with
the
escalation
clause.
They
were
a
little
bit
uncomfortable
with
the
20
year,
time
frame
and
I.
Believe
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
they
did
request
the
performance
schedule
as
part
of
the
development
agreement
that
is
intended
to
go
forward
to
the
City
Council.
I
can't
remember
if
it
is
on
the
agenda
for
the
26th
or
the
19th,
but
it
will
be
at
a
and.
A
A
D
D
D
D
E
Golden
Sands
was
a
little
bit
easier
in
terms
of
dealing
with
one
association
versus
five
associations,
and
it
was
also
critical
to
the
success
as
a
project
on
the
north
end
of
the
project
that
they
really
wouldn't
be
able
to
go
forward
without
it.
So
those
were
the
recent
items
on
city
council
agendas.
A
E
Have
not
scheduled
those
yet
I
sent
an
email
to
you
late
yesterday,
looking
at
either
the
19th
or
the
20th,
which
would
be
next
week.
Mr
Hudson
is
back
I.
Believe
I
can't
remember.
He
gets
back
on
the
19th,
but
he
said
he
would
be
available
in
the
20th,
so
that
might
be
the
best
opportunity
for
us
to
do
interviews.
We
could
schedule
that
perhaps
that
1
o'clock
in
the
afternoon,
if
that
would
be
an
appropriate
time
for
you
all
and.
E
H
E
So
there
seems
to
be
general
agreement,
we
will
go
ahead
and
do
a
special
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission
on
July,
the
20th
at
10:00
a.m.
in
the
morning.
We
will
send
out
a
meeting
notice
to
you
identifying
the
room
that
where
that
will
occur,
we
have
two
applicants
for
AAC.
We
will
invite
them
to
be
there
we'll
do
the
interviews
first,
with
the
applicants
for
AAC
at
10
o'clock
and
then
continue
with
your
discussion
on
the
PDD
ordinance
immediately
following
that,
and
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
schedule
that,
for
you.
A
E
E
Ultimately,
that
would
go
to
the
City
Council
at
some
point
in
time.
One
of
the
issues
is:
if
they
don't
complete
the
construction,
we
do
have
bonds
for
the
off-site
improvements
that
need
to
be
addressed.
City
Council
would
need
to
deal
with
that
matter
if
construction
does
not
continue
in
the
building
permits
expire.
When.
B
D
F
E
On
the
downtown
landscape
project,
we
are
waiting
for
direction
from
the
city
council
subcommittee,
in
terms
of
when
they
would
like
to
meet
on
that.
They
are
the
ones
who
set
the
meeting
for
us
on
the
other
one.
The
dream:
hotel
I'll
go
ahead
and
contact
mr.
Robertson
to
see
if
Miss
Kitty
is
back
and
we
will
try
and
get
that
set
up
as
quickly
as
we
can.
Okay,
because.
F
E
A
E
E
At
least
you
remember
to
remind
me
one
of
the
things
that
we
passed
out
in
your
packet,
the
last
time
that
I
forgot
to
discuss,
because
I'm
a
little
forgetful
at
times
is
the
attendance
schedule
for
the
AAC
meetings
for
the
upcoming
2017
2018
fiscal
year.
I
put
this
out
as
a
suggested
schedule.
If
there
are
changes,
if
we
could
discuss
that
now,
if
there
are
any
months
that
are
problematic
for
some
of
you
in
terms
of
what
I
have
you
fit
into
the
schedule,
it
works
for.
C
E
But
we
are
always
happy
to
make
adjustments
in
the
schedule
as
needed,
as
things
do
come
up
for
the
members
of
the
Planning
Commission.
So
again
we
can
revise
that,
but
if
everyone's
satisfied
with
the
dates
as
they
are
currently
we'll
go
ahead
and
publish
that
for
you
and
then
again
is
you
need
to
make
changes
during
the
course
of
the
year
we're
more
than
happy
to
accommodate.
E
Let's
see
and
under
directors
business
is:
is
there
any
more
commission
business,
okay
under
directors,
business
I,
think
I've
run
out
of
everything
that
we
were
to
talk
about.
We
talked
about
the
schedule.
We've
talked
about
the
joint
Planning
Commission
City
Council
meeting,
just
so
that
you're
aware
that
we'll
start
at
6:00
p.m.
here
at
the
convention
center.
There
is
the
discussion
on
the
downtown
park.
E
First,
before
we
go
into
the
joint
planning
commission
City
Council
session,
it's
felt
that
it
would
be
very
beneficial
to
have
all
the
planning
commissioners
there
for
the
discussion
of
the
park.
So
we
hope
that
you
will
participate
in
that
as
well
and
then
again,
we'll
go
right
into
the
discussion.
E
Don't
know
I
haven't
seen
them
yet
we
have
a
meeting
later
today
with
the
park
subcommittee
and
hopefully,
we'll
have
more
information
on
that.
In
terms
of
the
joint
meeting,
we
will
be
talking
about
the
recommendations
of
the
ad
hoc
PDD
committee
and
so
we're
forwarding
the
documentation
that
you
all
received
as
part
of
your
planning
commission
with
the
recommendations
and
then
all
of
the
backup
information
and
public
comments.
So
they'll
have
the
same
packet
of
materials
that
you
all
received
and.