►
From YouTube: Planning Commission Meeting | February 13, 2019
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
E
C
E
H
E
H
E
C
E
In
favor,
all
those
in
favor
aye
aye
opposed.
No,
the
motion
passes
the
agenda
accepted.
So
the
first
item
are
there
anyone
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
any
items
on
the
agenda
except
for
public
hearing
items
which
you
can
speak
during
the
item
if
you're
here
to
speak.
This
would
also
be
a
time
to
speak
on
that
item
for
a
which
is
has
to
deal
with
the
maryland
development.
E
Anyone
here
in
the
audience
to
speak
on
anything
on
the
agenda,
seeing
no
one
to
speak
on
the
agenda,
we'll
move
on
to
public
hearings.
First
public
hearing
is
item
to
see
a
request
by
Austin
Todd
on
behalf
of
California
organics,
for
conditional
use
permit
to
operate
a
five
thousand
four
hundred
and
forty
foot
square-foot
cannabis
cultivation
facility.
With
the
existing
industrial
building
located
at
six
nine
five
South
Williams
Road,
it's
Zone
M
one
section
33.
The
case
is
5.14
for
CU
p.
Can
I
have
a
staff
report?
Please.
I
Good
afternoon
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
so,
as
you
may
recall,
this
item
was
first
presented
to
you
on
December,
12
2018
and
at
that
public
hearing,
because
of
some
questions
that
the
Commission
had
the
hearing
had
to
be
continued
and
made
some
specific
directions
to
both
the
applicant
and
staff.
So
I'm
gonna
go
through
those
directions
that
you
gave
a
number
one.
You
requested
that
the
psychic
consultant
be
here
to
answer
some
specific
questions
relative
to
retrofitted
buildings
for
such
a
use.
I
The
big
consultant
is
here
today
to
talk
to
you
about
that.
You
also
ask
the
applicant
provide
proof
that
the
building
and
the
building
sillens
will
be
high
enough
to
contain
ventilation
system
it's
equipment,
so
we
have
had
revised
plans
for
that.
Those
are
included
in
the
package
that
you
have
to
do.
You
also
directed
that
the
applicant
address
the
issue
of
the
implementation
for
odor
control
plan.
I
I
have
can
also
inform
the
Planning
Commission
today
that
the
applicant
has
since
submitted
a
revised,
odor
control
plan
that
was
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
city's
consultant,
including
some
recommendations.
This
recommendations
have
been
added
as
part
of
the
part
of
the
Planning
Commission's
conditions
of
approval
that
would
be
added
to
the
project.
Should
you
decide
to
approve
the
project.
I
I
E
I
G
I
Two,
so
those
two
recommendations
are
in
the
first
page
of
the
staff
memo
I
can
go
over
and
go
through
that.
So
the
first
recommendation
is
that
the
a
potential
request
that
the
other
control
provider
provided
current
safety
data
sheet
or
the
SDS,
as
well
as
it
toxicity
report
showing
that
the
recommended
order,
control
initializer,
has
been
tested
using
the
EPA
guidelines
to
ensure
the
community
/
environment,
I've,
been
acting,
exposed
or
I've,
been
exposed
to
the
safest,
neutralizers
available
and
also
start
just
this
afternoon.
I
Few
minutes
ago,
I
received
the
report
from
the
applicant
AB,
given
that
to
our
consultant
to
go
over,
and
the
second
recommendation
is
that
this
toxicity
report
should
be
no
later
than
2009
and
sure
and
sure
product
was
tested
using
EPA
guidelines
for
inhalation,
ie
rotation,
consumption
and
skin
touch.
So
those
were
the
two
recommendations
are
from
the
city's
expert
in
approving
the
odor
control
plan.
I
Furthermore,
the
Planning
Commission
directed
that
the
applicant
should
provide
additional
information
on
regarding
overall
improvements
to
the
building
and
the
site
in
general.
So
in
the
package
that
were
mailed
to
you
and
that
I
will
be
going
over
shortly,
the
applicant
has
submitted
revised
plans
showing
the
future
renovations
of
the
side.
There
is
also
a
condition
that
staff
has
recommended
that
those
renovations
plans
be
presented
to
the
AAC
through
our
minor
architectural
approval
process.
I
The
Commission
also
directed
that
the
applicant
indicates
on
the
parking
lot
to
show
ABA
access,
lighting
and
security
plans.
Those
have
all
been
also
submitted
to
staff
and,
lastly,
that
the
applicant
should
add
a
bicycle
rack
and
shower
shower
facility
to
decide
those
have
also
been
been
completed
by
the
applicant
so
before
questions
I
just
want
to
take
a
minute
to
go
over
the
revised
plans
that
were
submitted.
You
also
have
those
in
your
package.
First
is
the
new
site
plan.
I
I
I
This
is
a
new
roof
plan
that
shows
where
the
ventilation
equipment
will
be
placed.
This
was
the
old
elevation
plan
as
as
it
is
today-
and
this
is
the
new-
this
will
be
the
new
elevations
when
approved
when
reviewed
and
approved
by
the
architectural
Advisory
Committee
through
our
minor
architectural
approval
process.
I
It's
also
part
of
the
new
elevation
renderings.
If
you
recall,
staff
included
a
condition
of
approval
requiring
a
revamp
of
the
landscaping
I
decide.
The
applicant
has
also
provided
a
plan,
allow
a
new
landscape
plans
along
with
the
plants.
This
is
the
new
landscape
plan,
along
with
a
photometric
plan,
also.
I
J
Obviously,
the
the
remodel
of
the
exterior
of
the
building
is
quite
significantly
different
than
what
we
looked
at
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
and
maybe
this
is
a
question
for
the
applicant.
But
what
is
the
nature
of
the
of
the
material
that's
being
used
to
clad
the
building?
Is
it
a
metal
substance,
I'm.
J
My
related
question
is
by
doing
it
this
way
by
wrapping
it
in
this
material
which
someone
in
usual
does
that
help
with
any
leakage
of
odor
from
the
facility.
Obviously,
the
old
building
had
quite
a
bit
of
openings
and
spaces
over
time
it
had
gotten
in
in
quite
bad
shape.
Does
this
help
us
with
respect
to
that's?
That's.
I
Correct
and
part
of
the
the
renovation
is
to
be
able
to
contain
any
type
of
odors
that
may
be
married
in
from
the
building.
So
that
was
the
key
or
the
central
point
of
our
discussions
with
the
appetizer.
So
they're.
Aware
of
that,
and
yes,
the
architects
well
aware
of
that,
and
he
may
be
able
to
speak
more
I'd.
J
Like
to
learn
how
the
cladding
helps
that
issue
and
then
finally,
that
I
take
it
to
parapets
or
high
enough
to
cover
it
looks
like
they
cover
all
the
cooling
equipment.
Are
the
air
filtration
ventilation
equipment
on
the
roof?
That
is
the
case.
That's
correct
and
then
I'm,
the
other
question
I
had,
and
maybe
this
is
for
the
applicant
I,
don't
know
what
a
pineapple
Express
is
all
about
it.
When
I
first
looked
at
I
didn't
almost
look
like
a
holiday
and
sigh
and
turn
here's
something.
J
J
I
G
You
so
when
this
came
before
us,
there
was
a
great
deal
of
concern
about
a
building
of
this
age
being
able
to
capture
the
odors
within
the
building
and
I,
see
they've
done
a
lot.
They've
sealed
up
most
of
the
openings
and
and
looks
like
they
painted
it.
So
maybe
that'll
help
it
contain.
But
my
question
is
its
is:
is
the
engineer
that
reviewed
the
plan
is
that
person
here.
H
Let
me
go
ahead
and
address
that.
No,
our
consultant
is
not
our
odor
control
consultant.
The
individual
who
reviews
our
odor
control
plans
is
based
out
of
Northern
California
and
the
city
does
not
have
the
funds
to
fly
him
down
here
for
every
Planning
Commission
meeting.
So
you
need
to
rely
on
his
report
and
his
approval
of
the
odor
control
plan.
Well,.
G
I
didn't
need
him
for
every
Planning
Commission
meeting,
just
ones
that
deal
with
odor,
but
let
me
just
say
that
I
do
have
a
question
as
to
whether
the
integrity
of
the
building
capsule
was
was
evaluated
for
the
purposes
of
of
approving
this
by
the
odor
control,
consult
as
well
as
our
sequel
consultant
and
or
is
it
just
looking
or
was
it
just
looking
at
the
ventilation
equipment
itself?
No.
G
H
H
So,
by
virtue
of
the
fact
that
he
has
issued
an
approval
of
the
plan
has
made
findings
and
recommendations
and
we've
incorporated
the
recommendations
in
the
conditions
of
approval
requiring
the
applicant
to
abide
by
those
recommendations.
Then
it
is
justified
in
approving
it
based
on
this
odor
control
plan.
So.
G
G
K
K
The
first
one
is
that
that
that
there
be
a
toxicity
report
on
the
material
they're
using
because
they're
in
there
proposing
a
material
that
would
be
sprayed
into
the
air
very
finely
sprayed
into
the
air
that
neutralizes
odors
as
opposed
to
carbon
filtration,
which
you've
probably
seen
more
of
in
these
proposals
and
and
because
that
matter
is
emitted.
The
odor
consultant
wanted
demonstrated
proof
that
the
product
was
safe
and
the
materials
that
have
been
submitted
to
indicate
that
the
product
is
EPA,
approved
and
safe.
Those
were
that's
the
basis
of
the
consultants
recommendation.
G
K
That
the
plan
itself
describes
how
that's
done,
and
his
findings
are
that
that
the
vapour
is
dispensed.
The
proposed
odor
consisten
does
not
employ
carbon
filters,
but
that,
ultimately,
the
project
at
the
the
planned
odor
mitigation
complies
with
the
city
standard.
He
wouldn't
have
approved
the
plan
otherwise,
and.
H
In
your
conditions
of
approval
under
the
conditional
use
permit,
as
well
as
in
Chapter
five
of
the
Mizpah
code,
there
are
requirements
that
the
applicant
has
to
meet.
If
they
don't
meet
those
conditions,
then
they
must
make
either
repairs
or
renovations
in
order
to
be
compliant,
and
so
it
just
like
anything
else
where
there's
an
issue
of
code
compliance,
they
cannot
continue
operations
until
they
are
compliant.
If
it's
found
that
they
don't
meet
the
standard
that
we
have
relative
to
odor
control
and.
C
G
H
C
E
L
Looking
at
the
findings
of
the
odor
control,
expert,
I,
don't
expect
a
sequin
consultant
to
answer
these
questions,
because
this
is
specific
to
what
NCM
wrote.
So
what
I
understand
is
it?
It
says
the
plan
is
approved,
but
under
findings
ii
from
the
bottom,
it
says
the
performance
of
the
proposed
vapors
system
and
other
cannabis
facilities
is
unknown.
So
I
don't
understand
how
the
consultants
could
conclude
that
this
odor
control
method
is
going
to
work
if
it's
unknown
they've.
No,
there
is
no
other
example
of
a
cannabis
facility.
That's
using
this.
L
H
Yeah
he's
basing
it
on
the
calculations
looking
at
issues
such
as
air
flow
and
again
I'm,
not
an
expert
in
this,
but
based
on
the
neutralizer
that
is
being
used
based
on
the
air
flow
within
the
building
itself,
and
the
openings
in
the
building
he's
saying
that,
based
on
those
equations,
it
will
control
the
odors
again.
We
have
the
safeguards,
as
mr.
Hirsch
mine
has
just
asked
about
that.
H
L
The
bullet
point
right
below
it
says.
In
the
event,
there
are
owners
that
are
not
mitigated.
The
applicant
has
indicated
that
the
system
would
be
adjusted
as
needed,
I'm,
not
sure
how
they
know
how
to
adjust
it.
If
well
anyhow,
they
would
adjust
it
in
some
way
and
then
the
odor
control
expert,
whether
he's
there
in
Northern
California
or
here,
will
conclude
whether
or
not
those
adjustments
have
eliminated
odors
exactly.
L
C
K
K
That's
that's,
found
to
to
have
an
issue
with
the
amount
of
space
devoted
to
to
parking
revises
its
parking
plan
to
accommodate
the
adequate
parking
that
would
be
mitigation
by
design.
The
second
thing
that
we
look
at
under
sequa
is
is
whether
a
jurisdiction
has
standard
requirements
and/or
if
there
is
law
that
applies
to
take
it
out
of
outer
control
and
give
you
an
analogy.
The
city
requires
for
all
new
projects
that
a
hydrology
study
be
prepared.
That
demonstrates
that
during
a
hundred
year,
storm
the
project
will
retain
its
water
on
site.
K
Back
to
odor,
the
city
has
multiple
requirements
in
Section,
five
of
the
Municipal
Code
that
relate
both
to
preventing
and
mitigating,
as
Flynn
has
explained,
that
there
are
requirements
for
adequate
ventilation.
That's
the
first
layer.
There
are
requirements
for
an
independent
review
of
the
ventilation
system
or
the
odor
control
plan,
and
there
are
standards
for
being
that
it
can't
be
detected
outside
the
premises
that
are
all
a
matter
of
law,
and
so
we
sight
to
the
city's
existing
standards
and
that's
why
it
is
listed
as
less
than
significant.
M
I
have
a
question
about
regulation
number
twenty
19-0,
one
interim
location-specific
suspension
of
acceptance
of
application
for
cannabis
permits.
Can
you
talk
about
that
because
I
was
sent
this
and
it's
says
that
it's
effective
as
of
February,
12,
2019
and
I
just
need
a
little
more
information
about
that.
M
This
is
this
is
signed
by
the
city
attorney
and
the
city
manager
talking
about
site
different
sites
in
this
city,
specifically
northern
part
of
the
city
and
the
southern
DeMuth
Park
area,
where
there's
a
high
concentration
of
cannabis
facilities
and
having
a
temporary
stop
to
to
this
until
the
City
Council
acts.
I'm.
Sorry
I'm,
just
looking
at
this
right
now,
but
I
feel
like.
If
this
is
something
that
we
need
to
consider,
we
should
do
so
and
I
don't
think
we
didn't
receive
it
in
our
packet.
It's
but
it's
says:
effective
February,
12,
2019,.
M
H
M
M
E
H
The
city
attorney
issued
yesterday
a
notice
to
applicants
that
we
are
not
accepting
new
applications
in
a
specific
area
of
the
city.
However,
there
is
no
moratorium
in
place
and
it
does
not
affect
this
application
which
is
being
considered
today.
The
City
Council
may
consider
a
moratorium
in
the
future,
but
they
are
not.
They
have
not
approved
one
yet,
so
we
can
go
ahead
and
continue
and
just
in
the
future,
anything
for
public
comment
needs
to
be
introduced
prior
to
the
meeting.
Oh.
F
I
F
J
To
make
this
complicated,
I
don't
mean
to
do
it
and
we
want
to
move
on,
but
I
understand
why
AAC
should
see
the
architecture
but
AAC
if
we
find
out
from
the
applicant
that
there's
a
special
reason
why
this
particular
cladding
is
being
used
because
it
somehow
does
help
with
the
seepage
of
odors
from
the
building.
Aac
needs
to
put
that
into
their
consideration.
In
addition
to
just
an
aesthetic
consideration,
there's.
E
D
My
name
is
austin
todd.
I
am
the
owner
over
on
six
nine
five
South,
Williams
and
I
have
my
associate
Troy
here
and
some
consultants
with
me.
I
have
the
architect
who
is
helping
us
put
together.
The
detailed
architectural
drawings
and
I
have
our
odor
control
expert
here
as
well,
who
are
here
to
answer
any
questions
that
anyone
has
on
the
operations
and
and
really
a
lot
of
these
questions
will
be
deferred
to
these
two.
D
We
do
we
do
agree
to
all
the
conditions
and
we're
definitely
here
to
take
care
of
the
any
any
conditions
that
you
guys
have
and
the
name
we
are
open
to
switching
the
name
and
in
the
design,
and
we
have
a
you
know
that
it
is
patented.
There's
a
lot
of
different
patents
and
things
going
on
behind
the
scenes.
But
we
are
we're,
definitely
flexible
and
want
to
make
sure
that
the
city
approves.
E
D
Our
equipment
that
we're
proposing
here
is
a
vapor
system
which
we
are
introducing
to
the
exhaust
side
of
the
air
system
in
the
building
and
probably
have
two
maybe
three
sites
where
the
air
comes
to
the
central
location
from
negative
airflow
and
where
the
air
comes
in,
it
can't
come
out
of
the
building,
so
it
comes
into
a
centralized,
vapor
collection
area
and
it
will
treat
the
air
as
as
it
is
exhausted
out,
treating
the
air
of
any
odorous
gases
or
anything
like
that.
That
may.
D
We
have
sites
in
this
Santa
Barbara
area
that
Santa
Barbara
County,
that
they
have
many
grow.
Homes
grow
up
facilities
there
that
we
have
our
product
there
and
the
best
my
knowledge
in
the
last
year
and
a
half
we've
been
there.
There
haven't
been
any
complaints
these
facilities,
but,
like
I,
said
to
the
best
my
knowledge
there's
been
complacent.
There,
schools,
nearby
churches
so.
D
D
Also
and
then
these
try
makes
a
very
good
point,
the
product
that
we
have
our
HS
or
products
they
work
as
they
eliminate,
or
it's
not
a
masking
agent.
So
as
air
moves
downstream,
the
odor
will
not
ever
come
back.
It's
actually
a
molecular
reaction
that
takes
the
odorous
gases
biodegrades
and
they
don't
they
don't
come
back.
Our
goal
is
to
have
no
odor
at
all,
whether
it's
the
smell,
the
eCos
or
or
where
the
cannabis
odor.
Our
goal
is
to
have
zero
smell
coming
out
of
these
buildings.
E
N
Name
is
Gabriel
Han
I'm
here
with
the
architects
office.
The
reason
for
the
perforated
metal
panels
are
more
an
architectural
look.
Should
they
be
required
to
be
part
of
the
order,
control
we're
ready
to
implement
anything.
We
need
to
do
to
implement
it,
but
at
this
point
we're
trying
to
make
a
building
that
looks
dilapidated.
N
O
O
We
are
also
inventors
of
technology
specific
to
the
industry.
That
also
has
several
patents
already
on
it.
So
we
are
flexible
to
change
this
name,
but
just
note
that
it
is
a
reflection
of
our
brand.
We've
spent
millions
of
dollars
on
that
brand,
and
so
we
kinda
would
like
to
have
that,
but
we
understand
again
we're
here
to
make
sure
that
we
all
the
conditions.
E
O
Adults
per
se
I
mean,
if
you
guys
have
some
other
questions
specific
to
odor
control.
We're
happy
to
do
that.
You
know
these
guys
flew
out
here
on
our
account
so
that
they
can,
you
know,
stand
as
experts
in
this
field.
We
are
also
not
experts
in
the
field.
That's
why
we
hire
them
to
help
us
with
these
designs,
but
we
stand
behind
our
buildings,
our
facilities.
When
we
come
in
and
do
this
sort
of
thing
we've
been
doing
it
for
about
ten
years.
O
D
Also
to
add,
if
the
reason
we
really
went
with
OMI
was
because
of
the
actual
elimination
of
the
odors
and
the
odor
control
expert
did
approve
of
the
plan.
So
we
mean
we're
open
to
to
really
making
the
odor
control
work
around
what
you
guys
are
saying,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
had
the
best
technology
available.
E
D
J
D
We're
pulling
the
effort,
we
got
to
have
a
negative
airflow
where
which
means
we're
pulling
air
and
it's
in
a
sucking
air
from
the
outside
and
bringing
the
air
inside.
Really
it's
gonna
be
really
difficult
for
any
of
that
air
to
get
any
sort
of
cracks,
or
you
know,
there's
an
older
building
to
get
out
of
those
to
get
out
the
building,
because
it,
the
air,
is
being
sucked
in
and
out
through.
An
exhaust
system
make
sense
and.
J
D
Hvac
guy
I'm,
a
wreck
I
think
that
we're
probably
at
least
two
two
exhaust
areas.
You're
looking
at
a
fan,
it's
probably
four
five
feet,
you
know
widen,
you
know
eight,
you
know
gate
all
where
the
air
comes
out
and
it
and
it's
exhausted
that
way
it
can
handle
quite
a
bit
of
air
flow
or
you
know
it
can
cut
a
bit
air
which
I
think
we're
probably
big
enough
for
two,
maybe
three
of
those
exhaust
fans
to
take
care
of
it.
Building
in
that
size.
Obviously,.
J
E
G
G
Delivery
area
well
it
so
it
seems
to
me
that
the
whether
that
roll-up
door
is
open
or
not
is
gonna
determine
whether
odors
are
escaping
from
the
building,
regardless
of
the
negative
pressure,
because
the
door
is
pretty
big.
Is
there
any
way
that
the
timing
on
that
door
can
be
controlled,
stay
down
for
a
majority
of
the
business
hours?
Yes,.
N
G
N
G
N
G
G
G
I
would
ask
you
if
it's
a
problem
either
putting
a
full
gate
across
those
niches
where
the
stairs
are
or
a
solid
wall
with
a
solid?
Well,
if
you
have
a
door,
then
you
have
all
kinds
of
a
DEA
things,
but
there
it
needs
to
be
blocked
off
from
public
access
because
just
having
those
well,
the
rendering
shows
it.
N
N
G
F
F
N
It's
not
really
white,
it
would
be.
It
would
be
just
like
an
aluminum
color
frame
and
then
the
panels
attached
to
them,
but
they
can
be
black,
they
can
be
any
color.
We
want
to
it's
just
a
3d
rendering,
where
my
my
3d
guy
decided
to
make
it
look
so
that
they
stick
out
a
little
bit
more.
Give
it
a
little
more
articulation.
I.
F
N
F
N
N
F
N
N
N
The
state
requires
separate
entrances
to
the
separate,
depending
on
the
micro
and
the
business
license.
They
require
separate
entrances,
so
the
manufacturing
has
to
have
its
own
separate
entrance.
They
cannot
go
in
through
dispensary.
They
cannot
go
in
through
delivery,
so
we
assumed
that
that
would
be
the
best
way
for
manufacturing
to
have
its
own
entrances.
I.
N
We
could,
if,
if
you
feel
that
is
deemed
necessary,
we
could
we
could
do
a
blend
of
stucco
and
screen
at
this
point.
This
was
our
first
shot
at
it.
We
didn't
know
what
kind
of
approvals
we
needed
to
get
because
of
the
fact
that
it
was
this
far
along.
So
we
figured
okay,
let's,
let's
bring
it
in
and
then
see
what
you
guys
decide
for
us
to.
N
F
F
N
N
We
feel
confident
that
we
have
ample
room
screaming,
but
once
again
I
mean
once
we
get
into
the
actual
and
nuts
and
bolts
of
it.
If
we
need
to
increase
it,
it
can
be
increased.
The
biggest
thing
we
wanted
to
show
by
a
roof
screening
is
showing
that
the
AC
units
were
gonna,
be
screened
as
necessary.
Okay,.
L
I'm
not
familiar
with
eco,
sorb
and
I.
Guess
that's
the
product
that
you're
representing,
but
you
know
if
it
works
the
way
you
believe
it
will
and
that's
wonderful,
but
I
still
would
like
to
have
a
condition
of
approval
that
in
six
months
the
staff
would
prepare
a
report
just
summarizing
what
has
occurred
since
the
facility
went
into
operation.
L
How
many
complaints
there
have
been
if
there
had
to
be
some
adjustments
based
on
complaints
based
on
what
has
to
be
done
if
there
are
so
that
is
something
I
would
like
to
see
regarding
the
name
I,
don't
think
we
should
I,
don't
know,
I
mean
it's
their
business
name
and
it's
they've
done
their
research
and
they
spent
a
lot
of
money
for
their
brand
and
they
have
a
lovely
pineapple
with
with
a
marijuana
leaf
or
leaves.
So
you
don't
want
to
take
that
away
from
them.
H
G
G
G
It
in
from
somewhere
sport
delivery,
you're
climbing
up
those
stairs
doing
something
to
adapt
upstairs
and
then
taking
it
back
downstairs
and
going
back
in
the
building.
What
so
my
preference
would
be
that
there
be
some
interconnecting,
so
they
don't
have
to
go
outside
and
can
to
accomplish
that
task,
and
that
has
to
do
with
odor
control,
and
it
seems
like
possibly
on
that
one.
On
the
on
the
east
side,
you
could
just
punch
a
hole
in
that
door
and
maybe
build
a
little
vestibule
in
front
of
it.
G
C
N
If
we
have
to,
we
can
always
remove
redesign
them.
Okay
and
change
these.
N
C
G
Then
the
other
one
I
have
goes
to
the
the
decorative
screening
and
it's
not
an
aesthetic
discussion
or
question
I
have,
but
the
fact
that
to
install
that
for
each
screen,
you're
gonna
have
four
penetrations
into
the
stomach
and
my
concern
with
that
is
again
your
might
you
have
the
potential
for
air
leakage
at
that
point.
I
know
there's
negative
air
pressure,
but
you
know
it's
not
always
on
or
whatever
so
I.
For
that
reason,
I
don't
want
to
have
those
things
attached
to
the
building.
N
G
G
H
I'm
going
to
tell
you
you
can
do
that
and
I
think.
Actually
that's
a
good
recommendation.
Mr.
chair,
what
I
would
might
recommend
is,
rather
than
indicating
how
they
achieve
it.
We
can
just
apply
a
condition
of
approval
that
any
exterior
screening
shall
not
penetrate
the
exterior
wall
right
so
if
they
either
secure
it
at
the
ground.
E
G
H
Me
go
ahead
and
read
through
the
conditions
that
I've
heard
thus
far
number
one
I
think
mr.
Robertson
already
identified
this,
but
there
will
be
a
correction
to
the
condition
relative
to
the
bike
box
to
say:
bike,
racks
or
bike
boxes,
plural,
and
the
addition
of
a
shower
for
employees.
So
we'll
correct
that
condition
and
then
beginning
with
the
conditions
that
Commissioner
Hirsch
mine
has
suggested
number
one.
There
shall
be
air
curtains
at
all.
Exterior
entrances
of
building
number
two.
The
applicant
shall
be
required
to
recoat
the
existing
roof
number
three.
H
H
H
The
next
condition
is
from
Commissioner
Maroussi
vice-chairman
rootsy,
requesting
that
in
six
months
after
operation,
there
be
a
report
at
the
Planning
Commission
relative
to
any
odor
complaints
or
any
adjustments
to
their
odor
control
system.
Condition.
Number
seven
is
that
an
interior
stairway
shall
be
required
for
transporting
product
between
the
floors
who
interior
stairways,
ok
and
then,
finally,
that
the
any
proposed
exterior
screening
on
the
building
shall
not
penetrate
the
exterior
surface
of
the
walls.
H
G
G
F
F
So
specifically,
the
signage
is
the
signage
design
is
almost
on
the
three
most
pronounced
exterior
elevations,
so
they
should
be
part
of
the
design
of
the
building.
Right
now
it
just
looks
like
tacked
on
the
proportion
of
the
screening
in
respect
to
how
much
surface
area
there
is
so
right
now
it
looks
like
it's
a
hundred
percent,
so
reducing
that
percentage,
so
that
there
is
some
proportion
between
the
exterior
stucco
wall
and
then
this
minimizes
the
amount
of
penetration
and
angles
that
could
be
added
that
the
entry
doors
are
more
pronounced
than
the
stairway
doors.
F
If
that's
what
they're
going
to
have
done
so
that
the
public
knows
exactly
where
the
entry
is
of
this
project.
Third
is
when
they
do.
The
mechanical
screening
is
that
it
has
to
be
a
screening
and
such
that
the
perforation
is
no
more
than
20%,
so
that
when
you're
looking
at
it
from
far
away,
you
really
don't
see
the
units
all
around
Palm,
Springs
and
I'm
responsible
for
some
of
them.
E
J
J
J
J
G
F
F
G
E
H
One
of
the
attic
conditions
is
relative
to
framing
in
the
exterior
balconies
relative
to
the
treatment
of
the
stucco
versus
the
mesh
screening,
and
then
the
other
one
was
to
show
all
mechanical
equipment,
including
exhaust
fans
as
part
of
the
roof
plan.
When
a
AC
evaluates
the
mechanical
equipment,
screening
and.
E
M
I
just
have
concerns
about
marijuana
and
marijuana
cultivation
within
neighborhoods
I
mean
we've
had
a
lot
of
people
complaining
about
it
over
in
desert
highlands,
and
it
just
seems
like
we're
adding
to
that
just
in
a
different
neighborhood,
now
I'm
sure
I'm
in
the
minora
minority.
On
this,
but
I
and
I
know
there
wasn't
anyone
speaking
against
it,
but
I
do
think
that
there
we
do
have
open
space
other
places
for
cultivation
facilities.
We
have
had
complaints.
E
You
know
we're
close
to
public
hearing.
I
would
emphasize
with
what's
being
said,
I
think
that
we're
not
cultivating
at
this
site.
However,
we're
manufacturing
I
think
that
a
lot
of
the
some
of
the
past
rooms
we
looked
at
we're
dealing
with
the
cultivation
and
the
flowering.
This
will
be
a
new
kind
of
a
new
step
for
us.
As
far
as
the
odor
control
goes,
there's.
M
E
E
E
H
E
Motion
passed.
The
next
is
a
public
hearing
item
number
two,
a
which
is
1875
North,
Palm,
Canyon,
Properties,
LLC,
doing
business
as
the
Toba
hotel
and
beach
club
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
full-service
spa
and
a
full-service
restaurant
and
a
major
architecture,
application
for
the
construction
of
a
fifteen
thousand
two
hundred
square
foot
restaurant
building
to
an
existing
hotel
located
at
1875
North
Palm
Canyon
Drive.
The
case
is
five
point
one:
three,
eight
four
CU
p
3.0
one:
five,
seven
maj
can
we
have
a
staff
report?
Please
thank.
B
You
chair,
what
I
will
do
is
give
you
a
brief
history
of
the
project.
Some
of
the
commissioner
commission
members
are
were
not
present
back
when
the
the
Planning
Commission
first
reviewed
this
in
2017.
So
we'll
talk
about
the
major
architectural,
the
design
of
the
proposed
building
and
then
we'll
talk
about
the
conditional
use
permit.
So
back
in
2017
on
August
26,
the
Planning
Commission
approved
a
major
architectural
for
the
exterior
renovations
to
an
existing
hotel
on
North
Palm
Canyon
Drive.
B
It
included
the
renovations
of
several
of
the
hotel
buildings
and
a
lobby
building
which
was
existing
at
the
time.
Since
then,
the
building
has
received
a
demolition
permit.
Demolition
did
occur
for
the
preparation
of
the
renovation
of
the
site
and
at
that
time,
building
a
which
was
the
current
lobby
building
or
I'm.
Sorry,
the
previous
lovely
building
was
raised
to
a
point
where
there
was
one
or
two
walls
and
then
over
time
the
walls
have
collapsed
so
and
in
a
lesson
sits,
it's
been
completely
removed
from
the
site.
B
So
what
we're
here
to
do
today
is
to
ask
for
a
building
F,
which
is
a
fifteen
thousand
two
hundred
square
foot
restaurant
building,
which
is
the
square
at
the
top
of
the
slide.
The
building
a
is
the
lobby
building,
which
is
at
the
bottom
of
the
slide,
and
when
the
Planning
Commission
first
reviewed
this,
there
was
an
issue
with
maintaining
or
or
having
offsite
parking
on
the
hotel
property.
The
applicant
had
reviewed
different
options.
The
zoning
code
allows
you
to
find
parking
off
site
within
300
feet
of
the
of
the
subject
site.
B
They
found
a
site
that
was
beyond
that
limit
and
they
applied
for
a
variance
and
the
Planning
Commission
denied
that
variance
based
upon
not
being
able
to
make
findings
that
meet
the
code.
So
in
the
meantime,
the
applicant
has
come
back
with
a
scheme
that
includes
adding
underground
parking
under
buildings
a
and
F.
So
that
is
where
we've
been,
and
that's
what
is
here
before
you
today.
B
Once
again,
the
AEC
has
reviewed
this
architecture.
It
has
also
been
to
the
architecture
visor
committee
multiple
times,
and
the
Planning
Commission
approved
the
architecture
for
building
a
and
building
F,
which
is,
as
I
said,
onto
the
on
the
right,
is
very
similar
in
design.
It's
the
same
materials,
the
same
site,
type
of
window
systems
and
the
same
type
of
roof.
The
heights
of
the
building
building
F
is
a
little
bit
taller
than
building
a
building.
F
will
be
a
30
feet,
tall
building
with
a
first
floor,
a
mezzanine
and
then
a
second
floor.
B
This
does
meet
the
requirements
of
the
zoning
code,
which
is
a
30
foot
maximum
height.
So
in
your
packet
there
are
a
series
of
architectural
drawings
that
I'll
let
the
architect
go
over.
This
is
a
material
board,
a
streetscape
showing
what
it
will
look
like
from
Palm
Canyon
Drive,
and
then
this
light
is
fairly
important.
It
shows
the
the
cross
section
of
the
underground
parking
that
will
be
under
building
a
and
building
F
and
we'll
come
back
to
that
in
a
minute.
B
B
So
in
your
staff
report,
there's
a
table
that
shows
the
parking
that
is
required.
So
there
are
95
guestrooms,
they
need
50
guestrooms,
one
per
the
first
50
rooms
and
then
0.75
for
the
rest
of
the
rooms
for
total
of
84
rooms.
When
you
add
in
a
guest
parking
the
staff
that's
required
to
operate
the
bar
and
thus
proposed
spa,
they
need
116
the
restaurant
based
upon
the
number
of
seats
that
they're
proposing
they
need
46.
They
need
20
spaces
for
staff
and
the
total
restaurant
is
a
66
and
they
need
182
spaces.
B
B
This
is
what
building
a
is
left
of
it.
So
over
time
there
has
been.
The
applicant
has
been
working
with
the
city
and
code
forcement
to
keep
the
site
clean
and
tidy
they've
added
fencing
they've
had
on-site
security
added
some
screening
around
the
the
front
fence
showing
some
of
the
designs
and
graphics
so
that
the
the
site
looks
a
little
well-maintained.
B
So
in
your
staff
report
there
are
findings
that
need
to
be
made
made
by
the
Planning
Commission
to
congr
ant.
The
conditional
use
permit
and
the
major
architectural
noticing
was
sent
to
all
property
owners
or
than
500
feet.
We
have
not
received
any
correspondence
from
the
neighborhood
in
opposition
to
the
project
so
chair.
That
concludes
my
report
and
the
applicant
is
here
thank.
M
B
J
B
J
G
So
going
by
the
applicants,
analysis
on
SiO,
eight
non
blended
parking
requirements
are
224
and
blended
parking
requirements
are
177.
That's
a
deficit
of
25
around
50
I,
guess,
maybe
a
little
less
than
50
spaces.
Can
you
explain
the
rationale
or
how
that
would
work
or
what's
the
reasoning
behind
I
guess,
that's
all
the
same
thing.
Rationality!
Yes,.
B
G
B
G
B
P
And
so
and
like
so,
this
has
been
before
the
Planning
Commission
for
as
well
as
the
architecture
Review
Board,
so
wanted
it
not
spent
a
lot
of
time
on
the
overall
project
other
than
just
kind
of
quick
explanation
on
the
site
plan,
so
sure
if
this
will
show
on
the
screen
at
all,
so
starting
at
the
lower
lower
right.
Okay,
great,
can
you
hear
me
up
there?
Yes,.
P
All
right
so
kind
of
turn
this
way,
so
you
guys
can
kind
of
see
so
starting
at
the
lower
end
of
the
site.
So
building
a
is,
as
was
described
before,
is
our
main
lobby
building
that
was
an
existing
building
and
at
the
initial
stage
or
presentation
of
the
project,
the
intent
was
to
keep
all
of
the
existing
buildings
under
a
renovation
with
the
new
construction
being
on
the
pool
building
and
the
new
restaurant.
P
Again,
since
we've
had
some
delay
in
construction
that
portions
come
down
and
now
with
the
opportunity
to
actually
have
a
full
subgrade
garage,
it
makes
sense
to
completely
start
over
and
have
both
building
a
and
building
F
as
new
construction,
buildings,
B,
C
and
D
are
existing
guestroom
buildings,
those
in
in
structure
and
in
form
and
mass
will
be
essentially
be
the
same
as
they
are
now.
They're
fully
renovated
and
we
are
adjusting
a
few
of
the
rooms,
and
so
that's
why
the
room
counts,
kind
of
adjusted
a
bit
as
well.
P
So
I
want
to
just
address
that
as
well,
and
then
we're
also
looking
at
a
full
renovation
of
the
interior
of
the
site.
Trying
to
keep
as
much
of
the
existing
parking
intact,
obviously
it's
being
restriped
to
accommodate
a
larger
portion
of
the
parking
one
of
the
big
things
was
proved
before
was
that
we
have
a
single
entry
to
the
site
right
now
off
of
more
North
Palm
Canyon,
we
felt
with
the
traffic
flow
in
here.
P
So
really
it's
it's!
The
new
restaurant-
that's
here
and
also
the
use
of
this
spa,
which
is
the
second
level
of
the
lobby,
building
that
generates
the
additional
need
for
parking,
which
is
why
we're
looking
at
the
subgrade
garage
on
the
next
I
have
that
next
slide
so
circulation
wise.
It
was
really
important
for
us
to
again
maintain
circulation
flow
through
the
site,
but
again
being
that
it
is
a
counterclockwise
clockwise
circulation
through
here,
it's
a
little
counter
to
in
a
one-way
circulation.
It's
counter
to
it
to
what
is
typically
done.
P
So
that's
why
one
reason
also
why
we're
looking
at
a
fully
Valley
site
so,
as
you
arrive
to
the
site
and
vehicular
circulation,
is
in
the
red
you
derive.
You
met
by
valet.
Your
car
is
then
taken
either
surface
parked
on
the
main
surface
lot
or
brought
down
to
an
entry
ramp
to
the
garage
adjacent
to
the
property
line
here
that
comes
back
around
and
then
through
the
garage,
and
then
you
exit
back
out
onto
the
main
arrival
point.
P
P
Again.
Here's
an
updated
landscape
plan
very
similar
to
what
was
previously
submitted
and
approved.
Really,
the
only
change
is
just
to
accommodate
the
new
ramps
next
slide
again,
just
a
kind
of
a
close-up
view
of
that
that
entry
sequence
some
of
the
additional
paving
that
we're
looking
at
through
here
and
then
the
revision
of
that
pool
deck
again.
Really
no
change
from
the
previous.
Some
it'll
go
ahead,
planting
plan
and
go
forward
to
that.
So
go
to
the
next
plan,
which
is
the
parking
plan.
P
So
this
is
I
think
where
the
bulk
of
the
items
are
here.
So
one
of
the
things
actually
go
back
one
slide
in
the
staff
report.
It
indicates
that
there's
95
units
we
actually
are
looking
at
106
units
overall
on
the
project.
The
95,
which
was
in
our
initial
calculation,
was
based
off
of
as
Glenn
mentioned
before.
He,
the
the
first
50
are
parked
at
a
one
to
one
ratio,
the
remaining
balance
of
that
are
parked
at
0.75
ratio
and
for
the
hotel,
and
that's
where
that
number
of
95
came.
P
That
was
our
parking
load
for
106
units,
and
so
that
was
one
of
our
our
drivers.
So
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
in
terms
of
what's
required
for
the
hotel,
and
then
we
also
added
in
staff
onto
that
as
well,
which
then
generated
about
127
units
of
required
parking
for
for
the
hotel.
That
also
brings
in
the
the
lobby
bar
elements
which
are
calculated
at
a
little
bit
different
rate
as
well
as
far
as
the
restaurant
required
as
well.
P
We
were
looking
not
only
for
the
number
of
guests,
but
also
staff,
which
is
where
our
parking
calculations
came
out
a
little
bit
higher
the
the
number
of
occupants
or
required
parking.
P
The
rationale
is
that,
in
a
non
blended
rate,
you
assume
that
all
of
the
users
of
the
restaurant
are
not
staying
at
the
hotel,
and
so
the
two
are
completely
independently
functioning.
The
main
purpose
of
that
restaurant
is
so
that
this
is
a
fully
functioning
4-star
hotel,
which
the
requirement
is
that
it
has
a
three
meal
restaurant
on
site.
P
So
the
thought
is
that
which
we
thought
was
it
was
a
rational
assessment,
was
that
50
percent
of
the
load
of
the
restaurant
would
be
handled
from
users
that
are
already
on
site
staying
at
the
hotel,
which
their
parking
is
already
accounted
for
in
the
guestroom
calculation.
So
that's
where
the
discrepancy
came
in
and
that's
where
we're
asking
for
that
blended
rate
that
we're
majority
of
those
users
will
actually
or
physically
be
on
site
already
next
slide.
This
was
the
existing
drainage
plan.
P
Next
slide,
really
no
change
there,
and
so
again
we're
looking
at
at
one
level
below
grade
in
terms
of
the
heights.
You
were
asking
about
code
requirement
for
a
parking
garage
is
8
foot,
2
clearance
from
seven
foot,
six
clearance
and
all
the
way
through.
We
have
some
a
three
somebody:
eight
clearance
we
have
were
providing
8
foot
four
there's
also
requirements
for
an
80,
a
van
which
is
8
foot
2.
P
As
far
as
the
the
separation
or
the
distance
from
the
current
grade
level
to
the
base
of
that
we're
looking
at
about
eleven
foot,
six
with
our
water
tables
down
at
I
believe
about
fourteen
feet
here
so
well
well
within,
what's
acceptable,
I
think
with
with
the
depth
of
the
garage,
the
one
thing
you
go
back,
one
slide
as
well
a
way
back
to
the
parking
garage.
So
we
go
one
of
things
we
are
looking
at
again
we're
still
in
InDesign
as
we're
working
through.
This
is
right
now
the
existing
pool
house.
P
That's
there
has
all
the
pump
rooms
on
site.
Now
we
actually
have
the
ability
of
bringing
some
of
those
pump
rooms
down
below
and
some
mechanicals.
So
we
well
so
we're
looking
at
this
being
a
potential
expansion.
It
doesn't
increase
our
parking,
but
just
wanted
to
note,
as
we
continue
to
design
there
may
be
some
push
and
pull
as
far
as
where
that
garage
may
actually
fall
and
actually
align
with
the
building
below
it
to
make
it
systems
a
little
bit
more
efficient.
P
That's
the
photo
metrics
again
is
when
mentioned
before.
You
know
very
sort
of
neutral
color
palette,
looking
sort
of
the
soft
tones
of
the
desert,
looking
at
a
full
plaster
exterior
to
that
we're
looking
at
a
sort
of
a
silver
aluminum,
look
for
all
the
storefront
systems,
green
glass
and
also
incorporating
some
of
the
the
CMU
blocks
as
architectural
screening
along
the
existing
outer
exterior
corridor
systems
and
then
the
overall
look
of
the
building
so
again,
buildings
a
which
is
our
main
hotel
arrival.
P
D
E
P
J
J
So
that's
the
lawful
way
of
doing
it,
you're
looking
at
it
more
from
a
functional
operational
standpoint
where
you
think
your
need
will
be
greater
because
of
the
way
you've
configured,
the
restaurant
and
the
bar
and
all
that,
but
are
we
not-
and
maybe
this
is
a
question
for
Glen
as
a
Planning
Commission?
Are
we
not
bound
to
follow
the
ordinance
I
mean?
Do
we
have
to
go
beyond
what
the
ordinance
permits,
because
if
we
satisfy
the
ordinance
haven't
the
applicants
satisfied
its
parking
requirement?
Yes,.
B
I
mean
we
when
I
looked
at
it,
our
ratio
is
one
to
five
for
the
guests
versus
what
they
use
is
one
two
three
I.
The
code
allows
us
to
assume
that
some
of
the
residents
of
the
hotel
are
going
to
use
the
restaurant
space,
but
our
numbers
are
different
than
what
they
were
looking
at.
As
you
mentioned
it's
at
operations,
but
but
the
the
plan
equation
needs
to
follow
what
the
zoning
code
states,
okay,.
G
You
go
back
to
a
site
plan
I'm
interested
in
in
how
many
and
you
can
step
up
there
and
talk
us
through
it.
How
I
I
know
how
the
queuing
would
work
for
cars
coming
in
and
cars
going
out,
but
how
many
cars
can
you
queue
up?
I,
I'm,
just
thinking
with
all
valet
you,
you
might
be
kind
of
jammed
in
that
area
and
although
I
love
that
kind
of
Brazilian
paving
pattern
you
got
going
on
there,
it's
it.
Those
aren't
lanes
so
I'm
going.
If
you.
P
Okay,
so
one
more
plan
back
circulation,
diagram
of
the
whole
site.
There
we
go
perfect
all
right,
so
what
we'd
planned
for
was
queueing
for
roughly
about
twelve
cars
along
along
this
edge,
which
basically
wraps
all
the
way
around
to
this
point.
So
if
you
really
stack
these
all
the
way
in
from
from
end
to
end,
we
can
get
about
twelve
cars
in
there
now
that
was
the
intent
and
then
that
still
allows
for
a
third
line
or
for
a
middle
lane
and
a
bypass
Lane
as
well.
P
So
if
this
stacks
up,
you
still
have
the
ability
of
coming
through
the
side
of
valet
it's
coming
through
and
being
able
to
get
access
to
the
garage
or
there's
also,
as
we
mentioned
before,
it's
a
gated
facility
around
the
perimeter.
So
we
have
one
entry
gate
here
and
one
exit
gate
back
over
in
here.
The
purpose
of
this.
Basically
so
that
as
you
as
you're
riding
your
car
has
taken
over
here
and
that's
why
we
have
the
the
valet
booth
here.
P
So
the
valet
company
will
work
some
of
the
operations
of
that
it's
right,
how
they
staged
things
appropriately
and
obviously,
if
there's
not
space
out
here,
they'll
wait
before
they
come
out
of
the
garage
so
that
there
is
proper
queuing
for
that
and
I
believe
it.
Through
their
operations.
We
can
ask
a
designate,
a
sort
of
no
parking
area
or
loading
zone
only
type
of
space.
So
there's
no
stoppage
at
that
point,
but
the
intent
is
that
you're,
you're
you're
picking
up
you're,
probably
dropping
off
and
picking
up
through
that
through
that
system.
P
So
you've
got
a
right
in
and
right
out,
but
again,
there's
three
lanes
here
from
a
paving
pattern,
point
of
view
you're
coming
in
perpendicular
to
those
lanes.
The
intent
of
this
is
again
it's
it's
sort
of
like
the
sand
dunes.
You
know
the
ripples
of
the
and
is
wind
blowing
across
that's
kind
of
where
the
idea
Kanna
came
from
ESCA,
more
of
a
textural
identity
and
that
and
that
blends
between
the
the
curb
line
here
and
the
main
drive
out.
G
It's
a
it's
a
it's
a
type
sight.
It's
a
tough
problem.
I
see
some
inherent
conflict.
I,
don't
think
it's
any
reason
not
to
approve
the
project,
but
I
love
the
paving,
but
you
might
want
to
think
about
Lane
striping
to
kind
of
encourage
the
uses
you're
seeing
it
develop
because
there
are,
there
are
some
inherent
conflicts
come
coming
out
and
going
out
of
the
site
versus
coming
in
and
I.
Think.
G
P
F
P
P
Being
that
it's
a
valet,
you
can
move
things
back
and
forth,
so
you,
your
valet,
will
take
that
move
staff
locations
in
the
back
here
so
because
they're
going
to
be
there
for
a
longer
duration,
while
they're
there
and
you
can
plan
when
they're
gonna
be
leaving
the
site
as
well.
So
operationally
you
can
plan
when
those
cars
are
exiting
the
premises
versus
someone
who's.
Just
coming
to
the
side
of
the
restaurant.
You
can't
really
plan
exactly
when
they're
going
to
leave,
but.
F
P
F
P
F
P
So,
for
that
to
extend
up
again
it
just
it's
more
cost,
with
with
steel
and
concrete
coming
up
to
support
that,
we
also
felt
that
it
was
nice
to
break
that
up
and
have
a
reveal
so
that
really
it
is
about
these
large
portal
frames
that
we're
starting
to
the
front
to
define
and
break
that
building
up,
which
then
also
recalls
back
to.
If
you
go
back
to
slides
Nick
to
the
front
elevation,
so
you've
got
these
large
frames
kind
of
framing
the
openings
and
the
windows
we're
kind
of
taking
that
same
besides
yeah.
F
F
P
P
Building
a
building
F
very
similar
to
that
that
mezzanine,
as
when
mentioned,
we
have
the
lower
level,
which
is
our
main
dining
level.
We've
got
an
interstitial
mezzanine
level
right,
that's
our
basic,
our
mechanical,
so
at
the
mezzanine,
all
of
our
mechanical
units
are
within
the
building
and
anything
that
needs
to
be
out
with
open
air
in
the
is
in
a
mechanical
yard.
That's
basically
on
the
backside
of
that
building
with
a
mechanical
screen
that
wraps
all
the
way
around
the
perimeter.
P
So
we've
got
a
full
8
foot
screen
that
wraps
that
and
it's
below
the
ridge
line
of
this.
So
this
will
actually
extend
up
and
above
where
the
mezzanine
starts,
with
roughly
the
right
around
this
area
here
I
think
I.
Don't
we
have
the
the
so
you
have
the
elevation,
the
overall
streetscape
elevations
people
gonna
be
further
back
one
more
there
we
go
so
what
we're
looking
at
doing
is
basically
again
kind
of
creating.
So
this
is
the
the
mezzanine
basically
is
starts
right
here
above
that
and
it
screens
this
whole
area
below.
P
P
Is
a
yeah
go
ahead?
It's
this
existing!
If
you
can
go
back
to
the
pool
view
the
rendering
yeah
so
the
existing
building,
that's
there
has
what's
called
a
p-tech
unit,
so
it's
a
through
wall
unit
units
right,
we're
keeping
a
very
similar
a
pro
to
that,
but
instead
of
a
hanging
with
them
low
and
linear
we're
going
we're
going
vertical
with
those,
and
so
that's
actually
what
you're
seeing
here
are
these
vertical
louver
systems?
So
that's
an
intake
supplying
that
particular
unit.
P
F
P
If
you
go
to
the
overall
plan
speak
to
it
there,
the
site
plan
will
be
fine,
yeah,
okay,
so
what
we're
doing
is?
Is
it
we
need?
We
need
a
five
foot
fence
all
the
way
around
the
pool
to
define
pool
area.
You
know
protect
that
and
what
we
also
are
looking
at
at
individual
unit
balconies,
and
so
we
wanted
to
maintain
still
a
level
of
privacy,
it's
at
the
same
grade
level,
but
we
wanted
to
maximize
those
ground
floor
units
with
having
this
nice
perceived
deep
balcony.
In
reality,
what
happens?
P
Is
they
have
the
standard
existing
concrete
deck?
That's
out
there,
but
that
extension
is
actually
a
landscape
area
with
larger
landscaping
areas
with
then
that
five
foot
fence
happening
all
the
way
at
the
perimeter
here.
So
that
becomes
your
barrier
to
the
pool
and
also
for
code.
You
can't
have
you
have
to
had
kind
of
the
ability
of
pushing
furniture
up
against
that,
so
you
can
climb
over
it,
which
is
why
that
landscape
buffer
is
there.
P
So
you
provide
this
nice
extension
and
sort
of
a
perceived
private
area,
even
though
the
actually
usable
space
is
half
of
that.
It's
currently
with
the
existing,
but
it
also
feels
like
you're
right
on
the
pool
deck
without
actually
having
access
to
it
so
to
get
access
you're
still
coming
out
through
and
through
the
main,
securing
points
both
at
the
midpoint
of
the
buildings,
as
well
as
through
the
courtyard
here
and
then
out
into
the
pool.
P
P
P
F
So
I
just
have
an
overall
comment:
I
I
think
the
your
design
of
the
actual
Street
hardscape,
it
blends.
What
sort
of
the
technical
fire
department
and
engineering
requirements
for
driveways
are
and
what
it
feels
natural
to
people
so
I,
actually
like
the
fact
that
it
blends
the
lines
and
it
doesn't
define
the
traffic
lane.
Second
thing,
I
have
to
say
is
that
I
do
recognize
what
a
huge
investment
this
is
for
you
to
provide
an
underground
parking
structure
so
kudos
for
that
investment
and
I
still
think
it's
a
challenging
sight,
but.
P
M
P
For
special
events,
absolutely
they'd
love
to
keep
the
option
to
have
special
events
available
to
that
and
of
several
other
properties
throughout
Palm
Springs
have
have
events
and
they
have
actually
shuttle
buses
to
connect
it
great
to
be
part
of
that
and
actually
connect
with
the
community.
It's
a
great
opportunity
to
do
that.
They
want
the
flexibility
to
do
that
and
that's
why
I
think
the
entry
in
is
also
very
important
as
far
as
the
view
into
that
pool
and
a
destination
on-site,
okay,.
M
And
this
might
just
be
in
conjunction
with
staff,
because
I
see
that
the
the
condition
says
that
use
of
the
pool
by
the
general
public
would
require
separate
parking
analysis.
So,
as
we've
already
talked
about
there's
in
your
plan
right
now,
you
have
four
more
parking
spaces
than
is
required
by
the
code.
How
many
more
parking
spaces
would
they
need
if
they
did
have
it
open
to
the
general
public?
Do
we
know
that.
B
P
M
L
L
A
L
A
A
A
L
A
Know
challenge
we
had
the
priority
yupi
approval,
which
we
was
great
for
us.
We
started
our
demo
and
we
got
95%
done.
I
think
we
just
have
a
little
bit
left
we've
since
hired
our
general
contractor.
We
have
since
secured
the
Marriott
autograph
collection,
approval
and
and
we're
ready
to
go
so
it's
as
soon
as
you
guys
give
us
the
approval
on
the
parking
see
that
we
had
with
the
original
COP
we
had
to
take
off
building
F
because
we
just
couldn't
park
it.
A
A
They
call
it
so
building
off
came
back,
so
we
had
to
figure
out
how
we
going
to
accommodate
that,
because
we
felt
that
Marriott
brought
enough
to
our
table
from
a
from
a
every
stand
point,
and
so
we
said:
okay,
we'll
bring
it
back
and
the
only
way
we
could
go
was
down.
That's
it.
So
that's
why
we
went
back
to
our
friends
again
slur
and
they've,
designed
the
parking
lot
and
and
working
with
the
city.
A
A
From
our
standpoint,
we
we
believe
this
will
be
the
nicest
hotel
in
the
city.
You
know,
modestly,
we
really
do
believe
that
and
we
we
look
at
little
her
eyes
and
we
look
at
the
Parkers,
our
competition.
Those
are
our
comps.
So
when
we
do
our
analysis
and
our
appraisal
for
the
property,
we
use
those
properties
as
our
comps,
because
we
feel
that
we're
going
to
offer
that
level
of
service
that
level
of
quality
both
in
design
and
it
features
and
amenities.
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
we
wanted
to
add
the
spa.
A
The
spa
will
be
a
nice
addition,
because,
if
you're
gonna
have,
if
you're
gonna
charge,
300
or
350
bucks
a
night
for
a
room,
you
want
to
have
as
many
amenities
as
possible.
So
the
restaurant
will
be
a
four-star
restaurant
to
force
to
our
hotel
up
in
a
four-star
restaurant.
The
bar
next
to
it
will
be
a
four-star.
A
E
L
E
A
A
P
P
The
real
intent
is
is
to
create
a
very
sort
of
high
drama
element
here.
Some,
that's
very
you
know,
Pleasant
appealing
to
the
city,
obviously
not
a
nuisance
with
high
light
levels.
The
intent
is
really
to
focus
the
attention
really
at
the
center
of
the
site,
with
zero
bleed
to
the
to
the
neighboring
sites.
The
photometric
school
will
show
that
as
well,
but
really
to
create
this
large
feature
element
here,
so
you've
got
project
branding
with
the
the
entry
fountain.
P
That's
here,
there'll
be
some
integral
lighting
with
that,
obviously
having
the
two
buildings
with
full
glazed
corners
all
the
way
the
intent
is
really
to
light
or
to
see
visibly
into
the
building
the
activity
and
activate
that
street
level.
So
we've
pushed
the
bar
and
located
the
bar
area
at
the
lobby
here
visible
from
the
street,
as
well
as
the
main
check-in
area,
so
again,
you're
creating
a
large
sort
of
active
area.
P
That's
here
through
the
overhangs
of
the
building
which
wrap
on
both
of
those
sides
there's
also
integral
down
lighting,
which
would
provide
the
proper
foot-candles
here
and
then
all
of
the
landscape
lighting
is
accent
lighting
throughout
the
project.
So
it's
I
think
to
numerous
delayed,
but
every
fixture,
but
the
intent
is
that
there's
full
accent
lighting
on
all
of
the
the
frontage
landscaping.
That's
there
great.
J
J
Remember
that
you
had
to
give
up
the
restaurant
facility
and
I
was
never
comfortable
that,
because
I
never
thought
our
hotel
of
this
caliber
could
do
without
a
restaurant
and
and
the
fact
that
you
were
able
to
come
back
and
re-engineer
this
and
and
do
underground
parking,
which
is
MS
song
set,
is
not
cheap.
I
think
is
a
testament
to
your
commitment
to
this
project.
So,
although
I
agree
with
mr.
J
J
A
A
E
He's
trying
to
get
it
for.
Thank
you
any
more
questions
for
the
applicant
Harry,
no
more
questions
from
the
applicant
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
I'd
like
to
start
before
we
open
thing,
I've
heard
two
potential
conditions
of
approval.
One
was
to
narrow
the
exit
side
so
that
it
delineating
what's
the
entrance
and
what's
the
exit,
the
other
one
I
heard
was
to
extend
the
decorative
block
walls
up
to
the
top
of
the
parapet
on
the
hotel
portion
of
it.
I
heard
those
two
conditions.
E
I
would
like
to
add
a
couple
of
conditions
to
that
to
open
our
discussion.
One
is
to
continue
the
fencing
and
maybe
expand
the
screening
to
say
what's
to
come.
I
would
like
to
add
one
that
they
give
full
consideration
to
general
gender-neutral
restrooms.
Our
code
does
require
by
parking
I,
think
that
was
just
emitted
by
accident.
Just
the
bike
parking
be
incorporated
into
the
plans
as
well
and
with
that
I'll
open
it
up
to
discussion.
G
Like
your
conditions,
I
think
miss
song
suggestion
about
narrowing
that
exits
quite
important
and
I
think
it'll
eliminate
a
couple
of
problems.
One
is
people
turning
in
they're
going
north
as
you
suggested,
and
also
you
if
it's
wide
enough,
you're
gonna
have
somebody
waiting
going
around
them
because
the
guy
and
the
Ferrari
wants
to
go
around
it.
So
if
you
narrow
it
I
think
it
eliminate
both
those
and
it
also
make
a
nicer
interest
because
you'll
be
able
to
have
a
little
more
landscaping
at
the
street
side,
so
I'm
fully
supportive
of
that.
G
It's
a
great
idea.
If
you
don't
want
to
do
lanes,
that's
fine,
I
think
the
paving
patterns
quite
lovely,
obviously
I'm,
not
sure
about
forcing
them
to
do
that.
Scream
block,
walk
the
breeze
block
up
to
the
parapet.
I,
you
know.
If
we
ask
them
to
consider,
it
I'd
be
happy
to
put
that
in
as
a
condition,
but
all
in
all
I
like
to
think
it's
a
great
project
and
let's
vote
on
it
and
move
forward.
We.
J
Mr.
Chairman
I
would
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
this
project.
It
would
be
an
approval
of
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
full-service,
spa
and
full-service
restaurant
and
an
approval
of
a
major
architectural
application
for
the
construe
action
of
a
15,000
200
square
foot
restaurant
building
to
an
existing
hotel.
It's
1875
North
Palm,
Canyon
Drive,
with
the
conditions
as
expressed
by
director
Flynn.
H
And
I
will
confess
that
I
have
these
not
in
the
same
order
that
you
do.
My
first
condition
is
relative
to
the
decorative
construction
screening
that
shall
be
in
place
within
three
months
and
to
include
what
is
to
come.
An
identification
of
the
hotel
number
two
is
relative
to
narrowing
the
exit
side
of
the
driveway
on
North
Palm.
Canyon
number
three
is
to
extend
the
decorative
screen
to
the
underside
of
the
parapet.
Although.
F
H
J
E
H
F
E
E
The
next
item
is
item
to
be
on
the
agenda:
sons
of
Italy,
on
behalf
of
the
Dahle
Sinatra
Lodge
number
220
400,
to
reestablish
conditional
use
permit
to
operate
a
meeting
hall
within
the
existing
building
located
at
1700
North
Sierra
Road
Zone
P
section
one.
The
applicant
has
asked
for
this
to
be
continued
to
February
27th
on
this
particular
item,
and
unless
there
is,
is
there
anyone
in
the
audience
here
to
speak
on
this?
Have
you
no
one
in
the
audience
here
to
speak
on
it?
Do
you
have
a
motion
to
continue
it
to
February?
E
E
H
Chair
and
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
the
item
that
you
have
before
you
is
a
zone
text
amendment
which
I'm
calling
an
annual
update,
but
more
accurately
might
be
called
a
clean
up.
One
of
the
things
that
I
intend
to
do
over
the
next
several
years
is
to
have
an
annual
item
on
our
agenda,
where
we
are
able
to
clean
up
minor
elements
of
our
zoning
code.
H
Each
of
my
planners
in
the
department
has
kept
a
list
of
things
that
drive
them
nuts
in
the
zoning
code,
and
so
that
forms
the
basis
for
many
of
the
things
that
you
see
here.
I've
provided
a
table
showing
all
of
the
proposed
changes
and
then
the
reason
for
those
changes.
As
you
can
see,
many
of
them
deal
with
definitions
that
are
no
longer
in
use
in
our
zoning
code.
H
There
are
certain
areas,
for
example,
references
to
accessory
units
where
that
has
already
been
addressed
under
our
new
accessory
dwelling
unit
ordinance,
and
so
those
need
to
be
revised
or
removed.
There's
a
couple
of
places
where
there's
conflicts
in
zoning
regulations,
for
example,
there's
one
section
talking
about
the
front
yard
setback
on
corner
Lots,
which
says
either
15
feet
or
10
feet
and
again
that's
one
of
those
things
where
we
need
to
clear
that
up.
H
So
it's
clear
to
both
staff
and
the
public
in
terms
of
what
the
requirement
is,
so
those
are
the
basis
of
the
changes
that
are
being
proposed.
If
you
have
any
specific
questions
about
any
of
those
changes,
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
those
at
those
time,
but
otherwise.
That
concludes
my
presentation
to
you
and
I
would
seek
your
support
on
these
changes.
The.
M
H
E
More
questions
of
staff,
okay,
hearing
no
questions-
is
there?
Anyone
in
the
audience
here
to
speak
on
this
item,
I'm
open
to
public
hearing
on
this
hearing,
no
idea
from
the
audience
to
speak.
On
this
I
closed
the
public
hearing
and
I
open
it
for
discussion
with
the
Planning
Commission.
Is
there
a
motion?
Yes,
motion
has
been
made
to
approve
a
seconded
by
somebody.
Second,
the
motion
motions
been
second
okay,
please
vote.
J
E
We
move
on
to
new
business,
there's
no
unfinished
business.
We
move
on
to
a
new
business
item
number
four,
a
which
is
gallery
homes,
requesting
approval
of
a
final
PDD
plans
for
50
single-family
residential
units
in
planning
area
for
see
within
phase
1
of
planned
development.
District
290,
the
merlin
development
located
at
801
sunrise
way,
which
is
his
own
PDD
290
section
of
35.
Can
we
have
a
staff
report?
Please
Thank.
I
You
mr.
chair
members
of
the
Planning
Commission,
so
just
a
very
brief
background.
This
project
in
itself
the
Maryland
development
was
approved
way
back
in
2004
by
the
City
Council
and
it
is
to
contain
eleven
hundred
and
fifty
residential
units.
So
what
you
have
before
you
today
is
a
final
development,
one
of
the
final
development
plans
for
phase
1
of
the
project.
I
I
So
today,
gallery
is
presenting
50
homes
to
be
located
in
those
area
that
highlighted
on
the
site
plan
that
you
have
on
your
screen,
so
what
they
are
proposing
50
units
and
they
will
be
located
on
the
6000
square
feet
Lots.
This
lot
are
basically
unto
us,
the
not
only
side
of
where
the
motif
units
will
be
located
and
then
to
the
south
east
section
of
the
side.
I
Also,
so
that's
where
the
two,
the
units
will
be
located
as
a
result
of
the
process
that
we
had
to
go
through
when
the
first
final
PDD
plans
came
before
you,
the
Planning
Commission
decided
to
form
a
subcommittee
consisting
of
three
members
of
the
Planning
Commission
and
three
members
of
the
AAC
that
worked
with
the
applicant
to
to
get
to
where
we
are
today.
So
they
we
had
meetings
of
up
to
three
meetings
with
the
applicant
comments
and
recommendations
were
given.
I
I
That
will
be
the
very
first
time
that
the
joint
subcommittee
reviewed
the
plans
and
then
again
it
went
back
to
them
on
another
day
before
they
finally
went
to
the
AAC,
and
that
meeting
also
consisted
of
the
subcommittee
members
from
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
AAC
to
talk
a
little
bit
briefly
on
final
development
plans.
So
anytime
you
have
a
preliminary
plan.
Development
district
application
they
do
require
to
review
process
for
final
approval
first
set
is
or
the
first
review
is
the
preliminary
we're
just
amassing
and
overall
sites
of
the
project.
I
Very
preliminary
conceptual
drawings
of
the
project
is
presented
to
both
the
AAC
and
Planning
Commission,
so
the
PD
D
project
will
consist
of
development
standards
or
design
guidelines
that
the
project
must
adhere
to.
In
the
case
of
Admiral
on
the
Planning
Commission
and
City
Council
did
approved
architectural
design
guideline
and
landscape
design
guidelines.
I
Also
I
did
provide
the
development
standards
that
these
the
Lots
that
that
fits
the
lot
sizes
of
this
project.
They
had
to
be
located
on
the
60
foot
wide
Lots.
Those
have
a
specific
development
standards,
and
this
project
also
conforms
with
all
those
developments
than
that
in
terms
of
height
setback
in
in
terms
of
maximum
block
covered,
for
instance,
so
it
is
and
parking.
I
This
project
is
in
conformance
with
all
those
development
standard
in
terms
of
mass
majority
of
these
units
will
be
one-story
building,
so
the
maximum
I
do
not
exceed
24
feet
allowed
by
the
design
guidelines
in
terms
of
landscape.
The
applicant
did
provide
a
final
landscape,
including
the
planting
and
also
for
the
future
model.
Homes,
staff,
AAC
and
stab
did
review
those,
and
they
are,
in
conformance
with
the
design
guidelines
in
terms
of
the
plant
selections
and
the
groupings
of
the
plantings.
I
They
were
also
asked
to
provide
a
site
analysis.
The
applicant
has
done
all
of
those
and
also
at
the
last
hearing
and
the
ASC,
there
were
three
conditions
that
you
will
find
in
your
staff
report.
The
applicant
has
also
incorporated
those
conditions
in
CD
into
the
revised
plans
that
you
have
specifically
the
the
the
applicant
was
asked
to
review
the
application
of
stucco
and
fiber
cement,
the
different
elevations
of
plan
1c
and
plan
3c.
They
were
asked
to
simplify
the
design
that
has
been
done.
I
Those
of
us
who
also
been
done
and
as
I
mentioned,
what
the
Planning
Commission
has
been
asked
to
do
today,
is
to
make
a
finding
that
the
plans
before
you
in
substantial
confirmands,
with
the
approved
design,
guidelines
and
development
standards,
so
to
break
down
the
the
makeup
of
the
plants.
As
I
mentioned,
there
will
be
50
units
and
the
plants.
There
are
four
different
plants,
the
plant
one,
two
three
and
four,
and
each
of
these
will
consist
at
you
each
plant.
We
have
two
different
elevations,
so
this
is
a
site
plan
on
the
plot
line.
I
I
H
Chair
also
I
might
just
mention,
as
mr.
Robertson
had
indicated,
there
was
a
subcommittee
review
of
this
project.
They
reviewed
the
project
on
November,
the
15th
and
December
the
3rd
mr.
Rotman
and
mr.
Jake
wave
from
the
architectural
advisory
committee
were
the
AAC
representatives
and
then
Commissioner
Hudson
and
Commissioner
Hersh
Pine
were
the
representatives
from
the
Planning
Commission.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
the
recommendations
as
a
subcommittee
mission,
mr.
Hirsch
pinewood
be
able
to
tell
you
about
those,
but
again
I
just
wanted
to
confirm
that
we
did
have
the
subcommittee
review.
H
E
G
You
I
would
say
that
there
was
a
general
consensus
in
the
meeting
that
the
design
of
the
project
is
is
is
very
good
and
I
think
that
we
thank
the
applicant
and
his
architect
for
listening
to
our
previous
comments
and
responding
to
them
I.
Think
of
all
the
Marilyn
projects.
So
far,
we've
seen
this
is
looking
at
the
design
guidelines,
understanding
them
and
and
reacting
appropriately.
G
I
I
I
E
G
I
just
have
a
couple
questions
yeah,
the
applicant
come
for
us
and
the
architect
also
it
it's
always
been.
We've
always
focused
on
the
some
of
the
venire
materials
other
than
the
stucco
and
I
see
them
I
think,
maybe
for
the
first
time
I'm
sure
the
exact
wasn't
there
very
all
they're,
all
very
handsome,
but
are
they
in
different
sizes
and
proportions
and
are
there
a
lot
of
them
are
just
two
or
three
sizes
in
proportion.
C
C
G
Q
That
was
a
a
very
informed
decision
we
made
on
our
is
to
mix
them
just
because
of
of
the
discussions
that
we're
having
right
now
to
have
some
some
similarities
and
materials
that
they
go
through
the
community.
But
at
the
same
time,
has
some
distinctive
looks
for
the
individual
units
themselves
and
just
want.
G
Q
F
C
G
Q
It's
the
third
to
the
last
page
in
the
book.
L7
yeah
I.
Take
it
back
I'm!
Sorry,
that's
the
models
now,
eight
okay!
So
what
we
consciously
did,
as
you
can
see,
there's
there's
three
different
types
of
elevations
that
are
assigned
and
then,
with
that
we
identified
what
driveway
would
go
with
that
elevation.
F
C
C
Q
That
tubular
fencing
is
a
standard
for
Maryland
for
the
community
and
it's
in
the
it's
in
the
common
areas
of
an
area
past
the
lot
that
the
homeowner,
actually
it
gets
to
improve
and
that's
the
same
for
the
entire
community
and
the
look
of
that
is
is
in
the
book
here.
It's
this
the
detail.
It
shows
the
iron
with
a
gate,
so
everybody
has
direct
access
from
their
unit
into
the
Groves
and
the
trail
systems.
So
it's
a
standard
for
the
community,
not
just
our
project.
C
F
F
G
Q
A
correction:
there
is
a
solid
wall
along
our
South
border,
our
East
border.
That's
an
existing
perimeter
wall,
it's
not
in
so
we
do
have
1619
homes
that
do
backup
to
that
perimeter
wall.
That's
the
only
solid
wall
that
you'll
see
in
these
developments
is,
if
they
back
up
to
a
perimeter,
anything
that
is
in
against
the
Groves
will
have
that
iron
fence.
So
every
single
lot
will
be
a
hundred
percent
enclosed.
Q
F
F
E
G
G
C
E
F
H
City
Council
just
saw
the
mixed
use,
ordinance
the
planned
development
district
ordinance
and
the
small
odd
ordinance
at
their
meeting
on
February
the
5th,
so
that
was
first
reading
of
those
ordinances.
They
had
minor
Corrections
to
the
planned
development
district
ordinance
and
the
mixed
use
ordinance,
but
recommended
approval
or
approved
all
three
at
first
reading.
Those
will
go
for
second
reading
on
February
the
20th
on
the
mixed
use,
ordinance.
They
had
a
question
about
the
parking
ratio.
H
If
you'll
remember,
I
had
originally
a
pro
recommended
one
space
per
unit,
you
all
had
did
it
based
on
the
bedrooms
and
they
asked
well.
Why
did
Planning
Commission
change
it?
They
accepted
your
recommendation
with
one
addition
that
they
will
establish
the
parking
ratio
at
point
five
spaces
per
bedroom
for
mixed-use
for
residential
within
mixed
use,
developments
with
a
cap
at
two
bedrooms.
So
if
you
have
three
bedrooms,
it
would
still
only
be
0.5
spaces
per
unit
for
the
first
two
bedrooms,
so
that's
how
they
approved
it.
H
One
of
the
other
changes
that
they
did
to
the
mixed
use
ordinance,
instead
of
requiring
a
conditional
use
permit
mixed-use,
will
be
permitted
by
right.
In
the
CBD,
c1
and
c2
zones,
so
you'll
still
see
those
come
forward
as
a
major
architectural
application,
but
they
won't
be
required
to
file
a
conditional
use
permit.
Oh
those
were
the
two
changes.
J
H
This
point
in
time:
no,
it's
not
being
reworked.
The
moratorium
is
currently
in
place
until
March.
The
20th
I
believe
I
will
need
to
do
a
report
to
City
Council
on
the
Mort
aureum,
which
is
required
by
state
law,
and
that
will
be
on
the
March
6th
City
Council
agenda.
At
that
point
in
time,
City
Council
will
either
discuss
opening
up
the
golf
course
ordinance
again
or
they
may
make
changes,
or
they
may
not
consider
it.
J
G
H
No,
it
really
hasn't.
Our
understanding
is
that,
as
allotted
land,
it
would
be
subject
to
the
city's
zoning
ordinance
per
the
agreement
with
the
tribe.
The
applicant
has
asserted
that
there
is
language
within
their
contract
with
the
alati
that
would
exempt
them
from
that.
But
again
the
applicant
has
not
pursued
their
application
other
than
filing
the
general
plan
amendment
it's
going
through
environmental
review.
They
haven't
requested
that
a
determination
be
made
on
that
point.
So
until
they
do,
we
are
going
to
assume
that
it's
subject
to
our
regulations.
H
Two
items:
the
first
is
just
a
reminder
that
we
will
have
a
study
session
on
February,
the
27th
beginning
at
11
a.m.
in
large
conference
room,
we'll
be
doing
a
training
session
going
over
making
findings
talking
a
little
bit
about
the
Brown
Act.
There's
a
couple
of
other
things.
I
wanted
to
chat
with
you
all
about,
and
then
engineering
would
also
like
to
do
a
brief
presentation
in
terms
of
their
role
relative
to
the
entitlement
process
and
applications
that
come
forward
to
you.
So
they'll
also
have
a
brief
presentation.
H
The
second
thing
we
had
discussed
the
possibility
of
doing
tours
of
the
Maryland
site
and
I
think
we
will
go
ahead
and
extend
that
opportunity
to
you
all
as
we
do
tours
because
of
the
Brown
Act.
We
can't
have
more
than
three
planning
commissioners
together
at
a
time
on
the
Maryland
site,
so
we'll
need
to
organize
you
in
groups
but
we'll
send
out
emails
and
make
that
opportunity
available
to
you
when.